| From: | Chris Elliott |
| Date: | 14 Jan 2000 at 18:31:33 |
| Subject: | Re: I've problem with setpatch patch |
From: Chris Elliott <sembazuru@crosswinds.net>
Hello Chris Elliott
On 08-Jan-00, Chris Elliott wrote:
[...]
CE> (For some reason some tools didn't realize that I have an 060, instead
CE> thought I had an 040 w/o FPU... Finally found the problem with the
CE> 680x0.library and 68060.library from the mmu.library distribution
CE> conflicting with something (didn't figgure that part out) in OS3.5
OK, an update for those interested... I finally found the reason for
the problem that I was experiencing, and have fixed it on my system...
The problem I was having was because BB1 installed a new SetPatch
command, overwriting the one that I had patched to use the
680x0.library (from the mmu.library archive). The latest mmu.library
release (see aminet in utils/libs) has a spatch .pch file for the BB1
setpatch. Done and fixed on my system.
Pax
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Independent contractors: Find your next project gig through JobSwarm!
You can even make money by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm2 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------