[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Cliff: What was Apple's response?
>>>>> "Accomplice" == Accomplice <Accomplice@dev.null> writes:
In article <3181e109.23746561@199.0.216.204> Accomplice@dev.null (Accomplice) writes:
Accomplice> On Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:23:55 -0400, mbodine@tiac.net
Accomplice> (Marc Bodine) wrote:
>> In article <fisk-2504962100070001@tty31.maze.ppp.uab.edu>,
>> fisk@eyes.uab.edu (Gary Fisk) wrote:
>>
>>> Cliff: You posted a message here a few weeks ago that you sent
>>> to some executives at Apple to see if they were interested in
>>> Executor. What kind of response did you get?
>> Actually I've seen reports that Apple itself may have an
>> actual x86 OS up and running--not an emulator but an actual Mac
>> OS 7.5 for Intel boxes. No idea if it's true. But interesting.
Accomplice> MAE (Macintosh Execution Environment) runs full System
Accomplice> 7 support on Unix boxes and they supposedly have an
Accomplice> internal version of it which runs on x86. Check out
Accomplice> http://www.mae.apple.com/
Since about 1988, Apple has never,, to my knowledge, introduced new
technology without it being widely known to Apple watchers two years
in advance. I watch MAE fairly closely; I do not think they have an
internal version which runs on x86. I have heard of a project that
they're working on that people could easily confuse with x86 but is
exceedingly different.
Accomplice> ---The Accomplice---
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
Follow-Ups:
References: