| From: | Stephan Rupprecht |
| Date: | 7 Jan 2000 at 11:33:08 |
| Subject: | Re: MCPRamLibpatch (was: 2 things) |
Hello John,
On 07-Jan-00, you wrote:
> ...
>> The ramlibpatch is required for some libraries (esp. MUI) which
>> consume more stackspace than ramlib has.
>
> OK, but as I said, I ran OS 3.5 for quite a while without it with no
> problems. Never ran it with 3.1 and I have had 3.1 since it first came
> out. So, is this a 3.5 issue and if so then why was ramlib not fixed or
> something in the docs saying MCPRamLibPatch is required or include it in
> 3.5 or.......
AFAIR the os3.5 modules don't consume that much stackspace that a patch
like MCPRamLibPatch is required. Only third-party products like MUI may
crash without the patch. This is a bug or misbehaviour of the third-party
product because it breaks the programming guidelines for libraries ...
>> ...
>> v1.0 of MCPRamLibPatch has a bug which can cause random crashes. v1.1
>> works fine, it should be placed at the top of S-S.
>
> I have V1.1. I did have it as the second command in S-S after SetPatch.
> Are you saying it should be the first command? I will try that but, I
> don't see the point if I am not having a problem.
Then you don't need the patch ;) At least I need it to have a stable system ...
Regards.
http://home.debitel.net/user/stephan.rupprecht
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Hey Freelancers: Find your next project through JobSwarm!
You can even make money in your sleep by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm1 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------