CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN (SPANKING)
The Issue
Restrictions on parental spanking is expected to become one of the main
topics of debate between religious conservatives and liberals during
the next decade.
The level of state sanctioned violence is gradually decreasing in society.
In the past:
- slave-owners could whip slaves. This was abolished with the Emancipation
Proclamation of 1883
- masters could whip indentured servants
- husbands could beat wives with little chance of being arrested; this
immunity has been recently reduced in most areas
- the public could commit violence against people found guilty and held
captive in a pillory. This was abolished in most US states in 1839; in 1905.
Delaware was the last state to eliminate stocks
- jail guards could cane or whip prisoners. The last flogging was in 1952,
also in Delaware.
- ship officers could flog sailors until it was abolished by the US Senate
in 1850
- boxers were expected to beat each other senseless and often injure
each other's brains
- parents and guardians could use corporal punishment on their children.
- school teachers could use corporal punishment on their students.
In 1996, only the last three categories are still legal in North America.
And the degree of violence is in decline:
- The use of violence in public schools dropped from 1.4 million students
in 1981 to 500,000 in 1991
- A survey of US parents shows a drop in the use of spanking as the main
disciplinary method from 59% in 1962 to 19% in 1993. Parents now prefer
using time-outs (38%) and lecturing (24%).
If we are to become less violent societies, some argue that we
should ban all inter-personal violence.
The Current Legal Status of Corporal Punishment
Existing laws in most countries prohibit physical assaults. But these same
laws often have "not withstanding" clauses that permit assaults:
- in a boxing ring
- of reasonable intensity in a parent-child situation
- of reasonable intensity in a teacher-student situation
Corporal punishment in the home and school are banned in a number of
countries: Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Bans are
currently being debated by the Governments of Germany, Ireland, Poland,
Spain and Switzerland. A private member's bill by Canadian Member of
Parliament Svend Robinson proposes the repeal of Section 43 of
the Canadian Criminal Code which permits parents to use "reasonable
force" when disciplining children.
The Case for Corporal Punishment
It is normally our policy to include both or all sides of an issue, and let
the reader make up their mind on the matter. However, we abstain this time
for moral reasons. The authors feel that beating children is so abhorrent
and unjustifiable that they cannot include material that might serve to
encourage the practice.
The Case Against Corporal Punishment
There are four main arguments against spanking:
- It is ineffective: Spanking a child will stop the child
from misbehaving for the moment. But studies have shown that the child's
compliance will only last for a short time; corporal punishment actually
increases the child's non-compliant behaviour in the future.
- It can lead to abuse: Because a spanking works for a while, the
parent often repeats the spanking whenever the child misbehaves. Corporal
punishment may then become a standard response to any misbehavior. This can
lead to increasingly frequent and harsher spanking which can lead exceed
the "reasonable force" threshold and become abuse. According to the
Institute for the Prevention of Child Abuse, "85% of all cases of
physical abuse result from some form of over-discipline through the use of
corporal punishment". Each year about 44 Canadian children are known
to have been killed by family members; 35 of them by parents. The figures for
the United States is probably about 10 times higher.
- It can unintentionally cause serious damage: Boxing a child on the
ear can burst an eardrum; shaking a child can cause a concussion, serious
brain damage or even death; a child who is hit can accidentally fall and
seriously injure themselves.
- It trains a child to use violence: Children who are often spanked
learn that it is acceptable for the strong to use force against the weak.
The concept that "Might makes right" is regularly reinforced. They have an
increased likelihood of becoming more aggressive towards their siblings,
their fellow students, and (later in life) against their spouses and their
own children. Violence as a way of behaving is a learned response.
Studies of mass murderers, "ordinary" murderers, rapists etc often show that
they were victims as children of seriously abusive punishment during
childhood. A preliminary study of inmates on death row of a US prison found
that all had been so seriously abused as children that they had
probably suffered brain injuries. If serious abuse causes such extreme
anti-social behaviour, perhaps milder forms of punishment also contribute
to violence in society.
The Family Research Laboratory of the University of New Hampshire
conducted a large study involving over 3,000 mothers of 3 to 5 year old
children during the late 1980's. The women were interviewed in 1986, 1988
and 1990. The found that 63% of the mothers had spanked their child at least
once during the previous week. Among those that spanked, they hit their
children a little over 3 times per week, on average. They found that the
children which were spanked the most as 3 to 5 year olds exhibited higher
levels of anti-social behaviour when observed 2 and 4 years later. This
included higher levels of hitting siblings, hitting other children in
school, defying parents and ignoring parental rules. Dr. Murray Straus, the
Co-director of the Laboratory noted how ironic it is that the behaviours for
which parents spank children are liable to get worse as a result of the
spanking.
Many feminists, who have been battling spousal abuse for decades, are
proposing a complete ban on violence as one way of reducing battering
within the family. A 1995 Canadian study funded by the Federal government
found that corporal punishment of children is associated with:
- increased level of aggression by the child
- increased frequency of child delinquency
- increased frequency of violence and crime in later life
- increased chance of child abuse
What Bible Says About Corporal Punishment
The phrase "spare the rod and spoil the child" is often incorrectly
attributed to the Christian Bible. However, it was first written in a
poem by Samuel Butler in 1664.
The following are important Biblical quotations relating to corporal
punishment taken from the book of Proverbs in the King James Version of the
Bible. They were written by King Solomon:
- Prov 13:24: "He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that
loveth him chasteneth him betimes (diligently)."
- Prov 19:18: "Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy
soul spare for his crying."
- Prov 22:15: "Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but
the rod of correction shall drive it far from him."
- Prov 23:13: "Withhold not correction from the child: for if
thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.
- Prov 23:14: "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver
his soul from hell (Shoel)."
- Prov 29:15 "The rod and reproof give wisdom: but a child left
to himself bringeth his mother to shame."
Many Fundamentalists and other Evangelicals, who believe in the inerrancy of
the Bible feel that the above passages place upon them a religious
obligation to physically punish rebellious children. At the other extreme
are the views of Robert Ingersoll, a well known free-thinker, who wrote in
1891:
"To me it has always been a matter of amazement why civilized people,
living in the century of Darwin and Humboldt, should quote as authority the
words of Solomon, a murderer, an ingrate, an idolater, and a polygamist --
a man so steeped and sodden in ignorance that he really believed he could be
happy with seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines."
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Canada is a signatory to this convention; the United States has not yet
taken action on it.
The Convention defines a child as any "human being below
the age of eighteen years unless, under the law applicable to the child,
majority is attained earlier."
Article 19:
"States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative,
social and education measures to protect the child from all forms of
physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment,
maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of
parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the
child. Such protective measures should, as appropriate, include effective
procedures for the establishment of social programs to provide necessary
support for the child and for those who have the care of the child, as well
as for other forms of prevention and for identification, reporting,
referral, investigation, treatment and follow-up of instances of child
maltreatment described heretofore, and, as appropriate, for judicial
involvement."
Return to the OCRT home page.
Return to the "Hot Religious Topics" page.
Useful References
- The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child can be seen at:
http://www.cs.albany.edu/~ault/fof/misc/unchild/un/part1.html
- Robert G. Ingersoll, a famous freethinker from the 19th Century wrote
an article "Is Corporal Punishment Degrading? in response to an
article in the American Review, 1891-DEC. See:
http://freethought.tamu.edu/freethought/ingersoll/corporal_punishment.html
- A collection of "anti-spanking" material can be found at:
http://www.cei.net/~rcox/nospan.html
- There are two likely sources of material that advocates corporal
punishment of children:
- public libraries which might stock older books on parenting
- books on parenting available in Evangelical Christian bookstores
- The (Canadian) Institute for the Prevention of Child Abuse (IPCA)
has a home page at:
http://www.interlog.com/~ipca/new/sec43-1.html
- A WWW location which has book reviews, discussions of selected parenting
topics, and which encourages sharing amongst parents is Parent's
Place, the Parenting Resource Center on the Web" (tm). They are
at:
http://www.parentsplace.com/
- Penelope Leach, a British child psychologist and mother of 2, has
a WWW site consisting of a lengthy but clearly written essay titled
"Spanking, a Shortcut to Nowhere". See:
http://cnet.unb.ca/corg/ca/e/pages/prevention_cruelty/spank.htm
- Kathryn Kvols, President of the International Network for Children
and Families has a site promoting "9 Things to do Instead of
Spanking" at:
http://www.fishnet.net/~pparents/nospank.html
- If you are really keen on spanking your children, you might consult
an Evangelical Christian page Guidelines for Spanking Your Children
at:
http://www.opendoor.com/Higher.Ground/spank.html
Return to the OCRT home page.
Return to the "Hot Religious Topics" page.