The pedagogies of on-line assessment
Flipcharts from the discussion | |
Newcastle 28th November 2002 |
A 20 minute activity to focus participants on key issues
The session was used as a productive �icebreaker� to form active groups that would generate ideas and concerns over the current state of on-line assessment, identify areas where advances need to be made and isolate issues which would be key to the adoption and delivery of on-line assessment. |
Form groups of 4 or 5 | |
Using the flipchart provided, identify the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of on-line assessment. | |
Once the chart is complete, identify the CSFs � the Critical Success Factors � which must go right for the process to be a success. | |
Post the chart on the wall for discussion | |
Strengths | |
Weaknesses | |
Opportunities | |
Threats | |
Strengths | |
Weaknesses | |
Opportunities | |
Threats | |
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats | |
Strengths | |
Weaknesses | |
Opportunities | |
Threats | |
Rapid response � student feedback is immediate. Students value this highly. | |
Re-use � time and effort saved �over the long run�. Cost benefits ? | |
Convenience � anytime anyplace anywhere | |
Volume � larger groups make computer based assessment more viable | |
Flexibility � questions can be tailored with respect to performance. | |
Limitations on the skills that can be tested | |
Security � risks for high stakes testing need careful management | |
Technical demands � is the platform in place and robust ? | |
Time demands for �getting started� � development of appropriate staff skills. | |
Students better equipped technologically | |
Broadband networking supporting remote delivery | |
Flexibility | |
Saving staff time | |
Sharing content resources between institutions |
Security of delivery | |
Security of �testee� � remote candidate validation | |
Collusion among students | |
Obsolete systems � investment in system must be returned; essential to select a �future proof� system. | |
QAA issues | |
Future role for lecturers ? | |
Each group was also asked to (quickly) highlight KEY CSF factors � the elements that MUST be right to make the process successful. These were investigated with each of the products used in the days activities. | |
Time constrained discussion followed (5 mins). A brief report of the discussion is available. | |