[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Executor 2beta0 runs faster?
According to the benchmark program included with Executor 1.99q/2.0b0,
Executor v2 beta 0 runs just under four times as fast as Executor 1.99q.
However, most of you report slower performance with v2 beta 0. Can
someone explain why.
My system configuration:
AMD 486DX2-80 w/ 128K cache
20M RAM
ATI Mach32 VESA Local-bus video
Windows 95
Univbe 5.1
And I'm running Executor (both 1.99q/2beta0) under Windows 95 DOS prompt.
:->
Rick
PS. don't hit reply, instead send your reply to rick.ho@utoronto.ca
Follow-Ups: