[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: MacDoom???



In article <199603262346.RAA05127@raven.ots.utexas.edu>,
 <osiris@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> "N" == Naveen G Rao <ngr@cs.duke.edu> writes:
>N> I just can't see why you would want to even run on MacDoom on a PC!
>N> i guess it is kind of cool just to see if you can get it to work...
>Not that I know why the original poster wanted to run MacDOOM on a PC,
>but how about the following:

Well, wasn't Doom developed on a NeXT?  Surely there's a NeXT version.  And
I *know* there are two Linux versions, and if you don't mind not having
music, the Linux-SVGAlib version is actually faster than the DOS version.

But I suspect the reason to run MacDoom is, indeed, "It'd be cool."

Adam
-- 
adam@phoenix.princeton.edu | Viva HEGGA! | Save the choad! | 64,928 | Fnord
"Double integral is also the shape of lovers curled asleep":Pynchon | Linux
Thanks for letting me rearrange the chemicals in your head. | Team OS/2
You can have my PGP passphrase when you pry it from my cold, dead brain.


Follow-Ups: References: