| From: | Adam Szymczak |
| Date: | 3 Jan 2000 at 03:02:47 |
| Subject: | Re: WbCtrl |
From: Adam Szymczak <adam.szymczak@utoronto.ca>
On 02-Jan-00, John S. Burger wrote:
> On or about 01-Jan-00 00:18:23 Adam Szymczak typed the following words
> about "[amigaOS3_5] Re: WbCtrl". My reply is thus...
>> John, FYI, I placed WBCtrl near the end of my s-s and noticed that I
>> too get about an additional 100k of Chip RAM compared to having
>> WBCtrl near the beginning. So it appears that location of the command
>> is vital.
>
> Yup, same here. I have since put it back in U-S at the beginning. Some
> day when I get some time I will move it around a few lines at a time in
> S=S to see what is causing the difference.
Let me know the results if you ever get around to experimenting.
> I would have thought that putting it early in S-S would save the most
> since it would catch anythinh that was using chip RAM. Obviously, that is
> not the case.
Yes, this is odd. I wonder if it has anything to do with IPrefs?
The Wastebasket Newsletter - http://surf.to/szymczak
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Hey Freelancers: Find your next project through JobSwarm!
You can even make money in your sleep by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm1 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------