[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Port to what? was: Re: executor-digest V1 #301



>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Hunter <huntercr@cs.purdue.edu> writes:

    Charles> Personally, I can't believe that Windows95 support [is
    Charles> going to come /would be] before OS/2, afterall there is
    Charles> no native gcc for 95, but we've got two complete
    Charles> followings of gcc for OS/2 ( EMX and gcc/2 )

I believe by the time 2.0 ships there will be a version of gcc we can
use.  At least that's what I think Mat told me.

    Charles> I think porting Executor to a native OS/2 VIO app would
    Charles> take less than a week with EMX. And a really *flashy* (
    Charles> threaded, DIVE, etc ) executable could be had within a
    Charles> month.

Most likely we'll work on both concurrently and make them available to
our customers via the experimental/bleedingedge system we currently
use.

    Charles> Something to think about...

    Charles>  Sheesh.. I'd even do the port if you all ( ARDI ) would
    Charles> like 8-)

We may ask you questions, but it's too early to tell.

    Charles> 		Just some thoughts.
 
    Charles> 			-- Charles Hunter

--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com




Follow-Ups: References: