[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: OS/2 Porting
Doug Wing (doug_wing@il.us.swissbank.com) wrote:
: >
: >I just have to respond to all of the OS/2 people saying that an OS/2 port
: >would be the best thing for ARDI to do...
: >
: >While I like OS/2, own it (though I'm not currently running it...) and
: >think that it should be much more widespread than it is. I don't agree
: >that ARDI should put a priority to porting Executor to OS/2.
:
: If you add up the total Linux users and Nextstep users they still total less
: than OS/2 users. Win95 still runs on top of DOS, so a Win95 does not seem as
: critical as an OS/2 port. E/D runs on DOS as does Win95. There is only one
: DOS/Win program I run and that is Executor. I had to turn DOS support on to
: run E/D and will be glad to turn support off as soon as I can.
Oh, really? I'd disagree with you on that.. there are many more linux users than os/2.
Follow-Ups:
References: