[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Port to what? was: Re: executor-digest V1 #301
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Hunter <huntercr@cs.purdue.edu> writes:
Charles> Personally, I can't believe that Windows95 support [is
Charles> going to come /would be] before OS/2, afterall there is
Charles> no native gcc for 95, but we've got two complete
Charles> followings of gcc for OS/2 ( EMX and gcc/2 )
I believe by the time 2.0 ships there will be a version of gcc we can
use. At least that's what I think Mat told me.
Charles> I think porting Executor to a native OS/2 VIO app would
Charles> take less than a week with EMX. And a really *flashy* (
Charles> threaded, DIVE, etc ) executable could be had within a
Charles> month.
Most likely we'll work on both concurrently and make them available to
our customers via the experimental/bleedingedge system we currently
use.
Charles> Something to think about...
Charles> Sheesh.. I'd even do the port if you all ( ARDI ) would
Charles> like 8-)
We may ask you questions, but it's too early to tell.
Charles> Just some thoughts.
Charles> -- Charles Hunter
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
Follow-Ups:
References: