[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: DOS vs. 95



On Thu, 7 Mar 1996 12:48:23 GMT, "R. Scott Norris"
<rsnorris@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

>On 6 Mar 1996, Joe Drasin wrote:
>
>> 	I'm sure this is a surprise to noone, but Executor runs a 
>> million times better under DOS than 95. It's faster and more stable.
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>	Actually, I have a question:  Did you try it in "DOS" mode or did 
>you try running it after Windows 95 loaded from a DOS session.  I 
>wouldn't be surprised that, it you ran it from windows, that it would run 
>poorly.  I'm sure it runs perfectly if you don't led windows load. 
>
It really depends on the computer system. I would be hard pressed to
tell the difference. It acts the same other than I can Alt-Esc out of
Executor and do something else and come back etc. 


References: