AmigaActive (259/1728)

From:Jan-Erik Karlsson
Date:5 Jun 2001 at 22:54:39
Subject:Re: graphics cards

Hello, Kyle

On 05-Jun-01, you wrote:

KM > Hmm, you've obviously never seen a game running at 1600x1200x32 with
KM > anti-aliasing and full detail turned on.
KM >
KM > The Matrox cards are good but compared to nVidia...
KM >
KM > A friend of mine recently compared benchmarks (of a real app) for a PC
KM > running an nVidia Geforce3 and a 300,000 pound SGI machine. There was
KM > very little in it.

you ain't buying a 300,000 pound SGI machine to play games.

well the geforce3 SHOULD be better than a matrox G450/G550 since it cost's
in the region of
4 times of the Matrox card ( a rough translation of prices is 700£ for the
geforce3 and 100-150£ for the matrox), is the geforce worth the money?
everyone in the pc market that knows
anything about these stuff say NO! the only ones buying the geforce3 is
those that belives microsoft when they state that window's ME is a must
buy!

With kind regards,
Jan-Erik Karlsson



Email: trg@privat.utfors.se
WWW: http://hem.fyristorg.com/TRG/
UIN (ICQ): 54667153


The Borg assimilated my race & all I got was this T shirt.

Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/