[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: executor-digest V1 #153




Dear Execvutor person,

I am on the executor-digest mailing list. Two weeks ago there was a 
problem with my e- mail system. As a by-product of this I keep 
receiving the following message a number of times every day. Can you 
figure out a way to stop it being sent to me. I am sorry for the 
inconvenience caused, which is of my own making.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.



> Date sent:      Fri, 19 May 1995 18:47:14 -0700
> From:           owner-executor-digest@nacm.com
> Subject:        executor-digest V1 #153
> To:             executor-digest@nacm.com
> Send reply to:  executor@nacm.com

> 
> executor-digest             Friday, 19 May 1995        Volume 01 : Number 153
> 
> 
>   In this issue:
> 
>     FTP Site for Wolfenstein 3D 1.0.1
>     Re: Reading MAC 800k disks
>     Two Items, One: Does Linus know?, Two: Appleshare over AFS
>     Re: Reading MAC 800K disks
>     Signal 11 - X crashes, Stuffit and Go resets, spinning A: drive
>     X crashes - signal 11, StuffIt expander resets Go, spinning drive A:
>     Win95/MSDOS beta 7 sup
>     Re: latest release
>     Re: latest release
>     Re: Two Items, One: Does Linus know?, Two: Appleshare over AFS
>     latest release
>     Executor
>     Re: latest release
>     Re: Two Items, One: Does Linus know?, Two: Appleshare over AFS
>     Re: Two Items, One: Does Linus know?, Two: Appleshare over AFS
>     Apple System software
>     Re: Apple System software
>     Realmz: A Macintosh RPG Game
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> From: dan_g@ix.netcom.com (Dan Guisinger)
> Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 21:18:22 -0700
> Subject: FTP Site for Wolfenstein 3D 1.0.1
> 
> Here is the site for any one who doesn't have WWW.
> ftp.utexas.edu/pub/mac/game/wolfenstein-3d-101-fat.hqx
> 
> Any one know if there is a demo for the Macintosh version of Doom?
> 
> - -Dan Guisinger
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> From: rrs0030@ibm.net (Steve Sinnott)
> Date: Fri, 19 May 95 00:33:35 EDT
> Subject: Re: Reading MAC 800k disks
> 
> On Fri, 19 May 95 00:25:00 UTC you wrote:
> >Yeah, but the amount of profit such a device would make probably wouldn't be
> >worth the time and effort necessary to make it work (assuming that it is
> >possible on a PC).  That and the mere fact that it _TOTALLY_ precludes the
> >use of multitasking may be difficult to deal with (many people would keep
> >hollering "why doesn't it run in Windows?"  <G>).
> > 
> >||||| Jesse D. Sightler |||||
> 
> Why? I have a ton of Mac disks, and two of them are 800k disks (and those are printer drivers). I mean, the last mac with a 800k-only disk drive was the Mac Plus, wasn't it? I haven't seen any mac s> oftware that was only on 800k disks in quite a lon
>use of multitasking may be difficult to deal with (many people would keep
>hoould keep
>ho
> 


+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
|    Patrick J. Foley                                                |
|    Room 205 B                                                      |
|    Department of Mechanical Engineering                            |
|    University College Dublin   +-----------------------------------+
|    Belfield                    |  e-mail  patfoley@ollamh.ucd.ie   |
|    Dublin 4                    |  Tel.    +353-1-706-1753          |
|    Rep. of Ireland             |  Fax.    +353-1-283-0534          |
+--------------------------------+-----------------------------------+