FCC At Center Of Internet Controversy (02/14/97; 10:08 a.m. EST) By Sam Masud, Computer Reseller News WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Federal Communications Commission is being barraged with complaints from those objecting to a local telephone-access charge for Internet usage. With Friday, Feb. 14 being the final day to comment on whether local phone companies should be paid an access charge for Internet usage, the FCC is said to have received more than 80,000 messages in its mailbox. Internet service providers, other than the local telephone companies, are almost universally opposed to the local telephone companies adding interstate access charges for Internet usage. "The biggest loser will be the consumer, because this industry operates on very thin margins, and ISPs would have to pass those costs on to the consumers," said Jill Lesser, deputy director for law and public policy at America Online, Vienna, Va. David Parker, vice president of marketing at Delphi Internet Services, Cambridge, Mass., agreed. "This would be the death of unlimited access, which would be a shame for consumers who don't want to worry about the clock ticking," Parker said. Telephone companies claimed that dial-up Internet access, because of the long duration of the calls, ties up the network. They said they estimated that by the year 2000, one-third of all local exchange traffic will be for Internet access. But not all telcos agree the solution is metered usage of the Internet. "Our position is that for the long term, there should be technical solutions," said Ted Creech, a spokesman for BellSouth, Atlanta. "This would be devastating for small and regional ISPs," said Pat Mallon, a spokeswoman for AT&T, New York. "As an interexchange carrier, we are all too familiar with local access, and we know what they are charging now is seven times their cost." Christine Heckart, vice president for telecommunications at TeleChoice, a Verona, N.J., consultant, said metered usage would affect not just residential users of the Internet, but also business rates, including those for dedicated access. "A part of what the regional Bell operating companies are arguing is valid, and that is that nobody gets something for free. But they also hold the local loop hostage," Heckart said