[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: OS/2 Porting
Hello again. Followups directed to comp.os.os2.advocacy.
As the previous post stated, this isn't a flame either.
In <4inq00$9a3@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, compexpr@aol.com (CompExpr) writes:
>Unfortunately my take on situation is IBM is not willing to do the right
>job in getting OS/2 out there, and are likely to cut their losses and drop
>support of the system altogether.
Go talk to John Soyring or any other high ranking official in IBM's PSP
department. IBM will continue to develop and support OS/2 as long as
there is a market for it. Since OS/2 is heavily used in the US Government
and the banking communities, it is clear that it will be a supported
environment for many years to come. IBM is fully committed to keeping
OS/2 a live and viable product on the Intel platform.
>IF IBM were to somehow give ARDI some financial incentive to develop an
>Executor/2, I think that would be great.
Agreed! However, it remains unclear as to whether IBM is going
to get Apple's official support to run Mac binaries under OS/2. If they
do get that official support, funding from IBM for Executor/2 is unlikely.
>except that there are much less
>people using OS/2 than there are Windows, Windows NT and Windows 95. It's
>unfortunate but true...
I disagree, and have seen the numbers to prove it. Let's keep this out
of c.e.m.executor, though. Take it to private email or comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>I would like to see ARDI continue it's efforts to complete the
>Executor/DOS, Executor Linux and Executor Next Step (Yes, there is
>probably a smaller installed base of NextStep people than OS/2, but ARDI
>has a desire to support/respect their roots.) ports.
And I don't think that any of the OS/2 advocates want to see these
ports disappear. Many OS/2 supporters are also Linux supporters,
NeXTStep supporters, Solaris supporters, even Windows NT supporters.
ARDI just shouldn't ignore the large OS/2 community.
>By that time NT 4.0 will be out, as well as Win 97(?). Also at this point
>IBM will either have released OS/2 4.0 or canned it.
Merlin will be in beta within 6-8 weeks, perhaps even before Executor
v2.0 is shipping. From past beta periods, it's generally 3-4 months
for the GA code to be released.
>Personally, since Executor/DOS runs reasonably well on OS/2, I'd be much
>more interested in seeing a BeBox port of Executor..
Don't even *try* to argue that there are more BeBoxes out there
than OS/2 users. :)
>I hope all the loyal OS/2'ers won't flame me, but I think we all want
>Executor and ARDI to succeed, even if some of us don't get everything we
>want!
Clearly there is money to be made in the OS/2 market; just look at
Stardock Systems, which only puts out OS/2 software, and is doing
extremely well. I think ARDI would be wrong to neglect a market
where they clearly could make a nice sum of money.
Again, followups to comp.os.os2.advocacy please.
---
- Joseph LoCicero, IV | Grey is not the color I expected -
- jolo@ece.cmu.edu | On someone who's so often touched by grace -
- Think smarter, not harder | The eyes that hold the promise of perfection -
- Team OS/2 Use Warp! | Will find the flaw that no one can erase... -
References: