VNU - The Room

Net Sex - Is There A Solution, Or Indeed A Problem?

The whole issue of sex and the Internet raises many interesting, and important, questions. Unfortunately the answers are not exactly forthcoming from any quarter it seems. Davey Winder, author of a new book "Sex and the Internet", ventures forward with some often controversial ones of his own.

There is no point denying it, the Internet is home to a lot of sexually explicit material. Whilst this may well be just a tiny fraction of the Net's extremely diverse content, it is naturally the focus of a lot of attention from users, abusers and those who know a good story when they see one. The "media" have latched on to the distribution of pornography via the Internet as being indicative of all that is wrong with society today. The Net is the embodiment of the evils of technology, a world without control, virtual streets down which out children are not safe to walk alone. What a load of tosh - I can't remember anyone condemning the telephone because a few sad individuals use it to make obscene calls. I don't recall the same media hysteria about video recorders, yet blue movies have helped to drive that technology forward. The Internet is relatively new, it is hyped to death and any angle that helps to make a selling story is going to be latched upon by the tabloid hacks. But what is the truth of the matter? That's a question I asked myself about a year ago, and set out to research and write a book that explained the state of sex and the Internet in 1996. I discovered that not only is the much reported paedophile use of the Net actually rather difficult to stumble across, but as you may rationally expect the vast majority of Internet users do whatever they can to stamp it out whenever it raises its ugly head. Indeed, a number of paedophile "rings" have been busted thanks to the co-operation of Internet users helping the police. The reality is that paedophiles will use whatever means are at their disposal to continue their perversion, if the Internet is useful it will be used. There are, unfortunately, a handful of clever and active paedophiles who contribute sickening pictures to Usenet Newsgroups dedicated to the abuse of children - many of these you or I will, thankfully, never see because out Internet Service Providers refuse to make them available. Newsgroups that do openly discuss paedophilia, rather than distribute child pornography, are populated largely by people speaking out against it and making it as difficult as possible for the sickos to talk. And so, just as in the "real world", paedophiles resort to covert activity, hiding behind innocent sounding group names, not publicising what they do, becoming more difficult to catch. But it would be wrong to think that just because the media tell us that the Internet is full of child pornography then that's all there is to it - because it most certainly isn't. As well as pornography and erotica covering every possible taste (or lack of it) the Net provides a vital route for the dissemination of sexual support information. Discussion groups and Web pages offering support and advice on AIDS, safe sex, sexual abuse, rape and so on are flourishing. You will find more real life advice, of the type that often doesn't make it into wider circulation for "political" reasons, in the sci.med.aids Newsgroup than anywhere else for example. The Net also acts as an electronic agony aunt, a dating agency, and a place where sex and sexuality can be explored openly and safely. Gay and Lesbian culture is alive online, indeed it seems there are more people "out" online than off.

Without doubt though the Net has bred a new generation of electronic voyeur, and one has to stop and ask if this is healthy. Indeed, does society in general have an obligation to make access to material such as this as difficult as possible? Some, especially those who associate pornography with abuse, would say yes. The trend over the last few years has been for the nature of this online pornography to get gradually, and relentlessly, more hardcore. People become unmoved, turned off, by seeing the same old "man bonks woman" routine and seek something ever more daring, ever more out of the ordinary. Such constant exposure to explicit and increasingly bizarre images may well blunt our reaction to what is "acceptable behaviour" and what isn't. I can't argue that levels of violence in our society have increased roughly in keeping with the levels of graphic violence that is portrayed in film and on TV, it eventually becomes the norm and we are no longer shocked by it. Perhaps a study needs to be made to try and pinpoint what effect such online exposure has on the sexual needs of the Internet generation, who knows it may disprove the "associated abuse" theory once and for all. I've often wondered why, if exposure to hardcore pornography leads to sexual abuse, more censors are not appearing before the bench on serious charges? (Maybe it is just us "common" folk who are affected by pornography...)

However, the cries are out there for legislation against Internet pornography, apparently at any cost. In the US it would seem that the cost can be counted in terms of free speech, and the hurried introduction of the "Communications Decency Act" as part of a Telecoms Reform bill is indicative of the type of knee-jerk legislature that we should strive to avoid in the UK. The terms of the act are such that sending anything that anyone at anytime might find "indecent" is illegal and punishable by fines of up to a quarter of a million dollars and two years in jail. Sending email to your partner that includes passionate discussion about sex, discussion that would be perfectly legal if done verbally or by post all of a sudden becomes a hanging offence. The same thing applies to online groups that talk about abortion, their members could now face prosecution. Perhaps it is not surprising to learn that the "Christian Coalition" were a fundamental and important supporter of the CDA in the States. Can you imagine what might happen if the "Mary Whitehouse" mob got the same bee in their bonnet and had the power to push for a change in the law here?

But is a change in the law really necessary? OK, you may well now be crying out for a straight jacket for the poor old loony writing this drivel, but stop and think about it for a moment. Why do we need new laws to apply to the Internet? Don't existing laws serve perfectly adequately, after all they have already been used on a number of occasions to put paid to the paedophiles who try to ply their vile trade online. Being in possession of obscene material is illegal no matter what the format, pictures on your computer are just as illegal as photographs or video tapes. Of course, catching someone in the act of possessing Internet pornography could be a different matter altogether, but no more difficult than intercepting someone's post to find video tapes. The Police still need a suspicion before they can intervene and arrest, and it would be just about impossible for any agency to monitor and decode every online communication taking place. Which, of course, is the main string to the "cannot legislate" bow that I'm plucking. What is the point of introducing a piece of legislation aimed directly at the Internet when just about anyone who knows about such things will tell you it is impossible to enforce?

Surely the answer, if an answer is what you want, is that we must return to the good old days of parental responsibility. Remember the time when parents actually took an interest in what their kids were getting up to, made an effort to bring them up "properly", didn't just let them carry on regardless? Perhaps the Internet, and the sexual issue in particular will mean that we, as parents, will have to renew our concern for our children's welfare and accept the responsibility for care. If there is one thing that the Internet does allow us to do, and do rather well, then it is self-censor. PC's are such tame beasts that it only takes a relatively simple piece of software to be installed to vanquish those nasty pictures of naked women to the online ether. Parents who complain that their kids know more about computers than them will need to learn, at least to the stage of securing access to the family PC. A good analogy here would be satellite and cable TV. Adult channels are readily available, but require a viewing card to be inserted before the pictures will unscramble. Parents don't complain that this process is beyond them, and society doesn't get up in arms that our civil liberties are being eroded as a result of their use.

Not to be overlooked either is the response to the new wave of computer pornography from the established publishers of the glossy paper variety. Seeing as a large amount of online porn actually consists of pictures scanned straight from these publications, and much of the rest from videos, surely there would be an interest in some form of restrictive legislation from these concerns? After all, the drop in circulation rates of many of the adult magazines since the Internet has arrived on the scene cannot just be a coincidence. Most magazines are distributed mainly by subscription, simply because readers are embarrassed about buying them over the counter in the high street. The Internet provides almost total perceived anonymity, and there are precious few financial implications either. The would be pornographic patron needs only pay but ten quid for a month's Internet sub, and telephone charges at 1p per minute (assuming off peak local call rates) - this gets them access to an almost limitless choice of perversion, no coughing up £3 per copy for a small selection of soft porn pictures in a mag. Of course, the clever players are moving their magazines onto the Web themselves and publishing them alongside the traditional paper versions. They charge a small subscription fee to view, don't incur much in the way of extra production costs (the magazine is already produced on computer anyway), and can rake in a small fortune from willing advertisers drawn by the huge readership potential such ventures can attract. When Playboy launched their online version it broke all Internet records at the time with an estimated 880,000 visitors in the first day! Penthouse got in on the act and some observers reckon that the online version could be the saviour of the paper version, in a time of declining fortunes for the Guccione empire. Making pornography available to the computer owning public is nothing new to the porn publishers, the CD-ROM market is a booming industry in the US and accounts for a huge volume of adult material sales. What is new is the notion of giving a product away, or at least not charging a fortune for it. Adult magazines have historically never been a cheap commodity, understanding the Internet concept of not charging the end user may take some getting used to.

One thing is for sure, sex has been amongst the biggest driving forces in the popularisation of the Internet in general, and cutting edge technology is always going to be put to good use by the sex industry. So what does the future hold as far as sex online is concerned? Well, as the cliché goes, the future is now - and this is most definitely the case with the Net. Already we have operations set up in the US which utilise video online. Using CU-SeeMe technology you can dial into a sex service where, for a price, one or two girls will strip off and "perform" for you live on camera, online. Perhaps this isn't a bad move, at least for the girls concerned. They have no direct contact with the customer, there is no danger of sexual infection, and they can hang up if things get nasty. Or can they? I doubt that the owners of such operations would look too favourably on a girl who cuts off a paying customer in mid call, especially when some are charging a buck a minute or more! In that sense things haven't moved forward that far, it is still the girls who are exploited by the pornography trade and the men who make the money from it. In general that particular trend seems unlikely to change. But I stray from the plot here, the future of sex online is most certainly interactive. As bandwidth restraints are removed with the widespread availability and use of cable technology, real time video at a real time cost will lead to more "Virtual Strip Joints" more visits to online prostitutes, and less of the dangers associated with the rougher parts of town. The days of "Lawnmower Man" VR-Sex are far away, what the Internet will realistically provide is an electronic real-time replacement for the wank mags that adorn the top shelf at the newsagent today - unless the censors decide that it is all just too much for us, that is.

Davey Winder's new book, Sex and the Internet, costs £12.99 and can be ordered by phoning 01225 822511. You can contact Davey by email to waveydavey@dial.pipex.com