The World of Ham Radio CD-ROM From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:52 1996 From: wb6siv@cyberg8t.com (Raymond Sarrio) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Large shortwave and Ham Classified Ads page on the web Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 23:05:37 -0700 Message-ID: The Raymond Sarrio Company's Ham Radio WWW site is proud to announce a FREE Ham Radio classified advertising page at http://www.csz.com/sarrio.html. This new classified section will allow Hams to search for equipement with the help of a search engine--no need to scroll through 100's of listing before you find that special piece of gear. Plus, when you find the gear your interested in, each listing comes with point-and-click e-mail access, direct to the Ham that listed the item. For those Hams with gear to sell, take note! It is absolutely FREE to list your equipment within Ham Classifieds, and there will be no posting time delays. Your posting will go on-line, in our classified search engine, immediately. All you need do is fill out a simple forms page, and upon its (point-and-click) submission, your "For Sale" advertisement is on-line within 1 hour. I will be purging the classified listing initially about once every month, but that timeline will shorten as our classified numbers go up. Give it a try, and let me know how you like it. 73's Ray -- The Raymond Sarrio Co. a full feature Ham Radio Storefront on tth WWW at http: //www.csz.com/sarrio in association with Brillar Enterprises http://win-win.co m/brillar an Extensive Discount CD-Rom Catalog! From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:53 1996 From: history67@aol.com (History67) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Need copy of Manual for R.L.Drake SSR-1 reciever Date: 30 Apr 1996 23:54:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4m6n9p$2qj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4lroc8$gmc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: history67@aol.com (History67) thanks all for your help, n1wsc From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:54 1996 From: afalcon@grfn.org (Andrew Falcone) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS - ICOM IC-728 Date: 1 May 1996 00:49:45 -0400 Message-ID: <19960501004934.aaaa001qq@babyblue.cs.yale.edu> Subject: ICOM IC-728 (NEW -IN-THE-BOX) IC-728 in original factory packaging. Never used. Asking $895 plus shipping. Andrew J. Falcone afalcon@grfn.org From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:55 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Icom IC-2KL with Kenwood TXRX Date: Wed, 01 May 96 12:20:44 GMT Message-ID: <830953244snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <199605011045.UAA27529@mugca.cc.monash.edu.au> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <199605011045.UAA27529@mugca.cc.monash.edu.au> gnmcd1@mugc.cc.monash.EDU.AU "Mr GN Mcdonald" writes: > linear amp. Has anyone used this with a late model Kenwood > TXRX? Any problems with ALC or TXRX switching? The manual > seems to infer that the amp. will not work without ALC > connected .. Perhaps the manual was stating the matter too strongly. It was no doubt just suggesting that it *ought* not be used without ALC control which would prevent overdrive and distortion or even damage. Remember that ALC is an output from the amplifier and so the lack of a connection to that terminal can do nothing to prevent the amplifier from operating. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:57 1996 From: "Chris Smith, NR3O" Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-706 whats it like to operate? Date: 1 May 1996 13:54:32 GMT Message-ID: <4m7qeo$4l3@newsroom.HITC.COM> To: 100135.2612@CompuServe.COM Hi Mike: It's worth the money (I wish the same was true for the accessories, gees Icom) ! It's very straightforward once you get used to the menu system (experience wit h modern digitally controlled radios with set modes and such helps speed you alo ng). If you can't program your VCR, forget the rig ! Hams should have no proble ms and most adapt more qucikly to the 706 than comparable rigs. I still have to go f or the manual to program my Azden 2m rig and Realistic 202 HT. The memory/scanning features are the most involved to set-up, but the least likely used day to day . I am very happy with the radio (only a week with it so far). I suggest you go to DejaNews and do a search on "IC-706" and "IC706" for a dump of what is in the usenet archives on the rig. Also, Alta Vista can be used to get current articles. I read up this way to get a good idea as well as other articles I could dig up (one b elow was pulled off QST's posting). Just this AM I tried DXing from the car on 20 meters during the commute. The thrill of working a TI (Costa Rica) on my first try was worth the effort I put into t he antenna (GOOD auto installations are somewhat labor intensive). I also worked Hawaii first try last night on 20. Though I planned to use the rig more in th e shack than in the car, that may now change . As far as the features, etc., read the posted articles on usenet. The only lacking is the out of band receive above 100 MHz (including broadcast FM) is poor as everyone says it'd be. I plan to do the mod that's supposed to fix this after warranty expires. As far as the good stuff, there is plenty. I love the band coverage (160 thru 2), small size, and excellent performance for the money. It is really fun to use. There are at least three other competitors from Kenwood, Yaesu and Alinco, but the consensus I gather is the IC-706 for a host of reasons. Hope to hear you on the air! 73 de Chris QST (March 96, I think) It seems that radio manufacturers are all trying to outdo each other by putting more and more features into smaller and smaller packages. With the IC-706, ICOM has outdone all their competitors by offering an MF/HF/VHF transceiver that covers all bands from 160- to 2-meters! The entire unit with the detachable front panel attached, measures less than 7- X 8- X 2.5-inches (18- X 20- X 6-cm.) and weighs only 5.5-pounds (2.75-kg.), not including power supply. Not only that, they also have given the rig almost every operating feature that is possessed by full-sized rigs many times larger. The transmitter output is 100-watts from 160- through 6-meters, and 10-watts on 2-meters. Its receiver covers from 300-KHz. to 200-MHz., continuously, and it operates all of the usual modes: CW, SSB, AM, NBFM, and digital modes. It uses true FSK in digital operation. It also receives wide-band FM and provides scanning functions. In addition, it has a built-in keyer and 101 memories. The little rig even contains some features that many of its big brothers and competitors do not have, such as the option of listening to CW on either sideband, VOX with independent delay settings for each mode, adjustable CW offset with tracking sidetone pitch, first-in/first-out scratch-pad memories, speech compressor with adjustable gain, and software settings to modify the SSB transmit audio response to fit one's microphone and personal choices. It also provides optional computer interfacing and band-in-use outputs to operate external linear amplifiers and for remote antenna switching. To enable the rig to handle the heat dissipation of its 100-watt transmitter, the designer made the chassis a die-cast heatsink on which the PC-boards are mounted. This also makes the rig exceptionally rugged. Power requirement at 13.8-volts is a nominal 20-amps while transmitting; it drops as low as 1.5-amps when receiving with the output squelched. With all of those functions and operating choices, the designers had a major problem of how to provide all of the necessary controls on a front panel only 2.5- X 7-inches (6- X 18-cm.) in size. The tuning knob, alone, takes up the full height and about 2.5-inches (6-cm.) of the width, leaving only about 4.5-inches (11-cm.) of width for the LCD digital display and all other controls. Their solution to the dilemma was a clever system of menus, with function keys that access the menu choices, plus a number of multi-function buttons. In addition to the tuning knob, there are only two other pairs of concentric control knobs. One is RF/SQL that acts either as the RF gain or the squelch control; the other is RIT/Shift. Most of the control buttons initiate at least two different actions. Pushing the button briefly gets one action; pushing and holding it for two seconds or more gets another. This scheme, plus a hierarchy of menus that are displayed on the backlighted LCD digital display, provide the flexibility to control the inherently complex functionality of the rig. The reviewers found that, although the complexity was initially daunting, it did not take long until the control functions became essentially intuitive. The reviewer's summary states that the rig on all ham bands, up to and including 6- and 2-meters, provides all the functions and receiver sensitivity that could be expected. They did, however, criticize the transmitter's IMD. On HF, they rated its performance as acceptable, though not "stellar"; but on 6- and 2-meters, the distortion is bad enough that it may cause significant splatter, especially if used with an amplifier. As for receiving, the ARRL laboratory tests of dynamic range, IMD, and sensitivity indicate that the performance is entirely creditable, and not far below the very best of modern transceivers. The manufacturer's list price for the IC-706 is $1560. An automatic antenna tuner for all bands except 2-meters, Model AT-180, is available for $599. Optional i.f. filters are priced at $84 to $106, depending upon bandwidth. No a.c. power supply is listed. From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:13:59 1996 From: w8jitom@aol.com (W8JI Tom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: DON"T SELL YOUR TUBES TO ANYONE ELSE!! Date: 1 May 1996 16:37:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4m8i25$llk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4m7n1d$mmt@crash.microserve.net> In article <4m7n1d$mmt@crash.microserve.net>, jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) writes: >>Tubes don't clip differently from transistors when they hit the >>power supply limit (though they can also clip by hitting the >>cathode current emission limit which transistors don't have). > >It's been a long time, but I seem to remember that the rounded >waveform will also appear directly at the plate of the tube when >the amplifier runs out of headroom. I don't want to guess about >the cause of this though, and I've already stated elsewhere that >I don't fully understand it. Tubes do clip differently than transistors, and the distortion produced much more to do with non-linearity in the tube than actually reaching the supply voltage or current saturation. The problem in tubes occurs gradually, because the current demand moves into a non-linear part of the grid voltage to plate current curves. This always occurs long before a current emission problem, although voltage swing clipping can occur if the plate's load impedance is too high. >>A low pass filter on the output of a transistor amp will >>produce the same spectrum. > >Absolutely not. Manufacturers of solid state guitar amplifiers >have reasearched this for years in an effort to produce an >amplifier that will simulate the sound a tube amplifier produces >when it clips. You won't get very far telling Fender that they >should have tried a low pass filter. Right on target again Jack. The low pass filter action is pointless. Most well designed high fidelity audio transformers go well about the limit of the human ear. Any "rounding off" by a low pass filter or transformer would be would inaudible to humans. As per speaker damping provided by the amplifier, I'm puzzled by some of the comments. But that isn't anything I've ever thought about or researched, so I'll hold my tounge. Distortion products are another story. The "in-band" IMD distortion makes the observable difference, not the ultrasonic stuff. No way will a simple low pass or audio transformer will make a transistor amp have the same distortion characteristics as a tube amp. 73 Tom From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:00 1996 From: rtw@fuwutai.att.com (Rob Whitacre) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-50 cellular Date: 1 May 1996 18:29:26 GMT Message-ID: <4m8ai6$6e9@nntpa.cb.att.com> For those of you who would like to receive the 869-894 MHz range with your Yaesu FT-50, try tuning it to the corresponding image frequency range, 778.8-803.8 MHz. The sensitivity is the same as when tuned to an 860 MHz signal. Rob WB8WQA From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:02 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: P11578@email.mot.com (Curtis Eickerman) Subject: Re: HTX202 low audio with speaker/mic Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 18:45:45 GMT Message-ID: <1996May1.184545.23064@schbbs.mot.com> References: <4ljit7$9j5@lynx.unm.edu> <3180173d.140911619@news.bright.net> In article <3180173d.140911619@news.bright.net>, dhellen@bright.net says... > >> A friend has >> an HTX202 that he uses with the remote speaker/mic, and even though his >> signal is S9, the audio is very low. I hope that someone can point me >> to a fix for his problem. > >>| Bob Boardman, Albuquerque, New Mexico - KC5SFW - ARRL, Upper Rio FM Society | >>| PGP 2.6.2 public key available | > >I had a problem with mine, and I took it back for repair. >It was tested and I was told it was "within specs" for >proper deviation. I got another unit after a complaint, and >the same thing. I got on the local repeater and someone >gave me the information to increase the deviation by turning >one of the pots inside (there were two if I remember). The >first time I turned the correct one (I forgot which) the >wrong way and had NO deviation, just carrier. Then I tried >it the other way and it was perfect. Find out which pot to >adjust and be careful taking it apart as it does not allow >separation of the front and back parts very far. If you >feel safer doing so, let someone else perform the mod for >you. > >A side point, deviation is dependent on your voice, the >microphone, and the circuitry. Setting the deviation to, >say, 7 khz instead of 5 but talking softly will still give >you less than 5 khz deviation. If you go too far, you will >get complaints on poor audio quality. On mine, both with >the portable mic and the built-in mic, I got reports of low >modulation (deviation) until the mod was performed. > >Sorry I can't help any more as to which pot to turn or which >way, but it's a start. > >Donald Hellen KJ3I > >Made of only the finest electrons and the purest >ascii text to bring you the utmost email pleasure. > >dhellen@bright.net I also noticed the low audio with the external microphone for the HTX-202. From a review of the schematic it is clear there are ways of correcting this by opening the radio. However I did run across a novel approach which does not require opening the radio itself with all of it's inherent risks. The following information regarding low audio with the HTX-202 was found at: http://pages.prodigy.com/CA/LA/htx202htx404/htx202htx404.html Title : Low ext mic audio on the HTX-202 and HTX-404 If you own the HTX radio you probably already know about the low external audio problem. I have tried a few different brand mic's and they all failed to get any significant audio into the radio. There is a good reason for this. The problem is the radio does not provide enough voltage to properly bias an ext condenser mic. When the radio is keyed the voltage at the ext condenser mic drops to about 2 tenths of a volt. Most common condenser mic's need a minimum of 2 volts and a nominal of about 4.5 volts. Design flaw or design feature. You be the judge. There is an easy way to get around this. I will tell you how to modify the Radio Shack speaker mic to get very respectable audio out of it. You then will be able to amaze all the smug Yaesu and Icom owners that have looked down at your HTX rig. You will need the following parts from your friendly neighborhood Radio Shack cat num,............. description,........... generic 19-310............... speaker mic 270-430.............. lithium batt holder.... 20 mm single cell 23-162............... lithium battery........ dl2032..3v 180mah 270-092.............. condenser mic........ -65 db sens 2v-10v .33 microfarad cap,disc type or any small profile type cap At this point I should say that this is a " use at your own risk" modification. It is not approved by the manufacturer and if they knew it would probably void your warranty. Any damage to your radio because of an incorrectly implemented mod to the speaker mike is solely your responsibility. Now having said that, probably the only thing to happen if you blow the mic mod is that the mic won't work or you won't be able to key the radio from the external ptt switch. They made the radio hard to hurt through the ext mike jack. #1: Unsolder the ptt switch. #2: Cut the leads to the mic element and remove original mic. #3: Connect the red wire from the main cable that was going to the ptt switch before to the side of the resistor that is not connected to the speaker. #4: Install the ptt switch in line between the resistor and ground which is the minus terminal on the speaker. #5: Connect the .33 mf cap to the top of the resistor where the red wire is. #6: Connect the white signal wire from the condenser mic to the other side of the .33mf cap. #7: Connect the shield wire from the condenser mic to the ground side of the resistor. This would be above the switch but on the low side of the resistor. This is important because if this is wrong the battery will only last a few days instead of a year or more. #8: Connect the minus side of the battery holder to the ground point that is the minus terminal on the speaker. #9: Connect the positive terminal of the battery holder to the red bias wire that comes from the mic element. #10: Install the battery. #11: Check with a volt meter to check that the bias wire on the mic is getting aprox 3.1 volts positve. That should be it. The .33mf cap keeps the radio {red wire from main cable} from seeing the ext dc from the battery. The ptt switch grounds the resistor and causes the radio to key and completes the ground for the mic element. When the radio is not keyed the battery is looking at a high impeadance instead of the 3k impeadance the mic presents when in circuit. I checked modulation on my rig by putting the HTX on a dummy load at low power and listened with headphones to a scanner. this is a good way to insure that all is well before you take to the bands. Also I should note that this type of mod can be made to other brand mic's. Before I tried the Radio Shack model I modified a MFJ-284. The same principals are involved but in the case of the MFJ there is more latitude in how you accomplish the mod. The ptt switch is dpdt on the MFJ and only spdt on the Radio Shack. Having two sets of switch contacts allows you to use one set to ground the resistor and the other set to apply the positve voltage to the mic element. Applying the positive voltage rather than grounding the mic is probably prefered. If you use the Radio Shack mic you don't have much choice and will need to use the grounding method on the mic. Now there are better parts available to do this mod, a noise cancelling higher sensetivity mic for instance. If you are interested in really having a high performance mic send a self addressed stamped envelope and I will tell you how obtain these better performance parts. Send the envelope to: Terrapin Sales P.O. Box 12426 La Crescenta, Ca. 91224-5426 Another cool place for HTX-202 and HTX-404 info as well as other ham related topics is at the following address. http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/wa3rvt/ Make sure you check out . The above was located at: http://pages.prodigy.com/CA/LA/htx202htx404/htx202htx404.html Be careful if you chose the route of internal adjustment for the external microphone audio. In so doing you will probably be in a position of over deviating with the built in microphone. Curtis Eickerman WB6PUS Phoenix, AZ From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:03 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Wide Band Rec HT's? Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 21:05:17 -0200 Message-ID: <3187EE2D.42B0@mail.rust.net> References: <3183BF70.1EF9@mail.rust.net> <4m8a3l$6e9@nntpa.cb.att.com> To: Rob Whitacre Rob Whitacre wrote: > > In article <3183BF70.1EF9@mail.rust.net>, billc@mail.rust.net says... > > > >Can someone please provide a list of HT's that have WIDE band receive, > >including the 800-MHz. band? > > > >Thanks, Bill Crocker > > You can start with the Yaesu FT-50 you just got rid of..... Rob: I was fully aware of that. It wasn't the cellular reception I was concerned with. It was the FT-50R's inability to function in the WFM mode that it claim ed to have, but didn't. I wanted to use it for commercial FM broadcast, and T.V. sound, which it can receive, but it sounds like garbage due to the not-wide-en ough WFM mode. It's too bad. Other than that, it is a super radio. Bill Crocker From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:05 1996 From: mulveyr@ll.aa2ys.ampr.org (Rich Mulvey) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: What's Going On Here, folks Date: 1 May 1996 22:25:32 GMT Message-ID: References: <1996Apr29.185515.19406@schbbs.mot.com> Reply-To: mulveyr@vivanet.com On Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:08:12 -0400, Ken Knapp wrote: >Bill, > >There are cops everywhere. Just like on the air, there are tons of people >waiting to tell you what you are "doing wrong" I figure if I want to read >a post, I'll read it. If I'm not interested, I'll skip it. A lot easier >then sending replies to people who author posts that I don't approve of. > Is it asking too much to offer a little consideration to those people who have to pay more money to wade through unrelated newgroup postings? Especially when there are other groups that *exactly* meet the needs of the person posting the message? Or has the concept of 'politeness' completely died out? - Rich --- Rich Mulvey, aa2ys Rochester, NY USA mulveyr@vivanet.com aa2ys@net.wb2psi.ampr.org aa2ys@wb2psi.#wny.ny.us From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:05 1996 From: Jeffery Ramlow Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IC-706 CI-V Codes Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 22:26:02 -0500 Message-ID: <31882B4A.1307@gglbbs.com> I've been working on an interface program for the Icom 706 and have a few questions. There is a list of available commands in the 706 Book, and a call to Icom determined that these are the ONLY command codes available under CI-V. My question is, is this true? Are there any undocumented codes? It seems to me that the in-ability to set tone, plus a number of other really good features is somewhat limiting. I know, Icom says....... But reality is a little more complex. I have been lead to believe that there are other codes that are undocumented in the IC-706 Manual. Such as the code to read Mode and code to read Frequency which are not in the manual. Are there more? Any help, or general information anyone has would be greatly appreciated. 73's de jeff N9WBR From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:07 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-101E FOR SALE << YAESU >> Message-ID: <1996May2.000435.119048@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> From: Bill Date: 2 May 96 00:04:35 CDT :::::::::::::::::::::: YAESU FT-101E :::::::::::::::::::::: AMATEUR TRANSCEIVER Serial # 7L300489 STANDARD FEATURES: * 160-10 meter AM / CW / SSB * RF speech processor * Noise blanker * Owner's manual (mint) YAESU OPTIONS INSTALLED: * 600 Hz CW filter * Cooling fan DC INPUT POWER: * 260 W - SSB * 180 W - CW * 80 W - AM This transceiver is physically and electrically in absolutely MINT condition, and meets all original Yaesu operational specifications. No modifications! No scratches! No stains! No dings! ASKING: $450. 00 Bill Worthington AA4FM/0 Eudora, Kansas, USA debral@falcon.cc.ukans.edu ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:08 1996 From: claude@bauv.unibw-muenchen.de (Claude Frantz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: DON"T SELL YOUR TUBES TO ANYONE ELSE!! Date: 2 May 96 12:17:59 GMT Message-ID: References: <4l2n6g$krn@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <31750D1B.7106@gte.net> <4l44rk$qht@crash.microserve.net> <1996Apr21.070928.4280@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> <4lgkbc$dfl@crash.microserve.net> <1996Apr27.124144.16199@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) writes: >Clipping produces only odd order harmonics. By definition, square >waves are composed only of odd order harmonics in an infinite >power series. >Clipping in a tube amp results when power supply voltage limits >are reached, or when tube cathode current emission limits are >reached. The distorsion is different on triode and tetrode/pentode amplifiers. Triodes can reach high anode current when the driving grid voltage is high enough, while tetrodes and pentodes are more limited in this area. Therefore the triodes produce more even order harmonics while the tetrodes and pentodes produce more odd order harmonics. -- Claude (claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de) The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer and not necessarily those of her employer. From amsoft@epix.net Fri May 03 12:14:08 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: INFORMATION ON IC-820H (ACOPP) Date: 2 May 1996 19:27:01 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4mb2a5$dmv@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> I AM INTERESTED IN PURCHASING A ICOM IC-820H. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW + AND - OF THIS EQUIPMENT. I CURRENTLY OWN A ICOM IC- 271H. THANKS AL From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:49 1996 From: murrayl@cs.hope.edu (Murray Leshner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Bird 8325 500W 30 dB Type N attenuator Date: 3 May 1996 04:14:29 GMT Message-ID: <4mc175$hl7@news.cs.hope.edu> Keywords: Bird For Sale: Bird 8325 30 dB 500W oil filled RF attenuator, N connectors in/out, 28# shipping. Make offer? New one is $1125, not sure what they go for used. -- MurrayL@macatawa.org From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:50 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: GMRS equipment, need help finding Message-ID: <1996Apr30.144031.3336@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) References: <4m3uns$1ah@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:40:31 GMT In article <4m3uns$1ah@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> dononeg@ix.netcom.com(Donald Swartz) writes: >I am looking for information on where GMRS radio equipment can be >acquired. I have only seen GMRS equipment offered by Radio Shack (I >own two of these) and these fall far short of utilizing the full scope >of this radio service. >I would greatly appreciate any information on manufactures you can >supply. Most of the major two-way equipment manufacturers make these radios. Motorola, GE/Ericsson, Tait, Maxon, etc all make GMRS models. Look in your phone book under Two Way Radio dealers. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | Due to provider problems Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | with previous uucp address es 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | Email to ke4zv@radio.org Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:51 1996 From: stan@mutadv.com (Stan Huntting) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: KaWin 6.38 released on the web Date: 3 May 1996 14:19:04 GMT Message-ID: <4md4ko$c1o@news-2.csn.net> KAWIN NEWS KaWin 6.38 is ready for download from the KaWin Home Page! New files are: KAWIN638.EXE the full KaWin system for new users, KAWUP638.EXE just the updated KAWIN.EXE and squawk file, KAWINHLP.EXE the latest KAWIN.HLP, help file. The new features in version 6.38 are logging and Yapp! The new logging feature is a modest start at a very big subject. A simple text file, in comma-delimited format for easy import into other programs, stores a wealth of info on your QSOs. See the new help file for details. With the addition of a very full implementation of the Yapp file transfer protocol and a significant enhancement of the existing KaWin HF protocol, KaWin becomes the undisputed leader in file transfer technology for RF datacomm. The following table summarizes the features of the three protocols that KaWin now supports: Feature KaWin/HF Yapp Gold ------------------------------------------------------------ Applicable modes G-tor/Pactor Packet Packet Full binary transparency yes yes yes Robust error detection yes yes yes Auto-start remote upload/download yes yes yes Auto-start remote directory request yes no yes Multiple file selection on Send File yes yes no Wildcards on Get File yes yes no Restartable after a broken transfer yes yes yes Verifies original file on restarts yes yes no Keyboard chat during transfer no no yes All currently reported bugs are fixed in 6.38. To add to the KaWin News mailing list, send email to stan@mutadv.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line, or use the handy subscription link on the KaWin Home Page. To be removed from the list, send email to stan@mutadv.com with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line and be sure to include the email address this message was sent to in the body. I cannot remove you if I don't know your address! 73, Igottago... Stan .. KaWin News is published by Stan Huntting, KF0IA. -- Stan Huntting, KF0IA Email: stan@mutadv.com Fax: 303 444 2314 KaWin home page: http://www.mutadv.com/kawin/ Postal address: 4655 Pleasant Ridge Rd., Boulder, CO 80301-1731, USA From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:53 1996 From: donb@direct.ca (Don Boekenkruger) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Kenwood 733 vs IC-2350 vs DR610? Date: 3 May 1996 20:21:20 GMT Message-ID: <4mdps0$d40@orb.direct.ca> References: <4lu4rb$47h@news.zipnet.net> <1996Apr28.145602.22200@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: donb@direct.ca In article <1996Apr28.145602.22200@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us says... > >In article <4lu4rb$47h@news.zipnet.net> pmarkou@ferrets.zipnet.net (Peter M) writes: >>I'm in the market for a dualband radio. I would like to hear any >>comments (both negative and positive) about ICOM, Kenwood and Alinco >>dualband radios. One point of interest is the intermod rejection >>comparison and receiver sensitivity. > >All three have too much receiver sensitivity, and are too prone to >intermod (the Kenwood is the worst of course). Have you actually tried the DR-610T against intermod, it is certainly the better of all threee, and the best I have seen in it's league. This is the case with or without the Attenuator feature turned on. >>Important options: >>1) Crossband Repeat > >The Kenwood and Alinco have it for sure, I think the Icom does too. >It's important to be able to set separate CTCSS tones on the two >channels during crossband operation, IE has separate encoder and >decoder, make sure the radio you choose allows that. The Alinco DR-610T also has one of the fastest switching systems in terms of crossband repeat that I have ever seen. >>2) 9600 Baud > >The Kenwood *clains* to be "9600 ready", but it isn't. The others >aren't either. The synthesizer designs don't allow proper 9600 >baud modulation (the loop filter chops off parts of the modulation). >You can sort of make them work, but they won't work right. You either >have to go in and modify them for two point modulation, or choose >a radio that does modulation outside the synthesizer loop, IE IF >modulation such as the Azden PCS9600D and IC820H use. I would say that the DR-610 is the best bet if you want 9600 baud ready, remember that Alinco was the first to come 9600 baud ready out of the box with their DR-1200TH2. >>3) DTMF memory > >Don't know about that, don't use it and didn't look. >Take a look at the Standard dualbander. It is almost >intermod free, and works better (but still not right) >for 9600 baud packet than the ones you've chosen. The DR-610T does have DTMF memories. In my opinion the DR-610 is the BEST dual band mobile radio on the market and I have lots of people who agree. And I say anyone who doesn't has obviously never owned one. Don Boekenkruger donb@direct.ca From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:54 1996 From: "Thomas W. Castle" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Sale Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 01:52:58 -0400 Message-ID: Reply-To: "Thomas W. Castle" Hi Tom here... I have for sale 2 Regency 16ch programable mobiles. They have 30W output, keyboard programable, mobile mtg brackets, power cords, mics & all paperwork... They have programming switch added to back of radio for on the fly re-programming. They have been set-up for Emergency service rigs 140Mhz - 180Mhz. broad banded, running 25W at the moment, an working in the 2 mtr band. Type Accepted... So should be usable in other services as well. They have scan, priority, skip, monitor & Tx & Rx pls built in. It can have 2 different PL's <1 tx & 1 rx>... Still with their original boxes, never pressed into service... Tested to check functions on 2 mtrs... Area has gone 800Mhz trunked... Will sell one or both, $235.00 each shipped.... Both for $450.00... Contact me via e-mail or thru packet KD4QHH@K4DPZ.#Gnsvl.Fl.USA.NA. Tnx De Tom 73 From amsoft@epix.net Sat May 04 15:46:55 1996 From: cfii Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Wide Band Rec HT's? Date: 3 May 1996 02:48:25 GMT Message-ID: <4mbs5p$6t7@condor.ic.net> rtw@fuwutai.att.com (Rob Whitacre) writes: > In article <3183BF70.1EF9@mail.rust.net>, billc@mail.rust.net says... > > > >Can someone please provide a list of HT's that have WIDE band receive, > >including the 800-MHz. band? > > > >Thanks, Bill Crocker > > You can start with the Yaesu FT-50 you just got rid of..... > > Rob WB8WQA > > My Icom IC-2SRA has 2m xcvr on one half, 25-950 MHz rx on other. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:25 1996 From: Dave Maciorowski Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: 100HZ Tone Generator info for repeater access? Date: 5 May 1996 13:46:56 GMT Message-ID: <4mibgg$iru@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> References: <4mh9k1$5v0@detroit.freenet.org> To: af104@detroit.freenet.org af104@detroit.freenet.org (Jeffrey L. Bauman) wrote: > >Anyone seen any articles and/or circuits for a 100hz tone >generator I can use with some older 2 meter gear to access >some local repeaters? > >Jeff >WB5KZW >Near Detroit >(810) 788-3210 > >Thanks! >-- I'd go down to the radio store and get a Communications Specialists SS-32 encode-only CTCSS encoder. The frequencies are dip-switch selectable. I have built my own CTCSS encoders in the past, but the 1% resistors are usually hard to track down -- stability of CTCSS tones if VERY important because they should be accurate and stable to a tenth of a Hertz, 100.0 Hz in your case. ----- Dave Maciorowski, WA1JHK Colorado Repeater Association, Inc. Serving Colorado with Voice and Data, 6-Meters to 1.2 Gig Internet: wa1jhk@ix.netcom.com or wa1jhk@amsat.org CRA: http://www.rmsd.com/hamradio/cra/ From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: wn878@freenet.Victoria.BC.CA (Sandra Kinion) Subject: << HELP >> HOW MUCH SHOULD I PAY FOR YAESU FT-101E ? Message-ID: <1996May3.234815.12882@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 23:48:15 GMT I have decided that the new ham rigs are just out of my reach for now, so I have decided to look for an older model in excellent condition. Someone recommended the FT-101E, but I have no idea of how much I should pay for an older set like this. I would really appreciate any help or pointers that anyone can send my way. Thanks! Sandra Kinion Kent, Washington From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:28 1996 From: roland.stiner@hobbs.com (ROLAND STINER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: AM RADIO LOG Message-ID: <8BFF314.0027003D4E.uuout@hobbs.com> Date: Sat, 04 May 96 13:08:00 -0400 Distribution: world Reply-To: roland.stiner@hobbs.com (ROLAND STINER) To: ALL Subject: AM RADIO LOG Can someone tell me who distributes the AM Radio Log (book which lists all AM Broadcast Stations?) --- OLX 1.53 --------------> 73, de NK2U <---------------- * Origin: CyberNet BBS Lyndhurst, NJ (1:2604/151) .....oooooOOOOOo http://www.intac.com/~cono __,-----. ---+_________#_ The Roy Hobbs BBS sysop@hobbs.com |________| |__|___________} Node 1: 201-641-7307 ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\ Node 2: 201-641-3126 From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:28 1996 From: dwhowell@iamerica.net (DWH) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Anyone use a LOG PERIODIC antenna for VHF/UHF? Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 21:54:59 GMT Message-ID: <4mogta$9kb@ns3.iamerica.net> Hello, I am looking for someone that is using a LOG PERIODIC antenna for VHF and UHF. Maybe something like the Tennadyne T-31 or the Create Antenna's. I would like to know how well they perform. Please email me if you have used such a antenna. Thanks dwhowell@iamerica.net From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:30 1996 From: jus@killn.time (D) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: BA1404 fm-stereo transmitter chip Date: 4 May 1996 20:53:14 GMT Message-ID: <4mgg3q$pvv@nntp.interaccess.com> I am looking for anyone who might have an interest in BA1404 through hole Stereo Transmitter Chips. I worked for this company that was contracted to create a FM-stereo transmitter for oanother company that was using it for commercial use. I helped design a board and had it FCC approved through Bell Labs. After ordering 1000 units the company was satisfied yet their need was fulfilled. I had anticipated 2000 units and ordered an extra 1000 IC's since the manufacturer back-ordered 5000 for 6 months. I now have 1000 BA1404 chips to sell if anyone is interested. I also have 100 crystals and varialbe inductors for the FCC approved design. If you or anyone you know would be interested please let me know. I will also give schematics if desired. dc@interaccess.com Doug P.S. I would like to sell them as 1 package but will consider breaking them up in quantity. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:30 1996 From: askaggs@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Allen Skaggs) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: BT-6 battery info Date: 5 May 1996 16:13:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4mj25a$417@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> I have a BT-6 battery case for a Kenwood HT. Would anyone know what kind of Kenwood HT uses this type of battery case? Thanks for all replies, Allen -- ============================================================================== Allen Skaggs, Grove City, OH. Packet Radio Address: NV8R@W8CQK.#CMH.OH.USA. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:31 1996 From: rchappel@ix.netcom.com (rchappel) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Butternut HF5B Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 01:41:20 GMT Message-ID: <4mjmqq$27l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: rchappel@ix.netcom.com (rchappel) I am interested inany experiences any of the readers of this newsgroup have had with the Butternut HF5B antenna. I am considering a rooftop tower with this small antenna if there are no adverse charateristics. How 'bout it? Any opinions? good experiences? bad experiences? Will a small (Radio Shack) rotator handle this antenna? Bob Chappelear KI0AS From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:32 1996 From: Clifford Shepherd Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: decoder MFJ-462B by MFJ Date: 4 May 1996 10:24:29 GMT Message-ID: <4mfb8t$6hg@uruguay.it.earthlink.net> References: <4meecd$g52@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com> To: Klaus,(JFL67A@Prodigy.com) MFJ Multi-Reader: Select Signal Setup; then Options. First to be displayed should be CW: Button on left: in is CW, out is all otherd. I bought Shortwave guide from CRB Research, this tells me where to go and what baud rate is being used, quite helpfull(now no need to guess about settings). Have fun... From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:33 1996 From: "D. GALILEO" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: KENWOOD SM-220 MONITOR Date: 6 May 1996 15:20:37 GMT Message-ID: <4ml5c5$qnt@ns4.ac.edu> To: REC.RADIO.AMATEUR.EQUIPMENT I HAVE AN SM-220 MONITOR SCOPE WITH BS-8 PANADAPTER IN EXCELLENT CONDITION FOR SALE. $310.00 SHIPPED WITH ORIGINAL MANUAL. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:34 1996 From: tenorman@i1.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc Subject: FS: TS-450SAT Plus Stuff Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 02:03:41 GMT Message-ID: <4mh2id$58h@news1.i1.net> For Sale: Kenwood TS-450SAT - 160-10 Meter All Mode transceiver with built in antenna tuner. Absolute perfect shape. Very little use!!! Includes Astatic D-104 desk mic, and Timewave Tech. DSP9 digital signal processor with latest ROM, and RS232 interface (home brew). Asking $1200.00 for all or best offer. Please email tenorman@i1.net or call Mike at 314-235-8012 days or 314-428-4849 evenings. 73 - WQ0N From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:35 1996 From: que@srv.net (Rob Lundahl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS:Icom IC-W2A Dual Band 2m 440 Date: Sat, 04 May 96 03:24:20 GMT Message-ID: <4meimr$ava@mars.hyperk.com> I have an Icom W2A dual band with manual less battery. The unit works perfectly - period - full xmit power! In very good shape. Make offer by email. Rob. que@srv.net. Rob Lundahl Lundahl Scientific Alternative Science: http://www.srv.net/~que/index.html From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:36 1996 From: rtw@fuwutai.att.com (Rob Whitacre) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50 cellular Date: 6 May 1996 13:11:06 GMT Message-ID: <4mktpa$n5@nntpa.cb.att.com> References: <4mdhj4$4b0$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> In article <4mdhj4$4b0$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com>, 75162.2371@CompuServe.COM says... > >Huh? The images are 90.2MHz HIGHER than the fundamentals, so you'd hear >full strength signals in the 959-984MHz area. How do you know they are higher? They could be higher or lower, depending on which side of the receive frequency the LO is. With my rf generator set to 881.5, I can set the radio to either 791.3 or 971.7 and receive the signal. I can see the LO in both cases on the spectrum analyzer at 836.4 and 926.6, respectively. So, apparently the receive range of the radio is extended simply by flipping from high to low side injection. By the way, the sensitivity is about the same in both cases... From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:37 1996 From: Chris Boone Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT712 RH mods Date: 5 May 1996 15:02:53 GMT Message-ID: <4mifut$3mk@argentina.it.earthlink.net> I have a FT712RH mobile and want to get any and ALL mods available... I know there are some to open it up below 430 Mhz (which is what I want) Email them to me or reply here... Anyone with the Radio Mods book and has a copy can FAX the 712 mods to my fax number.. 409-760-7477 MARK ATTENTION to my name... Tnx and 73 Chris From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:38 1996 From: asperges@innotts.co.uk (Jeremy Boot) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: G4NJH Pages Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 18:18:41 GMT Message-ID: <318cf034.5975781@news.innotts.co.uk> Reply-To: asperges@innotts.co.uk The local server programme which processes forms has thrown a wobbly this weekend, so if I've missed anyone's messages, please be patient. http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/ The pages are still functioning fine however and have been recently updated. If you haven't visited yet, do please drop by. 73 de Jeremy G4NJH asperges@innotts.co.uk [Am Radio, SWL pages: http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/ ] From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:39 1996 From: brayman@apt_pc.kodak.com (Caldera Desktop User) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: GMRS equipment, need help finding Date: 3 May 1996 19:29:33 GMT Message-ID: <4mdmqt$n6v@kodak.rdcs.Kodak.COM> References: <4m3uns$1ah@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <1996Apr30.144031.3336@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> In article <1996Apr30.144031.3336@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) writes: |> In article <4m3uns$1ah@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> dononeg@ix.netcom.com(Don ald Swartz) writes: |> >I am looking for information on where GMRS radio equipment can be |> >acquired. I have only seen GMRS equipment offered by Radio Shack (I |> >own two of these) and these fall far short of utilizing the full scope |> >of this radio service. |> >I would greatly appreciate any information on manufactures you can |> >supply. |> See http://www.gmrs.com for other gmrs equipment. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:40 1996 From: rh3333@aol.com (RH3333) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Hamfest Date: 4 May 1996 10:32:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4mfppt$582@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <318AD8B8.41C6@asp1.sbs.ohio-state.edu> Reply-To: rh3333@aol.com (RH3333) May 17-19 From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:41 1996 From: ken yetzer Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Hamfest Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 00:10:33 -0400 Message-ID: <318AD8B8.41C6@asp1.sbs.ohio-state.edu> Can anyone out there tell me when the Dayton hamfest is? From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:41 1996 From: Ray Tang Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HDTV Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 01:30:18 +0100 Message-ID: <318BF69A.4EB1@ardprest.demon.co.uk> Can some-one please assist me??? I need to do a short presentation on how HDTV works!!! I know i've left it too late. Can anyone help? Ps. I Know little or nothing! Thanks From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:42 1996 From: amundson@cts.com (Ray Amundson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Help with FT-40R Date: Sun, 05 May 96 16:44:38 GMT Message-ID: <4miltm$9jg_001@amundson.cts.com> Keywords: FT-40R I recently bought a FT-40R to use in Search and Rescue. The radio was previously converted and I did a master cpu reset. After the reset the radio w ent back to 430.00 to 450.00. I was wondering if anyone knew the sequence of butto ns to push to bring back the extended rx/tx? Thanks ...Ray KC6FUA. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:43 1996 From: bowman@montana.com (robert bowman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Help with HT-202 2/2 Date: 5 May 1996 18:03:34 GMT Message-ID: <4miqhm$seg@maw.montana.com> References: <640_9605030928@woodybbs.com> <729.6698T808T2709@nycmetro.com> In article <729.6698T808T2709@nycmetro.com>, midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) sa ys: >What I'm trying to figure now is when in M-VFo mode and I hit M-Set and >run thru the menu items I get to set a bunch of things such as: > >oS (which I figured out is the Repeater offset) >Ar touch tone auto reply on/off >Lb priority channel lookback time >To transmit timeout >tE transmit inhibit >P5 power save duty cycle >ud vacant channel scan direction >S2 upper scan limit >S1 lower scan limit >5d scan delay time >Sc scan resume >Sr frequency step >rc (which I figured out is PLL decode) >tc (PLL to Tx) From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:44 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Help with JRL-2000F Linear Date: Sat, 04 May 96 14:27:30 GMT Message-ID: <831220050snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <830876447snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <830876447snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk "Anthony R. Gold" writes: > Can anyone tell me the mod that allows JRC's JRL-2000F to operate on 10m? This matter is now successfully resolved. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:45 1996 From: dhughes@efn.org (Dick Hughes) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC 745 Battery replacement Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 02:59:34 GMT Message-ID: <318ac1e2.44976979@news.efn.org> References: <4lvj2l$m2l@ram2.ramlink.net> <4m5d9u$17qt@chnews.ch.intel.com> <318689ee.10782783@news.efn.org> <4mdmb1$a6o@news1.sunbelt.net> flanders@groupz.net (Jerry Flanders) wrote: >dhughes@efn.org (Dick Hughes) wrote: > >>cmoore@vegas.ch.intel.com (Cecil A. Moore~) wrote: > >>>In article <4lvj2l$m2l@ram2.ramlink.net>, Tom wrote: >>>>Does anyone have any experience replacing the >>>>backup lithium battery in the IC 745 HF xcvr???? >>> >>>I wouldn't even attempt it. >>> >>>73, Cecil, KG7BK, OOTC (not speaking for my employer) > >>Actually it can be done if you are very careful. ... >>... One slip and >>your goose is cooked. I agree with Cecil. Much better to send it to >>Icom. > >>Dick Hughes - W7LVA >====================================================================== >I suspect that ICOM charges the same fee to replace the battery and >reload the EPROM regardless of whether you have tried to do it >yourself, so isn't this one of those situations where you have nothing >to lose by trying it yourself? If you are not a klutz, you would >probably succeed. > >Jerry W4UKU (unknown as to klutz factor - haven't changed mine YET) > >flanders@groupz.net > I would agree with you for a lot of people, Jerry. I did it and survived. One does need to be able to attach a battery to two I.C. legs without shorting anything out or attaching to the wrong legs. Need steady hands. Just a precaution. Dick Hughes - W7LVA From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:46 1996 From: dale@exo.com (R. Dale PIedfort) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ICOM DAY SPECIALS AT HRO Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 05:23:34 GMT Message-ID: <4mk2bf$h78@news.snni.com> This coming Saturday May 11th all the Ham Radio Outlet stores will be offering Specilal Discounts on Icom Products.. Store hours are from 10:00am until 5:30pm From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:47 1996 From: parf@aol.com (Parf) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: intermod vs overload Date: 2 May 1996 23:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4mbu3v$q4d@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <1996Apr30.141409.3048@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: parf@aol.com (Parf) May seem like a small point but I believe that m+n= intermod order should perhaps be |m|+|n| because as stated m and n may assume + or - signs. Dale WA2YPY From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:48 1996 From: cqcqcq@ipoline.com (Dan Tang) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood DSP-100, any comments? Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 18:53:28 -0500 Message-ID: I bought a Kenwood DSP-100 and hooked it up with my TS-850, unfortunately I can hardly see the difference. Can anybody help please? Tnx. de VE3CQD From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:48 1996 From: viking@pacifier.com (viking) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood TL-922A KW linear Amp, Present value? Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 22:00:49 GMT Message-ID: <4me1g7$164@news.pacifier.com> Does anyone have an idea of the present value of a Kenwood TS-922A KW linear amplifier? I'm trying to help a friend dispose of some extra equipment and haven't a clue as to its current value. Thanks in advance, Bob East WA7RED PS. To the anonymous poster, if you don't have the nerve to put your name on something then don't bother sending it to me!!!! From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:49 1996 From: rfburns Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Kenwood TM-241A Date: 7 May 1996 00:35:17 GMT Message-ID: <4mm5s5$ctb@nn1.fast.net> References: <4m5ejt$8jh@ns2.sirinet.net> To: pwardell@sirinet.net HERES THE PIN OUT FOR THE KEN 231 IT SHOULD BE THE SAME FOR THE 241 PIN 1 MIC AUDIO PIN 2 PTT PIN3 DWN PIN 4 UP PIN 5 8 VDC 150MA MAX PIN 6 RX AUDIO OUT APPROX 100MV/10K OHM PIN 7 GND (MIC AUDIO) PIN 8 GND HOPE THIS HELPS THIS IS OUT OF THE MANUAL DOUG N2PLR From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:50 1996 From: scott@west.net (Scott M. Phillips) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood TM-2550A Date: 3 May 1996 21:28:14 GMT Message-ID: <4mdtpe$h8j@daffy.sb.west.net> I'm looking for a manual for a Kenwood TM-2550A 2mtr radio. If anyone has one, or knows where I can get one, please email me at scott@west.net Appreciate it! From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:51 1996 From: srwhite@ibm.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood TM-742 questions... Date: 4 May 1996 02:40:37 GMT Message-ID: <4meg35$3vn0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: srwhite@ibm.net I just bought a new TM-742 and have the extended TX mods for it and the 800MHz RX and extra 100ch mods and I can't get the latter 2 to work... My question is does the extended TX mod have to be done to get 800MHz to work?? I can't even get the rig to tune in the 800 range in the display. As for the extra memories, the mod says in memory mode hold down F and REV. Extra mem's A1-J0. BUT, I can't seem to tune to them or be able to write to t hem. Also any tricks like real-time DTMF monitoring, games, etc. would be appriciat ed. I have tries the the CD-ROM sites and oakland for the info that I have now as well as the ARTSCI mod book. Thanks! Steve W. N2RWE From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:52 1996 From: daniel@pandora.lugs.org.sg (Daniel Wee, 9V1ZV) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap Subject: Looking for a HF rig. Date: Fri, 03 May 96 14:48:22 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4md69i$6vq@lantana.singnet.com.sg> Hi, I am in the market for a mid-range HF rig. I've been looking at some of the Kenwood TS-series and they look good. Also been looking at some Icoms. Don't k now much about Yaesu though. In particular I am wondering if there are any problem s with the TS450S/AT. What is the Icom model that is closest to this? What about the Icom IC-728? If someone can recommend me a good rig, not necessarily contest grade but dece nt and reliable, I would really appreciate it. I am a little wary about Kenwood becau se of their notorious reputation with their VHF sets. Thanks in advance. 73 de 9V1ZV Daniel p.s. If you can let me know how much to expect for them I would be grateful. Daniel Wee | daniel@pandora.lugs.org.sg 9V1ZV | daniel.wee@f516.n600.z6.fidonet.org From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:54 1996 From: Edward Lawrence Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.female,alt.binaries.erotic.senior-citizens,alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.senior-citizens,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.breasts,alt.binaries.pictures.erotics.breasts,alt.binaries.pictures.voyeurism,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.banjo.clawhammer,alt.binaries.sounds.midi,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.appalachian,alt.binaries.clip-art,k12.ed.music,alt.sex.fat,rec.sex,alt.consumers.sweepstakes,sci.numerology Subject: Re: Looking for info on numerology Date: 6 May 1996 12:56:57 GMT Message-ID: <4mksup$42c@fcnews.fc.hp.com> References: <4lp7o9$nhr@news.mountain.net> <318A23BD.2462@adnc.com> Why are you posting this material to rec.amateur.antennas? This is about as far off topic as you can get . Please don't do it again. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:55 1996 From: kn4aq.gary@mms.net (Gary Pearce) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Low Transmit Audio IC-2410 Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 11:32:56 GMT Message-ID: <4mkns2$sor@ralph.vnet.net> References: <4m0rtg$86f@rock101.genie.net> flanagan@genie.com wrote: >The ICOM 2410 is well-known for having low transmit audio with the stock >microphone. Apparently ICOM was trying to reduce background noise by >forcing the user to all but shout into the microphone. >I read an early review where the reviewer replaced the stock microphone with >another standard ICOM mobile mic and found the transmit audio was back up >where it "should" be. I cannot find that review. Can anyone identify the >other ICOM mobile microphones that can be used with the IC-2410 to bring the >transmit audio up? Thanks! >-- >Dick Flanagan, W6OLD - (flanagan@genie.com) - Minden, NV The dealer I bought my 2410 from gave me an HM-14 mic. It lacked the autodial memories, but A/B comparisons showed it provided more mic gain, and better fidelity. 73, Gary KN4AQ From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:56 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 06 May 96 01:18:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Manual Wanted for Yaesu F Message-ID: <683_9605061502@woodybbs.com> Brian - you need a copy of "Lost Users Manuals" #1 - which includes your FT-470. artsci publications. HRO has them. If no local dealer to you has it, artsci's telephone number is 818-843-4080. clint.bradford@atdbbs.com ... ATTENTION to Details BBS - 909-681-6221 - REACT/GMRS/AMATEUR RADIO --- * TLX v4.00 * * wcECHO 4.1 ~ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details * Mira Loma, CA * 909-681-6221 -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:57 1996 From: mscherzi@ix.netcom.com(Matthew Scherzi) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Motorola UHF repeater for sale Date: 3 May 1996 14:22:35 GMT Message-ID: <4md4rb$1bd@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> I have 2 Micor Stations that are upgrade pull outs. Wattage is 280 (?) with certified to 225 watts. 6 foot cabinets Eimac CV400 Cavity encoder modu repeater contol modu squelch gate guard tone decoder f-1 tone control module tot station control module spectra tac line equalizer These also have the 3 meters on the top front of the cabinets. Email or 714-957-9398 California Have a great day Matt KF6cyw From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:58 1996 From: eric@sierra.net (Eric Hutchins) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.swap Subject: R-1051 Receiver Manual wanted Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 08:24:47 GMT Message-ID: <4mkd91$f6e@nntp.sierra.net> I need to find a manual for the R-1051 series Receiver. I have a R-1051c and need to make repairs. Can anybody provide me with a copy of the Technical and/or Operator's manual{s} ? Thanks ! Eric KE6IIY From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:41:59 1996 From: cbuttsch@slonet.ORG (Clifford Buttschardt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re IC 706 hand mic improvements Date: 4 May 96 16:03:35 GMT Message-ID: References: <199605041130.EAA02764@mail.ucsd.edu> The supplied hand microphone issued with the IC706 has very little low frequency response probably suited best to the Japanese voice. To minimize this effect, select MENU Q4 (carrier frq) ssb only, and change the default to minus 200. This will retain some low frequencies. Do not use the compressor (COMP) as this will also eliminate lows. At least these changes will allows the "rag chew" guys to get off your back until another microphone can be fitted! 73 Cliff W6HDO Morro Bay, CA From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:00 1996 From: kleerdex@epix.net (Vic Klein) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Swapping HT Accessories Date: 7 May 1996 12:10:12 GMT Message-ID: <4mnej4$964@guava.epix.net> After the recent untimely demise of my IC2-SAT, I am looking for a replacement. The QST artical on small 2m HT's was well timed and has me leaning toward the Yaesu FT-11R, but I have a couple of questions: Does the Yaesu accept the speaker-mics that work on Icom, specifically the R/S mic and the same TNC connections? Can the filtered 12v cigar lighter adaptor for the Icom be used on the Yaesu? What is the experience of those reading with this rig? Is OK? Thanks! =Vic=, WA4THR From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:01 1996 From: info@mopa.global.it (Roberto Manderioli) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: test Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 14:16:01 GMT Message-ID: <4migsq$mg@estense.global.it> Reply-To: info@mopa.global.it From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:01 1996 From: info@mopa.global.it (Roberto Manderioli) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: test Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 14:15:28 GMT Message-ID: <4migrq$mg@estense.global.it> Reply-To: info@mopa.global.it From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:03 1996 From: Ronald M. Dalton Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wanted Kenwood TM-331 Date: 4 May 1996 05:03:51 GMT Message-ID: <01bb3977.3bd7a3e0$963246c6@rmdalton> Looking for a Kenwood TM-331 220 radio in good clean condition. Please send reply's to rmdalton@tcd.net Thanks and CU Ron - KG7LM From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:04 1996 From: prvalko@saturn.acs.oakland.edu (prvalko) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WANTED: IC-22U Schematic Date: 6 May 1996 19:38:54 GMT Message-ID: <4mlkge$akb@news2.acs.oakland.edu> Hello everyone! Do you have a schem of the Icom 22-U laying around? I'd like a Xerox or FAX of the PLL section. I have the owners' manual and the PCB drawing but no schematic. My version is the IC-22E and I'd like to convert it to the USA "U" version. Many thanks in advance! =paul= wb8zjl From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:05 1996 From: nobody@mockingbird.alias.net (Anonymous) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: What's Going On Here, folks Date: 4 May 1996 23:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <19960504233550.aaaa002Y8@babyblue.cs.yale.edu> bobw@col.hp.com (Bob Witte) writes: >The other thing that's going on is that some folks don't politely > inform, they flame away. Sorry about that. No one has been flamed. Mr. Burger only sent a copy of the FAQ. From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:06 1996 From: bobw@col.hp.com (Bob Witte) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: What's Going On Here, folks Date: 7 May 1996 19:55:44 GMT Message-ID: <4mo9s0$d68@nonews.col.hp.com> References: <19960504233550.aaaa002Y8@babyblue.cs.yale.edu> Anonymous (nobody@mockingbird.alias.net) wrote: : bobw@col.hp.com (Bob Witte) writes: : >The other thing that's going on is that some folks don't politely : > inform, they flame away. Sorry about that. : No one has been flamed. Mr. Burger only sent a copy of the FAQ. I stand corrected, Mr. Anonymous. Bob KB0CY From amsoft@epix.net Tue May 07 19:42:06 1996 From: TJM <74032.172@compuserve.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-10 Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 10:30:45 -0700 Message-ID: <318B9445.37A1@compuserve.com> Looking for other FT-10 users/owners... Anyone else have a problem where the battery drains out while unit is turned off?? My first FT-10 would now and then drain a fully charged battery over a 24 hr period even tho off, a current drain shows if tested (like radio is still on). New radio replaced.. serial # off by one and same problem now occuring again. Production problem??? Anyone else ??? Tks Tjm From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:29 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: << HELP >> HOW MUCH SHOULD I PAY FOR YAESU FT-101E ? Date: Wed, 08 May 96 21:54:00 GMT Message-ID: <4mr97l$r6s@crash.microserve.net> References: <1996May3.234815.12882@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> <4mqt49$frj@canyon.sr.hp.com> Tom Zoch (tomz@premier1.net) wrote: > I saw a number of them going for about $250ish A clean FT-101EE or FT-101E still sells for at least $300, and if it's really clean, $350-375 isn't out of line. On the other hand, I've seen quite a few of these at hamfests for $250-300 that probably weren't even worth $150. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:30 1996 From: donrm@sr.hp.com (Don Montgomery) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: << HELP >> HOW MUCH SHOULD I PAY FOR YAESU FT-101E ? Date: 8 May 1996 19:36:41 GMT Message-ID: <4mqt49$frj@canyon.sr.hp.com> References: <1996May3.234815.12882@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> Tom Zoch (tomz@premier1.net) wrote: > I saw a number of them going for about $250ish at the Mike and Key Club's I think you'd be better off if you spent a little more money and bought something solid state like the Kenwood TS-130S. I've seen them as cheap as $350; they're all solid state, WARC bands, 100W, CW-SSB (no AM) and virtual- ly trouble free. However, they will require an antenna tuner if 'looking' into anything other than 50 ohms, and require 12 volts DC at about 25A. 73 from Don K6LTS donrm@sr.hp.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:30 1996 From: t-mathur@students.uiuc.edu (Tarun Mathur) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ?? Yaesu FT-530 still available ?? Date: 9 May 1996 18:40:06 GMT Message-ID: <4mte66$r55@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> Keywords: Yeasu, FT530 I was looking into buying a Yaesu FT-530 after hearing about the $70-off speci al price, but it seems like I started my search too late. Most places I have asked are already sold out. If anyone knows of a place where the 530 is still available, please let me know via email. Thanks in advance, Tarun From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:31 1996 From: ploton@plasma.com (Plotininius E. Waxxmann) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: AD: Mods 4 Sale Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 00:07:34 GMT Message-ID: <319287d4.9810737@news.davlin.net> References: <1996Jan11.190913@axp2.umkc.edu> <4mqe25$jga@newsbf02.news.aol.com> On 8 May 1996 11:19:33 -0400, bucherj@aol.com (BucherJ) wrote: >The Mods I currently have for your equipment is: >* = Not able to be modified for cellular frequencies > etc ... etc.... etc.... > > If you wish to order the mods please send $5 (check or money >order) for each radio model (1 radio= $5, 2 radio's = $10, etc.) to: > >Jamie Bucher >P.O. Box 15653 >Loves Park, IL 61132 > > Please specify if you want your mods faxed, e-mailed, or sent via >the postal service when ordering. It is possible that when we send this >information additional mods for that radio will be available, if so we >will send them along also. > >Please included an e-mail address if I have any questions about your >order. Why send this guy hard earned money when 99.5% of these modifications are easily found on the net already for FREE? Hey Jamie, why not buy an ad in a mag like Popular Communications, then take advantage of net nebies? Have a nice day>>>>>>insert smiley face here<<<<<<<<<< From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:32 1996 From: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: aerotron fm unit...anyone familiar? Date: 6 May 1996 23:06:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4mmen0$bd8@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mjkpf$9p@news.mhv.net> Reply-To: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) aerotron was acquired by siemens; they used to be in north carolina near raleigh; try aol reference desk for electronic phone book From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:33 1996 From: Dan Nixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Antenna Analysers Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 20:34:21 -0400 Message-ID: <31928F0D.1718@akorn.net> References: <4msp12$fh0@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> wrote: > > THE ONLY EXPERIENCE I HAVE HAD IS WITH THE MFJ 259. I HAVE FOUND IT TO BE VE RY > RELIABLE AND ACCURATE. I ESPECIALLY LIKE METERS FOR RESISTANCE, SWR AND THE > FREQUENCY COUNTER TO SHOW AT WHAT FREQUENCY YOU ARE RESONANT. ONE FINAL COMM ENT > I HAVE FOUND MFJ TO BE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND WILLING TO ASSIST WITH ANY > PROBLEMS AND THEY BACK THEIR EQUIPMENT. > > 73'S > AL COPP KF4GKV > GEORGIAI'd like to fully agree with Al's comments. I've found my 259 to be t he best buy for the dollar in all of my antenna arsenal. Also have found the folks at MFJ to back up their products very well with FB service. -- Dan Nixon, N4DVW Loganville, GA USA adnixon@akorn.net From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:34 1996 From: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: AV-3 antenna help Date: 7 May 1996 02:00:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4mmoto$fla@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Hi, I am trying to rebuilt my AV-3 which was taken out by hurricane Opal last year. Hope it don't happen again this year! I need to know the lenght from the base to the first trap, the length in-between the two traps and finally, the top section lenght. This information would be very helpful. Thanks! From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:35 1996 From: cstimson@hookup.net (Craig Stimson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: CAN YOU IDENTIFY THIS MICROPHONE? << HELP >> Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 01:11:49 GMT Message-ID: <4mrgon$h9c@loki.tor.hookup.net> References: <1996May7.191856.119401@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Bill wrote: >I have an old Turner microphone that I hope one of you out there can help >me identify. >Here is the description: >------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Bill, It sounds like a Turner +2 Desk mike that is popular with CB'rs (myself included at one time). You did not mention the colour of the finish. Would it happen to be blue? Also is there a gain control located behind the shaft. If so, I believe it is pre-amplified dynamic microphone. 73 de Craig ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Craig Stimson + + E-mail: cstimson@hookup.net + + AX.25 : VA3DCS@VE3ZRD.#SCON.ON.CA.NA + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:36 1996 From: tubebuyer@aol.com (TUBEBUYER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: DON"T SELL YOUR TUBES TO ANYONE ELSE!! Date: 5 May 1996 23:01:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4mjq1n$co2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mj3au$v2@gorgor.pa.tetherless.com> Reply-To: tubebuyer@aol.com (TUBEBUYER) Can some tell me how to subscribe to this group, or hook me up with a good shrink? From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:37 1996 From: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: ek895 or 896 Date: 6 May 1996 23:06:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4mmeo6$bec@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mglkr$2gt@dub-news-svc-2.compuserve.com> Reply-To: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) who can afford it? got a catalog, but the unit is a bit pricey. please post your findings, if any thanx From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:38 1996 From: Bill Robinson Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS - GERTSCH MODEL FM-3 VHF Frequency Meter Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 17:22:40 -0700 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3193DDD0.999@pinsight.com> For sale - Gertsch Model FM-3 VHF Frequency Meter and manual. $25.00 plus shipping. Please contact me by e-mail Thanks, Bill From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:38 1996 From: murrayl@cs.hope.edu (Murray Leshner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: 6GE5 New tubes Date: 10 May 1996 03:56:28 GMT Message-ID: <4muepc$5as@news.cs.hope.edu> 6GE5 tubes (Heath 411-185) used in HW-16 and single banders. New Old Stock GE tubes in boxes $5 each + shipping -- MurrayL@macatawa.org From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:39 1996 From: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Radome Cellular Antenna Date: 9 May 1996 19:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtvb3$see@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) For Sale: Radio Shack "Radome" Cellular Antenna. This antenna is less than an inch high, and only four inches square. Soft surface magnetic mount for mobile operation. Includes ten foot cable and cellular connector. Also works as an 800 MHz scanner antenna. Antenna is brand new, and originally sold for $49.99. Will sale for $20.00, shipped free in the Continental U.S. via UPS. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:40 1996 From: n7ory@primenet.com (Dungeon Master) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: TS-50, PCS 7500H, HTX-212 Date: 9 May 1996 10:15:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4mt96l$6hr@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Hello! Time to move on to bigger and better things. I have the following for sale. Kenwood TS-50 (manuals, mic) 100W HF $600.00 Azden PCS-7500H 6mtr FM 50 w (manuals, mic, box) $300.00 Radio Shack HTX-212 45W 2mtr FM (manuals, mic, box) $200.00 All are in exelent condition. TS-50 does not have original box. All prices are firm. Will ship for $10 extra (per rig). Cannot hold items for "maybes", first come first served. The TS-50 was purchased new on 2/2/94, the Radio Shack and Azden rigs were purchased 6 months ago. I can be reached at the following: Home Phone: 1-602-931-0157 (M-F 6pm-11pm MST; S-SUN any time) Email: n7ory@primenet.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:41 1996 From: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Weatherproof cellular/800 MHz antenna Date: 9 May 1996 19:27:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtv07$sas@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) For Sale: Radio Shack Marine Cellular Antenna (Cat. No. 17-313). > 4 db gain > 32 inches long > 10 foot cable with TNC connector Great cellular operations in fringe areas, such as marine or cabin. Also great for scanner use for 800 MHz operation. Antenna is brand new. Original price $59.99. Will sale for $25.00, shipped free in the Continental U.S. via UPS. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:42 1996 From: Clyde Soles Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-50 ?? Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 10:34:56 -0600 Message-ID: <318F7BB0.1AE4@nile.com> Can the Yaesu FT-50 be modified for out of band? Has anyone done it? TIA From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:43 1996 From: Alan Raskind Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50 questions Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 14:04:00 -0800 Message-ID: <318FC8D0.7D86@trw.com> References: <4mdn4b$had@aphex.direct.ca> Don Boekenkruger wrote: > > In article , jpss@ais.net > says... > > > > > > > > I was wondering if any out here can answer some questions about the > Yaesu > >FT-50R? > > > > How is it on intermod? > > > > I made the mistake once of buying a Kenwood TH-79a. That thing was > useless > >as it would pick up every radiating if oscillator with in a block of > itself. > >Was always hearing garbage, images etc. It went back to kenwood and was > >told thats the way it is and learn to live with it. Question...is the > >FT-50 prone to suck up this crud too? > > HA! If you thought that the Kenwood TH-79A was bad, then don't even think > about the FT-50R. I have both and the TH-79A has a receiver that is > millions times better. The FT-50R has an adequate VHF receiver, a HORRIBLE > UHF receiver, and the cellular receiver is terrible as well. The kenwood is > nothing to gawk over, but it blows the yaesu away. > > > How do you like the rx audio, qualitity?, loudness? > > Receive audio in the FT-50 is excellent. > > > Battery life? > > Battery life seems pretty darn good. > > > Anyone hack any mods? > > Yup. 140-174 and 420-470 > > > Thanks ! > > No prob. > > > Yaesu told me on the phone today that the FTT-12 keypad option will not > >be available till sometime in May. > > IA question. You may or may not know the answer. How does the FT-50R compare (receiver wise as compared above) to the FT-530? Do you happen to know. I would be curious. Thanks Alan From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:44 1996 From: Martin.Rask@mailbox.swipnet.se (Martin Rask) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Has anyone tried the new TIMEWAVE DSP 599zx Date: 11 May 1996 19:02:04 GMT Message-ID: <4n2o7c$s20@mn5.swip.net> I would lie to get a opinion on the new Timewave DSP.. has anyone tired it and how doses it work.. ?? Many thanks in adance and 73Žs de SM7VHS /Martin From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:45 1996 From: "Thomas W. Castle" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Help with HT-202 2/2 Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 04:05:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <685_9605061502@woodybbs.com> Reply-To: "Thomas W. Castle" To: Clint Bradford Hi Tom here... I have a basic copy of the HTX-202 manual, stored in a a Txt file form.... It can be sent over the modem for ease of handeling. If this would help let me know, for it is a rather long file..... 73 De Tom From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:46 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: Help with HT-202 2/2 Message-ID: <996.6700T1050T1194@nycmetro.com> References: <4miqhm$seg@maw.montana.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 20:27:41 GMT >In article <729.6698T808T2709@nycmetro.com>, midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) >says: >>What I'm trying to figure now is when in M-VFo mode and I hit M-Set and >>run thru the menu items I get to set a bunch of things such as: >> >>oS (which I figured out is the Repeater offset) >>Ar touch tone auto reply on/off >>Lb priority channel lookback time >>To transmit timeout >>tE transmit inhibit >>P5 power save duty cycle >>ud vacant channel scan direction >>S2 upper scan limit >>S1 lower scan limit >>5d scan delay time >>Sc scan resume >>Sr frequency step >>rc (which I figured out is PLL decode) >>tc (PLL to Tx) Thanx for the info Robert. Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:47 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 07 May 96 19:38:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Help with HT-202 2/2 Message-ID: <6b3_9605080929@woodybbs.com> (Continued from previous message) -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/211.9 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:47 1996 From: kenn2sqw@aol.com (Ken N2SQW) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HELP!! Need R390A part Date: 8 May 1996 21:48:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4mrisk$1on@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kenn2sqw@aol.com (Ken N2SQW) I desperately need a function switch for the R390A. This is the wafer switch that controls standby/mgc/agc/calibrate. I could also use the microswitch that is used for power control, although that can be worked around. I believe the wafer switch from a R390 will also work. Please E-Mail KenN2SQW @ AOL.COM Thanks and 73 de Ken From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:49 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 07 May 96 19:38:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: HTX202 low audio 2/2 Message-ID: <6b5_9605080929@woodybbs.com> (Continued from previous message) #11: Check with a volt meter to check that the bias wire on the mic is getting aprox 3.1 volts positve. That should be it. The .33mf cap keeps the radio {red wire from main cable} from seeing the ext dc from the battery. The ptt switch grounds the resistor and causes the radio to key and completes the ground for the mic element. When the radio is not keyed the battery is looking at a high impeadance instead of the 3k impeadance the mic presents when in circuit. I checked modulation on my rig by putting the HTX on a dummy load at low power and listened with headphones to a scanner. this is a good way to insure that all is well before you take to the bands. Also I should note that this type of mod can be made to other brand mic's. Before I tried the Radio Shack model I modified a MFJ-284. The same principals are involved but in the case of the MFJ there is more latitude in how you accomplish the mod. The ptt switch is dpdt on the MFJ and only spdt on the Radio Shack. Having two sets of switch contacts allows you to use one set to ground the resistor and the other set to apply the positve voltage to the mic element. Applying the positive voltage rather than grounding the mic is probably prefered. If you use the Radio Shack mic you don't have much choice and will need to use the grounding method on the mic. Now there are better parts available to do this mod, a noise cancelling higher sensetivity mic for instance. If you are interested in really having a high performance mic send a self addressed stamped envelope and I will tell you how obtain these better performance parts. Send the envelope to: Terrapin Sales P.O. Box 12426 La Crescenta, Ca. 91224-5426 Another cool place for HTX-202 and HTX-404 info as well as other ham related topics is at the following address. http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/wa3rvt/ Make sure you check out . The above was located at: http://pages.prodigy.com/CA/LA/htx202htx404/htx202htx404.html Be careful if you chose the route of internal adjustment for the external microphone audio. In so doing you will probably be in a position of over deviating with the built in microphone. Curtis Eickerman WB6PUS Phoenix, AZ --- * wcECHO 4.1 ~ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details * Mira Loma, CA * 909-681-6221 -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:50 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: HTX202 low audio with Message-ID: <1335.6700T1051T2593@nycmetro.com> References: <4mk473$f3b@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 20:27:45 GMT >>: an HTX202 that he uses with the remote speaker/mic, and even >though his >>: signal is S9, the audio is very low. I hope that someone can >point me >>: to a fix for his problem. >> >>Sounds silly, but make sure he's speaking into the microphone - >located >>in the bottom-right of the RS Speaker-mike. Makes a world of >difference! >> >> >>clint.bradford@atdbbs.com >> >Come on Clint the HTX-202 low deviation problem is long standing and >well known. I know you think the Tandy stuff is great but they have >some serious QA problems and most of all at the retail level they just >don't have a clue. The problem stems from the deviation adjustment >telling the guy to speak into the mike is a cheap shot. >To the original poster there is a deviation adjusrment I can't remember >just which pot it is but I am sure someone here can help you. Don't >mind Clint he just has a lot of Radio Shack stock. > 73 Jerry There's a file detailing how to fix this at oak.oakland.edu via FTP Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:52 1996 From: Ron Giuntini Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: I Just Built A Ten-Tec 1056 Receiver Date: 10 May 1996 23:23:10 GMT Message-ID: <4n0j4u$m7j@news1.slip.net> I put it in a homemade enclosure with a 2" speaker and it works. I built it for 40 meters and I pleased with it. Thoughts during and after construction; All parts present and instructions adequate and thankfully they assume some intelligence on the part of the builder. The manual is adequate but requires some thinking to identify the capacitators. Caps have a confusing system for identifying them, but the manual has a nice back page with info on this. The board is fine, and there is not much to it. They give you an option on powering the two sections separately and it is a good kit to play with. The price is dirt cheap and since you can build it for any band it is fun to experiment with. I decided 40 was a good band since the manual confesses that in a direct conversion receiver the stability is better on the lower frequencies. It is satisfactory on 40. I have good audio out with a good signal. It takes slow careful tuning however. There is a way to get slower tuning by substituting a resistor but I have not tried it. Once I put it in a case and added an LED pilot light ( 1200 ohm dropping resistor) and a couple switches (Power and speaker on/off - earphone jack in line) I did not wish to take it apart to change any resistors. But I might recommend trying a different value to slow down the tuning. This will vary on different bands, apparently. Anybody wishing to talk about this or other kits on the market please email me at rong@slip.net. I may or may not visit this group often enough to get your comments, but I will try. I am now waiting for the 1253 9band Receiver and think this will be easier because I will not have to scrounge the parts to finish it but that part was fun. In fact I am quite proud of the case I made out of sheet metal. I've built and used an Oak Hills Research Sprint (40 meter xcvr - direct conversion - 2 watts) and have an unbuilt Explorer (20 meter superhet xcvr) I guess I like building kits.. I have a couple of Heathkits that I built and really miss the Heathkit Company, I'm glad Ten Tec is taking up the slack and will supporting them .. I don't need a two meter xcvr but I'm tempted to buy one of theirs just to build it., I'd like to hear from anyone that has built other Ten Tecs. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:53 1996 From: Gary P. Fiber Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: IC-706 Yellow Wire Mod -- Con? Date: 9 May 1996 12:36:40 GMT Message-ID: <01bb3da2.f2a1b1e0$06101dcc@gfiber.halcyon.com> References: <4mdfvb$pn@newsroom.HITC.COM> <1996May5.153608.28273@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Gary, > The yellow wire mod works, and was apparently circulated by someone within > Icom America itself shortly after the radio came out. My first reaction on > reading this was to say "Hogwash!", but then I thought that maybe I ought > to do some investigation first. The Yellow wire modification was first written here in this news group. ICOM did not figure this out, some other owner of the 706 did so. When the yellow wire is cut it turns off the bandpass filter as shown on the block diagram that covers 60 to 200 MHz and turns on the 2 meter bandpass filter any time you tune above 60 MHz. There may be some receiver radiation because of this and the radio will not pass Part 15 after the modification. Remember Part 15 basically is a test where the radio is looked at for all possiable frequencies to see if the receiver is going to bother consumer electronics and such. This is most likely no skin off any bodys nose but a manufacturer can not sell a radio that will not pass Part 15 where the receiver operates above 30 MHz, after the sell the manufacturer has no more responsibility as he can not control the owners actions. Although the manufacturer gets into the intent of the law and can bypass the letter of intent or fines could and will result with possiable loss of a type acceptance of a product. As you know amateur equipment, only the receiver is tested and only those receivers that operate above 30 MHz specifically. Amateur transmitters need only be compliant with Part 97 and are not tested by the FCC for any spurs etc. in the amateur service. Manufacturered Low Band Linear Amps are the only device that receive an actual Type Acceptance, this to prove they do not cover 24 to 29 Mhz out of the box in the United States. In Canada this rule of course does not apply and amps sold there have full frequency coverage out of the box. Anyway its a moot point, cut the wire, the manufaxcturer will not likely incorporate this " mod " into manufacturing. Gary From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:54 1996 From: sbryant@wco.com (Steven B. Bryant) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IC-730 PreAmp Problem: Help? Date: 7 May 1996 16:19:13 GMT Message-ID: <4mnt61$861@news.wco.com> Hello- I have ICOM IC-730 that appears to be having a problem. When I press the PreAmp, the volume actually gets softer instead of louder. Has anyone else experienced this problem? If so, what was the fix and is it somethings that could be done without sending the rig to ICOM for repair? Any information will be greatly appreciated. 73s -Steve B., N6EQY From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:54 1996 From: Bill Wehling Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ICOM 275, 475 MODS? Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 21:01:57 -0500 Message-ID: <31915215.185F@comland.com> Has anyone seen, done, or know of modifications that will take the Icom 275, or 475 out of band? -- Bill Wehling <<>> From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:55 1996 From: quandt.pad@sni.de (Ulrich Quandt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: JST-245 : "Hidden Menus" Date: 10 May 1996 13:55:07 GMT Message-ID: <4mvhrr$vv@nervous.pdb.sni.de> Hello, does anyone know the "Hidden Menus" of the JST-245 ? For example: FUNC + LSB, what does it mean ? Best 73 de Ulli (DL4YCM) Email: quandt.pad@sni.de From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:56 1996 From: flanagan@genie.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Low Transmit Audio IC-2410 Date: 7 May 1996 13:58:17 GMT Message-ID: <4mnktp$b33@rock101.genie.net> References: <4m0rtg$86f@rock101.genie.net> <4mkns2$sor@ralph.vnet.net> kn4aq.gary@mms.net (Gary Pearce) writes: >The dealer I bought my 2410 from gave me an HM-14 mic. It lacked the >autodial memories, but A/B comparisons showed it provided more mic >gain, and better fidelity. I asked my question over on Compuserve and the ICOM Tech Support rep said the "standard fix" for this problem is to remove the zener diode across the microphone element. I will give this a try and see what happens. Thanks to all here for their responses. -- Dick Flanagan, W6OLD - (flanagan@genie.com) - Minden, NV From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:15:57 1996 From: kc5egg@ix.netcom.com(Gerald Schmitt ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Manual needed Date: 7 May 1996 13:29:40 GMT Message-ID: <4mnj84$gf5@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> Hello all, Over the weekend I picked up a AEA Morse Baudot ASCII reader model MBA-RO. I got no documentation with it. If anyone has a copy of the manual I would greatly appreciate a Xerox. I thought with this thing as a confidence builder I might do a bit more CW than I do now. Thanks for any help and I'll be glad to reciprocate or pay expenses. 73 Jerry KK5YY From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:00 1996 From: estedman@aol.com (EStedman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Mod ft-50 Date: 10 May 1996 07:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4mvai7$cbr@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mu7nt$7fm@news1.warwick.net> Reply-To: estedman@aol.com (EStedman) Hi nick - A fellow posted the mod info a few days ago - I tried it on a friend's radio and it works - here it is: Subject: Re: FT-50R info. From: felix@netwizards.net (Anonymous) Date: 28 Apr 1996 19:25:43 GMT Message-ID: <4m0gnn$bf0@news.wco.com> I have purchased the FT-50R and yes it is a pretty cool little "radidio". I does have a built in game if yo press the MR button while turning the radio on. I have also modified the radio to transmit out of band.. MARs and CAPs ...Here is the information everyone needs to modify it: 1. remove the battery pack 2. remove the two screws contained under the Battery safety sticker on the back of the radio. 3. remove the key board (instuctions on how to remove the keyboard are in the owners manual) 4. by removing the keyboard, it will reveal three jumper pads 1,2,&3 5. Only jumper pad #1 will be bridged by soldier. 6. remove the soldier from jumper #1 7. now, put the radio back together 8. reset the master cpu... instruction in owners manual. 9. reset the extended receive,.. see the owners manual. 10 you now have a modified radio. any questions e-mail me (him, not me) By the way, if anyone figures out what the object of the game is, let the rest of us know! 73 Ernie N2OJQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:01 1996 From: leo@jove.com (Lawrence Ober) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Narrow Filtering in TS-930 FSK kills KAM receive Date: 10 May 1996 10:58:16 GMT Message-ID: <4mv7g9$21g@decius.ultra.net> References: <4m9bch$8vr@decius.ultra.net> <4me57f$dco_001@pine222.cruzio.com> >Make sure the mark is 2125 and the space 2295. The KAM defaults to 1600/1800. >You may also need to offset the IF Shift or Passband tuning a little to the >high side. I have to do this with my ICOM IC-765 to "peak" the tones. > >73 de Dave KD6TO I've tried this setting. BTW, the HF default on the Kam (non-packet is 1955/2125). The best I can do at any setting, and on a strong signal, is light the bargraph from left to one led right of center (hmmm... makes the tnc sound political :-) Can you suggest the setting need inferred by this reading ? Tnx, Larry From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:02 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: opinion on Alinco DJ-582T and Yaesu FT-530 Message-ID: <639.6700T1033T995@nycmetro.com> References: <318CBE7C.3E75@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 20:27:26 GMT >You may want to check out the new Yaesu dual band 50R. It's very small in >size,5w output, exellent audio, wide band coverage (76-200,200-540,590-999), >mil-spec 810. >-- >Greg Ottria >San Leandro, California >Amateur call KE6PTP >E-Mail gottria@earthlink.net Any Idea what the going price on this radio is? Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:03 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Out of Band Modifications for Radio Shack HTX-212 Date: Tue, 07 May 96 07:47:42 GMT Message-ID: <831455262snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <318C2E94.7603@tima.com> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article charles.adams@ntc.nokia.com "Charles P. Adams" writes: > Besides, it has been posted here many times > before that the RS handhelds are not modifiable for out of band operation. It Is is common to use the HTX-212 as a handheld? How many hands does it take to carry the rig, the lead-acid battery, an antenna and a mike? It might just be easier to carry a around Buick as a really handy hold-all. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:03 1996 From: vanmeter@voicenet.com (Michael Van Meter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Out of Band Modifications for Radio Shack HTX-212 Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 15:17:19 GMT Message-ID: <4mqdti$a50@goodnews.voicenet.com> References: <318C2E94.7603@tima.com> Reply-To: vanmeter@voicenet.com "John P. Scheiwe" wrote: >I am looking for the modifications for a Radio Shack HTX-212 that will allow it to transmit out of band. I am >hoping to be able to use this radio for RACES work. Any assistance is apprec iated. >John Scheiwe - KB9LTI >Bedford, IN >jscheiwe@tima.com Press & hold down the "F" & "DTMF" keys on the front panel as you power up the rig. This allows transmit from 143.000-149.000 in either vfo or memory modes, and receive as follows: vfo mode = 136.000-174.000 Mem mode = 143.000-149.000 Live Life Lovingly! Michael Van Meter From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:05 1996 Date: 10 May 1996 08:04:40 EDT Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: hduff@humnet.humberc.on.ca (Hugh Duff) Message-ID: <8317298828801@humnet.humberc.on.ca> References: <319218A2.4334@ee.port.ac.uk> Subject: Re: PIC repeater controller software?? > Have anyone written any repeater control software for a PIC processor?? > > I found a repeater IDer, but would like to find also the rest of a > controller: > > time-out timer, PTT control, tail delay. > > No DTMF or CTCSS, just the normal timers and latches which are needed > > Erik > -- > Erik Finskas M1AAJ & OH2LAK > Email Finskase@ee.port.ac.uk > Lakki@clinet.fi > University of Portsmouth, UK > Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering I can offer you repeater controller firmware that I wrote for the Intel 8031 that you could try to transpose into 'PIC speak'. The trouble with the PIC is the limited resources like the stack. You may have to write more inline code or use creativity to accomplish some tasks. Might be a good exersize for you ! Regards.. Hugh Duff VA3TO Toronto --- þ NFX v1.3 [000] From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:06 1996 From: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Amateur PAGER... Date: 9 May 1996 14:10:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtcdu$lsk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mqp49$jg6@athena.ulaval.ca> Reply-To: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Paging is in essence, an addressable broadcast. Since I don't think the FCC allows a one-way broadcast on any ham freq., I suspect it would be illegal. (The paging terminal (*data generator*) would probably be hooked to a phone line (a violation since the caller would control the channel), and if you used an answering service to generate the information, the operators would have to be hams. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:07 1996 From: Rick Dykstra Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Amateur PAGER... Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 08:17:11 +0500 Message-ID: <3192B537.16A9@ix.netcom.com> References: <4mqp49$jg6@athena.ulaval.ca> <4mtcdu$lsk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4mtrs4$aoi@hpbs2500.boi.hp.com> <4muedr$1pcs@mule2.mindspring.com> Donald D. Davis, Jr. wrote: > > It would be possible to build something using a DTMF decoder chip - > lots are available. But there are nice HT's out there with DTMF paging > built in, such as the Yaesu FT-11/41/51 series, it might be better to > buy than build. I have the FT-11 and FT-51, and since my wife is also > licensed, we would find this feature useful **IF** any repeaters in > our area would pass DTMF tones. They don't. Since it only works for > simplex operation, we never use it. > > On another vein, members of the local BSRG (Atlanta area) repeater > group got some used Motorola pagers which the repeater owner set up to > be addressed through the 2M machine. It did work , but we never used > it very much - at least not that I heard. It sounded good on paper, > but it was usually just as easy (easier?) to pick up the mike and > call. We probably kept our radios on more than our pagers. > > Nevertheless, I am intrigued by this idea. Any other comments? > > Don (KE4KYO) Most repeaters WILL pass or regenerate DTMF tones if you know the correct command. Check with the trustee to see if this is allowed on the system you use. Rick (KD8CP) From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:09 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Message-ID: <1996May9.170233.16965@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 17:02:33 GMT In article <587cc$b2826.196@News> hcohen@analogic.com writes: >I've had a 202 for about a year now, and have been very happy with >it when it works. I think the electronics are wonderful. The problem >that I have with it is the mechanical connection of the antenna's >bnc connector with the case. It uses a very thin screwed ring with >two notches in it. This loosens frequently and causes intermittant >contact with the inner electronics. This seems to cause two problems >other than just being annoying. It breaks a soldered connection with >the electronics and it causes some overload conditions on the >transmitter, that causes it to die and require service. These problems >have already put my ht in the shop three times. I'm so happy I >bought the extended waranty. My questions are the following: > > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? Red Locktite. (Though if you ever want to be able to replace the connector, and you will if you connect and disconnect antennas frequently, use optical balsam instead.) > Has anyone found a decent tool for tightening this > ring, other than a small screwdriver? It is called a beam spanner, available from places selling tools to the optical trade. You can make do with an old pair of dividers whose tips you don't care about buggering up. Sometimes a pair of snap ring pliers can be made to work as well. The most likely reason you are having this problem is excessive connecting and disconnecting of antennas to the connector. A BNC is an *assembly* connector. It is only rated for at most a few hundred cycles. It is not designed for daily connecting and disconnecting. Eventually the female center pin will lose its spring, or fracture, and you'll have to replace the connector. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | Due to provider problems Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | with previous uucp address es 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | Email to ke4zv@radio.org Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:10 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Message-ID: <1549.6703T1011T1293@nycmetro.com> References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 20:54:37 GMT >I've had a 202 for about a year now, and have been very happy with >it when it works. I think the electronics are wonderful. The problem >that I have with it is the mechanical connection of the antenna's >bnc connector with the case. It uses a very thin screwed ring with >two notches in it. This loosens frequently and causes intermittant >contact with the inner electronics. This seems to cause two problems >other than just being annoying. It breaks a soldered connection with >the electronics and it causes some overload conditions on the >transmitter, that causes it to die and require service. These problems >have already put my ht in the shop three times. I'm so happy I >bought the extended waranty. My questions are the following: > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? > Has anyone found a decent tool for tightening this > ring, other than a small screwdriver? >Thank you. >Howard, n1vxs I had the same problem recently Howard. I suggest that you get yourself a bottle of Loc-Tite from the Hardware store. Remove the ferrule, apply some Loc-tite to the threads and retighten. Once this is done you should have no further troubles. As to a Tool I use a Jeweler's screwdriver to tighten it. Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:11 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Date: Fri, 10 May 96 08:19:39 GMT Message-ID: <831716379snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <587cc$b2826.196@News> hcohen@analogic.com writes: > > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? > If you attach an adaptor which is a BNC socket to Type N plug and put this on your antenna, then you can simply make the antenna a push fit. It will lack the captive properties if yanked but it can be attached and removed without any twisting action which is causing your problem and it will give a perfect r.f. connection. You can use this trick for quick-disconnect on all sorts of sets and instruments without any sacrifice to the constant-impedance of the line. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:12 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE; NEW STANDARD MOBILE (A.COPP) Date: 9 May 1996 18:18:51 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4mtcub$6il@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> BRIAN; THE RADIO YOU ASKED ABOUT IS THE STANDARD C5900DA. THE WATTAGE IS 3-10-50WATTS ON 2 METERS, 3-10-35 WATTS ON 70CM, AND 3-10-45 WATTS ON 6METERS. FREQUENCY RECEIVE RANGES: LEFT BAND 44.000- 99.995 MHZ 100.000 - 225.000 MHZ 240.000 - 530.000 MHZ RIGHT BAND 100.000 - 200.000 MHZ 260.000 - 510.000 MHZ 550.000 - 1020.000 MHZ* * CELLULAR BLOCKED ON 800 MHZ BAND! I CONTACTED OKLAHOMA COM SEVERAL WEEKS AGO FOR A PRICE AND THEY TOLD ME IT WOULD GO FOR $859.00 DEL. HOPE THIS HELPS, AL COPP KF4GKV GEORGIA From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:13 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner From: jherman@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman) Subject: Regency still alive? Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 02:36:05 GMT I'm getting an older Regency tone-alert monitor from some fire dept. I'd like to re-crystal and re-tone it for the NWS on 162.55 MHz. Anyone know if Regency is still in business? The xtal shouldn't be a problem but I'm worried about getting the 1050 Hz tone decoder for it. Thanks in advance, Jeff KH2PZ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:14 1996 From: Andy Brinkley Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Regency still alive? Date: 9 May 1996 00:15:50 GMT Message-ID: <4mrdfm$opc@server2.ols.net> References: To: jherman@Hawaii.Edu jherman@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman) wrote: >I'm getting an older Regency tone-alert monitor from some fire dept. >I'd like to re-crystal and re-tone it for the NWS on 162.55 MHz. >Anyone know if Regency is still in business? The xtal shouldn't >be a problem but I'm worried about getting the 1050 Hz tone >decoder for it. > >Thanks in advance, >Jeff KH2PZ Jeff - Regency is now Regency Land Mobile Radio (RELM) and they are located in West Melbourne Fl. Tech Help is 800-422-6281 and the parts number is 800-422-6282. They may not have much on the alert monitor - They probably stopped making the m at least 10 years ago. If the unit has a decoder that uses "reeds" then you can probably get one from BRAMCO and swap it out. Another method might be to build a decoder circuit fr om a 567 tone decoder chip for the NWS Alert tone. Hope that this has helped. E-mail me if you need more info. Andy N4ROX "brinkley@ols.net" From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:15 1996 From: David Mclean Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Standard C568a mods needed!!!! Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:32:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3194F969.4EE2@dfw.net> Hello I am looking for the mods for the C568a. If you have them please send tham to dmclean@dfw.net -- David Mclean From The Land of The Hams KC5NNV is Clear! [Dfw-Hams] http://www.dfw.net/~dmclean _________________________________________________________________________----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:16 1996 From: jyazel@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Jack Yazel) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: SuperMorse question Date: 7 May 1996 16:37:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4mocau$df4@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> References: <4mo2ib$g0a@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> Chris Dorn (cdorn@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca) wrote: : Hello, : I just bought the May issue of Ham Radio Today from Britian at my local : newstand. It came with a free disc of the latest version of the : SuperMorse code software. The disc does not work properly, and instead of : sending it back to Europe, I am wondering if there is somewhere on the : Net where I may find the lastest version of the software. : Thanks, : Chris VE6RDC You can get it at FTP location: oak.oakland.edu /pub/hamradio/dos/theory-and-morse The file name is sm410.zip Jack - W8RAG From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:17 1996 From: Marinus Willemstijn Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TS120S Problem - Pse Help!! Date: 7 May 1996 18:25:21 GMT Message-ID: <4mo4ih$2s9@newnews.iafrica.com> Thank you for reading this... I hope you can maybe help me. I have a Kenwood TS120S. I have a problem on it which no one can help me with. Not even the agents as the previous owner did take it there. Everything works 100%. Rx and TX is 100% except for one thing. When the TX is keyed in ssb mode without modulation it draws a current of about 15A.There is however no power output(while not modulating). When another RX is put closeby and you key the TX a tone is generated on the RX about 2khz of frequency. If you however modulate(talk) on the rig there is no problem with the ssb output and good signal reports is received except of course that the current drawn stays 15A. The ALC meter also function OK and only goes up on modulation like it should. I have however found that CW output is only about 50W but I do not think its related to this problem. Could you please assist me by telling me where to look to see why the rig draw such a lot of current when its not being modulated. RX current is normal. The rig is usable as it is but I don't think my PS30 power supply will last. The rig does the same in a dummy load. Your assistence will be greatly appreciated. Marinus Willemstijn ZS6MAW Voice : +27 12 3256503 Fax : +27 12 3114438 Internet : willemma@telkom19.telkom.co.za -- Marinus Willemstijn Tel +27 12 325-6503 willemma@telkom19.telkom.co.za From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:18 1996 From: paul1@news.sfu.ca (Paul Erickson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TS930 display dimming problem Date: 11 May 1996 15:35:58 GMT Message-ID: <4n2c4u$ckk@morgoth.sfu.ca> I have noticed that the display on my TS930 will dim from time to time as I tune across the band. I know that if the display blanks it means the PLL has gone out of lock, but this does not seem to be the issue. Has anyone else encountered this type of problem, and if so been able to fix it? cheers, Paul ve7cqk email: paul1@wizard.ucs.sfu.ca From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:19 1996 From: ckollai@cybergate.net (Craig D. Kollai) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wanted: First rig advice for Technician License Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 15:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <4mvgea$vv7@galaxy.cybergate.net> Reply-To: Craig@Kollai.com I wanted to know, what band would you recommend for a soon-to-be licensed Technican class HAM in teh Cleveland, OH area (More specificly, Brooklyn OH)? Ideally, I would love something with lots of toys like an ICOM IC-781, but I can't afford anything over $400 right now. I would like to find something used, If possable, at around $200, witha smaller antenna. I am in a corner apartment, and I am not allowed to use an externa antenna, so I'm planning to use a mobile mount antenna, probably buy it from Radio Shack. I'd like a base station transciever, but I would also buy a mobile if the price and feature would meet my needs; I do have a 120 VAC to 12 VDC 2.5A regulated power supply. My biggest question is, what band should I go for? I want to start using phone, and I was thinking either 2 meter or 1.25 meter, but am not sure which is better, as I don't currently have a reciever to try and find activity here and don't personally know any HAMs in the area! Thansk for your advice, either posted or E-mailed here, I appriciate it! -Craig D. Kollai E-mail: Craig@Kollai.com Visit my web page at:: http://www.cybergate.com/~ckollai/homepg1.htm From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:20 1996 From: tmilko@unisys.com.br (TM) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wireless Telephones Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 18:18:54 GMT Message-ID: <4mtgj3$n7p@panther.unisys.com.br> Reply-To: tmilko@unisys.com.br Sorry to post this question here, but this was the best I could find to this subject. I'm looking for a wireless phone which has a long range reach, to be used in a large warehouse. The home Panasonic type phones cannot reach so far, can anyone help me to recommend a particular product, average price, and where to find in NY ? Tks for the help ! Thomas tmilko@uninet.com.br From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:21 1996 From: Bill Kirk Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: KENWOOD MC-42 Hand Mike Date: 10 May 1996 19:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <4n06gn$5mp@wdl1.wdl.loral.com> I am looking for a working Kenwood MC-42 hand microphone in good+ condition for a ham friend in Poland. Please let me know by direct email, if you have one you'll sell, along with the condition and price. I will be off email from 5/16 thru 5/24, but will respond when I get back on. Thanx, Bill W6RQQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:21 1996 From: ka3vsp@voicenet.com (Brian Pasternak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: Unbuilt Heathkit HW8 or HW9 Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 14:46:40 GMT Message-ID: <4mnrni$l7d@goodnews.voicenet.com> Reply-To: ka3vsp@voicenet.com Hello. I am looking for an unbuilt Heathkit HW8 or HW9. Kit must be complete with docs. Please send me $$$ info and condition via email ka3vsp@voicenet.com. Thanks. Brian Pasternak From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:22 1996 From: bclongwell@delphi.com (Brian Longwell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: YAESU AT-180 Tuner (for IC-706) Date: 10 May 1996 03:44:26 GMT Message-ID: <9605092258592.The_Win-D.bclongwell@delphi.com> I have one of these also. I found that it can have a little trouble "learning" a new antenna and "rejected" the antenna the first few times. I have been using it mobile, though with good affect. I have been able to get the Ten-Tec and Hamstick antennas to cover 100khz + on 75 meters with uniform field strength. (There was no detectable peak at the antenna's resonant frequency). 40 meters has complete coverage. It has worked well in that I don't have to get out and make adjustments roadside in the rain, ... All this may be for nothing, for I may be upgrading to a screwdriver antenna. Brian WB2DSH From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 12 18:16:23 1996 From: jkolin@cloud9.net (Jay Kolin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-10 on Aircraft Freqs. Date: 10 May 1996 19:54:08 GMT Message-ID: <4n06t0$jou@news.cloud9.net> Anyone know how to program an FT-10 so it will receive AM from 110 to 130 Mhz? Thanks Jay NE2Q From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:44 1996 From: mrbbs@mindspring.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: (no subject) Date: 6 May 96 02:51:04 GMT Message-ID: <318D6918.16E3@atl.mindspring.com> add ham-equip From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:45 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: << HELP >> HOW MUCH SHOULD I PAY FOR YAESU FT-101E ? Date: Wed, 08 May 96 21:54:00 GMT Message-ID: <4mr97l$r6s@crash.microserve.net> References: <1996May3.234815.12882@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> <4mqt49$frj@canyon.sr.hp.com> Tom Zoch (tomz@premier1.net) wrote: > I saw a number of them going for about $250ish A clean FT-101EE or FT-101E still sells for at least $300, and if it's really clean, $350-375 isn't out of line. On the other hand, I've seen quite a few of these at hamfests for $250-300 that probably weren't even worth $150. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:46 1996 From: donrm@sr.hp.com (Don Montgomery) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: << HELP >> HOW MUCH SHOULD I PAY FOR YAESU FT-101E ? Date: 8 May 1996 19:36:41 GMT Message-ID: <4mqt49$frj@canyon.sr.hp.com> References: <1996May3.234815.12882@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> Tom Zoch (tomz@premier1.net) wrote: > I saw a number of them going for about $250ish at the Mike and Key Club's I think you'd be better off if you spent a little more money and bought something solid state like the Kenwood TS-130S. I've seen them as cheap as $350; they're all solid state, WARC bands, 100W, CW-SSB (no AM) and virtual- ly trouble free. However, they will require an antenna tuner if 'looking' into anything other than 50 ohms, and require 12 volts DC at about 25A. 73 from Don K6LTS donrm@sr.hp.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:47 1996 From: t-mathur@students.uiuc.edu (Tarun Mathur) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ?? Yaesu FT-530 still available ?? Date: 9 May 1996 18:40:06 GMT Message-ID: <4mte66$r55@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> Keywords: Yeasu, FT530 I was looking into buying a Yaesu FT-530 after hearing about the $70-off speci al price, but it seems like I started my search too late. Most places I have asked are already sold out. If anyone knows of a place where the 530 is still available, please let me know via email. Thanks in advance, Tarun From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:48 1996 From: ploton@plasma.com (Plotininius E. Waxxmann) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: AD: Mods 4 Sale Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 00:07:34 GMT Message-ID: <319287d4.9810737@news.davlin.net> References: <1996Jan11.190913@axp2.umkc.edu> <4mqe25$jga@newsbf02.news.aol.com> On 8 May 1996 11:19:33 -0400, bucherj@aol.com (BucherJ) wrote: >The Mods I currently have for your equipment is: >* = Not able to be modified for cellular frequencies > etc ... etc.... etc.... > > If you wish to order the mods please send $5 (check or money >order) for each radio model (1 radio= $5, 2 radio's = $10, etc.) to: > >Jamie Bucher >P.O. Box 15653 >Loves Park, IL 61132 > > Please specify if you want your mods faxed, e-mailed, or sent via >the postal service when ordering. It is possible that when we send this >information additional mods for that radio will be available, if so we >will send them along also. > >Please included an e-mail address if I have any questions about your >order. Why send this guy hard earned money when 99.5% of these modifications are easily found on the net already for FREE? Hey Jamie, why not buy an ad in a mag like Popular Communications, then take advantage of net nebies? Have a nice day>>>>>>insert smiley face here<<<<<<<<<< From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:49 1996 From: bstevens@moran.Mines.EDU (Brian D. Stevens) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Alinco DR-150T - Thoughts? Date: 13 May 1996 23:19:24 GMT Message-ID: <4n8g1s$j0g@magma.Mines.EDU> I'm thinking of putting a 2M mobile radio in my '84 Suburban. I like the looks of Icoms and Alincos. I've heard that the Icoms are somewhat succeptable to interference (pagers, cell, etc). Any thoughts on the Alincos? B (AB5IC) From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:50 1996 From: Dan Nixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Antenna Analysers Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 20:34:21 -0400 Message-ID: <31928F0D.1718@akorn.net> References: <4msp12$fh0@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> wrote: > > THE ONLY EXPERIENCE I HAVE HAD IS WITH THE MFJ 259. I HAVE FOUND IT TO BE VE RY > RELIABLE AND ACCURATE. I ESPECIALLY LIKE METERS FOR RESISTANCE, SWR AND THE > FREQUENCY COUNTER TO SHOW AT WHAT FREQUENCY YOU ARE RESONANT. ONE FINAL COMM ENT > I HAVE FOUND MFJ TO BE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND WILLING TO ASSIST WITH ANY > PROBLEMS AND THEY BACK THEIR EQUIPMENT. > > 73'S > AL COPP KF4GKV > GEORGIAI'd like to fully agree with Al's comments. I've found my 259 to be t he best buy for the dollar in all of my antenna arsenal. Also have found the folks at MFJ to back up their products very well with FB service. -- Dan Nixon, N4DVW Loganville, GA USA adnixon@akorn.net From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:51 1996 From: csmith1@ccgate.hac.com (Chris Smith) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Azden Service: Excellent! Date: 17 May 1996 15:19:40 GMT Message-ID: <4ni5ec$grv@newsroom.HITC.COM> I have an Azden PCS-7000H 2 meter mobile. One of the display lamps finally went out after over 2 years, so I decided to replace both before the other one went too... The radio comes with a 2-year warranty, and I'm 6 months past that, so "fumble-fingers" got into the radio on his own. It turned out to be much trickier than I'd hoped and I had no luck getting the LCD to work right after reassembly. I called their tech service and told them my woes and asked about replacement parts. The guy there (Lew, a ham) insisted I sent it back and that he'd fix it. Despite it being out of warranty, he fixed it right away, no charge. I sent it from MD Thurs at lunch and had it back the next Wed! Azden gets high marks by me! From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:52 1996 From: cstimson@hookup.net (Craig Stimson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: CAN YOU IDENTIFY THIS MICROPHONE? << HELP >> Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 01:11:49 GMT Message-ID: <4mrgon$h9c@loki.tor.hookup.net> References: <1996May7.191856.119401@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Bill wrote: >I have an old Turner microphone that I hope one of you out there can help >me identify. >Here is the description: >------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Bill, It sounds like a Turner +2 Desk mike that is popular with CB'rs (myself included at one time). You did not mention the colour of the finish. Would it happen to be blue? Also is there a gain control located behind the shaft. If so, I believe it is pre-amplified dynamic microphone. 73 de Craig ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Craig Stimson + + E-mail: cstimson@hookup.net + + AX.25 : VA3DCS@VE3ZRD.#SCON.ON.CA.NA + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:53 1996 From: alt.radio <102745.360@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Cushcraft A4 40M Kit Date: 17 May 1996 20:13:35 GMT Message-ID: <4nimlf$esb$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com> Hi: I have a 40M Add-on Kit for the A4 Beam. Brand new, box never opened. Asking $100. Jeff/WB3DLG From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:53 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: DUAL BAND 2M/70CM BASE (ACOPP) Date: 16 May 1996 13:42:48 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4nfbco$t9@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> I AM LOOKING FOR A DUAL BAND BASE STATION IN LIKE NEW CONDITION. I HAVE NOT OWNED ONE SO INFORMATION ON PRO'S OR CONS WOULD BE APPRECIATED. I THINK AT THI S POINT IT IS BETWEEN THE FT736R YAESU OR THE ICOM IC820H. I ALSO FOUND OUT THAT ICOM IS ABOUT TO INTRODUCE AN ICOM IC821H, ANY IFO ON THIS? THANKS & 73"S AL COPP KF4GKV 9127815836 From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:55 1996 From: a_sweet@condor.psych.ucsb.edu (Art S.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap Subject: FOR SALE Ranger 2950 (100 Watt) Date: Fri, 17 May 96 17:38:02 GMT Message-ID: I have a ranger 2950, 100 watt,10-11 meter , for sale. This radio was $539.00 new. I still is new, but I will sacrifice for $250.00 OBO. ALSO have a new 20 Watt external power supply for $75.00 I will consider $300.00 for Entire setup with wilson antena and panasonic external speaker unit. All Offers considered. Also consider swap on good set of Handheld's Contact Art via; a_sweet@psych.ucsb.edu Thanks, Art From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:56 1996 From: jleining@planet.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: For Sale Kenwood TS-940s/AT, SP-940, SM-220 Date: 18 May 1996 19:17:25 GMT Message-ID: <4nl7o5$8rr@jupiter.planet.net> References: <319cb68f.5333012@news.concentric.net> > spinsfcl@concentric.net (Frank) writes: > I will take the best offer for the entire system. There is a very > minor problem in the TS940, for some reason it needs a two to three > minute warm up period. Also, the TS940 has been modified for out of > band transmission for MARS. > > I am no longer active in MARS and would consider trading down to > smaller HF rig. > > > Frank > N6VQI > >>>> Frank: I have a 1 year old Kenwood 450S,mint,original box,mic + some cash I will tr ade you for your 940S system. Send me a e-mail if interested. 73 Jim From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:57 1996 From: Jerry Hogsett Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: For Sale: Yaesu FT-51R Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 08:45:19 -0400 Message-ID: <319C74DF.4C31@hogsett.com> For Sale: Yaesu FT-51R Micro-dualbander new condition includes extra nicad pack, AA batt pack speaker mic, drop-in charger, user manual, technical supplement CTCSS en/dec built in Asking $400 -- +------------------------------------------------------------ | Jerry Hogsett (home) jerry@hogsett.com | | POB 636 Redwood City CA 94064 (work) jhogs@micrografx.com | | (500)-G-HOGSETT http://www.hogsett.com | ------------------------------------------------------------+ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:57 1996 From: 31W609@Amps-r-us.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Forsale: Gellcell batteries Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 19:56:30 GMT Message-ID: <4n842n$86a@news.inc.net> I have about 2 dozen(24) gel cel batteries. Ranging from 1.2 to 8 amp hour. So me are single 12V cell, others are 2 six's in series.. Anyone interested in these. They are approx 1 year old. They have been kept in -20F storage as part of a stand loss test at low temps. Reply here if interested. I'll send a complete list to those who post reply with e-mail address.. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:58 1996 From: Bill Robinson Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS - GERTSCH MODEL FM-3 VHF Frequency Meter Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 17:22:40 -0700 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3193DDD0.999@pinsight.com> For sale - Gertsch Model FM-3 VHF Frequency Meter and manual. $25.00 plus shipping. Please contact me by e-mail Thanks, Bill From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:53:59 1996 From: acephotog@emi.net (Daniel L. Conklin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS Icom 720 Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 10:42:54 -0400 Message-ID: I'm selling my Icom 720 HF rig. I've got a photocopied version of the manual for it (it's all there). HM-7 mic. It works good. Requires a 20amp 12v power supply. Make an offer if you're really interested. If you're not really interested, then don't make an offer. Thanks and 73 - Dan WB2IZP -- Dan Conklin acephoto@emi.net From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:00 1996 From: d-hemphill@ti.com (D.W.Hemphill KC5NG) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Icom IC-25A 2m FM xcvr, $150 Date: 17 May 1996 13:15:52 GMT Message-ID: <4nhu68$q1d@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> For Sale: Icom IC-25A 2m FM transceiver 25 Watts / 5 Watts selectable, five memories, two VFOs, LED display, DTMF up/down mic, manual and schematic. Works well. Average physical condition (a little worn). This is an older rig from the early 1980s, but is still a decent performer. Would make a good rig for packet, starter rig for a new ham, install in spare car, etc. The price is $150, and the buyer pays the shipping. E-mail me (quickly) if you wanna buy it... Thanks and 73! Dean Hemphill, KC5NG d-hemphill@ti.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:01 1996 From: murrayl@cs.hope.edu (Murray Leshner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: 6GE5 New tubes Date: 10 May 1996 03:56:28 GMT Message-ID: <4muepc$5as@news.cs.hope.edu> 6GE5 tubes (Heath 411-185) used in HW-16 and single banders. New Old Stock GE tubes in boxes $5 each + shipping -- MurrayL@macatawa.org From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:03 1996 From: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Radome Cellular Antenna Date: 9 May 1996 19:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtvb3$see@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) For Sale: Radio Shack "Radome" Cellular Antenna. This antenna is less than an inch high, and only four inches square. Soft surface magnetic mount for mobile operation. Includes ten foot cable and cellular connector. Also works as an 800 MHz scanner antenna. Antenna is brand new, and originally sold for $49.99. Will sale for $20.00, shipped free in the Continental U.S. via UPS. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:04 1996 From: n7ory@primenet.com (Dungeon Master) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: TS-50, PCS 7500H, HTX-212 Date: 9 May 1996 10:15:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4mt96l$6hr@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Hello! Time to move on to bigger and better things. I have the following for sale. Kenwood TS-50 (manuals, mic) 100W HF $600.00 Azden PCS-7500H 6mtr FM 50 w (manuals, mic, box) $300.00 Radio Shack HTX-212 45W 2mtr FM (manuals, mic, box) $200.00 All are in exelent condition. TS-50 does not have original box. All prices are firm. Will ship for $10 extra (per rig). Cannot hold items for "maybes", first come first served. The TS-50 was purchased new on 2/2/94, the Radio Shack and Azden rigs were purchased 6 months ago. I can be reached at the following: Home Phone: 1-602-931-0157 (M-F 6pm-11pm MST; S-SUN any time) Email: n7ory@primenet.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:05 1996 From: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Weatherproof cellular/800 MHz antenna Date: 9 May 1996 19:27:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtv07$sas@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) For Sale: Radio Shack Marine Cellular Antenna (Cat. No. 17-313). > 4 db gain > 32 inches long > 10 foot cable with TNC connector Great cellular operations in fringe areas, such as marine or cabin. Also great for scanner use for 800 MHz operation. Antenna is brand new. Original price $59.99. Will sale for $25.00, shipped free in the Continental U.S. via UPS. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:05 1996 From: joel@cfc.com (Joel Lessenberry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,misc.test,mi.misc Subject: FT 50 R vs IC T7 a Date: 14 May 1996 10:17:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4na4mc$6u@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> I am looking for opinions of the FT50R and the ICT7A I am currently leaning toward the T7A becuase it looks simpler to use and has tone scan built in. Also I like the way it feels in my hand better, the FT50R is a little short and fat for my tastes. The FT50 is also a bet confusing programming wise... Anyone with experience they would like to share pls email me joel@cfc.com I do not read this group. joel wb8rhg > From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:06 1996 From: joel@cfc.com (Joel Lessenberry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,mi.misc Subject: FT 50 R vs IC T7 a Date: 14 May 1996 09:59:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4na3kr$t15@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> I am looking for opinions of the FT50R and the ICT7A I am currently leaning toward the T7A becuase it looks simpler to use and has tone scan built in. Also I like the way it feels in my hand better, the FT50R is a little short and fat for my tastes. The FT50 is also a bet confusing programming wise... Anyone with experience they would like to share pls email me joe@cfc .com I do not read this group. joel wb8rhg From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:08 1996 From: Gerald Schmitt Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT 901 DM Mod ??? Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 07:41:43 -0600 Message-ID: <31988D97.7546@eule.lanl.gov> References: <4n8puq$3sc@zappa.northnet.org> yamaha@northnet.org wrote: > > Does anyone remember how to put this rig on 11 meters ? > ( It will be used legally ... honest!! ) > Thanks !! 73 , N3NDQ Jim For the uninformed please explain how it will be used legally. Perhaps outside of the US or as a laboratory frequency source? Just limiting the power to 4 watts is not going to slop the hogs. If you want to operate on 11 meters there is a lot of legal stuff for a very few bucks. Operation Amateur equipment on CB is one of the few areas still drawing enforcement from the FCC. Just my opinion no flame intended. 73 Jerry KK5YY From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:08 1996 From: Michael Keller Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-10R extended receive use Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 15:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <319C7B5B.44E3@itr.ch> Does anyone know, if i can extend the bandwith (actual 140-174MHz) of my FT-10R with a soft-key-code. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:09 1996 From: Clyde Soles Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-50 ?? Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 10:34:56 -0600 Message-ID: <318F7BB0.1AE4@nile.com> Can the Yaesu FT-50 be modified for out of band? Has anyone done it? TIA From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:10 1996 From: Alan Raskind Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50 questions Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 14:04:00 -0800 Message-ID: <318FC8D0.7D86@trw.com> References: <4mdn4b$had@aphex.direct.ca> Don Boekenkruger wrote: > > In article , jpss@ais.net > says... > > > > > > > > I was wondering if any out here can answer some questions about the > Yaesu > >FT-50R? > > > > How is it on intermod? > > > > I made the mistake once of buying a Kenwood TH-79a. That thing was > useless > >as it would pick up every radiating if oscillator with in a block of > itself. > >Was always hearing garbage, images etc. It went back to kenwood and was > >told thats the way it is and learn to live with it. Question...is the > >FT-50 prone to suck up this crud too? > > HA! If you thought that the Kenwood TH-79A was bad, then don't even think > about the FT-50R. I have both and the TH-79A has a receiver that is > millions times better. The FT-50R has an adequate VHF receiver, a HORRIBLE > UHF receiver, and the cellular receiver is terrible as well. The kenwood is > nothing to gawk over, but it blows the yaesu away. > > > How do you like the rx audio, qualitity?, loudness? > > Receive audio in the FT-50 is excellent. > > > Battery life? > > Battery life seems pretty darn good. > > > Anyone hack any mods? > > Yup. 140-174 and 420-470 > > > Thanks ! > > No prob. > > > Yaesu told me on the phone today that the FTT-12 keypad option will not > >be available till sometime in May. > > IA question. You may or may not know the answer. How does the FT-50R compare (receiver wise as compared above) to the FT-530? Do you happen to know. I would be curious. Thanks Alan From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:11 1996 From: Gregg_Palmer@msn.com (Gregg Palmer) Subject: FT-51R Date: 16 May 96 14:46:56 -0700 References: <4n09lj$or5@math.mps.ohio-state.edu> Message-ID: <00001fed+000032ba@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Does anyone out there have any specs on this radio as to mods or how far it will go out of band?? Gregg_Palmer@msn.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:12 1996 From: netsvic@ipoline.com (Vic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-59r or IC-Z1A??? Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 06:01:50 GMT Message-ID: <4njbum$gl8@ipo.ipoline.com> References: <4njbtg$gl8@ipo.ipoline.com> netsvic@ipoline.com (Vic) wrote: >Hi! I am thinking about buy FT-50R or IC-Z1A?? Does any one can give >some advice for me?? Thank you!! >Vic From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:13 1996 From: netsvic@ipoline.com (Vic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-59r or IC-Z1A??? Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 06:01:11 GMT Message-ID: <4njbtg$gl8@ipo.ipoline.com> Hi! I am thinking about buy FT-50R or IC-Z1A?? Does any one can give some adive for me?? Thank you!! Vic From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:13 1996 From: string@ix.netcom.com(William Alfred Beekman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT50 Date: 14 May 1996 08:14:11 GMT Message-ID: <4n9fcj$61u@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> Anyone have any information on the FT-50? From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:14 1996 From: rtw@fuwutai.att.com (Rob Whitacre) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT50 Date: 14 May 1996 13:40:48 GMT Message-ID: <4na2h0$heb@nntpa.cb.att.com> References: <4n9fcj$61u@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> In article <4n9fcj$61u@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>, string@ix.netcom.co says... > >Anyone have any information on the FT-50? > What do you want to know? From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:15 1996 From: NJC@WARWICK.NET (Nick J Chiarchiaro, AET / N2QXF) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT50-R Yaesu: NO FIX Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 13:36:55 GMT Message-ID: <4na2il$8ib@news1.warwick.net> References: <31973470.2CDA@hogsett.com> Jerry Hogsett wrote: >I just spoke to a technician at Yaesu about the crappy audio in Wide FM >mode on the FT-50R. She said that due to the size of the radio, they >were only able to fit a 30-35KHz filter, instead of a 75KHz filter, for >Wide FM mode. When I mentioned that this made the extended bands >useless, she said that people in Japan are able to use it (I doubt >that). She offered to fax me a list of FM frequencies I can listen to >in Wide FM mode. >She said they were going to "fix it" in the manual and advertisements. >She said there's not going to be a fix offered for the radio. When I >said I wanted my money back, she called my bluff and asked me where I >bought the radio. >I'll keep it, but I wish it worked as advertised. >-- >+------------------------------------------------------------ >| Jerry Hogsett (home) jerry@hogsett.com | >| POB 636 Redwood City CA 94064 (work) jhogs@micrografx.com | >| (500)-G-HOGSETT http://www.hogsett.com | >------------------------------------------------------------+ Why would anyone want an amateur HT to work in the FM broadcast band anyway? Although the ad is incorrect it was pointless int he first place. Just my opinion Nick From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:16 1996 From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT50-R Yaesu: NO FIX Date: 14 May 1996 14:39:18 GMT Message-ID: <4na5um$app@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <31973470.2CDA@hogsett.com> Reply-To: parnass@att.com In article <31973470.2CDA@hogsett.com>, Jerry Hogsett wrote: >I just spoke to a technician at Yaesu about the crappy >audio in Wide FM mode on the FT-50R. She said that >due to the size of the radio, they were only able to >fit a 30-35KHz filter, instead of a 75KHz filter, for >Wide FM mode. .... Have you tried replacing the WFM filter with a resistor? Since, I don't have an FT50 schematic, I don't know if there is another filter, located in an earlier IF, which limits the bandwith, too. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@bell-labs.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:17 1996 From: Jerry Hogsett Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT50-R Yaesu: NO FIX Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 07:59:46 -0400 Message-ID: <319875B2.515B@hogsett.com> References: <31973470.2CDA@hogsett.com> <4na2il$8ib@news1.warwick.net> Nick J Chiarchiaro, AET / N2QXF wrote: > Why would anyone want an amateur HT to work in the FM broadcast band > anyway? > > Although the ad is incorrect it was pointless int he first place. > > Just my opinion > > Nick In my case, it's like a little general coverage scanner that also transmits. I also regularly listen to public service freqs, marine and air freqs, etc. -- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:18 1996 From: gary Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ft50r mods?? Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 07:25:33 -0400 Message-ID: <319DB3AD.4AAA@pcnet.com> looking for ft50r mods.specifically opening up transmit in the 450 and 462Mhz realm. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:19 1996 From: n7ory@primenet.com (Dungeon Master) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Future HF xcvrs: Are any of you Radio Manufacturers Reading this ? Date: 13 May 1996 13:26:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4n85sp$gv4@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> References: <4n7dg2$ms0@ilx018.iil.intel.com> "Richard B. Harel" wrote: >Here is a list of features I'd love to see the 'Big 3' Japanese >manufacturers of AR equipment incorporate into their future >HF xcvrs. Many commercial manufacturers have already incorporated >many of these features. >1. Sylabic Squelch. - If anyone has ever used this feature, there's no > going back ! This type of squelch opens upon detection of voice > characteristics. JPS makes a plug in module with this feature > that is sold to many commercial OEM's. Some include a 'gaurd tone' > similar to a PL that reduces false squelch tripping. >2. Wide band digital receiver. - Imagine if every 10 minutes (if you > so desired) your xcvr would transmit a digital packet containing > your callsign, frequency and present time. Providing that everyone > used the same protocol and the idea caught on, a wide band receiver > built into your xcvr would constantly monitor the band and collect a > list of 'who's on' and where. Interfaced to a PC, you'd be able to > keep your xcvr on for a while and scan for several years until that > rare station you've always been looking for from Yemen came on. > Yes, a DX packet cluster does very much the same thing, but not > everyone has access to them and input is not in real time. >3. ALE. - Automatic Linking. Many commercial xcvrs now use an ALE > protocol to link 2 xcvrs on the most suitable freq. with the highest > S/N ratio. True, we are much more limited in freq allocation, but it > would still be neat to set up my xcvr with the same protocol with > my friend's xcvr in London that would automatically determine that > from the preset memories that we both have set up in our xcvrs on > 14,18,21,24,+28Mhz, at this time 28.450 (i.e.) is providing the best > S/N ratio. It checks other memories from time to time to see > when this changes. >4. Alpha-numeric memories display. - With 99 memories in my FT-990, > I have to remember what each one is or write it down somewhere ! > Yaesu has done this for their VHF/UHF radios (FT2400/2500/7400) > why not HF xcvrs ? >5. MORE MEMORY CHANNELS ! Rohde & Schwartz provide 1000 memory > channels in some of their commercial receivers (EK870). This > would not add to the cost of manufacturing in a significant way. >6. BITE - Built in Test Equipment. Many commercial xcvrs have BITE. > If I disconnect module A19 in my Harris RF-590, next time I turn > on the receiver, the display shows me that that module has a fault. > This used to be very expensive to incorporate into equipment but > technology is probably cheap enough to provide this for the equipment > we use. >I'd be curious to hear your ideas and hope that the folks in >Osaka are listening ! >73, >Rich >4X1DA/WB2JBS > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Amateur Radio: The Original Information Highway" >Packet:4X1DA@4X4LI.ISR.MDLE >E-Mail:rharel@fab8.jer.intel.com >VHF: 145.625 (-600Khz, PL 91.5) Jerusalem >UHF: 438.700 (-7.6Mhz PL 91.5) Jerusalem >Disclaimer >================= >My thoughts, writings, any previous writings, spelling, >opinions and other mental noise are in no way reflective >or related to my employer or any organization that might >appear in an "address header". >I assume complete responsibility for my actions. How about AM sync detection for General coverage reception. A lot of the SW rigs have it, why not AR gear? From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:22 1996 From: dave@hip-hop.hh.sbay.org (David Black) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Fw: More facts on (Best Dual-Band Handheld) Date: 14 May 1996 09:50:12 GMT Message-ID: <4n9l0l$svt@moe.virtual.org> References: Hi, let me preface this by saying I'm the happy owner of a Kenwood TH-79A(D) HT. Prior to purchasing this HT I researched the Yaesu and Icom offerings, and to a lesser extent, Alinco. lpvwwwtp@cencom.net wrote: : about them as you felt. Secondly I got the price on the dual-band Kenwood H T : (I think that thta means handheld) it was a rather steep $459 which he agree d : was probably the best dual-band handheld. I poked further to find that the I paid $429 for the low-power version (6.0V 600mAh NiCd included) on sale at HRO. I think it's $439 now for the same radio. : TH-79D has 5w transmit on 2 meter and less on 440Mhz. (which was apparently for My instruction book specs 5W on both bands, with 9.6V or higher voltage input. I've verified this output into a Diamond NR-2000 (tri-band) mobile antenna with a Daiwa CN-465M SWR/power meter. : safety reasons, it being a higher frequency and closer to microwaves) it had : full 2 meter tx but only 438Mhz-450Mhz tx in 70 centimeter band. I then fou nd The radio is modifiable for TX+RX 136-174 and 410-470 (mine was, some radios seem to mod to wider bandwidths). Aircraft AM receive 118-136 is in there too. The mod is not easy though, involves removing a couple VERY small surface-moun t diodes. I heard rumors of a keyboard mod sometime ago but nothing concrete has come of it. Does anyone know of such a mod that actually works? : that the FT-51R, Yaesu's competiton cost the same, but lacks cross-band : repeating capabilities, and the easy-to-read dot-matrix display. The FT-51R The dot matrix display is very easy to read. I like it a *lot*. The back lighting isn't terribly bright though - the Yaesus seem to have better backlighting of the display and keys (the Kenwood's keys are not backlit), but in practice this hasn't turned out to be a problem. : did, however, have a spectroscope which I guess gives you a graphic read-out of : full band activity. I think the operator said that cross-band repeating let Ya know, it's funny... I also own a TH-89 (Japanese). It is almost identical to the TH-79, but is 430/1200 MHz, and it *does* have the spectroscope display like the Yaesu and Alinco radios. Do I use this function much though? Nope! : the models more in my budget range (though if you feel the Kenwood to be wor th : the extra money, tell me). The Yaesu FT-50R is a tiny little dual-band (whi ch Yep! I'm happy with it. Packed with features. And quite compact. : has tx. capabilities of full 2 meter and 430Mhz-450Mhz) plus {brand-new} tha t : goes for around $329, the man said that this lacked the ease of programming : that the Kenwood has and it lacked the cross-band repeating {or maybe all : repeating capabilities altogether} Once programmed, however, this hold more : memories and will operate just as well {or so he says}. The batteries come I saw one at HRO and it's a handful! The salesperson said it didn't do simultaneous reception or rx + tx (full duplex) like the TH-79 and other more expensive HTs can. The FT-50 looks and claims to be quite rugged, however. : with them, but sold seperately will cost $90 for the Kenwood TH-79D and $50 for : the Yaesu FT-50R {these are the high-power battery prices) The kenwood has a BTW, you can get aftermarket batteries from Periphex and other mfrs. The 6.0V 1200mAh long-life battery for the Kenwood goes for about $50. (Kenwood brand of same battery is $90, same as 9.6V 600mAh hi-power you mention). Also, this isn't a big deal, but the Kenwood rapid charger is the least expensive I've seen for any of the mfrs. Mr. NiCd (see Nuts 'n Volts magazine) has batteries and their own chargers for less too. : standard BNC connector and the Yaesu an available, but not so common SCR (I : think) connector. Your input is welcome! I'm leaning towards the FT-50R It's an SMA connector. I think it has, or has the potential of, lower loss than a BNC. For attaching a rubber duck though, I dunno if this really makes much difference. I do have SMA connectors on some other radios, and 1) they can be fragile, 2) they take more time to change (owing to screw-on instead of snap-on), and 3) you will likely have to use SMA-BNC and/or SMA-PL259 converters anyway, and see some signal loss. My $.02 Cheers, Dave KE6AJC From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:23 1996 From: ckollai@cybergate.net (Craig D. Kollai) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Fw: More facts on (Best Dual-Band Handheld) Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 03:00:45 GMT Message-ID: <4n60f5$kin@galaxy.cybergate.net> References: Reply-To: Craig@Kollai.com lpvwwwtp@cencom.net wrote: >Hi, > I called Radio City (which was the only ham outlet open after 6:00pm) and I >got hold of a intelligent sounding operator who I squeezed acouple of facts >out of. I'm looking for my first Ham rig, and I wanted to know: A) What is Radio City's phone number -and- B) By any chance, do they have a preferably free catalog I can get? Thanks, -Craig D. Kollai E-mail: Craig@Kollai.com Visit my web page at:: http://www.cybergate.com/~ckollai/homepg1.htm From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:24 1996 From: gmayner@access1.digex.net (G. Mayner) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Garage door opener rcvr Date: 12 May 1996 15:06:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4n5cqr$8ss@access1.digex.net> I am trying to build a simple receiver to control a small solenoid that will operate a door latch. The force on the latch is only a few ounces. I would like to use a garage door transmitter to send the signal to the receiver. Does anyone have any suggestions about how to do this? I am *not* an electronics expert but I do have a basic understanding. If I can find someone who sells basic kits for receivers I think I can make this work. If you have any ideas about where I should start please send me an e-mail. Thanks! From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:25 1996 From: sidener@munch.nuc.umr.edu (Scott Sidener) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: GE MPS PROGRAMMING WANTED Date: 17 May 1996 01:59:42 GMT Message-ID: <4ngmie$n9m@hptemp1.cc.umr.edu> Hi, I am looking for either a cable, schematic, software, instructions or all of the above in order to be able to program my GE MPS handheld radio. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get the equipment to do this? I would really appreciate any comments. Thanks, Scott Sidener N0WFL sidener@umr.edu From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:26 1996 From: dbwillia@uci.edu (Brian Williams) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Glass mount on "shaded" window Date: 13 May 1996 20:51:15 GMT Message-ID: <4n87c3$hhv@news.service.uci.edu> References: <31974F69.5048@tor.comm.mot.com> In article <31974F69.5048@tor.comm.mot.com>, louisb@tor.comm.mot.com says... >Hello all, >Does anybody have any experience with the "patterned" sun shade at the >top of the rear window of >GM cars (mine is a 92 Chev Corsica)? >Thanks > --Louis I was told by the manufacturer of the antenna (Larsen) to avoid the patterned area. I used the area where the heater wires are about two inches below the bottom of the pattern and stratled the heater wires with the antenna coil plate horizontal (parallel to the wires). I did this on my Chevy Lumina which I believe is the same style glass as the Corsica and it performed well. After about 1-1/2 years, the glue started to seperate on the outside antenna, so I reglued it using contact cement and it was fine until I returned the vehicle (company car). Be careful to check the mounting regularly and DON'T exceed the power capability. Brian - N6ZAU From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:27 1996 From: Martin.Rask@mailbox.swipnet.se (Martin Rask) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Has anyone tried the new TIMEWAVE DSP 599zx Date: 11 May 1996 19:02:04 GMT Message-ID: <4n2o7c$s20@mn5.swip.net> I would lie to get a opinion on the new Timewave DSP.. has anyone tired it and how doses it work.. ?? Many thanks in adance and 73Žs de SM7VHS /Martin From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:28 1996 From: John Kitchens Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: heathkit Manuals Date: 17 May 1996 14:09:54 GMT Message-ID: <4ni1bi$t30@guyana.it.earthlink.net> I have seen many requests for the old Heathkit manuals. All Heathkit manuals are now available from Heathkit, photocopies only. telephone is 616-925-5899. NS6X From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:29 1996 From: bprender@lynx.dac.neu.edu (Brian Prendergast) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: help needed Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 12:31:41 -0500 Message-ID: Here the situation, I'm just starting in on this radio thing and I'm having a problem figuring out what is best. I started with a couple of 49 MHZ radio shat in pocket communicators so I could play paintball and talk to another member of my team at the same time. I quickly found out that the refs use the same frequency and that the rang and clearity wasn't that good. I nneded something that would work better since I didn't have time to play around with things while I was playing paintball. I also tryed to use these in the car since we travel in multiple cars a lot and I thought it would be nice to be able to talk to each other. At any rate this didn't work. I returned them and figured I would give a CB a shot. It started out really good, then I realized that the CB (a hand held one) would be great for paintball, but not very good for the car since it picked up every little electronic devise in my car, since I have a stereo well over $1000 and an alarm to guard it along with a radar detector to watch for police oh and I can't forget about the pager and cell phone. Anyway you get the point, I'm into electronics. So now I hear all about these HAM radios, and VHF. How far can they reach and what kinds are the best, how much do they cost, where can I get them, are there a lot of people using them? You get the idea, I have no clue about them. I know I need a licencse and that's about it. Some one has been a great help to me so far, any more help would be greatly appreciated. I am extreamly interested in what the benefits are off having the VHF as opposed to the CB. Well please get back to me, one of the more important things is cost and range. I want to creat a docking station for it for my home and for my pickup truck. I am very interested on how far people think they can go. Please email me at bprender@lynx.dac.neu.edu with any help. I don't read these all the time so I would probibly miss any resonse to this. Thanks for any help at all...... From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:30 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 07 May 96 19:38:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Help with HT-202 2/2 Message-ID: <6b3_9605080929@woodybbs.com> (Continued from previous message) -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/211.9 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:30 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 11 May 96 02:01:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Help with HT-202 2/2 Message-ID: <6e4_9605111440@woodybbs.com> (Continued from previous message) -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/211.9 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@2619-211-9.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:31 1996 From: kenn2sqw@aol.com (Ken N2SQW) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HELP!! Need R390A part Date: 8 May 1996 21:48:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4mrisk$1on@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: kenn2sqw@aol.com (Ken N2SQW) I desperately need a function switch for the R390A. This is the wafer switch that controls standby/mgc/agc/calibrate. I could also use the microswitch that is used for power control, although that can be worked around. I believe the wafer switch from a R390 will also work. Please E-Mail KenN2SQW @ AOL.COM Thanks and 73 de Ken From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:32 1996 From: John Kitchens Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Henry 2002 Manual/Schematic Date: 17 May 1996 14:07:43 GMT Message-ID: <4ni17f$t30@guyana.it.earthlink.net> I need a manual and schematic for the Henry 2002 2 meter amp. Have to rebuild the power supply. Thanks, NS6X From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:33 1996 From: "Karl M. Gjestrum" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HTX-202 final-transistor Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 17:24:50 +0200 Message-ID: <319B48C2.41EE@norconnect.no> I have a Realistic/Tandy HTX-202 2M transceiver and I have a big problem with it: When I was using the radio, tuning up a PA, the final transistor said "goodbye". The PA transistor is a Mo torola SRFH1900. It doesn't seem to exist in Norway. Have already tried to get the transistor from Tandy, but they will not send it to Norway, because the radio only was for sale in the States. So if anybody know where to get this transistor or any other transistor that would work, please let me know. Thanks in advance From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:34 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: mattro@radware.net (Matt Roberts) Subject: Re: HTX-202 Leaking Oil! Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 May 96 20:39:01 GMT References: <4n3u85$su2@server2.codetel.net.do> You might also look for a different problem all together. If the problem come s after you use the HT for a while, it may (underline "may") just be a transistor or other hea t sensitive part which is close to going bad. I'd suggest that the next time the hi power quit s you, very quickly attach an ohm/continuity meter across the switch and close the switch. If the meter says 'ok', but the hi power does not come on, then your switch is not the prob lem. I'm thinking that if this is actually the case, then your taking time to disas semble the radio and apply tuner cleaner, etc., is allowing enough time for whatever it is to c ool off. ---- Matt Roberts, KK5JY, mattro@radware.net From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:35 1996 From: driller@mars.superlink.net (Steven Meltz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HTX-202 Low Ouput Power Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 22:14:44 GMT Message-ID: <4n5nvm$d1b@earth.superlink.net> I have 2 HTX-202 HT's, one of which has developed the following problem. When I transmit at hi power with T-squelch turned on, the power indicationg lcd bars only indicate about 1/3 to 1/4 full power. If I turn off T-squelch, I get a full power indication. The next part is the screwy one; if I place an inline power/SWR meter on the rig, I then get full power output whether T-squelch is on or off! This doesn't make any sense to me (if the output stayed low, I would think maybe something was wrong with the tone generator). I reset the rig, and this made no difference. Anyone with any ideas? Tnx in advance. 73 Steve N2QLQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:36 1996 From: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com (Clint Bradford) Date: 07 May 96 19:38:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: HTX202 low audio 2/2 Message-ID: <6b5_9605080929@woodybbs.com> (Continued from previous message) #11: Check with a volt meter to check that the bias wire on the mic is getting aprox 3.1 volts positve. That should be it. The .33mf cap keeps the radio {red wire from main cable} from seeing the ext dc from the battery. The ptt switch grounds the resistor and causes the radio to key and completes the ground for the mic element. When the radio is not keyed the battery is looking at a high impeadance instead of the 3k impeadance the mic presents when in circuit. I checked modulation on my rig by putting the HTX on a dummy load at low power and listened with headphones to a scanner. this is a good way to insure that all is well before you take to the bands. Also I should note that this type of mod can be made to other brand mic's. Before I tried the Radio Shack model I modified a MFJ-284. The same principals are involved but in the case of the MFJ there is more latitude in how you accomplish the mod. The ptt switch is dpdt on the MFJ and only spdt on the Radio Shack. Having two sets of switch contacts allows you to use one set to ground the resistor and the other set to apply the positve voltage to the mic element. Applying the positive voltage rather than grounding the mic is probably prefered. If you use the Radio Shack mic you don't have much choice and will need to use the grounding method on the mic. Now there are better parts available to do this mod, a noise cancelling higher sensetivity mic for instance. If you are interested in really having a high performance mic send a self addressed stamped envelope and I will tell you how obtain these better performance parts. Send the envelope to: Terrapin Sales P.O. Box 12426 La Crescenta, Ca. 91224-5426 Another cool place for HTX-202 and HTX-404 info as well as other ham related topics is at the following address. http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/wa3rvt/ Make sure you check out . The above was located at: http://pages.prodigy.com/CA/LA/htx202htx404/htx202htx404.html Be careful if you chose the route of internal adjustment for the external microphone audio. In so doing you will probably be in a position of over deviating with the built in microphone. Curtis Eickerman WB6PUS Phoenix, AZ --- * wcECHO 4.1 ~ AR-Net: ATTENTION to Details * Mira Loma, CA * 909-681-6221 -- |Fidonet: Clint Bradford 1:2619/228 |Internet: Clint.Bradford@bbs.woodybbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:37 1996 From: Gerald Schmitt Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: HTX202 low audio with Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 07:36:28 -0600 Message-ID: <31988C5C.A9@eule.lanl.gov> References: <5dc_9604281609@woodybbs.com> <4mk473$f3b@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4mpb9i$ef3@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com> <4n8vtn$nsv@express.ior.com> KD7AAT wrote: > > As quoted from many posts..... > > >The low deviation problem is quite common with the RS HTX-202 > > I have recently purchased a 202 and am VERY happy with it. I have > been told many times that the output quality is quite good and clear. > The audio on my end is exceptionaly loud and covers the loudest noise. > I couldn't be happier. > I am also very pleased with my 212. > > John KD7AAT Very simple John yours, was adjusted properly at the factory many are not. When properly adjusted the HTX-202 has wonderful audio but this is not always the case. The Radio Shack customer base may not be technically adept enough to deal with a problem like this. The average RS sales person certainly is not. Before flaming note I said average not my Extra friend who work there part time. A non technical customer coupled with a store staff who is taught to push the merchandise and precious little else will not get these type of problems resolved. As I recall John you have had your ticket for a couple of weeks now perhaps there has not been enough time to find the warts on the RS equipment. I also seem to recall a flame from you on this subject. Do you work at a RS store perhaps? Inquiring minds want to know. 73 Jerry KK5YY From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:38 1996 From: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: HTX202 mods anyone? Date: 18 May 1996 12:59:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4nkvl1$dmp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4nkrr4$dup@www.gatecom.com> Reply-To: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) >> Anyone done any wide-recieve mods (icomm 02at possibly) to the HTX202. I have heard from 1 it CAN be done and another says that the 202 CAN NOT be modified? I dont know whos right and whos is just opinion! Anyone tried it? << I hope this response is posted appropriately, AOL does not permit me to control crossposts. There is only the "duct tape" mod for the 202. It's extremely good intermod rejection is due to the narrow band it is designed to recieve. It is software controlled also, there are no mods. Other radios can be modified because essentially the same radio is used in other bands, and so by swapping a few components the company can use the same design over a wide range. This has the consequence of making them not very selective. THe 202 is designed for 144 to 148 only. For the "duct tape" mod, you will need another radio, and some duct tape. IT has the advantage of allowing recieve out to the 160 meter band, and up tthrough the gigahertz, with proper radio choice. :) Jose KD1SB From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:39 1996 From: maccabeus@gatecoms.gatecom.com (Maccabeus) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HTX202 mods anyone? Date: 18 May 1996 15:54:12 GMT Message-ID: <4nkrr4$dup@www.gatecom.com> Anyone done any wide-recieve mods (icomm 02at possibly) to the HTX202. I have heard from 1 it CAN be done and another says that the 202 CAN NOT be modified? I dont know whos right and whos is just opinion! Anyone tried it? -- 73 KC8DQF ############################################################################ "If the government is big enough to give you everything you want, it is also big enough to take everything you have." ############################################################################ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:40 1996 From: Ron Giuntini Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: I Just Built A Ten-Tec 1056 Receiver Date: 10 May 1996 23:23:10 GMT Message-ID: <4n0j4u$m7j@news1.slip.net> I put it in a homemade enclosure with a 2" speaker and it works. I built it for 40 meters and I pleased with it. Thoughts during and after construction; All parts present and instructions adequate and thankfully they assume some intelligence on the part of the builder. The manual is adequate but requires some thinking to identify the capacitators. Caps have a confusing system for identifying them, but the manual has a nice back page with info on this. The board is fine, and there is not much to it. They give you an option on powering the two sections separately and it is a good kit to play with. The price is dirt cheap and since you can build it for any band it is fun to experiment with. I decided 40 was a good band since the manual confesses that in a direct conversion receiver the stability is better on the lower frequencies. It is satisfactory on 40. I have good audio out with a good signal. It takes slow careful tuning however. There is a way to get slower tuning by substituting a resistor but I have not tried it. Once I put it in a case and added an LED pilot light ( 1200 ohm dropping resistor) and a couple switches (Power and speaker on/off - earphone jack in line) I did not wish to take it apart to change any resistors. But I might recommend trying a different value to slow down the tuning. This will vary on different bands, apparently. Anybody wishing to talk about this or other kits on the market please email me at rong@slip.net. I may or may not visit this group often enough to get your comments, but I will try. I am now waiting for the 1253 9band Receiver and think this will be easier because I will not have to scrounge the parts to finish it but that part was fun. In fact I am quite proud of the case I made out of sheet metal. I've built and used an Oak Hills Research Sprint (40 meter xcvr - direct conversion - 2 watts) and have an unbuilt Explorer (20 meter superhet xcvr) I guess I like building kits.. I have a couple of Heathkits that I built and really miss the Heathkit Company, I'm glad Ten Tec is taking up the slack and will supporting them .. I don't need a two meter xcvr but I'm tempted to buy one of theirs just to build it., I'd like to hear from anyone that has built other Ten Tecs. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:41 1996 From: larry@ (Larry Schroeder) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IC-2350H Problem Date: 13 May 1996 13:37:17 GMT Message-ID: <4n7dud$27la@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Reply-To: lschroeder@vnet.ibm.com (Larry Schroeder) Hello All, I bought a IC 2350H in March at a Hamfest and put it in my car a month later. Since I have put it in it has done a full reset many times. This has caused it to lose all the stations etc I had programmed into it. I have been careful not to push the buttons that cause a full reset prior to powering on the rig. It only resets as part of a power on. Has anyone else had this problem with this radio? Other than this reset problem it seems to run like a champ. The problem will occur with the engine running or not. The radio is wired directly to the batter and is double fused. I do not know if I have a bad CPU or not? I have spoken to ICOM and they have told me they no longer use a battery to retain the memory, but have a electronicly programmed eprom. A power spike could cause a memory loss. The only problem is I do not believe I have had such a spike. Well the radio goes back today and I will let this forum know the out come of the service efforts at ICOM. Have a good day. Larry Schroeder lschroeder@vnet.ibm.com KD4HSL From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:42 1996 From: Gary P. Fiber Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: IC-706 Yellow Wire Mod -- Con? Date: 9 May 1996 12:36:40 GMT Message-ID: <01bb3da2.f2a1b1e0$06101dcc@gfiber.halcyon.com> References: <4mdfvb$pn@newsroom.HITC.COM> <1996May5.153608.28273@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Gary, > The yellow wire mod works, and was apparently circulated by someone within > Icom America itself shortly after the radio came out. My first reaction on > reading this was to say "Hogwash!", but then I thought that maybe I ought > to do some investigation first. The Yellow wire modification was first written here in this news group. ICOM did not figure this out, some other owner of the 706 did so. When the yellow wire is cut it turns off the bandpass filter as shown on the block diagram that covers 60 to 200 MHz and turns on the 2 meter bandpass filter any time you tune above 60 MHz. There may be some receiver radiation because of this and the radio will not pass Part 15 after the modification. Remember Part 15 basically is a test where the radio is looked at for all possiable frequencies to see if the receiver is going to bother consumer electronics and such. This is most likely no skin off any bodys nose but a manufacturer can not sell a radio that will not pass Part 15 where the receiver operates above 30 MHz, after the sell the manufacturer has no more responsibility as he can not control the owners actions. Although the manufacturer gets into the intent of the law and can bypass the letter of intent or fines could and will result with possiable loss of a type acceptance of a product. As you know amateur equipment, only the receiver is tested and only those receivers that operate above 30 MHz specifically. Amateur transmitters need only be compliant with Part 97 and are not tested by the FCC for any spurs etc. in the amateur service. Manufacturered Low Band Linear Amps are the only device that receive an actual Type Acceptance, this to prove they do not cover 24 to 29 Mhz out of the box in the United States. In Canada this rule of course does not apply and amps sold there have full frequency coverage out of the box. Anyway its a moot point, cut the wire, the manufaxcturer will not likely incorporate this " mod " into manufacturing. Gary From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:43 1996 From: Bill Wehling Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ICOM 275, 475 MODS? Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 21:01:57 -0500 Message-ID: <31915215.185F@comland.com> Has anyone seen, done, or know of modifications that will take the Icom 275, or 475 out of band? -- Bill Wehling <<>> From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:44 1996 From: Gary P. Fiber Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: ICOM 275, 475 MODS? Date: 11 May 1996 15:32:00 GMT Message-ID: <01bb3f4d.bdd67200$25101dcc@gfiber.halcyon.com> References: <31915215.185F@comland.com> On Wednesday, May 08, 1996, Bill Wehling wrote... > Has anyone seen, done, or know of modifications that will take > the Icom 275, or 475 out of band? There was a modification tested at one time, it was SPUR city, the radio when out of banded transmitted spurs on a lot of frequencies so the modification information was destroyed and forgot. So no worthy modification information exhists for there radios. Gary From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:45 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: Icom IC-2KL with Kenwood TXRX Date: Mon, 13 May 96 17:31:37 GMT Message-ID: <4n7vp0$8o7@crash.microserve.net> References: <199605011045.UAA27529@mugca.cc.monash.edu.au> <4moi3s$9m9@vivaldi.telepac.pt> <01bb3da3.956f8d20$06101dcc@gfiber.halcyon.com> >I use a Kenwood TS-870 and have been offerred an Icom IC-2KL linear >amp. Has anyone used this with a late model Kenwood TXRX? Any problems >with ALC or TXRX switching? The manual seems to infer that the amp. >will not work without ALC connected .. > >Please post replies to damien.vale@airservices.gov.au There is no reason not to use those two items together. You may need to be slightly more careful regarding level setting at the rig, but AGC won't entirely replace the need to do that anyway. Remember that the majority of homebrew amplifiers (as well as many older commercial designs) do not include AGC. In my own system, neither the transceiver nor the amplifier has provisions for this. Whenever I feel the need to drive the amplifier harder on SSB, I just turn on compression (processing) in the rig. That raises the average power without overdriving the amplifier. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:46 1996 From: Gordon or Nina Adams Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Icom IC2000 Mods Needed Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:06:02 -0600 Message-ID: <3195013A.D3@laplaza.taos.nm.us> Does anyone have the expanded transmit modifications for the Icom IC-2000H? Please reply by e-mail if you can help. Thanks. Gordon, WU5B From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:47 1996 From: Miguel Angel Simoes Santiago Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: If money were no object Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 19:35:52 +0000 Message-ID: <31978F18.104FA179@mail.telepac.pt> References: <4n7s32$1ch@stratus.skypoint.net> pdunn wrote: > > If money were no object, what would be the best hf tranceiver you could buy. For expending a great deal of money.. a Kenwood TS-870 or a Yaesu FT-1000... > Further assume you would put it on a motor boat and go around the world. Than maybe a Kenwood TS-50S will be the ideal transceiver, because it's so great and compact. > Therefore you would need absolute reliability (no need for service ever - ex cept In this case maybe an self-built transceiver, will be ideal :) I had a Ts-120S for 12 years without any problem or service, now i have a TS-140 because it's similar to the TS120 and it has a digital general all mode receiver. Good luck, Miguel CT2GDD radimprensa@mail.telepac.pt From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:48 1996 From: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: If money were no object Date: 13 May 1996 14:38:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4n7vj2$674@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4n7s32$1ch@stratus.skypoint.net> Reply-To: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) >> Therefore you would need absolute reliability (no need for service ever - except what a ham could do herself), << Dunno what the "best" rig would be, but in terms of reliability, as nothing is perfect, the aim is to have the highest probability that, at any given time, you will have a working radio. Redundancy is the key here. Take three of them along. NASA does this all the time (in fact, they sometimes have five each of critical systems, like Shuttle computers) If money is no object (and you have room), this is the way to go... and if money IS an object, it is statisticaly better to have several less reliable units, than one reliable unit. Further, with several different radios, you can have several different brands and types, to maximize your options in any case. Jose KD1SB From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:49 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington) Subject: Re: If money were no object Message-ID: References: <4n7s32$1ch@stratus.skypoint.net> Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 20:56:53 GMT Glad to hear that money is no object. Get two ICOM IC-706's. They are the smallest rig available and do virtually everything. Nothing else comes close for any price. Keep the other one sealed in plastic. If the main rig breaks down, toss it overboard. pdunn (admin@hoptechno.com) wrote: : If money were no object, what would be the best hf tranceiver you could buy. : Further assume you would put it on a motor boat and go around the world. : Therefore you would need absolute reliability (no need for service ever - ex cept : what a ham could do herself), excellent stability and sensitivity. : Assume that gimmicks and contest helpful trinkets are of no essential : value. : Phil -- Steve Ellington N4LQ@IGLOU.COM Louisville, Ky From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:50 1996 From: gwittig@microsys.net (Greg Wittig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info needed on Vibroplex Kevers Date: Mon, 13 May 96 16:46:06 GMT Message-ID: <4n7p0e$188_001@news.ni.net> Is there any info on how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers? I have two I believe are old both have grey basses one is a paddle type its serial number is 126433 the other is a button type and it says Zephyre on the bottom. Thanks Greg From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:51 1996 From: gwittig@microsys.net (Greg Wittig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info needed on Vibroplex Kevers Date: Mon, 13 May 96 16:58:50 GMT Message-ID: <4n7poa$m8_001@news.ni.net> Is there any info on how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers? I have two I believe are old both have grey basses one is a paddle type its serial number is 126433 the other is a button type and it says Zephyre on the bottom. Thanks Greg From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:51 1996 From: gwittig@microsys.net (Greg Wittig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info needed on Vibroplex Kevers Date: Mon, 13 May 96 16:52:49 GMT Message-ID: <4n7pd1$1a8_001@news.microsys.net> Is there any info on how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers? I have two I believe are old both have grey basses one is a paddle type its serial number is 126433 the other is a button type and it says Zephyre on the bottom. Thanks Greg From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:52 1996 From: gwittig@microsys.net (Greg Wittig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info needed on Vibroplex Keyers Date: Mon, 13 May 96 16:32:12 GMT Message-ID: <4n7o6c$mc_001@news.ni.net> Does anyone know how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers. I have two that look old both have grey bases and one is a paddle and one has the button. The one I have here at work has a serial # of 126433 the other says Zephyre on the bottom. What is a bug? I there a book out on how to adjust them? Thanks Greg just a lowely tech and have never played code but the keys are well made. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:53 1996 From: gwittig@microsys.net (Greg Wittig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info needed on Vibroplex Keyers Date: Mon, 13 May 96 16:19:56 GMT Message-ID: <4n7nfc$1cs_001@news.ni.net> Does anyone know how to date Morse keyers I have three and they all appear to beold. I am at work and only have one here on my desk. They all are about the same this one has a grey base and the serial # is 126433 it is a paddle I assume, it has a box and hookups. The other one is about the same but has a typical button not a paddle. It says Zephyre the speeling may be wrong but it was not Zepher. What is a bug? Thanks just a tech never used these but they are interesting. Thanks Greg ke6lpv From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:54 1996 From: snpcross@aol.com (SnPCross) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: INFO: Motorola MOCOM 70 Date: 12 May 1996 14:09:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4n59h7$9ls@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: snpcross@aol.com (SnPCross) Hello there, my name is Shawn. I have 2 MOCOM 70 units and I'd like to know if anyone has any manuals for them. I'd like to know the specs, too. Currently, they are crystalled at 35.52, but I'l like to know if they can be brought down to 10M or up to 6M work? Thanks in advance, -Shawn SnPCross@AOL.COM From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:56 1996 From: quandt.pad@sni.de (Ulrich Quandt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: JST-245 : "Hidden Menus" Date: 10 May 1996 13:55:07 GMT Message-ID: <4mvhrr$vv@nervous.pdb.sni.de> Hello, does anyone know the "Hidden Menus" of the JST-245 ? For example: FUNC + LSB, what does it mean ? Best 73 de Ulli (DL4YCM) Email: quandt.pad@sni.de From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:54:59 1996 From: stuart.andrew@ayo.mts.dec.com (Stuart Andrew (GM3SNA @ GB7AYR)) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood TM241E / Toshiba S-AV17 PA Module failure - kenwood.txt (1/1) Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 13:52:08 GMT Message-ID: <4na2l1$lpk@mrnews.mro.dec.com> begin 644 kenwood.txt M22!N;W1I8V5D(')E8V5N=&QY('1H870@22!C;W5L9"!O;FQY(&]P96X@=7`@ M;7D@;&]C86P@2!002X@ M(%1H92!P;&%S=&EC(&-O=F5R('-N87!S(&]F9B!E87-I;'D@=&\@'!A;G-I M;VX@;V8@8V5R86UI8R!A;F0@86QU;6EN:75M(&%R92!V97)Y(&1I9F9E2!A='1A M8VAI;F<@82!H96%T2!A8F]V92!T:&4@:6YV97)T M960@8VAI<"$A*0T*#0I)(&=A=&AE2!S;V]N+@T*#0I" M5%<@22!T:&EN:R!)(&UA>2!H879E(&UA;F%G960@=&\@3\@($%N>7=A>2P@>6]U(&UI9VAT(&QI:V4@=&\@=')Y(&ET(&)E9F]R92!P M87)T:6YG('=I=&@@82!L;W0@;V8@8V%S:"X-"@T*22=L;"!B92!R=6YN:6YG M(&]N(&QO=R!P;W=E References: <5e7cc$11271c.2ce@NEWS> I've had a Larsen 2m glass mount since 1989. The antenna works fine and the adhesive has been great. When I got a new car I removed the antenna (much work with acetone, a putty knive and lots of elbow grease) and wrote to Larsen about how to re-install the antenna. They sent me a re-installation kit gratis - contained the glass cleaner, the double-sided adhesive and isntructions. Follow the instructions and make sure the mounting surface is clean and dry. I've never had a problem with the adhesive coming loose. 73, es cul Jim, WG1Y p.s. I have no connection with Larsen. They just seem to be a good company. -- Jim Gozzo jgozzo@mitre.org From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:00 1996 From: flanagan@genie.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Low Transmit Audio IC-2410 Date: 7 May 1996 13:58:17 GMT Message-ID: <4mnktp$b33@rock101.genie.net> References: <4m0rtg$86f@rock101.genie.net> <4mkns2$sor@ralph.vnet.net> kn4aq.gary@mms.net (Gary Pearce) writes: >The dealer I bought my 2410 from gave me an HM-14 mic. It lacked the >autodial memories, but A/B comparisons showed it provided more mic >gain, and better fidelity. I asked my question over on Compuserve and the ICOM Tech Support rep said the "standard fix" for this problem is to remove the zener diode across the microphone element. I will give this a try and see what happens. Thanks to all here for their responses. -- Dick Flanagan, W6OLD - (flanagan@genie.com) - Minden, NV From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:01 1996 From: Jim Wagner Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: MFJ 90xx CW transceivers - opinions? Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 20:19:54 -0400 Message-ID: <3197D1AA.2465@nando.net> MFJ makes a series of CW QRP transceivers, the 90xx (where xx=band, e.g. 9040 for the 40m version). I'm thinking about the 9040 or maybe the 9030 and would be interested in how anyone who owns any of these rigs feels about them, both good and bad. 73 de Jim, N4SVZ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:02 1996 From: "Gerald K. Shaffner Sr." Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: MFJ Multicom Software Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 19:15:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3197ECC1.63A3@epix.net> Has anyone had any trouble using Multicom Ver. 3.1 with Windows 95 installed. I use the Dos prompt and when Multicom comes up, it locks up in the first setup screen. The keyboard locks. I get the same thing if I reboot to Dos. The only way it will work is if i use a boot disk. Anyone have any answers. Thank You Jerry WA3HFR From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:04 1996 From: estedman@aol.com (EStedman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Mod ft-50 Date: 10 May 1996 07:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4mvai7$cbr@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mu7nt$7fm@news1.warwick.net> Reply-To: estedman@aol.com (EStedman) Hi nick - A fellow posted the mod info a few days ago - I tried it on a friend's radio and it works - here it is: Subject: Re: FT-50R info. From: felix@netwizards.net (Anonymous) Date: 28 Apr 1996 19:25:43 GMT Message-ID: <4m0gnn$bf0@news.wco.com> I have purchased the FT-50R and yes it is a pretty cool little "radidio". I does have a built in game if yo press the MR button while turning the radio on. I have also modified the radio to transmit out of band.. MARs and CAPs ...Here is the information everyone needs to modify it: 1. remove the battery pack 2. remove the two screws contained under the Battery safety sticker on the back of the radio. 3. remove the key board (instuctions on how to remove the keyboard are in the owners manual) 4. by removing the keyboard, it will reveal three jumper pads 1,2,&3 5. Only jumper pad #1 will be bridged by soldier. 6. remove the soldier from jumper #1 7. now, put the radio back together 8. reset the master cpu... instruction in owners manual. 9. reset the extended receive,.. see the owners manual. 10 you now have a modified radio. any questions e-mail me (him, not me) By the way, if anyone figures out what the object of the game is, let the rest of us know! 73 Ernie N2OJQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:05 1996 From: jimdorr@ici.net (Jim Dorrance) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Mod ft-50 Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 04:29:10 GMT Message-ID: <4n6d23$t5@crusher.ici.net> References: <4mu7nt$7fm@news1.warwick.net> <4mvai7$cbr@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3193ED85.193@compuserve.com> Reply-To: jimdorr@ici.net TJM <74032.172@compuserve.com> wrote: >> By the way, if anyone figures out what the object of the game is, let the >> rest of us know! >> 73 >> Ernie >> N2OJQ >Ernie, >The object of the game is to guess the other number so the total is ten! >exp; the radio pick a secret number ( say it's 3 ) you have to pick the >other number ( 7)((process of elimination)) as to get a total of 10...The >radio keeps track of your success and displays score after 10x >Tom Ok I understand the concept of the game, but how do you enter your choice of number. I find that entering numbers through the keypad has no effect on the random display. 73, -Jim- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:06 1996 From: nelli@lemax.it (Marco Nelli) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: mods for Icom IC 2340 H Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 14:08:49 GMT Message-ID: <319741d6.24473234@venere.inet.it> I'm serching for mods for my radio Icom IC 2340H can anyone help me ?? Thanks... bye Marco. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:07 1996 From: leo@jove.com (Lawrence Ober) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Narrow Filtering in TS-930 FSK kills KAM receive Date: 10 May 1996 10:58:16 GMT Message-ID: <4mv7g9$21g@decius.ultra.net> References: <4m9bch$8vr@decius.ultra.net> <4me57f$dco_001@pine222.cruzio.com> >Make sure the mark is 2125 and the space 2295. The KAM defaults to 1600/1800. >You may also need to offset the IF Shift or Passband tuning a little to the >high side. I have to do this with my ICOM IC-765 to "peak" the tones. > >73 de Dave KD6TO I've tried this setting. BTW, the HF default on the Kam (non-packet is 1955/2125). The best I can do at any setting, and on a strong signal, is light the bargraph from left to one led right of center (hmmm... makes the tnc sound political :-) Can you suggest the setting need inferred by this reading ? Tnx, Larry From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:07 1996 From: K.S. Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need general coveraged transmit mod for ICOM775-DSP Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 22:51:25 GMT Message-ID: <4nj00b$qca@peng.ping.at> From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:08 1996 From: netsvic@ipoline.com (Vic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need Help!!!About Standard C528!! Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 08:25:36 GMT Message-ID: <4n6eek$11qk@ipo.ipoline.com> Hi! Does anyone know the modification of specification of standard C528?? And Can It receive Air Band?? Thank you!! From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:09 1996 From: acao@micro.ti.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need manual for IC-U16 Date: 14 May 1996 16:17:23 GMT Message-ID: <4nabmj$7c0@hammerhead.dadd.ti.com> E-mail acao@micro.ti.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:10 1996 From: efiten Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need Mods TH79e Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 14:56:31 -0700 Message-ID: <3199018F.37A0@dds.nl> Hi ! Are there already Mod's available for the Kenwood TH79E ? Is it still the green wire ? Please write to Efiten@dds.nl From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:10 1996 From: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Neutralizing Finals Date: 17 May 1996 14:32:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4nir9d$f08@safety.ics.uci.edu> References: <4ni3l5$r77@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> In <4ni3l5$r77@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> optics3d@ix.netcom.com(Ronald D Luci er) writes: >Is there any convenient way to neutralize the finals on my Kenwood 520 >other than using a VTVM with an RF probe, neither of which I have? I believe I always used an external receiver to do the null and it worked just fine. You can also use the try and try method of twisting the cap until the "dip" in the plate current corresponds with maximum RF output. Clark WA3JPG From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:11 1996 From: optics3d@ix.netcom.com(Ronald D Lucier) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Neutralizing Finals Date: 17 May 1996 14:49:09 GMT Message-ID: <4ni3l5$r77@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> Is there any convenient way to neutralize the finals on my Kenwood 520 other than using a VTVM with an RF probe, neither of which I have? 73 de WA1UWZ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:12 1996 From: rrehr@epix.net (Roger Rehr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: New Satellite Transceiver Date: 17 May 1996 01:30:28 GMT Message-ID: <4ngkrk$c13@coconut.epix.net> Does anyone have info on the new ICOM IC-821H? It looks like its meant to be a replacement for the 820 --Roger Rehr WA3JYM From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:13 1996 From: Chester Bowles Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: New Standard Mobile Date: 14 May 1996 13:32:18 GMT Message-ID: <4na212$bei@news.monad.net> References: <3191A6AB.5615@frii.com> Got the new HRO catalog in the mail yesterday. They had a full-page color ad about the new mobile in addition to the typical B/W picture in the Standard section. Of course, no price given, but there was a fair amount of detail plus a good picture. As I recall, it was 35 watts out on 6 and 440. 45 watts on 2. Detachable head. Only two band "windows" but lots of options about how you display the various bands. I must admit that I was VERY intrigued by the radio. Getting 6M in addition to 2/440 could be a lot of fun. Plus, according to the specs, a tri-plexer is built-in so you can only need one antenna (doesn't do you much good though since I don't think such an animal exists. I'd probably opt for an antenna switch to go back and forth between the 2/440 antenna and the 6M antenna.) IMHO, Standard builds good although it's certainly not cheap. I'm sure this radio won't be an exception. Chet, AA1EX -- *---------------------------------------------------------------------* | CHESTER S. BOWLES | Education, rehabilitation, housing, | | Vice President | and managed care for children, | | Crotched Mountain Foundation | adolescents and adults with physical | | One Verney Drive | and developmental challenges. | | Greenfield, NH 03047 | http://www.cmf.org | | 603.547.3311 ext. 404 | bowles@cmf.org | *---------------------------------------------------------------------* From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:14 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: opinion on Alinco DJ-582T and Yaesu FT-530 Message-ID: <639.6700T1033T995@nycmetro.com> References: <318CBE7C.3E75@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 20:27:26 GMT >You may want to check out the new Yaesu dual band 50R. It's very small in >size,5w output, exellent audio, wide band coverage (76-200,200-540,590-999), >mil-spec 810. >-- >Greg Ottria >San Leandro, California >Amateur call KE6PTP >E-Mail gottria@earthlink.net Any Idea what the going price on this radio is? Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:15 1996 From: vanmeter@voicenet.com (Michael Van Meter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Out of Band Modifications for Radio Shack HTX-212 Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 15:17:19 GMT Message-ID: <4mqdti$a50@goodnews.voicenet.com> References: <318C2E94.7603@tima.com> Reply-To: vanmeter@voicenet.com "John P. Scheiwe" wrote: >I am looking for the modifications for a Radio Shack HTX-212 that will allow it to transmit out of band. I am >hoping to be able to use this radio for RACES work. Any assistance is apprec iated. >John Scheiwe - KB9LTI >Bedford, IN >jscheiwe@tima.com Press & hold down the "F" & "DTMF" keys on the front panel as you power up the rig. This allows transmit from 143.000-149.000 in either vfo or memory modes, and receive as follows: vfo mode = 136.000-174.000 Mem mode = 143.000-149.000 Live Life Lovingly! Michael Van Meter From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:16 1996 From: "Andrew D. Lawlor" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Out of Band Modifications for Radio Shack HTX-212 Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 17:56:08 -0500 Message-ID: <31966C88.27F6@concentric.net> References: <318C2E94.7603@tima.com> <4morhh$j7l@ursa.smsu.edu> Reply-To: adlawlor@concentric.net Nehl Bryan D wrote: > > The HTX-212 is a MOBILE unit. It IS modifiable for CAP/MAARS. > I believe in the first few pages of the manual tells/shows what needs to be > done. Of course, this does void the warranty. > Actually, this is untrue. The modification is discussed on page 17 of the manual and makes no mention of voiding the warranty. It's simply a matter of pushing a couple of buttons. 73 KC6NMD From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:17 1996 Date: 10 May 1996 08:04:40 EDT Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: hduff@humnet.humberc.on.ca (Hugh Duff) Message-ID: <8317298828801@humnet.humberc.on.ca> References: <319218A2.4334@ee.port.ac.uk> Subject: Re: PIC repeater controller software?? > Have anyone written any repeater control software for a PIC processor?? > > I found a repeater IDer, but would like to find also the rest of a > controller: > > time-out timer, PTT control, tail delay. > > No DTMF or CTCSS, just the normal timers and latches which are needed > > Erik > -- > Erik Finskas M1AAJ & OH2LAK > Email Finskase@ee.port.ac.uk > Lakki@clinet.fi > University of Portsmouth, UK > Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering I can offer you repeater controller firmware that I wrote for the Intel 8031 that you could try to transpose into 'PIC speak'. The trouble with the PIC is the limited resources like the stack. You may have to write more inline code or use creativity to accomplish some tasks. Might be a good exersize for you ! Regards.. Hugh Duff VA3TO Toronto --- þ NFX v1.3 [000] From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:18 1996 From: Jim Wagner Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Pocket Morse Code Trainer - Opinions? Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 20:15:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3197D0B9.29B5@nando.net> Has anyone tried the Pocket Morse Code Trainer as advertised on page 172 of the May QST? It looks like a pretty good way to carry around code in your ear for building speed, but I haven't actually heard from anyone who has tried this device. 73 de Jim, N4SVZ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: QST conflict of interest Again! Message-ID: <1996May5.163121.28590@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) References: <4m5b7n$gk4@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4mcr84$4mf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 16:31:21 GMT In article <4mcr84$4mf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> w8jitom@aol.com (W8JI Tom) writ es: >Another thought came to mind. > >Besides obvious control grid to cathode linearity problems created from >phase shift or delay at syllablic rates when the cathode is "floated" by a >series resistance (in parallel with some capacitance), a more severe >problem creeps in. The tube is moved closer to cut-off if the cathode is >not allowed to return to ground at during the neagtive grid portion of >each cycle exactly in step with the RF signal! I obviously don't know the value of stray capacitance between cathode and ground in this modified amp (nothing is said about it in the article), but there's no deliberate capacitance there. And given that T=R*C, and R is fixed at 30 (or 20) ohms, the value of stray C would have to be substantial to have any effect at syllabic rates. >For example, consider a class AB amplifier at the edge of cutoff. Adding a >few volts of positive cathode voltage not only reduces the effective >current by increasing the bias voltage, it also reduces the effective >screen voltage. Moving the screen to cathode voltage around carelessly at >an audio rate is absolutely the last thing that should be done in a SSB >amplifier. Yes, but moving it around on purpose may be useful. Consider that screen voltage controls stage gain in a tetrode. By varying screen voltage in step with drive, you get a gain control effect in accordance with the 3/2 power rule, IE speech compression for "free" without the use of external ALC. The author claims that no external ALC is required. There's a 0.1 uf cap in parallel with a 180k resistor shown connected right at the screen. That has a time constant of 0.018 second which would seem to smooth response above the syllabic rate, IE above 95 Hz. >Raising the cathode voltage moves the tube rapidly towards class C >operation, increasing efficiency and decreasing linearity. This effect is >indicated by Svetlana's specifications for the 4CX1600, which shows >efficiency rising from 61 to 72 %, and IMD increasing from -36 dB (below a >single tone of a two tone test) to -30 dB when a catode resistor is added >to a 4CX1600! OTOH, the author of the article quotes the Swetlana data sheet for their 4CX800A as yielding a 3 db *improvement* in 5th order IMD with the addition of the cathode resistor. I just went back and examined the ARRL lab report graphs again. In what I hope is proper terminology, here's what I see. 3rd order -41 db 5th order -38 db 7th order -55 db All figures are db down from one tone of the two tone test signal, and are interpolations from the graph. They might be off a db one way or the other due to my interpolation. It appears to me that the author's meaning might have been reversed in the text of the article since 5th order products are the worst of the three. But the relevant point to me is that these are actual test results from what we should hope is a relatively unbiased source. >Gary's text called my attention to yet another very good reason why the >correct grid resistor should have been selected in these articles, rather >than the addition of a simple cathode resistance to correct a grid loading >error. Again you're assuming the author of the article is stupid. Assume instead that my attempt at explaining the article to you is what's stupid. Now if the author indeed knows what he's doing (he is a Phd with extensive tetrode experience according to the bio), the use of a cathode resistor is *not* to cover up an error. In fact, in the text he stresses the reasons he chose to use a cathode resistor in the circuit, primarily to obviate the need for ALC and to use negative feedback to improve amplifier linearity. The hopefully correct two tone test data I've entered above would tend to confirm his choice wouldn't you say? >The more technical information I hear about the two articles Gary >mentioned, the more questions I have about the effort actually made to >design a clean HF amplifier. Tetrode design is complex and must be >carefully done to avoid unwanted distortion. If you've dropped your ARRL membership for some reason, I'll be happy to go down to HRO and *buy* a copy of the magazine for you and send it to you. As long as you won't read the actual article, you're shooting wildly in the dark. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | Due to provider problems Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | with previous uucp address es 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | Email to ke4zv@radio.org Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:21 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: QST conflict of interest Again! Date: Thu, 09 May 96 09:58:13 GMT Message-ID: <831635893snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <4ml52t$nqf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4mrph0$4dm@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <4mrph0$4dm@newsbf02.news.aol.com> w8jitom@aol.com "W8JI Tom" writ es: > In article <1996May5.163121.28590@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us > (Gary Coffman) writes: > >3rd order -41 db > >5th order -38 db > >7th order -55 db > > >All figures are db down from one tone of the two tone test signal, and > >are interpolations from the graph. They might be off a db one way or > >the other due to my interpolation. > > This data confirms this particular tetrode has poorer IMD performance than > a grounded grid 8875 would produce. As I said earlier: > "8875 measured third order (one measured sample of a pair of tubes 1980 > data) : -39 dB third, -44 dB fifth at rated output. Your reported data was > -38 and -48 dB with negative feedback. Where's the "big universal tetrode > advantage"?" > > Now your data suddenly becomes even less supportive of your (and the > author of the 811 article's) claims, with the tetrode 6 dB poorer than the > triode in a laboratory test. Is this a level comparison? Gary says his numbers are of IMD products relative to the amplitude of one of the two tones (wonder why just one, weren't the two equal?) Standard IMD performance is quoted versus a point 6dB ABOVE the individual and equal two tones, i.e. versus the PEP of the combined two-tone product. As I'm not sure whether Tom is using Gary's unorthodox standard or the more usual one which is used in the more recent ARRL lab reports (the ARRL changed to this format a few years ago), I can not be sure whether these numbers are indeed different or identical. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:22 1996 From: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Amateur PAGER... Date: 9 May 1996 14:10:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4mtcdu$lsk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mqp49$jg6@athena.ulaval.ca> Reply-To: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Paging is in essence, an addressable broadcast. Since I don't think the FCC allows a one-way broadcast on any ham freq., I suspect it would be illegal. (The paging terminal (*data generator*) would probably be hooked to a phone line (a violation since the caller would control the channel), and if you used an answering service to generate the information, the operators would have to be hams. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:24 1996 From: Rick Dykstra Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Amateur PAGER... Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 08:17:11 +0500 Message-ID: <3192B537.16A9@ix.netcom.com> References: <4mqp49$jg6@athena.ulaval.ca> <4mtcdu$lsk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4mtrs4$aoi@hpbs2500.boi.hp.com> <4muedr$1pcs@mule2.mindspring.com> Donald D. Davis, Jr. wrote: > > It would be possible to build something using a DTMF decoder chip - > lots are available. But there are nice HT's out there with DTMF paging > built in, such as the Yaesu FT-11/41/51 series, it might be better to > buy than build. I have the FT-11 and FT-51, and since my wife is also > licensed, we would find this feature useful **IF** any repeaters in > our area would pass DTMF tones. They don't. Since it only works for > simplex operation, we never use it. > > On another vein, members of the local BSRG (Atlanta area) repeater > group got some used Motorola pagers which the repeater owner set up to > be addressed through the 2M machine. It did work , but we never used > it very much - at least not that I heard. It sounded good on paper, > but it was usually just as easy (easier?) to pick up the mike and > call. We probably kept our radios on more than our pagers. > > Nevertheless, I am intrigued by this idea. Any other comments? > > Don (KE4KYO) Most repeaters WILL pass or regenerate DTMF tones if you know the correct command. Check with the trustee to see if this is allowed on the system you use. Rick (KD8CP) From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:25 1996 From: ken.thompson@Symbios.COM (ken.thompson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Amateur PAGER... Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 08:52:48 Message-ID: References: <4mqp49$jg6@athena.ulaval.ca> <4mtcdu$lsk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4mtrs4$aoi@hpbs2500.boi.hp.com> <4muedr$1pcs@mule2.mindspring.com> we would find this feature useful **IF** any repeaters in >our area would pass DTMF tones. They don't. Since it only works for >simplex operation, we never use it. If they use ACC controllers then DTMF tones can be repeated. The default prefix to pass tones is # . If it has been changed ask the owners what the code is. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Message-ID: <1996May9.170233.16965@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 17:02:33 GMT In article <587cc$b2826.196@News> hcohen@analogic.com writes: >I've had a 202 for about a year now, and have been very happy with >it when it works. I think the electronics are wonderful. The problem >that I have with it is the mechanical connection of the antenna's >bnc connector with the case. It uses a very thin screwed ring with >two notches in it. This loosens frequently and causes intermittant >contact with the inner electronics. This seems to cause two problems >other than just being annoying. It breaks a soldered connection with >the electronics and it causes some overload conditions on the >transmitter, that causes it to die and require service. These problems >have already put my ht in the shop three times. I'm so happy I >bought the extended waranty. My questions are the following: > > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? Red Locktite. (Though if you ever want to be able to replace the connector, and you will if you connect and disconnect antennas frequently, use optical balsam instead.) > Has anyone found a decent tool for tightening this > ring, other than a small screwdriver? It is called a beam spanner, available from places selling tools to the optical trade. You can make do with an old pair of dividers whose tips you don't care about buggering up. Sometimes a pair of snap ring pliers can be made to work as well. The most likely reason you are having this problem is excessive connecting and disconnecting of antennas to the connector. A BNC is an *assembly* connector. It is only rated for at most a few hundred cycles. It is not designed for daily connecting and disconnecting. Eventually the female center pin will lose its spring, or fracture, and you'll have to replace the connector. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | Due to provider problems Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | with previous uucp address es 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | Email to ke4zv@radio.org Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:27 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Message-ID: <1549.6703T1011T1293@nycmetro.com> References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 20:54:37 GMT >I've had a 202 for about a year now, and have been very happy with >it when it works. I think the electronics are wonderful. The problem >that I have with it is the mechanical connection of the antenna's >bnc connector with the case. It uses a very thin screwed ring with >two notches in it. This loosens frequently and causes intermittant >contact with the inner electronics. This seems to cause two problems >other than just being annoying. It breaks a soldered connection with >the electronics and it causes some overload conditions on the >transmitter, that causes it to die and require service. These problems >have already put my ht in the shop three times. I'm so happy I >bought the extended waranty. My questions are the following: > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? > Has anyone found a decent tool for tightening this > ring, other than a small screwdriver? >Thank you. >Howard, n1vxs I had the same problem recently Howard. I suggest that you get yourself a bottle of Loc-Tite from the Hardware store. Remove the ferrule, apply some Loc-tite to the threads and retighten. Once this is done you should have no further troubles. As to a Tool I use a Jeweler's screwdriver to tighten it. Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:29 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack HTX 202 antenna connection Date: Fri, 10 May 96 08:19:39 GMT Message-ID: <831716379snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <587cc$b2826.196@News> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <587cc$b2826.196@News> hcohen@analogic.com writes: > > Has anyone found a way of solving this problem? > If you attach an adaptor which is a BNC socket to Type N plug and put this on your antenna, then you can simply make the antenna a push fit. It will lack the captive properties if yanked but it can be attached and removed without any twisting action which is causing your problem and it will give a perfect r.f. connection. You can use this trick for quick-disconnect on all sorts of sets and instruments without any sacrifice to the constant-impedance of the line. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:30 1996 From: s17@aixterm6.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (Joachim Seibert) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RCI 2950 schematics ?? Date: 14 May 1996 14:59:07 GMT Message-ID: <4na73r$6pq@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> Hello reader! I am looking for the schematics of the 10m-radio RCI 2950. Any suggestions are weclcome... please mail to my e-mail-addr. vy 73 de Joachim DL1GSJ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joachim Seibert Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Heidelberg Moenchhofstr. 12-14, D-69120 Heidelberg e-Mail: Joachim.Seibert@urz.uni-heidelberg.de Phone : ++49 6221 405246 or ++49 6221 405135 FAX: ++49 6221 405297 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:31 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE; NEW STANDARD MOBILE (A.COPP) Date: 9 May 1996 18:18:51 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4mtcub$6il@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> BRIAN; THE RADIO YOU ASKED ABOUT IS THE STANDARD C5900DA. THE WATTAGE IS 3-10-50WATTS ON 2 METERS, 3-10-35 WATTS ON 70CM, AND 3-10-45 WATTS ON 6METERS. FREQUENCY RECEIVE RANGES: LEFT BAND 44.000- 99.995 MHZ 100.000 - 225.000 MHZ 240.000 - 530.000 MHZ RIGHT BAND 100.000 - 200.000 MHZ 260.000 - 510.000 MHZ 550.000 - 1020.000 MHZ* * CELLULAR BLOCKED ON 800 MHZ BAND! I CONTACTED OKLAHOMA COM SEVERAL WEEKS AGO FOR A PRICE AND THEY TOLD ME IT WOULD GO FOR $859.00 DEL. HOPE THIS HELPS, AL COPP KF4GKV GEORGIA From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:32 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner From: jherman@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman) Subject: Regency still alive? Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 02:36:05 GMT I'm getting an older Regency tone-alert monitor from some fire dept. I'd like to re-crystal and re-tone it for the NWS on 162.55 MHz. Anyone know if Regency is still in business? The xtal shouldn't be a problem but I'm worried about getting the 1050 Hz tone decoder for it. Thanks in advance, Jeff KH2PZ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:33 1996 From: Andy Brinkley Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Regency still alive? Date: 9 May 1996 00:15:50 GMT Message-ID: <4mrdfm$opc@server2.ols.net> References: To: jherman@Hawaii.Edu jherman@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman) wrote: >I'm getting an older Regency tone-alert monitor from some fire dept. >I'd like to re-crystal and re-tone it for the NWS on 162.55 MHz. >Anyone know if Regency is still in business? The xtal shouldn't >be a problem but I'm worried about getting the 1050 Hz tone >decoder for it. > >Thanks in advance, >Jeff KH2PZ Jeff - Regency is now Regency Land Mobile Radio (RELM) and they are located in West Melbourne Fl. Tech Help is 800-422-6281 and the parts number is 800-422-6282. They may not have much on the alert monitor - They probably stopped making the m at least 10 years ago. If the unit has a decoder that uses "reeds" then you can probably get one from BRAMCO and swap it out. Another method might be to build a decoder circuit fr om a 567 tone decoder chip for the NWS Alert tone. Hope that this has helped. E-mail me if you need more info. Andy N4ROX "brinkley@ols.net" From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:35 1996 From: Rich Fortnum Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Repeater Equipment Needed Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 13:14:44 -0400 Message-ID: <319E0584.1233@pints.com> Reply-To: fortnum@pints.com I need the following for repeater equipment: Cavities/Duplexer Feed Line Multi-Node Controller, VHF (perhaps with UHF links) Antenna (onmidirectional) Any ideas, please e-mail me. This repeater is for emergency use with the R= ed Cross. = Please help us help people. Cheers! -- = Rich Fortnum (aka BeeRich) fortnum@pints.com VA3 RFZ F&M Breweries, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Renaissance Brewers of Fine Ales and Lagers=99 = ONTARIO BEER PAGE http://www.pints.com/pints/index.html From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:36 1996 From: "Chris Smith, NR3O" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Review: JBI PC--Rig Control Kit Date: 10 May 1996 15:29:24 GMT Message-ID: <4mvnck$qos@newsroom.HITC.COM> I purchased JBI's radio control kit recently and was very pleased. It's a level convertor circuit board that fits inside a 25-pin D-type shell. It allows you to control a radio (Icom, Yaesu, Ten-Tec and Kenwood) from a PC serial port. They give you a complete kit including both radio & PC connectors, 6' of multi-conductor cable and even some shareware rig control & logging programs to get you going. Cost is $29.95 and construction was simple enough. Mine worked right away without any problems (well, okay, I had to figure the darned software out first a bit). They also have assembled kits and a CW option. JBI's number is: 800-524-8658 (they have a machine, but called me back, even on a Saturday!). I am now in the process of looking for some software I like, having tried a few already I was mixed about. DxBase for Windows95 (http://ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/dxbase/dxbwpeek.html) is coming out to Dayton and will be available "this summer." Also AmSoft has a Windows version of AmCall (http://hamster.ivey.uwo.ca/~amsoft/amsoft3.html) coming out in "early" 1996 (isn't it almost *MID* 96 guys?). These look tempting... 73 de Chris From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:37 1996 From: "Andrew D. Lawlor" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: RS HTX-202 Low Audio Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 07:41:24 -0500 Message-ID: <319C73F4.2EE4@concentric.net> References: <4mrt3i$ffc@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4mt4e8$3s0@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <4ngq7o$f2l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: adlawlor@concentric.net Gerald Schmitt wrote: > > I quite agree adjusted properly the HTX-202 has some of the nicest > audio available. It is also an excelent packet radio. But I have > personally helped over two dozen people get them going on packet > because of the non-standard keying circuit. This is one of the design > problems I refer to. > > > Agreed the intermod rejection is among the best primarily because it > will not go out of band and thus the filtering can be tighter. I stand > by the poor quality control comments. All you have to do is pay > attention to the questions about "err 2" to understand there is a > design flaw. I guess I never will understand why people are so > defensive about the R/S gear it no so bad but certainly not deserving > of the reverence it deserves. > > 73 Jerry Jerry, I don't mean to be a jerk, but do you read this stuff over before you send it over the wires? From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:38 1996 From: Denny Alford Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Santec 144up 2 meter HT; What's it worth? Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 23:54:05 -0500 Message-ID: <319C066D.4BE9@occ-uky.campus.mci.net> What is the value of a Santec 144up 2 meter HT with desk charger? It has 3 power levels, is a synthesized, 10 memory HT programable with touchtone keypad. It is in very nice condition. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:39 1996 From: David Mclean Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Standard C568a mods needed!!!! Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:32:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3194F969.4EE2@dfw.net> Hello I am looking for the mods for the C568a. If you have them please send tham to dmclean@dfw.net -- David Mclean From The Land of The Hams KC5NNV is Clear! [Dfw-Hams] http://www.dfw.net/~dmclean _________________________________________________________________________----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:40 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: elliott@iglou.com (Elliott) Subject: Ten-Tec Omni-D Modification Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 23:30:47 GMT I was wondering where I could find the 9.00 & 10.00 Mhz mods for the Ten-Tec Omni D Model 546D Series B radio's? I tried Ten-Tec's home page but no mods are mentioned. I received this radio from an estate sale and the mod is mentioned in the manual but not explained. Any other interesting/helpfull mods for this rig? Thanks, Bob Elliott N8LAJ ====================================== elliott@iglou.com NRA/ILA Information is the currency of the future, stock up on it, but don't horde it. ====================================== From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:41 1996 From: Ron Giuntini Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Re: TenTec 2M->6M Xvrtr? Date: 18 May 1996 04:42:54 GMT Message-ID: <4njkge$q49@news1.slip.net> References: <4ne7hm$del@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4ni81k$apl@news.indy.net> As you are probably aware there is a review of the 14mhz to 50mhz xverter in the June 96 QST. I just got my issue and have not yet read it, but you may be able to get something from it that means something to you even though you are interested in the 2M version. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:42 1996 From: "B.C. 'Jay' Jackson, Jr." Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: TenTec 2M->6M Xvrtr? Date: Sat, 18 May 96 01:15:56 EST Message-ID: <20823.jackson@mail.us.net> Finally got around to completing mine last week. It works quite well, is very sensitive, and I get good signal reports from the local stations. One problem is that if I transmit a long winded exchange, the case gets rather warm, and worse, I have noted that the 94 MHz LO frequency drifts significantly with the temperature change. For those still building or about to build, please note the following errors in the manual: 1. "wrong value". On assemby page 6, step 1-4. The manual says put in a 470 ohm resistor for R54. This is wrong. Instead, put in a 220 ohm resistor for R54. If you put in the 470 ohm like they say, the circuit will still work, but you won't discover the error until you get to assembly page 31, step 5-54b, where they will call for a 470 ohm resistor but you won't have any resistors left except for the 220 ohm that should have been put in back at the beginning. Then you'll have to carefully unsolder and pull it off the board, etc. At least that is what happened to me. 2. "duplicate installation". On assembly page 24, step 4-36. The manual says install L7, a 4.7 uH inductor. You will look all over the board for 15 minutes and never find a spot marked L7, (even though you will have an a 4.7 uH inductor left at that point). The reason is because you will already have installed L7 back on assembly page 8, step 1-51, and won't remebre doing it (at least I didn't). Likewise, assembly page 32, step 5-72 asks you to install the red LED wire that you've already installed earlier. 3. "corrections". TenTec sent me a letter with a 6.8k ohm resistor to be used at R15 (assembly page 8, step 2-20) in place of the 10k ohm that came with the kit. I went back and made the change, but it seemed to work OK with the 10k. In the letter they also clarified assembly page 24, instruction 4-33 as to the orientation of T3 - i.e. ignore the manual, install as on indicated on the board. 4. "tricky steps". The main problem I had building was the winding of RF transformers T4 and T5 (assembly page 29, steps 5-18 thru 5-24). DO NOT follow step 5-18 and cut the red teflon wire to 7.75 inches. If you do, it will be too short. Then you will have to call TenTec and ask for some more red teflon wire. They sent me about 3 feet of it (apparently thought I was gonna screw it up a few more times - HI) in the mail in a few days. Cut it to 8 inches, at least. What I did (the second time around) was prepare one end, solder at point A, then wind transformer, then, when you see about how long its gotta be to reach point B, then cut it! This worked and I had no further trouble with the transformers. However, I recommend that you not install Q9 and T3 (at steps 4-32 and 4-33) until after you wind T4; because these will be in the way and may get bent. I indulged my need to tinker and improve with one mod. I redrilled the LED hole in the case to 13/64" and installed a clear frosted bipolar LED on a little piece of PB board, together with two junk box NPN transistors and a few resistors. The LED gets 12 Volts off of the nearby on off switch, but I put a sense wire to the T test point (draws a few ma at most). That way, the LED glows green for power on in receive mode and red when in the transmit mode. Now I am thinking about a small RF relay and an additional connector on the back to bypass the transverter when it is turned off. I think that it is feasible despite what TenTec says. The model 1209 is a really cool kit. You will enjoy building it (mostly) as it is challenging and works well when you get done. I am anxiously awaiting the Paragon kit (just kidding). 73 de AF4O B.C. "Jay" Jackson, Jr. - Fairfax, VA From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:43 1996 From: johnoz@indy.net (Occolowitz John) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Re: TenTec 2M->6M Xvrtr? Date: 17 May 1996 16:04:04 GMT Message-ID: <4ni81k$apl@news.indy.net> References: <4ne7hm$del@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> In article <4ne7hm$del@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>, markem@primenet.com (M. Monninger) wrote: >Has anyone built the TenTec 2M-to-6M transverter? I'm thinking about buying >one to get on 6M FM. I'd be interested in hearing opinions/experiences about >it. If it's as good as the 20M-to-6M unit it should be worthwhile. > >Tks & 73.... Mark AA7TA I recently built one and am quite satisfied with it. My power meter indicates 12W into dummy load on FM. Phone help is good, I stupidly installed GASFET upside down, Tenn TEC sent new one free of charge. Did take me quite a bit more time to assemble than I expected. If you're short on time the assembled price represents good value. John O. KB9MIE. From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:44 1996 From: Ian Cummings <102152.1703@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Tm-421A mods Date: 13 May 1996 20:57:55 GMT Message-ID: <4n87oj$3qi$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> I have a TM421A kenwood 70CM radio and have been looking for the mods to allow broader frequency coverage. There are mods around talking about mods for this radio but they refer to VHF frequencies and a green jumper (my TM421A is a UHF radio and has no green jumper). The manual refers to the TM421E and ES as european versions of this UHF radio and it covers 435-440. Mine covers 438-440. I desire to operate my TM421A from 435 to 438. Kenwood of course will not tell me the mods to broaden coverage into the 435 region (I suspect it isn't difficult as the E series radio is covered in my A series manual). Any help?? Thanks Ian KB1SG Please email any replies to cummings@neca.com -- Ian Cummings, KB1SG From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:45 1996 From: jyfourri@simplet_3.univ-lr.fr (FOURRIER Jean-Yves) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TM255 Mods Date: 17 May 1996 17:06:05 GMT Message-ID: <4niblt$lif@hpuniv.univ-lr.fr> I am looking for mod about TM255,if somebody know it please send me a reply , thanks you. Dominique F1DOQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:46 1996 From: Pietro Muraca Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TR-751E mod Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 13:38:52 +0200 Message-ID: <319C654C.41C67EA6@unical.it> I am looking for modifications for KENWOOD TR-751E that will allow it to transimit and receive from 140 to 150 MHz. pietro ---------------------------------====------------------------------- Pietro Muraca ik8fgm e-mail: pietro.muraca@unical.it -------------------------------------------------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:46 1996 From: jskapiak@dreamscape.com (John T. Skapiak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TS-870 Filters Date: Tue, 14 May 96 13:22:27 GMT Message-ID: <4na1ej$94o_001@sb10.dreamscape.com> Keywords: TS-870 Has anyone had any experience with insatlling better crystal filters in the TS-870, such as the ones sold by International Radio? If so, how difficult was the installation, alignment, etc. and what were the results in terms of improved performance. Any information would be appreciated. Thanks, John WA2LIY E-Mail jskapiak@inficon.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:47 1996 From: paul1@news.sfu.ca (Paul Erickson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TS930 display dimming problem Date: 11 May 1996 15:35:58 GMT Message-ID: <4n2c4u$ckk@morgoth.sfu.ca> I have noticed that the display on my TS930 will dim from time to time as I tune across the band. I know that if the display blanks it means the PLL has gone out of lock, but this does not seem to be the issue. Has anyone else encountered this type of problem, and if so been able to fix it? cheers, Paul ve7cqk email: paul1@wizard.ucs.sfu.ca From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:48 1996 From: subbustr@whidbey.net (DAVE M . SCHERTZER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: W31A rx between 50-100 MHz Date: 12 May 1996 15:06:48 GMT Message-ID: <4n4uq8$6nt@news.whidbey.com> References: <4n09lj$or5@math.mps.ohio-state.edu> I have a mod which u remove : Diode D15 & remove chip jumper W1 fer RX freqs from 108-172, 300-600, 800-900 mhz TX 138-174, 400-480mhz subbustr@whidbey.net From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:49 1996 From: holcombe@oscar.teclink.net (Doug Holcombe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: wanted info for a HP-IB Digital Clock. Date: 12 May 1996 19:19:17 GMT Message-ID: <4n5djl$i34@lou.teclink.net> Hello and thanks for reading this. I just got a Hewlett Packard HP-IB Digital Clock and didn't get a manual with it. If you know anything about this unit or have one would you mind sending me some info about it? I would like to hook i t up to my radios and computer via its computer port it has. Thanks Doug -- -- Doug Holcombe, KB5YZI inet: holcombe@mc.edu Mississippi College (601)894-5210 Clinton, MS 39058 From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:50 1996 From: ckollai@cybergate.net (Craig D. Kollai) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wanted: First rig advice for Technician License Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 15:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <4mvgea$vv7@galaxy.cybergate.net> Reply-To: Craig@Kollai.com I wanted to know, what band would you recommend for a soon-to-be licensed Technican class HAM in teh Cleveland, OH area (More specificly, Brooklyn OH)? Ideally, I would love something with lots of toys like an ICOM IC-781, but I can't afford anything over $400 right now. I would like to find something used, If possable, at around $200, witha smaller antenna. I am in a corner apartment, and I am not allowed to use an externa antenna, so I'm planning to use a mobile mount antenna, probably buy it from Radio Shack. I'd like a base station transciever, but I would also buy a mobile if the price and feature would meet my needs; I do have a 120 VAC to 12 VDC 2.5A regulated power supply. My biggest question is, what band should I go for? I want to start using phone, and I was thinking either 2 meter or 1.25 meter, but am not sure which is better, as I don't currently have a reciever to try and find activity here and don't personally know any HAMs in the area! Thansk for your advice, either posted or E-mailed here, I appriciate it! -Craig D. Kollai E-mail: Craig@Kollai.com Visit my web page at:: http://www.cybergate.com/~ckollai/homepg1.htm From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:51 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: Dave Fifield Subject: WINFO: TS700A - Worth buying? Message-ID: <3198C408.117E@lan.nsc.com> Reply-To: fifield@lan.nsc.com Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 17:34:00 GMT Guys, does anyone know what a second hand one of these old analog dial 2m multimode rigs is really worth these days? I have the opportunity to buy one for $300...and based on what I see other (more modern) rigs going for, I reckon it's about the right price. I'd love to have that confirmed though, before I shell out my hard earned cash! Are there any "known" problems/quirks that this rig had? Any information would be much appreciated. Thanks. Dave Fifield, KQ6FR Email fifield@lan.nsc.com From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:52 1996 From: tmilko@unisys.com.br (TM) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wireless Telephones Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 18:18:54 GMT Message-ID: <4mtgj3$n7p@panther.unisys.com.br> Reply-To: tmilko@unisys.com.br Sorry to post this question here, but this was the best I could find to this subject. I'm looking for a wireless phone which has a long range reach, to be used in a large warehouse. The home Panasonic type phones cannot reach so far, can anyone help me to recommend a particular product, average price, and where to find in NY ? Tks for the help ! Thomas tmilko@uninet.com.br From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:53 1996 From: Mark Oppenheim Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Wireless Telephones Date: 17 May 1996 21:46:50 GMT Message-ID: <4nis4a$r6q@gorgor.pa.tetherless.com> References: <4mtgj3$n7p@panther.unisys.com.br> crum@xmission.xmission.com (crum) wrote: >Anyone know of other cordless phone models that use spread spectrum? >How about the possibility of using such equipment under amateur service >rules, with amplifiers, e.g. for computer networking? (I guess the >WaveLAN 2Mbps product also uses spread spectrum in either the 900MHz >or 2GHz bands depending on the model.) A friend said something about >differences in Part 15 and Part 97 with respect to spread spectrum, >but I don't know the details yet. The spreading codes that are used by ALL of the Part 15 devices are not legal under current Part 97 rules.... this, however is being changed, but it's unlikely ev en after the change you'll be able to use Part 15 devices undr Part 97 rules - th e proposed Part 97 SS language requires a form (not specified) of automatic RF p ower reduction.... Mark From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:54 1996 From: rst-engr@oro.net (Jim Weir) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB - Kwood 221/231/241 Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 19:06:02 GMT Message-ID: <4n81ap$hst@hg.oro.net> If you have an operating unmodified Kenwood 221 or 231 or 241 for sale, please post or email me back. Thanks. Jim Jim Weir VP Engineering | You bet your sweet patootie I speak for the RST Engineering | company. If I don't, ain't nobody gonna. Grass Valley CA 95945 | http://www.rst-engr.com | AR Adv WB6BHI--FCC 1/C phone--Cessna 182A N73CQ rst-engr@oro.net | Commercial/CFI-Airplane/Glider-----A&P Mechanic From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:55 1996 From: Gary Zabriskie Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB Yaesu FNB-3A and FNB-4A battery packs for use with Yaesu FT727R Dual Band HT Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 15:59:03 -0700 Message-ID: <3197BEB7.46B5@tcd.net> I am looking for battery packs to use with my dual band HT. Please e-mail me directly at: garyzab9@tcd.net Please state the condition and price. I can use either the 3A or the 3 or the 4A or the 4. They were only different in color. The "A" distinguished the silvery color for the FT109/FT709 series of mono band HT's. The ones without the "A" were a different color to match the FT103 series of HT's. I don't care as long as they work. Thanks in Advance! Gary Zabriskie, N7ARE in sunny St. George, Utah From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:56 1996 From: Carl Estey Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: ICOM IC-551 or 551D Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:04:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3198A111.951@HBC.Honeywell.com> I am looking for an Icom IC-551 or IC-551D 6-meter transceiver for a friend. If you have one and would like to convert it to cash, please send me an E-Mail message including your name, phone number (he does not have e-mail). model you have, asking price, and condition. He is willing to consider other brands of 6-meter all-mode gear. In advance, Thanks! 73, Carl -- Carl Estey, Amateur Radio Station WA0CQG Honeywell Inc., Homes and Building Control, MN10-2518, 1885 Douglas Dr., Golden Valley, MN 55422 (612) 954-6922 E-Mail: carl.estey@HBC.Honeywell.com or wa0cqg@wa0cqg-uhf.ampr.org (TCP/IP) From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:57 1996 From: Bill Kirk Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: KENWOOD MC-42 Hand Mike Date: 10 May 1996 19:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <4n06gn$5mp@wdl1.wdl.loral.com> I am looking for a working Kenwood MC-42 hand microphone in good+ condition for a ham friend in Poland. Please let me know by direct email, if you have one you'll sell, along with the condition and price. I will be off email from 5/16 thru 5/24, but will respond when I get back on. Thanx, Bill W6RQQ From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:58 1996 From: bclongwell@delphi.com (Brian Longwell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RE: YAESU AT-180 Tuner (for IC-706) Date: 10 May 1996 03:44:26 GMT Message-ID: <9605092258592.The_Win-D.bclongwell@delphi.com> I have one of these also. I found that it can have a little trouble "learning" a new antenna and "rejected" the antenna the first few times. I have been using it mobile, though with good affect. I have been able to get the Ten-Tec and Hamstick antennas to cover 100khz + on 75 meters with uniform field strength. (There was no detectable peak at the antenna's resonant frequency). 40 meters has complete coverage. It has worked well in that I don't have to get out and make adjustments roadside in the rain, ... All this may be for nothing, for I may be upgrading to a screwdriver antenna. Brian WB2DSH From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:58 1996 From: jkolin@cloud9.net (Jay Kolin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-10 on Aircraft Freqs. Date: 10 May 1996 19:54:08 GMT Message-ID: <4n06t0$jou@news.cloud9.net> Anyone know how to program an FT-10 so it will receive AM from 110 to 130 Mhz? Thanks Jay NE2Q From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:55:59 1996 From: Ken18@Cris.com (Kenny K) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-890/AT for Sale Date: 18 May 1996 21:32:14 GMT Message-ID: <4nlfku$6mj@tribune.concentric.net> Summary: Low band/All mode Yaesu 890 with Auto Antenna Tuner for sale Keywords: Low Band HF Yaesu 890 I have a Yaesu FT-890/AT All band/mode HF radio for sale. Features built in auto antenna tuner and 100W output. Comes with all standard accessories. Asking $750. Will include DSP9 digital signal processor. If interested please leave E-mail at Ken18@Cris.com or Kwongk@Towers.com Ken AA2TD From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:56:00 1996 From: Ken18@Cris.com (Kenny K) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-890/AT for Sale Date: 18 May 1996 21:34:37 GMT Message-ID: <4nlfpd$6mj@tribune.concentric.net> Summary: Low band/All mode Yaesu 890 with Auto Antenna Tuner for sale Keywords: Low Band HF Yaesu 890 I have a Yaesu FT-890/AT All band/mode HF radio for sale. Features built in auto antenna tuner and 100W output. Comes with all standard accessories. Asking $750. Will include DSP9 digital signal processor. If interested please leave E-mail at Ken18@Cris.com or Kwongk@Towers.com Ken AA2TD From amsoft@epix.net Sun May 19 13:56:01 1996 From: jimo@vt.edu (Jim Overfelt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu T-1000MP gen coverage tranmit Date: 16 May 1996 17:18:37 GMT Message-ID: <4nfo1d$t3v@solaris.cc.vt.edu> How is the FT-1000 MP modified to transmit in general coverage? From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:15 1996 From: adamw@shep.shepparton.net.au (Adam Watkins) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: test cq cq cq de vk3vyu Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 00:05:27 +1000 Message-ID: hello From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:15 1996 From: n5lbz@aol.com (N5LBZ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: Dentron MLA2500B Date: 19 May 1996 10:42:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4nnbvu$4rv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4mr8vu$kn5@Holly.aa.net> WANTED: Dentron MLA2500B in Excellent to MINT condition without tubes. Email scole@juno.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:17 1996 From: Art Gunderson Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio electronics magazine ? Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 16:04:53 -0700 Message-ID: <319E5795.1557@west.net> References: <4nj0l1$9fs@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> John, Radio Electronics has changed its name to Electronics Now. They can be reached at 1-800-999-7139. 73's Art WB6VKR From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:18 1996 From: Adam Lilien Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ECUADOR Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 16:48:26 +0000 Message-ID: <31A0A25A.6677@pacificnet.net> Felicitaciones Jaime Nebot Saadi, ojala todo se cumpla con la mejor suerte para ti y todos los Ecuatorianos. Viva el Ecuador!!!!!! From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:18 1996 From: egriffin@ctc.net (Ed Griffin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need FT-757 for parts Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 01:47:18 GMT Message-ID: <4ntrnu$t42@news1.sunbelt.net> looking for a ft-757 to salvage some parts from. Ed.....KC4DPK From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:19 1996 From: russ@delnet.ige.com (Russ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Mods for Alinco DJ-582T Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 04:43:36 GMT Message-ID: <31a149be.430452428@pubxfer.news.psi.net> I am looking for mods for the Alinco DJ-582T HT. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated as it appears they are different than the 580. Please email to russ@delnet.ige.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:20 1996 From: johanb01@tigger.stcloud.msus.edu (Brad Johannes) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Knwd th78 HT questions Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 02:18:16 Message-ID: How do I get my handheld into car. op. squelch. I tried as the manual sugest and hold down 8 while powering up or the VHF side. But it stays in time scan mode. Any ideas, or did I miss something in the manual. Brad KB0HNN From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:21 1996 From: dvoges@mail.global.co.za (David Voges) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ? firmware for PK232 MBX Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:09:57 GMT Message-ID: <4npfv0$kj@dodo.global.co.za> Reply-To: dvoges@mail.global.co.za Can someone tell me what the latest firmware version for the PK232 is, and where I can get it. ? Regards Dave From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:21 1996 From: "Strelcov" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HELP MANUAL FT-757-GX Date: 20 May 1996 13:12:21 +0400 Distribution: world Message-ID: <31a0a579@krom.pskov.su> Reply-To: igor@krom.pskov.su HELLO ALL HAM HELP ME MANUAL INSTRACTION YAESY FT-757GX THANK YOU UA1WER UA1WDK 73! igor@krom.pskov.su From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:22 1996 From: "Richard D. Spector" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Icom W31-a Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 23:56:48 +0000 Message-ID: <319FB540.27BD@csus.edu> Reply-To: richard.d.spector@csus.edu I am new to amateur radio and I am looking to buy my first radio. I have heard good things about the IC w31-a . Does anyone have any comments on this rig, good or bad. Or does anyone have any suggestions on a dual band HT. Thanks for the help. Richard From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:23 1996 From: jimo@vt.edu (Jim Overfelt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Pork Butt Filter needed Date: 21 May 1996 20:14:31 GMT Message-ID: <4nt877$8fg@solaris.cc.vt.edu> I need a filter to filter out WB2OTK Rich Whiten, the infamous Pork Butt. This low life scum bag has been giving Amateur Radio here in the US a black eye. Any suggestion on how to get him off the air will be appreciated. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:24 1996 From: shfoster@ix.netcom.com(Steve Foster ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ACC SHACKMASTER 100 info needed Date: 19 May 1996 20:24:01 GMT Message-ID: <4no011$joc@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> Hi , I just came across an ac100 with 1.6 software. I need some help in hooking it up. 1 What hf rigs does it support,How are they connected ? 2 Can I use a dualband radio instead of 2 seperate rigs to controll it? 3 Any suggestions/suggestions from users. Thanks in advance . Steve WB5OMP shfoster@ix.netcom.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:25 1996 From: joel@tech.mis.cfc.COM (Joel Lessenberry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Ft50 and ic 7 Date: 21 May 96 18:42:12 GMT Message-ID: <199605211842.OAA09109@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> A week or so ago I posted an article about the ft50r and the icom ic 7. So far I have had glorious reports on the ft50, but know one with an ic 7 answered... Anyone care to defend their rig? joel From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:25 1996 From: Ed Cortes Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Santec 144up 2 meter HT; What's it worth? Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 10:45:21 -0700 Message-ID: <31A0AFB1.69E2@bb.iu.net> References: <319C066D.4BE9@occ-uky.campus.mci.net> Denny Alford wrote: > > What is the value of a Santec 144up 2 meter HT with desk charger? It > has 3 power levels, is a synthesized, 10 memory HT programable with > touchtone keypad. It is in very nice condition.I have one that I purchase 10 years ago and is a good radio. I pay 275.00 at that time. If it is in good conditions maybe 100.00 remember all the features that the new radios have and this one doesn't when you consider the offering price. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:26 1996 From: ccsys@interport.net (ccsys@interport.net) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IC-2340 800MHz MOD??? Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 03:26:48 GMT Message-ID: <31a28837.10740744@news.interport.net> Reply-To: ccsys@interport.net Has anyone gotten the Icom 2340 to receive on 800-900 like the 2410? Mine has the front-end module installed but after much diode-testing and jumper-changing I still haven't had any luck. The ICOM techs I've asked have changed the subject very quickly. Anyone know if it's a cpu swap??? Andrew N2CBU From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:27 1996 From: ccadic@lenet.fr (Philippe Cadic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: RCI2950. New modification book Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 22:58:42 GMT Message-ID: <4nqtr3$nto@mordred.cc.jyu.fi> PLease send an empty email to rci@spiralweb.entrepreneurs.net You will have as much information as you need on the new modification book for the RCI 2950 and derived rigs. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:28 1996 From: ccadic@lenet.fr (Philippe Cadic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: new RCI2950 modification book Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 22:58:59 GMT Message-ID: <4nqtrj$nto@mordred.cc.jyu.fi> PLease send an empty email to rci@spiralweb.entrepreneurs.net You will have as much information as you need on the new modification book for the RCI 2950 and derived rigs. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:29 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Message-ID: <39650187@lagn.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 21:51:00 (DST) Reply-To: ej.mars@lagn.com (Ej Mars) From: ej.mars@lagn.com (Ej Mars) Subject: Kenwood TS820S I have a problem transmitting and receiving on frequency while on upper side band. Lower side band is Ok. The IF Shift has to be a couple of notches to the minus side to receive on frequency. Does anyone have any ideas on a fix ????? Please reply Thanks KC5EPI From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:30 1996 From: Nathan Odle Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: WTB: YAESU FT-530 WILL TRADE KENWOOD TH-28A w/MIC FOR PART OF PRICE Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 23:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: <31A1408D.29F159D0@showme.missouri.edu> References: <31A13F94.5A156FB8@showme.missouri.edu> I apoligze for making this WTB posting in this newsgroup. I just realized my mistake...won't happen again... -- -Nathan c670064@showme.missouri.edu http://www.missouri.edu/~c670064/ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:30 1996 From: kto9@mail.fwi.com (Kevin Thomas O'Neill) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: Used Test Equipment Date: 22 May 1996 03:06:35 GMT Message-ID: <4nu0br$6i7@News.IDT.NET> I have several pieces of test equipment for sale; all in great condition. HP 339A Distortion Measurement System -- $1750 HP 85024A High Frquency Probe -- $1000 HP 3478A Digital Multimeter -- $ 650 Fluke 8600A Digital Multimeter -- $ 175 Tektronix 2235A Oscilliscope -- $ 850 E-mail or phone at 219-429-4373 From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:31 1996 From: rod@venus.hili.com (Blackshadow) Newsgroups: alt.forsale,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap Subject: DJ-G5 Alinco Dual/HT Date: 18 May 1996 22:42:00 GMT Message-ID: <4nljno$dfa@news.ios.com> I have a Alinco DJ-G5 dualband HT, with EMS-9 microphone and ESC-35 case forsale. Asking $350.00 Email: rod@venus.hili.com Call 201-797-1227 Rod From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:32 1996 From: Ian Brothwell Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Info needed on Vibroplex Keyers Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 14:34:01 +0100 Message-ID: <319F2349.10C@cs.nott.ac.uk> References: <4n7o6c$mc_001@news.ni.net> To: Greg Wittig Hi Greg. I believe that there is a book covering the history of Vibroplex - that might be the best source of info re dating your keys. Regards, Ian G4EAN (Secretary, British Amateur Radio Teledata Group) Greg Wittig wrote: > > Does anyone know how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:33 1996 Message-ID: <694utVz0tsB@r-she.link-r.zer.sub.org> From: s.heinkel@link-r.de (Siegmar Heinkel) Subject: Contr.SONY CRF-V21 via RS-232 Date: 18 May 1996 17:07:00 +0200 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Distribution: world Hello everyone, I`m neither a Ham nor a specialist in computing, I'm interested in listening SW-Radio stations. I want to drive my SONY CRF-V21 via RS-232 by the computer (store stations, frequencies, times etc.). Does anybody have a software to support this ? Thanks in advance ! Siegmar Heinkel ## CrossPoint v3.1 ## From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:34 1996 From: "jaiyoung,yi" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Grid indicator of HF Liner Amplifier ???? Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 13:00:54 -0700 Message-ID: <31A0CF76.2187@nextel.net> I am using H.F amplifier. What I am worrying about is that I can't understand the indication of grid. When I am using amplifier on 20 meter band into one element quad antenna, the indication of grid is less than 25 amp with 600 watt -output in average. However, I am using it into three element quad antenna on 15 meter band, indication of grid shows me around 50 amp or more,but less than 70.(output is around 600 watt). What I wonder is that I am using same watt but different indication of grid. Is it good or not for me to have high indication of grid ? Anyone who give information regarding this problem will highly be appre- ciated. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:34 1996 From: garyzab9@tcd.NET (Gary Zabriskie) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Want to Buy Yaesu FNB-4A and FNB3-A Battery Packs Date: 13 May 96 18:24:08 GMT Message-ID: <199605131824.MAA00338@main.tcd.net> I am looking for battery packs to use with my Yaesu FT727R Dual Band HT. Please resond via my e-mail address: garyzab9@tcd.net with the condition, price, etc. if you have any of these. Am also looking for additional alkaline cell packs for this radio. These are the same battery packs that fit the FT103 FT109 FT709 series of radios. The FNB-3 and FNB-4 would also be okay. Only difference was the color of the plastic. Thanks in Advance!! Gary, N7ARE From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:35 1996 From: spinsfcl@concentric.net (Frank) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: For Sale Kenwood TS-940s/AT, SP-940, SM-220 Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 17:33:30 GMT Message-ID: <319cb68f.5333012@news.concentric.net> Reply-To: spinsfcl@community.net I will take the best offer for the entire system. There is a very minor problem in the TS940, for some reason it needs a two to three minute warm up period. Also, the TS940 has been modified for out of band transmission for MARS. I am no longer active in MARS and would consider trading down to smaller HF rig. Frank N6VQI From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:36 1996 From: jlin@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (GECL) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Radio electronics magazine ? Date: 17 May 1996 16:04:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4nj0l1$9fs@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> Can anyone advise the fax/tel number of RADIO ELECTRONICS magazine publisher ? and if they have e-mail online . Thanks John -- -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:37 1996 From: jpss@ais.net (Chip) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Rubber Ducky Comparisons?? Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 07:42:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4noghp$oev@crl14.crl.com> In article <4noghp$oev@crl14.crl.com>, klausner@crl.com (Ben Klausner) wrote: > Has anyone ever done any impartial performance comparisons on various > rubber ducky antennas? Specifically for 2M and 70CM. > > I look at things like the "Miracle Baby", and have to agree with the guy at > the Ham Store that "Baby, it would be a miracle if it worked." At least > that's the intuitive response looking at it. \ It is a expensive DUMMY LOAD for your HT. Its great to use if your want to really cripple the TX of your HT. Do NOT waste your money. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:38 1996 From: pu2uep@unix.bhnet.com.br (Demilson Quintao) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Mods for DJ191 wanted... Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 16:03:10 GMT Message-ID: <4nq52d$168@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au> Hello everybody! I just receive the new DJ191 HT. Now, IŽm looking for mods to open the TX band (by default 144~148) for use it in may job also. Any help will be wellcome. Thank you in advance. Demilson Quintão - PY2UEP From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:39 1996 From: amirault@laraby.tiac.net (Richard Amirault) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood 732a seperation kit Date: 20 May 96 00:20:04 GMT Message-ID: I run a Kenwood 732a dual-band mobile. I've just changed cars. The new car has much less space for radios. The rig has the ability to seperate the faceplate from the body of the radio, but (since this is no longer the current production model) I can not find the seperation cable kit anywhere. Anyone have one, or can point me in the right direction? -- Richard Amirault N1JDU Boston, Massachusetts USA amirault@tiac.net "Go Fly A Kite" From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:40 1996 From: Richard@DrForeman.carson-city.nv.us (Richard Foreman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Standard on WWW?? Date: 20 May 1996 17:11:18 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4nq93m$2uj@news.greatbasin.net> References: <4nklbv$pfg@argentina.it.earthlink.net> In article <4nklbv$pfg@argentina.it.earthlink.net>, medic33@earthlink.com says... > >Greetings all, > > If anyone has the web address for Standard, could you please spare it >to a reply? LOL Yes Standard is on the Web the address is: http://www.stdradio.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:40 1996 From: jbnjb@cris.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: In search of Kenwood 7625,TR9130,TR9000 or Santec LS202A Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 04:47:34 GMT Message-ID: <4nrhh1$9m4@tribune.concentric.net> IN help in finding these radios and possibly purchasing them would be of great help. Thank You in advance for any assitance. Again the radios were Kenwood 7625 Kenwood TR9130 Kenwood TR9000 Santec LS202A 73 N3TVN From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:41 1996 From: joel@cfc.com (Joel Lessenberry) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ft50 / ic7 Date: 21 May 1996 16:03:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4nt7i5$b2m@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> A week or so ago I posted an article about the ft50r and the icom ic 7. So far I have had glorious reports on the ft50, But know one with an ic 7 answered... Anyone care to defend their rig? joel From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:42 1996 From: hartley@smart.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need IC-761 Service Bulletin Date: Mon, 20 May 96 21:42:17 PDT Message-ID: Greetings, I am looking for a copy of ICOM service bulletin 24287-005 for the IC-761. ICOM accidently lost or mailed their last copy to someone and they have no way of determining what it contained. It has something to do with fixing the PLL lockup problem with the early versions. Anyone out there have a copy of this bulletin? Tnx es 73, Chuck - KM3V hartley@smart.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:43 1996 From: bhare@ma.ultranet.com (Bradley A. Hare) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,sci.electronics.repair Subject: WTB: Service Manual for HP141T 8556A Plug in Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 20:42:59 GMT Message-ID: <319cdfe9.3250263@news.ma.ultranet.com> I'm looking for a service manual for an HP141T 8556A RF pluging (this is the 0 - 300khz unit) HP's service and parts people have told me that they have discontinued the manual, and so far all attempts to find one have failed. No reasonable offer will be refused. Thanks in Advance, Brad Hare bhare@pandora.ultranet.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:44 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: DTI Mod Kit ? From: steve.lee@nashville.com (Steve Lee) Message-ID: <00000598000045C2@nashville.com> Date: 21 May 96 23:51:50 "Opens up the full potential of the MB8719 PLL chip with 128 consecutive frequencies with "radio" type graphic display for Windows or Dos. Gives Seek, Scan, Presets, Frequency display and more! Installs in minutes! I saw this posted somewhere earlier. Does anyone know about this "Kit"? Thanks, Steve From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:44 1996 From: mfick@engrs.unl.edu (Michael Fickenscher) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Needed: FM stereo multiplex ICs Date: 22 May 1996 17:33:15 GMT Message-ID: <4nvj4r$7js@crcnis3.unl.edu> As stated in the subject, I need to get my hands on a couple of stereo FM multiplexor chips (and their appropriate demultiplexor IC). Additional requirement: must be cheap, as these are for weather balloons that I will probably never see again after launch. Please email me with any ideas on where I can get these chips. -- Michael Fickenscher ----------------------------------------------------- Undergraduate Student, Great wits are sure to madness near allied, Electrical Engineering And thin partitions do their bounds divide. University of Nebraska-Lincoln - Dryden, "Absalom and Achitophel" ------------------------/ mfick@engrs.unl.edu /-------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:45 1996 From: n9mxt1@aol.com (N9MXT1) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Alinco DR-130T MOD Needed Date: 22 May 1996 10:44:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4nv998$h6v@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: n9mxt1@aol.com (N9MXT1) Hello, I am a member of a local EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and I just picked up a Alinco DR-130T and want to know if anyone has any mods for this radio?? I would like to be able to transmit on it for my EMA group on 154.770 So, if anyone out there has any mods for this radio please let me know... Thanks all and hope to hear from you soon N9MXT1 - Jeffrey From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:46 1996 From: John Thomas <100553.1214@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,uk.radio.amateur Subject: Re: Info on IC-706 Date: 19 May 1996 11:36:57 GMT Message-ID: <4nn14p$858$2@mhade.production.compuserve.com> References: <4nbj8t$p5p@villa.fc.net> It's great - buy one "A shack in a box" Audio is a bit iffy but its a savage 100w o/p on 6 and gives a good account with 10 on 2. I'm only VHF approved so haven't used the HF side in anger but its a damn good Rx apart from tinny audio but an extensipn speaker does help. All i use is a 2/70 colinear, 6m vertical 1/4 wave and G5RV for HF Rx Buy one!! Jim G7NKS UK From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:47 1996 From: ns1z@agate.net (John Wilcox) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Help: No Bias; TS-520s Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 15:31:05 GMT Message-ID: <4nqha4$ot8@service-2.agate.net> References: msr@interpath.net (Michael Ramsey) penned thusly: >I found that I had no output power on my Kenwood. Following the manual to >adjust the bias, I was unable to make the needle move. >I have been told it is a common problem. Any hints on where to look would >be appreciated. Lacking that, anyone know a safe and reliable place to >send it to for repair (hopefully in time for Field Day)? Hmmm?? I would be interested in this information also as our club purchased a TS-520 which originally worked well but now the idle current is 180 mA in LSB and >200 in USB. Not really up on this "hollow state" stuff so any help is GREATLY appreciated. Thanks From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:48 1996 From: bill.sorsby@dlep1.itg.ti.com (Bill Sorsby) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: Heathkit DX-100 and Marauder Date: 17 May 1996 16:45:05 GMT Message-ID: <4niaeh$rjp@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> References: <4ndlhv$739@news.microsoft.com> In article <4ndlhv$739@news.microsoft.com>, joehol@microsoft.com says... >Can someone tell me the matching Receiver for the DX-100 and Marauder >Transmitters ? Hi Joe, According to Chuck Penson's book, there is no matching receiver for the DX-100, which was Heath's second entry into the ham radio market. The matching receiver for the Marauder is the RX-1, "Mohawk", Heath's first ham band only receiver. Regards, Bill Sorsby, N5BU From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:49 1996 From: "Ken Bessler (KG0WX)" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Coax Power Ratings Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 10:41:40 -0500 Message-ID: <319DEFB4.3670@southwind.net> References: <4nkjf3$l2o@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> To: Merv Stump Merv Stump wrote: > > How much power will RG58 take? As I recall it's a function of the voltage > rating, frequency and SWR, but I can't seem to find the formula. On 80 > and 160 meters I would like to replace RG8 with RG58 just because of the > weight of the cable. Anyone have the formula handy? Merv If you are worried about power, I suggest RG8/m (mini 8). The center conductor is 16 gauge (as opposed to 20 gauge for RG58 and 13 Gauge for RG8). These are Radio Shack's specs. Hope this helps. 73 De KG0WX -- Ken Bessler Design Services Company http://www2.southwind.net/~kg0wx Model railroad designing From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:50 1996 From: gregg@plains.nodak.edu (Joe Gregg) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Parts for Amp Supply LK500zb Date: Tue, 21 May 96 13:01:44 GMT Message-ID: <4nsero$lfj@daily-planet.nodak.edu> I need the plate capacitor for my LK500ZB amp. Does anyone know anything about the Amp Supply Co. or where to find parts? I don't think this variable is anything odd or custom made, so probably I just need to find one of the right physical size and value. It is a 250pf variable, but I'll have to measure it to find the physical size. What would make something like this arc over? I had no indication of trouble before the bzzzzzzt yesterday morning. Joe kn0a *************************************************************** Joe Gregg Internet: Gregg@Plains.NoDak.edu Ham Radio Packet: KN0A@W0ILO.#SEND.ND.USA.NOAM Home: 701-588-4427 Work: 701-231-8353 "I yam what I yam, that's all that I yam"...Popeye, 1928 *************************************************************** From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:51 1996 From: jmaynard@k5zc.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: "HAM BURGER" READ THIS Date: 22 May 1996 17:28:49 GMT Message-ID: References: <31A211E6.4AA66058@showme.missouri.edu> <4nvddm$5js@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: jmaynard@admin5.hsc.uth.tmc.edu I disagree with Ham Burger's approach, especially his hiding in anonymity. That said... On 22 May 1996 15:55:34 GMT, Jim Lowman wrote: >Thus far, I've seen only two rational arguments against FS postings in >other than rec.radio.swap [and the name here is the biggest part of the >problem]: that FS postings may cause the newsgroup to be dropped at >some sites [read: the employer's system] where commercial posts are not >allowed, and that some users have to pay for connect time or receiving >mail/news. The solution in both cases is to find a REAL provider, that >carries all 17,000+ of the newsgroups, for better or worse. "Let 'em eat cake." No, the solution is to follow the charter as adopted by vote, so that everyone, including those who don't HAVE real providers they can access at a cheap flat rate, can continue to enjoy these groups. -- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can http://k5zc.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity. "Just because I'm a superhero doesn't mean I have to smell poo gas." -- Freakazoid From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:52 1996 From: jimf@zoinks.corp.sgi.com (Jim Fellows) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Icom Z1A 800 MHz mod kills 440 Date: 17 May 1996 20:40:58 GMT Message-ID: <4nio8q$j73@murrow.corp.sgi.com> Keywords: OOPS? Hello all, Ok after finally getting the two tiny surface mount transistors soldered into their spots I can receive 800 through ~1000 MHz just dandy. But... I can no longer receive ANYTHING in the 70 cm band or for the local PD stuff at 482 - 488 MHz. I do receive stuff (maybe images) all along in 300 - 415 MHz range. Additionally, from about 420 to 445 the "S" meter shows full scale on nothing but white noise. Out side this range white noise is a minima l S 0.5 - 1. Soldering was done by a professional MIL certified tech and the joints were inspected under microscope as well as continuity checks to the other ends of t he traces. All looks/tests OK. So... Did I screw something up? Or is this the way the mod is intended to work? BTW, the HT will TRANSMIT just fine at the intended offset from display ed freq along with tone etc. Any ideas anyone that has done this? Jim From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:53 1996 From: kenny@erinet.com (Ken Gunton) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Dayton Hamvention Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 22:54:42 GMT Message-ID: <31a247e5.35972246@news.erinet.com> Reply-To: kenny@erinet.com Let's congratulate the Hamvention organizers for moving the date to three weeks later! The weather was near perfect! Attendance seemed to be good, and there were DEALS TO BE HAD! I bought two 6146's for my SB-102 (first time I've replaced the tubes since I built the xcvr in 1969!) for $10.00 each and they work fine. A new, higher output battery pack for my Kenwood TR-2500, and new Nicads for my Drake TR-22 rounded out my needed items. Wanted goodies included a new SW rcvr for my ham-to-be son, and an HF vertical antenna and a length of RG59, then on to the computer stuff. 16 Meg 60ns w/parity for $169 was good, so I got two. That was all the money I had for the day, so I looked for microwave goodies. There were more microwave components at this show than at any other. Where else could you find Narda directional couplers for $25.00 (brand new condition, recent pulls from new equipment), or RLC SP6T switches for $75.00. All in all, a very successful show, and the weather really helped. See you all next year. Regards, Ken Gunton WB6QWF TL Distributing - Microwave and RF Components CAGE Code 01DH7 http://www.erinet.com/kenny/microwave.html From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:54 1996 From: dnorris@k7no.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-1000 Expert Needed!! Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 14:29:45 GMT Message-ID: <4nsjv6$66v@news.syspac.com> References: <319E8728.5A4B@snet.net> <31a019e7.32547450@nuhou.aloha.net> ed@aloha.net (ed) wrote: >TDE wrote: >>My piece of !$#@ FT-1000 is off frequency about 50 cycles or so. Drives >>me nuts, love to be exact. Looking for any info on tweaking it back >>into place. Can this be done easily enough, or is it stricltly a >>factory job? Thanks very much!!! - Rick, N1SQJ >There's a trimmer in the hole on the TXCO, if you have that option, or >probably in the master oscillator circuit, if you don't. You can >zero-beat on WWV if you turn the IF shift all the way to the bassy >side with an SSB mode selected (use headphones to hear the zero beat >clearly). Make sure the set's fully warmed up before adjusting. >Ed- AH6MI You don't have to listen to zero beat. It is easier and more accurate to switch alternatively between USB and LSB and adjust the trimmer until both sidebands exhibit the same tone. cdn C. Dean Norris Amateur Radio Station K7NO e-mail to dnorris@k7no.com http://www.syspac.com/~dnorris/ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:55 1996 From: pgc@izzy.net (Peter G. Campbell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: need help with Realistic htx-202 dtmf(setting tones) Date: 22 May 1996 16:01:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4nvrrl$ffi@izzy4.izzy.net> References: <4nvmm1$r1v@alterdial.UU.NET> tuffguy (snod@firecraker.com) wrote: : Hello.... I got a Realistic htx 202 about a year ago, but no manual. : To access some of the repeaters here, I need to set my tones (to 114.8 : specifically). Does anyone here have a two meter handheld from radio : shack such as this one, who can help me with this? I think the codes : for the tones are in the manual. Thanx in advance.... Mark N9UVR The entire manual for the HTX-202 is online at http://www.tandy.com/support/html15/15563.html The specific answer to your question: Code Freq.(Hz) Code Freq.(Hz) Code Freq.(Hz) XZ 67.0 2A 114.8 7Z 186.2 XA 71.9 2B 118.8 7A 192.8 WA 74.4 3Z 123.0 M1 203.5 XB 77.0 3A 127.3 M2 210.7 WB 79.7 3B 131.8 M3 218.1 YZ 82.5 4Z 136.5 M4 225.7 YA 85.4 4A 141.3 M5 233.6 YB 88.5 4B 146.2 M6 241.8 ZZ 91.5 5Z 151.4 M7 250.3 ZA 94.8 5A 156.7 1Z 100.0 5B 162.2 1A 103.5 6Z 167.9 1B 107.2 6A 173.8 2E 110.9 6B 179.9 From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:56 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Parts for Amp Supply LK500zb Date: Wed, 22 May 96 14:08:39 GMT Message-ID: <4nvbav$ql8@crash.microserve.net> References: <4nsero$lfj@daily-planet.nodak.edu> Post / CC by Mail gregg@plains.nodak.edu (Joe Gregg) wrote: >I need the plate capacitor for my LK500ZB amp. Does anyone know >anything about the Amp Supply Co. or where to find parts? I don't >think this variable is anything odd or custom made, so probably I >just need to find one of the right physical size and value. It is a >250pf variable, but I'll have to measure it to find the physical >size. Is the capacitor actually defective? The Tune capacitor used to arc occasionally in the amp that I own (before I fixed the problem), but there was no permanent damage. >What would make something like this arc over? I had no indication >of trouble before the bzzzzzzt yesterday morning. One of the things that can cause this is the T/R relay. If the relay applies drive before it connects the load to the amplifier, or if the contacts that connect the load are not in good condition, the RF voltage at the input to the Pi-net can skyrocket. Depending on the exact nature of the problem, this may occur only when the amplifier is initially switched. Another possibility is that the amplifier is oscillating, although that seems unlikely if you haven't experienced problems until now. This problem might also be caused by spurious signals in the output of the driver. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:58 1996 From: WD8DZB (Dave Zawodny) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Need mike pinout for Motorola Maxtrac Date: 21 May 1996 09:43:04 -0700 Message-ID: <31a1e2f3.17495809@news.primenet.com> References: <4nobnj$4o2@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: zawodny@primenet.com ernurse@ix.netcom.com(Brian David Millan) wrote: >Anybody have the pinout for a motorola maxtrac 300 with the 8 pin >telephone-jack style modular connector? If so, I'd be eternally >grateful if you'd send it to me! Thanks. >-- > >73 de Brian > > |-------------------------------------------------------| > | Internet: n2ofm@ampr-gw.essradio.com | > | (no large files or commercial traffic) | > | | > | Internet: ernurse@ix.netcom.com | > | | > | AX25 Packet: N2OFM @ N2IMC.NJ.USA.NA | > | | > | Amprnet: n2ofm@n2ofm.ampr.org [44.68.48.112] | > | | > | Amprnet: n2ofm@gw.k2mf.ampr.org [44.64.20.2] | > |-------------------------------------------------------| > Brian, 1. (blu) PB1----> n/c 2. (brn) PB2----> n/c 3. (blk/red) Hook ----> on/off hook indicate (for pl/monitor function) 4. (yel) gnd ----> Chassis Ground 5. (org) Mic Audio----> Tx Audio 6. (gry) PTT----> Push To Talk 7. (grn) SCI+ ----> Programming Data in/out 8. (wht/org) Handset Audio ----> Rx Audio Out (low level) 73 de Z, WD8DZB From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:49:59 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Yeasu 736R transmit problem (ALCOPP) Date: 22 May 1996 16:02:31 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4nvdqn$a6f@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> In message <31A37844.39B@mpce.mq.edu.au>, Guy Fletcher writes: >Rick Dykstra wrote: >> >> I have a 736R which has intermittant transmit on 70 cm. Receive is >> fine. When it transmits okay, the meter swings about 3/4 way over. >> When there is a problem, it swings all the way over. The watt meter >> shows I have output, but it looks like it's not on the frequency it >> should be. >> Has anyone run into this before. >> Thanks, >> Rick KD8CP > >Yes, this problem is not uncommon in the FT736R. >The rig takes off around 453MHz! >The problem lies in the VCO on the 430MHz RF Unit; >the input to this is inadequately decoupled. > >I will email you details, and anyone else with the problem >may care to contact me by email. > >Thanks to Gordon McDonald VK2ZAB, who tracked down this >problem on his own rig this morning. It hasn't yet surfaced >on my FT736R! > >Guy VK2BBF guy@mpce.mq.edu.au GUY, I WOULD APPRECIATE THIS INFORMATION ALSO ANY OTHER IDIOSINCRICIES YOU MIGHT HAVE ENCOUNTERED OR HEARD ABOUT. I DO NOT HAVE AN EMAIL ACCOUNT BUT IF YOU WIL L MAIL THE INFORMATION I WILL REIMBURSE YOU THE COPY COST AND MAILING. THANKYOU AND 73'S AL COPP KF4GKV From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 22 18:50:01 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: midgard@nycmetro.com (SARUMAN) Subject: Re: MFJ 90xx CW transceivers - opinions? Message-ID: <1495.6711T777T2684@nycmetro.com> References: <319A74A3.FD4@nando.net> Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 21:07:33 GMT >Ron Giuntini wrote: >> >> Also, I think you should look into the several kits available, I just >> picked up a OHR Explorer 20M QRP kit for 100.00. It is comparable to the >> MFJ, and you get the fun of building it yourself. >I have looked into kits. See the June, 1996 issue of QST for reviews >on 6 QRP transceivers. I've also spent several hundred hours building >kits and homebrewing everything from code practice oscillators to >a 25 inch color tv, and a lot in between. Read the QST reviews you >were too busy to look up, too. >None of which is relevent. I'd sure like to hear from someone who >actually owns and uses one of the MFJ-90xx rigs and would share >their experiences. >Jim, N4SVZ The Last 2 issues of CQ have had Articles on homebrewing QRP kits and even homebrewed battery's using Hot sauce. There's also an Ad in the the same issue s for kit versions of these at $14.95 included all parts circuit board and Case They are selling both Regular version and SMT version. I think they have 10 meter,15 meter,20 meter,40 meter and 80 meter versions. ****NOTE**** The kits are Transmitters ONLY, you'll still need a Receiver. Hope this helps ya'll Midgard Graphics 3D Animation and Special FX for the hobbyist videographer Email: midgard@nycmetro.com -- Drop into #amigacafe on IRC's undernet for a chat sometime -- A man of many hobby's master of none. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:10 1996 From: BQQL61C@prodigy.com (Sean Hall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: "HAM BURGER" READ THIS Date: 25 May 1996 14:07:13 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4o746h$1at8@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> References: <31a211e6.4aa66058@showme.missouri.edu> Ham Burger is probably the same guy you see on that Gold Mastercard commercial who tries to forge his signature on the card, but can't. I e-mailed him personally after my faux pas of putting a FS in the wrong newsgroup. I asked if he had slapped the wrists of the dozen or so others who committed the same sin--then told him to get some balls and come forth with HIS real name. Ham, buddy--it's people like you who give this hobby a real bad name. Knock it off. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:11 1996 From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: ** Yaesu FT-50R handheld dual-band problem!!!! Read this ** Date: 27 May 1996 12:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <4oc897$hsb$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> This is exactly what happened to a person on CompuServe HamNet! He bought the early, flawed software at Dayton from the manufacturer of the Yaesu interfaces. There is not a fixed version. It is my hope that you can restore full tx coverage via the MARS mod that many people already have. In other words, download the flawed code to restore the extra rx regions, get the MARS mod to get the full tx ranges, and then proceed to program your memories. (Memories are lost when loading the flawed program.) -Jeff From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:12 1996 From: greenberg@courier8.aero.org (Steve Greenberg) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: 2m/440 mobile Date: 21 May 1996 20:44:52 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: Hi I am interested in any operator's comments on the following 2m/440 mhz mobile radios: Icom 2700 and 2350 series Alinco DR-610 Yaesu 5100 and 5200 Kenwood TM-733A Both good and bad comments would be appreciated. You can email them or post them here. Thanks for the info and 73s Steve, WA6TAF email: greenberg@courier8.aero.org From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:13 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: 2m/440 mobile (acopp) Date: 22 May 1996 12:21:18 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4nv0ru$p1g@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> STEVE, FIRST OF ALL LET ME TELL YOU THE OLD ADDAGE, BEAUTY IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER, OR WHAT ONE LIKES ANOTHER DOESN'T. THAT'S THE REASON FOR SO MANY BRANDS. ENOUGH OF THE BULL, I HAVE OWNED 2 OF THE RADIOS LISTED AND I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE OTHERS, HERE'S MY THOUGHTS. I ORIGINALLY LOOKED FOR A KENWOOD 733A, AND WENT TO THE DALTON HAMFEST TO PURCHASE ONE. I FOUND OUT THOUGH, THE 733A DOES NOT HAVE A BUILT IN DUPLEXER, NOW THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM IF YOU DON'T MIND PURCHASING AN EXTERNAL DUPLEXER, OR RUNNING 2 ANTENNA. I INSTEAD OPTED FOR A DR 610T ALINCO. I HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH THE UNIT WITH THE EXCEPTION, OF MANY PEOPLE COMPLAINING OF "HOT" AUDIO. I WAS HOWEVER LESS THAN ENAMORED WITH ALINCO THE COMPANY. I SPENT A GOOD DEAL OF MONEY ON LONG DISTANCE CALLS TO ALINCO FOR SOME TECHNICAL INFO. EVEN FAXED THE M I NEVER TALKED TO HUMAN, ONLY HANG ON. I SURMISED THAT IF I HAD THIS MUCH PROBLEM CONTACTING THEM NOW WHAT IF I HAD A PROBLEM. I SOLD THE RIG! THE 5100/5200 YASEU ARE NICE RADIOS, THE ONLY DRAWBACK IS THEY ONLY HAVE TWO POWER LEVELS,(IF THAT IS A PROBLEM ). YOU DIDN'T ASK ABOUT THE FT8500, BUT SINCE I OWN ONE I WILL COMMENT ON IT. I HAVE THE MH-39 MODEL (NOT POTATO HEAD) WITH THE DTMF MIKE. I LIKE THE RADIO PRETTY WELL, WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS, ONE BEING ALMOST ALL CONTROLS ARE ON THE MICROPHONE, AND IT REQUIRES A GOOD BIT OF PRACTICE,TO MASTER IT , ALSO I PREFER INDEPENDENT CONTROLS OF VOLUME AND SQUELCH, WITH KNOBS. ONE OTHER PROBLEM I ENCOUNTERED, IS I EXPERIENCED ALTERNATOR WHINE, THE ALINCO OR THE ICOM 2700H DID NOT. I MOVED THE YASEU TO BASE TO USE THE 70CM SIDE AND REPLACED IT IN THE MOBILE WITH ICOM 2700H, KNOCK WOOD TO THIS POINT I HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY HAPPY WITH IT. I HOPE YOU DON' THINK I AM TOO CRITICAL BUT I BELIEVE I WOULD WANT TO KNOW AS MANY POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH A RIG AS POSSIBLE, AS THE COST OF THESE UNITS, FO R MOST OF US PROHIBITS CHANGING EVERY OTHER DAY. FORTUNATELY I SOLD SOME TO GET SOME. BEST OF LUCK, AL COPP From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:14 1996 From: ka1kla Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: 48 FT. ROHN TOWER Date: 29 May 1996 10:32:53 GMT Message-ID: <4oh94m$4ds@crusher.ici.net> To: SALE I HAVE A ROHN HBDX 48 F00T FREE STANDING TOWER FOR SALE.IT'S DOWN AND READY TO GO ASKING $300.00 OR TRADE FOR COMPUTER SET UP.NAME IS DICK,KA1KLA From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:14 1996 From: ka1kla Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: 48 FT. ROHN TOWER Date: 29 May 1996 10:33:30 GMT Message-ID: <4oh95q$4ds@crusher.ici.net> I HAVE A ROHN HBDX 48 F00T FREE STANDING TOWER FOR SALE.IT'S DOWN AND READY TO GO ASKING $300.00 OR TRADE FOR COMPUTER SET UP.NAME IS DICK,KA1KLA From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:15 1996 From: Jonathan Kohn Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: re: 6146b Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 20:25:57 -0700 Message-ID: <31ABC3C5.4CD0@paonline.com> I stand corrected. JON N3AJB From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:16 1996 From: T E I X E I R A Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: 6146B/6146W ???? Date: 26 May 1996 02:04:18 GMT Message-ID: <4o8e72$ec2@ccnet2.ccnet.com> I have a Yaesu FT101ZD with the original 6146B tubes in it. Question... I have a new set of 6146W tubes, will they work? Don From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:17 1996 From: claude@bauv.unibw-muenchen.de (Claude Frantz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: 6146w's Date: 28 May 96 12:13:47 GMT Message-ID: References: <31A8FB6F.34DB@paonline.com> Reply-To: claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de Jonathan Kohn writes: >6146w's are just ruggedized versions of 6146b's and are direct >replacements. Sorry, but they are ruggedized versions of 6146a's. -- Claude (claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de) The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer and not necessarily those of her employer. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:20 1996 From: 100317.1432@compuserve.com (Ian Hamilton) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: 70 MHz Amplifier Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 10:25:31 GMT Message-ID: <4oh965$rja@hil-news-svc-3.compuserve.com> References: <31AAAF3B.3009@unm.edu> Matt Bohn wrote: >Hello, >I am a physics graduate student and I need a 100 Watt, 70 MHz amplifier. I c urrently >have 20 Watts at 70 MHz. I was looking into building this myself, but the >publications from ARRL show some rather bizarre design features. Would this be a >difficult item to build? (Can you reference circuit designs?) Or is it possi ble to >purchase something like this? I realize this is not a Ham frequency. >The output impedance will be coaxial to terminate into 50 ohms. It is a singl e >frequency and not modulated. >The application is to modulate a pockel cell for a laser. >Thanks for any help. >Matt >email: bohn@unm.edu Oh, but it is a Ham frequency, in the UK! We have an allocation from 70.0MHz to 70.5MHz. This means that there are several PA designs and kits available in the UK for this band. There is a design for a 100W 70MHz PA in the RSGB's VHF Manual, which you can probably get through the ARRL. I could dig out the names and addresses of some UK companies selling kits for 70MHz PAs, but unfortunately I am at work, and my 'library' is at home! If you would like me to do so, please Email me. As a footnote, I believe that there are moves afoot to get a 70MHz allocation for more countries (in Europe at least), though with the speed at which these things work, it'll probably be well into the next century before this happens! 73 de Ian, G0TCD. Email: 100317.1432@compuserve.com Packet: G0TCD@GB7MSW.#33.GBR.EU Amprnet: g0tcd@g0tcd.ampr.org From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:21 1996 From: Steve Dobak Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Alinco DR-130T MOD Needed Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 19:48:50 -0400 Message-ID: <31AA3F61.23EE@prolog.net> References: <4nv998$h6v@newsbf02.news.aol.com> To: N9MXT1 N9MXT1 wrote: > > Hello, > I am a member of a local EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and I just > picked up a Alinco DR-130T and want to know if anyone has any mods for > this > radio?? I would like to be able to transmit on it for my EMA group on > 154.770 > > So, if anyone out there has any mods for this radio please let me > know... > > Thanks all and hope to hear from you > soon > > N9MXT1 - Jeffrey If I remember correctly, copy down all your memories as you will lose them, then take the top off the radio, you will find a obvious wire loop blue I believe, maybe red, going to the front panel cut that wire turn on and reset the radio you are all set then, reprogram the radio. ----steve wb3amg----- From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:24 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Antenna Analysers Date: Thu, 23 May 96 11:06:14 GMT Message-ID: <832849574snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <831505842snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> <832765677snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> <31A3B891.F26@interramp.com> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <31A3B891.F26@interramp.com> ir002126@interramp.com "Ken Neal" writ es: > My question is a little different-- I have the MFJ-208 for VHF and > the MFJ-247 for HF. Would I be gaining anything (other than a > single unit) by selling these two and buying the MFJ-259? I don't see the 247 in the current catalogue so I can't comment on that, but I note that the 208 shows VSWR but not an antenna's resistance at resonance. If you fancy knowing this, and it may be useful when say fiddling with gamma matches for instance, then the 259 will add that one feature. Unless you can get most of your money back from selling the older instruments or you do this for a living, it may not be worthwhile. Of course, if you've not been naughty, you might try asking Santa :-) Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:24 1996 From: Maurice R Baker Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Re: Anyone got a service manual for President Lincoln?? Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 16:51:25 -0300 Message-ID: <31ACAABD.28CF@hodcs.att.com> References: <31AC5EAF.71AF@ee.port.ac.uk> Reply-To: mrbaker@hodcs.att.com Erik Finskas OH2LAK wrote: > > As the subject tells, I am looking for a service manual for President > Lincoln. > If you have one, please mail me. I would be interrested of a copy. > > Erik Perhaps the Walter Reed Army Medical Center or Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington, DC could supply one. Sorry, couldn't resist :-) WA3ZXO From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:25 1996 From: Rod Thompson Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Automatic Tone Search (ATS) on Yaesu FT-51R Date: 25 May 1996 02:50:01 GMT Message-ID: <4o5sgp$iah@news.ro.com> References: <4o4qdj$elr@crl.crl.com> To: klausner@crl.com klausner@crl.com (Ben Klausner) wrote: > Does anyone know how to make this work? The instructions in the manual seem > identical to the instructions for manually selecting a tone. Am I > overlooking somethin simple? > > Thanks. Follow the manual like you are setting the tone frequency. Once in the freque ncy selection mode press and hold the UP or DOWN arrows keys until the tone freque ncies start to change. Your radio must be set on the frequency you want to receive and have Tone Squelch turned on. Rod RT Systems, Amatuer Radio Supply Huntsville AL 800-723-6922 205-882-9292 From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: source@netcom.com (David Harmon) Subject: Re: Automatic Tone Search (ATS) on Yaesu FT-51R Message-ID: References: <4o4qdj$elr@crl.crl.com> <4o5sgp$iah@news.ro.com> <4o7vnd$lu1@crl8.crl.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 02:18:58 GMT In article <4o7vnd$lu1@crl8.crl.com>, Ben Klausner wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, but that doesn't seem to work for me. I activate Tone > Squelch, then try F-2 to set Tone Frequency, and hold the Up key. AAs long > as I hold the key the value changes, but when I let go it stops. Do I need > to test this against a live signal with tone? Sounds like something is wrong; it should have worked just as described. When you hold the Up key for a second it should start scanning the tone frequencies. It scans quickly when no RF is being received, then slows down when a signal is detected, then stops when the matching tone freq is detected. Or at least, mine does. Do you have a very early FT-51R? The procedure is not described in my FT-51R manual but on a loose sheet that came with it, so maybe it was a version add-on? Does your Tone Squelch work otherwise? From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:28 1996 From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Automatic Tone Search (ATS) on Yaesu FT-51R Date: 27 May 1996 12:49:52 GMT Message-ID: <4oc8dg$hsb$2@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> Once you're on a freq with your tone decoder enabled and the tone-freq display showing one of the PL freqs, hit an arrow and the FT-51R will proceed to search for the correct one. Naturally, the radio will only find the correct freq while there are transmissions on the freq. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:32 1996 From: Sean Nixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: C-528a Mods?? Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 10:58:51 +1200 Message-ID: <31A790AB.1580@actrix.gen.nz> References: <4o2mqb$10gg@ipo.ipoline.com> To: SDU SDU wrote: > > I have a Standard C528 , can it be mods?? I hope some one can tell me, > Thank You > SDU http://oak.oakland.edu:8080/pub/hamradio/mods/ is a good place to look for mods, here is what you want. The C528 can be modded completely by button presses, I got 130-180 tx/rx 400-472 tx/rx 300-400rx 800-900rx From: Young-Hoon Yoon The Standard C520 or the C528 has tons of features. TX/RX mod. Depending on the model( U.S. Japan, Europe) some of the following steps may be omitted. First you must open up the RX. To do this 1. press VHF(144) button once to put the rig in the VHF side. Then press Func-set then Func-ENT This will open up the rig for extended receive. 2. press UHF(450) button once to put the rig in the UHF side. While keeping the function button pressed press the following sequence of buttons LAMP, SET, B, LAMP, 3. Once this is done 900 Mhz band should be open. To change bands press Func-Set, Func-3. 3. Once that's done now to open the TX part. Put your rig on VHF. Change your step size to 12.5, press CL(A) Press Func-8, Func-8, Func-7, Func-7 Func-MS.M Now you should have the + sign with out the T and the small inverted triangle on the display. Set your frequency to 145.00 Mhz Rotate the rotary knob and change the frequency to 144.9875. Press Func-SET, Func-ENT then CL. Now your rig should be able to transmit out of band. About 130Mhz to 176Mhz. This mod will disappear once the rig is reset. If the rig's ever reset you must do the mod sequence again. ============================================================================== From: This simple key-in sequence will enable the Standard 528 twin band HT to receive out of band signals up 999MHz. 1) enter UHF side (UHF is main) 2) enter VFO mode 3) push F + L (function key + light key) 4) then F + 0 (function key + zero key) 5) next F + code (funtion key + code key) 6) then F + L (function key + light key (again)) 7) next F + 3 (function key + three key) 8) then PTT (push to talk button) Now your in! To change bands you have to press F + 0 followed by F + 3, this is the toggle function. Each time you enter the F + 0 and F + 3 the receiver will jump bands. To get back to 440 (where you started from) keep using the toggle sequence. If you did something wrong and the HT losses its mind DON'T PANIC! Just push the microproc. reset button. I have done this keyboard entery mod to my HT and it works. The sensitivity isn't great, but you can pick up any- thing that has a strong signal. This information was obtained from the local Standard representitive in Chicago. ============================================================================== From: Lawrie.Brown@adfa.oz.au I too have a Standard C528 (as do quite a few of the other local amateurs here), and I'm very happy with it. In addition to the sequence you gave, there is also a (longer) sequence which enables wide-band transmit (how wide I don't know as I've no need to use it). There are also quite a few additional functions available off the keyboard from those documented. Appended below this is a table (which I keep as an Excel spreadsheet), listing the various functions in rather abbreviated form - I'd be very interested in learning about any others. Note the extra memory channels - there are actually 20 on each band, the upper 10 are accessed as shown below (accesed with a F+A prefix key, and displayed with a bar over the number). You can't use them in band scanning, but apart from that they function as normal memories. Standard C528 Keystroke Cheat-sheet Key\Seq key F+key Set,key Set,F+key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0 Set / Scan mode Mute beep Set freq limits 1 1 PTT Lock # Pager beeps 2sec xbRPT delay 2 2 Dual Operation 1 kHz entry Tone scan stop 3 3 TX Power Pager TX delay UHF band switch 4 4 Freq lock Squelch mute 4 digit entry 5 5 Battery save Auto Power save Mute pager audio 6 6 Tuning step Rotary enable in FL 1MHz step 7 7 Tone coder on/off Set Tone freq DTMF single tone 8 8 Repeater mode Set Offset freq Crossband RPT 9 9 Reverse mode LAMP is REV 10MHz up/down * PS step DOWN Dial/Tone Scan DTMF Clone # SHIFT step UP Memory freq shift Call Tone burst A CL Cancel B PAG Page on/off Page code set/show C MS MS.M Mem scan MS.M set/scan D V/M ENT Mem<->Dial Memory set VHF VHF main VHF only UHF UHF main UHF only LAMP Lamp on/off Lamp toggle SQL OFF Squelch off sub-band sql off Other Key Sequences ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wideband RX: Reset, VHF, F+0, F+D, PTT, UHF, F+L, F+0, F+B, F+L, F+3, PTT Wideband TX: VHF, F+6, PTT, F+8, F+8, F+7, F+7, F+C, rotate down 1, " F+0, F+D, PTT, F+8, F+C, F+0, F+4 (F+0, F+3)*4 Set Upper 10 Memory channels: F+D, F+A, num ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The 520/28 is very flexible capable of TX RX on 122.825 to 176.800MHz and 328.000 to 473.125MHz. And RX only on 820.225 to 972.500MHz. The following are not in the owners book. F=FUNC L=LIGHT ______________________________________ There are two ways to set Rx wide band if you press reset you will need this (A) 1 F + VHF 2 F + 0 3 F + D 4 RELEASE F 5 PRESS UHF 6 F + 0 7 F + D 8 F + L 9 F + B 10 F + 3 11 F + 0 12 F + 3 13 F + 0 14 F + 3 15 F + L TO CANCEL RESET? ______________________________________ (B) 1 F + 0 2 F + D 3 PTT ON 145.00MHz IS DISPLAYED 4 PRESS VHF 5 F + L 6 F + 0 7 F + B 8 F + L 9 F + 3 10 PTT ON 433.00MHz IS DISPLAYED TO CANCEL RESET? THE RX IS NOW WIDE BAND FOR TX CONTINUE BELOW ______________________________________ TX WIDE BAND PROCEDURE 1 VHF 2 F + 6 3 CHANGE FREQUENCY STEP FROM 10KHz TO 12.5KHz BY ROTARY SELECTOR 4 PTT ON 145.00MHz IS DISPLAYED 5 F + 8 6 F + 8 CONFIRM T AND + IN DISPLAY 7 F + 7 8 F + 7 9 F + C 10 SET 144.9875 BY ROTARY SELECTOR 11 CONFIRM THE SMALL 75 ON DISPLAY 12 F + 0 13 F + D 14 PTT ON 15 F + 8 16 F + C TO CANCEL RESET? _____________________________________ TO TOGGLE BETWEEN 3-400 AND 8-960 MHz 1 SET MAIN BAND TO UHF 2 F + 0 3 F + 3 ______________________________________ DIRECT 4 DIGIT KEY INPUT 1 F + 0 2 F + 4 DISPLAYS A . BETWEEN 2nd AND 3rd DIGIT TO CANCEL REPEAT ABOVE ______________________________________ 10 MHz SHIFT BY UP/DOWN KEYS 1 F + 0 2 F + 9 TO CANCEL REPEAT ABOVE ______________________________________ 40 CHANNALS MEMORY There are 2 memory channels per memory number on VHF and UHF. They can be used in 2 ways. (A)To provide programble RX TX frequencies (B)To double the simplex channels available (A) 1 SELECT RX FREQ (VFO MODE) 2 F + D 3 PRESS MEMORY NO TO BE PROGRAMMED 4 D 5 SELECT TX FREQUENCY 6 F + D 7 F + THE MEMORY NO TO BE PROGRAMMED + - will appear indicates that memory channel is in split frequency mode Once a memory is in split mode it cannot be changed back to a single memory unless its programmed as a extra channel (see below) or reset F + 9 WILL SWAP RX AND TX (B) Extend to 40 memories Program first 10 memories in each band to program additional 10 memories 1 SELECT FREQUENCY (VFO MODE) 2 F + D _ 3 F + A AN M WILL APPEAR 4 PRESS MEMORY NO TO BE PROGRAMMED To recall extra memories use rotary control in memory mode or enter memory mode and press F + A THE M AND BAR APPEARS PRESSING 0 to 9 will recall ex channels the ex channels can have rep shift and ctcss tones but value will be the same for both channels in one memory ______________________________________ DTMF CLONE COPYS YOUR SETTINGS TO ANOTHER 520/28 TUNE BOTH RADIOS TO SAME FREQUENCY 1 B P IS DISPLAYED 2 B C IS DISPLAYED 3 F + 0 4 F + PS 5 PTT ONLY ON THE RADIO THAT CONTAINS THE MEMORY DATA A series of tones will be heard for approx 2 minutes the radio memorys will now be identical ______________________________________ DTMF SINGLE TONE 1 F + 0 2 F + 7 TO CANCEL REPEAT ABOVE ______________________________________ MUTING THE AUDIO OUTPUT OF PAGER 1 F + 0 2 F + 5 TO CANCEL REPEAT ABOVE ______________________________________ TONE SQUELCH SCAN STOP 1 F + 0 2 F + 2 TO CANCEL REPEAT ABOVE ______________________________________ H.H.TRANSPONDER SUB BAND TO MAIN 1 F + 0 2 F + 8 A . APPEARS TOP RIGHT OF MEMORY NO TO CANCEL SET SUB BAND ON CLEAR FREQUENCY BY ROTARY SELECTOR AND PRESS UHF OR VHF _____________________________________ TOGGELS BETWEEN 100KHz AND 1MHz STEPS ON ROTARY SELECTOR WHEN FUNC IS PRESSED (FAST TUNING RATE) 1 F + 0 2 F + 6 _____________________________________ SET FREQUENCY LIMIT ON EACH BAND 1 F + 0 2 F + 0 ______________________________________ SET TX HANG DURING TRANAPONDER FUNC 1 F + 0 2 F + 1 ______________________________________ Be very carfull with the h.h.transponder and wide band tx func. G7IED @ GB7FCI ============================================================================== From: Subject: Standard C528A receiver mods (999MHz) To enable the Standard twin band HT to receive way out of band enter the following key-board sequence. First enter UHF side (UHF main) then enter VFO mode, now follow these steps.. 1) press F + L (function key + light key) 2) press F + 0 (function key + zero key) 2) press F + code (function key + code key) 3) press F + L (function key + light key (again)) 4) press F + 3 (function key + three key) 5) " " PTT (push to talk button (will not xmit)) now press the F + 0 (function key + zero key) and the F + 3 (function key + three key) to toggle bands. i.e. you are starting out at 440MHz, push the F + 0 and F + 3. Now you should be at 840MHz. If you want to get back to 440MHz keep pushing the toggle sequence and your wish will come true. ============================================================================== Hi All, another mode from Elio IK4NYY. I would like to thank him for the mod plus a very big Thanks to Steve's (G8SFR) Xyl Alison for retypeing out the mod for me into English. This has been sent mainly as a guide and that i can not be of any help if you run into trouble, but i bet there are more tec minded people that can help you. De Steve G0OMM @ GB7OMM.#34.GBR.EU With this simple mod, you can upgrade your Standard C520/528 using rechargable batteries without having to spend a lot. You will need to get 6 rechargeables of 600\700 mah, a resister of 33ohm 2 watt and two diodes of 1 amp type 1N4004. Start by taking off the outside cover. To open the transceiver, you need to remove the small metal plate where you will find the battery pack held in place by 4 little screws, the cross-headed screws mounted laterally on the back. It's all you have to do, the transceiver will open. Carefully open the two parts holding together from the flat cable upon which half you should find the finger control/keyboard and a long wire approx 7 cms. You can't miss it, it's the only wire there is. Now, from the point where this is soldered onto the lower, bottom part of the transceiver, solder a small piece of wire about 3 or 4cms. The other end should be soldered to the PCB where there is a large/fat/wide soldered little square (PCB Track?) which also cannot be missed tacking as orientation the connector from the external power supply: The said little square stands on its own and with this the mod on the inside of the apparatus are complete and can now recharge them Now let us look at the battery pack (Model CBT 151). Open the two parts and take out only that one where you see the sign + (positive). Note where the first battery is, its positive pole resting on the little metallic tab( tongue) having the shape and the characteristics of a corner angle slipped off from its housing towards the top. Do not worry, it is only fixed in and divides with cutters in the middle of the corner/angle. Be careful when separating with the cutters, The two parts may tend to fall apart, thus, if you are not careful you can lose a piece. If this happens, do not worry , but be very careful that this does not happen. Take the smallest piece, namely that which is mounteed next to the + symbol and solder on top of the terminals the two diodes in series opposite in between, namely an anode and a cathode. Mind that the pieces of the terminals are chromed metal, ie, on the point when you intend to solder the join, it is necessary you clean in a bit first with a thin sanding paper, solder it and try to slide it away; you can also help by using some soldering flux such as a deoxydising one. Do this soldering, solder the diodes to the very edges of the resister (divie the leads furthest most extreme side k cathode diod-resistance). Now remount the first piece on the capaciter moulded sockets of resistor of 33 ohms and diodes so that they can be fixed in the restricted space at the side of the first battery. Also replace the other piece of the metal tab onto place and solder it on top of the terminal along the resister (on to which is attached :- A anode of the diode. That is basically it. One last thing, make absolutely sure that there exists no kind of electrical contact from the two metal tabs from your solders. Mount on the battery carriers the six rechargeable batteries, check again the whole thing and connect on the switch of the external feeder/power supply a voltage of 10 to 12 volts and let the batteries charge up. The apparatus can then work on batteries and with the power supply; When working with the latter, The batteries will just charge up, In spite of all the modification... ============================================================================== From: dplumb@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Plumb) Standard C520/C528 Modifications ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This file is a compendium from to others being bandied about the place. It is hoped this will be the better of them, being the easiest to follow! o To open up the rx only up on the unit on VHF: VHF F+0 F+D o To add 320-400MHz, 400-480MHz, 820-900MHz, 900-980MHz: UHF F+L F+0 F+B F+L F+3 A o To Expand Tx/Rx coverage, do both the above in that order, then: VHF F+6 change step to 12.5MHz A F+8 F+8 F+C Tune down to 144.9875 F+0 F+D PTT F+8 F+C o To Store independent transmit/receive frequency in one channel: Enter receive frequency into dial F+D Enter transmit frequency into dial F+D F+A F+ A o To Clear the tx assignment offset: F+D F+A +A F+A A o To Clone one set to another: B B F+0 F+PS then key up on the set to clone from Set mode key assignments: The set mode allows a number of user parameters to be customised according to individual taste. Set mode is initiated by pressing F+0. The following are entered after going into set mode: 0 Turns off the beep tones on each keypress F+0 Sets band edge limits, i.e. 0079=100-179, 400-479. 3060=130-160 1 Changes count of paging operations tone, one beep or 5 F+1 Set tx delay on carrier drop when using as cross-band repeater 2 Enables entry of the 1kHz figure on direct keypad entry F+2 Stop scan on busy channel even if CTCSS doesn't match 3 Sets mod delay on paging Tx to either 450ms or 750ms F+3 Switch UHF bands between 300/400/800/900 4 Mutes short noises during squelch operation F+4 Keypad entry of 4 digit or 3 digit frequency 5 Turns on and off the auto power off function F+5 Pager Audio Mute (effectively disables pager) 6 Enable/Disable the rotary channel knob when keypad locked F+6 Fast tune (F+KNOB) gives either 1MHz steps, or 100kHz 7 Sets the CTCSS tone frequency F+7 Either Dual Tone Multi Frequency, or Single Tone Frequency 8 Sets the offset repeater frequency F+8 Cross Band Repeater Enable/Disable (Identified on display by a ".") 9 Changes the LAMP button into the REV button F+9 Up and Down keys either act as the knob, or as 10MHz steps. Quick Chart: /---------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Standard C520/528 - Keypad Guide | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Key| Alone | With "FUNC" key | Key alone in set |In Set With "F" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 0 | 0 |Enter Set Mode |Mute keypad bleep |Set Band Edge Limit| | 1 | 1 |Disable Transmitter |1/5 beeps when paged|Tx wait on c-b rept| | 2 | 2 |Dual Watch Operation|1kHz entry on keypad|CTCSS Scan Stop | | 3 | 3 |Select Output Power |Tx Delay on repeater|Switch UHF Bands | | 4 | 4 |Frequency Lock |Mute during squelch |4/3 digit direct fr| | 5 | 5 |Battery Saver Mode |Automatic powr off |Pager Audio Mute | | 6 | 6 |Select Step Size |Enable tune in lock |Fast tune 1MHz/100k| | 7 | 7 |CTCSS select TX/RX |CTCSS tone frequency|Single/Dual tone MF| | 8 | 8 |Repeater Shift +/- |Set Tx/Rx split freq|Cross Band Repeater| | 9 | 9 |Reverse Split |Make LAMP button REV|Up/Dn keys do 10MHz| | * |Step Down|Search 1MHz band | | | | # |Step Up |Memory Shift | | | | A |Cancel | | | | | B |Pager On |Set Pager Codes | | | | C |Mem Scan |Partial Memory Scan | | | | D |Dial/Mem |Store Dial In Memory| |Extend RX coverage | |VHF|Tx VHF |Enable VHF Only | | | |UHF|Tx UHF |Enable UHF Only | | | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To expand Rx coverage only | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | VHF F+0 F+D | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To add 320-400,400-480,820-900,900-980 | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | UHF F+L F+0 F+B F+L F+3 A | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To Expand Tx and Rx coverage: | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | VHF F+0 F+D A ; Extends RX coverage | | UHF F+L F+0 F+B F+L F+3 A ; Gives 300/800/900MHz | | VHF F+6 step to 12.5MHz A ; This appears to set a special condition | | F+8 F+8 F+C ; within the unit which is stored with F+C. | | tune down to 144.9875 ; All params must be correct for it to work | | F+0 F+D PTT F+8 F+C ; And Store it | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To store independent transmit and receive frequency in one memory channel | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Enter receive frequency into dial | | F+D | | Enter transmit frequency into dial | | F+D F+A F+ A | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To remove independent transmit frequency from memory | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | F+D F+A +A F+A A | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | To clone one set to another | |---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | B B F+0 F+PS on both sets, and PTT on the one to clone from | \---------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ============================================================================== From: dplumb@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Plumb) the mod for the C528 it's: VHF F+0 F+D UHF F+L F+0 F+B F+L F+3 A The "L" is the light, F+L means press function, and while pressing function, press the "Light" button. The above sequence opens up the set for rx for all limits. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:32 1996 From: sid@comptech.airtime.co.uk Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: computer scanner Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 18:55:00 GMT Message-ID: <4o6p1g$d7u@neon.airtime.co.uk> anybody got any computer scanner for mobile telephones From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:35 1996 From: Harold Hackman Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Dayton Hamvention Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 21:38:18 -0700 Message-ID: <31A3EBBA.2B8B@earthlink.net> References: <31a247e5.35972246@news.erinet.com> Ken Gunton wrote: > > Let's congratulate the Hamvention organizers for moving the date to > three weeks later! The weather was near perfect! Attendance seemed to > be good, and there were DEALS TO BE HAD! I bought two 6146's for my > SB-102 (first time I've replaced the tubes since I built the xcvr in > 1969!) for $10.00 each and they work fine. > > A new, higher output battery pack for my Kenwood TR-2500, and new > Nicads for my Drake TR-22 rounded out my needed items. > > Wanted goodies included a new SW rcvr for my ham-to-be son, and an HF > vertical antenna and a length of RG59, then on to the computer stuff. > 16 Meg 60ns w/parity for $169 was good, so I got two. That was all the > money I had for the day, so I looked for microwave goodies. There were > more microwave components at this show than at any other. Where else > could you find Narda directional couplers for $25.00 (brand new > condition, recent pulls from new equipment), or RLC SP6T switches for > $75.00. > > All in all, a very successful show, and the weather really helped. > > See you all next year. > > Regards, > > Ken Gunton WB6QWF TL Distributing - Microwave and RF Components > CAGE Code 01DH7 http://www.erinet.com/kenny/microwave.htmlAs well, the DARA group did a great job with traffic and all the other assorted problems that must have come up. I enjoyed myself and talked to lots of other folks who did too. Regards, Harold KE6TVO From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:36 1996 From: mcinnis@austin.ibm.com (Mickey McInnis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: DFjr Date: 23 May 1996 20:46:39 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4o2irf$2758@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Reply-To: mcinnis@austin.ibm.com Has anyone bought the new DFjr direction finder and used it yet? It sounds great, but I'm waiting to hear from other satisfied customers before I buy. If you did get one, was it a beta test unit or regular production? And if you want to know what a DFjr is, try http://home.navisoft.com/agrelo/page20.htm -- Mickey McInnis - mcinnis@austin.ibm.com -- All opinions expressed are my own opinions, not my company's opinions. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:37 1996 From: Crum Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: DFjr radio direction finder, frequency selection Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 18:00:39 -0600 Message-ID: <31AA4227.51A6@xmission.com> The DFjr sounds pretty cool, but even after reading the web pages in detail, it is not clear to me how one selects the frequency that the DFjr listens to. I don't see any frequency selection user interface. It doesn't require a radio to be connected to it, does it? The web pages I'm talking about are: http://home.navisoft.com/agrelo/page11.htm http://home.navisoft.com/agrelo/page20.htm From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:37 1996 From: Crum Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: DFjr radio direction finder, frequency selection Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 18:10:26 -0600 Message-ID: <31AA4472.665C@xmission.com> References: <31AA4227.51A6@xmission.com> To: ejlarson@concentric.net Right after I clicked on "Send" to post that article, I saw that the answer to my question was right at the top of one of those web pages I referenced. It says "Using your reciever, the DFjr can locate FM radio signals..." Oh well. Boy, news.xmission.com can sure posts messages quickly when you don't want it to. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:38 1996 From: duane@rci.ripco.COM (Duane Whittingham) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Does anyone have a schematic for dj-162 Date: 25 May 96 00:41:04 GMT Message-ID: References: <199605240846.BAA26938@.mail.ucsd.edu> Reply-To: duane@ripco.com Does anyone have a schematic for a Alinco DJ-162 ht. -Duane -- >>>> Duane Whittingham - N9SSN - Dedicated to TVRO & Radio Broadcasting! <<<< duane@ripco.com (MHGC -- Damian Smith) >>>> Tom & Darryl Show On Hiatus Will it & TTN Return? Watch this Space! <<<< From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:39 1996 From: Jacques Patry Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Ever heard of this? Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 18:41:18 -0400 Message-ID: <31A2468E.4D06@ultranet.com> References: <319FE9FB.3F70@southwind.net> Ken Bessler (KG0WX) wrote: > > I picked up a mag mount antenna the other day. It is made by Motorola > and called "Mocat". The antenna resonates on 10m and works quite well. > Has anyone ever heard of this antenna? What band was it designed for? > -- > > Ken Bessler KG0WX > Design Services Company > http://www2.southwind.net/~kg0wx > Model railroad designingThe Motorola MOCAT w as a CB radio. Gee wonder why it works on 10meters. That was a good find. 73! jacques From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:40 1996 From: kos@fastlane.net (Rick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FS: ATV EQUIPMENT - CHEAP! Date: 25 May 1996 06:19:24 GMT Message-ID: I have the following Amateur Television equipment available, all in AS-NEW condition and guaranteed to work: P.C. Electronics TX70-1 70 CM ATV XMTR, New: $259 Sell for: $150 P.C. Electronics KPA5-E, 70 CM ATV xmtr board, New: $169 Sell for: $95 P.C. Electronics TXA5-70, ATV exciter/modulator, NEVER USED, New: $89 Sel l for $60 P.C. Electronics FMA5-F Audio Subcarrier Generator, NEVER USED, New: $39 Sell for: $25 P.C. Electronics PA5 10-watt P.E.P. ATV Power Amp, Drive directly with TXA5-70 (above) or TX70-1 or KPA5-E with small attenuator. NEVER USED, New:$89 Sell for: $65 AEA "Hot Rod" end-fed half-wave telescoping UHF antenna w/BNC connector, NEVER USED. Still in unopened package. New $23. Sell for $15 Panasonic Model WV-F2 Pro Color CCD camera with 10-pin VHS connector, $75 Panasonic PK-452B Newvicon Color Video Camera, with 10-pin VHS connector, like new, rarely used, manual $75 E-mail kos@fastlane.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:41 1996 From: Jerry Hogsett Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT 50 R vs IC T7 a Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 08:16:30 -0400 Message-ID: <31AAEE9E.1933@hogsett.com> References: David Edger wrote: > It is so rugged that I believe it will stand up to really > rough use better than the T7A > I went out to my car this weekend to see my FT-50R lying face down in the pavement. It has fallen out an hour earlier when I left the car to go into a friend's house. The speaker grill area looks scratched up, but it still works fine. I feel lucky that some kid didn't come along and take it! -- +------------------------------------------------------------ | Jerry Hogsett (home) jerry@hogsett.com | | POB 636 Redwood City CA 94064 (work) jhogs@micrografx.com | | (500)-G-HOGSETT http://www.hogsett.com | ------------------------------------------------------------+ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:42 1996 From: gooch Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc Subject: Ft 51r mods wanted Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 19:37:59 -0600 Message-ID: <31A3C177.3E8E@burgoyne.com> Reply-To: gooch@burgoyne.com if anyone knows about any mods for this radio please contact me From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:44 1996 From: Jim Nance Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-1000 Expert Needed!! Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 05:02:05 -0700 Message-ID: <31A6F6BD.4403@one.net> References: <319E8728.5A4B@snet.net> <31a019e7.32547450@nuhou.aloha.net> <4nsjv6$66v@news.syspac.com> dnorris@k7no.com wrote: > > ed@aloha.net (ed) wrote: > > >TDE wrote: > > >>My piece of !$#@ FT-1000 is off frequency about 50 cycles or so. Drives > >>me nuts, love to be exact. Looking for any info on tweaking it back > >>into place. Can this be done easily enough, or is it stricltly a > >>factory job? Thanks very much!!! - Rick, N1SQJ > > >There's a trimmer in the hole on the TXCO, if you have that option, or > >probably in the master oscillator circuit, if you don't. You can > >zero-beat on WWV if you turn the IF shift all the way to the bassy > >side with an SSB mode selected (use headphones to hear the zero beat > >clearly). Make sure the set's fully warmed up before adjusting. > >Ed- AH6MI > > You don't have to listen to zero beat. It is easier and more accurate > to switch alternatively between USB and LSB and adjust the trimmer > until both sidebands exhibit the same tone. > > cdn > > C. Dean Norris > Amateur Radio Station K7NO > e-mail to dnorris@k7no.com > http://www.syspac.com/~dnorris/ Swithing between sidebands usb and lsb is not the proper way to set the master oscillator. You are probally thinking of the way to set the carrier points without test equipment. If you want to be accurate and apparently the original post is if they are concerned about 50 cycles. Forget WWV and set the freq. with an accurate frequency counter. 73 de KE4WY (Usually dosn't get involved) From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:45 1996 From: CSLE87@email.mot.com (Karl Beckman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-10R Mods?? Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 09:26:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4nqbcb$u3o@sol.caps.maine.edu> In article <4nqbcb$u3o@sol.caps.maine.edu>, newman@maine.maine.edu (Bryan D. Newman) wrote: > Are there any Mods out for the FT-10R? I specifically want ot open up > the transmit so that I can use it at work also. As an amateur operator you should already be aware that use of non-FCC Type accepted equipment is NOT permitted on commercial channels. Being found in violation of the rules could cost you your amateur license and your employer could lose his industrial radio license. This could mean that you'd also be looking for a new employer. -- Karl Beckman, P.E. < If our English language is so > Motorola Private Data Systems < precise, why do you drive on the > Schaumburg, IL / Parma, OH < parkway and park on the driveway? > (847) 576-0992 / (216) 265-2092 ** Opinions expressed here do NOT represent the views of Motorola Inc. ** -- Amateur radio WA8NVW NavyMARS NNN0VBH @ NOGBN.NOASI From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:46 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: Michael M Long Subject: ft-50r Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 14:02:56 GMT Hello everyone, I just recently purchased an FT-54r and am so far very happy with it. However, I think I have a problem with the beep function. The beeps soudn VERY distorted through the speaker. Has anyone else had this problem? I can turn the volume down to the point where I can barely hear them, then they sound fine. Anyone have this problem? michael long "The World is an illusion created by a conspiracy of our senses." -Roger Penrose From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: Michael M Long Subject: ft-50r Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 15:51:11 GMT I just got an FT-50r and am confused about one of the funtions. The knob function is SFT 24, which the manual does not talk about. In the back, it says that it sets the CPU shift, so don't change it. If it is so important, why make it a knob function that someone could accidentally chage. Anyone know what this actually does? michael long "The World is an illusion created by a conspiracy of our senses." -Roger Penrose From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:49 1996 From: Jerry Hogsett Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: ft-50r Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 12:38:49 -0400 Message-ID: <31A73799.3AEF@hogsett.com> References: Michael M Long wrote: > > I just got an FT-50r and am confused about one of the funtions. > The knob function is SFT 24, which the manual does not talk > about. In the back, it says that it sets the CPU shift, so don't change > it. If it is so important, why make it a knob function that someone could > accidentally chage. Anyone know what this actually does? > michael long > > "The World is an illusion created by a conspiracy of our senses." > > -Roger Penrose I've changed it and not detected any differences. The technical supplement of fers no help in the matter. My guess is it does *nothing*. -- +------------------------------------------------------------ | Jerry Hogsett (home) jerry@hogsett.com | | POB 636 Redwood City CA 94064 (work) jhogs@micrografx.com | | (500)-G-HOGSETT http://www.hogsett.com | ------------------------------------------------------------+ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:50 1996 From: jrw4@ix.netcom.com (JRW) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-530 Date: Wed, 29 May 96 20:07:34 GMT Message-ID: <4oiajf$eis@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> References: <4ohs4u$gll$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> In article <4ohs4u$gll$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com>, David L. Williams < 74673.3553@CompuServe.COM> wrote: >I have a FT-530 that I modified about 2 years ago to receive (it >might also transmitt) comercial frequencies. I haven't used it in >a while and now the batteries are dead. The part I can't remember >is when you first turn it on you need to hold down a couple of >buttons to finish the modification. Does anyone remember how to >do this? > >David Williams >Dwilliam@ksjo.com >KD6QPR > >-- >David Williams Hold down both arrow keys while powering-on (this also resets the CPU & erases all memories) -jrw4 Get PAID for SAVING MONEY?!?! and/or *CHEAP* Internet Access !!! http://www.cognigen.com/f/fci.cgi?wa9431673.html From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:51 1996 From: bduxbury@zetnet.co.uk (Sir Barry Duxbury) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT1000MP CAT Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 09:03:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4o963e$uqf@roch.zetnet.co.uk> Does anyone know if CAT software exists yet for the 1000MP ? I am using Turbolog which allows a limited link from and to the PC, but does not support thr full 1000MP facilities.-- Barry Duxbury bduxbury@zetnet.co.uk 100031.2223@compuserve G4GAH Oxford UK From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:52 1996 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: T. Ronald Davis Subject: RE: ft50 / ic7 Message-ID: <01bb4a57.be292bc0$354060cc@dell100> Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 17:33:19 GMT References: <4nt7i5$b2m@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> sorry I can't address the ic7 but let me put another glowing report in on the FT50R. I bought the FT50-41R (5w) -- love it -- very impressive features and performance. Two things to remember -- it has an SMA connector - so you should order a SMA/BNC adapter to be able to use your existing antennas ($8). I also -- immediately went back and ordered the the FTT-12 keyboard option ($64) - Gives you voice recording/playback, DTMF code squelch and CTCSS decode capabilities. ============ A week or so ago I posted an article about the ft50r and the icom ic 7. So far I have had glorious reports on the ft50, But know one with an ic 7 answered... On Tuesday, May 21, 1996, Joel Lessenberry wrote... > A week or so ago I posted an article about the ft50r and the > icom ic 7. So far I have had glorious reports on the ft50, > > > But know one with an ic 7 answered... > > > Anyone care to defend their rig? > > joel > > > > From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:53 1996 From: markn9srt@aol.com (Mark N9SRT) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Ft50 and ic 7 Date: 29 May 1996 09:17:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4ohioc$q74@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <199605211842.OAA09109@serve.tech.mis.cfc.com> Reply-To: markn9srt@aol.com (Mark N9SRT) I have a Yaesu FT51R, and an Icom IC-T7A. (Also an Icom IC-T22A, but it's not a dual-bander). I wasn't too fired up about the modern styling of the T7A, but over a few weeks it dosen't look quite so futuristic; I like it now... I carry the T7A because it is MUCH smaller than the 51R, if both radios have the 12-volt packs... the Yaesu is small with the smaller battery pack, but you can't get 5 watts out of it then. The Icom just gets heavier, not larger. If you don't neet 5W, use the battery that comes with it (gives you 3W) and it is SO LIGHT! A voltage meter comes on for a few seconds when you power up the radio. The Yaesu can be displayed continuously. Both have AM air RX. Icom has (4) sets of programmable scan pairs, and built in pairs (all 144, all 440). I wish the T7A had alphanumeric display (like the T22A), but I use the memories to compensate (10's for local police zones 1-13 (Chicago) 20's for 2-meter, 40's for 440, 50's and 60's for travelling). Bar far the most simple radio I have ever owned to program. Both the Yeasu and Icom offer programming software (Yaesu is Windows and really nice, Icom is DOS and not as pretty, but functional. I find the sliding lock switch kind of strange, but I don't use wide variety of lock combinations... only PTT, PTT and freq, more combinations than I care to go into. My Icom accessories (HM-46 mike ( I REALLY like this mike, small and TOUGH... the plug is short so there's not a lot of leverage on the jack, the HUGE plug on the Yaesu display mike scares the crap out of me) and the headset) work with my T22A, and worked with my 2-SAT... nice not to have to buy all new stuff for each radio. The T7A has an automatic squelch (that can be adjusted, but seems to work quite nicely, so I haven't had to), and a volume KNOB instead of the up/down buttons of the Yeasu FT51R... personal preference, but it seems like the steps on the buttons are just a little above or below what I want. The tone scan feature is nice... I can use it on RX of public service (police, fire) and see the PL tone (like I have any use for that info...). You can only use one band at a time with the Icom, but I hardly ever used the dual RX in the Yaesu anyway. No "function" key, the keys have two uses depending on whether you press and release, or press and hold before releasing. My only gripes are: No alphanumeric, and the case has a cutout to let you use the sliding lock switch, and stuff gets in through that cutout, kind of defeats the purpose... I just use the case from the T22A - no cutout. The T22A and the T7A use the same batteries, too. BONUS! Hope Icom makes this a standard battery for a while. The Yaesu has a really nice display, alphanumerics, on-board help (Icom has on-board help displays too... I don't understand why no user-programmed alphanumerics), a lighted keypad, and a really trick lighted display mike, with freq readout, and remote control. The Yaesu has been a good radio, but the Icom seems to be more in a smaller package. I'm selling my FT50R to my brother this weekend... does that help? :-) Mark N9SRT@aol.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:55 1996 From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT50-R Yaesu: NO FIX Date: 25 May 1996 11:45:25 GMT Message-ID: <4o6rsl$t45$1@mhafc.production.compuserve.com> One of the guys on CompuServe HamNet got ahold of an early version of the software interface that was just released and it is a little buggy - Seems tha t the code for the European version is in there and his FT-50R now has restored CELLULAR coverage! This is not a joke; I'm waiting to hear back from him to see if there's some obvious way to tell if you are buying the early version or not. (He now has the new code available to him, too.) I'm also waiting to see if we lose anything. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:55 1996 From: eugene@loop.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Ham listings Date: 25 May 96 18:37:57 GMT Message-ID: <199605251837.LAA03684@patty.loop.net> Please subscribe me to the mailing listing! E. Joe Orrico WB6HRO From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:56 1996 From: tegennett@hfs.purdue.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Heil Pro headsets? Date: Sat, 25 May 96 09:13:51 PDT Message-ID: References: <4o6u8p$1af0@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> I have been using one for about 6 months. Can't remember the mic element's number but it's the one recommended for contesting, not casual rag chewing. I have gotten good audio reports. If you are going to buy a Heil I strongly recommend you borrow one from a friend and wear use it for several hours at a time, as you would in a contest situation. I tried mine on in the store and it felt great. But after wearing for several hours I found it very uncomfortable. My ear's don't stick out ver y far from my head (at least I don't think they do!!!) but I wish there was more space between the outside of the earcushion and the flat plastic plate that holds the speaker. Or maybe thicker foam on the plastic plate. I hope to experiment with this in the near future, to see if thicker foam or a denser foam makes a difference. Other than the comfort issue, I like mine just fine. Previously used a hand mic (when operating SSB) and an old pair or Rat Schack hi fi stereo headphones however, so I don't have much to compare to. > > Any opinions on the Heil Pro Headset? > Likes and dislikes, is it worth the money? > Any preference on the mic elements. I Dx and contest, but dislike harsh > audio. > Thanks for you input > > 73, Jim > > From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:57 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: HR 2600 Service Manual needed. Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 18:09:02 GMT Message-ID: <4oi7cj$l4k@nadine.teleport.com> References: <4od24g$2nq@news.mcn.net> vfiscus@mcn.net (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL) wrote: >I need the service manual for the Uniden(President) HR 2600. >I'll Pay Copy costs and postage for mailing. >73 de KB7ADL >vfiscus@mcn.net You should be able to order it from Uniden. Go to their web page at: www.uniden.com and get the number for ordering parts. Steve WB7PSD From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:58 1996 From: 100427.1601@compuserve.com (Pascal Levasseur) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC 820H is it worth of buying? Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 17:36:24 GMT Message-ID: <4o7gc0$f38@hil-news-svc-3.compuserve.com> References: <4o015l$kju@perjantai.hit.fi> <31a3b1a8.8265177@news.hayburn.com> dkaylor@hayburn.com (Dave Kaylor) wrote: >On 22 May 1996 21:32:37 GMT, mjappine@news.hit.fi (Mika Antero >Jäppinen) wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >> I am looking for anything like bugs or good to know about >> this Icoms dualband-multimode rig IC-820H. It is cheapest >> of such rigs (containing 2m/70cm multimode) and is quide >> new. For exp. Yeasu still sells it 736 which is quide old >> and others like kenwoods 790 is not so simple to use.. >> >> I had heard roomers that 820 has lack of RF capabilities >> on its receiver ?! >> >> Well anyway if you might have some experience or have heard >> about it let me know, that I won't trow my money to something >> that doesnt work well.. >> >> I have Yaesu ft290r2 and I am quide satisfied to it but I would >> like to have also multimode for 70cm (satellite working) >> and f I buy single band rig it wuold cost me same or little more.. >> And with transvertes and so on it is allways hassle with cables.. >> >> Antero Jappinen Email mjappine@maanantai.hit.fi >> Packet OH2LJH@OH2BAR.FIN.EU >> >> >> >If you are interested in the 820 you might want to wait a little while >the have come out with a 821 which has some updates over the 820. So >if you are looking to buy one I would check with icom on the new one >and the differences. Good Luck. 73 de Dave. I am also interrested in buying an satellite tranceiver. The 820 looks to me even more attractive if a a new version is delivered to the market. It means potential second hand opportunities. So, I would like to know your opinion if you have the oportunity to use the 82Oh as a 9600b stellite packet tranceiver. 73 PASCAL LEVASSEUR Packet: F1UZE@F5KAT.FMLR.FR.EU Internet : 100427.1601@compuserve.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:42:59 1996 From: mc@shore.net (Michael Crestohl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-706 Mods? Date: 24 May 1996 06:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4o426j$ib4@northshore.shore.net> References: <4ntv75$7lq@news2.delphi.com> <4o1mn2$6hm@news.halcyon.com> From what I have read the "yellow wire" mod is to improve RECEPTION on the VHF portion of the IC-706's coverage, not add general coverage transmit capabilities. I have not performed either mod and do not plan to do them as I have no need for out-of-band transmit and an excellent scanner that covers VHF and UHF. These mods would most likely invalidate the warranty. I bought the IC-706 for mobile HF - but boatanchors are my main interest! 73, Michael Crestohl, KH6KD/W1 mc@shore.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:01 1996 From: Jim Nance Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-781 mods Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 18:11:39 -0700 Message-ID: <31AA52CB.7447@one.net> References: <4o6u8p$1af0@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> <31A99904.3CE5@castle.net> To: Larry Harding Larry I know of none. Only problem I am aware of is a conponent in the PS that could come loose during shipping and this was the very early models. 73 de KE4WY Larry Harding wrote: > > James Brannigan wrote: > Does anyone have the mods for Icom 781s. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:03 1996 From: clinton.peebles@saloon.bcbbs.net (Clinton Peebles) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: icom IC-2SAT Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 13:19:00 GMT Message-ID: <96052705413812401@saloon.bcbbs.net> Distribution: world References: T>I have a IC-2SAT 144 meg hand-held. I want to use the radio in my car T>while traveling cross country. Can I make up a cable from the 12v DC of T>the car to my hand held, or do I need to buy a special cable from ICOM? If you can get a plug to fit the radio you should be able to make one up. --- þ QMPro 1.53 þ Procrastination Day Has Been Postponed! From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:04 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: raf@dwroll.att.com (D434-Richard_A_Ferguson(Richard)x82612) Subject: Re: Ignition noise problem Message-ID: Reply-To: raf@dwroll.att.com References: <4oeti5$rvo@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 14:13:20 GMT From article <4oeti5$rvo@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>, by Cecil Moore : > Mike Lazaroff wrote: > > : Any ideas? This one is really beginning to bug me...have never had a > : car give me as hard a time as this one is. > > Hi Mike, I have a similar problem with an S10 Pickup and > IC-706. My problem is only there when going uphill and > goes away when going downhill. Any ideas out there? > > 73, Cecil, KG7BK (W6RCA soon), OOTC > Ignition noise increases at higher engine output, consistent with going uphill. To suppress ignition noise, cover the sparkplug wires with tubular copper braid, grounded to the block. Ignition noises usually are a popping sound. Richard Ferguson, KA0DXM My opinions are my own,not those of my employer. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:05 1996 From: NJC@WARWICK.NET (Nick J Chiarchiaro, AET / N2QXF) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Info Moto advisor pager Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 13:53:18 GMT Message-ID: <4o73om$1l7@news1.warwick.net> anyone know the pinout of the advisor series pager? Need the connections fromt he RIB boxx to the pager tnx Nick From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:05 1996 From: Neal McEwen Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Info needed on Vibroplex Kevers Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 20:40:21 -0700 Message-ID: <31A92425.157B@metronet.com> References: <4n7poa$m8_001@news.ni.net> To: Greg Wittig Greg Wittig wrote: > > Is there any info on how to date Vibroplex Morse keyers? I have two I believ e > are old both have grey basses one is a paddle type its serial number is 1264 33 > the other is a button type and it says Zephyre on the bottom. For info on Vibroplex bugs check out my Telegraph WWW page shown below -- 73 de K5RW, Neal McEwen nmcewen@metronet.com - Richardson, TX (Dallas) Telegraph Key Collector and Historian Web Page http://fohnix.metronet.com/~nmcewen/ref.html From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:06 1996 From: Paul O'Connor Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Kenwood for sale Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 03:26:03 -0400 Message-ID: <31AAAA8B.1151@epix.net> Listed items are for sale prices as listed plus shipping. 1. Kenwood 440S/Tuner $800.00 2. Kenwood 430S $550.00 3. Kenwood PS430 Power supply $100.00 4. Timewave DSP-9.............$100.00 5. Kenwood IF232 (2)...........$50.00 6. MFJ-492 Memory keyer........$50.00 7. Hayes Optima 14400 modem...$100.00 8. Vibroplex Original bug..... $90.00 9. Gap Voyager DX-4 Antenna...$200.00 Please reply e-mail or 717-232-1015. -- If the news is bad......SHOOT the messenger! Paul O'Connor A.R.S. N3OYB 1405 Smokehouse Lane Harrisburg, Pa. 17110 From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:07 1996 From: doc@dxnet.com (Anthony O. Cardenas ~ WA6IGJ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Larsen glass mount antennas Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 00:46:28 GMT Message-ID: <319d1a33.3929389@news.dxnet.com> References: <5e7cc$11271c.2ce@NEWS> <4nd2v8$3m2@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> Truth is... The 'thru-the-glass' antenna(s) uses two plates as capacity-coupling between the coax and antenna. It will never equal the efficiency of a direct connection to the active element (period). Tony WA6IGJ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:08 1996 From: "dr. personality" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: LOOKING FOR 2-220-440 Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 01:36:03 -0700 Message-ID: I am looking for some 2 meter + 220 + 440 gear. Being I am on limited funds I can't expect much. Being medically depended on others is a real pain. however if you know where i can obtain a radio pleae let me know. thakns 73's KE6SSO From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:09 1996 From: x0schech@ti.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Looking for SRF2926 Transistor Date: 29 May 1996 05:38:56 GMT Message-ID: <4ogntg$6d2@news-f.iadfw.net> References: <4od7hf$as8@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> In article <4od7hf$as8@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>, markem@primenet.com says... > >I'm trying to locate a SRF2926 transistor to repair the PA in a UHF repeater. >I can't find them listed in any of my catalogs (which are not extensive). >Anyone know of a source or replacement for them? Anyone have any spares laying >around? It's a late 70's vintage Aerotron unit, if that helps. > >Thanks & 73... Mark AA7TA What you've got is a Motorola transistor that was a "special". SRF's usually have a standard counterpart (such as an MRF455 in the case of an HF power transistor) but were house-marked for a particular company's application due to a special requirement. They may be graded for a certain beta range or, more likely in your case, for having more tightly controlled UHF parameters than a standard MRF part would have from any given lot. Sometimes, companies have parts specially marked just to discourage copycats. The silly part is that these special parts often have the Motorola "bug" printed right on the top (although Motorola probably won't release the actual cross reference information for one of their customer's source control drawings). WHat you might do is get hold of an old Motorola RF Devices handbook and just do some detective work. You probably know the output power and frequency range of the device; you know or can measure the Vcc (and double it to put you in the ballpark of the proper Vcex ratings for a Class-C UHF power amp). THe case type is obtainable by simple observation and comparison to what's in the catalog.With this info, you can generally cross-reference the device to a standard part with a minimum amount of trouble and with a high degree of certainty. Hope this helps! 73's Geoff NQ7A From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:10 1996 From: moritz@ipers1.e-technik.uni-stuttgart.de () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Looking for ultra-compact HF xceiver Date: 29 May 1996 11:30:34 GMT Message-ID: <4ohcgq$l3i@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <4of1gu$d7f@yarrow.wt.com.au> In article <4of1gu$d7f@yarrow.wt.com.au>, bruce varley wrote: >I am looking for the most compact possible HF SSB set, for backpacking >into remote areas. Consider the Ten-Tec Scout 555. It has a good receiver, 50W out, and a very low price. It can be operated for a long time from a moderate battery and incorporates a SWR meter. Several hams reported good results with it. 73, Moritz DL5UH From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:11 1996 From: boardman@cobra.unm.edu (Bob Boardman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: LOUD Astron PS?? Date: 28 May 1996 21:51:19 GMT Message-ID: <4ofsgn$ko6@lynx.unm.edu> Reply-To: boardman@cobra.unm.edu I recently picked up an Astron 20 amp PS at a local swap meet, and I have some questions for other Astron owners. I checked the voltage, and it checked out OK, but when I hooked it up at home and keyed up a rig that draws 8 amps or so, the PS went from quiet (no load) to making a VERY loud 60hz hum when the current draw went up. I mean loud enough to hear at the other end of the house! People I talked to also heard a 60 hz hum. At first I thought they were just hearing the audio hum, but after getting far enough away from the PS so that the hum wasn't so loud, they still could hear it on my signal. Is this normal for Astron supplies, or did I just end up with one that has a problem? -Bob =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- = | Bob Boardman, Albuquerque, New Mexico - KC5SFW - ARRL, Upper Rio FM Society | | PGP 2.6.2 public key available | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- = From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:11 1996 From: johnestein@mcn.net (John E. Stein) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Motorala Micor Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 17:58:32 GMT Message-ID: <4oa2h0$bf6@news.mcn.net> Hi! I have a fellow ham who's picked up an old Motorala Micor. He's looking for any kind of a manual with schematics . The only information he has is off the radio itself. FCC Xmtr Data : CC 3161 Model T83RTA1404BA S/N 203CDE4804 We have no idea what range the radio is designed to operate in. His plans are to modify it to operate in either the 2 meter range or 7 cm. range. I'm not sure but I think he wants to use it for a repeater. He'd be grateful for any info. You can email me at : johnestein@mcn.net as well. Thanks! John KC7MRY From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:12 1996 From: davidp@mindspring.com (David Patterson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Motorala Micor Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 21:27:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4oa2h0$bf6@news.mcn.net> In article <4oa2h0$bf6@news.mcn.net> johnestein@mcn.net (John E. Stein) writes : >From: johnestein@mcn.net (John E. Stein) >Subject: Motorala Micor >Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 17:58:32 GMT >Hi! I have a fellow ham who's picked up an old Motorala Micor. He's >looking for any kind of a manual with schematics . The only >information he has is off the radio itself. >FCC Xmtr Data : CC 3161 >Model T83RTA1404BA >S/N 203CDE4804 >We have no idea what range the radio is designed to operate in. His >plans are to modify it to operate in either the 2 meter range or 7 cm. >range. I'm not sure but I think he wants to use it for a repeater. >He'd be grateful for any info. >You can email me at : johnestein@mcn.net as well. >Thanks! >John >KC7MRY Hi John. Looking at the Motorola model number - -T83RTA1404BA - - The "8" tells us that it is a high power radio - - 110 watts. The "3" is the frequency range - - 146 to 174 mHz. The "1" designates carrier squelch (no PL), and the "4" means that it is a four channel unit. I don't have a manual, but this will at least tell you what you have. David Patterson davidp@mindspring.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:13 1996 From: "Richard R. Fasi" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Motorola Max Trac 800 ? Date: 25 May 1996 16:50:47 GMT Message-ID: <4o7dp7$2m3@miwok.nbn.com> References: <4nahva$9gs_001@ppp.hooked.net> To: kdisk@hooked.net Hi, The Maxtracs are 800 MHZ Trunked units. Depending on Model they may support co nventional 800 MHZ operation. There is no mod that I am aware of to put these on the 900 Mhz amateur freqs. In the SF Bay Area, There is no trunked service available for these radios. Th e radios are programmable only with Motorola software. 73 de Dick KM6PA From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:14 1996 From: bsager@interserf.NET (Ben Sager) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: MSF-5000 EPROM Date: 25 May 96 14:05:53 GMT Message-ID: <199605251407.KAA02412@ns.interserf.net> Does anyone know of any place or person around the mid-atlantic area who still has the equipment to reprogram a Motorola MSF-5000 repeator eprom?? I've been run around in a circle without any luck for the last month or so trying to get it done.. I've got the old eprom. Any helpful information would be appreciated. Regards Ben KC4ASF.VA From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:15 1996 From: Gary Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Need Code Teaching Software for C-64 Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 17:45:24 -0700 Message-ID: <319D1DA4.1A3B@pacificnet.net> References: <4n7vrn$111@news.tcd.net> Tim Taylor wrote: > > A friend of mine is looking for code tutor software for a Commodore > 64. > > He is also interested in Gordon West tapes 0to5 wpm. > > Please E-Mail me. > > kj7az@coffey.com > > Thanks > > KJ7AZ/Tim Tim, I have a doctor QSO,which is a ROM cartridge that simulates over the air QSO's at different speeds $40.00. I also have some G West tapes. I have to look for them. Gary N6KHZ aarc@pacificnet.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:16 1996 From: Mel Dixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need Help on KLM 160 -watt 2-meter amp. Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 11:55:55 -0700 Message-ID: <31A3633B.3CD9@mimi.itg.ti.com> Need info on how to tune up a KLM 160-watt 2-meter amp. I could only see two adjustment pots internally and a additional one on the rear panel. Does anyone know how to tune one of these for the 146.52 section of the band???? Perhaps someone has the manual for it that would be willing to fax me a couple of pages???? Thanks, Mel Dixon (WB5BTG) MELD@dlep1.itg.ti.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:17 1996 From: n1mm@usa.pipeline.com(Tom Wagner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Need manual for Autek CMOS Keyer MK-1 Date: 22 May 1996 10:13:04 GMT Message-ID: <4nupbg$8kf@news1.t1.usa.pipeline.com> I bought an Autek MK-1 CMOS Keyer at Dayton and I need a copy of the manual. Anybody got one? Tom - N1MM From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:18 1996 From: egg117@carroll.com (Christopher Anthony) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Need Motorola programing software Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 06:52:41 GMT Message-ID: <4ogijk$jjg@ruby.interactive.net> References: <4o02ip$s6@itchy.itsnet.com> <4o7rg0$mif@ruby.interactive.net> <31a7daef.1968140@news.ais.net> twob@eagle.ais.net (SnareCom) wrote: Thanks alot for that information. I was not aware of that. The dealers always told me that I was not privledge to buy from motorala. Thanks again! Chris >On Sat, 25 May 1996 23:29:01 GMT, egg117@carroll.com (Christopher >Anthony) wrote: >>dennism@cache.net (Eric) wrote: >> >>>Does anyone have programing software for Motorola radios. I bought some >>>radios and I need to program them. >> >>>73 de KC7BDT >> >>If you find out let me know as well. I though that programming >>motoral radio was illegal? Only authorized ressellers can? >Its not that reprogramming the radio itself is illegal. Its the fact >that you are doing it with unlicensed soffware. Motorola sofware can >only be purchased direct from apd, it cannot be resold once purcahsed >either. Give them a call, they will happily sell it to you, but they >make it $350 so that one one, other than a service shop, will buy it. >Motorola americas parts division: 800-422-4210 From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:19 1996 From: chrise@n0jcf.com (Chris Elmquist) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,sci.electronics Subject: Need schematic for HP6220B power supply Date: 24 May 1996 09:37:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4o4hk4$ceo@n0jcf.com> Looking for the schematic (or even better the manual) for an HP6220B DC power supply. It's a 0-50V, .5A / 0-25V, 1A bench top supply. It was a "good deal" at Dayton... it makes output, which is adjustable, however the metering circuit is bonkers. The meter swings wildly from the negative peg to the positive peg in both voltage or current modes. I'll reimburse for any duplicating/mailing costs. Thanks. Chris -- Chris Elmquist, N0JCF chrise@n0jcf.com n0jcf@amsat.org From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:20 1996 From: dylanr@rrt.com (Dylan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: NEED SCHEMATICS FOR FM TRANSMITTER Date: 28 May 1996 03:40:56 GMT Message-ID: <4odsk8$d1d@pegasus.odyssee.net> For a very long time now I have wanted to build a small 2-mile radius transmitter 88-108, but I can't seem to find the schematics to build one. If anyone has plans so I can build my transmitter, please post, or atatch it to and e-mail at dylanr@rrt.com. Thank you for your all your effort. Vector From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:20 1996 From: Spencer Petri Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: NEED: Schematic for Heath Seneca Date: 21 May 1996 19:57:14 GMT Message-ID: <4nt76q$opl@e-tex.com> Anyone who has one and willing to make copy? 73 de Pete WA5JCI From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:21 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Ouch! I freaked out again! Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 20:23:02 -0200 Message-ID: <31A78846.6315@mail.rust.net> References: To: "Daniel L. Conklin" Daniel L. Conklin wrote: > > I can't believe I did this! I'm not sorry ... yet. I walked into my local > Ham Radio store to buy a used 2m HT to hook up to my packet TNC, and > somehow got talked into buying an ICOM IC-T7A dual band HT. I spent more > than twice my budget. What can I do to avoid this in the future? I love > gadgets! Help! > > -- > Dan Conklin acephoto@emi.net Dan: Do I know that feeling! I do that sort of thing all the time. It must be something in the drinking water! :) Bill Crocker From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:22 1996 From: acephotog@emi.net (Daniel L. Conklin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Ouch! I freaked out again! Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 15:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: I can't believe I did this! I'm not sorry ... yet. I walked into my local Ham Radio store to buy a used 2m HT to hook up to my packet TNC, and somehow got talked into buying an ICOM IC-T7A dual band HT. I spent more than twice my budget. What can I do to avoid this in the future? I love gadgets! Help! -- Dan Conklin acephoto@emi.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:23 1996 From: Joe Fitter BV/N0IAT Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Problem with TS-520S Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 17:45:01 -0700 Message-ID: <31A2638D.40C9@magic.itg.ti.com> References: <31A260BD.16D7@magic.itg.ti.com> Joe Fitter BV/N0IAT wrote: > > I bought a TS-520S via the internet a few weeks ago. The > rig is in fair shape cosmetically (which the buyer pointed out) > but, the buyer did not warn me that the rig has a problem electrically. > Here's the problem: Uhhh....I think I meant the SELLER didnt point out..blah blah blah... sorry, Joe From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:24 1996 From: cstimson@hookup.net (Craig Stimson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Programming Software for Ft-530 ? Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 03:35:58 GMT Message-ID: <4o3au7$fae@loki.tor.hookup.net> I've been following the thread regarding ADMS software for the Yaesu FT-50 which has prompted me to ask the question about the FT-530. I understand there is presently nothing available but does anybody know if there may be anything in the works? I guess since the FT-530 is an old model now there may be no interest on the part of Yaesu however there still is a lot of dealers selling them an a lot of users who would be interested. It sure would come in handy to manage the memory locations. Since the FT-530 does have some sort of digital (?) communication on the mic and/or speaker connections for the MH-29 & cloning capabilities it would seem possible. Comments anyone?? 73 Craig ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Craig Stimson + + E-mail: cstimson@hookup.net + + AX.25 : VA3DCS@VE3ZRD.#SCON.ON.CA.NA + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:25 1996 From: wd6dih@ix.netcom.com(Kevin Karamanos ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Programming Software for Ft-530 ? Date: 25 May 1996 19:16:41 GMT Message-ID: <4o7map$g1a@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> References: <4o3au7$fae@loki.tor.hookup.net> The FT-530 CAN'T be programmed by a PC. It has been tried many times without luck. So I will save you the time and trouble. You have to get a newer model like the FT-51R or FT-50R.... 73's Kevin, WD6DIH In <4o3au7$fae@loki.tor.hookup.net> cstimson@hookup.net (Craig Stimson) writes: > >I've been following the thread regarding ADMS software for the Yaesu >FT-50 which has prompted me to ask the question about the FT-530. I >understand there is presently nothing available but does anybody know >if there may be anything in the works? I guess since the FT-530 is an >old model now there may be no interest on the part of Yaesu however >there still is a lot of dealers selling them an a lot of users who >would be interested. It sure would come in handy to manage the memory >locations. > >Since the FT-530 does have some sort of digital (?) communication on >the mic and/or speaker connections for the MH-29 & cloning >capabilities it would seem possible. > >Comments anyone?? > >73 >Craig >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >+ Craig Stimson + >+ E-mail: cstimson@hookup.net + >+ AX.25 : VA3DCS@VE3ZRD.#SCON.ON.CA.NA + >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:26 1996 From: back@maine.maine.edu (Jason Baack) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 Date: 25 May 1996 13:35:04 GMT Message-ID: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> Is the Rat Shack DSP unit any god? It is on clearance here for $39.00? Yes/ No? reply to email please.. baack@midcoast.com http://www.umecut.maine.edu/~baack From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:27 1996 From: "Ken Bessler (KG0WX)" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 13:12:08 -0500 Message-ID: <31A9F078.5997@southwind.net> References: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> <4o8e28$ec2@ccnet2.ccnet.com> <4o9jv2$7lr@explorer.csc.com> <4o9mtl$881@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <31A92AC8.484@inetworld.com> <4ockc5$mdr@crash.microserve.net> To: WB3U WB3U wrote: > > Brett Carter wrote: > > >The Rat Shack DSP is alright for killing heterodynes, > >great CW filter, but lousy at noise reduction on SSB. > > > >$39 is a good price. > > My transceiver has an audio notch fiter built in, as well as a > 400 Hz crystal filter. I also use an Autek Research QF-1A on the > rare occasion that additional CW filtering is needed. Would the > RS DSP provide any significant advantage for CW work? The Autek > is very effective at "peaking" the incoming signal, but the > ringing that occurs when it's narrowed down can be a problem, > particularly when the band is noisy. > > 73, > Jack WB3U Jack I've used the Radio shack DSP unit with my Yaesu FT-ONE. My rig also has audio peaking and notching but the RS unit works faster and a bit better when it comes to hetrodynes. As for the other operations of this DSP unit, My rig doesn't seem to need them. Overall, I'd say the Radio Shack unit is an excellent buy! 73 -- Ken Bessler KG0WX Design Services Company http://www2.southwind.net/~kg0wx Model railroad designing From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:28 1996 From: schmooze@msn.com (Ariel Maiselman) Subject: RE: Radio Shack Prices Outrageous Date: 27 May 96 22:29:22 -0700 References: <4oakgl$bip@ccnet2.ccnet.com> Message-ID: <00001fed+000032dc@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment What do you think Radio Shack stands for? Needless Markup""""""""""" If i were you, I would'nt touch the place, i purchased htx 202 2 meter fm Broke 5 x's and still not opperating, then i bought a voltage meter, it was about a week to break, they said it was faulty, from the manufacture, who's the manufacture?? Any over sea's Company that is willing to sell their wares, specially when their inferior quality""""""""""""" That's Radio Shack"""""" From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:29 1996 From: thomas.g.booth@den.mmc.com (Booth, Thomas G) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Re. 12-24 HR LED Clock Display Date: 24 May 1996 23:51:46 GMT Distribution: usa Message-ID: References: <4o02is$ksd@news.global1.net> In article <4o02is$ksd@news.global1.net>, rxbobxr@globalone.net (bob rx) wrote: > > hi name is bob --wb2flx-- have heard there is a way to change a 12 hr displa y LED clock to 24 HR -- > anyone know how -- thanks for the help?? bob wb2flx Well, it's really going to depend on the particular integrated circuit used in a given clock...often it's as simple as changing the input state on one pin of the clock IC, but you'd need some further info on the clock IC (or perhaps a schematic of the clock) in order to figure out which pin to jumper. If you can, look at the clock IC and see if you can figure out the manufacturer and part # & include the info in a followup post; someone reading the newsgroup just might have the datasheet you need. Hopefully, the IC hasn't been "house marked", i.e., marked w/ a customer peculiar P/N which is meaningless to the rest of the world. If the clock was built entirely out of standard TTL or CMOS ICs (which would likely be a rather old clock), it could require a bit more rework to convert to a 24 hour display, but shouldn't be impossible to do. There is a chance that the particular clock you have uses a clock IC which doesn't allow for switchover to 24 hour display, in which case you're outta luck. I bring this up because I seem to recall some mid-70's vintage clock ICs - perhaps some of MOSTEK's clock ICs - which were built strictly for 12 hour display only. There may be some more recent chips configured for 12 hour only display as well. TGB \\ The opinions expressed herein are my own. // From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:30 1996 From: Sean Nixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Req. for Mods: Alinco DJ-G5T, Kenwood TM-742 Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 13:22:04 +1200 Message-ID: <31A660BC.3792@actrix.gen.nz> References: Gary F. Kendall wrote: > > Is anyone aware of any other mods for the DJ-G5T besides the "cut the blue > wire" for extended TX? I recently learned that the European version can > be modified for 800 MHz RX but it supposedly has a different chip set in > it. I've scrounged cyber-space without much luck. > > Also, a friend of mine just bought a TM-742 at Dayton; he is trying to > modify the 6m section for TX down to 45 MHz. He's been able to tune it > down to 46, which is close, but not close enough... Has anyone succeeded > with a similar mod? > > Any info would be appreciated. Thanks much! > > -- Gary KB4GCF > > -- > Gary F. Kendall, Programmer/Analyst kendall@vt.edu > Project ENABLE -- the Administrative Systems Initiative > Virginia Tech Dunno- but have a look here- its where i get mine from: http://oak.oakland.edu:8080/pub/hamradio/mods/ Cheers From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:31 1996 From: Brian Oblivion Newsgroups: alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.swap Subject: Schematics/Parts list for Ramsey 2 Meter Kit? Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 16:47:20 -0500 Message-ID: <31A77FE8.3505@l0pht.com> Greetings, Has anyone built the Ramsey 2 Meter Kit and still have the Schematics/ Parts List still around? I just picked one up at a Hamfest for dirt cheap so it's worth it for me to try and repair it. One component is fried beyond recognition, hence my need for the schematic/list. I'd really like to fix this rig. The exact part number of this rig is either RK-FX146 or RK-FX220. I'm sure the cicuitry is close enough for either part number. Thanks. Brian oblivion@l0pht.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:32 1996 From: schmooze@msn.com (Ariel Maiselman) Subject: Selling Date: 27 May 96 22:24:06 -0700 Message-ID: <00001fed+000032db@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Kenwood TS 440 at Ps 50 DC Power Supply Keenwood 742 FM 2 meter & 440 Best offer Send reply to Schmooze@msn.com From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:33 1996 From: btess@magic.mb.ca (robert tessier) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Selling old Drake Date: 25 May 1996 19:22:26 GMT Message-ID: <4o7mli$p1v@aahz.magic.mb.ca> I have the following: Drake R-4C receiver; Drake T-4X transmitter; Speaker and power supply. I have no idea if these babies work. If you live in southern Manitoba and want to check them out, please e-mail. Any reasonable offer considered. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:34 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Spectum analyzer HF probes? Date: Fri, 24 May 96 08:27:00 GMT Message-ID: <832926420snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <4o30mu$lr4@news3.realtime.net> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <4o30mu$lr4@news3.realtime.net> akent@bga.com "Kent Farnsworth" writes: > What is a good high frequency probe to use with a spectrum analyzer? > The hoped for frequency range is up to 500mhz. > I would rather not pay $2500 for HP's probe, and the surplus dealers > that I have contacted don't have any suitable probes. > > Any thoughts? What equipment do you have and what is your application? My analysers have 50 ohm coax inputs rated to about 1 watt max and no probes are used. Sometimes I plug in a short whip antenna to see what's around, just for fun, but mostly I'm looking at stuff I'm generating locally such as my transmission monitoring, checking out sig-gen's and oscillators, etc. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:35 1996 From: Michel Lamoureux <100277.1476@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Spectum analyzer HF probes? Date: 25 May 1996 15:59:56 GMT Message-ID: <4o7aps$lba$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> References: <832926420snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> You might use HP85024A which is a 300 kHz - 3 GHz high impedance probe (1 MOhm // 0.7 pF). Also HP41800A with 5 Hz - 500 MHz bandwidth , 0.5 MOhm // 3 pF Both with 50 Ohms, N connector output. I'm not sure they are rated less than $2,500 but you may found second hand one. Good luck. PS: I do not work for HP :-) -- 100277.1476@compuserve.com (Michel Lamoureux) From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:35 1996 From: akent@bga.com (Kent Farnsworth) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Spectum analyzer HF probes? Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 20:25:55 GMT Message-ID: <4o59r4$pbo@news3.realtime.net> References: <4o30mu$lr4@news3.realtime.net> <832926420snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> I have an HP 8565A analyzer, and need to look at signals using a 1 megohm+, as low capacitance as possible, high impedance probe. I can't load the circuit much at all. An active probe would be fine, but I would rather not reinvent the wheel, if such a probe design exists. Thanks. Kent "Anthony R. Gold" wrote: >In article <4o30mu$lr4@news3.realtime.net> > akent@bga.com "Kent Farnsworth" writes: >> What is a good high frequency probe to use with a spectrum analyzer? >> The hoped for frequency range is up to 500mhz. >> I would rather not pay $2500 for HP's probe, and the surplus dealers >> that I have contacted don't have any suitable probes. >> >> Any thoughts? >What equipment do you have and what is your application? My analysers >have 50 ohm coax inputs rated to about 1 watt max and no probes are used. >Sometimes I plug in a short whip antenna to see what's around, just for >fun, but mostly I'm looking at stuff I'm generating locally such as my >transmission monitoring, checking out sig-gen's and oscillators, etc. >Regards, >-- > Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com > tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk > packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:36 1996 From: srwhite@ibm.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: STOLEN:RADIO SHACK HTX202 IN NATCHEZ, MS on 951226 Date: 25 May 1996 15:09:26 GMT Message-ID: <4o77r6$2qvu@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> References: <4o3e4k$jm1@solaris.cc.vt.edu> Reply-To: srwhite@ibm.net In <4o3e4k$jm1@solaris.cc.vt.edu>, wonderly@vt.edu (wonderly) writes: >HTX202 was missing sm. flexible antenna when taken. It had a cartop antenna[ mfg. Valor] attached. > >Please email or Ph me @ evenings (540)382-8830 Sure... With 1000's of HTX's out there I might just be able to spot yours... How about posting the serial number so anyone who comes across it might identify it... If you didn't write it down, it's as good as gone! Steve W. N2RWE From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:37 1996 From: cdorn@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Chris Dorn) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Ten-Tec Corsair I vs. Corsair II question Date: 24 May 1996 03:01:26 GMT Message-ID: <4o38q6$v90@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> Hello, I was flipping through some old QSTs today, and as usual I have come up with some questions. In the October 1983 edition, the original Corsair is advertised by Ten-Tec with a dynamic range in excess of 90db, and with a third order intercept of +5dbm with preamp, and +18dbm without. This measured at 20KHz spacing. This seems really impressive. I could not find an independent review of the rig, but compared these figures to the 1987 QST review of the Corsair II. It shows that the Corsair II exhibited a dynamic range of about 84db, and a third order intercept of -1 dbm at best. This was also measured at 20KHz spacing. Does this suggest that the Corsair II was a step backward as far as dynamic range characteristics are concerned, or are the original Ten-Tec specs exaggerated? Just curious about this discrepancy. Have the Corsair owners noticed any RX performance difference between these two rigs? As always, thanks for your expertise. Chris VE6RDC From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:38 1996 From: Ed Guzis Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Ten-Tec OMNI 6-Radio controlled software? Date: 26 May 1996 17:14:52 GMT Message-ID: <4oa3ic$i7e@tribune.concentric.net> References: <4o8ru0$rhp@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> To: n7ahn@ix.netcom.com n7ahn@ix.netcom.com(Steve Massey) wrote: >What are folks using to control there OMNI 6?I tryed CT using the icom >735 didnt work,called Ten-Tec they said maybe i have a serial number >that needs a cap removed.Any info would be appreciated >steve n7ahn@ix.netcom.com Steve, There is a Ten-Tec Reflector that might have some answers for you. All messages from the Reflector are archived. You can get to both at .... good luck. Ed Guzis W9TW From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:39 1996 From: NJC@WARWICK.NET (Nick J Chiarchiaro, AET / N2QXF) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: test Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 17:05:37 GMT Message-ID: <4ocnpt$n70@news1.warwick.net> test From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:40 1996 From: cbuttsch@slonet.ORG (Clifford Buttschardt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: TS 930 repair Date: 21 May 96 22:01:39 GMT Message-ID: References: <199605211130.EAA21287@.mail.ucsd.edu> You seem to have a classic case of a bad changeover relay. This is really not hard to repair as it is contained in the area just behind the coax connector on the back panel of the TS 930. The relay is a small OMRON unit easily avialable from Kenwood parts (order number is 1414-05). Just remove the bottom cover and look before you go sending the unit off. With a good antenna connected, simply tap the relay and if the received signal comes back, you know that is the problem! Cliff Buttschardt W6HDO From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:41 1996 From: Peter Barville Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: TS-50S / IC-706 / DX-70 / TS-900 Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 23:14:39 +0100 Distribution: world Message-ID: I have used my TS-50S for hf mobile for quite some while now, and am very pleased with the excellent reports I receive, particularly on the transmit audio quality. The main criticism I have of the TS-50S concerns the ineffectual nature of its noise blanker. I am attracted by the idea of replacing the TS-50S with one of the later rigs, with detachable front panel. There have been recent postings comparing these different rigs, and (as I recall) opinion seems to be that the receive performance of the rigs vary considerably. I think it was suggested that the TS-50S is the worst, followed by the IC-706, then the DX-70, with the FT-900 having the best rx. I wonder whether anybody would care to offer any comments about the relative performance of each rig (and their noise blankers)? The IC-706 certainly offers plenty of facilities, but does it offer satisfactory performance? By the way, I use Pro-Am mono-band whips (40m - 17m) and find their performance very good indeed. 73 - and thanks -- Peter Barville G3XJS "It is vain to do with more G-QRP QRP ARCI what can be done with less" peter@barville.demon.co.uk William of Occum (1290-1350) From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:41 1996 From: vvv@radio.stack.net (Victor V Voronkov) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: V-J 90PL ? Date: 25 May 1996 08:02:37 GMT Message-ID: <4o6eqt$529@ns.serpukhov.su> Hello ! I'am looking for information about V-J 90PL two meters ampliffier. What's output power, max input power ? Victor From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:42 1996 From: bodoh@dakota.net (Tom Bodoh) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wanted: Alinco 1200 service manual or help Date: 27 May 1996 12:39:01 GMT Message-ID: <4oc7p5$3cp@server2.dakota.net> Hello, Yesterday when I turned on my Alinco 1200, it seemed to be dead but on closer inspection the radio worked OK but all of the panel lights are out. Actually when I first turned it on, one of the lights seemed to be on, but very dim and later all were out. I would be willing to buy a service manual if anyone has one. If anyone would be willing to share their knowledge/experience or look up what I need that would be good too. Is there a micro-fuse inline with the panel LED's? Are they connected in series so that if one is out, they all go out? Has this happened to anyone else? I took it apart but could not spot any problems. Everything else seems to work. Please Email rather than post responses. Thanks... Tom, N0YGT From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:43 1996 From: molson@apollo.tricord.com (Mark Olson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Wanted: ft-41r Date: 28 May 1996 09:04:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4of165$624@apollo.tricord.com> Looking for a clean Yaesu FT41r UHF HT, anyone out there selling? Mark Olson AA0MH -- Mark Olson Manager, Performance/Characterization Lab Tricord Systems, Inc. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:45 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: griffin@jgfl1.allcon.com (Jens Goerke) Subject: Re: Wanted: info on Graetz Message-ID: References: Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 09:53:36 GMT Dave Calhoun (calhoun@televar.com) wrote: > I have inherited a tube radio and would like to find information about the > company that produced it and where I will be able to find replacement > parts for it. The company is called Graetz. The back of the radio is > printed: > Graetz Graetz is still in business, AFAIK. > I can identify 7 tubes. All tubes read: > TELE > FUN > KEN > Made In Germany Manufactured by Telefunken, also still in business. > They have the indentification as follows: > EL84 equivalent to 12BY7A > ECH81 > 6AV6 U0309602 > EF89 B1209503 > ???? B2109206 > EM84 B8009600 acts as signal strength meter > 1 tube wrapped in metal sheath > The radio can tune AM, FM SW1 (125-49 M), SW2 (41-13 M). The tuning > ability of the SW is also rated in Mc. > On the front, the radio says it is stereo. It has plugs on the back for > external antenas (multiple) and for external speakers. > The cabinet also contains a record player for 78's. > Any information about this radio or it's components would be appreciated. > Thanks, > dave calhoun Can't help you with the rest of the tubes, but the radio itself seems familiar. I had a similar one without record player and used it as an amplifier for several years. I suggest you check a tube reference manual for information about replacement tubes. Hope that helps, Jens, DB9LL -- Do _YOU_ know where your towel is? From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:45 1996 From: claude@bauv.unibw-muenchen.de (Claude Frantz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Wanted: info on Graetz Date: 28 May 96 12:03:51 GMT Message-ID: References: Reply-To: claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de griffin@jgfl1.allcon.com (Jens Goerke) writes: >Dave Calhoun (calhoun@televar.com) wrote: >> I have inherited a tube radio and would like to find information about the >> company that produced it and where I will be able to find replacement >> parts for it. The company is called Graetz. The back of the radio is >> printed: >> Graetz >Graetz is still in business, AFAIK. This logo is still used but I'm not sure that the products manufactured and sold using this logo are still manufactured by the same factory. >> They have the indentification as follows: >> EL84 >equivalent to 12BY7A Wrong ! The EL84 is the same as the 6BQ5. The 12BY7A is the same as the EL180. -- Claude (claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de) The opinions expressed above represent those of the writer and not necessarily those of her employer. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:46 1996 From: hturn@pelican.davlin.net (Hank Turner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: What kind of antenna is this? Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 09:01:02 GMT Message-ID: <31a81da3.23755608@news.davlin.net> Reply-To: hturn@pelican.davlin.net I have just aquired a military antenna and I was wondering what exactly I have. It seems to be a very large mobile antenna. It consists of the bottom (base) which is about 24 inches long and 3 inches in diameter painted green. N type connecter on the side about 9 inches from the bottom. Stamped on the base is the following: ANTENNA AT-1062/G ORDER NO. 40512-PM-60 MOTOROLA INC. SER.NO. 1 Yes ser.no. 1. After the base is a very heavy steel spring. Then comes 24 inches of half inch aluminum tube on the end of which is a compression nut where a whip such as a 102 incher would fit. Any ideas as to what I have aquired? Does the N type connector indicate that this is a VHF or UHF antenna? Let me know if you have any ideas I am tempted to disasemble the base but don't dare to now. Thanks Hank. hturn@pelican.davlin.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:47 1996 From: mc@shore.net (Michael Crestohl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: What tone is used to access 10m FM repeaters? Date: 24 May 1996 02:08:53 -0400 Distribution: na Message-ID: <4o3jpl$cbp@northshore.shore.net> I just returned from the Dayton Hamvention and an Icom IC-706 followed me home. I have not yet removed this technological marvel from its plastic protective bag and am trying to understand the manual. Boy - what a box! It has been some time since I played around on 10M FM and cannot recall the tone frequency generally used to access 10M FM repeaters. Since the sunspot cycle will soon be increasing I am curious to know if this IC-706 will be able to work 10M FM repeaters. Can anyone confirm this tone frequency? Tnx es 73, Michael Crestohl, KH6KD/W1 mc@shore.net From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:48 1996 From: mreiney@hevanet.com (miker in Tigard, OR.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: What's a Kenwood KSC-1 rapid charger? Schematics? Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 02:42:22 GMT Message-ID: <4ntuv8$98m@vista.hevanet.com> I picked up a used Kenwood KSC-1 Rapid Charger. I can't find it in any of the old AES catalogs. What battereis does it charge? Volts etc. It trickle charges ok, but I can't get it to rapaid charge on any battery voltage. Maybe I need to hook up one of the sense contacts. Anyone got a schematic? Ideas on how the 4 contacts hook up in the battery? Thanks, miker From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:49 1996 From: carlosr@csulb.edu (Carlos Ramirez) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB LF-30A keewood low-pass filter Date: 24 May 1996 22:52:15 GMT Message-ID: <4o5eiv$nan@hatathli.csulb.edu> I am looking for this unit. State price and condition. From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:50 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: rreneau@iquest.net Subject: Yaesu FT-208R Manual Needed Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 16:47:07 GMT A friend that just got his ticket has purchased a used FT-208R HT. Does anyone have an owners manual they could copy or are willing to sell?? From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:51 1996 From: Chuck Bigbie Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu FT-2500M Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 15:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: <31A617F9.2463@tulsa.com> To: All Does anyone have the open TX mod for the Yaesu FT-2500M. Please e-mail me crbigbie@tulsa.com. Thanks, Chuck From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:51 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: YAESU FT-736R POWER OUTPUT INCREASE? (ACOPP) Date: 29 May 1996 12:55:08 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4ohhfc$qjq@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> THIS PROBABLY IS A STUPID QUESTION TO MANY OF YOU, BUT I WILL ASK ANYWAY. I RECENTLY PURCHASED A FT736R AND LIKE IT VERY MUCH, WITH 2 EXCEPTIONS. ONE IS THE POWER OUTPUT IS JUST TO LOW! I AM WONDERING IF THERE IS ANY WAY TO PRODUCE MORE OUTPUT POWER WITHOUT PURCHASING AN EXTERNAL AMPLIFIER. THE SECOND EXCEPTION IS I CAN'T FIND A DESK MIKE WITH THE SAME AUDIO AS THE HAND MIKE. I TRIED THE MD1C8 AND THE AUDIO AND TONE QUALITY WENT SOUTH. ANY IDEAS ON THESE ITEMS WOULD BE APPRECIATED. THANKS AND 73'S AL COPP KF4GKV From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:53 1996 From: Dave Norton Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Yaesu T-1000MP gen coverage tranmit Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 00:39:11 +0100 Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <4nfo1d$t3v@solaris.cc.vt.edu> In article <4o569m$k48@roch.zetnet.co.uk>, Sir Barry Duxbury writes >In message > Dave Norton writes: > >> In article <4nfo1d$t3v@solaris.cc.vt.edu>, Jim Overfelt >> writes >> >How is the FT-1000 MP modified to transmit in general coverage? >> > >> Turn the radio with the FAST and the LOCK key pressed at the same time. >> then press the FAST and the ENT key to access the menu. >> then go to menu 9-9 and set it to GEN then press ENT to get out. To get >> it back >> to normal repeat the steps and select 15 instead of GEN. > >> Snipped From a previous posting > >> Cheers > >> Dave >> Dave Norton - G UHI >> dave@khn.foobar.co.uk > >Hi Dave...Thanks for posting the info on the FT1000MP. The menu >system only goes as far as 8-9 so I am a bit baffled...Hi Ant thoughts? > >73 ...Barry Hi Barry >> Turn the radio with the FAST and the LOCK key pressed at the same time. should be Turn ON the radio with fast and lock keys depressed this should enable the further menu items, note it is fast and lock use fast and enter after this to enable normal menu mode You should see further menu items 9-1 to 9-9 now It works here Dave Dave Norton - G0UHI From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:54 1996 From: Guy Fletcher Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Yeasu 736R transmit problem Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: <31A37844.39B@mpce.mq.edu.au> References: <31A12229.6C1F@ix.netcom.com> Rick Dykstra wrote: > > I have a 736R which has intermittant transmit on 70 cm. Receive is > fine. When it transmits okay, the meter swings about 3/4 way over. > When there is a problem, it swings all the way over. The watt meter > shows I have output, but it looks like it's not on the frequency it > should be. > Has anyone run into this before. > Thanks, > Rick KD8CP Yes, this problem is not uncommon in the FT736R. The rig takes off around 453MHz! The problem lies in the VCO on the 430MHz RF Unit; the input to this is inadequately decoupled. I will email you details, and anyone else with the problem may care to contact me by email. Thanks to Gordon McDonald VK2ZAB, who tracked down this problem on his own rig this morning. It hasn't yet surfaced on my FT736R! Guy VK2BBF guy@mpce.mq.edu.au From amsoft@epix.net Wed May 29 23:43:55 1996 From: fwhitehurst@ezdial.com (David Whitehurst) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yellow wire mod on ICOM IC706 Date: 29 May 1996 14:10:29 GMT Message-ID: <4ohlsl$o0a@news.cais.com> Has anyone clipped the "yellow wire" on the ICOM 706 to get decent sensitivity outside the vhf ham bands yet? Did it increase intermod on 2 meters??? Dose it void the 1 year warranty by Icom??? N4ZGT David. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:10 1996 From: wa4pgm@moonstar.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 Date: Sun, 26 May 96 09:12:56 EDT Message-ID: References: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> <4o8e28$ec2@ccnet2.ccnet.com> <4o9jv2$7lr@explorer.csc.com> In Article<4o9jv2$7lr@explorer.csc.com>, write: > Path: news1.mnsinc.com!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!i n1.uu.net!explorer.csc.com!explorer.csc.com!not-for-mail > From: dteague@csc.com (Guy Teague) > Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment > Subject: Re: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 > Date: 26 May 1996 08:48:34 -0400 > Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation > Lines: 16 > Message-ID: <4o9jv2$7lr@explorer.csc.com> > References: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> <4o8e28$ec2@ccnet2.ccnet.com> > NNTP-Posting-Host: explorer.csc.com > X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] > > T E I X E I R A (teixeira@ccnet.com) wrote: > : back@maine.maine.edu (Jason Baack) wrote: > : >Is the Rat Shack DSP unit any god? It is on clearance here for $39.00? > : >Yes/ No? > > : I heard it was not bad. Well worth $39.00 but in Fremont, CA they are $34. 00 > > : Don AC6TG > --------- > > I got one at the $39 price. So far I can't see any improvement over the > standard filters in my IC706, but for that price, I'm sure I can find a > use for it. > -- > Cheers 73 de dteague@csc.com "They're out there" K Kesey > Guy KG5VT gteague@why.net "Hey don't eat that yellow snow" F Zappa I have one here as well and think it has a fairly good CW filter and takes out carriers pretty good. As far a SSB DSP it stinks !!! Other than that for $39 you wont go wrong. GL 73, Kyle www.moonstar.com/~wa4pgm Amateur Radio--Civil War--Kayaking--Nascar Blue Ridge River Runners Central VA Contest Club From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:11 1996 From: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: ADVISOR PAGER TECH HELP NEEDED Date: 27 May 1996 07:23:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4oc3be$b7u@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: radiomatt@aol.com (Radiomatt) Can an advisor be reprogrammed to work on Russian alphabet (Cyrillic?) I have several hundred Advisor on the right frequency, which I'd like to sell to Russia, but the transmit Cyrillic characters. Have gotten no help from big "M"; they want to sell me new pagers. HELP From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:12 1996 From: klausner@crl.com (Ben Klausner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Automatic Tone Search (ATS) on Yaesu FT-51R Date: 27 May 1996 11:06:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4ocjur$o46@crl2.crl.com> References: <4o4qdj$elr@crl.crl.com> <4o5sgp$iah@news.ro.com> <4o7vnd$lu1@crl8.crl.com> In article , David Harmon wrote: >In article <4o7vnd$lu1@crl8.crl.com>, Ben Klausner wrote: >> >> Thanks for the reply, but that doesn't seem to work for me. I activate Tone >> Squelch, then try F-2 to set Tone Frequency, and hold the Up key. AAs long >> as I hold the key the value changes, but when I let go it stops. Do I need >> to test this against a live signal with tone? > >Sounds like something is wrong; it should have worked just as described. >When you hold the Up key for a second it should start scanning the tone >frequencies. It scans quickly when no RF is being received, then slows >down when a signal is detected, then stops when the matching tone freq is >detected. Or at least, mine does. Do you have a very early FT-51R? The >procedure is not described in my FT-51R manual but on a loose sheet that >came with it, so maybe it was a version add-on? Does your Tone Squelch >work otherwise? It's a current model, and the instructions for ATS (such as they are) were included in the manual. Tone squelch is not common around here, so finding a test signal is tough, and I can't answer if it's working properly otherwise. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ben Klausner, N5DJL | "Beware of bugs in the above code; klausner@crl.com | I have only proved it correct, Austin, TX | not tried it." -- Donald Knuth From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:13 1996 From: KSmith1951@gnn.com (Karl Smith) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Remote for Kenwood TM-201B Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 22:15:19 Message-ID: <4offk1$c2a@news-e2d.gnn.com> Iam looking for a remote control for my tm-201b part# FC-10. If anyone can help I would be thankful. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:14 1996 From: jflowers@unlinfo.unl.edu (john flowers) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-840 mod? Date: 28 May 1996 03:26:26 GMT Message-ID: <4odrp2$hbm@crcnis3.unl.edu> Summary: Need out of band transmit mod for transverter. Keywords: FT-840 transverter I am planning to use my FT-840 with the Ten-Tec 20m<>6m transverter kit. My FT-840 only TX's from 14.000-14.500. I wish to be able to use FM up in the 52-53 Mhz range, but I would need my 840 to transmit from 14.000-18.000Mhz to use the whole 6m band. In short, how to I get out of band transmit on the Yeasu FT-840? TNX de Andy, KB0JSU From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:15 1996 From: D Montgomery Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: HF AMP TRADE Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 21:10:44 -0500 Message-ID: <31ABB224.21AE@wt.net> i WANT TO TRADE A HENRY 2K-4 1500W 10-80 IN MINT COND. FOR A 10-160 IKW AMP. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:16 1996 From: jones@San-Jose.ate.slb.com (Clark Jones) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-706 Yellow Wire Mod -- Con? Date: 28 May 1996 21:50:11 GMT Message-ID: <4ofsej$f4b@k9.San-Jose.ate.slb.com> References: <4mdfvb$pn@newsroom.HITC.COM> <1996May5.153608.28273@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> Gary Coffman (gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us) wrote: [...] : Somebody who *hasn't* modified their IC-706 yet please try this : test. Tune the IC-706 to 75.352 MHz and listen on 144.365 MHz : with your HT for LO leakage. Report back here what you hear. [...] Well, I tried this with my unmodified IC-706, using an Alinco DJ-580 with an Anli rubber-dummy-load antenna as a "probe". (I didn't bother disconnecting the J-pole antenna from the IC-706, as I figured if it was putting out any significant signal that way, I should be able to pick it up with the DJ-580. After I remembered to turn off tone squelch on the DJ-580, :-), I found that I had to have the antenna within about an inch of the IC-706 to pick up the interference. I confirmed that the "interference" was coming from the IC-706 by cycling power on it, and noticing that the interference went away with the 706 off, and came back as soon as the 706 was powered on again. I tried this with the 706 in all modes. I noticed that the interference was present in all modes _except_ wide-band FM, where it disappeared as completely as when the 706 was turned off. As a further test, I installed the separation cable, and placed the front panel on the floor about three feet from the radio. In this case, the DJ-580 had to be about 5 feet from any portion of the IC-706 for the interference to be completely undetectable. Again, the signal was present in all modes on the IC-706 _except_ wide-band FM. All tests were done with squelch "wide open" (i.e., hearing the background hash) on the DJ-580. -- Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are mine and not those of Schlumberge r because they are NOT covered by the patent agreement! Phone: (602) 345-3638 Internet: jones@San-Jose.ate.slb.com Packet:(not currently available) RF: KI7TU ICBM: 33 20' 44"N 111 53' 47"W Snail: Clark Jones, Schlumberger Technologies, 7855 S. River Pkwy #116, Tempe, AZ 85284-1825 From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:17 1996 From: Cecil Moore Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Looking for Mods for Icom IC22S Date: 28 May 1996 22:10:04 -0700 Message-ID: <4ogm7c$hvh@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> References: <4og8oh$fv8@Ouimet.tbaytel.net> Andrew Malcolm wrote: : I am interested in any modifications that might be around for the Icom : IC22S 2m xcvr. TechnoLogic Concepts sells one that covers from about 144.6 to 148 MHz in 5KHz steps. email them at tlcdhconsult@delphi.com They have similar full coverage EPROM kits for Ramsey transceivers. 73, Cecil, KG7BK (W6RCA soon), OOTC From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:17 1996 From: Andrew Malcolm Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Looking for Mods for Icom IC22S Date: 29 May 1996 01:20:17 GMT Message-ID: <4og8oh$fv8@Ouimet.tbaytel.net> I am interested in any modifications that might be around for the Icom IC22S 2m xcvr. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:18 1996 From: von1@ix.netcom.com(D. vonFleckles ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: Kenwood Tk-900 series Date: 29 May 1996 04:48:29 GMT Message-ID: <4ogkut$o7h@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com> References: <31a1fc5f.1603755@news.primenet.com> I'm looking to find any used/good condition Kenwood Tk-930's or similar models in HT for business use. These are the 800 mhz repeatable trunked systems. Thanks Dave.... Von1@ix.netcom.com From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:19 1996 From: corrigad@televar.com (Dave) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Help! need test point for WFM for MX7000 Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 05:55:50 GMT Message-ID: <4ogot5$3mr@golden.ncw.net> Hello, anyone happen to have a schematic handy for a Regency MX 7000 that can tell me a handy spot to tap into the wideband FM IF? I am trying to use an Icom 751 to monitor the IF to demodulate the SSB signals on VHF-Mostlly 6 meters. The 455Khz IF works great, just too narrow to move the Icoms VFO around more than 10Khz on each side of the IF center. Seems like the wideband IF would be alot better for this purpose. I have a circuit for sampling the IF without loading it down that is good to +25Mhz. Anyways, I brought the IF out thru the back of the scanner with an RCA jack and it works pretty decent. Anyone give me a hand? Thanks very much for reading! -Dave , KB7SVP From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:20 1996 From: vvv@radio.stack.net (Victor V Voronkov) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IDR-96 ? Date: 29 May 1996 07:00:08 GMT Message-ID: <4ogslo$4tk@ns.serpukhov.su> In June QST (p 7) I read about Integrated Data Radio from AEA. I not find any helpful information about IDR-96 on the AEA WWW and they will answer on phone call only. If you know what's price and which radio (TEKK, other, own) is in a box, PSE let me know. AEA can be reached: Call these numbers 8:00 am to 4:30 pm (PST), Monday through Friday: Main Office: (206) 774-5554 Upgrade Hotline: (206) 774-1722 Call these numbers anytime: 24-Hour Literature Request Line: (206)712-8054 Fax:(206) 775-2340 73! de RX3DIN Victor From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:21 1996 From: prljmfan@best.com (Sean Cusiter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: KENWOOD TM741A For Sale Date: 29 May 1996 07:18:11 GMT Message-ID: <4ogtnj$ag6@nntp1.best.com> KENWOOD FM MultiBander TM741A for Sale, comes with mounting bracket, and antenna. $400 or best offer Sean prljmfan@best.com San Jose, Cal. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:22 1996 From: subbustr@whidbey.net (DAVE M . SCHERTZER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Kenwood TM-241A Date: 29 May 1996 14:59:48 GMT Message-ID: <4ohop4$i92@news.whidbey.com> References: <4o9nps$89m@news.inforamp.net> I have that mod... subbustr@whidbey.net From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:22 1996 From: Erik Finskas OH2LAK Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Anyone got a service manual for President Lincoln?? Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 15:26:55 +0100 Message-ID: <31AC5EAF.71AF@ee.port.ac.uk> As the subject tells, I am looking for a service manual for President Lincoln. If you have one, please mail me. I would be interrested of a copy. Erik -- Erik Finskas M1AAJ & OH2LAK Email Finskase@ee.port.ac.uk Lakki@clinet.fi University of Portsmouth, UK Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:23 1996 From: mwalkdba@ezl.com (Mark Walker (N9HCI)) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: LOUD Astron PS?? Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 15:35:39 GMT Message-ID: <4ohqi8$dgd@ns1.ccinet.net> References: <4ofsgn$ko6@lynx.unm.edu> boardman@cobra.unm.edu (Bob Boardman) wrote: ------- snip ------------------- No, Bob, this is not the norm. I use an rs-20 on a Kenwood 430 and the hum is not audible over regular ambient shack noise. Just a one-second burst of hum when I switch the ps on, but certainly not audible more than a few feet away. I regularly tax the 16-amp continuous rating for extended periods. A little detective work is in order. I would guess something is loose, like maybe a transformer mounting bolt. Good luck to you. 73, Mark Walker (N9HCI) From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:24 1996 From: skipperm@MTC2.MID.TEC.SC.US Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Gonset G-50 Date: 29 May 1996 18:00:41 GMT Message-ID: <4oi3c9$qll@news1.sunbelt.net> Reply-To: skipperm@MTC2.MID.TEC.SC.US I need a schematic and/or service data on the Gonset G-50 6-meter transceiver. Will be glad to pay any cost associated with copying and mailing information. Thanks Regards Skip KE4DFY email skipperm@mtc.mid.tec.sc.us From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:25 1996 From: jpss@ais.net (Chip) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 21:09:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> In article <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com>, duane park wrote: > Does anyone know if the antenna on a Standard c-508A dual band radio is > the same type & gender, (sma) that is on the FT-50r?? If so, the Standard > antenna is much smaller and would work nice on the FT-50r As far as I know there are NO after market antennas yet available. The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. Chip From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:26 1996 From: Firstname.Lastname@UCHSC.edu (Your Name) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: kenwood ts850s problem ?? Date: 29 May 1996 21:15:58 GMT Message-ID: <4oieqe$b4b@tali.UCHSC.edu> References: <4o9udi$6iv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article <4o9udi$6iv@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, f1jrb@aol.com says... > >hello from france . > >i want to buy this transceiver . >please what is your opinion of this transceiver ?? >what is the modification possible ( all ) ??? > >thanks for the reponse f1jrb@aol.com I have owned a TS 850S for about 3 years now. Very happy with it. Absolutely no problems. I have not done any modifications or installed any of the optional items. --73, Mike From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:27 1996 From: "Dale \"Squeak\" Porray" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: 6146B/6146W ???? Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 21:27:39 -0700 Message-ID: <31AD23BB.6BE6@accessnv.com> References: <4o8e72$ec2@ccnet2.ccnet.com> T E I X E I R A wrote: > > I have a Yaesu FT101ZD with the original 6146B tubes in it. > Question... I have a new set of 6146W tubes, will they work? > > Don The 6146W is a ruggedized version of the original 6146 and 6146A, which were not designed with linear service in mind (i.e., developed before the days of SSB). The 6146B has a higher plate dissipation, and requires different biasing. What perceived benefit do you see, other than cost? I would not recommend it. Good Luck! "Squeak" Porray, AD7K Manager, Amateur Electronic Supply/Las Vegas From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:28 1996 From: "Dale \"Squeak\" Porray" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: LOUD Astron PS?? Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 21:46:52 -0700 Message-ID: <31AD283C.5AD6@accessnv.com> References: <4ofsgn$ko6@lynx.unm.edu> <4ohqi8$dgd@ns1.ccinet.net> Mark Walker (N9HCI) wrote: > > boardman@cobra.unm.edu (Bob Boardman) wrote: > > ------- snip ------------------- > > No, Bob, this is not the norm. I use an rs-20 on a Kenwood 430 and > the hum is not audible over regular ambient shack noise. Just a > one-second burst of hum when I switch the ps on, but certainly not > audible more than a few feet away. I regularly tax the 16-amp > continuous rating for extended periods. A little detective work is in > order. I would guess something is loose, like maybe a transformer > mounting bolt. Good luck to you. > 73, Mark Walker (N9HCI) I missed the original post, so I can only but guess what was said ... If you are talking about mechanical noise, this is sometimes caused by the magnetic field of the transformer attracting the steel case, and causing it to vibrate (usually at the top rear of the cabinet, where it overlaps the vertical panel the heat sinks are located on. Sometimes you can remove the top cover, "warp" it in an upward direction (bend it about 1/8 inch), and replace it to find that the contact (which is what causes the vibration) goes away ... sometimes a shim (I used a folded business card - if you want one of mine, let me know ;-) ) in order to keep the two panels from contacting will do the trick. With the amount of current flowing in the low voltage windings of the transformer, this sort of situation is not uncommon, particularly in the higher current supplies. Good Luck - hope this helps! "Squeak" Porray, AD7K Manager, Amateur Electronic Supply/Las Vegas (We go through about a ton of Astron supplies - literally - every month or so, and find this problem rare, but it does happen!) From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:29 1996 From: yv5dta@igc.net (Steve Morao) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Mods for FT2500 Date: 29 May 1996 22:34:30 GMT Message-ID: <4oijdm$lnv@news.bridge.net> Hi Does anyone has any info on mods for the Yaesu ft2500M? Steve YV5DTA/W4 yv5dta@bridge.net From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:29 1996 From: Melvin Seyle Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: IC-245 Date: 30 May 1996 00:36:24 GMT Message-ID: <4oiqi8$3vh@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> I just purchased an IC-245 that I knew in advance had problems. It was really inexpensive, so I thought it was worth taking a chance. Does anyone out there have an instruction and service manual that I could buy or copy? Thanks. Mel Seyle WA3KZR From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:30 1996 From: Melvin Seyle Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Tokyo Hi-Power Labs Date: 30 May 1996 01:16:20 GMT Message-ID: <4oist4$cm5@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> Does anyone out there have a stateside phone number for Tokyo Hi-Power Labs? I have an HL-35V that needs new relays, and need to find somehwhere to obtain them. Thanks. Mel Seyle WA3KZR From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:31 1996 From: Dave Norton Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Yaesu T-1000MP gen coverage tranmit Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 01:52:44 +0100 Distribution: world Message-ID: <6852DCAcFPrxEwxL@foobar.co.uk> References: <4nfo1d$t3v@solaris.cc.vt.edu> In article <4o7fss$c2a@roch.zetnet.co.uk>, Sir Barry Duxbury writes > > >Dave , Very many thanks for explaining the way to enter level 9 of >the menu. It works as suggested. I wonder what some of the other menu items d o? > >Again, many thanks and best wishes. .... Barry >> > > Barry I'm not sure and have not managed to find out from Yaesu, apart from the fact that they are "engineers functions" used by Yaesu engineers. But this is what I have found out 9-0 seems similar to item 8-9 it is labelled "car-set" but the settings are differant to the ones in 8-9 9-1 is rx if gain -- just like another rf gain, you can turn it up and give everyone a 59+ or turn it down and simulate receiving qrp .. hi 9-2 is tx if-gain? I haven't been brave enough to muck about with it 9-5 is a weird one .. if u move the vfo 1 all the rig lights come on and if u press enter all the small segments do a magic impression of the seige of venice .. dead usefull !! 9-6 turns the little tuning bar on for ssb, very neat, It seems to give a good indication of audio or alc. 9-7 is a self check, with settings for time to tx, rx and change mode. it looks like a sort of "burn in" method for the rig. 9-8 i think is the software/rom/whatever version for the radio, mine is 951207c2 9-9 is the settings for tx/rx and bands for all the differant markets, I havent tried them all but suppose that some leave out differant parts of different bands. thats it This is all guesswork (probably bad) so don't try them on my account. if anyone can add/disagree or pass on their information, I would be interested. Sometimes I even use it for transmitting .. Dave Dave Norton - G0UHI dave@khn.foobar.co.uk From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:33 1996 From: Gary Judd Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: 30 May 1996 03:24:09 GMT Message-ID: <4oj4cp$25g@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> jpss@ais.net (Chip) wrote: >In article <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com>, duane park > wrote: > >> Does anyone know if the antenna on a Standard c-508A dual band radio is >> the same type & gender, (sma) that is on the FT-50r?? If so, the Standard >> antenna is much smaller and would work nice on the FT-50r > >jpss@ais.net (Chip) wrote: >In article <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com>, duane park > wrote: > >> Does anyone know if the antenna on a Standard c-508A dual band radio is >> the same type & gender, (sma) that is on the FT-50r?? If so, the Standard >> antenna is much smaller and would work nice on the FT-50r > > As far as I know there are NO after market antennas yet available. > > The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. > >Chip Comet makes a dual band antenna called the SMA-3 that fits the FT-50R, and makes a considerable improvement over the stock antenna. HRO carries it in their stores. Gary WB7SLY From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:34 1996 From: Stephen Castle Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB AUSTRALIA Long Wave radio Date: 30 May 1996 05:55:55 GMT Message-ID: <4ojd9b$mcq@funlwb2.stl.dec.com> I need to borrow for 2 -3 months or buy a CHEAP radio that will recieve long wave, specifically for aircraft NDB's. Please E-mail Stephen.Castle@sno.mts.dec.com Steve Castle VK2ZSC From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:35 1996 From: Scott Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 Date: Thu, 30 May 96 11:23:23 PDT Message-ID: References: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> To: baack@midcoast.com In Article<4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net>, writes: > Path: news2.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!servi ce-2.agate.net!usenet > From: back@maine.maine.edu (Jason Baack) > Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment > Subject: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 > Date: 25 May 1996 13:35:04 GMT > Organization: Your Organization > Lines: 6 > Message-ID: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> > NNTP-Posting-Host: union_7.midcoast.com > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII > X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 > > Is the Rat Shack DSP unit any god? It is on clearance here for $39.00? > Yes/ No? > reply to email please.. > baack@midcoast.com > http://www.umecut.maine.edu/~baack > Jason, I've found it a good buy at $49.00. I use it with my FT-()! and FT-840 with good results even tho' both have narrow CW filters. It is quite good on SSB as well, really gets rid of the tuner-uppers, those annoying hetrodynes. I use in front of my TNC as well on HF and find it effective. Only weakness is noise blanker is not too effective. BTW, it really shines with my National NC-300 I use as a VHF/UHF IF. Id buy another if I could find it.... GL es 73 Scott W7GSM From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:36 1996 From: scam@siu.edu (Scott A. Manthe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 12:26:04 -0600 Message-ID: References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> In article , jpss@ais.net (Chip) wrote: > In article <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com>, duane park > wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the antenna on a Standard c-508A dual band radio is > > the same type & gender, (sma) that is on the FT-50r?? If so, the Standard > > antenna is much smaller and would work nice on the FT-50r > > As far as I know there are NO after market antennas yet available. > > The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. > > Chip Actually, Yaesu is using two different kinds of SMA connectors on their HTs, the one on the FT10/40 and the one on the FT50R. I believe that the Standard antenna will work on the FT50, but not on the FT10/40. Scott A. Manthe, N9AAT "There is no reason for any individual E-MAIL: scam@siu.edu to have a computer in their home." Protect your privacy, Kenneth Olsen, President, use PGP. Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:37 1996 From: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack Digital SWR/Power Meter Date: 30 May 1996 12:33:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4okt6f$fr3@safety.ics.uci.edu> References: <4oct04$i52@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31AD08D4.2EB3@concentric.net> I had the meter for about two days before I took it back for a refund. I like the meter overall, but the one function I really wanted was not working properly. I tried a second unit, and indeed the problem seems to be a design flaw. I wanted a good PEP reading wattmeter for SSB. The PEP function on this meter is all but useless for SSB. It is an oversight, and I am surprised it was not done properly. The PEP readings come very quickly, so quickly that I cannot read PEP while speaking in a normal voice. It seems to have no "peak and hold" circuit working with a decent time interval so that I can read the meter. The numbers just fly by, and I get nothing from it. Now, the meter seems quite nice for CW and other modes. It seems quite accurate down to low power levels. I like the way the physical unit was designed, it is backlighted and easy to use. I would have loved to keep the meter. But for SSB PEP readings, it is just plain unacceptable. Even the average readings were pretty nonsensical for SSB. Too bad. I went out and got the NYE Power monitor ( for the price of several Radio Shack meters :-) and I am OK now. Clark WA3JPG From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:38 1996 From: lawrence.wald@lerc.nasa.gov (Larry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Modes for the ICOM 281H Date: 30 May 1996 12:48:39 GMT Message-ID: <4ok5f7$dm8@sulawesi.lerc.nasa.gov> Hey, anyone know how to open up the receive to at least get the NOAA WX? Larry, KE8GW PS, TNX for any help -- =========================== Lawrence.Wald@lerc.nasa.gov NASA Lewis Research Center 21000 Brookpark Road Cleveland, Ohio 44135 MS 500-202 v(216) 433-5219 f(216) 433-8660 =========================== From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:39 1996 From: "Anthony R. Gold" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-245 Info Date: Thu, 30 May 96 14:38:37 GMT Message-ID: <833467117snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> References: <4oj2ha$gnu@bolivia.it.earthlink.net> Reply-To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk In article <4oj2ha$gnu@bolivia.it.earthlink.net> hepc@earthlink.net "Todd Owen" writes: > Icom didn't make a IC-245 service manual. I beg to differ. Icome did publish a single service manual which covered all of the IC-245A/E/H models. Regards, -- Tony - G3SKR / AA2PM email: tgold@panix.com tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk packet: g3skr@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:39 1996 From: Clyde Soles Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 14:39:09 -0600 Message-ID: <31AE076D.7D10@nile.com> References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> Chip wrote: > As far as I know there are NO after market antennas yet available. > > The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. I bought the Yaesu SMA to BNC adaptor and a 1/2 wave Hot Rod for when I want to reach out. It's a bit fragile so I wouldn't leave it on and tightening the nut is a nuisance but it works. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:41 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-738 vs TS-450 Date: Thu, 30 May 96 15:44:50 GMT Message-ID: <4okk1i$lrt@crash.microserve.net> References: <31AE2EFB.A59@concentric.net> Ben Johnson wrote: >I am in the currently considering my first HF rig and would >appreciate any input anyone might have in regards to features to >look for, options nice to have, etc. I think I have narrowed my >search to the two above units...however, I am open to any other >suggestions in that 12-1300 price range. I am currently learning >code and expecting to use to unit for about 50% code, 50% phone. If you're going to make CW a significant part of your operating, QSK is highly recommended. There is no peer to Ten Tec in this regard - they build the best CW rigs on the market. Your price range would easily buy a used, "loaded" Corsair or Corsair II. At a time when Japanese service and support seem to be waning, Ten Tec continues to offer the best service and customer support of any Amateur manufacturer. They also stock used gear (although you may need to put your name on a mailing list) and they offer a free trial period on every transceiver they sell. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:41 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: LOUD Astron PS?? Date: Thu, 30 May 96 15:45:07 GMT Message-ID: <4okk24$lrt@crash.microserve.net> References: <4ofsgn$ko6@lynx.unm.edu> boardman@cobra.unm.edu (Bob Boardman) wrote: >I checked the voltage, and it checked out OK, but when I hooked >it up at home and keyed up a rig that draws 8 amps or so, the PS >went from quiet (no load) to making a VERY loud 60hz hum when the >current draw went up. I mean loud enough to hear at the other end >of the house! People I talked to also heard a 60 hz hum. At first >I thought they were just hearing the audio hum, but after getting >far enough away from the PS so that the hum wasn't so loud, they >still could hear it on my signal. Are you certain it is 60 Hz? Could it be 120 Hz? 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:42 1996 From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Ignition noise problem Date: Thu, 30 May 96 15:46:11 GMT Message-ID: <4okk44$lrt@crash.microserve.net> References: <4oeti5$rvo@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> raf@dwroll.att.com (D434-Richard_A_Ferguson(Richard)x82612) wrote: >Ignition noise increases at higher engine output, consistent >with going uphill. To suppress ignition noise, cover the sparkplug >wires with tubular copper braid, grounded to the block. Ignition >noises usually are a popping sound. Corvettes have the braided covers and shielded spark plug boots as standard equipment. They also cover the entire distributor and coil with a metal "doghouse". If the engine is a Chevy V8, you could probably use those parts as-is. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:43 1996 From: Barry Williams Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: FT-990 Info WTD Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 16:45:02 -0500 Message-ID: <31AE16DE.653E@wt.net> Hello, Does anyone have information on the FT-990? I am interested in the filtering scheme for the IFs, and the receiver performance. Thank Barry From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:44 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: "T. Ronald Davis" Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Message-ID: <01bb4e85.fd58e920$354060cc@dell100> Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 17:11:44 -0700 References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> For $8 HRO will sell you a Yaesu CN-3 (a SMA to BNC adapter that works on the FT50R) > > > > > > Does anyone know if the antenna on a Standard c-508A dual band radio is > > > the same type & gender, (sma) that is on the FT-50r?? If so, the Standard > > > antenna is much smaller and would work nice on the FT-50r > > > > As far as I know there are NO after market antennas yet available. > > > > The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. > > > > Chip > > From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:45 1996 From: "Jon-Harald Bråthen" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-530 Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 17:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <01bb4e3a.cf250480$cb0c8fc2@jonhbraa> References: <4ohs4u$gll$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> You have to hold down the UP/DOWN /the ones with arrows) while turning the radio on. The first time you do this, the radio enters the extended mode. The second time it does a full reset, so be careful. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:46 1996 From: russell1@ihgp16.ih.att.com (-Keating,R.W.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: 30 May 1996 18:08:20 GMT Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4oko6k$lmf@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> <4oj4cp$25g@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> >> The Yaesu SMA connector is NOT compatiable with the Standard type SMA. >> >>Chip >Comet makes a dual band antenna called the SMA-3 that fits the FT-50R, >and makes a considerable improvement over the stock antenna. HRO carries >it in their stores. Gary WB7SLY These two statments don't seam to go together. I bought the SMA-3 for my Standard C508. It fits and works very well (but it is a bit long for a small radio), So I know the SMA-3 fits on the Standard. If it also fits on the FT-50R, then the connections must be the same. I though that SMA was a standard like BNC, TNC, PL-259 or any other connector . -- Russell Keating, N9LIL -----------> Send email to: russell1@ihgp.att.com From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:47 1996 From: k2wk@crystal.palace.net (Walt Kornienko) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Voice Band Equalizer Advice Date: 30 May 1996 18:36:05 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4okpql$fn3@puzzle.palace.net> Howdy. I am wondering if anyone knows of a good audio equalizer that is specifically designed for voice band applications, i.e. 250 Hz to 4,000 Hz? Any design ideas for building one will also be appreciated. I am handy with a soldering iron, hi. 73 de Walt - K2WK -- ***************************************************************** * * * 73 de Walt Kornienko - K2WK (FRC) * * k2wk@crystal.palace.net or K2WK@N2ERH.NJ.NOAM * * * ***************************************************************** From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Anyone got a service manual for President Lincoln?? Message-ID: <4ol1so$oec@crash.microserve.net> From: jackl@pinetree.microserve.com (WB3U) Date: Thu, 30 May 96 19:41:12 GMT References: <31AC5EAF.71AF@ee.port.ac.uk> <4ok6m0$ok2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> w8jitom@aol.com (W8JI Tom) wrote: >Clinton goes into thermal runaway, Gingrich gets random glitches >in his I/O port, and Dole's clock is running real slow. You forgot Gore. His RAM is full and the CPU has stopped. 73, Jack WB3U From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:48 1996 From: Steve Kennedy Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Antenna Analysers Date: 30 May 1996 20:28:56 GMT Message-ID: <4ol0e8$5mu@nadine.teleport.com> References: <831505842snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> <832765677snz@microvst.demon.co.uk> To: tgold@microvst.demon.co.uk I bought one of the MFJ 259 units too. I don't know how I muddled through ant ennas and resonant circuits before I got this unit. It is great! The peace of mind and surity it brings to my dealings with resonance and imped ance approaches a religious experience! Steve WB7PSD From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:49 1996 From: Bill Rahl Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Problem with Rpt or meter?Help Date: 30 May 1996 21:46:08 GMT Message-ID: <4ol4v0$4dqc@CT1.SNET.Net> I have a GR300 UHF repeater. I have a Daiwa Power& SWR meter hooked up to it ,and it reads 40 watts output and swr around 1.9 I took a Daiwa "N" connecter 2 position antenna splitter to hook the antenna to one side and a 60 watt dummy load to the other side, so I could switch the antenna feed line to the dummy load in case of storms and for testing. The problem I noticed is that on my meter, the watts out dropped down to 30 watts either on the antenna or dummmy load. Any one got a clue what is happing here? I checked the cables for shorts and they OK Appreciate all help, Bill Rahl From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:50 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc From: n1ist@netcom.com (Michael L. Ardai) Subject: Re: Another Ramsey kit to avoid Message-ID: References: <4oksc5$c03@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 22:12:29 GMT In article <4oksc5$c03@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> cjs9@cornell.edu (Carl Steck ler) writes: -In article , n1ist@netcom.com says... ->I picked up the FM-6 "Crystal Control Micro Size FM Transmitter Kit", ->hoping to use it as a Fox transmitter. -> ->This is a surface-mount kit with a varactor-tuned crystal oscillator around ->12 MHz followed by a quadrupler and a tripler to get to 2M. What it doesn't ->have is ANY filtering. -Mike, I also looked at this kit in the catalog, you know what? there is no -mention of filters. So what's the bitch? It is not as if they promised you -filters and you didn't get them. The ad doesn't mention any other part of the circuit either... What I expected was a kit that, when built according to their instructions, would be legal to use. This kit does NOT meet FCC harmonics requirements, and transmits on frequencies that ARE NOT licensed for this purpose (FM broadcast band, aircraft band, etc.) while also transmitting on the intended frequency. The filter should have been included as part of a decent (or just legal) design. -They offer suggestions to try as in modifing the kits I have purchased. Why should I have to modify a kit to get it to perform as described? -Another thing, just what did you expect for what they were charging for this -kit. Sounds like you want top of the line for little or nothing. No, I just wanted a 2M transmitter without the hassle of designing one myself. There is no reason that they couldn't have added filtering at that price... ->On the other hand, I am just finishing up the Ten Tec 2M kit; -How much more was the TenTec kit? Might there be a correlation? Apples and oranges here... The Ten Tec kit is a full 2M transceiver, and is priced comparably to the Ramsey FTX-146 (which, according to the QST review, is also a kit of questionable performance and legality...) On features, the Ten Tec 1220 beats the FTX-146 hands-down; it has a full front panel, CTCSS, mike and mobile bracket, and place for an internal 35W amp for about $20 more than the Ramsey. /mike -- \|/ Michael L. Ardai N1IST n1ist@netcom.com \|/ -*- --- Boston Amateur Radio Club: http://www.barc.org/barc --- -*- /|\ or send "info barc-list" to listserv@netcom.com /|\ From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:51 1996 Message-ID: <31AE8E7F.BEA@cbn.net.id> Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 23:15:27 -0700 From: Judhi Prasetyo Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-59r or IC-Z1A??? References: <4njbtg$gl8@ipo.ipoline.com> <4njbum$gl8@ipo.ipoline.com> Vic wrote: > > netsvic@ipoline.com (Vic) wrote: > > >Hi! I am thinking about buy FT-50R or IC-Z1A?? Does any one can give > >some advice for me?? Thank you!! > >Vic BUY Z1A !!! Reason ? Try it yourself ! - Judhi From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:52 1996 From: hepc@earthlink.net (Todd Owen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: IC-245 Service Manual Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 00:41:15 GMT Message-ID: <4olf3k$81v@uruguay.it.earthlink.net> Where can you get an Icom IC-245 SM? I was told that Icom didn't make one. --73, Todd KE4UDN ----------------------------------------------------------------- Todd Owen Hanover Engineers, P.C. Richmond, VA 804-730-0011 (Voice) 804-730-4012 (Fax) ke4udn@amsat.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:53 1996 From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50r replacement antenna Date: 31 May 1996 02:13:55 GMT Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4olkl3$o0g@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <31AA0696.45EF@ix.netcom.com> <01bb4e85.fd58e920$354060cc@dell100> Reply-To: parnass@att.com In article <01bb4e85.fd58e920$354060cc@dell100>, T. Ronald Davis wrote: >For $8 HRO will sell you a Yaesu CN-3 (a SMA >to BNC adapter that works on the FT50R) I bought a similar adapter for $5 last week at The Ham Radio Toy Store, Wheaton, IL. Sorry, I don't have the telephone number handy. Dial information at (708)555-1212. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S AMPS Wireless Development Laboratory parnass@bell-labs.com - (708)979-5414 Bell Laboratories From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:54 1996 From: n4fan@shelby.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-50R Date: 31 May 1996 03:52:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4omj2a$li1@doc.zippo.com> References: In article , thblazer@bri ght.net says... > > >To all ! > Hello...I just got the FT-50R at Dayton also...I think I got the buy >of the day...Love the Radio..Nice features. Nice size too! >Looking for Mods to open it up...Appreciate any help... I have read in this >news group about itscapablities...or what can be expected..We hope... and I >am Interested in the Optional keypad ...to see if it is worth buying... > >Thanks to all...I get lots of Great info from these postings... > > I'v had conflicting reports, does it do 88-108 wide FM? Will it scan resonably fast. I dont expect one to be like a scanner, but is it usable like one? Thanks! N4FAN n4fan@shelby.net From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:55 1996 From: Burt Fisher Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur,policy,rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 05:47:17 -0400 Message-ID: <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com> Clearly almost anyone can better use ham frequencies than hams can. Have you listened to the important conversations plus contests and useless traffic on ham bands. If the FCC wiped out ham radio today 99% of the public would be unaffected. Even most hams would be unaffected as they are either dead, should be dead, or inactive. I think I will write my congressIT. #================#=====================================================#| Bur t Fisher | Teacher of video, broadcasting and electronics | | Amateur call | South Dennis, Ma. (Cape Cod) | | K1OIK | If you sit on the fence, it is a pain in the butt | #================#=====================================================#| k1oi k@ccsnet.com fisher@meol.mass.edu MAC is 5% of the market | #======================================================================# From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:56 1996 From: dteague@csc.com (Guy Teague) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur,policy,rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: 31 May 1996 06:49:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4omir5$1se@explorer.csc.com> References: <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com> I support putting Mr. Fisher in Low Earth Orbit. -- Cheers 73 de dteague@csc.com "They're out there" K Kesey Guy KG5VT gteague@why.net "Hey don't eat that yellow snow" F Zappa From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:57 1996 From: markn9srt@aol.com (Mark N9SRT) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: 31 May 1996 08:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4omovp$41h@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com> Reply-To: markn9srt@aol.com (Mark N9SRT) > Even most hams would be unaffected as they are either > dead, should be dead, or inactive. So why do you use K1OIK to identify yourself? If hams are such losers, it seems you would distance yourself from the group. > Clearly almost anyone can better use ham frequencies than hams can. > Have you listened to the important conversations plus contests > and useless traffic on ham bands. No, it's not MENSA discussions most of the time, but some people enjoy these activities. Perhaps you could draft a list of approved activities and topics for discussion. I'm sure we could all sleep better at night knowing we are "K1OIK APPROVED". I think if you don't like what you hear, change the frequency! All my radios have a knob or button to change it. If you can elevate the level of discussion, join in! I personally think there are more constructive uses for the space occupied by Major League ballparks, but some enjoy the experience, and the land on all sides is used for other purposes, so it would seem everyone gets something. A lot of new blood has entered the hobby recently, with better operating habits than I hear used by some old-timers on HF. ncouragement to learn and experiment and possibly compete for at least equal footing with countries that take education seriously, we need more cable channels, satellite feeds, pagers, cell phones and cordless phones, and a populace that has NO IDEA how any of it works. What a bunch of morons we have in the NASA astronauts who hold ham licenses. Just think how much better off life would be if we had done away with ham radio years ago! How useless all the hams were in World War II. Maybe Foot Locker will start a "Shoes for Amateur Radio Equipment" program. I can't wait! And this computer! I'll just grab the phone cord and puBBBBBBBBBBBBZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:58 1996 From: CSLE87@email.mot.com (Karl Beckman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: What kind of antenna is this? Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 08:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <31a81da3.23755608@news.davlin.net> In article <31a81da3.23755608@news.davlin.net>, hturn@pelican.davlin.net wrote : > I have just aquired a military antenna and I was wondering what > exactly I have. It seems to be a very large mobile antenna. > It consists of the bottom (base) which is about 24 inches long and 3 > inches in diameter painted green. N type connecter on the side about > 9 inches from the bottom. Stamped on the base is the following: > > ANTENNA AT-1062/G > ORDER NO. 40512-PM-60 > MOTOROLA INC. SER.NO. 1 > > Yes ser.no. 1. > After the base is a very heavy steel spring. Then comes 24 inches of > half inch aluminum tube on the end of which is a compression nut where > a whip such as a 102 incher would fit. > Any ideas as to what I have aquired? > Does the N type connector indicate that this is a VHF or UHF antenna? > Let me know if you have any ideas I am tempted to disasemble the base > but don't dare to now. > Thanks Hank. > hturn@pelican.davlin.net Working from memory, you have the base of a multi-channel military HF 2-18 MHz mobile antenna, hence the N connector. Your guesses about NOT disassembling the base and about requiring a long whip are correct, but I recall the whip length was 96". Maybe you can find an Army MARS member who could obtain the AT-1062/G performance specs for you. -- Karl Beckman, P.E. < If our English language is so > Motorola Private Data Systems < precise, why do you drive on the > Schaumburg, IL / Parma, OH < parkway and park on the driveway? > (847) 576-0992 / (216) 265-2092 ** Opinions expressed here do NOT represent the views of Motorola Inc. ** -- Amateur radio WA8NVW NavyMARS NNN0VBH @ NOGBN.NOASI From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:33:59 1996 From: a313@Lehigh.EDU Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: 31 May 1996 09:15:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4omre0$tfr@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> In article <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com>, Burt Fisher writes: >Clearly almost anyone can better use ham frequencies than hams can. >Have you listened to the important conversations plus contests >and useless traffic on ham bands. If the FCC wiped out ham radio >today 99% of the public would be unaffected. Even most hams >would be unaffected as they are either dead, should be dead, or >inactive. > >I think I will write my congressIT. > > >#================#=====================================================#| Bu rt Fisher | Teacher of video, broadcasting and electronics | >| Amateur call | South Dennis, Ma. (Cape Cod) | >| K1OIK | If you sit on the fence, it is a pain in the butt | >#================#=====================================================#| k1o ik @ccsnet.com fisher@meol.mass.edu MAC is 5% of the market | >#======================================================================# > Why do you still have a ticket ???? You're either dead, should be dead or Inactive ? Which is it ??? According to regulations.... Amateur traffic in non emergency situations shall be restricted to items not interfering with commericial telecommunications bussiness, ie it's supposed to be unimportant. This philosophy allows foreign governments an opportunity to protect their telecommunications industry. The intent of the FCC regs is to provide a pool of technically trained people in communications and electronics for use in emergencies. I believe the last "Emergency" was WW II. Communication is only one facet of ham radio. 73's Dick K8WHA (Not Inavtive but maybe dead or should be dead) Dick K8WHA From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:00 1996 From: Clyde Soles Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Yaesu software?? Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 09:58:23 -0600 Message-ID: <31AF171F.5421@nile.com> OK, I have an FT-50R and would like to get the software for programming it. The crux is I have a PowerMac and it is a Windows program. Fortunately I should be able to run the program using SoftWindows 3.0 but I will need an adaptor for the cable. So has anyone out there done this? If so, do you know what adaptor is needed? Any help would be appreciated. TIA From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:01 1996 From: an609568@anon.penet.FI Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: SSTV GEAR? Date: 31 May 96 11:01:21 GMT Message-ID: <9605311036.AA13867@anon.penet.fi> Reply-To: an609568@anon.penet.fi Any recommendations for a good PC-based SSTV system? I use a 486DX4/100 with the usual multimedia SB card/CD-ROM gear and Stealth graphics card. Advice would be appreciated - replies to damien.vale@airservices.gov.au Damien VK3CD --****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION*** Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED. Please, report inappropriate use to abuse@anon.penet.fi For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to help@anon.penet.fi If you have any problems, address them to admin@anon.penet.fi From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:02 1996 From: CrACKeD Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur,policy,rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: 31 May 1996 12:06:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4onfup$66v@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> References: <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com> <4omir5$1se@explorer.csc.com> Guy Teague wrote: : I support putting Mr. Fisher in Low Earth Orbit. I second the motion. Apparently Mr. Fisher has not been involved in the public service side of amateur radio. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:03 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: "T. Ronald Davis" Subject: mirage amplifier Message-ID: <01bb4f25.85006340$384060cc@dell100> Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 12:15:24 -0700 I'm thinking of pumping up my FT-50R for home use. Any comments on Mirage amps. In particular the Mirage B-34-G, 2m, 5in/35out watt unit? From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:03 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: "T. Ronald Davis" Subject: Re: ft-50r Message-ID: <01bb4f26.b2647460$384060cc@dell100> Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 12:21:42 -0700 References: <31A73799.3AEF@hogsett.com> Speaking of accidents -- Of course I was dinking with my FT50R, changed it, and THEN LOOKED in the manual and read "DON'T CHANGE IT". Fortunately - it didn't seem to do anyting. It is "ON" or "OFF" when it comes from the factory???? > Jerry Hogsett wrote in article <31A73799.3AEF@hogsett.com>... > Michael M Long wrote: > > > > I just got an FT-50r and am confused about one of the funtions. > > The knob function is SFT 24, which the manual does not talk > > about. In the back, it says that it sets the CPU shift, so don't change > > it. If it is so important, why make it a knob function that someone could > > accidentally chage. Anyone know what this actually does? > > michael long > > From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:04 1996 From: eisner@lavielle.com (eisner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: WTB: Motorola Walkie Talkie Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 12:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: I'm looking for the WWII Motorola shortwave walkie talkie, about 4"x4"x14", looks like an oversized telephone handset and is painted olive green. -- Herbie Eisner: eisner@lav.de From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:05 1996 From: csmith1@ccgate.hac.com (Chris Smith, NR3O) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: AMP HOOK UP FOR IC706 Date: 31 May 1996 12:48:42 GMT Message-ID: <4ompra$bpo@newsroom.HITC.COM> References: <4oiap2$fps@newsroom.HITC.COM> In article <4oiap2$fps@newsroom.HITC.COM>, "Chris Smith, NR3O" says: > > >> Any body out there running a amp with a 706? I need to hook up my AL 80 >> . Looks like you use pin 3 on the acc bot 20 ma isnt going to get it you >> must have to find a light relay to switch with les than that. Any help >> would be great. > >May 1996 CQ, pp 30 -- EXACTLY what you wanted to know. > Here's more: The CQ May 96 gives the following for a 737A that "will work with many current Icom transceivers": 22 ohm 1/4W _ ICOM ACC(1) 0------\/\/\/\------(_)-- amp OR ACC(2) DIN | plug (both /------------------' have pins 3 1/4 w /. (shield) & 7 assigned 220 ohm 0 . the same) 7 ---/\/\/\--------|---3 - 3 3 ---| 1N914 ^ 3 Radio Shack #275-283 |_____________|___3 12V reed relay If this is not understandable, read the article . The text calls out #275-233 and says it's 11 mA, so there is a discrepancy. From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:06 1996 From: Ray Wilson Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Feedback on MFJ HF tuners please. Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 12:50:32 -0400 Message-ID: <31AF2358.4B08@voicenet.com> References: <4olsol$5li@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: n3rkh@voicenet.com Gerald: Here is a quirk of the MFJ tuners: The dummy load ain't so dumb. If I select the dummy load with an antenna attached to the tuner, then key up, enough RF will find it's way to the antenna to get S-7 reports within a mile or so. Ray Gerald Phillips wrote: > > I am thinking about buying an MFJ HF tuner (specifically the 300w one > with dummy load, etc.) Looking on some feedback about them and any > expereiences (good or bad) folks have had. Also reccomendations on > other tuners is fine also. Thanks. > > KE4MBD > Gerald From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:07 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew From: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington) Subject: Re: Anyone got a service manual for President Lincoln?? Message-ID: References: <31AC5EAF.71AF@ee.port.ac.uk> <31ACAABD.28CF@hodcs.att.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 13:54:51 GMT Would you settle for a service manual for President Clinton? It's much more compact. : > As the subject tells, I am looking for a service manual for President : > Lincoln. : > If you have one, please mail me. I would be interrested of a copy. : > : > Erik : Perhaps the Walter Reed Army Medical Center or Bethesda Naval Hospital in : Washington, DC could supply one. : Sorry, couldn't resist :-) : WA3ZXO -- Steve Ellington N4LQ@IGLOU.COM Louisville, Ky From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:08 1996 From: "David M. Kaye" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: test Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 14:41:01 -0400 Message-ID: <01bb4f20.b73a0000$9ddc61cc@Dave.superlink.net> test message From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:09 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: dgf@netcom.com (David Feldman) Subject: IC-1200A 25 kHz channel spacing? Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 15:04:41 GMT In so cal there seem to be alot of 1.2 GHz band repeaters with 25 kHz channel spacing (i.e., 12xx.x25 MHz). The unit can be configured for 10 or 50 kHz tuning steps. (the IC-1200E can be set for 12.5 or 25 kHz steps), so I can't tune exactly (i'll be 5 kHz off those particular spots). Is the diff between the 1200A and 1200E set by a jumper? Is there any way to accomodate this short of a lobotomy (of the radio, not me!)? 73 Dave WB0GAZ dgf@netcom.com From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:10 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: Bob Lewis Subject: Re: What does DISCRIMINATOR term means ? Message-ID: <31AF446A.22EA@staffnet.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 15:11:38 -0400 References: <4oepif$okc@ss10.elvis.ru> Oleg Melnikov wrote: > > Hi folks, > > What does "Discriminator " term means ? > How can I identify it on the wiring diagram of my Radio > (radio with NFM mode) ? > > Thanks in advance. > Best regards. Perhaps a direct discrimintor audio output (before deemphesis) to drive a sub-audible decoder or 9600 baud packet? From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:11 1996 From: Dave Bernstein Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Experience with QRO Linear Amplifiers? Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 16:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <31AF7F5F.1226@rational.com> If you have used or are now using a QRO linear, I'd appreciate your frank assessment of the amplifier. I've read the review published in the DX Bulletin, but would like feedback from a broader base of users. Dave AA6YQ dhb@rational.com From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:12 1996 From: Dave Booth Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Yellow wire mod on ICOM IC706 Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 16:53:50 -0700 Message-ID: <31AF868E.41C6@pactitle.com> References: <4ohlsl$o0a@news.cais.com> To: David Whitehurst David Whitehurst wrote: > > Has anyone clipped the "yellow wire" on the ICOM 706 to get decent sensitivi ty > outside the vhf ham bands yet? Did it increase intermod on 2 meters??? Dose > it void the 1 year warranty by Icom??? N4ZGT David. i found a few mods for the ic-706 here.... ftp://www.cdrom.com/pub/hamradio/oak/mods/icom/ic-706.mod have fun ! http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/5860 -- Dave Booth kc6wfs From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:12 1996 From: cdorn@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Chris Dorn) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Opinions on Ten-Tec 555 Scout Date: 31 May 1996 17:07:18 GMT Message-ID: <4on906$vd2@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> Hi, I'm sure this question has been asked numerous times, but a friend and I are interested in opinions and experience with the Ten-Tec 555 Scout. Camping and backpacking season is finally arriving here in Western Canada, and we are looking at inexpensive, portable rigs, with a reasonable current draw to take outdoors. We need something with more power than QRP, but don't need a ton of buzzers and bells. 80 and 40m coverage should be adequate for the time being. What is the construction like with the Scout, and what kind of current draw can be expected with lower power output (say 25W)? We are interested to hear any general user comments/experience with the rig. Thanks, Chris VE6RDC From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:13 1996 From: jms@col.hp.com (Mike Stansberry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur,policy,rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: I support the LEO and the loss of ham frequencies. Date: 31 May 1996 17:20:01 GMT Message-ID: <4on9o1$a4a@nonews.col.hp.com> References: <31AEC025.6EB1@ccsnet.com> Burt Fisher (k1oik@ccsnet.com) wrote: : Clearly almost anyone can better use ham frequencies than hams can. : Have you listened to the important conversations plus contests : and useless traffic on ham bands. If the FCC wiped out ham radio : today 99% of the public would be unaffected. Even most hams : would be unaffected as they are either dead, should be dead, or : inactive. Don't buy into Burt's flame. He lives to do this sort of thing. Mike From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:14 1996 From: k2wk@crystal.palace.net (Walt Kornienko) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: FT-1000 Expert Needed!! Date: 31 May 1996 17:23:31 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4on9uj$obc@puzzle.palace.net> References: <319E8728.5A4B@snet.net> <31a019e7.32547450@nuhou.aloha.net> <4nsjv6$66v@news.syspac.com> <31A6F6BD.4403@one.net> Jim Nance (jnance@one.net) wrote: : dnorris@k7no.com wrote: : > : > ed@aloha.net (ed) wrote: : > : > >TDE wrote: : > : > >>My piece of !$#@ FT-1000 is off frequency about 50 cycles or so. Drives : > >>me nuts, love to be exact. Looking for any info on tweaking it back : > >>into place. Can this be done easily enough, or is it stricltly a : > >>factory job? Thanks very much!!! - Rick, N1SQJ : > : > >There's a trimmer in the hole on the TXCO, if you have that option, or : > >probably in the master oscillator circuit, if you don't. You can : > >zero-beat on WWV if you turn the IF shift all the way to the bassy : > >side with an SSB mode selected (use headphones to hear the zero beat : > >clearly). Make sure the set's fully warmed up before adjusting. : > >Ed- AH6MI : > : > You don't have to listen to zero beat. It is easier and more accurate : > to switch alternatively between USB and LSB and adjust the trimmer : > until both sidebands exhibit the same tone. : > : > cdn : > : > C. Dean Norris : > Amateur Radio Station K7NO : > e-mail to dnorris@k7no.com : > http://www.syspac.com/~dnorris/ : Swithing between sidebands usb and lsb is not the proper way to set the : master oscillator. You are probally thinking of the way to set the : carrier points without test equipment. If you want to be accurate and : apparently the original post is if they are concerned about 50 cycles. : Forget WWV and set the freq. with an accurate frequency counter. On the FT-1000, which controls (vari-caps) need to be adjusted to set the carrier point? The service manual lacks a "Theory of Operation" chapter so finding the specific part is quite difficult. MANY THANX de Walt - K2WK : 73 de KE4WY (Usually dosn't get involved) -- ***************************************************************** * * * 73 de Walt Kornienko - K2WK (FRC) * * k2wk@crystal.palace.net or K2WK@N2ERH.NJ.NOAM * * * ***************************************************************** From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:15 1996 From: Randall Rhea Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Radio Shack DSP $39.00 Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 17:28:21 -0500 Message-ID: <31AF7285.55CD@informix.com> References: <4o72a8$hm@service-2.agate.net> To: Jason Baack Jason Baack wrote: > > Is the Rat Shack DSP unit any god? It is on clearance here for $39.00? It is not a god :-) It works well as a narrow filter for CW or for a notch filter for SSB. For $39, it's a good tool if you are having problems with heterodynes (squeals) on SSB, especially on 40m. It automatically notches out the squeal. Its noise cancelling does not work at all as far as I am concerned, except maybe on CB AM. -- =================================================== Randall Rhea randall@informix.com Informix Software, Inc. Sr. Systems Engineer From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:16 1996 From: fedingas@perkunas.omnitel.NET (Viktoras Peteraitis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: DC-DC converter ? Date: 31 May 96 18:12:35 GMT Message-ID: <9605311812.AA58812@perkunas.omnitel.net> Does someone can recommend, where we could purchase a DC-DC converter 12 V ->24 V , 15-20 A (YES, i.e. from 12V to 24V !!! Not the popular 24->12V !) A manufacturers name, product name, E-mail link, tel/fax will be appreciated. Thanks, and BYE ! ====================================================== Viktoras Peteraitis LY2BIG (AB4UW) Vilnius, LITHUANIA E-mail: fedingas@post.omnitel.net Tel: (370-2) 709-833 office; (370-2) 700-598 home; Fax: (370-2) 709-807 =========================--============================ From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:17 1996 From: szumbrun@aol.com (SZumbrun) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re:FT-1000mp Date: 31 May 1996 18:21:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4onre1$eqc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: szumbrun@aol.com (SZumbrun) Does anyone have any experience in increasing the power output of the mp. I've heard one can increase the rf power output in the mp to 200 watts. Anyone have any experience? Would appreciate info. Thanks, Steve W6SHO From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:18 1996 From: burch@netline.net (Burch Akin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Mod for FT-726R Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 18:59:31 GMT Message-ID: <4onfen$p6k@tesla.netline.net> References: <4gu525$ais@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> sba3020@InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca (Carl Hodder) wrote: >How would anyone compare the Ft-726R against the FT-736R besides >it having CAT and 1200 MHz band option? I bought a new FT-736R back in Oct/Nov. of '95. I have never used a FT-726R but I have been extremely pleased with the 736. I have been told that the band modules are different between the two radios, but I am not 100% sure. Burch Akin KE4ZQV From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:19 1996 From: david_k@simusa.sim.ORG (David A. Keller) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: DUAL-BAND HT INFO?? Date: 31 May 96 20:03:20 GMT Message-ID: <199605312035.QAA00651@news.interpath.net> Reply-To: david_k@simusa.sim.org markn9srt@aol.com (Mark N9SRT) wrote: > I carry the T7A because it is MUCH smaller than the 51R, if both > radios have the 12-volt packs... the Yaesu is small with the smaller > battery In QST advertisements, the ICOM IC-T7A says it has "4W VHF OUTPUT - With optional 9.6V BP-173" battery. Since they do say something like "5 Watt output with 13.5V battery", they seem to imply that 9.6V is the highest voltage battery you can use, and, consequently you will need an adapter to use 12-13.8V from your auto. Can you advise me on this? --////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- David A. Keller Work: david_k@simusa.org -- SIM USA, Inc. 704.587.1462 -- Box 7900 Home: kellermd@aol.com -- Charlotte NC 28241.7900 KF4JDL -- By Prayer Since 1893 --////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:20 1996 From: Piers Rochford Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: TS450S - Wide RX??? Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 20:08:31 GMT Message-ID: <737285292wnr@sling.demon.co.uk> References: <4om0mu$odp@igubu.saix.net> Reply-To: piers@sling.demon.co.uk -- Please can you send me details of the mod that you already have and if you get the new one that as well Thanks Piers. _______________________________________________________________ piers@sling.demon.co.uk _______________________________________________________________ From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:21 1996 From: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Re: Quick Call 2? Date: 31 May 1996 20:35:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4oo38c$ip9@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4onqd8$o4c@news.ysu.edu> Reply-To: teacherjh@aol.com (Teacherjh) >> The tones that the fire dept uses are called Quick Call 2 or also 2 tone sequential. I was wondering if anyone knew of any ham hts that would be set off by these tones or that could be modified to do such. << The Radio Shack HTX-202 comes with built in DTMF squelch. You send a DTMF tone sequence and the other radio unsquelches and hears you. I think many other 2 meter radios do this, but I don't know if it is built in. CTCSS "subaudible" is a bit of a misnomer, you can hear it, but it is not very loud... more like a light buzz. However, it does keep the radio quiet unless that tone is recieved, then the radio unsquelches and can hear your voice call. It is also called PL which stands for "private line", a Motorola trademark. It was intended to let several users share the same frequency (though not to transmit at the same time... it jsut keeps the other people's radios off while you are talking to your cohorts) Jose KD1SB From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:22 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment From: mai@iquest.net (Patrick Croft) Subject: WindTrax Balloon Flight! Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 21:14:49 GMT WINDTRAX VII FLIGHT IS SATURDAY!!! June 1, 1996 at approximately 1200 UTC (start checking about 6am Indiana time) , Launch site: 2.5miles east of Whiteland, Indiana (south of Indy about 10 miles ) Prelaunch Freqs: Check-ins: 3.871MHz, & 146.835/R locals Nets begin at 1130UTC Balloon Type: Kaymont 1200 Gr. Parachute Size: 5 foot diameter custom made by KB9BSV Flight packages; Crossband repeater (by Paul /W9DUU) 2m rcvr to 6m & 70cm xmtrs, with voice ID & nicad pwr p ack, dual half wave antennas GPS/Packet(By Chuck/WB9IHS) Garmin rcvr, Paccom controlled (HandiPacket) & down-li nked on TEKK 446MHz xmtr. Self contained, nicad & lithum powered, 1/4 wave xmtr antenna, Ball Corp stripline rcvr. Stripline antenna on top of box. Audio beeper for ground retrival of pac kages. ATV(by Terry/KT9V) Two (2) B&W CCD cams, WB8ELK color video graphics dow nlinked on Wyman ATV xmtr with 1/4 wave antenna. Self contained, lithum powered. CCD cams are mou nted one shooting horz., and one up, solid state switching controlled. Flight Package Freqs; Crossband rptr; Dn 52.525 & 444.85 MHz (VP) 50 & 100mW o utput Up @ 144.3MHz (VP) GPS/PAcket: Dn 446.0 MHZ @1200 Baud packet (VP) 250mW out put. ATV: Dn 439.25 MHz (VP) 1.5 WATTS OUT!!! All amateurs are welcome to participate, checkin, monitor feeds, etc. Pix wil l be posted on the following WEBSITE: www.surf-ici.com/marc Stop by and get a birds eye view from 95,000 feet up! For details on the WindTrax Group and the WindTrax program, contact Chuck Cris t/WB9IHS via email, mai@iquest.net From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:23 1996 From: duane@rci.ripco.COM (Duane Whittingham) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: Schematic for Alinco DJ-162 Date: 31 May 96 21:49:03 GMT Message-ID: Reply-To: duane@ripco.com Hi, I am looking for a schematic for a Alinco DJ-162 HT, could someone please help me, thanks. duane@ripco.com -- >>>> Duane Whittingham - N9SSN - Dedicated to TVRO & Radio Broadcasting! <<<< duane@ripco.com (MHGC -- Damian Smith) >>>> Make The Right Choice --- C-Band TVRO --- Not The Little Dish! --- <<<< From amsoft@epix.net Mon Jun 03 19:34:24 1996 From: Harold Hackman Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.swap Subject: Re: WTB: Icom 3SAT HT Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 22:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: <31AFD75C.2EAB@earthlink.net> References: <4og2o0$9u8@fido.asd.sgi.com> Bill Dorsey wrote: > > I'm interested in buying two of these radios. If you have one or two > available for sale, please send me email stating condition and price. > Thanks! > > 73s > > Bill Dorsey (N3LMF) Bill, For your info, I paid $190 at a flea market for a 3sat in excellent condition. I suspect you'll pay between that and $250. Good luck. Harold