[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Why dont we make a list of what works?e



In article <960416.180324.1601@mest.unizar.es> Emilio Moreno <emilio.moreno@mest.unizar.es> writes:
>Hello everyone.
>
> so consider joining all the names of the apps for making a big list of what 
> works under executor 2.0 beta 0.
> [snip]
>
>ADDRESS TO SEND THE REPORTS: emoreno@encomix.es
>SUBJECT: Program report
>
>----------------------Program info----------------------------------
>Program Name:
>Version:
>Language:
>Kind of program (Game, application, utility):
>Subkind of program (you choose):
>Commercial/Shareware:
>WWW/Ftp etc node:
>
>What does not work:
>
>Comments: 
>
>----------------------Executor info----------------------------------
>Executor version:
>Operating system used:
>Command line switches used:
>Preferences panel switches used:
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>-Emilio Moreno

What's wrong with the list on http://vorlon.mit.edu/ardi/proglist.html ?

	If you really want to post a list to this newsgroup, encourage
people to post to vorlon, then compile the results and post to the 
newsgroup.  Or, you could have people email you, then you could update
the list on vorlon.  In any case, I think it's important to try to keep
the web site as up-to-date as possible (which I don't think it is...)
-- 

                                --  Mike S. (M_Sauder@fccc.edu)
				www.fccc.edu/research/labs/roder/mike.html


References: