| From: | J.G. |
| Date: | 24 Jan 2000 at 00:29:50 |
| Subject: | Re: Memory usage |
From: "J.G." <jgerman@paonline.com>
Hello John
On 23-Jan-00, you wrote:
It was you that started it, yes..but as you can see there are others in here
that special and do not have problems and call someone a "moron" for
agreeing or mentioning the same situation..
Hope you find an answer John, because I have no clue what is causing it
now..I run bare bones here with just WBCTRL..
a2000 040/40mhz with PII+ & p96
>> It was easier for them to answer this way..maybe they need to see who
>> originally started this thread? It was not me, I merely stated that I
>> too have this problem and with what help i got it still exists..But they
>> appearantly took the attitude and responded in this manner.
>
> Actually, if I remember correctly it was I that started this thread. The
> bottom line is that something is different in Fast memory usage from 3.1
> to 3.5. Booting with the same startup in both 3.1 and 3.5 results in 3.5
> using 2-3 megs more Fast RAM than 3.1. Weather or not this is a program
> being run in startup that is not fully compatible with 3.5 or 3.5 itself
> is what needs to be answered.
>
> It is the same thing with StackAttack. Someone said that the parameters I
> was using in StackAttack were unreasonable. However, the fact remains that
> using those "unreasonable" values work just fine with 3.1 and 3.5 but with
> 3.5+BB1 those same values eat gobs of Fast RAM. So, whose fault is it,
> StackAttack or 3.5/BB1?
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Hey Freelancers: Find your next project through JobSwarm!
You can even make money in your sleep by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm1 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------