$Unique_ID{BRK01353} $Pretitle{} $Title{The Right to a Breast Biopsy While in Prison} $Subject{breast cancer detection community social special procedure procedures neoplasms biopsy prison incarcerated lumps malignancy mammogram mastitis mammography problem tissues neoplasm breasts cancers detecting biopsies prisons jail jails incarceration incarcerations lump malignant mammograms mammographies} $Volume{Q-19, P-19, B-19} $Log{} Copyright (c) 1991-92,1993 Tribune Media Services, Inc. The Right to a Breast Biopsy While in Prison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ QUESTION: I am presently incarcerated at a prison, but please do not let that sway you from reading this letter. I am concerned about a friend here who has the problem of lumps in her right breast. They are spreading now to underneath her arm. Some are large, some are pea sized. They are very tender and warm to the touch. In addition her mother had breast cancer. She was seen in a local hospital and was told she should get a biopsy for malignancy. But the medical staff here refuses to give her a biopsy without a mammogram, which they won't give her because she is under 35. Can you help my friend? I do not understand this chain of logic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ANSWER: I will do what I can. To start with, I am a bit confused myself, by the tale of the rapid spread of lumps that are tender and warm to the touch. That and some of the other symptoms you included in your letter, make me think of mastitis, or infection of the breast, more than I do of cancer. But that is only a hunch, not a diagnosis, for it is clear that more studies are needed, certainly both a mammogram and biopsy. There may be some confusion at your institution about the indications for mammography screening, and the use of this procedure for diagnosis. While it is true that the recommendation for the screening is for women over the age of 35, the presence of lumps and the history of breast cancer in your friend's family throws that restriction out of the book. Even if there is an opinion that the condition is not malignant, there is no prudent physician who would not immediately proceed with the two investigations. And since the condition seems to be progressing quite rapidly, there certainly is need for some haste in getting these things done. I don't know what the two of you did to get you into the situation you now find yourself, but you are paying the price in a manner prescribed by law. That doesn't mean that you have lost the right to proper medical care. Somehow my concept of medicine does not allow me or any of my colleagues to restrict their care to those in need based upon social judgements or prejudice. It is not supposed to work that way, and I hope that this answer and my concern may help you obtain the care I believe you need and to which you have every right. ---------------- The material contained here is "FOR INFORMATION ONLY" and should not replace the counsel and advice of your personal physician. Promptly consulting your doctor is the best path to a quick and successful resolution of any medical problem.