[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Slowdown?



On 14 Apr 1996 20:52:41 GMT, drasin@wam.umd.edu (Joe Drasin) wrote:

>	I never got an answer, why is the beta0 so much slower?
>
>Joe
>


Ahhhh, I noticed the same thing. The specs 586/100 16 megs ram #9GXE64
video card w/ 2 megs ram for video. 400 Meg HD and 850Meg HD (both
drivespace (e)'d (except for a 100 meg portion of the 850) running
straight from command prompt of win 95 (not booting GUI) running only
the mouse driver and guest driver (for zip drive access under 1.99q12
and to make it fair under 2.0b0)

1.99q12 w/out UNIVBE	15.769
1.99q12 with UNIVBE	16.018
2.0b0 w/out UNIVBE	15.281
2.0b0 with UNIVBE	15.440

as speedometer shows, even with UNIVBE, 2.0b0 runs slower than
1.99q12. While the UI (borwser) has a much crisper feel to it that
1.99q12 (and even seems faster to an extent) do the numbers lie????

Bill/wcb4@upx.net




References: