================================================================================ Texinfo converting Tools Release 1.00 28.03.97 (c) 1996 by Andreas Kaiser (c) 1997 by Karl Heinz Marbaise ================================================================================ $Id: TODO 1.7 1997/03/31 20:37:43 KHM Exp $ Global: o Look at source to make the source clean of warnings while compiling with -Wall (GNU-emx). o Create makefile for gen directory and let the work do due to one makefile which is placed in source directory. o Combine the converter(Texinfo to HTML, Texinfo to RTF, Texinfo to IPF) into one which means only one lexical analyser for Texinfo. This might be a good base to convert to any other format. o Make command line switch to change the situation @iftex @end iftex @ifinfo @end ifinfo @ifhtml @end html. o Let do @raisesection @lowersection do what they were created for. o @node Copyright, Top, (dir), (dir) produces a message like this: " node undefined in 'Copyright', 'Top', '(dir)', '(dir)'" o @nwnode is not documented in Texinfo but implemented in makeinfo ! May I ignore it or what should I do? o @example @code @end example Support this style to let things like this work. o extend makefile to do the release job (actualy these are several batch-files; and not part of the release). o may be a Texinfo documentation(if needed for a general Texinfo to... converter) HTML part: o implement @multitable @end multitable o @math{} not handled o Produce a Table of contents out of the @chapter, @sections, ... and so on. o Menu Entries like the following should produce links within HTML document: * entry-name:(filename)nodename. Discription o @xref{Anton, Egon} The second "Egon" is type set in italic: Anton Egon This has to be changed. But to what? o If texihtml creates big indexes there I have todo some corrections. I think about a possibility to create a index file which only holds the index of a big document as a stand alone HTML file. o Might it be a good idea to create a great number of little documents instead of a big one? RTF part: o I don't say anything about it, because RTF converting is already in gamma state!