[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Printing on E/L



>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Halverson <jeff@umn.edu> writes:

    Jeff> Hello, Does anyone get decent printouts from E/L?  I think I
    Jeff> might not really be= =20 set up right for it, either that or
    Jeff> E/L doesn't do the right thing.  (I=20 tend to think it may
    Jeff> just be my problem, though)...
...
    Jeff> It actually is the latest version (1.99o E/L).  Let me know
    Jeff> if it works on your setup in house...  oh, and thanks for
    Jeff> telling me about my mailer-- I guess I'll have to find out
    Jeff> how to not get it to send as "Quoted Printable"..

Ack.  You're right, it looks pretty bad.  A quick glance at the output
shows these bugs:

	weird word placement and line breaking (suggesting that there
	is a problem measuring the text, and that it's *not* purely a
	font substitution problem)

	improperly placed graphics in "pictures" in the document (e.g.
	the Tex-Edit icon on the first page, the overstriking in the
	table of contents)

	the last portion of the manual isn't printed out

I believe that those three bugs explain all the badness in the
Tex-Edit Reference Executor printed output. I'll look into them fairly
soon.  Different programs may have other bugs.  I think Word output
prints fairly well if you have fractional widths enabled.

	--Cliff
	ctm@ardi.com