[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: OS/2 Porting
>
>I just have to respond to all of the OS/2 people saying that an OS/2 port
>would be the best thing for ARDI to do...
>
>While I like OS/2, own it (though I'm not currently running it...) and
>think that it should be much more widespread than it is. I don't agree
>that ARDI should put a priority to porting Executor to OS/2.
If you add up the total Linux users and Nextstep users they still total less
than OS/2 users. Win95 still runs on top of DOS, so a Win95 does not seem as
critical as an OS/2 port. E/D runs on DOS as does Win95. There is only one
DOS/Win program I run and that is Executor. I had to turn DOS support on to
run E/D and will be glad to turn support off as soon as I can.
>Unfortunately my take on situation is IBM is not willing to do the right
>job in getting OS/2 out there, and are likely to cut their losses and drop
>support of the system altogether.
OS/2 Merlin is currently in testing and nears completion. This is a major
upgrade to Warp and should carry a 4.0 badge. Does this appear to be dropping
support? OS/2 for the PPC seems near death, but OS/2 for x86 continues to
evolve.
>IF IBM were to somehow give ARDI some financial incentive to develop an
>Executor/2, I think that would be great.
How much money does Bill Gates give Ardi to devolpe E/D, E/NT and E/Win95?
How much money does Steve Jobs give Ardi to devolpe E/NS?
How much money does Linux Whatshisname give Ardi to develope E/Linux?
I am sure IBM matches their total contributrion dollar for dollar.
>And I do indeed agree that OS/2 would be a much more stable platform for a
>native port of Executor than Win 95, except that there are much less
>people using OS/2 than there are Windows, Windows NT and Windows 95. It's
>unfortunate but true...
See my first comment.
The only reason I made the purchase of E/D (Dec 95), was that Cliff told me
that they hoped to have an OS/2 port out around April. In Feb, Melissa told me
that they hoped to have the OS/2 port out before summer. I know that 2.0 is
the priority, but I have no intentsion of holding out for the OS/2 port
indefinetly.
Regards,
Doug
Follow-Ups: