| From: | Hynek Schlawack |
| Date: | 01 Jun 2000 at 12:23:07 |
| Subject: | Re: Graphics |
On 01-Jun-00 wrote Mike Carter:
> »>>>> libraries completely so why don't use some of these especially
> »>>>> designed libraries? »>>> The reason is simple. Today, most of
> the software is not under »>>> development anymore..look at the
> render.library or the »>>> guigfx.library...both excellent, but
> dead... [...] »>> They are??? hmm... maybe you could persuade the
> author to continue »>> his work, even though he'd probably prefer
> one with some »>> experience in the field of image manipulation. And
> just for the »>> records, my
> »> Even their homepage (http://www.neoscientists.org (iirc)) is »>
> down....
> » It's regularly down. I'm pretty sure that it's still being »
> developed, just not very quickly. It's not too long since the most »
> recent release:
> » 13.System:> version libs:guigfx.library full » guigfx.library 17.1
> (26/01/00)
> I'd have to agree that the website has not been accessible for ages,
Yeah :-(.
> and his email address bounces too IIRC. I've been trying to contact
I'll try out timm.mueller@darmstadt.netsurf.de.
> for ages. Last time I talked to him he was converting GUIGfx BACK to
> 'C' source so he could compile a PPC version.
We'll see :-(.
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers.
http://click.egroups.com/1/4633/1/_/451227/_/959858639/
------------------------------------------------------------------------