[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Let's get System 7.x on top!
In article <317431BB.4A3D@ald.net>, Sandman <sandman@ald.net> wrote:
>Dwight W Weisman wrote:
>>
>>> I replied to this only because... etc. etc. etc...
>>> Thank you, and lets not get a huge thread here, both sides have been heard.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I didn't want to drag this on the group, but someone seems to have a
>chip on his shoulder; also, I don't like to leave things undefended.
>I have nothing further to say, unless prompted to do so by someone else.
You were right the first time... enough has been said and both sides have
been heard. Now you've had your say and more. If "someone has a chip
on his shoulder" more talk will not remove it. It'll only perpetuate the
dispute in ever more rancorous modes until someone gets tired of pounding
their head on the wall or, if it gets bad enough, someone in a position
to do so puts a stop to it. If you're in the right, don't worry about
it. If you're in the wrong, don't worry about it. The only unforgivable
sin is wasting more and more and more bandwidth on what has become a
personal contest. And if you're worried about what everyone else thinks,
don't -- everyone who cares has already formed an opinion.
Larry
--
Larry A. Shurr (las@cbgbcs.cb.att.com or lshurr@freenet.columbus.oh.us)
A Keane consultant on assignment at Lucent Technologies/Bell Laboratories
Innovations, but not officially representing the views of either company.
References: