[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Win95, and Why...?
JIM210@aol.com writes:
> But if I may ask, *with time/money in such short supply*,and * from a
> strictly business viewpoint*, why work on multiple platforms at the same
> time? EVERYBODY knows
> Executors success will come from the DOS/PC world not Linux or NEXT(?). It
> sounds like its more do to personal interest of individual engineers there
> and not a business
> decision. And when you are way overdue on a project I would think you would
> do only what is essential and would contribute most to its/your success.
> Linux?! Next?!
> Criticism?No.Puzzled?Yes.
>
> jim210
I am a registered user of Executor/Linux and intend to continue to be
one. I think that the price is well worth it. I also think that
there are many Linux users like myself that will want Executor for
running proprietary mainstream apps.
Also, I am sure that the Executor development team derives many
benefits from doing their development under a stable platform like
Linux. Based on your statements, I am pretty sure that you have never
done any serious software development under both DOS and a UNIXoid
system. The difference between getting "segmentation violation (core
dumped)" and a screen of blinking happy faces is many many hours
minimum.
References: