| From: | Alex |
| Date: | 31 Jan 2000 at 22:23:22 |
| Subject: | Re: P F S (was OS 3.5 FAQ v1.0) |
From: Alex <neurodancer@gmx.de>
Hello John,
you wrote on 31-Jan-00 about "RE: [amigaOS3_5] P F S (was OS 3.5 FAQ
v1.0)":
> improvement over PFS, and PFS came after AFS. So PFS2 ought to be not
> half bad. And indeed, it seems that it is.
Just for the record, AFS was the commercial version of PFS, while PFS2/3 is
the sucessor of AFS.
"Things always seem darkest just before the bottom drops out."
-- Arthur Lifshin
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds. Get rates as low as 0.0 percent
Intro APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/NextcardCreativeCL ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------