Sex 5
But is a change in the law really necessary? OK, you may well
now be crying out for a straight jacket for the poor old loony
writing this drivel, but stop and think about it for a moment.
Why do we need new laws to apply to the Internet? Don't existing
laws serve perfectly adequately, after all they have already been
used on a number of occasions to put paid to the paedophiles who
try to ply their vile trade online. Being in possession of obscene
material is illegal no matter what the format, pictures on your
computer are just as illegal as photographs or video tapes. Of
course, catching someone in the act of possessing Internet pornography
could be a different matter altogether, but no more difficult
than intercepting someone's post to find video tapes. The Police
still need a suspicion before they can intervene and arrest, and
it would be just about impossible for any agency to monitor and
decode every online communication taking place. Which, of course,
is the main string to the "cannot legislate" bow that
I'm plucking. What is the point of introducing a piece of legislation
aimed directly at the Internet when just about anyone who knows
about such things will tell you it is impossible to enforce?
- Sex1.htm
- Sex2.htm
- Sex3.htm
- Sex4.htm
- Sex6.htm
- Sex7.htm
- Sex8.htm