[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: DOS vs. 95
On Thu, 7 Mar 1996 12:48:23 GMT, "R. Scott Norris"
<rsnorris@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>On 6 Mar 1996, Joe Drasin wrote:
>
>> I'm sure this is a surprise to noone, but Executor runs a
>> million times better under DOS than 95. It's faster and more stable.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
> Actually, I have a question: Did you try it in "DOS" mode or did
>you try running it after Windows 95 loaded from a DOS session. I
>wouldn't be surprised that, it you ran it from windows, that it would run
>poorly. I'm sure it runs perfectly if you don't led windows load.
>
It really depends on the computer system. I would be hard pressed to
tell the difference. It acts the same other than I can Alt-Esc out of
Executor and do something else and come back etc.
References:
- Re: DOS vs. 95
- From: "R. Scott Norris" <rsnorris@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca>