Clifford T. Matthews <ctm@ardi.com> wrote: > >Apparently we introduced a serious bug in 1.99q. It's a very high >priority bug and I hope to have something fixed by this weekend. I ran into this problem _before_ 1.99q. I wasn't sure about it, though, so I did not post about the problem. It was somewhere after 1.99p7 (which still works fine) and before 1.99q. --Kyle kyle@rtoads.com