[ Introduction | Contents | Administrivia | Information | World | Trivia | Prophecies | Publishing | Credits ]


Fifty ways to kill a Gholam


The Gholam seems to be the hardest-to-kill monster RJ has introduced thus far. What, exactly, is it? All the information we have on it comes from Birgitte, who has some memories of the War of Power, via Mat (ACOS: 40, Promises to Keep, 606-607), and from Elayne, Mat, etc's encounter with one in (ACOS: 39, Six Stories, 598-600.

Gholam were created by Aginor (LOC, 23, To Understand a Message, 347) for the express purpose of killing channellers, although they're pretty handy at killing non-channellers, as well. The OP can't touch them; the effect of channelling at a gholam is exactly the same as channelling at a person wearing Mat's foxy medallion (i.e. the flows break apart on contact). They can sense the ability to channel at a distance of about 50 paces. They look like normal human beings on the outside. Inside is another matter. They have no bones, and can squeeze under a door, and are very strong, and very quick. (Think the T-1000 from _Terminator 2: Judgement Day_.) Only six were ever made; three have a masculine outward appearance, three feminine. They have at least a rudimentary intelligence (Mat chats with the one he fights in Ebou Dar), and they are living things, not some sort of machine. (Mat surmises (actually, Birgitte surmises) that the one they met was "kept alive" since the Breaking in a stasis box.) Needless to say, they aren't harmed by being stabbed by ordinary weapons, either.

We can draw some further conclusions, namely, that unlike the T1000, they don't have the ability to assume any form, only liquid form and their humanoid form. (If not, why specify that 3 are male-shaped, and 3 are female-shaped?)

Where have we seen gholam? We've seen two for certain, namely the one in Ebou Dar, and the one that killed poor Harid Fel in Cairhien at the end of LOC. There is one previous possible gholam encounter, which took place "off-screen." This is the killing of Lord Barthanes in TGH. Barthanes was clearly killed at Ishy's instigation because he helped the renegade DF, Padan Fain, get away with the Horn of Valere. Barthanes died in a very similar fashion to Fel, i.e. he was ripped limb-form-limb. Furthermore, this took place in the SAME building as Fel's demise. Again, this may or may not be a gholam-induced death, but it is is worth mentioning as a possibility.

How can you hurt/kill/dispose of a gholam?

The only thing we know for certain that can injure a gholam is Mat's foxy medallion. When Mat smacks the Ebou Dar gholam with it (ACOS: 38, Six Stories, 598), the gholam was burned -- "The medallion fell across the man's cheek. The man screamed. Smoke rose around the edges of the foxhead, and a sizzle like bacon frying....A raw red brand marked where the foxhead had fallen." What we do not know is _why_ the medallion hurt the gholam. There are three possibilities:

It's the magic, stupid:

Both the medallion and the gholam have the unusual property that they somehow neutralize flows of the OP. (Note that the actual mechanism employed by each may be different.) It is possible that some kind of adverse reaction occurred when the medallion came into contact with the gholam's body. While the medallion didn't get characteristically cold, it did seemingly get hot.

It is difficult to be more precise, because we don't know how either the medallion or the gholam actually work. Perhaps it is because the gholams are made with/are held together with/have some connection with the OP, and the medallion negates the OP. Or, perhaps it's a "like charges repel" sort of deal. Or, maybe the gholam is a kind of "living ter'angreal," and the effect is due to an adverse reaction between like ter'angreal, as described (TDR: 23, Sealed, 217). If it is the case that the magic is the key, then a gholam could probably be killed by prolonged contact with some weapon/ter'angreal made to copy the medallion's effect. This is problematic, bc the medallion is currently buried under a wall, along with its wearer.

An argument against this theory is if the medallion's ability to negate flows is the key, then the gholam probably would have been hurt by contact w/ Mat himself, and not just the foxhead. -- Contributed by James Huckaby

Then again, maybe not. As stated above, we don't really know how the medallion works. It was pointed out that when Mat was wrestling the gholam, the foxhead fell out of Mat's "open" shirt: "Struggling for air, he [Mat] pushed himself up, foxhead dangling from his open shirt." (ACOS: 38, Six Stories, 597) So, if the medallion works only when it is in contact with the wearer, then Mat may not have been in contact w/ it when he touched the gholam. -- Contributed by Jason Wilson?

It's the silver, stupid:

The medallion is made out of silver (TSR, 26, The Dedicated, pp306-307). The argument for silver is more of an argument against the medallion's magical properties. (Combined with some cross-pollination from werewolf legends.) It is not likely that the foxhead works because it is destroying flows, because the foxhead doesn't get cold after damaging the gholam, it just has "the cool of silver." (ACOS: 38, Six Stories, 598) Loony idea: When the gholamstuff and silver come into contact, there is a chemical reaction. This reaction is exothermic--the heat is produced by the reaction, not by the medallion.

An argument against this theory is that it seems kind of silly. Why would the Forsaken make such specific, deadly AS assassins if they have such a common, easily exploitable Achilles' heel? Why would the Forsaken be so wary of them that they limited their number to six? Contributed by: Tim Yoon

"Oh No! A gholam's chasing us!" "How much money do you have on you?" -- Aaron Bergman

The former question can be rationalized by saying that the Forsaken counted on the fact that people wouldn't think to use silver on something the OP can't stop. This idea does NOT explain the objection that if it was so easily defeated if you knew the key, the Forsaken wouldn't have been so wary of it that they only made six.

Got any more bright ideas?

Many. Here are some of the more popular ones:


[ Introduction | Contents | Administrivia | Information | World | Trivia | Prophecies | Publishing | Credits ]


This page was last modified on 24-Aug-1996, 15:57. Illustrations © 1989-1996 by Tor Books.

This FAQ compiled by Pam Korda (kor2@midway.uchicago.edu) and converted to HTML by Matthew Hunter (mhunter+@andrew.cmu.edu).