[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: DOS vs. LINUX
>>>>> "Steve" == S Duhaime <smd3@ix.netcom.com> writes:
In article <317D57BE.41FF@ix.netcom.com> "S. Duhaime" <smd3@ix.netcom.com> writes:
Steve> Are there any functionality improvements over having E/L
Steve> than E/D. I'm getting another drive soon, and I intend to
Steve> install linux on that, and keep Win95. I will be able to
Steve> run both DOS, and LINUX versions of executor. But I want to
Steve> know if one runs Mac apps better/faster...
Right now E/D supports fast graphics on a larger set of video cards
than E/L does, but E/L handles multitasking better and, because it's
the platform that the main Executor development takes place on, is
usualy the first version of Executor to incorporate new features.
After Executor 2 is released we'll probably support some new
extensions to X-Windows (DGA) which will then allow E/L to support
fast graphics on a large set of video cards. At that point I would
think E/L would be preferable to E/D if you can run Linux.
Steve> steve... (smd3@ix.netcom.com)
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
References: