home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1992-10-31 | 312.9 KB | 7,385 lines |
-
- This forum is supplied for demonstration purposes only and is
- accessible via the IBM OS/2 BBS system. What you see below is the
- forum as it existed on 10/30/92. The IBM OS/2 Bulletin Board System
- (BBS) is IBM's new electronic support offering for OS/2 Version 2.0.
- With OS/2 BBS you can electronically review OS/2 technical
- information, submit program defects to IBM, and receive information
- on how to solve problems. Users of the OS/2 BBS not only include
- OS/2 customers, but the OS/2 expertise of the entire internal IBM
- community worldwide. OS2BBS makes all this available via a local
- or toll free number in most major cities.
-
- To request a complete OS/2 BBS Information Package detailing
- the OS/2 BBS offering and including pricing and registration/access
- information, please call: 1-800-547-1283.
-
- ===== OS2LAN CFORUM created at 01:50:01 on 92/04/08 GMT (by HOPKINS at AUSVM8)
- IBM UNCLASSIFIED
- ----------------
- The information in this forum is considered by IBM to be
- external and may be shared by everyone who is given access.
- This forum is shared with the internal IBM employee conferences.
-
- Forum: OS2LAN CFORUM
-
- Forum subject: IBM Lan Server/Requestor for OS/2 (LS)
-
- This FORUM is provided as a conferencing tool to promote
- dicussion relating to the installation, customization,
- and use of IBM Lan Server and Lan Requestor for OS/2 Version
- 2.0 . Use this forum to present issues, questions, and
- problems encountered during the use of Lan Server/Requestor
- in addition to topics relating to DOS Lan Requestor.
-
- Contributions must not contain confidential or proprietary information.
-
- Each contributor agrees, in placing material in this forum, that IBM and
- other users are free to prepare derivative works based upon it, and to use,
- reproduce, perform, display and distribute inside and outside their company
- such material and such derivative works, without obligation or charge.
-
- IBM is not responsible or liable for the use, copying, or distribution of
- materials placed on this forum, and has therefore no obligation to control
- such acts.
-
- All subscribers are required to abide at all times by the conference
- rules described in the Bulletin Board Rules under "News and Announcements".
-
- All IBM personnel are required to abide at all times by the IBMPC RULES
- and the IBM Business Conduct Guidelines. IBM personnel will read the
- CUSTOMER FORUM RULES in IBMPC RULES before contributing.
-
- Contributions violating these rules will be deleted by the CFORUM
- Owner or their delegate, and in some cases by an IBM conference
- Administrator.
-
- The OS2BBS CFORUM is where anyone may raise concerns regarding rules
- violations found in this and other CFORUMS.
-
- The IBM Owner of this forum is:
- Name: Kenneth M. Hopkins, OS/2 Support Services
- Mailing Address: IBM Manufacturing and Development
- 11400 Burnet Road
- Internal Zip 2900-042/1D003
- Austin, Texas 78758
- IBM Node/Userid: AUSVM8/HOPKINS
-
- ..... 6342 lines pruned at 07:49:32 on 92/09/11 GMT (by FOLGER at YKTVMV) .....
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:54:35 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: NET STATISTICS detailed information
- Ref: Append at 03:12:24 on 92/07/15 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
- The CNFGLS13 PACKAGE on MKTTOOLS has a file, CNFGLS13 NOTES, that
- explains the 'number of times you run out' fields and makes some
- recommendations. As far as I know, these comments still apply to 2.0
- Entry server (or the Advanced server when you have FAT disks.)
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:05:18 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Upgrade to Advanced LS 2.0
- Ref: Append at 22:50:06 on 92/07/14 GMT (by GAWOOTEN at SFOVMIC1)
- The INI file setting from CNFGLS13 will (generally) be OK for LS20 Entry
- -- with the obvious change to the NET1 line to not try to use NETBIOS$.
- Entry Server is, effectively, LS132 and is used also when you access FAT
- file systems with Advanced LS20. Net, your INI should be OK.
- BUT, that doesn't mean your PROTOCOL.INI file is OK. Make sure the
- NETBIOS resources you need are defined -- se the spreadsheet's Col
- E&F for parameters it calculates. Look at Rows13-18.
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:10:19 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: NET STATISTICS detailed information
- Ref: Append at 18:12:39 on 92/07/14 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
- Correct. LS20 Advanced server is designed to be largely self tuning (for
- performance, not for number of users, amount of shared resources, eic.)
- Also, the LS20A does NOT use bigbufs, only the LS20E does. LS20E is
- used even if you are running LS20A if you access FAT file systems.
- Alll HPFS and LS20A? Let bigbuffs default and ignore the spreasheet's
- recommendation.
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:15:17 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Multiple Domain logon in LS 2.0
- Ref: Append at 22:07:26 on 92/07/13 GMT (by MRTOM at YKTVMV)
- I'd just add that this feature is called External Resources. Just so
- you know what to look for in the docs!
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:36:45 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Lan Man to Lan Server Migration
- Ref: Append at 14:54:25 on 92/07/08 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- I don't know of any tool do do the migration, but maybe I can help out
- with your other questions.
- There is a NETBIOS limit of 254 sessions per adapter card -- but LS20
- supports up to 4 adapter cards. Each has its own copy of NETBIOS, so...
- The IBMLAN.INI file has a parameter, maxusers, which is documented to
- support a maximum value of 254, but I understand this max is NOT enforced
- and that you can exceed it. Some other items might be of interest to
- you, though. How many shares will you need (maxshares)? Connections
- (maxconnections in the iNI file)? Maxopens? Reqbufs?
- Also, make sure you have your newest Token Ring Adapters in the server.
- Busmaster server adapters if you've got 'em -- these are best.
- 'Shorties' are next best, 'middies' next, and 'regular' 16/4 adapters
- last. These adapters require CPU resources ('stolen' from the server)
- to drive the LAN, and I have listed them in sequence from the least
- demanding to the most demanding of CPU time.
- Finally, docs say the adapters must be on different rings, and that
- those rings cannot be bridged. BUT, if you filter NETBIOS traffic
- at the bridge, they can be bridged. Name filters can also be used
- if more than server/requesters are using the network.
- In fact, with a little care and filtering, we have run the bridge
- in an MVDM! Bridge program MUST be at CSD/PTF UR37463, though.
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:44:33 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: OS/2 LAN Server as a "modem server"
- Ref: Append at 20:00:28 on 92/07/03 GMT (by UST1013 at OS2CUST)
- I have not used the product, but previous appenders have said that
- RemoteVision from Token-Technologies can be used. 415/965-8607.
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:06:15 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Configurator Worksheets
- Ref: Append at 13:36:59 on 92/06/29 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- I have not updated the CNFGLS13 tool for 2.0.
- That is not the end of the story, though. There is help comming!
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:09:34 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: srvpipes parameter in IBMLAN.INI
- Ref: Append at 18:26:18 on 92/06/26 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- I agree with all you say EXCEPT the divide by 40. I use 12.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:30:16 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Net start in Config.sys
- Ref: Append at 22:47:49 on 92/06/24 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- If you want logon to be faster, there is some tuning you can do.
- I'll assume your network does not have any bridges.
- In PROTOCOL.INI, find the parameters 'netbiostimeout' and
- 'netbiosretries'. When you logon to the network, NETBIOS searches it
- for any other station (anywhere) which might be using the same names you
- have (and it won't add yours as a Messaging name if it finds someone
- else is already using your name - most of us have seen THAT message.)
- Timeout on the add name query is 1/2 second (the minimum), and the retry
- count is 8. The query is sent on remote rings first, then on your
- local ring (even if you have no bridges!) So, you wait while no
- remote stations reply -- and you wait for 8 retries. Then the local
- ring is searched. AND there are multiple names to be added. 14 seconds
- worth! Set the retry count to 2, and wait less to logon faster.
- Do NOT mess with the 'dlcretries' value -- it is used for other
- purposes, and can help your work continue even if you have a
- 'dity/noisy' network.
- If you have bridges, you might experiment with a timeout/retries
- combination until you find a minimum that works for your network.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:41:53 on 92/07/16 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 22:18:29 on 92/07/16 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: srvpipes parameter in IBMLAN.INI
- Ref: Append at 21:09:34 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- Thank you Tom for all this useful information. I had gotten the
- maxusers/40 value from the 1.3 Parameter and tuning guide (pg 5-41).
- make a note of your maxusers/12 suggestion for future reference.
- Does this reflect an increased LS 2.0 pipe usage compared to 1.3?
-
- | I just realized that 2.0 is likely not at issue in this figure...
- | so where was the /40 coming from?
-
- Giovanni Bertolini
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:41:37 on 92/07/17 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Net start in Config.sys
- Ref: Append at 21:30:16 on 92/07/16 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- Another way to minimize logon time from an OS/2 Req. is to minimize the number
- of applications in the Public applications folder.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 04:58:24 on 92/07/17 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: RIPL OS/2 across 8209
- Ref: Append at 14:58:43 on 92/07/15 GMT (by 83200599 at EHONE)
-
- I think the problem lies in the 'same' diskette.
- The RIPL uses 802 for communication and your TR address. It is different
- for every TR card.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:06:48 on 92/07/17 GMT (by AHEATH at MSNVM3)
- Subject: workstation clock gets reset correctly to incorrect time!
- Ref: Append at 06:33:15 on 92/07/14 GMT (by HERRICK at AUSVM2)
-
- You folks in Austin might consider making an enhancement on the next
- CSD to optionally disable the "feature". In the mean time, I've
- got 2 Mod 80's now so one will never log onto any LAN (and thus will
- have a time I can trust) and the other I won't ever trust the time
- on as I will use it for LAN access. Great way to sell hardware!
-
- Al
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:00:48 on 92/07/17 GMT (by NBLKCXG at OS2CUST)
- Subject: ATTRIBUTES FOR PUBLIC APPS FOLDER
-
- I WOULD LIKE TO SET THE PUBLIC APPLICATIONS FOLDER ATTRIBUTES FOR FLOWED AND TO
- EDIT THE APPLICATION ICONS. HOW CAN THIS BE ACCOMPLISHED SO THAT THE RESULTS A
- RE SAVED AND SUBSEQENT LOGON'S WILL PRESENT THE PUBLIC APPLICATIONS FOLDER WITH
- THE MODIFIED FOLDER ATTRIBUTES?
-
- MIKE
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:33:42 on 92/07/17 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: srvpipes parameter in IBMLAN.INI
- Ref: Append at 21:41:53 on 92/07/16 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- I can't say where someone else gets their numbers, but when I was
- developing the tuning spreadsheets, I couldn't find ANY information
- on setting the srvpipes parameter. Some people even thought applications
- on the server used srvpipes! (See the early SPM/2 docs) The only hint
- we had was -- if a lot of users sign on at the same time, increase the
- value. I finally took the maximum number of users (254) and divided by
- the maximum number of pipes, 20. Bingo, 12 was the number for the
- spreadsheet. No complaints that it was too low EVER got back to me.
- It may be generous (I can't prove 40 isn't right, after all), but it
- works, and I am nothing if not a pragmatist!
- The CNFGLS13 package contains a file CNFGLS13 NOTES which discusses
- my logic/reasons (?) for picking the values generated by the tool.
- Anyway, we also put the 12 value in the NAR Vol 2 (pg 3-55 in my
- copy - which may not be the same level as yours).
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:24:56 on 92/07/17 GMT (by XXWESB22 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: workstation clock gets reset correctly to incorrect time!
- Ref: Append at 15:06:48 on 92/07/17 GMT (by AHEATH at MSNVM3)
-
- Leave automatic synchronization alone! I don't want users to have
- another option that may screw things up. I suggest a $4.99 solution
- for your LAN Administrator...A QUARTZ DIGITAL Watch and instructions
- on how to set the correct time on the servers!
-
- Also, with multiple domains is it not possible to set one server to
- be the timesource for the whole network?? If not, that could be worked
- on.
-
- Gareth "I even have a nice Seiko of my own" Jones
- ISM - Information Systems Management
- Regina, SK Phone (306) 781-5109
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 07:05:06 on 92/07/18 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: workstation clock gets reset correctly to incorrect time!
- Ref: Append at 22:24:56 on 92/07/17 GMT (by XXWESB22 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Does netview supports this ckock 'feature' ? This could be syncroni-
- zed . I'm assuming that the Date-Time on our 3090 is correct.
- So When the Domain connects to the SNA and to Netview, they should
- talk about the time.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:00:58 on 92/07/19 GMT (by HERRICK at AUSVM2)
- Subject: workstation clock gets reset correctly to incorrect time!
- Ref: Append at 15:06:48 on 92/07/17 GMT (by AHEATH at MSNVM3)
-
- Configurable time synchronization is planned to be included in
- the next release of LAN Server. I had intended to imply that
- by saying that it wasn't currently in there, but I guess I was a
- little too subtle about it. Next time I'll use caps for
- 'currently'.
-
- If you can't find another use for your extra mod 80 when this new
- support gets in there, I'll be glad to take it off your hands.
-
- Tom Herrick
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:47:48 on 92/07/20 GMT (by PSZILARD at SYDVM1)
- Subject: LANPASS release
-
- A little while ago I wrote an IBM Internal Use Only REXX/2 program to
- update your user password on all domains that you use.
-
- Someone had requested that this be made available outside IBM(!) So, I
- have started the procedure to do this. It should not take too long,
- however certain approvals, etc. do have to be met, so I can't predict
- when it will 'hit' the market.
-
- If/when I am told that it is publicly available I shall make a brief
- announcement here. IBM'ers (e.g. reps. can already access this package
- on OS2TOOLS under name of LANPASS).
-
- If you're impatient, and want to write your own, there is really nothing
- complex about it. I just use REXX/2 to build a series of NET PASSWORD
- commands, which are then passed to the OS/2 LS program.
-
- END: /* Paul Szilard in Sydney/Oz! */
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:24:07 on 92/07/20 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: LANPASS release
- Ref: Append at 01:47:48 on 92/07/20 GMT (by PSZILARD at SYDVM1)
-
- Thanks Paul,
- This would be real useful.
-
- (u.i.: Can I say koszonjuk)
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:02:22 on 92/07/20 GMT (by XXBCSC76 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Attaching Printers to OS/2 Requesters
- Ref: Append at 23:31:01 on 92/06/01 GMT (by AMOON at WASVMIC5)
-
- I know of two products: Spool+ Version 2.1 from Shany; and LANSpool 3.0
- for LAN Server from Intel.
-
- Of the two, I like the way Spool+ operates better than LANSpool.
-
- With these, you can have up to 32 printers/server where the printers are
- attached to DOS or OS/2 workstations (max 5 per workstation).
-
- Shany can be reached at 415-694-7410. Their technical support is quite
- responsive and helpful...
-
- Bye for now,
- GLen GLITTLE@BCSC02
- Senior Computer Systems Analyst, FICOM Fax: 604 660-3170
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:03:20 on 92/07/20 GMT (by WSRC051 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Requester for Netware Fails Under OS/2 2.0-ES
-
- I have the March25, 1992 version of the OS/2 LAN Requester for Netware. I
- get the error message: NWD0115 Error getting connection ID (0x88F). I also
- get the messag: SYS0059 Unexpected Network Error Occurred. Everything else
- seems OK. Communications Manager gives me host sessions, and OS/2 isnormal.
- I am using the LANSUP driver selection. I have tried different things in
- CONFIG>SYS, but nothing does the trick.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:38:52 on 92/07/21 GMT (by AMOON at WASVMIC5)
- Subject: DIABLO 630 Printer Driver
-
- My customer needs this print driver for OS/2 2.0. He has several
- Cannon Laser printers and we have been unable to locate any OS/2
- printer drivers for these. Apparently, the only thing Cannon will
- emulate is DIABLO 630. Can anyone help?
-
- Ann Moon
- WCTA, Charlotte, N.C.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:55:15 on 92/07/21 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Attaching Printers to OS/2 Requesters
- Ref: Append at 16:02:22 on 92/07/20 GMT (by XXBCSC76 at TORVMCOP)
-
- I just caught the back end of this thread...
-
- If you are trying to connect additional printers (not connected directly to
- the server), have you looked into the LEXMARK 4033 solution?
-
- It is a box that connects the printer directly to the lan and via software
- to an LPT port on the server machine...
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:19:15 on 92/07/21 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DOS Requester
-
- What is the P: drive for? It is listed as reserved, and cannot be removed. It
- shows up in the Windows File Manager, and I would prefer that it did not - it
- is confusing! Secondly, also in Windows File Manager, when I attemp to access
- a network directory when not logged in, I am prompted to log on. The directory
- is supposed to connect every time this station is logged in, but it does not
- show up. I cannot manually connect to the desired resource, dialog appears
- saying that I'm not currently logged on. Exiting File Manager and re-starting
- seems to solve the problem.
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:05:06 on 92/07/21 GMT (by AT at VIA) -----
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
-
- Hello...
- Can someone please tell me the future direction of LAN Server now
- that IBMhas embraced Netware as an "alternative" network operating
- system?
-
- When does IBM recommend Netware instead of LAN Server?
- When do they recommend LAN Server rather than Netware?
-
- I cannot understand how both network operating systems can be endorsed
- by a single entity like IBM without one suffering some loss of market
- share.
-
- Much obliged,
-
- Lou
-
- Lou Breit
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:35:15 on 92/07/21 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 19:05:06 on 92/07/21 GMT (by AT at VIA) -----
-
- As a matter of fact, IBM has a brief position summary on this.
- My summary of the summary:
-
- Netware is recommended where
- It's already there and the customer prefers it,
- Where Apple or Unix is on the LAN,
- Where a mixture of TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, OSI, Appletalk, etc., is needed,
- Where Arcnet or other odd hardware is in use,
- Where something is needed that in turn needs Netware,
- Where the server must also be a bridge,
- Where the server must also have the management tools....
-
- LAN Server is recommended where
- It's already there and the customer prefers it,
- Where OS/2 and SAA are strong factors,
- Where IBM hosts are strong factors,
- Where the strategy of one domain controller handling multiple servers
- is important,
- Where client and server should be the same operating system,
- Where strong system and network management software is needed,
- Where a non-dedicated server is beneficial,
- Where price is a factor....
-
- Novell and IBM have agreed to keep their products interoperable.
-
- "IBM is committed to enhance our customers' investment in OS/2 and
- IBM OS/2 LAN Server."
-
- And indeed, at PC Expo, IBM demonstrated an OS/2 LAN Requestor
- that was happily running against an IBM LAN Server, a Novell
- Netware server, a Microsoft LAN Manager server and a mainframe-
- based server....
-
- John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:37:58 on 92/07/21 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 19:05:06 on 92/07/21 GMT (by AT at VIA)
-
- I'm not an IBM-er but from what I heard is: The LAN Server is a
- long term strategic application, and IBM is and will be enhancing
- the capabilities. The NETWARE is what previously the costumers
- requested, and IBM changed because the market demand.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:31:34 on 92/07/21 GMT (by YOUNGR at AUSVM1)
- Subject: DOS Requester
- Ref: Append at 17:19:15 on 92/07/21 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
-
- If the LASTDRIVE statment in your config.sys is "LASTDRIVE=Q"
- then your P: (lastdrive-1) is used to get to the DCDB on the
- domain controller. This is needed to get such information as
- what applications to put on your application selector.
-
- Russell Young
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:46:04 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM) -
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: None
-
- Since OS/2 V2 now has "Better Windows than Windows", I installed
- Microsoft Project on my Server hoping to be able to run it from any 1
- requester. If I NET USE E: PROJECT, change to the E: drive and enter
- WINPROJ, my PC invokes its own copy of OS/2 Windows, then loads and runs
- PROJECT from the server - No problem there.
- However, (having deleted use of the alias) if I try to start it as a
- public app, I get the message "NET8018 - OS/2 Error 2 when loading
- E:\WINPROJ.EXE
- I assume that the fact that WINPROJ needs WINDOWS is not reported to my
- requester so it doesn't load the support (WINDOWS) that WINPROJ needs.
- Is this assumption correct ?? Is there any way round it ??
- If not, this means that I cannot run any Windows App from my server, even
- though I have the OS/2 Windows code available at my workstation.
-
- Trevor Giles, Havant Site 721-4245
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:58:57 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM) -
- Subject: Selective Process KILL then SHUTDOWN
- Ref: None
-
- I have an LAN based application where the SERVER must run the program
- all day long to provide a named pipe for information exchange to/from
- any requester which starts its end of the application.
- If this is running when I SHUTDOWN the server, it is automatically
- started when the server is re-booted/powered on. Unfortunately, this
- happens before the server is fully up and running.
- I can use NET SEND and KILLP to send a warning message to users, and
- then KILLP processes that I know will cause problems on a re-boot, but
- is there any way, once this has been done, of invoking the SHUTDOWN
- procedure from the command line, preferably bypassing the confirmation
- request ??
-
- Trevor Giles, Havant Site, 721-4245
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:23:34 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Custom Dual Req Install Diskette
-
- Is there a technique to generate a LS client custom install diskette that will
- generate a protocol.ini file which references a Netware ODI driver?
-
- I am trying to figure out an automated way to create a dual requester
- system with the tools available. Right now the time & effort needed to modify
- the config.sys and protocol.ini file is being counted as a significant
- negative in the evaluation of OS/2 in my organization.
-
- LAPS seems to choke on the ODI drivers. I think this may be because there
- is not .nif file for the ODI drivers. Can a dummy token.nif (for example)
- file be created that LAPS will accept and use to generate a usable protocol.ini
- file ?
-
- This still leaves the config.sys modifications which may be amenable to a
- REXX script. But it would be MUCH nicer if the install program could
- handle this.
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:05:28 on 92/07/22 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: Append at 12:46:04 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM)
-
- The workaround is to fold the dos/windows .exe into an OS/2 .cmd
- file on the server, and define this .cmd file as the (OS/2!) public
- application; currently only DOS machines can run public DOS apps.
- Giovanni Bertolini
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:17:09 on 92/07/22 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: How close is LS to WPS?
-
- Our current configuration is 1.3 LS with OS/2 2.0 Lan Requester...
- This question deals with whether we should upgrade the LS code to 2.0
-
- I realize that in order to create a Public OS/2 application, I must execute
- the NET.EXE program and create the application thru it's interfaces (for
- one application at a time).
-
- Now I have just recently install a compiler onto our LS and it created a
- group with ICONs for the various pieces of the compiler kit (on my local
- desktop). Now comes the question of how closely nit is the LS (2.0 or 1.3)
- with relation to the 2.0 WPS. Can I MOVE the group from my desktop to the
- Public apps group so that it would create a display the group for all those
- users that have the 2.0 WPS and are logged on with 2.0 OS/Requester?
-
- Can I create a public application through the WPS interface (using the
- program template) and would this be reflected in the LS database.
-
- If the above is no, and no, may a make a suggestion that it should be
- yes and yes. There seems to be a large "gap" between the LS/Requester
- database management and the 2.0 WPS interface. Also, while on the subject
- of "it would be nice", if I add a group to the Public applications group
- I should be able to run a .CMD file before any of the applications contained
- within that group. -- I have worked around the LIBPATH problem for DLL's and
- the only thing that the group requires is a bunch of SET statements before the
- apps within the group is executed. And since all the apps are from the same
- product (compiler installation), the SET statements are the same for all the
- EXE files.
-
- I realize that with the 1.3 LS that this would not be pratical. But under 2.0
- the interface for the public and/or private applications should be placed close
- to the WPS. Requiring us to go through the OLD TYPE NET MENUS is a little out
- of sync with the rest of 2.0's interface.
-
- Questions, comments, suggestions, and even answers are welcome :)
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:23:48 on 92/07/22 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Selective Process KILL then SHUTDOWN
- Ref: Append at 12:58:57 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM) -
-
- Quick fix:
-
- Don't start your application from the WPS. If you want to be able to
- do so, then instead of starting the application itself, start a CMD
- that does a START. Then the CMD, which is all the WPS is aware of,
- will be long gone before you shut down, so it won't automatically
- start when you reboot.
-
- John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:26:33 on 92/07/22 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: How close is LS to WPS?
- Ref: Append at 15:17:09 on 92/07/22 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
-
- My understanding is that the present code is one-way. Whenever you
- log on, LS uses the same code that your compiler install did to
- create Public Applications afresh.
-
- I'd be willing to bet that the sort of thing you're thinking of is in
- the list of long-term plans, though.
-
- John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:08:40 on 92/07/23 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 19:35:15 on 92/07/21 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
-
- Gee, I thoght that IBM and Apple had agreements that should culminate in net-
- working solutions for mixed networks. If this is not in the immediate future,
- then I guess I'll have to abandon LAN Servrer 2.0 or OS/2 2.0 or both. We need
- Appletalk support on a server that is running OS/2 2.0 - can't do that with Net
- ware or MS Lan Manager right now! From what been told - it's comming real soon
- and I'd like to believe that it's true. Any thoughts?
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:40:41 on 92/07/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 01:08:40 on 92/07/23 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
-
- The document I have recommends Netware when "Apple or Unix clients
- are on the LAN". It does not mention Appletalk by name. Perhaps
- Novell has a "Netware for Apple" that is not the same thing as
- Appletalk? But I'm just guessing....
-
- I'm afraid this is really out of my reckoning. I'm only just
- learning how to work with LAN Server, having never used a LAN for
- anything else but SNA, and know nothing about Netware at all -- I
- just happen to have this IBM summary sheet in front of me.
-
- In any case, note that IBM says "IBM is committed to enhance our
- customers' investment in OS/2 and IBM OS/2 LAN Server." Not
- "protect", but "enhance".
-
- John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:55:06 on 92/07/23 GMT (by XXACNI16 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: net805 disconnect
- I have a network application running in Foxbase from a dos 5 dlr work
- station to an os/2 2.0 server. I have set the autodisconnect parameter
- in the ibmlan.ini on the server to -1, but after about an hour the
- foxbase application stops with a net805 error on the fileset the
- application is running on. I did not upgrade the user with LS 2.0
- version of DLR because they are really tight on memory and I cant risk
- losing any. So, my question is - is there anything new I have to set
- in LS 2.0 to avoid disconnect, or is it probably DLR? Thanks.
-
- Sharon Harper, Technical Analyst
- Nielsen Marketing Research
- (416) 475-1131 x2618
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:13:41 on 92/07/23 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Future of LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 20:40:41 on 92/07/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
-
- I guess the iritating part about this is the fact that Microsoft's LAN Man-
- ager product can do just what I want - but no support for running it on OS/2
- 2.0, as far as I know it only operates on Microsoft's OS/2 1.3. They implement
- this entirely on the PC by allowing multiple protocols - Appletalk can be pur-
- chased for an additional fee, but it is available. The Mac users see nothing
- but their standard System 7.0 network interface - or so I have been led to
- believe.
-
- Netware only supports OS/2 2.0 as a requestor - not as a server, again as far I
- as I understand. I just read about a Boston Computer Society meeting that I
- missed where a rep from IBM described the relationship with Apple. I wish I
- could have asked her this question. One of the four goals of the partnership
- as I remember, had to do with recognizing the Mac as part of IBM's corporate
- strategy - with references to connectivity. Oh well, in a few weeks the
- Windows and OS/2 conference will be here and I can bother them about it.
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:22:51 on 92/07/23 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: netpopup blanks windows screen
-
- Can someone help.
- When netpopup screen pop ups while I'm in a windows application
- my screen goes black. I have to Shift-Esc to get screen back.
- Windows is running full screen VGA. While desktop is XGA.
-
- Byron Campbell State Universities Retirement System
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:05:20 on 92/07/24 GMT (by CMBRENNA at ATLVMIC1)
- Subject: Problems installing LAN Requester 2.0, error LS10034
- Ref: NONE
-
- I am trying to install an OS/2 Requestor on my workstation
- 8580-A31, with OS/2 2.0, OS/2 ES, and Lan Requestor for OS/2 2.0.
- Everything is fine until I tried to install the Lan Requestor
- I insert the first Diskette and in install a piece of code on my
- Harddrive and then it asks me to insert the Network Adapter Drivers
- diskette, I do this and I get the following message:
- LS10034 - The diskette drive specified does not exist on this
- workstation.
- Any idea's what's wrong? the diskette drive works fine with the first
- install diskette, and it reads/writes fine in normal operation.
- Thanks
- CMB
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:05:37 on 92/07/24 GMT (by MEDP011 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Advanced OS2 LAN Server V2.0 on OS2 V1.3 5050 no DOS Box
-
- If I am running OS2 Advanced LAN Server V2.0 on OS2 V1.3 5050 I do
- not get a DOS Box (session)! How can I load DOS Software on the
- Server itself?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:03:54 on 92/07/24 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Advanced OS2 LAN Server V2.0 on OS2 V1.3 5050 no DOS Box
- Ref: Append at 21:05:37 on 92/07/24 GMT (by MEDP011 at OS2CUST)
-
- The DOS compatability box is not available on an Advanced Server.
- The 386HPFS file system and DOS box are incompatable with each other.
- When the Advanced Server is installed, CONFIG.SYS is updated to
- remove the DOS box if it is present.
-
- You will not be able to run DOS code on the Advanced Server.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:33:38 on 92/07/25 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: netpopup blanks windows screen
- Ref: Append at 23:22:51 on 92/07/23 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
-
- Byron,
- I have seen a PM based NETPOPUP that works much nicer than the text based netpo
- pup. It should be on a BBS site somewhere, and is called NEWPOP. I just found
- it and here is where it may be available,
-
- via modem. call 718-494-0197.. 24hrs 7 days.
-
- I have tried this program and it seems to work very nicely, popping up a PM
- window instead of a text screen.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:59:47 on 92/07/25 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Removing \CMLIB from the server
- I migrated our 1.3 server to 2.0 entry running on 1.30.2 .
- Since the 2.0 server is NOT using the Comm Mgr, and this is
- a DEDICATED server, can I just remove the whole \CMLIB directory??
- Can I remove someting else too?
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:26:15 on 92/07/27 GMT (by 86202260 at EHONE)
- Subject: MS LAN Manager and IBM LAN Server
-
- My customer is currently running MS LAN manager. Now he wants to install
- OS/2 V2.0. Is there any recent news about the compatibility?
- Microsoft people here say they're waiting for an update to LAN Manager.
- If that's not very near (which I hope) I'll be able to sell our
- LAN Server to him. Anyone heard any news on this please?
- Aysin
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:02:07 on 92/07/27 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Selective Process KILL then SHUTDOWN
- Ref: Append at 12:58:57 on 92/07/22 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM)
-
- Add the following line to your CONFIG.SYS
-
- SET RESTARTOBJECTS=STARTUPFOLDERSONLY
-
- This will allow things to start automatically that are in your STARTUP
- folder or in STARTUP.CMD
-
- Start your app from STARTUP.CMD after you start your server.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:13:51 on 92/07/27 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: Append at 15:05:28 on 92/07/22 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
-
- The easiest way to set up PUBLIC APPLICATIONS is to call it from a
- batch file. When defining it, choose "VIO" as the program type.
- All of our batch files have
- @echo off
- start /dos /FS (for a dos full screen app)
- start /dos /win (for a dos app in a window)
- start (for OS/2 app in window)
- start /fs (for OS/2 full screen)
- start /pm (for PM apps)
- exit (to close the window that STARTed the app)
-
- I believe that OS/2 2.0 will sense that a prgram is OS/2, DOS, or
- WINOS2 and start the correct session if just use the START command.
-
- I have tried running the windows CLOCK.EXE program from and OS/2 window
- and it opened a WINOS2 session to run it under.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:05:41 on 92/07/27 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
-
- An application written to run on 1.3 and 2.0 to display
- logged on users works differently under each OS/2 system.
- Under 1.3 NetLogonEnum shows more users than NetSessionEnum
- while under 2.0 it is reversed. I found this out by trial and
- error. So, I now ask the question: what is the difference
- between a session and a logon? Why the difference between
- 1.3 and 2.0?
-
- Alan Kerl - New York Life Insurance Co.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:36:02 on 92/07/27 GMT (by STEINBOJ at WMAVM7)
- Subject: MS LAN Manager and IBM LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 12:26:15 on 92/07/27 GMT (by 86202260 at EHONE)
-
- The only "update" coming out for MS LAN Manager is updated requester
- code to enable workstations to run MS Lan Man on OS/2 2.0. Servers
- will still be restricted to OS/2 1.3 (which is unfortunate, since
- servers are often the computers which can benefit most from > 16MB
- of useable memory). The workstation code for Lan Man on 2.0 is currently
- in beta test. MS has stated that they have no plans to support Lan Man
- servers on an OS/2 2.0 base, since they expect such potential servers
- to migrate to NT when it is available.
-
- John Steinbock
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:31:39 on 92/07/27 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Diskless install of LAN Services and Extended Services
- Ref: NONE
-
- For those of you who are installing LS and ES remotely using
- SRVIFS, I have verified that LS and ES can be installed without
- booting in between the installs.
-
- For the patch to the LSINST process that allows this to work,
- send a note to:
- N$H52HAL at RALVM11
-
- If you need the LSINST package to allow you to do the diskless
- LS install, you can request this package from VM:
- REQUEST LSINST FROM SWSMITH AT RALVM29
-
- Hal Humphrey
- N$H52HAL at RALVM11
- TL 441-0732
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:35:25 on 92/07/28 GMT (by ZJLH07 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NETAUDITCLEAR
-
- (no text entered)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:36:26 on 92/07/28 GMT (by ZJLH07 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NETAUDITCLEAR
-
- After issueing a NETAUDITCLEAR with the Backup option how does one go about get
- ting to the archived logs created by netauditclear ?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:51:56 on 92/07/28 GMT (by SAILING at RHQVM02)
- Subject: DUAL PRINTING
- HI, I WAS WONDERING IF ANYONE CAN HELP ME. I HAVE A PRINT SERVER RUNNING
- OS/2 2.0. I AM TRYING TO RUN 2 PRINTERS OFF OF THE SAME PRINT SERVER
- IF ANYONE HAS ANY POINTERS OR IDEAS I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THEM
- THANKS....ALEX HARRISON
- 8/826-4558
- SOMERS, NY
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:32:11 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Requesters
-
- I just purchased 2 OS/2 LAN Server (Entry,2.0) packages. I have the following
- questions:
-
- 1. How many requester licenses doew LAN Server give me?
-
- 2. How many of these licenses are OS/2 and how many are DOS?
-
- 3. If I have users who are now DLR users and they switch to OS/2
- can they change to an OS/2 Requester without charge?
-
- 4. What is the maximum number of users I can have on a domain?
- Am I limited to the number of sessions, or is their a
- maximum number of users set within the software?
- Is their a greater number of users available with Advanced LS as
- opposed to Entry LS?
-
- Eric Brunsen
- Eastern New Mexico University
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:12:31 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DUAL PRINTING
- Ref: Append at 20:51:56 on 92/07/28 GMT (by SAILING at RHQVM02)
-
- Aex,
- That should work ok with OS/2 LAN Server, I think it supports up to 7? (maybe
- 6) per server - 3 parallel printers and 3-4 serial printers. You could also
- have network attached printers with IBM's 4033, or HP Network Printer interface
- s. HP supports up to 6 network attached printers per server.
- If using a ISA bus clone, watch your serial and parallel port interupts closely
- .
- As far as performance goes, use parallel ports if possible - it will move the
- print files quicker to the printer.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:15:37 on 92/07/29 GMT (by CTLC036 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 lan req on ethernet
-
- We have several PC's that are attached to the ethernet running OS/2 1.3.
- To access the mainframe, they go accross an 8209 bridge to the token ring,
- then in through a TIC on the 3745. They also use LAN Req. to get to a
- OS/2 server on the token ring. We had several problems with LAN Req. logon
- prior to WR05050, but this CSD seemed to clear them up.
- We started to install OS/2 2.0 on these machines and Comm. Mgr. is working fine
- but LAN Req. will not access the servers. They come back with an error:
- 'Remote node or Domain Server not currently availible'. We have installed
- OS/2 2.0 on several PC's on the token ring and they seem to be working fine.
- Any suggestions or are there any current problems open?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:45:46 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL71568 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: TOKEN RING BUSSMASTERS ON IBM PS/2 & LAN SERVER
-
- WHEN WILL I BE ABLE TO USE THE BUSSMASTER CARD I BOUGHT A YEAR AGO
- FOR MY DOMAIN CONTROLLER? OS/2 1.3 DOESN'T SUPPORT IT. I WAS TOLD THAT
- OS2/2.0 WILL (AND IT DOES) BUT THEN I CAN'T USE LAN SERVER 2.0 BECAUSE
- IT WILL ONLY RUN UNDER OS/2 1.3.
-
- JOE KAMPF - MONTANA POWER COMPANY
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:10:33 on 92/07/29 GMT (by SYKES at ATLSER) -
- Subject: TOKEN RING BUSSMASTERS ON IBM PS/2 & LAN SERVER
- Ref: Append at 15:45:46 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL71568 at OS2CUST)
-
- Lan Server 2.0 supports it today on either OS/2 1.3 or 2.0.
-
- Bill Sykes
- PROFS: ATLVM10(SYKES) IBMMAIL: USIB14BG
- Internet: Sykes@atlvm10.vnet.ibm.com
-
- From: SYKES at ATLSER
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:28:21 on 92/07/29 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: net.acc
-
- What are the differences between the net.acc files in IBM Lan Server
- 2.0 and Microsoft LAN Manager 2.0? If I backup the MS Lan man
- net.acc with backacc, will I be able to restore it to a LAN Server 2.0
- server (assuming I keep the same server name)? I don't want to have
- to add all 240 user ids and groups when I change to LAN Server. If
- possible I would like to see a migration utility from IBM to make the
- switch. I don't like the MS idea of not supporting OS/2 beyond 1.3
- as a server platform. Who knows when NT will be stable enough (or
- even there) to support a production server environment.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:29:57 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL32771 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 RIPL PERFORMANCE
-
- I am trying to find out if I can RIPL 80 OS/2 PC's at the same time. I have
- read previous messages that said 32 was a recommended maximum when using OS/2
- LAN Server advanced. It did not say what hardware this was using. I am using
- a PS/2 Mod 90 as a server and will upgrade it to a 486/50Mhz processor and 36MB
- of memory. Does anyone know if this system will be able to handle RIPLing 80
- PC's? Also, in a previous message I say a tuning tip that suggested
- "increasing the amount of RIPL files which are stored in RAM on the server".
- Does anyone know how to do this? Has anyone used a RAM disk to load the copy
- of OS/2 that is used for RIPLing. If so, do the files have to be copied every
- time you reboot to the RAM disk?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 10:56:43 on 92/07/30 GMT (by QUINN at DKIBMVM2)
- Subject: TOKEN RING BUSSMASTERS ON IBM PS/2 & LAN SERVER
- Ref: Append at 15:45:46 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL71568 at OS2CUST)
-
- In order to use a Token Ring Busmaster adapter on a server you need the
- following software:
-
- OS/2 2.0
- LAN SERVER 2.0 (Entry Edition)
-
- Your problem is that you are use LAN SERVER 2.0 (Advanced Edition). The
- Advanced Edition ONLY works with OS/2 1.3. You must obtain the ENTRY EDITION
- of LAN SERVER 2.0 to use the Busmaster card on a OS/2 2.0 server.
-
- Quinn Plattel (Network Administrator)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:45:41 on 92/07/30 GMT (by A157623 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 lan req on ethernet
-
- This is for CTLC036, problem of 7/29/92 15:15:37
-
- Try looking at the settings of ETHERAND_TYPE in the PROTOCOL.INI file. We
- have set all of ours for the IBM default installation value of I to D. Now
- we can access 1.3 and 2.0 servers.
-
- I do have an open problem with IBM concerning one of our Model 70 PS2 machines.
- It can access the lan via TCP/IP but the Lan Requester Logon fails every time.
- Not sure if that is your problem. When I know more, I will post the findings.
-
- Larry Mason
- Texas Instruments
-
- ref CTLC036
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:45:02 on 92/07/30 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS/2 RIPL PERFORMANCE
- Ref: Append at 18:29:57 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL32771 at OS2CUST)
-
- The question is not really how many RIPL machines you can hang off
- of one server, but what level of performance you are expecting at
- the RIPL clients. The magic number of 32 means that below that
- number of RIPL clients, performance should be good. Above 32
- RIPL machines, performance will degrade. We have 64 RIPL machine
- configurations in our development labs, it works.....but....
-
- There are many other concerns in your configuration beyond just
- the server hardware, like what version of OS/2 you will be RIPLing,
- will you be keeping the SWAPPER file on the RIPL machine or the
- server, which package of LAN Server(Entry or Advanced) are you
- using, and many more.....
-
- No one can give you a definitive answer on acceptable performance,
- you will have to decide for yourself. But, I think that you should
- consider splitting the RIPL task onto multiple additional servers.
-
- To answer your other questions, yes you can move some of the
- files used by RIPL to other locations to help performance.
- This is done through mappings in the FIT files.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:29:58 on 92/07/30 GMT (by IL54079 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: aliases for logon domain
-
- Can someone tell me whether there's any way to define external resource
- printers so that they can be shadowed out of the "Aliases for the
- Logon Domain" folder? This folder shows up under the Network->LAN server
- folder, but is empty.
-
- We can drag the shadow for the print devices directly out of the
- server folder (we use othdomains= to make the printer domain visible),
- but this gets us into difficulty if we have to move printers around in the
- print domain -- aliases work much better since they provide a level of
- abstraction for the printers.
-
- Reed Snellenberger
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:24:57 on 92/07/30 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
- Ref: Append at 15:05:41 on 92/07/27 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
-
- These APIs have not changed between 1.3 and 2.0, so I don't
- understand how you are getting different results?
-
- NetLogonEnum returns all the users who were validated by the
- server when they logged on, During logon they have a session, but
- the session will disappear if the user is not using any resources
- at the server that performed the validation. So users returned
- by NetLogonEnum may or may not be returned by NetSessionEnum (and
- vice versa).
-
- NetSessionEnum returns the list of users who have a session (to
- use resources) on the server.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:40:58 on 92/07/30 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: net.acc
- Ref: Append at 18:28:21 on 92/07/29 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- The file structure of net.acc is identical for Lan Manager and
- Lan Services, the migration utilities should work fine.
-
- The only difference in the use of fields is that Lan Manager uses
- the SCRIPTS path in the user record to store the path to the logon
- script. Lan Services does not use this field for anything. The
- information for initial logon processing for Lan Services is kept
- in the profile.cmd (for the user) and the DCDB.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:13:33 on 92/07/31 GMT (by IL32771 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 RIPL PERFORMANCE
- Ref: Append at 13:45:02 on 92/07/30 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
-
- When you RIPL your 64 stations, how long does it take to boot up? Are you also
- getting Extended Services 1.0 from the server? I would like to be able to boot
- up the 80 PC's within 5 minutes. This would include OS/2 2.0 base and ES 1.0. I
- will not hold you to it, but do you think this is possible with 1 server?
-
- Rick Kisling
- Des Moines, IA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:49:09 on 92/07/31 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS/2 RIPL PERFORMANCE
- Ref: Append at 01:13:33 on 92/07/31 GMT (by IL32771 at OS2CUST)
-
- RIPLing 64 machines takes a good deal longer than 5 minutes, even
- under the most ideal circumstances. You have the right idea by
- spending your money on high-power server hardware, but that is
- only one piece of the performance puzzle. Many other factors
- like network protocol, network load, bridges and RIPL client
- hardware constraints come into play.
-
- We do include ES in some of our RIPL testing configurations, but
- I don't think that is part of our 64 machine testing. If you plan
- on having all software (base OS/2 plus ES) reside on the RIPL
- server, then there is no way to RIPL all 80 machines from one
- RIPL server using LAN Server 2.0
-
- LAN Server 2.0 has a maximum limit of 8K files open on the server.
- Each RIPL client maintains about 70 open files for the base
- OS/2 2.0 operating system.
- Each RIPL client will open somewhere between 50 - 100 files for
- ES, depending upon your ES configuration.
- This works out to allow somewhere between 48 - 68 RIPL clients
- maximum per server for the configuration that you are suggesting.
-
- There are ways that you can work around these numbers. If you
- kept more files on the local hard disk, then that works out
- to be less open files on the server. For example, keeping all
- of your ES files on the RIPL client hard disk would help.
-
- To achieve your 5 minute performance expectations, then you
- absolutely must have multiple RIPL servers and should strongly
- consider keeping ES on the RIPL client local hard disk. For top
- performance, keep the ratio of RIPL clients per server low.
- Remember the magic number of 32 RIPL clients per server......
- 82 RIPL clients divided by 32 RIPL clients per server equals
- 3 RIPL servers. Even with 3 RIPL servers, I cannot guarantee
- you will achieve the 5 minute boot.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:56:30 on 92/07/31 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NET3062 Again...System Acct Not Config Correctly?
-
- I am getting Net3062 error again when I try to start my Domain Controller
- Server. I have had this problem before and corrected the problem by
- following the steps in Network Admin Ref #2 3-48 and in OS2BBS item -
- Append at 5:47 on 92/07/09. When I enter the command on the domain controller,
- NET USER (additional server name) "", The logon window appears so I logged
- on with an administrative ID, then I get message "The remote node or
- domain server is not currently available", I click on ok then receive
- message NET3672 - you are not currently logged on. Then when I check The
- NET.ERR file under \IBMLAN\LOGGS it contains message "The user accounts
- system is not configured correctly". Has anyone experienced this problem
- or know of a solution???...........
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:57:10 on 92/08/01 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
- Ref: Append at 19:24:57 on 92/07/30 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
-
- Thanks for the reply, does your response mean that
- the logon sessions should be at least equal to the
- number of users with sessions? If so this is not what
- I was getting back from the NetLogon API. It did
- return some, but not all the users logged on. I
- just wanted to understand the process and share this
- with others.....
-
- Alan Kerl - New York Life Insurance Co.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 07:32:44 on 92/08/03 GMT (by STEPHENC at SYDVM1)
- Subject: LAN Tracing programs that don't "behave"
-
- A "well behaved" LAN Tracing tool sends a "Trace Present
- Frame" to the LAN (Network) Manager functional address when
- begining a trace...
-
- LAN (Network) Manager then has the option of removing the "tracing"
- adapter if it is set accordingly...
-
- I want to know if the fact that LAN (Network) Manager removes
- "tracing" adapters is a secure process, ie: does anyone know of
- "unbehaved" LAN tracing programs that don't announce their presence
- with a "Trace Present Frame"
-
- Stephen Carpenter, STEPHENC @ SYDVM1
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:07:51 on 92/08/03 GMT (by PNWB016 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: PrfWriteProfileString slow to LAN drive
-
- Has anyone seen a problem were the PrfWriteProfile family of OS/2 2.0 APIs
- are MUCH slower when done to LAN drives?(APIs used to maintain .INI files.)
-
- I have a program that runs in 5 seconds when done to a local drive and
- 25 seconds when done to a LAN redirected drive. (All the program does is
- 10 PrfWriteProfileString calls.)
-
- I've opened an ETR, and so far we have determined that this problem does NOT
- happen to the LAN that support in Boca uses. They are running with 2.0
- on both the requestor and server, my configuration is 2.0 (with 2.0 redirector)
- on the requestor and OS/2 1.3 (with Lan Server 1.3 at WR05050) on the
- server.
-
- The problem appears to be 2.0 related, since the same program run on a 1.3
- workstation has no performance difference between LAN and local drives. I
- have checked the WRKHEURISTICS and found nothing out of the ordinary between
- the 1.3 and 2.0 levels.
-
- Any suggestions on things to look at? Has anybody else seen this problem
- when storing .INI files on redirected drives? Thanks for ANY suggestions.
- Wayne "No space to store INI files on my local drive" Holmes
- U S WEST Communications
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:22:27 on 92/08/03 GMT (by CHARLIEB at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Requesters
- Ref: Append at 00:32:11 on 92/07/29 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST)
-
- My answers follow each question.
-
- 1. How many requester licenses does LAN Server give me?
-
- The LAN Server 2.0 -- Entry package does not give you any requester
- licenses. You must purchase these separately. A requester license
- is called a "distributed feature license". Even if you have multiple
- servers you need only one distributed feature per requesters.
-
- 2. How many of these licenses are OS/2 and how many are DOS?
-
- Each distributed feature license gives you the right to install one
- requester machine whether it's OS/2 or DOS.
-
- 3. If I have users who are now DLR users and they switch to OS/2
- can they change to an OS/2 Requester without charge?
-
- Yes, if you currently have LAN Server 1.3 and use the special promotional
- upgrade (which expires on August 24), you will get a distributed feature
- license for LAN Server 2.0 for each requester currently in use.
-
- 4. What is the maximum number of users I can have on a domain?
- Am I limited to the number of sessions, or is their a
- maximum number of users set within the software?
- Is their a greater number of users available with Advanced LS as
- opposed to Entry LS?
-
- There is no set limit to the number of users per domain, it is only limited
- by performance. There is a limit of 254 sessions per LAN Adapter on a
- server. Advanced LS will support significantly more users on a given
- server because it performs better.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:24:24 on 92/08/03 GMT (by CHARLIEB at AUSVM1)
- Subject: TOKEN RING BUSSMASTERS ON IBM PS/2 & LAN SERVER
- Ref: Append at 10:56:43 on 92/07/30 GMT (by QUINN at DKIBMVM2)
-
- Sorry, Quinn, this is wrong. The Token Ring busmaster adapter is supported
- by LAN Server 2.0 -- Entry on both OS/2 1.3 and OS/2 2.0, and by LAN Server
- 2.0 -- Advanced on OS/2 1.3.
-
- The greatest benefit is gained with LAN Server 2.0 -- Advanced.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:31:47 on 92/08/03 GMT (by IL36962 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Alias Creation and User Configuration
-
- Is there any way with either the net command and REXX or the C APIs to
- create an alias and access control profile and add it to each user's
- definition assigned to a logical drive?I know I can use the net alias
- and net access commands in a REXX command file but I cannot find a way
- to assign a logical drive to the alias in each user's definition like
- you can in the full screen interface.
-
- Brian McManamon
- Ford Credit
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:25:07 on 92/08/04 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
- Ref: Append at 02:57:10 on 92/08/01 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
-
- There is no permanent correlation between NetLogonEnum and
- NetSessionEnum. The reason I use permanent is that the validation
- process will set up a session. If the session times out because the
- user is not using any resources at that server, he is STILL logged
- on.
-
- All users who are validated by a server are kept in a table.
- The users in the table are then periodically polled and may be removed
- from the table after failing to respond. The users are also removed
- from the logon table when they logoff. NetLogonEnum is returning the
- list of users in the table.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:02:13 on 92/08/04 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: TOKEN RING BUSSMASTERS ON IBM PS/2 & LAN SERVER
- Ref: Append at 18:24:24 on 92/08/03 GMT (by CHARLIEB at AUSVM1)
-
- > Yes, if you currently have LAN Server 1.3 and use the special promotional
- > upgrade (which expires on August 24), you will get a distributed feature
- > license for LAN Server 2.0 for each requester currently in use.
-
- When or how are we supposed to get the "distributed feature license" ?
- I have several customers that have upgraded to LS Entry 2.0 (including our-
- selves), the package came, but no "DFL's".
-
- Do we need to call someone and specify the number of DFL's ? Will they just
- show up one day or what?
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:18:47 on 92/08/04 GMT (by CHARLIEB at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Distributed feature licenses
- Ref: Append at 15:02:13 on 92/08/04 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
-
- Paul, I am not in marketing, I am in development. I'd recommend you
- see your IBM marketing rep on this question of whether or not you got
- the distributed feature licenses. I have seen the promotional upgrade
- form, and you are supposed to indicate how many requesters you have
- actively using the LAN Server 1.3 server. This is supposed to trigger
- the distributed feature licenses coming back to you in your upgrade
- package.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:37:10 on 92/08/05 GMT (by 84816403 at EHONE)
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: Append at 15:05:28 on 92/07/22 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
-
- I did just that, creating a .cmd file on the server (to start AMIPRO)
- but it didn't help. Starting the application from the public
- applications folder I get 'Cannot start RAS2.EXE'. If I put the
- .cmd file on my requester and start it from an OS/2 command prompt
- it works.
-
- Gary Christen, IBM Switzerland (CHR at CHVM1)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:00:39 on 92/08/05 GMT (by QUINN at DKIBMVM2)
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: Append at 13:37:10 on 92/08/05 GMT (by 84816403 at EHONE)
-
- Have you set the required program type? (OS/2 PM;Protmode;VIO). You must use
- VIO program type to execute CMD files in Public Applications.
-
- Quinn Plattel (Network Administrator)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:59:09 on 92/08/05 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 14:54:09 on 92/08/06 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Diskless install of OS/2 2.0 BASE + LS + ES
- Ref: NONE
-
- The final release of the LSINST package is now available.
- This release supports
- 1) Install of LAN Services from a remote drive letter (across LAN)
- 2) Has "response file" type capability (workstations can be
- configured by user or admin)
- 3) Extended Services can be installed immediately after LAN Services
- (No re-boot needed betweee installs)
-
- To offer this service to users in your area, enter this command on VM
-
- REQUEST LSINST FROM SWSMITH AT RALVM29
-
- The package includes
- 1) A utility diskette to help you set up your own server
- 2) A copy of MY server (You can use this in your area--most people do)
- 3) Admin documentation
- 4) User documentation
- 5) Two disks that are set up to connect to a SRVIFS server and install
- OS/2 2.0 BASE, LS, and ES.
-
- If you have any questions, contact:
- Hal Humphrey
- N$H52HAL AT RALVM11
- TL 441-0732
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 09:19:15 on 92/08/06 GMT (by 84816403 at EHONE)
- Subject: Public Windows Applications
- Ref: Append at 14:00:39 on 92/08/05 GMT (by QUINN at DKIBMVM2)
-
- I made it| Got AMIPRO running from the server, it's just a matter of
- reading all documentation. In the samples docs is a readme.sam, there
- they point to readnet.txt if you install on a network. If you follow
- the instructions AMIPRO is added as an application to the program
- manager of WIN-OS/2 full screen and can be started from there.
- No need for defining it as a public application. This works for
- AMIPRO but I assume it would be the same for other LOTUS Windows
- applications.
-
- Gary Christen, IBM Switzerland (CHR at CHVM1)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:08:25 on 92/08/06 GMT (by NAAG8T6 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Lan Server overnight
-
- Last nite, I booted my machine and went home. My desktop has auto lockup after
- 15 minutes, and the lock screen was present when I got in this morning. There
- are 3 items in my startup folder: Lan Server, Netware Tools, and my personal
- folder. Lan Server and Netware logon windows were there when I unlocked. The
- Lan Server logon failed with a message 'Requested network not found' (approx.),
- the network being 'LS'. It persisted in failing although the server had been
- up all night, until I selected Cancel in the error box, and reran the Lan
- Server icon (that worked). The Netware logon worked.
-
- Bruce Ferrero (Aetna)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:56:57 on 92/08/06 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Diskless install of OS/2 2.0 BASE + LS + ES
- Ref: Append at 19:59:09 on 92/08/05 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
-
- There was a typo in the REQUEST line
- REQUEST LSINST from SWSMITH at RALVM29
- -------
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:41:03 on 92/08/06 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Diskless install of OS/2 2.0 BASE + LS + ES
- Ref: Append at 14:56:57 on 92/08/06 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
-
- Is the infomation on how to do a remote install of LS & ES available
- to us customers also?
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:47:23 on 92/08/06 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
- Ref: Append at 14:25:07 on 92/08/04 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
-
- OK, to give my problem some real numbers, I have a single
- domain and today our Domain Controller took a hit and had to be
- re-IPL'd. NetLogonEnum reports 7 users logged on, NetSessionEnum
- reports 11 sessions on the DC and NET WHO reports 26 users logged
- on. Curious, half the users show up logged on time-wise before the
- DC was borught back up, so I guess they were in "the table".
-
- Bottom line is I need to be able to display the users logged on
- to the domain (like NET WHO) and am having difficulty understanding
- why NetLogonEnum will not give me this information???
-
- Thanks,
-
- Alan Kerl - New York Life Insurance Co.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:20:00 on 92/08/06 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Showing users Logged on with NeTLogonEnum
- Ref: Append at 20:47:23 on 92/08/06 GMT (by NAAC4E8 at OS2CUST)
-
- Net Who is a list of users on all the servers in the domain.
- The list of servers in a domain can be obtained with the
- NetServerEnum API. The other people are probably on another server
- in the domain. Also if a userid/machine pair is returned more than
- once, only the time from the first occurence is displayed because the
- list of users returned from each call are merged.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 11:51:15 on 92/08/07 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
-
- HELLO EVERYBODY,
- DOES ANYONE KNOW IF REMOTE PRINTING IS SUPPORTED UNDER LANSERVER 1.3 OR
- 2.0? CAN A PRINTER ATTACHED TO A DOS LAN REQ OR OS/2 REQ BE ACCESSED BY
- OTHER WORKSTATIONS OR MUST ALL PRINTERS BE ATTACHED TO A SERVER?
-
- I KNOW NOVELL SUPPORTS THIS. IF NOT ANY IDEAS?
-
- THANKS FOR THE INPUT.....
-
- LOU BREIT, DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:32:17 on 92/08/07 GMT (by MAKMWY at HKGVM8)
- Subject: LAN Server 2.0 UPS Service
-
- Please help!!!
-
- I installed OS/2 2.0 and LAN Server 2.0 Entry and use serial port COM1
- to test a UPS supplied Merlin Gerin Company. The UPS machine support
- all three signals - line failure, low battery and UPS shutdown.
- I tested it using PS/2 Model 80-111 and Model 95-0KF. Results were
- very different and neither of the two models worked according to what
- the manual - Network Admin Ref. Vol 3. Appendix B.
-
- 1. When I tested with model 80-111, using the following parameters:
-
- signals = 111
- voltlevel = 111
- batterymsg = 60
- batterytime = 90
- lowbattery = warning
- messdelay = 5
- messtime = 60
-
- After a power failure, a power failure message was displayed every 60 sec
- correctly for about 30 mins. Then a low battery message was displayed.
- However, the server never shutdown itself.
-
- I also tested that if power was restored after a AC line current failure
- the server could generate a power restored message correctly.
-
- Then I recharged the battery of UPS and changed the parameter to
- lowbattery = shutdown and start the testing process all over again. he
- This time, after the power failure message repeated every 60 seconds
- for 30 mins, a shutdown message was displayed and after about 2 minutes
- a final shutdown message was displayed. Then the machine stopped and
- the UPS was also shutdown.
-
- About the testing with PS/2 model 80-111, I have the following
- questions:
-
- 1.1 According to the Network Admin Ref Vol 3, appendix B-2, the
- lowbattery parameter should take effect only when AC line current
- is available. However, in my test with Model 80-111, it
- seems that the lowbattery parameter take effect even when AC line
- current is NOT available. Was it a mistake of the manual, or a
- LAN Server problem, or a hardware problem?
-
- 1.2 In my test, there was no low battery warning message before the
- shutdown message. Would the server display a low battery warning
- message before a shutdown message?
-
- 1.3 What is the length of the time between the server getting a low
- battery signal from UPS and generating a final shutdown message?
-
- 1.4 According to the manual page B-3, batterytime is time between
- power failure and shutdown and is effective only when there is no
- low battery signal. On the same manual page B-6 fig. B-3,
- the diagram indicates that the time between low battery and shutdown
- is determined by the batterytime value. This seems to be an
- obvious contradiction. Please clarify.
-
- 2. Then I tested the UPS using PS/2 Model 95-0KF, using the following
- parameters:
-
- signals = 111
- voltlevel = 111
- batterymsg = 60
- batterytime = 90
- lowbattery = warning
- messdelay = 5
- messtime = 60
-
- When AC line current is available, I started the UPS service.
- Immediately after the service was started, a low battery signal was
- displayed. However, I am sure that the UPS was running in full battery
- at that time and the UPS did not generated any low battery signal.
- The low battery signal was generated just once. It was never repeated
- according to the batterymsg value. According to the engineer of the
- UPS vendor, the UPS would never generate any low battery signal when
- AC line current is available.
-
- Then I disconnected the AC line current, there was no power failure
- message was displayed at the server. Nothing at all happened at the
- server.
-
- Then I tested using Model 95-0KF again using the following parameters:
-
- signals = 101
- voltlevel = 101
- batterymsg = 60
- batterytime = 90
- lowbattery = warning
- messdelay = 5
- messtime = 60
-
- When AC line current is available, I started the UPS service. Power was
- obviously OK but the server displayed a power failure message. After
- 90 sec, it displayed a shutdown message and completed machine shutdown
- and shutdown the UPS also.
-
- About the testing with PS/2 model 95-0KF, I have the following
- questions:
-
- 2.1 Why did the model 80-111 detect power failure correctly but the
- model 95-0KF just detect the reverse? Power failure signal should
- be generated by the same UPS through the same pin and at the same
- voltage to detected by the same software. Is there any different
- between the serial port of Model 80-111 and Model 95-0KF that
- can cause this?
- I read from a SETI saying that there are differences between
- type II and type III serial ports. Was it related this problem?
-
- 2.2 Please give a full description of the pin assignment and voltage
- specification for PS/2 model 95 serial port to work with
- LAN Server 2.0 UPS service. Is it the same as Microsoft LAN Manager
- 2.0 UPS service?
-
- 2.3 What is meant by "contact closure UPS" and "signal UPS"? What are
- the differences between them?
-
- This is urgent as we have to give our recommendation of UPS vendor to
- the customer as soon as possible.
-
- Millie Mak HKGVM8(MAKMWY)
- Finance Marketing Branch, Hong Kong
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:14:25 on 92/08/07 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 11:51:15 on 92/08/07 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- HP has a product that allows a NIC card to be installed in their laser
- printers. You share it on the domain and your print server communicates
- to it via named pipes.
-
- Also, you could set up a pc to be a PCLP server, share printers off that
- and set it up as an external resource on you LS domain.
-
- There are probably other solutions out there, Castelle may have a
- LS/LM solution too.
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:07:44 on 92/08/07 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Diskless install of OS/2 2.0 BASE + LS + ES
- Ref: Append at 14:56:57 on 92/08/06 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
-
- Hit a snag with everyone on vacation and ITO.
- Gave it kick again today.
- Will let you know as soon as it is available to the outside world.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:50:48 on 92/08/07 GMT (by DERIDDER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Survey on LAN Server 2.0 Installation
-
- This survey regards the LAN Services installation program shipped
- with LAN Server 2.0. The survey is intended for persons who have
- installed IBM LAN Server 2.0, especially those who have assisted
- others to install that software.
-
- To participate in the survey, copy it to your personal storage,
- respond to the items, and send the resulting file to DERIDDER at
- AUSVM1 (Mitch DeRidder, LAN Systems Usability, T/L 678-2572).
-
- To copy the survey to your personal storage, issue the following
- command in FORAVIEW or XEDIT:
-
- PUT 578 INSTALL SURVEY A
-
- NOTE: If you are using XEDIT without FORAVIEW, first make
- "Subject" line current (by using the UP or DOWN command), and
- then type the PUT command given above.
-
- PARTICIPANT
-
- Your Name: ___________________________________________
-
- Your Job Title: ______________________________________________
-
- Your IBM location: ________________________
-
- Your VM ID and node: ________ at ________
-
- Your Tie-Line: ________
-
- Indicate which of the following duties are part of your job:
- (Check all that apply, if any.)
-
- ___ Planning LANs
-
- ___ Requesting or ordering LAN hardware
-
- ___ Setting up LAN hardware
-
- ___ Requesting or ordering LAN software
-
- ___ Installing LAN operating systems
-
- ___ Installing LAN applications
-
- ___ Administering access to LAN resources
-
- LAN DEPLOYMENT AND USAGE
-
- 1. For what group(s) do you provide LAN support? (If you do not
- provide LAN support to a group, enter "None" and skip to Item
- 4.)
-
- 2. For the group you most often support, estimate the following:
- (Or enter "DK" for Don't Know.)
-
- a. How many IBM LAN Servers are installed? ________
-
- b. How many IBM OS/2 LAN Requesters are installed? ________
-
- c. How many IBM DOS LAN Requesters are installed? ________
-
- 3. ìThis item was intentionally omitted.┘
-
- 4. Indicate how the LANs at your site are used: (Check all that
- apply, or "DK" if you don't know.)
-
- ___ To access servers running a LAN operating system
-
- ___ To support sessions with other types of host systems
-
- 5. ìThis item was intentionally omitted.┘
-
- USE OF THE LAN SERVICES INSTALLATION PROGRAM
-
- 6. At your site, approximately what percentage of IBM OS/2 LAN
- Requester and LAN Server installations are performed by each
- method? (Enter "DK" if you don't know.)
-
- REQUESTERS SERVERS INSTALLATION METHOD
-
- _______ _______ Advanced Path
-
- _______ _______ Basic Path
-
- +_______ +_______ Custom Diskette
-
- = 100% = 100%
-
- 7. Describe the typical and the least experienced users of the
- REQUESTER BASIC installation path. (Check all that apply.)
-
- Least
- Typical Experienced
- User User Possible Descriptors
- ------- ----------- -------------------------------------
-
- ___ ___ Already knows which LAN protocol drivers
- to use, without being told
-
- ___ ___ Can determine what LAN adapters are
- installed
-
- ___ ___ Is familiar with network services (e.g.,
- Requester and Messenger)
-
- ___ ___ Can navigate among directories from an
- OS/2 or DOS prompt
-
- ___ ___ Knows common OS/2 or DOS commands (e.g.,
- COPY, DIR, and MKDIR)
-
- ___ ___ Can determine what is installed on the
- local drive(s)
-
- ___ ___ Can redirect local drive letters to
- remote directories, as needed.
-
- ___ ___ Runs applications from the OS/2 or
- WIN-OS/2 desktop
-
- ___ ___ Other (Please describe below.)
-
- ___ ___ Not applicable or don't know
-
- 8. Describe the typical and the least experienced users of the
- REQUESTER ADVANCED installation path.
-
- Least
- Typical Experienced
- User User Possible Descriptors
- ------- ----------- -------------------------------------
-
- ___ ___ Already knows which LAN protocol drivers
- to use, without being told
-
- ___ ___ Can determine what LAN adapters are
- installed
-
- ___ ___ Is familiar with network services (e.g.,
- Requester and Messenger)
-
- ___ ___ Can navigate among directories from an
- OS/2 or DOS prompt
-
- ___ ___ Knows common OS/2 or DOS commands (e.g.,
- COPY, DIR, and MKDIR)
-
- ___ ___ Can determine what is installed on the
- local drive(s)
-
- ___ ___ Can redirect local drive letters to
- remote directories, as needed.
-
- ___ ___ Runs applications from the OS/2 or
- WIN-OS/2 desktop
-
- ___ ___ Other (Please describe below.)
-
- ___ ___ Not applicable or don't know
-
- 9. Describe the typical user of the SERVER BASIC installation
- path.
-
- ___ Already knows which LAN protocol drivers to use, without
- being told
-
- ___ Can determine what LAN adapters are installed
-
- ___ Is familiar with network services (e.g., Server and
- Netlogon)
-
- ___ Is skilled at setting up server hardware
-
- ___ Can administer a LAN server
-
- ___ Refers to documentation as needed
-
- ___ Follows written instructions carefully
-
- ___ Solves problems readily
-
- ___ Other (please describe below)
-
- ___ Not applicable or don't know
-
- DESIGN OF THE BASIC PATHS
-
- 10. Which options should be included in the BASIC installation
- paths for IBM OS/2 Requester or LAN Server?
-
- Basic Paths
- -----------------
- Requester Server Possible Features
- --------- ------ -------------------------------------------
-
- ___ ___ Choice of target drive for first-time
- installation
-
- ___ ___ Choice of target drive when an earlier
- version is already installed
-
- N/A ___ Choice of server role (domain controller or
- additional server)
-
- ___ ___ Choice of components to install
-
- ___ ___ Option to entirely remove the software
-
- ___ ___ Choice of components to remove
-
- ___ ___ Choice of components to configure
-
- N/A ___ Option to initialize the domain control
- database
-
- ___ ___ Option to specify the LAN adapter(s)
-
- ___ ___ Option to install LAN adapter drivers
-
- ___ ___ Option to select LAN protocol drivers
-
- ___ ___ Option to edit PROTOCOL.INI settings
-
- ___ ___ Other (please describe below)
-
- ___ ___ Don't know or don't care
-
- 11. It has been suggested that the Basic paths be removed because
- users may take those paths when they actually need some
- features of the Advanced path. What course of action should
- we take for each Basic path? (Check one in each column.)
-
- Basic Paths
- -----------------
- Requester Server Possible Courses of Action
- --------- ------ ------------------------------------------
-
- ___ ___ Leave the path as it is.
-
- ___ ___ Remove the path altogether.
-
- ___ ___ Add the most-needed options to the path.
-
- ___ ___ Modify the path to include the same options
- as the respective Advanced path, but design
- the panels for a less experienced user.
-
- ___ ___ Other (Please describe below.)
-
- ___ ___ Don't know or don't care
-
- 12. If you select the requester Basic installation path on a
- machine that already has the current version of the requester
- installed, you are given a choice of refreshing the existing
- code or changing the LAN names (i.e., the requester and
- default domain names). Are you satisfied with those options?
-
- ___ Very satisfied
-
- ___ Somewhat satisfied
-
- ___ Neutral or don't care
-
- ___ Somewhat dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- ___ Very dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- DESIGN OF THE ADVANCED PATHS
-
- 13. Some confusion may have resulted from our use of "Advanced"
- to denote both an installation path and a server package
- (i.e., "IBM LAN Server 2.0 - Advanced"). How serious was
- this problem at your site?
-
- ___ Very serious
-
- ___ Quite serious
-
- ___ Somewhat serious
-
- ___ Not at all serious
-
- ___ Not applicable or don't care
-
- 14. At the "Install and Remove" window in the Advanced paths, you
- can select components to be installed or removed. How
- satisfied are you with that window?
-
- ___ Very satisfied
-
- ___ Somewhat satisfied
-
- ___ Neutral or don't care
-
- ___ Somewhat dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- ___ Very dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- 15. At the "Configure" window in the Advanced paths, you can
- select components to configure. How satisfied are you with
- that window?
-
- ___ Very satisfied
-
- ___ Somewhat satisfied
-
- ___ Neutral or don't care
-
- ___ Somewhat dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- ___ Very dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- 16. At the "Configure" window, during an initial, Advanced
- installation, you are not required to view configuration
- options for which IBM defaults are set, even though some of
- those settings may be unsuitable. Should users be required to
- view the default settings? (Check one.)
-
- ___ Yes, users should have to view the settings.
-
- ___ No, users should not have to view the settings.
-
- ___ Don't care
-
- 17. At the "Configure Workstation" window in the Advanced paths,
- you can configure LAN protocols and adapter drivers. How
- satisfied are you with that window?
-
- ___ Very satisfied
-
- ___ Somewhat satisfied
-
- ___ Neutral or don't care
-
- ___ Somewhat dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- ___ Very dissatisfied (please explain below)
-
- ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION TASKS
-
- 18. When you install a new additional server, it must be defined
- to its domain controller before it can be started. Has this
- requirement caused problems at your site?
-
- ___ Yes, people often fail to define the additional server.
-
- ___ Yes, people sometimes fail to define the server.
-
- ___ No, this is not a problem for us.
-
- ___ Don't know
-
- 19. Should the installation program attempt to automatically
- define additional servers to their domain controllers?
-
- ___ Yes, it is critically important to make this change to the
- installation program.
-
- ___ Yes, it is quite important to make this change.
-
- ___ Yes, it is somewhat important to make this change.
-
- ___ No, this change is not needed.
-
- ___ No opinion
-
- 20. Soon after installing an LAN Server 2.0 - Advanced server
- with the 386 High Performance File System, a 386 HPFS boot
- diskette should be prepared using either the MAKEDISK utility
- or a manual procedure. In the future, should LAN Services
- installation program attempt to create the boot diskettes
- automatically? (Check one.)
-
- ___ Yes, it is critically important to make this change to the
- installation program.
-
- ___ Yes, it is quite important to make this change.
-
- ___ Yes, it is somewhat important to make this change.
-
- ___ No, this change is not needed.
-
- ___ Not applicable (We don't use the 386 HPFS.)
-
- ___ No opinion
-
- 21. Before you can run OS/2 2.0 remote IPL requesters, you must
- unpack the RIPLINST utility from an OS/2 2.0 installation
- diskette and run it to copy OS/2 2.0 from diskettes. How
- satisfied are you with this procedure?
-
- ___ Very satisfied
-
- ___ Sufficiently satisfied
-
- ___ Neutral or no opinion
-
- ___ Somewhat dissatisfied (Please explain below.)
-
- ___ Very dissatisfied (Please explain below.)
-
- ___ I have not used RIPLINST.
-
- 22. Indicate which of the following alternatives to the existing
- RIPLINST procedure you would prefer. (Check one.)
-
- ___ Alternative 1: Modify RIPLINST so that it provides the
- option of copying OS/2 2.0 diskette images stored by the
- SEINST utility. (This alternative would be useful only if
- you have run SEINST.)
-
- ___ Alternative 2: Modify RIPLINST so that it reads as many
- OS/2 files as possible from the server's fixed disk and
- then requests OS/2 2.0 diskettes to obtain the remaining
- files (e.g., additional printer and display drivers).
-
- ___ Alternative 3: Modify the LAN Services installation
- program so that RIPLINST is no longer needed. The
- installation program would read as many OS/2 files as
- possible from the server's fixed disk and then request
- OS/2 2.0 diskettes to obtain the remaining files.
-
- ___ Other (Please describe below.)
-
- ___ No opinion or don't care
-
- 23. How important is it that we implement the option you selected
- for the preceding item?
-
- ___ Critically important (Please explain below.)
-
- ___ Quite important (Please explain below.)
-
- ___ Somewhat important
-
- ___ Not important at all
-
- ___ No opinion
-
- 24. If you install (or reinstall) remote IPL support during a LAN
- Server installation, you must later run the GETRIPL utility.
- Should the functions of GETRIPL instead be performed
- automatically by the LAN Services installation program?
-
- ___ Yes, it is critically important to incorporate GETRIPL's
- functions into the main installation program.
-
- ___ Yes, it is quite important that this change be made.
-
- ___ Yes, it is somewhat important that this change be made.
-
- ___ No, this change would not be worthwhile.
-
- ___ No opinion
-
- 25. Have you experienced difficulties in migrating from an
- earlier release of LAN Server to LAN Server 2.0?
-
- ___ No, the migration(s) went very smoothly.
-
- ___ Yes, but only minor problems were encountered. (Please
- describe below.)
-
- ___ Yes, serious problems were encountered. (Please
- describe.)
-
- ___ I have not migrated from an earlier release of LAN
- Server.
-
- ___ Don't know.
-
- 26. Use the space below for any additional comments about
- installation of LAN Server 2.0.
-
- 27. Use the space below for any comments about this survey.
-
-
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:02:47 on 92/08/07 GMT (by CHVY002 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multi Domain VS. Single
-
- I am about to configure a WAN that will link 20 locations that will
- be using LAN Server Entry 2.0. All of the workstations that hang off
- of this WAN are IBM PS/2's and are running OS/2 2.0, ES and LR. What are
- the pros and cons of ...A) creating seperate Domains in each location
- vs B) a single Domain? If it is a single Domain do I still run into the old
- IBM restriction of 50 requesters on one Domain before you degrade performance?
-
- John Zawistowski Systems Prog, Chevy Chase FSB
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:55:26 on 92/08/07 GMT (by THRUMD at SYDVM1)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 13:14:25 on 92/08/07 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- Another implementation of this approach is the IBM 4033, which should
- support any brand/type of printer. There are versions for LAN Server
- and Netware.
-
- Dave
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:45:52 on 92/08/10 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 22:55:26 on 92/08/07 GMT (by THRUMD at SYDVM1)
-
- I HAVE ALSO DISCOVERED THAT SHANY SOFTWARE 310-204-0111 MAKES A
- SOFTWARE PRODUCT THAT WILL ALLOW DOS LAN REQ OR OS/2 REQ TO HAVE
- THEIR LOCALLY ATTACHED PRINTERS SHARED BY OTHER USERS ON THE LAN.
-
- I AM AWARE OF THE 4033 AND HP NIC OPTION. HOWEVER THEY ARE EXPENSIVE.
-
- THE MUCH TOUTED BENEFIT OF THE SPEED OF LAN ATTACHED PRINTING AS OPPOSED
- TO PARALLEL PORT PRINTING IS NOT NECESSARILY NOTICEABLE. MY OWN TESTING
- FOUND LITTLE SPEED DIFFERENCE. THE MAIN ADVANTAGE IS THE FLEXIBILITY OF
- PRINTER LOCATION.
-
- I CANNOT COMPREHEND WHY IBM CHOSE NOT TO INCLUDE REMOTE PRINTING IN LANSERVER.
- ANY IDEAS?
-
- LOU BREIT
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:45:40 on 92/08/10 GMT (by HITTR at OS2CUST)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 13:46:04 on 92/08/11 GMT (by HITTR at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multi Domain VS. Single
- Ref: Append at 19:02:47 on 92/08/07 GMT (by CHVY002 at OS2CUST)
-
- John
-
- At the highway department, we have over 500 users defined on one domain control
- ler. The updating of user information is sometimes slow when you use the full
- screen interface, but otherwise there aren't any performance problems. We curr
- ently have everyone in one building in one domain. People attached over split
- bridges have their own domain and access the main office domain filesets as ext
- eranl resources.
-
- At first, all the remote locations were in one domain, but the reliability of o
- ur bridges kept causing synch problems. (Educate yourself about synch problems
- before you implement a multiserver domian.) The bridges normally worked ok, b
- ut the number of components required to operate them caused the problems (power
- outages, line problems, bridge failure, etc). If you are confident of your li
- nk to the main domain then a single domain is much easier.
-
- Multidomains increase the amount of user administration. You will find yoursel
- f logging on and off all the time as well as being an expert at the net admin c
- ommand. Users accessing filesets in other domains also poses a problem since p
- asswords would have to be updated at multiple locations (or not used at all).
-
- The biggest factor is the stability of the communications link. Hope this help
- s.
-
- Bob Hitt, Missouri Highway & Transportation Department
-
- ps An afterthought note, we do have over 500 workstations defined on one domia
- n, but the users access all the servers on this domain as an external resource.
- We have dubbed this the "data domain". Users logon to a print server/domain
- controller which has items in the data domian defined as external resources. I
- t shounds a little complex, but is actually working out pretty well. This does
- require 2 userids defined, but the userids in our "data" domain do not require
- a password. Another benifit of this is that the servers in the data domain on
- ly do file sharing and thus can be tuned for that function.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:34:39 on 92/08/10 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 12:45:52 on 92/08/10 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- Lou, and others
- In my testing with the HP NIC I did see a performance difference, especially
- with heavy graphics/soft fonts. I constructed one page of heavy graphics
- and softfonts, about 2MB worth. It took 4 minutes to print the page on a
- parallel conection, and 3 minutes with a Token Ring connection to the Series
- III HP LJ, 4Mbs token ring. The CPU use on the server also went down 10%
- for the TR connected HP, so I saw two benefits.
- So I guess it will depend on what types of printing an organization does
- whether one of these network interfaces will be of benefit.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:54:13 on 92/08/10 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 11:51:15 on 92/08/07 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- Every printer has to be controlled by a LAN Server. However, every
- printer does not have to be _connected_ to a LAN Server. Instead, it
- can be connected to a 4033, a little green box that plugs into a LAN
- at one end and plugs into one parallel and/or one serial printer at
- the other. Software comes with it that makes it look like LPTx to
- the LAN Server. In other words, printout goes:
-
- From the Requester over the LAN to the Server (to SPOOL), and then
- from the Server SPOOL over the LAN to the 4033 to the printer.
-
- The traffic from the Server to the 4033 is carried on a different SAP
- (sort of a "channel" on the LAN) than the LAN Server traffic, so the
- 4033 is equally compatible with LAN Server, LAN Manager, Netware,
- TCP/IP or SNA, just as long as the Server is running an operating
- system that is supported by the 4033 driver. To the Server, it just
- looks like any other LPTx-attached printer.
-
- LAN Server does not let you print to a printer that is directly
- attached to a requester; however, with a 4033, you _can_ print to a
- printer without having a PC close by to it to drive it. Depending
- on your needs, this may be more or less expensive.
-
- John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:00:35 on 92/08/10 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: LAN Tracing programs that don't "behave"
- Ref: Append at 07:32:44 on 92/08/03 GMT (by STEPHENC at SYDVM1)
-
- Only trace tools which use the IBM TAP chip set will do this. Sniffer
- and the iBM RTAP use it, but many others use the TI chip set.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:11:49 on 92/08/10 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 12:45:52 on 92/08/10 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- You might want to look at Intel's LANSpool Software. 800/538-3373.
- Or, use thei FaxBack line, 800/525-3019 and ask for report/product 9607.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 10:22:10 on 92/08/11 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
- Subject: Access permission on userid basis
- Hi, anyone knows how to display (or print) the access permission
- of each userid defined in the domain ? If this is not possible,
- how to display or print the overall access control profiles ?
- Many thanks !! AMY CHEUNG (CHEUNGLL AT HKGVM8)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:53:24 on 92/08/11 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 22:11:49 on 92/08/10 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- (no text entered)
-
- LOU BREIT
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:55:23 on 92/08/11 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 22:11:49 on 92/08/10 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- Thanks to Tom and everyone else...
- Has anyone had any experience with LANSPOOL and OS/2 LANServer?
- How about any other third party remote printing products.
-
- I heard printing from Lotus 123 may be a problem..
-
- Thanks,
-
- LOU BREIT, Dean Witter Reynolds
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:57:54 on 92/08/11 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Support Options?
-
- Howdy,
-
- Anyone know of any software products that allow dial up to an OS/2
- 1.3 LAN Server/Domain Ctrller for remote control purposes?
-
- Dial up would be via modem from pc to server.
- I am aware of Carbon Copy but it does not support OS/2.
-
- Much Obliged,
-
- LOU BREIT, Dean Witter Reynolds
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:03:17 on 92/08/11 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: LAN Server Performance tests completed by LANQuest Labs
- Ref: None
-
- ***** WARNING - Long APPEND ***** 80 lines to read.
-
- LAN Server, LAN Manager, and NetWare
- Performance Benchmark Comparison
-
- Executive Summary
-
- IBM has improved the performance of LAN Server dramatically in this
- new release. For a number of years, LANQuest Labs' performance
- testing had consistently found Novell's NetWare to be the performance
- leader, with no close competitor. Starting two years ago, we found
- that Microsoft's LAN Manager v2.0 (and later v2.1) had caught up to
- NetWare in performance. However, as recently as last year, our
- testing showed IBM's LAN Server v1.3 was still lagging far behind.
-
- This series of tests demonstrates that such is no longer the case.
- All three network operating systems (NOS's) performed exceptionally
- well, indicating that performance should now be relegated to a
- secondary role when purchasing a LAN/WAN operating system.
- Connectivity, maintainability, support, ease-of-installation,
- security, price and other cost/feature issues should now take the
- leading roles.
-
- The most dramatic finding in these Token Ring tests is that LAN Server
- v2.0 has closed the performance gap with NetWare and LAN Manager. To
- our surprise, we also found that LAN Server and LAN Manager both
- outperformed NetWare. Using the same suite of LANQuest Labs tests as
- in our earlier published reports, we found that with OS/2 as the
- workstations' operating system (OS), LAN Server v2.0 had the best
- overall performance. LAN Manager v2.1 was very close behind, while
- NetWare v3.11 was third. With DOS as the workstations' OS, we found
- that LAN Manager v2.1 had the best overall performance. LAN Server
- v2.0 was very close behind when we used IBM's new and not-yet-released
- NetBios drivers for DOS workstations, referred to in this report as
- "NetBios Beta". With IBM's current NetBios drivers, performance was
- significantly lower than both LAN Manager and LAN Server (NetBios
- Beta), but it was nevertheless nearly equivalent to NetWare 386 v3.11.
- Overall, each of the three operating systems performed exceptionally
- well throughout our tests, and all should be considered state-of-the-
- art.
- Performance Compared to NetWare
- Ratios of Network Performance across a Range of Loads
-
- OS/2 Wkstn Tests NetWare LAN Manager LAN Server
- Lotus for OS/2 1.0 Reference 0.9 Times as Fast 1.1 Times Faster
- DisplayWrite 1.0 2.4 2.4
- XCOPY 1.0 2.6 2.5
- Overall Results* 1.0 1.7 1.8
-
- LAN LAN Server LAN Server
- DOS Wrkstn Tests NetWare Manager (current drvrs) (NetBios Beta)
- Lotus 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.5
- Word 1.0 1.3 0.9 1.2
- dBase 1.0 1.6 0.7 1.4
- Overall Results* 1.0 1.5 0.8 1.4
-
- *Overall Results = Ratios of the Sums of all 15 Test Completion Times-
- 3 Applications with 5 Network Loads per App.
- "2.0" means Twice as Fast as NetWare, i.e. took Half the Time
- to complete the Tests
-
- The vast improvement in LAN Server is primarily due to changes in the
- network operating system's architecture, although two additional
- factors contributed to the performance differences between this and
- earlier LANQuest tests. First, these tests were conducted using Token
- Ring, where both LAN Server and LAN Manager appear to be more
- efficient than NetWare. Second, LAN Manager uses a server/workstation
- communication technique that speeds up data transfer and reduces
- network traffic. IBM employs a similar technique in its OS/2 drivers
- and not-yet-released NetBios drivers for DOS workstations, and Novell
- now offers an NLM and corresponding drivers that use a similar
- approach.
-
- June 1992
- LANQuest Labs, San Jose, CA
-
- <END>
-
- ======================================================================
-
- Some SERIOUS work is going on with the server, it would seem.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:01:57 on 92/08/11 GMT (by XXWESB22 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: LAN Requesters
- Ref: Append at 18:22:27 on 92/08/03 GMT (by CHARLIEB at AUSVM1)
-
- I have seen the below before:
-
- |The LAN Server 2.0 -- Entry package does not give you any requester
- |licenses. You must purchase these separately. A requester license
-
- My question is with the Advanced Version. How many requesters (if any)
- are licenced with the advanced???I am fairly sure at least one comes
- with both.
-
- Gareth "I'm not sure I want the answer" Jones
- ISM - Information Systems Management
- Regina, SK Phone (306) 781-5109
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 03:54:57 on 92/08/12 GMT (by EJDIAMO at NYCVMIC1)
- Subject: LAN Tracing programs that don't "behave"
- Ref: Append at 07:32:44 on 92/08/03 GMT (by STEPHENC at SYDVM1)
-
- I've used a Bytex analyzer which did not announce itself.
- (On the other hand, it can insert into a beaconing ring,
- which I don't think IBM TAP or NetGen Sniffer can do).
-
- Eric Diamond EJDIAMO at NYCVMIC1
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:29:51 on 92/08/12 GMT (by EJDIAMO at NYCVMIC1)
- Subject: Remote Support Options?
- Ref: Append at 12:57:54 on 92/08/11 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- IBM's DCAF (Distributed Console Access Facility) lets you
- dial into your server and perform "full screen" activities
- (but no Presentation Manager stuff). It also lets you transfer files.
-
- Announcement letter 290-331 dated 6/19/90 has the details.
-
- Eric Diamond EJDIAMO at NYCVMIC1
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:36:15 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 VS OS/2 1.3 and LS 2.0 Advanced
- I've ordered LS 2.0 and I had planned to run it on OS/2 2.0
- (I missed the line in the announcement that it is not supported
- under 2.0) so I would like to know what are the risks of installing
- LS 2.0 under OS/2 2.0? The installation program allows you to
- proceed anyway after displaying the message that it requires OS/2 1.3
- Did any one try it under OS/2 2.0, is there any features that should
- not install? And finally why the Entry offering runs under OS/2 2.0
- and the advanced does not (quite a surprise to me)?
-
- Eyad Saad/Towers Perrin/Montreal, Canada
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:37:57 on 92/08/12 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Requesters
- Ref: Append at 22:01:57 on 92/08/11 GMT (by XXWESB22 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Entry and Advanced are the same with respect to licensing. The server
- product includes the requester code, but does not license any additional
- machines. The distributed feature license authorizes you to install
- the requester code on another machine.
-
- This scheme is much simpler for you to administer than schemes where
- each server has "n" requester licenses. You simply have a license for
- each machine -- server or requester as appropriate. Our customer council
- was very vocal on this point.
-
- Also, you only have to buy a requester license once, no matter how many
- servers that requester is using. With n-users-per-server schemes, you
- end up paying for requesters twice.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:08:02 on 92/08/12 GMT (by SAWK4ZE at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS2 2.0 WorkStation to attach to OS2 1.3 Network
-
- I have an OS2 2.0 workstation I need to attach to my existing OS2 1.3
- network server what are the steps I need to take to get the workstations
- on the lan.... Do I need to upgrade the server first or can this wait.
-
- CHAWKI
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:36:30 on 92/08/12 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 VS OS/2 1.3 and LS 2.0 Advanced
- Ref: Append at 14:36:15 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- The advanced package of LS 2.0 can be installed on OS/2 2.0 as long as
- 386HPFS is not installed. This means that Local Security and Fault
- Tolerance also can not be installed as they require 386HPFS. If the
- 386 HPFS is installed on an OS/2 2.0 system, it will crash on the reboot.
-
- PC
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:09:50 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 VS OS/2 1.3 and LS 2.0 Advanced
- Ref: Append at 18:36:30 on 92/08/12 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1)
-
- I forced the HPFS386 to a 2.0 PC once. It is NOT recommended.
- When I rebooted , I could't boot. Booting from a diskette was't
- help at all. I ended up to use the FDISK to Remove-Create my whole
- hard-drive. I lost a whole day.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:40:12 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Access permission on userid basis
- Ref: Append at 10:22:10 on 92/08/11 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
-
- The access profiles are kept with the resources, so you can't get a
- direct list for a user.
-
- You can print the domain definition from the full-screen interface if
- your printer doesn't break down in the middle of it.
-
- There are a bunch of REXX routines from Carolyn Easter of IBM that were
- available at the OS/2 Tech Conf of '91. Check with your SE or look
- around the BBS's. The LANACCSS routine would list the access rights
- for a user.
-
- I'm using the same basic technique to create a REXX routine to print a
- summary of aliases and there access profiles. I may actually get it
- finished some day.
-
- Tom Boyle
- Productivity Services
- Metropolitan Life
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:06:22 on 92/08/12 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 VS OS/2 1.3 and LS 2.0 Advanced
- Ref: Append at 14:36:15 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- The LS 2.0 Advanced package will install on OS/2 2.0, but you should
- not install the HPFS 386 component (the default is not to install it
- on OS/2 2.0). If you do force it to be installed your system will be
- unusable --- HFPS 386 is incompatible with OS/2 2.0.
-
- We have committed that HFPS 386 will be upgraded to support OS/2 2.0
- in a future release.
-
- Advanced Server minus HPFS 386 is equivalent to Entry Server. If you
- want to run your server on OS/2 2.0 today, save some money and buy
- Entry Server.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:07:22 on 92/08/12 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS2 2.0 WorkStation to attach to OS2 1.3 Network
- Ref: Append at 15:08:02 on 92/08/12 GMT (by SAWK4ZE at OS2CUST)
-
- I assume you are running LAN Server 1.3 on your OS/2 1.3 server machine.
-
- Simply install the requester from LAN Server 2.0 on your OS/2 2.0
- workstation. It will connect to a LAN Server 1.3 server.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:21:55 on 92/08/13 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
- Subject: Access permission on userid basis
- Ref: Append at 19:40:12 on 92/08/12 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Tom, thanks very much for your help.
- But how to get LANACCSS ? I don't have access to any BBS. Is it
- somewhere in some tooldisk which I can request ?
- Many thanks !! AMY CHEUNG (CHEUNGLL AT HKGVM8)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:04:02 on 92/08/13 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM) -
- Subject: LAN Use of Serial Device - Plotter on Server
- Ref: None
-
- I have an IBM 7372 Plotter connected to my Server COM1 and it plots ok
- from the Server. Can anyone describe the method by which such a plotter
- can be made available to Requesters on my Domain ???
-
- Trevor Giles, Havant Site x4245
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:44:11 on 92/08/13 GMT (by AMOON at WASVMIC1)
- Subject: Adding another Queue to a Network Printer
-
- We have OS/2 LAN Server 2.0 on OS/2 2.0 and customer would like to
- define several different queues to go to the same network printer.
- Is this just a matter of creating another Network Printer object
- going to the same port? Can all queues be active and going to
- the same port/printer (e.g. LPT1)?
-
- Customer plans to get a 4029 and would then be printing in both
- Postscript and HP LaserJet modes. Would having separate queues
- (printer objects) be the way to handle that? I am used to the
- 1.3 Server, but could not find details on how to do this for the
- 2.0 Server in the manuals.
-
- Also, the customer gets confused when the manuals talk about the
- Print Manager because he sees no such icon. I assume references
- to Print Manager in a 2.0 environment just refer to the generic
- print management process represented by the printer objects. Or
- am I missing something?
-
- Thanks,
- Ann Moon
- WCTA, Charlotte, NC
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:45:39 on 92/08/13 GMT (by FALHOLT at DKIBMVM2)
- Subject: BUSMASTER TOKEN-RING with MS LAN Manager
-
- I have been told that IBM is shipping an NDIS driver with
- the T-R busmaster adapter. MS LAN Manager supports an NDIS
- interface. Result: MS LAN Manager can run with Token-Ring
- Busmaster Adapter.
- Are there anyone out there who succesfully run an IBM
- Token-Ring Busmaster Server in connection with
- a MS LAN Manager on top off OS/2 1.3 SE.
-
- Please clarify my confussion
-
- Any help will be apriciated.
- Regards,
- Torben Falholt
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:45:50 on 92/08/13 GMT (by FALHOLT at DKIBMVM2)
- Subject: BUSMASTER TOKEN-RING with MS LAN Manager
-
- I have been told that IBM is shipping an NDIS driver with
- the T-R busmaster adapter. MS LAN Manager supports an NDIS
- interface. Result: MS LAN Manager can run with Token-Ring
- Busmaster Adapter.
- Are there anyone out there who succesfully run an IBM
- Token-Ring Busmaster Server in connection with
- a MS LAN Manager on top off OS/2 1.3 SE.
-
- Please clarify my confussion
-
- Any help will be apriciated.
- Regards,
- Torben Falholt
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:19:22 on 92/08/13 GMT (by KUNESH at RALVM17)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 13:52:52 on 92/08/14 GMT (by KUNESH at RALVM17)
- Subject: adapter0 vs. adapter1 problem?
-
- | After getting a copy of LAN Server User's Guide, changing
- | net1 in IBMLAN.INI and restarting CM did the trick.
-
- I am trying to get LAN Requester started for the first time.
- I had an IBM T/R card in slot1 when I installed OS2 1.3 CSD 5050
- and LAN requester. Since then I have had to move my adapter to
- slot 2 in my P70 because I installed a long card that only fits
- in slot 1.
-
- When I try to start Lan Requester it terminates with
- SYS0059: An unexpected network error occurred
- NET8002: The name of the function detecting the error is rcf2snet.
-
- Is there something I need to change in CM or IBMLAN.INI to
- point to adapter 1? Can I force it to use adapter 1?
-
- | Sharon (no longer embarassed now that my new machine works) Kunesh
- IBM SER I&TSS | Vnet: KUNESH at RALVM17
- Network Performance Team | Internet: kunesh@ralvm17.vnet.ibm.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:07:51 on 92/08/14 GMT (by IL57100 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Access Profiles - LS 2.0
-
- I am having a problem with the access profiles of LAN Server 2.0. I turn on
- the auditing feature of LAN Server. When I did this I started to go messages
- about access violations, and all my users could not get access to thier home
- dirves. So I made an alias of the Server Root Drive and gave all access to
- this alias and I applyed this to all subdirs. This seems to have stop some of
- the messages but I still get others. I know this is not the way to fix this
- problem. So if anyone out there known any thing about these please help me out
-
- Thank you
-
- George Di Martino
- Skandia America Group
- (212) 978-2924
-
- George Di Martino
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:23:47 on 92/08/16 GMT (by IL58291 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: REMOTE PRINTING ??
- Ref: Append at 12:55:23 on 92/08/11 GMT (by IL61500 at OS2CUST)
-
- to print to the queues in 1-2-3, select interface 5(the DOS LPT1) versus #1
- r
-
- Alan
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:21:37 on 92/08/17 GMT (by WZ00545 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Netbios names
-
- I am trying to increase the number of netbios sessions ncbs and names
- from the "default" of 8,40,7. I have changed the protocol.ini
- netbuei_nif section parameters both from CM LAPS and via the editor
- to no avail. Adapter still opens with 8 sessions 40 ncbs and 7
- names. Any idea what I'm missing where?
-
- BRIAN K. SPEARS - KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES USA. INC.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:53:46 on 92/08/17 GMT (by TCC3824 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Adapter address does not show up it lantran.log
-
- I have set up lan & com mngr on two machines. when I view the lantran.log
- this is what I get. What am I missing in set up so that It will display
- the adapter address for a universal address?
-
- IBM OS/2 LANMSGDD ì02/26/92┘ 2.01 is loaded and operational.
-
- IBM OS/2 LAN Protocol Manager
-
- IBM OS/2 LANDLLDD 2.01
- IBM OS/2 LANDLLDD is loaded and operational.
- IBM OS/2 NETBEUI 2.01
- IBM OS/2 NETBIOS 4.0
- Adapter 0 has 35 NCBs, 8 sessions, and 7 names available to NETBIOS app
- .
- NETBIOS 4.0 is loaded and operational.
- IBM - IBM Token-Ring Network Driver, Version V.2.02
- IBM OS/2 LAN Netbind
- IBM Token-Ring adapter data rate is 4 mbps.
-
- Kevin McConnell 512-338-7457 Continuum Austin Tx
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:04:42 on 92/08/17 GMT (by SUN0012 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: RIPL DOS5
-
- I tried installing LS 2.0 Entry for the first time today and attempted to load
- RIPL support for DOS 5.0. All went will until the prompt to load a DOS 5.0
- startup/operating diskette. All of our IBM DOS 5.0 packages have three
- diskettes labeled 1/2, 2/3 and 3/3 (the upgrade packges are labeled this
- way with the word upgrade appended). The upgrade package also has two
- diskettes for IBM and Novell LAN support.
-
- None of these diskettes seem to satisfy the installation package. What is
- it looking for?
-
- Jim Snively, Sun Companmy, Inc
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:29:49 on 92/08/17 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote IPL and Lan address
-
- We have had great success with remote IPL of an OS/2 2.0 station from a
- server, and this seems to be a great solution for some of our machines
- with small hard drives, but we have one small problem. We seem to be
- forced into using the token ring's burned in 12 digit hex code for the
- LAN address. Our local data center had a very strict requirement that
- LAN addresses be of a certain format (designating building number, room
- number, etc.) for our non-DFT terminal sessions defined through the
- gateway server. Is there ANY way to use a different LAN address than
- the burned in hex code on a remote IPL workstation?
-
- Elizabeth Parker, University of Florida Information Systems
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:53:46 on 92/08/17 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: RIPL DOS5
- Ref: Append at 20:04:42 on 92/08/17 GMT (by SUN0012 at OS2CUST)
-
- Install DOS to diskette (boot from the first of your 3 DOS 5.0
- diskettes, specify Intall to diskette, and feed it four blank
- diskettes as requested); this will create the disks LS is looking
- for.
- Giovanni Bertolini
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:40:05 on 92/08/18 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote IPL and Lan address
- Ref: Append at 20:29:49 on 92/08/17 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
-
- The burned in address is only needed to do the RIPL. When the OS/2
- LAN device drivers are loaded, you can switch to local addressing.
- Update the PROTOCOL.INI file for each RIPL workstation and add the
- following statement to the {LANDD_NIF} section:
-
- NETADDRESS = Txxxxxxxxxxxx
-
- where T indicates a tokenring format address and
- xxxxxxxxxxxx is the locally administered address.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:57:38 on 92/08/18 GMT (by XXX0956 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Printing through OS/2 server to 5225 attach to AS400
- I was trying to print a text doc from an OS/2 req. through the server to
- a 5225 line printer off AS/400. During the printing process, if I choose
- the network printer, I am forced to print in WYSIWYG. And the print file
- never reached the outputq on AS/400. But I can do it without any problem
- if I send the file either directly from OS/2 req. or OS/2 server. The
- text editer I use for the text doc is EPM.EXE.
-
- Any suggestion! Thanks!
-
- Have A Nice Day!
- Thunder Bay Hydro - Jan Wang
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:33:34 on 92/08/18 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote IPL and Extended Services
-
- I am trying to install extended services on a remote IPL OS/2 2.0
- workstation, with very little success. I can't do it from the installation
- diskettes, it just kicks me back to the OS/2 full screen without a
- message. I can understand why installing this way couldn't work, since
- OS/2 and all the configuration information is on the server, but I didn't
- find a way to do it from the server, either. There must be some facility
- to use extended services on a remote IPL requestor. Could you enlighten me?
-
- Elizabeth Parker, University of Florida Information Systems
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:53:47 on 92/08/18 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote IPL and Extended Services
- Ref: Append at 17:33:34 on 92/08/18 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
-
- If I understand correctly, you have RIPLed OS/2 on your workstation
- and you are trying to install Extended Services to the local
- hardfile (drive c:). Is this correct?
-
- I have not tried to do this. I will have to check with the
- Extended Services people to see if they know why it fails.
-
- There is a RED BOOK, order number GG24-3875, called "LAN Server 2.0
- New Functions and Features", that explains how to install Extended
- Services on the RIPL server such that you can access Extended
- Services from the RIPL server. The procedure is much to lengthly
- to describe here. If you are interested, you should order the
- RED BOOK.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:25:01 on 92/08/19 GMT (by PRCI041 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote IPL and Extended Services
- Ref: Append at 17:33:34 on 92/08/18 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
-
- If you are trying to install ES to a local hard drive after ripl'ing from a
- server, it doesn't work. I tried all sorts of ways to do this and couldn't
- get it to work. A call to the support center resulted in "this isn't
- supported."
-
- There is a guide that tells you how to set up ES on the RIPL server and allow
- the RIPL'd PC to USE ES, but I haven't tried it.
-
- The last alternative is to use a re-directed drive to install ES. If you
- install LAN requester and get access to a LAN drive, you can install ES from
- that LAN drive. For example, I copied all the ES diskettes to a drive on
- our LAN Server (S:\ESGA). Then I log on to the LAN, issue the command,
- SET SRCDRV=S:\ESGA and then I can install ES or issue the REINST command.
- This works great, but you do have to get to the LAN drive first. (You cannot
- install Lan Requester from the RIPL server either - it has to be done from
- diskettes. I hope IBM corrects these problems soon!) BTW, the directions
- for using the re-directed LAN drives are documented in a README file that
- comes with ES.
-
- Mark Polly - Progressive Insurance
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:38:01 on 92/08/19 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Access permission on userid basis
- Ref: Append at 01:21:55 on 92/08/13 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
-
- If you've got an IBM SE, he or she might be able to find the routines
- on one or the other of IBM's internal tools disks. Other than that,
- I don't know where you might find them.
-
- Tom Boyle
- Productivity Services
- Metropolitan Life
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:46:37 on 92/08/19 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Access Profiles - LS 2.0
- Ref: Append at 15:07:51 on 92/08/14 GMT (by IL57100 at OS2CUST)
-
- You will always get access violation messages, since LAN Server does
- not distinguish between security violations and simple attempts to
- open a read-only file in read-write mode, etc. You'll just have to
- learn what to ignore.
-
- It's going to a long job reversing your apply to the root alias. You'll
- need to re-apply the proper access for each individual alias. For the
- home directories, you can change or re-apply access profiles through
- the Full Screen. Use Definitions, Access Profile, Servers to get at
- the Access Profile for the start of each users home directory, change
- the user profile and re-apply.
-
- Tom Boyle
- Productivity Services
- Metropolitan Life
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:06:44 on 92/08/19 GMT (by TEC05 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Using disk Icon to look at dos server hard drives
-
- I am running OS/2 2.0 and lanserver 1.0 as a domain. When I attempt to use the
- drives icon to look at a dos based server's disk a window opens and then closes
- without ever letting me see the contents of the drive. Doing the same thing on
- a os2 server works fine. The DOS server is running DOS 5.0 with PCLP 1.34 and
- lansupport 1.21. Am I doing something wrong that will not allow me to see the D
- OS server's disk.???
-
- Eric Decker
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:08:32 on 92/08/19 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Busmaster card with LAN Server - Entry
-
- Can someone explain to me the scatter/gather feature that is supposedly only
- available in LAN Server Advanced. What does this provide that is not
- available in LAN Server Entry??? Is the busmaster card worth it if we only
- plan to use LAN Server Entry???
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:11:14 on 92/08/19 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Reporting utilities for LAN Server
-
- Are there any reporting programs available for LAN Server???
- How many users logged on.
- Resource utilization.
- How many are currently using a particular alias.
- Analysis of security.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 06:00:12 on 92/08/20 GMT (by CHEUNGLL at HKGVM8)
- Subject: Access permission on userid basis
- Ref: Append of 08/19/92 at 15:38:01 GMT (by XXMETL15 at TORVMCOP)
- Tom, I am an IBM SE but don't know how to get such REXX
- samples like LANACCSS you mentioned before.
- Best regards,
- Amy Cheung (CHEUNGLL AT HKGVM8)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:32:02 on 92/08/20 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Using disk Icon to look at dos server hard drives
- Ref: Append at 18:06:44 on 92/08/19 GMT (by TEC05 at OS2CUST)
-
- 32-bit apps such as the Workplace Shell don't work well with PC LAN Program
- servers. Unfortunately those servers don't support the advanced APIs that
- are available to OS/2 32-bit apps. You can access PCLP server data through
- the 16-bit OS/2 API, or from 32-bit apps using a subset of the 32-bit APIs
- (just DosOpen/Read/Write/Close should be OK).
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:34:08 on 92/08/20 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Busmaster card with LAN Server - Entry
- Ref: Append at 21:08:32 on 92/08/19 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
-
- The busmaster card will certainly work and work well with LAN Server -- Entry.
- However, you may be spending your money for minimal return as compared to the
- regular 16/4 card. The HPFS 386 in Advanced Server has special code that
- takes advantage of a BusMaster adapter, minimizing or eliminating any data
- movement by the main processor. You will get your money's worth, and more,
- from the Busmaster adapter with Advanced Server.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:47:15 on 92/08/20 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Netbios names
- Ref: Append at 16:21:37 on 92/08/17 GMT (by WZ00545 at OS2CUST)
-
- Brian,
- Does the IBMLAN.INI file also affect what is said when you boot up your machine
- . Try changing the sessions and commands and names in IBMLAN.INI to see if tha
- t has any effect on your report of 8,40,7.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:54:58 on 92/08/20 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Adding another Queue to a Network Printer
- Ref: Append at 15:44:11 on 92/08/13 GMT (by AMOON at WASVMIC1)
-
- Ann,
-
- ==============================================================================
- We have OS/2 LAN Server 2.0 on OS/2 2.0 and customer would like to
- define several different queues to go to the same network printer.
- Is this just a matter of creating another Network Printer object
- going to the same port? Can all queues be active and going to
- the same port/printer (e.g. LPT1)?
- ===============================================================================
-
- yes. You would have multiple printer objects all pointed to the LPT1 on the Se
- rver, share them out as several alias, and then requesters can have these alias
- 's net used with diferent LPT ports on the requester.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:02:47 on 92/08/20 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Use of Serial Device - Plotter on Server
- Ref: Append at 15:04:02 on 92/08/13 GMT (by TGILES at HVTVM) -
-
- Trevor,
- I would check out the command refernce under the subject Redirecting printing t
- o a serial device. then I would just share out the queue as a printer using th
- e an alias. If you just shared the plotter out as a serial device, I think tha
- t only one requester could use it at a time (no multiple print job spooling) an
- d only OS/2 requesters could get to it (DOS LAN Requester does not support NET
- USE COMx alias).
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:00:31 on 92/08/21 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS2 2.0 NetBIOS Overhead?
-
- When tuning my NetBIOS and 802.2 resources for my NetBios application under
- OS/2 2.0, it looks as if I'm 'losing' a handful of sessions, commands, and
- names. My NetBIOS application generates a trace comparing resources
- requested against resources granted by OS/2. When I configure under OS/2 1.3
- I get exactly what I ask for, but under 2.0 it looks like there's about
- 1 to 5 less of each resource. It's not a consistent variance, BTW.
-
- Is there some overhead I should be aware of? Or is this a bug, known or
- unknown? Compounding matters, one of my accounts not only encounters this
- 'overhead', but they are losing large (30-50) numbers of resources and
- the variance sometimes increases when the system is recycled. We all
- are running under 'GA' code of the base opsys and extended services.
-
- I appreciate any insight...
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:04:19 on 92/08/21 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS2 2.0 Full-screen NetBIOS Performance
-
- I'm seeing a marked difference in how my NetBIOS application performs in an
- OS/2 2.0 full-screen session vs. a VIO window. When run under a VIO session
- my application performs very well. But under a full-screen session the
- performance is unacceptably slower.
-
- My application is a client-server app. When I run both ends on the same
- machine then I commonly get a NetBIOS timeout.
-
- Are these known bugs? Is there something I can do to get around this?
- Upping the client app's priority is alright when I keep each end app on
- different machines, but then I lose performance when both ends run out
- of the same box.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:33:11 on 92/08/21 GMT (by AAAF0CY at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Reporting utilities for LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 21:11:14 on 92/08/19 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
-
- We've written some of our own (Space usage by alias, number of sessions, ...)
- Some of them are hookey, number of sessions is a "grep" counting the number of
- session entries kicked out by the NET SESSIONS command, but they work. Our
- local LAN Server User's Group is having a meeting next week to share some of
- this stuff, so I'll know more then. Also, I put a REXX utility called ALIASMOV,
- which moves aliases between drives and servers, on Pete Norloff's OS/2
- Shareware BBS.
-
- In general there is an open market for these tools (i.e. there ain't much
- around).
-
- P.S. SPM/2 can be used to look at system resources (CPU usage, RAM usage, ...),
- but it doesn't give specific LAN resource info.
-
- Jim Sauber, MN Mutual
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:10:14 on 92/08/21 GMT (by X019347 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 Lan Server 2.0 Entry UPS Support
-
- I have a Computer Room with 5 servers. Do I have to run a cable from the UPS t
- o Each servers serial port?? Or can I just run one to the Domain Controler and
- have it tell the rest??
-
- If not how about in LS 3.0 which I hear in going into Beta soon.
-
- Is there any difference between Entry and Advanced when it comes to UPS support
- ??
-
- Jim Grant
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:52:10 on 92/08/21 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Reporting utilities for LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 17:33:11 on 92/08/21 GMT (by AAAF0CY at OS2CUST)
-
- Jim,
- Thanks for your response on reporting utilities. Let me know what you find
- at your users group meeting. Hopefully, we can generate some interest in
- sharing what is out there. I'm sure others are needing more information also.
-
- Bill Clark, Illinois Power
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:54:29 on 92/08/21 GMT (by ILLP033 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Busmaster card with LAN Server - Entry
- Ref: Append at 22:34:08 on 92/08/20 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
-
- Charlie,
- Thanks for the response on the busmaster cards. We are setting up a database
- server and are wanting to maximize performance. Sounds like the best deal
- would be the busmaster with LAN Server Advanced.
- Bill Clark, Illinois Power
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:36:26 on 92/08/22 GMT (by IL47372 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN SERVER 3.0, Mac Requesters????
-
- I see IBM is making LAN Server 3.0 Code available for Beta. Does anyone know if
- this release will support Mac requester???? and if IBM has made any strong sta
- tnments as to when it is coming.
-
- Thomas Zingarella Cartier Inc.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:34:41 on 92/08/22 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
-
- What is the maximum number of Netbios sessions supported with LAN
- Server 2.0 and 3.0? I need to support a large number of users under
- a single server. Also if using multiple adapters, is internal bridging
- supported under either version?
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:10:59 on 92/08/24 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 21:34:41 on 92/08/22 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- The maximum number of NetBios sessions is the same in LAN Server 2.0 and
- 3.0 -- 254 per adapter. The big, EXCITING change is that we now support
- multiple adapters going to the same LAN. So, you can support up to 4 times
- 254 sessions per server by installing 4 token ring busmaster adapters, even
- if it's to a single LAN.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:28:21 on 92/08/24 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: WHOAMI program
-
- I cannot seem to get the DOS flavor of WHOAMI (DWHOAMI) to work. It does not
- seem to see the command line variable or do anything else. Any information I
- can get (Support, or way to contact the author) would be greatly appreciated.
-
- Eric Brunsen
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:03:06 on 92/08/25 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 22:10:59 on 92/08/24 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
-
- |
- | So, you can support up to 4 times
- | 254 sessions per server by installing 4 token ring busmaster adapters, even
- | if it's to a single LAN.
- |
-
- 2 questions: Do these HAVE to be busmaster adapters and, more importantly,
- what kind of load balancing is done on the adapters? I would hate to have
- a machine that has 4 adapters on it and 100 users all fighting over 1 adapter.
-
- Thane Smith - Salt River Project
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:25:45 on 92/08/25 GMT (by AMRT04A at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 LanServer 1.3 server with OS/2 2.0 workstations
-
- We have a Brother CB-8PS Laser printer which is attached to LPT1
- on a OS/2 1.3 WR05050 file server named RFSSRVR1. This laser will
- print in HPCL mode using driver HP LaserJet Series II . It also
- has a postscript drive using driver PScript.Apple Plus v 42_2 .
- We then have a proprinter Brother M-1709 using IBM 4201 Proprinter II
- driver connected to COM1. Using PrintMgr 1.3 we set up 2 printer
- definitions one for the laser and one for the DotMatrix printer. For
- the laser we highlighted the two drivers available for the same
- printer. We then created 3 que's . Que LANHP has a separator file
- for HPCL printing with the LaserJet Series II driver selected. LANPS
- que has a separator file for PostScript printing with the Apple Plus
- v 42_2 . Que LANDOTMX has a separator file for ProPrint with the IBM
- 4201 Proprinter II driver selected.
-
- In LanServer 1.3 we defined the Alias HPCL to point at the LANHP que,
- Alias PScript to point at the LANPS que, and DOTMATRX to point at the
- LANDOTMX que. We then per user assign LPT1 to alias DOTMATRX, LPT2
- to alias PScript, and LPT3 to alias HPCL in the User Logon Startup
- settings.
-
- Everything works fine this way for OS/2 1.3 workstations. But when
- we started converting some of these users to OS/2 2.0 workstations
- we started having problems printing to the 3 printer que's on the
- OS/2 1.3 file server. As a note the printing problems increased when
- we applied the latest OS/2 2.0 kernel patch and drop/drag printer
- fix.
-
- At install of OS/2 we selected No Printers which installed the IBMNULL
- driver. After install we installed the 3 drivers we needed as
- specified above from the install pop-up on the IBMNULL icon. We
- then draged the printer icon (not the Network printer icon) from the
- template folder to the desktop. The network printer icon was not in
- the template folder at this time. We created 3 printers this way.
- We gave it the same DOTMATRX, PSCRIPT, and HPCL names so it would
- match the alias printer names assigned to the user. We highlighted
- the appropriate driver out of the Default printer driver box. We
- then assigned it to the LPT1 for DOTMATRX, LPT2 for PSCRIPT, and
- LPT3 for HPCL to match the LAN SERVER logon assignments.
-
- Drag/Drop never has worked to these ICONS, however Exel, PMWord, and
- Corel do see these drivers. The enhanced editor also would see them.
- Print to HPCL and DOTMATRX worked as long as the packages supported
- them. PScript always made it the the OS/2 1.3 server print manager
- que but would go into imediated Job Paused status or even hang up
- the laser printer with Ignore data's. We thought maybe the OS/2 2.0
- drivers do not work on the laser printer. We took the laser printer
- off of the 1.3 file server and attached it to physical LPT1 on one
- OS/2 2.0 workstation. We changed this users logon driver assignments
- to blank so no conflict would exist with the LPT1 physical verses
- LPT1 logical assignments.
-
- Now I then discovered the NetWork ICON's printers and tried shadows
- of them, copies of them etc. The net result is I can no longer print
- at all to my HPCL, DOTMATRX, and PSCRIPT printers as first setup.
- I also under enhanced editor, 3270 print control, EXEL, etc have a
- long list of printers when I only have 3 que's.
-
- I do have OS/2 drag/drop , right mouse pop-up print, EXEL, and
- 3270 Print Control working to the LANHP and LANDOTMX que's on the
- OS/2 1.3 server printers. However I can not get anything at all
- or a job pause/hang when using the LANPS que. This is where I am
- now using a copy of the printer ICON's to the desktop from the
- Aliases for the Logon Domain folder. My HPCL and DOTMATRX regular
- printers no longer work at all.
-
- Is it possible that the ProPrinter and LaserJet drivers I am using
- did not change at all between 1.3 and 2.0 and hence because they
- match - they print ? Is it also possible the PostScript will not
- work through the lan when it did locally attached because that
- driver I am using has changed between 1.3 WR05050 and 2.0 with the
- Drag/Drop printer patch?
-
- Also OS/2 icon pop-up print, EXEL, enhanced editor, etc now show
- multiple copies of my LS:\\RFSSRVR1\LANHP, LS:\RFSSRVR1\LANDOTMX
- printers. Is one a ghost, if so how do I remove it?
-
- Also I can no longer print to the LASER in PMWORD anymore because
- it shows the right que names for the LAN AWARE but shows them as
- being at NONE port and will not allow print. Can I fake out PMWORD
- and give it PORT assignments without messing up the other one's
- that work because they use the fileserver info to locate the LPTx?
-
- Is there anyway to have both OS/2 2.0 , applications, etc. all print
- properly to the 1.3 server attached printers? Could I somehow use
- the 2.0 drivers on the 1.3 server without messing up the 1.3 work-
- stations out there? What about assigning a different set of printer,
- que, and alias definitions in OS/2 lanserver 1.3 for OS/2 2.0 work-
- station use only?
-
- Please download and print this article if you are in a similar
- situation or have been.
-
- I need to have about 10 out of 90 workstations working at minimum
- acceptable standards before I can start the proper OS/2 1.3 migration
- plan and update my server!!!! I would just like to find a setup
- that would allow these 2.0 workstations access to the 3 printer modes
- on the 2 printers attached to the 1.3 server some how. As Long as
- they can print out of PMWORD, EXEL, COREL to the supported modes for
- those products they don't care how they have to do it. The same with
- printing ASCII files. As long as they can print them through the
- OS/2 editor or somehow they are happy. If drag/drop does not work
- thats fine as long as the editor would or visa/versa.
-
- I have IBM Account Market Support Representative John Muller also
- helping us research these difficulties. If you have any information
- which could help us bring up a few workstations on OS/2 2.0 and
- still use the OS/2 1.3 Server attached printers your information
- would be much appreciated.
-
- You may contact John Muller at 214-280-2740
- or fax him at 214-280-2779.
- Thanks
-
- Ken O. (American Airlines, Tulsa, Ok.)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:05:19 on 92/08/25 GMT (by AMRT04A at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 1.3 LanServer with 2.0 Clients
-
- OS/2 1.3 Lan Server at WR050 sharing resources with newly
- installed OS/2 2.0 client workstations using Token Ring.
-
- This question applies to installing OS/2 2.0 Extended Edition
- on PS/2 Model 70's with only 8 Meg of memory,
- 60 Meg Drive, and running at 16 mhz. These are attached to an OS/2 1.3
- WR05050 model 90 File Server. 1 Brother Laser with HPCL and PSCRIPT
- modes is attached to LPT1. 1 Brother Dot Matrix printer is attached to
- COM1 on the server. We are not able to upgrade the server at this time
- but need to bring up some OS/2 2.0 workstations now ASAP.
-
- If you are having install problems now, have experienced this type of install
- before, or know how a 2.0 install should be installed with a 1.3 server and
- resources please Read the two questions below in the OS2PRINT forum.
-
- For Details please see the OS2PRINT forum question
- OS/2 2.0 client printing - 1.3 Server and
- Using printer template Fore 1.3 questions from 92/08/25 .
-
- Ken O. (American Airlines, Tulsa, Ok.)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:18:08 on 92/08/25 GMT (by SC31402 at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 15:03:06 on 92/08/25 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
-
- You dont have to have Busmasters, Charlie was just referring to
- the best possible speed/adapter combo.. There IS load balancing
- logic which is built into NTS/2 beta.
-
- Dan Wiggins -Austin
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:27:22 on 92/08/25 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 15:03:06 on 92/08/25 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
-
- The multiple adapter support will work with any adapter types, it's
- just a question of how many adapters of any given type will coexist
- in one system. In the case of IBMs non-busmaster Token Ring adapters
- only 2 can coexist in a system, so to get to 4 TR adapters, at least
- 2 would have to be busmaster.
-
- Load balancing will occur for all adapters if none of the adapters are
- connected through a bridge. If the adapters are all on the same ring
- then netbios session establishment is balanced across all adapters.
-
- If the adapters are connected to different rings which are bridged to
- each other, then the netbios session establishment is handled first-come-
- first-served in order to decrease the traffic through the bridge. In
- this mode the first adapter to see an incoming call will establish the
- session so that requestors on the same ring as one of the server adapters
- will most likely be serviced through that adapter.
-
- There is only one mode (balanced or bridged) for the entire system so
- in a complex environment where 2 adapters are on the same ring and a
- third is connected through a bridge, the server will operate in bridged
- mode and no load balancing will occur.
-
- Dan Heimsoth
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:41:45 on 92/08/25 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 15:03:06 on 92/08/25 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
-
- No, they don't have to be busmaster adapters. However, most non-busmaster
- adapters do not support more than one or two adapters per machine. This is
- a hardware statement, it has nothing to do with software. For example, IBM's
- 16/4 token ring adapter allows only two per machine (primary and alternate).
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:03:20 on 92/08/25 GMT (by XXVALC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: OS/2 LanServer 1.3 server with OS/2 2.0 workstations
- Ref: Append at 15:25:45 on 92/08/25 GMT (by AMRT04A at OS2CUST)
-
- I had to install OS/2 2.0 print drivers on my 1.3 server to be able
- to print over the network. The drivers are upward compatible, but
- not downwards.
- Dos and 1.3 requesters have no problem printing.
-
- Tony Valenti
- Valcomp Technology Inc.
- (416) 850-9111
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:57:50 on 92/08/25 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 17:27:22 on 92/08/25 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
-
- There was a previous restriction that the network adapters could not be on
- the same ring nor could the rings those adapters were on be bridged together
- via source routing. This was a result, as I understand it, of Netbios
- considerations.That is, there is a one-to-one co-respondence on netbios
- name to MAC address (adapter) and the netbios name must be unique on a
- source routed LAN. Has this restriction been overcome??? I would
- be very interested in the details.
-
- A sample IBMLAN.INI and Protocol.ini file would be very useful.
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:23:51 on 92/08/25 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 20:57:50 on 92/08/25 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- I second the idea of a sample protocol.ini and ibmlan.ini. As the
- originator of this thread, I have been trying unsuccesfully to get
- two token ring adapters to support 254 netbios sessions on each
- adapter. I realize that there are memory consideration/limitations
- but the documentation is rather vague on working with netbios on
- multiple adapters.
-
- I would idealy like to support up to 700 netbios sessions an a single
- server, with all the adapters on the same ring. I have an
- environment where we have IBM local bridges connecting 4 rings, where
- all users connect to the single server, and Wellfleet remote routing
- bridges (only bridging) connecting remote locations. Users at the
- remote location have access to the server. My problem is that I have
- 225 users now and I am ready to add 50 more right now. Is this going
- to be possible with LAN Server 2.0 or do I need 3.0 and NTS/2?
- (The server is a Compaq SystemPro with Compaq busmaster adapters)
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:35:01 on 92/08/26 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 20:57:50 on 92/08/25 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- NetBIOS did work as you described, but it has been improved to remove
- the unique NAME-to-MAC address requirement in some special cases.
- Without getting into too much detail, NetBIOS will now detect when
- the same name is added to multiple adapters on the same LAN if those
- adapters are all in the same system. In this case NetBIOS will "share"
- the NAME between the adapters by only allowing one adapter at a time
- to respond to CALLs for that NAME.
-
- (Just to clarify one other thing, the previous restriction applied to
- any type of bridge, not just Source Routing bridges.)
-
- As for the .INI files, the Install/Config menus should set these up
- correctly if multiple adapters are selected, but since I just edited
- mine by hand when I switched to multiple adapters, I can show you the
- changes I made, with the warning that I'm no expert on the contents of
- the IBMLAN.INI file so I can't vouch for the accuracy of those changes.
- In PROTOCOL.INI I changed the bindings for Netbeui,
-
- Drivername = netbeui$
- Bindings = IBMTOK_nif ---> Bindings = IBMTOK_nif, IBMTOK2_nif
-
- and then added a new MAC driver section:
-
- {IBMTOK2_nif} <--- the {} should be square brackets
- Drivername = IBMTOK2$
- ALTERNATE
-
- In IBMLAN.INI I added a NET2 line:
-
- net1=netbeui$,0,LM10, 64, 64, 64
- net2=netbeui$,1,LM10, 64, 64, 64 <--- this line was added
-
- and changed the wrknets and srvnets lines:
-
- wrknets =net1 ---> wrknets =net1,net2
- srvnets =net1 ---> srvnets =net1,net2
-
- Those changes took my server from one adapter to two.
-
- Dan Heimsoth
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:46:00 on 92/08/26 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 14:35:01 on 92/08/26 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
-
- Excellent, thank you!!
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:57:19 on 92/08/26 GMT (by NBQHGQ3 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Connection to a MODEM from a Workstation
-
- My file server has a modem which I can utilize the CarbonCopy and
- PCPLUS software. Is there a way that I can use PCPLUS and the modem
- from my work station ?? When I tried it the PCPLUS software appeared
- to wait for a modem to be connected to my work station. Do I need a
- redirection of my COMM port and how would I do that ???
-
- Jim Nennig - Baxter Health Care
-
- Jim Nennig
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:31:23 on 92/08/26 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Maximum Sessions under LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 21:34:41 on 92/08/22 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- The Bridge program has an announced PTF, UR37463, which will allow it
- to run in an OS/2 2.0 DOS machine (MVDM). The README for the PTF will
- give more details on installation. I do not know how much of a PS/2
- system's CPU is taken up by a bridge -- or how much/little is left
- for the server function, though. Bridge will use Adapters 0 and 1.
- This means the server will have to use Busmaster adapter(s).
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:42:38 on 92/08/27 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 RPL IMAGES ARE NOT THERE
-
- Services for OS/2 2.0. The problem I am having is that even though the OS/2
- 2.0 RPL services show to be installed there are no RPL images for it. I
- have also installed RPL for DOS 5.0 and that seems to work fine. I have tried
- several times to uninstall this and reinstall this program and always the same
- results. What am I doing wrong??? Has anyone any ideas besides starting from
- scratch and loading again?
-
- Dale Radspinner Simco Electronics 713-483-3574
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:52:33 on 92/08/27 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Consolodation of Domain Controllers
-
- We are currently working to merge a few domain controllers into a
- single domain. I can merge the DCDB information fairly easily
- because I can extract it in a readable format. The BIG problem as I
- see it is to re-create the userid's on the new domain. I know I can
- get a userid list and create new userids from that, but I would like
- to keep the password information intact to create as few user problems as
- possible.
-
- Does anyone know of a way that I can either selectively merge the
- NET.ACC information or extract it in a form that can be manipulated
- to create NET commands to create the userids on the new domain?
-
- Thanks.
-
- Thane Smith - Salt River Project
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:40:13 on 92/08/27 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS/2 RPL IMAGES ARE NOT THERE
- Ref: Append at 14:42:38 on 92/08/27 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
-
- There are no images for OS/2 RIPL. If you are planning on
- RIPLing OS/2 2.0, then you must unpack and then run the
- RIPLINST utility. RIPLINST is shipped with OS/2 2.0 and is
- located on diskette #7. After running RIPLINST, you must then
- run the GETRPL utlity to complete installation of RIPL.
-
- The procedures for installing and configuring the Remoteboot
- service are documented in the Network Admininstrator Reference
- Vol. 3 and also the LAN Server Supplement for OS/2 2.0.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:50:07 on 92/08/27 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: OS/2 RPL IMAGES ARE NOT THERE
- Ref: Append at 14:42:38 on 92/08/27 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
-
- OS/2 RIPL does not use the image concept. It uses a shared library
- concept. The shared code is installed in directories beneath the
- \IBMLAN\RPL directory. For example,
-
- \IBMLAN\RPL\IBMCOM LAN TRANSPORT
- \IBMLAN\RPL\MUGLIB USER PROFILE MANAGEMENT
- \IBMLAN\RPL\IBMLAN LAN REQUESTER
- \IBMLAN\RPL\OS2 OS/2 1.3
- \IBMLAN\RPL\OS2.20 OS/2 2.0
-
- The LS 2.0 Install handles everything except the OS2.20 directory.
- You must use the RIPLINST utility on OS/2 2.0 Install diskette 7
- to install the OS/2 2.0 code.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Deveopment
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:28:06 on 92/08/27 GMT (by XXBCHY11 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Netview Distribution Manager
- Can someone confirm that Netview Distribution Manager/2 1.0 runs
- on OS/2 v.2.0 + LAN Server 2.0. Do I need an upgrade ?
- We use this in conjuction with Annatek's Network Navigator for OS/2.
-
- Regards, Joe Smeets
- WESTECH Information Systems Inc.
- Vancouver, BC, Canada (604) 663-2795
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:20:01 on 92/08/27 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Connection to a MODEM from a Workstation
- Ref: Append at 21:57:19 on 92/08/26 GMT (by NBQHGQ3 at OS2CUST)
-
- Network Administrators Reference, Vol 3, in Chapter 4 discusses the
- sharing of Serial Device Queues. DOS users, however, do not have the
- ability to access Server COMx ports -- just OS/2 requesters can do it.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 11:37:58 on 92/08/28 GMT (by RFITCH at ATLVMIC1)
- Subject: Apple Connectivity
-
- There are a few APPENDS which discuss Apple connectivity to LAN Server.
- Does anyone have any information on a planned availability of this
- feature?
-
- Many Thanks in advance.....
-
- Randy Fitch (RFITCH/ATLVMIC1)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:18:33 on 92/08/28 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Apple Connectivity
- Ref: Append at 11:37:58 on 92/08/28 GMT (by RFITCH at ATLVMIC1)
-
- Information on this will be made available soon.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:22:46 on 92/08/28 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Server Licensing
-
- I have a question concerning the licensing of LAN Server Requesters. Let me kn
- ow if this is a correct understanding. To get 250 concurrent users:
-
- 1 OS/2 1.3 Standard Edition $ 150
- 1 LAN Server 2.0 entry $ 795
- 1 LAN Server upgrade to Advanced $ 1570
- 250Workstation requester licenses $ 18750($75/requester)
- ---------
- $ 21265
-
- If this is correct, Netware 3.11 250 user looks like a bargin at $ 12495.
-
- Also, are there any site licenses for either the DOS or OS/2 requesters?
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:19:30 on 92/08/28 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Apple Connectivity
- Ref: Append at 11:37:58 on 92/08/28 GMT (by RFITCH at ATLVMIC1)
-
- Randy,
- If you need Mac conectivity right away, there is a product called MAC LAN Conne
- ct that we use to lets Macs access LAN Server files and postscript printers.
- It runs on a DOS machine and runs their special Appletalk drivers as well as
- Dos LAN Requester. Any printers or filesets that are net used at the DOS
- machine can be shared to a Mac. It is from a company called Mirimar.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:45:16 on 92/08/28 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: LAN Server Licensing
- Ref: Append at 18:22:46 on 92/08/28 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Yes those are the list prizes.
- As far as I knew IBM is real flexible in volume purchases.
- I cant speak for them but I'd expect about 50% discount on additional
- licences.
-
- Again I'm not an IBM-er .
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:33:52 on 92/08/31 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Server Licensing
- Ref: Append at 18:22:46 on 92/08/28 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Your analysis is correct from a list price point of view.... BUT....
-
- First, you can just buy LAN Server -- Advanced to start and save a little
- off the LAN Server -- Entry plus upgrade price.
-
- Second, there are aggressive discount schedules for volume purchases of any
- OS/2 software including the distributed feature licenses.
- I have seen them but I am in development, not marketing. Please see your
- IBM rep for a quote.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:36:18 on 92/08/31 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Server 3.0 Remote IPL (RIPL) Survey
-
- If you are currently a LAN Server 2.0 customer RIPLing OS/2 1.3
- clients, do you plan on continuing to RIPL OS/2 1.3 once you
- have migrated to LAN Server 3.0?
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:43:04 on 92/08/31 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Server Licensing
- Ref: Append at 19:33:52 on 92/08/31 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
-
- Thanks for the reply, I will contact marketing and see what I get from that end
- .
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:51:35 on 92/08/31 GMT (by TD02091 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LSI0047
-
- After successfully installing 2.0 and ES on a Mod 70 A21 with 120 hard disk
- space I tried to install Lan server. Did a A: then laninst - the IBM LOGO
- screen came up fine, after selecting OK the screen displayed an error msg
- LSI0047 - Local Hard Disk is not installed. Why is Lan server install not
- recognizing the Hard disk? I've installed on several other machines and
- never got this error, what the deal?
-
- ADGapc
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:49:16 on 92/08/31 GMT (by SINCLAIR at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LSI0047
- Ref: Append at 20:51:35 on 92/08/31 GMT (by TD02091 at OS2CUST)
-
- Some of the fields in the PBP on the boot sector of the drive are
- getting set to zeros(I don't know who or why), this causes the dasddriver
- to build a default PBP which does not contain the information I need.
- I will make a change to the LS install to avoid this problem.
- To fix the boot sector for now, you need to start PMDISK.
-
- EDIT the volume for the drive.
- SELECT the BOOT SECTOR.
- change the following bytes if set to zero
- byte 14 (Sectors/Allocation Unit) should be 04x for HPFS
- byte 15 (Reserved Sectors) should be 01x.
- byte 22 (Media Descriptor) should be F8x.
-
- Start counting the bytes from 1.
-
- Bill Sinclair
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 11:48:54 on 92/09/01 GMT (by XXCDSX26 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: LSI0047
- Ref: Append at 22:49:16 on 92/08/31 GMT (by SINCLAIR at AUSVM1)
-
- Bill:
-
- What is PMDISK? From your description it sounds like a disk
- editor. Where can one find it?
-
- Michael Harper - Cdn Depository for Securities, Ltd
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:02:31 on 92/09/01 GMT (by DBXB533 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: RIPL AND APPLYING FIXES
-
- Could anyone tell me how I could apply fixes such as the OS2KRNL fix to
- the copies of OS/2 that are being RIPL'd using LS 2.0. How do I apply
- the fixes to copies that have already been defined to users or is there
- just one place where I make the changes?
-
- Frank Valdivieso
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:36:34 on 92/09/01 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: RIPL AND APPLYING FIXES
- Ref: Append at 15:02:31 on 92/09/01 GMT (by DBXB533 at OS2CUST)
-
- The base operating systems files that are sent to the RIPL client
- machines are located in:
- FOR OS/2 1.3 RIPL--> C:/IBMLAN/RPL/OS2
- FOR OS/2 2.0 RIPL--> C:/IBMLAN/RPL/OS2.20
-
- This subdirectory appears as the root C: directory on the RIPL
- client and is the directory for all commonly shared RIPL files.
- Changes to files in these directories will affect all RIPL clients.
-
- David Dutcher
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:43:07 on 92/09/01 GMT (by SINCLAIR at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LSI0047
- Ref: Append at 11:48:54 on 92/09/01 GMT (by XXCDSX26 at TORVMCOP)
-
- PMDISK is an PM OS2 tool that will read/write any where on a harddisk.
- I have been using it, but I sure NORTON or some other disk utility is
- available that can do the same thing. I know the re-formatting the
- harddisk is unpleasant, but without being able to change the boot sector,
- I don't of any other quick way to fix this problem.
-
- Bill Sinclair
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:07:00 on 92/09/01 GMT (by IL48228 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS 3.0, DOS & Performance
-
- With the Lan Server 3.0 beta code installed my machine performs
- (responds) as well as I would expect until a DOS VDM session is
- started. As soon as a DOS session is initiated windows begin to take
- about 10-15 seconds to draw on the desktop. The PULSE program
- (reliable ?) shows the machine is running about 30% with no active
- programs, other than the server code. My network connections that
- were available in OS/2 report a network error when attempting to do a
- directory on a used resource in both DOS and OS/2 seesions. I have
- never seen a machine run so slow. I am currently testing on a Mod 57
- with 16MB RAM and plenty of disk. Any ideas?
-
- Brian Davelaar, City of Tacoma
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:57:22 on 92/09/02 GMT (by NR679452 at ATLVM1)
- Subject: Remote IPL
- Will OS/2 Lan Server V2.0 support a diskless workstation, such as
- a 3151 ASCII terminal or a Model 25 without a Harddrive. If not what is
- the minimum hardware requirement for a requester.
-
- Corey Leverette
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:29:14 on 92/09/02 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote IPL
- Ref: Append at 13:57:22 on 92/09/02 GMT (by NR679452 at ATLVM1)
-
- I don't know anything about a 3151 terminal, but the model 25
- can RIPL all day long. Your memory requirements will depend
- upon which operating system you plan on RIPLing. Which operating
- systems you can RIPL will depend upon which processor you have.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:10:29 on 92/09/02 GMT (by XXULTR04 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Netbios Support in a VDM
-
- I have installed Intel's LANSight on our LAN server 1.3 network. This
- program allows me to view the screens of DOS machines over the network.
- I would like to run the program that allows me to view the users screens,
- on my OS/2 V2 machine in a VDM. I believe LANSight uses NETBIOS to get
- the names of the other workstations logged on to the network. I have run
- the SETUPVDD program which adds the following statements to the
- CONFIG.SYS for the virtual LAN support:
-
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\LANVDD.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\LANPDD.OS2
- Ultramar Canada Inc.
- I also placed the following command in the DOS_DEVICE DOS setting:
-
- C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\LANVMEM.SYS
-
- and the following command in the AUTOEXEC.BAT:
-
- C:\IBMCOM\LTSVCG S=12 C=14 N=16
-
- After adding all of these statements as outlined in the Communications
- Manager Additional Functions Installation Guide, LANSight still can't
- get information from NETBIOS. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong.
-
- Brian Brookshaw
- Ultramar Canada INC.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:20:00 on 92/09/02 GMT (by IL80677 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Slowdown in Lotus printing
-
- We applied WR05050 on our workstation which is running OS/2 EE 1.3 and we
- noticed a slowdown in printing in LOTUS 123 in either worksheet or WYSIWYG.
- It took from 3 to 25 minutes to print and the printer is either HP or
- PSCRIPT. Any idea?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:51:13 on 92/09/02 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote IPL
- Ref: Append at 13:57:22 on 92/09/02 GMT (by NR679452 at ATLVM1)
-
- LS 2.0 Remote IPL only supports pc's that are LAN attached and
- capable of booting either DOS or OS/2. Remote IPL (RIPL) requires
- one of the following LAN adapters in the client workstation:
-
- IBM Tokenring Adapter and Adapter/A
- IBM PC Network Adapter (broadband and baseband)
- IBM Adapter/A for Ethernet Networks
-
- For DOS clients, the minimum hardware is:
-
- DOS compatable processor
- 640K memory
- LAN Adapter with RIPL capability
-
- For OS/2 clients, the minimum hardware is:
-
- OS/2 compatable processor (SE 1.3: 80286 or above, some non-IBM
- machines may not RIPL SE 1.3,
- SE 2.0: 80386SX or above)
- 6MB memory (I would recommend at least 8MB for medialess machines)
- LAN Adapter with RIPL capability
-
- Note: Although not required, a local hardfile is desirable. If a
- local hardfile is present, the SWAPPER.DAT will go to the
- local hardfile and not back to the sever.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:51:27 on 92/09/03 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR Faster than OS/2 Req?!?
-
- Consider the following:
- Two machines configured *EXACTLY* the same. One is running DOS 5.0 and
- DLR (WR06000). The other is configured for OS/2 2.0 (these machines are
- 486/33 with 8mb of RAM). Executing the same .BAT file that copies a file
- (large file) from a network drive to another file on the same network drive.
-
- Under DLR and DOS the time that this copy takes is: 8 seconds.
- Under OS/2 2.0 VDM the copy takes: 25 seconds!!
- Under just an OS/2 full screen with the exact copy under Os/2: 25 seconds!!
-
- Is the OS/2 Req *THAT* much slower ... or are we missing something here?
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:22:24 on 92/09/03 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
-
- Is it possible to logon to a lan server domain from a workstation
- booted with only an os/2 2.0 full screen session (no pm/wpshell)?
-
- With lan requester 2.0, it appears that one cannot logon without
- starting the LSCLIENT service, and that LSCLIENT requires run-time links
- to pm dll's.
-
- I did this previously under 1.2 and 1.3 to perform os/2 installs as
- outlined in GG24-3502 "OS/2 in Interconnected Environments Guidelines
- for Installation and Maintenace." I realize that this is not the supported
- method of remote installs for OS/2 2.0, but it has worked well and I thought
- I would give it a try with 2.0.
-
- Brian Norwood, Associated Wholesale Grocers, Kansas City, KS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:57:46 on 92/09/04 GMT (by XXVALC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Slowdown in Lotus printing
- Ref: Append at 19:20:00 on 92/09/02 GMT (by IL80677 at OS2CUST)
-
- I have had printer slowdowns like this and discovered that my parallel
- port jumpers were set incorrectly (lpt2 instead of lpt1, and/or
- interrupt conflicts). Why it worked at all I'll probably never know.
-
- Tony Valenti
- Valcomp Technology Inc.
- (416) 850-9111
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:47:53 on 92/09/04 GMT (by IL04688 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Public Apps folder empty
-
- We installed OS/2 on a PS/2 90 with 16 meg RAM and XGA graphics (8514
- monitor using LIU/2 and a model comprised of the base, TCP/IP, ES and LS.
- The user is able to logon to our token ring network with no errors, but
- when he opens his Public Applications Folder it is empty. Going into
- Lan Requester shows all of the items highlighted in program starter. A
- net use reveals all of his allocations were established. We have added
- and deleted applications with no effect -- Public Apps folder still empty.
- We have tried changing the view settings for Public Apps folder, but
- without effect. We had the user logon from another OS/2 2.0 workstation
- (the server is running OS/2 1.3 EE csd 5050) and everything worked fine.
- We then reinstalled Lan Requester without incident. Public Applications
- folder is still empty. (We also have other users using this model with
- no problems.) Any ideas ??
-
- Leo Tornow
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:59:03 on 92/09/04 GMT (by VCORN at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
- Ref: Append at 17:22:24 on 92/09/03 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
-
- Should be able to logon w/o the lsclient service started if you
- have a program that just calls the NetWkstaSetuid2 api to logon.
- The UPM logon command will not work.
- You start the with req w/o lsclient by typing :
- "net start req /wrkservices:"
-
- I can find or write a NetWkstaSetuid2 logon program if you need one,
- would just need to figure out how to get it to you.
-
- Vance Corn
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:31:48 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: WHOAMI program
-
- Answer to my WHOAMI program problem.
-
- Problem: Program would not do anything on an 808x based machine.
-
- Fix: Program was originally compiled with the G2 command line option which
- enabled the 80286 instruction set. By re-compiling with G0 the program
- ran just fine.
-
- Eric Brunsen
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:17:18 on 92/09/08 GMT (by HOCK at GDLVM7) --
- Subject: NETRUN crash
- Ref: none
-
- I have trouble when using the NETRUN facility on LS 2.0. Whenever I
- try to use it, my server crashes and it is time to power it off and
- back on. Is this a known problem, or do you need more information
- to try to debug it? If it's known, is there any way to avoid this
- nasty problem and use NETRUN?
-
- Rich Hock
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:36:32 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR or PCLP & NETLOGON Errlevel
-
- I am trying to find answers to the following 2 problems.
-
- 1. How can I tell whether a machine is running DLR or PCLP from within my
- application. Would appreciate any advise. Just point me to the correct
- API's etc.
-
- 2. What (if any) ErrorLevels are returned by Net Logon? Am specifically
- interested in those returned by incorrect password, user already logged
- on, rescource assignment failure, network password experation, etc.
-
- Thanx,
-
- Eric Brunsen
- Eastern New Mexico University
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:26:06 on 92/09/08 GMT (by SADS29F at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS 3.0, DOS & Performance
- Ref: Append at 20:07:00 on 92/09/01 GMT (by IL48228 at OS2CUST)
-
- I've had the same problem on 2.0 requesters intermittently since April.
- I had it repeatably on my 2.0 Entry server, but Development couldn't
- recreate it - we attributed it to my "messy" upgrade from 1.3.
- I'm reluctant to try the 3.0 Beta until I can resolve this problem
- with 2.0 - but hadn't come across anyone with similar symptoms until
- this item.I'm hoping the 2.0 "Service Paks" will have a fix...
-
- Dick Duncan, Alameda County DPD
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:04:25 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL04688 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Public apps folder empty
-
- The support center in Austin thought that this might actually be a known
- workplace shell problem in which folders come up empty. They had me boot
- from diskette and change to the os2 directory and run MAKEINI OS2.INI INI.RC
- and MAKEINI OS2SYS.INI INISYS.RC, then run ATTRIB C:\WP?ROOT.?SF -s -r -h
- and DEL C:\WP?ROOT.?SF and reboot. But it did NOT fix the problem. I tried
- installing a different LIU/2 model, but the final behavior is the same:
- Logon to IBM Lan Server and the public applications folder appears. Open it
- and it is empty. Try arrange and sort; still empty. Open Lan Requester,
- lots of things selected in program starter. Add another app. Close Lan
- Requester and go back to public applications folder -- still empty.
-
- Any ideas ??
-
- Leo Tornow
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:18:21 on 92/09/08 GMT (by MATTR at BCRVMPC1)
- Subject: INT 21 (5E02h) and (5f02h) not working
- Ref: Append at 19:12:04 on 92/09/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82)
-
- A customer is having a problem in OS2PRINT CFORUM using these
- interrupt functions. Can anyone help that knows what the filesystem
- does for these calls?
-
- Matt Rutkowski
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:13:42 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Help in setting up RIPL for reference disk
-
- I am having trouble setting up an image file for a reference disk under OS/2
- 2.0 LAN Server Program. I am not sure how to make the autoexec file recognize
- the command.com file of the reference disk. Am I on the right track?? Most of
- what I have done so far has been trial and error. Is this the most thorough way
- of figuring out how to write RIPL images? I've been trying to use the Network
- Administrator's reference guide but find it does not get very specific. Please
- point me in the right direction and let me know if there are any reference
- manuals out there that I can get my hands on to help with RIPL.
-
- The RIPL machine I have has no hard or floppy disk and is an PS/2 8555
-
- Dale Radspinner, Simco Electronics, Inc. (713)483-3574
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:29:18 on 92/09/08 GMT (by RDJOHNS at MSPVMIC1)
- Subject: LS 2.0 NEW FUNCTIONS & FEATURES - RIPLing ES
- My customer recently acquired this redbook (GG24-3875). It is
- excellent!! He is currently setting up a server to RIPL OS/2 2.0 & ES
- workstations. He found a section in the redbook that mentions an
- available package on OS2TOOLS called "FULLINST". The redbook says this
- package contains config files for a full & complete install of ES Comm
- Mgr. This would be a quick & easy way to have all the available Comm
- Mgr features on his RIPL server.
-
- I have been unable to locate the "FULLINST" package on OS2TOOLS or
- other conference disks. Can someone help me locate this package?
- Thanks.....
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:32:05 on 92/09/08 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 21:45:39 on 92/09/08 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
- This APPEND was deleted at 17:45:38 on 09/08/92 EST.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:40:47 on 92/09/08 GMT (by LOY2 at DFWVM04) -
- Subject: OS/2 2.0 Ripl
- Ref: Append at 12:27:24 on 92/06/08 GMT (by ZJLH07 at OS2CUST)
-
- Thanks to this append things are progressing...
- Now I'm getting an error message which I cannot figure out...
-
- "Error opening boot file"
-
- Anyone out there know what I've done wrong? Thanks in advance
-
- Dick Loy, Roanoke, TX
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:23:47 on 92/09/08 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Help in setting up RIPL for reference disk
- Ref: Append at 19:13:42 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
-
- It sounds like you are using the wrong technique to create the
- RIPL image. To create a Reference diskette image, use the
- following procedure:
-
- 1. Select the 'Definition' option from the Main panel.
- 2. Select the 'Images' option.
- 3. Select the 'NEW' entry.
- 4. Select 'Create' option.
- 5. Enter image name, use default of 'Definition file' = NO.
- 6. When image profile list is displayed, select the image
- from step 5.
- 7. Select the 'Make' option (top line).
- 8. Select "To Server" option.
- 9. Insert the Reference diskette in drive A.
- 10. Enter the 'Source Drive' = A and select the appropriate
- RIPL server from the displayed list.
- 11. An image of the reference diskette will be created.
-
- This image can then be used to RIPL a medialess workstation and
- run the appropriate hardware configuration steps.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:00:00 on 92/09/09 GMT (by NIC177 at SFOVMIC6)
- Subject: CONFIG.SYS Errors after installing ES then LS
-
- After installing ES and then LS on top of a 1.30.2 EE (which had the
- LAN Requester, CM and DBM installed) system, I am receiving an error message
- (see below) at boot time. After pressing ENTER to continue on with the boot,
- the system (including LAN Requester and comm mgr) seems to operate fine
- The C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBIOS.OS2 file exists. Why are these
- messages being displayed?? I want/need to understand these msgs since
- this migration scenario will be replicated on many machines. Any info
- is greatly appreciated. Following are copies of the error msgs and
- relevant CONFIG.SYS entries. Thanks
-
- ---------------These are the boot msgs--------------------------------------
- IBM OS/2 LANDLLDD 2.01
- Installing NETWKSTA.SYS Version 2.0.279 (April 1, 1992)
- IBM OS/2 NETBIOS 4.0
- Adapter 0 has 0 NCBs, 9 sessions, and 6 names available to
- NETBIOS applications.
- LT00090: Adapter 0: NETBIOS is not operational.
- SYS1201: The device driver C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBIOS.OS2 specified in the
- DEVICE command on line 61 of the CONFIG.SYS was not installed.
- Line 61 is ignored.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- DEVICE=C:\ibmcom\lanmsgdd.os2 /I:C:\ibmcom
- DEVICE=C:\ibmcom\protman.os2 /I:C:\ibmcom
- DEVICE=C:\ibmcom\protocol\LANDD.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\ibmcom\protocol\LANDLLDD.OS2
-
- RUN=C:\ibmcom\protocol\landll.exe
- RUN=C:\ibmcom\protocol\netbind.exe
- RUN=C:\ibmcom\lanmsgex.exe
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBEUI.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\RDRHELP.SYS
- IFS=C:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\NETWKSTA.SYS /I:C:\IBMLAN /N
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBIOS.OS2----------->>>>> This is line #61
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\MACS\IBMTOK.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\CMLIB\APPN\CMKFMDD.SYS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:48:28 on 92/09/09 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: CONFIG.SYS Errors after installing ES then LS
- Ref: Append at 02:00:00 on 92/09/09 GMT (by NIC177 at SFOVMIC6)
-
- Looks like you're running out of NCB's. Up the number of NCB's in
- the PROTOCOL.INI file and see what happens.
-
- PC
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:20:35 on 92/09/09 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Help in setting up RIPL for reference disk
-
- Larry,
-
- You got me through the initial setup of the reference disk and I get to the
- main menu. What is the trick to copying an option disk? I get a message saying
- that "This selection is not available when running an image of the reference
- diskette." I had got this far before trying run the reference disk over the
- network but got the same error. Thanks
-
- Dale Radspinner, Simco Electronics, Inc. (713)483-3574
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:58:49 on 92/09/09 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Netbios Support in a VDM
- Ref: Append at 19:10:29 on 92/09/02 GMT (by XXULTR04 at TORVMCOP)
-
- What errors are you getting? Have you allocated more NetBIOS resources for
- this program?
-
- Dave Scheffer, ARGO Data Resource Corp.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:02:23 on 92/09/09 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Help in setting up RIPL for reference disk
- Ref: Append at 15:20:35 on 92/09/09 GMT (by IL44027 at OS2CUST)
-
- The diskette that is used to create an image must be a bootable
- DOS system diskette. The Reference Diskette is a bootable DOS
- system diskette. An Option Diskette is NOT a bootable diskette.
- You must use the "Install an Option" feature of the Reference
- Diskette to update your Reference Diskette, then, make an image
- of the Reference Diskette.
-
- David Dutcher
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:43:19 on 92/09/09 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
- Ref: Append at 17:22:24 on 92/09/03 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
-
- Thanks for your reply, Vance.
-
- I wrote a program using NetWkstaSetUID2 and it works when I am booted for
- os/2 2.0 pm. However, it locks up when booted os/2 2.0 non-pm. The problem
- appears to be that the requester doesn't finish its install. If I use
- 'net start req' it gets to about the seventh elapsed time dot, and the usual
- flurry of disk activity is heard when the requester install is finished.
- However, the elapsed time dots keep on going. If I ctrl-break out and run
- a program which does a NetServiceControl with an interrogate opcode I get
- a status of 1 (install pending) and a code of 4294952970. I wrote a program
- to use NetServiceInstall to start the requester without going through net.exe
- and it doesn't hang - but it still ends up with an 'install pending'.
-
- Any ideas on how to get the requester service to successfully install in a full
- screen (non-pm) mode? Following is my config.sys:
-
- ifs=\os2\hpfs.ifs /c:64
- protshell=\os2\cmd.exe /k \startup.cmd
- libpath=.;\;\os2\dll;\prog\dll;\ibmlan\netlib;\muglib\dll;\ibmcom\dll;
- set path=\;\os2;\os2\system;\os2\install;\prog;\ibmlan\netprog;\muglib;
- set dpath=\;\os2;\os2\system;\os2\install;\prog;\ibmlan\netprog;\ibmlan;\muglib
- device=\ibmcom\lanmsgdd.os2 /i:\ibmcom
- device=\ibmcom\protman.os2 /i:\ibmcom
- device=\ibmcom\protocol\landd.os2
- device=\ibmcom\protocol\landlldd.os2
- buffers=60
- diskcache=64,lw
- iopl=yes
- memman=noswap,move
- protectonly=yes
- country=001,\os2\system\country.sys
- set keys=on
- basedev=print02.sys
- basedev=ibm2flpy.add
- basedev=ibm2scsi.add
- basedev=os2scsi.dmd
- basedev=os2dasd.dmd
- run=\ibmcom\protocol\landll.exe
- run=\ibmcom\protocol\netbind.exe
- run=\ibmcom\lanmsgex.exe
- device=\ibmcom\protocol\netbeui.os2
- device=\ibmlan\netprog\rdrhelp.200
- ifs=\ibmlan\netprog\netwksta.200 /i:\ibmlan /n
- device=\ibmcom\protocol\netbios.os2
- device=\ibmcom\macs\ibmtok.os2
- rem run=\ibmlan\netprog\lsdaemon.exe
-
- I removed the lsdaemon.exe because I noticed that it references pm dll's
- and starts stoplan.exe, which also references pm dll's, but this didn't
- make any difference.
-
- Thanks for any suggestions you might have.
-
- Brian Norwood AWG Kansas City, KS (AWGDBWN at HONE86)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:33:31 on 92/09/09 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Help in setting up RIPL for reference disk
- Ref: Append at 16:02:23 on 92/09/09 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
-
- As David indicated, the Option diskette must be copied to the
- Reference diskette prior to building the RIPL image. The
- easiest way is to boot the Reference diskette in a machine that
- has a diskette drive and use the 'Copy Option Diskette' option.
- If you do not have a machine that can boot the Reference diskette,
- you can manually copy the appropriate files from the Option
- diskette to the Reference diskette. Usually the files to be
- copied are the *.DGS and *.ADF files. However, some adapters may
- require additional files to be copied.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:49:07 on 92/09/09 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
-
- We have a product called IEF which is a case tool from Texas Instruments. It
- consists of 3 products each with a differenct license count.
-
- At an IBM training course I was told that IBM marketed a product which ran
- on LS 2.0 which could be use to manage concurrent user counts for served
- applications but I don't remember the name of the product.
-
- I would like to find out the name of this product, cost, and procurement
- information so I can buy a copy for R&D for use with IEF and perhaps other
- software products with multiple licenses.
-
- Rick Wells, WIS DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION, 608/267-9432
-
- Rick Wells, WIS DEPT of Transportation, 608/267-9432
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:34:21 on 92/09/09 GMT (by MBCSQ11 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: CONFIG.SYS Errors after installing ES then LS
- Ref: Append at 02:00:00 on 92/09/09 GMT (by NIC177 at SFOVMIC6)
-
- I don't have the technical answer to the error message but perhaps it will
- comfort you to know this: I get that same msg regarding NETBIOS not being
- operational frequently on various LAN server machines but it has never caused
- a problem for our network ... I talked to someone at IBM once about this and
- they guessed along with me that essentially the CONFIG.SYS boot process is
- "beating" the token-ring adapter reset....
-
- Brian Treptow Senior Technical Analyst, Miller Brewing Company
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:38:56 on 92/09/09 GMT (by MBCSQ11 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 19:49:07 on 92/09/09 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
-
- I have been looking for a product like this also but never found one. Lan
- Server 2.0 can of course manage concurrent licenses for a served application
- as long as you have an alias at the level of the software. This works without
- error so long as you can get away with having enough drive letters for all
- the aliases you would need for all your concurrent-use-licensed software...
-
- Brian Treptow Senior Technical Analyst, Miller Brewing Company
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:09:00 on 92/09/09 GMT (by VCORN at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
- Ref: Append at 16:43:19 on 92/09/09 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
-
- Try renaming os2\dll\pmwin.dll before starting requester and logging on.
-
- Vance Corn
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:33:31 on 92/09/09 GMT (by NDIGGS at LSAVMIC4)
- Subject: E-mail between OS/2 LAN Server and Netware
-
- Can anyone out there direct me to an E-mail package that will
- allow my customer to establish comunications between OS/2 LAN server
- 2.0 and Netware 3.11 or 2.2. The customer is currently using MicroSoft
- mail.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:40:18 on 92/09/09 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Public apps folder empty
- Ref: Append at 17:04:25 on 92/09/08 GMT (by IL04688 at OS2CUST)
-
- Leo,
- Does the empty public apps folder stay with the machine, or with the userid, or
- only with one userid on one machine?
-
- You didn't by accident install the LAN Requester 3.0 Beta code - it has this
- exact same problem with certain configurations.
-
- I have found that the public apps folder under 2.0 seems to be somewhat dynamic
- ,sometime people do not get all of thier icons and they must logoff/logon to g
- et all of them, or go into LR full screen and into program starter and del an O
- S/2 program, wait, and then add the same one back again. This rebulids the pub
- lic apps group.I would like to see this behavior cleaned up.
-
- Good luck,
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:28:51 on 92/09/09 GMT (by BCFLYNN at NYCVMIC1)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 19:49:07 on 92/09/09 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
-
- You may be thinking of the package called VENDOR, which is orderable
- thru your IBM representative for no charge. Tell your SE that it used
- to be on MKTOOLS but now must be REQUESTED from Austin. They can
- find further info on VENDOR FORUM on IBMPC. They should know what
- that means.
-
- Brian Flynn
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:30:27 on 92/09/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 19:49:07 on 92/09/09 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
-
- There is a package that is available thru your SE or Sales Rep. called VENDOR
- that is what your are looking for I believe. Think if you search back you
- can find a post from myself and several others asking where it was. It was
- originally said to be available here, but after about a month of run-around I
- was told to get it thru my SE. Which I did. Haven't tried to implement it
- yet because of the delay in getting it we went on to other things.
-
- Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:30:58 on 92/09/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 19:49:07 on 92/09/09 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
-
- Correction the posts where in the "IS There" forum.
-
- Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:55:29 on 92/09/10 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 23:28:51 on 92/09/09 GMT (by BCFLYNN at NYCVMIC1)
-
- Thanks. I'll pursue this further with our SE. Rick
-
- Rick Wells, WIS DEPT of Transportation, 608/267-9432
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:59:30 on 92/09/10 GMT (by WIS0417 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Applicaton License Counts With LS 2.0 served software products
- Ref: Append at 00:30:58 on 92/09/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84)
-
- Thanks. I'll pursue this further with our SE. Rick
-
- Rick Wells, WIS DEPT of Transportation, 608/267-9432
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:23:24 on 92/09/10 GMT (by AWGDBWN at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NON-PM OS/2 2.0 AND LAN REQUESTER
- Ref: Append at 22:09:00 on 92/09/09 GMT (by VCORN at AUSVM1) -
-
- Renaming the pm*.dll files did work. Thanks for your help, Vance.
-
- Brian Norwood AWG Kansas City, KS (AWGDBWN at HONE86)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:44:36 on 92/09/10 GMT (by SVRN018 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Support 1.3?
-
- I am trying to get Chameleon's TCP/IP for Windows running with Dos Lan
- Requester. The people at Chameleon's tech. support say that we need
- Lan Support program vers 1.3 with the NDIS drivers. What do these drivers
- ship with? The Lansup drivers with Lan Server Advanced are version 1.25.
-
- Am I missing something? (or did Chameleon inhale when they did Windows?)
-
- Thanks in advance!
-
- Brad Bueche NationsBank EUC/Hotline Technical Support Norfolk, VA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:02:45 on 92/09/10 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Support 1.3?
- Ref: Append at 14:44:36 on 92/09/10 GMT (by SVRN018 at OS2CUST)
-
- LAN Server 2.0 uses DOS LAN Support Program Version 1.25. LSP V1.25
- does not support NDIS device drivers. LAN Server 3.0 will ship
- with LSP V1.31 which will support NDIS device drivers.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:26:44 on 92/09/10 GMT (by JHB369 at PKMFGVM1)
- Subject: Net9853 error message
-
- When I log on from my requester I get the error message NET9853 -
- 'Your user ID was not added as a message name. The Message service
- may not be started or your user ID may already be in use as a message
- name on the network.'
- How do I correct this?
-
- Jim Brown(JHB369 at PKMFGVM1)
- 8-292-1094
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:40:16 on 92/09/10 GMT (by TSO09 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Lan Server Administration
-
- I recently inherited responsibility for Lan Administration on a LAN
- Server network. The current Administrator has made several
- statements that I don't understand. The network is a mix of 8 to
- 10 Lan Server 1.3 and 3.0 advanced servers in a single domain,
- the Domain Controller is 1.3. There are about 200 users, all
- running OS/2 1.3 or 2.0.
-
- The issue is when and how administration functions can be done. I
- am being told that you must make sure that only one administrator
- at a time is doing administrative functions.(add/maint user list,
- applications, or access rights). They tell me that multiple can be
- defined and that the system will allow multiple to try to work at
- once, but that we run a high chance of corrupting the NET.ACC file,
- if there is simultaneous maintenance.
-
- This sounds like a bad situation, but a livable one. However they
- then go on to say that all maintenance should be done off hours
- when there is no chance of the user id's you are doing maintenance
- to, are logged on. The argument for Lan Server over Novell is the
- ease of maintenance on the multiple servers. My personal philosophy
- is that nothing that "must" be done on off hours is easer!!
-
- I would appreciate any comments on if these restrictions are
- necessary, particularly from Lan Server development people.
- The person who originally set this network up had several years
- experience with Lan Server at another company. He insists that
- whenever they violated these restrictions at his old company,
- the NET.ACC file would corupt. His past experience was with older
- releases of Lan Server, please tell me that this has been fixed.
-
- Ed Klein
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:44:00 on 92/09/10 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Net9853 error message
- Ref: Append at 18:26:44 on 92/09/10 GMT (by JHB369 at PKMFGVM1)
-
- Jim,
- Please ensure that the computer(requestor) name is NOT the same as your
- userid.
- You can change it in the'OS/2 LAN Services Installation/Configuration'
- (laninst.exe) or editing directly the \ibmlan\ibmlan.ini
- Look for :
- ............
- ìrequester┘
-
- COMPUTERNAME = IS0944
- DOMAIN = NHO32
- ................
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:18:43 on 92/09/10 GMT (by SVRN018 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Support 1.3?
- Ref: Append at 18:02:45 on 92/09/10 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
-
- Larry,
-
- I just got off the phone with Chameleon. The rep. there says that their
- information is that the product went into beta in June and the beta period
- ended at the end of July. He said that they also understood that the person
- working on this project (i.e. the person to have your IBM rep. contact) was
- somebody named Toni Sweetland. I say "was" because the Chameleon rep. also
- states that they understand that Toni is no longer working on the Lan
- Support program.
- The Chameleon rep stated that he had a part number for Lan Support version
- 1.3 as well. He says that the part number that he has for it is 93F2456.
- He said that he understood that the product could be purchased by itself (i.e.
- without Lan Server).
-
- Could you please tell me if his information is correct? Or where is the
- confusion coming in here. I see that the product that you mention is
- version 1.31 not 1.3; is there a 1.3? If there is a 1.3 how do I go about
- getting it. We may get the 3.0 beta and I assume 1.31 will come with that.
- Is this correct? But that may take a while. How do I get 1.3 ASAP?
-
- Thanks in advance!
-
- Brad Bueche NationsBank EUC/Hotline Technical Support Norfolk, VA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:50:17 on 92/09/10 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Support 1.3?
- Ref: Append at 20:18:43 on 92/09/10 GMT (by SVRN018 at OS2CUST)
-
- DOS LAN Support Program V1.3 is a standalone product that can be
- purchased from IBM (I don't know the part number).
-
- LAN Server 2.0 packaged LSP V1.25 as part of LAN Server 2.0. LSP
- V1.3 was not available when LAN Server 2.0 shipped.
-
- LSP V1.31 is a special version of LSP V1.3 (it is LSP 1.3+) that
- is being provided to LAN Server 3.0. It will probably never be
- available as a separate product called LSP V1.31. It will only
- be available with LAN Server 3.0. My guess is that the next
- external version of LSP V???, will incorporate the feature added
- for LAN Server 3.0, but I don't know that for sure. Nor do I
- have any idea when that might happen.
-
- LAN Server 2.0 does not know how to handle NDIS device drivers.
- Even if you had LSP 1.3, you can not just replace LSP 1.25 with
- LSP 1.3. It might be possible to upgrade a DLR requester on
- an individual basis by manually copying the 1.3 files. However,
- you would need to understand the differences between 1.25 and
- 1.3 so that the appropriate configuration changes could be made.
- I don't know if DLR would work after doing this.
- I am NOT recommending that anyone do this, this is pure speculation.
-
- If you were wanting to use LSP 1.3 for Remote IPL support, forget it.
- I don't know if you could ever get it to work. It would take a LOT
- of manual tweeking to set it up. Then the first time you used
- the LS 2.0 menu interface to update the client, you would probably
- lose all the manual changes you had made.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:15:05 on 92/09/10 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
- Subject: LS 2.0 NEW FUNCTIONS & FEATURES - RIPLing ES
- Ref: Append at 21:29:18 on 92/09/08 GMT (by RDJOHNS at MSPVMIC1)
- It is on OS2TOOLS, but its date is 90/06/11 and says it works with
- OS/2 1.2. You would have to contact the author to get permission to
- distribute and to find out if it would work with OS/2 V2.0.
- If he agrees ask him to put it in for EWS (employee written software)
- __ __ ___ __ __ _ _
- | |_| | / \ | \| | | |./ / Hank Henderson HNDERSON at AUSVM8
- | _ | / _~_ \ Sincerely | . < on Assignment to OS/2 BBS (TEAMOS2)
- |__| |__| /_/ \_\ |__|\__| |_| \_\ Tie:8-793-8647 Austin, Texas
- LNK1SM7 @ IBMLINK - OS/2 BBS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:10:32 on 92/09/11 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Lan Server Administration
- Ref: Append at 18:40:16 on 92/09/10 GMT (by TSO09 at OS2CUST)
-
- Multiple administrators working should no longer corrupt net.acc.
- In the 1.2 timeframe there were a lot of problems with the net.acc
- becoming corrupted. These have been eliminated, as long as you
- are using the 1.3 CSD level 5050 you should have no problems with
- multiple administrators working simultaneously.
-
- The reason for doing administrative work on accounts off hours,
- probably was done because some changes to the user accounts do not
- take effect until the next time the user logs on.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:03:18 on 92/09/11 GMT (by ABLI001 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Support 1.3?
- Ref: Append at 22:50:17 on 92/09/10 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
-
- Hi Larry,
- I know that your tag line says that you work for development; but what you say
- doesn't match with what the doc says. I have in front of me the OS/2 LAN serve
- r - entry box (04g1051). On the back it says: ...supports...(NDIS).. Remote IPL
- for both DOS and OS/2...
- The diskette for LAN support program is marked 2.0, not 1.3 or 1.25. The books
- in the box specifically talk about NDIS drivers and creating diskettes for rem
- ote IPL of 1.3 and 2.0 workstations.
-
- ->Rich Corbett; ABC Liquors, Inc., Orlando, FL (NASPA: CORBRIC7)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:10:33 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL47372 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
-
- I was told today by a person I work with That he read IBM will now support Mac
- requesters on a OS/2 LAN. He can remember what paper he saw it in. Is this true
- ???
-
- Thomas Zingarella Cartier Inc.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:07:39 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL42140 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: OS/2 Pub Apps Icons
-
- Is there a way to get the "native" icons for programs defined as Public OS/2
- within LAN Server 2.0? I see that on the user's side, they're actually
- executing some sort of enabler application that fires up the actual .exe file
- on the server - so I could see why the icons are not showing. Is there a
- technique using REXX or something that will show the icons?
-
- Chris Klann, BETA Systems Inc.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:42:58 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Data Services on a RIPL'd station with ES
-
- I have successfully RIPL'd several workstations and have them using
- communications manager and data base manager installed according to
- the directions in the Red Book GG24-3875-00 "Lan Server 2.0 New
- Functions and Features". My only problem seems to be that I cannot
- open the remote data base that we have residing on our data base
- server. We have no problem accessing it from our standard non-RIPL'd
- workstations. I am assuming that you have to do something special
- in addition to the Red Book instructions to get remote data services
- to work. The only thing I found and tried was to add one additional
- line to the config.sys DEVICE=C:\CMLIB\RDSLANDD.SYS, but this did not
- solve the problem. The message that I am getting when I try to open
- the database (which I have previously cataloged as remote to the
- remote workstations) is QRW2272W, with an additional code of '0038'.
- When I looked it up under messages, I was pointed to SQL30080N. Under
- that error, reason 38 says "Requested resources not available". Can
- you give me any insight into this problem???
-
- Elizabeth Parker, University of Florida Information Systems
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:46:15 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Data Services on a RIPL's workstation with ES
-
- I forgot to mention, we are using NETBIOS for remote data services.
-
- Elizabeth Parker, University of Florida Information Systems
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:25:09 on 92/09/12 GMT (by NMM1009 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Unable to get license on shared 123W from OS2/LS 2.0 requester
-
- We are sharing 123 for Windows from a server running LAN Server 1.3 CSD5050.
- Under this same alias we have put the license counter that Lotus sends with
- their network products. If we access this alias from a DLR/Windows 3.1
- requester everything works fine. If we access this same alias from an OS2/
- LS 2.0 requester from a WINOS2 session we get an error stating that no
- licenses are available (even when there are know to be some available).
- Both requesters are using the same alias and have the 123W.INI file in the
- appropriate sub-directory. They even have the same 123W.INI file. Does
- anyone have a similar problem or any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks!
-
- Don Cantrell, Nissan Motor Mfg Corp. Smyrna, TN 37167
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:56:47 on 92/09/14 GMT (by XXTLRT01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: DOS LAN REQUESTER
-
- TRYED TO INSTALL DOS LAN REQUESTER USING A DOS 5.0 SESSION AND A DOS 3.30
- SESSION BUT TO NO AVAIL. THE INSTALL PROGRAM WOULD FAIL TO COMPLETE.
- I THEN BOOTED UP WITH DOS 5.0 AND INSTALLED DOS LAN REQUESTER THAT WAY
- WITH SUCCESS. RE-BOOTED TO OS/2 AND RAN A DOS 5.0 SESSION AND TRYED TO
- PERFORM A "NET START" BUT I KEEP GETTING A "NET074: THE NETWORK CANNOT BE
- STARTED, NETWORK ADAPTER RESOURCES ARE DEPLETED. THERE ARE PLENTY OF
- NETBIOS NCBS, SESSIONS AND NAME CONFIGURED. CAN ANYBODY SHED SOME LIGHT?
-
- Ray Hori TORIBM(XXTLRT01)
- Telerate Canada Inc.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:42:43 on 92/09/14 GMT (by N$H52HAL at RALVM11)
- Subject: Unable to get license on shared 123W from OS2/LS 2.0 requester
- Ref: Append at 02:25:09 on 92/09/12 GMT (by NMM1009 at OS2CUST)
-
- We had the same problem with 123 for DOS.
- We never could get the setup program to work under OS/2.
- Finally had to boot under DLR to do it.
-
- We also had the "0 license" response from the program.
-
- Hal
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:49:22 on 92/09/14 GMT (by JPICKER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: DOS LAN REQUESTER
- Ref: Append at 14:56:47 on 92/09/14 GMT (by XXTLRT01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- There are actually two netbios resources that have to be configured.
- One is system wide, which can be configured by editing the Protocol.ini
- file found in the \IBMCOM directory. The second one is for each specific
- DOS session. You need to run the utility LTSVCFG.COM which also resides
- in the \IBMCOM directory. We recommend the following parameters:
-
- LTSVCFG S=12 C=14
-
- This will configure the DOS session for twelve sessions and fourteen
- commands which is the minimum requirement for DOS LAN Requester to
- start as a RECEIVER.
-
- Jim Pickering
- DOS LAN Requester Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 12:35:39 on 92/09/15 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote Data Services on a RIPL'd station with ES
- Ref: Append at 20:42:58 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL46290 at OS2CUST)
-
- It sounds like Remote Data Services is getting an access denied
- error or file not found error when it tries to run. If it is
- an access denied error, turn on auditing on the server for the
- database directories in the RPL directory tree. Access denied
- errors will be logged, you can then move the file(s) to the RPLUSER
- tree and add entries in the client.FIT to map them to RPLUSER.
- File not found is more difficult, these error are not logged in
- the audit file. The best way to find file not found errors is to
- use a network analyzer and look at the data frames flowing on the
- the wire. However, not everyone has access to such a device.
- Another possiblity is to use the OS/2 TRACE facility and trace
- on major_code 48 (file I/O). Do this on the RIPL workstation not
- the server. This can generate a lot of data, so set it up
- first. Then turn on trace, do the RDS request, and immediately
- turn off trace. Then use the TRACEFMT commmand to dump the data.
- Look for an error on a OPEN request.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:10:39 on 92/09/15 GMT (by X019347 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Upgrade from 1.2 to 2.0 BS and LS
-
- We are planning to upgrade are single server Domain from OS/2 1.2 ee with
- LS 1.2 to OS/2 2.0 with LS 2.0 Entry.
- What is IBM 'Recommended' Way?? Do I goto 1.3 first and then 2.0 or can I go
- strait to 2.0??
-
- Jim Grant
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:46:38 on 92/09/15 GMT (by SC31401 at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Upgrade from 1.2 to 2.0 BS and LS
- Ref: Append at 15:10:39 on 92/09/15 GMT (by X019347 at OS2CUST)
-
- Upgrading from OS/2 EE 1.2 to LAN Server 2.0 - Entry is documented
- pretty clearly in the LAN Server 2.0 Migration Handbook.
- Luckily, since you are moving to the Entry package, migration is
- fairly simple - you can ALMOST just install and go, but PLEASE
- follow the backup steps listed in the book just to be on the save
- side in case something untoward happens.
-
- According to feedback from other customers, LAN Server 2.0 upgrade/
- migration paths are much better than previous releases, so you
- should have little/no trouble following the handbook's steps.
-
- M.A. Philpot
- OS/2 LAN Server System Test
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:28:37 on 92/09/16 GMT (by IL05357 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: CNFGLS13 and LS 2.0 and 2 TR adapters
-
- I am setting up a server which is hooked up to two token ring
- networks, a 16M and 4M. The 16M has 3 OS/2 requesters, as well as
- 8 3270 Gateways (3 sessions each) and a 3174 host gateway connection.
- The 4M will have 34 Dos stations (PCLP 1.3) accessing files on the server.
- The server has 4 mainframe sessions, and 2 5250 sessions (on the 16M),
- and is a 8580-a31 w 12Mb memory running OS/2 1.3 (5050) and ES and LS2.0
- entry.
-
- I will use the CFGLS13 worksheet and the LS 2.0 performance manual to help
- set up my config and init files. Any suggestions?
-
- Thanks in advance....
- ...trm
-
- Timothy R. Muggli, Sr Tech Analyst, Preferred Risk Group
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:07:16 on 92/09/16 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Can't create alias on additional server
-
- We are running OS/2 2.0 & OS/2 2.0 Lan Server. I am trying to create an
- alias from my domain controller which when I go to define it and enter
- the name of my additional server as the name of the server which the alias
- resides it does not show up in the F4=List of servers. However, if I show
- statistics or logs or pre-selected servers the additional server shows up.
- Also if I assign a user a home file set and tell the Lan Server that the
- home file set is to reside on the additional server the domain controller
- server does not list the additional either. Can anyone please inform me
- on how to correct this situation?
-
- Thank you!
-
- Peter P.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:23:32 on 92/09/17 GMT (by AMBC006 at MARTLINK)
- Subject: Net Copy and 0 (Zero) byte files
-
- I am trying to use NET COPY with UNC's to backup up directory trees from a
- server to another server and it seems that Net Copy will not copy a source
- file that has 0 (Zero) bytes. Is this supposed to happen ? My users would
- probably look at the number of files in the target directory and compare it
- to the number of files in the source, if there is a mismatch they will go
- ballistic (like right through the ceiling).
-
- Michael Suszko, Jr (A. M. Best Co., Oldwick NJ)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:23:30 on 92/09/17 GMT (by MRTOM at YKTVMV) -
- Subject: Net Copy and 0 (Zero) byte files
- Ref: Append at 13:23:32 on 92/09/17 GMT (by AMBC006 at MARTLINK)
-
- A regular COPY or XCOPY command won't copy a zero byte file either.
-
- Tom
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:27:13 on 92/09/17 GMT (by SAMI3QU at OS2CUST)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 19:34:35 on 92/09/17 GMT (by SAMI3QU at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Server/Requester and Ethernet
- This APPEND was deleted at 15:34:34 on 09/17/92 EST.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:33:47 on 92/09/17 GMT (by DAWNI at AUSVM1) -
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 22:56:04 on 92/09/17 GMT (by DAWNI at AUSVM1) .
- Subject: Net Copy and 0 (Zero) byte files
- Ref: Append at 14:23:30 on 92/09/17 GMT (by MRTOM at YKTVMV)
-
- | Deleted Append
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:45:35 on 92/09/17 GMT (by IL04688 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Excel SS for LS 2.0 Config
-
- With Lan Server 1.3 there was an Excel spreadsheet to help in the config.
- Does a similar spreadsheet exist for LS 2.0 and 3.0 ? If so, could it be
- made available here ?
-
- Thanks.
-
- Leo Tornow
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:11:15 on 92/09/17 GMT (by FRMLSPA at OS2CUST)
- Subject: CONFIG.SYS Errors after installing ES then LS
- Ref: Append at 21:34:21 on 92/09/09 GMT (by MBCSQ11 at OS2CUST)
-
- We've receive that error message. It seems to be caused by the previous
- message which says how many Netbios resources are available. If one of
- the resources says 0, then the "Netbios not loaded" message appears.
- The message which indicates how many resources are available takes the Netbios
- sessions, commands, and names values from Comm Manager (\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL.INI)
- and subtracts the sessions, commands, names values from the "NET1" line of
- the IBMLAN.INI. This is supposed to tell you how many Netbios resources will
- be left after the IBMLAN requester does its thing. The "Netbios not loaded"
- appears because one of the Netbios resources specified in the "NET1" line is
- greater than the Netbios resources allocated via the PROTOCOL.INI. I think
- the reason the LAN Server still works is that LAN Requester will grab all
- it can up to the limit specified in the IBMLAN.INI or the limit on allocation.
- If you attempted to use Netbios for another app after loading LAN Server, i.e.
- Database Manager connecting via Netbios, that app would probably fail because
- LAN Requester will have already sucked up the available Netbios resources.
- Try increasing your available Netbios sessions, commands, and/or names.
-
- Scott Atwell - Farmland Industries
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:21:58 on 92/09/17 GMT (by FRMLSPA at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Consolodation of Domain Controllers
- Ref: Append at 14:52:33 on 92/08/27 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
-
- You can use a batch file with a list of NET USER user password
- to create each userid, however, you're not going to find a way to extract
- a user's current password. The NetUserEnum API returns null in the password
- field for IBM's proprietary reasons.
-
- Scott Atwell - Farmland Industries
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:35:14 on 92/09/17 GMT (by AMBC006 at MARTLINK)
- Subject: Net Copy and 0 (Zero) byte files
- Ref: Append at 14:23:30 on 92/09/17 GMT (by MRTOM at YKTVMV) -
-
- Tom,
- XCOPY with a /S /E does it extremely well, but XCOPY doesn't support the UNC's.
- And, of course, with XCOPY there are the small problems with locked files and
- other stuff. I am using XCOPY currently, but I want to get out of the drive le
- tter game. I have enough mapping on the VM Mdisks as it is already.
-
- Michael Suszko, Jr (A. M. Best Co., Oldwick NJ)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:44:23 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FVXB533 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Dialog Driven Remote Installation
-
- Has anyone been able to perform a dialog-driven remote installation
- of OS/2 2.0over the LAN. I have gotten the remote install to work
- with a response file but have not been successful with the dialog
- driven. I added the following statements to the CONFIGRI.20 file for
- the machine I was trying to perform to install on and commented out the
- other PROTSHELL statement that uses the response file:
-
- PROTSHELL=Z:\OS2INST\disk_1\SYSINST1.EXE
- SET OS2_SHELL=Z:\OS2INST\disk_1\SYSINST2.EXE Z:\
-
- I am able to get the installation procedure to stop but it stops and
- gives me an error message in the INSTALL.LOG that follows:
-
- INSTALL.LOG
-
- Installing Operating System/2.
- Model = F8
- Submodel = 0B
- ABIOS machine
- Bus Architecture: |-14236|
- POSIDì00┘ = |545c|
- POSIDì01┘ = |c884|
- POSIDì02┘ = |4e68|
- POSIDì03┘ = |27|
- POSIDì04┘ = |240a|
- POSIDì05┘ = |7ff6|
- POSIDì06┘ = |7ff6|
- POSIDì07┘ = |0|
- Disk Type: |0|
- Greater than 15MB primary partition exists.
- Copying files C:\CONFIG.BAK -> C:\CONFIG.008
- Copying files C:\CONFIG.SYS -> C:\CONFIG.BAK
- Copying files C:\AUTOEXEC.BAK -> C:\AUTOEXEC.007
- Copying files C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT -> C:\AUTOEXEC.BAK
- Making directory C:\OS2
- Making directory C:\OS2\DLL
- Making directory C:\OS2\HELP
- Making directory C:\OS2\INSTALL
- Making directory C:\OS2\SYSTEM
- Making directory C:\OS2\SYSTEM\TRACE
- Making directory C:\OS2\BOOK
- Making directory C:\OS2\MDOS
- Making directory C:\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2
- Making directory C:\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2\SYSTEM
- Making directory C:\OS2\BITMAP
- Making directory C:\OS2\APPS
- Making directory C:\OS2\APPS\DLL
- Making directory C:\OS2\HELP\GLOSS
- Making directory C:\OS2\HELP\TUTORIAL
- Making directory C:\OS2\DRIVERS
- Copying files Z:\OS2INST\Disk_2\UNPACK.EXE -> C:\OS2\UNPACK.EXE
- No Dual Boot installed.
- The system cannot open the
- device or file specified.
-
- Open File Error
-
- An error occurred when System Installation tried to open
- a file.
-
- Frank Valdivieso
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:20:27 on 92/09/18 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Dialog Driven Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 15:44:23 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FVXB533 at OS2CUST)
-
- The dialog driven install was the first remote install that I did. I worked
- fine for me. However, I was installing from a Netware server.
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:43:42 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FRMLSPA at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Dialog Driven Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 15:44:23 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FVXB533 at OS2CUST)
-
- I think you may need to add SET SOURCEPATH=path_for_root_of_DISK1 to
- your config.sys as well. We've been using an internal IBM tool
- called SRVIFS which sets up the network connection as an installable
- file system. I believe you need SET SOURCEPATH for the install program
- to know to look for DISK1, DISK2, etc directories.
-
- Scott Atwell - Farmland Industries
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:23:28 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FVXB533 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Dialog Driven Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 17:43:42 on 92/09/18 GMT (by FRMLSPA at OS2CUST)
-
- I followed the instructions in the REDBOOK "Remote Installation and
- Maintenance" and I have included my CONFIGRI.20 file below. My SOURCEPATH
- statement is SET SOURCEPATH=Z:\OS2INST. Maybe there something else that
- I need to change.
-
- REM
- REM Special CONFIG.SYS file to support the remote installation of OS2 2.0
- REM to a Remote IPLed workstation.
- REM
- REM NOTE!!: The name of the INSTALL.RSP file in the PROTSHELL statement
- REM must be updated to reflect the name of the install response
- REM file that will be used to install the workstation. If the
- REM target drive is not C, update the IFS=Z:\OS2\HPFS.IFS
- REM statement to autocheck the target drive.
-
- PROTSHELL=Z:\OS2INST\disk_1\SYSINST1.EXE
- SET OS2_SHELL=Z:\OS2INST\disk_1\SYSINST2.EXE Z:\
-
- DEVICE=Z:\IBMCOM\LANMSGDD.OS2 /I:Z:\IBMCOM
- DEVICE=Z:\IBMCOM\PROTMAN.OS2 /I:Z:\IBMCOM
- DEVICE=Z:\IBMCOM\MACS\IBMTOK.OS2
- DEVICE=Z:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBEUI.OS2
-
- DEVICE=Z:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\RDRHELP.200
- IFS=Z:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\NETWKSTA.200 /I:Z:\IBMLAN
- IFS=Z:\OS2\HPFS.IFS /CACHE:512 /CRECL:4 /AUTOCHECK:CD
-
- SET USER_INI=Z:\OS2\OS2.INI
- SET SYSTEM_INI=Z:\OS2\OS2SYS.INI
- SET COMSPEC=Z:\OS2\CMD.EXE
- SET SOURCEPATH=Z:\OS2INST
-
- REM THE FOLLOWING LINE WAS SPLIT UP SO THAT IT WOULD FIT IN A 80
- REM COLUMN DISPLAY.
-
- LIBPATH=.;Z:\OS2\DLL;Z:\IBMLAN\NETLIB;Z:\MUGLIB\DLL;
- Z:\OS2INST\DISK_1;Z:\OS2INST\DISK_2;
-
- SET PATH=Z:\OS2;Z:\OS2\SYSTEM;Z:\IBMLAN\NETPROG;Z:\MUGLIB;Z:\OS2\INSTALL;Z:\;
- SET DPATH=Z:\OS2;Z:\OS2\SYSTEM;Z:\IBMLAN\NETPROG;Z:\IBMCOM;Z:\OS2\INSTALL;Z:\;
- SET PROMPT=$iì$p┘
- SET HELP=Z:\OS2\HELP;Z:\IBMLAN\HELP;
- SET GLOSSARY=Z:\OS2\HELP\GLOSS;
- SET BOOKSHELF=Z:\OS2\BOOK;Z:\IBMLAN\BOOK;
- SET EPATH=Z:\OS2\APPS
-
- BUFFERS=30
- IOPL=YES
- rem DISKCACHE=64,LW
- MAXWAIT=3
- MEMMAN=SWAP,PROTECT
-
- REM Use the following statement for SWAPPER.DAT on server:
- SWAPPATH=Z:\OS2\SYSTEM 4096 512
- REM Use the following statement for SWAPPER.DAT on workstation. Note that
- REM this statement can not be used if the C drive will be formatted:
- REM SWAPPATH=C:\ 1024 2048
-
- BREAK=OFF
- THREADS=512
- PRINTMONBUFSIZE=134,134,134
- COUNTRY=001,Z:\OS2\SYSTEM\COUNTRY.SYS
- SET KEYS=ON
- REM SET DELDIR=Z:\DELETE,512;
-
- rem BASEDEV=PRINT01.SYS
- BASEDEV=PRINT02.SYS
- rem BASEDEV=IBM1FLPY.ADD
- BASEDEV=IBM2FLPY.ADD
- BASEDEV=IBM2ADSK.ADD
- rem BASEDEV=IBM1S506.ADD
- BASEDEV=IBM2SCSI.ADD /LED
- BASEDEV=OS2SCSI.DMD
- BASEDEV=OS2DASD.DMD
-
- SET BOOKSHELF=Z:\OS2\BOOK;Z:\IBMLAN\BOOK;
- SET EPATH=Z:\OS2\APPS
- PROTECTONLY=YES
- FCBS=16,8
- DEVINFO=SCR,VGA,Z:\OS2\VIOTBL.DCP
-
- REM Use the following 4 statements for workstations with XGA displays:
- REM DEVICE=Z:\OS2\XGARING0.SYS
- REM SET VIDEO_DEVICES=VIO_XGA
- REM SET VIO_XGA=DEVICE(BVHVGA,BVHXGA)
-
- REM Use the following 2 statements for workstations with VGA displays:
- SET VIDEO_DEVICES=VIO_VGA
- SET VIO_VGA=DEVICE(BVHVGA)
-
- CODEPAGE=437,850
- DEVINFO=KBD,US,Z:\OS2\KEYBOARD.DCP
-
- Frank Valdivieso
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:05:26 on 92/09/18 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Consolodation of Domain Controllers
- Ref: Append at 22:21:58 on 92/09/17 GMT (by FRMLSPA at OS2CUST)
-
- It's not "IBM proprietary reasons" for not returning the password...
- LAN Server stores a scrambled version of the password from which the
- original password can never be recovered. This is a security feature.
- There is no way to recover or discover a user's password even if you
- read all the bits on the LAN Server's disks and on the network wires.
-
- When you type your password at login, it's scrambled using the same
- scrambling process the server did... and then it's sent to the server.
- The server compares what it received with the scrambled version it has
- stored.
-
- For you security experts out there note this is a simplified explanation.
- More details if you really want them... just ask.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:38:01 on 92/09/21 GMT (by SRPIE05 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Consolodation of Domain Controllers
- Ref: Append at 22:05:26 on 92/09/18 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM1)
-
- >"When you type your password at login, it's scrambled using the same
- scrambling process the server did... and then it's sent to the server.
- The server compares what it received with the scrambled version it has
- stored."
-
- That's consistent with most other password schemes and exactly what I
- expected. But I don't really need to have the passwords in un-scrambled
- format to accomplish what I need to do.
-
- As I see it, I have 2 options:
-
- 1 - Either find or write a procedure to pull records out of 1 NET.ACC file and
- insert them into another. The problem with this is that I can't find any
- supplied utility or any documentation on the internals for the NET.ACC
- file. Any ideas where I could look?
-
- 2 - Trap the passwords when the user enters them. We implemented a procedure
- similar to this when we migrated an MVS system from ACF2 to RACF. Is
- there an exit point within LS that I can get at to implement something
- like this?
-
- Thanks.
-
- Thane Smith - Salt River Project - IBMMAIL(USSRP4RP)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:13:17 on 92/09/21 GMT (by NBQHGQ3 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: CNFGLS for 2.0 ?? When ??
-
- CNFGLS for 1.3 was a great help and valuable tool for tuning LS1.3. When will
- CNFGLS for 2.0 be available ???
-
- Jim Nennig
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:37:07 on 92/09/21 GMT (by NABCA7B at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Server 2.0 Cache Parameters
-
- While reading the Network Administrator Reference Performance Tuning guide, I
- came across a reference to the /LAZY switch that I had never seen before. On
- page 6-7 the guide indicates that a drive letter can be specified with this
- switch. I have two disk drives on our Domain Controller and now I'm wondering
- if I have Lazywrite turned ON for the "D:" drive. Would a correct use of
- the CACHE.EXE program be: RUN=CACHE.EXE /LAZY:C:ON /LAZY:D:ON?? I suppose
- that the default is LAZY:ON for all drives, so unless OFF is specified it's a
- moot point, but I was curious to see this here since the online OS/2
- information never makes mention of the optional drive parameter. I'm also
- wondering if running CACHE.EXE automatically buffers all disk drives in the
- system. The documentation is unclear.
-
- Also, the Performance Tuning guide makes mention of the FAT system cache
- parameter DISKCACHE and the HPFS system cache CACHE. In an all HPFS system, is
- there any need to specify a DISKCACHE parameter? Anyone have any ideas?
-
- Michael Laughlin Allied-Signal Aerospace
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:11:11 on 92/09/22 GMT (by CORVENA at SYDVM1)
- Subject: NET4915 Error starting OS/2 1.3 with LS Adv 2.0
-
- Running OS/2 1.3, ES and LS Adv 2.0 with local server security on a
- model 80-A31 with 16MBytes RAM.
-
- When the system starts up and I do NOT logon at the initial prompt,
- I receive the following error messaage :
-
- NET4915: Error 5 occurred while starting the default protect-mode
- shell: C:\OS2\PMSHELL.EXE
-
- and all I can do is re-boot (Ctrl-Alt-Del), then logon at the initial
- prompt. Once I have logged on, OS/2 starts OK (as well as Server, etc.).
-
- My problem is that this machine should be able to re-start automatically
- after a power outage, and having to logon means that it cannot.
-
- Any clues/suggestions ?
-
- Alan Corven SYDVM1(CORVENA)
- IBM Australia
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:38:16 on 92/09/22 GMT (by CORVENA at SYDVM1)
- Subject: Local server security versus unattended backup
-
- I am trying to understand how local server security and unattended
- backup can work together without creating some sort of security
- exposure.
-
- The way I understand it is :
-
- In order to allow unattended backup you need a user-id to be logged
- on to the server. This user-id could be an administrator id, or should
- at least have read authority to all directories/drives which require
- backup. If I want the backup software to run on the server itself
- (because I know the server will be running 24hrs a day), then the
- admin/backup user-id must also be logged on AT the server.
-
- So that this can happen daily automatically, I would leave the admin/
- backup user-id logged on at the server all the time.
- This would effectively allow anyone who gets access to the servers
- keyboard to at least read (if backup user-id) or even delete (if admin
- user-id) any files on the server - removing the benefits of local
- server security !
-
- I know I can use a keyboard lock program, but that is no better security
- than I had for LAN Server 1.3.
-
- Also, to give a backup user-id the appropriate accesses I need to
- create aliases for the drives/directories and apply the profiles.
- Applying the profiles MAY override other profiles, unless I create
- and apply these BEFORE I create others (which I cannot do now, as
- I already have many alises defined and applied).
-
- Is this understanding correct, or am I missing something somewhere ?
-
- Can someone suggest an alternative unattended backup methodology which
- does not compromise the nice features of local server security ?
-
- Thanks.
-
- Alan Corven SYDVM1(CORVENA)
- IBM Australia
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 04:53:10 on 92/09/22 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Local server security versus unattended backup
- Ref: Append at 02:38:16 on 92/09/22 GMT (by CORVENA at SYDVM1)
-
- Alan,
- You can create nice CMD files (or REXX programs) to do the job for you
- .Do the logon , logoff from the batch prrogram and use the @AT command
- to execute. Like:
-
- Logon MASTER /p:xxx /D:...
- Sytos "Full Night"
- Logoff /D
- ^Z
-
- Issue the at command
- AT time [/EVERY:date[,...] | /NEXT:date[,...]] command
-
- The AT runs Detached (unattended) so you can use the Keylock to protect
- the PC, and still logon¢logoff on time.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:00:05 on 92/09/22 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: LAN Server communicating to requester (or another server) LTLW.
-
- I am looking for references - folks who have LS20 and LAN-to-LAN WAN
- installed, up and running. Problems? Successes? Willing to talk to
- a prospective user? Or to appear in a list of users? Append here or
- call me at 817/961-7604. Need your help. Thanks!
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:03:56 on 92/09/22 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: LAN Server 2.0 Cache Parameters
- Ref: Append at 21:37:07 on 92/09/21 GMT (by NABCA7B at OS2CUST)
-
- Don't know about the LAZY parm, but if you cache anything, you cache
- everything. And, DISKCACHE is only used for FAT drives (in 2.0).
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:14:43 on 92/09/22 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: CNFGLS for 2.0 ?? When ??
- Ref: Append at 16:13:17 on 92/09/21 GMT (by NBQHGQ3 at OS2CUST)
-
- This has to be counted as an 'opps!' You may be familiar with a product
- now in Beta, CID. In CID, there is something called SCM in its own Beta
- (don't know what it'll be called when it announces.) The Systems Config
- Mgr. contains many of the 'rules' from my spreadsheets. Improved, of
- course, since the SCM stuff is an Austin product and I'm just one guy
- in Dallas.
- SCM was intended for LS20, and I agreed with the development team to not
- do a spreadsheet for 2.0. Then, CID came along and SCM was added to it.
- But, CID was LS30 oriented, so -- LS20 slipped between the cracks.
- Not intentional, I assure you. But, all the same, there is no CNFGLS20.
-
- CNFGLS13 can be used for LS20 with a few exceptions. I know it doesn't
- set all the parameters, but the Entry server can pretty much use it as is
- Some mods you might make --
- 1. The NET1 line uses NETBEUI$, not NETBIOS$
- 2. For Advanced Server, ignore the 'numbugbufs' recommendation.
- 3. " " " " " 'diskcache' "
- 4. " " " add diskcache number to hpfs' cache value.
- 5. The srvheuristics' value for DLRs (digit 15 or 16) should be a '1'.
- CNFGLS13 will set it to '0' if there are fewer than 60 DLR's.
- LS20A uses bigbufs only for print data, and the defaults are fine for
- that type of use.
- DISKCACHE is used only for FAT drives (which means, with the LS20E
- server.)
- Memory calculations are probably off -- to be safe, subtract 1 Meg from
- cache. Check with SPM/2 when available.
- Use the generated values to be found to the right of the top screen --
- not the generated INI file found at the bottom of the spreadsheet.
- Then, plug the numbers into the LS20 INI file and PROTOCOL.INI file.
-
- Sorry for our confusion, but this may help you out. Nobody tried to
- 'abandon' y'all.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:09:44 on 92/09/22 GMT (by XXVALC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: LAN Server 2.0 Cache Parameters
- Ref: Append at 21:03:56 on 92/09/22 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- My understanding is that if you install on an HPFS drive, write caching
- is automatically enabled. However if you add another partition you
- must specify LAZY to enable write caching on it.
-
- Tony Valenti
- Valcomp Technology Inc.
- (416) 850-9111
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:01:48 on 92/09/23 GMT (by ELIBOW at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Program Starters for OS/2 Requesters
-
- We are currently running OS/2 Lan Server 1.3 lvl 5015 on our domain controller.
- We are getting ready to upgrade to Lan Server Entry 2.0, and are trying to get
- a few questions resolved first. None of our OS/2 2.0 requesters get a public
- application folder on their desktop. We would prefer to give access to
- applications in this manner rather than give resource allocations for apps that
- may only be used occassionaly. The help screens say we should get this folder,
- but I have not found out how to get it. Could you please let me know how to
- have this folder created upon logon to the server?
-
- Thanks,
-
- Eric Libow
-
- Eric Libow
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:26:17 on 92/09/23 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Lan Manager Conversion
-
- I am about to convert a server from LAN Manager 2.0c to LAN Server
- 2.0. Has anyone had any experience in doing this? My main concerns
- are the relationship between the Net.acc and DCDB. Since LAN Manager
- did not use the DCDB, will I be able to port the net.acc over to a
- new system? Also, I have not tried this yet, but are the ACLs backed
- up with backacc c: /s from LM able to be restored with a restacc c:
- /s from LAN Server? I did try to copy an existing net.acc to an
- existing LAN Server and the server errored on trying to start. (this
- was a brute force experiment that I did not expect to work, but was
- worth a try.)
-
- Where can I get any reference to the format of the net.acc? In some
- past appends, I received some information that the conversion
- "should" work. I need to know if it "WILL" work. I don't want to
- enter all 200+ users and all 150+ sharenames again.... (although I
- relize that over time we will convert sharenames to aliases and
- utilize home directories that take the DCDB into account)
-
- Thanks in advance for any "real" information.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:41:04 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Lan Manager Conversion
- Ref: Append at 18:26:17 on 92/09/23 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Charles,
- I can't answer for the question, but in the net.acc there are more
- information, than just the userid\password, so you can't copy it
- over to another PC. (Drive,volumelabel\volume #\directory names.)
-
- PS:the backacc and restacc does come with LS2.0 Mig diskette.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:05:34 on 92/09/23 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Lan Manager Conversion
- Ref: Append at 19:41:04 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
-
- I figured that was the case with the net.acc file. However, what if
- I took an LM server, backed up the net.acc, reformat, installed LAN
- Server, restored the directory structure, and then tried to use the
- old net.acc? (Probably fail...huh?)
-
- What I'd really like to do is to pipe the info out of the LAN Manager
- version and pipe the relevant info into the LAN Server version. In
- order to do this though, I need detailed information on the format
- and contents of both net.accs. Is this available? I have programers
- who can write our own migrations utilities, if I can get some info.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:12:01 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Missing DLLs files from OS/2 RIPL Image
- I have the following setup: OS/2 2.0 with LS 2.0, one requester machine
- successfuly does RIPL but when I try to execute Excel on the requester
- (Excel was installed on the requester machine before it became a RIPL
- station) I get a message stating that COMMDLG.DLL and SHELL.DLL are
- not found. I checked the server image of OS/2 2.0 and those files
- are there but there are not on the RIPL image. Why? What other
- files can be missing after completing the RIPLINST procedure?
-
- Eyad Saad/Towers Perrin/Montreal
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:15:03 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Missing OS/2 Desktop Icon From Win/OS2 session on RIPL station
- I have the following setup: OS/2 2.0 with LS 2.0, and a requester
- machine performing a RIPL. That works but the WIN/OS2 session does
- not have the OS/2 desktop icon, and CTRL-ESC does not work to switch
- back to OS/2 desktop, ALT-ESC however works. Where is the OS/2 Desktop
- icon?
- Thanks
-
- Eyad Saad/Towers Perrin/Montreal, Canada
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:43:37 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Lan Manager Conversion
- Ref: Append at 21:05:34 on 92/09/23 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- If you use the proper backup (like Sytos) wich backs up the EA-s
- AND the access control rights,.... I don't knew. ( I don't have the
- time to try it.)
- When you format\install you creating a NEW net.acc, with NEW access
- profiles to the directory entries.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:33:42 on 92/09/24 GMT (by IL13321 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: ABILITY TO RESTRICT HOME DIRECTORY SIZES
-
- I WOULD LIKE THE ABILITY TO RESTRICT USERS HOME DIRECTORIES TO A CERTAIN MB SIZ
- E. I JUST FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE GIVING THEM TOTAL ACCESS TO WHATEVER IS REMAINING
- ON THE SERVERS DRIVES. PEOPLE DON'T WATCH THEIR DISK SPACE AND WHEN THEY SEE
- A DRIVE WITH 120MB THEY TEND TO GO WILD. I WOULD LIKE TO RESTRICT THEIR USAGE
- TO ABOUT 10 OR 20MB OF A SERVERS DISK.
-
- CHARLIE
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:39:13 on 92/09/24 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Missing DLLs files from OS/2 RIPL Image
- Ref: Append at 21:12:01 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- I checked all the packed files on the OS/2 2.0 install diskettes and
- COMMDLG.DLL and SHELL.DLL do not appear to be part of the base OS/2
- 2.0 operating system. I suspect that they are installed by Excel.
-
- The most obvious solutions are:
-
- 1. Copy these files to the ..\RPL\OS2.20\OS2\DLL directory.
- 2. Update the RIPL copy of CONFIG.20 to add the local hardfile
- path to the LIBPATH statement. If you do this, be sure to
- add the local hardfile reference to the END of the LIBPATH.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:06:33 on 92/09/24 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Missing DLLs files from OS/2 RIPL Image
- Ref: Append at 21:12:01 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Those two files must be part of the Excel package.
-
- You have two options:
- 1) if those files exist on your local RIPL workstation hardfile
- then you can edit the CONFIG.SYS for that workstation and
- and the local path into the LIBPATH statement. The CONFIG.SYS
- for that workstation will be:
- C:/IBMLAN/RPL/MACHINES/machine_name/CONFIG.20
-
- 2) if those files exist somewhere on your server hardfile then
- you can copy them into your RIPL directory tree so that your
- current LIBPATH statement can find those files. You can
- copy the files into the directory:
- C:/IBMLAN/RPL/OS2.20/OS2/DLL
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:11:26 on 92/09/24 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Missing OS/2 Desktop Icon From Win/OS2 session on RIPL station
- Ref: Append at 21:15:03 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Read the file C:/IBMLAN/README.DOC.
- It discusses how to complete the installation of the WIN-OS/2
- desktop for RIPL machines. You have to make some manual updates
- to your SYSTEM.INI file.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:14:54 on 92/09/24 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Missing OS/2 Desktop Icon From Win/OS2 session on RIPL station
- Ref: Append at 21:15:03 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Check the README that comes on the first requester diskette. There is a
- section that covers exactly your situation. Some manual editing of the
- Windows .ini files is required, and it's spelled out in the README.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:16:48 on 92/09/24 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: ABILITY TO RESTRICT HOME DIRECTORY SIZES
- Ref: Append at 00:33:42 on 92/09/24 GMT (by IL13321 at OS2CUST)
-
- There is no enforced real time restriction, but the CHKSTOR command is
- available for auditing users' home directory space utilization. It can
- be automatically run several times a day if needed, and it can send
- alerts to the operator for users who are exceeding their assigned space
- limits.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:39:59 on 92/09/24 GMT (by V$IGBERT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Missing OS/2 Desktop Icon From Win/OS2 session on RIPL station
- Ref: Append at 21:15:03 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXTPFC01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Warning: long, redundant append.
- From the readme.doc on the LS Requester disk 1:
-
- ----------------------------------------
- WIN-OS/2 FOR A REMOTE IPL SYSTEM
- ----------------------------------------
-
- The RIPLINST utility does not configure the WIN-OS/2 desktop.
- The administrator must update the SYSTEM.INI file prior to
- creating Remote IPL workstations. This file may be copied
- from an installed OS/2 2.0 system, or manual updates may be
- made as described below. This file must be updated for
- WIN-OS/2 to function properly on the Remote IPL system.
- The path to the default SYSTEM.INI file is
- \IBMLAN\RPLUSER\DEFALT20\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2\SYSTEM.INI.
-
- To update the file manually, edit the above file and make the
- following changes or additions. The parameters that specify
- VGA values are dependent on the type of display attached to
- the Remote IPL system and must be updated accordingly. Also,
- the language.dll parameter in the boot.description section and
- the keyboard.dll parameter in the keyboard section are
- dependent on the language to be used on the Remote IPL system
- and must also be updated accordingly.
-
- ìboot┘
- useos2shield=1
- os2shield=winsheld.exe
- system.drv=atmsys.drv
- WOS2VDMApps=!clipwos2,!ddeagent
- fonts.fon=vgasys.fon
- fixedfon.fon=vgafix.fon
- oemfonts.fon=vgaoem.fon
- display.drv=vga.drv
- atm.system.drv=system.drv
- language.dll=
-
- ìkeyboard┘
- keyboard.dll=
-
- ìboot.description┘
- language.dll=English (American)
-
- Giovanni Bertolini
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:41:53 on 92/09/24 GMT (by XXMTBD03 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Requester missing files
-
- I have successfully installed LS 2.0 - Entry on several servers, and
- am now attempting the same with a few OS/2 requesters. The installation
- follows a clean(newly formatted) install of OS/2 V2 and procedes without
- a hitch. After re-booting the requester starts successfully, but when
- I attempt certain 'NET ...' commands I get the following messages
-
- NET3502: OS/2 error 2 has occurred.
- SYS0002: The system cannot find the file specified
-
- NET START, NET NAME, NET ERROR seem to work fine but
-
- NET USE and NET do not. I haven't tried any others. NET ERROR returns
- There are no entries in the list.
-
- Any Ideas? Tryed Re-installing, no change.
-
- Rolph Poorter Metro Toronto School Board
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:16:34 on 92/09/25 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Program Starters for OS/2 Requesters
- Ref: Append at 16:01:48 on 92/09/23 GMT (by ELIBOW at OS2CUST)
-
- Eric,
-
- Have you defined a public os/2 app on the LAN Server and then added to the
- OS/2 users logon application assignments?
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:08:54 on 92/09/25 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Requester missing files
- Ref: Append at 15:41:53 on 92/09/24 GMT (by XXMTBD03 at TORVMCOP)
-
- You are missing the "installation aids" from your original OS/2 2.0 install.
- Go back and reinstall OS/2 2.0, specifying the aids this time.
-
- Sorry about the non-intuitive error message. We have added a check in LAN
- SERVER 3.0 to make this problem easier to resolve for you.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:33:08 on 92/09/25 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Local server security versus unattended backup
- Ref: Append at 04:53:10 on 92/09/22 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Have you tried to run SYTOS PLUS on a LS 2.0-Entry Server? We are having
- problems getting to work.
-
- DIANE KEHL Missouri State Highway Patrol
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:59:15 on 92/09/25 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Local server security versus unattended backup
- Ref: Append at 15:33:08 on 92/09/25 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
-
- You need the Sytos 1.35 to use it with OS/2 2.0 .
- They are offering it for 70$ upgrade from previous version.
- (It works 1.3 too) I just faxed back my offer.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:10:42 on 92/09/25 GMT (by STEVEF at AUSVM1)
- Subject: IBM Named Pipe lovers treat !!
- Ref: Append at 14:16:16 on 92/09/25 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Two very good things for those of you using and writing named pipe
- Here is some good news for those of you writing or using
- named pipe applications across the network:
-
- 1) We have rewritten some key sections of the IBM LAN Server named
- pipe code that have given customers problems in the past.
- This should greatly enhance named pipe reliability especially under
- heavy stress conditions. This could give us an edge over
- competitors who have not carefully designed their named pipe
- server code for reliability and speed.
- 2) The popular book "Client Server programming with OS/2 2.0"
- includes benchmarks which indicate IBM OS/2 named pipe support is much
- faster than Novell's named pipe support. The authors seem to like
- named pipes for usability considerations as well.
-
- It is great to see the word getting out because we in the labs
- have spent a lot of time making IBM LAN Server named pipes the fastest
- and easiest to use interprocess communication mechanism in the industry.
-
- Steve French LAN Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:47:12 on 92/09/28 GMT (by IL34375 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LAN Requster # of NCBs vs 2nd NET1 param
-
- LS 2.0 OS2 V 2.0 LAN Requester IBMLAN.INI file
- How does the number of NCBs parameter on the NET1 line (2nd last parameter)
- compare to the maxcmds parameter in the requester section? Specifically,
- do any other parts of LAN requester use NCBs and therefore maxcmds should be le
- ss than the NET1 parameter or does it normally make sense (on a requester) to s
- et maxcmds equal to the NET1 parameter? If there are other uses for NCBs, what
- are they and how should the NET1 parameter be allocated?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:19:24 on 92/09/29 GMT (by XXTCAN19 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: NET START REQ IN STARTUP.CMD
-
- I am having to leave a floppy disk in drive A: during my
- NET START REQ statement in my startup.cmd file. No big deal but it
- would be nice if I could fix it. If no diskette in inserted the requester
- will hang at the second dot.
-
- Any ideas?
-
- Rick Menard
- Transport Canada
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:11:54 on 92/09/29 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Local server security versus unattended backup
- Ref: Append at 15:59:15 on 92/09/25 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Thanks!!! I just received our upgrade notice in the mail today.
-
- Diane Kehl Missouri State Highway Patrol
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:26:20 on 92/09/29 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Installation
-
- I am having a problem trying to run a remote install. I have followed the
- procedures outlined in the RED BOOK: "OS/2 Version 2.0 Remote Installation and
- Maintenance" through Chapter 5. We are running a 16mps Token-Ring LAN.
-
- My test workstation is an 8557 which was pre-installed with OS/2 2.0 Base. I
- thought the problem might be that OS/2 2.0 already existed, so I did a low-
- level format of the hard drive from the reference diskette. I then restored
- my system partition from the reference diskette and tried my remote install
- with my 2 diskettes (Installation disk and LT disk). The machine boots from
- the disk fine and prompts to insert disk #2. After reading disk #2 for a
- while, I get returned to an A:\ prompt.
-
- Does anyone have any ideas as to what I may be doing wrong?
-
- Diane Kehl Missouri State Highway Patrol
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:41:40 on 92/09/29 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
- Subject: Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 21:26:20 on 92/09/29 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
- Diane, Normally after a low level format, you have to FDISK the
- drive and then FORMAT the partitions with either FAT or HPFS.
- I don't think you did that, did you?
-
- __ __ ___ __ __ _ _
- | |_| | / \ | \| | | |./ / Hank Henderson HNDERSON at AUSVM8
- | _ | / _~_ \ Sincerely | . < Staff OSS to OS/2 BBS (TEAMOS2)
- |__| |__| /_/ \_\ |__|\__| |_| \_\ Tie:8-793-8647 Austin, Texas
- LNK1SM7 @ IBMLINK - OS/2 BBS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 09:04:18 on 92/09/30 GMT (by DAWNI at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: NET START REQ IN STARTUP.CMD
- Ref: Append at 13:19:24 on 92/09/29 GMT (by XXTCAN19 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Check your path statements in your CONFIG.SYS. I have heard of this
- happening before when there was an A:\ in someone's path statements.
-
- Dawn
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:49:01 on 92/09/30 GMT (by KEHLD at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 22:41:40 on 92/09/29 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
-
- Hank--
-
- Shouldn't the Remote Install Response File take care of the formatting problem?
-
- In my response file, I have the following parameters:
- FormatPartition=1 (so the partition will be formatted)
- BaseFileSystem=1 (for HPFS)
-
- Diane Kehl Missouri State Highway Patrol
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:49:02 on 92/09/30 GMT (by TRP1027 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Redirected Installation using NTS/2
-
- I'am having a problem using NTS/2 for a redirected installation. After the
- system has been downloaded, and the Client machine is re-booting, it hangs
- displaying the single OS/2 logo with the comment 'Loading, Please wait'.
- The display flashes, and I wind up with a distorted OS/2 logo and a band of
- blue vertical lines about one inch high across the top of the screen. I,ve
- checked to be sure the drivers that were downloaded are correct, and they seem
- to be. I can load the machine fine from a set of diskettes. Has anyone
- experienced this problem? Any help woul be greatly appreciated. Thanks
- in advance Don Swam.
-
- Don Swam T. Rowe Price Associates (410-581-6299)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:54:04 on 92/09/30 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
- Subject: Remote Installation
- Ref: Append at 22:41:40 on 92/09/29 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
- Diane, I believe it should, but from a few remote installs the I've
- done, there were a few times I had to FDISK, then format with FAT.
- There has been discussion on a bug with HPFS, that results in format-
- ting the HD by FAT, then formatting for HPFS. Jerry Sitbon had report
- ed the problem, (fix not yet availabel), and a way to circumvent the
- problem.
-
- __ __ ___ __ __ _ _
- | |_| | / \ | \| | | |./ / Hank Henderson HNDERSON at AUSVM8
- | _ | / _~_ \ Sincerely | . < Staff OSS to OS/2 BBS (TEAMOS2)
- |__| |__| /_/ \_\ |__|\__| |_| \_\ Tie:8-793-8647 Austin, Texas
- LNK1SM7 @ IBMLINK - OS/2 BBS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:11:52 on 92/10/01 GMT (by RMSV200 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DOMAIN CONTROLLER TUNING
-
- I AM TRYING TO TUNE A DEDICATED DOMAIN SERVER FOR A NETWORK WITH 200
- DLR/RIPL USERS. THIS IS A NEW INSTALLATION AND IS NOT IN PRODUCTION
- YET. THE SERVER IS A MODEL 57 16MB RAM 160MB HD IBM 16/4 BUSMASTER
- T/R ADAPTER RUNNING OS/2 2.0 AND LS 2.0 ENTRY. MY QUESTION IS SINCE
- THIS MACHINE WILL SERVE ONLY AS DOMAIN CONTROLLER HOW SHOULD I SET
- THE IBMLAN.INI, PROTOCOL.INI AND CONFIG.SYS PARAMETERS FOR 200 TO 250
- USERS (ALLOWING FOR RAPID GROWTH). THERE ARE 3 ADDITIONAL SERVERS
- FOR FILE, PRINT, RIPL AND APPLICATIONS SERVICES. THE DOMAIN SERVER
- WILL BE ON OUR BACKBONE SEGMENT AND THE OTHER SERVERS WILL SERVE
- THIER RESPECTIVE SEGMENTS. MOST TUNING RECOMMENDATIONSASSUME A MIXED
- BAG OF SEVICES AND THAT WILL BE FINE FOR THE ADDITIONAL SERVERS. ANY
- SUGGESTIONS???
-
- JOHN MAY (RUPPMAN MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:30:10 on 92/10/01 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 16:10:33 on 92/09/11 GMT (by IL47372 at OS2CUST)
-
- Would someone from IBM please divulge the status of the Mac Requesters for LS!
- I was at the OS/2 & Windows show in Boston in AUGUST and Mac client support was
- supposed to be available "very soon". I know that it is separate from the LS 3
- version, but was expecting it BEFORE not AFTER that release. I have seen no
- written info on this subject and a comment is needed at this point.
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:48:39 on 92/10/01 GMT (by WBWORD at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Redirected Installation using NTS/2
- Ref: Append at 15:49:02 on 92/09/30 GMT (by TRP1027 at OS2CUST)
-
- Don, I need more info. What "system" (code) did you download?
- Also, would you append your answer on the LSYSBETA forum using the
- same subject? We moniter the LSYSBETA forum daily and were lucky
- someone called your append on this forum to our attention. Thanks.
- Bill Word, LAN Systems Customer Readiness
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:11:19 on 92/10/01 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 20:30:10 on 92/10/01 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
-
- We are working on Macintosh client support for LAN Server. We haven't
- yet announced anything about it. Expect to see a beta program and a
- product announcement soon.
-
- We always planned it to be close behind LAN Server 3.0, but never ahead
- of it. I'm sorry if you got that impression.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:38:13 on 92/10/02 GMT (by IL54080 at HONE86)
- Subject: LS20FX fixes for IBM LAN Server/Requester 2.0
- Ref: Append at 22:31:23 on 92/08/26
-
- I have downloaded the LS20FX and installed them both on a LAN Server 2.0 Advanced and
- several LAN Requesters running on OS/2 2.0 with ES installed. One of my users modified
- his CM configuration and verified the new configuration, which changed the PROTOCOL.INI
- as follows:
-
- It added the line: ADAPTER = "PRIMARY" in the ìIBMTOK_nif┘ section.
-
- When he rebooted his machine the full screen OS/2 logo was displayed and the machine
- stopped booting. He waited for several minutes and finally pressed the ENTER key. At that
- point a message was displayed as follows:
-
- LT20023: An unrecognized parameter %1 was found in PROTOCOL.INI.
-
- After this message the PC finished the startup process but the LAN Requester and CM failed to
- start. We compared the Protocol.ini with one prior to changing the CM configuration and the
- only difference was the line above. In the old Protocol.ini the ìIBMTOK_nif┘ section had
- a line that had PRIMARY. The ADAPTER = and quotes were not present. We remarked the
- ADAPTER = "PRIMARY" line and added just PRIMARY and rebooted the PC which completed
- startup without a problem? Why is this happening? any ideas?? Is it a bug in the new
- IBMTOK.OS2 driver or should the IBMTOK.nif file be modified?
-
- Thanks, John.
- ROTOCOL.INI
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:11:08 on 92/10/02 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 23:11:19 on 92/10/01 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
-
- Charlie,
-
- I'm a little confused, doesn't a big sign in a booth at the OS/2 & Windows show
- represent some sort of announcement <g>? OS/2 is called the Premier Server
- platform but does not support the 2nd largest group of clients at all. IBM is
- at least one year behind every other LAN vendor in this respect. I do have the
- feeling that OS/2's Macintosh support will be superior if some of the most per-
- sistent rumors are correct. Now, how about peer services for the Mac?
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:03:31 on 92/10/02 GMT (by PJE7360 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Icons For Public Applications
-
- Is there a way to get the pretty Icons to appear for Applications served out on
- an OS/2 LS LAN? I have several Clients who have written custom applications a
- nd would like to serve them out with their custom Icon.
-
- Any help is appreciated....
-
- Richard Ellison - Software Consultant - Duke Power Co.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:39:42 on 92/10/02 GMT (by STEVEF at AUSVM1)
- Subject: INT 21 (5E02h) and (5f02h) not working
- Ref: Append at 18:18:21 on 92/09/08 GMT (by MATTR at BCRVMPC1)
-
- I do not believe that the network filesystem is called on either
- of those calls. If you have a small testcase, please send it to me
- and I will verify.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:41:13 on 92/10/02 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6) -
- Subject: Resetting an administrator's password?
- Ref: Append at 19:41:04 on 92/09/23 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
-
- We have a server machine that was set up several month's ago. The
- administrator USERID and PASSWORD was changed from its defaults and the
- new id/password has been lost. The network never really got started, so
- I could wipe out any of the files that already exist and start over, but
- the trouble is, I don't know which ones to kill.
-
- How do I reset the administrator USERID/PASSWORD?
-
- Stan Cason - Systems Analysis Eng. - D/852 - 855-3143
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:15:00 on 92/10/02 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 14:11:08 on 92/10/02 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
-
- Chris,
- Don't Macs already have peer serivices with System 7?
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:21:28 on 92/10/02 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Icons For Public Applications
- Ref: Append at 16:03:31 on 92/10/02 GMT (by PJE7360 at OS2CUST)
-
- You can certainly do this but not through the LS Public Applications
- facility. You can define a program object on your machine which has
- as its path and/or its working directory a redirected drive or (better)
- a UNC name (i.e. \\server\netname). The Workplace Shell will pick up
- the icon from the server and put it into the program object.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:25:03 on 92/10/02 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 14:11:08 on 92/10/02 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
-
- Please note that LAN Server 3.0 hasn't been announced yet either.
- That doesn't mean it's not coming!!
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:05:29 on 92/10/02 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Resetting an administrator's password?
- Ref: Append at 17:41:13 on 92/10/02 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6)
-
- Do an install over the top of it.
- Go to Advanced Install and select UPM to replace. IF you get a message
- about to reinitialize the Accounts select YES.
- (you do loose ALL the userid-s and other access control stuff too.)
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:31:04 on 92/10/02 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Mac Requesters?
- Ref: Append at 18:15:00 on 92/10/02 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
-
- Mike,
-
- Yes with each other. The requesters that are curently availabe (Novell, MS)
- are just that - requesters for clients. My understanding is that peer services
- will be available in LS 3.0 for OS/2 clients only. Could this be reasonably ex
- tended to Mac clients to share Mac resources with the PC's? BTW I think that
- Mac client support does include the ability to use Appletalk printers - at
- least it does in the MS product.
-
- The Mac peer function could be provided by Macintosh emulation running on an
- OS/2 system which has been rumored to be in the works...
-
- To further confuse the client/server issue, its my impression that while it is
- client support that is offered, it is provided by the server, not software
- that is loaded on the Mac like a traditional PC requester. This provides Apple
- users with a single interface that is less confusing.
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:20:04 on 92/10/02 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Net.acc and DCDB
-
- Back to this subject... (I still have not received any info from IBM
- on this) I am in the process of converting LAN Manager servers to LAN
- Server (I really do want to use IBM product). I installed a copy of
- LAN Server on a System Pro that was a LAN Manager Primary domain
- controller. I setup the LAN Server as a Primary domain controller.
- When I restored the NETACC.BKP to NET.ACC, I could start the
- requester, server, and netlogon. All user IDs and ACLs stayed and
- everything seemed to be OK until I tried to start LSServer. I got an
- error saying the domain controller database does not exist.
-
- I went to reinstall and selected the option to reinitialize the
- domain controller database. That reset everything to original
- install state. When I restored the net.acc again I could not start
- lsserver.
-
- I need the lsserver service to administer the server. How can I
- create a DCDB using information from a LAN Manager net.acc? I have 230
- users defined, and I don't want to create them again. Please tell me
- there is a way to do this....
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:18:52 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84)
- Subject: NetBios Status Problem
-
- Could you please submit this to the OS2BBS as a beta problem?
- This is also a problem in the GA.
-
- Description:
- A program on a remote machine does a NetBIOS STATUS request
- of a machine running OS/2 2.0 NetBios to determine its status
-
- The OS/2 machine does an IPE:
-
- The system detected an internal processing error at
- Location ##0f00:0d0f-0002:0d0f
- 60000, 2008
- 048600b4
- PaulDev private, 92/08/19
- The system is stopped. Record etc.....
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:46:37 on 92/10/05 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Need for help
-
- Can any one point me in the right direction to get help with the
- net.acc file? All I want is format, content and how it interacts
- with the DCDB. There must be documentation on this somewhere.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:52:22 on 92/10/05 GMT (by SVRN018 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: NET 823
-
- This is a 1.3 question, but I dont know where else I could possibly get
- any info on this.
-
- I have been doing support for about 2 years now and on three occasions
- I have talked to users (I do phone support) who are getting the NET 823
- error. The DLR manual gives a very generic explanation of this code and
- isnt much help. Basically, the user tries to access the application and is
- denied this with the NET 823 message. On all occasions the app. is either
- a Paradox program or Paradox itself. None of these calls have ever been
- resolved. Two of the calls we just let die (its an art form that only help
- desk people can understand). The third problem is occuring in a high
- profile dept. and it is not going to die. I HAVE managed to shift the
- responsibility to another dept. (our WAN/LAN dept). The only problem now is
- that I am getting moved into WAN/LAN and the problem will now be mine!!!
- In this paticular dept. after they get the NET 823 (which, again, is when
- they try to access Paradox) they go into the eternal beep on their stations
- and sometimes cant get back into the app for hours. I know the beep is a
- comm. over-run and they were having that problem before the NET 823 errors
- started.
-
- We have 2 servers running there at 1.3 5050. We have the DCDB on one server
- (Paradox itself is actually running on this machine), and then we have an
- additional server that is running the Paradox application. Both servers
- are old model 80's. The DCDB has about 100+ people accessing it. And there
- are rights for about 40 people for the Paradox app on the additional server.
-
- Any ideas will be greatly appreciated! We will be upgrading to 2.0 soon...
- will this help?
-
- Brad Bueche NationsBank EUC/Hotline Technical Support Norfolk, VA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:50:54 on 92/10/05 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Net.acc and DCDB
- Ref: Append at 22:20:04 on 92/10/02 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Charles,
- I talked with the DCDB person (I own net.acc) and we couldn't
- come up with anything. We checked a couple of ideas but came up
- empty. We need to know what errors are being logged by lsserver.
- Look in the error log by typing "net error", and post the errors,
- along with any hex data, that lsserver is logging when trying to start.
- starting up.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:08:26 on 92/10/05 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Need for help
- Ref: Append at 14:46:37 on 92/10/05 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- If you want to see the contents of net.acc, contact your rep
- and tell him/her you want the ACCUTIL PACKAGE on OS2TOOLS. It
- contains a utility to dump the contents of net.acc. There currently
- is no tool to look at the contents of the DCDB.
-
- The only interaction between net.acc & the DCDB is
- that net.acc contains the users home directory and a special
- userid, SYSASID, that is created when LSSERVER starts. LSSERVER
- also gets some of the 'machine definition' from net.acc.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:49:58 on 92/10/05 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6) -
- Subject: Resetting an administrator's password?
- Ref: Append at 20:05:29 on 92/10/02 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
-
- Thanks, I think the USERID and PASSWORD are back, because I can
- logon/logoff the User Profile Management Screens. But when I try
- to logon to the Requester I keep getting the error The remote node
- or the domain server is not currently available. What do I need
- to do to make the domain server available?
-
- Stan Cason - Systems Analysis Eng. - D/852 - 855-3143
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:14:32 on 92/10/05 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Net.acc and DCDB
- Ref: Append at 20:50:54 on 92/10/05 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
-
- The error is NET8250 - The doamin control database (DCDB) does not
- exist on this workstation. Either restore the DCDB or change the role
- of this workstation to MEMBER.
-
- To add a little more to the scenario, I reinstalled the LAN Server
- and reinitilaized the domain controller database. I then restored
- the old net.acc. LSserver was then able to start. It seemed that
- the second install did something different to the DCDB. I am now
- running LAN Server advanced under 1.3, with requester, server,
- lsserver, netlogon, rpl, and time source.
-
- Thanks for the help.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:16:52 on 92/10/05 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 22:25:33 on 92/10/05 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Resetting an administrator's password?
- Ref: Append at 21:49:58 on 92/10/05 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6)
-
- What error do you get from 'Net start Req' ?
- |
- | See the prev (322) message thread.
- |
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583 Fax:(403)-290-5900
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:27:36 on 92/10/06 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6) -
- Subject: Remote node or domain server not available
- Ref: Append at 22:16:52 on 92/10/05 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- If I do a net start req I get a service already started message.
- NET2182: The requested service has already been started.
- If that's the case, then why can't I log on?
-
- Stan Cason - Systems Analysis Eng. - D/852 - 855-3143
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:37:04 on 92/10/06 GMT (by GALLISON at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LS20FX fixes for IBM LAN Server/Requester 2.0
- Ref: Append at 13:38:13 on 92/10/02 GMT (by IL54080 at HONE86)
-
- You are right, ADAPTER='PRIMARY' is bogus. I do not know why this
- is happening, but this is the second report of this I have seen.
- The line should just be "PRIMARY" (no quotes) as it was before the
- 'fix'. I'll send this along to the NTS/2 folks.
-
- Gary Allison
- OS/2 LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:29:30 on 92/10/06 GMT (by WZ00624 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Cabletron NIC
-
- Does IBM support the Cabletron NIC's? They claim to have the correct drivers
- for LS 2.0 (NDIS), but would like to know if IBM supports a wider variety of
- cards than were shipped with the LS 2.0 package.
-
- Chris Knoell (MGH)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:18:07 on 92/10/06 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Default drive mapping by groupID
- Is it possible (if yes, how, if not when can I <g>) to set up
- a group level of default drive mapping ?
- What I'd like to have is If I add a userif to a group ,let's say
- LOTUSERS, than at the next logon they inherit the two necessary
- drive mappings. (Gee,I come from Novell...)
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583 Fax:(403)-290-5900
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:31:48 on 92/10/07 GMT (by BOI0006 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Adding ES RIPL to existing OS/2 2.0 RIPL Server
-
- I would like to add an Extended Services RIPL service to a server that already
- has the it's code configured to RIPL OS/2 2.0 base. The RED BOOK "OS/2 2.0
- LAN Server New Functions and Features" appears to give very good instructions
- on how to do this for a NEW server..(chapter 9). Can someone enlighten me on
- a method to add this service to a server without changing the existing \CMLIB
- on the server? I think I would just like to add the CMLIB 'fullinst package'
- as a seperate subdirectory, but I'm not sure of the implications, and how to
- do it. I would think this would chew up more disk space than would have been
- used had I just enabled this service to begin with, but I can't think of anythi
- ng else to do.
-
- Scott Baer
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:14:29 on 92/10/07 GMT (by WZ00533 at LINK21)
- Subject: Utilities
- Ref: Append at 19:40:58 on 92/07/30 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1)
-
- I have a few IBM utliities to query Netbios and 802 information.
- The names are NCBSTAT.EXE DIRSTAT.EXE and NETSESS2.EXE. They work
- fine in OS/2 1.3 EE and OS/2 Lan Requester 1.3. They don't, however,
- work with OS/2 2.0 and OS/2 Lan Requester 2.0.
-
- Does anyone know if there are 2.0 versions of these utilities?
-
- Dave Ferrey - Bethlehem Steel Corp. Bethlehem PA.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:46:40 on 92/10/07 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Adding ES RIPL to existing OS/2 2.0 RIPL Server
- Ref: Append at 15:31:48 on 92/10/07 GMT (by BOI0006 at OS2CUST)
-
- If the \CMLIB on your server currently supports the types of
- connections that will be used by the RIPL clients, then you can
- xcopy the CMLIB to the RIPL tree and use the Red Book instructions
- for setting it up.
-
- If the server does not have the desired connection support installed,
- then will need to install it. The ES Install will not let you
- install directly to the RIPL tree. You must install on the server
- first and xcopy everything to the RIPL tree.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:52:53 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Can't reinstall LAN Server
-
- Our server had a problem today and I ended up missing some lan server files.
- tried to reinstall and the install proccess said server was already installed.
- We wiped out IBMLAN,IBMCOM,CMLIB,and MUGLIB. Still get message that server
- is installed. What is causing me to still get the message and how do I
- reinstall LAN Server 2.0.
-
- Byron Campbell State Universities Retirement System
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:35:41 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL42721 at OS2CUST)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 22:42:59 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL42721 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Windows application metering on OS2 Lan Server
-
- Now that Windows has become very popular both in OS2 2.0 and
- in its own right, I am stuck with a problem that did not exist
- in the Dos world. I need to find a product that does software
- metering (like what Lotus provides with its appls) or what
- Sitelock and Sabre do for Novell networks. If anyone is aware
- application software I could use please let me know. Thanks
- Robert E. Young
- workstations.Thanks for any suggestions............Is RNAF
- available, would it work in this capacity ?
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:23:18 on 92/10/09 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Can't reinstall LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 19:52:53 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
-
- Why can't you reinstall? Even though you get a msg that says the server
- is already installed, you can still keep going and replace LS.
-
- PC
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:37:28 on 92/10/09 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Netbios configuration in Protocol.ini
-
- I have just converted a server from MS LAN Manager 2.0c to IBM LAN
- Server 2.0 advanced. In the LAN Manager protocol.ini, I had set
- NCBS=255 and SESSIONS=254. When I tried the same parameters in LAN
- Server I get a message on boot saying that there are not enough
- resources to load netbios. I played around with the parameters and
- found that the largest number I could get is NCBS=160 and
- SESSIONS=160. What is different? None of the hardware has changed.
- I have 240 users defined and I have 190 active most of the time.
- When the netbios does load it shows that there are 110 NCBS, 128 Sessions, and
- 141 Names available.
-
- How do I get the resources back? I need help!
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:08:06 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DSMARTT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Netbios configuration in Protocol.ini
- Ref: Append at 14:37:28 on 92/10/09 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Many of you may already know this, but just in case you don't.... The
- OS/2 LAN Server 2.0 ship-group publications are available in BookManager
- format as a separately orderable item. I'm not positive what the retail
- price is. The media is 3.5" diskettes. The following books are
- included:
-
- Network Admin Ref. Vol.1: Planning and Installation
- Network Admin Ref. Vol.2: Performance Tuning
- Network Admin Ref. Vol.3: Network Administrator Tasks
- Network Admin Ref. Supplement for OS/2 2.0
- Problem Det. Ref. Vol.1: Problem Determination Guide
- Problem Det. Ref. Vol.2: LAN Alerts
- Problem Det. Ref. Vol.3: LAN Error Messages
- OS/2 LAN Requester User's Quick Reference
- DOS LAN Requester User's Quick Reference
- DOS LAN Requester Windows User's Guide
- LAN Support Program User's Guide
- Migration Handbook
-
- In order to use the softcopy books, you must have BookManager Read/2
- Version 1.2.1 (or BookManager Read/DOS). If you're running on OS/2 2.0,
- you must have the May BookManager CSD.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:22:32 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DSMARTT at AUSVM1)
- Subject: LAN Server Softcopy Publications
- Ref: Append at 20:08:06 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DSMARTT at AUSVM1)
-
- I forgot to give you the order number. It's S96F-8317.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:11:14 on 92/10/09 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Can't reinstall LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 13:23:18 on 92/10/09 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1) -
-
- I couldn't go on. It kept taking me back to the C prompt. The whole sub-
- directory had been deleted. What I had to do is make a dummy net.acc file
- and make directory \ibmlan\services. Copied the net.acc file into that and
- then only would it let me remove lan server.
-
- Byron Campbell State Universities Retirement System
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:26:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Utilities
- Ref: Append at 16:14:29 on 92/10/07 GMT (by WZ00533 at LINK21)
-
- Those utilities probably use the 802.2 or NetBIOS External APIs. These
- interfaces are not necessarily installed when the Lan Requester is
- installed since it interfaces directly to the NETBEUI device driver using
- a special single-user ring-0 NetBIOS interface. The multi-user ring-0
- NetBIOS interface is implemented in the NETBIOS device driver and the
- ring-3 NetBIOS interface is implemented in the ACSNETB DLL. If these
- modules are installed then the NetBIOS utilities should work.
- To use 802.2 utilities like DIRSTAT you would need to install the 802.2
- protocol (LANDD, LANDLLDD and ACSLAN) but it would probably not make
- sense to install 802.2 just to run DIRSTAT. Since NetBIOS traffic no
- longer runs through the 802.2 protocol stack DIRSTAT would be reporting
- nothing.
-
- Dan Heimsoth
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:22:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by FRMLSPA at HONE84)
- Subject: Resetting an administrator's password?
- Ref: Append at 21:49:58 on 92/10/05 GMT (by CASON at GDLVM6)
-
- You may have to do a NET ACCOUNTS command to set the role to /ROLE:PRIMARY.
-
- Scott Atwell - Analyst Programmer - Farmland Industries, Kansas City, MO
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:22:57 on 92/10/12 GMT (by FRMLSPA at HONE84)
- Subject: Utilities
- Ref: Append at 16:14:29 on 92/10/07 GMT (by WZ00533 at LINK21)
-
- I'm using DIRSTAT which I downloaded from this system under 2.0.
- I'm interested in the Netbios utilities as I have been unable
- to find something to "show me more". Could you help point me to
- where you got the NB utils?
-
- Scott Atwell - Analyst Programmer - Farmland Industries, Kansas City, MO
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:50:36 on 92/10/12 GMT (by DBEELER at WASVMIC1)
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- The 10/5/92 issues of Information Week (pg. 24) and PC Week (pg. 12)
- refer to a program developed at Leiden Univ. in the Netherlands that
- can breach LAN security. The Info Week article says that this would
- be an exposure to OS/2 LAN Server. Does anyone know if this is
- accurate, and if so, is IBM developing a fix which will prevent entry?
- Dave Beeler
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:30:51 on 92/10/12 GMT (by XXCEGA01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Excelan 205T Cards
- Can anyone point me in the right direction for acquiring an
- NDIS driver for these cards. We wish to use some of these
- cards we have existing, but don't have the drivers for them.
-
- Jeff Johnstone
- (Centra Gas B.C. Inc)
- (604)380-3300
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:52:06 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE86)
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- Ref: Append at 18:50:36 on 92/10/12 GMT (by DBEELER at WASVMIC1)
-
- Dave:
- The problem is in Netware. Novell has already fixed the 'hole' and the fix
- is on their boards (and I think CIS). Sorry but I don't know the number
- maybe someone else does.
-
- J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:41:51 on 92/10/12 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Netbios configuration in Protocol.ini
- Ref: Append at 14:37:28 on 92/10/09 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- The messages at IPL time are referring to the NETBIOS External API and
- not the interface to NetBIOS that the Lan Server product is using.
- The numbers that are put in the message for NCBs, etc are the values
- from PROTOCOL.INI minus the amounts that the Lan Server is configured
- to use, which are specified on the "net1=..." line in IBMLAN.INI.
- The NETBIOS External API is for NetBIOS applications other than Lan
- Server, and if you don't have any you can take the NETBIOS.OS2 device
- driver (do NOT remove NETBEUI.OS2, you still need that) out of CONFIG.SYS
- and you won't get the NETBIOS messages at IPL time and Lan Server will
- still work fine. You will still need to change both PROTOCOL.INI and
- IBMLAN.INI when configuring the numbers of NCBs, SESSIONS and NAMES.
-
- Dan Heimsoth
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:44:55 on 92/10/12 GMT (by XXCMSY01 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Missing RIPLINST Program???
- I am installing OS/2 RIPL for a diskless wstn. All was going well until
- one screen indicated that I should run the RIPLINST procedure which is
- shipped with OS/2. I can't find it on my system but found it on diskette
- 7 of the product. Can someone tell me how to install the program. I can't
- find instructions in any manual.
- Bob Schuett
- CMT Systems Calgary
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 23:05:42 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL12885 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: IRMALAN DOS CLIENT IN VDM
-
- I am successfully running the DCA IrmaLAN DOS workstation client (LAN78SXT.EXE.
- .. a DOS netbios application) from emulated DOS VDM and a DOS 5 VMB. It seems
- I can only run it from local workstation DASD, though.
-
- Question: Why can't I run it from a redirected "V" drive on the server
- ? I have ADMIN rights to the alias and the code on the server is the same as
- that on my local drive. Does the virtual netbios have problems with redirected
- drives that even a DOS 5 VMB won't solve?LAN78SXT communicates fine across th
- e LAN using netbios the the DOS IrmaLAN/EP gateway, shouldn't it work with LAN
- Server SMB's?
-
- COLBY HARPER - WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:51:58 on 92/10/13 GMT (by LARRYS at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Missing RIPLINST Program???
- Ref: Append at 22:44:55 on 92/10/12 GMT (by XXCMSY01 at TORVMCOP)
-
- I am assumning that you are installing LAN Server 2.0.
-
- The instructions for RIPLINST are in the Network Administrator
- Reference Supplement for OS/2 2.0, chapter 4 (S04G-1080).
-
- The steps are:
-
- 1. If you are running LAN Server 2.0 on OS/2 2.0, skip to step 2.
- If you are running LAN Server 2.0 on OS/2 1.3, do the following:
-
- - Make a temporary directory.
- - Change directory to the temporary directory.
- - Copy the file UNPACK.EXE from OS/2 2.0 diskette 2 to the
- temporary directory.
- - Remaining in the temporary directory, proceed to step 2.
-
- 2. Insert OS/2 2.0 diskette 7 into drive A and issue the following
- command:
-
- UNPACK A:\RIPLINST
-
- 3. Type in the following command
-
- RIPLINST
-
- 4. When the IBM logo is displayed, press Enter.
-
- 5. The OS/2 Installtion for Remote IPL window is displayed.
-
- IMPORTANT: The only thing on this panel you should change
- (if necessary) is the target drive id. You
- must install the OS/2 code to the same drive
- where you told LAN Server Install to put
- IBMLAN\RPL. DO NOT change any of the path
- information except for the drive id.
-
- Larry Sullenger
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:25:23 on 92/10/13 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: in Protocol.ini
- Ref: Append at 22:41:51 on 92/10/12 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
-
- If the IPL messages are not relevent to the operation of LAN Server,
- how do I find out how many netbios resources are available to LAN
- Server?Are there any netbios monitering programs out there?
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:03:10 on 92/10/13 GMT (by SC31402 at AUSVM2)
- ..... OS2LAN CFORUM modified at 15:24:43 on 92/10/13 GMT (by SC31402 at AUSVM2)
- Subject: in Protocol.ini
- Ref: Append at 14:25:23 on 92/10/13 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Ok, let me take a try at this one. The number of resources available
- to LAN Server can be found by the NET1 line in the IBMLAN.INI,
- the last three numbers being SESSIONS, NCBS, and NAMES..
- (ex. NET1=netbeui$,0,LM10, 32, 50, 14 )
-
- The PROTOCOL.INI in /IBMCOM has these same three parameters
- (SESSIONS, NCBS, NAMES) which are the pool from which NET1
- takes its resources. So, from this, the PROTOCOL.INI parameters should
- be greater than or equal to the ones in the NET1 line. If it is
- greater than, the remaining resources will be available for EXTERNAL
- NETBIOS apps, but if the parms in PROTOCOL and NET1 are equal
- LAN Server is using all the resources and there will be none
- available for EXTERNAL NETBIOS resources(which prompted your
- first append). If you want the parameters equal(in PROTOCOL.INI
- and NET1) you can remove the NETBIOS.OS2(which is the external
- NETBIOS driver) line from the CONFIG.SYS to spare yourself the
- boot message(which Dan H. explained earlier). Hoped this helped
- and didnt make things worse...
-
- Dan Wiggins -Austin
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:32:18 on 92/10/13 GMT (by FDRCS15 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: RIPL not working with 2.0 Window Support and XGA
-
- We have been able to RIPL OS/2 2.0 workstations OK using VGA displays. When
- we try and RIPL an XGA workstation the PM Desktop comes up in XGA but the
- Windows desktop only comes up in VGA. If we try and edit Win.ini and
- System.ini to support XGA the Windows Desktop does not come up. The DOS
- command line appers but then it switchs back to the PM Desktop. We are trying
- this in Windows Full Screen Mode.
-
- Dwight Warak, First Data Resources
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:11:07 on 92/10/13 GMT (by WZ00533 at LINK21)
- Subject: Utilities
- Ref: Append at 14:26:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
-
- Thanks for your response.
-
- I have ACSNETB.DLL in my IBMCOM\DLL libpath. The program I
- would really like to get running is called NETSESS2.EXE dated
- 12/05/88. The error I get is "Error 34 in call to NetBIOS"
- I realize you may not know about that program but hey... why not
- ask anyway <g>.
-
- My goal is to take a look at NetBIOS type information, i.e. what
- names are in the name table, send and receive statistics, number of
- available commands, names etc. Are you (or anyone) aware of any
- other utilities to query this type of information.
-
- Thanks again
-
- Dave Ferrey - Bethlehem Steel Corp. Bethlehem PA.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:56:46 on 92/10/13 GMT (by HEIMSOTH at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Utilities
- Ref: Append at 19:11:07 on 92/10/13 GMT (by WZ00533 at LINK21)
-
- I have that same version of NETSESS2 on my 2.0 requestor and it seems
- to work fine. Could you check LANTRAN.LOG to see if NETBIOS is loading
- sucessfully? If it isn't you may need to bump up the PROTOCOL.INI
- values for NCBs, SESSIONS and NAMES or bump down the values for these
- in IBMLAN.INI.
-
- Dan Heimsoth
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:28:48 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL06950 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Move DOS DLR & LSP to Extended Memory
-
- IBM'rs --
- Your LAN Server would be more attractive to folks like us who have to support
- mostly DOS and Windows natives, if you could minimize the lower memory usage
- of DOS LAN Requester and LAN Support Program to free up the 640K region for
- large applications. How about providing users with an option to move the
- bulk of the 130K requirement to extended memory?
-
- Bill Soong, Univ of Hawaii Comp Ctr
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 02:34:42 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR & LSP to Extended Memory
- Ref: Append at 22:28:48 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL06950 at OS2CUST)
-
- Bill,
- You should be able to move a goodly portion of LSP to UMB's with DOS 5.0
- DEVICEHIGH commands, and 64K of DLR can be placed into EMS with /EMS in
- DOSLAN.INI, and even more of DLR can be placed into UMB's with /UMB in
- DOSLAN.INI. If you have a system with lots of UMB, you could get almost all
- of DLR and LSP up there.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:26:23 on 92/10/14 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LSP to Extended Memory
- Ref: Append at 02:34:42 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
-
- We ran into a problem (or two, or three) using UMB's and EMM386... One very
- strange problem was that an application that was supposed to be networkable
- and sharable on the LAN suddenly started getting Sharing Violations when the
- app started accessing a shared file.... We where able to solve the problem
- by either moving to QEMM (without DOS=UMB), or by getting rid of EMM386 com-
- pletely (DOS=HIGH works fine).
-
- Anyway we solved our problem by loading QEMM386 onto our machines, or moving
- the user to OS/2.
-
- Note this was at DLR level 6000
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:51:30 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL06950 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Re: Move DLR & LSP to Extended Memory
-
- Aloha Guys,
- Thanks for your input. Often times, much of the UMB area get reserved for
- add-in boards and/or 64K of contiguous space is not available for EMM386 ...
- also, we may be too cheap to buy another memory manager :-)
-
- If IBM software would make use of their extended memory and let HIMEM.SYS do
- its thing, then that would make a lot of happy campers, including our 80286
- brethren.
-
- Bill Soong, Univ of Hawaii Comp Ctr
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:22:34 on 92/10/15 GMT (by SSIA013 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Re: Move DLR & LSP to Extended Memory
- Ref: Append at 22:51:30 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL06950 at OS2CUST)
-
- One other "problem" with moving alot of the code of DLR out of the 1mb space..
- Programs typically are not executable up there under DOS, and if so, there's
- the problem of switching to and from protected mode, which is a very time
- consuming thing (esp for the 286). So, any gain you might get from memory
- under 640kb, you would trade for *LOTS* of waiting for network transactions.
-
- Paul Kurr -- Stockholder Systems, Norcross GA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:22:27 on 92/10/15 GMT (by DWAH1 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS20FX installation
-
- The install instructions for LS20FX indicate that NETWKSTA.200 should be
- replaced on both the RIPL server and in the IBMLAN library used by the RIPL
- workstations. However, for the WKSTA*.EXE and IBMTOK.OS2 files, it only
- says to update those files on the RIPL server. Why shouldn't these files also
- be updated in the libraries used by the RIPL workstations? Also, the
- instructions indicate that the apar numbers should be added on a line at the
- end of the install log. This works fine for the server, but the RIPL
- workstations don't have install logs - how do we keep track of service on
- RIPL workstations?
-
- William Hansen
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:16:42 on 92/10/16 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE82)
- Subject: Can't reinstall LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 19:52:53 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SURS001 at OS2CUST)
-
- C:\OS2\INSTALL\EEINST.PRO, for one.
-
- John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 06:05:51 on 92/10/16 GMT (by XXNOVA24 at TORVMCOP)
- Subject: Order in LIBPATH,PATH,DPATH.
- What is the preferred directory order in PATH,DPATH,LIBPATH on a system
- where Base,ES,LS installed as a Requester and what is for a server ?
- Since LAPS, CM, ES, and LS are ALL playing with my config.sys, at
- every re-configuration I used to see those directories in different
- order.
- The stations are connected to IBM LS2.0, over TokenRing, and 3278 in CM.
-
- Geza Szivos
- NOVACOR Chemicals (403)-290-6583 Fax (403)-290-5900
- NHO-32 801-7th Ave Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2P 2N6
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:04:35 on 92/10/16 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR Application Autostart
-
- Is there a way to have an application automatically start up once
- you log on to the lan instead of having to select the application
- from the program starter main menu for DLR workstations ?
-
- thank you
-
- Peter P.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 03:21:39 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR Application Autostart
- Ref: Append at 18:04:35 on 92/10/16 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
-
- Peter,
- Would putting the commands to start up the application in the PROFILE.BAT
- file work for you? (normally Z:\DCDB\USERS\userid\PROFILE.BAT). PROFILE
- .BAT runs before the full screen NET menu comes up.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 01:14:42 on 92/10/19 GMT (by SACG78X at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR UNABLE to LIST FILES in HOME DIRECTORY
-
- I am currently running OS/2 2.0 and LAN server 2.0. I have several
- DLR users who are unable to list files in their home directory. I have
- looked at their home directory under the admininstator panel in show
- they are OS/2 users. Is the a way I can change this back to DOS? Or
- do I have a problem?
-
- Willie Lee
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:40:04 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR Application Autostart
-
- Mike,
-
- Thank you for responding to my question. However I could not find
- profile.bat anywhere. I am currently using OS/2 2.0 and OS/2 2.0
- LAN Server. Does this make a difference?
-
- Again Thank you
-
- Peter P.
-
- Peter P.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:13:27 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL63537 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: DLR Application Autostart
-
- Mike,
-
- I took a chance and just created one, it works great !!!
-
- Thank you very much
-
- Peter P.
-
- Peter P.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:30:49 on 92/10/19 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8)
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- Ref: Append at 18:50:36 on 92/10/12 GMT (by DBEELER at WASVMIC1)
- FOR ALL BBS'ers
- See statement in News & Announcements concerning this --------
- Just added today!!!
- ___ __ ___ __ __ _ _
- | |_| | / \ | \| | | |./ / Hank Henderson HNDERSON at AUSVM8
- | _ | / _~_ \ Sincerely | . < Staff OSS to OS/2 BBS (TEAMOS2)
- |__| |__| /_/ \_\ |__|\__| |_| \_\ Tie:8-793-8647 Austin, Texas
- LNK1SM7 @ IBMLINK - OS/2 BBS
- Please do something..! Lead, follow or get out of the way.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:09:56 on 92/10/20 GMT (by MATT at AUSVM1) --
- Subject: LS 3.0 using native NetBIOS and NetBIOS for TCP/IP
- Ref: None in the current forum
-
- This is an append to OS2LAN CFORUM that has been pruned off. I have
- revived it because of recent questions on the subject. It shows
- just how smart our customers are. I have tried Chuck's procedure on
- the entry server for both LS 2.0 and 3.0 (beta and golden); it works.
- Thanks, Chuck.
-
- Matt Barkley, PS LAN Systems
-
- -- OS2LAN CFORUM app. at 05:02:36 on 92/06/30 GMT (by SAAQ71T at OS2CUST)
- Subject: TCP/IP Questions
- Ref: Append at 17:58:56 on 92/06/23 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- We've been able to run set up an OS/2 2.0 Requester to run both protocol stacks
- (IBM NetBEUI on 802.2 and IBM NetBIOS for TCP/IP on TCP/IP) using a single
- Token-Ring adapter. This workstation could NET USE against one of our OS/2
- LAN Server 1.3 servers (NetBEUI, 802.2 on Token-Ring) and then NET USE against
- a WAN accessible Ungermann-Bass server (RFC compliant NetBIOS, TCP/IP on
- Ethernet). To get to the U-B server, our TCP/IP stuff went through an 8209
- Bridge to get from our Token-Ring to our Ethernet, then through a CISCO
- connected 56 KB line to get to the remote Ethernet.
-
- I haven't done exhaustive testing, but I had no trouble moving files from our
- OS/2 LAN Server to the remote U-B server and vice versa. The configuration
- isn't trivial, but it's not impossible. My CONFIG.SYS goes something like
- this:
-
- DEVICE=D:\TCPIP\BIN\INET.SYS
- DEVICE=D:\TCPIP\BIN\IFNDIS.SYS
-
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBEUI.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\NETBIOS.OS2
- DEVICE=C:\IBMTCPNB\NBDRIVER.SYS (the IBM NetBIOS for TCP/IP driver)
- IFS=C:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\NETWKSTA.200
- DEVICE=C:\IBMLAN\NETPROG\RDRHELP.200
- DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\MACS\IBMTOK.SYS
-
- Note that the IBM NETBEUI.OS2 and NETBIOS.OS2 drivers were loaded before the
- IBM NetBIOS for TCP/IP driver. The NETBIND call is located farther down in
- the file.
-
- In the PROTOCOL.INI file, the NETBEUI_nif module didn't change. I added a
- NETBIOS_nif module with the following two lines:
-
- DriverName = netbios$
- Bindings = IBMTOK_nif
-
- The file also contains the TCPIP_XIF module,
-
- DriverName = TCPIP$
- Bindings = IBMTOK_nif
-
- In the IBMLAN.INI file, I had to modify two lines:
- Under the networks section,
-
- net1=netbios$,0 (this is for the IBM NetBIOS for TCP/IP)
- net2=netbeui$,0,LM10,32,50,14 (this is for the IBM NetBEUI)
-
- and farther down,
-
- wrknets=net1,net2
-
- The only other requirement was access to a NetBIOS Name Server. I think we
- were using a DOS machine running Wollongong software to provide this service.
-
- I'm currently working on an OS/2 LAN Server configuration which would allow
- either DOS or OS/2 requesters running NetBEUI, 802.2 on Token-Ring or DOS
- requesters running RFC NetBIOS, TCP/IP on Ethernet to connect to the server.
- I'm also going to try the FTPD and NFSD services to provide additional
- connectivity.
-
- I think it can be done and would sure consider working with you to figure
- out optimal configuration settings. If you want additional info, let me
- know.
-
- Chuck Immich
- Boeing Computer Services - Wichita, Ks.
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:39:43 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL62928 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: lan server v1.3 csd5050; message net355 cannot logon
-
- (no text entered)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:01:16 on 92/10/20 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
-
- I am trying (unsuccesfully) to get a LAN Server 2.0 Advanced server
- to start with netbios being tied to two adapters on the same ring. I
- have the protocol.ini configured to support as many names and ncbs
- that memory allows. At boot it shows how many are still available to
- netbios applications. However if, in lanman.ini, I specify wrknets
- and srvnets = net1, net2 I get an error saying theat the workstation
- name already exits on the network. I thought that LS 2.0 supported
- multiple adapters running netbios on the same ring? Isn't there
- supposed to be a name resolution feature to allow a single
- workstation name to be shared by multiple adapters? If this is not a
- feature of LS 2.0, is it a feature of LS 3.0 or NTS/2. If NTS/2 can
- I use that with LS 2.0?
-
- As a side note, is there any reason I should wait before going to LS
- 3.0? I am (still) in the process of converting a large LAN Manager
- network to LAN Server. So far the conversion has not gone as smooth
- as I thought it would. I think I have all the kinks ironed out
- (except for getting the 254 sessions and 255 NCBS I had with LAN
- Manager). Will this conversion be easier with LS 3.0? Should I go to
- 2.0 and then migrate to 3.0 when 3.0 is more situated in the market
- place (tested and debugged).
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:37:14 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DUTCHER at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 21:01:16 on 92/10/20 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- The multiple adapter support on the same LAN is a feature of
- LAN Server 3.0.
-
- David Dutcher
- LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:51:44 on 92/10/21 GMT (by NABCA7B at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Connection Manager v1.6
-
- On the Migration Utility Disk is a program called CONMAN that is basically a
- Presentation Manager, graphical, NET USE. It's really a great program but I
- have one problem with the program and I'm wondering am I the only one? I have
- an XGA adapter that may be part of the problem. The problem is that the
- text for the resources is too big for the icons and everything gets run
- together on the screen. What's really needed is some way to change the font
- size to something more reasonable for my display adapter. When I choose half-
- graphics I can't read any of the text at all! Does this happen on a VGA?
- Anyone ever heard of this program?
-
- Michael Laughlin Allied-Signal Controls & Accessories
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 03:15:02 on 92/10/22 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 21:01:16 on 92/10/20 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- First, as David Dutcher pointed out, multiple adapters on the same LAN
- is a feature of LS 3.0 and is not supported in LS 2.0.
-
- Second... I would advise you to go now to LS 3.0 if you have a window
- of opportunity now. You can think of it as the first LS 2.0 CSD if you
- want to. There are lots of fixes in it that are not in the golden LS 2.0.
- We are very confident in its quality.
-
- I am assuming that you do not have any OS/2 1.3 systems in your network...
- remember that LS 3.0 supports only OS/2 2.0.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:11:44 on 92/10/22 GMT (by IL54488 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Number of users cannot exceed 10?
-
- At one of the sites here, OS/2 2.0 LAN server/requester was installed (not by m
- e). After starting the LAN Server, I go to the users' stations also running OS/
- 2 2.0 with requester. I can sign on for the users up to 10 stations. At the 11t
- h station, I get the error message that some of the logon assignments cannot be
- completed, and a few users later, I get logon unsuccessful.
- Straight from the box, we should be able to run 32 users. What I am missing?
- I tried to increase some parameters in IBMLAN.INI with the exact same result. I
- then tried increasing the x1, x2, and x3 parameters in NETx of IBMLAN.INI with
- also increasing the equivalent parameters in PROTOCOL.INI. I get the SAME RESU
- LTS!!!WHAT DO I DO NEXT?
-
- I need help FAST. Thanks.
-
- J.-C. Vaugeois (212) 241-0128
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:29:19 on 92/10/22 GMT (by WZ00845 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Remote Access Server (RAS)
-
- Is there a product, IBM's or third party, which performs the same
- functionality as Microsofts Remote Access Server with their LAN package?
- We want to use LAN Server, but require this feature.
-
- For those that don't know, RAS allows a machine to have network access
- via modem.
-
- Jim.
-
- Jim Karl
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:42:43 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NABCA7B at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Number of users cannot exceed 10?
- Ref: Append at 17:11:44 on 92/10/22 GMT (by IL54488 at OS2CUST)
-
- It used to be that the Server out of the box would support a lot fewer than 32!
- But we continuously change the settings in IBMLAN.INI, so I don't know what the
- defaults were anymore.
-
- First of all, dig out the Network Administrator Reference Volume 2: Performance
- Tuning. As far as I know, the LAN Server spreadsheet that could be obtained
- for tuning LAN Server 1.3 is not available for LAN Server 2.0, so this book
- will be your only resource.
-
- Second, Pay close attention to exactly how many shares a user is given when
- they log in to the Server. Then take a look at the settings for the following
- parameters:
- maxconnections
- maxlocks
- maxopens
- maxsessopens
- maxshares
-
- The default IS 32 for the maxusers parameter, but that doesn't mean that each
- user can share 52 aliases when they log in without fiddling with a few
- parameters. Read the Performance and Tuning Guide very carefully and check all
- the settings for the srvheuristics settings as well. The defaults are not
- necessarily what you want to run with. Good luck.
-
- Michael Laughlin Allied-Signal Aerospace
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:11:49 on 92/10/23 GMT (by STEFANY at WASVMIC1)
- Subject:Remote Administration of OS/2 LAN Server
- Is anyone aware of a product (IBM or non-IBM) to allow LS administration
- from "home" (dial-up)? Thanks,
- Vivian Stefany STEFANY at WASVMIC1
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 19:30:01 on 92/10/23 GMT (by JMSABOL at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Remote Administration of OS/2 LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 17:11:49 on 92/10/23 GMT (by STEFANY at WASVMIC1)
-
- I think there are several ways of doing this. First, IBM sells TCP/IP
- for OS/2, you could use slip (Serial Line Internet Protocol?) to
- establish a remote console to a LAN Server. This would be using
- the TN (Telenet) application from TCP/IP and the LAN Server Full Screen
- Interface and/or Command line interface.
-
- One vendor I know sells tools that provide this function as well as
- other LAN admin function is Shany. Shany is located in CA and has
- several products that are complementary to LAN Server. They have
- both OS/2 and DOS clients/servers allowing a DOS (home) machine to
- administer a OS/2 (office) machine, or any combination of the OSs.
-
- Another possibility is using NetView, I think DCAF is the tool that is
- used to establish a remote console to a machine.
-
- JMS
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:07:50 on 92/10/26 GMT (by CI16017 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multiple Token Ring Adapters
-
- We are about to start testing a scenario to decrease the number of servers we
- use at our larger offices. We are using OS/2 2.0 w/ LAN Server 3.0. We are
- using an IBM PS/2 95 w/ 4 Token Ring Bus Master adapters. Our target offices
- are using a collapsed backbone configuration. We are trying to decide if we
- should insert all 4 adapters into the backbone ring or insert one in each of
- four floor rings. Are there some load balancing advantages to inserting all 4
- adapters into some backbone ring?
-
- Dave Blatcher
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:44:46 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 03:15:02 on 92/10/22 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
-
- It's too late to go to 3.0 for me - I made the conversion to 2.0
- this weekend.However, what is this about 3.0 supporting only OS/2 2.0
- workstations? What about DOS and Macintosh? Also we have over 200
- workstations on our existing LAN, of which only 20 are at OS/2 2.0,
- the rest are all OS/2 1.3. We are not going to upgrade the 1.3 to
- 2.0 until it is stable. Is 3.0 going to support 1.3 ever?
- will be out any day now, but is there going to be anything put out
- for extended services? I am also curious as to how this will work
- with Database out of Toronto, Comm Mgr out of Raliegh and LAN out of
- Austin. If fixes need to be made, will each group issue there own,
- or will it be a bulk fix?
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:58:00 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Upgrading from LAN Manager to LAN Server
-
- A note of thanks to everyone who helped me with my questions on
- converting from LAN Manager to LAN Server. The conversion went
- smooth except for ACLs. It seemed that even though I restored the
- ACLs that were backed up from LAN Manager, they did not come over to
- LAN Server. I had to go in and create aliases for all 160 share
- names I had. Other than that, I now have what seems to be better
- response from the workstations and I love the ability to do server
- administration from workstations.
-
- I do have some questions on logon scripts. It seems to me if I add a
- user, I used to be able to specify a logon script under LAN Manager.
- I don't see where to do this in LAN Server except at the command line
- by typing NET USERS xxxx /scriptpath:xxx.cmd. Is there an easier way
- of doing this?
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:06:41 on 92/10/26 GMT (by UNCS018 at HONE82)
- Subject: Cleaning up the Desktop
-
- Here is an interesting tip I picked up from an IBM person. After
- installing your desktop (LAN,CM,DATABASE, ETC) you might want to clean
- up the desktop clutter to make it easier for you users. I reduce the
- number of ICONS on the desktop to two. This allows more of the
- background picture to display, and if the WPS crashes (seldom right?)
- it will rebuild itself much faster as this is the slowest part of the
- restart.
-
- To accomplish this I create another folder (or use the MAIN folder
- created by LAN requestor install). I then place a shadow or copy of
- theprograms that I use frequently into this folder. All other folders
- are moved into OS/2 SYSTEM folder. I then adjust the size of the folders
- to contain the objects and set the sort flag to always sort. This also
- makes it less necessary to get to the desktop to open another folder
- because if you have both of these folders open you can use CTRL-ESC to
- access them.
-
- Leonard "Did you backup your desktop yet?" Campbell
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:18:11 on 92/10/26 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multiple Token Ring Adapters
- Ref: Append at 18:07:50 on 92/10/26 GMT (by CI16017 at OS2CUST)
-
- Dave-
-
- My understanding is that if all TR cards are on the same ring, there will
- be an automatic load levelingdone. However, if they are on seperate rings,
- they will respond on a first come, first serve basis. There is a performance
- hit going through a bridge (the last time we tested it was around 20% on
- large file transfers going through 2 bridges).
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:19:39 on 92/10/26 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: in Protocol.ini
- Ref: Append at 15:03:10 on 92/10/13 GMT (by SC31402 at AUSVM2)
-
- There is an explaination of many of the inter-relationships among the
- INI and LAN configuration parameters in a 10 page document that is a
- part of the CNFGLS13 PACKAGE on MKTTOOLS. Your SE should be able to
- get a copy of the package for you. It includes a spreadsheet (for 1.3,
- not 2.0) which calculates some recommednded values for the parameters
- for you.
-
- CNFGLS13 can be used for LS20 with a few exceptions.
- 1. The NET1 line uses NETBEUI$, not NETBIOS$
- 2. For Advanced Server, ignore the 'numbugbufs' recommendation.
- 3. " " " " " 'diskcache' "
- 4. " " " add diskcache number to hpfs' cache value.
- 5. The srvheuristics' value for DLRs (digit 15 or 16) should be a '1'.
- CNFGLS13 will set it to '0' if there are fewer than 60 DLR's.
- Memory calculations are probably off -- to be safe, subtract 1 Meg from
- cache. Check with SPM/2 when available.
- Use the generated values to be found to the right of the top screen --
- not the generated INI file found at the bottom of the spreadsheet.
- Then, plug the numbers into the LS20 INI file and PROTOCOL.INI file.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:23:33 on 92/10/26 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- Ref: Append at 18:50:36 on 92/10/12 GMT (by DBEELER at WASVMIC1)
-
- This problem was with NetWare. Novell provided a fix. It was broken
- within 6 hours. Don't know if they have a second fix. LS20 has no
- problem. One report I heard (no confirmation) said the NW problem
- was architectural - hard to fix. I am sure Novell is working on it.
-
- Tom Gordy
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:39:52 on 92/10/26 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Upgrading from LAN Manager to LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 18:58:00 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Are logon scripts supported with LS 2.0? I used them with LS 1.3, but when
- I tried to report a problem, I was told that they were not a supported
- component. Theoretically LAN Server and LAN Manager converge at the 2.0
- level, but if logon scripts are supported there is little evidence of it
- in the documentation. User profiles may be the way IBM wants you to go.
-
- Matt Hickman, Chevron Matt@bhice.hou130.chevron.com
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:06:53 on 92/10/26 GMT (by GALLISON at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 18:44:46 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Looks like a little clarification is in order. LAN Server 3.0 runs
- only on OS/2 2.0. Other clients, DOS, OS/2 1.3, and Macintosh (when
- available), can connect to a LAN Server 3.0 server just as they did
- with a 2.0 server.
-
- The point is that only the workstation running LAN Server 3.0 or LAN
- Requester 3.0 must use OS/2 2.0. DOS LAN Requester is part of the
- LAN Server 3.0 package and requires DOS, naturally.
-
- I can not speeak for how Extended Services plans to handle corrective
- service. Corrective service for LAN Server will naturally be separate.
-
- Hope this helps.
-
- Gary Allison
- OS/2 LAN Server Development
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:05:35 on 92/10/26 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE83)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 18:44:46 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- LAN Services 3.0 requires an OS/2 2.0 _Server_. Workstations
- can be 2.0 or lower releases of OS/2, DOS or Macintoshes.
-
- John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:23:44 on 92/10/27 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 18:44:46 on 92/10/26 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- Charles, LAN Server 3.0 supports all kinds of clients:
-
- DOS -- with PCLP or LS DLR 1.3/2.0/3.0
- Windows -- with LS DLR 1.3/2.0/3.0
- Macintosh (with the addon LAN Server for Mac package)
- OS/2 1.3 -- with EE 1.3 or LS 2.0 requester
- OS/2 2.0 -- with LS 2.0/3.0 requester
-
- What you have heard is that the LAN Server 3.0 OS/2 requester runs only on
- OS/2 2.0, it does not run on OS/2 1.3. However, the *server* will continue
- to support OS/2 1.3 clients running previous release requesters. So you can
- make your transition at your own pace.
-
- To answer your other question... you will see LAN Server, Extended Services,
- and OS/2 each with its own service pak schedule and deliverable. We aren't
- tied to each other. At this point in time LAN Server 3.0 is the best and
- latest level of LAN Server in the field. If you are looking for the latest
- levels of everything go with OS/2 2.0 + service pak + LS 3.0.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:27:37 on 92/10/27 GMT (by BROWNCS at AUSVM2)
- Subject: Multiple Token Ring Adapters
- Ref: Append at 18:07:50 on 92/10/26 GMT (by CI16017 at OS2CUST)
-
- Interesting question. There are some tradeoffs here. My first reaction
- is to put the adapters directly on the four rings rather than on the backbone.
- That will get the server closest to the clients and keep the high volume
- traffic off the bridges -- while still maintaining full connectivity and
- redundancy between the rings (i.e. if one adapter fails the users on that
- LAN can still contact the server across two bridges).
-
- You will lose some load balancing in this environment but as long as the
- average load across the rings isn't wildly out of kilter I think the
- better course is to put the adapters on each ring.
-
- Charlie Brown
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 13:38:20 on 92/10/27 GMT (by TIERNEYC at FSHVMDC)
- Subject:ERR_PIPE_BUSY Named Pipes
-
- I have a PS/2 that communicates with a second PS/2 via Named Pipes.
- I am using OS/2 1.3 with OS/2 2.0 LAN Server.
- All my pipe commands are issued from my main process. When the main
- process is the only process running, I can successfully DosClose both
- response and command pipes and DosOpen the response pipe and
- DosMakeNmPipe the command pipe. However, when I have a chile process
- running ( this process does nothing but increment a counter and DosSleep)
- the return code from the DosClose is good but the return code from the
- DosOpen and DosMakeNmPipe is 231 ERROR_PIPE_BUSY. If the pipes close
- successfully how can they be busy ?????
-
- Can anyone Help ?
- Thanks Cathy Tierney
- Fshvmdc Tierneyc
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:40:04 on 92/10/27 GMT (by PAULC at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- Ref: Append at 20:23:33 on 92/10/26 GMT (by GORDY at DALVM41B)
-
- There is also a good article about this in 'Network World', Oct. 12th
- issue, page 13.
-
- PC
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 14:50:14 on 92/10/27 GMT (by DWAH1 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS20FX Installation
-
- I'm very dissatisfied with the help available via this bulletin board. I
- submitted an item twelve days ago and haven't gotten any replies yet. Since
- I needed the information within my lifetime I opened a problem with defect
- support and they were able to help me.
-
- Does anybody in IBM actually have responsibility for making sure items
- submitted to this bulletin board receive an answer, or is this just a way
- of wasting more of my time?
-
- William Hansen
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:12:34 on 92/10/27 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Multiple adapters on the same ring
- Ref: Append at 21:06:53 on 92/10/26 GMT (by GALLISON at AUSVM1)
-
- Gary, thanks for the clarification. That is what I suspected. I did not think
- there would be access to only 2.0 clients.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:16:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: Upgrading from LAN Manager to LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 20:39:52 on 92/10/26 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- If that is so, it looks like I have quite a bit of work ahead of me converting
- to profiles. Could IBM comment on if logon scripts are or are not supported in
- LS 2.0? I do (or did) use them quite extensively in the LAN Manager world and
- they are easy to maintain.
-
- Charles Boyce - US Bank, Portland OR
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 15:30:05 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL22458 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: restoring LAN Services icon
-
- Hardly a major problem, but bothersome nonetheless. Due to a delightful series
- of circumstances, I have recently had to recreate my desktop. In doing so, I
- have LAN Services back on my desktop, but the icon is the generic folder. I
- don't remember what it used to be, but I would like to get it back to normal.
- For that matter, the same thing is true of my Extended Services object. My
- thanks to anyone who can provide me with what, where, and how.
-
- Tim Rice Legislative Information System (Illinois)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 17:55:12 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81)
- Subject: LS20FX Installation
- Ref: Append at 14:50:14 on 92/10/27 GMT (by DWAH1 at OS2CUST)
-
- William:
- First of all I am not IBM, I am just another user. If you have a problem of
- a serious nature you're first contact should be to support. This is a BBS
- not a support line. If you post a problem here, you answer could come from
- other users. The other users maybe internal to IBM or external. The internal
- IBM users are just like you and me - users. They have no special contact to
- the OS/2 support or development. At times the OS/2 support and development
- people are present on these boards, but with the current effort to get out
- the service pack they have not had much time.
-
- Yes, someone from IBM will answer your problems, but not necessary in these
- fora. The fore are a method for creating unstructure dialogs between users
- and at times IBM developers but they are not formal. Use option 2 on the
- OS2BBS menu to electronically submit a problem. I have done this with good
- results. At times I have also submitted the problem this way and also posted
- to the fora. A lot of times another user who has had a similar problem can
- give my more data the IBM support.
-
- J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS, Sandy Utah)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 18:13:05 on 92/10/27 GMT (by MCI1078 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS2.0 Public DOS Apps on OS2 2.0 Req. Desktop
-
- I've been administering a 1.3 Domain with a few 2.0 requesters and have
- created several .CMD files to enable the users to access DOS Public Apps
- from their desktop (I set them up as Public OS/2 Apps on the server). I was
- told (@ a PS/2 Forum Conference) that after I upgraded the server to LS 2.0,
- Public DOS apps would appear on OS2 2.0 client's desktops. I'm now in the
- process of upgrading the Domain to LS2.0 and just tried to add Harvard Graphics
- as a Public DOS app. to the starter of an OS2 2.0 client.....the Public App.
- folder doesn't show up. Was I lied to at the conference? Will I have to
- continue to rely on .CMD files for my DOS apps?
-
- Ed Lefkowitz - MCI Arlington, VA
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:57:01 on 92/10/27 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8)
- Subject: Leiden Univ. Security Exposure
- Ref: Append at 18:50:36 on 92/10/12 GMT (by DBEELER at WASVMIC1)
-
- Dave,
-
- There was a "News" article on this very topic placed in "News and
- Announcements" for the OS/2 BBS users. I'll see if I can send you
- a copy.
-
- Stephen Poole
- OS/2 Service and Support - IBM Austin, TX
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 21:19:42 on 92/10/27 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8)
- Subject: LS20FX Installation
- Ref: Append at 14:50:14 on 92/10/27 GMT (by DWAH1 at OS2CUST)
-
- William,
-
- I'm sorry I missed your original item or I probably would have
- tried to find an answer. The install instructions from development
- on the LS20FX did not cover exactly the question that you posed.
-
- To answer your overall question about the forums on the OS/2 BBS,
- no, there is no commitment by IBM to answer every item or question
- posted on the forums. They are a device for exchanging information
- among many different customers, customer types, and all IBM internals
- that spend time (voluntarily) on the forums. We have started getting
- a bit more dedicated support for some of the newer product forums being
- created but this is not a commitment by IBM that every item is going
- to receive a response by an IBM person. Many of the IBM personnel
- on these forums cannot speak officially on positions or fixes made
- available on the BBS.
-
- There is an official channel for reporting problems with any IBM
- OS/2 based software or product; or any fix distributed for these
- that is not documented with "AS IS ONLY". The LS20FX and LS13FX are
- fully supported. The official channel on the OS/2 BBS is on the
- main menu, item "IBM Support". The submenu of this has "Submit an
- OS/2 Problem Report". You could have submitted your problem via
- this method and you would have received a response within 48 hours
- maximum, although usually these BBS Problem Reports have been
- getting a voice response from someone in support within 4 hours.
- The BBS Problem Report is supposed to be for "defects" only, but
- we allow quite a bit of leeway with this and your question on
- LS20FX would have received a reply.
-
- I hope this clears up any confusion you may have had about the
- IBM Support position with respect to the customer forums. There
- are many IBM'ers inside and out of customer support for all the
- various IBM products that spend time on these forums. Many others
- within IBM contribute suggestions as do a lot of the customers.
- But the forums are not "committed" IBM support. The "IBM Support"
- option and the BBS Problem Reports are.
-
- Stephen Poole
- OS/2 Service and Support - IBM Austin, TX
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:37:57 on 92/10/27 GMT (by KELLS at AUSVM1) -
- Subject: Upgrading from LAN Manager to LAN Server
- Ref: Append at 15:16:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by USBC238 at OS2CUST)
-
- If you have logon scripts, then they should work. The Lan Server
- user interface will only work with User Profiles. The logon scripts
- work because that code existed in what we picked up from MS. To the
- best of my knowledge, none of it has been disabled.
-
- It's there, it should work, the command line interface commands
- should also work (if any), but is not supported, which is also why
- it is not documented.
-
- tim kells
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 22:41:01 on 92/10/27 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8)
- Subject:ERR_PIPE_BUSY Named Pipes
- Ref: Append at 13:38:20 on 92/10/27 GMT (by TIERNEYC at FSHVMDC)
-
- Cathy,
-
- When using named pipes over a LAN, you may need to use the
- DosConnectNPipe and DosDisConnectNPipe from the server application.
- Refer to the discussion on these and named LAN pipes in the OS/2 2.0
- Programming Guide (NOT the PM Programming Guide), Chapter 9.
- The error you mention (ERROR_PIPE_BUSY) is documented as the return
- you will get when a requester attempts to open a pipe that the
- server has not issued a disconnect and reconnect on.
-
- Stephen Poole
- OS/2 Service and Support - IBM Austin, TX
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:28:41 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: LS2.0 Public DOS Apps on OS2 2.0 Req. Desktop
- Ref: Append at 18:13:05 on 92/10/27 GMT (by MCI1078 at OS2CUST)
-
- Ed,
- I think youwill have to rely on CMD files to start DOS apps from the OS/2
- 2.0 requester when moving from LS1.3 to LS2.0. The other infomation you
- had seems to be a mistake.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 00:38:29 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: restoring LAN Services icon
- Ref: Append at 15:30:05 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL22458 at OS2CUST)
-
- Tim
- To get the group folder icon put back onto the LAN Services folder,
- open the settings on the Main, DOS Programs, OS/2 programs, or whichever
- icon is the correct one. Then go to general, edit the icon, select all,
- copy, exit the icon editor, exit the settings for that folder.
- Now open up the LAN Services folder settings, general, edit, paste, save,
- exit icon editor, exitsettings.
- The LAN Services icon should now look like it did in the begining,
- with six little boxes inside of a white box with a blue-green top.
-
- Mike Long - CARD Iowa State University - PC/LAN Analyst
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 20:41:08 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL22458 at OS2CUST)
- Subject: restoring LAN Services icon
- Ref: Append at 00:38:29 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL19543 at OS2CUST)
-
- Mike,
- Your tip worked just fine. I appreciate your help. Regards and much thanks.
-
- Tim Rice Legislative Information System (Illinois)
-
- ----- OS2LAN CFORUM appended at 16:40:29 on 92/10/29 GMT (by GALLISON at AUSVM1)
- Subject: Peer Networking / MS Windows for Workgroups
- Ref: Append at 20:18:11 on 92/10/26 GMT (by TBHIC at OS2CUST)
-
- Have the forum participants seen or read about Windows for Workgroups
- (WFW)? If so, what do you think? Is this function valuable to you?
-
- You may have read in PC WEEK that a similar offering is in process for
- OS/2 2.0. In LAN Server 3.0, a function call Peer Services is avail.
- that allows some limited peer connectivity. What is proposed is a
- much more integrated approach that implements basic network operations
- in the Workplace shell. (BTW this is not a reaction to WFW, it has
- been under discussion for some time).
-
- Do you think this is strictly a small business solution, or do you
- think this has applicability in the enterprise as well?
-
- What types of capabilities would you like to see in this function
- over and above File sharing, print sharing, and network DDE?
-
- Gary Allison
- OS/2 LAN Server Development
-