[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: netatalk-style resource forks? (please? :)
> Of course, CAP aufs uses .resource directories, Helios EtherShare and IPT
> uShare use .rsrc directories, Xinet KA-Share uses .HSResource directories, and
> Pacer PacerShare uses afp_resource directories.
>
> There are corresponding differences for desktop representation. Many of these
> systems also appear to have files or directories for storing finder
> information. Fun, eh?
I'm not sure what DEC Pathworks does.
Who do we shoot for causing such a massive divergence? At least some
of these people had to be aware of the other efforts, and could have made
their own work compatible. Gratuitous difference sucks.
References: