+ $? = + roof?


Stadium Survey FINAL Results

Thanks to more than 200 listeners for taking the time to vote!

Should there be a new stadium in concept?
YES - 86%
NO - 14%

Should there be a non-binding referendum?
YES - 76%
NO - 24%

When should the referendum be held?
SEPTEMBER - 14%
NOVEMBER - 61%
SPECIAL - 5%
NO PREFERENCE - 19%

Should voting be state- or metro-wide?
METRO - 54%
STATE - 46%

Should the stadium be open or with a retractable roof for $40 million more?
RETRACT - 56%
OPEN - 44%

How much of the estimated $250 million cost should the non-user public pay?
ZERO - 37%
$25 MILLION - 5%
$50 MILLION - 11%
$100 MILLION - 23%
$150 MILLION - 17%
$200 MILLION - 5%
$250 MILLION - 3%

How much would you pay out-of-pocket, per year, beyond what you'd pay to attend games?
ZERO - 24%
$1 - 11%
$5 - 21%
$10 - 15%
$20 - 13%
$50 - 16%

Which taxes should be used? (More than one answer allowed)
HOTEL/MOTEL/LIQUOR - 61%
CIG - 32%
SALES - 26%
INCOME - 6%
PROPERTY - 3%
OTHER - 24%

Should it be mandated that 20% of new stadium tickets be priced less than eight bucks?
YES - 63%
NO - 37%

Should an equal amount of taxes raised go to youth sports?
YES - 31%
NO - 69%

Should the referendum include a question about possible public purchase or public stock ownership?
YES - 75%
NO - 25%

If it came down to it - a $250 million stadium paid for by the public or the Twins leaving, which would you choose?
BUILD THE STADIUM - 56%
LET TWINS GO - 44%

[Back to the Home page]

Again, thanks everybody for participating! -- David Brauer, Host, KSTP-AM's So-Far-Unnamed
Morning Show, 5:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. Monday through Friday


WebMania!™ 1.1 Unregistered - ©1995 Q&D Software Development
http://www.q-d.com


This document was created with the assistance of
WebMania!™ 1.1 (Unregistered) - ©1995 Q&D Software Development -
http://www.q-d.com