| From: | David Oakes |
| Date: | 13 Jan 2000 at 08:46:29 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Memory Use with BB1<good news update?> |
From: "David Oakes" <doakes@fox.nstn.ca>
John S. Burger said to Moses Wildermuth:
>>> Do you StackAttack???
MW>> Yep, and just recently too.
JSB> It is really nice when we can find a definate cause.
>>> I set my stack to 200K early in my S-S so I probably don't need
>>> StackAttack anyhow. I existed for years without it, and only
>>> started using it in the last year. I wasn't having stack problems
>>> but it seemed like a good idea at the time.
>>>
This triggered a memory here. BB1 includes a new HDToolBox, which
now defaults to higher buffer and blocksize settings. These, of
course, take more memory. You haven't by chance changed either of
these settings for your hard drives, have any of you?
This didn't occur to me earlier, because I have been using higher
numbers for both of these for years now.
Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
-*- ASTG 1.9
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Hey Freelancers: Find your next project through JobSwarm!
You can even make money in your sleep by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm1 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------