merc 2juin (1B) alcuin-shinobi31 - fw10-1am // TomH.(2) -Tellinger - N.News - news -

=============================================================

..........TOM H. ...................

Wednesday, June 02, 2010
 
BREAKING: 1 of 2/ Questions that Need to be Answered - Leo Wanta Update
Awakening Americans: Behind the scenes intelligence briefings ALL Patriot Americans MUST know...the REAL facts and truth the corporate-controlled mainstream media covers up
by Tom Heneghan   International Intelligence Expert
Friday March 19, 2010 reposted Wednesday June 2, 2010
http://www.eeng.net/eeng/eeng/leowanta.jpg

UNITED STATES of America  -  Further update from Ambassador Leo Wanta:

From: Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta ..
Subject: Some Questions, Some Answers
To: "The Honorable Barack H Obama" <president@whitehouse.gov>, "The Honorable Barack H. Obama" <president@messages.whitehouse.gov>, "President Barack Obama" <info@messages.whitehouse.gov>, "President Barack Obama" <comments@whitehouse.gov>
Cc: "Mr David Axelrod" .., "The White House_David Axelrod" ....(...)
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 12:51 PM
I ask the following questions as an interested observer and a journalist of many years.  During my 25 years as a banker, my writing career continued with reputable publications like The American Banker, Bank Marketing Magazine, Trust Marketing Magazine, the American Bankers Association, Private Banker International.  As an aside, the term “private bank” is not synonymous with “central bank” -- except to journalists who want them to sound the same – but that’s a different issue for a different day.

Here is a statement (to which Christopher Story, International Currency Review, refers in his 15 March 2010 article) of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond regarding the Writ of Mandamus filed by Ambassador Wanta against Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury and his Deputy Secretary Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Chief of Staff at Treasury, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond:

"FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND

"Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., Respondent Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB Richmond”) moves to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief (the “Petition”). The grounds of this Motion, as amplified in the attached Brief, are as follow.

"For the purposes of this Motion only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true."

(END OF QUOTE)

                   If the Federal Reserve accepts the statements made by "Ambassador Leo E. Wanta" in the Writ of Mandamus "as true," on what grounds does Christopher Story suggest the Richmond Fed is lying?

To know what the Fed means when it says “all well pleaded facts will be taken as true” can be found by reading the Writ of Mandamus.  You will find a copy of the Writ below my observations and questions.  If you want to read the former but not the latter, there is a scroll bar on the right side of your screen.

The Federal Reserve said it takes the facts as stated in the Writ “as true.”  Read the Writ.  Look at the facts the Fed is willing to accept "as true.”

Who is lying?  A private corporation called the “Federal Reserve” which signs a document under penalty of perjury?  Or an editor or publisher of a report trying to make a buck via histrionics?

From International Currency Review (ICR), World Reports, 15 March 2010

"• THE CROOKS AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL HAD BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED TRYING, ONCE AGAIN, TO DIVERT/STEAL THE SOVEREIGN LOAN FUNDS INTENDED FOR DOLLAR REFUNDING."

(Just another aside, but in the last issue of ICR, didn't the Editor decide the "Sovereign Loan Funds" were lost by the Queen to Wall Street derivatives?  Wasn't the Governor of the Bank of England in jail because the "Sovereign Loan Funds" were used to purchase worthless derivatives?  Or, is "the Queen's Gold" that which was reported by the Editor to have been lost in bad derivative investments by the Bank of England's Governor who was, according to the Editor, imprisoned?  Do the "Sovereign Loan Funds" involve the $6.2 trillion Her Majesty was supposed to have loaned President G. W. Bush?  Or is the $6.2 trillion the "Sovereign Loan Funds" lost to derivatives? Are they the same funds?  Or, are they different?  The terms seem to be used interchangeably and it's difficult to discern what's being said.  One thing is certain.  For a nation with so many trillions of dollars available -- Sovereign Loan Funds" and "Queen's Gold" (and who knows what other funds exist that Mr. Story has not yet divulged?) the UK sure has a lot of unemployment and British Pound Sterling is taking a bath vs. other world currencies.  You'd think with all this money, the Queen would be able to help Her people.

(Back to International Currency Review, 15 March 2010.)

"THE IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR DECEPTION THAT WE ALSO ABORTED

“As you will recall, an earlier, more feeble operation had erupted, centred on a crude attempt to rewrite Mr Wanta’s legend, inter alia to purport to represent that he ‘worked for’ the Federal Reserve – which would have had tangible consequences facilitating’ diversion of the funds – contrary to the language of the Writ for a Petition of Mandamus and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, both of which were the subject of a hearing at the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, attended by Michael C. Cottrell, Dana V. Wilcox, the Editor of this service, and Mr Wanta.

"Any variation of Wanta’s legend would have undermined the language of the Petition, leaving him vulnerable to a charge of perjury: hence, when we republished the text of the Petition which it had been anticipated that everyone would have forgotten all about, that operation had to be aborted. Moreover parties involved in promulgating the lies in question had to cease and desist, as well."

Who, other than Christopher Story, purported Ambassador Wanta “worked for" the Federal Reserve?  I’ve never seen a document from or about the Federal Reserve and/or an “employee” named “Leo Wanta” or “Leo Emil Wanta” or “Lee Wanta” – or “Junkyard Dog,” for that matter.  Had he done so, the Federal Reserve of Richmond would have certainly had grounds to Dismiss the Writ of Mandamus based on conflict of interest.  Instead, they accepted the Writ, as submitted by Ambassador Wanta, “as true.”  Did the Fed lie?  If so, since it would hurt Ambassador Wanta’s case, why?

As a journalist, this fascinates me.  A person who earns his income from writing a newsletter makes an unverified statement about a “feeble operation” in an article, then much later refers to it as if, because he is quoting himself,  it is a verified statement.  It appears what can be a rumor one day becomes a fact when later quoted.  What a way to run a railroad – I mean, newsletter.

1)     Christopher Story publishes an article that declares Ambassador Wanta had some kind of nebulous and never described working relationship with the Federal Reserve.  No evidence is published that verifies this statement.

In a very early edition of the same publication (I have no date, but the pages are marked at the bottom #30, 2 & 3).  This article says:  "Much of the totals accumulated in Title 18 Section 6 USG corporations are or were tied up in the kind of instrument that the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve state for public consumption, does not exist, namely 'Prime Bank Guarantees,' a type of Certified Deposit Mr. Wanta would buy from lending banks and trade at a profit, on behalf of the US Treasury, working under cover of Title 18 corporations such as Aneko Credit Pte based in Singapore."

Story states Ambassador Wanta would buy "Prime Bank Guarantees" but the Fed doesn't admit they exist.  Other sources say "Prime Bank Guarantees" were, at the time Ambassador Wanta was investing in them, legal in Europe but not in the U.S.  Christopher Story doesn't even allow that other opinions outside of his own exist.

Story went to the Writ of Mandamus hearing in Virginia.  He says the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was discussed at the same hearing he, Christopher Story, attended.  If that's true, then Mr. Story is aware that the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's statement included the following statement (Mr. Story is aware because he published it; here it is, again):

"FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND

"Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., Respondent Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB Richmond”) moves to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief (the “Petition”). The grounds of this Motion, as amplified in the attached Brief, are as follow.

"For the purposes of this Motion only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true."

In other words, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond accepted as truth the statements made by Ambassador Wanta in his Writ of Mandamus.  I repeat:  For those who have not read the total Writ of Mandamus, it is provided at the end of my comments.

2)     In March 2010, Christopher Story writes about an earlier, more feeble operation he says erupted -- again, no evidence to support his written words -- and that it is a "crude attempt to rewrite Mr Wanta's legend..."  Unless I'm mistaken, Mr. Story just admitted that his own published words were a "crude attempt" to rewrite another person's legend -- a legend that belongs to one man but one he, credits himself with creating.   And he has dramatically changed the tale as he wrote about it.  What a great way to make a living!  Create it, get monetary credit for it, back away, attack it, make a "crude attempt" to destroy it, but keep it alive as long as it's making money.

3)     Christopher Story tells us that if Ambassador Wanta was working for the Fed it would 'have had tangible consequences facilitating' diversion of the funds -- contrary to the language of the Writ for a Petition of Mandamus and the “as true” statement about the Writ in the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.  That Hearing in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, was, according to Christopher Story, attended by Michael C. Cottrell, Col. Dana V. Wilcox, "the Editor of this service," and Mr. Wanta.  He offers no proof that makes a reasonable person doubt the documents as presented to the Court that day, but expects his readers to accept what he says as fact -- though the "facts" often change from paragraph to paragraph -- as do the terms used to describe things like "Sovereign Fund" and "Queen's Gold."

Everyone needs to remember that Christopher Story also said in a recent edition of International Currency Review:  "But although I invented the phrase Wantagate and then plugged the matter very intensively, I did this as a marketing matter and publicity device because the Wanta cause served several purposes." In other words, facts don't matter.  Serving Story's purpose and marketing it "intensively" matter.

THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Civil Action no.: 1-07 CV 609

LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA (Individually and as sole and exclusive shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., a Commonwealth of Virginia registered corporation)

Petitioner                v.                   HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

ROBERT M. KIMMITT
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

JAMES R. WILKINSON
CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

MICHAEL CHERTOFF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
DIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS,
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

Respondents

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF

A. PARTIES:

1. LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner

2. Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

3. Robert M. Kimmitt
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

4. James R. Wilkinson
Chief of Staff
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20220: Respondent

5. Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.: respondent

6. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001: Respondent

7. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219: Respondent

B. JURISDICTION:

1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.

C. VENUE:

2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.

D. STATEMENT OF CL..

3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).

4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.

Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.

5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

• Secretary of the Treasury;
• Attorney General of the United States of America;
• Bank of America;
• J.P. Morgan Chase;
• CITIBANK/CITIGROUP/NYC including but not limited to Mr Charles O. Prince, CITIGROUP Chief Executive Officer;
• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;
• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary
Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;
• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States Department of Homeland Security;
• One or more known and/or unknown “compliance officers” that act directly and/or under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other USG investigative and reporting entities;
• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.

View Part 2 of 2 below or click on url
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=147509065&blogId=531285897

...

TOM HENEGHAN'S EXPLOSIVE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
International Intelligence Expert, Tom Heneghan, has hundreds of highly credible sources inside American and European Intelligence Agencies and INTERPOL--reporting what is REALLY going on behind the scenes of the corporate-controlled mainstream media cover up propaganda of on-going massive deceptions and illusions.
http://blogs.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel

...

8:22 PM  0 Comments   1 Kudos

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=147509065&blogId=535281556

================================================================

..  Wednesday, June 02, 2010
 
Part 2 of 2: Questions that Need to be Answered - Leo Wanta Update
...
Awakening Americans: Behind the scenes intelligence briefings ALL Patriot Americans MUST know...the REAL facts and truth the corporate-controlled mainstream media covers up
by Tom Heneghan    International Intelligence Expert
Friday March 19, 2010 reposted Wednesday June 2, 2010
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/obama18_38.jpg  http://en.wikivisual.com/images/b/bd/USA_Flag_Map.png

UNITED STATES of America  -  Further update from Ambassador Leo Wanta:

View Part 1 of 2 above or click on url
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=147509065&blogId=531286377

Continued:

6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.

7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.

8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings.

In one or more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.

E. BACKGROUND:

9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law (3).

10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.

11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China.

The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein. Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.

12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.

The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.

13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein.

This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond.

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury.

At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.

15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner.

Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary {Henry M.] Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers.

In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense.

These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. The said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.

19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. certifies as follows:

• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.

• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.

• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and Background” are true and correct.

• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. legislation and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.

F. CONCLUSION:

21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”.

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to hear the merits of this matter.

2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of the Petitioner.

Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116

AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.

2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government

3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.

4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.

5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were “tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.

6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.

7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.

8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.

9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.

10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and exclusively in my name.

IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.

[Signed] Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and Ambassador Leo E. Wanta

...

TOM HENEGHAN'S EXPLOSIVE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
International Intelligence Expert, Tom Heneghan, has hundreds of highly credible sources inside American and European Intelligence Agencies and INTERPOL--reporting what is REALLY going on behind the scenes of the corporate-controlled mainstream media cover up propaganda of on-going massive deceptions and illusions.

http://blogs.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel

...

8:19 PM   0 Comments   1 Kudos

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=147509065&blogId=535281418

...............

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

..........TELLINGER...................

More from       Discovering the Oldest Man-made Structures on Earth

/wednesday mercredi 2 juin 2010 20 h 47....9pm...............
De: "Michael Tellinger" zuluplanet@majesticinteractive.co.za
A 10-part article by Michael Tellinger     Part 3 of 10        October 2009   //   Hi     

So why is this Adam’s Calendar so special? The more research we do around it, the more we realise how important this structure is. The one thing we could not figure out was how the calendar was linked to the thousands of circular stone ruins in the greater part of southern Africa.

The first estimates of the number of stone ruins was made in 1891 by Theodore Bent who had a real fascination with the stone ruins. He was the first person to document his excavations of Great Zimbabwe at the time and estimated that there were about 4,000 stone ruins in this part of the world.

In the early 70s Roger Summers calculated around 20,000 stone ruins. After my first year of living among the ruins and researching them extensively, I concluded that there are at least 100,000. This was confirmed by Prof. Revil Mason, retired head of Archaeology at the University Of The Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. He immediately retracted his statement when I suggested that this would put at least 1 million people living and working here some 200 - 400 years ago. By the middle of 2009 I realised that we are looking at probably around 200,000 stone ruins. The more mountains I climbed the larger this ancient settlement became.

You see, this is where all the earlier researchers always got tripped up, because they did not have the benefit of aerial and satellite photography. Thanks to Johan Heine’s work over an extended period we could make much more accurate calculations than ever before.

But let’s get back to the this population thing, which is a huge problem for historians, because the population models and our history books suggest that the there were no more than 200,000 people living in the greater part of southern Africa between 200 – 400 years ago. It is quite obvious that it would require a much larger population to build so many stone structures. One of my favourite laughable theories, that are repeatedly presented by our tertiary institutions and leading archaeologists, is that many of these ancient stone settlements were built by the women and children. Do with this theory what you want.

But the link between Adam’s Calendar and the stone ruins still evaded us. For some reason we were under the impression that the Barberton valley and impact crater did not have any stone ruins. The valley is the entire flat area, surrounded by mountains, which is overlooked by Adam’s Calendar. Until my friend Brian Young called me one day in great excitement, saying that he found a circle. Fortunately for me Brian is a superb pilot who runs a flying school right in the heart of the Barberton valley. We went flying on several occasion and not only did we find many stone circles but also the ancient roads that connected them all at some stage in the distant past. We also found gold mines and many other strange anomalies.

Suddenly it became quite obvious. If this was indeed Enki’s calendar, at the dawn of humanity, the entire valley would have been the main settlement and gold-mining area in the entire southern African region. From the edge of the mountain top where the calendar is perched, you can see the entire valley. The master looking down on his slaves producing gold, in thousands of gold mines. The most impressive of all would have been a hidden mine just north of Adam’s Pyramids, perched right in the middle of the valley. A mine that was rediscovered by prospectors many thousands of years later, and appropriately named, Sheba Gold Mine.

Did I say pyramids? You heard right. We will deal with the growing body of evidence in the next article.
 
Please click here to share my articles with your friends who you know will appreciate them.   Keep exploring – spread the word.   Michael Tellinger

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

.........N.News.............

Wednesday, June 2, 2010
RAP -- PUT UP--or SHUT UP    RAP wants people to “follow the Elders”.I do not blindly follow leaders, especially self-appointed leaders.
Based upon the following public statements by RAP “Elders”, a demand for answers to questions is made:
1. “The Republic has been Restored.”
2. “The bonds have been arrested.”
3. “The IRS will be eliminated within 30 days.”
4. “All bank foreclosures will cease within 30 days.”
5. “The military came to us with the plan.”
6. Sam Kennedy: “Jury members have been threatened, to the point of death threats.”
7. Sam Kennedy; “There is a blood oath/covenant”

.........................................................................
1. “The Republic has been Restored.”
a. What offices in the “Republic” are currently filled?
b. By whom?
c. By what means were these people placed into office?
d. When are the PEOPLE going to elect officials to the Republic?
2. “The bonds have been arrested.”
a. Prove it. Give the name(s) of the bond companies and the policy numbers upon which the distress of the bonds were made.
3. “The IRS will be eliminated within 30 days.”
a. Under what authority of law was this statement made?
b. The 30 days have passed. Explain in detail why the IRS has not been eliminated.
4. “All bank foreclosures will cease within 30 days.”
a. Under what authority of law was this statement made?
b. The 30 days have passed. Explain in detail why the bank foreclosures continue.
5. “The military came to us with the plan.”
a. Specifically define the word “military”
b. What is the military’s “plan”?
c. Is this a military coup? With a resulting junta?
6. Sam Kennedy: “Jury members have been threatened, to the point of death threats.”
(this has been vetted by independent sources)
a. Under what authority of law were the Grand Jury members threatened?
b. Who threatened the Grand Jury members?
7. Sam Kennedy; “There is a blood oath/covenant”
a. Explain in detail the blood oath/covenant that Mr. Kennedy refers to.
These questions are continuing in their nature.
Additional failures by the “Elders” to respond, with facts and evidence to support answers to the above questions, will be deemed prima facie evidence that RAP and the “Guardians Elders” is a fraud upon the People.
Posted by Nancy Lazaryan at 1:23 PM 
Labels: RAP Restore America Plan military coup junta
....................23 comments: .........................

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2010/06/rap-put-up-or-shut-up.html

........................................

Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Oil Spill - Only a Nuclear Bomb will work!
"Heard your mention of the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico this morning, and you (and most everyone else except maybe George Noory) are totally missing the boat on how big and bad of a disaster this is.

First fact, the original estimate was about 5,000 gallons of oil a day spilling into the ocean. Now they're saying 200,000 gallons a day. That's over a million gallons of crude oil a week!

I'm an engineer with 25 years of experience. I've worked on some big projects with big machines. Maybe that's why this mess is so clear to me.

First, the BP platform was drilling for what they call deep oil. They go out where the ocean is about 5,000 feet deep and drill another 30,000 feet into the crust of the earth. This is right on the edge of what human technology can do. Well, this time they hit a pocket of oil at such high pressure that it burst all of their safety valves all the way up to the drilling rig and then caused the rig to explode and sink. Take a moment to grasp the import of that. The pressure behind this oil is so high that it destroyed the maximum effort of human science to contain it.

When the rig sank, it flipped over and landed on top of the drill hole some 5,000 feet under the ocean.

Now they've got a hole in the ocean floor, 5,000 feet down with a wrecked oil drilling rig sitting on top of is spewing 200,000 barrels of oil a day into the ocean. Take a moment and consider that, will you!

First they have to get the oil rig off the hole to get at it in order to try to cap it. Do you know the level of effort it will take to move that wrecked oil rig, sitting under 5,000 feet of water? That operation alone would take years and hundreds of millions to accomplish. Then, how do you cap that hole in the muddy ocean floor? There just is no way. No way.

The only piece of human technology that might address this is a nuclear bomb. I'm not kidding. If they put a nuke down there in the right spot it might seal up the hole. Nothing short of that will work.

If we can't cap that hole that oil is going to destroy the oceans of the world. It only takes one quart of motor oil to make 250,000 gallons of ocean water toxic to wildlife. Are you starting to get the magnitude of this?

We're so used to our politicians creating false crises to forward their criminal agendas that we aren't recognizing that we're staring straight into possibly the greatest disaster mankind will ever see. Imagine what happens if that oil keeps flowing until it destroys all life in the oceans of this planet. Who knows how big of a reservoir of oil is down there.

Not to mention that the oceans are critical to maintaining the proper oxygen level in the atmosphere for human life.

We're humped.  Unless God steps in and fixes this.  No human can.  You can be sure of that!
ANYONE WITH A IDEA HOW TO CAP THIS WELL CAN CONTACT: Lamar McKay, chairman of BP America   Lamar McKay, chairman of BP America:
http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/inquiry/2931/
I RESPONDED TO THE CHALLANGE BUT NO ONE EVER CONTACTED ME.
WHY NOT?
CONFIDENTIAL CREATOR OF A SALUTION TO SEAL THE OIL FLOW LEAKING.
SHARON_HENSLEY@ATT.NET    SUBJECT: SEALING OIL SPILL.
I WANT TO TALK TO THE PRESS NOW TO FIND OUT WHY I GOT NO RESPONCE FROM B.P. TODATE?
I SUBMITED MY OFFER ON 05/30/2010 @ 9:46 P.M.
I STILL HAVE THAT OFFER ON FILE.
I BELIEVE THAT THE OIL LEAK COULD BE SHUT DOWN IN LESS THAN 8 HOURS FROM THE TIME WE START.
TODAYS DATE: 06/02/2010 SEVERAL DAYS LATER
I DO NOT WANT TO TALK WITH BARRY SORTERRO A.K.A. OBAMA ON THIS ISSUE AS I DO NOT TRUST HIM.
I BELIEVE I HAVE 2 NEW IDEAS AT THIS POINT.
Posted by John MacHaffie at 5:33 PM 
.......................6 comments: ............................

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2010/06/oil-spill-only-nuclear-bomb-will-work.html

......................

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++