[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Win95, and Why...?



JIM210@aol.com writes:
 > But if I may ask, *with time/money in such short supply*,and * from a
 > strictly business viewpoint*, why work on multiple platforms at the same
 > time? EVERYBODY knows
 > Executors success will come from the DOS/PC world not Linux or NEXT(?). It
 > sounds like its more do to personal interest of individual engineers there
 > and not a business
 > decision. And when you are way overdue on a project I would think you would
 > do only what is essential and would contribute most to its/your success.
 > Linux?! Next?!
 > Criticism?No.Puzzled?Yes.
 > 
 > jim210

I am a registered user of Executor/Linux and intend to continue to be
one.  I think that the price is well worth it.  I also think that
there are many Linux users like myself that will want Executor for
running proprietary mainstream apps.

Also, I am sure that the Executor development team derives many
benefits from doing their development under a stable platform like
Linux.  Based on your statements, I am pretty sure that you have never
done any serious software development under both DOS and a UNIXoid
system.  The difference between getting "segmentation violation (core
dumped)" and a screen of blinking happy faces is many many hours
minimum.


References: