The World of Ham Radio CD-ROM From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!ghansen.accessone.com!ghansen From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How much is R7000 worth? Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 00:22:54 GMT Organization: .tacoma.link Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <4e626p$fc5@post.gsfc.nasa.gov> <310C4CF7.5A19@connect.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghansen.accessone.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article <310C4CF7.5A19@connect.net> SWW writes: >I'd go to $600 So would I if you would sell it to me for that. To get the one I own you would have to send me at least $1000. grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sparky.insinc.net!grumpy.insinc.net!KEY.globalx.net!pagesat.net!netserv.com!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!winternet.com!news.minn.net!news From: Brad Hedlund Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:14:33 -0600 Organization: MinnNet Communications Lines: 2 Message-ID: <31106859.442A@minn.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-68.minn.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) I have a Pro-46 scanner and it seems to be unmodifiable. Is there anybody out there that knows otherwise? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.icon.net!usenet From: g_reed@icon.net (Glenn Reed) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack.... Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 02:05:19 GMT Organization: (ICON) InterConnect Online, Inc. Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <960131171212_211082828@emout05.mail.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: okc163.icon.net X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [1.0] > hello there! I saw your posting on the net about "The Shack" and was > wondering if I can ask you a question since you work for those folks. I am > looking for a Cigarette plug adaptor that will fit into the back of my > scanner so I don't have to mount it in my truck for life ( I'd hate to worry > about that thing.). My buddy has one, and says he got it at "the shack." But > when I went there, I couldn't locate one :( As the string has been saying, > those guys who work there don't know much, and when I ask one, he didn't kno w > anything either. Any ideas? Thanks! > Christian > Hi Christian, I don't know what model of scanner you have, but most of the ones at RS use a standard size coaxial power plug for 12 VDC. If yours is like that, go back to the store and ask to see a 270-1533. It is a straight cord with a cigar lighter on one end and a coaxial plug on the other. It is about 5 or 6 feet long. I believe that is the number. I could not find it in the catalog, but I think that is right. I think it sells for $4.49. If that plug doesn't fit, then try a 270-1528. This is a "Coiled Power Cord", pg. 174, and has differen t size plug adaptors. It is $9.99. Both should be on the same section of pegboard. Hope this helps. Regards, <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> <> Glenn Reed <> <> OK Wing Communications - C.A.P. <> <> Sooner 44 <> <> KF5XB <> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Note: The above remarks do not necessarily represent those of anything sentient. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.icon.net!usenet From: g_reed@icon.net (Glenn Reed) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 02:40:41 GMT Organization: (ICON) InterConnect Online, Inc. Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <4eoatu$1co@i-2000.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: okc141.icon.net X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [1.0] > > I really don't think you are going to change the way the company does > business. The Corporate police requires a physical - including rectal > exam. They only hire perfect assholes - from the top down. > > That way when you come into the store, they can be sure you both speak the sam e language. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!ub!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!gilbreth.ecn.purdue.edu!gerde From: gerde@gilbreth.ecn.purdue.edu (Carlyle Gerde) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: 1 Feb 1996 03:32:59 GMT Organization: Purdue University Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4epc9b$1qm@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> References: <4ek0ti$7op@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> <4ekrcp$boo@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gilbreth.ecn.purdue.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 (NOV) I still don't think people get the core of the problem. It is not just Radio Shack. It is all mass marketing. Your go into Lowes or Home Depot and you may get someone who has techical knowledge of plumbing or you may get some kid working his way thru college. Sales droids are everywhere. Technical specialist are expensive and usually do not generate revenue (unless they are a professional - ie lawyer or CPA). Marketing is there to sell, get the product out the door. If you are mad at Radio Shack, why are you not mad at Service Merchandize? 73... N9NWO From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!mcm111036 From: b-korn@nwu.edu (BGK) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR-8000 or MVT7100?? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 04:11:41 GMT Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, US Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4epeht$av0_001@res-hall.nwu.edu> References: <4e8atd$hth@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: mcm111036.res-hall.nwu.edu X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44799 alt.radio.scanner:27095 In article , wgow@chattanooga.net (Sam Hall) wrote: >In article <4e8atd$hth@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan >Gingras) wrote: > >> I am looking into either the Yupiteru MVY-7100, or the AOR AR-8000. Both >> look like great scanners. The Yupi seems only to lack computer control, >> and alphanumeric tagging. Computer control is not that important to me, >> so which one is better? I have heard that the Yupi is built better.. Some >> believe that the RF performance is significantly better on the Yupi. My understanding is that the AR8000 has a ferrite core antenna built in - read AM broadcast reception. Still havn't gotten the Yupiteru 7100 to do that yet. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!news.paonline.com!usenet From: blithering.idiot@shivasys.com (Blithering Idiot) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wanted: Formula 1 Race Freqs Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 04:25:25 GMT Organization: Pennsylvania Online [Usenet News Server for Hire] Lines: 16 Message-ID: <310fc119.3196744@news.paonline.com> References: <4ek8nr$1ro@mark.ucdavis.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: sl14.shivasys.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 ctbaker@burrito.engr.ucdavis.edu (shatter) wrote: >I am going to the Canadian Grand Prix Formula 1 race this June and want >to bring along my scanner... I want to know if anyone knows where I can >obtain the race team freqs. >Chad Last info I had was 92 Mex GP; Officials 464.350, Helicopter 464.875, #5 Schumacher 468.175, #6 Patrese 466.8375, #25 Brundle 467.725, The Marlboro team was scrambled. 2 French channels; 464.8725, 460.475 unidentified; 481.625, 481.637 Try to arrive for practice session and scan 460.000 to 485.000 range for any active frequency. Hope your multi-lingual! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!ub!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: why radio shack should be tolerated Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4ep16m$4u5@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 04:51:27 GMT Lines: 24 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44855 alt.radio.scanner:27126 BOEING377 (boeing377@aol.com) writes: > True, not all their sales people are knowledgeable and they have had some > doggy products... BUT where else can you buy components e.g. capacitors > resistors diodes transformers relays etc in most small towns? Thank > goodness RS still devotes shelf space to this stuff which probably isn't > nearly as profitable as phones, video hi-fi etc. Also, you can get > detailed repair manuals for most products at reasonable prices. The shack > has its faults but don't overlook its virtues. Sure it might be the only place to get certain things. But they know that as well. Therefore some of those things are very overpriced. Little connectors that should only cost about $1.99, cost from $4.99 to $5.99. Funny since only 2 years ago I saw the same ones for no more than $2.99. I usually go to a tiny little electronics store now first for such connectors. At least I'm dealing with an expert and also get friendly service (at a reasonable price). -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:48 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!ub!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Radio Shack.... Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <960131171212_211082828@emout05.mail.aol.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:00:01 GMT Lines: 33 Glenn Reed (g_reed@icon.net) writes: >> hello there! I saw your posting on the net about "The Shack" and was >> wondering if I can ask you a question since you work for those folks. I am >> looking for a Cigarette plug adaptor that will fit into the back of my >> scanner so I don't have to mount it in my truck for life ( I'd hate to worr y >> about that thing.). My buddy has one, and says he got it at "the shack." Bu t >> when I went there, I couldn't locate one :( As the string has been saying, >> those guys who work there don't know much, and when I ask one, he didn't kn ow >> anything either. Any ideas? Thanks! >> Christian >> > > Hi Christian, > > I don't know what model of scanner you have, but most of the ones at RS u se > a standard size coaxial power plug for 12 VDC. If yours is like that, go ba ck > to the store and ask to see a 270-1533. It is a straight cord with a cigar > lighter on one end and a coaxial plug on the other. It is about 5 or 6 feet > long. I believe that is the number. I could not find it in the catalog, bu t I > think that is right. I think it sells for $4.49. If that plug doesn't fit, > then try a 270-1528. This is a "Coiled Power Cord", pg. 174, and has differ ent > size plug adaptors. It is $9.99. Both should be on the same section of > pegboard. Hope this helps. > I think maybe he's looking for just the plug to put on the existing scanner power cord. That catalog number is 274-331. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:50 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!enterprise!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!slider.bme.ri.ccf.org!kira.cc.uakron.edu!odin.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: car antenna Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4eorjd$g3o@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:21:28 GMT Lines: 25 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27156 rec.radio.scanner:44910 Tom Brusoe (tbrusoe@ix.netcom.com) writes: > Hello, I need to know everyones opinion on a antenna for my car. > coverage needed is 42 mhz to 160 mhz maybe all range. can you please > provide name and where I can get it. > > Please responde e-mail to tbrusoe@ix.netcom.com > > Thank You > > Tom You could use your car Stereo antenna. Reception isn't too bad. I didn't want the bother of installing another antenna in the car. I use the following from Radio Shack: 3-way connector (split the radio antenna) : 12-1313 Male to Male extension (from splitter to radio) : 12-1312 Male to female extension (from splitter to scanner): 12-1312 Motorola to BNC connector (if this the your scanner connector) : 278-117 -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.missouri.edu!hptemp1.cc.umr.edu!sford From: sford@rocket.cc.umr.edu (Scott Ford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: Uniden BearTracker Date: 1 Feb 1996 06:07:16 GMT Organization: UMR Missouri's Technological University Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4eplak$dit@hptemp1.cc.umr.edu> References: <4eh5aq$16ml@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: rocket.cc.umr.edu >: It sells for over $200, but since this one is about 4 months old, >: I will sell it for $100 plus shipping. This is a great unit, but I just X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Walmart sells this for lid $70 or something like that, I bought my BCT7, the 800mhz model for under $200. -- ============================================================================ | | | '56 Ford F100 --> '78 Cutlass Salon --> '86 Mustang GT | | "thgir peek ciffart rewols" | | sford@saucer.cc.umr.edu | | | ============================================================================ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:52 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!ub!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!mdean From: mdean@netcom.com (Mark Dean) Subject: "Code Red" from LAPD; what is it? Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:31:39 GMT Lines: 4 Sender: mdean@netcom15.netcom.com LAPD uses the term "code red" occasionally; seems to be when it's raining. Anyone know what it means? Mark From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!io.org!winternet.com!visi.com!news3.mr.net!mr.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!ucsbuxb.ucsb.edu!mcl!usul From: usul@mcl.ucsb.edu (Matthew Staroscik) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mac, PC, PRO-51 available-best DTMF decode solution? Date: 1 Feb 1996 06:43:22 GMT Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4epnea$r82@ucsbuxb.ucsb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: mcl.ucsb.edu Keywords: dtmf computer Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27152 rec.radio.scanner:44898 Well, the subject line says it all... I've got a PC (with sound-in ability), a Macintosh (also with sound-in), and a PRO-51 scanner. What's the easiest or cheapest way to get DTMF decode ability? I have yet to find any of the software I see discussed in the newsgroups. I am not adverse to buying a box, but I'd like to do it all cheap. Hell, had I the plans I could build one. I can habdle a soldering iron as well as the next geek. :) Thanks in advance. Matt Staroscik usul@mcl.ucsb.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:53 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equip,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail From: dconti@carroll.com (Daniel M. Conti) Subject: FS : Standard C 508 A mini dual band HT, MINT X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated) Organization: Carroll-Net Message-ID: X-Trace: 823147857/13269 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: atlas22.carroll.com Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 07:00:25 GMT Lines: 5 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27088 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97570 rec.radio.scanner:44787 rec.radio.swap:56478 Standard C 508 A dual band mini HT, MINT, in box with manual, access. Also includes custom soft leather case and lapel speaker mike. $200.00 shipped to 48...COD $5.00 extra. E-Mail if interested From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!newshost.convex.com!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.vancouver.istar.net!news.vancouver.istar.net!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!pooh.freenet.mb.ca!winnie.freenet.mb.ca!xhp195 From: Henry Wysmulek Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why 75 ohm cable? (was: RS discone problems...CELLULAR) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 07:12:19 -0600 Organization: Blue Sky FreeNet of Manitoba Inc. Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <4eii1d$ecj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4eiu2p$kpa@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: winnie.freenet.mb.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <4eiu2p$kpa@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> YOU SHOULD GET A COPY OF THE ARRL HANDBOOK OR THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK. H. WYSMULEK xhp195@freenet.mb.ca BLUE SKY FREENET From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!brighton.openmarket.com!decwrl!news-server.ncren.net!news.duke.edu!cobia.gulf.net!ppp103 From: breeze@gulf.net (MHM) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 1 Feb 1996 07:19:31 GMT Organization: The Gulf Coast Internet Company Lines: 46 Message-ID: <4eppi3$s7r@cobia.gulf.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp57.pcola.gulf.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44847 alt.radio.scanner:27124 In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: >The following is an exerpt from the Canadian RS Catalog: > >"...Radio Shack has many things to be proud of... > ... 'You've got >questions. We've got answers.'" > >Personally I think they should change the slogan to:" >"You've got questions. Get our catalog" > >When I read such a thing in their catalog, I expect them to actually know >about their products. Like I have written before, when I brought a >defective cordless phone back, the manager was surprised to see that he >had a Call Display cordless phone in his store. Then it took him 25 >minutes looking in the manual to see how it worked. Meanwhile he's telling >me about all the features of the phone. Duh! I already know about the >features that's why I bought it, just give me a new one! > >Don't tell me that Radio Shack is supposed to be self serve when they >boast about their knowledgeable staff. The only thing RS staff know how to >do is change batteries. Don't think me heartless, but I watched a R/S employee sell a young lad 10 feet of solid core RG-59 an two 1/4" phone jacks so that he could replace his Guitar to Amplifier cord. I tried to inteject with the physical problems of this configuration, but the arrogant ass blew me off as if I were ignorant. For the sake of clarification, RG-59 is 75 ohm coax. By specification, it has a solid core. That basicly means that it is not intended to be moved around alot. Impedance mismatch? Well, yeah. Not enough to cause damage at the power levels in the guitar feed, but still a mismatch. Interferance suppresion? It should be better, providing the kid put it together right. Durability? No way. Yet another example of the "WISDOM" at Radio Shack! breeze@gulf.net | Poor planning on your part | does not constitute a crisis | on my part... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news2.ee.net!news.ee.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!docs25!fkelcz From: fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu (Frederick Kelcz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 08:11:15 +1000 Organization: University of Wisconsin Dept. of Radiology Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fkelcz.radiology.wisc.edu X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B] > Fred, please tell me more about your loose BNC problem. Did you >fix it OK ? I have the same thing on my AR8000, any advice from >someone who has been there before will be appreciated. Doug, I have emailed you with details, but briefly - it is not easy to fix and EEB says there is no room inside to put a commercial grade BNC with good lock nut washer. Am therefore having it tightened under warranty and when it gets back I will glue the BNC to the case and buy a lower stress whip (comes on and off easier). GROVE repair service did not offer a fix for this well publicized problem. Does Javiathon have anyting to add on your side of the ocean? Fred N9SLR Frederick Kelcz, PhD, MD Dept. of Radiology University of Wisconsin, Madison From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 1 Feb 1996 08:50:11 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4epus3$rvl@emerald.oz.net> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:872 sci.electronics.repair:20968 alt.radio.scanner:27089 rec.radio.scanner:44789 misc.wanted:60375 alt.anything:737 In article , gregm@cv.hp.com says... > >brueger@infi.net (Brian J. Rueger) wrote: >>Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will record for >>greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 >>minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. Use a VCR with a added twist.... Hook up an old video camera to the VCR and point it at the scanner! Now you know what freq was active at the time. You can even put a small "disposable" lcd clock/watch next to the scanner so you know what time the freq "hit". Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:35:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: YoCuz@ix.netcom.com (YoCuz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: What exactly is a DTMF decoder? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 09:03:20 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 35 Message-ID: <4epvlk$hjn@cloner4.netcom.com> References: <4ebt5u$hoq@over.mhv.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: atc-nj1-03.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Feb 01 1:03:48 AM PST 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44807 alt.radio.scanner:27103 asi@escape.ca wrote: >>I recently received a catalog in the mail hawking various electronic >>gadgets. One was a DTMF decoder. The ad stated that it could be hooked >>to a scanner to decipher codes. What codes? Was the implication of this >>ad that it can be used for something illegal? >Illegal?? Maby getting codes for somebody's voice mail or answering service. >Getting Credit Card numbers when using it for Tele-Bank or something. >Don't buy any of that junk, most is over priced . Software and or hardware >for your computer is the best way to go for deciphering DTMF. And hay for th e >same price these SCAM Spy Shops charge, you can buy devices that will also >decode ACARS(aircraft communications addressing), GOLAY,POCSAG(digital >pager modes),CTCSS and DCS(digital coded squelch). I on the side I run a Spy >Shop and know how many 'Spy Shops" are selling DTMF decoders for over $100. >SCAM SCAM SCAM. These Spy Shops are getting so bad I am going to change >my companys name. I want to make money but not STEAL from the customer. >>What are DTMF decoders supposed to do and what can they do if hooked to a >>scanner. >>Thanx. What are some good software programs for scanners especially a Pro-2006. Espcially the DTMF function would be pretty useful.. YoCuz@ix.netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Nuu Bee) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: TV show freaks Date: 1 Feb 1996 09:18:56 GMT Organization: imadork.com Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44790 alt.radio.scanner:27090 I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of radio system. Second..... Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? Thank You Nuu Bee From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Scanning digital cell phones? II Date: 1 Feb 1996 09:51:58 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4eq2fu$rvl@emerald.oz.net> References: <4c9etb$sje@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> <4cd87m$r05@dallas1.connect.net> <4d6gqt$gmb@errigle.gpl.net> <4ek9m2$ht3@brahms.tfi.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 In article <4ek9m2$ht3@brahms.tfi.be>, vex@unicall.be says... > >B >I am from Europe (Belgium), and there seems to be a possibility to >crack the GSM signal. Some rumors are "in the air" that there are CD's >available from the UK. Not just rumors...... According to "The London Times" British digital phones have been cracked and a "black box" is available. It runs about $10,000 (US) and was demonstraited for the L.T. reporter wilst undercover. ("wilst" is one of those British Words) Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!snooze.ser.bbnplanet.com!nntp-hub2.barrnet.net!pacbell.com!amdahl.com!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: jerryke7ua@aol.com (Jerryke7ua) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO 2035 Mods Date: 1 Feb 1996 10:01:00 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 12 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4eqkjc$kb4@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader Being new to this group, I'm sure this question has been asked before. I've read in some posting the PRO 2035 can not be modified for cellular freqs. I just recently read in Monitoring Times about a Downconverter. Any other possibilities?? Any comments welcome. Thanks You. Jerry, KE7UA Ex: WA8HHM, WB4QVD, WB8LNF, & DL4PY From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!alterdial.uu.net!not-for-mail From: Michael Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR8000 Modification? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 10:05:48 -0500 Organization: Visual Numerics, Inc. (Cleveland office) Lines: 32 Message-ID: <3110D6CC.390F@boulder.vni.com> References: <310fd207.693242@news.intellinet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pool056.max1.cleveland.oh.dynip.alter.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b4 (Win95; I) LF wrote: > > Does anyone offer or know of a place that will > do the modification that was in one of the > magazines to make the AR8000 > not "cut out" or clip while listening? > > lflaxman@intellinet.com I'm sure an electronics repair shop specializing in 2-way radio repair would probably do it and charge you time and materials. Call around to some of your local ham radio stores to get references, or maybe they also can do it for you. The magazine article tells how to go about doing it so they could probably follow that guideline. I would not take it to RS, even though they do out-of-brand rapair work. I had them fix a blown regulator in my PRO-37 out of warranty, and it came back with the reflective back of the LCD display totally messed up. I took it apart myself and discovered that they had dumped or sprayed some sort of solvent that got between the back of the plastic LCD diffuse reflector and the circuitboard, melting the back of the reflector. Had to repaint the reflector myself and reassemble. Mike -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-res.gsl.net!news-penn.gsl.net!news-stkh.gsl.net!news-paris.gsl.net!news-lond.gsl.net!Tagada.grolier.fr!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!citi2.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!ecf2.puc.edu!tpdang From: Toan Dang Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: "Code Red" from LAPD; what is it? Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:42:20 -0800 Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ecf2.puc.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: Call them and ask them... On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Mark Dean wrote: > LAPD uses the term "code red" occasionally; seems to be when it's > raining. Anyone know what it means? > > Mark > > - Toan Dang, EMT-IA Pacific Union College 103 Grainger Hall Angwin, Ca 94508-9797 (707) 965-6253 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-res.gsl.net!news-dc.gsl.net!news-lond.gsl.net!Tagada.grolier.fr!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!panix!not-for-mail From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: need 10 to 150 khz FM demodulator Date: 1 Feb 1996 11:10:09 -0500 Organization: panix Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4eqol1$2g1@panix3.panix.com> References: <4eomvr$mbf@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix3.panix.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13077 rec.radio.scanner:44848 In article <4eomvr$mbf@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>, Bruce M. Marshall wrote: >Does anyone know of a chip that is used to demodulate multiplexed >signals such as FM sterio, secondary audio programming (SAP) on TV >sound and SCA on FM broadcast? I thought I could use my HF radio in FM >mode but I tried it and it didn't work. I finally figured out that >although the readout goes down to 0 hz it actually won't receive >anything less than 150 khz (the manual says so and I can hear the >relay click out.) >I'm sure there is a small, easy circuit to do this. Get a VLF converter, such as the ones made by Datong or Palomar Engineers, and put it in the antenna path. -- Mike Schuster | schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM ------------------- | schuster@shell.portal.com | schuster@mem.po.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!gail.ripco.com!golden.ripco.com!unclebob From: Uncle Bob Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Alien Frequencies Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:10:13 -0600 Organization: Ripco Communications, Inc. Lines: 140 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: golden.ripco.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Imagine if you will... the leader of the fifth invader force speaking to the commander in chief... "They're made out of meat." "Meat?" "Meat. They're made out of meat." "Meat?" "There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." "That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars." "They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines." "So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact." "They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines." "That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat." "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat." "Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage." "Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea the life span of meat?" "Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside." "Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through." "No brain?" "Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat!" "So... what does the thinking?" "You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat." "Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!" "Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?" "Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat." "Finally, Yes. They are indeed made out meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years." "So what does the meat have in mind?" "First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the universe, contact other sentients, swap ideas and information. The usual." "We're supposed to talk to meat?" "That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there? Anyone home?' That sort of thing." "They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?" "Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat." "I thought you just told me they used radio." "They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat." "Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?" "Officially or unofficially?" "Both." "Officially, we are required to contact, welcome, and log in any and all sentient races or multi-beings in the quadrant, without prejudice, fear, or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing." "I was hoping you would say that." "It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?" "I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say?" `Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?" "Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact." "So we just pretend there's no one home in the universe." "That's it." "Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you have probed? You're sure they won't remember?" "They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them." "A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream." "And we can mark this sector unoccupied." "Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?" "Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotations ago, wants to be friendly again." "They always come around." "And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the universe would be if one were all alone." From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hideout.emanon.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!visi.com!news3.mr.net!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: *******NEED INFO ON CELL PHONES******* Date: 1 Feb 1996 11:14:11 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4eq7a3$q2f@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> References: <4e56lh$ntm@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel8p05.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: nevr4getu@aol.com nevr4getu@aol.com (Nevr4Get U) wrote: >Does anyone have any info or know how to Clone Cell phones. >If so post or e-mail me with the info. > > > > > >Thanks in advance > http://www.primenet.com/~mtorola/ TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Anyone using PD (POCSAG Decoder) Date: 1 Feb 1996 11:17:51 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4eq7gv$q42@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel8p05.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: lui@netcom.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44808 alt.radio.scanner:27104 lui@netcom.com (Stephen Lui) wrote: >I download PD V2, the shareware version of the POCSAG decoder. I put together >the scanner to PC interface on a breadboard and checked all of the wiring, bu t >I don't get anything on PD running on my PC. Has anyone else been successful >using PD and could offer some suggestions? > >Stephen Works fine for me. Does the little character spin at the bottom-right of your screen? (/|\-/ etc), this tells you the audio is clocking-over the rs-232 line, if not, check hardware. You plugged it into the serial port didn't you? Got a CRO? chech all again, definatley works. TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:11 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!pau!news From: peter@Isis.st.3com.com (Peter Simpson) Subject: Re: Pager's and Cap Codes Message-ID: Sender: news@pau.synnet.com (News Administration) Reply-To: peter@Isis.st.3com.com Organization: 3Com Corporation References: <4ejfvr$rbf@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:43:53 GMT Lines: 22 Yes, cap codes and just about anything else in a pager can be reprogrammed. You need to talk, either to the company that sold or leased you the pager, the company that you intend to use to supply pager service or a pager repair company. Look in the yellow pages. Usually, the only things that cannot easily or inexpensively be changed are the signalling code (GOLAY, POCSAG, FLEX, ERMES) and the frequency on which the pager operates. In the first case, the signalling code is dependent on the type of decoding logic installed on the board, and in the second, the receiver frequency is determined by a crystal and the design of the receiver itself. -- -- Peter Simpson, KA1AXY Linux! Peter_Simpson@3mail.3com.com 3Com Corporation The free Unix (508) 264-1719 voice Boxborough, MA 01719 for the 386 (508) 264-1418 fax From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: NJFM83A@prodigy.com (Gary Belt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: OKI cellular phone as scanner? Date: 1 Feb 1996 13:37:08 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 2 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eqfm4$d9c@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4dic8d$emn@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4dpan1$4q48@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4efgk1$8kc@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap6.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 What shouldn't I do to my Motorola Bag phone? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Are You Lookin' For FREQS Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:01:31 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 11 Message-ID: <3111383B.55C5@shasta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppb6.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) If you're looking for freqs, here is a nice searchable DB that should get you well started; http://www.percon.com/db_srch.htm -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Are You Lookin' For FREQS, Correction Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:15:04 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 16 Message-ID: <31113B68.980@shasta.com> References: <3111383B.55C5@shasta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppb6.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Garry Hobart wrote: > > If you're looking for freqs, here is a nice searchable DB that should get yo u > well started; http://www.percon.com/db_srch.htm > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------CORRECTION, The cor rect address is; http://www.perconcorp.com/db_src.htm -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news2.ee.net!news.ee.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!winternet.com!news2.interlog.com!news.interlog.com!jmckay From: jmckay@interlog.com (NEWSRADIO) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: paging decoder using soundboard Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 14:15:29 GMT Organization: InterLog Internet Services Lines: 16 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eqhur$t3p@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: jmckay.interlog.com X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2 Does anyone know of a scanner paging decoder program that uses the soundboard for audio input? I have a program caled PD-102 but it requires a direct connec tion to the com port from the scanner descriminator. -------------------------------------------- Southern Ontario Radio News & Broadcast Engineering homepage: www.interlog.com/~jmckay LeBlanc homepage: www.npsnet.com/leblanc -------------------------------------------- (((x))) | "Waddya mean the tower doesnt meet the | current CODE? Its been standing for 20 years!!??!!" /|\ ------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news-w.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!aramco!stimpy.aramco.com!usenet From: bjones@aramco.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DOES ANYONE KNOW ANY ALIEN FREQUENCIES? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 14:30:43 PDT Organization: Aramco Services Company Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: <082302Z29011996@anon.penet.fi> <4el3qg$5t1@buffnet2.buffnet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.80.203.97 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage If you insist... try: The Outer Space Frequency Directory Author: Curtis, Anthony R. ISSN: 0-936653-49-3 Published by: Tiare Publications @ (414) 248-4845 Anthony R. Curtis has the Yellow Pages for outer space... The journalism instructor at Salisbury State University in Salisbury, Maryland, wrote an outer space phone book so people can tune in radio signals from space. The Outer Space Frequency Directory lists 2,200 frequencies used by weather, navigation, communications, observation, science, military and spy satellites, robot probes roaming the solar system, and many of the other man-made objects circling Earth. "It's a giant master list of every frequency you could possible want coming down from the heavens," says Curtis, who has been a science writer for 30 years. Some of his recent publications include: Monitoring NASA Communications, Space Almanac, and the Space Satellite Handbook. Frequencies used in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence are listed along with frequencies where radio- astronomers eavesdrop on natural radio signals emanating from cataclysmic events in far-flung galaxies across the universe. The recently book includes frequencies used by astronauts in space stations and shuttles. It also covers receivers and antennas and explains how to tune in space signals. "An ordinary boom box won't pick up most of these radio signals. However, in many cities, you can listen to the voices of astronauts during a shuttle mission by merely using a police scanner." Although radio signals are continuously raining down from outer space and appear somewhere on radio dials, Curtis points out that many appear as a series of beeps. Curtis believes the book will be popular among amateur radio operators, hobbyists, and people interested in outer space. It's the first book to list all the frequencies. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news2.interlog.com!news.interlog.com!jmckay From: jmckay@interlog.com (NEWSRADIO) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: is there a scanner mods website??? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 14:45:12 GMT Organization: InterLog Internet Services Lines: 15 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eqjmi$c9@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: jmckay.interlog.com X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2 I used to have a link in my homepage to a site with lots of scanner mods (greg 's site at ripco) but its no longer valid. Does anyone know of any such sites that are active? Thanks... -------------------------------------------- Southern Ontario Radio News & Broadcast Engineering homepage: www.interlog.com/~jmckay LeBlanc homepage: www.npsnet.com/leblanc -------------------------------------------- (((x))) | "Waddya mean the tower doesnt meet the | current CODE? Its been standing for 20 years!!??!!" /|\ ------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:19 1996 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ns.pilot.net!news2.pilot.net!xilinx!neocad.xilinx.com!uucp-1.csn.net!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!slwork From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Message-ID: Followup-To: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4eoqeq$ijv@news.esslink.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 15:02:14 GMT Lines: 15 Sender: slwork@netcom5.netcom.com Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:979 sci.electronics.repair:21090 alt.radio.scanner:27157 rec.radio.scanner:44915 misc.wanted:60434 alt.anything:754 Ted Szypulski (szypulsk@esslink.com) wrote: : If you need long length recording consider using a HiFi VCR in LP or : SP mode. I work at ESPN and we use consumer VHS machines to record : the ESPN Radio programs as an archive log of the actual broadcasts. : It is cheaper for us to do this than to buy some commercial item. We : just chuck the machines when they wear out in about a year. I'm : usually found loitering near the dumpsters. I have used a good-quality VCR in EP (6-hour) mode for this purpose for several years and have had no problems at all, even with cheap tapes. Not only do you get 6 hours of recording time on a cheap tape, you can also set the thing to record at a certain time. Most HiFi VCR's can record and play sound only without even having any video input connected. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!wabakimi!dbowlby From: dbowlby@chat.carleton.ca (Donald Bowlby) Subject: Ottawa, Ont Freq List X-Nntp-Posting-Host: wabakimi.carleton.ca Message-ID: Sender: news@cunews.carleton.ca (News Administrator) Organization: Carleton University X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 15:08:46 GMT Lines: 40 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45087 alt.radio.scanner:27245 He is a short list of Ottawa Ontario Frequencies, If you would like something more specific, Email me. Ottawa Police (22/23 Div of Ott Carleton Regional Police) F1 142.095 XJF83 F2 142.485 XJF27 F3 142.725 XJF?? F4 142.995 F5 142.770 (Ontario Prov. police Provincial Common) F6 139.680 Simplex (Used sometimes By TAC Team) Note: all frequencies use CTCSS of 151.4Hz. except for F5, the input frequencies are all 4.02Mhz lower. Nepean Police F1 142.770 (OPP Prov Common) F2 142.335 XJH265 Primary Dispatch Channel F3 142.425 Secondary Dispatch Channel Note: All Nepean Freqs use the CTCSS tone of 127.3, and are also 4.02 Mhz lower for the rptr input Freq. Glouster Police F1 142.635 Primary dispatch CTCSS 162.2 Note Due to the Regionalization of tyhe police force some assests are routinely shared eg. K9 units, etc. the Tactical team is also dispatched for the whole Ottawa Carleton Region. Ottawa Carleton Ambulance OTTC 142.890 Ottawa Common OTT2 148.210 Ottawa District 2 XMI740 PTAC 149.605 Provincial Tactical XMI774 OTT1 151.370 Ottawa District 1 PCOM 150.100 Provincial Common Note All Freqs except for PCOM use CTCSS of 118.8hz. I have a lot more freqs, almost all with their CTCSS tones, availible if needed From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!twizzler.callamer.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!info-server.bbn.com!bbn.com!rbarile From: rbarile@bbn.com (Robert Barile) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC200XLT Antennas Connection Problem Date: 1 Feb 1996 15:24:15 GMT Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN) Lines: 15 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eqluv$sof@info-server.bbn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: flounder.bbn.com I have a BC200XLT (2 years old) and I have a question about the antenna connection inside the unit. Recently I noticed poor reception and it improved when I slightly twisted the antenna. I also noticed that the socket turns slightly when you twist the antenna into the socket. I took the unit apart and it is obvious that the soldier connection is bad. I seem to recall that this subject came up befoer in this news group. I don't remember exactly what the best solution was. It seems to me that soldiering a short lead that will bend and twist would be a good fix. Does anyone have any sugestions? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:22 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news From: revoke@eskimo.com (Dean Sepstrup) Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com Message-ID: Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id) Organization: Loosely X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 15:41:31 GMT Lines: 26 Scott, Based on some earlier articles and notes on the AR8000 mailing list, I went ahead and converted to stereo mini-jacks (3/32") on the left hand side of the unit, near the bottom (opposite from the power connecter). I was a little unsure about disasembling a $600 radio that was brand new, but there were no surprises. There is plenty of room inside the case for the jacks, and the wiring must be done carefully, but the connections are all readily accessible when fully disassembled. The radio interfaces fine with my CX12-AR and it's so much easier to hook up, now. Good luck. In article , smcintyre@whoi.edu says... > >Does anyone know of a description of a modification for the computer >interface port on the AR8K to go to a couple of stereo plugs on the side, >similar to the Scout modification? > >It is VERY annoying to have to take the unit apart just to plug in to my >computer (well, take off the leather case, battery slide, etc...)...plus >that flat cable system looks VERY fragile. > >Thanks. > >Scott From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!globalcenter.net!a1ad1aa1.globalcenter.net!wdaviesmac.globalvillag.com!user From: wyn_davies@globalvillage.com (Wyn Davies) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Stanford Lifeflight freqs. Date: 1 Feb 1996 16:03:44 GMT Organization: Global Village Communication Lines: 5 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: wdaviesmac.globalvillag.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.1.8 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27158 rec.radio.scanner:44918 Does anybody have a list of Stanford (CA) Lifeflight and CALSTAR helicopter frequencies? Email me if you do, thanks! Wyn wyn_davies@globalvillage.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news2.ee.net!news.ee.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.vancouver.istar.net!news.vancouver.istar.net!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.ntnet.nt.ca!gov.nt.ca!ve8ev From: ve8ev@gov.nt.ca (John Boudreau) Subject: FRG-8800 VHF via CAT Message-ID: <1996Feb1.160859.19774@gov.nt.ca> Organization: Government of the NWT, Canada Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:08:59 GMT Lines: 16 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.shortwave:69561 rec.radio.scanner:44851 Does anyone know how to send VHF frequencies to a FRG-8000 via the CAT port? Works fine on HF but I can't figure out how to send VHF frequencies (FRG-8800 with FRV-8800 VHF module). Please reply direct as I don't follow these groups. Thanks in advance, John - VE8EV ================================================================ John Boudreau - VE8EV E-mail: ve8ev@amsat.org Inuvik, NWT Packet: VE8EV@KL7AA.#NAK.AK.USA.NOAM CANADA VE8EV@KO-23/KO-25 ================================================================ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:25 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: TV show freaks X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts1-28.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:15:35 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 25 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44842 alt.radio.scanner:27122 markj@got.net (Nuu Bee) wrote: > I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using >Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF >duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. > >What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of >radio system. > >Second..... > Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they >say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" > >Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? > >Thank You > >Nuu Bee > Wow! You're joking......right? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!alterdial.uu.net!not-for-mail From: Michael Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Poor Performance of RS Telescoping Scanner Antenna??? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 16:16:01 -0500 Organization: Visual Numerics, Inc. (Cleveland office) Lines: 53 Message-ID: <31112D91.4CB3@boulder.vni.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pool023.max1.cleveland.oh.dynip.alter.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b4 (Win95; I) Jim West wrote: > > Last night I bought a telescoping whip antenna from Radio Shack. This > is the one with the center loading coil and BNC connector. I have one too. > I tried it out and I'm kinda underwhelmed with it's performance as > compared to the stock duckie that came with my PRO46. The thing does > better around 33 mhz, but around 150 - 160 mhz it really sucks. And > 800 mhz, well..... what 800 mhz. I agree. I get the same sucky results on anything above VHF High (generally anything above the 54MHz / 6m ham band). > I tried playing with different lengths, and it makes a little > difference. But nowhere near as good as the stock antenna. Supposedly changing the length shorter makes it better in the VHF High and UHF ranges, but I also noticed little difference. This antenna seems to work best when fully extended, if you accept the fact that it is tuned well at that point only for VHF Low, and perhaps aircraft too (108-136Mhz). I also gave up on trying to get 800MHz. > So I'm wondering if this is typical or if I'm doing something stupid? > Any ideas? No, you're OK. I use this antenna on my AR8000 when I want to pick up anything in the shortwave band (3-30MHz), as well as getting the best reception in VHF Low. In my opinion, it even works much better for cordless phones (46-49MHz) than my stock duckie. I'm glad I have it, and it's relatively cheap. I couldn't believe it when I was able to pick up WWV on 10MHz from my second floor, using just that telescoping antenna. My nice $30 Diamond RH77CA 8-band rubber duckie didn't stand a chance - just static. Think like a photographer who has different lenses for different lighting and situations. You may consider different antennas for different ranges of frequencies. All scanner antennas are compromises, just like Instamatic cameras. Mike -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news1.h1.usa.pipeline.com!usenet From: 156kay@usa.pipeline.com(Rich B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cleve/Toronto Date: 1 Feb 1996 16:47:34 GMT Organization: Pipeline USA Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4eqqr6$n3e@news1.usa.pipeline.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe3.h1.usa.pipeline.com X-PipeUser: 156kay X-PipeHub: usa.pipeline.com X-PipeGCOS: (Rich B.) X-Newsreader: Pipeline USA v3.4.0 Would anyone have the Freqs for Toronto Center Air and Cleveland Center Air??? Email 156kay@usa.pipeline.com -- Rich B. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!peer-news.britain.eu.net!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.starlink.com!usenet From: Bill Funk Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks Date: 1 Feb 1996 17:29:38 GMT Organization: Star Link Internet Services Lines: 44 Message-ID: <4eqta2$7s0@pegasus.starlink.com> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-18.starlink.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45001 alt.radio.scanner:27216 markj@got.net (Nuu Bee) wrote: > I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using >Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF >duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. > == They talk through repeaters that handle the seperate bands. == >What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of >radio system. == Police Story officers get their frequencies allocated directly from the studio they work for. These frequencies are not controlled by the FCC. == >Second..... > Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they >say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" == Since this show is no longer in production, the frequencies they used have been removed from the spectrum, and, by a special vote of the Academy of Performing Arts, have been retired to a special resting place in the Academy's museum. == >Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? == These shows were done on such a low budget that no radios were used. Everybody just yelled real loud. == >Thank You > >Nuu Bee > == No problem. Any other questions, just ask. Auld Bee From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.us.world.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.cris.com!news From: Peter Kamilakis Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Engine noise Date: 1 Feb 1996 17:35:10 GMT Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4eqtke$h2r@spectator.cris.com> References: <4eomqc$q6b@linus.mitre.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: crc4-fddi.cris.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: cseymour@mitre.org From my experience in car stereo installation, I would say that your problem is ignition spark noise, from the spark plugs or coil. This dubious and elusive problem is pretty tough to solve. 1. Make sure you have heavily shielded spark plug wires, which you can buy at auto parts stores. 2. As with any noise problem, make sure that your scanner's ground lead is securely connected to BARE METAL, (metal that has been scraped or sanded) not a seat bolt or existing screw. 3. I had a similar problem with radiated noise when my car stereo was on; the switching power supplies in the amplifiers were causing birdies on the scanner, where through static you could hear what was playing on CD. What fixed this? I wrapped the entire length of the antenna cable with a thick layer of aluminum foil fastened on by electrical tape. This may be a bit of a hokie solution, but it worked. pnk From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: JHBW43A@prodigy.com (Jim Youse) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wanted help 200xlt Date: 1 Feb 1996 17:39:14 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 3 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eqts2$h3k@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <310fe8b5.560e@algonet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 Press MANUAL, enter the lower limit and press LIMIT, enter the upper limit and press LIMIT, press SEARCH. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:33 1996 Date: 1 Feb 1996 17:41:24 EDT Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!infoshare!whome!gts!feline!humnet.humberc.on.ca!hduff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: hduff@humnet.humberc.on.ca (Hugh Duff) Message-ID: <8232144866502@lss.humnet.humberc.on.ca> Organization: HumberNet LSS, Humber College, Canada References: Subject: Re: Hypocrite Pjb Strikes Again!!!! Lines: 45 > In article <4ebsvi$rko@newsbf02.news.aol.com> alicelg@aol.com (Alicelg) writ e > > >Now this is more like it! Go get that dastardly PjB! And while you're at > >it, Mr. Cheek has been awfully quiet, Dagnabit, he must have other things > >to do..... :) > > He isn't dastardly, he is a moron. As to Bill being quiet, he is like a dog. > If you leave him alone he will wag his tail and leave you alone. If you poke > him witth a stick he will more than likely try to chew your leg off and then > eat various other body parts. I have yet to see Bill bite somebody without > reason. > > > grh Gag...not another Billy croonie ! Just don't corner Bill with a technical question he can't answer or go questioning his 'expert' advice or catch him in a lie... He (thinks he) is a master at diverting the context of the discussion and resorting to insulting namecalling, not unlike a kid....in order to avoid his looking like he is not the expert he would like to have you beleive he is (I guess he is an expert to most scanner enthusiasts who don't have the technical knowledge or resources to go hunting down scanner mods from BBS', FTP sites or WWW sites.) He turned the FIDO ScanRadio conference into a commercial support area for his mod. books... I see he's attempting to capture the NET audience like he did the FIDO crowd...good thing that the folks who frequent these galaxies are more capable of sourcing tech. info on their own. I just read a message where he insults a fellow for his lack of proper english (more insults)...in the same paragraph Mr. Bill spews out verbal diatribe like "Methinks...". I keep thinking of the line ..."A legend in his own mind !" Hugh Duff VA3TO Toronto --- þ NFX v1.3 [000] From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!news2.ios.com!gramercy.ios.com!roywland From: roywland@gramercy.ios.com (Roy Land) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: No Code = No Brain Date: 1 Feb 1996 17:42:31 GMT Organization: Internet Online Services Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4equ27$eoo@news2.ios.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gramercy.ios.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Regardless of legality... Isn't OFF TOPIC just what it says?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 Date: 1 Feb 1996 19:04:11 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 4 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Looking for modifications and secret tricks for unlocking secrets of Uniden sportcat sc150. Please Email or post a message. Thanks Elmo110860@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!usenet From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Baseband Audio Pins (Discriminator Chips) Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 19:27:26 GMT Organization: COMMtronics Engineering Lines: 123 Message-ID: <4er46o$7nd@news2.cts.com> References: <4eoipp$rrv@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bcheek.cts.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44810 alt.radio.scanner:27109 UPDATE: 2/1/96 This file is for the benefit of all. (c) 1995 Bill Cheek-COMMtronics Engineering This file is for personal use only and may NOT be placed on a CD-ROM nor any other media that conveys, stores, or transports for any monetary cost, without expressed permission of the author. This file can only be given away, absolutely free of charge. -Bill Cheek- There is a growing interest in tapping the baseband audio out of various scanners for decoding of a variety of esoteric signals, including CTCSS, SCA, FSK, RTTY, FAX, etc. By and large, such signals cannot be take from TAPE REC jacks, headphone jacks, and EXT SPEAKER jacks because of the voice-band filtering that is done between the signal source and these output jacks. Therefore, it is necessary to tap the "baseband audio" directly at the output of the discriminator chip for your scanner. The below Table shows a list of scanners, the discriminator chip(s) used in the scanner, circuit symbols of those chips, and three pins of general interest on the chips: RF-Input, Scan Control, and, of course, the baseband audio pin. Even though your scanner may not be listed, if you can find its discriminator chip, it will be listed with one or more scanners below, the pins of which will be the same for your unlisted scanner! Corrections and additions to this list are requested. See my email and other addresses at the end of this file. SCANNER DISCRIMINATOR CHIP PINS OF INTEREST Updated 2/01/96 CKT RF-in SCAN AUDIO SCANNER NFM CHIP TYPE SYMBOL Pin Pin BASEBAND =============== =============== ======= ===== ===== ========= MPS5071 n/a 16 13 9 AR-1000 TA-7787AF IC-4 ? ? ? AR-2002 MC-3357P IC-4 16 13 9 AR-3000 MC-3357P ? 16 13 9 AR-800 MC-3361N IC-200 16 13 9 AR-900 MC-3361N IC-201 16 13 9 AR-950 MC-3361N IC-201 16 13 9 BC-100XL MC-3359P IC-1 18 15 10 BC-100XLT TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 BC-200XLT TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 BC-205XLT TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 BC-250 ? IC-3 16 13 9 BC-2500XLT TK-10930VTL IC-201 24 - 12-FM 13-AM BC-350A NJM-3359D-A IC-3 18 15 10 BC-400XLT NJM-3359D-A IC-1 18 15 10 BC-560XLT NJM-3359D-A IC-1 18 15 10 BC-700A NJM-3359D-A IC-3 18 15 10 BC-760XLT NJM-3359D-A IC-2 18 15 10 BC-800XLT MC-3359P IC-1 18 15 10 BC-8500XLT MC-3361BP IC-9 16 13 9 BC-855XLT TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 BC-890XLT NJM-3359D-A IC-3 18 15 10 BC-950XLT NJM-3359D-A IC-2 18 15 10 HX-1000 TK-10420 U-201 16 13 9 MR-8100 NJM-3359D-A IC-3 18 15 10 MX-5000 MC-3357P IC-4 16 13 9 MX-7000 MC-3357P IC-4 16 13 9 PRO-2002 MC-3357P IC-101 16 13 9 PRO-2003 MC-3357P IC-104 16 13 9 PRO-2004 NFM/AM TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 (TP4) PRO-2004 WFM KB4419A IC-1 1 ? 6 (TP3) PRO-2005 NFM/AM TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 (TP2) PRO-2005 WFM KA2243N/HA12413 IC-1 1 - 10 (TP1) PRO-2006 NFM/AM TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 (TP2) PRO-2006 WFM KA2243N/HA12413 IC-1 1 - 10 (TP1) PRO-2011 TK-10420 IC-1 16 13 9 PRO-2020 MC-3357P IC-101 16 13 9 PRO-2021 TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 PRO-2022 MC-3361N IC-1 16 13 9 PRO-2023 NJM-3359D-A ? 18 15 10 PRO-2024 MC-3361N IC-2 16 13 9 PRO-2025 NJM-3359D-A IC-1 18 15 10 PRO-2026 NJM-3359D-A IC-7 18 15 10 PRO-2027 MC-3361N IC-2 16 13 9 PRO-2028 NJM-3359D-A IC-2 18 15 10 PRO-2030 NJM-3359D-A IC-3 18 15 10 PRO-2035 NFM/AM TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 (TP2) PRO-2035 WFM KA2243N/HA12413 IC-1 1 - 10 (TP1) PRO-2042 NFM/AM TK-10420 IC-2 16 13 9 (TP2) PRO-2042 WFM KA2243N/HA12413 IC-1 1 - 10 (TP1) PRO-23 MC-3361BD IC-1 16 13 9 PRO-26 NFM/AM TK-10930V IC-14 24 - 12-NFM 13-AM PRO-26 WFM TK-10489M IC-16 20 16-17 11 PRO-31 TK-10420 IC-1 16 13 9 PRO-32 TK-10420 IC-101 16 13 9 PRO-34 TK-10420 IC-101 16 13 9 PRO-35 TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 PRO-36 TK-10420 IC-101 16 13 9 PRO-37 TK-10420 IC-101 16 13 9 (TP103) PRO-39 MC-3361N IC-201 16 13 9 PRO-41 MC-3359P IC-1 18 15 10 PRO-42 MC-3361N IC-2 16 13 9 PRO-43 TK-10427/-10420 IC-301 16 13 9 PRO-44 MC-3361N IC-201 16 13 9 PRO-46 TK-10421M-3LT IC-401 20 16 11 PRO-51 MC-3361BD IC-1 16 13 9 PRO-60 ? IC-301 16 13 9 R-1600 NJM-3359D-A IC-2 18 15 10 R-4030 TK-10421M-2 IC-401 20 16 11 SR-15 TK-10421D-2 IC-1 16 13 9 TurboScan 2 3130-6056-502 U-201 18 ? 10 or 16 ==================================================================== This file is copyrighted (c) 1995 +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.interport.net!usenet From: Michael Neidich Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.collecting,rec.antiques.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio&phonos Subject: FREE: Zenith TransOceanic List of Model Nos, etc. Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 20:34:45 -0800 Organization: Interport Communications Corp. Lines: 8 Message-ID: <31119465.5AF2@interport.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: neidich.port.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b3 (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:56529 rec.radio.scanner:44826 rec.radio.shortwave:69541 rec.collecting:65975 rec.antiques.marketplace:12563 Request in the subject of your reply Free List and I'll send you my handy Zenith T-O list with model, chassis, tube count, band count, and other info to help identify your find. I'm looking for a 7000-2 12 band with two tunable VHF bands for my own use. 73, K2ENN From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.PBI.net!pa.mother.com!usenet From: Robert K Dixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: FS/ Sony 2010 Date: 1 Feb 1996 21:12:27 GMT Organization: Mother.COM Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4erabr$69u@pa.mother.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rdixon.dav.mother.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44912 rec.radio.swap:56659 For sale Sony 2010. It,s been a great radio but I have recently purchased a Drake R8A to take its place. Orig owners manual,box, power supply come with the radio. I have an outside portable longwire I'll throw in, along with some great utility frequency files. Cost is only 215.00 e-mail for complete discription thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!usenet From: KARL DAHLQUIST Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: "Code Red" from LAPD; what is it? Date: 1 Feb 1996 21:50:21 GMT Organization: MCI/News Corp. Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4ercit$530@merlin.delphi.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: slip135-107.bb.delphi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22D (Windows; U; 16bit) Watch "A Few Good Men" From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hideout.emanon.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!inforamp.net!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!usenet From: nbussey@calvin.stemnet.nf.ca () Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: JPole Plans Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:00:38 GMT Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4erdd5$e9p@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: calvin.stemnet.nf.ca X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.46 Hello: Can anyone post me the plans for constructinhg a Jpole antenna suitable for a radio scanner. I am looking for the exact measurments. A reply by email will be appreciated. Thanks Nels From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.cais.net!grouper.Exis.Net!34.exis.net!user From: hutson@exis.net (Peter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: JPole Plans Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 23:34:45 -0500 Organization: Exchange Information Systems Networks Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <4erdd5$e9p@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 34.exis.net I am looking for the same, but I would like to use it for an HT (FT-530) for use with packet. Please e-mail me at hutson@exis.net. Thanks, Pete In article <4erdd5$e9p@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>, nbussey@calvin.stemnet.nf.ca () wrote: > Hello: > Can anyone post me the plans for constructinhg a Jpole antenna > suitable for a radio scanner. I am looking for the exact measurments. > A reply by email will be appreciated. Thanks > > Nels From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!xyzzy.bubble.org!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!cph-1.news.DK.net!dkuug!dknet!usenet From: Jens Bo Juel Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frequencyies Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 23:48:38 +0100 Organization: Customer at DKnet Lines: 6 Message-ID: <31114346.392F@pip.dknet.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: cph23.pip.dknet.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) I just wanted to know if somebody, could tell me the frequencyies that are used for the police in DENMARK. You can mail me at: Flash@pip.dknet.dk Jens Juel From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.shadow.net!benny From: benny@shadow.net (Benito Horta) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks Followup-To: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Date: 1 Feb 1996 23:51:30 GMT Organization: Shadow Information Services, Inc. Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4erjm2$8ob@bud.shadow.net> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: hyper.shadow.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44883 alt.radio.scanner:27141 Nuu Bee (markj@got.net) wrote: : I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using : Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF : duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. : What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of : radio system. : Second..... : Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they : say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" : : Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? : Thank You : Nuu Bee Well the knight rider people and the Air wolf people use DVP radios (encryption) since the matters they discuss is usually sensitive information From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!daver!UB.com!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!usenet From: Robert Blumenkranz Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 list.... READ THIS Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:40:39 -0700 Organization: Engineering Consulting Lines: 3 Message-ID: <3111BFF7.19AB@kaiwan.com> References: <4edphi$moj@ias2.med.iacnet.com> Reply-To: radiobob@kaiwan.com NNTP-Posting-Host: kaiwan134.kaiwan.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Macintosh; I; PPC) majordomo@ml.rpmdp.com subscribe ar8000 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:46 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!llyene!news From: jparkyn@kilroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (James F. Parkyn) Subject: Re: RS discone problems with CELLULAR!!!!! Message-ID: <1996Feb2.005003.25828@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: news@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 References: <4eii1d$ecj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 00:48:54 GMT Lines: 60 magicjlass@aol.com (MagicJLass) wrote: >Just recently I bought the RS discone from my local RS. After I put it on >my roof top off of my chimney I tried scanning celullar. I got barely >nothing (as compared to with the rubber duckie the duckie was 100 times >better). I am using RG59 (40ft) and a Pro-51, the antenna is grounded, >the RG59 is good ( no power lines near it either). > To make another twist to the subject when I scan cellular and unscrew >the PL259 connecter from the So39 to BNC connecter and just leave the pin >of the PL259 connecter in the So39 to BNC connecter cellular is almost as >good as the rubber duck. >If any one has any Ideas as to why I shouldn't recieve better reception >from an RS discone than a tipical rubber duck, PLEASE LET ME KNOW! >thanx > Jim I can't resist: Jim, in keeping with the spirit of the ECPA, all Radio Shack antennas now have cellular reception permanently blocked! There is no longer a diode to clip.... We all know that you are only receiving your own cellular radio and wouldn't dream of violating federal law, much less admit that here on the newsgroup. ;) I have both the ICOM and R/S discones and have found that the performance of the R/S seemed poorer in the 800 - 900 MHz range. The "fit" of the connector as well as its RF performance have always been suspect. As a side note, by using RG-59 you are throwing away about 1/2 (3dB) of your signal in line loss. You also have mismatch due to the impedence of 75 ohms. Some folks claim that impedence mismatches only count when you are transmitting and that a scanners front end isn't a truly resistive 50 ohms. I will counter that they are simply advancing an incorrect arguement because their wallet won't open wide enough to spring for BELDEN 9913 and the proper connectors. (Oh boy, the flames are-a-coming!) Insults aside, If you are trying to recieve a high power transmitter that is nearby, any old cable will work. If you are trying to pick up body wires or perhaps a cellular handheld's transmitter, you had better pay attention to antenna VSWR, cable losses, and receiver front end performance if you expect a weak signal to make it past all of the RF "speed bumps" you are introducing by using inferior cable, connectors, and antennas. I would check out your BNC to PL-259 adaptor also. In mentioning the "twist" in your saga, is the improvement in receive performance only occuring at cellular. Is the performance on other frequency ranges improved over your rubber duck test antenna? When you mentioned that the antenna was "grounded", is that because you are providing a local "earth" ground to the antenna mast? Are the driven elements becoming inadvertently grounded? Good Luck! Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!buffnet2.buffnet.net!bga.com!realtime.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.eng.convex.com!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!dc.cis.okstate.edu!martin From: martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How do scanners cause problems on planes? Date: 2 Feb 1996 01:39:15 GMT Organization: Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK Lines: 34 Message-ID: <4erq03$6o9@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dc.cis.okstate.edu In article smcintyre@whoi.edu ( Scott A. McIntyre) writes: >This is probably a very basic physics/engineering question, but how >exactly is it that a device such as a scanner could conceivable cause >interference on a plane? In a nut-shell, the problem with scanners on planes is that they have oscillator circuits in them that behave like very low-powered transmitters. As the scanner scans, the local oscillator generates a carrier on a different frequency for each channel scanned. These carriers may appear on several frequencies at once because the scanner may use mixers and harmonic - rich doublers and tripplers to generate the desired injection frequency so you can't always predict where the crud will fall. My old regency scanner listens to frequencies in the 150MHZ band as well as a few in the 45MHZ region and several in the 440-470MHZ range. The synthesizer manages to generate bursts of carrier on lots of frequencies from 30 to over 800MHZ as it scans. Airliners use frequencies from below the AM broadcast band up to microwave frequencies. Since stray signals can effect the operation of navigational aids as well as voice communication, the results are unpredictable. Many modern portable electronic gadgets from cell phones to CD players have clock oscillators in them or actually contain small transmitters and nobody wants the chance of a navigational error which could endanger lives being caused by something that was totally preventable. The bottom line is simple. DON'T do it. The in-flight telephones and other entertainment equipment on the plane has all been certified by the FAA as safe to use, but anything you might bring on the plane is basically an unknown quantity and nobody wants to run the risk. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK 36.7N97.4W OSU Center for Computing and Information Services Data Communications Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 2035 Owners / Euro-board is great Date: 2 Feb 1996 01:45:29 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 7 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4esbu9$b9o@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader I just installed mine in about 10 minutes, no soldering. Cellular is right on the money. Mark mark s. conway From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news2.ee.net!news.ee.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.escape.ca!ts1dl21.escape.ca!asi From: asi@escape.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cellular DDI interface Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:15:44 LOCAL Organization: escape communications corp. Lines: 22 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1dl21.escape.ca X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] Come on guys!! I am still looking for a DDI that will work with AMPS! Anything that will control a cell phone and or scanner!! Include the mods for the phone! I know someone must have written new software or modified Celltracker!!?? I do not have the knowledge to do this, nor do I have time to learn this. I spend most of my time installing alarms in cars, houses, and stores. Due to the temp in Winnipeg Manitoba Canada -41c with a wind chill of 2300 remote car starters have been a big hit. -41c+ in the winter and last summer we had +40c that is CRAZY! Last summer it was hotter at night most of the time than LA was in the day. Peace from Frozen Canada. And to all you guys in the deep South, TAKE OFF EH! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!news From: vbook@vbook.com (Ed Mitchell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.pirate Subject: February edition of Ham Radio Online available on the Net Date: 2 Feb 1996 03:27:46 GMT Organization: Virtual Publishing Co. Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4es0bi$nb@news.accessone.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: vbook.accessone.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:97617 rec.radio.amateur.policy:32951 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:13911 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24455 rec.radio.scanner:44858 rec.radio.shortwave:69567 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:18827 alt.radio.scanner:27128 alt.radio.pirate:13346 The February 1996 edition of Ham Radio Online is available at http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm New articles are available now and we will be adding 1 to 2 new articles each week. Ham Radio Online has up-to-date news about Amateur Radio from around the world , feature stories, real-time propagation and auroral condition reports, real-tim e earthquake and severe weather conditions for emergency communications planning , online humor section and the Ham Radio Online Library with fully indexed (find any section with just a mouse click) Part 97 rules and regulations. And we plan to offer some totally cool new services during the coming month. A s always its free and free of ads. Thanks to you, we had over 10,000 readers stop by during January! Please enjoy! 73, Ed Mitchell KF7VY vbook@vbook.com http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm ------------------------ personal email to vbook@vbook.com Visit Ham Radio Online, it's free, at http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:52 1996 From: adamsonr10226@www1.utech.net (Ralph T. Adamson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 03:50:22 GMT References: <310b3f66.160499147@news.solo.pipex.co.za> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 NNTP-Posting-Host: p2.utech.net Message-ID: <311188f4.0@news.utech.net> Lines: 20 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.utech.net! timj@solo.pipex.co.za (Tim Jackson) wrote: >>Does anyone know of a description of a modification for the computer >>interface port on the AR8K to go to a couple of stereo plugs on the side, >>similar to the Scout modification? >All you need to do is carry out the Scout mod but use a STEREO jack >socket and wire the TX data line too and not just the RX data line as >required for the Scout. That gives you GROUND, TX data and RX data. This >stereo socket can then be used for a Scout connection or as an interface >connection to a PC. No need for two sockets. Ah yes. And while this is true, if you would like the squelch function as in using the CX12AR interface, you might want to put in that other jack. You can fit 2 in there on the lower left, front portion of the chassis (nearest the 2 arrow keys). I used some enclosed jacks from Radio Shmuck. I think they were #274-249 on page 80 but I'm not sure. The drawback is that these jacks, while enclosed, are not air-tight and the case "breaths". So I avoid large temp changes. If I had it all to do over I would search out some sealed 1/8th inch jacks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!lynx.unm.edu!bubba.NMSU.Edu!thharrel From: thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu (KC5KTO) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Possible cellular mods on CPU-blocked scanners? Date: 2 Feb 1996 04:10:02 GMT Organization: New Mexico State University Lines: 39 Message-ID: <4es2qq$2n3@bubba.NMSU.Edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cream.cs.nmsu.edu Summary: A way to enable cellular coverage on blocked scanners? X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44935 alt.radio.scanner:27162 I was doing some thinking this evening, about the state of the world in general and cell-blocked scanners in particular. We all know about the ECPA, and how scanner manufacturers have "blocked out" the channels in the CPU. It would seem that Uniden, GRE, etc., are thinking that just disallowing users from being able to input cellular frequencies is sufficient to keep them from scanning those ranges, since how can you scan a range you can't input? Look at the 7A4 PRO-51. You couldn't directly input a cellular frequency, because it wouldn't let you. However, sticking that puppy in test mode would fill one of the memory locations with a cell frequency, which the scanner would then happily search from. This got me to thinking - what about bypassing the CPU and programming the EEPROM directly? What I'm thinking about is a device that would be wired to the relevant EEPROM pins (mundane stuff like the ENABLE, DATA IN, CLOCK pins) and would directly write a frequency into a memory location. After directly accessing the EEPROM, you'd turn on the scanner, and it'd happily search from that stored frequency, not knowing (or caring) where it came from. You could store channels and frequency data in a computer, then shove that information down a serial line. The device would translate the RS-232 data into TTL-compatible (or whatever the memory chip needs) signals for EEPROM programming. The EEPROM doesn't know that it's not the CPU programming it, and when you fire up the scanner, the CPU won't know that it wasn't the one that programmed the EEPROM. Now I know that this would probably break the ECPA provision about having a combination of a computer, a scanner, and an EPROM burner or other device with intent to do this. I'm just theorizing about the possibility of something like this being workable. Obviously, this would only work with scanners with external memory chips (such as the PRO-43). Anybody care to comment? T.J. -- | T.J. Harrell III NRA KC5KTO thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu | _\| /\ |/_ | KC5KTO's Radio Page: | \ / \ / | http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~thharrel/scanner/scanner.html | / \ | * Opinions not those of NMSU ARC or Business Office * | /______\ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!guitar.sound.net!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: milliron@ix.netcom.com(William Milliron ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR8000, Grove, and 800 mhz? Date: 2 Feb 1996 04:43:12 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4es4p0$b2k@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> References: <4es0bi$nb@news.accessone.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-dc15-10.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Feb 01 8:43:12 PM PST 1996 Grove is advertising the AR8000 as being 800 mhz band restorable. Does this really restore the entire 800 - 900 mhz (cellular?) band or is it some sort of built in frequency converter? Has anyone out there purchased an AR8000 with this mod? Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!ablecom!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.PBI.net!pa.mother.com!usenet From: Robert K Dixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio,shortwave Subject: Re: FS/ Sony 2010 Date: 2 Feb 1996 05:01:00 GMT Organization: Mother.COM Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4es5qc$24d@pa.mother.com> References: <4erabr$69u@pa.mother.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rdixon.dav.mother.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44835 rec.radio.swap:56551 Robert K Dixon wrote: > > For sale Sony 2010. It,s been a great radio but I have recently > purchased a Drake R8A to take its place. Orig owners manual,box, > power supply come with the radio. I have an outside portable > longwire I'll throw in, along with some great utility frequency > files. Cost is only 215.00 e-mail for complete discription > thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news1.h1.usa.pipeline.com!usenet From: bumologist@usa.pipeline.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS discone problems with CELLULAR!!!!! Date: 2 Feb 1996 06:03:32 GMT Organization: Pipeline USA Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4es9fk$mu6@news1.usa.pipeline.com> References: <4eoth1$su7@news.iii.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe12.h1.usa.pipeline.com X-PipeUser: bumologist X-PipeHub: usa.pipeline.com X-PipeGCOS: (BUMOLOGIST) X-Newsreader: Pipeline USA v3.4.0 The Impedance doesn't really matter unless you are transmitting.Sure,if you can afford it,there are cables that are 50 ohm and have lower loss than RG6,but for the money,it works good,is cheap,lasts a good amount of time,and you don't have to go to a radio store,or go to a hamfest,or call on the phone and wait to buy it.As far as money/performance goes,it's hard to beat.. -- Bumologist...Not just a Job,it's a Hobby! Barry Felstein From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: wa6sul@ix.netcom.com(gg ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Date: 2 Feb 1996 06:48:54 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4esc4m$6p1@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: irv-ca7-14.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Feb 01 10:48:54 PM PST 1996 In <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> SFS@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) writes: > >I have it from a reliable source that the FCC uses the Create LP >at their monitoring stations! >********************************************************************** ** Thats true, not gossip. Just drive by their monitoring station in Cerritos. You can see them from the freeway. Good quality concentric towers and helical coax lines too. You dont see any cheap TV ANTENNAS for their monitor posts. P.S They are mounted vertically polarized, so it is real easy to see what model of Create antenna they are using. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!news.delphi.com!usenet From: TESTRELLA@delphi.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Dressler Antennas for an Apartment? Date: 2 Feb 1996 07:52:02 GMT Organization: Delphi Internet Services Corporation Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4esfr2$6ad@news2.delphi.com> References: <4emqrp$4iu@news-e2a.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44874 alt.radio.scanner:27135 Quoting JeffC from a message in rec.radio.scanner Je[ Does anyone have any experience with Dressler antennas? I am Je[ wondering if the ARA-2000 or other models could be used in an Je[ apartment with space limitations. Je[ Thanks, Je[ JeffC@gnn.com Jeff, I have a Dressler Ar1500 and use it with a Pro 2006. It is mounted inside my apartment. Excellent sensitivity with no overload problems. I've had it for 4 years...solid construction...no problems. To Rainbow V 1.11 for Delphi - Test Drive From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:36:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!io.org!else.net!tor250!org!gryn!paulsplace!paul.boccaccio From: Paul.Boccaccio@paulsplace.gryn.org (Paul Boccaccio) Date: 02 Feb 96 08:16:43 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AOR1000xlt Message-ID: Organization: Paul's Place Lines: 8 Does any have a fix sheet for a AOR1000xlt. I saw a while ago some one was talking about a fix it sheet but I forget who it was so if any has one please let me know where I can get it ...Any thing would be appreciated... -- | Fidonet: Paul Boccaccio 1:244/126 | Internet: Paul.Boccaccio@paulsplace.gryn.org From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!docs25!fkelcz From: fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu (Frederick Kelcz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 08:31:21 +1000 Organization: University of Wisconsin Dept. of Radiology Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: fkelcz.radiology.wisc.edu X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B] In article <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> Jonathan Clough writes: >Path: news.doit.wisc.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.in ternetmci.com!btnet!zetnet.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!javiaton.demon.co .uk >From: Jonathan Clough >Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner >Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 96 11:08:20 GMT >Organization: Javiation, Bradford, U.K. >Lines: 65 >Message-ID: <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> >References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.produ ction.compuserve.com> >Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk >X-NNTP-Posting-Host: javiaton.demon.co.uk >X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.30 >X-Mail2News-Path: javiaton.demon.co.uk >In article > fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu "Frederick Kelcz" writes: >Morning Fred, >< [snip] Does Javiathon have anyting to add >> on your side of the ocean? >Mmm...not sure if I'm half Company half man now :-) Jonathon, Thanks for the very detailed (and daunting) advice on the BNC >Its only in recent weeks and on threads here on r.r.s that this >"problem" seems to have appeared - the chances of this "problem" is probably >increased for those who change antennas on a regular basis. Given the wide freq range of this receiver I would have expected AOR to make a sturdier BNC - as one must change antennas to take full advantage of the radio. I regularly change antennas on a Bearcat 200xlt and a Yaesu FT530 and after years, the BNC have shown no problem. In your opinion would there be room to fit a sturdier BNC with actual lock washer into the space of the current BNC? regards, Fred K N9SLR Frederick Kelcz, PhD, MD Dept. of Radiology University of Wisconsin, Madison From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.intelenet.com!unogate!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!newsserver.sdsc.edu!newshub.csu.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx07-52.teleport.com!user From: tvine@teleport.com (PjB) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Group Proposal Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 09:39:39 -0800 Organization: thornyvinemusic Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <4dtnks$h6k@news2.aimnet.com> <4dtq7p$lna@news-e1a.megaweb.com> <4efg6v$8kc@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx07-52.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0b30 In article , ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) wrote: __So who made you read the off topic posts? Are you so slow and simple you __can't read a message header and skip it.? When you log on to a newsgroup __do you read every single message posted? Have you noticed that I only respo nd __to messages already posted and don't initiate any new ones? __ __ __>I'm quite prepared to E-Mail all off topic peoples with many meg's of __>garbage, and as many have complained, and none have heard, this is what __>I must be forced to do to help reclaim the group. __ __Ahh, the Usenet Savior! Hey go ahead and E-mail bomb me. It is a two way __street dipstick, except when I return the favor your ISP will receive copies __of everything you send me. I wonder how they will enjoy your many megs returned __twofold? If you don't like it don't read it. You seem to have less brains than __that given by God to dogs and other small simple creatures. __ __Have you also noticed how quiet it gets until some turd brained moron pops u p __and complains and makes threats? You should considering you seem to be forced __to read everything that comes accross the Usnet. __ __BTW, did they ever figure out if your VD was from a dog, dingo or farm animal?? That settles it! Either this Glenn Hansen douche-nozzle is really Butt Cheek or Mr. Hansen has a huge school-girl crush on him! Notice how he copies Cheeks writing 'style' down to the very nuance? Usenet Saviors, two-way streets, I dont initiate, I just respond ( even tho nothing is ever directed to him, he responds anyway!) STD's from animals, if you dont like it dont read it, and on and on......Unbelievable. This guy needs a mind of his own, but he clearly doesnt have one.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!news.net99.net!news.igc.net!runabout1-27 From: opto@igc.net (Kevin Cox) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Optoelectronics February Special !! Date: 2 Feb 1996 14:45:37 GMT Organization: Optoelectronics Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4et82h$r8t@IRIS.igc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: runabout1-27.igc.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Optoelectronics announces a special price for the Scout for the entire month of February. The Special price is $399 plus you receive a free CC30 carrying case. The regular price for the Scout is $449 and the CC30 has a $10 value. That's a savings of $60. All orders must be received by February 29th. This special is limited to U.S. and Canadian customers only. Contact Optoelectronics at 1-800-327-5912 or 1-954-771-2050. You must mention that you saw this special on the Internet. For further information on the Scout see our Web page: http://www.optoelectronics.com Shipping and handling is extra. Sincerely, Kevin Cox From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.cirrus.com!bug.rahul.net!a2i!olivea!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!decwrl!pa.dec.com!depot.mro.dec.com!mrnews.mro.dec.com!fccvde.enet.dec.com!klimasewski From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Shareware software for ACARS reception? Date: 2 FEB 96 15:31:47 Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4etsk3$gif@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fccvde.enet.dec.com Is there shareware available for ACARS reception? Ken From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: Guy Adams Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 16:07:03 -0800 Organization: Netcom Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3112A727.1D41@ix.netcom.com> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-roc-il1-28.ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Feb 02 2:06:04 PM PST 1996 X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6b (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44891 alt.radio.scanner:27145 Nuu Bee wrote: > > I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using > Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF > duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. > > What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of > radio system. > > Second..... > Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they > say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" > > Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? > > Thank You > > Nuu Bee So, do you believe the space shuttle uses the CB band too? Break 1 9 - Houston - you got your ears on? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!hecate.umd.edu!mojo.eng.umd.edu!prolog.eng.umd.edu!gmripper From: gmripper@Glue.umd.edu (Harold Thomas) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: Opto Scout Date: 2 Feb 1996 16:21:09 GMT Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park, MD Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4etdll$72g@mojo.eng.umd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: prolog.eng.umd.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I'm interested in getting an opto scout. If you have one to sell please let me know. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news!waynepc From: phares01@internext.com (Wayne L. Phares) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: No. Virginia freqs Date: Fri, 02 Feb 96 17:15:23 GMT Organization: INTERNExT Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4ethik$4et@posh.internext.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-232.internext.com X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 I am looking for freqs in Northern Virginia (Fairfax) I have the Police Call 96' and have checked the PerCon DB. In particular I am in search of the freqs that Police and Fire personel switch to after the call has been dispatched. I pickup lots of dispatch traffic but loose them when the "switch to fire channel 3" or "Go to medic channel 5". I have used the trucked freqs from POlice Call 96' and PerCon only to find some cell calls and some plumbers talking between jobs. Thanks Wayne. phares01@internext.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: bsaranger@aol.com (BSARanger) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FAST FOOD FREQUENCIES Date: 2 Feb 1996 18:25:47 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 2 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4eu6hr$bk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4dr966$5rf@bud.shadow.net> Reply-To: bsaranger@aol.com (BSARanger) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27163 rec.radio.scanner:44938 try the red, blue and green dot frequerncies... These are non exclusive, and very easy to license. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!night.primate.wisc.edu!nntp.msstate.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!nwgw.infi.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: "H. David Ingram" Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UNIDEN WANTS TO KNOW... Date: 2 Feb 1996 18:49:28 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4etmbo$4sv@nw002.infi.net> References: <4d1t5f$lc0@bighorn.accessnv.com> <4da46t$oa6@news.pacifier.com> <4dptqv$gld@news2.cts.com> <1147cc$17712.2c6@news.olywa.net> <4duhqj$n51@su3.in.net> <4e8fhv$1p2@daily-planet.execpc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: h-snow.richmond.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27144 rec.radio.scanner:44888 A pl-tone entry feature that allows you to enter the tone used by police, fire and emergency crews; and if no tone is used it [the scanner] will accept 0.0 as the entry, therefore allowing other "signals" to come in that are not part of your programming choices. For example "Amelia County Sheriff's Office uses 123.0 on 39.240 MHz. Enter 39.240 as the frequency ; when the pl tone is requested, enter 123.0 as the entry and press the "Enter" and the only signal that you will hear will be Amelia County Sheriff's Office on 39.240 MHz using a pl-tone of 123.0 There you have it. A typical example of what I would like to see in future Uniden Bearcat scanners :Base, Mobile and Handheld scanners From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news-relay.us.dell.com!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!pendragon!ames!cisu2.jsc.nasa.gov!usenet From: Billy Joe Donnelly Newsgroups: dfw.forsale,houston.forsale,austin.forsale,utsa.forsale,tx.forsale,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro43 Handheld Scanner for sale Date: 2 Feb 1996 20:09:24 GMT Organization: NASA/Johnson Space Center Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4etr1k$2o2@cisu2.jsc.nasa.gov> References: <4e197t$r6b@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <4e1abo$m87@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4e2ajb$4h9@news.cyberspy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.169.219.147 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:4e2ajb$4h9@news.cyberspy.com Xref: news.epix.net dfw.forsale:23528 houston.forsale:16729 austin.forsale:43745 tx.forsale:15702 rec.radio.swap:56606 rec.radio.scanner:44877 You can even transmit your scanned color documents to truckers on Citizen's Band. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:13 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!mzenier From: mzenier@netcom.com (Mark Zenier) Subject: Re: need 10 to 150 khz FM demodulator Message-ID: Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.scanner Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <4eomvr$mbf@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 20:22:48 GMT Lines: 201 Sender: mzenier@netcom22.netcom.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13107 rec.radio.scanner:44940 in <4eomvr$mbf@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>, Bruce M. Marshall wrote: : Does anyone know of a chip that is used to demodulate multiplexed : signals such as FM sterio, secondary audio programming (SAP) on TV : sound and SCA on FM broadcast? I thought I could use my HF radio in FM : mode but I tried it and it didn't work. I finally figured out that : although the readout goes down to 0 hz it actually won't receive : anything less than 150 khz (the manual says so and I can hear the : relay click out.) : I'm sure there is a small, easy circuit to do this. Yup. Here's one I did a few years back. A one chip superhet SCA decoder. Sat Oct 19 21:19:14 1991 In article <19OCT199116511767@utkvx4.utk.edu>, padawer@utkvx4.utk.edu (Padawer , Justin Randall) writes: > In article <1991Oct19.194711.10535@cbnewsd.att.com>, polo@cbnewsd.att.com (m ark.b.colosia) writes... > >The subject line says it all. If any company sells an SCA adaptor or > >SCA modification suitable for the pro2006 and/or if there are any > >schematics available for constructing my own....{etc} > > I also would be very, very, very interested in seeing such a device! > Can anyone help? Ok, here's a repost of an SCA decoder. Before someone flames me again for how complex the circuit is, 1) it isn't that complex, it just looks that way because I dislike ASCII schematics and 2) it receives all of the sca subcarriers from 62 to 95 Khz unlike one based on a PLL with a fixed band pass circuit. I recommend the Mc3361 as a replacement for the Mc3359 since the Mc3361 has reached jellybean status and is available from three suppliers (Motorola, Signetics, and Samsung). If you have enough experience to build the circuit, you should be able to do the substition using the suggested circuits in the Motorola (or Signetics Linear - Communications) data books. start of old posting ---- Here is a description of an SCA decoder using the Motorola Mc3359 Low Power Narrowband FM IF integrated circuit. What is SCA SCA or Subsidiary Communications Authorization is a method of piggybacking signals on the normal audio programming from FM Broadcast stations. Normally, the audio program occupies the frequencies (after FM detection) from 0 to 15 Khz, there is a 19 Khz pilot tone for stereo, then the Double Sideband Supressed Carrier Stereo Difference signal takes 38 Khz +/- 15 Khz. There is room above all that for other signals, using the range 60 to around 100 Khz. About the only limitation the FCC places on the signal is how much the SCA signals modulate the main RF carrier. Monophonic FM stations can use subcarriers in the range of 20 to 100 Khz. The usual audio signals are narrowband FM subcarriers with a deviation of +/- 5 Khz. Common subcarrier frequencies are 67, 75, and 92 Khz. There are also FSK and PSK data subcarriers for such uses as stock market tickertapes and paging. Content, Property Rights and ECPA The signals can be used for whatever the station can get money for. Talking newspapers for the blind, "Muzak", and ethnic programming are signals I've monitored in my area. These are not considered public broadcasts, and are covered under some form of copyright or performance right. There is some question that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act may disallow listening to SCA signals. So don't try to go into competition with the program providers, because they are the ones collecting the subscription payments and the law is on their side. Theory of Operation The Mc3359 is one of several similar chips designed to be the second IF for a narrowband FM receiver. It has a local oscillator, a balanced mixer, a limiting IF amplifier, a FM quadrature detector. Also included is an OP amp, and a squelch/ mute circuit which is not used. It is documented in Motorola's Linear and Interface Integrated Circuits databook (DL128). The specifications state that it produces a useful audio signal with an input of around 10 microvolts. (Quite a change from logic thresholds for this digital hacker.) In this case, the signal is obtained from the output of the FM detector inside a FM tuner. The input resistor (R1) is large to prevent loading down the tuner's circuitry. Then a parallel LC tuned circuit (C1,C2,L1) selects the desired subcarrier. The Local Osc. frequency is set by L2, C4 and C5. This should be in the range of 388 (455 - 67) Khz to 363 (455 - 92) Khz. The output of the mixer is filtered by a three terminal ceramic bandpass filter, X1, (Not a ceramic resonater used for oscillators). The limiter input (the output of the filter) is the pin most senstive to spurious signal pickup. Keep that wire short. The limiter output is processed through a quadrature detector, a balanced mixer combined with a tuned circuit (L3 with an internal capacitor), to produce the audio frequency signal, deemphasized and filtered by R3, c11, c12, r4, etc. Parts First try the nearest Motorola distributor. I got the IC at a local (Seattle area) retailer called Supertronix. (Sort of a local "Radio Shack on Steroids" with a large selection (206) 251-8484 ). It's also in the NTE (and ECG) inventory as a NTE-860 ($$$ warning). A Mc3357 is similar, but requires more external parts. The inductors and bandpass filter are available from DIGI-KEY. I haven't yet tried the Toko 154ANS-T1020Z for L2, should work. ;-) The J. W. Miller 9001 is a big ugly wide range thing. Adjustment First, power the circuit up with no input signal, 4 to 9 volts, 3 mA. Hook the audio output up to your amplifer (about .5 V signal). With a DC voltmeter or 'scope across C11, adjust L3 across it's range. At one end, the voltage should be about .5 V DC, at the other end the voltage should be about 1 volt below the power voltage. The transition should be abrupt. In the transition area, adjust L3 so the voltage is halfway between the two extremes. This should be the point for the loudest output of random noise. If you have a frequency counter, scope, or LF receiver, look at pin 2 and adjust L2 for the subcarrier you want to try first. 388 Khz is a good bet. With L3 adjusted, it really isn't that critical. Hook the input to the FM detector output inside your FM receiver/tuner. (You'll have to figure this out yourself), and tune to the station with a SCA subcarrier. Quality of reception is important. If the normal broadcast audio isn't clear, the subcarriers will be drown out by noise and distortion. Tune L2, when a signal is there, you'll get a quiet output, or hear the music. Even with L1 misadjusted, the the chip is sensitive enough to pick the subcarrier up. Adjust L1 for the lowest extraneous noise. Alternatively, you can hook an audio oscillator to the input, instead of the FM receiver, set to 67 (or whatever) Khz, .1 to .5 Volt, look at pin 18, and tune L1 for a peak AC voltage. Performance There is still a lot of crud in the audio, but it's good enough to tell you what's out there. (Most SCA signals use some sort of compression to reduce noise, which this circuit doesn't do.) Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com mzenier@netcom.com What follows is 400some lines of wirewrap netlist output (ascii text). begin 644 scad.zip M4$L#!!0````(`.EA0B"?Q'N0"@<``!\N```(````2G_<=WUFA4G%FQ^"QSVB>W6[3/0.E9:9Z^O=:UKMV(MB[.BKEB0UT42 M`>%V#$!8ZXW9!-;NK&N3.(VKJ&3/_Q7^^3OO1MNUN/)FNWJ!^9X;T!KUXLPBM+BQ3_'?$.N!G)'NT;D=:6.EQ-J M4-UYA'&@XTP#U_5T6;$TOG`>XQ,[I1QS%07\K2WAJT['7YQE[9S\YQQ_S?Q$ MZ*,@<.P$?AW&.0`5!*Z=H!5_NS)!6.(LK)N%2I?O=P>6/K(J_Y:SOYZ^W#F? M=]YQ__@DB)T^XO;AL&9W[,C/]9'+(4FX((YK+CH^V[YJXVT___'WW3^;M;/^ M5[S+[7N7`O*]]L/2K^HRXOS$B0%1B=@I(ZXD.M]PQ^7_7/.^"3K'3J?M'D9_ MLMT!R%P[F::J^WN/?G#L^\_MJ=7>;L>)@I,5O#?E*L_CT$LGGE>8$ M3.:]99,5<>M)E,MH!GS-E_82 MR&]!,`ON;@;$^A]F+BO(3?AY#+(6I#Y,W%O9FD)#7`7:4CSLFF@YWC$WC#Y(W$W M4=.5D]FXOP#T!ED.D7@_]C9@;Y8@]&U"H:.G.462OX-29WY9YN]-^,<>GGB. MH;/3FW=,8B=N?`QKO&;SU.=`+^V*U@TQY)'$(A$6YP"%@03X;R46$0'S^Z38 MTVZ7!S@Z,]]R+W[S,Q=K=H"D,:KMR3'D??;]TWN8/L!T$]F+C$)$^:9U4,3_J"])5/*[,79M<3X:,4NX%D*4EF(+8G8-8 MY/P+H%+?-X`RH:I`<*,#]4'2<>]'!E M9\&)4WY&'S;Q!8M.O*17@5:*NF==+'VEJ@4'VV\;\?'*ZX'14WT=@[ZG8/9A M6BF/"L.F:CD&=E_!;@%N$@KTHH=`%V/?$NRT1-@\IUR/^7\]D2RI&TYBH,H+ MA:T+LG7T[W&A+A")=<5%>LZK*D^[%5>.X4)O`ZUBNHSK(-^6AP1R2MIM56<9 MJ'1.85K!@J4KUAO;5!_8G$"Z)WH?ECG&98FA?0 M4^AU]&)<-17,@[\^:\`Y$J:>O8E^CK83SI9,#1WHZ%CHS,R)NKPF%QJQF`KS MPSRZ&H]Z*B!:;%8N33TVZ"1IG3:<VN MEPUR[_6"\U=T.`VUG3^0;C52/1$=0:KZV-BNVDA%V[0W^1#CJF_:&3DSR;61 M>W4'2%3O%)JGVN<%.(0A%D9+B2%61Q:=:EJ,S?G+5056?>N%2](V".E71!JAF09JABN_*9I$" ME\J?WY!+=2"X&`-[JD_:D.$=S=[['&?&<'W0A;W8OA@:`K3;75=S*T' MTCRS&X5X2\D*5_!OI(5ZF0#2MCDY*01$ZCAP,6)90(31TA1Z5I8IX"I.<6GD M5G!EK0%,Y6`TA2[U'-,%F8R9=""3&4E(,QFXURJMP-U!:VY`,U(Z]*B=5C[D MK^EN,J'[+K,GYJ#$9$\N-,ZE^=1-XJ_->F5<6>45#["ZE3N>=JS^!U!+`0(3 M`Q0````(`.EA0B"?Q'N0"@<``!\N```(``````````$```"D@0````!S8V%D :+FYE=%!+!08``````0`!`#8````P!P`````` ` end From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!night.primate.wisc.edu!nntp.msstate.edu!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!services.arn.net!usenet From: Bert Burland Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 2 Feb 1996 21:26:05 GMT Organization: ARNet, Inc. Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> References: <31106859.442A@minn.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: borger-157.arn.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) I'd like to know too. A friend has one and is asking me the same question. -- Bert Burland From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.ptd.net!news From: joe2tpd Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: me again Date: 2 Feb 1996 22:02:58 GMT Organization: ProLog - PenTeleData, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4eu1mi$coc@ns2.ptd.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs1-01.scr.ptd.net any one get free catolog's on radio's scanner's, cb's, etc if so please e-mail me the name of the Co. and the telphone number thax if where is the scanning room on mirc From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!xpat.postech.ac.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Charlotte Frequencies Date: 2 Feb 1996 22:34:17 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 24 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4eu3h9$1up4@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 We're getting nailed with the second big ice storm in as many months down here, and I'd like to be able to hear as much as possible. Who's got frequencies for Charlotte/Mecklenburg? I have some, but not all of them. Specifically, I'm looking for: -Charlotte/Mecklenburg Police (800Mhz trunked. I have some, but I'm not sure that I have all of them) -Duke Power maintenance (supposed to be lotsa ice on the wires tonight) -NC and SC Highway Patrol (again, I have most...but not all) -Highway salt/slag/sanding crews -Public Service freqs. for surrounding counties (Cabarrus, Iredell, Union, Gaston, York, SC) -Anything else you can think of that would be interesting Thanks in advance! -Drew in Charlotte- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.starlink.com!usenet From: Bill Funk Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Date: 2 Feb 1996 23:00:28 GMT Organization: Star Link Internet Services Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4eu52c$o0o@pegasus.starlink.com> References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> <4esc4m$6p1@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-27.starlink.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) wa6sul@ix.netcom.com(gg ) wrote: >In <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> SFS@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) >writes: >> >>I have it from a reliable source that the FCC uses the Create LP >>at their monitoring stations! >>********************************************************************** >** >Thats true, not gossip. Just drive by their monitoring station in >Cerritos. You can see them from the freeway. Good quality concentric >towers and helical coax lines too. >You dont see any cheap TV ANTENNAS for their monitor posts. >P.S They are mounted vertically polarized, so it is real easy to see >what model of Create antenna they are using. ======================== True, the FCC doesn't use "cheap" antennas. Why should they? It's *OUR* money they use to buy their antennas. On reading this group, I find that a *lot* of people here are asking for help with doing things in such a fashion that I understand that they do not have any governmental funding behind them. In a case like that, a $50 TV antenna that performs almost as well as a $250+ antenna looks *very* good. Personally, I doubt that the extra $200 would be cost effective. Bill Funk From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!bdt.com!news.ossi.com!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.starlink.com!usenet From: Bill Funk Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: POCSAG,MESSAGE TRACKER Date: 2 Feb 1996 23:10:58 GMT Organization: Star Link Internet Services Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4eu5m2$o0o@pegasus.starlink.com> References: <4eo3vh$39v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-27.starlink.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) wrote: >Has anyone had the chance to compare PD-200 with MESSAGE TRACKER? >Does anyone have a circuit schematic for the MESSAGE TRACKER? I would >like to know if they use the same 741 op amp circuit. > >thanks, >Ken ============== They do not use the same circuit. I think the MT cable includes a loopback to ensure you are using their cable. I've tried a WEFAX and a few other generic decoders, and they all give the message that the cable is missing or not working. Bill Funk From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:19 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equip,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!news.qnet.com!news.widomaker.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail From: dconti@carroll.com (Daniel M. Conti) Subject: WTB : Kenwood model 742A multiband radio. X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated) Organization: Carroll-Net Message-ID: X-Trace: 823293342/17912 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: poseidon03.carroll.com Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:31:04 GMT Lines: 5 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27161 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97677 rec.radio.scanner:44931 rec.radio.swap:56685 Looking to purchase a Kenwood model 742A multi bander, with or without 6 meter module. Older model 741 also acceptable. Must be fully functional and in decent shape. Will pay reasonable price. E-Mail with response, please From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.kth.se!nntp.uio.no!fizban.solace.mh.se!paladin.american.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.express.ca!not-for-mail From: lowell@express.ca (Lowell) Subject: Re: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 Message-ID: <227cc$f3a3a.d2@news.express.ca> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 23:47:51 GMT References: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Lines: 11 elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) wrote: >Looking for modifications and secret tricks for unlocking secrets of >Uniden >sportcat sc150. Please Email or post a message. Thanks >Elmo110860@aol.com I doubt you'll find any useful mods for the newer Uniden scanners. If anyone knows of any, please post! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.intelenet.com!unogate!mvb.saic.com!homer.alpha.net!daily-planet.execpc.com!news.sol.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news1.isp.net!news.isp.net!news.slip.net!not-for-mail From: Greg Ottria Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: cell tracking program Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 00:08:15 -0800 Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: eb233.slip.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-NEWS-ADMIN: newsadmin@slip.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpose of course. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:22 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news5.ner.bbnplanet.net!news.ner.bbnplanet.net!arco!usenet From: Steve Giron Subject: Re: OKI cellular phone as scanner? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 138.241.55.71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <3112A80A.2138@is.arco.com> Sender: usenet@news.arco.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: ARCO References: <4dic8d$emn@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4dpan1$4q48@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4efgk1$8kc@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4eqfm4$d9c@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 00:10:50 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b3 (Win16; I) Lines: 9 Gary Belt wrote: > > What shouldn't I do to my Motorola Bag phone? And what shouldn't I do to my Motorotal DIGTIAL Flip Phone... Since the procedure for the Analog Microtac phone didn't work on mine. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!xyzzy.bubble.org!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!hazel.la.tds.com!voyager.ff.tds.com!usenet From: RR Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod Date: 3 Feb 1996 01:02:11 GMT Organization: Trident Data Systems Lines: 38 Message-ID: <4euc6j$mum@voyager.ff.tds.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: remote4.ff.tds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) I too recently did the mod using regular 1/8" stereo jack. I put it on the left side of the radio, since the 3/32" jack for the SCOUT is on the right under the power connector. No problem fitting the jack in the case at all. The new jack provides the Transmit, receive, and ground, while the 3/32" jack for the SCOUT only does Receive and ground. The 1/8" jack works well with the cables supplied with the CX12AR interface. Just lug it in and go! Of couse, it lacks the squelch output and a few of the other pins, which aren't really important to me right now anyway. What I was curious about was if anyone had been able to fit another kind of connector, like a 6 or 7-pin mini-DIN, into the radio for this purpose? I didn't have one, so I couldn't try it, but it seems like a good idea, if it fits. The flat cable thing is a mess, if you ask me... this mechanism works MUCH better and it doesn't feel like you're about to break anything, though the little 1/8" stero jacks from RS seem a little dainty. I hope to replace it with a sturdier one in the future. But it works! Works great!! revoke@eskimo.com (Dean Sepstrup) wrote: >Scott, > >Based on some earlier articles and notes on the AR8000 mailing list, I >went ahead and converted to stereo mini-jacks (3/32") on the left hand >side of the unit, near the bottom (opposite from the power connecter). I >was a little unsure about disasembling a $600 radio that was brand new, >but there were no surprises. There is plenty of room inside the case for >the jacks, and the wiring must be done carefully, but the connections are >all readily accessible when fully disassembled. The radio interfaces fine >with my CX12-AR and it's so much easier to hook up, now. Good luck. > From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet From: mpalmer@mail.utexas.edu (Morgan G. Palmer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Austin, Texas Area Frequency List (Raw DOS Text) - scanner.txt [1/1] Date: 3 Feb 1996 01:05:16 GMT Organization: University of Texas at Austin Lines: 128 Message-ID: <4euccc$mi1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-h-4.ots.utexas.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ MQkxNTUuNTgJVVRQRCBDSEFOTkVMIDEJQVVTVElODQoyCTE1NS44MglVVFBE IENIQU5ORUwgMglBVVNUSU4NCjMJMTU0LjA0CUFVU1RJTiBDSVRZIENJVklM IERFRkVOU0UJQVVTVElODQo0CTQ2MS45MjUJRE9CSUUgU0VDVVJJVFkJQVVT VElODQo1CTE1My45MDUJQVVTVElOIEVNRVJHRU5DWSBPUEVSQVRJT05TCUFV U1RJTiANCjYJNDUwLjA1CUtWVUUtVFYgMjQgTkVXUyAxCUFVU1RJTg0KNwk0 NTAuMTUJS1ZVRS1UViAyNCBORVdTIDIJQVVTVElODQo4CTQ1MC4zNQlLVlVF LVRWIDI0IE5FV1MgSUZCIExJTksJQVVTVElODQo5CTQ1MC4xMTI1CUtYQU4t VFYgMzYgTkVXUwlBVVNUSU4NCjEwCTQ1MC4zMTI1CUtUQkMtVFYgNyBORVdT CUFVU1RJTg0KMTEJNDUwLjU1CUtMQkotQU0gNTkwIE5FV1MJQVVTVElODQox Mgk0Ny40MglBTUVSSUNBTiBSRUQgQ1JPU1MJUkVHSU9OQUwNCjEzCTQ1My40 NQlBRkQgQUxBUk0gRElTUEFUQ0gJQVVTVElODQoxNAkxNTMuOTUJQUZEIExJ TksgVE8gQ09VTlRZIFZGRCdTCUFVU1RJTiANCjE1CTE1NC40CVRSQVZJUyBD T1VOVFkgRklSRSBDT05UUk9MCVRSQVZJUw0KMTYJMTU0LjQzCVRSQVZJUyBD T1VOVFkgRklSRSBDT05UUk9MCVRSQVZJUw0KMTcJMTU0LjIwNQlTRSBUUkFW SVMgQ09VTlRZIEZJUkUgKFNFVENPKQlTRSBUUkFWSVMNCjE4CTE1NC4zMjUJ U0UgVFJBVklTIENPVU5UWSBGSVJFIChTRVRDTykJU0UgVFJBVklTDQoxOQkx NTUuNzE1CVNUQVJGTElHSFQvQ09VTlRZIEVNUwlUUkFWSVMNCjIwCQkqKipF TVBUWQkNCjIxCTQ2MC40CUFQRCBGMSBDSVRZV0lERQlBVVNUSU4NCjIyCTQ2 MC4xCUFQRCBGMiBBREFNIC0gTlcJQVVTVElODQoyMwk0NjAuNDUJQVBEIEYz IEJBS0VSIC0gVyAmIENFTlRSQUwJQVVTVElODQoyNAk0NjAuMzI1CUFQRCBG NCBFRFdBUkQgLSBORQlBVVNUSU4NCjI1CTQ2MC4xNzUJQVBEIEY1IENIQVJM SUUgLSBTRQlBVVNUSU4NCjI2CTQ2MC4yNzUJQVBEIEY2IERBVklEIC0gU1cJ QVVTVElODQoyNwk0NjAuMDI1CUFQRCBGNyBUQUNUSUNBTC9DQVItVE8tQ0FS CUFVU1RJTg0KMjgJNDYwLjUJQVBEIEY4IFRBQ1RJQ0FML0lORk9STUFUSU9O CUFVU1RJTg0KMjkJNDYwLjIyNQlBUEQgRjkgQ0lEL0NBUi1UTy1DQVIJQVVT VElODQozMAk0NjAuMglBUEQgRjEwIEFJUlBPUlQgUE9MSUNFCUFVU1RJTg0K MzEJNDYwLjM3NQlBUEQgRjExIEhPU1BJVEFMIAlBVVNUSU4NCjMyCTQ2MC4w NQlBUEQgRjEyIFRBQ1RJQ0FMCUFVU1RJTg0KMzMJNDY0LjIJQVBEIFNXQVQJ QVVTVElODQozNAk0MTguOTUJQVBEIERSVUcgRU5GT1JDRU1FTlQJQVVTVElO DQozNQkxNTUuNTIJUk9VTkQgUk9DSyBQRC9TQU4gTUFSQ09TIENIMglXTVNO LEhBWVMNCjM2CTE1NS4xMTUJV0VTVExBS0UgUEQJVFJBVklTDQozNwkxNTYu MjQJUk9VTkQgUk9DSyBQRAlXSUxMSUFNU09ODQozOAkxNTQuOAlIQVlTIFNP CUhBWVMNCjM5CTE1NS44OAlMRUFOREVSIFBEL1NNSVRIVklMTEUgUEQJVFJB VklTL0JBU1RST1ANCjQwCTE1NS43OQlMRUFOREVSIFBEL1JPTExJTkdXT09E IFBECVRSQVZJUw0KNDEJMTU0Ljk1CUlOVEVSQ0lUWSBDQVItVE8tQ0FSCU5B VElPTldJREUNCjQyCTE1NS4zNwlJTlRFUkNJVFkgQkFTRS1UTy1DQVIJTkFU SU9OV0lERQ0KNDMJMTU1LjQ2CURQUyBGMQlBVVNUSU4gUkVHSU9ODQo0NAkx NTUuNDc1CURQUyBGMglBVVNUSU4gUkVHSU9ODQo0NQkxNTQuOTUJRFBTIEYz CUFVU1RJTiBSRUdJT04NCjQ2CTE1NS4zNwlEUFMgRjQJQVVTVElOIFJFR0lP Tg0KNDcJMTU1LjUwNQlEUFMgRjUJQVVTVElOIFJFR0lPTg0KNDgJMTU0LjY4 CURQUyBNT0JJTEUJQVVTVElOIFJFR0lPTg0KNDkJMTU1LjA3CURQUyBUQUNU SUNBTAlBVVNUSU4gUkVHSU9ODQo1MAkxNTQuOTIJRFBTIFRBQ1RJQ0FMCUFV U1RJTiBSRUdJT04NCjUxCTE1NS4zNAlFTUVSR0VOQ1kgU0VSVklDRVMJTkFU SU9OV0lERQ0KNTIJMTUzLjkzNQlUUkFWSVMgU08gRjEJVFJBVklTDQo1Mwkx NTQuMDg1CVRSQVZJUyBTTyBGMiBXRVNUTEFLRQlUUkFWSVMNCjU0CTE1NC44 NDUJVFJBVklTIFNPIEYzIENPTlNUQUJMRVMJVFJBVklTDQo1NQkxNTMuOAlU UkFWSVMgU08gRjQJVFJBVklTDQo1NgkxNTUuMzEJVFJBVklTIFNPIEY2IENB Ui1UTy1DQVIJVFJBVklTDQo1NwkxNTUuOTcJVFJBVklTIFNPCVRSQVZJUw0K NTgJMTU5LjE1CVRSQVZJUyBTTwlUUkFWSVMNCjU5CTE1NS42NAlMQUtFIFRS QVZJUy9NVVRVQUwgQUlECUFVU1RJTiBBUkVBDQo2MAkxNTUuNjcJTUFOT1Ig UEQJVFJBVklTDQo2MQkxNTQuMTc1CU1BUkJMRSBGQUxMUyBQRAlCVVJORVQN CjYyCTE1NC4xMTUJQkFTVFJPUCBTTwlCQVNUUk9QDQo2MwkxNTUuMQlCQVNU Uk9QIFNPCUJBU1RST1ANCjY0CTE1NC43MQlCRUxMIENPIFNPCUJFTEwNCjY1 CTE1NC43NTUJQkxBTkNPIFNPL0xFRSBTTwlCTEFOQ08vTEVFDQo2NgkxNTQu Nzg1CUJVUk5FVCBTTy9HVUFEQUxVUEUgU08JQlVSTkVUL0dVQUQNCjY3CTE1 NC44MTUJQ0FMRFdFTEwgU08vTExBTk8gU08vTE9DS0hBUlQJQ0FMRFdFTEws TExBTk8NCjY4CTE1NS4wODUJQ0VEQVIgUEFSSyBQRAlUUkFWSVMNCjY5CTE1 NS41OTUJQ09NQUwgU08JQ09NQUwNCjcwCTE1NS40MwlMTEFOTyBTTy9FTEdJ TiBQRAlMTEFOTy9CQVNUUk9QDQo3MQkxNTUuNzQJRkFZRVRURSBTTwlGQVlF VFRFDQo3MgkxNTguNzkJSEFZUyBTTwlIQVlTDQo3MwkxNTUuMTMJR0VPUkdF VE9XTiwgTVVTVEFORyBSSURHRSwgU00JV01TTixUUkFWLEhBWVMNCjc0CTE1 NS43MwlHSUxMRVNQSUUgU08JR0lMTEVTUElFDQo3NQkxNTUuNDE1CVBGTFVH RVJWSUxMRSBQRAlUUkFWSVMNCjc2CTE1NS44NjUJSEFZUyBTTwlIQVlTDQo3 NwkxNTQuODc1CVNVTlNFVCBWQUxMRVkgUEQJVFJBVklTDQo3OAkxNTguODUJ TEFHTyBWSVNUQSBQRAlUUkFWSVMNCjc5CTE1NC4wMjUJTEFLRVdBWSBQRAlU UkFWSVMNCjgwCTE1NC44OQlMQU1QQVNBUyBTTwlMQU1QQVNBUw0KODEJMTU1 LjcJU09VVEhXRVNUIFRFWEFTIFMgVSBQRCAJU0FOIE1BUkNPUw0KODIJMTU1 LjI1CVRBWUxPUiBQRAlXSUxMSUFNU09ODQo4Mwk0NjAuODc1CUFJU0QgU0VD VVJJVFkJQVVTVElODQo4NAk0NTMuNwlKQUlMIC0gVFJBVklTIENPVU5UWQlU UkFWSVMNCjg1CTQ1My43NQlKQUlMIC0gVFJBVklTIENPVU5UWQlUUkFWSVMN Cjg2CTE1NC45MDUJQkFURglSRUdJT05BTA0KODcJMTU2LjM3NQlCQVRGCVJF R0lPTkFMDQo4OAkxNjUuMjg1CUJBVEYJUkVHSU9OQUwNCjg5CTE2NS45NTUJ QkFURglSRUdJT05BTA0KOTAJMTU1LjkyNQlQRC9TTyBUQUMgVU5JVFMJUkVH SU9OQUwNCjkxCTE1NS42MjUJV0lMTElBTVNPTiBTTwlXSUxMSUFNU09ODQo5 MgkxNTQuNzI1CVdJTExJQU1TT04gU08JV0lMTElBTVNPTg0KOTMJMTU0Ljg2 CVdJTExJQU1TT04gU08gCVdJTExJQU1TT04NCjk0CTE2My43NQlCT1JERVIg UEFUUk9MCVJFR0lPTkFMDQo5NQkxNjMuNwlCT1JERVIgUEFUUk9MCVJFR0lP TkFMDQo5NgkxNjMuNjI1CUJPUkRFUiBQQVRST0wJUkVHSU9OQUwNCjk3CTE2 My45ODUJRkJJCVJFR0lPTkFMDQo5OAkxNjUuMjEJRkJJIC0gU0VDUkVUIFNF UlZJQ0UJUkVHSU9OQUwNCjk5CTE2NS43OQlGQkkgLSBTRUNSRVQgU0VSVklD RQlSRUdJT05BTA0KMTAwCTQ2MC40NzUJQVBEIE5BUkNPVElDUwlBVVNUSU4N CjEwMQkxNTMuOTA1CUFVU1RJTiBFTUVSR0VOQ1kgT1BFUkFUSU9OUwlBVVNU SU4NCjEwMgk0NS4xCURQUyBDT01QTEVYIFNFQ1VSSVRZCUFVU1RJTg0KMTAz CTE1NC42NjUJRFBTIFJFTU9URQlBVVNUSU4gQVJFQQ0KMTA0CTE1NC42OTUJ RFBTIFJFTU9URQlBVVNUSU4gQVJFQQ0KMTA1CTE1NC44MwlMT1dFUiBDT0wu IFJJVi4gQVVUSC4gUEQJUkVHSU9OQUwNCjEwNgkxNTUuNDQ1CURQUyBNRVRS TwlBVVNUSU4gQVJFQQ0KMTA3CTE1NS45MQlXRVNUIExBS0UgSElMTFMgUEQJ VFJBVklTDQoxMDgJMTU1Ljk1NQlUUkFWSVMgU08JVFJBVklTDQoxMDkJMTU2 LjAzCVRSQVZJUyBTTwlUUkFWSVMNCjExMAkxNTYuMDkJVFJBVklTIFNPL0FQ RAlBVVNUSU4vVFJBVklTDQoxMTEJMTU4LjczCURQUyBFWEVDVVRJVkUgU0VD VVJJVFkJQVVTVElOIEFSRUENCjExMgkxNTguOTEJQVBECUFVU1RJTg0KMTEz CTE1OS4xNQlEUFMJQVVTVElOIEFSRUENCjExNAk0NjAuMDc1CUNBUElUT0wg UE9MSUNFCUFVU1RJTg0KMTE1CTQ2MC4xMjUJQ0FQSVRPTCBQT0xJQ0UJQVVT VElODQoxMTYJNDUzLjcJVFJBVklTIFNPCVRSQVZJUw0KMTE3CTE1OS4xNQlG TE9SRU5DRSBQRAlMRUUNCjExOAkxNTUuMDEJRlJFREVSSUNLU0JVUkcgUEQJ R0lMTEVTUElFDQoxMTkJMTU1LjU2NQlMVUxJTkcgUEQJQ0FMRFdFTEwNCjEy MAkxNTUuODUJU0FOIE1BUkNPUwlIQVlTDQoxMjEJNDUzLjQ1CUFGRCBGNSBB TEFSTSBESVNQQVRDSAlBVVNUSU4NCjEyMgk0NTMuNzc1CUFGRCBGMSBGSVJF Q09NIFdFU1QJQVVTVElODQoxMjMJNDUzLjE1CUFGRCBGMiBGSVJFQ09NIE5P UlRICUFVU1RJTg0KMTI0CTQ1My41CUFGRCBGMyBGSVJFQ09NIEVBU1QJQVVT VElODQoxMjUJNDUzLjEJQUZEIEY0IEZJUkVDT00gU09VVEgJQVVTVElODQox MjYJMTU0LjM4NQlCQVNUUk9QIENPIEZECUJBU1RST1ANCjEyNwkxNTQuMzcJ Q0VEQVIgUEFSSyBWRkQJVFJBVklTDQoxMjgJMTU0LjI4CUNFREFSIFBBUksg VkZEL01BTkNIQUNBIFZGRAlUUkFWSVMNCjEyOQkxNTQuMjUJQ0UtQkFSIFZG RAlUUkFWSVMNCjEzMAkxNTQuMTkJVk9MRU5URSBWRkQJUkVHSU9ODQoxMzEJ MTUzLjc3CURSSVBQSU5HIFNQUklOR1MgVkZECUhBWVMNCjEzMgkxNTQuMzU1 CSBKT0xMWVZJTExFIFZGRC9ST1VORCBST0NLIEZECVdJTExJQU1TT04NCjEz MwkxNTQuMDcJTEFHTyBWSVNUQSBWRkQJVFJBVklTDQoxMzQJMTU0LjEJTEVB TkRFUiBGRC9PQUsgSElMTCBGRAlUUkFWSVMNCjEzNQkxNTguODk1CUxJQkVS VFkgSElMTCBGRAlSRUdJT04NCjEzNgkxNTMuODkJU0UgVFJBVklTIENPVU5U WSBGSVJFIChTRVRDTykJU0UgVFJBVklTDQoxMzcJMTU0LjEzCVNFIFRSQVZJ UyBDT1VOVFkgRklSRSAoU0VUQ08pCVNFIFRSQVZJUw0KMTM4CTE1NC4xNDUJ UEZMVUdFUlZJTExFIEZECVRSQVZJUw0KMTM5CTE1NS4zMjUJVFJBVklTIENP VU5UWSBGSVJFIENPTlRST0wJVFJBVklTDQoxNDAJMTUzLjk4CVRSQVZJUyBD TyBSVVJBTCBGSVJFIE5FVFdPUksJVFJBVklTDQoxNDEJMTU0LjE2CUhVRFNP TiBCRU5EIFZGRAlUUkFWSVMNCjE0MgkxNTQuMjM1CVNFIFRSQVZJUyBDTyBG SVJFIE5FVFdPUksJU0UgVFJBVklTDQoxNDMJMTU0LjM0CVNFIFRSQVZJUyBD TyBGSVJFIE5FVFdPUksJU0UgVFJBVklTDQoxNDQJNDUzLjgJQVVTVElOIEZE CVRSQVZJUw0KMTQ1CTE1NC4wMQlCVVJORVQgVkZECUJVUk5FVCANCjE0Ngkx NTQuNDE1CUJVUk5FVCBWRkQJQlVSTkVUDQoxNDcJMTU0LjI2NQk5NjkgVkZE IC0gRUxHSU4JQkFTVFJPUA0KMTQ4CTQ2LjE0CUdJTExFU1BJRSBDTyBGRAlH SUxMRVNQSUUNCjE0OQkxNTQuMzEJR0VPUkdFVE9XTiBGRAlXSUxMSUFNU09O DQoxNTAJMTUxLjQ2CUxBR08gVklTVEEgRkQJVFJBVklTDQoxNTEJMTU0LjI5 NQlMRUFOREVSIEZECVRSQVZJUw0KMTUyCTE1MS4xMTUJTUFOT1IgRkQJVFJB VklTDQoxNTMJMTU4Ljk4NQlNQU5PUiBGRAlUUkFWSVMNCjE1NAkxNTMuODMJ Q09NQUwgQ08gU08vRkQJQ09NQUwNCjE1NQkxNTYuMDc1CVJPVU5EIFJPQ0sg RkQJV0lMTElBTVNPTg0KMTU2CTE1Ni4xOTUJVFJBVklTIENPVU5UWSBGSVJF CVRSQVZJUw0KMTU3CTE1OS4zOQlKT05FU1RPV04gRkQJUkVHSU9ODQo= From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!Phil From: phenry@accessnv.com (Phil Henry) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: UNIDEN WANTS TO KNOW.... Date: Sat, 03 Feb 96 01:26:28 GMT Organization: accessnv.com Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4eudvq$rro@bighorn.accessnv.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp022.anv.net To: All X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 Uniden wants to thank everyone who participated in our recent survey to determine what features you would like to see in future scanner designs. On January 31, we met with the new products and the engineering departments at Uniden in Ft. Worth and presented all of the ideas that you submitted. The six, or so, most commonly requested features were discussed and very well recieved. They must still survive engineering cost evaluation, marketing acceptance, legal review, etc. However, I believe that you will see all or most of them in new models that will be out later this year. Please do not leave E-Mail asking which features are being considered as we are not at liberty to say at this time, but as Uniden firms up designs and permits us to reveal this information, you will be the first to know. Phil Henry & Richard Barnett Gray Electronics, Inc. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: nevr4getu@aol.com (Nevr4Get U) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: **NEED HELP WITH MY SCANNER** Date: 3 Feb 1996 01:58:36 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 9 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4ev12s$ahf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: nevr4getu@aol.com (Nevr4Get U) My scanner has stopped working. It will no longer turn on. I live in the Los Angeles area. Does anyone know of a good place to take my scanner to get fixed????? please i need help. CHRIS From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!inquo!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!news.cais.com!news From: fwhitehurst@ezdial.com (David Whitehurst) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mobile Scanner Antennas Date: 3 Feb 1996 02:19:24 GMT Organization: Centauri War Fund, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4eugnc$715@news.cais.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup_5.ezdial.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Are "mobile scanner antennas" anything more than just a vertical "rod"??? I wonder if they are any better than using my current cellular phone antenna for 800 & higher freqs & my 2M antenna for 140-150 MHz & below....??? I just wonder if there are any "good" mobile scanner antennas or are they a waste of money if you already have an antenna of SOME type? -David. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!inforamp.net!usenet From: samos@inforamp.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mashville / Minneapolis Date: 3 Feb 1996 02:34:25 GMT Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100 Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4euhjh$dnh@sam.inforamp.net> References: <4euddc$cfd@sam.inforamp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts40-10.tor.inforamp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Sorry ....that shud be "NASHville" of course From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!hopper.acm.org!ACM.ORG!MULLIGAN From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 25 Channel cordless bandplan needed Date: 3 Feb 1996 02:44:04 GMT Organization: ACM Network Services Lines: 29 Message-ID: <4eui5k$8h2@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG NNTP-Posting-Host: acm.org From the FAF - Frequently Asked Frequencies on ftp://oak.oakland.edu as /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/scanner.faf Cordless Telephone [15.233] Chan Base Handset Chan Base Handset 1 43.72 48.76 16 46.61 49.67 2 43.74 48.84 17 B 46.63 49.845 3 43.82 48.86 18 C 46.67 49.86 4 43.84 48.92 19 46.71 49.77 5 43.92 49.02 20 D 46.73 49.875 6 43.96 49.08 21 A 46.77 49.83 7 44.12 49.10 22 E 46.83 49.89 8 44.16 49.16 23 46.87 49.93 9 44.18 49.20 24 46.93 49.99 10 44.20 49.24 25 46.97 49.97 11 44.32 49.28 12 44.36 49.36 Chs A - E handset frequencies 13 44.40 49.40 are also used for baby room 14 44.46 49.46 monitors and low power 15 44.48 49.50 handie-talkies. Effective 05 June 95, channels 1 - 15 are authorized and the original 10 channels are renumbered 16-25. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov!news.alt.net!newspost1.alt.net!usenet From: zielasko@mnw.net (Lawrence H. Zielasko) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Case for Pro-60 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 03:19:42 GMT Organization: AltNet - Affordable Usenet Access - http://www.alt.net Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3112d351.31461693@news.mnw.net> References: <4dqvdf$d39@swifty.cfa.org> <31085243.88702850@news.wsnet.com> <310abbde.7463138@news.connix.com> Reply-To: zielasko@mnw.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.168 On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 00:00:40 GMT, orosz@connix.com (Bernie Orosz) wrote: >Can you still push the buttons, etc. while in the case? I assume it >has some sort of clear plastic front. > >I'm thinking of buying one but don't know what they look like. So, any >info you can give me would be appreciated. > >Thanks. > >Bernie The keypad and display are exposed without an plastic covering. Some may prefer the plastic; I don't. I also have an AOR AR1000 that came with a case which had the plastic covering. Over time the plastic yellowed and became scratched. The plastic also made the display difficult to view at times due to glare and reflected light. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!night.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!aimnet.com!netserv.com!pagesat.net!niia.net!usenet From: cgholson@niia.net (Clarke Gholson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cellular Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:25:04 GMT Organization: Northern Indiana Internet Access, Inc. Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4euo30$kau@gold.niia.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pmm1-11.niia.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anyone have a list of specific frequencies of cellular towers? I once saw one but have lost it. The actual freq pairs were listed. Thanks 73, Clarke Highland IN Vol FD cgholson@niia.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!infoserver.bgsu.edu!bgsuvax.bgsu.edu!sdougla From: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu (The Analog Kid) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cleveland Metro Police Cruiser Numbering Date: 3 Feb 96 04:48:30 GMT Organization: Bowling Green State University Lines: 50 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bgsuvax.bgsu.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #14 This is an idea I came across while sitting here at work... I am a bit new to the Cleveland Metropolitan area, and since I came here I have been jotting down the numbers of the police cruiser I observe in various suburbs to get a feel for what department I here on a commonly used frequency or two. Maybe somebody knows for sure, but thus far, I have observed the following cruiser numbers, and the important part is the first two digits: 18xx Brecksville PD 52xx North Olmsted PD 19xx Broadview Heights PD 55xx Oakwood Village PD 33xx Fairview Park PD 61xx Parma Heights PD 36xx Glenwillow PD 67xx Shaker Heights PD 39xx Independence PD 68xx Solon PD 48xx Middleburg Heights PD 74xx Walton Hills PD 77xx Westlake PD The further observation that I made is that both columns of this list are in order numerically and alphabetically, respectively. My hypothesis is this: Cuyahoga County has an agreement with the inherent municipalities to be assigned a two-digit municipality number, which would be prefixed to any further two-digit (or more) unit number for the maintenance of radio traffic and mutual aid situations, and these are done alphabetically with assigned numbers beginning somewhere higher than 01 so that the county can insert it's own law enforcement divsions. This could be similar to the way Ohio County Sheriff's Offices have been numbered alphabetically by county name. Maybe I am totally off my rocker, but if this is true, and some kind soul out there has a complete list for Cuyahoga and surrounding counties, I would greatly appreciate having a copy of this information emailed to me. Also, there are always exceptions to the hypothesis... Cleveland, Parma, North Royalton, Strongsville, Brookpark and Lakewood cruisers have all been observed to not follow this format. Thanx in advance, -----------------------*********************---------------------------------- Sean G. Douglas KB8IXP ************* Internet: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu NWSO Canton-Akron ******** LandLine: 216 888-6945 N. Central Ohio Skywarn ****** NetName: The Analog Kid Net Controller ***** Thoughts: When I leave I don't Vice-President NWOCAMS **** know what I'm hoping to find, P. O. Box 29055 *** and when I leave I don't know Parma, Ohio 44129-0055 ** what I'm leaving behind... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.cris.com!news From: Peter Kamilakis Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need an expert opinion on scanner/paging question Date: 3 Feb 1996 05:31:53 GMT Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crc2-fddi.cris.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) I tune into an interesting frequency sometimes on my scanner, and I cannot quite figure out what it is. It occurs at 152.150, and what happens is I hear two tones (like rescue tones), followed by what sounds like someone talking on an answering machine, saying something like "Bob, call home when you get a chance". This is not a front end overload from another frequency, because it is crystal clear. I am clueless as to what this could be, although I suspect that is some kind of paging thing. Anyone ever run into something like this before? pnk From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!usenet From: daydream@wolfenet.com (scanner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: New WWW site. Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 05:33:15 GMT Organization: Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4eupaj$k7i@news1.wolfe.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sea-ts2-p31.wolfenet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Hello, there is a new WWW site with lots of good scanner information: http://www.wolfenet.com/~daydream Check it out... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!cdc2.cdc.net!news From: Blaine Tessier Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 3 Feb 1996 05:50:01 GMT Organization: El-Equip Inc Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4eut29$t6h@cdc2.cdc.net> References: <31106859.442A@minn.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sud113.vianet.on.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: bradh@minn.net I have tried with no success to modify my Pro-46. It is possible, as I noticed in Popular Communications February 1996 pg41. The advertisement from Cellular Security Group (508) 281-8892 states they can unlock full 800 MHz for about $40.00 US on this unit. If anyone knows how this is accomplished in detail, please Email help. Too Cheap To Pay!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.intelenet.com!unogate!mvb.saic.com!homer.alpha.net!daily-planet.execpc.com!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!news.delphi.com!usenet From: TESTRELLA@delphi.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Poor Performance of RS Telescoping Scanner Antenna??? Date: 3 Feb 1996 06:05:45 GMT Organization: Delphi Internet Services Corporation Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4eutvp$ju5@news2.delphi.com> References: <4eqg27$g98@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1e.delphi.com When using the Rs telescoping ant in the 108-200 mhz range you want to have the ant totally extended EXCEPT for the section just above the coil. This should be collapsed. You will find that it is outstanding on HAM and aircraft signals using this configuration. For low band work...have it completely extended. Tom Rainbow V 1.11 for Delphi - Test Drive From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.iag.net!newsfeed.kdcol.net!xmission!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!hp228 From: hp228@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Mantoudis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Poor Performance of RS Telescoping Scanner Antenna??? Date: 3 Feb 1996 07:17:40 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4ev26k$c88@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <4eqg27$g98@wrdis02.robins.af.mil> Reply-To: hp228@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Mantoudis) NNTP-Posting-Host: kanga.ins.cwru.edu In a previous article, mmartin@wrdis01.robins.af.mil (Michael Martin) says: >In article , jwest@pgh.nauticom.net says... >> >>Last night I bought a telescoping whip antenna from Radio Shack. This >>is the one with the center loading coil and BNC connector. >> >>I tried it out and I'm kinda underwhelmed with it's performance as >>compared to the stock duckie that came with my PRO46. The thing does >>better around 33 mhz, but around 150 - 160 mhz it really sucks. And >>800 mhz, well..... what 800 mhz. >> >>I tried playing with different lengths, and it makes a little >>difference. But nowhere near as good as the stock antenna. >> >>So I'm wondering if this is typical or if I'm doing something stupid? >>Any ideas? > >I've been using that antenna for about 3-4 months and am very happy with the >increased reception quality. It is true that you have to adjust it for the >particular frequencies you are monitoring. The trick with this RS antenna is that when you listen to anything above around 50MHz, you extend the whole thing, and then retract only the one segment which is just above the center coil. That should get you excellent performance. Works for me, and I have also seen other people mention this here before. Good luck. Mike. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!peer-news.britain.eu.net!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!usenet From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 07:55:04 -0600 Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems Lines: 21 Message-ID: <31136938.5CEC@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <4euc6j$mum@voyager.ff.tds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: s12-pm02.occ-uky.campus.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6 (Win95; I) I'd like to hear from other AR8000 computer interface users on the subject of software - what are you using to communicate with the AR8000? There's a few commercial packages that seem like overkill for simple memory dump and restore functions, while Windows Terminal or some other communications package seems a little too primative. Does anyone have a package that seems to be targeted at uploading and download ing without all the frequency database functions? As an historical note, the Microsoft Access database that I developed and had posted on Vic Healy's Web page could really use a module to do the communicati ons with the radio. I have not made any significant improvements in the database s ince it was posted. The database is freeware and will stay that way, so any communication modules must be freeware also. I looked into writing the module in Access Basic, but really don't have the ti me or experience. Any help from interested parties would be appreciated. Jim Dantin jadantin@uky.campus.mci.net (mail checked every few days) jantin@phelpsd.com (online 8a-4p central time M-F From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!peer-news.britain.eu.net!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!usenet From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 08:05:53 -0600 Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems Lines: 21 Message-ID: <31136BC1.7A86@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <4euc6j$mum@voyager.ff.tds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: s12-pm02.occ-uky.campus.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44963 alt.radio.scanner:27179 I'd like to hear from other AR8000 computer interface users on the subject of software - what are you using to communicate with the AR8000? There's a few commercial packages that seem like overkill for simple memory dump and restore functions, while Windows Terminal or some other communications package seems a little too primative. Does anyone have a package that seems to be targeted at uploading and download ing without all the frequency database functions? As an historical note, the Microsoft Access database that I developed and had posted on Vic Healy's Web page could really use a module to do the communicati ons with the radio. I have not made any significant improvements in the database s ince it was posted. The database is freeware and will stay that way, so any communication modules must be freeware also. I looked into writing the module in Access Basic, but really don't have the ti me or experience. Any help from interested parties would be appreciated. Jim Dantin jadantin@uky.campus.mci.net (mail checked every few days) jantin@phelpsd.com (online 8a-4p central time M-F From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!panix!not-for-mail From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR-8000 or MVT7100?? Date: 3 Feb 1996 09:25:05 -0500 Organization: panix Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4evr81$b44@panix3.panix.com> References: <4e8atd$hth@uwm.edu> <4epeht$av0_001@res-hall.nwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix3.panix.com In article <4epeht$av0_001@res-hall.nwu.edu>, BGK wrote: >In article , > wgow@chattanooga.net (Sam Hall) wrote: >>In article <4e8atd$hth@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan >>Gingras) wrote: >> >>> I am looking into either the Yupiteru MVY-7100, or the AOR AR-8000. Both >>> look like great scanners. The Yupi seems only to lack computer control, >>> and alphanumeric tagging. Computer control is not that important to me, >>> so which one is better? I have heard that the Yupi is built better.. Some >>> believe that the RF performance is significantly better on the Yupi. >My understanding is that the AR8000 has a ferrite core antenna built in - rea d > AM broadcast reception. Still havn't gotten the Yupiteru 7100 to do that yet . The MVT-7200 does that. -- Mike Schuster | schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM ------------------- | schuster@shell.portal.com | schuster@mem.po.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!ames!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!venus.sun.com!nntp-hub2.barrnet.net!nntp2.cerf.net!news.claremont.edu!usenet From: Erik Karas Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden dead or do I need a New Battery?? Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 11:28:46 -0800 Organization: Never Snowboards Lines: 8 Message-ID: <3113B76E.5D6D69F0@chs.claremont.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: garibaldi.cusd.claremont.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586) I have a Uniden Sportcat. All of a sudden it won't recharge anymore and it won't work even if the power cord is connected. Does this just mean I need a new battery pack?? Or it is something else. Are these the normal circumstances when one these battery packs goes out. Thanks alot, ERik From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Stanford Lifeflight freqs. Date: 3 Feb 1996 12:39:43 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4evl2f$16v@emerald.oz.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27159 rec.radio.scanner:44923 In article , wyn_davies@globalvillage.com says... > >Does anybody have a list of Stanford (CA) Lifeflight and CALSTAR >helicopter frequencies? Email me if you do, thanks! Lifeflight/Calstar(Shared) 854.0125 Crystal Peak 852.2875 Mt. Allison 854.0625 Mt.Beacon 853.7875 Mt.Diablo There are other users on these systems(cement trucks on crystal peak,etc.)...they usually switch to the "ground contact" channel for the area they are responding to. The local fire departments usually set up the landing zones so they tend to use those channels. Some common channels are 154.280(fire "white-1") and 156.075 (Calcord) here in the So.Bay/Santa Cruz/Monterey areas. They have programmable radios so they can come up just about anywhere. Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!service-2.bluefin.net!bluefin.net!mapman From: mapman@bluefin.net (mapman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: National Scanning Convention info Date: 3 Feb 1996 15:46:43 GMT Organization: Blue Fin Systems, Inc. Lines: 8 Distribution: world Message-ID: <96010618019958@FrontierTech.COM> Reply-To: mapman@bluefin.net NNTP-Posting-Host: da.bluefin.net X-Newsreader: SuperHighway Access 2 for Windows Version 95.11 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44961 alt.radio.scanner:27178 Did anyone go to the convetion last year? I plan to go this July and would like info on the area; places to stay, where to eat, etc... Thanks in advance :-) From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!ablecom!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.PBI.net!pa.mother.com!usenet From: Robert K Dixon Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Re: FS/ Sony 2010 Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:11:18 GMT Organization: Mother.COM Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4f01f6$b34@pa.mother.com> References: <4erabr$69u@pa.mother.com> <4es5qc$24d@pa.mother.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rdixon.dav.mother.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44937 rec.radio.swap:56688 rec.radio.shortwave:69622 Robert K Dixon wrote: > > Robert K Dixon wrote: > > > > For sale Sony 2010. It,s been a great radio but I have recently > > purchased a Drake R8A to take its place. Orig owners manual,box, > > power supply come with the radio. I have an outside portable > > longwire I'll throw in, along with some great utility frequency > > files. Cost is only 215.00 e-mail for complete discription > > thanks > From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!service-2.bluefin.net!bluefin.net!mapman From: mapman@bluefin.net (mapman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Frequency Fan Club Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:19:31 GMT Organization: Blue Fin Systems, Inc. Lines: 6 Distribution: world Message-ID: <96010618349958@FrontierTech.COM> Reply-To: mapman@bluefin.net NNTP-Posting-Host: da.bluefin.net X-Newsreader: SuperHighway Access 2 for Windows Version 95.11 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44951 alt.radio.scanner:27169 I saw an address and 800# for this club in the back of "Beyond Police Call", 1994 issue. Is the address and phone number still correct? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: STANDARD 568 CELL MOD Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:35:59 GMT Organization: CompuServe HamNet Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4f02tf$4j8$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com> Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24561 rec.radio.scanner:45005 alt.radio.scanner:27217 Does anyone happen to know the cell mod for the Standard 568 HT? -Jeff From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!usenet From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 16:37:52 GMT Organization: COMMtronics Engineering Lines: 28 Message-ID: <4f030e$pql@news2.cts.com> References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> <4esc4m$6p1@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bcheek.cts.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44953 alt.radio.scanner:27170 wa6sul@ix.netcom.com(gg ) wrote: >>I have it from a reliable source that the FCC uses the Create LP >>at their monitoring stations! >Thats true, not gossip. You can't see the brand names on those antennas. The CREATE line comes from off-shore, and I believe government entities are required to buy "American" first. Those LP's may well NOT be from CREATE. >You dont see any cheap TV ANTENNAS for their monitor posts. So what do you think the FCC uses to monitor TV broacasts? Longwires? Look again. FCC monitoring sites have a number of TV antennas..... cheap or not, I can't attest. +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Advice-Bearcat 9000XLT-U Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:39:53 GMT Organization: CompuServe HamNet Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4f034p$4j8$2@mhade.production.compuserve.com> Don't be suckered into thinking that a model of radio like the 9000XLT ends in -U or whatever. It's a ploy by the advertiser to track which of his ads you used. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!infoshare!passport.ca!not-for-mail From: lmilrad@passport.ca (Lou Milrad) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Yupiteru MVT 8000 (price reduced) Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:41:20 -0500 Organization: Passport Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4f0kq0$g0q@diplomatic.passport.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: diplomatic.passport.ca Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45042 alt.radio.scanner:27227 Price is now $450.00 US plus shipping. The MVT 8000 is 200 channel ac/dc scanner with a mounting bracket for mobile use and comes with a cigarette lighter adapter although it can be hard wired. It covers 8 Mhz to 1300 Mhz (continuous without blockage) and receives in WFM, NFM and AM. Frequency steps are 5,10,12.5,50 and 100 Khz. It's got a 10 band search function, pass memory function, and other goodies found in high-end scanners. Lou Milrad VE3TRY lmilrad@passport.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.nodak.edu!warp6.cs.misu.NoDak.edu!murphy From: murphy@warp6.cs.misu.NoDak.edu (John Murphy MH113 857-3027) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: IRC Channel Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:45:34 GMT Organization: Minot State University Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4f03fe$16a@daily-planet.nodak.edu> References: <4emf9l$e6q@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: warp6.cs.misu.nodak.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27165 rec.radio.scanner:44943 Bob Salamone (balrog@ix.netcom.com) wrote: : I have seen a few posts regarding a scanner IRC Channel (#scanner). I : have check it several times and have not seen anybody there. Does : anyone use it to talk about scaning or scanning related issues? I think this is a very good idea!! I spend a lot of time on the irc (both the undernet and the otehr (upper??) net. If someone would like to do this, and but a bot (ScanBot) up to hold the channels, then let me know. I do not know how to set up a bot on the channels, though. I do know there are those bots that do a lot of things (welcome people, id people who register with them, store message for people, etc). If someone would like to do this and would like my help in the administration of the bots, then let me know. You can email me (see sig file below). On the nets I am known as Jon, or Jonn or Jon1 (there are a lot of Johns [Jons] out there). ------------------------ begin sig file ---------------------------------- John Murphy, Asst Technical Coordinator North Dakota Interactive Video Network Minot State University Minot, North Dakota 58707 email: murphy@warp6.cs.misu.nodak.edu voice: (701) 858-3984 (Voice mail available) fax: 701.858.3582 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!javiaton.demon.co.uk From: Jonathan Clough Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 BNC Loose - Case Removal Date: Sat, 03 Feb 96 16:52:18 GMT Organization: Javiation, Bradford, U.K. Lines: 39 Message-ID: <823366338snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> References: <4bg14d$2vm@uucp.intac.com> <4c9f4o$oh2@maple.enet.net> Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: javiaton.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.30 X-Mail2News-Path: javiaton.demon.co.uk In article <4c9f4o$oh2@maple.enet.net> daichelm@enet.net writes: > This is a great scanner but poorly laid out from a mechanical > standpoint. Hopefully I won't have to do that again. By the way I did > not remove the knobs since they are glued in place with a light coat > of silicon cement to keep them in place. Good luck! If you find an > easier way post it. I'm a little bit late noting this post but as I at home browsing through the group I thought I'd add to the above. The AR8000 is easy to dissassemble / assemeble providing you have the correct tools. A good set of small screwdrivers and a pair of long nosed pliers will suffice. If you are going to dissassmble the AR8000 IT IS ESSENTIAL to remove the three rubber knobs on the top and the THREE LOCKING NUTS that secure these in place. They are not "glued" in place or anything similar with any form of "cement". Removing the locking nuts will allow the board with the rotary dial/on/off and squelch controls be removed easily. Removing this board will allow considerable easier access to the BNC connection. -- Cheers, /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jonathan Clough | With Best Wishes for a Prosperous | | Javiation, | & Peaceful New Year to all. | | Bradford, UK | VHF/UHF Scanners from all the leading Mfr's | | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | inc PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000| | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation | | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \---------------------------------------------| | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:57 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cellular Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4euo30$kau@gold.niia.net> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:03:51 GMT Lines: 14 Clarke Gholson (cgholson@niia.net) writes: > Does anyone have a list of specific frequencies of cellular towers? I > once saw one but have lost it. The actual freq pairs were listed. > > Search from 869-894MHz in 30kHz steps. Mobile side is 45MHz lower. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!news.ecis.com!news.walltech.com!news.kjsl.com!daver!news.cerf.net!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.ios.com!usenet Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re:Cordless Phone Survey Message-ID: <4f064j$77r@news.ios.com> From: Martin Bleiwas Date: 3 Feb 1996 17:30:59 GMT References: <4emsl0$b4o_002@dyn189.usaor.net> Organization: Internet Online Services NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-1.ts-3.nyc.idt.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: ootman@usaor.net Lines: 5 Hi, I am interested in the cordless antenna that you posted. Where would I be able to purchase that unit. Thanks, Marty "E" Mail me at bleiwass@haven.ios.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:37:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!usenet From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO 2035 Mods Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:33:46 GMT Organization: COMMtronics Engineering Lines: 31 Message-ID: <4f0696$q5g@news2.cts.com> References: <4eqkjc$kb4@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bcheek.cts.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 jerryke7ua@aol.com (Jerryke7ua) wrote: >Being new to this group, I'm sure this question has been asked before. >I've read in some posting the PRO 2035 can not be modified for cellular >freqs. I just recently read in Monitoring Times about a Downconverter. Any >other possibilities?? That "Virtual Down Converter" works.....after a fasion. It's easy enough to implement. The best approach would probably be to replace the CPU with a European version.....Javiation in the UK sells them. There are all kinds of "mods" that can be done to the PRO-2035, from Extended memories of 16,000 channels to S-meters and much more. All are complex enough that you won't find them in a 1-paragraph text file on some Internet site, though. Rgds, Bill +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!usenet From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC200XLT Antennas Connection Problem Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:33:47 GMT Organization: COMMtronics Engineering Lines: 33 Message-ID: <4f0699$q5g@news2.cts.com> References: <4eqluv$sof@info-server.bbn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bcheek.cts.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 rbarile@bbn.com (Robert Barile) wrote: > I have a BC200XLT (2 years old) and I have a question about the > antenna connection inside the unit. > Recently I noticed poor reception and it improved when I slightly twisted > the antenna. I also noticed that the socket turns slightly when you twist th e > antenna into the socket. I took the unit apart and it is obvious that the > soldier connection is bad. > I seem to recall that this subject came up befoer in this news group. > I don't remember exactly what the best solution was. It seems to me that > soldiering a short lead that will bend and twist would be a good fix. > > Does anyone have any sugestions? Not sure if I follow you there, but tighten the BNC connector so that it does not move, and then resolder the connections. Bill +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!news.ecis.com!news.walltech.com!news.kjsl.com!daver!news.cerf.net!newsserver.sdsc.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!usenet Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 2035 Owners / Euro-board is great Message-ID: <4f06b4$q5g@news2.cts.com> From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:34:48 GMT References: <4esbu9$b9o@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Organization: COMMtronics Engineering NNTP-Posting-Host: bcheek.cts.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Lines: 11 mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) wrote: >I just installed mine in about 10 minutes, no soldering. >Cellular is right on the money. Does it have 30 kHz Search Steps? Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news From: Joseph Cardani Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Trunked systems Date: 3 Feb 1996 18:17:47 GMT Organization: Voicenet - Internet Access - (215)674-9290 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <4f08sb$g9b@news.voicenet.com> References: <4ejrfa$5p2@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cherryhill39.voicenet.com joshtu@ksu.ksu.edu wrote: > > I'm sure that you've been asked this question a hundred times, but i'm new t o > this group... > > Is there anyone who can point me in the right direction for some info on > listening to trunked systems > > is there a FAQ or anything?? > > thanks > joshtu@ksu.ksu.edu > KB0GUS > Josh, Here are a few tips that I use for trunked radio monitoring: 1. Find all of the frequencies in the trunking group and enter them in your scanner. 2. Do not use the delay function on any of the channels above. 3. Lock out the data channel (identified by a constant buzzing sound) This channel may change daily, so remember to unlock the one used the prior day. 4. Select the fastest speed available. This method is the best so far as I know until there is a device to read the trunking data channel and follow the conversation. The above method works well, except when the system gets crowded. Try to find out what trunking system is being used. There are 3 main systems currently: Motorola, GE-Errikson, and LTR (EF Johnson). The GE system is identified by the "We bring good life" tones at the end of each transmission. Commtronics Engineering has a device to eliminate these tones from the trans, allowing the scanner to resume. Bill Cheek is the owner of the company and he is a regular in this newsgroup. In addition, a company called Connect Systems in Ventura Ca, has a device to display uers of an LTR system. There is no Motorola or GE device to allow proper tracking, that I know currently. If you need any clarifications or have more questions, feel free to email me. Joe Cardani From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!ns.syncentral.com!usenet@syncentral.com From: dsbyrd@syncentral.com (Dwayne S. Byrd) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need an expert opinion on scanner/paging question Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 18:19:06 GMT Organization: Synapse Internet Communications Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4f0fge$2fv@news.syncentral.com> References: <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: dsbyrd@syncentral.com NNTP-Posting-Host: du131.syncentral.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Peter Kamilakis wrote: >I tune into an interesting frequency sometimes on my >scanner, and I cannot quite figure out what it is. >It occurs at 152.150, and what happens is I hear two tones >(like rescue tones), followed by what sounds like someone >talking on an answering machine, saying something like >"Bob, call home when you get a chance". This is not a Sounds exactly like a voice pager. I didn't pull out a frequency list, but 152.150 would seem to be in the right neighborhood. With a voice pager, you dial the pager number, and after a beep, you speak a brief message that is then transmitted to the specified pager where it is played through a small built-in speaker. I get the impression that alphanumeric pagers have now far surpassed voice pagers in terms of sales and use. But voice pagers used to be quite popular. Dwayne KC4POI From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!overload.lbl.gov!news.emf.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.io.com!arlut.utexas.edu!news.eden.com!matrix.eden.com!robert From: robert@eden.com (Robert Barker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: POCSAG,MESSAGE TRACKER Date: 3 Feb 1996 20:16:42 GMT Organization: Adhesive Media, Inc. Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4f0fra$5uj@boris.eden.com> References: <4eo3vh$39v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: matrix.eden.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] My friend says the Message Tracker hardware is totally different than the one they try to get you to put together for the PD102 program. I have Message Tracker and I love it. I have tried that cable with PD102 and it DOES NOT work. I cannot find anyone that can successfully build a working version of the PD102 cable from the limited information given in what is downloaded in text. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!sloth.swcp.com!usenet From: Collin Anderson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: For Sale IC R7000 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 21:03:09 -0600 Organization: Phone = 505-853-2157, Kirtland AFB,NM Lines: 6 Message-ID: <311421ED.1675@swcp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp42.swcp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) For Sale ICOM R7000 receiver. FULL Coverage from 25 Meg to 2 Gig. 1 year old I am asking 1400 dollars or best offer.(hard to find full coverage receivers anymore, so here is your chance!) collin@swcp.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: jrpitts@ix.netcom.com (J.R. Pitts) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 21:28:57 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 34 Message-ID: <4f0k37$2cg@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-tam8-12.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 03 1:29:11 PM PST 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I don't own an AR8000 (yet!) but am seriously considering one. If I were to get one and had the BNC problem, is there any reason why not, or would it help matters at all, to use a BNC coupler and attach the antennae to that? J.R. fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu (Frederick Kelcz) wrote: >> Fred, please tell me more about your loose BNC problem. Did you >>fix it OK ? I have the same thing on my AR8000, any advice from >>someone who has been there before will be appreciated. >Doug, >I have emailed you with details, but briefly - it is not easy to fix and EEB >says there is no room inside to put a commercial grade BNC with good >lock nut washer. Am therefore having it tightened under warranty and >when it gets back I will glue the BNC to the case and buy a lower stress >whip (comes on and off easier). GROVE repair service did not offer >a fix for this well publicized problem. Does Javiathon have anyting to add >on your side of the ocean? >Fred >N9SLR >Frederick Kelcz, PhD, MD >Dept. of Radiology >University of Wisconsin, Madison From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Campbell CA. Freg. Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 21:36:20 -0800 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 40 Message-ID: <311445D4.58A3@internetMCI.com> References: <4euoqq$6ah@cloner4.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr1-dialup17.sanfrancisco.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win16; I) CC: stevgest@ix.netcom.com Steve Abbott wrote: > > Hello, > > Just moved to Campbell, CA. (from Santa Clara) and would like to get > the Campbell area (i.e. Police, Fire, etc.) frequencies. I believe > that the Police just recently move to the 800Mhz band and I have not > found the frequency. If anyone has them please post and/or e-mail to > me. I THANK YOU! > > Steve > stevgest@ix.netcom.com Hi Steve, I'm here in Campbell on business for 2 weeks, and found Campbell PD on the Following: Primary 482.4625 Secondary 482.3375 Wireless Mic 170.245 - used when offices arrives to record the incident with a video camera in the cruiser. San Jose PD can be found on the Following: Channel 1 460.200 northest Channel 2 460.325 northwest Channel 3 460.425 east Channel 4 460.475 southwest Channel 5 460.400 central Channel 6 460.525 southeast Channel 7 460.025 tactical Channel 8 460.100 citywide (car to car) If you find any WEB sites or Frequencies list for the San Jose area, can you also send them to me? Thanks, Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!gatech!news.akorn.net!news.his.com!en.com!usenet From: ekadish@en.com (Eugene Kadish) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Any mod's for Bearcat BC700A? Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 22:27:03 GMT Organization: Exchange Network Services Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4f0n6q$gni@antares.en.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p2-ts5.en.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Just got a Uniden Bearcat BC700A. Are there any mod's available for this model? Checked ftp sites but can't find anything. Thanks for any info. Eugene From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!news.akorn.net!news.his.com!en.com!usenet From: ekadish@en.com (Eugene Kadish) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Any mod's for Bearcat BC700A? Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 22:28:01 GMT Organization: Exchange Network Services Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f0n8k$gni@antares.en.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p2-ts5.en.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Just got a Uniden Bearcat BC700A. Are there any mod's available for this model? Checked ftp sites but can't find anything. Thanks for any info. Eugene From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!erinews.ericsson.se!eua.ericsson.se!news.algonet.se!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!tribune.usask.ca!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: spamman44@aol.com (SpamMan 44) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Uniden dead or do I need a New Battery?? Date: 3 Feb 1996 22:31:27 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 12 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f19af$5gt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <3113B76E.5D6D69F0@chs.claremont.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article <3113B76E.5D6D69F0@chs.claremont.edu>, Erik Karas writes: >I have a Uniden Sportcat. All of a sudden it won't recharge anymore >and it won't work even if the power cord is connected. Does this just >mean I need a new battery pack?? Or it is something else. Are these the >normal circumstances when one these battery packs goes out. I have just about the same problem. Just one day it stopped working. It won't charge, won't turn on. I discharged the battery, and there was some juice in it, but it won't recharge. It's a Uniden Sportcat SC150B. Any suggestions? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.uoregon.edu!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.deltanet.com!news.deltanet.com!jlundgre From: jlundgre@delta1.deltanet.com (John Lundgren) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Followup-To: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Date: 3 Feb 1996 22:50:30 GMT Organization: Delta Internet Services, Anaheim, CA Lines: 27 Message-ID: <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: delta1.deltanet.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1051 sci.electronics.repair:21192 alt.radio.scanner:27229 rec.radio.scanner:45044 misc.wanted:60490 alt.anything:771 Brian J. Rueger (brueger@infi.net) penned: : Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will record for : greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 : minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. : Thanks : Brian In the back of electonics mags, and nuts & volts, there are ads for T.R.'s that will record 8 hours on a tape. apparently this is done by slowing the sped down someawhat. But 3 hours is doable. (Oh, how I hate that word. Now I'm starting to use it.) Er, easily done. BTW, I've had poor results with the thinner tapes that have a lot of tape on the cassette. It seems to have this affinity for the capstan. Just loves to embrace it, with consequent negative results. -- #======P=G=P==k=e=y==a=v=a=i=l=a=b=l=e==u=p=o=n==r=e=q=u=e=s=t======# | John Lundgren - Elec Tech - Info Tech Svcs. | jlundgre@delta1 | | Rancho Santiago Community College District | .deltanet.com | | 17th St at Bristol \ Santa Ana, CA 92706 | http://rsc.rancho| | My opinions are my own, and not my employer's. | .cc.ca.us | | I have gone out to look for myself.. If I should | | return before I get back, hold me until I get here. | | "You can flame your brains out -- it won't take long." | #===T=u=z=l=a==C=o=m=p=a=n=y=.=.===t=h=r=e=e='=s==L=e==C=r=o=w=d=!==# From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!usenet From: daveanderson@mail.telis.org (Dave Anderson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 22:54:32 GMT Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems Lines: 36 Message-ID: <4f0oms$9fe@ns.campus.mci.net> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> Reply-To: daveanderson@mail.telis.org NNTP-Posting-Host: s21-pm01.ucr.campus.mci.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44982 alt.radio.scanner:27189 markj@got.net (Nuu Bee) wrote: > I was watching "Police Story" last night and the detectives were using >Motorola HT-220 Handhelds. Some had UHF duckies and others had VHF >duckies and they were all able to talk to each other. >What frequency were they using or do they have a special secret type of >radio system. In the real workd this can and does work. I know a number of fire departments that either have or used to operate with a cross-band repeater system. This to allow a dept on UHF or communicate with the others that are on VHF. Or to allow the intra-county units to monitor and participate on the neighboring county's details. This setup also allows for a wider area for a local repeater poor department to have a county wide paging repeater. >Second..... > Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they >say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" Yes it is 0.000Mhz. >Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? Again this also, is on 0.000Mhz. These show are out of production and not event being filmed. >Thank You Your Welcome, >Nuu Bee Old Bee From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!usenet From: daveanderson@mail.telis.org (Dave Anderson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need an expert opinion on scanner/paging question Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 22:54:42 GMT Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4f0on4$9fe@ns.campus.mci.net> References: <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: daveanderson@mail.telis.org NNTP-Posting-Host: s21-pm01.ucr.campus.mci.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Peter Kamilakis wrote: >I tune into an interesting frequency sometimes on my >scanner, and I cannot quite figure out what it is. >It occurs at 152.150, and what happens is I hear two tones >(like rescue tones), followed by what sounds like someone >talking on an answering machine, saying something like >"Bob, call home when you get a chance". This is not a >front end overload from another frequency, because it is >crystal clear. I am clueless as to what this could be, >although I suspect that is some kind of paging thing. >Anyone ever run into something like this before? You are hearing a voice paging system... Old fashion - but, they DO exist. The frequency you mention is an RCC frequency used for mobile radio-phones operated through the operators of a telephone answering exchange and carry radio - telepphone links. Exactly what you heard and how your above mentioned system works depends. You may have heard them page to a pager only, into a moble units reciver or ???? Smoe of the techs or the owners of these facilities are willing to give general information about their system as long as you approach them in a friendly level headed manor. (And do not come off as a wierdo, but a curious scanner listener.) From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.deltanet.com!news.deltanet.com!jlundgre From: jlundgre@delta1.deltanet.com (John Lundgren) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Followup-To: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Date: 3 Feb 1996 22:58:25 GMT Organization: Delta Internet Services, Anaheim, CA Lines: 38 Message-ID: <4f0pah$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4epus3$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: delta1.deltanet.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1040 sci.electronics.repair:21171 alt.radio.scanner:27220 rec.radio.scanner:45023 misc.wanted:60479 alt.anything:766 That's one idea that makes me say, "Gee, I wish I had thought of that". If you could get one of thoose large LCD display watches, it would be easy to see on tape. I dunno about the scanner display tho. Might be a problem. But yeah, good idea. actually the audio quality should be real good. Mr.News (markj@got.net) penned: : In article , gregm@cv.hp.com says... : > : >brueger@infi.net (Brian J. Rueger) wrote: : >>Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will : record for : >>greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 : >>minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. : : Use a VCR with a added twist.... : Hook up an old video camera to the VCR and point it at the scanner! : Now you know what freq was active at the time. : You can even put a small "disposable" lcd clock/watch next to the : scanner so you know what time the freq "hit". : Mr.News -- #======P=G=P==k=e=y==a=v=a=i=l=a=b=l=e==u=p=o=n==r=e=q=u=e=s=t======# | John Lundgren - Elec Tech - Info Tech Svcs. | jlundgre@delta1 | | Rancho Santiago Community College District | .deltanet.com | | 17th St at Bristol \ Santa Ana, CA 92706 | http://rsc.rancho| | My opinions are my own, and not my employer's. | .cc.ca.us | | I have gone out to look for myself.. If I should | | return before I get back, hold me until I get here. | | "You can flame your brains out -- it won't take long." | #===T=u=z=l=a==C=o=m=p=a=n=y=.=.===t=h=r=e=e='=s==L=e==C=r=o=w=d=!==# From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:16 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: need Florida Fed Freqs X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts1-10.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 00:46:46 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 9 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:44992 alt.radio.scanner:27199 I am traveling to the Orlando and Tampa (Florida) areas in a week or so and would like some information on federal law enforcement freqs in the area. Specifically need DEA, FBI, ATF, Marshals, and Secret Service. Also interested in FDLE stuff. The more detailed the better. Thanks in advance. DOUG From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:17 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio,shortwave Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.aa.net!tsunami.ixa.net!news.questar.com!not-for-mail From: Steve S Subject: Re: FS/ Sony 2010 Message-ID: <237cc$112b39.282@news.questar.com> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 01:43:57 GMT References: <4erabr$69u@pa.mother.com> <4es5qc$24d@pa.mother.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rdixon@mail.davis.com X-URL: news:4es5qc$24d@pa.mother.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 3 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45052 rec.radio.swap:56825 Please send me the details on the sony 2010 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!charlesview.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!yama.mcc.ac.uk!keele!peer-news.britain.eu.net!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!castle.nando.net!parsifal.nando.net!not-for-mail From: salavi@nando.net (salavi) Newsgroups: triangle.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,alt.forsale,comp.forsale,misc.forsale,va.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,triangle.radio,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.autos.marketplace,rec.autos.misc,alt.autos,milw.forsale.autos,nj.market.autos,fj.fleamarket.autos,alt.auto.parts.wanted,nc.charlotte.forsale,dc.forsale.misc,dc.forsale,atl.forsale Subject: +++ Bearcar BC2 Scanner/Detector for sale +++ Date: 4 Feb 1996 02:02:23 -0500 Organization: Nando Net Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4f1llv$ja6@parsifal.nando.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: parsifal.nando.net Xref: news.epix.net triangle.forsale:45669 misc.forsale.non-computer:25389 alt.forsale:14576 alt.radio.scanner:27215 rec.radio.scanner:44999 rec.radio.swap:56767 triangle.radio:1573 rec.radio.cb:26102 rec.autos.marketplace:33417 rec.autos.misc:79994 nj.market.autos:4172 fj.fleamarket.autos:1486 alt.auto.parts.wanted:6 nc.charlotte.forsale:643 dc.forsale.misc:1768 dc.forsale:43913 I have a Bearcat BC-2 Multi band Scanner (that I have hardly used) for sale. It's a pretty neat device in that not only you can just punch in the state that you are in (and it picks up Police, Highway Patrol, DOT, weather, etc.) It also alerts you to the presence of radio waves in the vicinity (has a large red light and beeps). That way it offers protection from Vascar, airplanes, etc). It retails for $250+ and mine looks brand new. Includes cigarett lighter plug, mounting brakets, car radio antenna splitter/and wire antenna (that attaches to your windshield with small suction cups). $$ Best Offer. >>> Please include this message for reference <<< ====== S. Alavi [salavi@nando.net] (919)467-7909 (H) ======== From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:19 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.iag.net!newsfeed.kdcol.net!xmission!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4epq27$s7r@cobia.gulf.net> <655.6607T716T2424@nucleus.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 03:16:28 GMT Lines: 24 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27238 rec.radio.scanner:45074 Time Bomb (ridley@nucleus.com) writes: >>This is decent info. Don't forget: >>49.670 49.770 49.830 49.845 49.860 49.875 49.890 49.930 49.970 >>49.990 > > Those above numbers I have found great activity on. Regarding Cordless Phone s, > are there different frequencies for different phones? > I have a homebase 50 channel Netset Scanner. It works well and is very > enjoyable! > Most new cordless phones now have all ten channels and are starting to have all 25 as well. The phones will choose a "clear" channel out of the 10 or 25 available. Only the older ones would have fixed frequnecies. Those 49MHz frequencies posted are only the handset side. So they are not usually monitored. You usually would want both sides of the conversation therefore the 46MHz side is the best bet. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: PHIL DIAZ Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? Date: 4 Feb 1996 05:08:00 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 24 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <4f27j0$rqm@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> References: X-Posted-By: ip207.prc.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krogers@teleport.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii dear kevin, the general radio mobile service, hence GRMS,units run in the upper uhf frequencies and are great radios for personal use. the FCC allocated this band a long time ago and few people know about it. but you pay the FCC $80 for a five year license (no testing involved) and that covers the entire household no matter how many radios. i don't know what the rules as far as advertising goes, on the net. so i'm not sure how much i can tell you, because it's part of my business. but i can say if you would like more specifics, you could call me at (520-772-3892) and i could fill in the blanks for you. good luck phil kc7afbkrogers@teleport.com (Kevin Rogers) wrote: > am looking for a GMRS mobile unit (25 watts) and handheld units (2 or >more watts) here in the Portland,OR area. i am not having any luck finding >ANYONE who knows what i am talking about. can anyone here tell me where i >could find such equipment and maybe some average price info? >thank you very much for any information. >kevin From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!gail.ripco.com!unclebob From: unclebob@ripco.com (Uncle Bob) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Chicago Frequencies For Cold Snap Date: 4 Feb 1996 05:09:42 GMT Organization: Ripco Internet BBS, Chicago Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4f1f2m$j24@gail.ripco.com> References: <4f0i6a$21f@reader2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: golden.ripco.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] jfaul1@ix.netcom.com wrote: : Anyone have good City of Chicago frequencies for the cold snap? 453.675 Heating Compliance Enforcement Units 453.825 Dept. of Human Services, Fire & Weathering Sheltering Ops. -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Uncle Bob..............unclebob@ripco.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: VHSM82A@prodigy.com (Harold Hackman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR8000 interface Date: 4 Feb 1996 05:34:38 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 9 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f1ghe$jde@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> References: <31083d47.47fb@ismi.net> <822856776snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap5.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 Jonathan, I saw a an AR8000 modified for computer control and Opto Scout control using a RJ11 connector in the 8000. Neat looking and very easy to use. Regards, Harold From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!io.org!winternet.com!visi.com!news3.mr.net!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!uunet.ca!news.uunet.ca!news.nucleus.com!mbradley From: mbradley@nucleus.com (mbradley) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Date: 4 Feb 1996 06:35:30 GMT Organization: Nucleus Inc [Calgary, AB, Canada] Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4f1k3i$sbm@news.nucleus.com> References: <4epq27$s7r@cobia.gulf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: nucleus.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27235 rec.radio.scanner:45060 MHM (breeze@gulf.net) wrote: : In article , : cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: : >Bill Hammon (drhuman@onramp.net) writes: : >> In article , : >> shame@infohouse.com wrote: : >> -->Is it possible to listen in on Cordless Phones using a scanner? : >> No it is not. Your congressman has voted to make it illeagal to listen t o : >> such transmissions, making it impossible for you to monitor them. You ma y : >> now talk on your cordless phone, knowing that everything you say is as sa fe : >> as a land line. Have a nice day :-P (Snip) BOY this guy hasn't played with his scanner enough i get cordless phones everyday From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!castle.nando.net!bessel.nando.net!mfnelson From: "Michael F. Nelson (Stayin' Alive Raleigh, NC)" Newsgroups: triangle.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,alt.forsale,comp.forsale,misc.forsale,va.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,triangle.radio,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.autos.marketplace,rec.autos.misc,alt.autos,milw.forsale.autos,nj.market.autos,fj.fleamarket.autos,alt.auto.parts.wanted,nc.charlotte.forsale,dc.forsale.misc,dc.forsale,atl.forsale Subject: BMW Motorcycle 1984 R65LS Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 07:32:55 -0500 Organization: News & Observer Public Access Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <4f1llv$ja6@parsifal.nando.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bessel.nando.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <4f1llv$ja6@parsifal.nando.net> Xref: news.epix.net triangle.forsale:45665 misc.forsale.non-computer:25385 alt.forsale:14574 alt.radio.scanner:27214 rec.radio.scanner:44996 rec.radio.swap:56760 triangle.radio:1572 rec.radio.cb:26101 rec.autos.marketplace:33407 rec.autos.misc:79982 nj.market.autos:4171 fj.fleamarket.autos:1485 alt.auto.parts.wanted:5 nc.charlotte.forsale:642 dc.forsale.misc:1766 dc.forsale:43907 For sale: 1984 BMW R65LS (650cc motorcycle Limited Sport) Red, 50,000 miles New - Tires, Battery, Brake Pads, Seat, Paint Asking $3,000 E-Mail mfnelson@nando.net call (919) 834-3374 Raleigh, NC 27608 From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!beyond.escape.com!escape.com!marc_k From: marc_k@escape.com (marc_k) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: 4 Feb 1996 08:32:26 GMT Organization: Escape.Com Internet Access and Services Lines: 77 Message-ID: <4f1quq$flb@beyond.escape.com> References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: escape.escape.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Jonathan Clough (Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk) wrote: : In article : fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu "Frederick Kelcz" writes: : Morning Fred, : < [snip] Does Javiathon have anyting to add : > on your side of the ocean? : Mmm...not sure if I'm half Company half man now :-) : The loose BNC "problem" was a little more apparent on early versions - we : had a few customers come back to us about it. AOR said they addressed the : problem and in the last 12/18 months or so I cannot recall any direct : customer complaints re loose BNC connectors. : Its only in recent weeks and on threads here on r.r.s that this : "problem" seems to have appeared - the chances of this "problem" is probably : increased for those who change antennas on a regular basis. : To tighten the lock nut is not too difficult but be careful and don't : attempt brain suggery with a broken bottle - make sure you have the : correct tools. Dissasemble the AR8000 by removing the two screws in : the battery compartment and the two small black srews on the side (just : the front half will do). Split the radio in half placing the front half : to one side. : Remove the three rubber kobs from the top and the three locking nuts : around the On/Off, Squelch and Rotary Dial. These (the locking nuts) are : probably the hardest things to remove as they are "down the hole". If : you do not have a specific tool a pair of fine tipped long nose pliers : should be OK. : Remove the two screws at the bottom of the top circuit board. About on third : of the way up on either side of the board close to the edge are two white : connector blocks labled J4-1 & J4-2. You will see though the innermost "hole " : the leg of the battery contacts slighlty bent over. This board will lift : out but be careful the two battery contacts - to make life easier you could : just straighten them slightly. : The lower board and BNC connector should now be visible and allow : access to the locking nut. By removing the three retaining screws on the : bottom board you can also lift this board away together with the top : plastic section and BNC socket from the bottom case which may also make : life a little easier. Again a pair of small long nosed pliers should allow : you to tighten the locking nut quite easily. If you consider adding some : form of adhesive I would suggest using some specific Adhesive designed for : use with threaded fasteners. : Re-assmeble being careful to ensure the two battery contacts are located : correctly in the two connector blocks. You may wish to bend the end over : slightly just to stop them "falling" out when changing batteries. Your best bet is to use a liquid thread-locking product. One that I am familar with is called Locktite...they manufacture 2 versions... 1.Blue:can be removed with normal hand tools easily, but holds tightly under normal use. 2.Red:is virtually permanent under almost ANY circumstances! This stuff generally needs an impact wrench or a chisel to remove the fastener! In your situation, I recommend the blue, as if the connector ever HAS to be removed, the red version will render this nearly impossible! If it turns out that the blue is inadequate, then you can always redo the job with the red. : -- : Cheers, : /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ : | Jonathan Clough | With Best Wishes for a Prosperous | : | Javiation, | & Peaceful New Year to all. | : | Bradford, UK | VHF/UHF Scanners from all the leading Mfr's | : | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | inc PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000 | : | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation | : | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \--------------------------------------------- | : | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | : \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!news.consultix.com!noc.netcom.net!news.nyic.com!news From: Leo Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: sale-pro-43 Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 10:12:42 -0500 Organization: New York Internet Center Lines: 11 Message-ID: <3114CCEA.2EB4@wtm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d212.nyic.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) I have a Pro-43 I'm looking to sell, its been used for about 20 hours total. Taking best offer. Thanks, Leo LaChance -- +___________________________________________+ Encrypt whenever possible Leo LaChance...............Brooklyn,New York Finger lachancl@wtm.com For PGP Public Key +___________________________________________+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx07-08.teleport.com!user From: tvine@teleport.com (PjB) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How much is R7000 worth? Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 10:30:04 -0800 Organization: thornyvinemusic Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <4e626p$fc5@post.gsfc.nasa.gov> <310C4CF7.5A19@connect.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx07-08.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0b30 In article , ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) wrote: __So would I if you would sell it to me for that. To get the one I own you __would have to send me at least $1000. Wow. Thats pretty close to your annual income. Maybe you should budget that bottle-return money a little more carefully, son....... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.cris.com!news From: idjit Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mobile, Alabama freqs? Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 12:21:40 -0600 Organization: idjit Lines: 4 Message-ID: <3114F934.77E6@cris.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crc13-fddi.cris.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) Hi, Does anyone have a list of interesting frequencies for the Mobile, Alabama area? (law enforcement, etc) Thanks...John From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:30 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!darwin From: darwin@iquest.net (Darwin Teague) Subject: frozen LCD display? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dorite.iquest.net Message-ID: Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Organization: IQuest Internet, Inc. X-Newsreader: NewsWerthy 2.02 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 12:42:52 GMT Lines: 15 This morning it was about 10 below and I noticed something odd with the LCD display on my Pro 34. The numbers on the display were changing VERY slowly. When it locked in a channel, the numbers didn't lock in immediately, it took it a fraction of a second to form. How cold would it have to be before they quit working all together? Would extreme cold also slow down the processor? ======================================================== Dishheads, dishheads, roly poly dishheads. See Jane run. See Spot run. See Spot Dick Jane. "I don't understand lemonade myself. It's not my forte". "George Bush" Was it a REAL alien? http://www.trudang.com/autopsy.html ======================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.cic.net!condor.ic.net!news From: Michael Seagroves Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: AR8000 US Band Plan Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 13:27:18 -0500 Organization: ICNET... Your Link To The Internet... +1.313.998.0090 Lines: 5 Message-ID: <3114FA86.4CF@ic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: port25.gateway2.ic.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Does anyone know if the is a new US Band Plan that you can download. Thanks Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.cic.net!condor.ic.net!news From: Michael Seagroves Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: AR8000 US Band Plan Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 13:28:01 -0500 Organization: ICNET... Your Link To The Internet... +1.313.998.0090 Lines: 5 Message-ID: <3114FAB1.3AFE@ic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: port25.gateway2.ic.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Does anyone know if the is a new US Band Plan that you can download. Thanks Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How Good is the Bearcat BC860XLT??? Date: 4 Feb 1996 13:55:10 GMT Organization: Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL Lines: 54 Message-ID: <4f2dru$qg9@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <4evmjb$ld4@news.htp.com> Reply-To: parnass@att.com NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Summary: good value Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27226 rec.radio.scanner:45038 In article <4evmjb$ld4@news.htp.com>, wrote: >Is this scanner worth the price Yes, I think it's quite a good value in a lower-mid range model if you buy it at discount, e.g., mail order or at Best Buy stores. It's an excellent choice for a first time scanner owner or as a backup scanner for someone who owns a premium model. The BC860XLT has odd-shaped keys and there's a glare from the glossy case finish, but it's good, predictable performer save for images. The low priced BC860XLT I used was cleaner, RF-wise, than the more expensive, but disappointing BC890XLT and Radio Shack PRO-2036 I tested. For a full review, read "The Uniden Bearcat BC860XLT," in Monitoring Times, May 1995. >or are there better ones out there???? Yes, you can buy better, but it will cost more. Check out the Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT, with a street price of about $380. The pricey Radio Shack PRO-2042 is another option, but buy it mail order or wait for a sale. I published full length reviews of these recent scanner models in Monitoring Times magazine: Jan 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2035 vs. Radio Shack PRO-2006 Feb 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-62 Portable Mar 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT Apr 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC3000XLT Portable May 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC860XLT Jun 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC890XLT & Radio Shack PRO-2036 Jul 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2037 Aug 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-26 vs. Uniden/Bearcat BC3000XLT Sep 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-60 Portable Oct 1995 - AOR AR-2700 Portable Nov 1995 - selected AOR AR-8000 measurements Dec 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2040 Feb 1996 - Radio Shack PRO-2042 Note: Reprints of Monitoring Times articles are available for $2.00 each from Grove Enterprises, PO Box 98, Brasstown, NC 28902, tel. (800)438-8155. NOTE: I don't get any part of the $2.00. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!usenet From: Charles Kuhlman Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: frozen LCD display? Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 14:08:11 -0500 Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 14 Message-ID: <3115041B.7811@ultranet.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: homepc1.ultranet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (WinNT; I) lcd panels of all kinds do freeze. If it's a hard enough freeze, the panel will crack and you're SOL. No repair possible, just replacement. I'd say you are damn lucky at 10 below. Remember what the "L" in LCD stands for? That's "Liquid". "Automotive Grade" lcd panels (like car radios, etc, etc) are engineered for 40 below or so. "Consumer Grade" panels start to get 'slow' at the freezing mark and you are in danger of destroying the panel at 0 degrees or so. Keep your electronics warm, folks. It's not just the batteries. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts2-begin.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: To: wstrayer@ix.netcom.com Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 14:09:13 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 31 154.680 is most likely the repeater output for the California Dept. of Justice. Their channel plan is as follows: F-1 through 6 154.680 (out) 155.460 (out) -- \\\// (o o) -------------------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo------------------------- *| |* *| B U S I N E S S R E S O U R C E G R O U P |* *| |* *| Pre-Employment Background Screening |* *| and |* *| Security Consulting |* *| |* *| --also offering-- |* *| |* *| Nationwide Public Record Information Brokering |* *| Technical Surveillance CounterMeasures |* *| Bail Enforcement/Fugitive Recovery |* *| |* *| e-mail: drunyon@holli.com |* *| message content © Business Resource Group - 1996 |* ----------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.ultranet.com!usenet From: Charles Kuhlman Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-39 answers Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 14:09:42 -0500 Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 4 Message-ID: <31150476.21DB@ultranet.com> References: <4el0qo$e1b@parrett.net> <3114DB21.1202@nando.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: homepc1.ultranet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (WinNT; I) FWIW, that RS part is also the replacement key-pad-rubber for the PRO-43, too. The so-called "extra" button that needs to be clipped off for use on a PRO-39 is the am/fm modulation button on the PRO-43. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:40 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts2-begin.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: To: wstrayer@ix.netcom.com Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 14:16:59 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 22 If memory serves me, that is most likely the California Department of Justice. 154.680 is the repeater output for their first 6 channels. All have an input of 155.460. Each channel has a different CTCSS tone for different areas of the state. WHen I lived out there, DOJ's Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement (BNE) was very active on those repeaters as well as lots of simplex surveillance freqs. They did LOTS of surveillance using aircraft. A lot of that traffic was on NALEMARS...155.475 MHz. Go to the Base Station in Concord or Scanners Unlimited in San Carlos and buy one of Bob Kelty's freq books...Government Radio Systems-Golden Gate Edition. It will have a good breakdown of DOJ's comm system as well as unit ID's. I think BNE units utilized the ID of "Nora" and the Identification Division used "Ida". Good luck and happy listening. DOUG From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: NJFM83A@prodigy.com (Gary Belt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: For Sale IC R7000 Date: 4 Feb 1996 14:35:41 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 6 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f2g7t$bks@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <311421ed.1675@swcp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap6.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 >.(hard to find full coverage >receivers anymore, so here is your chance!) Not really......Icom 7100 $1295.00, $40.00 to unblock 800-900 Mhz band, from Grove Enterprises. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:42 1996 From: JanGJ@msn.com (Jan Alblas) Subject: MASC Date: 4 Feb 96 14:40:30 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+0000441a@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 5 Has anyone any info about MASC encryption? Is it possible to decode this? Any info gratefully received Regards Jan From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!li.net!usenet From: dagababi@li.net (Daniel M. Agababian) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Buff net Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 15:57:55 GMT Organization: LI Net (Long Island Network) Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f2kum$727@linet02.li.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lisuser21.li.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anyone have any freqs for the buffnet service in the Long Island and NYC area. Scanner Master Said that the list it but I couldn't find it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Daniel M. Agababian Deer Park FD...Home of RESCUE 14 http://www.li.net/~dagababi/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tir.com!news From: destarr@tir.com (David Starr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Fan Club Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 16:05:31 GMT Organization: The Internet Ramp Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3113e71f.3409794@news.tir.com> References: <96010618349958@FrontierTech.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: an45.tir.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45035 alt.radio.scanner:27223 On 3 Feb 1996 16:19:31 GMT, mapman@bluefin.net (mapman) wrote: >I saw an address and 800# for this club in the back of "Beyond Police Call", >1994 issue. > >Is the address and phone number still correct? Frequency Fan Club PO BOx 1987 Richmond Hill, GA 31324 1-800-RACE-FAN (722-3326) From their 1995 race scanning sales bulletin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I don't understand - I cut it twice & it's still too short ! Dave Starr From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!interramp.com!usenet From: Keith Stein Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-51, BC220XLT Information Date: 4 Feb 1996 16:06:13 GMT Organization: Satellite Times magazine Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4f2lhl$45c@usenet7.interramp.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ip93.herndon2.va.interramp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: whitbje@mail.auburn.edu Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27234 rec.radio.scanner:45057 I have a PRO-51 and its ok. One thing I notice is I've used it so much that the buttons numbers are wearing off. Also, it only has double conversion, so you will hear images on frequencies where they don't belong. That could be a big problem at times. Just wish it had UHF and AM/FM/WBFM select on it. -- Keith Stein Woodbridge, VA Community, Air & Space Report Editor: http://www.newspace.com/publications/casr/home.html Satellite Times magazine Editoral Staff Member http://www.grove.net/hmpgst.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!insync!happy.firstnethou.com!usenet From: stgduck@firstnethou.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DIGITAL CORDLESS PHONES How Secure? Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 17:25:32 GMT Organization: FirstNet Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4f2q3l$t34@happy.firstnethou.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp056.firstnethou.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Please help with some basic questions about secure cordless phones. The salespeople I have talked to contradict each other, so I turn to you experts! I want a phone that cannot be monitored by the casual scanner user. If the phone is labelled "digital", will only white noise be heard? Are all 900 MHz phones digital and secure? What do I look for, or can you recommend brands for a secure cordless phone? Thanks //<<<<<<<<<<<< stgduck@firstnethou.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>\\ Imagination is more important than knowledge ======================================================= From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:46 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: DIGITAL CORDLESS PHONES How Secure? Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4f2q3l$t34@happy.firstnethou.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:30:02 GMT Lines: 19 (stgduck@firstnethou.com) writes: > Please help with some basic questions about secure cordless phones. > The salespeople I have talked to contradict each other, so I turn to > you experts! I want a phone that cannot be monitored by the casual > scanner user. > > If the phone is labelled "digital", will only white noise be heard? > Are all 900 MHz phones digital and secure? > What do I look for, or can you recommend brands for a secure cordless > phone? Look for "digital", "spread spectrum" and also encrypted. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!usenet From: scanner@wolfenet.com (scanner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Add Your Scanner Radio URL. Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 18:48:44 GMT Organization: Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4f2sa8$6e7@news1.wolfe.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sea-ts2-p23.wolfenet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Hello, If you have your own scanner radio related homepage or know of a good one please add it to our well traveled scanner page. http://www.wolfenet.com/~daydream/html/wwwlinks/links.html Thank You... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!charlesview.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!yama.mcc.ac.uk!peer-news.britain.eu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!cobia.gulf.net!ppp64 From: breeze@gulf.net (MHM) Newsgroups: triangle.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,alt.forsale,comp.forsale,misc.forsale,va.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,triangle.radio,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.autos.marketplace,rec.autos.misc,alt.autos,milw.forsale.autos,nj.market.autos,fj.fleamarket.autos,alt.auto.parts.wanted,nc.charlotte.forsale,dc.forsale.misc,dc.forsale,atl.forsale Subject: Re: BMW Motorcycle 1984 R65LS Date: 4 Feb 1996 19:32:27 GMT Organization: The Gulf Coast Internet Company Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4f31kb$fdc@cobia.gulf.net> References: <4f1llv$ja6@parsifal.nando.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp64.pcola.gulf.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 Xref: news.epix.net triangle.forsale:45697 misc.forsale.non-computer:25410 alt.forsale:14606 alt.radio.scanner:27230 rec.radio.scanner:45050 rec.radio.swap:56821 triangle.radio:1574 rec.radio.cb:26119 rec.autos.marketplace:33453 rec.autos.misc:80086 nj.market.autos:4177 fj.fleamarket.autos:1491 alt.auto.parts.wanted:7 nc.charlotte.forsale:647 dc.forsale.misc:1774 dc.forsale:43924 In article , "Michael F. Nelson (Stayin' Alive Raleigh, NC)" wrote: >For sale: >1984 BMW R65LS (650cc motorcycle Limited Sport) >Red, 50,000 miles >New - Tires, Battery, Brake Pads, Seat, Paint >Asking $3,000 >E-Mail mfnelson@nando.net >call (919) 834-3374 >Raleigh, NC 27608 I might be interested if you would include the frequency range, and types of modulation that it can receive. What is the scan speed and how many conversion steps does it use to obtain sugh a high sensitivity? Can it store individual frequencies or do you just stick them in the tank? breeze@gulf.net | Poor planning on your part | does not constitute a crisis | on my part... From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!pm101-02 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PLEASE Help! Date: Sun, 04 Feb 96 19:41:08 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f31m2$1ehm@msunews.cl.msu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm101-02.dialip.mich.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 I REALLY want to get a scanner. I do not have a lot of money, but do not want to buy a piece of junk. I am willing to spend up to $150 but would like to spend less than $100. I am looking at a Uniden BearCat 350A at $80. Is this a "good" unit? Anyone selling something better for my price range? Also, I want to get a shortwave radio with continous band coverage (as opposed to shortwave #1-9). Is there a unit which performs as both a scanner and shortwave receiver? Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!charlesview.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!yama.mcc.ac.uk!peer-news.britain.eu.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!sloth.swcp.com!news.ironhorse.com!tsunami.ixa.net!news.aa.net!ratty.wolfe.net!usenet From: corrigad@adsnet.net (Dave) Newsgroups: triangle.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,alt.forsale,comp.forsale,misc.forsale,va.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,triangle.radio,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner,rec.autos.marketplace,rec.autos.misc,alt.autos,milw.forsale.autos,nj.market.autos,fj.fleamarket.autos,alt.auto.parts.wanted,nc.charlotte.forsale,dc.forsale.misc,dc.forsale,atl.forsale Subject: Re: BMW Motorcycle 1984 R65LS Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 20:34:54 GMT Organization: Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4f35u7$amn@news1.wolfe.net> References: <4f1llv$ja6@parsifal.nando.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: a025.adsnet.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net triangle.forsale:45707 misc.forsale.non-computer:25417 alt.forsale:14613 alt.radio.scanner:27233 rec.radio.scanner:45056 rec.radio.swap:56827 triangle.radio:1577 rec.radio.cb:26123 rec.autos.marketplace:33459 rec.autos.misc:80094 nj.market.autos:4178 fj.fleamarket.autos:1492 alt.auto.parts.wanted:8 nc.charlotte.forsale:648 dc.forsale.misc:1775 dc.forsale:43925 "Michael F. Nelson (Stayin' Alive Raleigh, NC)" wrote: >For sale: >1984 BMW R65LS (650cc motorcycle Limited Sport) >Red, 50,000 miles >New - Tires, Battery, Brake Pads, Seat, Paint >Asking $3,000 >E-Mail mfnelson@nando.net >call (919) 834-3374 >Raleigh, NC 27608 Trade you a radio shack 23 channel crystal radio for it... Great deal, Waddya say?? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!ghansen.accessone.com!ghansen From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Hypocrite Pjb Strikes Again!!!! Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 22:00:31 LOCAL Organization: .tacoma.link Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <8232144866502@lss.humnet.humberc.on.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghansen.accessone.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article <8232144866502@lss.humnet.humberc.on.ca> hduff@humnet.humberc.on.ca (Hugh Duff) writes: >Gag...not another Billy croonie ! >Just don't corner Bill with a technical question he can't answer >or go questioning his 'expert' advice or catch him in a lie... >He (thinks he) is a master at diverting the context of the discussion >and resorting to insulting namecalling, not unlike a kid....in order >to avoid his looking like he is not the expert he would like to have >you beleive he is (I guess he is an expert to most scanner enthusiasts >who don't have the technical knowledge or resources to go hunting down >scanner mods from BBS', FTP sites or WWW sites.) >He turned the FIDO ScanRadio conference into a commercial support >area for his mod. books... I see he's attempting to capture the >NET audience like he did the FIDO crowd...good thing that the folks who >frequent these galaxies are more capable of sourcing tech. info >on their own. >I just read a message where he insults a fellow for his lack >of proper english (more insults)...in the same paragraph Mr. Bill >spews out verbal diatribe like "Methinks...". >I keep thinking of the line ..."A legend in his own mind !" Gag...not another Andy Moss PjB croonie ! Just don't corner Amdy or PjB with a technical question they can't answer or go questioning thier 'expert' advice or catch them in a lie... Thee (thinks they) are masters at diverting the context of the discussion and resorting to insulting namecalling, not unlike a kid....in order to avoid his looking like they are not the expert they would like to have you beleive they are . I just read a message where they insult a fellow for his lackof proper english (more insults)...in the same paragraph Pjb and Mr. Moss spew out verbal diatribe like "Contact your ISP...........". I keep thinking of the line ...."This is the last time I will post on this..... " grh >--- > þ NFX v1.3 [000] From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hazel.la.tds.com!voyager.ff.tds.com!usenet From: RR Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR8000 interface Date: 4 Feb 1996 22:04:49 GMT Organization: Trident Data Systems Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f3ai1$500@voyager.ff.tds.com> References: <31083d47.47fb@ismi.net> <822856776snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> <4f1ghe$jde@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: remote3.ff.tds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) I was thining that a mini-DIN would also do nicely, but don't really know if a mini-DIN jack would fit in the case. >I saw a an AR8000 modified for computer control and Opto Scout control >using a RJ11 connector in the 8000. Neat looking and very easy to use. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gdbnet.ad.jp!news.hebel.net!nntp.inet.fi!news.tele.fi!news.funet.fi!jazz.cc.spt.fi!news.csc.fi!news.eunet.fi!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.bctel.net!kryten.awinc.com!kelowna.awinc.com!lwright From: lwright@kelowna.awinc.com (Lawrence Wright) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Scanner wanted to TRADE. Date: 4 Feb 1996 22:13:14 GMT Organization: A & W Internet Inc. Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4f3b1q$5c9@kryten.awinc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: awinc.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I'm looking for a good scanner, handheld would be nice but not critical. Preferably one that could be modified or has already been. I'm looking to trade for it, and I've got the following stuff to offer: For TRADE 1 NEO GEO Gold w/ 2 controllers Samurai Shodown 1 & 2 Alpha Mission 2 A/V cable RF switch boxes for everything TWO memory cards Gamest SamSho2 game guide from Japan 2 Pioneer LD player w/Aliens & Cliffhanger 3 NES Large POWER GLOVE IN BOX 4 Turbo Duo Games from Japan Cho Aniki Ai Cho Aniki R Type Complete Side Arms Special Super Raiden Dracula X Lords of Thunder Bomberman '94 5 Atari 7800, 2600, 5200 (all in boxes) 6 Sony PSX games ESPN Extreme Ridge Racer Air Combat DOOM XCOM UFO Loaded WANTED: The Lover and Koyaanaquatsi LDs Akira LD PC Engine/TG-16 Laser Active pak NEO GEO CD System MiniDisc player Vectrex System Wipeout (PSX) Atari Lynx Turbo Express Other Cool Toys Atari Jaguar w/Defender 2000 & CD ROM L. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: agentmiki@aol.com (AGENT MIKI) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: << NEEDED AR000 >> Date: 4 Feb 1996 23:01:06 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 2 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f3ve2$29s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: agentmiki@aol.com (AGENT MIKI) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Want to by AOR 8000. Will trade DDI or pay $$CASH$$. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: arizonman@aol.com (ArizonMan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How to install tone board in BC760-xlt? Date: 4 Feb 1996 23:08:44 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 1 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f3vsc$2fv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: arizonman@aol.com (ArizonMan) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com what does a tone board do? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news2.whytel.com!usenet From: tad@why.net (Tad Marko) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-2042 vs 2035 Date: 5 Feb 1996 01:22:31 GMT Organization: Using OS/2 in the Republic of Texas Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4f3m4n$3lt@what.why.net> Reply-To: tad@why.net (Tad Marko) NNTP-Posting-Host: dal119.why.net X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09 I've been away from scanners for a while and dropped into the Radio Shack the other day to see what was new (with the intention of buying soon). I liked the 2042 and the 2035, but I'll be darned if I can figure out what the difference is, other than $120. Can anyone clue me in? Perhaps make a suggestion for something to look at? I would like to get a base station unit that has features similar to these two. Thanks, Tad ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Tad Marko -- tad@why.net | Visit the Shooting Page: | | from the Republic of Texas |http://www.why.net/users/tad/index.html| |----------------------------| The Home of the 6.5x55 Fan Page | | OS/2 is cool! | and other shooting topics. | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | "No use saying sorry; it's something that I enjoy" | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:57 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts1-28.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: To: wstrayer@ix.netcom.com Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4f34b3$i99@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 01:32:08 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 21 wstrayer@i.netcom.com wrote: >I forgot to mention that I am scanning in Bodega Bay, which is 100+ >miles north of SF. Wow! They must have moved Bodega Bay further north. I used to live out your way...both Petaluma and Point Richmond. I don't recall it being anywhere near that far form SF. I used to play golf up there and it never took more than an hour from the city. Anyway...I think DOJ has a repeater in Santa Rosa. Actually I think they have some sort of office up there too. Check your phone book and see. You'll probably hear a lot of reference to Rancho Cordova also. Happy listening. DOUG P.S. If memory serves me, there is a CB shop in Santa Rosa that also sells scanners and freq books. Again, check your phone book. Sawyers Books in downtown Santa Rosa carries some of the scanner magazines. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:38:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: wstrayer@ix.netcom.com(Willis Strayer ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? Date: 5 Feb 1996 01:33:54 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4f3mq2$5p8@reader2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pet-ca1-19.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Feb 04 5:33:55 PM PST 1996 In <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> wstrayer@ix.netcom.com(Willis Strayer ) writes: > >I have been monitoring 154.6800 for some time and cannot determine what >it is, I receive car to car frequently and an occasional base but who >knows where that is, I hear the car to car anywhere in Sacto to San >Jose. All the manuals I have list it as state P, but what P. If >anyone knows what it is perhaps you know it's sister freqs, one this >active should have 3 or 4 different channels. > > > thanks Will PS: I am in Bodega Bay, about 100+ miles north of SJ., on the coast. > From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.aa.net!tsunami.ixa.net!news.ironhorse.com!sloth.swcp.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.jersey.net!agis!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!nwgw.infi.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: Scott Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Midrange handheld Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:22:00 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f3pk8$oao@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa2dsp9.cid.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) At the risk of starting a never-ending thread, what is the best "mid-range" handheld scanner? The feature I desire are as follows; 1. At least 200 channel memory 2. Coverage to at least 1000 MHz (1.3 GHz preferred) 3. GOOD audio. Needs to be heard in loud area's (racing) 4. Price in the $200 to $350 range 5. Full-featured search (limit search, search lockout, etc). 6. Cellular restorable a plus :-) From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!inquo!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!grouper.Exis.Net!usenet From: Phil Peterson Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-51 Cell Freqs Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:39:59 GMT Organization: Exchange Information Systems Networks Lines: 34 Message-ID: <4f3qlv$kra@grouper.Exis.Net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 43.exis.net Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27240 rec.radio.scanner:45076 Todd Coles writes: > I have a Realistic Pro-51 scanner. It does not receive the cell range, but a > book I just bought provides a solution. It is not done through hardware > modifications. Here are the steps as they are listed; > > 1. turn off scanner > 2. press 2, 9 and L/OUT all at once > 3. turn on scanner > 4. MANUAL > 5. 23 > 6. up arrow > 7. MONI > 8. PROG > 9. MONI > 10. channel # (pick one) > 11. enter > > Now, when I tried this all I managed to do was clear all my stored channels > from the memory. I tried turning the scanner on while holding the three > buttons mentioned in step 2. This cleared the channels. > I was wondering if anybody had managed to accomplish this with these steps, or > others. Also, in step 10, it mentions Channel #. This must be one of the t en > monitor channels? Am I right? Please let me know if this really does work > and how to do it. Thanks. > > > Todd Todd, It only works with EARLY PRO-51s. Newer versions were returned to the factory and and reworked so that this keyboard mod would not work. I know, I bought a new one from RS, the mod didn't work, so I took it back for a refund. Two weeks later, I bought a used PRO-51 that responded to the keyboard thingie. Good Luck! From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:02 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts1-12.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <227cc$f3a3a.d2@news.express.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:27:03 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 13 elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) wrote: >Looking for modifications and secret tricks for unlocking secrets of >Uniden >sportcat sc150. Please Email or post a message. Thanks About the only "cool trick" I have performed with a Sportcat 150 was to return the damn thing to the place that sold it to me. Glad to be rid of it! DOUG From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: rgallim232@aol.com (RGallim232) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Freq Database? Date: 5 Feb 1996 06:52:55 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 5 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f4r2n$al0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: rgallim232@aol.com (RGallim232) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com I saw a address for a freq. database a couple of days ago. Unfortunatly, I lost it. Can somebody post it again? Thanks Ron From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.pe.net!news.corpcomm.net!news.gate.net!news-adm From: cerebus@gate.net (Lon Lentz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Possible cellular mods on CPU-blocked scanners? Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 06:56:58 GMT Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Lines: 27 Message-ID: <4f499d$jj4@news.gate.net> References: <4es2qq$2n3@bubba.NMSU.Edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ftmfl2-51.gate.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45064 alt.radio.scanner:27236 thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu (KC5KTO) wrote: >This got me to thinking - what about bypassing the CPU and programming >the EEPROM directly? What I'm thinking about is a device that would be >wired to the relevant EEPROM pins (mundane stuff like the ENABLE, DATA IN, >CLOCK pins) and would directly write a frequency into a memory location. >After directly accessing the EEPROM, you'd turn on the scanner, and >it'd happily search from that stored frequency, not knowing (or caring) >where it came from. You could store channels and frequency data in a >computer, then shove that information down a serial line. The device >would translate the RS-232 data into TTL-compatible (or whatever the >memory chip needs) signals for EEPROM programming. The EEPROM doesn't >know that it's not the CPU programming it, and when you fire up the >scanner, the CPU won't know that it wasn't the one that programmed >the EEPROM. I had a friend take the ROM out of his Bearcat and throw it into an EPROM reader/burner. Spending several hours staring at the hex numbers on his screen, he found what were essentially all of the frequency settings. He changed the hex values to allow the entire 800 MHz band and burned a new EEPROM and stuck it in his scanner. Works great. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!atlantis.utmb.edu!news From: tpham@marlin.utmb.edu (tuan pham) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB/ WTT handheld scanner Date: 5 Feb 1996 07:21:52 GMT Organization: utmb Lines: 6 Sender: tpham@kerberos.utmb.edu Message-ID: <4f4b6g$mg5@atlantis.utmb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.109.59.39 X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.5@129.109.59.39 X-Authenticated: tpham on Unix host kerberos.utmb.edu I'm looking to buy or trade for a handheld scanner, preferably with air frequencies.I would pay extra for 800mhz frquencies, preferably with cell unlocked. would be willing to trade a casio 3" lcd pocket TV and/or magnavox portable CD player (discman type)for the scanner. TV and CD player are 6 and 1-month old respectively and are new like just out of box. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks and "ET"s Date: 5 Feb 1996 07:34:59 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4f4bv3$8nb@emerald.oz.net> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> <4erjm2$8ob@bud.shadow.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says... > > While on this topic. I have a question for those of you who live in the > Washington DC area. Have any of you ever picked up Dana Scully on her > cordless phone? Or even better yet her and Moulder discussing a case on. I heard them last year(I have a cordless/cellular waiver from the League of Nations) she was trying to rent an arc welding unit when her call waiting kicked in,Moulder was on the other line and had info about an "ET"landing inside the beltway. They were real stupid cause they gave the location on an unsecured line. So I took my TV camera to the location and waited in the back of my unmarked newstruck(with blackout windows). I waited....and waited...and waited. About three hour passed when I saw this very bright white light flash. When my eyes finally adjusted and I was able to focus my camera on the activity before me....It was Scully,Moulder and Marion Barry eating Chinese food on the hood of their cars with a couple guys that looked like welders. When I got back to the TV station and played back the tape...they were not there! Really wierd! Lesson Learned: Welders *ARE* Extra Terrestrials. Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!beyond.escape.com!escape.com!marc_k From: marc_k@escape.com (marc_k) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: prom changes for continuous reception Date: 5 Feb 1996 08:45:12 GMT Organization: Escape.Com Internet Access and Services Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4f4g2o$m5v@beyond.escape.com> References: <4etru4$6o5@dfw.dfw.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: escape.escape.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Brian Oakley (boakley@dfw.net) wrote: : [ Article crossposted from alt.radio.scanner ] : [ Author was Brian Oakley ] : [ Posted on 2 Feb 1996 14:22:35 -0600 ] : Has anyone tried to remove the prom for any of the "blocked" scanners and : disassembled the code on a prom reader and altered the code and loaded it : into a new prom for restoration of full coverage on their scanner? I : know it can be done but Im not sure what the code might look like. Id be : interested in hearing from anyone thats tried this. B. It's very unlikely that your approach will be sucessful, as most modern scanner CPU's have the "PROM" built in to it. Some ways around this might be: 1.add a different CPU(prehaps something like a "basic stamp")to the scanner. 2.using a suitable device, try to put "forbidden frequencies" directly into the scanner's RAM(this won't work on the units that have the RAM built into the CPU. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:08 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!peer-news.britain.eu.net!newsfeed.ed.ac.uk!hwcee!ceeamh From: ceeamh@cee.hw.ac.uk (Alistair Henderson) Subject: Help with ACARS decoder Message-ID: Lines: 21 Sender: news@cee.hw.ac.uk (News Administrator) Reply-To: ceeamh@cee.hw.ac.uk (Alistair Henderson) Organization: Dept of Computing & Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 09:53:43 GMT Hi, Can anyone out there provide me with any technical data regarding an ACARS decoder?? Basically, I'm trying to build my own rather than fork out a fortun e for a commercially available one. I need details of the design of the electronics and the decoding software. All help greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Al. -- Al Henderson. Computer Science III Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS Email: ceeamh@cee.hw.ac.uk RAF Web Pages: http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/~ceeamh From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:09 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news From: eat@joes.com Subject: Re: RS discone problems with CELLULAR SOLVED! X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com Message-ID: Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id) Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99.82 References: <4eii1d$ecj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4entdv$mmt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:06:58 GMT Lines: 20 magicjlass@aol.com (MagicJLass) wrote: >I appreciate all of your help and quick responses. Yesterday I picked up >so RG8 and installed it, but it still didn't work. > Then I got so pissed I pulled out the ground wire and wripped it off of >the scanner. >Turns out that was the key!!! It works great!!! Don't know why but it >works great. >(my guess is, is that the ground wire was to thick (almost 1/2 inch braid) >and it affected the reception by grounding it out.) >Thanx agin for all the help!! Maybe I missed something (a thread or two), but why did you need ground wire ? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!news.net99.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!miwok!bdt.com!news.tdl.com!news From: mental Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: 5 Feb 1996 10:41:45 GMT Organization: Phunatix Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4f4mt9$cpe@news.tdl.com> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: tdl-st171.tdl.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1PE (Windows; I; 16bit) Step up to a CTEK/OKI 900 if you really want to track. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.inc.net!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Hypocrite Pjb Strikes Again!!!! Date: 5 Feb 1996 10:49:05 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4f4nb1$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4ebsvi$rko@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4edrv1$nae@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel7p05.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: bcheek@cts.com bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) wrote: >alicelg@aol.com (Alicelg) wrote: > >>Now this is more like it! Go get that dastardly PjB! And while you're at >>it, Mr. Cheek has been awfully quiet, Dagnabit, he must have other things >>to do..... :) > >Aw, Alice...I try. I really try. Having other things to do >definitely helps, though. I've been in a real good mood for the last >couple of days, too. Maybe that's it. I feel like I'm fixing to win >the lottery or something...... :-) > >Bill > > I think this was posted to the wrong group, It ended up in alt.radio.scanner, but doesn't look like it belongs there. Check you setup and try again. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.ramlink.net!news From: paulh@ramlink.net (Paul Howard) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: CTCSS Tone Board Date: 5 Feb 1996 12:39:23 GMT Organization: RAMLink Internet Access Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4f4tpr$3ip@ram2.ramlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ash6.ramlink.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Would someone tell me what a CTCSS Tone board adds to a scanner? I see that that is an option on a BC 9000 scanner for $46.95, is it worth paying extra for it? From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.icon.net!usenet From: g_reed@icon.net (Glenn Reed) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: Mon, 05 Feb 96 15:05:12 GMT Organization: (ICON) InterConnect Online, Inc. Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <227cc$12c1e.37b@news.nmaa.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: okc138.icon.net X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [1.0] > BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) wrote: > > >I had a Radio Shack mag mount and it received pretty good. > >However... The thing was always blowing off on the freeway! Around > >town it was not a problem. I could do about 65 IF there was no wind, > >however in Southern CA, you can count on it! I don't know if we are talking about the same mount, but I have used a RS magmount scanner antenna on my van driving the interstate at slightly over the posted speed limit of 70 mph and western Oklahoma almost always has wind. It did not come loose and I have no way of knowing what its endurance might be. I was wondering how you have it placed. Is it on a very flat surface and is there any material in between the antenna and the mount, such as a vinyl top? Also, where on the car do you have it placed? Finally, I guess it's possible that the magnet is substandard. You might try comparing it to another one to see if that is the problem. Regards and luck with your problem. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> <> Glenn Reed <> <> OK Wing Communications - C.A.P. <> <> Sooner 44 <> <> KF5XB <> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Note: The above remarks do not necessarily represent those of anything sentient. From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!swidir.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!mx.kpn.com!hdxx05.telecom.ptt.nl!usenet From: andre2@dds.nl (Andre Broers) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Dutch Freqenties Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 16:35:49 GMT Organization: PTT-Telecom Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4f4btg$2li@hdxx05.telecom.ptt.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 145.7.53.123 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I'd like to meet that I can share dutch frequenties with (especially from the northern of holland.. Many thanx.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andre Broers |Telephone : PTT Telecom B.V. |Telefax : I&AT TU NWD |E-Mail : e.douma@telecom.ptt.nl Postbus 188 |DISCLAIMER: This statement is not an official Groningen |statement from, nor does it represent The Netherlands |an official position of, PTT Telecom B.V. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Mon Feb 05 22:39:15 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news From: Business Resource Group Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: th-ts1-27.holli.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Business Resource Group References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 21:27:39 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 8 Just saw the Maxon 210+3 GMRS portable (a good unit) advertised by Communications Electronics in Michigan. Their price is $188.95 and if you buy 2 or more the price drops to $174.95 each. They can be reached at 1-800-USA-SCAN. I'm sure there are other shops selling this radio, but this is the best price I've seen on this very popular unit. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.lahabra.chevron.com!usenet From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 7 Feb 1996 01:12:19 GMT Organization: CCnet Communications - Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 36 Message-ID: <4f8u9j$d8g@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cgwh.sr.chevron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) wrote: >Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A >>scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at >>450.7250 MHz. > > > If you listen carefully around the news cast and commercials you can >here >the engineer talking giving cues and such! > >Scan up and down from that freq during the main TV news hours and >you can listen to the studio talking to the reporters doing "live" shots >while >also listening to whatever the broadcast is. > >What you are hearing is being broadcast on the 450.725 in FM mode, as >far as I know it is meant for the field reporters to catch their cues. >Interesting >enough, even though it is ahead of the actuall 640Khz I still do not >hear >people cuss and freak out when they have to "dump" someone. So I think >even that broadcast is delayed some. > >Maybe the "Mr News" guy can give more details if he reads this? Much of the 450 to 451 range is for Auxilary Broadcast/Remote Pickup. The above description is pretty accurate. This is where you will often hear the link between traffic planes/helicopters back to the studios. Repeaters are often used 5 Mhz up. For instance you might here traffic on 450.725 and on the repeater receive (input) freq of 455.725. The remote/mobile stations often operate in full duplex. A point of interest. Broadcast auxilary and remote pickup are protected by the ECPA - you are not "supposed to eavesdrop" on them. They are for communications conducted under FCC rules part 74, not part 90. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!news.tju.edu!usenet From: "David. R. Clawson" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 15:58:46 -0500 Organization: Jefferson Medical College Lines: 24 Message-ID: <31166F86.55E8@mail.tju.edu> References: <4els6q$p71@pegasus.starlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: regist1.jmc.tju.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC) Bill Funk wrote: > > droy@netcom.com (Dave Roy) wrote: > >Well thanks for the invite. > > > >My most recent horror is a Radio Shack credit card bill for 16.61 that I > >paid but only wrote the check for $16.11 > > Hmmm... > Did you read the contract? Were they right? Yes, they were. > Was it Tandy's fault you made a mistake? I don't think so. Yet you expect > us to believe that somehow Tandy is the bad guy here? Was Tandy "legally" ringht? Absolutely, based on the contract. Did they most likely lose a customer over $0.50? Absolutely. I suspect a call to a supervisor woul d remove the $15.00 charge as a "good faith" move by Tandy. The response by the Tandy rep, if as reported, seems a bit on the harsh side. I had them scratching their heads when I asked for a frequency counter... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!interaccess!usenet From: "Herb A. Zite" Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,chi.forasale,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: FS: Sony ICFSW800 Pocket Radio Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 09:26:36 -0600 Organization: InterAccess, Chicago's best Internet Service Provider Lines: 4 Message-ID: <311A162C.5853@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d158.w.interaccess.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:57130 rec.radio.scanner:45269 alt.radio.scanner:27346 rec.radio.shortwave:69876 Sony ICFSW800 pocket sw radio. Touch screen tuning, preprogrammed tuning cards, indoor antenna and docs. $100 or best offer + shipping and COD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!interaccess!usenet From: "Herb A. Zite" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 12:25:44 -0600 Organization: InterAccess, Chicago's best Internet Service Provider Lines: 1 Message-ID: <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: d143.w.interaccess.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) Grove lists it at $1849, but they don't have any. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!llyene!news From: "James F. Parkyn" Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <1996Feb6.011334.856@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov> To: wa6sul@ix.netcom.com Sender: news@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> <4esc4m$6p1@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 01:13:34 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Lines: 35 wa6sul@ix.netcom.com(gg ) wrote: >In <4elodf$7ih@news-e1a.megaweb.com> SFS@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) >writes: >> >>I have it from a reliable source that the FCC uses the Create LP >>at their monitoring stations! >>********************************************************************** >** >Thats true, not gossip. Just drive by their monitoring station in >Cerritos. You can see them from the freeway. Good quality concentric >towers and helical coax lines too. >You dont see any cheap TV ANTENNAS for their monitor posts. >P.S They are mounted vertically polarized, so it is real easy to see >what model of Create antenna they are using. Hi Gary, the last time I looked when I had the inside tour, the FCC definitely did not have a Create L-P on the mast. What they had was end mounted in the vertical plane rather than center mounted as both Create models are. Are these antennas that you saw relatively new? I have not been up on the roof for two years and when I drive by on the freeway it is hard to see the type of coax without stopping and pulling out a spotting scope....but I wouldn't want them to think I was a sniper as the chief's office faces the freeway! They did have a lot of R7000s at the time though.... Jim Spectrum Analysis Center BBS 24 hours 14.4 kB 818/358-5861 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!stealth.loa.com!usenet From: "James J. Lass" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:19:45 -0500 Organization: Log On America, Inc. Lines: 20 Message-ID: <31181A51.7A64@loa.com> References: <31106859.442A@minn.net> <4eut29$t6h@cdc2.cdc.net> <3115501B.68D5@loa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip026.loa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Too Cheap To Pay!!!Of course there is a way. Just today as a matter of fact a friend and I > modified a pro-46 that when you pushed 2 9 and l/o did not work. But > after searching on the web we found out what is called a daughter borad > defeat. It is to long to explain so I suggest you go through webcrawler > and type in modify sccanner or darrens home page and then link to RS mod > page and look at what is called the daughter board defeat!! > let me know how it works out! > Jim > > jimlass@loa.comIn my previous posting the messages seemed to merge making it seem like I was saying that you were to cheap. But I did not the messages merged together making it seem that way. Sorry. In now way would I pay any money to have something done if I could simply do it my self! sorry for the misconception!!!! thanx Jim -- BM6´ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news-2.csn.net!usenet From: "Jeffrey J. Irvin" Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: Motorola For Sale Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 07:10:29 +0000 Organization: H2O C & M, Inc. Lines: 21 Message-ID: <31185065.67E@h2o.com> References: <4f11tv$ao4@news1.sunbelt.net> <4f8tl8$863@fly.compudata.com> Reply-To: jjirvin@csn.net NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.131.233.47 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Macintosh; I; PPC) To: Mike Mollet Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27361 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2132 rec.radio.scanner:45289 rec.radio.shortwave:69898 rec.radio.swap:57157 Mike Mollet wrote: > > Hi there... I was wondering if you had any motorola Ht's on the 500 mhz > band... my explorer group has recieved authorization from the Police > dept to use their frequencies, and we could really use a few for field > events... We will need one multi channel radio, and the rest can be > dual, or single channel.... Thanks... > Please send your prices to... > > MMollet@compudata.com Mike - Caveat empmtor (buyer beware). Make sure the PD radio shop will pop for the channel elements for any radios you purchase or check the price for "crystalling" the radios - the cost can be prohibitive and, therefore, you might look into buying new or late model used programmable radios. Make sure they support the coding features your department uses PL tone, CTCSS tones, whatever it might be. JI (Reserve Deputy, Jefferson County Sheriff's Dept., CO./Amateur radio operator KB0CHT). From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!wb3ffv!cs.umd.edu!coopnews.coop.net!news.den.mmc.com!usenet From: "joseph c. hawkins" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 7 Feb 1996 17:22:47 GMT Organization: Lockheed Martin -- Denver InterNetNews site Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4fan57$58s@tel.den.mmc.com> References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: mac-athena.den.mmc.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45203 alt.radio.scanner:27322 Dear Len Thanks for clearing something up for me. Have I got an answer for you. In the future I plan to take my money for my "annoying" (learn to spell) little projects to someone who gives a fuck about selling me the correct part for my needs. Joe > >I beg to differ with you if your RadioShack salesman has completed all >of his or her Radio Shack Certification Tests there is very little >thay can't answer. Most of the time it's not a matter of not knowing, >it's a matter of not wanting tobe bothered by all of the customer's >anoying little projects. Remember we are here to sell not build your >project; that is your job. Also, keep in mind "You've got question, >We've got answers" and the answer can be NO!!! > >Sincerly, > >Len Roberts, President Tandy Corp, and RadioShack From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:25 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsreader.jvnc.net!news From: "Richard A. Kroth" Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <31192BEA.325A@trenton.edu> Sender: news@tigger.jvnc.net (Zee News Genie) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Trenton State College - Music Dept. References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> <4fan57$58s@tel.den.mmc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 22:47:06 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) Lines: 37 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45201 alt.radio.scanner:27321 joseph c. hawkins wrote: > > Dear Len > > Thanks for clearing something up for me. Have I got an answer for you. > In the future I plan to take my money for my "annoying" (learn to spell) > little projects to someone who gives a fuck about selling me the correct > part for my needs. > > Joe > > > > >I beg to differ with you if your RadioShack salesman has completed all > >of his or her Radio Shack Certification Tests there is very little > >thay can't answer. Most of the time it's not a matter of not knowing, > >it's a matter of not wanting tobe bothered by all of the customer's > >anoying little projects. Remember we are here to sell not build your > >project; that is your job. Also, keep in mind "You've got question, > >We've got answers" and the answer can be NO!!! > > > >Sincerly, > > > >Len Roberts, President Tandy Corp, and RadioShack > That message was not written by Len Roberts. It was written by cs101bs@mama.indstate.edu (Ben Sanders)at Indiana State University. -- ****************************************************************** Richard A. Kroth Trenton State College - Music Department Technical Director, Audio Engineer Kroth@trenton.edu - RAKroth@aol.com Voice - (609) 771-2563 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.fast.net!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: REQ:Bay Area airport frequencies Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:45:50 -0800 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 2 Message-ID: <3117072E.BE6@internetMCI.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr1-dialup44.sanfrancisco.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win16; I) CC: SCAN-L@uafsysb.uark.edu Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45127 alt.radio.scanner:27274 Does anyone have a list of frequencies for the two major Bay Area airports San Francisco(SFO) and San Jose(SJC)? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: REQ:Bay Area airport frequencies Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:16:06 -0800 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 52 Message-ID: <311843A6.4F84@internetMCI.com> References: <3117072E.BE6@internetMCI.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr1-dialup5.sanfrancisco.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45237 alt.radio.scanner:27332 Jeff Willwerth wrote: Robert, Here are some frequencies I know to be current: SFO SJC Tower 120.50 124.00 269.10 120.70 257.60 Ground 121.80 121.70 124.25 Clearance 118.20 118.00 Approach 135.65 120.10 134.50 135.20 135.40 121.30 127.00 133.95 Departure 120.90 120.10 135.10 121.30 If you have access to the www, check out the web page: www.cc.gatech.edu/db1/fly/airport-info.html Regards, Jeff -- _______________________________________________________________________ / Jeff Willwerth / CONRAD Knowledge Engineer ____ ___ / Hewlett-Packard CSO IT / / / / Cupertino, CA __/ __/ _____/ Email: jwill@hpkel32.cup.hp.com / Phone: (408) 447-1439 ____________ __/ __________________________________________________ Robert Eisner wrote: Hi Jeff, Thanks for SFO & SJC frequencies! Do you have the company frequencies for United, American and Delta at SFO? Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!uunet.ca!news.uunet.ca!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!usenet From: 11364@poste.gig.net (crmf) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Antenna for AOR mod. ar2500 Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 21:50:52 GMT Organization: Inter-Acces Communications Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4f3bdr$6ra@rcogate.rco.qc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: g5317.gig.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I have a AOR mod AR 2500 scanner, and would like to know witch antenna is the best to use. I would like to install it on my tv antenna tower outside (it is about 40 feet long). Please tell me wish model to buy and reply me bu e-mail Thank' Claude favrac@gig.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gdbnet.ad.jp!news.hebel.net!news.sics.se!news.kth.se!news.eunet.fi!EU.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!news.mr.net!tccn.com!suzie.tccn.com!6481 From: 6481@tccn.com (Dave C. Steckling) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need Motorola software Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:38:03 GMT Organization: Twin Cities Computer Network Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4f3qib$eun@jeeves.tccn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: suzie.tccn.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Looking for software to program various motorola hand-helds. Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give me. Dave -- \_\_\______/_/_/ <0 0> ] [ [ ] -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:29 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hideout.emanon.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!news.midplains.net!gw2.att.com!oucsboss!ra.cs.ohiou.edu!ac256 From: ac256@seorf.ohiou.edu (Sean Dean) Subject: Are there Mods for a Bearcat 600 XLT X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ra.cs.ohiou.edu (ac256) Message-ID: Sender: postmaster@ra.cs.ohiou.edu (ac256) X-Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon Feb 5 11:35:27 1996 Organization: Ohio University, Athens Ohio, USA Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:35:30 GMT Lines: 13 If there are mods for a 600XLT Can anyone head me in the right direction? I checked Bearcat Mod section and there was none for a 600 XLT the scanner is a few years old it looks exactly like a RS 2026 I Think SEAN DEAN ac256@seorf.ohiou.edu -- Sean Dean ac256@seorf.ohiou.edu "Everytime a Bell RINGS an Angel Gets it's Wings" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: adavis9@ix.netcom.com(chris pohlen ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS - Pro 2006 Date: 5 Feb 1996 23:23:19 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4f63h7$4u7@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sdx-ca9-10.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Feb 05 3:23:19 PM PST 1996 Perfect condition, new from Grove less than 6 months ago, with cellular mod $300.00 OBO From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!sun4nl!xs4all!usenet From: Aerocom@xs4all.nl (Aerocom) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: IRC Channel Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 01:11:53 GMT Organization: SC-MAC, Military aircraft communications Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4f8r0g$52d@news.xs4all.nl> References: <4emf9l$e6q@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: Aerocom@xs4all.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: asd05-20.dial.xs4all.nl X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27312 rec.radio.scanner:45183 balrog@ix.netcom.com(Bob Salamone ) wrote: >I have seen a few posts regarding a scanner IRC Channel (#scanner). I >have check it several times and have not seen anybody there. Does >anyone use it to talk about scaning or scanning related issues? Bob, There are a few more or less 'established' IRC channels for this purpose. If you are into monitoring utility and military shortwave stations, you might want to try channel #wun on Sundays at 2300z. If you are interested in military aero communications, you could try channel #airband on Monday, Wednesday and Friday evenings at 2000 UTC. Will meet you there, best regards. Rene / Aerocom. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ | monitoring military communications | on UHF 225-400 MHz. | aerocom@xs4all.nl ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:32 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sparky.insinc.net!news.bc.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!engr.orst.edu!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!psgrain!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!cmchub.rns.com!news.silcom.com!webnews!lafn.org!lafn.org!ag001 From: ag001@lafn.org (Abraham Stavsky) Subject: AM on UHF??? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lafn.org Message-ID: <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> Sender: news@lafn.org Organization: Los Angeles Free-Net Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 20:37:48 GMT Lines: 13 Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at 450.7250 MHz. Given the wide spread between the frequencies, I cannot understand what's causing this. It was not a one-time "fluke" either - it seems to occur on a regular basis. Moreover, the signal on 450.7250 MHz seems to air some 10-20 seconds AHEAD of the one at 640 KHz. Any ideas? Thanks, Abe, KE6OCM -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hideout.emanon.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!guitar.sound.net!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.shadow.net!usenet From: alexandr@shadow.net (Robert Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 13:59:33 GMT Organization: Shadow Information Services, Inc. Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f52h2$d46@bud.shadow.net> References: <4a11f2$1r9a@tako.info.ucla.edu> <4a5rnn$27t@pegasus.starlink.com> <4acap1$5t9@pegasus.starlink.com> <30cb7ac5.15085590@168.100.1.3> <4aj6ds$mjs@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4b1d1e$t40@neptunus.pi.net> <4c9ut0$3me@dub-news-svc-2.compuserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-mia-44.shadow.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 It's my understanding that the operation of a jammer per se is not illegal, however, you can be ticketed for, (get this) "Interfering with an officer of the law in the performance of his duties" Personally, I think I'd rather have the speeding ticket! How 'bout you? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.inc.net!novia!news.dpc.net!news.heurikon.com!uwvax!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: alexkewl@aol.com (AlexKewl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: pro-26 Date: 6 Feb 1996 05:06:04 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 1 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f796c$7fi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: alexkewl@aol.com (AlexKewl) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com please send me your opinions on pro-26 scanner. are there any mods on it? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: alexkewl@aol.com (AlexKewl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 7 Feb 1996 23:17:52 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 1 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fbthg$4dk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fb2d2$l8g@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: alexkewl@aol.com (AlexKewl) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com pro-26 costs 449doll at radio shack and 349 in other companies. its cool From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usit.net!news From: ano360084@anon.penet.fi (Samantha Hamilton) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need Advice: Which one of these best for cellular adaption? Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 06:56:17 GMT Organization: S.C.O.P.E. Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4fc6pt$n54@news.usit.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.1.57.33 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I'm looking between Radio Shack's PRO-26 and PRO-60 handheld scanners. I'm leaning towards the 26 even it is more expensive. I'm wandering though about conversion to receive cellphone calls so I can check out my cellphone transmissions once in a while to make sure it is working right? Is the 26 easy to convert and where might I find this information? Samantha Hamilton From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.microsoft.com!news From: anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 7 Feb 1996 02:20:09 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation Lines: 14 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.56.153.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 In article <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com says... > >[...] ALL companies should be doing drug screens! What people put into their own bodies is their own business, and no one elses', least of all yours'. [Vote with your dollars, folks. Don't buy these statists' antennas.] -- The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!pirates!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!nntp.msstate.edu!sunset.backbone.olemiss.edu!csjaf From: aries@sunset.backbone.olemiss.edu (Aries) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 Date: 7 Feb 1996 06:30:39 GMT Organization: University of Mississippi NDES Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4f9guf$q45@sunset.backbone.olemiss.edu> References: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <227cc$f3a3a.d2@news.express.ca> <257cc$133415.386@news.express.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: csjaf.nexus.olemiss.edu X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 > >>About the only "cool trick" I have performed with a Sportcat 150 was to >>return the damn thing to the place that sold it to me. Glad to be rid of >>it! > >>DOUG > >Agreed, the best place for an SC150 is on the shelf at a store. > Why?? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.escape.ca!ts1dl29.escape.ca!asi From: asi@escape.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DIGITAL CORDLESS PHONES How Secure? Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 14:40:53 LOCAL Organization: escape communications corp. Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4f2q3l$t34@happy.firstnethou.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1dl29.escape.ca X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] > (stgduck@firstnethou.com) writes: >> Please help with some basic questions about secure cordless phones. >> The salespeople I have talked to contradict each other, so I turn to >> you experts! I want a phone that cannot be monitored by the casual >> scanner user. >> >> If the phone is labelled "digital", will only white noise be heard? >> Are all 900 MHz phones digital and secure? >> What do I look for, or can you recommend brands for a secure cordless >> phone? >Look for "digital", "spread spectrum" and also encrypted. Try Tropez 900, I own one and love it. I do not believe there is a encrypted model out there. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!news From: b w edginton Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Freq Database? Date: 7 Feb 1996 06:32:08 GMT Organization: University of Queensland Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4f9h18$5fm@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au> References: <4f4r2n$al0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup6.om.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) rgallim232@aol.com (RGallim232) wrote: >I saw a address for a freq. database a couple of days ago. Unfortunatly, >I lost it. Can somebody post it again? > >Thanks >Ron Don't know if it's the one you want but try PerCon Corp at http://perconcorp.com/db_srch.htm Did I leave ot the www bit ? Anyway, you can use a search engine to find it. BTW I found it by using the Alta Vista engine...it has a usenet search function which is really usefull if you want to check something on a newsgroup. While on the subject, have a look at the ISYS site for a shareware (free ?) download of HindSite. This little beauty runs with Netscape and indexes your cache to allow quick recall of urls you forgot to Bookmark. I have been using it for a couple of days and couldn't live without it now. You REALLY should have alook. Brian From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netone.netonecom.net!usenet From: bernie@netonecom.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Are You Lookin' For FREQS, Correction Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 01:48:45 GMT Organization: NetOne Communications Inc. Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4erqid$55m@netone.netonecom.net> References: <3111383B.55C5@shasta.com> <31113B68.980@shasta.com> <31113C8C.6FED@shasta.com> <31113DC6.175D@shasta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cad-55.netonecom.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Garry Hobart wrote: >Garry Hobart wrote: >> >> Garry Hobart wrote: >> >> If you're looking for freqs, here is a nice searchable DB that should get y ou >> well started; http://www.perconcorp.com/db_srch.htm >Guess I'm not having any luck today. The above should be the correct address >or I give up. Sorry about this, everyone. If that doesn't work, my bookmark is set at http://www.perconcorp.com You can follow the pointers to the database from there. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news2.aus.sig.net!news.fc.net!news.io.com!arlut.utexas.edu!news.eden.com!mu!bhuston From: bhuston@eden.com (Bill Huston) Newsgroups: austin.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: RS Pro-43 scanner (unblocked) Date: 5 Feb 1996 20:27:01 GMT Organization: Adhesive Media, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4f5p6l$b7q@boris.eden.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: net-1-200.austin.eden.com Originator: bhuston@mu Xref: news.epix.net austin.forsale:43927 alt.radio.scanner:27280 rec.radio.scanner:45133 Radio Shack Pro-43 programmable scanner. Modified for full 800 Mhz coverage. $275 + shipping. bhuston@eden.com (512) 292-6230 (Austin Tx) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!zetnet.co.uk!demon!birchnet.demon.co.uk!bill From: Bill Pugh G8IAY Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk Subject: Re: Users of PD (Pager Decoder) please read this! Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 20:51:30 +0000 Organization: What?? !!! Lines: 9 Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <4edsjg$j02@easy1.worldaccess.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: birchnet.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: birchnet.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.10 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27292 rec.radio.scanner:45153 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2112 Hi, if anyone is interested in using the PD pocsag decoder software that has been mentioned here I have a few interfaces that are made on pcb and built inside a 25 D socket and shell. The only external conection being a lead to the RX audio. If you would like to know more please feel free to email me. -- Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.scott.net!acara.snsnet.net!news5.crl.com!nntp.crl.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!billn From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: What do people talk about on cellular? Followup-To: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Date: 2 Feb 1996 05:08:47 GMT Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4es68v$lf4@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4deuq7$k9e@over.mhv.net> <30fc3a4a.10802264@allnews.infi.net> <4dkrbj$nh4@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <4du5d0$3fm@news.netvoyage.net> <4dvgg8$avp@news.cdsnet.net> <4e8bh8$ruj@tdc.dircon.co.uk> <310888a1.22049581@news.tir.com> <4elism$o49@tdc.dircon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: peak.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45110 alt.radio.scanner:27262 Alan Edwards (aedwards@tdc.dircon.co.uk) wrote: : In <310888a1.22049581@news.tir.com> garyn@sun.tir.com (Gary Newberry) writes : : >I f memory serves me correctly , this "savant" of a wife was using a : >"Cordless" phone to talk with the "hit man" and that's how the : >conversation was monitored, I believe it's a felony to listen to : >cell phone conversations and in this case it most likely would have : >been throw out of court had the person been monitoring a cell call, : >rather than monitoring a cordless phone freq. : Maybe I'm being dumb here, but I don't understand the difference. Whoever : recorded the call between the wife and the hitman was illegally monitoring : a private call. I don't see why it makes a difference whether it was a : cellular phone or cordless phone she was using. Nope. The evidence could be used in court. Only the police are restricted from obtaining such evidence themselves. Another example. You could break into a neighbor's house, find that he/she was poaching deer, and inform the police. The police could obtain a search warrant, based on your illegally obtained information, and search the house. They could then arrest the person based on what they found. Note that this is different than the police breaking into the house themselves, without a warrant. Could you be prosecuted for the illegal breakin? Certainly, but it would probably not happen. : Isn't using the scanner to listen to the cordless transmissions the same : as tapping the land wire? Maybe. I do not recall just how the ammendment was written. However, how are they going to detect your listening? And, if you tell them about an illegal act - do you think they are going to get the Feds to file charges against you? Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!realtime.net!news.mindspring.com!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hp-cv!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!news.willamette.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!billn From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 6 Feb 1996 05:23:50 GMT Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4f6ol6$lfj@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4a11f2$1r9a@tako.info.ucla.edu> <4a5rnn$27t@pegasus.starlink.com> <4acap1$5t9@pegasus.starlink.com> <30cb7ac5.15085590@168.100.1.3> <4aj6ds$mjs@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4b1d1e$t40@neptunus.pi.net> <4c9ut0$3me@dub-news-svc-2.compuserve.com> <4f52h2$d46@bud.shadow.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: peak.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Robert Alexander (alexandr@shadow.net) wrote: : It's my understanding that the operation of a jammer per se is not : illegal, however, you can be ticketed for, (get this) : "Interfering with an officer of the law in the performance of his : duties" : Personally, I think I'd rather have the speeding ticket! : How 'bout you? In the US, intentionally interfering with a signal is illegal. As such, your understanding is wrong. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hp-cv!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!news.willamette.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!billn From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 9 Feb 1996 05:48:40 GMT Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Lines: 29 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fen7o$geo@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: peak.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Drew Durigan (VUBS79A@prodigy.com) wrote: : It most certainly is! It becomes "my business" when these people drive : on the highway, endangering my life. If I'm a business owner, it is also : "my business" when these folks cost me money in the form of lower : productivity, increased "sick time" off of work, and making bad decisions : on the job, due to their drug or alcohol-induced state. You don't need drug testing for that. Being impaired on the job is sufficient by itself, as is poor performance of job duties. Now, what would be reasonable is impairment testing - for those that could cause hazards for others on the job. The problem with drug testing is that it does nothing to show whether the person is impaired or not, except for alcohol metabolites. And, no company that I know about tests for intoxication. Aside from alcoholism, I know of no decent studies that show the various drug users have any difference in attendence records, much less sick-time off. There ARE a lot of government apocryphal claims, however. Now, should a person take recreational drugs? Personally, I think they are stupid to do so - there must be other things to do. However, I also feel that such usage is a personal choice - as long as they are not endangering someone else. That means that anyone who operates a vehicle while impaired should be locked up - and that does not mean only "impaired by drugs". Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.brandonu.ca!115.dialup.common.net!Birdman From: Birdman@mail.common.net (Birdman BBS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: mods for bearcat 230 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 22:37:43 LOCAL Organization: Birdman BBS Lines: 1 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 115.dialup.common.net X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B.7] Is there any know mods for this little thing? If so please help. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news2.ee.net!news.ee.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.nova.org!bkobb.ppp.nova.org!user From: bkobb@newsignals.com (Bennett Z. Kobb) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 10:01:16 -0400 Organization: Ebullient Nucleus Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bkobb.ppp.nova.org X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0 In article , krogers@teleport.com (Kevin Rogers) wrote: > am looking for a GMRS mobile unit (25 watts) and handheld units (2 or > more watts) here in the Portland,OR area. i am not having any luck finding > ANYONE who knows what i am talking about. You can always get good GMRS info, including local contacts who could direct you to equipment sources, from: Personal Radio Steering Group Inc. 313 MOBILE-3 73016.163@compuserve.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!news.paonline.com!usenet From: blithering.idiot@shivasys.com (Blithering Idiot) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Fan Club Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 05:10:11 GMT Organization: Pennsylvania Online [Usenet News Server for Hire] Lines: 12 Message-ID: <311accf0.2625689@news.paonline.com> References: <96010618349958@FrontierTech.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: sl06.shivasys.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45304 alt.radio.scanner:27365 mapman@bluefin.net (mapman) wrote: >I saw an address and 800# for this club in the back of "Beyond Police Call", >1994 issue. > >Is the address and phone number still correct? > > Current Information; Frequency Fan Club, P.O. Box 610, Milledgeville, GA 31061 1-800 RACE FAN (voice) 1-800 SCAN FAX (Fax) as of Feb 96 frequency list. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: 2 Feb 1996 02:47:01 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 11 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 I had a Radio Shack mag mount and it received pretty good. However... The thing was always blowing off on the freeway! Around town it was not a problem. I could do about 65 IF there was no wind, however in Southern CA, you can count on it! So if you only stay in town or drive around 60 with no wind it is OK!! I do not have any experience with the window mount, I just pulled out the drill and devalued my truck! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: 5 Feb 1996 20:28:18 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 13 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f5p92$ta2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eu66c$o0o@pegasus.starlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 > I went from Phoenix to El Paso recently, and the I-10 stretch from PHX to >Tucson is now at 75MPH. That RS Mag-Mount antenna stayed on no problem. >Do you have a convertable?? ;-) > >Bill Funk No, a 'vette ! Just kidding, actually just a Toyota p/u. I would never be able to hit 75!! It would probably pull my radio right out the back if I tried that!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 6 Feb 1996 06:48:55 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 24 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A >scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at >450.7250 MHz. If you listen carefully around the news cast and commercials you can here the engineer talking giving cues and such! Scan up and down from that freq during the main TV news hours and you can listen to the studio talking to the reporters doing "live" shots while also listening to whatever the broadcast is. What you are hearing is being broadcast on the 450.725 in FM mode, as far as I know it is meant for the field reporters to catch their cues. Interesting enough, even though it is ahead of the actuall 640Khz I still do not hear people cuss and freak out when they have to "dump" someone. So I think even that broadcast is delayed some. Maybe the "Mr News" guy can give more details if he reads this? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: 7 Feb 1996 06:33:57 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 17 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f9h4l$1eic@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <227cc$12c1e.37b@news.nmaa.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 What freeways do you drive on when the come off? Not N/B 15 >throught the pass when the wind is gustying up to 60mph S/B are you? >Oh... and figure your doing 75 or more... > >I must have enough "flex" in my roof metal to cause a unstable condition, because all it would take is for me to just look at the 65 spot on my speedo for it to go flying! Of course, when I would go to Indio on the 10 it would have no chance! Hell, sometimes I fell my damn truck is ready to blow over out by the wind farm! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!brighton.openmarket.com!decwrl!news-server.ncren.net!news.duke.edu!cobia.gulf.net!ppp103 From: breeze@gulf.net (MHM) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: 1 Feb 1996 07:28:07 GMT Organization: The Gulf Coast Internet Company Lines: 39 Message-ID: <4epq27$s7r@cobia.gulf.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp57.pcola.gulf.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27284 rec.radio.scanner:45145 In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: >Bill Hammon (drhuman@onramp.net) writes: >> In article , >> shame@infohouse.com wrote: >> -->Is it possible to listen in on Cordless Phones using a scanner? >> No it is not. Your congressman has voted to make it illeagal to listen to >> such transmissions, making it impossible for you to monitor them. You may >> now talk on your cordless phone, knowing that everything you say is as safe >> as a land line. Have a nice day :-P >> >> Bill Hammon > I think Bill is probably living in a perfect world... > ...Remember just because something is illegal, doesn't >make it impossible. >Lots of cordless activity here: >46.61 46.63 46.67 46.71 46.73 46.77 46.83 46.87 46.93 46.97 >Not so much yet: >43.72 43,74 43.82 43.84 43.92 43.96 44.12 44.15 44.18 44.20 44.32 44.36 >44.4 44.46 44.48 This is decent info. Don't forget: 49.670 49.770 49.830 49.845 49.860 49.875 49.890 49.930 49.970 49.990 I do think that Bill Hammon was being facetious and is not as stupid as you have given him credit for. breeze@gulf.net | Poor planning on your part | does not constitute a crisis | on my part... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!inews.intel.com!itnews.sc.intel.com!fmsu03.fm.intel.com!ornews.intel.com!news From: Brett Miller - N7OLQ Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Stanford Lifeflight freqs. Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 10:01:44 -0700 Organization: Intel Corp. Lines: 21 Message-ID: <31178978.5CCC@ccm.hf.intel.com> References: <4evl2f$16v@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bmill-1079.ut.intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27290 rec.radio.scanner:45150 Mr.News wrote: > > In article , > wyn_davies@globalvillage.com says... > >Does anybody have a list of Stanford (CA) Lifeflight and CALSTAR > >helicopter frequencies? Email me if you do, thanks! > 854.0125 Crystal Peak > 852.2875 Mt. Allison > 854.0625 Mt.Beacon > 853.7875 Mt.Diablo -- I also remember hearing an AM frequency at 130.xxx (?) where lifeflight would coordinate the landing at Stanford hospital. Check it out. Brett Miller - N7OLQ brett_miller@ccm.ut.intel.com Intel Corp. CIS: 73370,3030 American Fork, UT From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!miwok!ultra.sonic.net!chopper From: chopper@sonic.net (James Lepphaille) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: What exactly is a DTMF decoder? Followup-To: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Date: 8 Feb 1996 04:44:26 GMT Organization: Sonoma Interconnect,707.522.1001,ppp$12/mo,Santa Rosa,CA(us) Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4fbv3a$aqv@ultra.sonic.net> References: <4ebt5u$hoq@over.mhv.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sonic.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45258 alt.radio.scanner:27342 : What are DTMF decoders supposed to do and what can they do if hooked to a : scanner. Turn DTMF tones into numbers you can read. -- chopper@sonic.net "under the redwoods" Forestville CA, USA "100mi. North of San Francisco" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:45:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: cloverle@ix.netcom.com(Michael I. Andrews, Sr. ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RS 2026 Date: 7 Feb 1996 03:06:40 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 1 Message-ID: <4f9500$a1c@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-ric-va2-04.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Feb 06 7:06:40 PM PST 1996 Looking for any known mods. to restore cellular coverage. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news.netvoyage.net!EZRA From: config@aol.com (Config.Sys Consulting Group) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TV show freaks Date: Thu, 01 Feb 96 17:57:03 GMT Organization: Config.Sys Consulting Group Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4er92g$bhj@news.netvoyage.net> References: <4eq0i0$rvl@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: culver_pm1_5.netvoyage.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45131 alt.radio.scanner:27277 :Second..... : Does anybody know what frequency they use on "Hawaii Five-O" when they :say "Patch me thru to McGarrett!" : :Anybody have freqs for the "A-Team" or "Knight rider"..."Air Wolf"????? : :Thank You : :Nuu Bee : What I want to know is the subspace freqs the enterprise uses to communicate when it is going Warp 5. Is it the same one Boc Brown uses to talk to Marty McFly across time deminsions using those Radio Shack hand helds? Ezra Duong-Van Config.Sys Consulting Group 800-386-2724 310-839-5178 fax Los Angeles, San Diego http://users.aol.com/config/index.html Serving Southern California's small businesses since 1986 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!brighton.openmarket.com!decwrl!news-server.ncren.net!redstone.interpath.net!cphillips From: cphillips@interpath.com (Curt Phillips) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Long play tape recorder info ? Date: Fri, 02 Feb 96 07:38:03 GMT Organization: Phillips Technicon Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4esf0r$gm0_001@news.interpath.net> References: <4e6l38$lbs@nntp.crl.com> <310CE681.6280@hp-usa-om13.om.hp.com> <4elhpr$poe@news.cis.okstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cphillips.pdial.interpath.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 In article <4elhpr$poe@news.cis.okstate.edu>, martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick) wrote: > > An audio recorder that runs for 10 hours could be quite useful. [snip] >and, of course, How much does it cost? I have often thought that a VCR >equipped with either highfi sound or one of those digital recording adapters >which were sold a few years ago would make an excellent system for archiving >logging recordings. The only real drawback to a VCR is its start-up time Another drawback of a VCR is limited playback resources. That is, if I record on a VCR, I have to playback on a VCR. I prefer something portable, so I can take the machine in the car or to the office to listen to tapes I have made. I could dub from VCR to standard cassette, but that's another step (and more time, which I have too little of). So I'm also interested in testimonials on the "10 hour" recorders. ========= Opinions expressed are solely those of the author ============ Curt Phillips, KD4YU (ex-WB4LHI) | "I don't want to achieve cphillips@interpath.com |immortality through my work. I Chairman, Tarheel Scanner/SWL Group |want to achieve immortality through ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh ARS; NRA, AEE|NOT DYING." -- Woody Allen From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!taco.cc.ncsu.edu!news-server.ncren.net!redstone.interpath.net!cphillips From: cphillips@interpath.com (Curt Phillips) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: Wed, 07 Feb 96 22:58:30 GMT Organization: Phillips Technicon Lines: 27 Message-ID: <4fbaqm$gg4_001@news.interpath.net> References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eu66c$o0o@pegasus.starlink.com> <4f5p92$ta2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cphillips.pdial.interpath.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 In article <4f5p92$ta2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) wrote: [snip] >No, a 'vette ! Just kidding, actually just a Toyota p/u. ^^^^^^^^^ Well, that explains EVERYTHING. Magnets have a really hard time adhering to that fiberglass. :-) BTW... two points on the topic. I used a Larsen mag mount for about 6 years for a ham radio (2 meter) antenna and never had any trouble; it had a really strong magnet and didn't move at up to 80 mph. I had it on a VW Scirocco (which could do over 100). Also, there are a lot of mag mounts that take the 3/8" x 24 threaded antennas, and there are a LOT of antennas (including scanner antennas) that are available in this threading. Some of these mag mounts are rated for large HF/shortwave ham antennas. =========Opinions expressed are solely those of the author============ Curt Phillips, KD4YU (ex-WB4LHI) | Those who beat their swords into cphillips@interpath.com |plowshares will end up doing the Chairman, Tarheel Scanner/SWL Group |plowing for someone who kept ARRL Life; QCWA; Raleigh ARS; NRA; AEE|their sword. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netgrp!news From: cquick@vic.com (Carl Quick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Entertainment Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:50:06 GMT Organization: Internet Communications Group Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4f8lv4$4df@grover.netgrp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: smoky2.vic.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Seems the " Bill Cheek" entertainment conference here in rec.radio.scanner is slowing down.We here at U. Tn get a real kick out of this conference.We've even started a pool on this character.Maybe this post will get him going again.If not won't somebody PLEASE do the honor? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!usenet From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:36:01 -0500 Organization: NF2G Enterprises Lines: 3 Message-ID: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr1-64.frontiernet.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) Has anyone laid eyes or fingers on the new AOR AR-5000 "DC-to-Daylight" receiv er? How about a review? How much does it cost (the radio, not the review)? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!wizard.pn.com!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!usenet From: Dave Booth Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RADAR Date: 7 Feb 1996 06:31:11 GMT Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4f9gvf$qvj@nntp.crl.com> References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.113.223.131 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP19) To: kboland@microserve.net X-URL: news:4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net the band the Radar signals are transmitted on are i think about 2-5 gig.. not sure on the band width. but yes if u had a scanner that could recieve up that high you probably wiuld hear something.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!skypoint.com!usenet From: dawg9@popmail.skypoint.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need freqs for Phoenix area Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 16:03:08 GMT Organization: SkyPoint Communications, Inc. Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f59ti$52@stratus.skypoint.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial020.skypoint.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I'm taking a business trip to Phoenix on the 2-9-96 and I'm looking for some freqs. Specifically, I'm looking for fire and police main dispatch freqs within the city limits. Also any freqs that pertain to on scene action like a fireground channel, etc. Any other freqs would help too. You can post in this newsgroup or e-mail me at dawg9@skypoint.com on or before 2-9-96. Your help is greatly appreciated. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!dimensional.com!news.wizard.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: dbdunfor@ix.netcom.com(Donald B. Dunford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: new pro-51 mods???? Date: 7 Feb 1996 07:37:45 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4f9ks9$1t6@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-cha-nc1-08.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Feb 06 11:37:45 PM PST 1996 I just bought a new pro-51 and was wondering if there was a mod for the radio since it didn't have the channel #23 cell freg. Thanks alot! Email me at dbdunfor@aol.com please. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:07 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equip,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!interactive.net!winternet.com!visi.com!news3.mr.net!mr.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.new-york.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail From: dconti@carroll.com (Daniel M. Conti) Subject: FS> Azden AZ-61A 6 meter HT, MINT - Brand NEW..Steal at $225.00 Shipped! X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated) Organization: Carroll-Net Message-ID: X-Trace: 823214236/11778 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: poseidon01.carroll.com Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 01:26:38 GMT Lines: 6 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27264 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97795 rec.radio.scanner:45114 rec.radio.swap:56930 Azden AZ-61A 6 meter HT, MINT, in box, with manual, all access., hardly used, BRAND NEW. They sell for $380.00 new. $225.00 Shipped to 48. COD $5.00 extra. E-Mail if interested From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:08 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equip,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!wang!uunet!in1.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail From: dconti@carroll.com (Daniel M. Conti) Subject: FS : Alinco DR 610 T, 2M/440 dual bander, MINT, in box.... X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated) Organization: Carroll-Net Message-ID: X-Trace: 823751240/18103 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: poseidon05.carroll.com Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 06:36:04 GMT Lines: 5 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27328 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97875 rec.radio.scanner:45226 rec.radio.swap:57085 Alinco DR 610 T 2M/440 mobile dual bander, MIN, harldy used in box with manual, all accessories. Also includes optional EJ-24U tone decode unit. $500.00 shipped to 48. COD $5.00 Extra. E-Mail please if interested. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:10 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equip,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!wang!uunet!in1.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail From: dconti@carroll.com (Daniel M. Conti) Subject: FS : Alinco DR 590 T 2M/440 dual bander, MINT...mods X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated) Organization: Carroll-Net Message-ID: X-Trace: 823751246/18103 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: poseidon05.carroll.com Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 06:36:10 GMT Lines: 11 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27329 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97876 rec.radio.scanner:45227 rec.radio.swap:57086 Alinco DR 590 T 2M/440 dual bander for sale. This rig is MINT, in box with manual, all acces. Radio has ben upgraded to 600T specs, and also has been modified for out o fband RX and TX ... Also includes optional EDC-20 15 foot extension kit for remote mount of head, and EJ-7U tone decode unit. $450.00 shipped to 48...COD $5.00 extra. E-Mail if interested From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: denoid95x@aol.com (DeNoid95X) Newsgroups: dfw.forsale,houston.forsale,austin.forsale,utsa.forsale,tx.forsale,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro43 Handheld Scanner for sale Date: 8 Feb 1996 00:02:50 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 5 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fc05q$5pf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <31176872.3F74@metronet.com> Reply-To: denoid95x@aol.com (DeNoid95X) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Xref: news.epix.net dfw.forsale:23816 houston.forsale:16937 austin.forsale:44032 tx.forsale:15865 rec.radio.swap:57113 rec.radio.scanner:45256 Hell I agree for $75 it had better do more than just hook to my belt, how about if I offer you $25 more and I wont need the darn clip! N9RLR/2 Syracuse,NY From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.luc.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!news From: emichelson@nwu.edu (Edward A. Michelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: O'Hare Airport Freq's Date: 1 Feb 1996 19:44:09 GMT Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. USA Lines: 41 Message-ID: <4er569$6j1@news.acns.nwu.edu> References: <4ebh1f$m3d@dub-news-svc-3.compuserve.com> Reply-To: emichelson@nwu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: aragorn210.nuts.nwu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11 In article <4ebh1f$m3d@dub-news-svc-3.compuserve.com>, 71736.210@compuserve.com says... > > >hi >Does anyone have the frequencies for the airports in chicago >(o'hare and midway) . I was unable to find much in "police call" or >"beyond police call". Air traffic controllers, security, airlines, etc .... >Thanks in Advance Here is my O'Hare list, mostly from listening tower 118.7 120.75 126.9 390.9 ground 121.9-in 121.75-out ATIS 135.4 clear 121.6 push 121.67 depart 125.0-E 125.4-W 127.4-S 120.55-N Aproach 125.7-W 119.0-E 124.35 128.45 company frequencies: american - 130.25-dispatch 129.675 - k ramp 128.975-G-H ramp 129.225 maintenance airinc 130.475 USAir - 129.8 -ops 129.55-push Delta - 129.6 Butler FBO 130.37 United - 131.875, 130.15 129.075 Chicago Center frequencies in vicinity of O'Hare: 132.2- NE 120.35- E 120.72 132.5 125.05 Please let me know if any are incorrect, or if you have others. -- Edward A. Michelson Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. USA emichelson@nwu.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:13 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!news.net99.net!news.igc.net!news.zynet.com!ez0!pagesat.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!ezwriter From: ezwriter@netcom.com (kEN Colburn) Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eu66c$o0o@pegasus.starlink.com> <4f5p92$ta2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 00:11:57 GMT Lines: 11 Sender: ezwriter@netcom2.netcom.com i live in SoCal also and my magmount blew off the other day. Was trying to grab it dragging ont he ground while buckled in a seat belt and going 65 on the fway. Musta looked pretty funny. Anyway, when i got home there was a very small lockwasher on the magnet causing it to lose total contact with the roof. That might be the problem or maybe it lost its magnetism. Too many paintjobs??? -- Gimme a bike, a laptop, a gun and a Leathermen's tool and i can go anywhere and do anything. ezwriter@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!olivea!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!usenet From: fbern@teleport.com (Frank B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Uniden Bearcat BC9000XLT: NEW Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 08:39:38 GMT Organization: Teleport Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4f749f$ih@maureen.teleport.com> Reply-To: fbern@teleport.com NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx06-30.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 I have one New Uniden Bearcat BC9000XLT for sale. The box has been opened bu t the radio is still in its' protective cover. AC adapter, telescopic antenna, and docs are there. $315 Shipped OBO> Frank Bernardi Beaverton, OR From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!bill.gnatnet.net!usenet From: Fred Zuschlag, dpeep@GnetNET.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Atlanta Airport Frequencies/Airline Frequencies Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 22:28:34 GMT Organization: . Lines: 42 Message-ID: <311a74de.20796218@news.gnatnet.net> References: <4fcaqv$enf@mordred.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup17.gnatnet.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.168 On 8 Feb 1996 08:04:47 GMT, derek@comlab.gtri.gatech.edu (Derek B. Cook) wrote: >I was wondering if anyone could provide me with information on frequencies >used at Hartsfield International Airport in Atlanta. Each airport uses certain frequencies for planes to communicate with flight controllers. The frequencies are the same at a given airport regardless of who is talking. Hope the following helps. My source is a bit old, but last time I was there most of them were busy. Approach control 118.350 Approach control 127.900 Approach control 126.900 Approach control 127.250 ATIS, arriving 119.650 ATIS, departing 125.550 Clearance delivery 121.650 Departure control 125.000 Departure control 125.700 Gate control 125.325 Ground control 121.750 Ground control 121.900 Pre-Taxi clearance 121.650 Tower 119.100 Tower 119.500 Tower 123.850 Unicom 122.950 ATIS stands for Auto Terminal Information Service, which provides hourly-updated prerecorded information, such as weather conditions, runways in use, special hazards (certain taxiways out of service) and other useful information to arriving or departing aircraft. Also listen for several airlines in the 460 MHz range, between 460.500 and 460.975. These are usually used for airline operations on the ground (Hey, Chuch, we need three more meals at gate A-35) and the like. Enjoy! Fred From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!msunews!news From: freema22@pilot.msu.edu (Mike Freeman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FBI Freqs. Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 05:31:15 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fc1p9$16dc@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Reply-To: freema22@pilot.msu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: via-annex4-59.cl.msu.edu X-MSUnetID: freema22 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anyone know what freqs the FBI operates on? If so, please E-mail them to me. Thanks a lot. Seeya. Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!news00.sunet.se!sunic!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!news.compuserve.com!newsmaster From: froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS Pro 62 problem Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 04:44:20 GMT Organization: CompuServe Incorporated Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4fbkhs$d52@dub-news-svc-4.compuserve.com> References: <4f8pqa$j68@nw002.infi.net> Reply-To: froggie@intac.com NNTP-Posting-Host: dd66-139.compuserve.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Scott Ryan wrote: >Yesterday I purchased a Pro 62 from the local RS. When trying it today I >found that broadcast frequencies (TV, NOAA weather & AM) bleed over other >frequencies. Weather frequency 164.475 MHz completely covers a local >Police frequency at 159.225 MHz. Turning the squelch down enough to >prevent bleed-over cuts reception of ALL frequencies. >Do I have a bad unit or is this a command problem with the Pro 62? Sounds like a LEMON. Try another till your happy. The 62 is one the best RS has ever had. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: fsgafrick@aol.com (FSGAFRICK) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How do scanners cause problems on planes? Date: 4 Feb 1996 07:30:49 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 11 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f28tp$fc6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: fsgafrick@aol.com (FSGAFRICK) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com The problem lies in the electromagnetic energy generated from these devices. and it is actually partly due to the aircraft itself. The older aircraft were more immune to this problem because they were *not* fly-by-wire aircraft as most of the airplanes are today. The newest commercial aircraft, Boeing 777, is a fly-by-wire aircraft, meaning that the connection between the yoke (steering wheel) and the flight control surfaces is not mechanical at all, but electrical. although these wires are shielded, there is still stray voltage running all over the place. That's why they place navigational instruments in the wingtips, usually on starboard, so as to keep these stray currents from damaging these navagational receivers, much less mis-tuning them. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.icon.net!usenet From: g_reed@icon.net (Glenn Reed) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS 2026 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 96 05:02:36 GMT Organization: (ICON) InterConnect Online, Inc. Lines: 54 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: okc122.icon.net X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [1.0] > Looking for any known mods. to restore cellular coverage. Try this one. ==================================================================== From: steuer@clam.rutgers.edu (robert Steuer) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-2026 MODS!!! Date: 20 Oct 92 14:55:50 GMT Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 29 Hi all, just got these mods, hot off the FAX! Note: It is not lawful to monitor cellular or conventional mobile telephone conversations. The 2026 has cellular frequencies deleted at the factory, but restoration is the easiest ever! - clip one marked wire! All you need is a Philips screwdriver and wire cutters. 1. Turn the scanner upside-down and remove the four side screws holding the bottom cover in place; pull the cover loose and set it back about two inches out of the way. 2. Locate the small circuit board at the lower right-hand corner and find jumper L201. Cut it and slightly separate the break. 3. Reassemble the radio which now has continuous 806-956 MHz coverage and 30KHz search increments in the cellular band. *** I have not tried the above mod, but did acquire it from a commercial radio dealer who is very respectable, so as always, proceed at your own risk and realize that this will violate your warranty! Have Fun! Rob KF2EK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - | Robert Steuer Internet: steuer@clam.rutgers.edu | | Rutgers University Amateur Radio: KF2EK@N3FOA.#EPA.PA.USA.NA | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - ================================================================ Best of luck. BTW, I have a Pro 2026 and did this mod while sitting in the recliner watching Seaquest. Whaddaya know, it worked !!! o<:-} <> Glenn Reed <> <> OK Wing Communications - C.A.P. <> <> Sooner 44 KF5XB <> From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna on the Pro-2006 Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 00:59:41 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3117187D.2FF4@shasta.com> References: <3116E5F1.2DF4@concentric.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppc6.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) jwmann@concentric.net wrote: > > When an external antenna and the stock antenna is installed on the Pro-2006 (or any other > scanner, is there any benefit. > > Joseph Nope. No benifit at all. If you were to notice an improvement, you would have serious problems with your external antenna. -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!siemens!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Are You Lookin' For FREQS, Correction Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:19:56 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 14 Message-ID: <31113C8C.6FED@shasta.com> References: <3111383B.55C5@shasta.com> <31113B68.980@shasta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppb6.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Garry Hobart wrote: If you're looking for freqs, here is a nice searchable DB that should get you well started; http://www.perconcorp.com/db_src.htm -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!siemens!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Are You Lookin' For FREQS, Correction Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 14:25:10 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 19 Message-ID: <31113DC6.175D@shasta.com> References: <3111383B.55C5@shasta.com> <31113B68.980@shasta.com> <31113C8C.6FED@shasta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppb6.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Garry Hobart wrote: > > Garry Hobart wrote: > > If you're looking for freqs, here is a nice searchable DB that should get yo u > well started; http://www.perconcorp.com/db_srch.htm Guess I'm not having any luck today. The above should be the correct address or I give up. Sorry about this, everyone. -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tweety.sna.com!newsmaster From: Garry Hobart Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS discone problems Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 05:44:03 -0800 Organization: Sacramento Network Access Lines: 20 Message-ID: <3119FE23.7567@shasta.com> References: <1d.25399.930@travel.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppb4.shasta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Patrick Walkup wrote: > By the way, speaking of the RS discone, has anyone popped the "boot' off > the top to see if a whip can be added for 30-50 mhz reception? Yes, you can add an extra whip to the top of your discone. The only problem is the thread, it's 5/16x (I forget the pitch) so you need to make a sleeve that goes to 3/8. Use a 5/16x? drill and tap one side for 3/8, add a stud if necessary. Then just add your whip to the top. I used radio shacks off road cb antenna w/coil. I saw major increases in signal strength below about 160Mhz, Below 50Mhz saw the most gain, naturaly. BTW, this mod had no ill effects on higher freqs. Good listening. -- --------------------------------------------------------- A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high virtues of a good citizen but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. Thomas Jefferson, Letter Sept. 20, 1810 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.voicenet.com!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.ptd.net!news From: georgef@postoffice.ptd.net (George) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Berks Co. PA frqs Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:58:26 GMT Organization: ProLog - PenTeleData, Inc. Lines: 46 Message-ID: <4f3roi$q8d@ns2.ptd.net> References: <4f37nf$fe8@ns2.ptd.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs1-09.eph.ptd.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 In article <4f37nf$fe8@ns2.ptd.net>, kenfish@postoffice.ptd.net says... > >I am looking for frequencies for Berks County Pennsylvania. Police, >Emergency, etc. Any help would be appreciated. > >e-mail to kenfish@postoffice.ptd.net or just leave reply here. > >Thanks tons. > Some Berks County PA Frequencies 33.940 County Fire 155.070 County/Township Police Dispatch 155.010 County/Township Police F2 155.220 Amb-Hosp. 154.310 Zone 4 Fire Dispatch 154.400 Zone 4 Fire F2 154.160 Zone 4 Fire F3 154.385 Zone 4 Fire Police The following frequencies used by Reading City Trunked System for fire, police, road, and water departments. 866.0125 866.3000 866.5125 866.6125 866.9125 867.2250 868.3250 868.5875 And if you are interest in Aircraft Freq. for the Reading/Lancaster area I've got them too. (I'm a pilot, so I know these work first hand!) 119.900 Reading Tower 125.150 Reading Approach 127.100 Reading ATIS (recorded weather/airport info update hourly) 120.900 Lancaster Tower 125.675 Lancaster ATIS (recorded weather/airport info update hourly) 123.050 Smoketown Airport UNICOM (6miles south east of Lancaster Airport) And if you need more leave me know. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!ghansen.accessone.com!ghansen From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How much is R7000 worth? Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 19:16:17 GMT Organization: .tacoma.link Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <4e626p$fc5@post.gsfc.nasa.gov> <310C4CF7.5A19@connect.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghansen.accessone.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article tvine@teleport.co m (PjB) writes: >(Glenn Hansen) wrote: >__So would I if you would sell it to me for that. To get the one I own you >__would have to send me at least $1000. >Wow. Thats pretty close to your annual income. Maybe you should budget >that bottle-return money a little more carefully, son....... Isn't this Mr. Net who was upset over Bill Cheek's behavior? Isn't this the guy who wanted us to write our ISP because of Bill? Isn't this the guy that said 3 weeks ago he wasn't going to post anymore? PjB, why are you flaming me when I reply to another user that has nothing to do with your common law partner Andy? Isn't that against the principles you have spent so much time preaching about? Can you say hypocrite?? BTW, funny you would post here, you didn't have the gonads to post about moving into your new apartment and being afraid to hook your scanner up to a TV antenna. OTOH, you did say you were a clueless newbie and knew nothing about scanners when you made your post on the Ham Radio newsgroup. Says it all . grh BYW, I retired four years ago at the age of 40. Keep talking bozo. ROFLMAO!!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: gilx@xmission.com (John GIlchrist) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 03:05:34 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4f94sq$g8i@news.xmission.com> References: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <227cc$f3a3a.d2@news.express.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: slc19.xmission.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Business Resource Group wrote: >elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) wrote: >>Looking for modifications and secret tricks for unlocking secrets of >>Uniden >>sportcat sc150. Please Email or post a message. Thanks >About the only "cool trick" I have performed with a Sportcat 150 was to >return the damn thing to the place that sold it to me. Glad to be rid of >it! Am I missing something here? I've had my Sportcat 150 since Christmas and love it. Why did you return yours? >DOUG John Gilchrist gilx@xmission.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!news.mindlink.net!van-bc!news.cyberstore.ca!news From: gjacek@Cyberstore.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 7 Feb 1996 02:52:57 GMT Organization: Cyberstore Systems, Inc. Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4f9469$993@sulla.cyberstore.ca> Reply-To: gjacek@Cyberstore.ca NNTP-Posting-Host: yvr-ppp-47.cyberstore.ca X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2 Hi Some villains broke into my locker and got my Pro43 and my January issue of MT! It looks like the possible replacements are the Pro60 and the Pro26. Anyone out there who owns one of these and would care to comment on their likes/dislikes. Which would you buy? Yeah...I know you can't get cellular reception on these models. ..Gary gjacek@freenet.vancouver.bc.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!edisto.awod.com!harbour.awod.com!usenet From: Glenn Little WB4UIV Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CTCSS decoder? Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 01:03:06 -0800 Organization: Amateur Radio Station WB4UIV Lines: 23 Message-ID: <311B0DCA.4ED9@awod.com> References: <1996Feb6.172912.19265@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA> NNTP-Posting-Host: chs0066.awod.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) To: ALLEN DAVID WIDISH ALLEN DAVID WIDISH wrote: > > I posted a message asking what a CTCSS decoder was and how much > they cost a couple of weeks ago. Unfortunately, I didn't get back to > the internet since. Perhaps my question has already been answered, but > I'll ask again anyway. I was also wondering if anyone might know the > repeater channel that the Niagara Regional Police (Ontario, Canada) use. > I think it's 138.something. My scanner doesn't have a search feature. > Any info would be appreciated. Thanks. CTCSS means Continous Tone Coded Subaudibale Squelch (I think). These decoders are available from Communications Specialists as programmable of fixed freq units. Their address is in most communications magazines. 138.xxx is a military freq in the US, I suspect that you have the freq wrong. Radio Shack sells Police Call and Beyond Police Call in their stores. One of these shouls list the freqs you need. 73 Glenn WB4UIV From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!xyzzy.bubble.org!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: gregemm@aol.com (GregEmm) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Long Island- Patchogue Date: 5 Feb 1996 20:22:55 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 1 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f6ahf$q1k@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4e5v5k$br7@i-2000.com> Reply-To: gregemm@aol.com (GregEmm) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com I believe they use 158.955 and 155.145,but I am not positive From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!xyzzy.bubble.org!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: gregemm@aol.com (GregEmm) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FD Pager wanted Date: 5 Feb 1996 20:21:01 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 3 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f6adt$q08@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: gregemm@aol.com (GregEmm) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Where can I buy a pager that recieves the fire department dispatch (46.46), and how much are they(average). Can you get them that also recieve 46.40? Please e-mail to Smokescreen@asb.com. Thanks in advance. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!ncar!noao!math.arizona.edu!news.Arizona.EDU!bigdog.engr.arizona.edu!hanson From: hanson@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (Jon M. Hanson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: 1 Feb 1996 20:44:04 GMT Organization: The University of Arizona Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4er8mk$n9o@news.ccit.arizona.edu> References: <4e5sr8$dim@news.ccit.arizona.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bigdog.engr.arizona.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Jon M. Hanson (hanson@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu) wrote: : I'd like to know how many AR8000 owners have experienced this : "wandering birdie" problem that I just saw a post about. I just ordered : an AR8000 a few days ago and am kind of concerned about this. I have received my AR8000 and have not noticed any wandering birdies. It must be an intermittent problem and not widespread. The company I bought it from said they have had no complaints from customers concerning this. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.binc.net!news From: hansons@mailbag.com (Jason Hanson) Newsgroups: alt.culture.ny-upstate,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.usa,alt.rhode_island,misc.transport.road,rec.autos.driving,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Help with trip to NE US/SE Canada Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:39:03 GMT Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Lines: 48 Message-ID: <4f6fd5$nei@grandcanyon.binc.net> Reply-To: hansons@mailbag.com NNTP-Posting-Host: msn_2_4.binc.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net alt.culture.ny-upstate:17600 soc.culture.canada:106959 soc.culture.usa:107106 alt.rhode_island:14019 misc.transport.road:970 rec.autos.driving:108240 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97796 rec.travel.usa-canada:37193 alt.radio.scanner:27270 rec.radio.scanner:45120 My fiancee and I will be married May 4, after which we will embark on our honeymoon. Below is our intended route - what we are looking for are hotel suggestions, dining suggestions, places to visit, must-see activities, road information, alternate routes, availabilities of services, known speedtraps, 2m repeaters, police scanner frequencies, and any other things you'd like to throw in, including flames for the wide cross-posting of this message. I-94 Madison, WI to Chicago, IL I-94 Chicago, IL to Detroit, MI/Windsor, ON ON401 Windsor, ON to Toronto, ON ON401 Toronto, ON to PQ/ON line TC20 PQ/ON line to Montreal, PQ TC20 Montreal, PQ to Quebec, PQ TC20 Quebec, PQ to Riviere-du-Loup, PQ TC185 R-d-L, PQ to PQ/NB line TC2 PQ/NB line to NB/ME line -- US1 NB/ME line to Brunswick, ME -or- I-95 NB/ME line to Bangor, ME and US1 Bangor, ME to Brunswick, ME -- I-95 Brunswick, ME to Boston, MA I-95 Boston, MA to New Haven, CT I-95 New Haven, CT to NYC, NY NY17 rural NYC, NY to I-390 (Is this road 55 or 65?) I-390 from NY17 to US20-Alt US20-Alt from I-390 to Buffalo, NY I-190 Buffalo, NY to Niagara Falls, NY/ON QEW Niagara Falls, ON to ON401 ON401 from QEW to London, ON ON402 London, ON to ON/MI line I-69 ON/MI line to I-94 I-94 back to Madison Any suggestions, comments, etc. will be appreciated - we have 9-10 days to do this and we are rather fast people - driving and sightseeing. Also, please reply via email since there is such a wide variety of newsgroups that would be included in a posted followup... Thank you very much to any or all with suggestions! -- Jason Hanson hansons@mailbag.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: haxx57@ix.netcom.com(Pooch) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: Cellular, Cordless, Private Freq's Date: 8 Feb 1996 21:24:47 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4fdpmv$as3@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-spr-ma1-10.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Feb 08 1:24:47 PM PST 1996 I am looking for lists of Cellualr phone, corldless phone, and private frequencies. Please reply via e-mail asap to: haxx57@ix.netcom.com -- --=/> Pooch <\=-- e-mail: haxx57@ix.netcom.com ƒØ||-|à Official Newsletter To get on the mailing list for the newsletter, e-mail the above address. -"If there's a will, there's a way, there is always a way" -Susan T hunder From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.interport.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: Henry Valera Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need suggestion / 200xlt problem... Date: 7 Feb 1996 19:43:22 GMT Organization: InternetMCI Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4favcq$72g@news.internetmci.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rdgw.racal.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) I recently sent my 200xlt to Radio Shack for repair and they returned it as "unrepairable". They said the Main Logic Board was shot and that Uniden does not stock that part. A few people have said that diagnosis did not sound right an d to call Uniden myself. Well, I've tried calling the six different 1-800 numbers they have and they're always busy. So I'm back to where I started. Any suggestion s would be greatly appreciated as far as where to send it for repair. BTW, the symptons of the radio are no audio, no light, never locks on a freq. Thanks in advance, Henry. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.crd.ge.com!tmpnews.crd.ge.com!rebecca!rpi!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!not-for-mail From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTD: AR-3000 Date: 5 Feb 1996 06:30:52 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 26 Message-ID: <4f486s$65i@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] I would be willing to trade too absolutely cool radios for one absolutely cool radio. I have A PRO-2006, everyone's favorite scanner. I also have a Sony SW-100s cute little shortwave radio. The SW recieves with SSB, or Synchronous detection, which I have concluded to be an absolute necessity for listening to SW brodcasts. The 2006 has been 'relieved' of an annoying blockage in the 800mhz band. otherwise, it has not been altered. They are both in mint shape, with boxes, manuals, antennas, and other neat stuff that comes with them. Oh yeah, The Pro 2006 is the one with the deeeeeeelightful indiglow backlight. (spelled indiglow wrong to avoud prosecution by timex) (spelled avoid wrong because i was not thinking.) I am looking for an AOR-3000a with full coverage, because I need a radio with SSB... I would like for it to be in good shape. I would also trade the 2006 directly for an AR-2500. Any questions can be mailed to me @ herb@csd.uwm.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!not-for-mail From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wtd: UNblockED R-1 Date: 7 Feb 1996 06:51:12 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f9i50$943@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] I'd like to swap my Pro-2006 for your ICOM r-1 With the BC-72 battery charger, and preferrably the BP-83/84. MUST BE IN MINT condition. I know that someone will tack something about how shitty the R-1 is, but I had one, and I loved it! so there! Nate, KB9LSX From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!delta.misha.net!news.ucdavis.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!not-for-mail From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Yupi 7100 backlight mod?? Date: 7 Feb 1996 03:43:53 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4f975p$6gg@uwm.edu> References: <4eo5cr$p00@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] Brian Kraft (bhkraft@iti2.net) wrote: : herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) wrote: : : >Anyone know of a mod to keep my Yupiteru MVT-7100's backlight on all the ti me? : : That would drain the batteries very quickly! : : Brian Kraft : Grand Junction, Colorado : Not if plugged into a DC supply! I found the mod, bythewaY, It is called buying a MVT-7200. Nate. http://www.uwm.edu/~herb From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!news.gate.net!not-for-mail From: hrick@gate.net (Rick Harrison) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Pro-46 Date: 7 Feb 1996 18:07:20 -0500 Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fbbb8$2g24@seminole.gate.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: seminole.gate.net For sale, Pro-46 handheld scanner in excellent condition, with belt clip and center-loaded telescoping antenna. $90 includes postage. -- Rick Harrison (hrick@gate.net) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Jeff Goldman <75162.2371@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 to AR8000 DX mod Date: 3 Feb 1996 16:40:59 GMT Organization: CompuServe HamNet Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4f036r$4j8$3@mhade.production.compuserve.com> The DX version has a passive narrow AM filter fitted, and it's enabled via the LOCAL button. So, you can't use a descrambler. And you get tons of loss. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: jfaul1@ix.netcom.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Chicago Frequencies For Cold Snap Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 22:01:29 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4f0i6a$21f@reader2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-chi4-16.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 03 12:56:43 PM PST 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Anyone have good City of Chicago frequencies for the cold snap? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:42 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.voicenet.com!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.duc.auburn.edu!mallard.duc.auburn.edu!whitbje From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: Re: Pro-51, BC220XLT Info In-Reply-To: <065_9601311031@castle.shore.net> X-Sender: whitbje@mallard.duc.auburn.edu Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: Sender: usenet@mail.auburn.edu (Usenet Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: mallard2.duc.auburn.edu Organization: Auburn University References: <065_9601311031@castle.shore.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:35:28 GMT Lines: 23 On 30 Jan 1996, Norman Beaulac wrote: > Well Jim, I've had my BC220XLT since last August, and I must say that I am > extremely happy with it.... It's a very well made scanner and extremely > tough to boot... Not a single problem with it as of yet, and I don't expect > any at all.... I have a much older Bearcat 210 that runs execellent to this > day...And that scanner was made in 1983.... So there you have it.... Of I'll score this as a vote for the 220XLT . > what I've read about RS, I would be terrified to buy one... But that's my > opinion... Good luck in your quest.... I've had three votes in favor of the Pro-51, and two in favor of the 220XLT so far. Thanks for the input. Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:43 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.voicenet.com!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.duc.auburn.edu!mallard.duc.auburn.edu!whitbje From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: Re: Wanted help 200xlt In-Reply-To: <310FE8B5.560E@algonet.se> X-Sender: whitbje@mallard.duc.auburn.edu Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: Sender: usenet@mail.auburn.edu (Usenet Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: mallard2.duc.auburn.edu Organization: Auburn University References: <310FE8B5.560E@algonet.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:38:53 GMT Lines: 23 On Wed, 31 Jan 1996, Sune Cullberg wrote: > Can someone tell me how to program a Uniden/Bearcat 200xlt to scan a > frequency range? Bought a used scanner without manual..I know it stupid. > A source to find a manual would be nice too. My Dad has a 200xlt, and he's 140 miles away, but I'm pretty sure this will work: 1. Hit "manual" to stop the scan. 2. Type in one limit for the search and hit "Limit" 3. Type in the other limit and hit "Limit" 4. Hit search. You can stop the search at any time by hitting "hold." Then, I believe that you can step up one freq. with "hold" and down one step with "limit." If you have any more questions, let me know and I'll try to help. Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:44 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!usenet.hana.nm.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.duc.auburn.edu!mallard.duc.auburn.edu!whitbje From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: Re: Pro-51, BC220XLT Information In-Reply-To: <199602020359.AA04564@mail.tyrell.net> X-Sender: whitbje@mallard.duc.auburn.edu Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: To: Mark Springer Sender: usenet@mail.auburn.edu (Usenet Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: mallard2.duc.auburn.edu Organization: Auburn University Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 01:35:22 GMT Lines: 17 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27340 rec.radio.scanner:45254 On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Mark Springer wrote: > I just recently bought the Pro 51. I am very pleased with it. I would note > that I am mostly interested in scanning RR frequencies (160-162) and it does a > great job in that area and it does relatively well in downtown where a lot o f > scanners and ham radio's have trouble due to the large amount of radio > traffic. The 50 channel per second scan is also pretty neat. All in all I > like it a lot and would recommend it highly. I am using the rubber ducky Thanks for the "yes" vote. Yours is about the 5th or 6th positive review, so I think I'm convinced. Now to convince Dad . Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!dimensional.com!news.wizard.com!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!usenet From: jimbob@acpub.duke.edu (James P. Meyer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RADAR Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:33:38 GMT Organization: Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3119430d.2425597@news.duke.edu> References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> <4f9tfv$sdm@news.fullerton.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: async103.async.duke.edu X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu wrote: >BTW - does anybody know the wavelength at which IR LED's generally >operate, and the wavelength of the laser in CD Players. IR LED's have a number of different wavelengths. Many are centered around 820 nanoMeters because the diodes for that wavelength are cheap and efficient. Laser diodes are often built to operate there too. The real answer is 700 to 1100 nM. >Also a narrower band than 700nm - >1100nm for police laser guns would be appreciated. See above. Laser speed guns could use any of a number of different wavelengths in that range. You'd have to know which brand and model to know the exact wavelength. Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!condor.acc.iit.edu!uchinews!ncar!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!shore!news From: jjmartin@shore.net (JJ Martin) Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk Subject: Re: R7100 Modification Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 06:44:47 GMT Organization: WK1V Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fbrjo$qs0@shore.shore.net> References: <4ejqb8$6e5@news.ios.com> <4ek51g$chl@grouper.Exis.Net> Reply-To: jjmartin@shore.net NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-7-20.shore.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net uk.radio.amateur:10724 rec.radio.shortwave:69891 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:18975 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24771 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97908 rec.radio.scanner:45283 alt.radio.scanner:27357 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2129 >In article <4ejqb8$6e5@news.ios.com>, . says... >>Ever since ICOM decided to delete the 800 - 900 MHZ coverage from its IC-R71 00 >>receiver, Just fer the record...ICOM didn't just decide to delete the 800-900 MHz coverage from any of their radios. It was our folks in Washington D.C. who made it illegal to listen to the cellular telephone frequencies when they modified the Communications Act of 1934. I believe the cutoff date for the manufacture of equipment openly capable of receiving cellular freqs is April of 1994. Just some gee whiz info. :) Cheeers! jjm From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!condor.acc.iit.edu!uchinews!ncar!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!shore!news From: jjmartin@shore.net (JJ Martin) Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk Subject: Re: R7100 Modification Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 06:44:49 GMT Organization: WK1V Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fbrjp$qs0@shore.shore.net> References: <4ejqb8$6e5@news.ios.com> <4ek51g$chl@grouper.Exis.Net> <4elqh2$p71@pegasus.starlink.com> Reply-To: jjmartin@shore.net NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-7-20.shore.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net uk.radio.amateur:10725 rec.radio.shortwave:69892 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:18976 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24772 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97909 rec.radio.scanner:45284 alt.radio.scanner:27358 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2130 Bill Funk wrote: >Hmmm... If you can buy a new R9000 (since you are in a business that will >allow you to do so), then you can get an un-restricted R-7100. The manufacturers will not deliver an unrestricted radio within the confines of the U.S. unless they are delivering it to a government agency. >Me, I'm lucky. I have an older R-7100, full coverage! (No, it's *not* for >sale!!) :-) This law sucks!! jjm From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!sundog.tiac.net!jmatk.tiac.net!user From: jmatk@tscm.com (James M. Atkinson, Communications Engineer) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Intelligence on AID/Westinghouse bugs Followup-To: alt.security,alt.security.tscm Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:05:22 -0500 Organization: tscm.com Lines: 56 Message-ID: Reply-To: jmatk@tscm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: jmatk.tiac.net Keywords: AID Bugs Surveillance TSCM Wiretap Spy Espionage X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.1.3 Xref: news.epix.net alt.conspiracy:77310 rec.radio.scanner:45230 rec.radio.shortwave:69851 alt.radio.scanner:27331 All TSCM people have heard about AID devices, but few know the actual freq they use, or what they look like. The devices are VERY popular with the law enforcement crowd, private investigators and corporate security types. The equipment is VERY overpriced, and the fairly easy to detect. AID bills itself as "The World's Largest Manufacturer of Electronic Intelligence Equipment and Specialized Protective Systems" AID was founded in 1970, and was sold in 92/93 to Westinghouse (Westinghouse i s currently selling TONS of equipment to the DEA and State dept) _____________________________________________________________________________ AID - Westinghouse/Audio Intelligence Devices, Inc. Bug Freqs 150 mhz - 174 mhz Standard/Primary Band (Most Popular) 135 mhz - 150 mhz Special Order/Secondary Band 216 mhz - 220 mhz Special Order 400 mhz - 470 mhz UHF Repeaters 36 mhz - 39 mhz Very Low Power WFM (.5mw - 50mw) ***Very Dangerous*** 80 khz - 200 khz "Line Carrier" Miscrophone Systems ***Very Dangerous*** 1700mhz - 1900mhz 25-250mw Video and audio bugs (Mostly DEA/DOJ stuff) 2450mhz - 2484mhz 25-250mw Video and audio bugs _____________________________________________________________________________ If the signal is "scrambled" it is nothing more than simple voice inversion, a circuit to "de-scramble" costs around $20. Note: AID devices are often re-tuned for outband channels... so be careful. The area of spectrum from 35mhz to 500mhz is the primary threat, 500mhz to 3gh z is the secondary threat, a "line carrier" threat is from 30khz to 750khz. If the person planting the bug suspects that a TSCM may be conducted then AID suggests a frequency between 30mhz to 50mhz, sensitivity of rcvr should be better than .18uv/-122dbm. Also, keep in mind that AID devices are frequently used for illegal buggings, so be familiar with what their realistic specs are, expect power outputs under 50mw, and expect to see the AC power circuits being used as the antennae. -jma =============================================================== James M. Atkinson "...Shaken, not Stirred..." TSCM.COM 127 Eastern Avenue #291 Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 URL: http://www.tscm.com/ E-Mail: jmatk@tscm.com =============================================================== The First, The Largest, The Most Popular, and the Most Complete TSCM Counterintelligence Site on the Internet =============================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:50 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!mothost!schbbs!news From: Joe Bakas Subject: Re: Need suggestion / 200xlt problem... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: MOTOROLA Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 17:51:56 GMT Message-ID: <1996Feb9.175156.25512@schbbs.mot.com> To: Henry_Valera@ftl03.racal.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; U; 16bit) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4favcq$72g@news.internetmci.com> Sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (SCHBBS News Account) Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.188.197.71 Lines: 5 I would suggest you use Uniden, They had trouble with their 800 number this week or try Electronic Repair Centers at 708-455-5105. They also advertise repair for Uniden units. joe From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!in-news.erinet.com!imci3!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!kiwi.crown.net!usenet From: Joeboo Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 23:40:55 -0600 Organization: Crown Net Inc. Lines: 17 Distribution: world Message-ID: <31198CE7.6C@crown.net> References: <4ertv5$1uq2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <227cc$12c1e.37b@news.nmaa.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: crown4.crown.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) > > > >I had a Radio Shack mag mount and it received pretty good. > > > >However... The thing was always blowing off on the freeway! Around > > > >town it was not a problem. I could do about 65 IF there was no wind, > > > >however in Southern CA, you can count on it! > >I had the same problem with the RS scanner antenna, but the problem with my antenna was that the coax was too large. I replaced the crap coax that it came with, but then I cou ldn't keep the thing from sliding off of my car @ 65+ MPH. The larger diameter coax wouldn't allow the magnet to seat properly, so the mount was always cockeyed. I never had any problem with it before I replaced the coax. I still have it and it stays on much better now that I have cut away a little bit of plastic. I would suggest seeing if the magnet sits flat against the roo f of your vehicle. OR: maybe you just got a "bum" magnet :) John Please post replies, complaints, etc. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!udel!news.udel.edu!usenet From: john <89421@udel.edu> Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.wanted Subject: For Sale:::: GP300 Motorola Radio Date: 9 Feb 1996 03:45:42 GMT Organization: University of Delaware Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4feg16$nun@news.udel.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: smyth97.smyth.udel.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: 89421@udel.edu Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27374 rec.radio.scanner:45314 *******For Sale********** (1) Motorola UHF GP300 HT Radio w/ 2 batteries and charger 420 - 480 MHz Must be in the Washington DC or in the Newark, Delaware Area. Asking for $500; will take best offer. Please reply via email at: 89421@udel.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!udel!news.udel.edu!usenet From: john <89421@udel.edu> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re:Cordless Phone Survey Date: 9 Feb 1996 03:29:58 GMT Organization: University of Delaware Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4fef3m$nun@news.udel.edu> References: <4emsl0$b4o_002@dyn189.usaor.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: smyth97.smyth.udel.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: ootman@usaor.net From a college dorm, I pick up people through my scanner within my dorm. I am sure it is the campus' own radio airwaves and the tight enclosure of the building I am in that I cannot pick up such great ranges. Though I am only using a rubber duck antenna vs. when I am at home/in my car using a magmount, I can pick up people from a much greater distance. john From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!zetnet.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!javiaton.demon.co.uk From: Jonathan Clough Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: Fri, 02 Feb 96 11:08:20 GMT Organization: Javiation, Bradford, U.K. Lines: 65 Message-ID: <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: javiaton.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.30 X-Mail2News-Path: javiaton.demon.co.uk In article fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu "Frederick Kelcz" writes: Morning Fred, < [snip] Does Javiathon have anyting to add > on your side of the ocean? Mmm...not sure if I'm half Company half man now :-) The loose BNC "problem" was a little more apparent on early versions - we had a few customers come back to us about it. AOR said they addressed the problem and in the last 12/18 months or so I cannot recall any direct customer complaints re loose BNC connectors. Its only in recent weeks and on threads here on r.r.s that this "problem" seems to have appeared - the chances of this "problem" is probably increased for those who change antennas on a regular basis. To tighten the lock nut is not too difficult but be careful and don't attempt brain suggery with a broken bottle - make sure you have the correct tools. Dissasemble the AR8000 by removing the two screws in the battery compartment and the two small black srews on the side (just the front half will do). Split the radio in half placing the front half to one side. Remove the three rubber kobs from the top and the three locking nuts around the On/Off, Squelch and Rotary Dial. These (the locking nuts) are probably the hardest things to remove as they are "down the hole". If you do not have a specific tool a pair of fine tipped long nose pliers should be OK. Remove the two screws at the bottom of the top circuit board. About on third of the way up on either side of the board close to the edge are two white connector blocks labled J4-1 & J4-2. You will see though the innermost "hole" the leg of the battery contacts slighlty bent over. This board will lift out but be careful the two battery contacts - to make life easier you could just straighten them slightly. The lower board and BNC connector should now be visible and allow access to the locking nut. By removing the three retaining screws on the bottom board you can also lift this board away together with the top plastic section and BNC socket from the bottom case which may also make life a little easier. Again a pair of small long nosed pliers should allow you to tighten the locking nut quite easily. If you consider adding some form of adhesive I would suggest using some specific Adhesive designed for use with threaded fasteners. Re-assmeble being careful to ensure the two battery contacts are located correctly in the two connector blocks. You may wish to bend the end over slightly just to stop them "falling" out when changing batteries. -- Cheers, /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jonathan Clough | With Best Wishes for a Prosperous | | Javiation, | & Peaceful New Year to all. | | Bradford, UK | VHF/UHF Scanners from all the leading Mfr's | | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | inc PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000| | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation | | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \---------------------------------------------| | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!javiaton.demon.co.uk From: Jonathan Clough Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 wandering birdie problem Date: Sat, 03 Feb 96 17:00:41 GMT Organization: Javiation, Bradford, U.K. Lines: 45 Message-ID: <823366841snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> References: <4eoqnj$47c$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> <823259300snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: javiaton.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.30 X-Mail2News-Path: javiaton.demon.co.uk In article fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu "Frederick Kelcz" writes: Hi Fred, > >Its only in recent weeks and on threads here on r.r.s that this > >"problem" seems to have appeared - the chances of this "problem" is probabl y > >increased for those who change antennas on a regular basis. What I meant to say here was its only on recent threads here on r.r.s that this problem seems to have come to light again. > Given the wide freq range of this receiver I would have expected AOR to make > a sturdier BNC - as one must change antennas to take full advantage of the > radio. I regularly change antennas on a Bearcat 200xlt and a Yaesu FT530 an d > after years, the BNC have shown no problem. Point taken at this end. I guess if I were to play the Devils Advocate for one moment I suspect the number of "complaints" against the number of AR8000 is miniscule...not the point I know - if its a problem its a problem. > In your opinion would there be room to fit a sturdier BNC with actual lock > washer into the space of the current BNC? I'll have to take a another look on Monday. I doubt there would be room for a second locking nut but I bet there is room for a "thinnish" locking washer between the nut and the underside of the BNC bracket. Have agood weekend. -- Cheers, /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jonathan Clough | With Best Wishes for a Prosperous | | Javiation, | & Peaceful New Year to all. | | Bradford, UK | VHF/UHF Scanners from all the leading Mfr's | | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | inc PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000| | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation | | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \---------------------------------------------| | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!news-adm From: JRM Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Arizona Frequencies Date: 9 Feb 1996 15:45:03 GMT Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4ffq5v$2n2g@news.gate.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: miafl3-9.gate.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27377 rec.radio.scanner:45322 KC7ANQ's Southwest Frequency Directory Homempage contains frequencies for most cities in Arizona. Be sure to check out ICP, the scanner pager that gives you DPS Pursuits, and working fires and Phoenix and Tucson. http://www.goodnet.com/~radio/swfd/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!agis!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 5 Feb 1996 13:39:05 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 1 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f5is9$h72@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> Reply-To: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Yes it's modifiable I got the mods From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:46:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!news2.acs.oakland.edu!news1.cris.com!news From: jwmann@concentric.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Antenna on the Pro-2006 Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 21:24:01 -0800 Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 4 Message-ID: <3116E5F1.2DF4@concentric.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: crc2-fddi.cris.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) CC: bcheek@cts.com When an external antenna and the stock antenna is installed on the Pro-2006 (o r any other scanner, is there any benefit. Joseph From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!usenet From: KARL DAHLQUIST Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: "Code Red" from LAPD; what is it? Date: 1 Feb 1996 21:53:59 GMT Organization: MCI/News Corp. Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4ercpn$530@merlin.delphi.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: slip135-107.bb.delphi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22D (Windows; U; 16bit) Actually, if you here it on the METRO frequencies, it means the same as when other agencies put "the marker" on (meaning, emergency radio traffic only.) If SWAT is responding to a situation, or effecting a "felony" traffic stop, the radio control operator says the frequency is "CODE RED" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Any way to power a base with battery for emergencies. Date: 7 Feb 1996 23:39:56 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 13 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fbuqs$557@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4ebldg$661@redstone.interpath.net> Reply-To: kb5wix@aol.com (KB5WIX) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com I have a Recoton Portable Power Station that I like quite a bit (I think they are now marketed by ANLI). They have a built-in voltage meter and a switchable output for 3-6-9 volts, as well as a dedicated "cigarette lighter" style 12 volt jack. I also have a portable battery built to power a Q-Beam spotlight which is nothing but 12 amps of pure power in a small pack with a carry strap. Either of these should keep your 12-volt scanner (cell phone, HT, etc.) going for many hours. I would tend to steer clear of the car batteries because of the potential associated dangers. Also, there is an article in the April, 1995 Monitoring Times magazine about scanning in emergency situations. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!news From: kboland@microserve.net (Karen Boland) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RADAR Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:05:29 GMT Organization: Microserve Information Systems (800)-380-INET Lines: 4 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.228.92.14 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Radar is a radio-type frequency, Right? Can it be picked up/detected by a scanner? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!news From: kboland@microserve.net (Karen Boland) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS Pro 62 problem Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 05:23:15 GMT Organization: Microserve Information Systems (800)-380-INET Lines: 14 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f9d3l$phl@crash.microserve.net> References: <4f8pqa$j68@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.228.92.9 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Scott Ryan wrote: >Yesterday I purchased a Pro 62 from the local RS. When trying it today I >found that broadcast frequencies (TV, NOAA weather & AM) bleed over other >frequencies. Weather frequency 164.475 MHz completely covers a local >Police frequency at 159.225 MHz. Turning the squelch down enough to >prevent bleed-over cuts reception of ALL frequencies. >Do I have a bad unit or is this a command problem with the Pro 62? Hmmmm...How close are you to the NOAA transmitter/tower? That could be your problem. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: pro-26 Date: 6 Feb 1996 19:13:50 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 3 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f8qru$ocj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f796c$7fi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com If you are looking for cell mods, Nope!! Get a BC3000xlt, I love mine!! Marshall KE4ZNR Proud Member: N. Carolina Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!news.supernet.net!news.cyberport.com!news.leonardo.net!nntp.adnetsol.com!nntp.adnetsol.com!not-for-mail From: kkoller@adnetsol.com (Ken Koller) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: Bay Area Freqs Date: 3 Feb 1996 21:54:01 -0800 Organization: Advanced Network Solutions Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4f1hlp$m1a@adnetsol.adnetsol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: adnetsol.adnetsol.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Hello all. I'll be going up to the Bay Area this upcoming weekend 2/10, and I need some freqs please Sunnyvale Fire/Police San Jose Fire Mountain View Fire/Police Pleasanton Fire/Police Livermore Fire San Francisco Fire Any thing else interesting would be appreciated. Thanks -- Ken Koller kkoller@adnetsol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!crl.dec.com!crl.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!depot.mro.dec.com!mrnews.mro.dec.com!fccvde.enet.dec.com!klimasewski From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ACARS, shareware available?? Date: 31 JAN 96 11:02:39 Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4eo43k$39v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fccvde.enet.dec.com Is there a shareware program available to receive ACARS tranmission? thanks, Ken From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news.pixi.com!news.hula.net!root From: krokus@hula.net (Rich Sheff) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 02:29:42 GMT Organization: Hula Net, Inc. Hawaii's Newest Internet Provider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4fbnkr$lnr@spartacus.hula.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: auwana06.hula.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) wrote: >In article <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com >says... >> >>[...] ALL companies should be doing drug screens! >What people put into their own bodies is their own business, and >no one elses', least of all yours'. It is their business, if/when it affects your on the job performance. Not to mention they don't want to have to go through the expense of hiring your replacement, if you happen to get arrested in the process of feeding your habit. >[Vote with your dollars, folks. Don't buy these statists' antennas.] It's your option, exercise it at your will. 73, Rich KD6HWF From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news.pixi.com!news.hula.net!root From: krokus@hula.net (Rich Sheff) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Questions... Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 02:37:07 GMT Organization: Hula Net, Inc. Hawaii's Newest Internet Provider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <4fbo2o$lnr@spartacus.hula.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: auwana06.hula.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 richardk@is.net (Richard Kleim) wrote: >I use a RS Pro-51 to scan. I'd like to use it in the car around town, but I >get a lot of static (not ignition noise) when using in the car. There are >two RS antennas I've seen for cars/scanners - the Mag mount and the glass >surface mount scanner antennas. Would either of these help me (mostly 800 >Mz, some Aviation/150/400 usage)? I don't know a lot about antenna design >- it appears that the mag mount might be a Marconi antenna since it >requires keeping intact the foil base. (?) The glass mount would mount >higher, but the mag is longer. Is either of these better? I figure the >mag mount looks like it might be better, I don't know why - after all I'm >most interested in 800 and I suppose the length wouldn't be a factor. I do >scan 2 meter bands also, tho. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. I have the RS mag-mount scanner antenna. I use it quite well on my Cherokee, and haven't had any problems with it coming off, even at speeds in excess of 75 MPH. Now hitting low ceilings in drive-thrus, parking garages, and the like is another story... :) However, I did replace the connector on the end with a twist-on BNC to fit my Pro-39. The RS Motorola-to-BNC adaptor doesn't seem to fit much of anything worth a damn. (I'm going to replace the connector with a solder-on BNC 'one of these days...') 73, Rich KD6HWF From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.brandonu.ca!usenet From: LASKOWSKI <$LASKOMW@BrandonU.CA> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: cullular frequencies Date: 6 Feb 1996 02:12:00 GMT Organization: Brandon University Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4f6ddg$c4o@goofy.BrandonU.CA> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc00011.fixed.brandonu.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) Can anyone give me a list of the frequencies for cellular phones? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!depot.mro.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!star.enet.dec.com!lederman From: lederman@star.enet.dec.com (Bart Z. Lederman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.collecting,rec.antiques.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio&phonos Subject: Re: FREE: Zenith TransOceanic List of Model Nos, etc. Date: 5 Feb 1996 18:29:22 GMT Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 12 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f5ia2$lfh@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> References: <31119465.5AF2@interport.net> Reply-To: lederman@star.enet.dec.com (Bart Z. Lederman) NNTP-Posting-Host: star.enet.dec.com X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-26 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:56929 rec.radio.scanner:45111 rec.radio.shortwave:69767 rec.collecting:66533 rec.antiques.marketplace:12895 Subject: Re: FREE: Zenith TransOceanic List of Model Nos, etc. Why don't you just post it here, so we can all see it and comment on it. P.S.: If the purpose of your post is to troll for addresses to e-mail to, this posting does NOT give you permission to send me e-mail or advertising of any kind by any medium. -- B. Z. Lederman Personal Opinions Only From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:14 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!lui From: lui@netcom.com (Stephen Lui) Subject: Freqs. for Indianapolis, IN Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:24:48 GMT Lines: 5 Sender: lui@netcom18.netcom.com I'm taking a business trip to Indianapolis (actually Columbus, a small suburb south) and wanted some interesting freqencies to listen to while I was there. Does anyone have any suggestions? Stephen From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.aa.net!usenet From: lutz@aa.net (TL.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Seattle freq.'s at http://www.aa.net/~lutz Date: 8 Feb 1996 05:54:46 GMT Organization: Alternate Access Inc Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4fc376$p5j@Holly.aa.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: s3c3p3.aa.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.4 Enjoy From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 2035 Owners / Euro-board is great Date: 3 Feb 1996 22:02:17 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 15 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f17jp$4tt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f06b4$q5g@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article <4f06b4$q5g@news2.cts.com>, bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) writes: >Does it have 30 kHz Search Steps? > >Bill > > No, you have to use 5khz steps. You end up searching more than you need, but it locks right on the true signal. Not before it or after it. mark s. conway From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!usenet From: MartinBleiwas Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need suggestion / 200xlt problem... Date: 8 Feb 1996 22:58:18 GMT Organization: Internet Online Services Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fdv6a$gmm@news.ios.com> References: <4favcq$72g@news.internetmci.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-40.ts-3.nyc.idt.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: Henry_Valera@ft103.racal.com Henry I had the same problem. I brought the unit to a local scanner repair shop and he fixed it. The problem was two burn't Caps. 1 blown 5volt voltage regulator. I have the unit three weeks now and it still works. Good Luck, Marty P.S. You can call the tech named Walter at 718 591-9700 and ask him about you unit. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeeder.gi.net!news.mid.net!news.creighton.edu!bluejay.creighton.edu!matthewb From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: radar detectors Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 16:25:17 -0600 Organization: Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska USA Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4f8098$nls@romeo.logica.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: bluejay.creighton.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <4f8098$nls@romeo.logica.co.uk> Check out Car & Driver's Web site. They normally do a review every year & I think the last one was about 10 months ago (or so). It should come up on a search. (I think.) http://www.caranddriver.com (your browser may have to be Netscape or AOL -- I know Mosaic 2.0 won't work on that site for me.) GO VALENTINE!! --> Matt Brummer matthewb@creighton.edu On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, John Lee wrote: > I'm interested in information eg reviews of radar detectors (for automobiles ). Can anyone tel me where I can find any? > > ------------------------ > John Lee, tel 0171 637 9111 X4357 WCT/1, Logica UK Ltd, Space Division > e-mail leej@logica.com | "Let Hercules himself do what he may, > --opinions are mine-- | The cat will mew and dog will have his day" > > From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!bcm.tmc.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!news.starnet.net!wupost!news.dra.com!news.mid.net!news.creighton.edu!bluejay.creighton.edu!matthewb From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RADAR Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:44:09 -0600 Organization: Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska USA Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> <4f9gvf$qvj@nntp.crl.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bluejay.creighton.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <4f9gvf$qvj@nntp.crl.com> 10.525 GHz (X-band) 24.150 GHz (K-band) 33.4 GHz - 36.0 GHz (Ka-band) According to the Valentine One owner's manual Note for those mathematically impaired: 1 Gigahertz = 1,000 Megahertz --> Matt Brummer matthewb@creighton.edu On 7 Feb 1996, Dave Booth wrote: > the band the Radar signals are transmitted on are i think > about 2-5 gig.. > not sure on the band width. > but yes if u had a scanner that could recieve up that high > you probably wiuld hear something.... > > > From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!ftn.net!news From: mcarthy@ftn.net (Shane McCarthy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Canadian & U.S. Coast Guard (Freq?) Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 14:44:32 GMT Organization: ftn Internet Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f557r$4gv@master.ftn.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pwin1-24.ftn.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Can someone please Email me the freq. the Canadian & US Coast Gaurd use. I live in the Windsor, Ont/Detroit, Mi. area if that makes a difference. -- Shane R. McCarthy Windsor, Ont mcarthy@ftn.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DIGITAL CORDLESS PHONES How Secure? Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 20:56:25 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <4f2q3l$t34@happy.firstnethou.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article , asi@escape.ca wrote: > > (stgduck@firstnethou.com) writes: > >> Please help with some basic questions about secure cordless phones. > >> The salespeople I have talked to contradict each other, so I turn to > >> you experts! I want a phone that cannot be monitored by the casual > >> scanner user. > >> > >> If the phone is labelled "digital", will only white noise be heard? > >> Are all 900 MHz phones digital and secure? > >> What do I look for, or can you recommend brands for a secure cordless > >> phone? > > >Look for "digital", "spread spectrum" and also encrypted. > > > Try Tropez 900, I own one and love it. > > I do not believe there is a encrypted model out there. The Tropez encrypts (i.e. scrambles) the signal, doesn't it? Not all 900 Mhz phones are secure--some use speech inversion, I believe, which means they can be understood using scanners such as the AOR8000 with a speech inversion chip installed. Those that use spread spectrum can also be intercepted, although not easily. In any case, unless you're a target of the NSA, I wouldn't worry about it---get a Tropez or one of the secure (spread spectrum) Panasonics and you won't be overheard readily. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 2035 Owners / Euro-board is great Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 20:52:25 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 68 Message-ID: References: <4f06b4$q5g@news2.cts.com> <4f17jp$4tt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article <4f17jp$4tt@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) wrote: > In article <4f06b4$q5g@news2.cts.com>, bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) writes: > > >Does it have 30 kHz Search Steps? > > > >Bill > > > > > > No, you have to use 5khz steps. > > You end up searching more than you need, but it locks right on > > the true signal. Not before it or after it. > > mark s. conway Just bought a PRO2042 from Ft. Worth Radio Shack and an Optoelectronics OS535 from Durham Radio in Canada. Ft. Worth is asking $425 for the scanner, which is not bad, but then they'll stiff you $20 for one-week UPS shipping and "handling". Check around, you might do better. Durham is asking $319 for the OS535, which is capable of receiving freqs in the 800 MHz range without need of any "unlock code" unlike the US version. I figured the extra $19 was worth it... I paid about $10 for shipping by the Candian donkey cart postal system (it took two weeks). I was told that if it went UPS, I would probably have to pay customs. Well, I still had to pay customs, to the tune of $13. All in all, not good deal--not a great deal. Installing the OS535 was pretty straightforward. It took about 1.5 hours. The biggest difficulty was having to cut out a piece of the metal case with a nibbling tool. It's a lot of work! First, you have to go to a Rat Shack. If you get into the store before you are attacked by a salesdroid, you can run to the area where they stock the tools and grab what you need and get out in under three minutes. In my case, I got stuck having to ask the manager droid where they keep the nibbling tools and then having to hear him tell me, "Uh oh, I don't think we have any of those." Then, after I show him four tools, hanging from a peg, having to hear him explain to me something about how "...some products that don't sell well get taken off the shelves..and we don't know about it.." After refusing to give my name, rank and serial number, I manage to get out of the store in six minutes. Back to do the install, I read through Opto's photocopied instuction "manual." The installation could have been done a bit faster (well, less stressful, in my case) if Opto had any clue about how to write a user manual. Having had to suffer through an earlier installation "manual" for the Opto 456, I was already wary. But if you have not had any experience with any of their products, read the "instructions" carefully and double check everything before you commit to doing anything. Bottom line? Paid $808 for a computer controlled scanner, plus some labor. Now, I gotta buy some new software to go with it! Gee, is this a fun hobby or what? I'll post a follow up in a few weeks--once I get the software and put the rig to test. By the way, I'm a day or two from wrapping up a FAQ on computer-controlled scanning. It will be posted on a web page before the weekend (I'll post the URL, once I get the go-ahead) for everyone to read and to make suggestions for improvements and to correct, no doubt, my errors. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-2042 vs 2035 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 06:38:25 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4f3m4n$3lt@what.why.net> <4f4v57$6bb@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article <4f4v57$6bb@nw002.infi.net>, Scott wrote: > Tad, > > I too wondered the same when shopping for scanners. It seems to me that > the 2042 offers only convenience features over the 2035 (auto lock-out of > blank freq., enhanched search functions, etc.) I decided to save the $$$ > and get the 2035. I plan to add a computer control in the future so the > extra features were less important then price! The current issue of MT has a brief article in which the writer compares the two scanners side by side. You're essentially correct in your observations about convenience features and enhanced search functions. I recently purchased a 2042 for $440 with shipping, from Ft Worth. The scanner was $420--they stiff you with an inflated shipping and handling charge. The 2035 is being sold in several places for about $375-$380 (it may be selling for less than that by some mail order places, but I didn't check terribly hard because I knew that I wanted the 2042 regardless). For me, I felt the price difference was worth it, if no other reason that in the long run, the 2042 would hold it's resale value better. I installed the Optoscan 535 and am just now putting the scanner through its paces. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.uoregon.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!fly.compudata.com!news From: Mike Mollet Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.ham-radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: Motorola For Sale Date: 7 Feb 1996 01:01:28 GMT Organization: Compudata.com Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f8tl8$863@fly.compudata.com> References: <4f11tv$ao4@news1.sunbelt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pnode10.compudata.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) To: CRobbins@SunBelt.Net X-URL: news:4f11tv$ao4@news1.sunbelt.net Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27310 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2115 rec.radio.scanner:45179 rec.radio.shortwave:69819 rec.radio.swap:57043 Hi there... I was wondering if you had any motorola Ht's on the 500 mhz band... my explorer group has recieved authorization from the Police dept to use their frequencies, and we could really use a few for field events... We will need one multi channel radio, and the rest can be dual, or single channel.... Thanks... Please send your prices to... MMollet@compudata.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.spss.com!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!caen!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!canyon.sr.hp.com!mikew Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: doppler DF question Message-ID: <4ert7j$4d@canyon.sr.hp.com> From: mikew@sr.hp.com (Mike Weihman) Date: 2 Feb 1996 02:34:27 GMT References: <4ecpsl$hof@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Organization: Hewlett Packard Sonoma County NNTP-Posting-Host: pyro.sr.hp.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 25 BOEING377 (boeing377@aol.com) wrote: : If you take the standard 4 verticals antenna array and tip the axis 90 : degrees so that the scan is in elevation rather than azimuth what info are : you really getting? Are you really determining the vertical angle of the : incoming wavefront? Could you jump to some conclusions about the height of : the reflecting layer if you knew the location of a distant low band skip : station? Sure. It will tell the angle of incidence in the vertical plane. However, your antennas are now polarized 90 degrees differently; this may make the signal weaker. Ground reflection and scatter could confuse the reading also. -mike _______________________________________________________________________ Mike Weihman mikew@sr.hp.com N1DJE Hewlett-Packard Co. | ARES/RACES EC, Rohnert Park/Cotati, CA Microwave Instruments Division | 1212 Valley House Drive | Firefighter/EMT-D Rohnert Park, CA 94928 USA | Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District (707) 794-4454 | Penngrove, California PGP key available: send email with "PGP key" as the subject. _______________________________________________________________________ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:25 1996 From: MITCH_CURLY@msn.com (Mitchell Bogh) Subject: RE: Pro-2020 Any Good? Date: 8 Feb 96 07:47:05 -0800 References: <4emaj0$pt2@rcp6.elan.af.mil> Message-ID: <00001ff6+0000452a@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 7 The pro2020 Its a no thrills scanner. No 800mhz recieve. General coverage. Some modifications are available. for example you could add a number channels. you can also change the 406-512 band to 380-480. other than that you should not have to pay much more than 40 bucks. Mitch From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:26 1996 From: MITCH_CURLY@msn.com (Mitchell Bogh) Subject: RE: Why 75 ohm cable? (was: RS discone problems...CELLULAR) Date: 8 Feb 96 07:42:09 -0800 References: <4eii1d$ecj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4eiu2p$kpa@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004529@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 22 if you should do a little math you will find that the slight mismatch between the 50 ohm scanner and the 75 ohm cable will more than offset the loss you have with rg58 cable. In many instances if the cable run is over 30ft or so you will end up receiving better using 75 ohm coax. The ultimate would be to use lossless coax. That big bucks to you and me even if you were to use beleden rg9913 at about 1.50$ per foot you would almost do better with rg6 75 ohm coax. If this were a transmitter you are correct. The mismatch would be terrible. Hope this clears up thing a little. Another idea with the poor receive might be front end overload. You could verify this by using the rubber duck antenna. If your receive improves over the outside antenna you might have too much signal entering the scanner. As another test you could also try the outside antenna with a 3 to 10 foot piece of 52 ohm coax. If you notice more signals you might want to reposition your antenna closer to your scanner. good luck Mitch From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: MKWS78A@prodigy.com (William Rahl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Alkalines for BC200XLT ?Where Date: 7 Feb 1996 08:47:55 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 7 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f9ovr$2lt4@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap1.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 Does any one know where I can get battery case that will use Alkalines for the Bearcat 200xlt Handheld? I have a extra nicad rechargable pack, but I need something to use when I cannot recharge right away. Thank You, Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gdbnet.ad.jp!news.hebel.net!news.sics.se!news.kth.se!news.eunet.fi!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: MM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Adelaide scanner frequencies Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:33:41 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4f3qa5$boe@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: sladl1p26.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) To: rec.radio.scanner Does anybody have any interesting frequencies of the Adelaide, South Australia area? If so, please e-mail me, as I would be eager to exchange some interesting chan nels that I have found. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gdbnet.ad.jp!news.hebel.net!news.sics.se!news.kth.se!news.eunet.fi!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: MM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Adelaide scanner frequencies Date: 5 Feb 1996 02:34:00 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4f3qao$boe@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: sladl1p26.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Does anybody have any interesting frequencies of the Adelaide, South Australia area? If so, please e-mail me, as I would be eager to exchange some interesting chan nels that I have found. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!news.paonline.com!dialup26.woodtech.com!user From: mtracy@woodtech.com (Mark Tracy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: any cool tricks with the sportcat sc150 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 10:27:13 -0600 Organization: Pennsylvania Online [Usenet News Server for Hire] Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4erkdr$2bj@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <227cc$f3a3a.d2@news.express.ca> <4f94sq$g8i@news.xmission.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup26.woodtech.com In article <4f94sq$g8i@news.xmission.com>, gilx@xmission.com (John GIlchrist) wrote: >Business Resource Group wrote: > >>elmo110860@aol.com (Elmo110860) wrote: >>>Looking for modifications and secret tricks for unlocking secrets of >>>Uniden >>>sportcat sc150. Please Email or post a message. Thanks > > >>About the only "cool trick" I have performed with a Sportcat 150 was to >>return the damn thing to the place that sold it to me. Glad to be rid of >>it! >Am I missing something here? I've had my Sportcat 150 since Christmas >and love it. Why did you return yours? I've had a 150 for one year and am also very happy with it. For less than $200, it is a good value in a handheld. Would be very interested in any problems, tricks and unlocking secrets. -- Mark Tracy, mtracy@woodtech.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!hopper.acm.org!ACM.ORG!MULLIGAN From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cullular frequencies Date: 7 Feb 1996 19:20:08 GMT Organization: ACM Network Services Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4fau18$rpe@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG NNTP-Posting-Host: acm.org From the FAF - Frequently Asked Frequencies on ftp://oak.oakland.edu as /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/scanner.faf Cellular Telephone [22.902] Chs Freqs (base) System Use 800-832 869.040 - 870.000 A - RCC voice 1-312 870.030 - 879.360 A - RCC voice 313-333 879.390 - 879.990 A - RCC data 334-354 880.020 - 880.620 B - Telco data 355-666 880.650 - 889.980 B - Telco voice 667-716 890.010 - 891.480 A - RCC voice 717-799 891.510 - 893.970 B - Telco voice Mobiles transmit 45 MHz below the base (824.040-848.970) and are usually repeated by the base. Channels are 30 kHz apart. Channels 800-832 are also identified as Chs 991-1023. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuhou.aloha.net!usenet From: my@hawaii.edu (Serrow) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: by popular demand the pro-mods Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 10:14:21 GMT Organization: Hawaii OnLine - Honolulu, HI Lines: 2 Message-ID: <311b1e40.2537295@news.aloha.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: oahu-16.u.aloha.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 just take a walk over to a site I found. http://rever.nmsu.edu/~weasel/scanner/handheld.html#pro46 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:33 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!globe.indirect.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!nickerr From: nickerr@netcom.com (nickerr) Subject: Pro2004 right for me? Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 08:13:28 GMT Lines: 8 Sender: nickerr@netcom12.netcom.com I am looking for a scanner. Lots of channels and cell phone freqs. I have heard that the Pro-2004 is a good unit and can acruire one for $145. Is this worth it? I want to basically listen to eevrything. WOuld this be the unit for me? -- nickerr@netcom.com <----------------------> nickerr@aol.com I had a signature once Its gone now. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!news1.isp.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!prairienet.org!obvious From: obvious@prairienet.org (Eric C. Loy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Presidential Debate-HELP Date: 7 Feb 1996 09:29:07 GMT Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4f9rd3$dro@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: firefly.prairienet.org We have a presidential debate coming to town very soon (Mar 14) and I could use your help in finding some freqs to scan during and around the event! Please E-Mail me any help you can. Thank you. addr: obvious@prairienet.com Eric Loy -- ________________________________________________________________ Eric Loy, WDWS "A pessimist is what an optimist obvious@firefly.prairienet.org calls a realist." ________________________________________________________________ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: page-usa@ix.netcom.com(Ken Mezger ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need an expert opinion on scanner/paging question Date: 6 Feb 1996 06:11:11 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 34 Message-ID: <4f6rdv$c08@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com> <4f0fge$2fv@news.syncentral.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-col-md1-22.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Feb 05 10:11:11 PM PST 1996 In <4f0fge$2fv@news.syncentral.com> dsbyrd@syncentral.com (Dwayne S. Byrd) writes: > >Peter Kamilakis wrote: > >>I tune into an interesting frequency sometimes on my >>scanner, and I cannot quite figure out what it is. >>It occurs at 152.150, and what happens is I hear two tones >>(like rescue tones), followed by what sounds like someone >>talking on an answering machine, saying something like >>"Bob, call home when you get a chance". This is not a > >Sounds exactly like a voice pager. I didn't pull out a frequency >list, but 152.150 would seem to be in the right neighborhood. With a >voice pager, you dial the pager number, and after a beep, you speak a >brief message that is then transmitted to the specified pager where it >is played through a small built-in speaker. > >I get the impression that alphanumeric pagers have now far surpassed >voice pagers in terms of sales and use. But voice pagers used to be >quite popular. > >Dwayne >KC4POI > ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: VOICE PAGER ARE COMING BACK NOW. WITHIN THREE MONTHS PAGENET WILL INTRODUCE THE NEW "VOICE-NOW" PAGER WHICH WILL HOLD 4 MINS. OF VOICE MESSAGES. THE MESSAGES WILL BE TOTALLY PRIVATE AND WILL BE TRANSMITTED ON A DIGITAL (COMPRESSED) FORMAT. TO FIND OUT MORE CHECK OUT THEIR WEB SITE AT: http://www.pagenet.com =KEN= From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!netaxs.com!news2.cais.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!night.primate.wisc.edu!aplcenmp!harings-pc.jhuapl.edu!paul_haring From: paul_haring@jhuapl.edu (Paul S. Haring) Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Message-ID: Lines: 12 Sender: usenet@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: harings-pc.jhuapl.edu Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory References: <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> <4f5is9$h72@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 15:48:33 GMT In article <4f5is9$h72@newsbf02.news.aol.com> jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) writes: >From: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) >Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? >Date: 5 Feb 1996 13:39:05 -0500 >Yes it's modifiable I got the mods Only SOME pro-46's are modifiable, you need to validate the date code before trying a mod. The older original units are modifiable, the newer date coded ones are not. All pr0-46 mods can be found at the usual place, ftp::rtfm.mit.edu in the usenet_by_group area; dig down into it to find the mods subdirectory. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: PCHH73B@prodigy.com (John Oliver) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden Bearcat 8C145XL???? Date: 5 Feb 1996 21:58:39 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 15 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f5uif$26ig@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 My father recently won a new scanner at our annual fireman's banquet. He gave me his old scanner. It is a Uniden Bearcat 8C145XL. What can I do with this scanner, It works fairly well with picking up Police and Fire talk, But I want to look for Cordless and Cell Phone Conversations, How can I do this. It is only a 16 Channel Programable scanner. I also need to know how to change the Weather Frequency on it. I would appreciate and help any of you can give me. Thank You, JOHN OLIVER PCHH73B@prodigy.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci3!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!zetnet.co.uk!demon!bearnet.demon.co.uk!pete From: Pete Baston Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: POCSAG Decoder Available from SimTel Archive Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:55:07 +0000 Organization: Alpha Organisation Lines: 55 Distribution: world Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bearnet.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: bearnet.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.10 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner.uk:2125 rec.radio.scanner:45270 alt.radio.scanner:27347 The latest version of my POCSAG Decoder, PD 2.00, is now available from the SimTel shareware archive. The software and documentation can be found in file SimTel/msdos/paging/pd-200.zip on the prime mirror site, FTP.Coast.NET, and also on the secondary mirror sites. For a list of SimTel mirror sites please email me directly. Pete Baston pete@bearnet.demon.co.uk SimTel Announcement Follows: SimTel/msdos/paging/ pd-200.zip POCSAG paging decoder version 2.00 PD Version 2.00 allows the off-air decoding of POCSAG paging transmissions. The program supports POCSAG speeds of 512, 1200 or 2400 bits/second and decodes alphanumeric or numeric paging messages. A simple interface is required to convert the audio output of a receiver or scanner to RS232 levels, for input to a COM port on a PC. Special Requirements: Interface circuit. Details given in documentation file (pd200.txt). Changes: The following improvements were made over the previous version (version 1.02):- * Now supports 2400 baud and has auto bit-rate detection. * Will now attempt to correct up to 2 bit errors in a codeword. * Will now attempt to auto-detect numeric or alphanumeric data. * Now supports logging of all messages to daily log files. * Logging now continues whilst in PAUSE mode. * PAGERS.INI and REJECT.INI will now allow comments after pager addresses. * PAGERS.INI and REJECT.INI will now allow wildcards in pager addresses. * PAGERS.INI and REJECT.INI will now accept up to 250 entries each. * Date format may now be configured for the US market. * Will now correctly display "umlaute" characters used in German. * Screen colours may now be configured. pd-200.zip has replaced pd-102.zip. Shareware. Uploaded by the author. Pete Baston pete@bearnet.demon.co.uk ************************************************************************ * Pete Baston * 7 Allerton Close, Pen y ffordd, Chester, CH4 0NJ, U.K. * ************************************************************************ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:40 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!mr.net!umn.edu!dialup-15-b-150.gw.umn.edu!user From: pete0934@maroon.tc.umn.edu (Andrew Peterson) Subject: Re: Alphanumeric Pagers Message-ID: Sender: news@news.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: dialup-15-b-150.gw.umn.edu Organization: University of Minnesota X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.2 References: <4bvupd$d1s@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <1996Jan3.062612.27249@news.etc.bc.ca> <4ctlgh$458@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 05:23:08 GMT Lines: 29 In article , locutus@netcore.ca (Locutus) wrote: > In message <4eg62g$gud@nosy.bart.nl> - bob@bart.nl (Bob) writes: > :> > :>In article , > :> asi@escape.ca (Christopher Baxted) wrote: > :>> > :>>>There is a program around which uses the audio-out of your scanner, and an > :>>>easy to build interface to your PC, you can read messages all day. > :>>>If you (or anyone) needs it, I'll post it here. Just ask. > :>> > :>>>TD. > :> > :>Hi, > :> > :>Which program is it? I want it if it's not PD-102 or PD-200. > :>Cheers, > :> > :> Bob > > > Could you please post this info here, or e-mail. Thanks, it sounds like > fun :) > > Patrick I don't s'pose anyone knows of any program like this for the Mac... Andy From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:41 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!vtnt02.vantek.net!not-for-mail From: pshayes@vantek.net (Perry Hayes) Subject: Questions about AR-8000 and Computer Control Message-ID: <277cc$8a18.2a6@vtnt02.vantek.net> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 16:34:58 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Lines: 25 Good Morning- I was hoping for some advice on the 8000 and computer control. I have heard that the Opto CX12AR and Scan*Star is the best combination to use...is this true? 1) Does the CX12AR require any mods to the radio? 2) Is Scan*Star Commercial better (equal/worse) than the SE or Plus versions for windows? I guess I would prefer a windows based program as long as it works the same. 3) How well does it work? 4) Does the Radio Shack telescopic scanner antenna do the job, or would you recommend a diiferent antenna. I would really appreciate any feedback or information on this subject! Thanks. -Perry Hayes From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.OnlineToday.Com!news.onramp.net!zeus.clr.com!newshost.convex.com!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!ringer.cs.utsa.edu!runner!psmyth From: psmyth@runner.utsa.edu (Patrick Songchai Smyth) Newsgroups: dfw.forsale,houston.forsale,austin.forsale,utsa.forsale,tx.forsale,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro43 Handheld Scanner for sale Followup-To: dfw.forsale,houston.forsale,austin.forsale,utsa.forsale,tx.forsale,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Date: 8 Feb 1996 01:43:39 GMT Organization: The University of Texas at San Antonio Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4fbkgb$ma2@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> References: <4e197t$r6b@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <4e1abo$m87@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4e6ucj$inn@reader2.ix.netcom.com> <31176872.3F74@metronet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: runner.jpl.utsa.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net dfw.forsale:23798 houston.forsale:16920 austin.forsale:44017 tx.forsale:15854 rec.radio.swap:57095 rec.radio.scanner:45232 Richard Nimz (rnimz@metronet.com) wrote: : D W Smoot wrote: :> Don't pay no mind to the Wal-mart shopper - a PRO-43 has nothing to do :> with color or black-n-white \ it is a radio scanner and $225 is not a :> bad price, allthough, i'll offer $150.00 since it has no belt-clip. : Wow! That must be some belt-clip For $75 bucks, I'd expect it : to clip and unclip by voice command. AND should transmit those color documents to truckers on CB! =) PS From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.kolumbus.fi!usenet From: Raimo Makela Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Welcome to Satakunnan radio's Home Page Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 12:05:21 -0800 Organization: Kolumbus Information Network, Finnet Group Lines: 20 Message-ID: <31190601.D1@pp.kolumbus.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: raima.pp.kolumbus.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I; 16bit) Welcome to Satakunnan Radio's Home Page. We are operating at FM 94.8 and 97.2 MHz 24 hours at Satakunta county, Finland. Address is: http://www.yle.fi/sataradio/ Hear us! It is possible via summer, FM DXing, Es- or tropo-propagation. We have happy listenners farway from us. Like Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Spain and Sweden. Send your reception report with audio recording to: Satakunnan Radio Raimo Makela PL 113 28101 PORI FINLAND From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!newshost.convex.com!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.dacom.co.kr!news.uoregon.edu!mars.efn.org!garcia.efn.org!not-for-mail From: rdr@efn.org (Robert Robertson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: VHF or UHF??? Date: 5 Feb 1996 05:11:12 -0800 Organization: Oregon Public Networking Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4f4vlg$7u6@garcia.efn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: garcia.efn.org X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #7 (NOV) I have a Ham Radio with expanded receive capabilities that allows me to use it as a scanner and I monitor police, fire, airports, utility companies, etc....Veeery Interesting to say the least, but I am confused about frequencey listings I see...(For example, those published in Monitoring Times). They never say if it's on the VHF or UHF band, and since my radio receives both (an Icom W2A dualband) and I find police on VHF and UHF, fire on VHF, I am never sure where to look. Are there any "guidelines" to follow?? Thanks for comments/suggestions. Rob R. KE6BGO Eugene, OR. (Freq's for this area would also be appreciated) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.electrotex.com!academ!bcm.tmc.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!feenix.metronet.com!news From: Richard Nimz Newsgroups: dfw.forsale,houston.forsale,austin.forsale,utsa.forsale,tx.forsale,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro43 Handheld Scanner for sale Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 14:40:50 +0000 Organization: Texas Metronet, Inc (login info (214/488-2590 - 817/571-0400)) Lines: 10 Message-ID: <31176872.3F74@metronet.com> References: <4e197t$r6b@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <4e1abo$m87@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4e6ucj$inn@reader2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fw42.metronet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (WinNT; I) CC: rnimz@metronet.com Xref: news.epix.net dfw.forsale:23742 houston.forsale:16867 austin.forsale:43945 tx.forsale:15810 rec.radio.swap:56981 rec.radio.scanner:45152 D W Smoot wrote: > Don't pay no mind to the Wal-mart shopper - a PRO-43 has nothing to do > with color or black-n-white \ it is a radio scanner and $225 is not a > bad price, allthough, i'll offer $150.00 since it has no belt-clip. Wow! That must be some belt-clip For $75 bucks, I'd expect it to clip and unclip by voice command. richard From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!news1.is.net!jason.is.net!user From: richardk@is.net (Richard Kleim) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Antenna Questions... Followup-To: rec.radio.scanner Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:21:10 -0500 Organization: The Internet Connection Lines: 19 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: jason.is.net Hello I use a RS Pro-51 to scan. I'd like to use it in the car around town, but I get a lot of static (not ignition noise) when using in the car. There are two RS antennas I've seen for cars/scanners - the Mag mount and the glass surface mount scanner antennas. Would either of these help me (mostly 800 Mz, some Aviation/150/400 usage)? I don't know a lot about antenna design - it appears that the mag mount might be a Marconi antenna since it requires keeping intact the foil base. (?) The glass mount would mount higher, but the mag is longer. Is either of these better? I figure the mag mount looks like it might be better, I don't know why - after all I'm most interested in 800 and I suppose the length wouldn't be a factor. I do scan 2 meter bands also, tho. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. TIA, -------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Richard Kleim richardk@is.net ---- -------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ACARS Software? Date: 6 Feb 1996 13:47:02 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 7 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <3117BE0C.B2@primenet.com> X-Posted-By: ip022.phx.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know if there is some free/shareware programs or information available for decoding ACARS data? I have seen the info on Tiggers's home page, but gives no technical info. Thanks in advance. n7ory@primenet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Coast Guard rescue ops at 757 crash Date: 7 Feb 1996 13:32:00 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 13 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <31190C25.24CE@primenet.com> References: <3115618A.30E2@voicenet.com> X-Posted-By: ip042.phx.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ray Wilson wrote: > > Tune to 5.696mhz USB to monitor the rescue operations. > > 73 > > Ray I caught that last night too! I was scanning around when I heard "Sam 1" asking for the ETA of a Cutter to the area, but never heard what the actual problem was till I got up this morning and heard the news. "Sam 1" also said he would be listnening on 5.696 and an 8 Mhz freq, but left the spec-fx at home. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!daver!UB.com!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!usenet From: Robert Blumenkranz Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 list.... READ THIS Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:40:10 -0700 Organization: Engineering Consulting Lines: 3 Message-ID: <3111BFDA.5ABF@kaiwan.com> References: <4edphi$moj@ias2.med.iacnet.com> Reply-To: radiobob@kaiwan.com NNTP-Posting-Host: kaiwan134.kaiwan.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Macintosh; I; PPC) majordomo@ml.rpmdp.com subscribe ar8000 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.io.com!arlut.utexas.edu!news.eden.com!matrix.eden.com!robert From: robert@eden.com (Robert Barker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Scanners and Household Insurance Date: 7 Feb 1996 04:49:50 GMT Organization: Adhesive Media, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4f9b1e$3e1@boris.eden.com> References: <4f6f2n$382@sulla.cyberstore.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: matrix.eden.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Show them that it plugged in and was being run off of house current at the time of the theft.. Was this a mobile radio? did it have holes to mount it with.. do you have a base antenna for it? any other documentation showing that it WAS used in your house. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bison.alfred.edu!kato.theramp.net!chi-news.cic.net!news.luc.edu!newsfeed.acns.nwu.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news2.interlog.com!news.interlog.com!news From: rodcase@interlog.com (Rod) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: B.C. Freq.(lower mainland) Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 14:44:48 GMT Organization: InterLog Internet Services Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4f54ma$6qd@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: robcase.interlog.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anyone know of good source of freq. for the Vancouver to Whistler B.C. area? Thanks Rod From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!intac!magsystems!151!roland.stiner From: Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland Stiner) Date: 08 Feb 96 19:24:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: X-FTN-To: Thumphrey@mailbag.Com Organization: MAG Systems, Inc/TFP BBS To: thumphrey@mailbag.com Subject: Regency Scanner Lines: 11 TH>I have a Regency MX 3000 in need of repair, does anyone know if >Uniden is repairing these ????????? If they don't, Grove probably will. --- OLX 1.53 73, de NK2U -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: rsaco@aol.com (RSACO) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 7 Feb 1996 15:34:42 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 11 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fb2d2$l8g@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f9469$993@sulla.cyberstore.ca> Reply-To: rsaco@aol.com (RSACO) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com The Pro 26 gets my vote. It goes down to 25MHz so it gets CB and 29MHz ham. Goes up to 1300MHz (although I haven't heard anything up there yet). Uses only 4 AA Batts, yet charges @9V. It's smaller and lighter than the Pro 60. Searches in 5 MHz mode at 300 steps/second, scans at 50ch/second. Has data skip and skip search in search mode to glide over noise and birdies etc.It autostores freqs into a bank in search mode. It costs $70 more. Is it worth it to ya? Good luck with your choice, it's not an easy one. rsaco@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.scott.net!acara.snsnet.net!HiWAAY.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!inforamp.net!usenet From: samos@inforamp.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mashville / Minneapolis Date: 3 Feb 1996 01:22:52 GMT Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4euddc$cfd@sam.inforamp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts3-03.tor.inforamp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Cud anyone please give a few police, ambulance, and media freqs for Nashville, Tenn., and Minneapolis. Many thanks ... Dan Toronto From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca!sba3020 From: sba3020@InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca (Carl Hodder) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: HELP Blackshadow Date: 6 Feb 1996 05:20:19 GMT Organization: St. John's InfoNET Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4f6oek$co3@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: infonet.st-johns.nf.ca X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I like your info on restoring the 800 MHz band on a Icom R-7100 but do you know or could you find out how to restore the missing band on the Icom R-1. Please post a reply if you do or E-mail me a sba3020@infonet.st-johns.nf.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.scott.net!acara.snsnet.net!news5.crl.com!nntp.crl.com!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!hookup!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca!sba3020 From: sba3020@InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca (Carl Hodder) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Icom R1 mod wanted Date: 2 Feb 1996 07:14:14 GMT Organization: St. John's InfoNET Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4esdk6$t36@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: infonet.st-johns.nf.ca X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Wanted the 800 MHz mod for the Icom R1. I heard of the mod for the Icom R7100 but not the R1. E-mail sba3020@infonet.st-johns.nf.ca Thanks, Carl. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.unb.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca!sba3020 From: sba3020@InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca (Carl Hodder) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO 2035 Mods Date: 7 Feb 1996 08:27:47 GMT Organization: St. John's InfoNET Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4f9nq3$fau@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> References: <4eqkjc$kb4@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: infonet.st-johns.nf.ca X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] In the november 1995 issue of Popular Communications you will see an AD for cellular modifications to Bearcat models BC-2500, BC-3000 BC-8500, BC-9000, BC-700 and Realistic PRO-2035. The AD goes on to say it will send well explained and illustrated steps to the modifications for the sum of $7. May be of interest to earlier posts on Bearcat mods. Nice to hear from anyone that had it done to see if it really works. Jerryke7ua (jerryke7ua@aol.com) wrote: : Being new to this group, I'm sure this question has been asked before. : I've read in some posting the PRO 2035 can not be modified for cellular : freqs. I just recently read in Monitoring Times about a Downconverter. Any : other possibilities?? : Any comments welcome. : Thanks You. : Jerry, KE7UA : Ex: WA8HHM, WB4QVD, WB8LNF, & DL4PY From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:47:59 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!news!ppp49.dowco.com!user From: scanan@biggus-webus.com (Scan Man) Subject: Vancouver BC listeners?-Cantel network modified? Sender: news@dowco.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:54:24 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp49.dowco.com Organization: Dowco Computer System Ltd. X-Newsreader: Value-Added NewsWatcher 2.0b27.1+ Lines: 7 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45317 alt.radio.scanner:27376 Hi there. I am in Vancouver and have recently found that when I scan through the freqs below 880 (cantel) the voices seem to be much more distorted than they seemed about a week ago. Anybody else notice this? Any possible explanations? The distortion seems to sound like the channel is being put through a "phlanger" or some sort of compressor. Scan Man From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!gwen.pcug.co.uk!kate.ibmpcug.co.uk!sapphire!scollin Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner.uk,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <993@sapphire.win-uk.net> Reply-To: scollin@sapphire.win-uk.net (Simon Collings) From: scollin@sapphire.win-uk.net (Simon Collings) Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 19:00:34 GMT Subject: Announce: PC-MANAGER for Windows AR8000/AR2700 RS-232 demo Lines: 17 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner.uk:2134 alt.radio.scanner:27370 rec.radio.scanner:45307 A demo of AOR PC-MANAGER for Windows is now available on the Internet. This is a full function RS-232 control package for the AOR AR8000 and AR2700 scanners. The demo is a fully working version which has file save options disabled and will run for periods of ten minutes. You can download a copy in a zipped archive format (about 846kb) from my home page (URL is in my sig) or direct from the following ftp site: ftp://ftp.demon.co.uk/pub/ham/scanners/pc-manag.zip Demos of AOR Searchlight (for the AR3000A) and Concerto (for the AR3030) are also available. Simon -- Simon Collings, G4SGI Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~g4sgi/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!nwgw.infi.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: Scott Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS Pro 62 problem Date: 7 Feb 1996 13:07:18 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fa866$1cl@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa2dsp7.cid.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: kboland@microserve.net Karen, At the time of I was approx. 2.5 miles from the transmitter. I'm also getting bleed over from broadcast TV, with transmitters almost 6 miles away. Last night the local RS let me take the display model home to try for a couple of days. That will tell me if the problem is unique to my Pro 62. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hideout.emanon.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!dimensional.com!news.wizard.com!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!nwgw.infi.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: Scott Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-2042 vs 2035 Date: 5 Feb 1996 13:02:31 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f4v57$6bb@nw002.infi.net> References: <4f3m4n$3lt@what.why.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa1dsp22.cid.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: tad@why.net Tad, I too wondered the same when shopping for scanners. It seems to me that the 2042 offers only convenience features over the 2035 (auto lock-out of blank freq., enhanched search functions, etc.) I decided to save the $$$ and get the 2035. I plan to add a computer control in the future so the extra features were less important then price! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: Scott Ryan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RS Pro 62 problem Date: 6 Feb 1996 23:55:54 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f8pqa$j68@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa1dsp19.cid.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) Yesterday I purchased a Pro 62 from the local RS. When trying it today I found that broadcast frequencies (TV, NOAA weather & AM) bleed over other frequencies. Weather frequency 164.475 MHz completely covers a local Police frequency at 159.225 MHz. Turning the squelch down enough to prevent bleed-over cuts reception of ALL frequencies. Do I have a bad unit or is this a command problem with the Pro 62? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!nwgw.infi.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: Scott Ryan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Life Guard Helo Frequencies Date: 9 Feb 1996 16:11:44 GMT Organization: InfiNet Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4ffro0$gt2@nw002.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa1dsp24.cid.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) Do Life Guard helos usually share a frequency w/ the local EMS, or do they have a dedicated freq.? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.bconnex.net!sdjones!not-for-mail From: sdjones@bconnex.net (Steve & Kelley Jones) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need Motorola software Date: 7 Feb 1996 12:10:26 GMT Organization: Barrie Connex Inc. Lines: 10 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fa4ri$fb8@news.bconnex.net> References: <4f3qib$eun@jeeves.tccn.com> Reply-To: sdjones@bconnex.net NNTP-Posting-Host: sdjones.bconnex.net X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0] Dave C. Steckling (6481@tccn.com) wrote: : : : Looking for software to program various motorola hand-helds. : Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give me. : : Dave Call Motorola and buy it. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!infoserver.bgsu.edu!bgsuvax.bgsu.edu!sdougla From: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu (The Analog Kid) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cleveland Metro Police Cruiser Numbering Date: 2 Feb 96 09:36:39 GMT Organization: Bowling Green State University Lines: 46 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bgsuvax.bgsu.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #14 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27325 rec.radio.scanner:45212 This is an idea I came across while sitting here at work... I am a bit new to the Cleveland Metropolitan area, and since I came here I have been jotting down the numbers of the police cruiser I observe in various suburbs to get a feel for what department I here on a commonly used frequency or two. Maybe somebody knows for sure, but thus far, I have observed the following cruiser numbers, and the important part is the first two digits: 18xx Brecksville PD 52xx North Olmsted PD 19xx Broadview Heights PD 55xx Oakwood Village PD 33xx Fairview Park PD 61xx Parma Heights PD 39xx Independence PD 68xx Solon PD 48xx Middleburg Heights PD 77xx Westlake PD The further observation that I made is that both columns of this list are in order numerically and alphabetically, respectively. My hypothesis is this: Cuyahoga County has an agreement with the inherent municipalities to be assigned a two-digit municipality number, which would be prefixed to any further two-digit (or more) unit number for the maintenance of radio traffic and mutual aid situations, and these are done alphabetically with assigned numbers beginning somewhere higher than 01 so that the county can insert it's own law enforcement divsions. This could be similar to the way Ohio County Sheriff's Offices have been numbered alphabetically by county name. Maybe I am totally off my rocker, but if this is true, and some kind soul out there has a complete list for Cuyahoga and surrounding counties, I would greatly appreciate having a copy of this information emailed to me. Also, there are always exceptions to the hypothesis... Parma, North Royalton, Strongsville, Brookpark and Lakewood cruisers have all been observed to not follow this format. Thanx in advance, -----------------------*********************---------------------------------- Sean G. Douglas KB8IXP ************* Internet: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu NWSO Canton-Akron ******** LandLine: 216 888-6945 N. Central Ohio Skywarn ****** NetName: The Analog Kid Net Controller ***** Thoughts: When I leave I don't Vice-President NWOCAMS **** know what I'm hoping to find, P. O. Box 29055 *** and when I leave I don't know Parma, Ohio 44129-0055 ** what I'm leaving behind... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!olivea!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!brutus.bright.net!chi-news.cic.net!condor.acc.iit.edu!uchinews!ncar!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.cais.net!news.cais.com!albert.nuc.umr.edu!sdrumm@albert.nuc.umr.edu From: sdrumm@albert.nuc.umr.edu@albert.nuc.umr.edu (Scott W. Drumm) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mobile Scanner Advice Date: 7 Feb 1996 01:59:41 GMT Organization: Capital Area Internet Service info@cais.com 703-448-4470 Lines: 39 Message-ID: <4f912d$p0n@news.cais.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: node3.bbs.wdn.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I am interested in purchasing a mobile/base scanner but have little information and no experience in this particular hobby. After reading the backlog in this group and alt.radio.scanner, I believe the following features would be desireable: Police/Fire/Ambulance/DOT coverage. Radiowave detection (VASCAR, Aircraft) HAM frequencies, especially 2m and 72cm Weather Alert Could someone advice me as to what other features I should look for in a scanner (MultiBand, 800Mhz, etc) and what such features actually do (both to the scanner's capabilities and the price - I would like to stay below $300). Product recommendations would also be appreciated. Thanks for the assistance, and if any of the above are FAQ, just point me to the archive site. /----------------------------\/--------------------------------------------\ | US NAVY: FULL SPEED AHEAD | OS/2 v3.0 - Warp | | ------------------ | Isn't it time to expect more from | | sdrumm@albert.nuc.umr.edu | your operating system? | \----------------------------/\--------------------------------------------/ GE(Nuclear) d? H-- s !g p?+ au+ a23 w+++ !v C++++ UB+ P? L 3 E-- N++ K- W--- M-- V-- po+ Y++ t++ 5++ !j R++ G''' tv b++ D++ B--- e-- -u h+ f !r n+ !y+ -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6 mQCNAy77IHoAAAEEALYk690QdoGgkqB7ocVmK3txmAns9e1G5N4Osm+G7sg+UGeq DZsmkG1tPcFrfYZJG5EnGhrLo7UnAktaajWCD8rwAjAiwNWLcMnpG/rRFXOwPSfR 0U5/ovqtX7P8pxn3Z8Z0yB+4l1J1QU4EOtE5oRE6zqV4wCI+mXvsBan6w9vZAAUR tCpTY290dCBXLiBEcnVtbSA8c2RydW1tQGFsYmVydC5udWMudW1yLmVkdT4= =g0jL -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:09 1996 From: SEColegrove@msn.com (Steve Colegrove) Subject: RE: PLEASE Help! Date: 9 Feb 96 03:05:09 -0800 References: <4f31m2$1ehm@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004559@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 11 I have a suggestion, that might sound a little backward. Decide what you want to hear, then go see if the frequencies are covered. I got a Undiden BC 120XLT in 1994, that does most everything I usually listen to (police, airport, marine). They should be about $ 150 or less now. All of the manuals will list the frequencies. Just match them up and see what the trade-offs are. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.aa.net!tsunami.ixa.net!news.ironhorse.com!sloth.swcp.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!olivea!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!pop.gnn.com!sfs From: sfs@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WANTED to buy, cellular capable scanner Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 17:17:30 Organization: Megaweb Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4f3f0m$55u@news-e1a.megaweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: @www-8-177.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 4 Feb 1996 23:20:54 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.2 I am looking for a used cellular capable base scanner. Prefer RS PRO-2004/5/6 but will not exclude others. Features wanted: Programable search Cover 869-894Mhz in 30khz steps At least 100 channels Must be in full working condition! (must be willing to ship COD) Please send e-mail, Thank you. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!usenet From: shuler@nr.infi.net (icom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re2: What exactly is a DTMF decoder? Date: 7 Feb 1996 04:29:38 GMT Organization: Customer of InfiNet Lines: 58 Message-ID: <4f99ri$717@nw002.infi.net> References: <4ebt5u$hoq@over.mhv.net> <4epvlk$hjn@cloner4.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa5dsp23.nr.infi.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.3 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45246 alt.radio.scanner:27337 In article <4epvlk$hjn@cloner4.netcom.com>, YoCuz@ix.netcom.com says... > >asi@escape.ca wrote: > > > >>>I recently received a catalog in the mail hawking various electronic >>>gadgets. One was a DTMF decoder. The ad stated that it could be hooked >>>to a scanner to decipher codes. What codes? Was the implication of this >>>ad that it can be used for something illegal? > >>Illegal?? Maby getting codes for somebody's voice mail or answering service. >>Getting Credit Card numbers when using it for Tele-Bank or something. > >>Don't buy any of that junk, most is over priced . Software and or hardware >>for your computer is the best way to go for deciphering DTMF. And hay for the >>same price these SCAM Spy Shops charge, you can buy devices that will also >>decode ACARS(aircraft communications addressing), GOLAY,POCSAG(digital >>pager modes),CTCSS and DCS(digital coded squelch). I on the side I run a Spy >>Shop and know how many 'Spy Shops" are selling DTMF decoders for over $100. > >>SCAM SCAM SCAM. These Spy Shops are getting so bad I am going to change >>my companys name. I want to make money but not STEAL from the customer. > > >>>What are DTMF decoders supposed to do and what can they do if hooked to a >>>scanner. > >>>Thanx. > > >What are some good software programs for scanners especially a >Pro-2006. Espcially the DTMF function would be pretty useful.. > >YoCuz@ix.netcom.com > > A DTMF decoder is:'Dual Tone Multiple Frequency'.decoder. Your touch tone telephone uses this scheme to transmit digits. The tones you hear are dual tones, each one a different frequency set for each digit dialed. A 'decoder' decoders these tones into a digit, e.g. 0 to 9 plus A-D and # and *. Check out the Motorola MC145436AP decoder IC ( or others). I wrote a program for my PC and this IC to decode tones heard from my scanner...it ain't hard to do. Beep beep to digits, simple. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.sunbelt.net!dial-8 From: SKing@SunBelt.Net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQUEST: Freqs for Central North Carolina Date: Thu, 08 Feb 96 00:17:59 GMT Organization: SunBelt.Net INTERNET Access Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4fbf2r$itf@news1.sunbelt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-8.r2.nchgpt.sunbelt.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Need Freqs For Randolph, Guilford county ... or near here. Please post or mail to sking@sunbelt.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!hobbes.cc.uga.edu!ice!skip From: skip@ice.bae.uga.edu (Skip Gundlach) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 2 Feb 1996 04:53:50 GMT Organization: Biological and Agricultural Engineering, UGA Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4es5cu$f0b@hobbes.cc.uga.edu> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ice.bae.uga.edu Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1196 sci.electronics.repair:21350 alt.radio.scanner:27311 rec.radio.scanner:45181 misc.wanted:60557 alt.anything:800 In article <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> brueger@infi.net writes: >Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will record for >greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 >minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. I use a superhifi beta on beta II for three hours - *great* sound, timable, too. VHS will work, too, natch... Some of my decks have digital inputs as well, so if you have a digital translator, you can even record digitally, for absolutely clean recordings... > >Thanks > >Brian -- Skip Gundlach, 1439wells and 2539fi for the shy Multi-faceted and -talented musician and survivor PS My mailer is screwy again, and eats my mail. I respond to *all* mail, so if you don't hear back in a day or so, please remail. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!msunews!pm098-02 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-2037 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 96 04:02:17 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4fbs4q$aqc@msunews.cl.msu.edu> References: <4fb271$1dai@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <4fbidk$59t@ssbunews.ih.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm098-02.dialip.mich.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45250 alt.radio.scanner:27338 > >I would really like to get some opinions of this scanner. > >Is it modifiable for cellular? Is it is good unit? > >I found a used one for $150, is this a fair > >price? THanks!!! > >Although I'm not in the market, I'd pay $120-$150 for a used >PRO-2037 in excellent condition, with manual and antenna. >I wouldn't pay any more than $150, though. > The unit is perfect condition. The guy buys a new models as they come out and he just updated. He wanted $200 for it, but he dropped to $150. He is throwing in an external speaker, some books and other "charts".... I would buy it, but I would like to get a modifiable unit. I am new to the scanner world, and I do not want to buy something I will need (want) to update in 6 months. I also think a hand-held might be nicer... Do you have any opinions or suggestions for me? Specific models to look for? Thanks a LOT for the informative reply!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!news.math.psu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!saluki-news.wham.siu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: speculous@aol.com (SPECULOUS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: JFK/LGA FREQS. Date: 8 Feb 1996 11:38:16 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 9 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fd8to$fuf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: speculous@aol.com (SPECULOUS) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com JUST WONDERING IF ANYONE OUT THERE HAS THE FREQS. THAT AIRLINES USE TO TALK WITH "THEIR" OWN GROUND PERSONNEL WHILE AT KENNEDY OR LAGUARDIA. I HAVE THE AIRPORT FREQS. ALREADY. THANKS ----------------------------------------------------------- THOSE WERE MY WORDS THAT HAVE BEEN READ BY YOU SO AS FRED WOULD SAY YABBA DABBA DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ------------------------------------------------------------ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!purdue!haven.umd.edu!hecate.umd.edu!not-for-mail From: sreider@holmes.umd.edu (Susan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Computer Interface Mod Date: 6 Feb 1996 13:35:03 -0500 Organization: University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 55 Message-ID: <4f870n$6io@holmes.umd.edu> References: <4euc6j$mum@voyager.ff.tds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: holmes.umd.edu In article <4euc6j$mum@voyager.ff.tds.com>, RR wrote: >I too recently did the mod using regular 1/8" stereo jack. I put it on >the left side of the radio, since the 3/32" jack for the SCOUT is on the >right under the power connector. No problem fitting the jack in the case >at all. > >The new jack provides the Transmit, receive, and ground, while the 3/32" >jack for the SCOUT only does Receive and ground. The 1/8" jack works >well with the cables supplied with the CX12AR interface. Just lug it in >and go! Of couse, it lacks the squelch output and a few of the other >pins, which aren't really important to me right now anyway. > >What I was curious about was if anyone had been able to fit another kind >of connector, like a 6 or 7-pin mini-DIN, into the radio for this >purpose? I didn't have one, so I couldn't try it, but it seems like a >good idea, if it fits. > >The flat cable thing is a mess, if you ask me... this mechanism works >MUCH better and it doesn't feel like you're about to break anything, >though the little 1/8" stero jacks from RS seem a little dainty. I hope >to replace it with a sturdier one in the future. > >But it works! Works great!! > > >revoke@eskimo.com (Dean Sepstrup) wrote: >>Scott, >> >>Based on some earlier articles and notes on the AR8000 mailing list, I >>went ahead and converted to stereo mini-jacks (3/32") on the left hand >>side of the unit, near the bottom (opposite from the power connecter). I >>was a little unsure about disasembling a $600 radio that was brand new, >>but there were no surprises. There is plenty of room inside the case for >>the jacks, and the wiring must be done carefully, but the connections are >>all readily accessible when fully disassembled. The radio interfaces fine >>with my CX12-AR and it's so much easier to hook up, now. Good luck. >> > > I did two mods I put the scout plug under the power plug on the left and I put two stereo plugs one above the other on the right then I could plug in the scout and both plugs need for the cx12ar. I cut a piece of ribbon cable and plugged it into the connector on the radio. This allowed me to hook up all the mods without soldering to the radio. Worked like a charm. I sold the 8k though .... Moving on . It seemed like a nifty radio but I wasn't too happy with quality It seemed flimsy and doomed to braking. The audio sucked ! I would have another one ,but not at 500, 400, 300 maybe $250. anyhow my .02$. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!hecate.umd.edu!not-for-mail From: sreider@holmes.umd.edu (Susan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AOR900 forsale Date: 8 Feb 1996 11:05:19 -0500 Organization: University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 8 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4fd6vv$ji0@holmes.umd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: holmes.umd.edu I have an AOR900 handheld forsale. $110 shipped to you. I have a manual, no box. Works great. Clean. Has Cellular. has nicads. Mail me. Richard Reider. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!dimensional.com!news.wizard.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com!nntp-hub.barrnet.net!parc!news.cp10.es.xerox.com!news From: Steve Rosenzweig@wb.xerox.com (Stephen Rosenzweig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: Freq List for Rochester NY Date: 6 Feb 1996 18:14:43 GMT Organization: Xerox Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4f85qj$pfc@news.cp10.es.xerox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 13.252.7.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6 Looking for a comprehensive list for Rochester NY and surrounding counties (Esp. Wayne Co.) including Fire, Medical, Business, whatever anyone might have. Please post or Email. Thanks in advance. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!mr.net!news.mr.net!gw.dgii.com!gw!steve From: steve@poe.dgii.com (Steve Wahl) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Followup-To: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Date: 06 Feb 1996 21:01:06 GMT Organization: Digi International Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4epus3$rvl@emerald.oz.net> <4f0pah$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: poe.dgii.com In-reply-to: jlundgre@delta1.deltanet.com's message of 3 Feb 1996 22:58:25 GMT Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1157 sci.electronics.repair:21308 alt.radio.scanner:27293 rec.radio.scanner:45154 misc.wanted:60533 alt.anything:793 In article <4f0pah$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> jlundgre@delta1.deltanet.com (John Lundgren) writes: > That's one idea that makes me say, "Gee, I wish I had thought of that". > If you could get one of thoose large LCD display watches, it would be > easy to see on tape. I dunno about the scanner display tho. Might be a > problem. But yeah, good idea. actually the audio quality should be real > good. Hey, there's something wrong with the parts count here. We've got an old VCR, a scanner, and a camera here. If the VCR and scanner were close enough, couldn't you get both the scanner front pannel and that part of the VCR that flashes 12:00 in the same picture? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:21 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!usenet.hana.nm.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!nntp.coast.net!torn!news!stewa3 From: stewa3@uwindsor.ca (Stewart Jeffrey C) Subject: Re: Canadian & U.S. Coast Guard (Freq?) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: server.uwindsor.ca Message-ID: Sender: news@news.uwindsor.ca (Usenet) Organization: University of Windsor References: <4f557r$4gv@master.ftn.net> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 19:19:13 GMT Lines: 21 In article <4f557r$4gv@master.ftn.net>, Shane McCarthy wrote : >Can someone please Email me the freq. the Canadian & US Coast Gaurd >use. I live in the Windsor, Ont/Detroit, Mi. area if that makes a Most of the activity is from the USCG Detroit, Michigan Group on Belle Isle. The traffic I've heard is on the main CG frequencies: 157.100 157.050 157.150 They answer distress calls on Channel 16 (156.800) but almost always tell the boater to switch to 157.100 (channel 21A I believe.) I've heard Sarnia, Ontario Coast Guard radio occasionally on 156.800 and continuous weather can be heard out of Leamington, Ontario on 161.775. Hope that helps! Jeff From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:22 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.ak.net!ppp09-07.rns.tamu.edu!user From: swr9925@acs.tamu.edu (Scott W. Rouse) Subject: Does BC200XLT Cell Mod work? Message-ID: Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 14:42:14 -0600 Organization: Texas A&M University Lines: 7 I'm looking for info on Mods for the BC200XLT. I know how to do the cell-phone mod, but does anyone have experience with how it works? Also are there any other 200xlt mods I should know about? Thanks. -- Scott Rouse swr9925@acs.tamu.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!lynx.unm.edu!bubba.NMSU.Edu!thharrel From: thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu (KC5KTO) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk Subject: Re: Users of PD (Pager Decoder) please read this! Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk Date: 1 Feb 1996 05:16:17 GMT Organization: New Mexico State University Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4epib1$je8@bubba.NMSU.Edu> References: <4edsjg$j02@easy1.worldaccess.nl> <4ekmsh$5pr@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> <4enb0a$b2n@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: cream.cs.nmsu.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27318 rec.radio.scanner:45200 alt.radio.scanner.uk:2117 Two-Dogs (why@do.you.ask?) wrote: : mike wrote: : >Can someone give me the ftp address for pd. : > : ftp://ftp.demon.co.uk/pub/ham/scanners/pd-200.zip : But it's slow from here. : TD. I was finally able to get a copy off of ftp.demon.co.uk (it's slow from here, too). It might be faster if you get it off of my page: http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~thharrel/scanner/scanner.html Look in the "Computer Software" section. T.J. -- | T.J. Harrell III NRA KC5KTO thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu | _\| /\ |/_ | KC5KTO's Radio Page: | \ / \ / | http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~thharrel/scanner/scanner.html | / \ | * Opinions not those of NMSU ARC or Business Office * | /______\ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!usenet From: thomas mcmath Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AM on UHF Date: 7 Feb 1996 05:43:59 GMT Organization: Delphi Internet Services Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4f9e6v$caf@merlin.delphi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip162-187.bb.delphi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22D (Windows; U; 16bit) To: ag001@lafn.org The AM radio station that you are hearing on the UHF frequency uses that frequency as a remote for the reporter in the field. The reason it is time delayed ahead of the actual AM station is for security reason such as a slip up on fowl language. I live in the Boston area and most of the local radio and tv stations use 450-452 MHZ for remote broadcast. I hope this answers your question. If you want additional info on these frequency, pick up a Police Call Book. Those freqs. are all listed in there. Good luck! Tom McMath From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.binc.net!news From: Tom Humphrey Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Regency Scanner Date: 6 Feb 1996 04:03:43 GMT Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4f6juv$nq8@grandcanyon.binc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: msn_2_7.binc.net I have a Regency MX 3000 in need of repair, does anyone know if Uniden is repairing these ????????? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:27 1996 From: tombernie@msn.com (Thomas Bernie) Subject: RE: Icom R1 mod wanted Date: 9 Feb 96 02:54:29 -0800 References: <4esdk6$t36@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004554@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 48 800 UNLOCK BY CELLULAR SECURITY GROUP 508-281-8892 MODEL MFG DATE METHOD DC* PRICE R1 ANY INSTALL DIODES 50.00 PRO23 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO25 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO26 ANY INSTALL COMPONENTS X 99.00 NOTE #1 PRO34 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO37 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO39 ANY REMOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO43 2A4 & PRIOR REMOVE DIODE 43.00 PRO46 2A4 & PRIOR MOVE JUMPER 40.00 PRO46 3A4 & LATER REMOVE COMPONENTS 40.00 NOTE #2 PRO51 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 R100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 BC200 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC205 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC220 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 C508A ANY REMOVE RESISTORS 50.00 BC700A OAID & PRIOR REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC760 OAID & PRIOR MODIFY CIRCUT 40.00 BC855 OAID & PRIOR INSTALL RESISTOR 40.00 BC860 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 BC890 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 PRO2004 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2005 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2006 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2022 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2026 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2026 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2027 ANY MOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO2030 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2030 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2032 2A4 & PRIOR INSTALL DIODE 40.00 PRO2040 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 BC2500 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC3000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 NOTE #1 R7100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 AR8000 ANY PROGRAM EPROM 50.00 BC8500 ANY INSTALL SWITCHES X 99.00 BC9000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 * DC = VIRTUAL DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #1: THE ATT FUNCTION ACTIVATES THE DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #2: 869 TO 894 ACCESSED BY 30 CHANNEL "TEST MODE" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:29 1996 From: tombernie@msn.com (Thomas Bernie) Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 9 Feb 96 03:04:11 -0800 References: <31106859.442A@minn.net> <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004558@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 48 00 UNLOCK BY CELLULAR SECURITY GROUP MODEL MFG DATE METHOD DC* PRICE R1 ANY INSTALL DIODES 50.00 PRO23 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO25 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO26 ANY INSTALL COMPONENTS X 99.00 NOTE #1 PRO34 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO37 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO39 ANY REMOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO43 2A4 & PRIOR REMOVE DIODE 43.00 PRO46 2A4 & PRIOR MOVE JUMPER 40.00 PRO46 3A4 & LATER REMOVE COMPONENTS 40.00 NOTE #2 PRO51 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 R100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 BC200 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC205 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC220 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 C508A ANY REMOVE RESISTORS 50.00 BC700A OAID & PRIOR REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC760 OAID & PRIOR MODIFY CIRCUT 40.00 BC855 OAID & PRIOR INSTALL RESISTOR 40.00 BC860 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 BC890 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 PRO2004 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2005 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2006 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2022 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2026 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2026 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2027 ANY MOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO2030 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2030 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2032 2A4 & PRIOR INSTALL DIODE 40.00 PRO2040 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 BC2500 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC3000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 NOTE #1 R7100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 AR8000 ANY PROGRAM EPROM 50.00 BC8500 ANY INSTALL SWITCHES X 99.00 BC9000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 * DC = VIRTUAL DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #1: THE ATT FUNCTION ACTIVATES THE DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #2: 869 TO 894 ACCESSED BY 30 CHANNEL "TEST MODE" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:30 1996 From: tombernie@msn.com (Thomas Bernie) Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 9 Feb 96 03:05:36 -0800 References: <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> <4f5is9$h72@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+0000455a@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 48 00 UNLOCK BY CELLULAR SECURITY GROUP MODEL MFG DATE METHOD DC* PRICE R1 ANY INSTALL DIODES 50.00 PRO23 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO25 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO26 ANY INSTALL COMPONENTS X 99.00 NOTE #1 PRO34 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO37 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO39 ANY REMOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO43 2A4 & PRIOR REMOVE DIODE 43.00 PRO46 2A4 & PRIOR MOVE JUMPER 40.00 PRO46 3A4 & LATER REMOVE COMPONENTS 40.00 NOTE #2 PRO51 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 R100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 BC200 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC205 ANY REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC220 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 C508A ANY REMOVE RESISTORS 50.00 BC700A OAID & PRIOR REMOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC760 OAID & PRIOR MODIFY CIRCUT 40.00 BC855 OAID & PRIOR INSTALL RESISTOR 40.00 BC860 ANY INSTALL SWITCH 99.00 BC890 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 PRO2004 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2005 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2006 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2022 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 PRO2026 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2026 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2027 ANY MOVE DIODE 40.00 PRO2030 2A4 & PRIOR CUT WIRE 40.00 PRO2030 3A4 & LATER INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 PRO2032 2A4 & PRIOR INSTALL DIODE 40.00 PRO2040 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 BC2500 OAID & PRIOR MOVE RESISTOR 40.00 BC3000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 NOTE #1 R7100 ANY REMOVE SOLDER BRIDGE 50.00 AR8000 ANY PROGRAM EPROM 50.00 BC8500 ANY INSTALL SWITCHES X 99.00 BC9000 ANY INSTALL SWITCH X 99.00 * DC = VIRTUAL DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #1: THE ATT FUNCTION ACTIVATES THE DOWN CONVERTER NOTE #2: 869 TO 894 ACCESSED BY 30 CHANNEL "TEST MODE" From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuhou.aloha.net!usenet From: tyrome@hawaii.edu (Serrow) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: mofifying the pro-46?? Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 19:24:49 GMT Organization: Hawaii OnLine - Honolulu, HI Lines: 8 Message-ID: <3118fc73.2795442@news.aloha.net> Reply-To: tyrome@hawaii.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: oahu-16.u.aloha.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 Just bought me a Pro-46, and I thought I would come to you all with a few questions. First, I was wondering where I could find information on modifying this model scanner, or how to do it, also, give me some input as to other scanners in this Range that work well. I still may return it if I find a better model for around the price I paid (169) I appreciate all the help From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!usenet From: vhealey@crl.com (Victor Healey) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Atlanta PD Codes? Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 09:36:36 GMT Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access Lines: 30 Message-ID: <3108ddce.5179200@nntp.crl.com> References: <4e1q5j$27v@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl11.crl.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 CODES 1 - Routine Call 16 - Released to Owner 2 - Make Call Immediately 17 - Report 3 - Emergency Call 18 - Abandoned Vehicle Check 4 - Cancel Call 19 - Articles Stolen 5 - Domestic Call 20 - Subject Warned 6 - False Alarm 21 - Assistance Needed 7 - Back in Service 22 - Unable to Locate 8 - Gone 23 - Arrest Made/Citation Issued 9 - Handled by :_______ 24 - Nothing to Call 10- Impound 25 - Explosive Device Found 11- Information 26 - Arrived on Call 12- Investigation 27 - Request to Eat 13- No Such Number 28 - Wanted & Record Check 14- Owner Refused 30 - Mayor's Family or 15- Owner on the Way Mayor Injured On 23 Jan 1996 00:02:43 -0500, wpstodd@aol.com (WPStodd) wrote: >When listening to the Police, I notice the dispatch uses signals # and the >officers use codes (no 10 codes). The third edition of Monitor America >has the correct signals listed but the codes do not correspond. Any >information on the codes used for Atlanta PD would be greatly appreciated. >Thanks.......Bill Victor Healey Ki4je http://www.crl.com/~vhealey/ar8000.homepage.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 7 Feb 1996 15:03:16 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 19 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) wrote: > >In article <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com >says... >> >>[...] ALL companies should be doing drug screens! > >What people put into their own bodies is their own business, and >no one elses', least of all yours'. It most certainly is! It becomes "my business" when these people drive on the highway, endangering my life. If I'm a business owner, it is also "my business" when these folks cost me money in the form of lower productivity, increased "sick time" off of work, and making bad decisions on the job, due to their drug or alcohol-induced state. -Drew in Charlotte- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!news.net99.net!news.corpcomm.net!news.pe.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!newshub.csu.net!news.fullerton.edu!ccvax.fullerton.edu!XRBARRON From: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RADAR Date: 7 Feb 1996 10:04:47 GMT Organization: California State University, Fullerton Lines: 22 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f9tfv$sdm@news.fullerton.edu> References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> Reply-To: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: ccvax.fullerton.edu In article <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net>, kboland@microserve.net (Karen Bo land) writes: >Radar is a radio-type frequency, Right? >Can it be picked up/detected by a scanner? Right and no <--- the short answers Here are the frequencies that speed guns work at (roughly). Note: they are in GigaHertz, not MegaHertz. 1 GHz is 1,000 MHz, not too many scanners get up above 2 GHz, so this is why you won't get radar guns on your scanner. Police Speed Enforcement Radar 10.450 - 10.600 ghz X-Band 11.488 - 11.628 ghz RD Detector 22.976 - 23.256 ghz RD Detector-2nd Harmonic 24.050 - 24.250 ghz X-Band 33.400 - 36.000 ghz Ka-Band 700nm - 1100nm Laser Threat BTW - does anybody know the wavelength at which IR LED's generally operate, an d the wavelength of the laser in CD Players. Also a narrower band than 700nm - 1100nm for police laser guns would be appreciated. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Feb 09 17:48:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!cornellcs!rochester!udel!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.cais.net!nntp.uio.no!news.kth.se!mango.mef.ki.se!ylo From: ylo@mango.mef.ki.se (Ylo Mets) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 5 Feb 1996 10:37:49 GMT Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mango.mef.ki.se Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1128 sci.electronics.repair:21269 alt.radio.scanner:27276 rec.radio.scanner:45128 misc.wanted:60520 alt.anything:787 John Lundgren (jlundgre@delta1.deltanet.com) wrote: : BTW, I've had poor results with the thinner tapes that have a lot of : tape on the cassette. It seems to have this affinity for the capstan. : Just loves to embrace it, with consequent negative results. I have had this problem recently only with TDK AD120 tapes bought in 1991-92. Later I used Sony HF120, Maxell UR120 and UD120 which seem to behave considerably better. The main problem for me seems to be the dust. If a particle gets stuck under the tape on a tape guide, it will stretch a longitudinal line onto the tape. You don't hear it immediately, but it looks ugly. Ylo Mets. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!usenet From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: *Radio Shacks Pro Models* Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 13:40:53 -0500 Organization: NF2G Enterprises Lines: 16 Message-ID: <311CE6B5.390D@frontiernet.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: usr2-114.frontiernet.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45365 alt.radio.scanner:27397 Steve Kennedy wrote: > >Escuse me, but what is ECPA. > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the federal law that tells you that i t > is illegal to listen to Cellular Telephone frequencies (among others), and > makes it illegal to manufacture or import scanners and receivers that are > easily modifiable to receive these forbidden frequencies. The manufacture and importation provisions are in a separate law - the Teleco mmunications Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act (TDDRA), which is commonly known as "Son of ECPA". 73 de Dave, NF2G dstark@frontiernet.net http://www.frontiernet.net/~dstark Editor/Author "Scanner Master Upstate New York Guide" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.channel1.com!news.channel1.com!channel1!bill.dunn Distribution: world Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Wi From: bill.dunn@channel1.com (Bill Dunn) Message-ID: <40.32882.2433@channel1.com> References: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:11:00 -0640 Organization: Channel 1(R) 617-864-0100 Info Lines: 54 * * * This message was from Robert H. Eisner to ALL * * * * * * and has been forwarded to you by BILL DUNN * * * ----------------------------------------------- _@FROM :bobeisner@internetMCI.COM _@SUBJECT:Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Windows?? Message-ID: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> Path: news.channel1.com!news1.channel1.com!news.sprintlink.net news.interport.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Windows?? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:49:14 -0500 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 27 Message-ID: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> References: <4fj3t3$4t8@thor.atcon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr3-dialup4.washington.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) To: Todd Penney Todd Penney wrote: > > I recently heard that the newer headsets used for fast food pick-up > windows are using 800 MHz,anyone know anything about this? > I'd like to find out the exact frequencies,so any help would be > greatly appreciated. > > Thanxx Carl Jr in Northern CA and Kentucky Fried Chicken are using 800 Mhz: Carl Jr 30.8400 806.0000 817.5875 819.2375 154.5700 816.1375 817.6375 819.3375 457.5375 816.2375 817.7375 819.5875 460.8875 816.3375 818.1375 819.6375 461.0875 816.5875 818.2375 819.7375 465.8875 816.6375 818.3375 820.1375 466.0875 816.7375 818.5875 820.2375 468.3875 817.1375 818.6375 820.3375 806.0000 817.2375 818.7375 820.5875 806.0000 817.3375 819.1375 820.6375 820.7375 Kentucky Fried Chicken 30.840 31.000 33.400 154.570 170.305 457.5875 457.600 460.8875 462.750 465.8875 461.0875 462.7625 467.8125 467.8875 806.000 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.channel1.com!news.channel1.com!channel1!bill.dunn Distribution: world Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Wi From: bill.dunn@channel1.com (Bill Dunn) Message-ID: <40.32883.2433@channel1.com> References: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:11:00 -0640 Organization: Channel 1(R) 617-864-0100 Info Lines: 54 * * * This message was from Robert H. Eisner to ALL * * * * * * and has been forwarded to you by BILL DUNN * * * ----------------------------------------------- _@FROM :bobeisner@internetMCI.COM _@SUBJECT:Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Windows?? Message-ID: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> Path: news.channel1.com!news1.channel1.com!news.sprintlink.net news.interport.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 800 MHz Drive-Thru Windows?? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:49:14 -0500 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 27 Message-ID: <311D20EA.146@internetMCI.COM> References: <4fj3t3$4t8@thor.atcon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr3-dialup4.washington.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) To: Todd Penney Todd Penney wrote: > > I recently heard that the newer headsets used for fast food pick-up > windows are using 800 MHz,anyone know anything about this? > I'd like to find out the exact frequencies,so any help would be > greatly appreciated. > > Thanxx Carl Jr in Northern CA and Kentucky Fried Chicken are using 800 Mhz: Carl Jr 30.8400 806.0000 817.5875 819.2375 154.5700 816.1375 817.6375 819.3375 457.5375 816.2375 817.7375 819.5875 460.8875 816.3375 818.1375 819.6375 461.0875 816.5875 818.2375 819.7375 465.8875 816.6375 818.3375 820.1375 466.0875 816.7375 818.5875 820.2375 468.3875 817.1375 818.6375 820.3375 806.0000 817.2375 818.7375 820.5875 806.0000 817.3375 819.1375 820.6375 820.7375 Kentucky Fried Chicken 30.840 31.000 33.400 154.570 170.305 457.5875 457.600 460.8875 462.750 465.8875 461.0875 462.7625 467.8125 467.8875 806.000 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:39 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: _Pro-26 Mods_ From: ron.roth@canrem.com (Ron Roth) Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!news.crso.com!canrem.com!ron.roth Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.31313.5773.0N20A80E@canrem.com> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 96 15:17:00 -0500 Organization: CRS Online (Toronto, Ontario) Lines: 42 G > writes: G > It looks like the possible replacements are the Pro60 and the G > Pro26. Anyone out there who owns one of these and would care to G > comment on their likes/dislikes. Which would you buy? I don't know about the Pro-60, but I've got a Pro-26 and really like it (it's on sale right now for $399.- Canadian at Radio Shack). With my own unit, sensitivity over the whole 25-1300 MHz range is at par with most other scanners, exceptions being around 120 MHz, which seems below average, while the entire 800 MHz band seems noticeably ABOVE average. Image rejection is no better compared to other (portable) scanners, despite the triple conversion, and is probably due to the crammed circuitry. Even though it's a small scanner, there is lots of room inside for possible modifications. G > Yeah...I know you can't get cellular reception on these models. I've come up with a mod that allows the Pro-26 to receive or search ALL locked-out frequencies with full sensitivity! It only requires one jumper across an IC chip - no other parts - so just about anyone with "soldering iron skills" should be able to do it. (the usual warranty/disclaimers apply). I've got detailed instructions with diagrams on how to do the above, including a mod for the backlight to stay on and not go off after 15 seconds. The backlight mod requires a couple of parts though, and is a bit more involved (one has to solder to tiny surface mount parts). Anyone interested can send me their (printed!) address, $4.00, and a first class stamp to: R. Roth P.O. Box 81027 Ancaster, Ont. Canada L9G 4X1 I have previously uploaded schematics for some of these mods, but I'm getting tired using usenet-conforming characters to piece these diagrams together. * Ron Roth --- * RoseReader 2.10b P003228 Entered at [CRS] From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!sun!oucsboss!gw2.att.com!gw1.att.com!cnn.Princeton.EDU!udel!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.ptd.net!news From: joe2tpd Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: a bearcat 160 Date: 7 Feb 1996 17:02:16 GMT Organization: ProLog - PenTeleData, Inc. Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4faluo$p88@ns2.ptd.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs1-11.scr.ptd.net i need some info on this scanner i got it for nothing please help! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Daryl Jackson <103016.1072@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ACARS Date: 12 Feb 1996 00:19:49 GMT Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736) Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fm135$778$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> I'm interested in exhanging information on ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System). I'm using the Universal M-400 interfaced to a computer, I'm located at Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. I do have the book by Ed Flynn and I'm familiar with aviation (Pilot on B727), however I'm not a radio or computer expert. I would be particularly interested in seeing flight plan, routing information (ie: United HOWGOZIT) and position reports. If you're interested in exchanging files or notes on ACARS operations, please e-mail at: 103016.1072@compuserve.com Thanks, Daryl Jackson From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!yama.mcc.ac.uk!news.u-net.com!news From: iain@morfis.u-net.com (Iain L. Taylor) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS and AEA WEFAX III Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 13:05:17 GMT Organization: U-NET limited Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fkpk3$6c9@nuntius.u-net.net> References: <4fjmd7$2f1@news-e1a.megaweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: morfis.u-net.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 JeffC@gnn.com (Jeff Chambers) wrote: >Is there any way to adapt the AEA WEFAX software so ACARS is >readable? I think the ACARS is FSK at 9600 baud... Jeff, ACARS is 2400bps, MSK >While I'm at it... I'd like to hear from anybody who has modified >the AEA programming to extend it's capabilities. Am I right in >assuming that additional programming is a limitation or is it >strictly hardware (demodulator, etc.) related. >Thanks, >Jeff From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: All 25 Cordless Freqs. Wanted Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 21:39:16 -0500 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 36 Message-ID: <311EA854.55A@internetMCI.COM> References: <4flbp1$5tj@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr3-dialup34.washington.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) To: James Redding Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27415 rec.radio.scanner:45400 James Redding wrote: > > Okay, I keep reading post after post saying "read the other messages to > find the cordless frequencies." Well, I don't want some random > frequencies that Joe Bob found while searching on his scanner, I need the > actual channel numbers and the frequencies as well. All I actually need > is all the handset freqs for new 25 Mhz phones. Thanks. > > _ ____________.--------. > \`' __________|________| > / [__)__] > | | > .' .' cracked@primenet.com > |____| These are the channel numbers that I found posted in Deja News: Cordless Telephone Chan Base Handset Chan Base Handset 1 43.72 48.76 16 46.61 49.67 2 43.74 48.84 17 B 46.63 49.845 3 43.82 48.86 18 C 46.67 49.86 4 43.84 48.92 19 46.71 49.77 5 43.92 49.02 20 D 46.73 49.875 6 43.96 49.08 21 A 46.77 49.83 7 44.12 49.10 22 E 46.83 49.89 8 44.16 49.16 23 46.87 49.93 9 44.18 49.20 24 46.93 49.99 10 44.20 49.24 25 46.97 49.97 11 44.32 49.28 12 44.36 49.36 Chs A - E handset frequencies 13 44.40 49.40 are also used for baby room 14 44.46 49.46 monitors and low power 15 44.48 49.50 handie-talkies. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 12 Feb 1996 08:17:13 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4fmt29$f44@emerald.oz.net> References: <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 In article <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org>, ag001@lafn.org says... > > >Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A >scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at >450.7250 MHz. Given the wide spread between the frequencies, >I cannot understand what's causing this. What you are hearing is the "cueing" frequency for news and traffic reporters in the field. 450.725 is in the remote broadcast portion of the uhf band. You are hearing the "real time"program audio feed *before* it goes thru the delay system that folks hear on 640-AM. It can be pretty funny to listen to as you can hear all the bad words and wild callers before they get "dumped" by the host with the delay system. You will also hear board ops and producers "override" the channel to give time cues to talent in the field. The coverage of 450.725 includes LA/Orange/Riverside/San berdo/Ventura and the coastal portions of San Diego county. Mr.News (Distant cousin to Mr.KFI) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!news.tcst.com!op.net!agis!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!peer-news.britain.eu.net!newsfeed.ed.ac.uk!nerc-keyworth!usenet From: Matt Brunton Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 8 Feb 1996 12:02:27 GMT Organization: Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: swmatt-e.nerc-swindon.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) wrote: >Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A >>scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at >>450.7250 MHz. > > > >Maybe the "Mr News" guy can give more details if he reads this? > Better still, ask Mr KFI! - mrkfi@netcom.com Heard him a couple of years ago just after landing at LAX - a surreal aural ex perience. Matt From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!interactive.net!winternet.com!news.minn.net!skypoint.com!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!night.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!edisto.awod.com!harbour.awod.com!usenet From: Glenn Little WB4UIV Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 00:55:05 -0800 Organization: Amateur Radio Station WB4UIV Lines: 56 Message-ID: <311B0BE9.73A@awod.com> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f8u9j$d8g@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chs0066.awod.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) C. Wheeler wrote: > > BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) wrote: > >Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A > >>scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at > >>450.7250 MHz. > > > > > > If you listen carefully around the news cast and commercials you can > >here > >the engineer talking giving cues and such! > > > >Scan up and down from that freq during the main TV news hours and > >you can listen to the studio talking to the reporters doing "live" shots > >while > >also listening to whatever the broadcast is. > > > >What you are hearing is being broadcast on the 450.725 in FM mode, as > >far as I know it is meant for the field reporters to catch their cues. > >Interesting > >enough, even though it is ahead of the actuall 640Khz I still do not > >hear > >people cuss and freak out when they have to "dump" someone. So I think > >even that broadcast is delayed some. > > > >Maybe the "Mr News" guy can give more details if he reads this? > > Much of the 450 to 451 range is for Auxilary Broadcast/Remote Pickup. > The above description is pretty accurate. This is where you will often > hear the link between traffic planes/helicopters back to the studios. > Repeaters are often used 5 Mhz up. For instance you might here traffic > on 450.725 and on the repeater receive (input) freq of 455.725. The > remote/mobile stations often operate in full duplex. > > A point of interest. Broadcast auxilary and remote pickup are protected > by the ECPA - you are not "supposed to eavesdrop" on them. They are for > communications conducted under FCC rules part 74, not part 90. If they did't want us to listen to them they would use scramblers. Until I id the station, how can I know that it is licenced under part 90 or part 74 or licensed at all. It appears that the FCC has more important things to do that look for scanner listeners or to check if licenses are proper. In our area farmers use marine band radios to conduct business, the local CBer runs over 500w tearing up most electronic gadgets and the FCC is not interested. This looks like an easy way for the FCC to justify their existance, rather that selling frequencies that they do not even own. They almost caused large international incidents by rendering communications in Canada and Mexico almosy useless on certain freqs when they illegally established the Citizens Band. ITU requirement that operations below 30 MHz MUST demonstrate a proficency in Morse code to operate. 73 Glenn WB4UIV Licensed since 1970 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF???(KFI L.A.) Date: 12 Feb 1996 08:26:09 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4fmtj1$f44@emerald.oz.net> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 I >>Maybe the "Mr News" guy can give more details if he reads this? >Better still, ask Mr KFI! - mrkfi@netcom.com Funny thing is that when Mr.KFI has been asked this question he refuses to even try to answer the question. This has been asked *MANY* times by his minions. Maybe he really does'nt know the answer... Maybe he DOES know the answer and thinks it's better to keep it a secret. Go figure! Mr.News (Distant relative to Mr.KFI) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news.wwa.com!news From: chris22@wwa.com (Maint) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Amplifiable anttena! Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:39:48 GMT Organization: WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com) Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fp164$8e6@kirin.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pool2-021.wwa.com X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.10 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27429 rec.radio.scanner:45450 Is there a amplifiable anttena I could use for my scanner. I live on the second floor of a concret and steel star shaped building and happen to be in the center of the star! please e-mail if you don't mind From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news From: chris22@wwa.com (Maint) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Amplifiable anttena! Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:48:47 GMT Organization: WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com) Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fp1mv$a17@kirin.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pool2-021.wwa.com X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.10 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27431 rec.radio.scanner:45457 Is there a amplifiable anttena I could use for my scanner. I live on the second floor of a concret and steel star shaped building and happen to be in the center of the star! please e-mail if you don't mind From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!uucp.primenet.com!iotp!clark.neider From: clark.neider@iotp.com (CLARK NEIDER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Antenna array Message-ID: <8BA7215.0792005B90.uuout@iotp.com> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 96 08:53:00 -0700 Distribution: world Organization: Inn on The Park PCBoard, Scottsdale, AZ USA (602)941-8635 Reply-To: clark.neider@iotp.com (CLARK NEIDER) X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22 X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20 Lines: 18 Hi Bill! Long time, no type! I got my new Diamond Discone atop 30' of RS mast on my roof. Excellent reception from South Phoenix PD ground units and marginal reception from handhelds at Sky Harbor. I've got it going to my ICOM R7100 through a Grove Pre-5 with an Optoelectronics Scout on the other output of the preamplifier. Eight guywires go to the 4 corners of the house and are insulated at each end with PVC crosses. My HF longwire is hanging from a boom just underneath the discone and is in an inverted "V" to the ends of the roof peak. I strung an additional HF antenna in a loop all the way around my house (under the eaves) and feed it to my Drake R8 with RG6. Do you still do the Denny's thing once a month? I'd like to see see you there again sometime. Which Wednesday night is it? ... ICOM R7100: the semiautomatic assault scanner! ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!venger.snds.com!usenet From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: antenna length @ 161MHz ? Date: 13 Feb 1996 14:14:51 GMT Organization: Sundstrand Corporation Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fq6cr$77o@venger.snds.com> References: <4fpoef$loq@cello.gina.calstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: aero.snds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu (Steven C Passmore) wrote: >What length shouls I cut my antenna for optimized coverage around >161MHz? The documentation that came with the antenna says to cut it to >16" but to my calculations a 1/4 wave antenna at 161MHz should be 18.34" >I only have 29" to work with. Any help would be appreciated. > My calculations show 17.44". (length in feet=234/frequency) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.columbia.edu!panix!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!oronet!i546.oro.net!user From: jlange@oro.net (Government Cheese) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Any mods for BearCat 145xl? Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 00:31:55 -0800 Organization: "oronet, Penn Valley, CA" Lines: 1 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: i546.oro.net Looking for mods for my crappy 145xl model. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.inc.net!news.inc.net!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.mci.newscorp.com!news.delphi.com!usenet From: bob93@delphi.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Atlanta Airport Frequencies/Airline Frequencies Date: Thu, 8 Feb 96 19:07:24 -0500 Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <4fcaqv$enf@mordred.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1b.delphi.com X-To: Derek B. Cook Here are some FAA tower and approach/departure freqs for ATL (Atlanta- Hartsfield Arpt. Sorry I don't have any of the airline "company" freqs ATIS 119.65 arrivals 125.55 Departures Unicom 122.95 Ground 121.75 121.9 Clearance Delivery 121.65 Departure 125.0 125.7 Approach 127.9 126.9 127.25 Tower 119.1 119.5 Good listening/Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news1.h1.usa.pipeline.com!usenet From: bumologist@usa.pipeline.com(BUMOLOGIST) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC 8500XLT/9000XLT Date: 11 Feb 1996 13:03:05 GMT Organization: Pipeline USA Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fkpe9$qr2@news1.usa.pipeline.com> References: <4fh4mv$mvr@suba01.suba.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe13.h1.usa.pipeline.com X-PipeUser: bumologist X-PipeHub: usa.pipeline.com X-PipeGCOS: (BUMOLOGIST) X-Newsreader: Pipeline USA v3.4.0 The 8500 and 9000 only look alike,the 9000 is a vastly superior radio compared to the 8500,one of the most screwed up scanners ever made,due to it's horibble intermod(CELLPHONES ON the FMBC?). -- Bumologist...The study of bums,scumbags,bag ladies,etc.Why the hell would someone study this crap? Barry Felstein From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:55 1996 From: SEColegrove@msn.com (Steve Colegrove) Subject: Re: BC 8500XLT/9000XLT Date: 11 Feb 96 15:04:37 -0800 References: <4fglo2$puv@vivanews.vivanet.com> <4fh4mv$mvr@suba01.suba.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+000045eb@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 3 I don't think the specs are the same. I just bought a 9000 at a local Ham radio store. I didn't compare everything, but there are 500 channels on the 9000. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dpc.net!novia!nntp.inc.net!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!news.byu.edu!nntp.et.byu.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vivanews.vivanet.com!usenet From: sbacker@vivanet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC 8500XLT/9000XLT Date: 9 Feb 1996 23:35:30 GMT Organization: VivaNET Internet Services 800-836-UNIX Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fglo2$puv@vivanews.vivanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ippy214.vivanet.com X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) What is the differents between these two scanners? Is the 9000 worth $95.00 mo re, and why? Do both have cell mods? Thanks, SBacker@vivanet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:10:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!sundog.tiac.net!shore!castle.shore.net!1-324-127-0!norman.beaulac From: Norman.Beaulac@f127.n324.z1.fidonet.org (Norman Beaulac) Date: 10 Feb 96 23:45:27 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC 890XLT Message-ID: <4af_9602111200@castle.shore.net> X-FTN-To: Bob Salamone Lines: 22 Hi Bob, the BC890XLT CAN PICK UP Military... I am holding the Spec sheet in front of me at this moment. They are: 29 to 29.7 MHz (10 Meter Ameteur Band) 29.7 to 50 MHz (VHF Low Band) 50 to 54 MHz (6 Meter Ameteur) 108 to 136.975 MHz (Aircraft Band) 137 to 144 MHz (Military Land Mobile) 144 to 148 MHz (2 Meter Ameteur Band) 148 to 174 MHz (VHF High Band) 216 to 225 MHz (VHF High Band) 225 to 400 MHz (UHF Air Band) 400 to 420 MHz (Federal Govt. Land Mobile) 420 to 450 MHz (70 cm Ameteur Band) 450 to 470 MHz (UHF Standard Band) 470 to 512 MHz (UHF "T" Band) 806 to 956 MHz (Public Service Except CellularBand) Have fun....Norman ... ARRRRRGGGHHH!!!! ... Tension breaker, had to be done. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: balrog@ix.netcom.com(Bob Salamone ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: BC 890XLT Confusion Date: 10 Feb 1996 15:42:09 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4fiech$k5v@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-chi12-13.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 10 7:42:09 AM PST 1996 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45490 alt.radio.scanner:27451 I have had the 890 for a few months now and have heard/seen 2 conflicting things about it and was hoping someone could help me get it straight. 1. I was told by the person who sold it to me that it does not pick up Military frequencies but seen something on the Internet that does. Does it? I am really looking forward to the Air & Water Show and was wondering if I would be able to listen in to the Military aircraft, has anyone ever done this? 2. I have read articles in the scanner newsgroups indicating you could nto modify it but seen a book in a catalog indicating you could. Can it be modified? Don't know if I want to but it would be nice to know I have the option. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!lanshark.lanminds.com!news.walltech.com!news.his.com!news2.cais.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!sdd.hp.com!usc!newshub.csu.net!csun.edu!usenet From: Keith Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC2500 Modifications Date: 7 Feb 1996 00:30:40 GMT Organization: California State University, Northridge Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4f8rrg$4su@dewey.csun.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.166.12.44 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:rec.radio.scanner/42826-42926#4f5ia2$lfh@nntpd.lkg.dec.com If anyone could point me in the right direection for finding instructions on how to restore the 800MHz band to the Uniden BC2500XLT, I would be sincerely gratefull. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!wmerrell From: wmerrell@news.epix.net (wfm) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC2500 Modifications Date: 12 Feb 1996 17:58:28 GMT Organization: epix.net Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fnv44$r1b@guava.epix.net> References: <4f8rrg$4su@dewey.csun.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plum.epix.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Just try searching 1270-1290 Mhz. Works fine. Keith (secs0861@secs.csun.edu) wrote: : If anyone could point me in the right direection for finding : instructions on how to restore the 800MHz band to the Uniden BC2500XLT, : I would be sincerely gratefull. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: jsimmens@aol.com (JSimmens) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC855 XLT MOD NEEDED Date: 10 Feb 1996 14:57:42 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 6 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fitbm$dlc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: jsimmens@aol.com (JSimmens) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Does anyone out there have any clear, concise,and understandable mods for this scanner? I would greatly appreciate any help. thanks JSimmens@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1!news.qtm.net!usenet From: jimsokol@all-phase.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Berks Co. PA frqs Date: Sun, 11 Feb 96 20:06:23 PDT Organization: Quantum Connections, Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4f37nf$fe8@ns2.ptd.net> <4f3roi$q8d@ns2.ptd.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts02-25.qtm.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage I am a Reading native, although am in Michigan now. Was back for a visit a few months ago and can add the following to the other person's posting: One of the Reading 800 mhz frequencies was dedicated to phone patches at the time. Don't remember which one. Also, the old fire dispatch , 154.43 was active with BASE STATION TRAFFIC ONLY. Was kinda nice to not miss any of the fire calls go out. You might also try out some of the other freqs around 33.94 for secondary fire traffic. I seem to remember 33.90 in use along with a few others. Be aware though that some neighboring counties also use these other freqs. Also try 155.280 ("280") and 155.340 ("340") for other EMS ambulance to hospital traffic. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: XSQM50A@prodigy.com (William Berris) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Best 460-465MHz antenna? Date: 11 Feb 1996 07:52:09 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 7 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fk779$1c84@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap3.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 What is the best antenna to use with my Pro-43 for optimal reception in the 460-465MHz range? That is what the local PD uses... Thanks a lot. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!ns1.aplatform.com!aimnet.com!news.exodus.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!pop.gnn.com!SFS From: SFS@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Beta Testers Wanted: CE-232 Software Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 16:39:59 Organization: GNN Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fgimd$fm9@news-e2a.gnn.com> References: <4ff774$s90@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: www-13-58.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 9 Feb 1996 22:43:25 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.2 Before you chop up your Pro-2004! Wanted to buy: Radio Shack Pro-2004 scanner. Must be in good working condition without major modifications, please send e-mail, thank you. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!news.moneng.mei.com!daily-planet.execpc.com!usenet From: Mac Feely Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BlackJack Ski Resort - U.P. Mich. Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 08:56:50 -0600 Organization: Exec-PC BBS - Milwaukee, WI Lines: 9 Message-ID: <311F5532.99B@execpc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chihuahua.execpc.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) I will be heading up to Blackjack Ski Resort this weekend and would be interested in any Freqs for the area. I'm looking for Ski patrol, Police, Fire, and EMS. Also any USCG stations in the area... Email would be appreciated. TIA Mac From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dpc.net!novia!nntp.inc.net!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: tomuser@aol.com (Tom user) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Bringing AR8K to Germany Date: 9 Feb 1996 17:42:35 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 3 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fgikr$kg1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4efr2v$hts@vectorbd.vivanet.com> Reply-To: tomuser@aol.com (Tom user) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com No problem with your A8000. Under new law, every scanner which is covering also the regular FM radio frequencies, is legal. It`s just unlegal to hear for example police, fire brigade, phones etc. Have a nice trip From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!newshost.uwo.ca!white.lambton.on.ca!white.lambton.on.ca!not-for-mail From: 94000797@white.lambton.on.ca (D Adams) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: CANADA:ONTARIO PROV. POLICE FREQ. Date: 7 Feb 1996 15:39:40 -0500 Organization: Lambton College, Sarnia, CANADA Lines: 1 Message-ID: <4fb2mc$gqh@white.lambton.on.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: white.lambton.on.ca X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:09 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!oronet!uniserve!news.sol.net!daily-planet.execpc.com!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!brutus.bright.net!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.nmaa.org!not-for-mail From: "Robert H. Eisner" Subject: Re: Canadian Fast Food Freq.'s Message-ID: <311E4183.7CF5@internetMCI.COM> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 14:20:35 -0500 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: tpenn@ATCON.COM References: <4ej3r9$lt5@thor.atcon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 16 Todd Penney wrote: > > Anyone know any fast food chains' frequencies?I'm in Halifax,Nova > Scotia and looking for these frequecies. > Tim Hoton's,Wendy's,Dairy Queen,Harvey's,etc. > The only one I know is Mc Donalds(30.580) > Thanks for any help you can give me. Hi Todd, I think McDonalds in Canada uses the following frequencies: McDonald's CANADA 30.8400 151.6700 main freq. Canada 30.8400 154.1450 aux. freq. Canada Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!news.algonet.se!newsfeed.tip.net!news.seinf.abb.se!erinews.ericsson.se!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!newshost.convex.com!bcm.tmc.edu!academ!tcac!conr-ara2-a9.tcac.com!user From: tdemars (Tony R. DeMars) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 07:09:42 -0500 Organization: TCA Communications of Texas Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: conr-ara2-a9.tcac.com Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1352 sci.electronics.repair:21563 alt.radio.scanner:27418 rec.radio.scanner:45418 misc.wanted:60651 alt.anything:834 In article <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net>, brueger@infi.net wrote: > Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will record for > greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 > minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. > > Thanks > > Brian My only suggestion would be to find a cassette recorder that has both the regular 1 7/8 ips speed (standard) and also the slower 15/16 ips speed. At the 15/16 ips speed, you can record 240 rather than 120 minutes, but, this is not going to give very good quality and should be used only for voice recording in a situation where all you need is an "audio log"--like the audio you see played from 911 calls, for example. I can't imagine a standard cassette that will ever be able to do 3 hrs. because the tape in a 120 min. one is already so thin just to let that much fit into the cassette housing. What about setting up a VCR to do audio-only recording? Some people use hi-fi VCRs as audio mastering tapes... Good luck. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!noc.nyx.net!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail From: anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cell images, PRO2035, 1100-1115Mhz Date: 11 Feb 1996 12:53:12 -0700 Organization: Nyx.net, free public access to the Internet Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4flhf8$4s2@nyx10.cs.du.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.nyx.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I have been playing around with a PRO2035 and have noticed what appears to be cell phone conversations. Needless to say, the unit is blocked at the normal cell phone freqs. The conversations are appearing ONLY between 1100 and 1115. On this model, the two IF's are 612Mhz and 48Mhz. I am having difficulty figuring out what is going on here. I would expect that if translation were to occur, it would be at either 1/2 or 1/3 of the first IF, i.e. 306 or 204 Mhz. The mechanism of the translation would be the second or third harmonic of the difference between the cell signal (i.e. 820Mhz), and the local oscillator (i.e. 1110-612=498Mhz) being demodulated. However, I cannot explain this phenomenon because shifting the 1110-1115 band by either 204 or 306 does not match any cell phone band. Can someone explain if 1) these are really images of cell calls and 2) by what mechanism are the frequencies being translated. I would guess that I am operating the receiver near a cell site of one of the two cell providers in this area. This would explain why there is only 15Mhz of bandwidth since half the spectrum is allocated to each carrier. However if this were the case, why would some signals be strong (very clearly intelligible) and some weak? If all the signals were coming from the same cell site I would expect them to be all the same strength. Or are there true frequencies broadcast in 1100-1115 which are some sort of personal communcations device, and the scanner makers not yet mandated to block these freqs? The signals sound suspiciously like phone conversations with rings, busy signals, automobile-type noises in the background, etc. The also abruptly disappear with an average life of about 20-30 seconds. There seems to be no mention of image rejection in the specs on this radio. They do mention "IF rejection" a useless spec since it only involves a couple of frequencies. Assuming these are really cell calls, is the next step the FCC is going to take is to mandate a minimum image-rejection spec? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cell Phone mods for PRO 2006 Date: 9 Feb 1996 13:06:17 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4ffgs9$8j0@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4dog8i$amu@shark.sb.grci.com> <4dre3h$mi0@news2.cts.com> <4dstlg$6mu@cobia.gulf.net> <4du6o8$k67@news.electrotex.com> <4eg1mk$17g0@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel3p42.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) NJFM83A@prodigy.com (Gary Belt) wrote: >The mod for cell restoration & speed increase for the Pro 2006 is VERY >easy. I only regret not having the mod sheet, as I loaned it out without >any back-up copies! Two diodes are to be cut, one enabling full 800 Mhz >and the other giving a slight scan speed increase. The mod works with no >side effects, as I restored mine about 3 yrs ago & has been ok. I will >seach other places for the diodes to be cut & will get back to you ASAP. > TRY..... ftp://ftp.qrz.com/mods/ cheers.] TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessus.net!news From: dcocke@accessus.net (David Cocke) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 19:23:34 GMT Organization: Data Processing Equipment, Corp. Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp24.basenet.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182 On 5 Feb 1996 10:53:59 GMT, Two-Dogs wrote: >>Greg Ottria wrote: >>>I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpose o f >>>course. >> >>Look for 'celltracker' that connects to a Motorola car/bag phone. >>If someone points me to info on how the 2006 controls the PLL, or >>how a Motorola handset 3-wire bus works, I'll modify the code I >>have to control either unit. This sounds interesting, since I have that phone. Can you give me/us a clue as to where to get 'celltracker' or at least a filename I could search for. Thanks. David From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.iag.net!newsfeed.kdcol.net!usenet From: charly@kdcol.com (charly) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 03:52:10 GMT Organization: KDC-Online Internet Access Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4fm9vr$nmv@kdcol.kdcol.com> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> Reply-To: charly@kdcol.com NNTP-Posting-Host: s06.cs00.io.kdcol.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 dcocke@accessus.net (David Cocke) wrote: >On 5 Feb 1996 10:53:59 GMT, Two-Dogs wrote: >>>Greg Ottria wrote: >>>>I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpose of >>>>course. >>> >>>Look for 'celltracker' that connects to a Motorola car/bag phone. >>>If someone points me to info on how the 2006 controls the PLL, or >>>how a Motorola handset 3-wire bus works, I'll modify the code I >>>have to control either unit. >This sounds interesting, since I have that phone. Can you give me/us a >clue as to where to get 'celltracker' or at least a filename I could search >for. >Thanks. >David I think it's available a Vaporware.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!pacbell.com!amdahl.com!amd!netcomsv!uu4news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: kelley@ix.netcom.com(Gene Kelley ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: College Park Fire Freq? Date: 11 Feb 1996 13:48:00 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fks2g$hqa@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> References: <4fiqf9$bhn@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-dc12-04.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Feb 11 5:48:00 AM PST 1996 In <4fiqf9$bhn@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> larryka@wam.umd.edu writes: > >Does anyone know the frequency for the College Park, Maryland fire department? > >Larry >N2TBX They are dispatched on the Prince George's County Fire Frequencies. Key in 494.8375 (North) 494.6625 (South) and 495.0125 (EMS). Also key in 46.120 MHz. This is a simulcast of ALL channels dispatch with alert tones. The tactical frequencies are 495.0625 and 494.7875. gk Washington, DC From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!snooze.ser.bbnplanet.com!crick.sura.net!lamarck.sura.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!cville-srv.wam.umd.edu!usenet From: larryka@wam.umd.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: College Park Fire Freq? Date: 10 Feb 1996 19:08:25 GMT Organization: University of Maryland College Park Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fiqf9$bhn@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> Reply-To: larryka@wam.umd.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: larryka.dorm.umd.edu X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2.5 Does anyone know the frequency for the College Park, Maryland fire department? Larry N2TBX From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!engr.orst.edu!holmes.ece.orst.edu!varine From: Brian varine Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cordless Phones WWW site Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:05:34 -0800 Organization: College of Engineering, Oregon State University Lines: 37 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: holmes.ece.orst.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Okay, It seems like every 5 days there's a flurry of "What are the Cordless Phones Freqs??" so, I've provided a "repository" for these freqs. Coming soon...... Fast Food freqs (Oregon area) 900MHz Phones Go to the Oregon Freq Page at the bottom under "generic freqs" http://www.orst.edu/~varineb ============================================================================== Brian R. Varine http://www.orst.edu/~varineb Oregon Freqs/Military.jpgs/Russian ECM list/car ECM eval He who owns the electromagnetic spectrum, owns the battlefield! When in doubt, JAM IT!!!! STOP HIGHWAY ROBBERY------JOIN THE NMA! -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQBtAzDwm6oAAAEDAOjurmD0Ft9VXTvnVVOf5uOLbsSB4PuidmW+aDjV7F7+KRSb fakuNHXVEhBYwTINVVnIjiSik12UcCv8UZXj/x9hAXBJXCk+v/8y9w6zk1Gu1iXC /HYnR/zJIyVohkIJwQAFEbQmQnJpYW4gUi4gVmFyaW5lIDx2YXJpbmViQHVjcy5v cnN0LmVkdT4= =NYjj -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!cdc2.cdc.net!news1.cris.com!news From: Peter Kamilakis Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Could Someone please assist with antenna choice? Date: 10 Feb 1996 12:29:47 GMT Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4fi33r$l7j@spectator.cris.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crc4-fddi.cris.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) I have had terrible problems with overload in the past, however, it is now significantly decreased by a PAR electronics helical VHF notch filter. I am now ready to put an antenna on the roof of my building. Can someone recommend an antenna that due to its design, or some other characteristic, has a reduced sensitivity to paging? Intuitively it seems that all antennas would receive this paging pretty strongly, but I am hoping that there is some magic out there! thanks pnk From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cullular frequencies Date: 9 Feb 1996 13:08:00 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4ffgvg$8j0@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4f6ddg$c4o@goofy.BrandonU.CA> NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel3p42.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) LASKOWSKI <$LASKOMW@BrandonU.CA> wrote: >Can anyone give me a list of the frequencies for cellular phones? > 870-890 Mhz in 30k steps. A little more each side for USA. TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!globe.indirect.com!jamoran From: jamoran@indirect.com (John Moran) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cullular frequencies Date: 12 Feb 1996 12:47:14 GMT Organization: Internet Direct, Inc. Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4fncsi$7og@globe.indirect.com> References: <4f6ddg$c4o@goofy.BrandonU.CA> <4ffgvg$8j0@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: bud.indirect.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Two-Dogs (why@do.you.ask?) wrote: : LASKOWSKI <$LASKOMW@BrandonU.CA> wrote: : >Can anyone give me a list of the frequencies for cellular phones? : > : 870-890 Mhz in 30k steps. : A little more each side for USA. : TD. correction, try 870-896 for the towers and 825-850 for the mobiles you can hear it ALL on these frequencies! if they want privacy, then they should use a LAND LINE! JOHN/PHX (jamoran@analon.com) computing & making good Chemistry! ----------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!intac!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!docs25!fkelcz From: fkelcz@facstaff.wisc.edu (Frederick Kelcz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Dressler ARA2000 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 17:28:14 +1000 Organization: University of Wisconsin Dept. of Radiology Lines: 12 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: fkelcz.radiology.wisc.edu X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B] Anyone check out the Dresslar ARA2000 amplified VHF/UHF antenna? Seems like a lot of money and wonder if it will really do better than my existing Avanti AV801? Rcvrs are an ICOM R7100 and Bearcat BC9000 Thanks, Fred Kelcz N9SLR Frederick Kelcz, PhD, MD Dept. of Radiology University of Wisconsin, Madison From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: zargon1011@aol.com (ZARGON1011) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF Date: 11 Feb 1996 19:17:00 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 2 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fm0ts$had@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: zargon1011@aol.com (ZARGON1011) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Any good DTMF decoder programs out there? Anything would be a help, thanks> From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!globe.indirect.com!jamoran From: jamoran@indirect.com (John Moran) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Engine noise Date: 12 Feb 1996 12:23:33 GMT Organization: Internet Direct, Inc. Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4fnbg5$7og@globe.indirect.com> References: <4eomqc$q6b@linus.mitre.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: bud.indirect.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] is the truck bed connected electrically to the rest of the truck ?? try using resistor spark plug wires or ignition parts designed to reduce noise. will work for your vehicle but you may still hear noise of neighboring vehicles when in a city traffic jam! JOHN/PHX (jamoran@analon.com) computing & making good Chemistry! Chip Seymour (cseymour@mitre.org) wrote: : What can I do to reduce or eliminate engine racket on my scanner? : Symptoms: reduced sensitivity and increased static (not alternator : whine) while the engine is running. The noise goes away when the : antenna is unplugged. : The antenna is mounted on the plastic tool box in the truck bed. : To provide for ground, I have a piece of thick stranded wire run : from the antenna mounting bracket to the bolt securing the tool : box to the truck bed. : Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!news.tcst.com!dildog.lgc.com!news.sesqui.net!news01.aud.alcatel.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Entertainment Date: 8 Feb 1996 08:54:04 GMT Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY Lines: 17 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fcdnc$2c7i@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4f8lv4$4df@grover.netgrp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 cquick@vic.com (Carl Quick) wrote: > >Seems the " Bill Cheek" entertainment conference here in >rec.radio.scanner is slowing down.We here at U. Tn get a real kick out >of this conference.We've even started a pool on this character.Maybe >this post will get him going again.If not won't somebody PLEASE do >the honor? >I agree, after the barfing stopped, it has become rather humerous!!!!! What is the current line ??? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!newshub.csu.net!floyd!nermal!jthompso From: jthompso@nermal.santarosa.edu (John Thompson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Fastfood Repeaters??? Date: 10 Feb 1996 01:52:27 GMT Organization: Santa Rosa Junior College, Santa Rosa, CA (US) Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fgtor$h73@floyd.santarosa.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: nermal.santarosa.edu X-ident: jthompso@nermal Hi, I have heard my local Taco Bell on 151.570 (I think).. It is one of those "dot" business band frequencies. Anyway.. I only here the store employee on that frequency; I can not here the customer ordering. Is there some sort of offset that is used (like a repeater)? Or is it that the person ordering is connected directly to the inside of the restaurant, while the employee is the only one that is on a radio? If you can help me with this puzzling little problem please e-mail me. Thanks, John jthompso@santarosa.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.datasync.com!news From: nexus@datasync.com (Jimmy Simmons) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Fastfood Repeaters??? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:22:43 GMT Organization: CoastCon Inc. Ms. GulfCoast Fandom Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4fmpt2$87t@osh2.datasync.com> References: <4fgtor$h73@floyd.santarosa.edu> <4fiuub$776@voyager.ff.tds.com> Reply-To: nexus@datasync.com NNTP-Posting-Host: os-ppp9.datasync.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 RR wrote: >At a few local ones around here, the clerk is on 150-something, while the >customer station is on 40-something Mhz. You need to hear the >customer-side frequency to get both parts of the conversation. It's the >"base"... just like with cordless phones. Yes, but thats not called a "repeater" its called "duplexing" Transmitting on one frequency and receiving on an entirly different other. Its common for all resturants with a drive-thru and a communications system to be operating like that, using the intenherint frequencies with only 1/4watt of power. My McDonalds uses 154.600mHz with 35.0200mHz But listening to 154.600 you will hear both order box, employee, and all employees with headsets communicating with one-another... note: this may be different in other places, my McD's has a strange configuration? The NeXus! nexus@datasync.com http://www.datasync.com/~nexus From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Frequencies for San Jose area? Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 18:08:36 -0800 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <31141524.13FA@internetMCI.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr1-dialup49.sanfrancisco.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win16; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45344 alt.radio.scanner:27389 I'm looking for a list of business and public services frequencies in the San Jose and San Francisco Bay area. If anyone has a good list can you please post it or better yet email it to me? Also, if anyone knows of any WEB sites that might have this information can please send me the URL? Thanks, Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!cedar.evansville.edu!usenet From: "Marie H. McDonough" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frequency converters Date: 11 Feb 1996 17:55:33 GMT Organization: University of Evansville Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4flail$2tck@cedar.evansville.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: speakermac.evansville.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:rec.radio.scanner Hello all, I'm looking for info on companies that sell reliable frequency converters or info on plans for a DIY (do it yourself) kit. Since my 2021 is non-modifiable and all police and fire are 800Mhz I need to make an adjustment. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Paul McDonough [It's my wifes e-mail account] From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!elsner From: elsner@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Donald L Elsner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS Regency MX400 scanner full coverage $125 Date: 10 Feb 1996 18:41:22 GMT Organization: Information & Media Technologies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 11 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fiosi$ds5@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 Keywords: MX4000 unblocked for sale Regency MX4000 scanner. 30-50 118-136 144-174 440-512 and of course 800 - 950 MHz inclusive. i have the programming manual also. works great. first $125 gets it -don elsner@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!not-for-mail From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: fs/trd: SONY ICF-SW100s Followup-To: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner Date: 7 Feb 1996 16:25:00 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fajos$ltn@uwm.edu> References: <4f9i81$943@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.shortwave:70011 rec.radio.swap:57369 rec.radio.scanner:45446 Nathan Ryan Gingras (herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu) wrote: : Swap ICFsw100s for AR-2500, or sell for $275 : : Nate. : : This radio has been sold. Nate, KB9LSX http://www.uwm.edu/~herb From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dpc.net!novia!nntp.inc.net!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!interaccess!usenet From: "Herb A. Zite" Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: FS: AR3000A Unblocked scanner Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 17:43:36 -0600 Organization: Zite's Water Works, Chief Drip in Charge Lines: 4 Message-ID: <311BDC28.1B68@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d113.nb.interaccess.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.shortwave:69982 rec.radio.scanner:45394 alt.radio.scanner:27411 rec.radio.swap:57300 Unblocked AR3000A scanner. In very good condition with all accessories, box and docs. $925 or best offer + shipping and COD From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx09-01.teleport.com!prografx From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: Radio Shack Pro-2026 Mobile UNBLOCKED Scanner Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:36:20 Organization: PROGRAFX of Oregon Lines: 18 Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <4eoa79$6rb@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <4eom51$ab8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4es1ie$fj3@hearst.cac.psu.edu> <4f5hl0$18uu@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx09-01.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A] In article <4f5hl0$18uu@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew D urigan) writes: >From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) >Subject: Re: FS: Radio Shack Pro-2026 Mobile UNBLOCKED Scanner >Date: 5 Feb 1996 18:18:08 GMT >"Roy D." wrote: >> >>I dissagree with you Drew. The modifiable rigs are GONE. >Not all of them. During the recent sale, I managed to locate no fewer >than FIVE Pro-2026 units with modifiable date codes at a local RS store. >-Drew in Charlotte- I located at least TWICE that many locally between 4 or 5 Radio Shacks, and at least half of them were purchased by people I know (I sent them there). Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.voicenet.com!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!ub!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!interaccess!usenet From: "Herb A. Zite" Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: FS: Sony ICFSW800 SW/FM Pocket Radio Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 17:49:11 -0600 Organization: Zite's Water Works, Chief Drip in Charge Lines: 5 Message-ID: <311BDD77.664D@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d113.nb.interaccess.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.shortwave:70049 rec.radio.scanner:45498 alt.radio.scanner:27456 rec.radio.swap:57430 Sony ICFSW800 pocket short wave/FM radio with touch screen tuning, compact external antenna, preprogrammed tuning cards and earphone. Like new with all docs. $100 or best offer + COD and shipping From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!fizban.solace.mh.se!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!news1.radix.net!news From: sbostic@radix.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:14:43 GMT Organization: RadixNet Internet Services Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fd42q$1t6@news1.radix.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin33.annex2.radix.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bkobb@newsignals.com (Bennett Z. Kobb) wrote: >In article , >krogers@teleport.com (Kevin Rogers) wrote: >> am looking for a GMRS mobile unit (25 watts) and handheld units (2 or >> more watts) here in the Portland,OR area. i am not having any luck finding >> ANYONE who knows what i am talking about. >You can always get good GMRS info, including local contacts who could >direct you to equipment sources, from: >Personal Radio Steering Group Inc. 313 MOBILE-3 73016.163@compuserve.com Exactly what freqs are used by GMRS? I wanna punch them into my scanner and listen in to see how much activity there is in my area. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:35 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!pgh!usenet From: jwest@pgh.nauticom.net (Jim West) Subject: Going South, Need Frequencys - D.C. to Florida Sender: usenet@pgh.nauticom.net (Usenet) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 03:24:38 GMT X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 199.234.151.183.du.nauticom.net Organization: Nauticom - Internet Access Provider X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Lines: 12 I'm driving to Florida for a vacation and would appreciate if anyone could send me some frequencys for citys along the way. Traveling I95 to the end and then US1 to Key West Mostly after interstate police, but also any other *interesting* frequencys you might have. If you send some frequencys, please mention the city and state. Are there any states along the way that frown on mobile scanning? Thanks in advance..... Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!llamkuf.demon.co.uk!david From: David Clark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Goodwood Circuit Radio Frequencies Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:25:52 +0000 Organization: I'm a Racing Driver! Lines: 16 Distribution: world Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: llamkuf.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: llamkuf.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.10 Does anybody know the frequency used by Goodwood Circuit (UK) for test days? I have tried the usual RAC frequency (169.3735) with no joy - I am down there later this week. Thanks in advance, --- David Clark ****************************************************************** * To err is human..... * * * * .....to really foul things up requires a computer! * ****************************************************************** Censorship is condoned by those people with something to hide...... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!news From: vbook@vbook.com (Ed Mitchell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Ham Radio Online goes Interactive! Check us out! Date: 12 Feb 1996 16:20:22 GMT Organization: Virtual Publishing Co. Lines: 44 Message-ID: <4fnpc6$38f@news.accessone.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: vbook.accessone.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.misc:98010 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:14099 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13295 rec.radio.amateur.space:6310 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:19025 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24869 rec.radio.amateur.policy:33073 rec.radio.scanner:45431 rec.radio.shortwave:70000 INTRODUCING HAM RADIO ONLINE INTERACTIVE! Now you can post free classified ads, DX openings, VHF band openings and much more. And with over 10,000 readers stopping by last month, your thoughts will actually get read at this ham radio web site! We are not just pointers to cyberspace - we've got actual content - feature articles, newsletters, product reviews, real-time propagation conditions and more. The February 1996 edition of Ham Radio Online International Magazine is available at http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm Some of the NEW February stories include a review of SkyTel's "2-way paging" s ystem, radio surveillance frequencies, and the effects of two-way radio operation in blasting zones. Ham Radio Online has been selected as a featured web site by America Online and a Top 100 web site for the month of January by Planet Earth, Inc. New articles are available now and we add articles throughout the month. Ham Radio Online has up-to-date news about Amateur Radio from around the world , feature stories, real-time propagation and auroral condition reports, real-tim e earthquake and severe weather conditions for emergency communications planning , online humor section and the Ham Radio Online Library with fully indexed (find any section with just a mouse click) Part 97 rules and regulations. Plus we cover broadcasting, shortwave, scanning generally anything having to do with radio telecommunications. And we plan to offer some totally cool new services during the coming months. As always its free and free of ads. Thanks to you, we had over 10,000 readers stop by during January! Please enjoy! 73, Ed Mitchell KF7VY vbook@vbook.com http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm ------------------------ personal email to vbook@vbook.com Visit Ham Radio Online, it's free, at http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline .htm From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!khis_news.khis.kodak.com!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!edisto.awod.com!harbour.awod.com!usenet From: Glenn Little WB4UIV Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How to install tone board in BC760-xlt? Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 01:09:59 -0800 Organization: Amateur Radio Station WB4UIV Lines: 13 Message-ID: <311B0F67.6CB1@awod.com> References: <4f3vsc$2fv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chs0066.awod.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) To: ArizonMan ArizonMan wrote: > > what does a tone board do? It keeps the speaker muted until a signal is received that has a tone on it that is the same as your tone board is tuned to. These tones are subaudible (67HZ to somewhere around 200 HZ). These tones are used to allow many users on the same channel without everyone having to hear everything that is going on on the channel. 73 Glenn WB4UIV From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet From: TOMGETTY@atl.mindspring.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: I want to buy your old scanner!! I need a handheld w/ 29 - 54 Mhz Band. Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 17:43:21 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fntgr$r0h@firebrick.mindspring.com> Reply-To: Tomgetty@mindspring.com NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-225.dialup.mindspring.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Wanted: A Handheld Scanner with 29 - 54 Mhz. band. Nothing Fancy E-Mail TOMGETTY@ATL.MINDSPRING.COM From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!xpat.postech.ac.kr!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: IF for BC9000xlt ? ? ? ? Date: 11 Feb 1996 14:43:32 GMT Organization: Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4fkvak$345@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <0099DB91.FEC40F80@netins.net> Reply-To: parnass@att.com NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45378 alt.radio.scanner:27406 In article <0099DB91.FEC40F80@netins.net>, wrote: > In my (so far unsuccesful) search for cellular images, > I'm wondering if anyone can tell me the 9000's IF? For the Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT: 1st IF = 254.4 or 380.7 MHz (depends on band) 2nd IF = 58.075 MHz 3rd IF = 5.5 or 0.455 MHz (depends on mode) -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsrelay.netins.net!news.netins.net!usenet From: aldrich@netins.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: IF for BC9000xlt ? ? ? ? Date: 11 Feb 1996 04:44:07 GMT Organization: INS Information Services, Des Moines, IA USA Lines: 2 Message-ID: <0099DB91.FEC40F80@netins.net> Reply-To: aldrich@netins.net NNTP-Posting-Host: ins.netins.net In my (so far unsuccesful) search for cellular images, I'm wondering if anyone can tell me the 9000's IF? thanks!! swami @;<} From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ns1.win.net!onli_info.win.net!russell_hibma Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <76@onli_info.win.net> Reply-To: russell_hibma@onli_info.win.net (RUSSELL HIBMA) From: russell_hibma@onli_info.win.net (RUSSELL HIBMA) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 16:23:00 GMT Subject: Illinois State Police Lines: 6 I'm looking for the 800mhz freq's for the Ill.SP, they went to 800mhz about 4-6 months ago. Anyone help would be appreciated. --- * PowerAccess 1.08 Become a programmer and never see the world!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:45 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!csprick From: csprick@netcom.com (Charles Sprick) Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Message-ID: <3120b453.2131858@10.0.2.1> Sender: csprick@netcom3.netcom.com Reply-To: Chuck Sprick Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182 References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:56:27 GMT Lines: 13 On Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT, powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) wrote: >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >states that do allow them. I'm also seeki9ng this info. Would appreciate an e-mail response if easier. TIA. Chuck csprick@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:45 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!globe.indirect.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news5.ner.bbnplanet.net!news.ner.bbnplanet.net!ineter.edgewater.com!not-for-mail From: powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) Subject: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Message-ID: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT Reply-To: powen@edgewater.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55 Organization: Edgewater Technology. Lines: 14 Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the states that do allow them. Thanks in advance, Phil... \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From the | POwen@Edgewater.com | Accept mind of | - or - | no Phil Owen. | POwen@Lynx.dac.neu.edu | substitutes! \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!beavis.kronos.com!usenet From: markmo@kronos.com (Mark Mojkowski) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: indoor antenna Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:21:23 GMT Organization: Kronos, Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4fqobj$st3@beavis.kronos.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.228.12.31 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 Hello, I am looking for advice on an inexpensive (<$50) fullrange (30-900MHz) indoor antenna for my RS 2032. I prefer that it not connect directly to the scanner, so I'll have about 12` of coax. I've thought of using a mobile antenna indoors, or the Grove Hidden antenna. If the Hidden antenna performs well, it would be an inexpensive choice (only $20). Thanks for any recommendations. Please reply to markmo@kronos.com. -Mark From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.microsoft.com!news From: anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 9 Feb 1996 22:15:32 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fgh24$njr@news.microsoft.com> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4fbnkr$lnr@spartacus.hula.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.56.153.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 In article <4fbnkr$lnr@spartacus.hula.net>, krokus@hula.net says... > [...] >It is their business, if/when it affects your on the job performance. Correct. "If" and "when" are the operative words. Lots of folks can handle sub stances -- some cannot. Action is only necessary when performance is affected, not bef ore. That, my friend, is called "prior restraint". >>[Vote with your dollars, folks. Don't buy these statists' antennas.] > >It's your option, exercise it at your will. How gracious of you, considering your stance on other folks' freedoms. -- The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!mr.net!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!oitnews.harvard.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!newshost.convex.com!news.dfw.net!news.dfw.net!not-for-mail From: boakley@dfw.net (Brian Oakley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 8 Feb 1996 22:12:49 -0600 Organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access Lines: 27 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fehk1$m94@dfw.dfw.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dfw.dfw.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Amen! drugged drivers cause as many accidents if not more than drunk drivers. And drugged up employes are a very dangerous issue, especially when they work with or around power tools. Not to mention the insurance costs caused by they number of accidents caused by doped up dope heads. B. Drew Durigan (VUBS79A@prodigy.com) wrote: : anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) wrote: : > : >In article <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com : >says... : >> : >>[...] ALL companies should be doing drug screens! : > : >What people put into their own bodies is their own business, and : >no one elses', least of all yours'. : It most certainly is! It becomes "my business" when these people drive : on the highway, endangering my life. If I'm a business owner, it is also : "my business" when these folks cost me money in the form of lower : productivity, increased "sick time" off of work, and making bad decisions : on the job, due to their drug or alcohol-induced state. : -Drew in Charlotte- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!realtime.net!news.mindspring.com!gatech!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!wetware!wsrcc.com!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!billn From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 10 Feb 1996 05:50:16 GMT Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Lines: 18 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fehk1$m94@dfw.dfw.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: peak.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Brian Oakley (boakley@dfw.net) wrote: : Amen! drugged drivers cause as many accidents if not more than drunk : drivers. And drugged up employes are a very dangerous issue, especially : when they work with or around power tools. Not to mention the insurance : costs caused by they number of accidents caused by doped up dope heads. B. Please provide some documentation for this claim. As far as I have been able to find out, there are very few automobile accidents due to users of illegal drugs - most are due to drunk drivers. I think anyone who is impaired while driving, for ANY reason (not just legal or illegal drug usage) should be cited and locked up. As far as on the job impairment, impairment testing is the answer. It would test for ACTUAL danger to others, not just because someone had smoked some marijuana at a party 3 weeks previously. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!intac!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!news.sol.net!news.inc.net!news From: Will Flor Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 11 Feb 1996 02:39:08 GMT Organization: R R Systems Group, Inc. Lines: 64 Message-ID: <4fjksc$jsh@news.inc.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fen7o$geo@odo.peak.org> <4ffksi$1vv2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: will.rrgroup.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit) VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) wrote: >billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) wrote: >> >>You don't need drug testing for that. Being impaired on the job is >>sufficient by itself, as is poor performance of job duties. > >How do you PROVE use if you don't have a testing mechanism. You just don't get it, Drew - nobody's talking about "proving use" - we're talking about proving poor performance of job duties and impairment - **regardless** of cause. >In these days of high-dollar, wrongful-dismissal lawsuits, "suspected drug us e" is >not sufficient grounds for termination of employment. It never has been, Drew. Wake up and smell the coffee (a recreational drug, BTW.) >You need proof. Actually, "use of illegal drugs" is a *very dangerous* reason to give for someones dismissal - in fact, in some states, it's illegal to fire someone for that reason. >Especially if the suspected user is female, or (worse) a member of a >minority group. These people will jump up and claim "discrimination" any >chance they get. Without conclusive evidence, you become the victim. > Actually, firing someone for using illegal drugs is itself illegal in many states and cities, and any employment lawyer you deal with will tell you as an employer that you simply shouldn't do it, either. The recommended tactic is to offer the employee some form of rehabilitation. If they refuse, *then* fire them. This seems to be a well-recommended course of action across the country. If the person in question is a bozo or slacker, then fire them for *that* and leave drugs out of it; this is much safer. >Is it also a "personal choice" to run red lights, drive on the highway at >100MPH, or assault people with semi-automatic weapons? Of course not! >All these acts are illegal...as is the possession and use of >"recreational drugs." Actually many recreational drugs are completely legal, Drew - alcohol, caffeine and tobacco come to mind as three that are. BTW - it's also not a good idea to fire an employee because he runs red lights or drives at 100 MPH - "breaking the law" in and of itself is, in fact, **not** considered a valid reason for "dismissal for cause." The opinions in this postings are facts, Drew - obtained by long talks with highly-paid lawyers who specialize in employment law. -Will from Wisconsin willf@rrgroup.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!interactive.net!winternet.com!dimensional.com!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.microsoft.com!news From: anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Larsen Antennas Job Posting Date: 9 Feb 1996 22:12:08 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation Lines: 42 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fggro$njr@news.microsoft.com> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.56.153.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 In article <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com says.. . > >anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) wrote: >> >>In article <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com > >>says... >>> >>>[...] ALL companies should be doing drug screens! >> >>What people put into their own bodies is their own business, and >>no one elses', least of all yours'. > >It most certainly is! It becomes "my business" when these people drive >on the highway, endangering my life. HELLOOOOO! Anybody home? Who mentioned anything about "driving on the highway" ? We already have laws dealing with "driving under the influence", etc. Pray tel l what harm is there when one excercises the right to consume substances of choice wi thout harming others? None, but you appear to be afraid when others do, though. >If I'm a business owner, it is also >"my business" when these folks cost me money in the form of lower >productivity, increased "sick time" off of work, and making bad decisions >on the job, due to their drug or alcohol-induced state. Fine. Do what you want with your "business". Inspect your employees' brain wav es for "non-PC-thought". Inspect their car's speedometers to see if they ever drove o ver 65mph. (BTW, any employee who works for you under these conditions has infinit ely low self-esteem, IMNSHO.) Go ahead an treat your employees like irresponsible crap, but you won't be selling *me* any antennas. If "your business" is having problems with employees' "low productivity", "inc reased sick time", "off work", etc. there is a simple solution -- fire their a**es an d hire workers who can do the job right. -- The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet From: wave@mindspring.com (Pieter Ibelings) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,rec.video.cable-tv,rec.video.satellite.dbs,rec.video.satellite.tvro Subject: Looking for interconnection cable for HP8505, 8501 or 8750 Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:06:43 GMT Organization: -.-. --.- -.. -..- Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fov83$s7k@brickbat.mindspring.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wave.mindspring.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24880 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13304 rec.radio.amateur.space:6314 rec.radio.scanner:45466 rec.radio.swap:57386 rec.video.cable-tv:19567 rec.video.satellite.dbs:23079 rec.video.satellite.tvro:23110 I am in desperate need of a couple interconnection cables for the HP8505 network Analyzer. The cable is a D-connector with 17 pins and 7 coax cables, but only six are used. If you have any info on where I can find some I would appreciate it. Thanks AC4OP Pieter wave@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~wave From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!usenet From: MartinBleiwas Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: MAGNIFIER LAMP STEREO Date: 12 Feb 1996 22:49:43 GMT Organization: Internet Online Services Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fog67$l62@news.ios.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-19.ts-3.nyc.idt.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) MasterLens Stereo Magnifier with twin 4-watt miniature florescent lamps. Magnifier has large 5x8 rectangular lens. This unit has adjustable arms. Great for close work I.E. soldering radio circuit repairs. Unit list for $ 449.00. I have only 2 left brand new in box. My price is only $ 199.oo plus shipping. Great Valvue! This is an unbelivable unit. Contact bleiwass@haven.ios. com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!purdue!oitnews.harvard.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!news.tamu.edu!xenon.brooks.af.mil!hal.brooks.af.mil!hall From: hall@hal.brooks.af.mil (Charles Hall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner Antennas Date: 9 Feb 1996 14:58:48 GMT Organization: CSC Lines: 20 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4ffnf8$7im@xenon.brooks.af.mil> Reply-To: hall@hal.brooks.af.mil NNTP-Posting-Host: mardah1.brooks.af.mil > >I am also interested in this question. I had a mobile antenna from Radio >Shack and one day i compared it to the rubber duck on my hand held scanner >and I found the duck to get better reception. I took the Radio Shack >antenna back. > >Bob J. > My experience has been quite the opposite. I drive about 50,000 miles per yea r through central and west Texas and find that a Radio Shack mobile scanner give s much better reception than the rubber duckie -- if it is on a car. These beasts are designed with the metal of the car body in mind. If you try to use sit one on a wooden shelf inside your house, you will get terrible reception. Charles Hall From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:56 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news From: doug@eskimo.com (Doug Brooks) Subject: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-ID: Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id) Organization: UltraCAD X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 23:54:37 GMT Lines: 7 I've heard that mobile scanners are illegal in some states. Anyone know for sure if they are legal in Washington, Oregon, and/or California? Going on a car trip and would like to know. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!engr.orst.edu!holmes.ece.orst.edu!varine From: Brian varine Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 06:47:57 -0800 Organization: College of Engineering, Oregon State University Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: holmes.ece.orst.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, Doug Brooks wrote: > I've heard that mobile scanners are illegal in some states. > > Anyone know for sure if they are legal in Washington, Oregon, and/or > California? Going on a car trip and would like to know. Comletely legal in all three. But, would it really matter? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!worldlinx.com!clio.trends.ca!news.io.org!winternet.com!fury.berkshire.net!op.net!agis!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: tyson664@aol.com (Tyson664) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Motorola SP-10 Mods Date: 8 Feb 1996 22:44:58 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 7 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fefvq$1qd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tyson664@aol.com (Tyson664) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Looking for help on modifing a sp-10 2-way. Right now it is configured to change to 16 different frequencies in the 400MHz range (I believe it is UHF). I would like to modify this to work in the VHF band. I have the service manual and the schematics for each setup, but am looking for someone that may have done this before or knows how to properly do it Chris From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:11:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!noc.nyx.net!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail From: anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: 11 Feb 1996 12:59:16 -0700 Organization: Nyx.net, free public access to the Internet Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4flhqk$576@nyx10.cs.du.edu> References: <4fl376$ck1@hopper.acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.nyx.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] F. Barry Mulligan (mulligan@ACM.ORG) wrote: : The allocation comes under the "Private Operational-Fixed Microwave" : service as "Multiple Address Systems". They're unlikely to be listed in : scanner guides, which are more concerned with Land Mobile licencees, but : you might try the Percom web site, which has a search engine for its : license database products. Both Percom and Grove publish CDs with fairly : complete extracts from the FCC Master File. Thanks for answering. Where is Percom's web site? I have tried all the major search tools and came up totally dry. : The frequencies in question are 928-929 MHz and 952-960 MHz. The bands : are shared with other multi-address systems, such as alarm monitors and : remote data acquisition systems, so finding intermitant digital bursts is : to be expected. In Atlanta, the local Muzak affiliate uses 956.3375 and : 959.8875 MHz. Does anyone know if Muzak or similar services would be on these frequencies in the N Texas (i.e. Dallas) area? Also, have they been expanding coverage on this band and are they planning to eventually replace their SCA-FM broadcasts with this? Or are they just on this band in a few localized areas? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.comm.net!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!noc.nyx.net!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail From: anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: 10 Feb 1996 21:38:37 -0700 Organization: Nyx.net, free public access to the Internet Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.nyx.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I remember a post a few months back about someone claiming to have received channels carrying Muzak (commerical-free light pop-rock music and/or elevator music) on 900Mhz. Specifically, the frequencies mentioned were 928.9125 and 956.3125. All I get on these is data transmissions. Are the above freqs licensed to Muzak (or whoever) on a nationwide basis or just in certain locations? Has anyone received music on these frequencies and if so where are you located? Also, in general, how do you look up who frequencies are allocated to in the 900 Mhz band? Is there anything online where you can look up someone by name and find what frequency they are allocated to? Or books? I looked in the Radio Shack guide and they have very little listed in the 900Mhz band. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!hopper.acm.org!ACM.ORG!MULLIGAN From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: 12 Feb 1996 02:08:01 GMT Organization: ACM Network Services Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fm7e1$ebq@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG NNTP-Posting-Host: acm.org As to Percom's web site, I don't know it off-hand, but Chuck or someone here should be able to supply the URL. Muzak and 3M Sound Products are pushing direct satellite delivery, so it's unlikely that there will be much expansion of existing multi-address systems. /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!gt-news!news From: Glenn Champion Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: NEED "CT-17" (CI-V) LEVEL CONVERTER SCHEMATIC Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 17:18:43 -0500 Organization: GTRI Lines: 5 Message-ID: <311BC843.E68@gtri.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghcpc.gtri.gatech.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) I have searched several FTP archive sites with no success. Does anyone know where I can find a design for a CT-17 compatible level converter for my ICOM R-9000? Thanks a bunch! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:03 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!news3.noc.netcom.net!zdc!szdc!usenet From: comsec@fastlink.net (comsec) Subject: Need Info on Dick Smith Electronics RDF X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55 Sender: usenet@clark.zippo.com Nntp-Posting-Host: ip129.vp.fastlink.net Organization: Zippo Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 01:51:57 GMT Lines: 8 Does Anybody have a manual or schematic for a Dick Smith Electronics Radio Direction Finder?. Please post any info or a phone number. I think they are in Australia . TIA COMSEC From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!khis_news.khis.kodak.com!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!edisto.awod.com!harbour.awod.com!usenet From: Glenn Little WB4UIV Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need suggestion / 200xlt problem... Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 01:12:25 -0800 Organization: Amateur Radio Station WB4UIV Lines: 21 Message-ID: <311B0FF9.6DB4@awod.com> References: <4favcq$72g@news.internetmci.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chs0066.awod.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) To: Henry Valera Henry Valera wrote: > > I recently sent my 200xlt to Radio Shack for repair and they returned it as > "unrepairable". They said the Main Logic Board was shot and that Uniden doe s not > stock that part. A few people have said that diagnosis did not sound right and to > call Uniden myself. Well, I've tried calling the six different 1-800 number s they > have and they're always busy. So I'm back to where I started. Any suggesti ons > would be greatly appreciated as far as where to send it for repair. > > BTW, the symptons of the radio are no audio, no light, never locks on a freq . > > Thanks in advance, > > Henry. Keep trying the 800 number. You will probably need am RMA (return material authorization) number for them toe accept the package. 73 Glenn WB4UIV From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.midplains.net!gw2.att.com!gw1.att.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!newsstand.tc.umn.edu!gold.tc.umn.edu!zant0001 From: zant0001@gold.tc.umn.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need tips on buying first scanner.. Date: 10 Feb 1996 10:38:43 -0600 Organization: University of Minnesota Lines: 23 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: gold.tc.umn.edu I'm interested in investing a fair amount of money into a handheld scanner, and have been looking through magazines, visiting local trade shows, etc.. but I'm still not coming up with much. From what I've read, and have seen so far, The widest coverage handhelds I'm willing to shell out money for are the Pro-26 and Bearcat 3000XLT. I'm also interested in getting shortwave coverage, and would consider something like the AR8000, but only if it's worth it. I know this has probably been asked a thousand and one times on here, but I need some non-salesman feedback. Thanks, Eric -- ........................o O C A U T i O N O o............................ zant0001@gold.tc.umn.edu caution@chess.cs.umn.edu zanto@nh.cc.mn.us General mail delivery: Eric.M.Zanto-1@umn.edu FLP: http://minerva.cis.yale.edu/~ariedels/seal.html WWW: http://www.umn.edu/nlhome/g479/zant0001 IRC: Caution From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:06 1996 From: SEColegrove@msn.com (Steve Colegrove) Subject: RE: Need tips on buying first scanner.. Date: 11 Feb 96 15:07:22 -0800 References: Message-ID: <00001ff6+000045ec@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 6 I have been on Compuserve for a year or so, and the top of the line, best handheld discussed there is the AR 8000. They all seem to buy through Javiation in the UK. The price is better, and there are no frequency gaps as in the US. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!metro.atlanta.com!nntp.atlanta.com!usenet From: "Adam L. Caskey" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Needed Mod for PRO 2021 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:58:06 -0800 Organization: WZGC-FM, Z93 Radio Lines: 8 Message-ID: <31200C4E.7E27@atlanta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dwinslow.atlanta.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I; 16bit) I am hoping someone out there can help me with finding some or any mods I can make to my PRO 2021 to inable it to pick up 800MHz or just additional frequencies. E-mail me directly with any info, and thanks in advance. Adam L. Caskey acc@atlanta.com http://www.com/z93/adamc.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.datasync.com!news From: nexus@datasync.com (Jimmy Simmons) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Orleans PD Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:17:43 GMT Organization: CoastCon Inc. Ms. GulfCoast Fandom Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4fmpjn$87t@osh2.datasync.com> References: <311CECC4.58DA@evansville.net> Reply-To: nexus@datasync.com NNTP-Posting-Host: os-ppp9.datasync.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Jeff wrote: >Has the NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPT now switched to 800 also is it the >dreaded GE? >thanks >Jeff >The Ham Station USA Jeff, the last time I was over there (2 weeks ago) thay were still HEAVYLY using the UHF-public safety frequencies, 460.000 to 461.000 mHz you will be able to find all kinds of traffic relating to law enforcement within the Greater New Orleans Area, Orleans Parish. Uhhh, if thay have gone to a trunked system, I wasn't able to pick it up yet, so far I found a LE net nearby, I am thinking its Slidell PD, or maybe Orleans Parish SO, on a Motorola Type-II trunk, on 855~859.7375mHz... I'm going to be going back on the 18th of the month for a Mardi-Gras festival, and parades for the day, I'll keep a scan all day/night long to find new or changed items and report them back here... Later, The NeXus! nexus@datasync.com http://www.datasync.com/~nexus/ My WebPage. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:09 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.duc.auburn.edu!mallard.duc.auburn.edu!whitbje From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: New Pro-51 X-Sender: whitbje@mallard.duc.auburn.edu Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: Sender: usenet@mail.auburn.edu (Usenet Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: mallard2.duc.auburn.edu Organization: Auburn University Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 04:53:05 GMT Lines: 15 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27416 rec.radio.scanner:45407 I wanted to thank everyone who gave me tips and suggestions about a new handheld. My parents (with just a little encouragement) gave me a Pro-51 for graduation yesterday, and so far I've been very impressed. The most impressive thing so far is the speaker: it is equal or better in quality than my desktop. Dad's 200XLT is noticeable "tinny," but mine leans heavily toward the bass side. The biggest drawback is that it's a bit harder to use than my Bearcat; everything takes a few more keystrokes. But for double the capacity and almost quadruple the speed, I'll learn . Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!news.supernet.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!news.serv.net!news.alt.net!news.net99.net!news.igc.net!ftl-fl-1-89 From: opto@igc.net (Kevin Cox) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Optoelectronics February Special Date: 9 Feb 1996 19:23:16 GMT Organization: Optoelectronics Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fg6v4$b24@IRIS.igc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ftl-fl-1-89.igc.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Optoelectronics announces a special price for the Scout for the entire month of February. The Special price is $399 plus you receive a free CC30 carrying case. The regular price for the Scout is $449 and the CC30 has a $10 value. That's a savings of $60. All orders must be received by February 29th. This special is limited to U.S. and Canadian customers only. Contact Optoelectronics at 1-800-327-5912 or 1-954-771-2050. You must mention that you saw this special on the Internet. For further information on the Scout see our Web page: http://www.optoelectronics.com Shipping and handling is extra. Sincerely, Kevin Cox From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!netaxs.com!news2.cais.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!spunky.RedBrick.COM!nntp.et.byu.edu!news.pr.erau.edu!usenet From: Stephen Waits Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: POCSAG,MESSAGE TRACKER Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 06:55:21 -0700 Organization: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Lines: 7 Message-ID: <31175DC9.3E65@pr.erau.edu> References: <4eo3vh$39v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> <4f0fra$5uj@boris.eden.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dns-error.pr.erau.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) To: Robert Barker What is Message Tracker and where can one get Message Tracker? I'm building the PD-200 interface right now. Thanks for your help! --Steve Waits From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO 2035 Mods Date: 7 Feb 1996 12:49:32 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 13 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4faonc$hk9@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article , michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) writes: >You can also replace the scanner's CPU with >one that is available overseas from Javiation and other companies. Not >sure about the price, however. Probably not any cheaper than an Opto, $148.00 US Dollars shipped from the UK Javiation Took about 3 weeks to get here and 10 mins. to install. Works great and cheaper than the others. mark s. conway From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!xyzzy.bubble.org!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.fibr.net!news From: leasley@ranch-house.com (Larry Easley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2006 & Pro-43 For Sale Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 17:42:41 GMT Organization: The Ranch House Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4f83vb$42e@nimitz.fibr.net> Reply-To: leasley@ranch-house.com NNTP-Posting-Host: dynm01-011.txdirect.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99b.112 I have available, for reasonable offers, a Pro-2006 400-channel (modified) base scanner, and a Pro-43 200-channel (also modified) handheld scanner. Any reasonable offers can be sent to me at leasley@txdirect.net. I will get back with the best offers and we'll work out the details at that time. Thanks, Larry All the way from the Ranch House in San ANtonio, Texas! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: Stephanie Steele Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-2035 Mods Date: 12 Feb 1996 00:10:02 -0700 Organization: Primenet Services for the Internet Lines: 9 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <311EE7C5.7C3C@primenet.com> X-Posted-By: ip166.pay.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello again, Could someone please tell me if there are any modifications or add-ons available for the RS PRO-2035 Scanner to extend it's frequency range. I am sorry if this has been covered in the past but I am new to the Internet. Thanks in advance for any help. Stephanie kc7dba@primenet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dpc.net!news.heurikon.com!uwvax!newssinet!news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp!tkyex1.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp!news.tisn.ad.jp!nalserver.nal.go.jp!statky2.stanet!news.imnet.ad.jp!news.join.ad.jp!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-2037 Date: 10 Feb 1996 04:46:55 GMT Organization: Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL Lines: 51 Message-ID: <4fh7vv$pft@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <4fbidk$59t@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <60.6672.2571.0N20A557@canrem.com> Reply-To: parnass@att.com NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27404 rec.radio.scanner:45377 In article <60.6672.2571.0N20A557@canrem.com>, paul.cordingley@canrem.com wrote: > -=> Quoting Parnass@att.com to All <=- > >Hi Bob, > > Pa> From the "Buying a Used Scanner" FAQ: > > Pa> PRO-2037: 1994 vintage. Triple conversion all plastic base > Pa> scanner made by GRE. Home version of the PRO-62 portable > Pa> but with more intermod. 200 channels in 10 banks, one > Pa> search bank, selectable AM and FM. Uses up conversion > Pa> circuitry but inadequate front end filtering still allows > >Can you explain what 'up-conversion' is? > I presume it's the >relation of the LO freq to the 1st IF freq, but which way >is 'up'? Strictly speaking, up conversion means the 1st IF is higher than the frequency to which the receiver is tuned. Truth be told, this condition holds for only part of the spectrum covered by the PRO-2037, since the 2037 covers freqs up to the GHz range, well above its 257.5 MHz IF. In the context of discussing scanners, using the term "up conversion" loosely differentiates the 2037 from simpler models with 1st IFs in the 10.7 - 10.8 MHz range (down conversion). > If I'm tuned to say 161.475 on the 2037, with an IF of >257.5, what's the LO tuned to? The LO would either be tuned to 418.975 (sum of IF plus programmed freq) or 96.025 MHz (difference). While I don't have the PRO-2037 documentation in front of me, I'd guess the PRO-2037 LO would be tuned to the sum in this case. Experimenter's tip: You might resolve this ambiguity yourself by listening on 96.025 MHz in a nearby FM broadcast receiver while your 2037 is programmed for 161.475 MHz. The signals radiated by receiver local oscillators are usually strong enough to hear in neighboring receivers. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!interactive.net!winternet.com!news.neocom.ca!news3.toronto.istar.net!istar.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-2037 Date: 8 Feb 1996 01:08:04 GMT Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4fbidk$59t@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <4fb271$1dai@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Reply-To: parnass@att.com NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45437 alt.radio.scanner:27424 In article <4fb271$1dai@msunews.cl.msu.edu>, SS wrote: >I would really like to get some opinions of this scanner. >Is it modifiable for cellular? Is it is good unit? >I found a used one for $150, is this a fair >price? THanks!!! Although I'm not in the market, I'd pay $120-$150 for a used PRO-2037 in excellent condition, with manual and antenna. I wouldn't pay any more than $150, though. Make sure the display is crisp -- not faded or blotchy. The PRO-2037 uses LEDs instead of a short-life electroluminescent panel for backlighting. From the "Buying a Used Scanner" FAQ: PRO-2037: 1994 vintage. Triple conversion all plastic base scanner made by GRE. Home version of the PRO-62 portable but with more intermod. 200 channels in 10 banks, one search bank, selectable AM and FM. Uses up conversion circuitry but inadequate front end filtering still allows images, though not as bad as in 10.7 or 10.8 MHz IF circuits. Crisp, respectable audio given the top mounted speaker. See "The Radio Shack PRO-2037," by Bob Parnass, in July 1995 Monitoring Times. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!csn!nntp-xfer-2.csn.net!csn!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!pm132-14 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2037 Date: Wed, 07 Feb 96 20:39:33 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4fb271$1dai@msunews.cl.msu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm132-14.dialip.mich.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 I would really like to get some opinions of this scanner. Is it modifiable for cellular? Is it is good unit? I found a used one for $150, is this a fair price? THanks!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!news.crso.com!blyle From: Bob Lyle Organization: CRS Online's Frontier Subject: PRO-2037 Modification Message-ID: <130296.21274177235.n@frontier.canrem.com> Date: 13 Feb 1996 21:27:41 GMT Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Lines: 10 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45495 alt.radio.scanner:27453 Can anyone advise if the PRO-2037 (Radio Shack) scanner is cellular restorable, by what means and if there's a date code limitation as is the case with the PRO-43 handheld? Thanks in advance! Bob blyle@frontier.canrem.com 73577.3602@compuserve.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.serv.net!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!pooh.freenet.mb.ca!winnie.freenet.mb.ca!snp346 From: Jason Piush Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-29 - is it worth it? Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 01:45:16 -0600 Organization: Blue Sky FreeNet of Manitoba Inc. Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <4epq27$s7r@cobia.gulf.net> <655.6607T716T2424@nucleus.com> <4f5ic1$aq5@nyx10.cs.du.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: winnie.freenet.mb.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <4f5ic1$aq5@nyx10.cs.du.edu> Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27428 rec.radio.scanner:45447 What are some random thoughts on the PRO-29? I just picked up one as a birthday gift for my father in law. I know that it isn't exactly top-of-the-line, but this guy is definately a novice at scanning. I thought I the PRO-29 would be a good start for him. Any replies and/or comments (both good and bad) are welcome and appreciated. Jason From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!castle.nando.net!news From: Dave Ferguson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-39 answers Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 08:13:21 -0800 Organization: News & Observer Public Access Lines: 24 Message-ID: <3114DB21.1202@nando.net> References: <4el0qo$e1b@parrett.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: vyger115.nando.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win16; I) Todd Erb wrote: > > To all you PRO-39 owners having keyboard problems, > I had the same problem last year with my manual button. > I went to Radio Shack and ordered the "keytop" (rubber > > keypad) part # KC-0387 at a cost of about $4.00 and installed it and > it took care of the problem. The metallic paste on back of buttons > wears off, rendering you're most commonly used button useless. It's a > fairly easy job.You have to unsolder one wire holding two boards > together, snip off one extra rubber standup on new pad (the one below > the number "0") install new pad, resolder wire, put back together. > > Happy Scanning, t_erb@parrett.net Dear Todd: Thanks for the info. I was all set to chunk my Pro-39 out in the trash. I'll be heading to the local Radio Slack today for that part and will give it a shot. Regards Dave Ferguson dferg@nando.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!realtime.net!news.mindspring.com!gatech!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!wetware!wsrcc.com!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!billn From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-46 Unmodifiable? Date: 10 Feb 1996 05:38:13 GMT Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4fhb05$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <31106859.442A@minn.net> <4etvhd$mem@services.arn.net> <00001ff6+00004558@msn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: peak.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Thomas Bernie (tombernie@msn.com) wrote: : PRO39 ANY REMOVE DIODE 40.00 : PRO43 2A4 & PRIOR REMOVE DIODE 43.00 Sheesh. How can you have such decent prices for these two? : PRO2006 ANY CUT DIODE 40.00 And then such an outrageous price for this one. It takes about 2 - 3 minutes to remove the cover and clip the diode. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!pop.gnn.com!sfs From: sfs@gnn.com (KS9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro2004 right for me? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 21:23:33 Organization: Megaweb Lines: 3 Sender: sfs@gnn.com (SaltyFishSauce) (from www-13-67.gnn.com. 205.188.13.67) Message-ID: <4fjnm5$2ug@news-e1a.megaweb.com> References: <4fij2k$ris@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: @www-13-67.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 1996 03:27:01 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.2 $145? If you know of anyone selling a Pro-2004 in good working condition for $145 please send them in my direction would you? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!usenet From: cef@hyperion.haystack.edu (Chris Farrell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RADAR Date: 7 Feb 1996 17:30:30 GMT Organization: MIT Atmospheric Sciences Group Lines: 42 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fanjm$mea@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.52.65.204 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Karen Radar stands for Radio Detection and Ranging. Radars operate at all different frequencies dependent upon their purpose. All radars operate in a pulsed mode. The transmitter sends a pulse to an antenna then the receiver waits for a return pulse. The time it takes to recieve a particular echo will give you a range to target. There are a number of different techniques used for transmitting and receiving depending on what you are trying to accomplish. To answer your question, I'm assuming you mean radar used by police. The short answer is NO. Because, they operate in the 7~10 Gigahertz spectrum. I don't know of any scanner that can receive anything over 2Ghz. Even if they were in the 400MHz region it would do you no good. Most scanners (bearcat 200xl and such) operate in the Amplitude Modulation (AM) mode. More expensive scanners or all band receivers (ICOM) have FM and sideband modes. Even these recievers will not lock on radar pulses. Radar pulses are very directional. As an example I maintain a radar system that is used to do science and track sattelites. It operates in the 440Mhz region. Our output power is nominally 2.5Mw. (see Web Site http:hyperion.haystack.edu). Our beam is approx 1degree wide. If I had a receiver capable of locking on to a pulsed signal and I were standing 10 degrees off to the side of where the antenna is pointed then I still would not receive anything. Not all antenne are as directional as a parabolic dish. I just used this as an example. I did not take into account the magnitude of the signal or side lobe strength into this brief note. Happy scanning Chris In article <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net>, kboland@microserve.net says... > >Radar is a radio-type frequency, Right? >Can it be picked up/detected by a scanner? > > From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!blackbird.afit.af.mil!neon.afsac.wpafb.af.mil!netzel From: netzel@neon.afsac.wpafb.af.mil (Fred Netzel) Subject: Re: RADAR Message-ID: Organization: Air Force Security Assistance Center References: <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net> <4f9tfv$sdm@news.fullerton.edu> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 17:16:42 GMT Lines: 35 xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu writes: >In article <4f8jep$mvs@crash.microserve.net>, kboland@microserve.net (Karen B oland) writes: >>Radar is a radio-type frequency, Right? >>Can it be picked up/detected by a scanner? >Right and no <--- the short answers >Here are the frequencies that speed guns work at (roughly). Note: they are in >GigaHertz, not MegaHertz. 1 GHz is 1,000 MHz, not too many scanners get up >above 2 GHz, so this is why you won't get radar guns on your scanner. > Police Speed Enforcement Radar > 10.450 - 10.600 ghz X-Band > 11.488 - 11.628 ghz RD Detector > 22.976 - 23.256 ghz RD Detector-2nd Harmonic > 24.050 - 24.250 ghz X-Band ..............actually it's Ka band > 33.400 - 36.000 ghz Ka-Band ..............this is Ku band > 700nm - 1100nm Laser Threat > ....even if your scanner could tune the freq all you would hear would be nothing (if the transmission were CW) or a buzzz if the modulation were Pulse (nothing eles is authorized for the radar bands). Then there is the Analog and Digital site to site communications links but that's all multiplexed anyway so you'd get garbage.....next..? Fred From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!news-server.ncren.net!concert!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!oleane!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!logica.co.uk!p012235 From: leej@logica.com (John Lee) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: radar detectors Date: Tue, 06 Feb 96 21:41:38 GMT Organization: Logica Lines: 6 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4f8098$nls@romeo.logica.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.234.36.214 X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #2.1 I'm interested in information eg reviews of radar detectors (for automobiles). Can anyone tel me where I can find any? ------------------------ John Lee, tel 0171 637 9111 X4357 WCT/1, Logica UK Ltd, Space Division e-mail leej@logica.com | "Let Hercules himself do what he may, --opinions are mine-- | The cat will mew and dog will have his day" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!con-nntp-gw!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!dns1.mci.com!usenet From: Brad Cuppy Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 5 Feb 1996 20:39:47 GMT Organization: MCI Telecommunications Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> References: <4a11f2$1r9a@tako.info.ucla.edu> <4a5rnn$27t@pegasus.starlink.com> <4acap1$5t9@pegasus.starlink.com> <30cb7ac5.15085590@168.100.1.3> <4aj6ds$mjs@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4b1d1e$t40@neptunus.pi.net> <4c9ut0$3me@dub-news-svc-2.compuserve.com> <4f52h2$d46@bud.shadow.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: consams1.con.mci.com alexandr@shadow.net (Robert Alexander) wrote: ; It's my understanding that the operation of a jammer per se is not ; illegal, however, you can be ticketed for, (get this) ; ; "Interfering with an officer of the law in the performance of his : duties" ; ; Personally, I think I'd rather have the speeding ticket! : : How 'bout you? : If it's a misdemanor and not a felony, it would be cheaper than a speeding ticket after you add in the insurance hikes, points, etc. If the FCC comes in the picture, the speeding ticket is definitely better. Brad From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.exodus.net!aimnet.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!lynx.unm.edu!bubba.NMSU.Edu!news.pr.erau.edu!usenet From: Stephen Waits Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Re2: What exactly is a DTMF decoder? Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 14:49:39 -0700 Organization: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Lines: 18 Message-ID: <311BC173.17E8@pr.erau.edu> References: <4ebt5u$hoq@over.mhv.net> <4epvlk$hjn@cloner4.netcom.com> <4f99ri$717@nw002.infi.net> <4fbrqn$7pa@feenix.metronet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dns-error.pr.erau.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45474 alt.radio.scanner:27443 Glenn Johnson (KB5VQI) wrote: > > shuler@nr.infi.net (icom) wrote: > > How about a PC/sound blaster only (no IC) software? > That seems hard to find. > I found one a guy wrote that works _REALLY_ well on my 486/66 + Soundblaster 1.0 combination. But the dork released it as shareware and it is SEVERLY crippled. It will only decode the first 5 tones and then it quits. Lame. I threw it in my debugger the other night and got a little bit with it and plan to work it over some this weekend. Otherwise, I'm writing my own. Cya.. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.charm.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!intac!magsystems!151!roland.stiner From: Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland Stiner) Date: 07 Feb 96 22:11:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <350_9602080500@magsystems.com> X-FTN-To: Thumphrey@mailbag.Com Organization: MAG Systems, Inc/TFP BBS To: thumphrey@mailbag.com Subject: Regency Scanner Lines: 11 TH>I have a Regency MX 3000 in need of repair, does anyone know if >Uniden is repairing these ????????? If they don't, Grove probably will. --- OLX 1.53 73, de NK2U -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news.lahabra.chevron.com!usenet From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Req UTAH Ski Area Freqs Date: 12 Feb 1996 20:50:15 GMT Organization: CCnet Communications - Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fo967$hrk@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cgwh.sr.chevron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) I am looking for frequencies used by operations, ski patrol, etc. at ski resorts near SLC. Particularly those in the Cottonwood Canyons (Alta, Snowbird, Solitude, Brighton). In addition - if there are any open amateur repeaters covering these areas (2m or 70cm) I wouls appreciate knowing about them. Thanks, Curtis Pleasanton, CA From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.magicnet.net!news.supernet.net!news.iosphere.net!grumpy.insinc.net!KEY.globalx.net!jolt.pagesat.net!pagesat.net!in-news.erinet.com!inquo!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news From: Brian Varine Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: REQ: Cellular, Cordless, Private Freq's Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 17:15:46 -0800 Organization: RCMA======>OREGON Lines: 28 Message-ID: <311AA042.55C5@ucs.orst.edu> References: <4fdpmv$as3@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip43.ucs.orst.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) Pooch wrote: Looking for Cordless Phone Freqs? http://www.orst.edu/~varineb -- ============================================================================== Brian R. Varine http://www.orst.edu/~varineb Oregon Freqs/Military.jpgs/Russian ECM list/car ECM eval He who owns the electromagnetic spectrum, owns the battlefield! When in doubt, JAM IT!!!! STOP HIGHWAY ROBBERY------JOIN THE NMA! -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQBtAzDwm6oAAAEDAOjurmD0Ft9VXTvnVVOf5uOLbsSB4PuidmW+aDjV7F7+KRSb fakuNHXVEhBYwTINVVnIjiSik12UcCv8UZXj/x9hAXBJXCk+v/8y9w6zk1Gu1iXC /HYnR/zJIyVohkIJwQAFEbQmQnJpYW4gUi4gVmFyaW5lIDx2YXJpbmViQHVjcy5v cnN0LmVkdT4= =NYjj -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.cris.com!news From: tjv@cris.com (Todd) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Rochester New York Scanner Frequencies! Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 03:08:03 GMT Organization: CRC Lines: 9 Message-ID: <3120007f.26083073@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: tjv@cris.com NNTP-Posting-Host: crc4-fddi.cris.com Anyone know where I can get them? No, I do not want to go to radio shack, thanks anyway Just looking for a simple list of good scanner frequencies for the Rochester area. Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!citi2.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx15-09.teleport.com!prografx From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RS 2026 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 00:29:54 Organization: PROGRAFX of Oregon Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4f9500$a1c@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx15-09.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A] In article cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) writes: >From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) >Subject: Re: RS 2026 >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 16:59:20 GMT >Michael I. Andrews, Sr. (cloverle@ix.netcom.com) writes: >> Looking for any known mods. to restore cellular coverage. >You must have an older model to do this. 20-148 NOT 20-148A >Open the bottom of the scanner (speaker side) >the is a smaller circuit board near the front of the unit with jumper >marked L201. Just snip and separate this jumper and reassemble your scanner. >-- > ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» > º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º > º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º > ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ Not necessarily true. I have seen 6 or so Pro-2026 scanners in the "A" packaging that had 11A3 date codes and were restorable via cutting L201 as normal! Radio Shack is inconsistent, if nothing else. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:35 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.aa.net!tsunami.ixa.net!news.ironhorse.com!sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.nmaa.org!not-for-mail From: 10226@www.utech.net (Ralph T. Adamson) Subject: Re: RS 2026 Message-ID: <287cc$132a7.90@news.nmaa.org> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 00:34:01 GMT References: <4f9500$a1c@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4fdb1i$d0k@venger.snds.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Lines: 17 Ray Matthews wrote: >cloverle@ix.netcom.com(Michael I. Andrews, Sr. ) wrote: >>Looking for any known mods. to restore cellular coverage. > Remove the bottom cover of the scanner. Facing the front of the >scanner with the bottom exposed, locate the small circuit board in the >lower right corner and look for a small wire jumper loop labeled L201. >Cut this wire, and reassemble the scanner. (Tough one, isn't it?) Not too simple if you open it and find that L201 isn't there. From what I've heard, this means you have a newer production model which cannot be modified. Ralph Adamson Lompoc, CA From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.spss.com!uchinews!ncar!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!cv282 From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: RS 2026 Message-ID: Sender: cv282@freenet2.carleton.ca (Mistie Mullarkey) Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <4f9500$a1c@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 16:59:20 GMT Lines: 14 Michael I. Andrews, Sr. (cloverle@ix.netcom.com) writes: > Looking for any known mods. to restore cellular coverage. You must have an older model to do this. 20-148 NOT 20-148A Open the bottom of the scanner (speaker side) the is a smaller circuit board near the front of the unit with jumper marked L201. Just snip and separate this jumper and reassemble your scanner. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:36 1996 From: Motorola_wireless@msn.com (Chris Jones) Subject: same as above Date: 13 Feb 96 00:15:39 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004642@msn.com> Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.msn.com!msn.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com) Lines: 1 I agree with them. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:37 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!nwgw.infi.net!imci3!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!uunet.ca!news.uunet.ca!nypl!torfree!an141 From: an141@torfree.net (Marg Eveleigh) Subject: San Francisco Frequencies Message-ID: Organization: Toronto Free-Net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 14:06:53 GMT Lines: 7 I will be visiting SF in late February and would greatly appreciate it if someone has the address of a site that has these frequencies listed. Also, from reading this usenet group it sounds like it is difficult to get scanner that get the 800 band in the States? Is this true? If so why? Is it illegal? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!fish.pond.com!kd3bj!jolt.pagesat.net!netserv.com!aimnet.com!news.ossi.com!agate!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!demon!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!cobia.gulf.net!ppp69 From: breeze@gulf.net (MHM) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: scanner amplifier Date: 9 Feb 1996 06:10:36 GMT Organization: The Gulf Coast Internet Company Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4feogs$ld3@cobia.gulf.net> References: <4f7gb4$ecl@ns2.emirates.net.ae> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp69.pcola.gulf.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 In article <4f7gb4$ecl@ns2.emirates.net.ae>, bingalib@emirates.net.ae (Sager Binghalib) wrote: >Hi ! > > I am trying to find a scanner amplifier that will ork on my ICOM-R1 , >I also would like to build one if possible... > I'll probably get blasted for this, but you can reconfigure a standard, run of the mill TV antenna amplifier for the job. It should be good from 50Mhz out to 512Mhz at 10 Db of gain. Just be careful when using it in an area where you could inadvertantly pick up a strong signal. (receiver front end overload) The impedance mismatch shouldn't hurt your sensitivity too much. The gain will overcome that. (unless you're using a couple of thousand feet of cable) breeze@gulf.net | Poor planning on your part | does not constitute a crisis | on my part... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.crd.ge.com!tmpnews.crd.ge.com!rebecca!rpi!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet From: dmenser@parrett.net (Drew) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: scanner amplifier Date: 13 Feb 1996 11:16:53 GMT Organization: Parrett Business Machines Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fprv5$3hc@parrett.net> References: <4f7gb4$ecl@ns2.emirates.net.ae> <4feogs$ld3@cobia.gulf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin2.parrett.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6 In article <4feogs$ld3@cobia.gulf.net>, breeze@gulf.netY says... > >the mill TV antenna amplifier for the job. It should be good from 50Mhz out >to 512Mhz at 10 Db of gain. Just be careful when using it in an area where I was at RatShack and noticed they have an amp that covers 50 mhz to 890 mhz. Don't remember the model number though. Seems it was about $25.00 Drew -- ************************************************************ I have a quote in mind, I just can't remember how it goes... dmenser@parrett.net Drew Menser http://www.parrett.net/~dmenser Bridgman, Michigan USA ************************************************************ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!usenet From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: scanner WWW page update Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 14:58:41 -0500 Organization: NF2G Enterprises Lines: 4 Message-ID: <311E4A71.460F@frontiernet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: no-name-211.frontiernet.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) CC: jerry@frontiernet.net The February 11 update of my NF2G Scannist Pages is complete. We now cover 43 upstate New York counties, and some other features have been added or updated. http://www.frontiernet.net/~dstark/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Scanners and Household Insurance Date: 9 Feb 1996 09:50:02 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 34 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <311B7B11.7FB2@primenet.com> References: <4f6f2n$382@sulla.cyberstore.ca> X-Posted-By: ip147.phx.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit gjacek@Cyberstore.ca wrote: > > I recently had the misfortune of having my Pro43 stolen > from a locker, along with some other stuff. My household insurance > company will cover almost everything, except the > scanner. > > They say the scanner falls under 'automotive' and they > won't cover it. Has anyone experienced this before? > > When I say 'scanner', are they thinking 'radar detector'? > > Perhaps I should have called it a computer-controlled > AM/FM radio. > > ..Gary > > gjacek@freenet.vancouver.bc.ca I have fought with the same bull for the last few years. I have gone from one insurance company to the next, and get a different reason why they won't cover them. They will cover antenna'a and stereos, they will also cover computers, but when it comes to 2-way radios they chicken out. Same with radar-detectors and cellular phones. There is a company that insures amateur radio equipment called Ham-Sure. I don't have the address or phone number but I remember reading about them in the back setion of ART (Amateur Radio Trader). The cost is cheap, based upon the replacement values of your equipment, and is a yearly charge. Rob n7ory@primenet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: wstrayer@ix.netcom.com(Willis Strayer ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? Date: 3 Feb 1996 23:40:37 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4f0rpl$br6@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pet-ca1-08.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 03 3:40:37 PM PST 1996 I have been monitoring 154.6800 for some time and cannot determine what it is, I receive car to car frequently and an occasional base but who knows where that is, I hear the car to car anywhere in Sacto to San Jose. All the manuals I have list it as state P, but what P. If anyone knows what it is perhaps you know it's sister freqs, one this active should have 3 or 4 different channels. thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.vanderbilt.edu!news From: Evan Singer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SFO Airline Company Frequencies Date: 13 Feb 1996 20:53:11 GMT Organization: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fqtnn$pmv@news.vanderbilt.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial119.vanderbilt.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:rec.radio.scanner I will be at SFO later this month. Am looking for company frequencies (airlines ramps, operations, etc.)- VHF (129.0 to 132.0) -Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!mn6.swip.net!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx09-01.teleport.com!prografx From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Shareware software for ACARS reception? Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 07:41:08 Organization: PROGRAFX of Oregon Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4etsk3$gif@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx09-01.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A] In article <4etsk3$gif@mrnews.mro.dec.com> klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) writes: >From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) >Subject: Shareware software for ACARS reception? >Date: 2 FEB 96 15:31:47 >Is there shareware available for ACARS reception? >Ken I haven't found any. That is why I bought the AEA Acars outfit. It works like a charm, and I think it was worth the $90 spent for it. The Lowes AirMaster is the same thing (right down to the software from what I have seen), but costs more $$. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.sunbelt.net!usenet From: koverly@carol.net (Dr. Kenneth R. Overly) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: South Carolina frequencies? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 21:43:09 GMT Organization: SunBelt.Net INTERNET Access Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fr0ft$554@news1.sunbelt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1_assigned_address_27.carol.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anybody have a list of frequencies for the upstate South Carolina area? Specifically, the Anderson and Greenville areas. Or, does anyone know of a web site that might have frequencies for South Carolina? Thanks in advance. Ken Overly koverly@carol.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!whidbey.!usenet From: subbustr@whidbey.net (DAVE M . SCHERTZER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Still looking 4 mods to 8500 Date: 11 Feb 1996 01:18:41 GMT Organization: DND CF DET Whidbey Is. WA Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fjg5h$41b@whidbey.whidbey.com> References: <4fh9q7$nuj@news-e2a.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: asn69.whidbey.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11 No mod iz required !! Use "cell-image" freq at 1275-1295mhz...LOUD + CLEAR !!!!!! subbustr@whidbey.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:47 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!sun4nl!metropolis.nl!news From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: UBC200XLT power problems X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp0-124.metropolis.nl Message-ID: <886.6617T1018T1306@metropolis.nl> Sender: news@news.metropolis.nl (usenet) Organization: Metropolis Internet X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED* Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:58:26 GMT Lines: 25 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27447 rec.radio.scanner:45484 I have some problems with my 200XLT. Let me describe the symptoms: - I can only turn it on if I apply about 10 Volts for a second or so. After this, it operates like normal at the normal 7.2 V battery power. In the beginning, I could get it on by using the AC adaptor, which will increase the battery pack voltage just a bit. Over time, the voltage needed to activate the unit has increased to the 10 Volts it is now. - Some programmed channels/modes seem to need more power than others, sometimes even so much the unit turns itself off. Extremely annoying if I'm carrying it around and don't have the 10 Volt power supply to 'kickstart' it. I have to lock-out these channels or even the complete bank to prevent the unit from turning itself off. Can anyone shed a light on this? Can I repair this myself? -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!guitar.sound.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!Empire.Net!news.net99.net!news.igc.net!news.zynet.com!ez0!jolt.pagesat.net!pagesat.net!in-news.erinet.com!inquo!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!news.iac.net!usenet From: cheidirn@iac.net (Cliff Heidorn) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden 300XLT Modification??? Date: 8 Feb 1996 13:43:54 GMT Organization: Internet Access Cincinnati 887-8855 Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4fcumq$ce6@cheyenne.iac.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip043225.iac.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5 Are there any possible mods that will restore the 800 freqs that are blocked? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!night.primate.wisc.edu!nntp.msstate.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Uniden BC350A (opinions) Date: 6 Feb 1996 19:41:37 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 11 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4f8sg1$p08@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f6l5k$1cfq@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Reply-To: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com I have 2 BC 350A's. Both are VERY intermod prone, not good for big cities with lot of RFI, but good for low cost scanner. Easy to program, Kinda aggravating to get to one specific freq. though. No direct entry, got to search till you hit freq. Go ahead and get the BC700A or the Beartracker 7. Both have 800Mhz coverage, with you can't do without these days!! Good luck and let me know if you have any more questions. Marshall KE4ZNR KE4ZNR@aol.com Proud Member: N. Carolina Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave group From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!hopper.acm.org!ACM.ORG!MULLIGAN From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: VHF or UHF??? Date: 10 Feb 1996 18:53:06 GMT Organization: ACM Network Services Lines: 29 Message-ID: <4fipii$95m@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG NNTP-Posting-Host: acm.org rdr@efn.org (Robert Robertson) asked: > ... if it's on the VHF or UHF band ... > Are there any "guidelines" to follow?? If you're asking what are the definitions of the ranges of the radio spectrum, the bands are defined as: Very Low Freq VLF 3 - 30 kHz Low Freq LF 30 - 300 kHz Medium Freq MF 300 - 3000 kHz High Freq HF 3 - 30 MHz Very High Freq VHF 30 - 300 MHz Ultra High Freq UHF 300 - 3000 MHz Super High Freq SHF 3 - 30 GHz Extremely High Freq EHF 30 - 300 GHz If you want to know what services are allocated in the U.S. to what frequencies, download: ftp://oak.oakland.edu /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/ fcc.allocations CompuServe HamNet Forum Lib 2 FCCTBL.TXT FCC Frequency Table Summary - A summary of the FCC Table of Frequency Allocations for the 30 - 1300 MHz range. Since it boils 90 pages of data down to 160 lines, a little detail has been lost , but it will guide a scanner user to what's where. /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dpc.net!novia!nntp.inc.net!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.ohsu.edu!news.orst.edu!news From: Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: VHF or UHF??? Date: 9 Feb 1996 23:56:50 GMT Organization: University Computing Services - Oregon State University Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4fgn02$hsg@news.orst.edu> References: <4f4vlg$7u6@garcia.efn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: craigd.rhn.orst.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; PPC) To: rdr@efn.org X-URL: news:4f4vlg$7u6@garcia.efn.org Eugene City Police 460.3 Main Ch. 460.05 Ch. 2 460.35 Detectives 155.34 Ambulance to Sacred Heart/McKenzie Willamette Eugene City Fire 154.355 Dispatch 154.265 Tac 2 154.43 Tac 3 154.205 Tac 4 154.28 Tac 5 (Statewide Mutual Aid, have to get State Fire Marsh. Permission to use) 155.16 Tac 7 (EMS) Lane County Sheriff 460.225 Dispatch 460.425 F-2 460.55 F-3 460.175 F-4 County-wide mutual aid (Eugene & Sprfld also there) 460.5 F-5 Lane Rural Fire District (Sprfld, River Road, Santa Clara, JC, Etc) 154.43 Dispatch 154.205 154.355 --All are also listed by Eugene City, but different Frequ. ID's. OSP Springfield Units 154.845 Unit #'s 25xx, Take a lot of calls in Santa Clara area for the county. Hope that gets you going!! I also have listing for EWEB, but am not sure of frequency usage. Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.accessone.com!ghansen.accessone.com!ghansen From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Vote Here for Cheek Digest Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 08:44:17 GMT Organization: .tacoma.link Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ghansen.accessone.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article tvine@teleport.co m (PjB) writes: >After receiving a surprisingly large number of requests, I am considering >starting up publication of The Daily Cheek Digest again. If you are >interested in seeing the return of this handy, one-stop compendium of the >ravings of a tinkerer, or not, email me, and we'll see. Hell, post a summary of every message ever posted. It is funny that you first say you have received a large number of requests and then you ask for acceptance. What a fool. >Simple majority rules. Oh, is this a CFV?? Yea, right. Still waiting for your answers PjBoy. Aren't you the one that posted the message telling all to write their IPS becuase of Bill's behavior? Aren't you the one that weeks ago said you ween't going to post again? Aren't you the dweeb that posts scanner questions on the Ham newsgroup then qualifies them with " I am new" and know nothing, will it hurt my scanner to hook it to a TV antenna. HAHAHAHAHA! You, the scanner technical critic. ROFLMAO!!!!!!! Sure is funny PjBoy, I have asked these questions a number of times but you never reply. I posted a reply to somebody about a R-7000 and you jumped in and made some personal attacks on me but still didn't answer any questions. Just think, most people would have to pay money to see a freak circus of the kind you put on but we get it free on the Net! On with the next PjBoy Show!!! Hey PjBoy, have you figured out how to turn your scanner on? Didn't get the wires on that TV antenna crossed did you?? ROFLMAO again!! grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:52 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!intac!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ub!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.av.qnet.com!ibbs!js Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <14@ibbs.av.org> Reply-To: js@ibbs.av.org (Jeff Stillinger) From: js@ibbs.av.org (Jeff Stillinger) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 14:16:34 GMT Subject: WEFAX Frequency Info Wanted Lines: 6 Is there a VHF/UHF set of frequencies that WEFAX is retransmitted on? I have a hard time with the listed HF frequencies that are listed in my instruction manual. Thanks... -- js@ibbs.av.org From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!brighton.openmarket.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.escape.ca!usenet From: phancock@escape.ca (Paul Hancock) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Western Canadian Frequencies Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 00:53:12 GMT Organization: escape communications corp. Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4f10dt$7k2@wpg-01.escape.ca> References: <4emdt7$s39@kryten.awinc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1dl03.escape.ca X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55 pbaran@awinc.com (Peter M. Baran) wrote: >Fellow Scannists: >I have a fair sized database of Western Canadian (Manitoba, >Saskatchewan, Alberta, & B.C.) frequencies. I am interested in >exchanging & sharing frequencies with anyone that is interested. >Please E-Mail me. >Peter M. Baran >Yorkton, Saskatchewan, Canada >pbaran@awinc.com Are you looking for any specific type of freq.s? I have an extensive database (~7000 listings) of Manitoba freq. in Dbase or Excel format that I am willing to share. Paul Hancock From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!chaos.aoc.nrao.edu!newshost.nmt.edu!rutgers!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!psuvax1!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!oitnews.harvard.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!newshost.convex.com!news.dfw.net!news.dfw.net!not-for-mail From: boakley@dfw.net (Brian Oakley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: What advantages to buying a scanner at Radio Shack Date: 8 Feb 1996 22:03:09 -0600 Organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4feh1t$lm0@dfw.dfw.net> References: <4f5m9h$17rc@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f6nao$pl9@bigboote.WPI.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: dfw.dfw.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] But what if you make your first purchace in an area where the sales tax is less than that where you bought the catalog? Then you do lose. Gregory K Doerschler (gkd@wpi.WPI.EDU) wrote: : In article <4f5m9h$17rc@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, : Drew Durigan wrote: : > : >On a related note: whenever someone complains about having to pay $3 for : >a catalog, Smiling Sammy Salesdroid is quick to tell you about the coupon : >inside, good for $3 off of your next purchase. "So really, the catalog : >is free." : > : >Not quite! It STILL costs you money because you have to pay SALES TAX on : >the catalog, which increases the price to MORE than $3!! : > : And when you go to use that coupon, they decrease the price of the item : being purchased by $3 on the sales slip _before_ taxes are computed; which : means that any sales tax which you paid on the catalog is deducted from : the price of the item along with the $3. : Greg From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!khis_news.khis.kodak.com!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!gt-news!news From: Glenn Champion Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: What can I do with my ICOM R9000? Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 10:02:42 -0500 Organization: GTRI Lines: 5 Message-ID: <311A1092.23A5@gtri.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghcpc.gtri.gatech.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) I have an R9000 at work and I want to add a computer interface, decoders, trackers, control software, and anything else that's available. The question is: what's available, what's good, what's bad? Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!holonet!colossus.holonet.net!hughsoft.com!charles.george From: charles.george@hughsoft.com (Charles George) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 05:40:00 GMT Message-ID: <529335457-960210234000@hughsoft.com> Organization: Hughes Software Corporation - Dallas, Texas Distribution: world Lines: 13 R(>It autostores freqs into a bank in search mode. I got me a Pro-26 in a trade for a Drake SSR-1 that I had. I didn't get the manual from the person, so I have not figured out how to get the Autostore to work. If you know how I would appreciate the information, also wonder how much a replacement manual would cost anyway? --- þ SLMR 2.1a þ All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here. -------------------------------------- * Processed by ViaUUCP! for WILDCAT! * -------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.inc.net!imci3!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB-Uniden 200xlt Date: 11 Feb 1996 03:40:21 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 2 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fka1l$tf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com WTB-Uniden 200xlt in good condition. Please e-mail me if you have one you'd like to sell thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!venger.snds.com!usenet From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: Uniden MR-8100 scanner w/software Date: 13 Feb 1996 14:22:37 GMT Organization: Sundstrand Corporation Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fq6rd$77o@venger.snds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: aero.snds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:57413 rec.radio.scanner:45489 alt.radio.scanner:27450 Looking for anyone that has a Uniden MR-8100 scanner with the programming software for sale, or for any possible sources for one of these units. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:12:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.OZ.AU!mel.dit.csiro.au!actcsiro!news.nsw.CSIRO.AU!wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au!news.une.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!tmx!news.tmx.com.au!news.acay.com.au!news From: spiro evagelakos (spiroe@acay.com.au) Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.misc,aus.radio.amateur.wicen,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: WTB:5KW AM Transmitter Date: 12 Feb 1996 10:19:25 GMT Organization: ACAY Network Computing P/L, Sydney AUSTRALIA. Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fn47d$j76@www.acay.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: spiroe.acay.com.au X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net aus.radio.amateur.misc:428 aus.radio.amateur.wicen:67 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:19019 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:14094 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24856 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13283 rec.radio.amateur.misc:98001 rec.radio.scanner:45416 rec.radio.swap:57330 This time I am after a second hand 5KW AM Transmitter Regards Spiro From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:13:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!ns.saard.net!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!mel.dit.csiro.au!actcsiro!news.nsw.CSIRO.AU!wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au!news.une.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!tmx!news.tmx.com.au!news.acay.com.au!news From: spiro evagelakos (spiroe@acay.com.au) Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.misc,aus.radio.amateur.wicen,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: WTB:AMATURE TRANSMITTER @ 160MTRS Date: 12 Feb 1996 10:15:25 GMT Organization: ACAY Network Computing P/L, Sydney AUSTRALIA. Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fn3vt$j76@www.acay.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: spiroe.acay.com.au X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net aus.radio.amateur.misc:427 aus.radio.amateur.wicen:66 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:19018 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:14093 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24855 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13282 rec.radio.amateur.misc:98000 rec.radio.scanner:45415 rec.radio.swap:57329 Hi , I am after a second hand amature transmitter for the 160mtr band Regards Spiro From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:13:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.OZ.AU!mel.dit.csiro.au!actcsiro!news.nsw.CSIRO.AU!wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au!news.une.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!tmx!news.tmx.com.au!news.acay.com.au!news From: spiro evagelakos (spiroe@acay.com.au) Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.misc,aus.radio.amateur.wicen,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: WTB:LINEAR AMPLIFIER FOR 160MTR BAND Date: 12 Feb 1996 10:17:15 GMT Organization: ACAY Network Computing P/L, Sydney AUSTRALIA. Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fn43b$j76@www.acay.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: spiroe.acay.com.au X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net aus.radio.amateur.misc:426 aus.radio.amateur.wicen:65 rec.radio.amateur.antenna:19017 rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc:14092 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24854 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13281 rec.radio.amateur.misc:97999 rec.radio.scanner:45414 rec.radio.swap:57328 Hi , I am after a second hand linear Amplifier for the 160mtr band Regards Spiro From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:13:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!imci4!imci5!suck-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!bcm.tmc.edu!newshost.convex.com!convex!not-for-mail From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wtd: UNblockED R-1 Date: 7 Feb 1996 11:44:25 -0600 Organization: Convex Technology Center of Hewlett Packard, Richardson, Tx USA Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4faodp$m66@eugene.convex.com> References: <4f9i50$943@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: eugene.convex.com In <4f9i50$943@uwm.edu> herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) writes: >I'd like to swap my Pro-2006 for your ICOM r-1 With the BC-72 battery >charger, and preferrably the BP-83/84. >MUST BE IN MINT condition. I know that someone will tack something about >how shitty the R-1 is, but I had one, and I loved it! so there! Wow, I wish I had a R1 to trade you! Then again, I already have a 2006. But this is such a good deal you're offering! David From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 13 21:13:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!news.alt.net!news1.alt.net!news.exodus.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Yupi 7100 backlight mod?? Date: 7 Feb 1996 12:49:18 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 15 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4faomu$hk2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f975p$6gg@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article <4f975p$6gg@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) writes: >Not if plugged into a DC supply! I found the mod, bythewaY, It is called >buying a MVT-7200. > >Nate. >http://www.uwm.edu/~herb Order a 7200, light switch from Javiation. No problem, they make them every day. Get it installed................................... Mark mark s. conway From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!intac!magsystems!143!dominic.post From: Dominic.Post@143.magsystems.com (Dominic Post) Date: 14 Feb 96 09:28:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ** FS. AR8000 ** Message-ID: <89f_9602141200@magsystems.com> Organization: MAG Systems, Inc/TFP BBS Lines: 29 4 Sale 4 Sale 4 Sale AOR AR8000 Wide Range Receiver Includes. AR-8000 radio. AOR Rubber Duck Antenna. AOR Wall Battery charger. AOR Belt clip wthh screws. AOR DC power lead with cigar lighter plug. AOR Hand strap. Operating manual. 4 AA NiCad batteries. Xtra 4 X 700mAh quick charge Fuji batteries. Xtra wall quick charger holds 4 batteries. ****** PLUS ****** Optoelectronics Computer interface CX12 Complete. Scancat-Gold software Scan*Star software Optoelectronics software $550.00 + $10.00 next day shipping. USP Money Orders Only. or best offer? ** e-mail - post@hobbs.com ** ** 201-943-3590 *=* Ridgefield, New Jersey 07657 ** --- * OLX 2.1 TD * Is That All There Is ?? -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!mhv.net!news.westnet.com!stevens-tech.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver2.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!ultra.sonic.net!chopper From: chopper@sonic.net (James Lepphaille) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: *** MOD NEEDED FOR PRO-44! *** Date: 15 Feb 1996 08:45:01 GMT Organization: Sonoma Interconnect,Santa Rosa,CA(us),http://www.sonic.net Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4furqd$nm1@ultra.sonic.net> References: <4febto$83q@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: sonic.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Nathan Zych (ag845@freenet.hamilton.on.ca) wrote: : Hey I need a mod any mod is fine but i need cellular 800mhZ mod for my : portable PRO 44 so if anyone can help me please write me private email : : Thanks! : Nathan Zych : hv@mcmi.com : or : ag845@freenet.hamilton.on.ca : -- -- chopper@sonic.net "under the redwoods" Forestville CA, USA "100mi. North of San Francisco" From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news3.digex.net!universe.digex.net!not-for-mail From: bnr@universe.digex.net (bnr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 3000xlt - did I get a lemon? Date: 15 Feb 1996 12:47:59 GMT Organization: Universal Access by Digital Express. 800-969-9090 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <4fva1v$s7a@news4.digex.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: universe.digex.net X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] I just rec'd my bc3000xlt mail order. After programming some local freq's (fire and police - 494 and 495 range), I noticed traffic seemed slow. I turned on my old Pro-2023 and compared reception. The 2023 picked up twice the traffic the new 3000 did. When I played with the squelch control I found if I opened the squelch up to where it would receive the signals - it would not release the channel back to scan. Also on several occasions it will keep all the channels open with static noise even with the squelch cut all the way back. I have adjusted the squelch, the attenuator, even changed the mode from NFM to WFM - all to no avail. This is my first high end scanner and if and old $80 RS PRO 2023 can out perform a $400 one - why spend the money? Should I attempt to return this one for another (I like the features) or should I step down to the 220xlt? I had an SC-150 before this 3000xlt (I returned the 150 to upgrade to the 3000) and I had no trouble with reception on the 150. Tonight I plan to compare reception with a 220xlt a neighbor has. All suggestions, comments, and/or advice -- Gladly accepted!!! Brian Raines bnr@universe.digex.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!panix!not-for-mail From: clay@panix.com (Clay Irving) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS (mis)information Date: 15 Feb 1996 08:19:30 -0500 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4fvbt2$9ka@panix.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: panix.com In Dale Dickerhoof writes: >I have seen several posts to this newsgroup, and I have received some >e-mail correspondence regarding the ACARS signal characteristics. I >don't think that I have seen the same information from any two >sources. >I have been told that the signal is PSK, MSK, FSK, and >Manchester-encoded AM. I have seen references to 1200, 2400, and now >9600 bps. The only commonality is that AM is used to transmit the >modulated signal. >I think it would be a great service to this group if someone could >authoritatively state (citing the reference material) the data rate >and its precise method of modulation. Perhaps someone with access to >the original ARINC spec. is listening? Check: http://www.u-net.com/~morfis/acars.htm -- Clay Irving, N2VKG : clay@panix.com : Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it http://www.panix.com/clay : to gnaw through the leather straps... From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!newshub.cts.com!default From: hartsell@cts.com (John Hartsell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, AEA Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 03:28:33 GMT Organization: CTS Network Services Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4g0tqd$i0d@news2.cts.com> References: <4ft43m$pus@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: noaa.cts.com I did call AEA and it is 50.00. In article <4ft43m$pus@mrnews.mro.dec.com>, klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) wrote: >POP COM, March 1996 page 68 states AEA ACARS uses the same demodulator >as AEA Fax I,II, and III. If you have the demodulator already you can >buy just the software. >Does anyone know how much the software cost? I believe the hardware and >software cost $90.00 > >Ken ------------------------------------------- John Hartsell Encinitas, Ca. USA hartsell@cts.com -------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!sgigate.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!depot.mro.dec.com!mrnews.mro.dec.com!fccvde.enet.dec.com!klimasewski From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ACARS, AEA Date: 14 FEB 96 11:47:50 Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4ft43m$pus@mrnews.mro.dec.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fccvde.enet.dec.com POP COM, March 1996 page 68 states AEA ACARS uses the same demodulator as AEA Fax I,II, and III. If you have the demodulator already you can buy just the software. Does anyone know how much the software cost? I believe the hardware and software cost $90.00 Ken From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!globe.indirect.com!jamoran From: jamoran@indirect.com (John Moran) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Advice on scanners sought Date: 15 Feb 1996 18:56:40 GMT Organization: Internet Direct, Inc. Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fvvl8$gsl@globe.indirect.com> References: <311A2A17.2EA5@scms.utmb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bud.indirect.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR, i HAVE AN AOR SCANNER, NOW i HAVE 2 OF THEM BECAUSE i RECENTLY PURCHASED ANOTHE. tHIS SCANNER HAS 1000 CHANNELS AND GETS FROM 0.1-1300MHZ (NO GAPS) THAT MEANS I CAN LISTEN TO ALL THE JUICY STUFF ON THE CELLULAR PHONE FREQUENCIES TOO! JOHN From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.oz.net!news.wwa.com!news From: chris22@wwa.com (Maint) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Amplifiable anttena! Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:39:48 GMT Organization: WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com) Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fp164$8e6@kirin.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pool2-021.wwa.com X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.10 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27429 rec.radio.scanner:45450 Is there a amplifiable anttena I could use for my scanner. I live on the second floor of a concret and steel star shaped building and happen to be in the center of the star! please e-mail if you don't mind From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news From: chris22@wwa.com (Maint) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Amplifiable anttena! Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:48:47 GMT Organization: WorldWide Access (tm) - Chicagoland Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com) Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fp1mv$a17@kirin.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pool2-021.wwa.com X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.10 (SPRY, Inc.) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27431 rec.radio.scanner:45457 Is there a amplifiable anttena I could use for my scanner. I live on the second floor of a concret and steel star shaped building and happen to be in the center of the star! please e-mail if you don't mind From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!niven.ksc.nasa.gov!angelfire From: glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Annoying beep from Pro-2026 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 19:34:03 GMT Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4g020r$ffp@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> References: <4eho0b$81t@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.205.42.94 Just curious, would these mods work on a Pro-51? The beep on that one is pretty annoying too. C.Glass> From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!venger.snds.com!usenet From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: antenna length @ 161MHz ? Date: 13 Feb 1996 14:14:51 GMT Organization: Sundstrand Corporation Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fq6cr$77o@venger.snds.com> References: <4fpoef$loq@cello.gina.calstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: aero.snds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu (Steven C Passmore) wrote: >What length shouls I cut my antenna for optimized coverage around >161MHz? The documentation that came with the antenna says to cut it to >16" but to my calculations a 1/4 wave antenna at 161MHz should be 18.34" >I only have 29" to work with. Any help would be appreciated. > My calculations show 17.44". (length in feet=234/frequency) From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: minesg@aol.com (MinesG) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Suggestions for Military Aircraft Band? Date: 13 Feb 1996 21:10:38 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 26 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4frgau$g94@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fo8l3$369@linus.mitre.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article <4fo8l3$369@linus.mitre.org>, Bob Cormier writes: >I want to improve the performance of my Pro-43 Scanner, particularly in >the 220-400 MHz military aircraft band. I live in the Washington, DC >suburbs and would hope to hear aircraft out of Andrews AFB, Patuxent NAS, >etc. > >Any suggestions for an antenna that I could mount in the attic of my >house? Radio Shack has an inexpensive (< $20.00) 4-element antenna that >supposedly covers 100-1300 MHz. Has anyone tried it? > My Pro-43 suffers desense (is that a word) in the military air band and increased intermod when hooked to my external antenna. I am using a Radio Shack (cat. no. 20-176) antenna with an RG-6 QS feedline to my Pro-2035. Commerical air band stuff is improved considerably but stuff in the 300 Mhz area comes in about the same as it did with the telescoping whip antenna. I think there may be some desense in this set up as well. Maybe a filter is needed to get rid of some of the extraneous noise. In other words, I have the antenna you're looking at and I'm still looking for better. Gerald M. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news.pge.com!usenet From: Kerry Cochran Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:57:49 GMT Organization: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fqmvd$402@news02.comp.pge.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kdc3ws02.comp.pge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: Yes, saw one last night (2/12/96) Impressive radio. The Retail price of the radio is $ 2199.95 It has some remarkable and numerous features that are not avaiable on any commercial monitor receiver. The technical performance specifications significantly exceed that of the average scanning receiver. The unit comes with a DTFM decoder, but the CCTSS decoder is an option. There is also an option for a Spectrum display unit. I don't know when that will be released for sale, but the one I saw was on the way back to the distributor an"Herb A. Zite" wrote: >Grove lists it at $1849, but they don't have any. d not for sale. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news.pge.com!usenet From: Kerry Cochran Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:05:18 GMT Organization: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fqnde$402@news02.comp.pge.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kdc3ws02.comp.pge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: hazite@interaccess.com Yes, I saw one last night. Impressive radio. Has remarkable and numerous features not available on most commercial monitor receivers. The Retail price is $2199.95. and from what I have been able to find out they are not being shipped yet. The one I saw was on the way back to the distributor and not for sale. There is a two page spec. sheet on the radio, and it comes with a DTMF decoder, but the CCTSS is an option. It also has an option for a spectrum display. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.shadow.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news.pge.com!usenet From: Kerry Cochran Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:57:20 GMT Organization: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fqmug$402@news02.comp.pge.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kdc3ws02.comp.pge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: Yes, saw one last night (2/12/96) Impressive radio. The Retail price of the radio is $ 2199.95 It has some remarkable and numerous features that are not avaiable on any commercial monitor receiver. The technical performance specifications significantly exceed that of the average scanning receiver. The unit comes with a DTFM decoder, but the CCTSS decoder is an option. There is also an option for a Spectrum display unit. I don't know when that will be released for sale, but the one I saw was on the way back to the distributor an"Herb A. Zite" wrote: >Grove lists it at $1849, but they don't have any. d not for sale. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.shadow.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news.pge.com!usenet From: Kerry Cochran Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:56:24 GMT Organization: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4fqmso$402@news02.comp.pge.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kdc3ws02.comp.pge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: hazite@interaccess.com Yes, saw one last night (2/12/96) Impressive radio. The Retail price of the radio is $ 2199.95 It has some remarkable and numerous features that are not avaiable on any commercial monitor receiver. The technical performance specifications significantly exceed that of the average scanning receiver. The unit comes with a DTFM decoder, but the CCTSS decoder is an option. There is also an option for a Spectrum display unit. I don't know when that will be released for sale, but the one I saw was on the way back to the distributor and not for sale. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:30 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!news.pge.com!usenet From: Kerry Cochran Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AOR AR-5000 - anybody seen one? Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:58:27 GMT Organization: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4fqn0j$402@news02.comp.pge.com> References: <31181E21.7A67@frontiernet.net> <3118EEA8.5902@interaccess.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kdc3ws02.comp.pge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: Internet@PGE@COM[hazite@interaccess.com] Yes, saw one last night (2/12/96) Impressive radio. The Retail price of the radio is $ 2199.95 It has some remarkable and numerous features that are not avaiable on any commercial monitor receiver. The technical performance specifications significantly exceed that of the average scanning receiver. The unit comes with a DTFM decoder, but the CCTSS decoder is an option. There is also an option for a Spectrum display unit. I don't know when that will be released for sale, but the one I saw was on the way back to the distributor an"Herb A. Zite" wrote: >Grove lists it at $1849, but they don't have any. d not for sale. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: slick@primenet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR-2700? Date: 15 Feb 1996 14:34:01 -0700 Organization: Primenet Services for the Internet Lines: 5 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <4g08s9$ji2@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> X-Posted-By: ip202.eau.primenet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anyone have any experiences they would like to share regarding the AR-2700? I would also like to be able to modify it for celluar, is this possible? THANKS! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!gatech!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!dsi.unimi.it!galileo.polito.it!usenet From: Enrico Segre Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR3000 mods Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 19:04:59 +0100 Organization: Politecnico di Torino, dip. Ing. Aerospaziale Lines: 19 Message-ID: <312375CB.17B8@polito.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: ibngabirol.polito.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Macintosh; I; PPC) Hi net, I have recently resolved to start tampering with my first series AOR3000. To begin with, I chopped off the high pass filter on AM/NFM/SSB audio freq. The mod is quite easy, though delicate, it involves unsoldering a SMD R and a C and soldering an extra C and a shunt (other variants may be devised). The low freq limit appears to be now ~60Hz rather than the original 3OOHz, and I've found the readability of broadcast transmission and of speech to be largely improved. If interested I may email details. Rather, however, I would like to exchange comments with anybody who has tried anyting else in that box. My next to do mod would be to add a switchable narrower 455kHz filter to improve AM selectivity. I'd expect it to improve slightly the shortwave reception, but I wonder to which extent it will help. The 3k notoriously suffers hopelessly from front end intermodulation and wide IF (which in turn is a design choice, due to WFM requirements and tunable 2nd local osc). Looking forward to read, e.s. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!shore!castle.shore.net!1-324-127-0!norman.beaulac From: Norman.Beaulac@f127.n324.z1.fidonet.org (Norman Beaulac) Date: 13 Feb 96 19:17:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR8000 database program Message-ID: <5ff_9602150900@castle.shore.net> References: <311FE47D.61D@uky.campus.mci.net> X-FTN-To: Jim Dantin Lines: 52 * In a message originally sent to All, Jim Dantin stated: -JD> From: Jim Dantin -JD> Subject: AR8000 database program -JD> Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems -JD> Thanks to Robert McKenzie for posting my AR8000 database -JD> program on his -JD> ftp site. The file can be found at: -JD> ftp.rpmdp.com/pub/ar8000/ar8000-2.zip -JD> This is a Microsoft Access 2 database application that -JD> assists you in -JD> maintaining a master frequency list and maintaining your -JD> channel -JD> assignments in the AR8000. It does not directly communicate -JD> with the -JD> radio (it generates a text file that you send to the radio -JD> with Terminal -JD> or some other communications program). I have included a -JD> formatted -JD> report that lists the AR8000's memory channels on four -JD> 8.5x11 sheets. -JD> This database is FREEWARE. -JD> I am currently modifying it to add the capability to -JD> specify step -JD> offsets, clear a bank or the entire channel assignment, and -JD> thanks to -JD> the help of some other interested users, may add direct -JD> communications. -JD> This version is in Access 2, but future versions will -JD> probably be in -JD> Access for Windows 95 Version 7. ALL future versions will -JD> stay freeware -JD> - all I ask is for your comments and suggestions. Have -JD> fun! -JD> Jim Dantin -JD> jadantin@uky.campus.mci.com -JD> jdantin@phelpsd.com -JD> --- -JD> * Origin: Computer Castle BBS 1:324/127MCI State -JD> Government and Un (1:324/128) Hi Jim. I'm interested in this program....But I do not have AOL or Compuserve or Prodigy....The only contact is through a buletin board... Now!! I know you left the address, but from a buletin board, how do I access this program??? Your help would greatly be appreciated.... Thanks, Norman From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.zeitgeist.net!news.pixi.com!news.hula.net!root From: krokus@hula.net (Rich Sheff) Newsgroups: phl.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Attn: Monroe Twp. Listeners Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 04:57:31 GMT Organization: Hula Net, Inc. Hawaii's Newest Internet Provider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4g3nvm$8n@spartacus.hula.net> References: <4g0mtl$o9$1@mhafc.production.compuserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kahiko20.hula.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net phl.scanner:582 rec.radio.scanner:45687 alt.radio.scanner:27566 Tim Glen <76423.540@CompuServe.COM> wrote: >Is there any scanner listeners that know what >the freq. is for Monroe Twp. Channel 36 ??? Monroe where? 73, Rich From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!usenet.hana.nm.kr!usenet.seri.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: hanover1@ix.netcom.com(ROSS LANE ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AUTO RACING FREQUENCIES Date: 16 Feb 1996 15:24:18 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4g27j2$9fn@cloner3.netcom.com> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> <4fm9vr$nmv@kdcol.kdcol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-tam1-26.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Feb 16 7:24:18 AM PST 1996 Saint Petersburg, Fl will sponsor a SCCA Pro-Series Trans-Am Championship Race on 2/23-25/96 through the downtown streets of the city. Does anyone out there have any frequencies associated with this race series? Some of the drivers listed in the promotional material are Greg Pickett, Paul Gentilozzi and Ron Fellows. Any help woud be most welcome. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!nuhou.aloha.net!news.lei.net!coconut!news.west.net!news.silcom.com!webnews!lafn.org!lafn.org!ag001 From: ag001@lafn.org (Abraham Stavsky) Subject: BC 700A - Non Cellular Mods Possible? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lafn.org Message-ID: <1996Feb16.044618.27994@lafn.org> Sender: news@lafn.org Organization: Los Angeles Free-Net Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 04:46:18 GMT Lines: 7 I'd like to know if the BC700A can be modified to receive 600-700 MHz. Any ideas? Thanks, Abe KE6OCM -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usit.net!news From: sstutts@use.usit.net (THE Lone Wolf) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC 8500XLT/9000XLT Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:44:05 GMT Organization: Organization - What Organization? Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3121b249.5237930@news.usit.net> References: <4fglo2$puv@vivanews.vivanet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.1.57.110 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182 sbacker@vivanet.com wrote: ->What is the different between these two scanners? Is the 9000 worth $95.00 more, and why? ->Do both have cell mods? -> 1. Totally different scanners - only look the same on outside. 2. Yes! 2a. See number 1 3. NO Both can pick up cell images. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ What little I know is probably wrong. I am not smart enough to know. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC200xlt scanner wanted! Date: 14 Feb 1996 12:14:18 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 3 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4ft59a$316@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com BC200xlt scanner wanted! please e-mail or call 510.702.7838 if you have one for sale, thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news.ptd.net!news From: RickyRicardo Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC80XLT Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:21:46 -0800 Organization: ProLog - PenTeleData, Inc. Lines: 2 Message-ID: <3122C2EA.5C16@postoffice.ptd.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs5-07.str.ptd.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) Can anybody help me to mod my scanner to get cells freq? Thanks in advance. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!sun.alegria.com!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet From: Jim Felix Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BCT7 mods wanted Date: 14 Feb 1996 06:38:40 GMT Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc. Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fs01h$1te@chile.it.earthlink.net> References: <4fobji$28qq@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.149.204.72 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit) To: pxup76a@prodigy.com Steve, I'm looking for the same thing...just started looking today...if I find anything I'll let you know...hope you'll do the same for me...tnx, jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.midplains.net!gw2.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.info Subject: Buying a Used Scanner Radio Followup-To: poster Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:13:28 GMT Organization: Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL Lines: 1001 Approved: rec-radio-info@stat.com Message-ID: <4fvm38$q55@ssbunews.ih.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Keywords: FAQ food, old scanner models, hamfests Originator: parnass@radioman Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45607 alt.radio.scanner:27511 rec.radio.info:10833 last changed February 5, 1996 | Lines changed since the previous issue are marked with a | character in the right margin. BUYING A USED SCANNER RADIO by Bob Parnass, AJ9S [NOTE: This article may not be reproduced in whole or in part on CDROMS, in bulletin boards, networks, or publications which charge for service without permission of the author. Free distribution is encouraged.] Abstract This article contains product review summaries for more | than 60 old and new scanner radios and monitor receivers. Other topics include: 1. Motivation for buying a used scanner 2. A used scanner may be a broken scanner - where to get it fixed 3. Evolution of the scanner 4. Obtaining crystals 5. Keyboard programmable scanners Introduction Anybody with enough money can buy a brand new scanner, but you can save lots of money if you get a good deal on a used scanner. Hamfests are probably the best place to find used radios, but you must be familiar with the equipment. Hamfests are repleat with older radios you won't see in today's catalogs. At last count, there were over 110 scanners and monitor receivers of various brands in my collection. I purchase most of my receivers at hamfests or horsetrade with other radio hobbyists. This article describes a few of the FM receivers in my collection, and is not meant to be complete. A Used Scanner May be a Broken Scanner Getting a bargain is not without some risk. I have had sellers look me square in the eye and tell me their radio worked fine -- when it really didn't. Buying a used portable scanner is riskier than buying a mobile or base model. Portable scanners are subject to more physical abuse and many have been dropped. If a radio has been dropped, the laws of probability dictate that the first point of impact was probably a corner, so be sure to examine each corner for evidence of trauma. Scanners used in mobile service are subject to vibration, dust, and temperature extremes. This shouldn't dissuade you from buying a used mobile scanner, but be aware of possible complications. You should have some recourse if the radio you buy turns out to be defective. If you can't fix the radio yourself, you can pay to have the manufacturer or a service clinic repair it for you. Several people have been pleased with Electronic Repair Center, in Franklin Park, IL, which repairs scanners for a flat fee. Call them at (708)455-5105 to find out their current rates. G & G Communications (telephone 716-768- 8151) is another scanner repair company. This family owned company repairs scanners and stocks parts and crystals for several older models. They usually don't repair AOR scanners due to lack of manufacturer support. They are located at 9247 Glenwood Drive, LeRoy, NY 14482. Evolution of the Scanner It helps to understand some scanner history before shopping for a used scanner. You will likely see radios from many vintages at a hamfest, and should avoid buying early units unless you are a scanner collector. One of the earliest ancestors to the scanner was the converter. Manufactured by Tompkins (Tuneaverter), Petersen, Bearcat (Lil Tiger), Midland, and others, converters were made to operate in conjunction with AM radios. Then came wide band monitor receivers, in both tunable and crystal control models, like the Radio Shack PRO-2B. Truthfully, converters and tuneable FM receivers are interesting but don't work well by today's standards. While tuneable receivers were in vogue, solid state technologies supplanted tubes. Better performing, narrow band crystal controlled units, like the Sonar FR-105, followed. These units did not scan, rather channel selection was accomplished using a simple rotary switch. Sonar even made a 24 channel unit, model FR-2513, in which crystals were held in a rotary "turret." The earliest scanners, like the 1968 vintage Bearcat BCH, BCL, and BCU models, did not provide individual channel lockout capability. Electra didn't use the term "scanner" and instead called these innovative radios "business receivers." Other models, like the SBE Sentinel, employed a "Channel 1 Bypass" switch so a user could lockout channel 1. The first scanners came in single band models, followed by multiband models. As two-way radio users started to populate the 450 - 470 MHz band, consumers were forced to pay a premium for UHF scanner coverage. Some multiband scanners, like the Electra's Bearcat III, required an optional circuit board for each band. There were scanner mutations, designs which never evolved -- odd combinations of AM broadcast receivers with VHF-FM receive capability, like the flamboyant turquoise Sonar Sentry FR-103 portables, Electra's Jolly Roger, and GE's Surveyor series. Lafayette Radio Electronics offered a few CB transceivers with VHF receiver capability. These poor performers didn't interest consumers of that era and you should avoid these models unless you are a scanner collector. The first programmable (crystal-less) scanners were difficult to program. Users had to look up frequencies in a code book and tediously program the information into the scanner in binary form. Some models, like the Bearcat BC- 101, Radio Shack COMP 100, and Tennelec MCP-1, resembled Altair or PDP-8 computers, with a row of 16 or so toggle switches. Instead of toggle switches, the Regency WHAMO-10 was programmed by breaking teeth from metal combs. The SBE Optiscan (and its Sears clone) required poking a series of holes in plastic cards which were then inserted into a slot on the front panel. Keyboard Programmable Scanners Both Bearcat and Regency, as well as Radio Shack offer some good models. I would avoid the Bearcat 100, and older scanners made by AOR, JIL, Fox, Tennelec, and Robyn. Scanner features often differ not only by model but by manufacturer. For instance, most Radio Shack and Bearcat programmables allow enable/disable of the delay function on a per-channel basis. Older Regency units permit the delay to be enabled/disabled only globally, that is, for all the channels at one time. Radio Shack scanners contain a reasonable number of features. All the older Radio Shack scanners were made by General Research Electronics (GRE). Uniden began making scanner models for Radio Shack in the late 1980s, and now supplies about half the Radio Shack scanners. The older GRE-made models scan a bit slowly and have a higher level of synthesizer noise. Most have too much hysteresis in the operation of the squelch control, but this can be fixed completely by replacing one resistor. Good, detailed shop manuals are available for Radio Shack units for $5 - $12. In the name of cost cutting, some models have done away with the concept of a "channel bank", i.e. the ability to select/deselect a group of channels at a time. The bank concept was a good one. It may be inconvenient to operate a 30 channel scanner without banks (e.g. Regency MX3000, HX1000) if you operate the way many scanner hobbyists do. If you want to buy an American-made scanner, you will have to buy an old model. A few years ago, the Regency and Bearcat scanner lines were purchased by Uniden, a Japanese company, and production was moved to Asia. My favorite VHF/UHF receivers are the 400 channel Radio Shack PRO-2005 and PRO-2006, the Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT, and the ICOM R7000 and R7100. The ICOM models are more "communications receiver" than a conventional scanner. For portable use, I prefer the Radio Shack PRO-43 and Uniden/Bearcat BC3000XLT. Obtaining Crystals If you do purchase a crystal controlled scanner or monitor receiver, you will probably want to buy more crystals to cover local frequencies. Scanner crystals may be ordered from your local Radio Shack store or from one of the companies below. Be sure to specify the operating frequency you want and the brand and model of scanner. Some companies may ask you to send a schematic of the scanner or require more detailed information, like series or parallel resonance, load capacitance, etc. American Crystal Co. 1623 Central Ave. Kansas City, KS 66102 tel. 913-342-5493 Bomar Crystal Company 201 Blackford Ave. Middlesex, NJ 08846 tel. 908-356-7787 Cal Crystal Lab Inc. 1142 N. Gilbert St. Anaheim, CA 92801 tel. 714-991-1580 International Crystal Mfg Co. 11 N. Lee Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73102 tel. 405-236-3741, 800-725-1426 G & G Communications 9247 Glenwood Drive LeRoy, NY 14482. tel. 716-768-8151 Jan Crystals Box #-6017 Fort Myers, FL 33911 tel. 813-936-2397 Monitor Crystal Svc 124 W Walnut St Watseka, IL 60970 tel. 815-432-5296 For more information about old scanners, see: 1. "Confessions of a Scanner Collector," by Bob Parnass, Monitoring Times, August 1988. 2. "Scanner Collector Primer," by Bob Parnass, Monitoring Times, May 1995. I have published full length reviews of these recent scanner models in Monitoring Times magazine: Jan 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2035 vs. Radio Shack PRO-2006 Feb 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-62 Portable Mar 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT Apr 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC3000XLT Portable May 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC860XLT Jun 1995 - Uniden/Bearcat BC890XLT & Radio Shack PRO-2036 Jul 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2037 Aug 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-26 vs. Uniden/Bearcat BC3000XLT Sep 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-60 Portable Oct 1995 - AOR AR-2700 Portable Nov 1995 - selected AOR AR-8000 measurements Dec 1995 - Radio Shack PRO-2040 Feb 1996 - Radio Shack PRO-2042 Note: Reprints of Monitoring Times articles are available for $2.00 each from Grove Enterprises, PO Box 98, Brasstown, NC 28902, tel. (800)438-8155. AOR AR2700: 1995 vintage. 500 channel portable covering 500 kHz to 1300 MHz. Lots of good features, e.g., 10 linkable search banks, lighted keypad, per-channel attenuator, S- meter, battery meter, optional voice recorder and speech inversion descrambler. Global rescan and pause delays, but no auto store, data skip, nor battery saver. Internally generated noise results in broad birdies on AR2700 tested. Insensitive carrier operated (vs. noise operated) squelch stays closed on signals unless they are moderately strong, causing scanner to skip transmissions of interest. IFs are | 287.55/749.25, 58.05, 10.7/0.455 MHz. See "The AOR AR-2700 | Portable Scanner," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring | Times, October and November 1995. ICOM R-7000: 1986 vintage. At about $1000, this was once the top VHF/UHF receiver. 99 channel, multi mode coverage from 25-2000 MHz with a small gap at 1000-1025 MHz. Memory can be expanded to 198 channels by adding simple switch to pin 19 of memory IC8. Tuning knob lets you tune through parts of the spectrum much easier than using the SEARCH mode on conventional scanners. Selectable USB/LSB allows reception of new amplitude compandored sideband (ACSB) stations. S- meter doubles as discriminator meter to aid tuning. Useful search and store feature, reminiscent of the the Bearcat 250, searches between 2 limits and automatically stores new frequencies into channels 80-99. Audio and control interface for tape recorder. Noisy relay, activated when the receiver is tuned to frequencies above 520 MHz. Searches and scans slowly but can be sped up to about 12 cps by adding a resistor. Too big for permanent mobile use, but too nice to leave alone in the car. If you don't want to spend $1000, get a Radio Shack PRO-2004/5/6 instead. R-7100: 1992 vintage. At about $1300, this is the Cadillac of VHF/UHF receivers. 900 channel, multi mode continuous coverage from 25-2000 MHz. The radio RF/IF/AF portions of the R7100 are similar to the older R7000, but the R7100 is constructed using surface mount parts. Both the R7000 and R7100 are much more immune to intermod than the Uniden/Bearcat 760XLT and the portable PRO-43. The firmware in the R7100 is much more sophisticated. 9 banks of 100 channels. Further, you can associate each channel with 1 of 10 groups. Many possible ways to scan. 10 pairs of search limits. Search and store ("memory write") scan mode lets you store 100 frequencies instead of the 20 in R7000. Another R7100 improvement is that you can program up to 100 channels for the R7100 to skip while searching. R7100 has 2 VFOs ("windows"). Both the R7000 and R7100 scan slowly compared with PRO-2004 and PRO-2006, and that's a drawback. Both the R7100 and R7000 employ a noisy relay, activated when the receiver is tuned to frequencies above 520 MHz. Scanning a mixture of VHF and UHF frequencies serenades the Icom user with a very annoying clickety- clack, clickety-clack! UNIDEN/Bearcat and Electra/Bearcat Bearcat III (Electra): 1976 vintage. 8 channel crystal controlled scanner. Requires optional front-end circuit board for VHF-low, VHF-high, and UHF bands, but only 2 boards can be installed within the radio at the same time. Two crystal filters. No aircraft band coverage nor rescan delay. Front mount speaker sounds good. Strong local oscillator radiation often causes interference with other scanners in the same house. Bearcat IV (Electra): 8 channel crystal controlled scanner. Newer version of Bearcat III but contains front-end circuitry for VHF-low, VHF-high, and UHF bands. Better selectivity than Bearcat III or 12 due to having three instead of two 10.8 MHz IF filters. No aircraft band coverage. Front mount speaker sounds good. No rescan delay. Bearcat 5 (Electra): 1979 vintage. Eight channel economy base model covering VHF-low, VHF-high, and UHF bands. 117 VAC only. No track tuning. Black plastic cabinet. Bearcat 6 (Electra): Six channel VHF-low and VHF-high bands. 117 VAC only. Wood covered particle board cabinet. Bearcat 8 (Electra): Eight channel VHF-low, VHF-high, and UHF bands. 117 VAC only. Wood covered particle board cabinet. Bearcat 12 (Electra): 1979 vintage. One of the last decent crystal controlled scanners. 10 channels. Variable scan speed up to 20 ch/sec. Single delay on/off switch. Front mount speaker sounds good. Manual contains schematic. Single conversion, 10.8 MHz IF. Selectivity is poorer than programmable models, like the 300, allowing adjacent channel interference. Covers VHF-low, VHF-high, and UHF bands but no aircraft band coverage. Crystal positions must be arranged by band. Bearcat 15 (Electra): 1983 vintage. Actually made for Electra by competitor GRE (General Research Electronics). The only Bearcat crystal controlled base/mobile scanner offering 118 - 136 MHz AM aircraft band. 10 channels. BC101 (Electra): 1975 vintage. First Bearcat synthesized unit. 16 channels, no priority. Frequency programmed in binary by setting toggle switches on front panel after looking up code in code book. No frequency readout. Uses custom IC for CPU, now discontinued, so factory authorized service is no longer available. I have four of these units. DC operation requires optional mobile power supply. BC100 (Electra): First programmable portable scanner. Be prepared for at least one repair in the first year. Early units, with threaded antenna connector, have high frequency of repair, particularly LCD readout, keyboard, and battery holder. No battery backup. Poor case design in early units caused battery to disconnect from radio, resetting microprocessor and clearing memories. No priority channel or aircraft band. Some people swear by the BC100, others swear at them. BC220 (Electra): 1979 vintage. 20 channels. Reasonable number of features but 20 channels doesn't seem enough. Service Search for Marine and Aircraft. LED readout. Good scanner, but tinny audio. BC20/20 (Electra): 1981 vintage. Similar to BC220 but with 40 channels and different CPU circuitry. A maximum of 20 channels can be scanned at one time. Reasonable number of features. Service Search for Marine and Aircraft. LED readout. Good scanner, but tinny audio. BC250 (Electra): 1976 vintage. 50 channel model, rich in features, but lacks aircraft band and 144-146 MHz. Search and Store feature extremely useful for finding federal frequencies. Clock. High frequency of repair. Power transistors not heat sinked adequately, causing heat damage to surrounding components and circuit board. Failure of Q204 on the feature board known to cause odd display readings. Digital circuitry very sensitive to glitches caused by static and AC line spikes. Avoid 1978 or earlier vintage units. All BC250s use custom ICs (e.g., IC6, a divider chip, mfd. by Exar), which are now discontinued, so factory service is no longer available from Uniden. BC260 (Electra): 1983 vintage. Super heavy duty metal cabinetry and lit controls, aimed at mobile use for firemen, police, etc. Few frills, only 16 channels, no aircraft, but generous coverage of federal bands omitted in the older Bearcat scanners. Good sensitivity. Lots of audio. Good internal construction. Backlit keyboard allows operation in the dark, but the keyboards on some units require high pressure to operate. Brightness control for display and keyboard, but multiplexor circuitry for vacuum fluorescent display produces audible whine which may be annoying in a quiet room. Backlighting may fail in some units due to poor contact on connector used to fasten light panel to front circuit board. 9 volt regulator transistor Q28 (TIP29) may fail, causing blank display while leaving audio intact. Method of connecting an external speaker is awkward. BC300 (Electra): 1979 vintage. 50 channel top of the line scanner. Service Search feature contains 11 ROM banks of preprogrammed channels. Switching power supply failure noted in early units due to insufficient capacitance - component value was changed in newer units. Schematics show at least 100 components changed between earliest and later units. Preset squelch pot, mounted internally on circuit board, misadjusted in new units - adjustment usually required after burn-in period. Good sensitivity. Built in clock. I leave it on 24 hours a day. This is a favorite. BC350 (Electra): 1981 vintage. 50 channels in 5 banks. Includes aircraft. Used to be Bearcat's top of the line, overpriced scanner but never very popular. Dual use keyboard and display allowed 8 text characters to be associated with each channel, a feature clumsily implemented, and awkward to use. Units plagued with various hardware problems including bad memory ICs and short life power transformers. Firmware bugs without cures. The BC300 is a much better scanner than the BC350, and at a lower price. BC760XLT (Uniden): Also sold as BC950XLT through Scanner World. Small, mobile scanner supplied with mounting bracket and wall wart AC power supply. Some of the keys are backlit. 100 channels in 5 banks. Service search. Earlier version has Motorola type antenna jack and AA battery backup. Later version has BNC antenna jack and internal lithium battery. Can be fitted with optional CTCSS decoder. Hyper sensitive and easily overloaded by strong signals, especially when used with outdoor antenna in base applications. Conventional 10.8 MHz IF prone to images. Television audio heard in some places. BC800XLT (Uniden): 1985 vintage. 40 channels in two banks. Covers 806-912 MHz, as well as of vhf, uhf, and aircraft bands. Receives 10 meter fm and all of 6 meters, as well as federal portions of vhf and uhf bands. Fewer birdies on vhf-lo band than other scanners. Scans and searches very fast. Clean, robust audio output. Extremely sensitive, but very prone to overload by strong signals when connected to outdoor antenna. Too much play (hysteresis) in squelch adjustment - can be improved by changing one resistor. Positive terminal in memory backup battery holder installed backwards in early units, allowing memory loss when scanner unplugged from AC outlet. Tunes in increments of 12.5 KHz on 800 MHz band, whereas cellular telephones are on 30 KHz channels. See "The Bearcat 800XLT ... an Owner's Report," by Bob Parnass, in Monitoring Times, March 1986. BC860XLT (Uniden): 1995 vintage. 100 channel table top unit. Can lock out 10 channels during search. Good performer except for images. See "The Uniden Bearcat BC860XLT," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, May 1995. BC890XLT (Uniden): Same as Radio Shack PRO-2036. Tuning knob. 200 channels, global delay. Count, AUX, and Auto Store features. Scans and searches fast. Accepts optional CTCSS board. Dual conversion with 10.8 MHz and 450 kHz IF | -- lots of images and birdies. Prone to severe intermod, especially when used with an outdoor antenna. See "The Uniden BC-890XLT and Radio Shack PRO-2036," by Bob Parnass, in June 1995 Monitoring Times. BC9000XLT (Uniden): 1995 vintage. High quality base using up-conversion. 500 channels in twenty banks. Up to 250 channels can be programmed with alpha labels. Tuning knob. Selectable AM, NFM, WFM modes. Optional CTCSS decoder. Very fast scan and search. Can lock out 50 channels during search. Delay and attenuator independently programmable for each channel. Effective Auto Store feature stores unique frequencies. Good RF section, but not as robust as PRO-2004/5/6. IFs are 380.7/254.4, 58.075, 0.455 MHz. One urban user, located within a couple of blocks of several high power transmitters, reports severe desense problems. See "The Uniden Bearcat BC9000XLT," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, March 1995. BC100XLT (Uniden): 1987 vintage. Very good 100 channel portable with 10 priority channels. Unique feature tells whether a given frequency has already been memorized. Generous coverage of conventional bands, including commercial aircraft, but no 800 MHz. Decent leather-like case. Slide-on 550 mAH NiCd battery pack. BC200XLT (Uniden): 1987 vintage. Also sold as BC205XLT through Scanner World. Very good 200 channel version of BC100XLT portable scanner but includes 800 MHz band. 10 priority channels. Unique feature tells whether a given frequency has already been memorized. Decent leather-like case. Slide-on NiCd battery pack. BC2500XLT (Uniden): 400 channel portable with tuning knob. Plagued by intermod and images. Early units drained batteries quickly even while turned off. BC3000XLT (Uniden): 1995 vintage. Excellent 400 channel portable with 20 banks. Up conversion. Very fast scan, search, and intelligent Auto Store. Mode, attenuator, and delay settings programmable for each channel. 50 frequencies can be locked out during search. Larger speaker than PRO-26 produces better, crisper audio. See "The Uniden Bearcat BC3000XLT," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, April 1995. Regency TMR series: First generation crystal scanners. Come in all varieties of band coverage. Models with both UHF and VHF bands must use separate antennas for each band (disadvantage in mobile installations, but can be overcome by connecting two front ends via a capacitor). Not sensitive enough to cover the entire 30 - 50 MHz range in a single model. There three versions of VHF-low band coverage depending on the part of the 30 - 50 MHz band covered (LL, LM. and LH). TMR scanners use unsocketed incandescent bulbs for channel indicators which require periodic replacement. Easy to crystal: Radio Shack crystals work well. TMRs usually $2 and up at hamfests, often in poor condition. Don't pay more than $50, even if mint. Front ends must be tuned for selected portions within the bands for best sensitivity. Wide IF selectivity troublesome in urban/suburban areas. Primitive digital scanning circuitry may become confused at times. but power off/on restores sanity. Replace aging capacitors in the scanning circuits. You can find a TMR8H eight channel high band unit most often. TME series: The base versions of the TMR models. Both the TME and TMR models share many common circuits but the base versions contain speakers mounted on the front panel. The most common TME model is the TME8 H/LM eight channel dual band scanner in a metal cabinet with wood coloring. ACTR series: Replaced the Regency TMR units. By the time Regency made the ACTR units, they no longer offered different models for different parts of the 30 - 50 MHz band. Look for the later ACT series, e.g., ACTR-106 (10 channel tri band) or ACTR20/6 (20 channel tri band), used light emitting diodes for channel indicators instead of incandescent bulbs. Available in 1 to 20 channel models - most are multi band receivers. Somewhat wide selectivity. Not all that bad a deal if cheap. ACTE series: The base versions of the ACTR series. The ACTE and ACTR circuitry is similar, although the base versions contain speakers mounted on the front panel. The most common ACTE model is the ACTE8 H/L eight channel dual band scanner in a black metal cabinet. WHAMO-10: Regency's first synthesized scanner. Appearance more like a crystal scanner, with a single LED per channel. User has to break off teeth on a metal 'comb' for each channel according to a code book. External frequency control unit DFS-5K optional. UHF VCO reference oscillator drifts on some units. Soldered sheet metal shields around some circuitry make access to some components difficult for servicing. Comb sockets prone to bad connections after moderate use. Not recommended due to maintenance difficulties. K500: Nice wood-like cabinet. 40 channel model with every feature Regency could dream of in one scanner, except aircraft band. Idle tone bypass feature for mobile phone stations works about 50% of the time. Weather alert feature. Service Search in several banks. Search and Store facility not implemented as well as BC250, but better than none. Built in clock when radio off or in manual mode. Can be programmed out of band. Reasonable performance, but sensitivity could be better. Spring contacts on membrane keyboard may need soldering after prolonged use. K100: Bare bones version of the K500. 10 channels, no priority feature. Same wood-like cabinet and reasonable performance as K500. Spring contacts on membrane keyboard may need soldering after prolonged use. M400: 30 channel replacement for K500. Service Search, but no aircraft. Easily programmable out of band. Built in clock when radio off or in manual mode. Backlit keyboard good for night viewing and mobile use but generates RFI into nearby SW receivers. A favorite. MX3000: 30 channel replacement for M400, but basic features only. Nice lit keyboard, but may cause RFI into nearby SW receivers. Easily programmable out of band, but no aircraft. All 30 channels are in a single bank, and lack of direct channel access make this model more difficult to operate. Good first scanner. M100: 10 channel unit. Same as MX3000 except different color and fewer channels. Nicely lit keyboard, but may cause RFI into nearby SW receivers. HX1000: Good, fairly rugged, 30 channel handheld synthesized unit. Generous out of band coverage but no AM aircraft coverage. Built by Azden. Very sensitive on UHF, but annoying audio hiss leaks through speaker when squelched. Belt clip chintzy, but can be directly replaced with better clip from Kenwood TR2600A. Like the MX3000, all 30 channels are in a single bank, and lack of direct channel access make this model more difficult to operate. Low discount price makes this best choice for programmable portable. HX650/H604: 6 channel crystal portable. Likely made by Sanyo. Same as Fannon and Bearcat Thin Scan units, (except that Bearcat has 10.8 MHz IF frequency, and is harder to get crystals for), but scans faster. Small size and common crystals (available at Radio Shack), make this 1st choice for bare bones portable scanner. Radio Shack PRO-2004: 1986 vintage. Top of the line, wide band scanner for 1987. After a diode is cut, enjoy continuous coverage from 25-520 and 760-1300 MHz, AM, NBFM, and WBFM. Has 300 channels in 10 banks of 30, backed up by conventional 9 volt alkaline battery. Any channel can be designated the priority channel. Scans and searches fast. Lots of well designed features, like 10 pairs of search limits, Lockout Review, default search increment and emission mode. Sound Squelch allows skipping dead carriers during search or scan. Metal cabinet, good internal construction and shielding, but no mobile mounting bracket or DC power cord. Soft touch membrane keyboard. Good sensitivity and selectivity. Very good radio. See "Product Review: The Radio Shack PRO-2004 Programmable Scanner," by Bob Parnass AJ9S, in The Radio Enthusiast, February 1987, and Monitoring Times, March 1987. PRO-2005: 1989 vintage. Essentially a size reduced PRO- 2004 with surface mount components and 400 channels. Some people think the small knobs, smaller display, and plastic cabinet are a setback from the 2004. The smaller size, real rubber keyboard, and vertical front panel make it easer to use mobile, although there is no mobile mounting bracket available and the keyboard is not backlit. More sensitive than the PRO-2004 but 800 MHz signals leak through into the commercial aero band. Highly recommended. See "Product Review: The Radio Shack PRO-2005 Programmable Scanner," by Bob Parnass AJ9S, in The Radio Enthusiast, June 1989, and RCMA Journal, August 1989. PRO-2006: 1990 vintage. Essentially the same as PRO-2005 but scans faster. Probably the best scanner made to date. Highly recommended. See "The Realistic PRO-2006," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, October 1990. PRO-2035: 1995 vintage wide coverage base made by GRE. 1,000 channels, but cumbersome 100 channel bank size. Tuning knob. Broader IF selectivity than PRO-2006. Poor dynamic range. 10 linkable search banks. Dumb Auto Store feature stores the same frequencies over and over. Wastes time scanning empty channels. See "The Radio Shack PRO- 2035 - How Does It Compare With the PRO-2006?," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, January 1995. PRO-2040: late 1995 vintage 100 channel base made by Uniden. Fair performance, but minimal image rejection. Local oscillator harmonics account for spurious responses, e.g., reception of cellular telephone calls in the 460 MHz UHF-high band. Scans over 40 channels/sec. Can lock out up to 50 channels from search. "Soft" on/off power switching via keypad. See "The Radio Shack PRO-2040," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, December 1995. PRO-2042: 1996 version of the wide coverage PRO-2035 base with improved firmware and amber display. Made by GRE. 1,000 channels, but cumbersome 100 channel bank size. Tuning knob. NFM selectivity is still a problem but improved over PRO-2035. 10 linkable search banks. Smart Auto Store feature stores the unique frequencies. Can lock out up to 200 frequencies from search. Query facility indicates if and in what channel a frequency is programmed. Scan skips over empty channels automatically. Can sort memories by frequency within a given bank. IFs are 609 - | 612, 58.05, and 10.7/0.455 MHz. Broader IF selectivity than PRO-2006. Overall, a top grade scanner and second only to Uniden/Bearcat BC9000XLT. See "The Radio Shack PRO-2042," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, February 1996. PRO-34: Portable scanner with 200 channels and 800 MHz coverage. Ten "monitor" channels. Operates from AA cells. Slow scanning, low audio output, and chintzy plastic case detract from an otherwise good performance. No decent leather case available from Radio Shack. If you need a portable with 800 MHz, get a Bearcat 200XLT. If you can't get a 200XLT, get a PRO-34. PRO-2021: Base/mobile scanner. 200 channels in 10 banks, LCD display and raised rubber keys. Lots of memory but scans too slowly and lacks 800 MHz. Ten "monitor" channels. Radio Shack seemed to have an overstock of 2021s as they were on sale for such a long time. Close out price dipped to about $200, which made it a nice scanner for beginners. PRO-2022: Base/mobile scanner. Like the PRO-2021 but includes the 800 MHz band. Cellular images throughout the 847.6 - 869 MHz range. Includes power saver circuit, odd for a base unit, which can clip the first part of a transmission. PRO-2036: Same as Uniden/Bearcat BC890XLT. Tuning knob. 200 channels, global delay. Scans and searches fast. Count, AUX, and Auto Store features. Accepts optional CTCSS board. Dual conversion with 10.8 MHz and 450 kHz IFs | -- lots of images and birdies. Prone to severe intermod, especially when used with an outdoor antenna. See "The Uniden BC-890XLT and Radio Shack PRO-2036," by Bob Parnass, in June 1995 Monitoring Times. PRO-2037: 1994 vintage. Triple conversion all plastic base scanner made by GRE. Home version of the PRO-62 portable but with more intermod. 200 channels in 10 banks, one search bank, selectable AM and FM. Uses up conversion circuitry but inadequate front end filtering still allows images, though not as bad as in 10.7 or 10.8 MHz IF circuits. Crisp, respectable audio given the top mounted speaker. See "The Radio Shack PRO-2037," by Bob Parnass, in July 1995 Monitoring Times. PRO-2001: Early, single bank 16 channel programmable. Reasonable coverage of the 3 traditional bands, minus aircraft band. LED digital display as well as an LED per channel. Mechanical lockout switch for each channel. Delay is either on or off for all channels at a time. High synthesizer noise level. Troublesome plated through holes on digital board in some units renders radio virtually unfixable. Could never get mine to work more than a few days in a row; always another bad connection. Some owners have no trouble. PRO-52: 8 channel VHF-Lo/Hi base unit. No UHF band or provision for mobile operation. Good little scanner despite limited frequency coverage and Spartan lack of frills. Crisp squelch action and good audio, helped by a front mounted, vertical speaker. PRO-2003: Radio Shack's 1986 top of line. 50 channels + 10 FM commercial broadcast band channels. Includes aircraft. Good frequency coverage and functionality, but at a high price. Poor human engineering: difficult to read keyboard makes the PRO-2003 hard to operate unless in a well lit room. Keyboard label coloring improved on newer units. Rather slow scan rate and high price. Although there are provisions for 12VDC operation, the cabinet shape and lack of mounting bracket makes mobile operation impractical. Scan rate only 8 channels/sec vs. 15/sec in Regency and Bearcat. Causes RFI: Plastic case permits scanner to radiate signals into nearby receivers. PRO-43: Very good portable made by GRE. First Radio Shack portable with up conversion, and 222 MHz ham and 225 - 400 MHz military air band coverage. 200 channels, single search range. Small, convenient size. Muffled audio. Speakers in early units known to fail and more powerful speakers were used in later units. 800 MHz band coverage fully restorable in early units by removing diode. Uses same 6 cell battery tray as other high end GRE portables. Subject to interference in 160 - 162 MHz range. PRO-60: 1995 vintage. Very good portable made by GRE. 200 channels, single search range. Similar features and same IFs as the PRO-43 it replaced but the PRO-60 has wider frequency coverage and crisper audio. Covers 75 MHz and commercial FM broadcast bands. Improved Direct search can be stepped manually in single steps. Uses same 6 cell battery tray as other high end GRE portables. Railfans take note -- the PRO-60 and PRO-43 are subject to interference in 160 - 162 MHz range. Draws 100 mA while scanning. PRO-26: 1985 vintage. Very good portable made by for Radio Shack by Uniden. 200 channels, very fast scan/search. Good display. Covers all TV channels, but spectrum adjacent to cellular phone band is censored which prevents monitoring parts of some trunked systems (e.g., IL State Police district 4). Up to 50 frequencies can be skipped during search. Limited image rejection causes 929 MHz paging interference in 170 MHz range. IFs are 380.7/254.4, | 58.075, and 5.5/0.455 MHz. Audio suffers from small speaker. PRO-62: 1984 vintage. Good portable 200 channel scanner using up conversion. Similar to PRO-43 but no military air band, different upper frequency limit, and slightly different IFs. Selectable AM/NFM modes. Better intermod immunity than PRO-43. See "The Radio Shack PRO-62," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, February 1995. PRO30: 16 channel programmable portable with aircraft band. Good frequency coverage. Extra controls on top allow control of SCAN, MANUAL, and PRIORITY functions while worn on belt. Good belt clip. Low audio output. Plastic case prone to break at BNC antenna connector under severe use, vs. metal frame in Regency HX1000. High price, no discounts or sales yet. I had 6 or 7 PRO30s, having to return them several times during the 1 year warranty, although other owners have had little or no trouble. Troubles included oscillation in IF stage, no UHF band reception, case broken around base of antenna connector, etc. PRO-24: 1983 vintage. Only 4 channels in this crystal controlled portable. Covers the three basic bands, but no aircraft. Easy to obtain batteries and crystals. Characteristic Radio Shack squelch problem, fixable by changing one resistor. All-plastic case larger than Bearcat Thin Scan and clones. See "The Radio Shack PRO-24 Scanner," by Bob Parnass, excerpted in the "Technical Topics" column, RCMA Newsletter, February 1984. Craig (division of Pioneer) 4530: Japanese 10 channel crystal controlled 3 band unit. Also available under Plectron name but in different cabinet. No aircraft band. Deluxe features like priority, trimmer capacitors for netting each channel, front panel speaker, and rugged metal cabinet make this unit a winner. Channel lockout slide switches have finite life. Replacing burned out incandescent channel lamps not fun. Grab a 4530 if you find one in good condition. Sonar: Sonar made several crystal controlled scanners and channelized monitor receivers which shared the same RF circuitry. Each radio was housed in the same size metal case and worked on both 120 VAC and 12 VDC. The models differed in the number of channels, the band coverage, and whether individual channels could be locked out. Although they used a 10.7 MHz first IF, Sonar radios require parallel resonant crystals different from the common series resonant crystals used in Regency and Radio Shack scanners. Some Radio Shack crystals will work in Sonar units, but more often they oscillate a few kHz off frequency and are unsuitable unless changes are made to the oscillator circuitry. Therefore, beginners should avoid these radios. Typical Sonar squelch has long time constant causing a long noise burst at the end of each transmission. FR-104, FR-105: 6 channel monitor receivers covering 25 - 50 MHz or 150 - 175 MHz. Manual channel selection, i.e., no scanning. Early models are identified by an 11 pin connector on the rear and they could be used with an optional NiCd battery pack and charger which bolted to the rear panel. Later models used Cinch Jones connectors with flat contacts. Optional tone decoder board. FR-2512, FR-2513: 24 channel versions of the FR-104 and FR-105 monitor receivers. Manual channel selection, i.e., no scanning. FR-2514, FR-2515: 8 channel scanners. Channel 1 priority. Recommend you avoid these models as there is no way to lockout a channel from the scan sequence. FR-2526, FR-2526, FR-2528: 10 channel scanners covering various combinations of 3 bands. Each channel could be locked out. Channel 1 priority. Sonar #chan- VHF VHF UHF lock- Model nels low high scans? outs? ___________________________________________________ FR104 6 X no FR105 6 X no FR2512 24 X no FR2513 24 X no FR2514 8 X yes no FR2515 8 X yes no FR2526 10 X yes yes FR2527 10 X X yes yes FR2528 10 X X yes yes Table 1. Summary of Sonar base/mobile monitor and scanner receivers Tennelec Manufactured the first synthesized scanners. Company went out of business several years ago. Schematics and parts difficult to obtain. Radios reputed to be poor performers. Got my MS-2 and MCP-1 basket cases for free and sometimes regret taking them. Not worth fixing unless you have access to DTL/RTL chips and circuit diagrams. Plectron and Motorola Alert Monitor Receivers In the 1960s and 1970s, thousands of firemen and ambulance squad members came to rely on their transistor Plectron and Motorola Alert monitor receivers. They have now been replaced by portable pagers, and are often available at hamfests in the $5 - $25 range. Since many are in rough condition and need repair, a hamfest special is better suited for hobbyists who like to fix their own radios. Plectron and Motorola Alert crystal controlled receivers are excellent for dedicated monitoring of local frequencies -- a task for which you wouldn't want to tie up your 400 channel programmable scanner. These radios are fixed channel units and do not scan. They can be powered form 117VAC or 12VDC with the proper mobile cord. The audio quality on a Plectron P1 or 700 series is far better than any consumer grade scanner and the sensitivity and intermod immunity is outstanding if aligned properly. Better image rejection than most scanners (see article by Bob Parnass in Monitoring Times, January 1996 for comparison). The Plectron 500 series is less desirable. The Motorola Alert monitors are pretty good, although the audio lacks bass. No single Plectron or Motorola Alert monitor can cover the entire 30-50 MHz band, and there were versions optimized for each portion of the band. There were different "split" models to cover segments of VHF-hi band, too. Although UHF versions were made, they are somewhat rare. Both brands of receiver require special crystals. I sometimes use Radio Shack's generic 3rd overtone scanner crystals in the Plectrons but they oscillate on frequencies far away from their marked frequencies. That's because the Plectron oscillator is designed to be used with a crystal which oscillates on its fundamental, not overtone, frequency. If you find the squelch on your Plectron 700 series receiver has too much hysteresis, replace R96, a 180K resistor, with a 560K resistor. On the P1, the resistor is designated R81. Repair service for the Plectron P1 and R700 models is offered by: Woodson Electronics Plectron Place P.O. Box 960 Imboden, Arkansas 72434 telephone 1-(501)869-7985 Some replacement parts are currently available from Federal Signal in University Park, IL, phone (800)524-3021. For more information, see "Add a Cystal Receiver to Your Arsenal," by Bob Parnass, January 1996 Monitoring Times. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:52 1996 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod From: zaphod@madnix.uucp (Ron Bean) Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Organization: /usr/lib/news/organi[sz]ation Message-ID: <1996Feb13.010350.26066@madnix.uucp> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 01:03:50 GMT Lines: 13 Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1468 sci.electronics.repair:21688 alt.radio.scanner:27480 rec.radio.scanner:45561 >Try a pawn shop or used electronics store, as what you want is a used VCR. >That will give you 6 to 8 hours of audio. There used to be a casette recorder that was specially modified to record at a very slow speed, sold by one of the shortwave radio vendors. Try calling the places that advertise in the World Radio-Tv Handbook (Whether this is more reliable than a used VCR is left as an excercise for the reader :-). ================== madnix!zaphod@nicmad.nicolet.com (Ron Bean) uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!acsc.com!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!kaiwan-internet From: natron@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (Wayne Scharf) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,misc.wanted,alt.anything Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 13 Feb 1996 22:33:00 -0800 Organization: KAIWAN INTERNET 714-260-8800 (local to 909,714,310,213,818,805) Lines: 31 Message-ID: <4frvms$q0l@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kaiwan009.kaiwan.com Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1513 sci.electronics.repair:21726 alt.radio.scanner:27508 rec.radio.scanner:45601 misc.wanted:60750 alt.anything:888 In article , Steve Kennedy wrote: >In article <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> brueger@infi.net (Brian J. Rue ger) writes: >>From: brueger@infi.net (Brian J. Rueger) >>Subject: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min >>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:56:11 GMT > >>Does anyone know if there is a cassette tape available that will record for >>greater than 120 minutes? I am looking for a tape that will record 90 >>minutes per side for a total of 3 hours. > >>Thanks > >>Brian > > >I solved the problem another way. For $5.00 I found a long-play data cassett e >player/recorder made by General Electric at a local thrift shop. It runs at >about 1/2 normal speed, so it records 90+ minutes per side on a C-90, or 120+ >minutes per side on a C-120! > >Great for radio communications! > >Steve ...and then, if you're really serious about long recording time, use your VCR sound channel for an audio recorder...with a T200 tape, you get 10 HOURS! -- NATRON@KAIWAN.COM Silverado From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!sun4nl!xs4all!falstaff From: falstaff@xs4all.nl (Falstaff) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 14 Feb 1996 09:28:44 GMT Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fsa0c$b0n@news.xs4all.nl> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> <1996Feb13.010350.26066@madnix.uucp> NNTP-Posting-Host: xs1.xs4all.nl X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #666 (NOV) Xref: news.epix.net sci.electronics.misc:1522 sci.electronics.repair:21740 alt.radio.scanner:27518 rec.radio.scanner:45619 zaphod@madnix.uucp (Ron Bean) writes: >>Try a pawn shop or used electronics store, as what you want is a used VCR. >>That will give you 6 to 8 hours of audio. > There used to be a casette recorder that was specially >modified to record at a very slow speed, sold by one of the >shortwave radio vendors. Try calling the places that advertise >in the World Radio-Tv Handbook (Whether this is more reliable >than a used VCR is left as an excercise for the reader :-). Also, a 120m tape at long play in my DAT recorder gives about 8.5 hours recording time. Frank -- "Life without a backbone is hardly worth consideration." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frank A. Vorstenbosch +31-(70)-355 5241 falstaff@xs4all.nl From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: xtrenched@aol.com (XTrenched) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: CB's(I know) being modified by out-of-range crystals? Date: 14 Feb 1996 01:48:12 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 9 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fs0jc$njd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4frlcq$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> Reply-To: xtrenched@aol.com (XTrenched) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45602 alt.radio.scanner:27509 I got really bored one day and began to think. Back when I was playing with CB's, I had to put in crystals for each channel. It finally clicked then that the crystal rating in Mhz was the same frequency the CB broadcast on(I'm almost positive) Now, obviously, it won't be efficient, but shouldn't you be able to get a say 832.xx crystal and plug it into the tx side to be able to talk on cell phone frequencies? This is, of course, only a quest for curiousity and I in know way want to do anything illegal...I guess From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!swrinde!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news.lahabra.chevron.com!usenet From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CB's(I know) being modified by out-of-range crystals? Date: 14 Feb 1996 16:22:56 GMT Organization: CCnet Communications - Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4ft290$43u@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> References: <4frlcq$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <4fs0jc$njd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cgwh.sr.chevron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) xtrenched@aol.com (XTrenched) wrote: > I got really bored one day and began to think. Back when I was playing >with CB's, I had to put in crystals for each channel. It finally clicked >then that the crystal rating in Mhz was the same frequency the CB >broadcast on(I'm almost positive) > Now, obviously, it won't be efficient, but shouldn't you be able to get >a say 832.xx crystal and plug it into the tx side to be able to talk on >cell phone frequencies? >This is, of course, only a quest for curiousity and I in know way want to >do anything illegal...I guess Well no... 99.9% probability that it won't work at all. The crystal(s) are just there to create the signals you need. After that they are of course modulated, perhaps multiplied, and amplified in your transmitter. Just about all other RF circuitry in the rig is "tuned" for the frequencies you are using. Everything in a CB is set up for 27 MHz. You probabaly wouldn't 800 MHz to go anywhere inside the radio, let alone to the antenna. Curtis From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.OZ.AU!metro!metro!OzEmail!usenet From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CellTracker For the US(amps) Date: 15 Feb 1996 10:45:01 GMT Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4fv2rd$47o@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel7p01.ozemail.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) asi@escape.ca wrote: > Has anyone hooked up Celltrackers ETACS software to a Cellphone and tried it >on the AMPS system? > >What did it do?? Anything?? > >Peace from Canada. > >Still looking for a DDI with control for AMPS. > > I got it to half work, but the PC didn't control the phone. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 13:59:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.escape.ca!ts1dl21.escape.ca!asi From: asi@escape.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CellTracker For the US(amps) Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 02:53:22 Organization: escape communications corp. Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <4fv2rd$47o@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1dl21.escape.ca X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] >asi@escape.ca wrote: >> Has anyone hooked up Celltrackers ETACS software to a Cellphone and t ried it >>on the AMPS system? >> >>What did it do?? Anything?? >> >>Peace from Canada. >> >>Still looking for a DDI with control for AMPS. >> >> >I got it to half work, but the PC didn't control the phone. If you get it to control the phone YOU WILL BE THE MAN. What did you do change the software??? Send me new info if so!!! How are you testing it you DOG?? A buddy just got back from your crazy land! Wow some of the story's! Peace! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!nntp.msstate.edu!terminator.ncts.navy.mil!news.fmso.navy.mil!usenet From: dave.hultberg@paonline.com (Dave Hultberg) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cheek's Rec-Scanner Technology Forum Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 04:20:29 GMT Organization: C&D Railroad Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4frob0$pn@news.fmso.navy.mil> References: <4e0qhh$1v4@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> <4eofqj$ggc@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> <4er470$7nd@news2.cts.com> <4f6nt8$rlp@news2.cts.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.249.140.202 X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 In article , Peter J. Boe tvine@teleport.com (PjB) wrote: >Thats the first bit of truth I've ever heard ol' Butt Cheek utter. Here >again tho, note the anal reference! Peter, Don't you ever get tired of running your mouth? Why don't you concentrate on giving your private music lessons and leave us in peace. Oh yeah, got any good frequencies for Portland? Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!oleane!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Commercial Data, both on SCA and UHF. Date: 15 Feb 1996 11:57:01 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 12 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <312381CF.1574@primenet.com> X-Posted-By: ip094.phx.primenet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There seems to be some type of continuous data being sent on an SCA channel, and the same type on a UHF frequency. It sounds like ALIST, but the device I have that decodes it does not recognize the tones. Kind-a sounds like: Chir____________up, Chir___________up, etc... It's not a very fast data rate either, probably 1200bps. It's an FM signal on UHF, 450.01 here in Phoenix. And as SCA (96Khz), on 102.5 FM.. If anyone has an idea, I'd like to hear from you. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Computer Scanning FAQ Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 18:11:07 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 24 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 Rob Bellville has been kind enough to post the beta version of my computer-aided scanning FAQ on his web site, www.ultranet.com/~bellvill. I've put a lot of work into the FAQ, trying to anticipate the sort of questions people who want to hook up their scanners to their desktop computers might have. Unfortunately, there is still work to be done, but I just don't have the time right now, so I figured that if I posted the FAQ, some other kind souls would be impelled to leap in with a hand. Anyway, take a look at it, give me your suggestions and comments on what you think needs fixing, what think ought to be there that isn't and so on. Note that I've basically taken marketing hype from the scanner software vendors, cleaned it up and then listed the salient features. At this minute, I'm running through the demo and live versions of software and when I can get to it, I'll flesh out the software with some personal observations (better yet, with some of your personal observations) that get around the hyped up claims. Notice I said, "give me your suggestions and comments." You got complaints, stick 'em in your ear (said only in partial jest). My earlier call for assistance triggered an avalanche of responses--from 1-2 people! -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Computer Scanning FAQ Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 06:24:36 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 The URL you should use is www.ultranet.com/~bellvill/scanner.html. I omitted the last part in my original post. My apologies. In article , michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) wrote: > Rob Bellville has been kind enough to post the beta version of my > computer-aided scanning FAQ on his web site, www.ultranet.com/~bellvill. > I've put a lot of work into the FAQ, trying to anticipate the sort of > questions people who want to hook up their scanners to their desktop > computers might have. Unfortunately, there is still work to be done, but I > just don't have the time right now, so I figured that if I posted the FAQ, > some other kind souls would be impelled to leap in with a hand. > > Anyway, take a look at it, give me your suggestions and comments on what > you think needs fixing, what think ought to be there that isn't and so on. > Note that I've basically taken marketing hype from the scanner software > vendors, cleaned it up and then listed the salient features. At this > minute, I'm running through the demo and live versions of software and > when I can get to it, I'll flesh out the software with some personal > observations (better yet, with some of your personal observations) that > get around the hyped up claims. > > Notice I said, "give me your suggestions and comments." You got > complaints, stick 'em in your ear (said only in partial jest). My earlier > call for assistance triggered an avalanche of responses--from 1-2 people! > > -- > Michael Alexander > michael@alexander.terranet.com -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!pipeline!not-for-mail From: ringo@nyc.pipeline.com (Richard Headley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Diamond D130J discone antenna Date: 17 Feb 1996 11:04:27 -0500 Organization: The Pipeline Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4g4uab$m4g@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com X-PipeUser: ringo X-PipeHub: nyc.pipeline.com X-PipeGCOS: (RICHARD HEADLEY) X-Newsreader: The Pipeline v3.4.0 I live in nyc and I would like to know if there are any radio outlets where i can buy the Diamond D130J discone antenna. If not where can I order it. Thanks Rich. ringo@pipeline.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca!news.escape.ca!ts1dl26.escape.ca!asi From: asi@escape.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Digital Receiver Built Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:54:36 Organization: escape communications corp. Lines: 7 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1dl26.escape.ca X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] I have started making a digital to analog device for my scanner. Has anyone else made or tried to make such a device? It will not work for all digital signals but has a selector for some. Anybody else? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bofh.mi.org!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!oitnews.harvard.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!fas-news.harvard.edu!usenet From: tham@husc.harvard.edu (Fu Tham) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Dream scanner Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:19:34 GMT Organization: Harvard Univ. Science Center Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4fqknn$51u@decaxp.harvard.edu> References: <311CE60E.7AB6@ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: scnpc12.harvard.edu X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <311CE60E.7AB6@ix.netcom.com>, "David L. Nelson" says: > >My list for the perfect handheld would include: > > - 200 channels in 10 groups > - standard RF coverage and specs as today's top of the line models > - Alpha/numeric display > - similar to Garmin GPS45 (64x100pixels) > - display would have: Band #, Band Name (12char), Channel Nam e (12 char), Channel > frequency, status(lockout & delay & number of hits since ent ered) > - full numeric keyboard > - up/down/left/right toggle switch for alpha char entry (again simila r to Garmin 45 > - RS232 like interface (no need to be 12 volt swing) > - Optional SW package to allow full range of data manipulation and up /down load 1. Someone else mentioned CTCSS programming 2. How about at least 1.2AH battery packs. None of these 500mAH stuff. 3. Better audio, better audio amp and larger speakers. 4. Since it is heavily compterized already, how about extensionl speaker (Speaker Mic style) with alpha-numeric LCD display, like the one ICOM got now. 5. Better case/enclosure like commercial two way radio, none of these el-cheapo polyethlene bearcat cases. 6. How about better and more flexable rubber duck, perhaps with switchable pre-amp built inside. BC200XLT's original rubber duck is so stiff, it keeps br eaking the solder connection inside. 7. How about accessories like, mobile mount plug-in cradle that has antenna c onnection, power, and external speaker. I think one of the Maxon CB portable got that. Th is way you get in your car, plug the portable scanner in the cradle, and you got instant mobile scanner. 8. Hey! how about Optoelectronics's Scout reaction tune features built onto t he handheld scanner. Just a few wishful thinking of mine. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!news.oz.net!news From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Drugged Driving (Was Larsen Antenna) Date: 14 Feb 1996 10:12:54 GMT Organization: News Intelligence Systems USA Lines: 41 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fscj6$dql@emerald.oz.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fehk1$m94@dfw.dfw.net> <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG> NNTP-Posting-Host: markj.got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 In article <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG>, billn@PEAK.ORG says... >Please provide some documentation for this claim. As far as I have been >able to find out, there are very few automobile accidents due to users of >illegal drugs - most are due to drunk drivers. Anyone remember the Amtrak train wreck in New York state in the late 80's. The Engineer was convicted of smoking pot and man slaughter....killed a few people! Head on wreck in 1992 on Highway 152 in Watsonville,California...two dead...driver convicted of operating a car under the influence of pot. August of 1995...highway 101 in Gilroy,Ca...truck driver with suspended licenese...3 dead(entire family)driver of truck tested positive for meth use.Driver being tried for murder. Shall I continue.... Jr college football players on the way home from a game in April of 1995...driving on highway 1 south of Santa Cruz,Ca...driver smoking a joint...slamms into the center divider...kills his buddy. Before you post statements like this I would suggest you talk to your local State Trooper/Highway Patrol Officer/E.M.S. professional or an Emergency Room Doctor...If they can't cite many cases of "drugged drivers" then ask a local TV or Newspaper Photographer. Mr.News (TV News Photographer) markj@got.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.seanet.com!usenet From: anthonyr@seanet.com (Anthony A. Robinson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Drugged Driving (Was Larsen Antenna) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 07:05:16 GMT Organization: Seanet Online Services, Seattle WA Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4fummf$37c@kaleka.seanet.com> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fehk1$m94@dfw.dfw.net> <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4fscj6$dql@emerald.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: anthonyr.seanet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 markj@got.net (Mr.News) wrote: >In article <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG>, billn@PEAK.ORG asks Mr News to... > >>Please provide some documentation for this claim. [ Anecdotes nowhere resembling "documentation" deleted ] >Before you post statements like this I would suggest you talk to your >local State Trooper/Highway Patrol Officer/E.M.S. professional or an >Emergency Room Doctor...If they can't cite many cases of "drugged >drivers" then ask a local TV or Newspaper Photographer. Sure. Let's asked someone really unbiased without an axe to grind while we're at it, too. >Mr.News >(TV News Photographer) Please look up "documentation" and "anecdotes" in a dictionary (or are they not issuing them to the media anymore?). Geez! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.localnet.com!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!news.uky.edu!news From: Tfugate@pop.uky.edu (Terry Fugate) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DTMF Date: 13 Feb 1996 17:15:56 GMT Organization: IT Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4fqh0c$ri1@service2.uky.edu> References: <4fm0ts$had@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.163.120.82 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6 In article <4fm0ts$had@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, zargon1011@aol.com (ZARGON1011) says: > >Any good DTMF decoder programs out there? Anything would be a help, >thanks> I think that the oakland.ftp mirror has some. Try there if not, drop me an Email. I know that I have seen them someplace and probably have a decoder. I built a little single chip decoder that drives both a Hex led display and the printer port. I like it better than the software, but each to there own. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.rain.org!dschmidt From: dschmidt@rain.org (David G. Schmidt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF decoders FS Date: 14 Feb 1996 02:14:52 GMT Organization: RAIN Public Access Internet (805) 967-RAIN Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4frgis$bcc@news.rain.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: dschmidt@coyote.rain.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] With and without displays, from $40.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ( DSchmidt Technologies, Ventura CA http://www.rain.org/~dschmidt ) ( Freq selectors for FME/FM25, DTMF decoders, Email dschmidt@rain.org ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Allan Twamley <71023.2643@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Edmonton Freqs Date: 13 Feb 1996 20:38:22 GMT Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736) Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fqsru$ijg$1@mhade.production.compuserve.com> Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45519 alt.radio.scanner:27468 I am going to be visiting Edmonton, Alberta, Canada in mid March 1996, does anybody have a list of frequencies for police, fire etc. that they would like to share? Allan Twamley From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:12 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usit.net!news From: pknode@USIT.NET (Philip Knode) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: For sell pro60 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:37:06 GMT Organization: United States Internet, Inc. Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4fss89$p56@news.usit.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bway-slip45.dynamic.usit.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 For sell mint condition pro60 handheld with manual box and a/c plug all for $200.00.If interested please email.Phil From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!matlock.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: 15 Feb 1996 19:45:58 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 8 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4g0k46$8i1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> Reply-To: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com I've had success in decoding Frequency Inversion Scrambled cordless phones with my ICOM R7000 by going to the USB of the frequency and offsetting it by 1.5 to 2.2 khz. This trick also works with my AOR1500, but using the BFO. I also have a decoder that I purchased in 1982 (which was legal back them) and it really didn't perform any better than my trick of using USB on my ICOM From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:14 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: rweber95@ix.netcom.com(Robert Weber) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: 17 Feb 1996 07:48:48 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4g4190$djs@cloner4.netcom.com> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-tac-wa3-22.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Feb 16 11:48:48 PM PST 1996 In prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) writes: > >In article <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> eyager@novagate.com (Eric) writes: >>From: eyager@novagate.com (Eric) >>Subject: Frequency Inversion Decrambling >>... >>but all I need is a schematic of the circuit. Can anyone help? > >>-- Eric > >>Eric Yagerlener >>eyager@novagate.com > >.... I know of 3 sources for audio scrambler/descramblers. 1. The Fall 1994 issue of Electronics Hobbyists handbook (put out by Popular Electronics) has a construction article with schematic on building an analog version. A kit of parts is available from Weeder Technologies, P.O.Box 421, Batavia, OH 45103 for $29.00 and the pcb for an additional $14.00. Or get it fully assembled for $69.00 2. The December 1993 issue of Electronis NOW has a construction article with schematic on building a digital version. A kit of parts is available from North Country Radio, P.O.Box 53, Wykagyl Station, New Rochelle, NY 10804 for $59.00 plus $3.50 S&H. 3. Ramsey Electronics (1-800-446-2295) has model SS-70A Speech Descrambler/Scrambler as a kit for $39.95 plus $14.95 for a case. Or fully assembled for $79.95 plus $4.50 S&H. Happy scanning. Bob...... From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet From: coolio83@atl.mindspring.com (Sean Davis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frequency's for Atlanta Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 05:19:16 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4g3okh$mm@brickbat.mindspring.com> Reply-To: coolio83@atl.mindspring.com NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-102-178.dialup.mindspring.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 It would be greatly apprieciated if someone could post the frequencies for the Atlanta area. Thank You! Sean From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rain.fr!jussieu.fr!oleane!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.datasync.com!news From: nexus@datasync.com (Jimmy Simmons) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frewquency Ban? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:27:32 GMT Organization: CoastCon Inc. Ms. GulfCoast Fandom Lines: 24 Message-ID: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> References: <4fua5g$fhi@tzlink.j51.com> Reply-To: nexus@datasync.com NNTP-Posting-Host: os-ppp24.datasync.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 fresco@j51.com (Jonah Gruda) wrote: >Could someone inform me on this issue! Someone told me that scanners >that are now sold do not tune into cellular frequencies (800Mhz). They >told me that there is a law banning the use of 800 Mhz on a scanner. I >am getting a new one So could you tell me if the new one I will be >getting shouldrecieve the cellular band? >fresco@j51.com As of Jan-1995 the FCC ordered all manufactures of scanners to completely block out the portion of the 800mHz band that is used by cellular companies. If your radio was manufactured before Jan-1995, and if it has 800mHz in it, then there is a good possiblity that you can have this scanner modified to widen the frequency range, if manufactured AFTER Jan-1995, then no, there is no modification for scanners. I find it hard to beleive how some people will tell you and I that they have a MOD for post-mod-ban scanners.... I just do. But don't sweat it, just buy your scanner, set it up to do a band search between 896.000mHz to 915.000mHz, you'll find TONS of cell actvity there, I've never modified any of my scanners (I don't have too)! :) Later. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!news.consultix.com!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!intac!hobbs!post From: post@hobbs.com (POST) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS. AR8000 Message-ID: <8BAC251.003200398C.uuout@hobbs.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 09:53:00 -0400 Distribution: world Organization: _T_H_E__R_O_Y__H_O_B_B_S__BBS Moonachie NJ 201-641-7307 Reply-To: post@hobbs.com (POST) References: X-Newsreader: PCBoard Version 15.22 X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20 Lines: 34 4 Sale 4 Sale 4 Sale AOR AR8000 Wide Range Receiver Includes. AR-8000 radio. AOR Rubber Duck Antenna. AOR Wall Battery charger. AOR Belt clip wthh screws. AOR DC power lead with cigar lighter plug. AOR Hand strap. Operating manual. 4 AA NiCad batteries. Xtra 4 X 700mAh quick charge Fuji batteries. Xtra wall quick charger holds 4 batteries. ****** PLUS ****** Optoelectronics Computer interface CX12 Complete. Scancat-Gold software Scan*Star software Optoelectronics software $550.00 + $10.00 next day shipping. USP Money Orders Only. or best offer? ** e-mail - post@hobbs.com ** ** 201-943-3590 *=* Ridgefield, New Jersey 07657 ** --- OLX 2.1 TD Is That All There Is ?? .....oooooOOOOOo http://www.intac.com/~cono __,-----. ---+_________#_ The Roy Hobbs BBS sysop@hobbs.com |________| |__|___________} Node 1: 201-641-7307 ooooo oo ~ ooO-O-O-O == oo\ Node 2: 201-641-3126 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: Pro-2006 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 17:59:11 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article , norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) wrote: > In article <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan > Gingras) wrote: > > > Pro-2006 with cell mod. Mint condition, and in the box. This is one of > > the best, yours for $300 firm. > ============================================ > > Isn't that a little high even for mint condition? Durham has the Pro-2006 > BRAND SPANKING NEW with a ONE YEAR WARRANTY for $379.00! If ya wanna see > it, just check out the web page: > > http://durhamnet.com/durham/pro2006.html Well, actually, the price is just about right on for a mint condition PRO2006, based on the data that I have been collecting over the past year (price guide is posted to www.ultranet.com/~bellvill/scanner.html). Although it's true that Durham sells them for $379, I'll bet you get slapped with customs fees of $15-$20 as well as shipping charges of $15-$20, putting you over the $400 mark without any trouble. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!psgrain!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.ios.com!usenet From: rod@venus.hili.com (Blackshadow) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: FT-8500 Need Mods Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:05:45 GMT Organization: Frequency Spectrum Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fov69$l98@news.ios.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.147.154.75 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45599 alt.radio.scanner:27506 rec.radio.amateur.misc:98108 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24966 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13353 Someone have the mods for FT-8500? Email: rod@venus.hili.com N2RVM From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!psgrain!nntp.teleport.com!ip-pdx13-13.teleport.com!prografx From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:25:28 Organization: PROGRAFX of Oregon Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <3119709c.5277633@news.nwlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-pdx13-13.teleport.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A] In article <3119709c.5277633@news.nwlink.com> gmalf19@montana.nwlink.com (G. M . Alf) writes: >From: gmalf19@montana.nwlink.com (G. M. Alf) >Subject: Re: GMRS equipment? >Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 03:51:24 GMT >> am looking for a GMRS mobile unit (25 watts) and handheld units (2 or >>more watts) here in the Portland,OR area. i am not having any luck finding >>ANYONE who knows what i am talking about. can anyone here tell me where i >>could find such equipment and maybe some average price info? >I believe there is a company called Sport Comm in your area that >handles the Maxon 210+3 handhelds. I do not recall their phone # or >address. As mentioned in another message Communications Electronics >has the best price around on the 210+3. This unit can used through a >repeater if one is available in your area possibly eliminating the >need for a 25 watt mobile. The 210+3 comes with a battery that allows >2 watts on transmit. Another battery is available that boosts the >power to 4 watts and when used with the car power adapter you'll have >5 watts. The 210+3 operates on 2 of the main GMRS channels plus the >REACT channel and will also operate on all of the interstitial >channels. >Mike Radio Shack theoretically sells GMRS radios, at least handhelds. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:21 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!spool.mu.edu!munnari.OZ.AU!metro!metro!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!newshub.cts.com!nuhou.aloha.net!news.lei.net!coconut!news.west.net!news.silcom.com!webnews!lafn.org!lafn.org!ax756 From: ax756@lafn.org (Stan Lui) Subject: GRE 9001 800 mhxz converter X-Nntp-Posting-Host: lafn.org Message-ID: <1996Feb15.082809.28602@lafn.org> Sender: news@lafn.org Reply-To: ax756@lafn.org (Stan Lui) Organization: The Los Angeles Free-Net Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 08:28:09 GMT Lines: 5 in like NEW condition , hardly used (actaully only twice I have a AR8000) .. I am asking 70 dollars obo plus shipping/This is the base type unit PS this is the 800 mhz converter via 400 thru 500 mhz approx to receive the fu ll 800 mhz band.. god[Dod for those non 800 full covrage scanners From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!xpat.postech.ac.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!taebaek.nowcom.co.kr!imci3!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!infoserver.bgsu.edu!bgsuvax.bgsu.edu!sdougla From: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu (The Analog Kid) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Greater Cleveland Monitors...please read Date: 13 Feb 96 08:22:55 GMT Organization: Bowling Green State University Lines: 36 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bgsuvax.bgsu.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #14 First off, thanx for taking the time to read this article. The reason that I posted is that I am trying to compile a book of frequencies and supporting information for monitoring in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. What I am looking for are kind souls who know more about monitoring in Cuyahoga County that may have archives of frequency info and supporting info including but not limiting to: frequencies, pl tones, dsq codes, channelizations, unit numbers, base locations, type of vehicles/equipment used, signals and codes, roll call times etc. While I am not limiting what information is provided, I do ask that only information for Cuyahoga County be donated, unless it is impossible to pass such info alone. If the material is published, I do ask that you as well provide full bibliographical reference so that proper permissions may be obtained. Donaters of material will be recognized in the work, if desired. Material can be sent via email to: sdougla@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu Material can be sent via snail mail to: Sean G. Douglas P. O. Box 29055 Parma, Ohio 44129-0055 For those of you living and/or monitoring in the surrounding counties of Summit, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Geauga and Portage, I will make requests for material in the near future, as I will be compiling books for these counties as well. Thanx in advance, Sean G. Douglas From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!alpha.sky.net!news.nyiq.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!gt-news!news From: Glenn Champion Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: How do I build an RS-232 to CI-V level converter? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:46:10 -0500 Organization: GTRI Lines: 4 Message-ID: <31238D82.2497@gtri.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghcpc.gtri.gatech.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Subject says it all - anyone seen schematics? I checked OAK and a few other archives with no success. thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Greg Bruns <72371.2757@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Icom R1 FAQ? Date: 17 Feb 1996 12:10:00 GMT Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736) Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4g4gip$ibi$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45684 rec.radio.shortwave:70192 alt.radio.scanner:27565 Where can I get a FAQ for the ICOM R1? Are there any improvements for this woderfully small horribly unselective insensititve receiver? How much are they worth used? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.seanet.com!dpm3.seanet.com!dpm3 From: dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 20:34:15 PST Organization: OSD, Inc. Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dpm3.seanet.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article thooker@psl.nmsu.edu (Tracy Hooker) writes: >How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in >excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. Tracy, I'd first be certain that it ahs full 800 mhz frequency coverage ( I think all R7000's do) and if so I would suggst somewhere in the area of $1,000. There will be some who will tell you what a lousy piece of equipment it is, but with a computer control program they are really nice, IMHO. I know it would take at least $1,000 to get me to part with mine! Dan Morisseau N7ZXL 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W Elevation: 300' From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:26 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 06:25:53 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article , dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) wrote: > In article thooker@psl.nmsu.edu (Tracy Hooker) writes: > > > >How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in > >excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. > > Tracy, > > I'd first be certain that it ahs full 800 mhz frequency coverage ( I > think all R7000's do) and if so I would suggst somewhere in the area of > $1,000. There will be some who will tell you what a lousy piece of equipmen t > it is, but with a computer control program they are really nice, IMHO. I kno w > it would take at least $1,000 to get me to part with mine! Morriseau's price "advice" is pure opinion and has no basis in reality. I have collected data on the used selling prices of scanners for about a year now, including the ICOM7000 (the blocked model is usually designated ICOM 7000-2). The data is based not on the asking price, but the actual selling price. Of the three mint condition ICOM 7000s that I have tracked, one sold for $800 and two sold for $900. The $800 unit included the computer interface. Answer to your question is, your unit is worth $800 to $900, probably closer to $800 because the low end selling price of the more capable ICOM 7100 is $1000. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!terra.net!alexander.terranet.com!user From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 07:06:25 -0400 Organization: TerraNet, Inc., Boston, MA, USA Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: alexander.terranet.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.6b4 In article , dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) wrote: > Ahhhhhh! I was certain that we'd hear from a self-designated expert and > jackboot wearing member of the Scanner Price Gestapo. I could think of no more > typical example of the type than Mikey Of course my advice was "an opinion and > was clearly labeled as such. Reality? Mikey you are hardly an arbiter of THA T > issue! Has the Doc changed your litium dosage yet? If you find a full > coverage R-7000 for $800.00 then by all means jump on it. I wouldn't part with > mine for that, though. > Dan Morisseau > N7ZXL > 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W > Elevation: 300' What's a matter Morriseau? Can't stand someone more intelligent than you pointing out that your observations are plain stupid? I have tracked the sales of that trash box you're so proud of for the past year and three have sold for the prices that I have noted. That's more than your so-called expertise. This is what I would expect from a moron (which is what you're often called in other newsgroups, I've noted) like you. Guess years of inbreeding up there in Auburn, Wash. will do that to you, clown boy. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.seanet.com!dpm3.seanet.com!dpm3 From: dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 20:48:53 PST Organization: OSD, Inc. Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dpm3.seanet.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4] In article michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) writes: >Morriseau's price "advice" is pure opinion and has no basis in reality. Ahhhhhh! I was certain that we'd hear from a self-designated expert and jackboot wearing member of the Scanner Price Gestapo. I could think of no more typical example of the type than Mikey Of course my advice was "an opinion and was clearly labeled as such. Reality? Mikey you are hardly an arbiter of THAT issue! Has the Doc changed your litium dosage yet? If you find a full coverage R-7000 for $800.00 then by all means jump on it. I wouldn't part with mine for that, though. Dan Morisseau N7ZXL 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W Elevation: 300' From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: rcn9jig@aol.com (RC N9JIG) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Illinois State Police Date: 14 Feb 1996 01:59:24 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 11 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fs18c$nsl@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <76@onli_info.win.net> Reply-To: rcn9jig@aol.com (RC N9JIG) Mutual Aid N/NW South 866.0125 866.4625 867.8875 866.4125 867.9375 866.5125 866.8875 868.3875 866.4375 868.4125 867.0125 866.9625 868.4625 866.9375 868.4375 867.5125 867.3875 868.8875 867.4125 868.9125 868.0125 867.4625 868.9625 867.9125 868.9375 For more info, contact ScannerMaster Books, and ask for Monitor America, or the Illinois Communications Guide. Rich Carlson, N9JIG, ScannerMaster Books From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:30 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!csprick From: csprick@netcom.com (Charles Sprick) Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Message-ID: <3120b453.2131858@10.0.2.1> Sender: csprick@netcom3.netcom.com Reply-To: Chuck Sprick Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182 References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:56:27 GMT Lines: 13 On Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT, powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) wrote: >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >states that do allow them. I'm also seeki9ng this info. Would appreciate an e-mail response if easier. TIA. Chuck csprick@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:31 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!globe.indirect.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news5.ner.bbnplanet.net!news.ner.bbnplanet.net!ineter.edgewater.com!not-for-mail From: powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) Subject: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Message-ID: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT Reply-To: powen@edgewater.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.55 Organization: Edgewater Technology. Lines: 14 Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the states that do allow them. Thanks in advance, Phil... \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From the | POwen@Edgewater.com | Accept mind of | - or - | no Phil Owen. | POwen@Lynx.dac.neu.edu | substitutes! \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:32 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.midplains.net!gw2.att.com!nntphub.cb.att.com!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:58:15 GMT Organization: Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL Lines: 22 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> Reply-To: parnass@att.com NNTP-Posting-Host: radioman.ih.att.com Summary: reference to law book Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45511 alt.radio.scanner:27467 In article <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com>, Phil Owen wrote: >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow >the use of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, >a list of the states that do allow them. From the FAQ, Introduction to Scanning: "... several states have laws pertaining to scanning while in your car. Indiana restricts some portable scanners. A few states have enacted their own laws against listening to cordless phones. You can find out about these restrictions in a paperback book, Listeners Lawbook, compiled by Frank Terranella, Esq. available for $9.95 + shipping from Grove Enterprises, PO Box 98, Brasstown, NC 28902...." -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bofh.mi.org!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!mail1.sas.upenn.edu!ajohnson From: ajohnson@mail1.sas.upenn.edu (Allen E. Johnson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 14 Feb 1996 03:19:45 GMT Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4frkch$sim@netnews.upenn.edu> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mail1.sas.upenn.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2-upenn1.3] Phil Owen (powen@edgewater.com) wrote: : Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use : of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the : states that do allow them. : Thanks in advance, Phil, It's definitely illegal in New York! Allen From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!msunews!pm100-16 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 01:36:43 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4frdq1$1o2c@msunews.cl.msu.edu> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm100-16.dialip.mich.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45563 alt.radio.scanner:27481 In article <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com>, parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) wrote: >In article <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com>, >Phil Owen wrote: > > >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow > >the use of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, > >a list of the states that do allow them. > It it illegal in Michigan :-( But I have heard it is not extremely difficult to get a permit allowing you to have it in the car. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!msunews!pm100-16 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 01:39:00 GMT Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4frdu9$1o2c@msunews.cl.msu.edu> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> <3120b453.2131858@10.0.2.1> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm100-16.dialip.mich.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 In article <3120b453.2131858@10.0.2.1>, csprick@netcom.com (Charles Sprick) wrote: >On Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT, powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) >wrote: > >>Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >>of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >>states that do allow them. > >I'm also seeki9ng this info. Would appreciate an e-mail response if >easier. TIA. > Illegal in Michigan :-( From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:36 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 13 Feb 1996 23:25:35 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 14 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In Florida, it is illegal to have a scanner hooked up to your car (i.e. 12vt power, external antenna). Now the good news. If you have your ham radio license, you are EXEMPT from the law :-) Warren Whitby wwhitby@aol.com - Home wwhitby@.bdm.com - Work Ham radio: KE4ITL "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Romans 10:13 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!hopper.acm.org!ACM.ORG!MULLIGAN From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 16 Feb 1996 13:43:02 GMT Organization: ACM Network Services Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4g21l6$dck@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG NNTP-Posting-Host: acm.org mcravit@condor.depaul.edu (Matthew Cravit) wrote: > ... if you are a licensed technician-class or higher ham radio operator, you > are permitted under Federal law to carry scanners (and any other legal radio > equipment) in your vehicle. I do not recall the exact reference for this, > but it is in the amateur radio regulations, which I believe are 18 CFR part > 97. (CFR = Code of Federal Regulations). errr ... Title 18 is "Conservation of Power and Water Resources". I kinda doubt that the TVA is too concerned with ham radio (Telecommunications is in Title 47). The federal preemption was an FCC declaratory ruling, PR Docket No. 91-36; FCC 93-410, effective 18 Oct 93. It makes no distiction as to license class and only applies to ham transceivers that incidently receive out-of-band. It does not apply to scanners. /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:38 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!beavis.kronos.com!usenet From: markmo@kronos.com (Mark Mojkowski) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: indoor antenna Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:21:23 GMT Organization: Kronos, Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4fqobj$st3@beavis.kronos.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.228.12.31 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14 Hello, I am looking for advice on an inexpensive (<$50) fullrange (30-900MHz) indoor antenna for my RS 2032. I prefer that it not connect directly to the scanner, so I'll have about 12` of coax. I've thought of using a mobile antenna indoors, or the Grove Hidden antenna. If the Hidden antenna performs well, it would be an inexpensive choice (only $20). Thanks for any recommendations. Please reply to markmo@kronos.com. -Mark From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.cais.net!primus.ac.net!news.serv.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeeder.gi.net!news.bridge.com!news.mid.net!news.creighton.edu!bluejay.creighton.edu!matthewb From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Iowa State Trooper Freqs Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 22:19:55 -0600 Organization: Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska USA Lines: 35 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bluejay.creighton.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I have an older publication and am wondering if new freqs have been added since my edition of the National Highway Patrol Frequency Handbook came out. Please add to or correct the following list. I currently have: Iowa State Trooper Freqs 155.640 DPS Area 1 155.790 LEA Area 1 155.655 DPS Area 2 155.685 LEA Area 2 155.565 DPS Area 3 155.700 LEA Area 3 155.475 NLEEP (State wide - mutual aid) 453.625 mobile extenders (Is this one ever used?) 155.370 Point to point -base to -base 155.430 Car to car, car to aircraft enforcement 155.505 primary air enforcement units 155.850 additional air unit 155.445 Command, intelligence, surveillance 155.670 Capitol security police 155.970 Scales (Dept of transportation) "Blue" channel 156.090 IA State fairgrounds police 154.905 IA law enforcement academy 156.210 portable repeaters (Again, is this ever used??) 155.910 Information Thanx... --> Matt Brummer matthewb@creighton.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.crd.ge.com!tmpnews.crd.ge.com!rebecca!rpi!ees1a0.engr.ccny.cuny.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!usenet From: Rick Colombo Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Judge voids conviction Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 11:25:09 -0600 Organization: FermiLab Lines: 14 Message-ID: <31221AF5.2781@fnal.gov> References: <4fsvnj$dvr@ionews.ionet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bronco.fnal.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha) michaelr@michaelr.com wrote: > > See article in alt.radio.scanner about Tulsa Federal judge H. Dale > Cook voiding a radio case conviction. > > Mike Reynolds I thought that alt.radio.scanner was replaced by rec.radio.scanner, so I don't read it. -- Rick Colombo@fnal.gov From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:40 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.icanect.net!news.sprintlink.net!ionews.ionet.net!usenet From: michaelr@michaelr.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Judge voids conviction Date: 14 Feb 1996 15:39:31 GMT Organization: michaelr Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fsvnj$dvr@ionews.ionet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: tsip56.ionet.net X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) See article in alt.radio.scanner about Tulsa Federal judge H. Dale Cook voiding a radio case conviction. Mike Reynolds From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.one.net!news From: Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: k Date: 15 Feb 1996 07:00:11 GMT Organization: OneNet Communications HUB News Server Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fullr$14k@news.one.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: port-2-3.access.one.net Content-Type: text/plain Content-length: 195 X-Newsreader: AIR Mosaic (16-bit) version 4.00.08.08 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:57557 rec.radio.scanner:45576 alt.radio.scanner:27487 "Herb A. Zite" writes: >AOR AR3000A base/mobile wide band scanner > >Very good condition with all accessories, box an docs. > >$925 or best offer + shipping & COD From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: KY FREQUENCIES Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:26:25 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 5 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fra7h$dgd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Can anyone PLEASE email me with a list of police/civil service frequencies for the state of Kentucky (preferably the Lexington and Louisville areas). Thanks in advance!!! ukfan1@shotgun.org From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.campus.mci.net!usenet From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: KY FREQUENCIES Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 18:55:49 -0600 Organization: MCI State Government and University Systems Lines: 12 Message-ID: <31213315.5115@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <4fra7h$dgd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: s17-pm01.occ-uky.campus.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Ukfan1a wrote: > > Can anyone PLEASE email me with a list of police/civil service frequencies > for the state of Kentucky (preferably the Lexington and Louisville areas). > Thanks in advance!!! > > ukfan1@shotgun.org Why don't you point your web browser at the Percon home page and use their database searcher? http://www.perconcorp.com/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:43 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bofh.mi.org!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: KY FREQUENCIES Date: 14 Feb 1996 17:56:04 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 12 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4ftpa4$a36@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fra7h$dgd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Check out the following e-mail List Server. It's has a Scanner discussion group for Kentucky. listserv@ukcc.uky.edu You can subscribe to it by sending a message with the following text in the body of the message: SUBSCRIBE KYSCAN Firstname Lastname From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.infinet.com!usenet From: Gerry Moersdorf Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:06:34 -0500 Organization: Applied Innovation Inc. Lines: 24 Message-ID: <31235A0A.5A41@aiinet.com> References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: gerry.aiinet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I) To: Curt Phillips Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27503 rec.radio.scanner:45597 >>>Curt Phillips wrote: >>>In article <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com>, bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) >>> Wow it's just amazing how much flaming gets going when a simple question gets asked. I think it's just the inaccuracys of a non face-to-face english language conversation,, you dudes probably violently agree on tv antenna costs, quality, and the original poster, now forgotten im sure is quite amazed by the short flame war. All that aside i think i have a more technical yes or no question (well maybee not. One assumed need for this hi-gain scanner antenna is surfing cellular radio. Is a beam/unidirectional technology really a good match. How could you use it effectively since the mobile targets are moving, and you really would want to hear as many fixed cell-sites as possible, and omidirectional antennas would seem to be the best fit. If "cheep discones" provide limited improvement, what is the best option for this portion of the spectrum? -- Gerry Moersdorf, President/CEO Applied Innovation INC 5800 Innovation Dr, Dublin OH 800-247-9482  From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet From: wave@mindspring.com (Pieter Ibelings) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,rec.video.cable-tv,rec.video.satellite.dbs,rec.video.satellite.tvro Subject: Looking for interconnection cable for HP8505, 8501 or 8750 Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:06:43 GMT Organization: -.-. --.- -.. -..- Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fov83$s7k@brickbat.mindspring.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wave.mindspring.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.amateur.equipment:24880 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:13304 rec.radio.amateur.space:6314 rec.radio.scanner:45466 rec.radio.swap:57386 rec.video.cable-tv:19567 rec.video.satellite.dbs:23079 rec.video.satellite.tvro:23110 I am in desperate need of a couple interconnection cables for the HP8505 network Analyzer. The cable is a D-connector with 17 pins and 7 coax cables, but only six are used. If you have any info on where I can find some I would appreciate it. Thanks AC4OP Pieter wave@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~wave From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!news-adm From: fletcher@gate.net (mike fletcher) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Marti System Description? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 23:10:45 GMT Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Lines: 30 Message-ID: <3123bc3a.340811096@news.gate.net> References: <4fu65g$95q@panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tpafl2-36.gate.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 On 14 Feb 1996 21:35:28 -0500, adam@panix.com (Adam Epstein) wrote: > >Can anybody give me a pointer to a description of Marti systems? >Lacking a pointer, a quick description would also be appreciated. > > -Thanx > -Adam > Marti is a brand name of a remote broadcast system usually used to send radio broadcasts from the ball game, mall or car lot grand opening etc back to the studio for broadcast. There are several other brands but most people call them Marti since they are the popular brand. Usually vhf or uhf but some 900 Mhz types have been used. I think Marti also made a STL system.. (studio to Transmitter) Happy Listening...... Mike fletcher Mike Fletcher AD4HV 813-622-9102 President,Tampa Bay Amateur Radio Society 95-96 Florida Certified Fire Alarm Contractor # EF-0000028 E-Mail to fletcher@gate.net Homepage **coming soon** If in the course of offering ideas or speaking my opinion, I should offend anyone, I apologize. However, my opinion is my own and thus, it shall be................................... From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rockyd!cmcl2!panix!not-for-mail From: adam@panix.com (Adam Epstein) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Marti System Description? Followup-To: poster Date: 14 Feb 1996 21:35:28 -0500 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fu65g$95q@panix.com> Reply-To: adam@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix.com Can anybody give me a pointer to a description of Marti systems? Lacking a pointer, a quick description would also be appreciated. -Thanx -Adam From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.PEAK.ORG!engr.orst.edu!holmes.ece.orst.edu!varine From: Brian varine Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 06:47:57 -0800 Organization: College of Engineering, Oregon State University Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: holmes.ece.orst.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: On Mon, 12 Feb 1996, Doug Brooks wrote: > I've heard that mobile scanners are illegal in some states. > > Anyone know for sure if they are legal in Washington, Oregon, and/or > California? Going on a car trip and would like to know. Comletely legal in all three. But, would it really matter? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!usenet.kornet.nm.kr!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!interramp.com!usenet From: edial@aol.com (Ed Dial) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mobile Scanners Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 08:01:37 GMT Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Lines: 6 Message-ID: <31204482.12409158@usenet.interramp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip56.knoxville.tn.interramp.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182 Does anyone know of a high quality scanner that does continuous coverage (~25-1300MHz) and has a detachable front control plate for remote mounting? I want to use this unit in a mobile environment with the bulk of the unit mounted in the trunk. Ed From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.ssd.intel.com!ornews.intel.com!news From: Collier_Chun@ccm.hf.intel.com (Collier Chun) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 07:15:54 PST Organization: Intel Corporation Lines: 29 Message-ID: <4fsudm$1bg@ornews.intel.com> References: <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cchun.intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.8 In article <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu>, anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu says... >I remember a post a few months back about someone claiming to have >received channels carrying Muzak (commerical-free light pop-rock music >and/or elevator music) on 900Mhz. Specifically, the frequencies >mentioned were 928.9125 and 956.3125. All I get on these is data >transmissions. Are the above freqs licensed to Muzak (or whoever) on a >nationwide basis or just in certain locations? Has anyone received music >on these frequencies and if so where are you located? Here in Portland, OR, Muzak is licensed to 928.9375. Everytime I checked, it was muzak. That was a couple of months ago (gee, I wonder why it's been soooo long since...) >Also, in general, how do you look up who frequencies are allocated to in >the 900 Mhz band? Is there anything online where you can look up someone >by name and find what frequency they are allocated to? Or books? I >looked in the Radio Shack guide and they have very little listed in the >900Mhz band. The Radio Shack guides tend to be restricted to public service agencies. Gene ric FCC databases from folks like Grove and Percon have *all* service classes, including Muzak. Most databases allow you to enter low and high frequency limits for the databases to search between. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:51 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsat!engineer.mrg.uswest.com!news.uoregon.edu!news.sol.net!uniserve!van-bc!news1.vancouver.istar.net!news.vancouver.istar.net!istar.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!slwork From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4flq47$34s@news.inc.net> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 18:01:51 GMT Lines: 29 Sender: slwork@netcom10.netcom.com Will Flor (willf@rrgroup.com) wrote: : The 956 MHz frequency you mention is carrying a STL (studio-transmitter : link) for a station's : SCA channel, which is how "Muzak" and other : similar services are broadcast. This is commonly : found in the 944-960 : MHz band in any major city. These are usually found in a different : : portion of this band (usually more like 944-952) so the poster may have : been hearing an image : 10MHz or so above the actual frequency, or it may : simply have been a station with its STLs in : an unusual portion of the : band; I know some stations are "grandfathered" this way. The 928 MHz : : frequency you mention is not in a band used for STLs AFAIK; that band is : usually used for : one-way or two-way telemetry of things like power : distribution systems, burglar alarm : monitoring, etc. These are probably : the data transmissions you found on these frequencies. : Again, the : original poster may have been receiving an image, or it may have been a : station with an unusual frequency allocation. I'm not sure I agree. I'm almost certain that the radio station would do the SCA (as well as FM stereo) encoding at their studio location, then beam the entire composite FM signal to the transmitter via the STL. Otherwise, they would need, perhaps, 3 separate STL frequencies, one for the main channel and one for each of the two Muzak programs. And having the SCA encoder at the transmitter site would just make it harder to maintain. The scanner listener could pick the Muzak broadcast by tuning to the STL, but he would need an SCA decoder in the scanner. Scanners do not typically have these unless you cut them open and add them in yourself. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:53 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.gate.net!news-adm From: fletcher@gate.net (mike fletcher) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 20:44:00 GMT Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Lines: 47 Message-ID: <3124eb73.418447277@news.gate.net> References: <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4flq47$34s@news.inc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: tpafl2-30.gate.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 On Thu, 15 Feb 1996 18:01:51 GMT, slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) wrote: >Will Flor (willf@rrgroup.com) wrote: > >: The 956 MHz frequency you mention is carrying a STL (studio-transmitter >: link) for a station's : SCA channel, which is how "Muzak" and other >: similar services are broadcast. This is commonly : found in the 944-960 >: MHz band in any major city. These are usually found in a different : >: portion of this band (usually more like 944-952) so the poster may have >: been hearing an image : 10MHz or so above the actual frequency, or it may >: simply have been a station with its STLs in : an unusual portion of the >: band; I know some stations are "grandfathered" this way. The 928 MHz : >: frequency you mention is not in a band used for STLs AFAIK; that band is >: usually used for : one-way or two-way telemetry of things like power >: distribution systems, burglar alarm : monitoring, etc. These are probably >: the data transmissions you found on these frequencies. : Again, the >: original poster may have been receiving an image, or it may have been a >: station with an unusual frequency allocation. > > >I'm not sure I agree. I'm almost certain that the radio station would do >the SCA (as well as FM stereo) encoding at their studio location, then >beam the entire composite FM signal to the transmitter via the STL. >Otherwise, they would need, perhaps, 3 separate STL frequencies, one for >the main channel and one for each of the two Muzak programs. And having >the SCA encoder at the transmitter site would just make it harder to >maintain. > >The scanner listener could pick the Muzak broadcast by tuning to the STL, >but he would need an SCA decoder in the scanner. Scanners do not >typically have these unless you cut them open and add them in yourself. Correct... the 950 freqs mentioned are in the Multiple address micorwave allocations.. Muzak and others are using some of the 1 way (single freq as opposed to paired with 928.????) to broadcast their program to customers. Usually multitudes of $ cheaper than an FM station's SCA . Mike Fletcher AD4HV 813-622-9102 President,Tampa Bay Amateur Radio Society 95-96 Florida Certified Fire Alarm Contractor # EF-0000028 E-Mail to fletcher@gate.net Homepage **coming soon** If in the course of offering ideas or speaking my opinion, I should offend anyone, I apologize. However, my opinion is my own and thus, it shall be................................... From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:54 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!helena.MT.net!usenet From: sftk@mt.net (Charlie Grasmick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: National Guard freqs? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 03:06:10 GMT Organization: Softekk Lines: 10 Message-ID: <4frjbj$m23@helena.MT.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sftk.mt.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Anybody know which freqs the National Guard uses? Thanks... +--------------------------+------------------------------+ | Charlie Grasmick | "On the internet, nobody | | sftk@mt.net IRC:Tweaker | knows you're really a dog." | | Check out my homepage: http://www.mt.net/~sftk | +--------------------------+------------------------------+ Picture Whirled Peas! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeeder.gi.net!news.bridge.com!news.mid.net!news.creighton.edu!bluejay.creighton.edu!matthewb From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Nebraska State Trooper Freqs Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 22:17:07 -0600 Organization: Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska USA Lines: 23 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bluejay.creighton.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I have an older publication and am wondering if new freqs have been added since my edition of the National Highway Patrol Frequency Handbook came out. Please add to or correct the following list. I currently have: Nebraska Trooper Freqs 42.46 Dispatch (base to car) 42.30 Car to base 42.46 Car to car 42.04 Car to car/ Aircraft speed control 42.20 Special Details 42.34 "future use" (What's this??) 465.525 mobile extenders (460.525 input & alternate) [is this used??] 39.90 statewide laws channel (all counties monitored by state patrol) Thanx... --> Matt Brummer matthewb@creighton.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:55 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!maggie.ionsys.com!news.corpcomm.net!news.pe.net!usenet From: psytry@pe.net (Robert D. Yeomans) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need Mods for Pro 2023 Date: 13 Feb 1996 14:40:45 GMT Organization: PE.net - Internet access from the Press-Enterprise Company Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fq7td$4rm@nfs1.pe.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: victoria.pe.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3 If anyone has info on the modifications for Realistic PRO 2023 please let me know. It would be greatly appreaciated. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:56 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!niven.ksc.nasa.gov!angelfire From: glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Pro-51 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 19:15:03 GMT Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4g00s8$f82@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> References: Reply-To: glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.205.42.94 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27510 rec.radio.scanner:45603 I'm also very happy with my Pro-51, and would recommend it very highly. C. Glass From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:57 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.neca.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.uoregon.edu!waikato!Chaos.es.co.nz!usenet From: aslan@es.co.nz (Aslan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: NZ police freqs? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 07:28:19 GMT Organization: Somewhere in New Zealand Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3121c59c.2164429@news.es.co.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: port8.athene.es.co.nz X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182 Just moved to NZ, but I cant seem to find the freqs for the NZ police. Does anyone know where I should be looking? Brian E-mail address aslan@es.co.nz ICBM address 45 51.19S 170 29.12E PADI IDC Staff Instructor SSI AOWI CMAS 1* -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2i mQCNAzC3X6IAAAEEALSSblMsYjv7AZvdkE28PDSVNFUtsH2d1dDGc2Asz03wEuXE JY1uIkNyIOTNRZ9+o5a3NYdg1z+ln0RMzSkTqgCe50/HxhhVdR2iA3BiC7KIe5gj lvjC0c/mSlrYTRclfbqcZZu0a8/15rh+OvqJseaZHiSyJIWpjg7tFPxgFt5pAAUR tBZBc2xhbiA8YXNsYW5AZXMuY28ubno+ =6cba -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:58 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.ais.net!usenet From: Mike Carpenter Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Odd interference Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 07:22:08 PDT Organization: American Information Systems, Inc. Lines: 18 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.27.119.204 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage Anyone in the western suburbs of Chicago caught the interference in and around Naperville? I find it generally in the 860mhz range (Naperville PD) and only between Naper Blvd and Washington, Ogden and Warrenville Road. It sounds almost like a trunked system's guard channel, but isn't. It has very regular pulses at about 1.5 seconds. AT&T, Amoco Research, Bectel, and Hewlett Packard all have facilities within this area. If you get outside the boundaries mentioned above, it pretty much goes away. Within the area you can pick it up on any of the Naperville trunked freqs. Any help would be appreciated. I know this is a local question (I am hoping Bill Parnass sees this :)). Thanks in advance Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:00:59 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!newshost.cyberramp.net!news.iadfw.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!newshub.csu.net!news.fullerton.edu!ccvax.fullerton.edu!XRBARRON From: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pager Decoding on a Macintosh Date: 15 Feb 1996 03:56:30 GMT Organization: California State University, Fullerton Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fuate$lf6@news.fullerton.edu> References: <4fjseb$r5i@utopia.hacktic.nl> Reply-To: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: ccvax.fullerton.edu I don't know about the Windows program, but there is a Mac program that is shareware and decoded DTMF tones, but only the numbers from what I remember. I don't know it's name but I tried it by using my Macs microphone for the input. It is a crippled version and only decodes eight out of the ten numbers. Paying the fee will get you a full version. Unfortunately I don't know what it is called or where to get it or if it will even work with pagers. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:00 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp.inc.net!news.sol.net!daily-planet.execpc.com!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!news From: tomm@vianet Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PERTH, West.Aust. Lets hear from you. Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 06:45:36 GMT Organization: iiNET Technologies Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4frv56$g2s@classic.iinet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip18.vianet.net.au X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Hi to all Radio Scanner listeners. I assume there must be quite a few of you reading this who live in the Perth, West.Aust. Metro area. It would be great if you could make yourself known and leave an E-Mail,also as time goes by maybe we could all share some interesting frequencies. Unfortunately at this time i am not upto date with a frequency list and are still looking for frequencies. MAYBE you can help ??? Westrail Security Gaurds - Locum Medical (after hours Doctors Service) Metro Bus - TV NEWS Helicopter. or any others you may think are interesting & upto date. Most people seem to have the Police, Fire, Ambulance & Aircraft but surley ther is more. Lets share the common interest. Send an E-Mail now and have a local Perth group of contacts. Thanks Guys Tom ( tomm@vianet.net.au ) From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:01 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: haxx57@ix.netcom.com(Pooch) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: POR-49 Mods? Date: 13 Feb 1996 22:12:42 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fr2cq$oog@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-spr-ma1-22.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Feb 13 2:12:42 PM PST 1996 any that can be made to get cellular freq's? please reply via e-mail -- --=/> Pooch <\=-- e-mail: haxx57@ix.netcom.com ƒØ||-|à -"If there's a will, there's a way, there is always a way" -Susan T hunder From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:02 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news-feed.iguide.com!news.delphi.com!usenet From: bob93@delphi.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Portland, OR Airport Frequencies Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 19:27:07 -0500 Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com X-To: "Sean P. Watts" Portland International (PDX) Approach control 133.0 118.1 tower 118.7 Ground control 121.9 Clearance delivery 119.0 Departure control 133.0 118.1 124.35 ATIS 128.35 Unicom 122.95 Goodluck/Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:03 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nuclear.microserve.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!news-admin From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Portland, OR Airport Frequencies Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:56:11 -0500 Organization: internetMCI 1-800-955-5210 Lines: 33 Message-ID: <31250B8B.45BA@internetMCI.COM> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: usr3-dialup61.washington.mci.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) To: "Sean P. Watts" Sean P. Watts wrote: > > I've looked for a long time for frequencies for airports and airplanes. > Since I live in SW Washington State Portland international is the biggest > airport in the area. So if anyone has air frequencies for either > Portland or frequecies that are used nationwide I would very much > appreciate it if someone could send them to me. THANKS!!! Check out the following WEB site: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/db1/fly/airport-info.html It contains Information on Airports all over the US PDX - Portland Intl Airport UNICOM: 122.95 ATIS: 128.35(503-284-1711) PORTLAND GROUND: 121.9 PORTLAND TOWER: 118.7 PORTLAND APPROACH: 118.1(100-279) 126.9 133.0(280-099) PORTLAND DEPARTURE: 118.1(100-279) 133.0(280-099) 124.35 127.85 CLEARANCE DELIVERY: 119.0 CLASS C: 118.1(100-279) CLASS C IC: 133.0(280-099) EMERG: 121.5 FINAL CTL: 126.9 RDR: 127.85 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.comm.net!bigmuddy.jaxx.com!news From: mardanny Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Possible cellular mods on CPU-blocked scanners? Date: 15 Feb 1996 09:21:18 GMT Organization: Jaxx Communications Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4futue$tua@bigmuddy.jaxx.com> References: <4es2qq$2n3@bubba.NMSU.Edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: fmy28.cyberstreet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit) To: thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45625 alt.radio.scanner:27522 thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu (KC5KTO) wrote: >I was doing some thinking this evening, about the state of the world >in general and cell-blocked scanners in particular... However, >sticking that puppy in test mode would fill one of the memory locations >with a cell frequency, which the scanner would then happily search from. > > I am new to the field- could you please explain what is Test Mode??? Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:04 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.shadow.net!usenet From: Phil Borod Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro 30 Repair? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 02:35:14 -0500 Organization: T.I.C.I. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <31258532.6F5C@shadow.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-mia-39.shadow.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I) I've got an old Pro-30 handheld scanner, and I like it alot. Some of the keys on the keypad have stopped working. Can the keys or keypad typically be repaired or replaced? By Radio Shack? By anyone else? TIA, Phil Please reply directly by E-Mail ============================================================== Primary Internet E-Mail : miamipab@shadow.net Secondary : d007546c@dcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us Voice : (305)935-2930 Fax : (305)935-1127 Postal Mail : TICI, PO Box 800636, Miami, FL. 33280-0636 USA ============================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:05 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.revealed.net!root From: Jerry McCray Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro 2035 mods Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 20:59:29 -0600 Organization: whosit whatsit Lines: 2 Message-ID: <3123F311.4467@mail.revealed.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.243.76.212 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Can some one tell me if there is any mods for the pro2035?? Thanks a million jm.. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:06 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.crd.ge.com!tmpnews.crd.ge.com!rebecca!newserve!starfish.acs.brockport.edu!squid!ww2150 From: "William L. Wittman, Jr." Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2021 Schematic Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 06:51:09 -0500 Organization: SUNY College at Brockport, Brockport NY Lines: 27 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: squid.acs.brockport.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: ww2150@squid Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27476 rec.radio.scanner:45543 I am in need of the schematics of the Radio Shack Pro-2021. I just inherited the scanner from a relative who said it was in perfect working condition. But when I plugged it in, the display did not light up and it then emitted some smoke. I did do some checking into it last night and did find that there is a resistor that connects from the Neutral side of the power cord to the case is dead (no resistance). And further probing shows that the voltage regulator is dead. Any help is greatly appreciated. Also if someone has a list of Rochester, NY frequencies, I would be interested in them. Thank you. Bill William L. Wittman, Jr. - Wittman Computer Products Home of the WCP306 KB2ETL MM/1 Product Reseller Authorized DFS Business Forms Dealer Voice (716) 494-1506 EST swamps.roc.ny.us!mm1wny!wlwjr (home) ww2150@ACSPR1.ACS.BROCKPORT.EDU (college) From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:07 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!rclnews.eng.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!news.crso.com!blyle From: Bob Lyle Organization: CRS Online's Frontier Subject: PRO-2037 Modification Message-ID: <130296.21274177235.n@frontier.canrem.com> Date: 13 Feb 1996 21:27:41 GMT Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Lines: 10 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45495 alt.radio.scanner:27453 Can anyone advise if the PRO-2037 (Radio Shack) scanner is cellular restorable, by what means and if there's a date code limitation as is the case with the PRO-43 handheld? Thanks in advance! Bob blyle@frontier.canrem.com 73577.3602@compuserve.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:08 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!pop.gnn.com!STHOMAS1 From: STHOMAS1@gnn.com (SHAWN THOMAS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-43 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:30:13 Organization: GNN Lines: 5 Message-ID: <4fr3h0$136@news-e2a.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: www-37-39.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 13 Feb 1996 22:32:00 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.2 WHERE ARE THE PRO-43 FAQ THANK YOU From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:09 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!wabakimi!dbowlby From: dbowlby@chat.carleton.ca (Donald Bowlby) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-43 SWL Mode Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:13:01 GMT Organization: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4fvm2d$601@bertrand.carleton.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: wabakimi.carleton.ca Keywords: Pro-43 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27553 rec.radio.scanner:45652 I was just searching through the Oak.Oakland.edu mod site, an noticed a NEW pro-43 mod that supposedly restores 6Mhz-1000Mhz reception, has anyone tried this modification out??? I realize that the performance is obviously not going to be awesome, but the price is right. Time only. I am planning on getting my roommate (Electrical Engineering Graduate Student) to look it over before performing it, but it looks possible, or at least like it won't fry my scanner. Any Thoughts or Ideas Thank you dbowlby@chat.carleton.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:10 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-50 MODS Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:26:22 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 6 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4fra7e$dgc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Does anyone here have any info on modifications possible for the Radio Shack Pro-50? Email me! Thanks ukfan1@shotgun.org From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:11 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!siemens!news.sprintlink.net!news.rain.org!tpfbear From: tpfbear@rain.org (Tbear) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro2004 right for me? Date: 13 Feb 1996 06:18:57 GMT Organization: RAIN Public Access Internet (805) 967-RAIN Lines: 40 Message-ID: <4fpagi$dsj@news.rain.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: tpfbear@coyote.rain.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Yes, It is worth it in my opinion. I have had one that I got at a police auction for $100 about 4 years ago, and I got the sales receipt with it when I got it and it originally cost $419.97. This scanner is very versatile and covers many frequencies that my BC200xlt does not cover. It also offers 300 channels and 10 search banks, auto program off of search mode and wide fm, narrow fm and am options and search speed and step options. You can use it in your car or in your home. Wide frequency coverage: 25-520 MHz 760-824.995 845-869.995 cell freq modifiable 890-1300 Providing that it is in good condition, you should buy it, but ask for a 1 week warranty to make sure it works, and give it a burn in test and run it for 48 hours and try all of the modes and search possibilities. I would pay 100 to 150 for a 2004, just to have a backup. I would rather have one of these that is modifiable than the new garbage that is coming out now days. I would be interested in the name of the person selling the 2004 if you are not interested. Try a compromise offer of $110 and work him down to $125. happy scanning....... nickerr (nickerr@netcom.com) wrote: : I am looking for a scanner. Lots of channels and cell phone freqs. I : have heard that the Pro-2004 is a good unit and can acruire one for : $145. Is this worth it? I want to basically listen to eevrything. : WOuld this be the unit for me? : -- : nickerr@netcom.com <----------------------> nickerr@aol.com : I had a signature once : Its gone now. -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.super-highway.net!usenet From: "George M. (MAC) Hickman" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: 16 Feb 1996 05:28:14 GMT Organization: A Super-highway.net InterNetNews site Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4g14le$gsq@news.super-highway.net> References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts19.super-highway.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12(Macintosh; I; 68K) To: howard_jim@isa.com X-URL: news:4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com There is a good article on this subject in the February, 1996 Nuts& Volts magazine. The article is titled "Cellular Extensions on Trial". I called them for a trial copy, and they actually sent me three months worth. It seems to be a useful "trader-type" magazine, with a mixture of articles. Nuts & Volts can be reached at 1-800-783-4624. I'll probably subscribe. Bottom Line - Revenue for additional lines is important to the cellular companies. I did not read of any technical reasons against it if only one set is operational at a time. A friend of mine in the cellular industry said that it would drive the system nuts if two like sets were on the system at the same time.howard_jim@isa.com wrote: >Does anyone know how to do this? Now, before you all jump down my throat for >asking a dumb question, let me make my self clear. I have seen ads all over town >for places that will program 2 phones on one cellular number. Why can't I do that >myself? I have service with a company, and have a handheld cell phone that w orks. >I also have a mountable car phone that isn't active. Why can't I program the car phone to >work on the same service I already pay for? The cell company will do it, but they want to >charge me double every month for doing so... Sounds like the old battle I use d to have with >the TV cable company... > >Anyway, I'd just like to know if this can be done, and how? > >Any comments? >Jim Howard > > Mac From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:13 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.tcd.net!news From: bfallona@tcd.net (Bob Fallona) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: radar detectors Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:29:10 GMT Organization: The Computer Den, Inc. Evanston WY Lines: 19 Message-ID: <4fuh33$pf5@news.tcd.net> References: <4f8098$nls@romeo.logica.co.uk> Reply-To: bfallona@tcd.net NNTP-Posting-Host: slip12.cheyenne.tcd.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 If you check your local library they should have a computer with the ability to scan for radar articles. Some of the mags that have reviews are Motor Trend and Car and Driver. Car and Driver are the best. If not at the library check out used magazine or bookstores. leej@logica.com (John Lee) wrote: >I'm interested in information eg reviews of radar detectors (for automobiles) . Can anyone tel me where I can find any? >------------------------ >John Lee, tel 0171 637 9111 X4357 WCT/1, Logica UK Ltd, Space Division >e-mail leej@logica.com | "Let Hercules himself do what he may, >--opinions are mine-- | The cat will mew and dog will have his day" From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:15 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!news.mind.net!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: bryant6634@aol.com (BryanT6634) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 16 Feb 1996 12:49:56 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 24 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader In article <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com>, Brad Cuppy writes: >; It's my understanding that the operation of a jammer per se is not >; illegal, however, you can be ticketed for, (get this) >; >; "Interfering with an officer of the law in the performance of his >: duties" >; >; Personally, I think I'd rather have the speeding ticket! >: >: How 'bout you? >: > >If it's a misdemanor and not a felony, it would be cheaper than >a speeding ticket after you add in the insurance hikes, points, etc. >If the FCC comes in the picture, the speeding ticket is definitely >better. If it's a "laser" jammer, since it's not RF, it's my understanding that the FCC wouldn't become involved with this. However, transmitting on any RF frequency for which you are not authorized can certainly lead to FCC intervention..... and THAT would cost FAR more than anything the police can cost you.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:16 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!Austria.EU.net!magnet.at!nuucpgw!gerald.klein From: gerald.klein@magnet.at (Ing.Gerald KLEIN) Reply-To: gerald.klein@magnet.at Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Distribution: world Subject: radar warn.system Date: 14 Feb 1996 10:07:11 GMT Message-ID: <1307246558.372979@magnet.at> Organization: magnet Online Service Lines: 17 Hi! I do not know if I am right here. I hope so because it works like a scanner. I am looking for a radar and laser warning system. I heared there is one from U.S. or Can. - Valentine One ( X-Band 10,525 Ghz., K-Band 24,15 Ghz., Ka-Band 33,4 to 36 Ghz. and laserlight 950 nm). Can anyone tell me where I can get it ? Do anyone know something about this system? Or is there a newsgroup on Internet? please to my BOX gerald.klein@magnet.at From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:17 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.uoregon.edu!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!alterdial.uu.net!not-for-mail From: skuter@tcgcs.com (Scott Eveland) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 03:41:02 GMT Organization: None to speak of Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4frlcq$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> Reply-To: skuter@tcgcs.com NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-5.tcgcs.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45573 alt.radio.scanner:27486 drhuman@onramp.net (Bill Hammon) wrote: > -->Len Roberts, President Tandy Corp, and RadioShack >You've got questions, we've got Imposters: Cute > -->Sender: news@onyx.indstate.edu > -->Nntp-Posting-Host: 139.102.7.42 > -->Organization: Indiana State University > -->X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141 > -->References: ><4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> > -->Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 16:06:31 GMT >You'd think Tandy would have it's own internet address. Aren't they in Ft. >Worth Texas? Maybe Mr President is on vacation in Indiana, and is using >his son's school account. Yeah, that's it. >Of course, I could be wrong. If I am, My appologies to Mr Roberts. I don't think you need to apologize to loudly, Tandy does have its own address, and yes, they're in Ft. Worth. ---------------------------------------------------------- Scott Eveland Ham Call: KB0FKN skuter@tcgcs.com Alternate: skuter911@aol.com Public safety dude in Hastings, Nebraska. Standard disclaimer There can be only one. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:18 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.uoregon.edu!news.dacom.co.kr!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: genealle@ix.netcom.com(Frank Allen ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got junk. Date: 14 Feb 1996 14:38:00 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4fss48$hf8@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> <4frlcq$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-stl3-22.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Feb 14 6:38:00 AM PST 1996 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45568 alt.radio.scanner:27482 Stopped into RS yesterday for a couple parts. Two people(not together) trying to return phone answering devices that forwards to pager. Woman was calm but pissed. Man was maniac, thought I would have to help restrain him. I thought , what are the chances that RS would sell 2 items that don't work as advertised? :) Moral is: Never buy at RS if it is available elsewhere! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:19 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!oitnews.harvard.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm.tmc.edu!news.tamu.edu!news From: w-chase@tamu.edu (William L. Chase) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Replacement ducky? Date: 13 Feb 1996 19:43:01 GMT Organization: Texas A&M University Lines: 10 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fqpk5$9dt@news.tamu.edu> Reply-To: w-chase@tamu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: moss3.tamu.edu X-Newsreader: NeoLogic News for OS/2 [version: 4.5 Build YJ] Due to the confusion surrounding a holiday visit from my dad and new (step)mom (a great lady!), I lost the original rubber duck antenna that came with my BC-2500XLT. I see a nicely-advertised unit in the Grove catalog. It's their ANT 14, an Austin Condor. Has a had any experience with this antenna? Will it provide any better performance than a cheapy replacement duck? Thanks! Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:20 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!rockyd!cmcl2!panix!not-for-mail From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Replacement ducky? Date: 14 Feb 1996 12:47:26 -0500 Organization: panix Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4ft77e$gqa@panix3.panix.com> References: <4fqpk5$9dt@news.tamu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix3.panix.com In article <4fqpk5$9dt@news.tamu.edu>, William L. Chase wrote: > Due to the confusion surrounding a holiday visit from my dad and new >(step)mom (a great lady!), I lost the original rubber duck antenna that came >with my BC-2500XLT. I see a nicely-advertised unit in the Grove catalog. It's >their ANT 14, an Austin Condor. Has a had any experience with this antenna? >Will it provide any better performance than a cheapy replacement duck? Yes, it will perform better, but it is SIGNIFICANTLY larger and less flexible. My favorite right-size duckie is the GRE all-band, availabable from GRE direct (see their ads). CRB Research (the "Red top" ... it's orange), or Radio Shack (PRO-34 replacement part). WARNING: Unsolicited commercial e-mail: $500 per message: US Code, Title 47 Section 227 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/227.html -- Mike Schuster | schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM ------------------- | schuster@shell.portal.com | schuster@mem.po.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!braintree!news.concourse.com!ragnarok.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!zippy.intcom.net!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!homer.alpha.net!usenet From: Joey Grey Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Req. Wisconsin Frequencies Date: 15 Feb 1996 22:19:50 GMT Organization: Alpha.net -- Milwaukee, WI Lines: 1 Message-ID: <4g0bi6$3bc@homer.alpha.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.46.30.102 Could someone please post any frequencies of interest in the Sheboygan Wisc. A rea? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:21 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.cris.com!news From: tjv@cris.com (Todd) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Rochester New York Scanner Frequencies! Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 03:08:03 GMT Organization: CRC Lines: 9 Message-ID: <3120007f.26083073@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: tjv@cris.com NNTP-Posting-Host: crc4-fddi.cris.com Anyone know where I can get them? No, I do not want to go to radio shack, thanks anyway Just looking for a simple list of good scanner frequencies for the Rochester area. Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:22 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.icanect.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.frontiernet.net!usenet From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Rochester New York Scanner Frequencies! Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:23:15 -0500 Organization: NF2G Enterprises Lines: 20 Message-ID: <31221A83.44DF@frontiernet.net> References: <3120007f.26083073@spectator.cris.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr3-189.frontiernet.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I) To: tjv@cris.com Todd wrote: > > Anyone know where I can get them? > > No, I do not want to go to radio shack, thanks anyway > > Just looking for a simple list of good scanner frequencies for the > Rochester area. > > Thanks! If you have Web access, go to http://www.frontiernet.net/~dstark/ If not, email me and I'll tell you how to get the best book about it. 73 de Dave, NF2G dstark@frontiernet.net http://www.frontiernet.net/~dstark/ Author/Editor "Scanner Master Upstate New York Guide" Co-Editor "Monitor America" From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:23 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!news00.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!news.jsums.edu!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!nntp.neu.edu!neil From: neil@lynx.dac.neu.edu (Neil Winer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RS PRO-39 FOR SALE Date: 17 Feb 1996 03:24:05 GMT Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4g3hol$9a2@chaos.dac.neu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lynx.dac.neu.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] radio shack scanner for sale. Pro-39 200 channel. Fast small dependable. New condition! With manual and power adapter. 800 fully restored for cellmon. $325 or best offer. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!dsm6.dsmnet.com!usenet From: mfunaro@dsmnet.com (Michael J Funaro) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Sale:Optoelectronics R-10 Intercepter Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 02:42:18 GMT Organization: Des Moines Internet Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fri24$3rh@dsm6.dsmnet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip19.dsmnet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99b.112 I have a mint Optoelectronics R-10 FM Communications Intercepter. Picks up any nearby FM signals from 30 mhz to 2.2 ghz. $300. I also have 3 filters BLP70, BHP800, N100. $50 for all three. If you have any questions please email me or call 515-961-6140. 73, Mike WA0SWJ mfunaro@dsmnet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:24 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.crd.ge.com!tmpnews.crd.ge.com!rebecca!rpi!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!usenet From: dmenser@parrett.net (Drew) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: scanner amplifier Date: 13 Feb 1996 11:16:53 GMT Organization: Parrett Business Machines Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4fprv5$3hc@parrett.net> References: <4f7gb4$ecl@ns2.emirates.net.ae> <4feogs$ld3@cobia.gulf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin2.parrett.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6 In article <4feogs$ld3@cobia.gulf.net>, breeze@gulf.netY says... > >the mill TV antenna amplifier for the job. It should be good from 50Mhz out >to 512Mhz at 10 Db of gain. Just be careful when using it in an area where I was at RatShack and noticed they have an amp that covers 50 mhz to 890 mhz. Don't remember the model number though. Seems it was about $25.00 Drew -- ************************************************************ I have a quote in mind, I just can't remember how it goes... dmenser@parrett.net Drew Menser http://www.parrett.net/~dmenser Bridgman, Michigan USA ************************************************************ From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:25 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!crl10.crl.com!not-for-mail From: mak@crl.com (Michael A Kelliher) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Scanner freq's in San Antonio Date: 13 Feb 1996 16:42:31 -0800 Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access (415) 705-6060 [Login: guest] Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4frb5n$4oi@crl10.crl.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl10.crl.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Does anyone know any good frequencies for scanners in the San Antonio area? all help would be greatly appreciated..please email with responses From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!iglou!news From: Markm1162@aol.com (Mark H. Michael) Subject: Scanner Frequencys for Lexington, KY X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dp-2-24.iglou.net Message-ID: Sender: news@iglou.com (News Administrator) Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 15:56:57 GMT Lines: 6 Does anybody have the scanner frequencys for the metropolitian Lexington, KY area or know of a database or FTP site that does? Please E-mail me at markm1162@aol.com if you do. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:27 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bofh.mi.org!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Scanner Frequencys for Lexington, KY Date: 14 Feb 1996 17:47:48 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 13 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4ftoqk$9te@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Check out the following e-mail List Server. It's has a Scanner discussion group for Kentucky. listserv@ukcc.uky.edu You can subscribe to it by sending a message with following text in the body of the message: SUBSCRIBE KYSCAN Firstname Lastname From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:28 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!homer.alpha.net!pacifier!ip49 From: mscheetz@pacifier.com (Tintin & Snowy) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 21:27:24 GMT Organization: United Parcel Service - Worldwide 1996 Olympic Sponsor Lines: 20 Message-ID: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip49.van2.pacifier.com X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27564 rec.radio.scanner:45682 Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland and Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net (the 155mhz neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background check. Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited check claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but couldn't find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or freqs for this SS activity? --- Michael aka Prof. Calculus mscheetz@pacifier.com/uofport.edu 45.31N 122.40W "Sometimes I think I learn more when I stay home from school." - Calvin -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.11 GAT/B d-@ s++:++ a- C++ U++ P+ L E---- W++ N++ K++ w+ O- M-- V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP t-- 5-- X++ R tv+ b++ DI++++ D++ G++ e(++) h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:29 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.clark.net!rahul.net!a2i!bug.rahul.net!a2i!genmagic!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!primus.ac.net!news.cais.net!xara.net!SoNet!innotts.co.uk!usenet From: asperges@innotts.co.uk (Jeremy Boot) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Server Problems, Radio Pages Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 23:07:10 GMT Organization: innotts.co.uk Lines: 25 Message-ID: <3123ba2b.10882244@news.innotts.co.uk> Reply-To: asperges@innotts.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Host: seriald1e.innotts.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45671 rec.radio.shortwave:70188 Some readers have been telling me they have had problems accessing my pages. http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/ The local server has been having problems, so do please keep trying. * The pages have an extensive list of links, * an explanation of aspects of amateur radio, * new special pages for SWLs (listeners) with broadcast web page access,* * an IRC link, * a tour of local historical site near the QTH, * a mock exam, * and even a history of Robert Burns, the Scots poet. So it's worth the wait! All welcome and I will reply to all e-mails sent through the pages. 2100 visitors to date (despite the recent server problems) since January. Jeremy G4NJH asperges@innotts.co.uk [Home, Am Radio, SWL pages: http://www.innotts.co.uk/~asperges/ ] From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:31 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!freenet.columbus.oh.us!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.vanderbilt.edu!news From: Evan Singer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SFO Airline Company Frequencies Date: 13 Feb 1996 20:53:11 GMT Organization: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fqtnn$pmv@news.vanderbilt.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial119.vanderbilt.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:rec.radio.scanner I will be at SFO later this month. Am looking for company frequencies (airlines ramps, operations, etc.)- VHF (129.0 to 132.0) -Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.vanderbilt.edu!news From: Evan Singer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SFO Airline Company Frequencies Date: 13 Feb 1996 20:53:15 GMT Organization: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Lines: 6 Message-ID: <4fqtnr$pna@news.vanderbilt.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial119.vanderbilt.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-URL: news:rec.radio.scanner I will be at SFO later this month. Am looking for company frequencies (airlines ramps, operations, etc.)- VHF (129.0 to 132.0) -Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:33 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.sunbelt.net!usenet From: koverly@carol.net (Dr. Kenneth R. Overly) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: South Carolina frequencies? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 21:43:09 GMT Organization: SunBelt.Net INTERNET Access Lines: 8 Message-ID: <4fr0ft$554@news1.sunbelt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1_assigned_address_27.carol.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Does anybody have a list of frequencies for the upstate South Carolina area? Specifically, the Anderson and Greenville areas. Or, does anyone know of a web site that might have frequencies for South Carolina? Thanks in advance. Ken Overly koverly@carol.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:34 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com!news@rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com From: John Lloyd KE4UTX Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: South Carolina frequencies? Date: 14 Feb 1996 16:16:19 GMT Organization: IBM Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4ft1sj$pv2@rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com> References: <4fr0ft$554@news1.sunbelt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: belize.raleigh.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; I; AIX 2) To: koverly@carol.net X-URL: news:4fr0ft$554@news1.sunbelt.net Try http://www.percomcorp.com We I lived in Clemson most frequencies were in Police Call expect Clemson University Police which is 460.925. -- John Lloyd Email - jlloyd@raleigh.ibm.com Phone - 919-254-8021 Radio - --... ...-- -.. . -.- . ....- ..- - -..- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:35 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: mike03@ix.netcom.com (Michael G. Sisco) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Tennessee freq. especially Nashville Date: 14 Feb 1996 22:10:18 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 2 Message-ID: <4ftmka$2en@cloner4.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-nas1-06.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Feb 14 2:10:18 PM PST 1996 does anyone have listings of freq for police, fire, emt for nashville metro area? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Toronto Fire Channel From: paul.cordingley@canrem.com (Paul Cordingley) Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.i2020.net!alpha.sky.net!winternet.com!news2.interlog.com!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!news.crso.com!canrem.com!paul.cordingley Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.31391.5773.0N20AE9E@canrem.com> References: <4fspp1$hvp@steel.interlog.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 15:46:00 -0500 Organization: CRS Online (Toronto, Ontario) Lines: 13 Hi John, -> fire and lots more. I think ch 6 may be the repeater that links to -> the Ontario fire marshal common channel 154.07. They use this -> repeater when they want to talk to adjacent fire departments. Yep, Channel 6 is repeated onto the OFM channel, but it is also TFD's simplex operational channel. TFD uses it for situations like subway rescue calls where the normal repeater operation won't work. Regards Paul From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:37 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news2.interlog.com!news.interlog.com!news From: John Mckay Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Toronto Fire Channel 6 Date: 14 Feb 1996 13:57:53 GMT Organization: InterLog Internet Services Lines: 11 Message-ID: <4fspp1$hvp@steel.interlog.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: jmckay.interlog.com an141@torfree.net (Marg Eveleigh) wrote: > > Occasionally the fire department switches from tact 2 and 4 to "channel 6". > I've been unable to locate it? Does anyone have the frequency? If you have www access go to http://www.interlog.com/~jmckay and follow the scanner links to RON KATZ page. He has freq listings for toronto fire and lots more. I think ch 6 may be the repeater that links to the Ontario fire marshal common channel 154.07. They use this repeater when they want to talk to adjacent fire departments. John From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:38 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!EU.net!sun4nl!metropolis.nl!news From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: UBC200XLT power problems X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp0-124.metropolis.nl Message-ID: <886.6617T1018T1306@metropolis.nl> Sender: news@news.metropolis.nl (usenet) Organization: Metropolis Internet X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED* Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:58:26 GMT Lines: 25 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27447 rec.radio.scanner:45484 I have some problems with my 200XLT. Let me describe the symptoms: - I can only turn it on if I apply about 10 Volts for a second or so. After this, it operates like normal at the normal 7.2 V battery power. In the beginning, I could get it on by using the AC adaptor, which will increase the battery pack voltage just a bit. Over time, the voltage needed to activate the unit has increased to the 10 Volts it is now. - Some programmed channels/modes seem to need more power than others, sometimes even so much the unit turns itself off. Extremely annoying if I'm carrying it around and don't have the 10 Volt power supply to 'kickstart' it. I have to lock-out these channels or even the complete bank to prevent the unit from turning itself off. Can anyone shed a light on this? Can I repair this myself? -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:39 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.rain.org!tpfbear From: tpfbear@rain.org (Tbear) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problems Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Date: 15 Feb 1996 07:41:47 GMT Organization: RAIN Public Access Internet (805) 967-RAIN Lines: 53 Message-ID: <4fuo3r$86u@news.rain.org> References: <886.6617T1018T1306@metropolis.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: tpfbear@coyote.rain.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27489 rec.radio.scanner:45579 Lennard voor den Dag (ldp@metropolis.nl) wrote: : I have some problems with my 200XLT. Let me describe the symptoms: : - I can only turn it on if I apply about 10 Volts for a second or so. After : this, it operates like normal at the normal 7.2 V battery power. In the : beginning, I could get it on by using the AC adaptor, which will increase th e : battery pack voltage just a bit. Over time, the voltage needed to activate : the unit has increased to the 10 Volts it is now. : - Some programmed channels/modes seem to need more power than others, : sometimes even so much the unit turns itself off. Extremely annoying if I'm : carrying it around and don't have the 10 Volt power supply to 'kickstart' it . : I have to lock-out these channels or even the complete bank to prevent the : unit from turning itself off. : Can anyone shed a light on this? Can I repair this myself? : -- : ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html : -- -- I have a similar problem...where one of my battery packs works fine (since I put new nicad solder packs into it) but the other pack that I replaced the nicads with does not work on its own...The first one works whether the transformer is plugged into it or not.. The second on only works when the 12v transformer is plugged into the back and is supposedly charging. When I unplug the transformer from the pack, It turns off as if the batteries are dead(when I know the batteries are good, or even overcharged slightly) Does anyone know what components in the charging system of the battery pack I might be able to replace or how to check them? I have tried using two different transformers : 1. a 12v dc 500mA transformer and 2. a 12v dc 800mA transformer..............with the same results.............. ......................I disabled the low battery signal on the radio to see if it would make things better, but no change. Any suggestions appreciated............perhaps running the battery down with a light bulb and then trying charging again? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:40 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!metropolis.nl!news From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problems X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp0-120.metropolis.nl Message-ID: <698.6620T129T640@metropolis.nl> Sender: news@news.metropolis.nl (usenet) Organization: Metropolis Internet X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED* References: <3123AE04.112D@west.net> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 01:09:12 GMT Lines: 21 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27534 rec.radio.scanner:45639 Temp Berdan (tberdan@west.net) wrote: >I've had repeated problems with two 200xlt batt. packs. >Found the 12vdc male board mounted connector was the problem. It was >coming loose and breaking the circuit board copper trace. I had this problem too. I replaced the connector, and it's allright now. My batterypack is not the problem. Even if I power my scanner straight from a regulated power supply it won't switch on until I put about 9 or 10 Volts on it. After this the batterypack will gladly power my scanner. That is, until I scan past a channel in the 470 MHz range... bzzzt, my scanner powered off all by itself. -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:41 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.west.net!usenet From: Temp Berdan Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problems Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:04:52 -0800 Organization: West.Net Communications Lines: 16 Message-ID: <3123AE04.112D@west.net> References: <886.6617T1018T1306@metropolis.nl> <4fuo3r$86u@news.rain.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: term1-30.sb.west.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27550 rec.radio.scanner:45647 Batt pack problems >snip<############################### I've had repeated problems with two 200xlt batt. packs. Found the 12vdc male board mounted connector was the problem. It was coming loose and breaking the circuit board copper trace. After much trouble I was able to fix both by disassembling and slobbering the hell out of the broken area. Batt. pak #1 a-ok after 1 year. Battery pak #2's connector came loose again after one weeks use! Haven't gone back in for rerepair yet. I would have been better off if I had epoxied the connectors back on the board as well. I also have had both male connectors casings break apart. Has anyone gotten any satisfaction from Uniden on this obvious poor design problem? TIA, Temp From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:42 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.fibr.net!nntp.news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!not-for-mail From: fireboss@primenet.com Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden 800 numbers changed Date: 14 Feb 1996 22:36:03 -0700 Organization: Primenet Lines: 12 Sender: root@primenet.com Message-ID: <4fugo3$2mp@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Reply-To: fireboss@primenet.com X-Posted-By: ip21-036.phx.primenet.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27502 rec.radio.scanner:45596 Uniden/Bearcat owners Uniden has changed the 800 numbers. The new numbers are 800 297-1023 for scanners, cordless phones, CB radios, and radar detectors; 800-364-1931 for commercial comm.; 800-364-1944 for cellular phones and pagers; 800-586-0409 for marine products; and 800-261-9498 for satellite products. Their FAX number is 800-323-2641. The numbers are still as busy as ever and the conversion to a new computer system seems painfully slow. The new direct number is 817-858-3300 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:43 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!tcnntp.trader.com!not-for-mail From: "David A. Lovell" Subject: Re: Uniden 800 numbers changed Message-ID: <2107cc$d382.33@tcnntp.trader.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 18:56:01 GMT References: <4fugo3$2mp@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Organization: Electra Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fireboss@primenet.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 8 Xref: news.epix.net alt.radio.scanner:27558 rec.radio.scanner:45664 It appears that Uniden is moving its Indianapolis repair facility as well. My understanding is that by March 1, they will have relocated to the Dallas/Ft .Worth area. New Address: 4700 Amon Carter Boulevard, Ft. Worth, TX 76155. NOTE: Electra Corporation is not moving :) Our Address: 251 N. 300 W. Greenfield, IN 46140-8496 (317) 326-4419 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:44 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!news.dacom.co.kr!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.toronto.fonorola.net!news1.toronto.istar.net!news.toronto.istar.net!news.crso.com!blyle From: Bob Lyle Organization: CRS Online's Frontier Subject: Re: Vancouver BC listeners?-Cantel network modified? Message-ID: <130296.0147276172.n@frontier.canrem.com> Date: 13 Feb 1996 01:47:27 GMT Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Lines: 17 Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.scanner:45558 alt.radio.scanner:27479 > Hi there. I am in Vancouver and have recently found that when I scan >through the freqs below 880 (cantel) the voices seem to be much more >distorted than they seemed about a week ago. Anybody else notice this? >Any possible explanations? The distortion seems to sound like the channel >is being put through a "phlanger" or some sort of compressor. > >Scan Man Cantel in Ontario has been doing this for some time now. They're simply not re-transmitting the mobile's audio on the cell site transmit frequency. Whether it's an attempt to make monitoring more difficult or only to reduce sidetone and echo in the mobile user's ear I don't know. It's simply annoying. Regards, Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:45 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!noc.nyx.net!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail From: anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Virtual downconverter, PRO2035/PRO2042, what is it? Date: 15 Feb 1996 19:07:33 -0700 Organization: Nyx.net, free public access to the Internet Lines: 9 Message-ID: <4g0ot5$8jl@nyx10.cs.du.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.nyx.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] I was reading an article in a scanner magazine and there was an ad offering a "virtual downconverter" for the PRO-2035 for $99. This is something to presumably allow less restrictions on access to the 800-900Mhz frequencies. What do they give you for the $99? Instructions on how to do it? Do you send your radio in and they fix it for you? What about the PRO-2042, can the same virtual downconverter work with it? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:46 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!news00.sunet.se!sunic!mn6.swip.net!mn5.swip.net!cindy!cindy.ct.se!swedx!jens.brandt From: jens.brandt@swedx.ct.se (Jens Brandt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wanted: Formula 1 Rac Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 00:06:00 +0200 Organization: SweDX (Swedish DX-Federation) +46-853034727 Lines: 31 Sender: news@ct.se Message-ID: <5591afeb@swedx.ct.se> Reply-To: jens.brandt@swedx.ct.se NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup108-5-1.swipnet.se Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: JCQWK X-Mailer: uugate 0.40 (SunOS 4.1.3) (Fidonet Gateway) X-Info: UUCP Dialup connection -=> Quoting Shatter to All <=- Sh> From: ctbaker@burrito.engr.ucdavis.edu (shatter) Sh> I am going to the Canadian Grand Prix Formula 1 race this June and Sh> want to bring along my scanner... I want to know if anyone knows Sh> where I can obtain the race team freqs. Sh> Thanks Hello there ! I visited the German grand prix 95 and i would advise you to serch in the region of 430 - 460 Mhz. But i am afraid they are scrambling their communication. I only found one freq that i actually heard somthing on, unfourtunly i dont recall witch freq this was. If you would find out something WHAT SO EVER conserning motorsport, please mail me ( a motorsport crazy guy ) on: jens.brandt@swedx.ct.se Have fun ! Watching formula 1 is really somting special ! ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:47 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!sid.net From: clay.juckett@sid.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wanted: Fre Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:48:03 -0400 Organization: Southeastern Information Depot, A Non-Profit Corporation Lines: 12 Message-ID: <9602131748.0P09C01@sid.net> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sid.net X-Mailer: TBBS/TIGER v1.0 X-Mail2News-Path: sid.net I am travelling to Gatlinburg, TN over the weekend and am looking for scanner frequencies for the area. Areas of interest include Gatlinburg, the surrounding rural area, the Smoky Mountain National Parks, and Tennessee State-Wide frequencies. Please reply via E-mail to . Thank you. Clay From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:48 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!hp228 From: hp228@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Mantoudis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 14 Feb 1996 16:45:39 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4ft3jj$55d@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <4f9469$993@sulla.cyberstore.ca> <4fb2d2$l8g@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31198372.10099938@news.nwlink.com> Reply-To: hp228@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Mantoudis) NNTP-Posting-Host: nextsun.ins.cwru.edu >>It costs $70 more. >>Is it worth it to ya? >>Good luck with your choice, it's not an easy one. > >Radio Shack's sale on the Pro-60 pushed me in that direction. > >Mike I ended up buying the PRO-60 also. But if I had had the money, I would have probably gone for the 26. I have to say that I'm very happy with my 60 though. If you have the money, do consider the 26, because it has some nice extra features like faster scanning, and frequency reception up to 1300MHz and some more little differences. Also, don't forget, many scanner stores and mail order places actually sell the RS scanners much cheaper than RS itself. Although, thinking about it, you could get yourself an AR2700 for $347 right now from EEB. Isn't that a much better scanner than the RS's? Check out the ads in the current PopComm issue. Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:49 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!pop.gnn.com!MMcanally From: MMcanally@gnn.com (Mark McAnally) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Windows database for scanner freqs. Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 16:06:59 Organization: McAnally and Associates Lines: 3 Message-ID: <4ftm8o$nfa@news-e1a.megaweb.com> References: <4ftd2o$g77$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: @www-9-165.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 1996 22:04:08 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.2 Could someone download this and then upload to AOL or attach to news posting here please ?? From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:50 1996 Path: news.epix.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!news.compuserve.com!news.production.compuserve.com!news From: Fred Gerbig <102676.1201@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Windows database for scanner freqs. Date: 14 Feb 1996 19:27:20 GMT Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736) Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4ftd2o$g77$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> New Windows software for scanner frequencies. WinScan Version 1.1, has fields like in the Radio Shack Police Call guide. Many features, search, sort (by any field) print and more! Tested in Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. Available on Compuserve in the Hamnet forum. Also on the ARRL bulletin board at (203)665-0090 (no charge to access files) find it in the General Intrest File area or search for keyword scanner. File name is WSCAN.ZIP. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!venger.snds.com!usenet From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: Uniden MR-8100 scanner w/software Date: 13 Feb 1996 14:22:37 GMT Organization: Sundstrand Corporation Lines: 4 Message-ID: <4fq6rd$77o@venger.snds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: aero.snds.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; U; 16bit) Xref: news.epix.net rec.radio.swap:57413 rec.radio.scanner:45489 alt.radio.scanner:27450 Looking for anyone that has a Uniden MR-8100 scanner with the programming software for sale, or for any possible sources for one of these units. From lwbyppp@epix.net Sat Feb 17 14:01:51 1996 Path: news.epix.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnews.wa.com!uw-coco!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.emf.net!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!alpha1.csd.uwm.edu!not-for-mail From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTD: Pro-2004/5 Date: 15 Feb 1996 07:20:41 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 7 Message-ID: <4fums9$5dc@uwm.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.169.1 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] Subj says it all. Must be in good shape. Nate. Thanks in advance. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:20 1996 From: ferno Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: (no subject) Date: 20 Feb 1996 13:06:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4gd9j9$lm4@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> To: NEWS.REC.RADIO.SCANNER RADIO SHACK PRO-23 HOW DO I MODIFY THIS SCANNER BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. I PURCHASED IT AFTER RS TOOK THEM OFF THE SHELVES AND DUMPED SOME FREQ. HELP PLEASE From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:20 1996 From: Marc Gauw Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: *** How to make the AR3000 IF more narrow ? *** Date: 17 Feb 1996 08:05:38 GMT Message-ID: <4g428i$qk0@news.simplex.nl> I know that it should be possible to make the IF of a AR3000 (normally 12 Kc for NFM and AM) more narrow (4.3 Kc). This gives improvements in especially Shortwave and Airband reception. I know that firms like Bogerfunk (Switzerland) are advertising with this (Deutch-Mark 150,-). Only I like to do it myself, and preferably for free ! Therefore, maybe somebody knows the following : * Is it possible to modify the IF of the AR3000 just by a switchable exchange of the current the SSB filter (4.3 Kc) and the normal IF filter (12 Kc) ? Or do I have to buy new extra filters ? * Could somebody mail (marcgauw@simplex.nl) or fax me a swithing diagram how to do it myself ? Marc Gauw, Holland From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:22 1996 From: Marc Gauw Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: *** Need Narrow IF-scheme for AR3000 *** Date: 14 Feb 1996 20:53:11 GMT Message-ID: <4fti3n$jm4@news.simplex.nl> I'm looking for a scheme how to make a "narrow IF" in the AR3000 Please mail direct to my e-mail. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:23 1996 From: ronald@trace.com.tw (Ronald Wiplinger) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: *==* Happy New Lunar Year *==* Date: 20 Feb 1996 22:59:35 +0800 Message-ID: <728708Au8708to182775@news.trace.com.tw> **************** Happy New Lunar Year **************** ** to you and your family !! ** ** We wish you a prosperous coming year, ** ** the year of the rat !! ** ** ** ** Ronald ** **** http://www.trace.com.tw/HappyLunarYear.html **** From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:24 1996 From: buettner@bbn.com (John Buettner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: 2006 Scanner WANTED Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 14:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4favi1$h8c@reader2.ix.netcom.com> In article <4favi1$h8c@reader2.ix.netcom.com>, y7up@ix.netcom.com (t bower) wrote: +> Want to buy a 2006 Scanner....please email with prices....thanks.... Durham Radio Sales and Service still has them. Brand new and in the box. No extra charge for cell mods! I don't work there. I'm just a satisfied customer. E-Mail: durhamradio@osha.igs.net WWW: http://durhamnet.com/durham phone: (905)436-2100 ******************************************************************** * "Arguing with an Engineer is like mud-wrestling a pig. Pretty * * soon you realize the pig likes it" -author unknown * * * * Note: My comments are my own and do not reflect the views of * * my employer or necessarily anyone else. * ******************************************************************** This message is copyrighted. Distribution of this message by Microsoft, its su bsidiaries, or its software shall constitute a violation of my copyrights. Mi crosoft may license copyrights to my messages, for distribution only, for the sum of $1,000 US per day. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:25 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: 2006 Scanner WANTED Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 09:02:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4favi1$h8c@reader2.ix.netcom.com> In article , buettner@bbn.com (John Buettner) wrote: > In article <4favi1$h8c@reader2.ix.netcom.com>, y7up@ix.netcom.com (t > bower) wrote: > > +> Want to buy a 2006 Scanner....please email with prices....thanks.... > > Durham Radio Sales and Service still has them. Brand new and in the box. > No extra charge for cell mods! > Durham has them indeed, but the price is much more than what you might suspect. I bought an OS535 from them at $319, but the final bill was closer to $350. After telling me that the interface would be sent by regular post (which took two weeks) at the usual postal rates, I found out too late that they jacked up the price by $30! On top of that, you are likely to get hit with customs fees, which for a 2006, I guess will be around $20. That $379 scanner suddenly becomes a $450 scanner! Well, I've lived and learn and I suggest that if you do business with Durham that you press them for the precise price to avoid getting ripped off like I did. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:27 1996 From: pjheller@west.net (PJH) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 3000xlt - did I get a lemon? Date: 15 Feb 1996 22:05:35 GMT Message-ID: References: <4fva1v$s7a@news4.digex.net> <4g05do$3ou@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Marshall: What kind of battery life are you getting with the 3000XLT. I'm thinking of buying one, but am somewhat put off by having to use a special battery pack. I have an AOR 1000 that takes AA batteries, which can be found everywhere. Cheers, PJ pjheller@west.net In article <4g05do$3ou@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) wrote: > Brian, > Looks like you got a lemon. I have had my BC3000xlt since it first > came out and I have not had a problem with it!! :-) The way I take it > with me everywhere and use it so much I thought that It would not > last a month. But it has surprised me and has kept scanning strong!! > Return yours and don't let this one dud make you think that the > 3000 is not a good scanner. It's great!! > 73 and Happy Scanning! > Marshall KE4ZNR KE4ZNR@aol.com > Proud Member: N. Carolina Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:28 1996 From: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 3000xlt - did I get a lemon? Date: 15 Feb 1996 15:35:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4g05do$3ou@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fva1v$s7a@news4.digex.net> Reply-To: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Brian, Looks like you got a lemon. I have had my BC3000xlt since it first came out and I have not had a problem with it!! :-) The way I take it with me everywhere and use it so much I thought that It would not last a month. But it has surprised me and has kept scanning strong!! Return yours and don't let this one dud make you think that the 3000 is not a good scanner. It's great!! 73 and Happy Scanning! Marshall KE4ZNR KE4ZNR@aol.com Proud Member: N. Carolina Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:28 1996 From: David De Coons Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 4SALE PRO-2006 with OS456 Date: 19 Feb 1996 11:14:33 GMT Message-ID: <4g9m2p$4ls@spectator.cris.com> For Sale: Pro-2006 with Optoscan 456 computer interface. Scanner is original conditional except for install of Opto board. Unit is perfect working condition and comes with software. Asking $625 and includes 2nd day shipping in continental US Please call Dave at (201)-896-0549 or email me at ddecoons@cris.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:29 1996 From: steve b Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 4SALE PRO-2006 with OS456 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:01:37 -0600 Message-ID: <312955B1.2AD5@mail.win.org> References: <4g9m2p$4ls@spectator.cris.com> David De Coons wrote: > > Pro-2006 with Optoscan 456 computer interface. > Unit is perfect working condition and comes with software. What software does it come with? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:30 1996 From: boblee Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 560 XLT -- ANY MODS? Date: 17 Feb 1996 05:56:10 GMT Message-ID: <4g3qlq$ao4@is05.micron.net> I HAVE A BEARCAT 560XLT AND WOULD LIKE ANY MOD'S AVAILABLE FOR IT. EVERYONE IN MY FAMILY HAS A SCANNER WITH A BILLION CHANNELS AND WIDE COVERAGE BUT ONLY USE 10 OR SO CHANNELS. IT IS FRUSTRATING, BUT I CAN'T GET ANYONE TO SELL OR TRADE IN THIS FAMILY. ANY MOD KNOWN TO MAN WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. 73'S -- KC7NIY CHUCK E-MAIL boblee@micro.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:31 1996 From: cef@hyperion.haystack.edu (Chris Farrell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: [q] Tac 3 what is the technique Date: 16 Feb 1996 17:22:55 GMT Message-ID: <4g2ehf$d6p@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> Does anyone know what type of modulation and how the local PD tx/rx what they call tac3. On my BC200xl I receive static on the primary frequency. Are they using digital modulation with the center frequency as a carrier. Are they using some form on USB/LSB I think if it was FM then I wouldn't be able to receive even the static. Boy is that static (pink or is it white noise) annoying. They definately get 100% modulation on tac3. Could someone fill me in please. Also if you know of a way to demodulate then I would appreciate any info. Chris From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:32 1996 From: bucherj@aol.com (BucherJ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AD: 1000's of mods available for ham & scanners Date: 15 Feb 1996 06:45:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4fv6c0$okg@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4d1i52$nrn@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> For information about mods available send email back with the make and model of your unit in the Subject. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:34 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: aoa@netcom.com (Allen Osborne Assoc) Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Message-ID: References: <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4fmt29$f44@emerald.oz.net> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 23:17:28 GMT In article <4fmt29$f44@emerald.oz.net>, Mr.News wrote: >In article <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org>, ag001@lafn.org says... >> >> >>Over the past several days, I've noticed that my Bearcat 700A >>scanner is picking up a local AM station, KFI (640 KHz) at >>450.7250 MHz. Given the wide spread between the frequencies, >>I cannot understand what's causing this. > >What you are hearing is the "cueing" frequency for news and traffic >reporters in the field. 450.725 is in the remote broadcast portion of >the uhf band. > > You are hearing the "real time"program audio feed *before* it goes thru >the delay system that folks hear on 640-AM. It can be pretty funny to >listen to as you can hear all the bad words and wild callers before they >get "dumped" by the host with the delay system. You will also hear board >ops and producers "override" the channel to give time cues to talent in >the field. The coverage of 450.725 includes LA/Orange/Riverside/San >berdo/Ventura and the coastal portions of San Diego county. > I suspect what you are describing is the "IFB", for interruptable feed back signal, which is used by most of the stations to allow their remote personnel not only hear what is going on the air, but to get instructions from the station, such as the cues you noted. Glad to hear KFI's freq., do you have any others of LA stations, especially the TV and news radio stations? >Mr.News >(Distant cousin to Mr.KFI) > Mr. Listener, significant fan of KFI From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:35 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 17 Feb 1996 10:56:16 GMT Message-ID: <4g4c8g$npd@emerald.oz.net> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> <311BD5F4.1ABF@is.arco.com> Steve says..... >450.7250 is the STL (Studio to transmitter Link) frequency for KFI. Not Quite.... The 450.725 is *NOT* an STL. 450.725 is a "cueing" frequency,it is used for cues only. The STL freqs are in the 950mhz range and are very directional(point to point). 450.725 is an omni signal and if it was used for STL then you would hear all the producers and board-ops over 640-AM. This is not to say that 450mhz is not used for STL's in some cases...but not in this case. The KFI STL freqs are listed on the "Percon" website. Take care! Mr.News, (Who has a few friends in the KFI News Department) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:36 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF??? Date: 17 Feb 1996 23:40:36 GMT Message-ID: <4g5p1k$ob3@emerald.oz.net> References: <1996Feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4fmt29$f44@emerald.oz.net> >> You are hearing the "real time"program audio feed *before* it goes thru >>the delay system that folks hear on 640-AM. It can be pretty funny to >>listen to as you can hear all the bad words and wild callers before they >>get "dumped" by the host with the delay system. You will also hear board >>ops and producers "override" the channel to give time cues to talent in >>the field. The coverage of 450.725 includes LA/Orange/Riverside/San >>berdo/Ventura and the coastal portions of San Diego county. >> >I suspect what you are describing is the "IFB", for interruptable feed >back signal, which is used by most of the stations to allow their remote >personnel not only hear what is going on the air, but to get instructions >from the station, such as the cues you noted. I was describing IFB,but IFB is more of a television term( I work in TV)and I really have never heard radio folks(I used to work in radio) call it IFB. I shyed away from usuing the term IFB since the post was related to radio. Glad to hear KFI's freq., >do you have any others of LA stations, especially the TV and news radio >stations? > Mr. Listener Sure...the last time I was in L.A.(during Christmas) I noted the following IFB frequencys.... KABC TV 450.225 KNBC TV 450.5625 KCBS-TV 450.6125 KCAL-TV SCA on TV-9 KGTV San Diego 450.600 Mr.News, Loyal Minion to Mr.KFI From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:37 1996 From: corbin@physics.ucla.edu (Brent Corbin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF???(KFI L.A.) Date: 16 Feb 1996 19:41:17 GMT Message-ID: <4g2mkt$1f3o@saba.info.ucla.edu> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> <4fmtj1$f44@emerald.oz.net> At the risk of being the N'th person to provide a limited answer to what's going on vis-a-vis KFI on 450.xxx ... The 450.000-451.000 MHz range is allocated to broadcasters for Remote Broadcast Pickup - typically, these frequencies are used to coordinate live remote broadcasting (usually newsgathering, sometimes special events, sports,...) It's not all that uncommon to hear the broadcast audio retransmitted on one of these frequencies - particularly around 5pm or 6pm 8*) Typically this retransmission ultimately winds up in the earphone of the person actually doing the remote, multiplexed with cues from the studio like 'you're almost up' and 'ok, wrap it up...' (or my favorite - 'we're cutting you off in 5... 4... 3... 2...') It's been a few years since I last paid much attention to 450, but back then it seemed like about half the TV stations simulcast for the full duration of their newscasts, and the the others for the live-news segment +- 15 minutes (One station simulcast for the full newscast +- 1.5 hrs)... KFI is doing something wierd. They're not simulcasting on a sporadic basis, but rather full time. At first glance, I'm tempted to suspect they're using a 450 transmitter like a Studio-Transmitter-Link (STL), but STL's are supposed to live up around 950MHz (I'm not sure that 'permanent' STL's are allowed in 450MHz). I don't listen to KFI, but they don't strike me as a station that does a lot of live-remotes (at least not in the sense of requiring a permanent bc simulcast). Maybe some of their segments are coming from remote studios, and this provides a feedback loop for those sites? Or perhaps they're just taking advantage of their 450 allocation to appeal to the techy types 8*( There was a station on the east coast that got popped years ago for doing essentially just that... At any rate - I hope this helps... //Brent From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:38 1996 From: Henry Wysmulek Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Amplifiable anttena! Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 19:15:43 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4fp164$8e6@kirin.wwa.com> CHECKOUT MAGAZINES LIKE POPULAR COMMUNICATIONS AND ANY OF THE AMETEUR RADIO MAGAZINES AND YOU WILL FIND PLENTY OF ADS FOR AMPLIFIERS THAT GO BETWEEN YOUR ANTENNA AND RECEIVER. H. WYSMULEK xhp195@freenet.mb.ca BLUE SKY FREENET From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:39 1996 From: chris22@wwa.com (Maint) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Amplifiable anttena! Date: 13 Feb 1996 03:38:43 GMT Message-ID: <4fp143$5kd@kirin.wwa.com> Is there a amplifiable anttena I could use for my scanner. I live on the second floor of a concret and steel star shaped building and happen to be in the center of the star! please e-mail if you don't mind From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:40 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Annoying beep from Pro-2026 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 02:11:28 Message-ID: References: <4eho0b$81t@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4g020r$ffp@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> In article <4g020r$ffp@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. G lass) writes: >From: glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) >Subject: Re: Annoying beep from Pro-2026 >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 19:34:03 GMT >Just curious, would these mods work on a Pro-51? The beep on that one >is pretty annoying too. >C.Glass> You would need to look at a service manual to determine if this is possible on a Pro-51. All scanners are different! Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:41 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: Kakuk Michael James Subject: antenna Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 22:24:41 GMT Hello, i am new to this scanner hobby, I have an older (6 years old) radioshack 20 channel scanner. The only thing i use it for now is once in a blue moon i listen cordless phones. The antenna i use is the one that came with the scanner, but i have some sort of converter that i can use. Can someone help me out on making a better antenna for my scanner? I know you can buy them, but are they easy to make yourself? Please help me out and tell me where to find some info on making it. Thanks, kakuk@server.uwindsor.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:42 1996 From: spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu (Steven C Passmore) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: antenna length @ 161MHz ? Date: 13 Feb 1996 02:16:47 -0800 Message-ID: <4fpoef$loq@cello.gina.calstate.edu> What length shouls I cut my antenna for optimized coverage around 161MHz? The documentation that came with the antenna says to cut it to 16" but to my calculations a 1/4 wave antenna at 161MHz should be 18.34" I only have 29" to work with. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve Passmore spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:43 1996 From: MITCH_CURLY@msn.com (Mitchell Bogh) Subject: RE: antenna length @ 161MHz ? Date: 19 Feb 96 07:02:33 -0800 References: <4fpoef$loq@cello.gina.calstate.edu> Message-ID: <00001ff6+000047ce@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Im quite sure that the formula for calculating the length of a quarter length antenna is 234/f where f is the frequency in megahertz. By my calculator 234/161 is 1.453ft this is approx 17.5 inches in length. It is quite possible that the length might have to be modified a small amount to include the mounting hardware above the connection of the coaxial cable. Hope this helps. Mabey you could borrow a antenna analyzer from some friendly ham operator. Mitch mitch_curly@msn.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:44 1996 From: TSJV87A@prodigy.com (Ernest Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Antenna Suggestions for Military Aircraft Band? Date: 18 Feb 1996 23:52:37 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4g8e45$1kli@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4fo8l3$369@linus.mitre.org> <4frgau$g94@newsbf02.news.aol.com> desense is caused by strong nearby transmitters. It will not be cured by using a broad-band antenna like a disk-cone. You need to move away from the strong transmitters or try to build or buy a filter to remove their strong signal from you receiver. An antenna that is tuned for the frequency you wish to listen might help depending on how strong the desensing signals are. Hams have the same problem on two meter moble on RT 270 in Maryland. There is a club that has developed filters for the specific problem frequencies. I think it might be caused by a strong UHF TV transmitter near RT 270. Email me If I hear more I will send you info. The problem is that the filters would have to be custom made for the interferring frequencies but maybe the design can be modified for your use. - ERNIE TSJV87A@prodigy.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:44 1996 From: forsberg@cts.com (Bruce W. Forsberg) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Anyboby have Grove FCC database for CA? Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:38:57 GMT Message-ID: <312978fc.111472@news2.cts.com> Does anybody have a copy of the Grove FCC database on CDROM ? I would like to get a printout of some frequencies. I don't know if the software can do this b ut I would like to get all of the frequencies within a 1 mile radius of a LAT/LON . If this can be done and you could email me the results I would really apprecia te it. We are trying to locate the source of some interference to our Amateur rad io repeater. The repeater is on Santiago Peak here is CA and the LAT/LON is: LAT: 33-42-41 LON: 117-33-08 Thanks, Bruce Forsberg WB6IZG From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:45 1996 From: slick@primenet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR-8000 Celluar Mod? Date: 14 Feb 1996 18:42:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4fu319$i2m@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> I am considering purchasing an AR-8000 and I was wondering if there is a mod to restore celluar to this unit? THANKS! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:46 1996 From: "David L. Bernstein" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR-8000 Celluar Mod? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 20:27:43 +0000 Message-ID: <3128DD3F.5D19@cmpedge.com> References: <4fu319$i2m@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> To: slick@primenet.com slick@primenet.com wrote: > > I am considering purchasing an AR-8000 and I was wondering if there is > a mod to restore celluar to this unit? > THANKS! It can be easily modified with the assistance of a computer control program such as AR80000 ToolKit (available on the www) or by cloning another person's scanner. You will need the computer interface for the former and the correct cloning cable for the latter. --- David From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: erics@eskimo.com (Yuppie Scum) Subject: AR800 : need manual Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:15:11 GMT I recently purcahsed a used scanner from Grove: an AOR AR800 (yes, that's eight-hundred). Unfortunately, it didn't come with a manual. Does anyone know where I could find a manual either on-line or for purchase? Also, the battery life on the unit seems to be very short. Any pointers to accessories for the AR800 (yes, that's eight-hundred) would be wonderful... --Eric -- # erics@eskimo.com ----------------------------------------- Eric Stenson # # "Underdeadline pressure for the next week. If you want something, it # # can wait. Unless it's blind screaming paroxysmally hedonistic" --Anon # From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:48 1996 From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 database program Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 20:10:46 -0600 Message-ID: <3123E7A6.9CE@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <311FE47D.61D@uky.campus.mci.net> <5ff_9602150900@castle.shore.net> Norman Beaulac wrote: > Hi Jim. I'm interested in this program....But I do not have AOL or Compuserv e > or Prodigy....The only contact is through a buletin board... Now!! I know yo u > left the address, but from a buletin board, > how do I access this program??? Your help would greatly be appreciated.... > Thanks, Norman I tried to email you but couldn't - try emailing me directly and we'll work something out. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:49 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Attn: Monroe Twp. Listeners Date: 17 Feb 1996 22:57:59 GMT Message-ID: <4g5mhn$inl@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG It would help if we had the state, or at least the country. A check of two atlases provided no clue. However, assuming it's in the USA, the reference to 500 and 508 MHz frequencies would appear to indicate the Philadelphia metro area. The range covered by TV channels 14-20 (470-512 MHz) is available in certain large metro areas, and Philly has Ch 19 & 20 allocations. In the UHF-TV shared band, mobiles are 3 MHz above the base, so for the frequencies mentioned: Base - 500.4375 Mobile - 503.4375 508.4625 511.4625 (511.4265 was probably a typo) 508.4875 511.4875 The 508 MHz freqs. are drawn from the General Access Pool, so the best place to look for additional channels is 506.3125 - 508.9875 MHz. Since assignments are usually made in asscending order, at 25 kHz steps, check 508.4125, .4375, .5125, .5375, etc. In particular, it would appear that 500.4375 may have been a typo for 508.4375. /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:50 1996 From: Tim Glen <76423.540@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: phl.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Attn: Monroe Twp. Listeners Date: 18 Feb 1996 18:17:18 GMT Message-ID: <4g7qfe$buk$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> References: <4g3nvm$8n@spartacus.hula.net> Monroe Twp, NJ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:51 1996 From: Mike Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,phl.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Attn: Monroe Twp. Listeners Date: Mon, 19 Feb 96 20:33:13 PDT Message-ID: References: <4g0mtl$o9$1@mhafc.production.compuserve.com> WHICH MONROE TWP ARE YOU ASKING ABOUT? I'M IN MONROE TWP, MI AND NO OF AT LEAST 5 OTHERS IN U.S. IT'S A BIG WORLD OUT THERE PERHAPS BEING MORE SPECIFIC WILL BRING BETTER RESULTS. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:52 1996 From: Tim Glen <76423.540@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: phl.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Attn: Monroe Twp. Listeners Date: 16 Feb 1996 01:33:41 GMT Message-ID: <4g0mtl$o9$1@mhafc.production.compuserve.com> Is there any scanner listeners that know what the freq. is for Monroe Twp. Channel 36 ??? Here are the ones I know of already that are not it. 508.4625 Channel 1 508.4875 Tac 2 511.4265 I have never heard anything on this. 511.4875 I have never heard anything on this. 155.8650 I have never heard anything on this. 500.4375>> I have heard some talk but it has been staticy, These 503.4375>> are also used by Evesham Twp which is not too far away >> and may be interfering. PLEASE HELP!!!! 76423.540@compuserve.com dizzy18524@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:53 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: Steve Giron Subject: Re: AUTO RACING FREQUENCIES Message-ID: <312A56BF.ABD@is.arco.com> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> <4fm9vr$nmv@kdcol.kdcol.com> <4g27j2$9fn@cloner3.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:18:23 GMT ROSS LANE wrote: > > Saint Petersburg, Fl will sponsor a SCCA Pro-Series Trans-Am > Championship Race on 2/23-25/96 through the downtown streets of the > city. Does anyone out there have any frequencies associated with this > race series? Some of the drivers listed in the promotional material > are Greg Pickett, Paul Gentilozzi and Ron Fellows. Any help woud be > most welcome. Contact 1-800-RACE-FAN. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:54 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: kevinb@indra.com (Kevin Brose) Subject: BC 2500 for sale Message-ID: Reply-To: kevinb@indra.com Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 18:07:39 GMT Greetings scanner fans. I have a Uniden Bearcat 2500 XLT scanner for sale. The unit is unmodified and includes extra battery pack and service manual. I have had the unit for two years now and it has worked perfectly. The scanner is like new and includes original box and packaging. $175 takes all. E-mail me at kevinb@indra.com - Kevin From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:54 1996 From: PCHH73B@prodigy.com (John Oliver) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC145XL Help Date: 15 Feb 1996 01:01:22 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fu0l2$2ak2@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> I need help, I just recently recieved a Bearcat BC145XL and I want to know what I can do with it. I listen to fire and police, but I want to listen to cell phones and cordless phones. What do i have to do to listen to these frquencies and I would also like to know what a mod is. I hope someone out there can help and if you can, can you tell me how much it is worth. Thanks, JOHN OLIVER PCHH73B@prodigy.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:58 1996 From: sunjen@azstarnet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC220XLT MODS? Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:06:16 GMT Message-ID: <4gb369$6mp@news.azstarnet.com> Anyone know of any BC220 XLT mods? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanx email sunjen@azstarnet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:59 1996 From: wobig@umich.edu (Roger W. Wobig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC2500XLT FOR SALE Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:38:20 GMT Message-ID: <4g66vd$ctn@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu> I have a bc-2500xlt for sale. The unit is 10 months old and in excellent condition, not a scratch on it. Everything's in the origional box (charger, antenna, battery, and manual) just as I received it. $225.00 or best offer. Please e-mail me at: rwobig@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:13:59 1996 From: wobig@umich.edu (Roger W. Wobig) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC2500XLT FOR SALE Date: 19 Feb 1996 10:29:11 GMT Message-ID: <4g9jdn$dck@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu> I have a bc-2500xlt for sale. The unit is only 10 months old and in excellent condition, not a scratch on it. It's in it's origional box with everything it came with (carrying case, charger, battery pack, and antenna). $225.00 or best offer. please e-mail me at: rwobig@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:00 1996 From: jgedmond@hic.net (James G. Edmondson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: BC9000XLT Memory Retention Time Date: 18 Feb 1996 16:08:08 GMT Message-ID: <4g7it8$atl@news.hic.net> Does anybody know how long the 9000 will retain memory information when disconnected from a power source? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:01 1996 From: Nole_Fan@ix.netcom.com (Scott) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BCT7 mods wanted Date: 17 Feb 1996 17:03:10 GMT Message-ID: <4g51oe$m9f@reader2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4fobji$28qq@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> <4fs01h$1te@chile.it.earthlink.net> In article <4fs01h$1te@chile.it.earthlink.net>, jimfelix@earthlink.net says... > >Steve, I'm looking for the same thing...just started looking today...if I >find anything I'll let you know...hope you'll do the same for me...tnx, >jim > We might as well start a club! I equally am interested in any MODs for my BCT7. Hopefully, enough of us are interested to spark something for our scanners. Scott in Omaha From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:02 1996 From: lancecr@msn.com (Lance Craig) Subject: Best sub $200 handheld scanner? Date: 18 Feb 96 07:33:42 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+0000477d@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner I'm looking to spend less than $200 on a handheld and I'd like oppinions on what to buy. I'll be using it to listen to police, fast food, security, cordless, etc... I wouldn't mind full 800MHz coverage, but I don't expect I'll get that for less than $200. I would consider non-US versions for full 800MHz. I would like it to be small enough to be easily carried around in a pocket (without looking like you've got a thermos in your pants.) I've considered a Bearcat SC150 - is there a non-US version of this unit? Should I consider a Radion Shack unit? Thanks for comments Lance From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:03 1996 From: Joe Goldsberry Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best sub $200 handheld scanner? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 20:17:15 -0800 Message-ID: <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net> References: <00001ff6+0000477d@msn.com> I've found the Radio Shack PRO-46 to be a good scanner for under $200.00, and it has 900 mhz. The only problems I've had is the display is hard to see, and it's too easy to accidently push a button (and lock out a bank of channels) when putting the scanner in your pocket. Joe, Freelance News Photog From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:03 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best sub $200 handheld scanner? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:31:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <00001ff6+0000477d@msn.com> <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net> In article <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net>, Joe Goldsberry wrote: > I've found the Radio Shack PRO-46 to be a good scanner for under $200.00, > and it has 900 mhz. The only problems I've had is the display is hard to > see, and it's too easy to accidently push a button (and lock out a bank > of channels) when putting the scanner in your pocket. > > Joe, > Freelance News Photog I don't know if Danmark is still selling refurb-ed BC200XLTs but that's a good choice for under $200 ($179, the last time I checked). -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:04 1996 From: Denny Alford Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Best VOX circuit "add-on" ? Date: 18 Feb 1996 01:25:58 GMT Message-ID: <4g5v76$t01@ns.campus.mci.net> I need recommendations for a good VOX circuit to be used as an add-on device. Any replies appreciated. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:05 1996 From: Roland S Geter PhD Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.noncomm,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: Broadcasting Radio Station Database for you...... Date: 17 Feb 1996 07:47:44 GMT Message-ID: <4g4170$hl2@news1.goodnet.com> References: <4fme8u$bsf@news.flinet.com> To: chuck@mail.flinet.com Hi Chuck, Let's try to get the database over here on this provider, OK? Thanks Roland S Geter PhD roland@mycronet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:06 1996 From: michaell@crl.com Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 20:44:41 GMT Message-ID: <4g5el0$b84@nntp.crl.com> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> Its kind of expensive, but C. Crane company in Fortuna, California sells a machine called talk radio recorder. Uses standard 90 minute cassete to record 3 hours. Has a built in radio and mic. Runs on ac or internal batteries and you can even even get an adapter to play through you car tape player. Hope this helps. Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:08 1996 From: patriot@wwa.com Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: Sat, 17 Feb 96 06:40:42 GMT Message-ID: <4g6ip5$kt1@kirin.wwa.com> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> <4g5el0$b84@nntp.crl.com> In article <4g5el0$b84@nntp.crl.com>, michaell@crl.com wrote: >Its kind of expensive, but C. Crane company in Fortuna, California >sells a machine called talk radio recorder. Uses standard 90 minute >cassete to record 3 hours. Has a built in radio and mic. Runs on ac or >internal batteries and you can even even get an adapter to play >through you car tape player. Hope this helps. > >Mike > i believe alot of portable tape recorders do have spped settings on them...i had a micro cassette recorder with a 1/2 speed on it and it wasnt very expensive either... 1¾ |It's under construction... | |Information Is Power ! | From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:09 1996 From: brueger@norfolk.infi.net (Brian J. Rueger) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 16:46:11 GMT Message-ID: <312605c2.1685099@allnews.infi.net> References: <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> <4g4vec$sj8@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: brueger@norfolk.infi.net ecomer7@aol.com (EComer7) pounded on the keyboard and wrote: >It is my understanding that a tape (cassette) longer than 120 minutes >would be so thin that it would be subject to breakage. >The VCR idea sounds like the cheapest and easiest way to go. >Good Luck, >Ellison Ellison, et al., I guess that I should jump back in here and thank everyone for their replies concerning my original post. I probably messed up by not stating my main purpose for wanting a tape with a capacity greater than 120 minutes. My main reason was portability and it would be kinda tough totting a VCR around the house or while jogging/walking. Cheers Brian -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brian J. Rueger | Hampton Div. of Fire & Rescue | "Who dares wins" Paramedic/Firefighter | Medic-7 (Advanced Life Support) | Hampton, Virgini a B.S. Comm/I/SEL Pilot | MSgt, USAF (Ret.) 49199 | NREMT-P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:10 1996 From: ecomer7@aol.com (EComer7) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: 17 Feb 1996 11:23:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4g4vec$sj8@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> Reply-To: ecomer7@aol.com (EComer7) It is my understanding that a tape (cassette) longer than 120 minutes would be so thin that it would be subject to breakage. The VCR idea sounds like the cheapest and easiest way to go. Good Luck, Ellison From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:11 1996 From: edm@pixie.co.za (Deon Maree) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc,sci.electronics.repair,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Greater then 120 min Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:04:22 GMT Message-ID: <4gd5u9$5pu@hawk.pix.za> References: <310cf4cb.5277853@allnews.infi.net> <4f0orm$l6e@news2.deltanet.com> <4f4mlt$orf@news.kth.se> <4f73e5$mbh@fieldday.mn.org> sewilco@fieldday.mn.org (Scot E. Wilcoxon) wrote: >Try a pawn shop or used electronics store, as what you want is a used VCR. >That will give you 6 to 8 hours of audio. >-- >Scot E. Wilcoxon sewilco@fieldday.mn.org > Laws are society's common sense, written down for the stupid. > The stupid refuse to read. Their lawyers read to them. I know that you can get modified audio tape recorders ( speed slowed down a certain percentage) from places that deal in bugging equipment-( "Spy Shop's"). These units can record up to 3-4 hours (with some loss of sound quality). They are used for phone bugging recordings. Try http://www.tscm.com for info. Alternatively we made our own unit by taking a standard piano type portable recorder, opening up the little plate that covers the motor and modified the feedback resistor value on the electronic speed-control circuit. This resistor normally is in series with the speed adjustment pot (assuming a standard motor with electronic speed control). We also found that adding a 1n400x series diode between the regulator and motor terminal ( in-line with say the +ve terminal ) reduces the speed without loss of start-up torque.( You can also try and fit more than one diode in series without modification to the regulator circuit. In our application we needed adjustable speed from standstill to full speed) Regards Deon Electronic Designs & Measurement edm@pixie.co.za From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:12 1996 From: sgrgasov@jagor.srce.hr (Sasa Grgasovic) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CB's(I know) being modified by out-of-range crystals? Date: 20 Feb 1996 10:31:35 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gc7u7$obe@bagan.srce.hr> References: <4frlcq$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <4fs0jc$njd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> XTrenched (xtrenched@aol.com) wrote: : I got really bored one day and began to think. Back when I was playing : with CB's, I had to put in crystals for each channel. It finally clicked : then that the crystal rating in Mhz was the same frequency the CB : broadcast on(I'm almost positive) : Now, obviously, it won't be efficient, but shouldn't you be able to get : a say 832.xx crystal and plug it into the tx side to be able to talk on : cell phone frequencies? : This is, of course, only a quest for curiousity and I in know way want to : do anything illegal...I guess Hehe... I hope this is not some kind of a joke. No u can't. The biggest difference normal CB can tolerate is some -+0.6mhz. ~800 mhz is just too much for it, but U can modify some commercial radios (Motorola or such a stuff) and actually talk with others using cell phones. It works for ATF2 (~400 mhz). But of course that's illegal and U wouldn't do such a things? Or U would? :-). -- --Maniac ContactInfo--------------------------------------------- mail :sgrgasov@jagor.srce.hr URL: http://jagor.srce.hr/~sgrgasov phone:098/200-001 IRC:sysop radio:3.6666mhz USB, 27.025mhz AM 001/345-XXX 169.000mhz FM +4.5 CTCSS: 141.3 -----------------------------------=GENOCIDE technologies=------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:13 1996 From: grant@epix.net (anonymous) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cellular Frequencies??? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 05:50:21 GMT Message-ID: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> I suspect this is naughty, but since I just purchased a 2006 w/cellular restored, my inquiring mind wants to know where I can obtain cellular frequencies so I can try it out. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:14 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Date: 21 Feb 1996 07:17:47 GMT Message-ID: <4gegus$34u@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG From the FAF - Frequently Asked Frequencies on ftp://oak.oakland.edu as /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/scanner.faf Cellular Telephone [22.902] Chs Freqs (base) System Use 800-832 869.040 - 870.000 A - RCC voice 1-312 870.030 - 879.360 A - RCC voice 313-333 879.390 - 879.990 A - RCC data 334-354 880.020 - 880.620 B - Telco data 355-666 880.650 - 889.980 B - Telco voice 667-716 890.010 - 891.480 A - RCC voice 717-799 891.510 - 893.970 B - Telco voice Mobiles transmit 45 MHz below the base (824.040-848.970) and are usually repeated by the base. Channels are 30 kHz apart. Channels 800-832 are also identified as Chs 991-1023. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:15 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 06:40:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4em4jv$2f0@crl6.crl.com> <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozema In article , asi@escape.ca wrote: > People have to start looking at where messages come from. Freq's are not > standard all over the world! The person who entered the message was in > Austrailia where freq's for cordless phones are in that range. > > Peace from Canada, where cordless is in the 46mhz range. And 75 and 900 bla h > blah blah. Ouch! You're absolutely correct. I've been trying to cure that American myopia that I was born with for years. I'll try harder. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:16 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: clifto@indep1.chi.il.us (Clifton T. Sharp) Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Message-ID: References: <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozema Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:04:27 GMT In article asi@escape.ca writes: >Peace from Canada, where cordless is in the 46mhz range. And 75 and 900 blah >blah blah. Where around 75? I have a friend (here in the Chicago area) who I've been calling crazy because he claims his phone is there and NOT around forty-mmmmph megaHertz. Maybe he got a Canadian model somehow. -- Cliff Sharp There are days when no matter which WA9PDM way you spit, it's upwind. clifto@indep1.chi.il.us --The First Law of Reality From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:17 1996 From: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Data Skip on BC3000XLT? Date: 19 Feb 1996 23:06:38 GMT Message-ID: <4gavpu$c5d@news.fullerton.edu> Reply-To: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Will the data skip feature on the BC 3000XLT skip over pager interference and/or control signals in trunked systems? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:18 1996 From: Scott Ryan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Daytona Freqs. Date: 15 Feb 1996 20:15:51 GMT Message-ID: <4g049n$gqd@nw002.infi.net> Anyone have the latest Nascar frequencies for Daytona? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:19 1996 From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Diamond D130J discone antenna Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 16:09:29 -0600 Message-ID: <31265219.17C4@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <4g4uab$m4g@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com> To: Richard Headley Richard Headley wrote: > > I live in nyc and I would like to know if there are any radio outlets > where i can buy the Diamond D130J discone antenna. If not where can I > order it. Try the Ham Station, Evansville Indiana (800)729-4373 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:20 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Drugged Driving (Was Larsen Antenna) Date: 17 Feb 1996 10:43:05 GMT Message-ID: <4g4bfp$npd@emerald.oz.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4eqdpa$1obm@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4f928p$vgd@news.microsoft.com> <4faevk$26l8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fehk1$m94@dfw.dfw.net> <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4fscj6$dql@emerald.oz.net> <4fummf$37c@kaleka.seanet.com> In article <4fummf$37c@kaleka.seanet.com>, anthonyr@seanet.com says.. >>In article <4fhbmo$l0o@odo.PEAK.ORG>, billn@PEAK.ORG asks Mr News to... >> >>>Please provide some documentation for this claim. > >[ Anecdotes nowhere resembling "documentation" deleted ] Just what do you want Anthony...the copies of the videotape or how about the court transcripts. I would be happy to provide those to you for a fee. >>Before you post statements like this I would suggest you talk to your >>local State Trooper/Highway Patrol Officer/E.M.S. professional or an >>Emergency Room Doctor...If they can't cite many cases of "drugged >>drivers" then ask a local TV or Newspaper Photographer. > >Sure. Let's asked someone really unbiased without an axe to grind >while we're at it, too. Is this your "Flame"? Where was the bias??? I posted *DOCUMENTED FACT* ie:"the use of documentary evidence" are court transcripts a document? Is a videotape a document? Is a hard copy of my posted article a document? Yes to all! I suggest you return to "Flame School" and try again when you have a better idea on how to flame me properly! I will be here waiting. Mr.News, News Documentarian(go look it up!) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:21 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: source@netcom.com (David Harmon) Subject: Re: Drugged Driving (Was Larsen Antenna) Message-ID: References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4fscj6$dql@emerald.oz.net> <4fummf$37c@kaleka.seanet.com> <4g4bfp$npd@emerald.oz.net> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 20:20:43 GMT In article <4g4bfp$npd@emerald.oz.net>, Mr.News wrote: > >Where was the bias??? I posted *DOCUMENTED FACT* ie:"the use of >documentary evidence" are court transcripts a document? Is a videotape a >document? Is a hard copy of my posted article a document? The remark in question was, "drugged drivers cause as many accidents if not more than drunk drivers." The evidence cited to support this claim was partial mention (i.e. no exact Who What When Where Why) of four (4) incidents, and NO references to any specific sources of the info. Assuming that this is the best you can do, you have DISproved your thesis, since there are lots more than four accidents caused by drunks over the same time span. Documentary evidence for a claim like this would probably consist of - The total number of accidents caused by drugged drivers in a particular time frame, with either a detailed description of how you did the original research to determine this OR a bibliographic citation to the published source you quoted from. - The number of accidents due to drunks in the same period, with the same kind of support. - Subtract the first number from the second. No number of annecdotes that you can post in a newsgroup are going to have any relevance to the relative rate of occurance of the two kinds of accidents. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:22 1996 From: lancecr@msn.com (Lance Craig) Subject: Re: DTMF Date: 18 Feb 96 07:19:22 -0800 References: <4fm0ts$had@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fqh0c$ri1@service2.uky.edu> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004778@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner This page has a link to a Sound Blaster DTMF decoder. I've downloaded it but haven't tried it yet: http://www.zianet.com/files/users/kc5kto/scanner.html Good luck Lance From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:23 1996 From: zargon1011@aol.com (ZARGON1011) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF Decoding Date: 14 Feb 1996 22:15:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4fu8h1$ftb@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: zargon1011@aol.com (ZARGON1011) I'm looking for a windows program that can decode DTMF tones when input through my sound card. Anything out there? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:24 1996 From: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF Program/Schematics Date: 18 Feb 1996 02:20:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4g6jv9$jfd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Hello everyone, I have a DTMF program and the associated schematic free to anyone interested. The hardware is a simple two chip circuit which connects into your existing Parallel port, the port where the printer is connected. The schematics are in a GIF format so you need a GIF viewer. If you want it, e-mail me at PDRUNEN@AOL.COM and I will send it via the Internet! Paul From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:25 1996 From: jrpitts@ix.netcom.com (J.R. Pitts) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Evangelism (was "Re: Frewquency Ban?" Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 06:30:04 GMT Message-ID: <4g6h2t$h8h@cloner3.netcom.com> References: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> >> "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." >> Romans 10:13 >####################################### >I think religious freedom ought to be akin to a "non-smoking" area. If >we're not into it, WHY *must* we find it in the rec.radio.scanner >newsgroup? It's a .sig; not the end of the world. Geez, get a grip. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:26 1996 From: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Evangelism (was "Re: Frewquency Ban?" Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:21:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) wrote : > ICOM has eliminated the entire 800 mhz range on their receivers. > > "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." > Romans 10:13 ####################################### I think religious freedom ought to be akin to a "non-smoking" area. If we're not into it, WHY *must* we find it in the rec.radio.scanner newsgroup? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:27 1996 From: fwhitehurst@ezdial.com (David Whitehurst) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Evangelism (was "Re: Frewquency Ban?" Date: 18 Feb 1996 22:33:22 GMT Message-ID: <4g89fi$d6u@news.cais.com> References: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article , norelco@shadow.net says... > >In article <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) wrote: > >I think religious freedom ought to be akin to a "non-smoking" area. If >we're not into it, WHY *must* we find it in the rec.radio.scanner >newsgroup? I think this was a .sig (signature) .... :) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:27 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: F1 racing team video Date: 18 Feb 1996 05:18:54 GMT Message-ID: <4g6cru$qd0@emerald.oz.net> References: <4g64p7$71t@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> In article <4g64p7$71t@oznet03.ozemail.com.au>, why@do.you.ask? says... > >Does anyone know the frequincies used by the on-board >cameras used by the racing teams? I'm sure this is >country specific, as the equiptment would be supplied and >installed by the appropriate TV station responsible for >the race coverage, but if anyone knows the usual band >for these, and other portable RF video links (EG at other >sporting events like golf etc) I would like some hints. Unless you have a reciever *and* are in-line with the signal you will be pretty much out of luck. I don't have the specific freqs handy but look around... 2ghz Portable ENG,newsvans and helos 7 channels 6 and 7 ghz fixed links/old newsvans 13 ghz short hop fixed links/"shoebox" portables 28 ghz fixed link/short hops There are a few more areas,but these are the most common. Mr.News (News Photographer/Live Truck Operator) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:28 1996 From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: F1 racing team video Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:00:55 GMT Message-ID: <4g64p7$71t@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> Does anyone know the frequincies used by the on-board cameras used by the racing teams? I'm sure this is country specific, as the equiptment would be supplied and installed by the appropriate TV station responsible for the race coverage, but if anyone knows the usual band for these, and other portable RF video links (EG at other sporting events like golf etc) I would like some hints. Thanks. TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:29 1996 From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Fastfood Repeaters??? Date: 17 Feb 1996 13:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4g57l4$2bi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4g39ol$dtv@news1.inlink.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Is there a Web or FTP site where I can download that chart of fast food frequencies? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:30 1996 From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Fastfood Repeaters??? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 11:52:06 -0500 Message-ID: <31275936.7918@internetMCI.COM> References: <4g39ol$dtv@news1.inlink.com> <4g57l4$2bi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> To: Ukfan1a Ukfan1a wrote: > > Is there a Web or FTP site where I can download that chart of fast food > frequencies? Check out the following URL's: http://www.li.net/~j4dice/scanning_info/fastfood.html http://www.SineWave.com/chelsea/fast.html http://www2.cy-net.net:80/users/kg5ai/freqs/fastfood.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:31 1996 From: JRM Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: FDNY Box Program for Windows Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:53:41 GMT Message-ID: <4gbk4l$252q@news.gate.net> For any FDNY radio listeners out there, I highly recommend for enjoyment the purchase of the FDNY Box Program. The Windows Program allows you to select a boro and enter in the box number which will provide you with the cross streets and any additonal info. ** Example ** Queens Box: 0269 Crash Box JFK International Airport ** Automatic 2nd Alarm ** The program will also allow you to enter to search strings in searching for boxes which can be searched either by one boro at a time or all boros. The program runs $20.00 and has a 10-Code list built in. I am not the one selling it, but just an avid listener recommending it. Send a check made payable to Lewis Kopp to: FDNY BOX PROGRAM PO BOX 650434 Fresh Meadows, NY 11365 He has a swareware version available for downloading on AOL. I downloaded and used it and have ordered the actual version. If you have any other questions regarding it, I would be happy to answer them. Lewis Kopp can be reached by E-mail at lkopp@pipeline.com or LKopp@aol.com. "10-75" JRM From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:32 1996 From: j_mohler@wmc34c.wmc.edu (Jason) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Freq for Dillon, MT Date: 21 Feb 1996 11:54:49 GMT Message-ID: <4gf169$1ec@umt.umt.edu> Reply-To: j_mohler@wmc34c.wmc.edu Hi, I'm looking for a list of frequencies for the Dillon/Beaverhead County Montana area. e-mail responses would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jason Mohler +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason Mohler j_mohler@wmc34b.wmc.edu | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | The writing on the wall is a mirror to our soul. | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:33 1996 From: Don L Barker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: frequencies used by local law inforcement Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 00:48:08 -0800 Message-ID: <31259648.6136@ix.netcom.com> I have been given a programmable scanner and want to communicate with someone in Santa Cruz California to determine which channels to monitor for maximun interest, x loaner @ IX.NETCOM.COM. THANKS.. DON From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:34 1996 From: rweber95@ix.netcom.com(Robert Weber) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: 15 Feb 1996 18:16:33 GMT Message-ID: <4fvta1$kh2@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> In <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> eyager@novagate.com (Eric) writes: > >I would like to know how to descramble signals that have been through >frequency inversion. The signal in question sound like a ssb signal >with the reciever on the wrong sideband. In other words, the low >frequencies are high, and the highs frequencies are low. I know that >there are circuits available to undo this in kit form, but all I need >is a schematic of the circuit. Can anyone help? > >-- Eric > >Eric Yagerlener >eyager@novagate.com > I know of 3 sources for audio scrambler/descramblers. 1. The Fall 1994 issue of Electronics Hobbyists handbook (put out by Popular Electronics)has a construction article on building an analog version using op-amps and National Semiconductors balanced mod.demod. ICs. A kit of parts is available from Weeder Technologies, P.O.Box 421, Batavia, OH 45103 for $29.00 and the pcb for an additional $14.00. Or get it fully assembled for $69.00 plus $3.50 S&H. 2. The December 1993 issue of Electronics NOW has a construction article on building a digital version. A kit of parts is available from North Country Radio, P.O.Box 53, Wykagyl Station, New Rochelle, NY 10804 for $59.00 plus $3.50 S&H. 3. Ramsey Electronics (1-800-446-2295) has model SS-70A Speech Descrambler/Scrambler as a kit for $39.95 plus $14.95 for a case. Or fully assembled for $79.95 plus $4.50 S&H. Bob..... From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:36 1996 From: eyager@novagate.com (Eric) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 02:09:54 GMT Message-ID: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> I would like to know how to descramble signals that have been through frequency inversion. The signal in question sound like a ssb signal with the reciever on the wrong sideband. In other words, the low frequencies are high, and the highs frequencies are low. I know that there are circuits available to undo this in kit form, but all I need is a schematic of the circuit. Can anyone help? -- Eric Eric Yagerlener eyager@novagate.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:37 1996 From: hunter@microserve.net (hunter@microserve.net) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 00:16:24 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <312a63e9.52122067@news2.microserve.net> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> <4g0k46$8i1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: hunter@genx.microserve.com >I've had success in decoding Frequency Inversion Scrambled cordless phones >with my ICOM R7000 by going to the USB of the frequency and offsetting it >by 1.5 to 2.2 khz. This trick also works with my AOR1500, but using the >BFO. > >I also have a decoder that I purchased in 1982 (which was legal back them) >and it >really didn't perform any better than my trick of using USB on my ICOM I heard my police use it on one of there frequencys. It got me mad becuase its so easy to decode, but I do not have a decoder, so they actually got me. Does any one have an web address, 1-800 number for a catalog (or just to order it) or a frequency inversion system? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:38 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency's for Atlanta Date: 17 Feb 1996 18:11:53 GMT Message-ID: <4g55p9$i6g@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG A file of 980+ annotated Atlanta area frequencies is available at: ftp://oak.oakland.edu /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/ atlanta.freq or CompuServe HamNet Forum Lib 2 ATL-AR.ZIP /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:39 1996 From: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency's for Atlanta Date: 17 Feb 1996 04:51:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4g48eo$m6g@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4g3okh$mm@brickbat.mindspring.com> Reply-To: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) What in atlanta? malls police ems utility airport what freq are you looking for? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:40 1996 From: wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frewquency Ban? Date: 17 Feb 1996 06:35:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> ICOM has eliminated the entire 800 mhz range on their receivers. Warren Whitby wwhitby@aol.com - Home wwhitby@.bdm.com - Work Ham radio: KE4ITL "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Romans 10:13 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:40 1996 From: fresco@j51.com (Jonah Gruda) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frewquency Ban? Date: 15 Feb 1996 03:43:43 GMT Message-ID: <4fua5g$fhi@tzlink.j51.com> Could someone inform me on this issue! Someone told me that scanners that are now sold do not tune into cellular frequencies (800Mhz). They told me that there is a law banning the use of 800 Mhz on a scanner. I am getting a new one So could you tell me if the new one I will be getting shouldrecieve the cellular band? fresco@j51.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:41 1996 From: cloudy1@ix.netcom.com(chris pohlen ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS Pro 2006 and 2500XLT Date: 18 Feb 1996 11:06:11 GMT Message-ID: <4g7173$j4d@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> Best Offer both mint and cellular capable From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:42 1996 From: bruce@bumetb.bu.edu (Bruce Tis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS PRO 43 Date: 20 Feb 1996 14:19:47 GMT Message-ID: <4gcla3$812@news.bu.edu> I've got a pro43 in good condition (works perfectly, slight wear on a few white letters on on/off switchi). Has cellular mod ************ $250 *************** bruce tis, K1WVY work (617) 353-2566 home (617) 237-5981 bruce@bumetb.bu.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:43 1996 From: braymer@SunBelt.Net (Bobby Raymer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS Pro-2026 Scanner With full 800 mhz Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 02:38:55 GMT Message-ID: <4gbfoe$ljl@news1.sunbelt.net> for sale a Radio Shack Pro-2026 100 channel mobile scanner with the full 800mhz reveive mod done,Scanner works great receive the full 800mhz celluar phone and 800 band.With mobile mounting bracket and indoor antenna,this is a mobile scanners and requires a power supply for indoor use. $200.00 shipped email too braymer@sunbelt.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:44 1996 From: ajohnson@mail2.sas.upenn.edu (Allen E. Johnson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS RS 2006 Date: 15 Feb 1996 14:34:33 GMT Message-ID: <4fvg9p$fp5@netnews.upenn.edu> For Sale Radio Shack 2006 Mint condition Cell mod Manual $300 Will pay shipping Please e-mail response From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:45 1996 From: kgm6591@ucs.usl.edu (McCoy Kristoffer G) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: BC 855XLT FULL CELL Date: 20 Feb 1996 09:06:41 GMT Message-ID: <4gc2v1$35m@rouge.usl.edu> Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap Subject: FS: BC 855 XLT Summary: Followup-To: Distribution: Organization: Univ. of Southwestern La., Lafayette Keywords: Cc: BC 855XLT for sale......PERFECT CONDITION, has 100 channel mod., FULL CELL mod for those who want the reciever exactly how the manufacturer intened to sale it, telescoping anteanea (crappy one that comes with it and good Rat Shack one). Full time backlit display. For those of you who want aa FULL 800 MHZ scanner...... $200.00 (or best offer, ALWAYS Negotiable--I'm a starving college student) Kris kgm6591@ucs.usl.edu 318-662-5367 318-945-1407 (car phone) Reply by phone pref., but E-mail is perfectly fine (it is Mardi Gras down here so it might not be until 5:00 or 6:00 Tues. before I check mail...) Later all. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:45 1996 From: cu050@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David L. Bernard) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: AOR AR1000 Date: 17 Feb 1996 00:32:09 GMT Message-ID: <4g37m9$t8c@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: cu050@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David L. Bernard) This is a hand-held wide coverage receiver with 1000 memories. It comes with case, strap, box. It is a late model of the 1000 family, and has full cellular coverage. I just don't use it. I am open to suggestions as to a selling price, have no idea what they go for. I think I paid like $459 for it or something. THanks, Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Icom W21AT with full cellular!!! Message-ID: <1996Feb18.231532.114321@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> From: Dave Campbell Date: 18 Feb 96 23:15:32 CST Distribution: world For immedeate sale: - Icom W21AT Dual band handheld with 50-999MHz recieve - Two BP-157 battery pack with built-in whisper mike for full duplex - Wall charger - Manuals and schematics I used this radio only for Rx at home (nice for it's wide coverage), but I just got a new base scanner that does the same job with more 'scanning' features (more memories, but no cell...). I need to sell this radio to pay off the scanner bill that will be coming in the mail any day now. Everything is in like-new condition, no scratches or markings of any kind. I'd like $400 for the lot, but the best offer will get it. Also, to fastest offer will get it! Thanks, Dave +=======================================================================+ |Dave Campbell (913)832-0980 Home | |213 Woogate Place (913)681-6950 KC Home | |Lawrence, Kansas 66049 (913)681-6951 Fax | | Freelance Graphic artist for hire! (816)870-9673 Pager | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~campy <--<<< Go on, check it out! | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |"Bow down before the one you serve, GO | | you're going to get what you deserve" NIN HAWKS! | +=======================================================================+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:48 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ax756@lafn.org (Stan Lui) Subject: Re: FS: Pro-2006 Message-ID: <1996Feb15.212130.21459@lafn.org> Reply-To: ax756@lafn.org (Stan Lui) References: <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 21:21:30 GMT In a previous article, norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) says: >In article <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan >Gingras) wrote: > >> Pro-2006 with cell mod. Mint condition, and in the box. This is one of >> the best, yours for $300 firm. >============================================ > >Isn't that a little high even for mint condition? Durham has the Pro-2006 >BRAND SPANKING NEW with a ONE YEAR WARRANTY for $379.00! If ya wanna see >it, just check out the web page: > > http://durhamnet.com/durham/pro2006.html > Correct me if Im wrong but isnt Durham in Canada ? I know when I bought my AR8000 from javiation in England -- the warranty was void here. Isnt is so when purchasing a scanner from canada ? So if something went wrong with it during the warranty period ... then the scanner had to be returned to Durham for the warranty to be effective ? maybe Im wrong... anybody know the answer for sure ??? Whats wrong with 300 ? I just sold mine not too long ago for 300 .. it was RARELY USED rather only collected ALOT of dust.The rat shack telescopic was included in the deal. Priced from 250 to 300 for a 2006 seems then norm for now. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:49 1996 From: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: Pro-2006 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:26:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu> In article <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu>, herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) wrote: > Pro-2006 with cell mod. Mint condition, and in the box. This is one of > the best, yours for $300 firm. ============================================ Isn't that a little high even for mint condition? Durham has the Pro-2006 BRAND SPANKING NEW with a ONE YEAR WARRANTY for $379.00! If ya wanna see it, just check out the web page: http://durhamnet.com/durham/pro2006.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:50 1996 From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: Pro-2006 Date: 15 Feb 1996 13:55:47 GMT Message-ID: <4fve13$9tj@uwm.edu> References: <4fnqiq$i57@uwm.edu> Nathan Ryan Gingras (herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu) wrote: : Pro-2006 with cell mod. Mint condition, and in the box. This is one of : the best, yours for $300 firm. : THIS RADIO HAS BEEN SOLD. Nate, KB9LSX From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:51 1996 From: lmilrad@passport.ca (Lou Milrad) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Yupiteru MVT 8000 (price reduced) Date: 17 Feb 1996 12:29:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4g538s$3r1@diplomatic.passport.ca> Price is now $450.00 US plus shipping. The MVT 8000 is 200 channel ac/dc scanner with a mounting bracket for mobile use and comes with a cigarette lighter adapter although it can be hard wired. It covers 8 Mhz to 1300 Mhz (continuous without blockage) and receives in WFM, NFM and AM. Frequency steps are 5,10,12.5,50 and 100 Khz. It's got a 10 band search function, pass memory function, and other goodies found in high-end scanners. Lou Milrad VE3TRY lmilrad@passport.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:52 1996 From: Mike Obermeier Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Re: FT-8500 Need Mods Date: 15 Feb 1996 04:56:45 GMT Message-ID: <4fueef$hke@news.htp.com> References: <4fov69$l98@news.ios.com> To: rod@venus.hili.com The mod is easy. This will give you 137-174mhz and 410-470mhz Tx/Rx. 1. disconnect power and antenna (like, you would'nt of done it already.) 2. open up the case by removing the screws and gently removing the cover and unpluging the speaker. 3. locate and CUT the GREEN WIRE on the CONTROL BOARD ( the vertical board beh ind the control panel. 4. reassemble the radio. 5. RESET THE MICROPROCESSOR (so much for the memory!) (press and hold [D/M] & [REV] & [ENT] & turn the power on (got enough finge rs?). (turn off the radio). (press and hold [SCAN] & [HOME] & turn on the radio (extended RX mod). Tha, Tha, Tha, That's All Folks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:52 1996 From: David.de.Coons@151.magsystems.com (David de Coons) Date: 17 Feb 96 16:30:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Help w/ interference from Message-ID: <468_9602180045@magsystems.com> Tim Bono said, -> Hello Everybody, -> In my truck at work I have a Motorola MDT8100 terminal and a Bearcat -> 560xlt scanner about a foot apart, and whenever the terminal goes -> into screen saver mode the scanner locks up on vhf-low channels with -> heavy static. Does anyone have any ideas for shielding the scanner? -> I cant move them apart and I cant turn the terminal off. Contact the radio repair company that maintains the 8100, there is additional shielding that can be done to the MDT. Also it is important that they use a ferrite choke on the power cable to the MDT and ALL equipment be grounded/bonded to the vehicle chassis. This has taken care of some similar problems I've seen. David De Coons ddecoons@cris.com -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:53 1996 From: bobropes@smokey.prismnet.com (robert johnson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Help With Reception Date: 19 Feb 1996 02:18:58 GMT Message-ID: <4g8mmi$gke@ferengi.prismnet.com> I am getting good reception around the 5000-10000 frequency range. Above that i get ocassional reception at 11000-14000. But I NEVER GET ANYTHING above that range. I am using an eaves antenna. Is this normal or do i need to try different antennas to get reception at these other frequencies. thanks in advance for any replies. Bob J From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:54 1996 From: Chief Doug Hamer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: HELP WITH TONES ON 800 MHZ TRUNK SYSTEM Date: 21 Feb 1996 04:27:54 GMT Message-ID: <4ge70a$ak7@darwin.nbnet.nb.ca> An area 800 mhz trunk system has recently added a 1250 mhz tone of about 7 sec duration running every 30 seconds to attempt to thwart monitoring (or require them to medicate with prozac). The system is utilized by about 6 - 10 users including some public safety (pd, fd etc) on a fairly limited number of frequency, The changing os the data channel every 24 hours was not a big problem... this is ?? Any suggestions how to get around it . Monitoring myself on a Radio Shack 2006. Great Box !! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:55 1996 From: rweber95@ix.netcom.com(Robert Weber) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Help?....Need Descrambler Information Date: 15 Feb 1996 17:12:42 GMT Message-ID: <4fvpia$g0e@cloner4.netcom.com> References: <1996Feb12.172414.5099@pmafire.inel.gov> In <1996Feb12.172414.5099@pmafire.inel.gov> jeffl@pmafire.inel.gov (Jeff Later) writes: > >Hi: > >I need to know where to get a kit or assembled descrambler for >my Rad Shack scanner. I'm looking for a simple design that >just plugs into the audio output jack. I think that a simple >audio inversion descrambler will do the trick. Does anyone >know of a source?? PLEASE EMAIL! >Much Thanks! >(jeffl@servprod.inel.gov) > Ramsey Electronics (1-800-446-2295) makes the SS-70A speech descrambler/scrambler as a kit for $39.95, case $14.95. Or you can buy it assembled/tested for $79.95. I got one, it works fine. Bob...... From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:57 1996 From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Hot-dawg Tip for Scanner Hackers! Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 18:01:22 GMT Message-ID: <4gadrt$p04@news2.cts.com> Ye public notice! Know how in my books and other writings, I always recommend the old Radio Shack "LAN cable, 278-776" as the peak of perfection for hookup wire? Well it is! I don't know why RS called it "LAN Cable", but the stuff comes as 25-conductor, shielded cable. The thing is, the 25 color-coded wires make for the absolute best hookup wire you ever saw!! The individual wires are *super-flexible* and the insulation doesn't melt and drip like candle wax, when soldered like Radio Shack's standard offering of hookup wire. To retrieve the wires, you just slit the outer jacket a little; peel it off; slip off the braided shielding, and there you have 25 uniquely color-coded wires that are pure joy to work with! And high reliability, too! This 25-cond cable was in the stores for several years but has been discontinued for some time. Bummer! However, take heart and great cheer, because a fellow I know bought out a large stock and is offering it to hobbyists for $0.25/ft plus S&H. This fine cable used to cost $1.19/ft in the RS stores, so it is one helluva deal! Now a couple bucks worth will give the casual hobbyist more of the best quality hookup wire than can be had anywhere for much higher cost! This stuff is really THAT good and is optimum for hackers and casual hobbyists as well as pro's. You've got to try it to see what I mean! For more information, contact: Tom Peters Fax: 210-654-3009 Voice: 800-859-6004 (8am-5pm, CST) Mr. Peters acquired several hundred feet of this 278-776 cable and knows where to get an additional 1000-ft, if needed. I go through this stuff like water, but the casual hobbyist could get by for a long time with just 10-ft or less. Remember, there are 25 wires in the cable, so 25 x 10 = 250-ft. Mr. Peters' price comes to a penny per foot plus the shipping. This is one of those truly rare, but absolutely great deals in Life. Take advantage of it if you're a hacker or experimenter of any kind! Rgds, Bill +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:57 1996 From: mike Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Houston Metro Police Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 23:35:01 -0600 Message-ID: <31256905.766B@bayou.uh.edu> I have got the METRO POLICE FREQS for the Houston/harris county Area if anybody wants them. Will post if there is interest!!!!! MH From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:58 1996 From: hackman@dimensional.com (Hack Man) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 14:40:30 GMT Message-ID: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> References: jh14@cornell.edu (Jonathan Ho) wrote: >Hi! Forgive my ignorance, but I was concerned about the security on my >regular cordless phone and was told by someone that a 900mhz cordless >phone is not scanable. Is this true? Do any of you guys know if you can >pick-up conversations on a 900mhz cordless? Thanks for all your help! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:14:59 1996 From: bbones@t-online.de (NorthStar Gazer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:35:41 GMT Message-ID: <4gfhta$n39@ram2.ramlink.net> References: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> hackman@dimensional.com (Hack Man) wrote: >jh14@cornell.edu (Jonathan Ho) wrote: >>Hi! Forgive my ignorance, but I was concerned about the security on my >>regular cordless phone and was told by someone that a 900mhz cordless >>phone is not scanable. Is this true? Do any of you guys know if you can >>pick-up conversations on a 900mhz cordless? Thanks for all your help! Try Cincinnati Microwave's Escort series. All their 900Mhz phones are Spread Spectrum. To my knowledge, there aren't any descrambler kits out for those phones at all. I've owned my Escort for better than a year and haven't ever heard the first blip of my conversations on the 900Mhz + range. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:07 1996 From: parnass@att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.info Subject: How to Find Scanner Frequencies Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:13:15 GMT Message-ID: <4fvm2r$q54@ssbunews.ih.att.com> Keywords: FAQ food, microfiche, books, sleuthing last changed February 15, 1995 | Lines changed since the previous issue are marked with a | character in the right margin. HOW DO YOU FIND THESE SCANNER FREQUENCIES? by Bob Parnass, AJ9S [NOTE: This article may not be reproduced in whole or in part on CDROMS, in bulletin boards, networks, or publications which charge for service without permission of the author. Free distribution is encouraged.] I am often asked, "How do you find these frequencies?" Scanner enthusiasts can obtain frequency information from several sources, including books, government microfiche records, or other listeners. Books The most convenient source of fire and police frequencies is the Police Call, published each year in 9 regional volumes by Hollins Radio Data, and sold at Radio Shack and larger book stores for under $13. Police Call is basically a computer printout of FCC license information in the fire, police, local government, and conservation services in two lists: by licensee name within state, and by frequency. Later editions have included a few pages of local airport and nonsensitive federal government frequencies. The 1996 edition contains selected business frequencies, too, but callsigns are listed only for local government and public safety licensees. I highly recommend Richard Barnett's 1992 book, Monitor America, published by Scanner Master Corp. A 3rd edition is expected soon and will be available from Grove Enterprises for about $30. This second edition is crammed full of police, fire, local government, news media, sports, national park, and commercial broadcast frequencies for all 50 states. The information was compiled mainly from members of the world's largest scanning club, the Radio Communications Monitoring Association (RCMA). Monitor America contains detailed communications system profiles and precinct maps for major metropolitan areas. Police and fire radio codes and unit identifiers unique to local agencies are listed for several cities. This differs from Police Call, which gives a more sterile, but uniform treatment of licensees, listing even the smallest of towns. A 3rd edition is expected in early 1995. Scanner Master also publishes regional frequency guides for Illinois, Florida, Virginia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and other states. Aeronautical frequencies are covered in the Aeronautical Frequency Directory, written by Bob Coburn, W1JJO. Although most of the information is about civilian aviation, Bob included sections on military mid-air refueling and CAP. The 401 page third edition is available from Official Scanner Guides (P.O. Box 525-NS, Londonderry, NH 03053). The same publisher sells the Maritime Frequency Directory and frequency guides for several New England states. Some of these books are available through Radio Shack, too. The most readily available source of sensitive US government frequencies is still Tom Kneitel's Top Secret Registry of US Government Radio Frequencies. Published by CRB Research, the 8th edition is available from Grove Enterprises for about $22. Kneitel's book contains frequency listings for NASA, military, FBI, Secret Service, DEA, IRS, Border Patrol, arsenals, ammunition plants, missile sites, and others in the 25 to 470 MHz range. Since the US government no longer offers frequency information for its own stations, and has never published sensitive frequencies, most of the information in Kneitel's book has been collected from listeners over the years. It is certainly not complete, nor 100% accurate, but is a good book for this difficult to obtain information. Tab Books Master Frequency File, first edition, written by James Tunnell and Robert Kelty, lists federal agencies and frequencies and deserves a read. However, there are no military listings and many pages are devoted to appendices and references which contain no frequency listings. The space would be much better used by a combined federal frequency list sorted by frequency. Magazines Although national in circulation, local frequency information is sometimes available in Grove's Monitoring Times and Kneitel's sensationalistic Popular Communications. Government Records Every year, the US Government sells FCC license information, in the form of microfiche, floppy disk, and magnetic tape, to the public through the US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service (NTIS). These lists contain license information for the industrial (e.g. Illinois Armored Car, Pinkerton's Security, Joe's Towing, etc.), highway maintenance, commercial broadcast, aviation, common carrier, and maritime services, as well as for police and fire. For more info call NTIS at 703-487- 4630. Microfiche is not for the casual hobbyist, but rather for the ardent listener, who can easily spend a few hundred dollars for the fiche, not including the price of a microfiche reader. Back in "the good old days," Grove Enterprises sold copies of some FCC microfiche files, and this was much cheaper than buying directly from NTIS. Grove no longer sells microfiche, but sells information on CDROM for $100 instead. In the 1995 edition, fields are different than PerCon's Spectrum CDROM. The licensee name and licensee city are used instead of the DBA (doing business as) name and transmitter city which makes query results confusing. The FCC has an agreement with PerCon (tel. 716-386-6015), a private company, to sell FCC license information to the public on both floppy disks and CDROMs. You can buy the full license information for a multi state region or a less detailed license database covering the the entire USA on CDROM for about $100. The new PerCon Spectrum CDROM sells for $29 and contains a handful of fields for every FCC license in the US. It works in DOS, Windows, and Mac environments. Companies have appeared which are "plugged into" the FCC licensing system and they sell computer time allowing on- line file access. They also sell paper copies of FCC information. Washington Radio Reports is one example. A monthly publication, it lists license applications made to the FCC. A few members of my scanner club subscribe and share the information with me. As I have already done for hundreds of radio enthusiasts, | companies, government agencies, and organizations across the country, I will locate FCC licensed and selected FAA transmitter sites in an area of your choice, in any state, and produce a custom RadioMap(TM) report, including an 8- 1/2" by 11" scaled color map, protected by plastic. The map is marked with transmitter sites, cities, highways, airports, military installations, national parks, etc. RadioMap allows you to identify antenna sites and visualize the transmitter locations in your neighborhood, near your office, and other places of interest -- from VLF through microwave. The report lists frequencies, callsigns, and licensee names. RadioMap covers police, fire, local government, TV, business, industry, common carrier, railroad, trucking, and many more types of transmitter sites, excluding ham radio stations. Wireline and nonwireline cellular phone and AM/FM broadcast transmitter sites are clearly marked using unique color icons. Industrial customers use RadioMap reports to survey the "radio environment" prior to installation of radios and wireless microphones at customer sites. RadioMap is used by the maritime and broadcast industries, as well as ham radio operators to solve intermod interference problems, and has been very favorably reviewed in RCMA Scanner Journal, American Scannergram, and USSN. The RadioMap processes and software are unique and proprietary. Unlike "more tame" maps, RadioMap shows the locations of military bases, ammunition plants, arsenals, weapons factories, and other military installations. For a flat fee, you choose the center location, and I choose the range, depending on transmitter site density: suburbs: 5 mile range (100 sq. mi. area) rural areas: 10 or more miles (400 sq. mi. area) dense urban area: 1 - 2 mile range Longer ranges for additional charge - call for pricing. A custom RadioMap report costs $20.95 plus $5.00 shipping and handling. For an additional $4.00, I will include a custom frequency allocation histogram, a 0 - 1,000 MHz "spectrum analyzer-like" display showing spectrum usage by the transmitters in the map coverage area. Send check or money order payable to Bob Parnass for $25.95 for standard or $29.95 for deluxe RadioMap report with histogram. Include your name, address, and telephone number, along with center location (nearest intersection of 2 streets, or latitude & longitude) and mail to: Bob Parnass, 2350 Douglas Road, Oswego, IL 60543. tel. (708)554-3839 6-10 PM central time. For a brochure, send SASE. Federal Radio Stations - Not Licensed by FCC Since federal government radio stations are not licensed by the FCC, they are not listed in FCC microfiche. In 1981, a group of 60 radio hobbyists split a $1300 fee, and obtained 80 microfiche cards of 'sanitized' information about federal government radio stations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)1. Only 12 of the 21 information fields for each station were furnished. Fields like "Remarks", which indicate the exact usage of a channel (e.g. "Sky Marshall's Net"), and "Bureau", indicating agency subdivision (e.g. TAC within the USAF), were withheld. These 80 pages of microfiche were sold by Grove Enterprises for $25, but are no longer available from that source. Private entrepreneurs have been known to ask $125 or more for a set! In a step backward, the US Government insists it will no longer release this type of information - it is now 'classified'2. For a reason unknown to this author, the government released a 1984 vintage set of frequencies allocated to the FAA. Perhaps this was a mistake, because the information is marked 'unclassified', but all fields are furnished, including some which indicate security related usage. Grove sold this set of 33 microfiche cards for about $13. Two way radio equipment formerly used by the armed forces often appears for sale at hamfests. Less often, Secret Service and FBI radios appear there from time to time, too. When you see such equipment, look over the radio for a frequency label and write down the frequencies stamped on the crystals or channel elements. Make note of any service or property tags which specify the agency or military base which used the equipment. Radio Clubs One of the best parts of the hobby is sharing it with other radio buffs. Trading information with other hobbyists about frequencies, communication systems, and receiving equipment is more valuable than a pile of magazines. Since the early 1960s, I had been an amateur radio operator, and belonged to amateur radio clubs, but I never realized there were any scanner clubs! In 1983, I joined the world's largest scanner club, the Radio Communications Monitoring Association (RCMA). Founded in 1975, the RCMA is the "first national and international organization of monitor radio listeners." There are several regional chapters which hold regular meetings. Club dues are collected annually, which covers a monthly newsletter, the RCMA Scanner Journal, about 50 pages long. Although the focus is on VHF and UHF ranges, there is coverage of HF utility stations below 30 MHz. A recent liberalization of club policy now permits the printing of most federal law enforcement frequencies, e.g., Secret Service, FBI, Customs, and DEA. The RCMA electronic mail address is RCMAHQ@GEnie.com. Inquiries about RCMA membership should be sent to: RCMA General Manager P.O. Box 542 Silverado, CA 92676 USA Another club which prints sensitive federal frequencies is the All Ohio Scanner Club. I enjoy its bimonthly publication, The American Scannergram, which is about 60 pages long. Although concentrating on Ohio, there is frequency information from other states, and plenty of product reviews and scanning tips. More information is available from: All Ohio Scanner Club 50 Villa Road Springfield, OH 45503 Do Your Own Sleuthing There is a challenge in deriving new spectrum usage information on your own. Sometimes it requires several days of listening, taping, and compiling fragments of information. Other times, the frequency information is there for the taking - without hassle. You can approach from two directions: 1. Listen first: Monitor a frequency or frequencies, and determine who's transmitting and what purpose the channel serves. Once you identify the user, log the information. 2. Compile first: Take advantage of opportunities, such as examining the frequency label on a guard's radio, or reading the FCC license hanging on the "radio room" wall, to compile frequency lists, then monitor the listed frequencies to confirm that they are really in use. Readers are urged to abide by the rules of good taste and local laws in the quest for frequency information. Don't trespass, wait for an invitation. Most listeners use a combination of both approaches. What Makes Station Identification Difficult? In most instances, FCC rules require radio users to identify their operations with FCC assigned call letters. Police and fire departments, especially those with trained radio dispatchers, seem particularly conscientious about station identification. Like commercial broadcasters, many of these stations identify on the hour and the half hour. Some repeater stations have Morse code identification circuits which transmit call letters on a periodic basis, insuring compliance with FCC rules. On the other hand, over 75% the industrial radio stations monitored within the last year ignore the FCC regulation, making it difficult for a listener to identify a station. Some stations may operate for years using the nondescriptive "base to mobile 2" or "Joe to base" protocol. One rung up the hierarchy are stations that identify using something like "Acme base to 107", giving the listener a clue for his log. If call letters are given, they are often rendered unintelligible by operators who fail to enunciate. The failure to identify is more likely due to sloppiness, rather than any attempt to hide station identity. While not regulated by the FCC, federal government radio stations vary in the extent to which they identify their transmissions. Some federal stations do not have call letters. A nearby paging transmitter periodically transmits a voice recording announcing, "This is the Army Joliet Ammunition Plant." What more could a listener ask for? Aside from a scanner and antenna, the most useful piece of equipment for sleuthing is a voice actuated (VOX) cassette tape recorder. You don't need a high fidelity model or anything fancy. I use two modified Radio Shack CTR-75 recorders, a discontinued model. VOX recorders allow one to compress a whole day's worth of monitoring onto a single tape. I often leave a recorder "armed" and connected to a scanner at home while I am at the office or doing something else. When call letters are mumbled, I can play and replay the tape until I hear and understand them. The following examples illustrate techniques I've used to derive new frequency information. Examine the FCC License on Premise I have found the actual FCC radio license, complete with frequency assignments, hanging on the walls of places like the Bell Labs security office and the guard shack at Waste Management's Greene Valley Landfill in Naperville. Examine the Labels on Radio Equipment Frequency information is engraved on labels on the back of many walkie-talkies, or inside the battery compartment, like in the Motorola HT220 model. Most pagers have labels on the bottom or inside. Like passwords taped onto terminals, it's not uncommon to find Dymo or P-Touch tape labels embossed with frequencies or call letters glued to the front of base stations. You can make your own opportunities for eyeing the equipment or take advantage of "open house" events. If information is displayed publicly, then a reasonable person could assume it's not government secret. - At the annual Glenview Naval Air Station open house, I examined a military manpack radio being used by dispensary paramedics. The radio's tuning dial was set at 34.15 MHz. - The Illinois Army National Guard displayed two armored personnel carriers at the local county fair, each equipped with VHF-FM and HF-SSB transceivers. In addition to a tuning control (VFO), the VHF-FM radio had a set of channel select pushbuttons, much like those in a car radio. I asked a guardsman a few questions about the radio, and he demonstrated the channel preset feature. A panel above the channel pushbuttons was labeled with the frequencies: 32.055, 34.45, 35.35, 40.55, and 40.60 MHz. - An Army National Guard UH1 helicopter was displayed at the Marseilles armory "open house". The public was permitted to climb aboard, and observe the instrumentation and radio gear. A channel plate on the instrument cluster listed over a dozen frequencies. Hobbyists are urged to exercise a modicum of restraint and good judgement. In New Jersey, a radio technician/hobbyist called to service a transmitter in a county building, noticed a new unattended repeater installation in the same room. Being curious about what frequency this repeater was on, he opened the access door to copy the frequencies from the radio's crystals. It turns out that this radio belonged to the US Secret Service, and opening the access door could have activated a "tamper alarm"! The tech was skating on thin ice. He had nobody's permission to tamper with that equipment. Another source of frequency information is as close as your nearest Radio Shack store. Some Radio Shack stores make a local frequency list available to assist their scanner customers. Be sure to ask. Stores located in shopping malls almost always know the mall security frequencies. I often check the frequencies programmed into the floor model scanners, too. Equipment to Determine Frequency Usage If you don't know the exact frequency, but have a general idea of the range (e.g. 150 - 152 MHz), use your scanner's "search" mode. Most programmable scanners afford the ability to search between two frequency limits set by the user. Some models, including the Radio Shack PRO-2035, ICOM R7000/R7100, Bearcat 2500XLT, and Bearcat 250, have the ability to automatically store active frequencies found during an unattended search operation. To find the frequency of a hotel communications system, one fellow installed his Bearcat 250 in his car and parked in the hotel lot, leaving the scanner in the "search and store" mode. He left the antenna disconnected so the scanner would only respond to a transmitter in the immediate vicinity. Test equipment can aid in the quest for new frequency information. I've used a spectrum analyzer connected to an outside antenna, another spectrum analyzer connected to a receiver IF stage, and a frequency counter for close-in work. How Can I Determine To Whom I'm Listening? - An Example While scanning the industrial frequencies in the 150 MHz range, a van driver was overheard communicating with "base" while driving around my town. The stations involved never used FCC call signs -- this would have made life a lot easier for me, and legal for them! (one may use FCC license microfiche, described earlier, to identify stations using call letters.) Transmissions were short and infrequent, so it was decided to tape record all transmissions on this frequency for several days to determine the station's identity. During daylight hours, a modified Regency K500 scanner was left tuned to the target frequency, connected to a cheap tape recorder through a home built interface. Using a carrier operated relay, the tape interface supplied power to the recorder only during radio transmissions, so a day's worth of traffic could be compressed into a 45 minute tape. Each day, the tape was played back and notes on names, locations, and activities mentioned during the day's transmissions were taken. The van driver appeared to be making daily stops at a local bank and two shopping malls. A Walgreen's store seemed to be the only stop at one mall. A few times, "base" ordered the van "back to the Training Center." There were frequent references to "guests checking out", "dropping a guest off", and "instructor[s] missing a class". At times, "base" spoke with "security", who must have been using a walkie-talkie as his signals weren't strong enough to hear. Was this a hotel? Calls to the three local hotels revealed that none provides shuttle bus service to the shopping malls. A call to the Walgreen's, inquiring about bus service to the store, drew another blank. During my shopping trips, I began to pay closer attention to vans with antennas driving through the parking lots. I was leaving the mall one day, when a week's effort paid off. A maroon and white van, equipped with a VHF-Hi antenna, was dropping shoppers off at Walgreen's. A sign on the van's door read: XYZ Central Training Center (XYZ is a pseudonym for the actual licensee name.) Lisle, Illinois I watched the driver pick up a microphone, and listened to him on my portable scanner checking back with his "base". All the pieces fit: the "guests", the "classes", the "instructors". Mystery solved; I had been monitoring the customer training center for a large computer manufacturer. The training center has hotel rooms and dining facilities to accommodate students from out of state. As a convenience, shuttle van service is provided to local shopping malls. Summary Through books, government records, and radio clubs, scanner listeners can make use of frequency information compiled by others. Two-way radio users often fail to identify their transmissions properly, making it more difficult for listeners to know who they are monitoring. By examining radio equipment labeling, and monitoring and taping transmissions, scanner enthusiasts can unearth new information. Addresses Grove Enterprises, PO Box 98, 140 Dog Branch Road, Brasstown, NC 28902. tel (704)837-9200 order line (800)438-8155 Official Scanner Guides, P.O. Box 525-NS Londonderry, NH 03053. tel (603)432-2615 order line (800)351-7226 Scan America, 430 Garner Drive, Suffield, OH 44260-1557 Scanner Master, PO Box 428, Newton Highlands, MA 02161. telephone 1-800-722-6701. __________ 1. See "The Government Giveth, the Government Taketh Away", by Richard Prelinger, in Monitoring Times, July 1982. 2. See "AFIO and the FOIA", by Bob Grove, in Monitoring Times, September 1982. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:08 1996 From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Icom R1 FAQ? Date: 17 Feb 1996 16:26:47 -0600 Message-ID: <4g5kn7$8s3@eugene.convex.com> References: <4g4gip$ibi$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> In <4g4gip$ibi$1@mhadf.production.compuserve.com> Greg Bruns <72371.2757@Compu Serve.COM> writes: >Where can I get a FAQ for the ICOM R1? Are there any >improvements for this woderfully small horribly unselective >insensititve receiver? How much are they worth used? Try http://www.icom-r1.sucks.faq/ David :-) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:09 1996 From: thooker@psl.nmsu.edu (Tracy Hooker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 08:01:03 Message-ID: Hi everyone, How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. Tracy From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:10 1996 From: dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 19:08:34 PST Message-ID: References: In article michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) writes: >What's a matter Morriseau? Can't stand someone more intelligent than you >pointing out that your observations are plain stupid? I have tracked the >sales of that trash box you're so proud of for the past year and three >have sold for the prices that I have noted. That's more than your >so-called expertise. This is what I would expect from a moron (which is >what you're often called in other newsgroups, I've noted) like you. Guess >years of inbreeding up there in Auburn, Wash. will do that to you, clown >boy. Thank you, Mike, for elevating a simple discussion of the price of a well known piece of monitoring gear to the usual high level of discourse for which you are so reknown. I'll pass on playing your typical flamewar game. You did it on GEnie and you've honed it to perfection here in supporting various scams over on rec.radio.swap. My experience with your actions over there alone would give me pause in trelying on just any off the wall number you quote as a "fair price". But, in the interests of all of us who are consumers, I urge you to post a full and complete, unedited copy of your highly vaunted (supposed) database whic lists all the "actual sale price" scanner transactions you claim to have documented. Don't do just the R-7000's Mike; give it ALL to us, OK? I'm sure you have it right at your fingertips and are glad to demonstrate your diligence and integrity. Now, it WILL have names and dates so we can check it for accuracy won't it Mike? Come on, Mike. Put up or shut up. Inquiring minds want to know. Dan Morisseau N7ZXL 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W Elevation: 300' From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:13 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:12:36 GMT Message-ID: References: >In article , dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan >Morisseau) wrote: >> In article thooker@psl.nmsu.edu (Tracy Hooker) writes: >> >> >> >How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in >> >excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. >> >> Tracy, >> I'd first be certain that it ahs full 800 mhz frequency coverage ( I >> think all R7000's do) and if so I would suggst somewhere in the area of >>$1,000. There will be some who will tell you what a lousy piece of >>equipment it is, but with a computer control program they are really nice, >>IMHO. I know it would take at least $1,000 to get me to part with mine! >Morriseau's price "advice" is pure opinion and has no basis in reality. I >have collected data on the used selling prices of scanners for about a >year now, including the ICOM7000 (the blocked model is usually designated >ICOM 7000-2). The data is based not on the asking price, but the actual >selling price. Of the three mint condition ICOM 7000s that I have tracked, >one sold for $800 and two sold for $900. The $800 unit included the >computer interface. Answer to your question is, your unit is worth $800 to >$900, probably closer to $800 because the low end selling price of the >more capable ICOM 7100 is $1000. You have been collecting data for a year and only have 3 R-7000 transactions on database? This is what you call reality? Three transactions?? That is a massive database. What fomula did you use? If I buy a used R7000 for $1200 will you change your figures? After all that would be 25% of your total database. >Answer to your question is, your unit is worth $800 to >$900, probably closer to $800 because the low end selling price of the >more capable ICOM 7100 is $1000. This is not pure opinion? More capable? Is that features? Performance? How do you arrive at that statement? Are you also aware that a number of people that bought R7100 soon sold them and returned to the R7000? I know this is true of at least 3 people so there certainly are more than my small circle of contacts. I myself turned down the R7100 for a variety of reasons. You will find many may disagree with your statement about the 7100 being a more capable receiver. I would pay $1000 for a R7000 long before I would a R7100. Have you owned either of these receivers ? Reality?? There are too many varibles to come to a conclusion with just 3 examples. That is just your opinion, not a fact. grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:14 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 07:55:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: In article , dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) wrote: > Thank you, Mike, for elevating a simple discussion of the price of a > well known piece of monitoring gear to the usual high level of discourse for > which you are so reknown. I'll pass on playing your typical flamewar game. You > did it on GEnie and you've honed it to perfection here in supporting various > scams over on rec.radio.swap. My experience with your actions over there alone > would give me pause in trelying on just any off the wall number you quote as a > "fair price". But, in the interests of all of us who are consumers, I urge you > to post a full and complete, unedited copy of your highly vaunted (supposed) > database whic lists all the "actual sale price" scanner transactions you claim > to have documented. Don't do just the R-7000's Mike; give it ALL to us, OK? > I'm sure you have it right at your fingertips and are glad to demonstrate your > diligence and integrity. Now, it WILL have names and dates so we can check i t > for accuracy won't it Mike? Come on, Mike. Put up or shut up. Inquiring mind s > want to know. > Oh Danny, boy,I hope you're hungry becuase I have a plate of crow for you to eat. I have never had an account on Genie and I have never supported any of your so-called scams on rec.radio.swap. Your statement is plain slanderous and one you obviously cannot support, even while insisting that I support my claims. The irony is wonderful! I have posted here on a number of occasions the URL of the web site where my price list has been available for everyone to see and to comment on. In fact, on several occasions, I have asked for help in completing it. But you don't have to take my word for it, oh wise one, point yourself to www.ultranet.com/~bellvill/scanner.html. It's been there for at least three or four months. Please, give me a hand in making sure that it is as accurate as possible but sending me your own data that you've gathered. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:16 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:39:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: In article , ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) wrote: [snip] > > Reality?? There are too many varibles to come to a conclusion with just 3 > examples. That is just your opinion, not a fact. > > > grh The fact is Glenn you have absolutely *nothing* to go on other than what you think you know. I have at least made some attempt to put realistic numbers on these sales. While I admit that three is not a lot, it is three more data points than you have. It's also a fact that you sit back on your butt and mouth off about what others do not lnow, when you're incapable of providing a single bit of useful information. Rather than question, which is all you can do, my views, why don't you offer some *meaningful* information or factual data to prove me wrong? Here's a useful comparison: a pre-EPCA 7000 and 7100. There are *major* differences between the two models, despite your suggestion to the contrary, which warrants the substantially higher price for the 7100: 7100 7000 SSB (USB/LSB) SSB AM (normal/wide) AM (normal) FM (normal/narrow) FM (normal) 900 channels 99 channels 25-1000, 1240-1300 25-10000,1240-1300 (does not cover 1000-1025) Program memory None The 7100 also has many other programming, memory and convenience features that the 7000 does not have. Now, let's talk about pricing big shot: I have been keeping a comprehensive listing of asking and selling prices for scanners for the past year. Not only do I record the prices that are being asked, I regularly send email to people asking what they really settled for, so I can compare asking and "real" price. In addition, people regularly contact me with information they have gathered, including their own personal price lists as well as prices they have paid for scanners in recent months. This is pretty solid data--data, I might add, that you are unable to provide to support your observation. am recounting to you the results of what goes on in the used scanner sell/buy marketplace. This info is not my opinion; this is as close to reality as you or anyone else is going to get. FYI: 7100 sell for about an average of $1150, although that is based on a small sampling (three units). But don't take my word for it: Contact batwing411@aol.com. On 2-10-96, he posted a message in which he asked $1050 for his Icom7100. I haven't included this data in my price guide because I have not asked him for the final selling price. Like I said, Morriseaus's -- and now yours-- observations have no basis in reality. -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:17 1996 From: dayglo@radix.net (Dayglo) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ICOM W31A 800MHz Mod Problems Date: 16 Feb 1996 00:05:47 GMT Message-ID: <4g0hor$2ua@news1.radix.net> I recently purchaced an ICOM W31A. There is a mod for it to Rx/Tx out of band . I did not want to Tx out of band only Rx. The mod was published in "Radio/Tech Modifications & Alignment Controls" edition #8A. The book states that you have to remove a jumper for the Rx mod and a Diode for the Tx mod. I only removed the jumper. My radio still works but when I try to the police up in the 850+ MHz range I get Cellular instead. Also from time to time various things won't work when scanning up in that range and I have to cycle the radio's power. Any clues to what is wrong? Do I need to remove the diode to complete the mod? Any help would be appreciated. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:18 1996 From: scosgt@nyc.pipeline.com (Bruce Markowitz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 14 Feb 1996 19:39:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4ftvcs$ko1@pipe10.nyc.pipeline.com> References: <4frdu9$1o2c@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Illegal in New York (except for licensed Ham operator). On Feb 14, 1996 01:39:00 in article , 'snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS)' wrote: >In article <3120b453.2131858@10.0.2.1>, >csprick@netcom.com (Charles Sprick) wrote: >>On Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:20:46 GMT, powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) >>wrote: >> >>>Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >>>of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >>>states that do allow them. >> >>I'm also seeki9ng this info. Would appreciate an e-mail response if >>easier. TIA. >> > >Illegal in Michigan :-( From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:19 1996 From: Steve Olmstead Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 12:42:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3127651F.6E5A@bright.net> References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> > > In Florida, it is illegal to have a scanner hooked up to your car > > (i.e.12vt power, external antenna). > > > > Now the good news. If you have your ham radio license, you are > > EXEMPT from the law :-) > Kentucky is the same way..got to have that HAM license. Do the scanners > really help that much in avoiding a speeding ticket? Would like to hear > your viewpoints on this. Post and/or email me! > > Grady I am unsure of the law in Ohio which pertains to carrying scanners in cars, but being an amateur radio operator I feel I'm well within the law. I don't feel that scanners help you avoid very many tickets, but they do produce advance warning to emergency vehicles that may be coming in your direction. They also help you in avoiding delays due to automobile accidents. I primarily use my scanner to monitor local railroad activity. My hometown is the crossroads for three major rail lines. On many occasions this monitoring has helped me avoid many lengthy delays that may have made me late for work! If you have any idea what the law is for Ohio pertaining to mobile scanners, please post or e-mail me. Thanks Steve Olmstead KC8ATK Fostoria, Ohio From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:20 1996 From: dcrmatt@vnet.net (David Crawford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:47:47 GMT Message-ID: <4g67h3$k3c@ralph.vnet.net> References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article , grady@netam.net says... > >Kentucky is the same way..got to have that HAM license. Do the scanners >really help that much in avoiding a speeding ticket? Would like to hear >your viewpoints on this. Post and/or email me! > >Grady Actually, I've found it helps in avoiding accident sites, etc. Rarely have I heard police traffic that identifies where they are running radar or vascar. David Crawford dcrmatt@vnet.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:21 1996 From: daveanderson@telis.org (Dave Anderson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 06:55:25 GMT Message-ID: <4g96fr$d3i@ns.campus.mci.net> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> <4frkch$sim@netnews.upenn.edu> Reply-To: daveanderson@telis.org jimsokol@all-phase.com wrote: >Michigan: Illegal in vehicle unless you are a licensed HAM. >Indiana: Illegal in vehicle or out walking around unless you >are a licensed HAM. What - you connot even walk down the street with a hand held scanner??? Where is big brother??? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:22 1996 From: ctrice@ssnet.com (Crickett) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 02:45:25 GMT Message-ID: <4g8o8i$53a@news.ssnet.com> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) wrote: >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >states that do allow them. Hey, whats up? I don't of many states but I do know that in N.J it is, unless you are a fireman or a police, or an EMT. Gary >Thanks in advance, >Phil... >\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ > From the | POwen@Edgewater.com | Accept > mind of | - or - | no > Phil Owen. | POwen@Lynx.dac.neu.edu | substitutes! >\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:23 1996 From: grady@netam.net (Grady Russell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 15 Feb 1996 23:09:36 GMT Message-ID: References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) wrote : > In Florida, it is illegal to have a scanner hooked up to your car (i.e. > 12vt power, external antenna). > > Now the good news. If you have your ham radio license, you are EXEMPT > from the law :-) > Kentucky is the same way..got to have that HAM license. Do the scanners really help that much in avoiding a speeding ticket? Would like to hear your viewpoints on this. Post and/or email me! Grady -- Visit the Rock Quarry http://pulsar.cs.wku.edu/~russellg/mac/software/the_rock_quarry.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:24 1996 From: jay vise Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 20 Feb 1996 07:56:33 GMT Message-ID: <4gburh$bnh@hunter.premier.net> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> <4frkch$sim@netnews.upenn.edu> <4g96fr$d3i@ns.campus.mci.net> >>Michigan: Illegal in vehicle unless you are a licensed HAM. >>Indiana: Illegal in vehicle or out walking around unless you >>are a licensed HAM. >What - you connot even walk down the street with a hand held scanner??? Where is big brother??? Well.....I did see on America's Most Wanted the other night: a couple of bank robbers were using a hand-held while robbing a bank. Another example of the very stupid doing things that will curtail the liberties we all enjoy. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:24 1996 From: jay vise Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 20 Feb 1996 07:53:57 GMT Message-ID: <4gbuml$bhh@hunter.premier.net> References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4g67h3$k3c@ralph.vnet.net> If you're using your scanner to avoid traffic tie-ups, try to find the freqs that the local traffic-reporting service uses. In any large metro, there's only one or two traffic-reporting services for ALL the radio stations.....you'll get some really juicy tidbits from conversations between the base and the plane(s.) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:25 1996 From: mcravit@condor.depaul.edu (Matthew Cravit) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:13:40 GMT Message-ID: <4fvm3k$k08@shrike.depaul.edu> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> In article <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com>, Phil Owen wrote: >Can someone please give me a list of states that do not allow the use >of mobile scanners in a car. Or, if the list is smaller, a list of the >states that do allow them. I know it is generally illegal in Michigan. However, if you are a licensed technician-class or higher ham radio operator, you are permitted under Federal law to carry scanners (and any other legal radio equipment) in your vehicle. I do not recall the exact reference for this, but it is in the amateur radio regulations, which I believe are 18 CFR part 97. (CFR = Code of Federal Regulations). As an aside, in Michigan, non-hams can carry scanners if they have a permit. And, if you go to the IL state police, and present them with copies of a photo ID and your ham license, they will issue you one of those permits. When I was in Michigan, I did that, so that if I ever had a problem, I could show the cops the MI permit, rather than having to debate the law with them. /MC -- Matthew Cravit, N9VWG | E-Mail: mcravit@condor.depaul.edu Technical Support Specialist +---------------------------------- DePaul University Libraries, Send me a message with "mailbot" as Chicago, Illinois 60614 the subject for help with my email-bot. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:27 1996 From: PXUP76A@prodigy.com (Steve Lemanski) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 20 Feb 1996 01:46:03 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gb94r$2eog@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4fqqgn$7ei@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <4fro7v$k2s@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Most of time, the police activity I hear is local - although I will occasionally pick up a trooper who discloses his/her location (undoubtedly, when I'm NOT on the highway) --- I will comment that the Uniden BCT7 often DOES tip off a trooper with its red "warning" light, but not always...... and usually by that time, I've long since found out about the "smokey bear" from channel 19 on my CB steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:35 1996 From: parnass@att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.info Subject: Introduction to Scanning Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:12:56 GMT Message-ID: <4fvm28$q51@ssbunews.ih.att.com> Keywords: FAQ food, motivation, scanner sources, books, clubs Last changed: February 15, 1996. | Lines changed since the previous issue are marked with a | character in the right margin. Introduction to Scanning by Bob Parnass, AJ9S [NOTES: This article may not be reproduced in whole or in part on CDROMS, in bulletin boards, networks, or publications which charge for service without permission of the author. Free distribution is encouraged.] This introduction is intended for people new to the scanning hobby and is oriented to scanning in the USA. It tells where you can buy your first scanner, what features it should have, where to get it repaired if required, how to get frequency information, and mentions a few scanner clubs worth joining. The author writes a monthly "Scanner Equipment" column for Monitoring Times magazine, published by Grove Enterprises, but views expressed in this article are his own. Why Scanning? Every day and night, scanner hobbyists are entertained by what they overhear on their radios. Police cars, fire engines, ambulances, airplanes, armored cars, trains, taxis, and buses are all equipped with radios and you can listen to them. You can monitor the local sheriff and fire departments to hear about events "as they happen," before the news reporters hear about them. Hostage dramas, bank robberies, car crashes, chemical spills, neighbor and domestic disputes, tornado sightings are all fair game. In a single afternoon, you can hear a high speed police chase, Drug Enforcement agents on a sting operation, and undercover FBI agents as they stakeout a suspect. How about listening to a presidential candidate discuss strategy with his advisor from a 415 MHz radiophone in Air Force 1, or a team of G-men protect him while transmitting in the 167 MHz range? Baby monitor intercoms are actually transmitters and you can hear them between 49.67 and 49.99 MHz. Stay ahead of road conditions by listening to highway road crews, snow plows, and traffic helicopter pilots. Many midwesterners monitor the state police and and county sheriff to learn of approaching tornados long before warnings are broadcast on TV and commercial radio. Take your scanner to sporting events and listen to race car drivers, football coaches, etc., in the 151, 154, and 468 MHz ranges. Monitor the everyday hustle and bustle of businesses, from cable TV repair crews tracking down pirate descrambler boxes, to security guards at your nuclear power plant or mall security guards chasing a shoplifter. Is Scanning Legal? In the United States, scanning from your home or at work is perfectly legal in most situations. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 made it illegal to listen to mobile phones, common carrier paging, and a few other types of communication. A new law outlaws listening to cordless phones, too, but many scanners cover these frequencies, and it's clear that Americans still listen to whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes despite the laws. It is now illegal for companies to sell recently manufactured scanners which cover or can be easily modified to cover the cellular phone frequencies, but sales by private individuals will still be allowed. Speaking of privacy, federal law also requires you to keep what you hear to yourself and not use the information you hear on your scanner for personal gain. Be aware that several states have laws pertaining to scanning while in your car. Indiana restricts some portable scanners. A few states have enacted their own laws against listening to cordless phones. You can find out about these restrictions in a paperback book, Listeners Lawbook, compiled by Frank Terranella, Esq. available for $9.95 + shipping from Grove Enterprises, PO Box 98, Brasstown, NC 28902. What Scanner Should I Buy? Radio Shack and Uniden (maker of Bearcat, Regency, and Cobra brands) offer a wide choice of scanners. Radio Shack scanners are actually manufactured by both GRE (General Research Electronics) and by Uniden. Personally, I don't recommend Trident nor many of the AOR brand scanners, although the AR8000 and AR3000 have good reputations. Programmable (synthesized) units have replaced crystal controlled models as they don't require crystals and usually have a keypad that permits you to store frequencies into channels. Programmables are now so cheap it doesn't make sense to buy a crystal unit as your main scanner unless you get it for under $45 or so. You can get a battery operated hand held scanner, a bigger "base" scanner which is powered from an AC outlet, or a mobile scanner which connects to your auto's electrical system. There are tradeoffs -- base and mobile scanners have larger displays and almost always provide more audio than portables, and some portables are more prone to interference when connected to outdoor antennas than base models. But when severe weather knocks out the power in your home, there's nothing like having a battery operated scanner to monitor the power utility and police frequencies! Make sure your first scanner: 1. has a "search" feature, which allows it to search all the frequencies between two frequency limits of your choosing. The lowest cost programmables can't search. 2. covers the 800 MHz band. Usage of the 800 - 950 MHz band is growing fast and you will miss out on the action unless your scanner covers this band. If you're not sure whether you'll like scanning, don't want to spend much money, a 40 channel radio will do. In general, the more channels and banks, the better. Most of the action takes place on frequencies between 30 and 1000 MHz, so don't be misled by scanner models boasting coverage from 3 to 2000 MHz. There's currently not much to monitor in the 1000 - 2000 MHz range. If you are interested in receiving short wave, that is, signals in the 3 - 30 MHz range, it's best to get a short wave radio specifically designed for that purpose. Although some scanners receive the short wave band, their performance in that range is often second rate. Deluxe scanners can be controlled and/or downloaded by a personal computer, a feature which appeals to a small but growing number of scanner owners. Almost all low and mid-priced scanners are prone to receiving images -- receiving the same signal erroneously on two or more frequencies. With a few exceptions, images are unwelcome due to the interference they cause, e.g., hearing aircraft transmissions while the scanner is tuned to the local police frequency. Premium quality scanners use "up conversion" circuitry, a scheme which greatly reduces, but does not eliminate, image reception. Currently, the more popular scanners include the Uniden/Bearcat BC760XLT (a/k/a 950XLT) and discontinued Radio Shack PRO-2006 base/mobiles, the Uniden/Bearcat BC200XLT (a/k/a BC205XLT), BC220XLT, and Radio Shack PRO-43 portables. A number of owners report problems with the Icom R1 portable and the older Uniden/Bearcat 8500XLT base and 2500XLT portable. The new Uniden BC9000XLT base and BC3000XLT portable work very well and are my current favorites. Considered by many as the best scanner ever made, the 400 channel Radio Shack PRO-2006 was replaced by the 1000 channel PRO-2035, which was replaced by the PRO-2042. The portable Radio Shack PRO-62 and PRO-60 are good performers. All five models employ up conversion and are made for Radio Shack by GRE (General Research Electronics). Scanner Antennas All scanners come with a built in antenna, permitting reception up to about 20 miles or so. Portable scanners are supplied with a helical (spring shaped) antenna, covered by rubber. The rubberized antennas furnished with current models are too stiff and place stress on the antenna jack. Older scanners to be supplied with more flexible antennas. I prefer to replace the stock antenna with an Icom FA-1433B dual band flex antenna which is thin and very flexible while providing better performance than a stock antenna. Although it is small and somewhat tolerant of physical abuse, the range of a heliflex antenna is very limited. Augmenting it with a 19" telescoping metal antenna can improve portable reception greatly. Since 1988, I've used the "Thin-Stick" 18 inch telescoping antenna for extended range on my portable scanners and 2 meter walkie-talkies. The Thin-Stick, made in USA by Smiley Antenna Co., Inc., is designed to cover both the 2 meter and 220 MHz bands, but its variable length means it can be adjusted for optimum performance on other bands. What makes the Thin-Stick different from an ordinary telescoping antenna is the spring between the antenna and the connector portions. The spring absorbs most of the impact if the antenna collides with an object. The street price is about $17 and it is available from Amateur Electronic Supply, Milwaukee and other retailers. Outdoor antennas, like the Channel Master 5094A or Antenna Specialists AV-801 (recently discontinued), can extend reliable reception to 100 miles or more. If you do use an outdoor antenna, be sure to disconnect and ground it during storms and when not in use to avoid a lightning hazard. Discone and ground plane type antennas can be more prone to cause scanner damage due to static charge buildup because they are not at "DC ground." Coaxial Cable Feedlines If your antenna installation requires more than 50 feet of feedline, use RG213/U or high quality RG8/U coaxial cable. RG213/U has a non-contaminating jacket and will last longer. Each has an outer diameter of about 13/32". Similarly sized Belden 9913 cable and clones have lower attenuation but are difficult to bend, require special connectors, and can accumulate moisture inside because they are hollow. If you must use a small diameter cable for long runs, use RG6/U. Avoid RG58/U (7/32" OD) due to its losses at high frequencies. RG8/X (1/4" OD) is suitable for short patch cords. Where Can I Buy A Scanner? Almost every community has at least one Radio Shack store, and you can find scanners there. Discount chain stores like Wal-Mart, K-Mart, Service Merchandise, and Circuit City sell scanners, but carry just a few models. Department stores, like Sears Roebuck and Montgomery Wards, sometimes offer low end scanners, although at high prices. The best buys on new scanners are from reputable mail order radio dealers, for example: - Grove Enterprises, 300 S. Highway 64 West, Brasstown, NC 28902. For a free catalog, call (704)837-9200. Telephone (orders only): (800)438-8155. - National Tower Company, PO Box 15417, Shawnee Mission, KS 66215. Telephone (913)888-8864. - The Ham Station, 220 N. Fulton Ave., Evansville, IN 47719-0522. Telephone (800)729-4373, (812)422-0231. - Scanner World (Albany, NY). Telephone (518)436-9606. - Amateur Electronics Supply (Milwaukee, WI). Telephone (800)558-0411. Beware of inflated "shipping and handling" charges and be sure to include these when comparison shopping. Used scanners may be found at hamfests, flea markets, garage sales, or listed in the classified advertisement section of your newspaper. Modifying Your Scanner The term "mod" is often used as shorthand for "modification." If you are handy with a soldering iron, you may be interested in modifying ("modding") your scanner to add features or enhance its performance. Be warned this usually voids your warranty and current models are difficult to service due to the small, delicate surface mount components. By federal regulation, new scanner models cannot be easily modified to tune the cellular phone bands. The term "mod" has been narrowly used by some people to mean a change which permits a scanner to receive cellular phone frequencies. This definition is far too restrictive as there are several ways one could modify a scanner, e.g., changes to improve audio quality, adding an S-meter, expanding the number of channels, changing the earphone jack to accept stereo headphones, etc. Modification article files can be copied from several ftp sites including the /pub/ham-radio/mods directory at: garfield.catt.ncsu.edu oak.oakland.edu (IP address 141.210.10.117) KD4MOJ maintains a scanner modification server for people without FTP access. You can request a list of scanner modifications by sending electronic mail with the words GET INDEX.TXT to FTPmail@exchange.tlh.fl.us If you cannot find files describing modifications to a particular scanner, it's probably because nobody bothered to devise a modification, or more likely, nobody has taken the time to document their modification. Modification articles posted on Usenet seem to have a life of their own. Frequently, they are plagiarized from the Internet and compiled by book, CDROM, and magazine publishers, sometimes reworded, then sold. Hobbyists then copy the modifications from the books, CDROMs, and magazines back onto the Internet or BBSs (bulletin board systems)! Grove Enterprises and other companies advertise a warranted, modification for fee service. Scanner Repair Shops Is your scanner broken? Aside from sending the scanner back to the manufacturer for repair, here are least two companies which repair scanners: 1. Electronic Repair Centers (telephone 708-455-5105) - Several people have been pleased with good repair service from Electronic Repair Centers in Franklin Park, Illinois. Although they are not authorized to perform warranty work, this outfit has been repairing Bearcat scanners for several years. They charge a flat rate of fixing scanners, and shipping is extra. Electronic Repair Centers will fix Regency scanners if they can obtain the parts. 2. G & G Communications (telephone 716-768-8151) - This family owned company repairs scanners and pagers and stocks parts for several older models. G & G cannot usually repair AOR scanners due to lack of manufacturer support. G & G sells and sometimes buys old scanners and parts, too. They are located at 9247 Glenwood Drive, LeRoy, NY 14482. Where Can I Obtain Frequency Information? To avoid chaos, the FCC licenses two-way radio users and assigns them specific frequencies. Groups of frequencies are allocated to specific types of users, so you won't usually find fire departments using the same frequencies as taxi drivers, for example. Scanner enthusiasts can obtain frequency information from several sources, including books, government microfiche records, or other listeners. Books: The most convenient source of fire, police, and local government frequencies is Gene Hughes' Police Call, published each year in 9 regional volumes by Hollins Radio Data, and sold at Radio Shack and larger book stores. The 1996 editions contain selected business listings, too, although callsigns are listed only for local government and public safety licensees. I also recommend the book, Monitor America, published by SMB Publishing (now known as Scanner Master Publishing), and available from Grove Enterprises for about $30. A new, 1100 page 3rd edition is now available. Monitor America contains several pages of police, fire, local government, news media, sports, federal government, and commercial broadcast frequencies for all 50 states. It contains detailed communications system profiles and precinct maps for major metropolitan areas. Police and fire radio codes and unit identifiers unique to local agencies are listed for several cities. This differs from Police Call, which gives a more sterile, but uniform treatment of licensees, listing even the smallest of towns. Uniden has published several regional directories using the "Betty Bearcat" name, although there are much better directories available from Scanner Master (Newton Highlands, MA, tel. (508)655-6300) for some regions. The most readily available source of sensitive US government frequencies is still Tom Kneitel's Top Secret Registry of US Government Radio Frequencies. Published by CRB Research, the 8th edition is available from Grove Enterprises for about $22. Kneitel's book contains frequency listings for NASA, military, FBI, Secret Service, DEA, IRS, Border Patrol, arsenals, ammunition plants, missile sites, and others in the 25 to 470 MHz range. Tab Books Master Frequency File, first edition, written by James Tunnell and Robert Kelty, lists federal agencies and frequencies and deserves a read. However, there are no military listings and many pages are devoted to appendices and references which contain no frequency listings. The space would be much better used by a combined federal frequency list sorted by frequency. Commercial Magazines: Although national in circulation, local frequency information is sometimes available in Grove's Monitoring Times (tel. 704-837-9200) and the sensationalistic Popular Communications, (tel. 516-681- 2922). National Scanning Report is a national scanner magazine published bimonthly and is affiliated with Uniden's Bearcat Radio Club. Early issues disappointed experienced scanner hobbyists, but it now has a good column on scanner modifications and has greatly improved its coverage of east coast frequencies since merging with NESN (North East Scanner News). The best scanner frequency lists are often found in club publications, not commercial magazines, and are discussed later. Government Records: Every year, the US Government sells FCC license information, in the form of microfiche, floppy disk, and magnetic tape, to the public through the US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service (NTIS). The high cost of buying government records limits their appeal to hardcore enthusiasts. You can write for a catalog of FCC Master Frequency Database items to the NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. The FCC has an agreement with PerCon (tel. 716-386-6015), a private company, to sell FCC license information to the public on CDROMs. You can buy the full license information for a multi state region or a less detailed license database covering the the entire USA on CDROM for about $100. The PerCon Spectrum CDROM sells for $29 and contains a handful of fields for every FCC license in the US. The Spring 1995 edition works in DOS, Windows, and Mac environments. Grove enterprises sells FCC license information on CDROM for $100. In the 1995 edition, fields are different than PerCon's Spectrum CDROM but the data appears to be of the same vintage. The licensee name and licensee city are used instead of the DBA (doing business as) name and transmitter city which makes query results confusing. As I have already done for hundreds of radio enthusiasts, | companies, government agencies, and organizations across the country, I will locate FCC licensed and selected FAA transmitter sites in an area of your choice, in any state, and produce a custom RadioMap(TM) report, including an 8- 1/2" by 11" scaled color map, protected by plastic. The map is marked with transmitter sites, cities, highways, airports, military installations, national parks, etc. RadioMap allows you to identify antenna sites and visualize the transmitter locations in your neighborhood, near your office, and other places of interest -- from VLF through microwave. The report lists frequencies, callsigns, and licensee names. RadioMap covers police, fire, local government, TV, business, industry, common carrier, railroad, trucking, and many more types of transmitter sites, excluding ham radio stations. Wireline and nonwireline cellular phone and AM/FM broadcast transmitter sites are clearly marked using unique color icons. Industrial customers use RadioMap reports to survey the "radio environment" prior to installation of radios and wireless microphones at customer sites. RadioMap is used by the maritime and broadcast industries, as well as ham radio operators to solve intermod interference problems, and has been very favorably reviewed in RCMA Scanner Journal, American Scannergram, and USSN. The RadioMap processes and software are unique and proprietary. Unlike "more tame" maps, RadioMap shows the locations of military bases, ammunition plants, arsenals, weapons factories, and other military installations. For a flat fee, you choose the center location, and I choose the range, depending on transmitter site density: suburbs: 5 mile range (100 sq. mi. area) rural areas: 10 or more miles (400 sq. mi. area) dense urban area: 1 - 2 mile range Longer ranges for additional charge - call for pricing. A custom RadioMap report costs $20.95 plus $5.00 shipping and handling. For an additional $4.00, I will include a custom frequency allocation histogram, a 0 - 1,000 MHz "spectrum analyzer-like" display showing spectrum usage by the transmitters in the map coverage area. Send check or money order payable to Bob Parnass for $25.95 for standard or $29.95 for deluxe RadioMap report with histogram. Include your name, address, and telephone number, along with center location (nearest intersection of 2 streets, or latitude & longitude) and mail to: Bob Parnass, 2350 Douglas Road, Oswego, IL 60543. tel. (708)554-3839 6-10 PM central time. For a brochure, send SASE. Do Your Own Frequency Detective Work When you try listening to a frequency for the first time, you'll want to know who you're hearing. Although FCC rules require radio systems to identify their operations with their assigned call letters either automatically or verbally, most ignore the regulation. This often makes it difficult to know who is transmitting. Moreover, many radios are now being placed in service illegally, without first obtaining the required FCC license. There is a challenge in deriving new spectrum usage information on your own. Sometimes it requires several days of listening, taping, and compiling fragments of information. Other times, the frequency information is there for the taking - without hassle. You can approach from two directions: 1. Listen first: Monitor a frequency or frequencies, and try to determine who's transmitting and what purpose the channel serves. Once you identify the user, log the information. 2. Compile first: Take advantage of opportunities, such as examining the frequency label on a guard's radio, or reading the FCC license hanging on the "radio room" wall, to compile frequency lists, then monitor the listed frequencies to confirm that they are really in use. Readers are urged to abide by the rules of good taste and local laws in the quest for frequency information. Don't trespass, wait for an invitation. Most listeners use a combination of both approaches. You can examine the FCC license on premise. I have found the actual FCC radio license, complete with frequency assignments, hanging on the walls of places like the mall security office or company guard shack. You can examine the labels on radio equipment. Frequency information is engraved on labels on the back of many walkie-talkies, or inside the battery compartment, like in the Motorola HT220 model. Most pagers have labels on the bottom or inside. Like passwords taped onto terminals, it's not uncommon to find labels embossed with frequencies or call letters glued to the front of base stations. You can make your own opportunities for eyeing the equipment or take advantage of "open house" events. If information is displayed publicly, then a reasonable person could assume it's not government secret. Hobbyists are urged to exercise a modicum of restraint and good judgement, however. How Can I Use Equipment to Uncover New Frequencies? If you don't know the exact frequency, but have a general idea of the range (e.g. 150 - 152 MHz), use your scanner's "search" mode. Most programmable scanners afford the ability to search between two frequency limits set by the user. A few models, like the ICOM R7000/R7100, and R1, and older Bearcat 250 and Regency K500, have the ability to automatically store active frequencies found during an unattended search operation. To find the frequency of a hotel communications system, one fellow installed his Bearcat 250 in his car and parked in the hotel lot, leaving the scanner in the "search and store" mode. He left the antenna disconnected so the scanner would only respond to a transmitter in the immediate vicinity. Aside from a scanner and antenna, the most useful piece of equipment for sleuthing is a voice actuated (VOX) cassette tape recorder. You don't need a high fidelity model or anything fancy, a Radio Shack CTR-82 will do. It's best to use a shielded, attenuating cable to feed the scanner audio into the recorder rather than relying on the recorder's internal microphone. VOX recorders allow one to compress a whole day's worth of monitoring onto a single tape. I often leave a recorder "armed" and connected to a scanner at home while I am at the office or doing something else. When call letters are mumbled, I can play and replay the tape until I hear and understand them. Test equipment can aid in the quest for new frequency information. I've used a spectrum analyzer connected to an outside antenna, and a frequency counter for close-in work. Are There Any Scanner Clubs? One of the best parts of the hobby is sharing it with other radio buffs. Trading information with other hobbyists about frequencies, communication systems, and receiving equipment is more valuable than any pile of magazines. The world's largest scanner club is the Radio Communications Monitoring Association (RCMA). Founded in 1975, the RCMA is the "first national and international organization of monitor radio listeners." There are several regional chapters which hold regular meetings. Club dues are $27.00 per year, which includes the monthly Scanner Journal, approximately 50 pages in 8-1/2" x 11" format. Although the focus is on VHF and UHF ranges, there is coverage of HF utility stations below 30 MHz. The RCMA web page is at http://comp.uark.edu/~plaws/rcma/. The RCMA electronic mail address is RCMAHQ@GEnie.com. Inquiries about RCMA membership should be sent to RCMA General Manager, P.O. Box 542, Silverado, CA 92676, USA. All Ohio Scanner Club A smaller club is the All Ohio Scanner Club. Its bimonthly publication, The American Scannergram, is about 60 pages long. Although concentrating on Ohio and the Northeastern states, there is frequency information from other states, and plenty of good product reviews and scanning tips. Annual dues are $18.50 and more information is available from: Dave Marshall, Managing Editor All Ohio Scanner Club, 50 Villa Road, Springfield, OH 45503. Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association The Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association (CARMA) is the foremost club for scanner radio hobbyists in the northern Illinois area. CARMA was formed from the Chicago chapter of the Radio Communications Monitoring Association (RCMA), and we have been meeting since the early 1980s. Many CARMA members are active in ham radio and GMRS, but the club is devoted to scanning and scanners. Meetings are held on Saturdays, many at area restaurants, about 6 times a year. Although lunch starts at noon, the meetings begin officially at 1 PM and often run until about 4 PM. You must purchase a lunch since we get the room for free. Meetings consist of a quick review of club business, sometimes a special presentation, and a "round table" discussion/question & answer session. Large quantities of information and frequency lists are often distributed in the form of free handouts. Members often sell radio equipment at the meetings, too. In addition to regular meetings, there are two CARMA picnic/field days during which members meet at a park, erect antennas, eat, and operate scanners from battery power. CARMA members take organized tours of various communications facilities in the area. Club meeting dates and times are published in the CARMA newsletter, published 6 times a year. A one year subscription is available by mailing a $15 check, payable to Kim Moran, to: CARMA P.O. Box 2681 Glenview, IL 60025 Some CARMA members participate on the CARMA computer bulletin board, run by Will Sperling. There is a $15 annual fee for the BBS. If you have a modem and terminal or computer, you can reach the CARMA BBS by calling (708)852-1292. All meetings are held on Saturdays at locations announced in advance. The next few meetings may be held at the | Destiny Restaurant, on Rand Road, in Des Plaines, IL. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:36 1996 From: rmason@ix.netcom.com(Richard Mason ) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Is AR8000 still the Big Dog? Date: 16 Feb 1996 18:20:11 GMT Message-ID: <4g2hsr$pgf@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4flbp1$5tj@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <311EA854.55A@internetMCI.COM> Is the ar8000 still the king of the hill in the scanner world? If so when is something better expected to come out? Did anyone ever find the source code to open up cell in the ar8000? if so, is it avaibable ftp? Why has the Icom RC-1 been so popular for such a long period of time? Just a few questions I had to get off my mind. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Russ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:37 1996 From: config@aol.com (Config.Sys Consulting Group) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Japan Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 04:31:50 GMT Message-ID: <4gbtdd$701@news.netvoyage.net> Does anyone have any info about scanning in Japan, specifically Tokyo? (Fire, Police, Cellular phones, etc.) I have a Icom R1 and some published frequencies but I don't seem to hear much traffic. Ezra Duong-Van Config.Sys Consulting Group 800-386-2724 310-839-5171 Office 310-839-5178 Fax Los Angeles, San Diego http://members.aol.com/config/index.html Serving Southern California's small businesses since 1986 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:38 1996 From: thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu (KC5KTO) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: KC5KTO's Radio Page is MOVING! Date: 15 Feb 1996 04:53:56 GMT Message-ID: <4fue94$lgm@bubba.NMSU.Edu> Since I'm now at or above quota for the various accounts that my Radio Page is on, I've purchased an account with a local ISP, and I'm nearly finished moving the page over there. The new URL for my Radio Page is http://www.zianet.com/files/users/kc5kto/scanner.html Most all the important links should work, but email me at either kc5kto@zianet.com or thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu if you find any broken ones. I'll keep the old site up for a while longer, but will only update the new site. Please change links (if you've got them). For those of you not familiar with my Radio Page, it's got frequency lists (by state, fed/mil, other stuff), scanning info, scanning- related software, mods (including my Radio Shack Scanner Modification Page), and a whole lotta links to other scanning sites. T.J. -- | T.J. Harrell III NRA KC5KTO thharrel@cs.nmsu.edu | _\| /\ |/_ | KC5KTO's Radio Page - now at: | \ / \ / | http://www.zianet.com/files/users/kc5kto/scanner.html | / \ | * Opinions not those of NMSU ARC or Business Office * | /______\ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:39 1996 From: JRM Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Letter of Appreciation for Radio Dealer "DO buy from this guy..!" Date: 20 Feb 1996 19:51:05 GMT Message-ID: <4gd8n9$1st4@news.gate.net> Recently I asked on Rec.Radio.Swap for someone who sold Motorola parts. I have seen all the recent posts on Rec.Radio.Scanner and Alt.Radio.Scanner about disaster tales of buying parts or radios from people on the internet. This was my first time buying something from someone on the internet and thought I would pass along my appreciation. I ordered a Saber earpiece adaptor from Carl Robbins of Carolina Radio. He kept the price he promised, and said I would have it in 3 days from the time he recieved my check. He delivered my adaptor to me right on time, brand new. His e-mail address is Crobbins@sunbelt.net. If you have ever want to buy a part or radio from him that you see him advertising, I highly recommend him and his company. Too bad there aren't more responsible people like him. Thanks Carl for the earpiece adaptor, it works GREAT...!!!!!!! Jeff M. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:40 1996 From: jim Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Letter of Appreciation for Radio Dealer "DO buy from this guy..!" Date: 21 Feb 1996 02:45:42 GMT Message-ID: <4ge10m$i89@excalibur.edge.net> References: <4gd8n9$1st4@news.gate.net> To: e54t4bc9@gate.net JRM wrote: >Recently I asked on Rec.Radio.Swap for someone who sold Motorola parts. snip >Too bad there aren't more responsible people like him. I have bought and sold several items over the internet (all HAM gear) and have never had a problem with anyone...I may have just been lucky but I don't think there are many HAMs looking to cheat other HAMs. but as always, let the buyer beware... before you let go of your hard earned money, etc. 73 ke4juh -- --------------------------------------------------------- Gutbang Entertainment Art Matters... http://www.gutbang.com/ --------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:41 1996 From: tjv@cris.com (Todd) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Lithium vs NiCad batteries? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 22:10:36 GMT Message-ID: <3127a30b.10168030@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: tjv@cris.com This is a bit off topic but I was wondering if anyone here could help. What is the difference between Lithium/Molybdenum Sulfate rechargable batteries and Nichol Cadmium Rechargable batteries? Can they be charged in the same charger? Can I use NiCads to replace Lithium batteries? Thanks for any help. Todd From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:43 1996 From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Log Periodic Ant Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 18:01:19 GMT Message-ID: <4gadrr$p04@news2.cts.com> References: <4doc89$iac@ns2.ptd.net> <4dsog7$pn7@news2.cts.com> <4ebh08$661@redstone.interpath.net> <31235A0A.5A41@aiinet.com> Gerry Moersdorf wrote: > Wow it's just amazing how much flaming gets going when a simple >question gets asked. I think it's just the inaccuracys of a non >face-to-face english language conversation,, More'n likely, it's the poor fellow whose expensive antenna is more a phallic symbol than a physical tool by which to accomplish a physical task to a certain criterion. Some people use their possessions as prosthetic devices for dimunitive or missing members of their anatomy and get emotionally charged when threatened with the idea that theirs isn't the biggest or the bestest........ > you dudes probably violently agree on tv antenna costs, quality, > and the original poster, now forgotten im sure is quite amazed > by the short flame war. Probably wondering what the hell he ever did to start all the ruckus. But yeah, some people feel there is no comparison between a $250 product and one that costs $75. > All that aside i think i have a more technical yes or no >question (well maybee not. One assumed need for this hi-gain scanner >antenna is surfing cellular radio. Which is illegal, by the way. And not long to last since cellular is going digital righteously soon enough, but anyway......... >Is a beam/unidirectional technology really a good match. Yes. > How could you use it effectively since the mobile > targets are moving, A directional beam would be an interferant ONLY when the mobile moves along a lone perpindicular to the azimuth of the beam. That would give the greatest rate of change of angular displacement and could be testy to the operator, if the mobile were close. But at any distance from the antenna, it is not really a problem to keep beamed in on a target. > and you really would want to hear as many fixed cell-sites as possible, You do? Well, first of all, mobiles are in the 824-849 MHz band while bases are in 869-894 MHz band. Bases don't move around like mobiles. And you don't usually listen to the mobiles since they're so low powered. It is real easy to keep a beam antenna pointed at the bases. And when you do, you're pretty much pointed at the mobile, too, since he's got to be in the same cell as the base. > and omidirectional antennas would seem to be the best fit. Why do you propose that? An omni 'hears it all'. This is ungood for NFM sites dispersed around the azimuth where where one signal completely overrides a weaker one on the same frequency. An omni antenna offers the operator no control over what he hears. Assuming you have a cell site north of you and another south of you, each on the same frequency(ies), you're only going to hear the stronger of the two, thanks to the "FM capture effect". If these cell sites change their power, then you might alternatively hear one site, and then the other throughout a session, and thereby become terribly confused and pull your hair out.......... If you used a beam antenna, then you could choose which sites to monitor and which not. Furthermore, a scanner site is much more efficient as a receiver than a mobile cellular phone. This means you will be bombarded by a number of base cellular sites from many azimuths, but only the most powerful will get through, NOT necessarily the one that's most powerful to the mobile, which is used by the MTSO to control things. Any "surfing" you do will be random, haphazard, and totally unscientific with respect to who you listen to and for how long. > If "cheep discones" provide limited improvement, what is the > best option for this portion of the spectrum? The best option for the serious scannist is two antennas fed into a low-loss coaxial switch. One should be an omnidirectional antenna such as a discone, for casual monitoring. The other should be a directional beam, whether log-periodic, yagi-uda, or a TV antenna mounted in the vertical plane, is up to the user as dictated by his needs, interests, and budget. +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:44 1996 From: wired@genes.pl.my (Eugene Kang) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: London police Message-ID: <824558682.22564snx@genes.pl.my> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 96 12:04:42 GMT Yes, I know it's illegal. But does anyone know the freqs for the London police? thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:45 1996 From: CHA95TS Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Looking for UK scanner frequencies... Date: 19 Feb 1996 10:18:03 GMT Message-ID: <4g9ior$efs@bignews.shef.ac.uk> As a recent investor in a Yupiteru MVT-7100 scanner in the UK, I'm looking for some interesting frequencies - if anyone out there has a list of some interesting ones - I've found a load of mobile phones already, but if anyone could mail me some police, aircraft etc. - anything really, I'd be really grateful. Cheers, Tim. CHA95TS@pp2.shef.ac.uk From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:47 1996 From: Chris Hale Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mailing list for Northwest locals Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 19:19:29 +0000 Message-ID: <31277BC1.3A78@teleport.com> New mailing list for Pacific Northwest locals. To join: send mail to 'majordomo@teleport.com' subject [doesn't matter] message 'subscribe nwscan-l' -- Email: Chris Hale (chale@teleport.com) WWW Page: http://www.teleport.com/~chale List owner of NorthWest Scanner Enthusiasts mailing list. send 'subscribe nwscan-l' to majordomo@teleport.com - to join list. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:49 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Marti System Description? Date: 17 Feb 1996 11:15:03 GMT Message-ID: <4g4dbn$npd@emerald.oz.net> References: <4fu65g$95q@panix.com> <3123bc3a.340811096@news.gate.net> In article <3123bc3a.340811096@news.gate.net>, fletcher@gate.net says... > >On 14 Feb 1996 21:35:28 -0500, adam@panix.com (Adam Epstein) wrote: > >> >>Can anybody give me a pointer to a description of Marti systems? >>Lacking a pointer, a quick description would also be appreciated. >Marti is a brand name of a remote broadcast system usually used to >send radio broadcasts from the ball game, mall or car lot grand >opening etc back to the studio for broadcast. There are several >other brands but most people call them Marti since they are the >popular brand. Usually vhf or uhf but some 900 Mhz types have been >used. > >I think Marti also made a STL system.. (studio to Transmitter) That's a pretty good description,but let me add to it.... Most "Marti's" are Wide band FM and run an average of 25 to 50 watts. They are designed to operate continuisly. Transmitters and recievers are seperate units and can be rack mounted(about the size of a suitcase). Most stations prefer to use directional antennas(yagi's) to the recieve site. Marti's usually have only one or two channels,but since it's been a few years since I used one,they probably have a systhesized(sp)unit available by now. Marti's *CAN* be used as STL's,but 900mhz STL's are the "norm"these days. I do know of one station in Monterey,Ca. that used a Marti as an STL for a couple of years. Many stations are now switching to ISDN for remote links because of extra voice and data channels. Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:50 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Michael Alexander or my dogs Butt?? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:51:31 GMT Message-ID: References: <310ecf24.3023017@news.duke.edu> <4fdku2$m4h@service2.uky.edu> <4fol6n$poc@news.doit.wisc.edu> <00001ff6+000046e3@msn.com> michael@alexander .terranet.com (Michael Alexander) writes: >You've already established that you're an simple-minded idiot. Now, you've >demonstrated that you're an uneducated clown. Your response is nothing >more than a cliche or two stolen from a Cheek post, stitched together with >some trash tough talk that you think makes you look like a tough guy. I hate to break the news to you but "the pot calling the kettle black" is not a quotation attributed to Bill Cheek. It is common like you. > As I've said: You're incapable of wit, ntelligence and riginality. You're >living proof of what happens when your mother and sister are one and the >same. For a good time, call Glenn: 206-288-28XX. Gee Mikey, I noticed you left out the part of my message where I took your little test on scanning and probably taught you a bit too. How come? Can you only make personal attacks? You didn't answer any of my quesions Mikey, how come? You know, the ones on you funky database that make you think you are the net price police? Lots of question Mikey but no answers from you. Here I'll repost one easy part for you. *What have you offered Michelle? Let's see. You made yourself out as an ass *quoting prices on the Icom R-7000. I mean any fool that would come on as an *expert on prices because he has a database of 3 transactions certainly *shouldn't be pointing fingers at others. You are clueless but have to try *and pretend to be an expert. Three transactions in over a year, you really *have a large collection of data. HAHAHAHA. Yea, your advise is sound!! What have you offered Mikey???????????????????? The other question I asked is who forces you to read my posting? Yea Michelle, you are a work of art! You try and play moderator and price police yet nobody listens to you. Must be a sorry life you live there boy. Hey shit-for-brains, answer my previous post in whole. Flames are easy (especially flaming a munch like you) for anybody but answers take some thought which you have yet to show. If you reply, reply to the whole post not just the flaming parts. Show us how bright you are. I can hardly wait! grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:52 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: Greg May Subject: missing location for Radio MODS? (Pro-51) Message-ID: <312368D3.37E3@cv.hp.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 17:09:39 GMT Looking for Pro-51 mods and it appears the old location for mods someone was doing is no longer available. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Greg gregm@cv.hp.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:54 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cwstan@holli.com (C. W. Stanley) Subject: Mobile Scanner Usage Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:29:49 GMT Howdy, Since there have been some posts wherein the question has been raised concerning some of the practical considerataons regarding the use of mobile scanners [MS] I thought perhaps the starting of a new thread was justified. While by no means an "expert" regarding this subject I have never-the-less utilized a MS in all 48 states and several Canadian provences. Thus perhaps some of my observations may provide some useful ideas to those less experienced. Also, perhaps this thread will prompt some of the more knowledgeable users to provide input. Some have ask if the MS is useful in the area of avoiding traffic citations. My experience would indicate that the short answer is "not very". If someone's primary reason to buy and use a MS is to avoid traffic citations I suspect that they will be greatly disappointed. Naturally, there are times when speed enforcement activity will be detected by the use of a MS. One example of such an exception would be when the police are using an airplane to spot speeders on a particular stretch of highway. The radio traffic _from_ the airplane can usually be intercepted several miles away. With a little experience the listner can usually recognize the air to ground traffic quickly. Usually a tip off as to the proximity of the activity is to listen for the ground to air traffic. If the ground to air traffic can be heard the activity is likely _close_. While the usefullness of the MS in avoiding traffic citations is problematical, there are _many_ uses for a MS. I'll list some of the MS uses that I have found to be really practical. I'm sure that there will be experienced MS users that can add to this list. The MS is a _great_ tool to aid one in obtaining the earliest and the most accurate information regarding traffic and weather conditions. By monitoring the public service bands one will hear reports concerning all sorts of road and traffic hazards: [ drunk drivers, a high speed chase, articles laying in the roadway, emergency vehicles making a run, disabled vehicles, accidents, traffic congestion, wrong way traffic, road closed due to various reasons, broken pavement, fuel spills, etc., etc., etc.. The list is almost endless. Just use your imagination. I have intercepted traffic on my MS regarding almost every imaginable situation that could constitute a traffic hazard. Often the MS provided me with the _first_ and the _most accurate_ information available. But then there is also the National Weather Service broadcasts! The National Weather Service broadcast weather information 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and 52 weeks a year. In times of inclinment weather these broadcasts can be _quite_ useful to the highway traveler. There have been times that the information that I got by listening to the NWS saved me a lot of time. Time that would have been spent sitting in a truckstop while the road was closed due to snowstorms. I was a few miles one way or the other and trucking on because I had the information ahead of time. Then there is the tornado season and the serere weather watches. When the NWS issues a serere weather watch the _sky warn_ net goes into action in many parts of the US. The Sky Warn Net is a network of local Ham operators that work in co-operation with the NWS in spotting tornadoes and severe thunderstorms. By monitoring the frequencies of the local Ham club's repeater[s] output the sky warn traffic can be monitored. This makes for interesting listening and at times can provide extremely useful information. I once listened to the local skywarn net track a tornado that was within two miles of my location! You can bet that my ear was _glued_ to the speaker in my little BC 200 XLT! Then there is the local TV and radio helecopter and/or airplane that is used for traffic reports. _Very_ informative! This radio traffic can be monitored easily and will provide accurate, on the scene, and timely information regarding rush hour traffic. The helicopter/plane to studio traffic will normally be five to fifteen minutes prior to the AM or FM broadcast of that information to the general public. There have been numerous instances over the years when the information that I received by monitoring this traffic has saved me a lot of time sitting in a traffic jam. When time and inclination permit there is monitoring that can be just plain entertainment. I've had fellow scanner buffs relate to me some of the "entertaining" traffic that they had monitored. They tell me that they have listened in to cordless telephome conversations that were extremely interesting. Ditto cellular calls. Since the monitoring of these frequencies is illegal I would never personally engage in that sort of thing, but it is my understanding that there are unscrupulous individuals on the loose that do engage in that sort of activity. I hear that it can at times be very interesting! I have been tempted! Cheers ;o) cws From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:56 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: M.D.Kalmijn@rechten.rug.nl (Marco Kalmijn) Subject: Mods for Realistic Pro-35 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:21:06 GMT Hello, Does anybody know of there are special tricks to make the frequency ranges bigger with the Realistic Pro-35? Perhaps a special code wich you can type such as manuel-2-9 to erase the memory? Greetings from Holland, Marco From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:57 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mods or _anything_ for PRO-2026??? Message-ID: <1996Feb14.215057.114051@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> From: Dave Campbell Date: 14 Feb 96 21:50:56 CST Distribution: world I just got a PRO-2026 from my local shack and looked for the mods. Well, the original is modifiable, but the one I have (newer model with 'b' on #) is not. At least not the old way. I was just wondering if there are _any_ mods for cell/speed/memories... etc. Also, I was just wondering what the Bearcat equivalent to this model is... Thanks for all info! Dave ps-I have an Icom W21AT for sale... send me an offer! +=======================================================================+ |Dave Campbell (913)832-0980 Home | |213 Woogate Place (913)681-6950 KC Home | |Lawrence, Kansas 66049 (913)681-6951 Fax | | Freelance Graphic artist for hire! (816)870-9673 Pager | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~campy <--<<< Go on, check it out! | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |"Bow down before the one you serve, GO | | you're going to get what you deserve" NIN HAWKS! | +=======================================================================+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:58 1996 From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mods or _anything_ for PRO-2026??? Date: 15 Feb 1996 14:39:17 GMT Message-ID: <4fvgil$i93@venger.snds.com> References: <1996Feb14.215057.114051@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> To: campy@falcon.cc.ukans.edu I was just wondering if there are >_any_ mods for cell/speed/memories... etc. Also, I was just wondering >what the Bearcat equivalent to this model is... > I do not believe that you can modify the newer 'B' units. And the 2026 is ALMOST a twin of the Uniden BC-760XLT, but there are some differences and they are not 100% compatable. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:15:59 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Mods or _anything_ for PRO-2026??? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4fvgil$i93@venger.snds.com> <4g8ctc$8or@pipe3.nyc.pipeline.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 02:15:39 GMT Alfred A. Berti (albe@nyc.pipeline.com) writes: > > Yes, there is a mod for the PRO 2026. > It is possible to get full 800 Mhz coverage and 30 kHz spacing (for test > purposes of course) by cutting one jumper numbered L201 > > Have fun! > > Albe Test purposes is fine, but you can also use it for intercepting real Cellular Telephone calls as I do. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:00 1996 From: albe@nyc.pipeline.com (Alfred A. Berti) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mods or _anything_ for PRO-2026??? Date: 18 Feb 1996 18:31:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4g8ctc$8or@pipe3.nyc.pipeline.com> References: <4fvgil$i93@venger.snds.com> Yes, there is a mod for the PRO 2026. It is possible to get full 800 Mhz coverage and 30 kHz spacing (for test purposes of course) by cutting one jumper numbered L201 Have fun! Albe From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:01 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) Subject: MODS wanted for BC80XLT Please. Message-ID: <2d7cc$818d.47@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:18:41 GMT Reply-To: powen@edgewater.com Could someone please send me by private email the modifications for a BC80XLT. That is, if it is "Modifiable". Thank you in advance, Phil... \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From the | POwen@Edgewater.com | Accept mind of | - or - | no Phil Owen. | POwen@Lynx.dac.neu.edu | substitutes! \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:02 1996 From: Guerito Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 19:33:22 -0800 Message-ID: <31254C82.3D1B@ix.netcom.com> References: <4fjrsd$onh@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4flq47$34s@news.inc.net> Steve Work wrote: > > Will Flor (willf@rrgroup.com) wrote: > > : The 956 MHz frequency you mention is carrying a STL (studio-transmitter > : link) for a station's : SCA channel, which is how "Muzak" and other > : similar services are broadcast. This is commonly : found in the 944-960 > : MHz band in any major city. Does anyone know of any SCA freqs in the Detroit area? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:03 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mystery Signal in Boston area........ Date: 19 Feb 1996 19:18:53 GMT Message-ID: <4gaiet$q68@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG pgeorge@sallie.wellesley.edu (PETER Q. GEORGE, N1GGP) inquired about: > ... digital signal on 153.440 MHz in and around the Boston area. Outside of the south-central US, 153.440 is allocated to the Power Service, i.e. electric utilities (and possibly pipelines). Sounds like control or telemetry for Boston Edison's distribution grid. /* barry /& From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:04 1996 From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mystery Signal in Boston area........ Date: 20 Feb 1996 07:11:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4gcdp2$kok@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <19FEB96.15343273@sallie.wellesley.edu> Talk about weird.... This weekend while visiting in Hingham, Ma I was searching around and heard Boston EMS on 84.200Mhz in Wide FM How can that be ????? mark s. conway From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:04 1996 From: hurst Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: NEED *Old* Sears freq. codes Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 02:06:22 -0800 Message-ID: <3125A89E.E4D@raven.cybercomm.net> I have an old Sears-Roebuck binary card scanner (like the optiscan). I lost the book that tells what holes to punch for freqs. I would need 460.275, 155.205, 155.280 and 33.780. Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:05 1996 From: michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NEED *Old* Sears freq. codes Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 18:58:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3125A89E.E4D@raven.cybercomm.net> In article <3125A89E.E4D@raven.cybercomm.net>, hurst wrote: > I have an old Sears-Roebuck binary card scanner (like the optiscan). I > lost the book that tells what holes to punch for freqs. I would need > 460.275, 155.205, 155.280 and 33.780. > Thanks! What is a binary card scanner? How does it work? Does it us something like the old IBM punch cards? It can't? Can it? -- Michael Alexander michael@alexander.terranet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:06 1996 From: marc_k@escape.com (marc_k) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NEED *Old* Sears freq. codes Date: 20 Feb 1996 11:14:25 GMT Message-ID: <4gcaei$f97@beyond.escape.com> References: <3125A89E.E4D@raven.cybercomm.net> Michael Alexander (michael@alexander.terranet.com) wrote: : In article <3125A89E.E4D@raven.cybercomm.net>, hurst : wrote: : > I have an old Sears-Roebuck binary card scanner (like the optiscan). I : > lost the book that tells what holes to punch for freqs. I would need : > 460.275, 155.205, 155.280 and 33.780. : > Thanks! : What is a binary card scanner? How does it work? Does it us something like : the old IBM punch cards? It can't? Can it? : -- : Michael Alexander : michael@alexander.terranet.com The Sears scanner you are refering to IS an SBE Optiscan! Sears just had their name put on it. Any data on the Optiscan will work on it as well. (and yes, I realize that I should have replied to the original poster instead of the previous reply, but what the hell, he'll see it anyway)! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:07 1996 From: doctoyguy@aol.com (DOC TOYGUY) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: need DENVER metro frequencies Date: 20 Feb 1996 07:46:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4gcfr7$lml@newsbf02.news.aol.com> I am in search of frequencies for the Denver metro area including police, sheriff,state patrol,fire,rescue and any other interesting ones, especially for the following: DENVER ARAPAHOE CTY LITTLETON ENGLEWOOD C.S.P. PARAMEDICS If anyone can help, please E-Mail me at: DOC TOYGUY@aol.com Thanks, Doc Denver 2-19-96 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:08 1996 From: "Joseph A. Sammartino" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: need frequencies for southern California entertainment Date: 16 Feb 1996 21:57:28 GMT Message-ID: <4g2uk8$eu@news.genrad.com> Hi, Can anyone out there provide some frequencies for Disneyland, Sea World, etc. I'll be vacationing with the family next week and would like to listen in. Thanks, Joe sammartino@genrad.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:09 1996 From: "Joseph A. Sammartino" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: need frequencies for southern California entertainment Date: 16 Feb 1996 21:47:30 GMT Message-ID: <4g2u1i$eu@news.genrad.com> To: sammartino@genrad.com Hi, Can anyone out there provide some frequencies for Disneyland, Sea World, etc. I'll be vacationing with the family next week and would like to listen in. Thanks, Joe sammartino@genrad.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:11 1996 From: "Joseph A. Sammartino" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: need frequencies for southern California entertainment Date: 16 Feb 1996 21:47:55 GMT Message-ID: <4g2u2b$eu@news.genrad.com> To: sammartino@genrad.com Hi, Can anyone out there provide some frequencies for Disneyland, Sea World, etc. I'll be vacationing with the family next week and would like to listen in. Thanks, Joe sammartino@genrad.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:12 1996 From: buettner@bbn.com (John Buettner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need Mods for Pro 2023 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 19:18:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4fq7td$4rm@nfs1.pe.net> In article <4fq7td$4rm@nfs1.pe.net>, psytry@pe.net (Robert D. Yeomans) wrote: +> If anyone has info on the modifications for Realistic PRO 2023 please let m e +> know. It would be greatly appreaciated. +> +> Thanks There are no hardware mods that I know of, but you can hold down 2, 9 and Lockout while powering up. It'll wipe out your stored channels and put some test ones in their place. The last 3 (I think) are in the cell band. Just search from there. Happy scans, Bit ******************************************************************** * "Arguing with an Engineer is like mud-wrestling a pig. Pretty * * soon you realize the pig likes it" -author unknown * * * * Note: My comments are my own and do not reflect the views of * * my employer or necessarily anyone else. * ******************************************************************** This message is copyrighted. Distribution of this message by Microsoft, its su bsidiaries, or its software shall constitute a violation of my copyrights. Mi crosoft may license copyrights to my messages, for distribution only, for the sum of $1,000 US per day. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:13 1996 From: "Marie H. McDonough" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Needed Mod for PRO 2021 Date: 15 Feb 1996 01:41:09 GMT Message-ID: <4fu2vl$4deg@cedar.evansville.edu> References: <31200C23.5E0D@atlanta.com> To: acc@atlanta.com HI, Sorry to give you the bad news but from what I have found out it is impossible to get a 2021 to recieve 800Mhz. There is one out there somewhere to increase the scan speed by replacing a resistor but thats it. Now i'm looking into a coverter unit to alter the freqs to the 400Mhz range but I can't get a straight answer. If you keep looking and find anything let me know but all the major sources give it a flat out no. Paul McDonough Writing from his wifes account From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:14 1996 From: vader@indirect.com (Dan Ross) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: New Mexico freq. Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 08:11:17 GMT Message-ID: <4g6kb9$asg@globe.indirect.com> What are some freq. for special police such as FBI, Army, etc From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:15 1996 From: vader@indirect.com (Dan Ross) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: New Mexico freq. Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:01:32 GMT Message-ID: <4gb3th$1dn@globe.indirect.com> Can anyone give me some special police freq. such as FBI, marines, etc. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:16 1996 From: mail.inx.net (inx.net) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Pro-51/ Why you are so happy? pl. explain Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:01:32 GMT Message-ID: <4g1342$qkp@inx3.inx.net> References: <4g00s8$f82@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> Reply-To: map@inx.net glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) wrote: >I'm also very happy with my Pro-51, and would recommend it very highly. >C. Glass Would you mind: giving us some concrete reasons! thank u From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:18 1996 From: cmccane@onramp.net@onramp.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 18 Feb 1996 07:37:11 GMT Message-ID: <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> Reply-To: cmccane@onramp.net In <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net>, boblee writes: >IF IT WAS NOT FOR THE NO-CODE TECH I WOULD NOT BE A HAM TODAY. >ALOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE ARE UPSET ABOUT THIS LICENCE CLASS BUT IT >IS ATTRACTING THOUSANDS OF NEW HAMS DAILY. OTHERS THINK WE WON'T >UPGRADE , I'VE ONLY HAD MY LICENCE FOR A COUPLE MOUNTHS AND I'M ALMOST >READY FOR GENERAL. MAYBE YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO "NEWS LINE" MORE OFTEN. > KC7NIY--CHUCK > 73'S Listen to a new world technologist's attitude that's shared by most: I'm an electronics engineer, a member of the IEEE, and a computer network architect. I like radio and analog electronics as a hobby. I use the 2M band on a regular basis and that includes auto patch and repeater services. I do not have ANY KIND of FCC license although I might get one if I have the time to waste. One thing is for sure: I WILL NEVER TAKE A TEST ON MORSE CODE!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of a BONEHEAD is so obsessed with HISTORY that they seek to make modern electronics professionals and hobbyists learn the trade of the old telegraph operators of the 1800's? In terms of electronics knowledge I have regularly WAXED every "amatuer" radio operator that I have ever met and all they can do is try to hold this childs toy morse code thing over my head. Gimme a break man!!! That CRAP IS DEAD!!!!! It serves NO PURPOSE!!!!! Don't even try and argue with that - YOU WILL GET WAXED TOO!!!! Let's face it, in the 1990's it's outdated to even use HF for voice. This is the age of DATA COMMUNICATIONS. I would like to invite all really fast morse code guys to come over and try to beat the speed of my terminal adapter at 9600 baud. And for those who want to say things like "but what if, in a really bad disaster, you didn't have your TA?" Do I even need to get involved in such a pathetic arguement? NO!! Now, to change the subject a bit, I don't ever want to be called an "amatuer radio operator" - what a pathetic label. I got my general class professional ticket while I was in the Navy, so how am I supposed to be called an "amatuer" - really weak label. And as for being called a "Ham Operator", I'll never be a HAM. I've been extremely successful as a designer of TCP/IP networks and recently became a Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer to boot, so, maybe with all that extra cash I'll pick up an HF radio for home and another for the car, hook up some TA's and have a roving data terminal, NATIONWIDE!!!!! One thing that will never stop me is MORSE CODE!!!!!!! C. McCane From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:19 1996 From: dayglo@radix.net (Dayglo) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 20 Feb 1996 22:47:08 GMT Message-ID: <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> On the other side of the coin there is: 60 ft tower + 1500 Watts + $1200 radio = NO BRAINS I am a technician and like building my own kit/antennas. I will be much more satisfied with a Worked All States from my own equipment then if I dropped $10,000 for a setup. I was talking with someone just like this on the air. The first thing that they said was, technician huh!, well you can upgrade!! then they proceeded to state that they could not talk because they were DX'ing Africa. Well how much brains does it take to DX anything with tha t setup. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:20 1996 From: Rod Dinkins Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 19 Feb 1996 17:51:38 GMT Message-ID: <4gadba$8cp@cloner3.netcom.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <4ga2mr$lhu@anomaly.ideamation.com> NO_CODE TECHS I HAVE KNOWN ART -- designs ATV and antennas and much more from scratch! I mean down to the component! Equips helicopter avionics. TED - A professor at UCI (no electronic background -- now a general) A worlds leading authority on the Ancient Greeks BILL - Designed his own cavities for his homebrew 6M repeater (see QST) JOHN - Former head of a Hewlett-Packard Division (one of the best) FRANK - A decorated Marine Corp Jet Pilot, now in ARES PAUL - Vision impaired -- knows more about VHF/UHF than many, now in NTC JEFF - Drives a truck probably makes more that u and I, knows computers inside and out Could site many more. THESE FOLKS HAVE ENHANCED AMATEUR RADIO GREATLY. Nuff said ?? Rod with a different perspective to the whining going on here. -- ***************************************************************** Hark! I Have Hurled My Words To The Far Reaches Of The Earth! What King Of Old Could Do Thus ? --- AC6V ***************************************************************** A Man May Know Of The World Without Leaving The Shelter Of His Own Home! Loa-Tsze ***************************************************************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:21 1996 From: Duffy1@gnn.com (J. Duffy Beischel) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 11:31:53 Message-ID: <4g4vub$f9d@news-e1a.megaweb.com> References: <4ejek7$m8s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eo4o4$3i7@nitrogen.mankato.msus.edu> <4fnp6i$p5p@i-2000.com> <4frl7u$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <3122300D.734A@sdrc.com> <4fu55o$5s6@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> In article Michael Alexander wrote: >> Brian Morgan writes: >> >> >If you are all so PO'ed with Radio Shack, why do you go there at all? >> >I've had mixed success with my local RS stores - they are like the >> >K-Mart of electronics. If they have what I need and I can find it, >> >I buy it. But why would you keep going back if you don't like the >> >store? Seems kind of dumb to me... >> > Brian >> >> >> I totally agree. I am so sick of the bitching. If you don't like >> the place, don't shop there. Modern mass marketing expects you to >> do "self service". If you can not educate yourself, we expect a >> store to do it for you. Do you bitch at Kmart? They are the same >> type of store as Radio Shack as is Home Depot and Service Merchandize. >> And Sears, JC Pennys, etc. > There is a difference between Kmart and Radio Shack. Both companies sell products of average to poor quality. Both have poor service and sales clerks that lack product knowledge. However, Kmart's prices are low and Radio Shark's prices are rather high. Kmart sells a number of brand name products. Radio Shark sells "off-brand, private label" stuff. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:22 1996 From: gerde@gilbreth.ecn.purdue.edu (Carlyle Gerde) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: 15 Feb 1996 02:18:32 GMT Message-ID: <4fu55o$5s6@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> References: <4ejek7$m8s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eo4o4$3i7@nitrogen.mankato.msus.edu> <4fnp6i$p5p@i-2000.com> <4frl7u$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <3122300D.734A@sdrc.com> Brian Morgan writes: >If you are all so PO'ed with Radio Shack, why do you go there at all? >I've had mixed success with my local RS stores - they are like the >K-Mart of electronics. If they have what I need and I can find it, >I buy it. But why would you keep going back if you don't like the >store? Seems kind of dumb to me... > Brian I totally agree. I am so sick of the bitching. If you don't like the place, don't shop there. Modern mass marketing expects you to do "self service". If you can not educate yourself, we expect a store to do it for you. Do you bitch at Kmart? They are the same type of store as Radio Shack as is Home Depot and Service Merchandize. And Sears, JC Pennys, etc. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:23 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Message-ID: To: gerde@gilebreth.ecn.purdue.edu Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4ejek7$m8s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eo4o4$3i7@nitrogen.mankato.msus.edu> <4fnp6i$p5p@i-2000.com> <4frl7u$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <3122300D.734A@sdrc.com> <4fu55o$5s6@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 20:19:32 GMT Carlyle Gerde (gerde@gilbreth.ecn.purdue.edu) writes: > > I totally agree. I am so sick of the bitching. If you don't like > the place, don't shop there. Modern mass marketing expects you to > do "self service". If you can not educate yourself, we expect a > store to do it for you. Do you bitch at Kmart? They are the same > type of store as Radio Shack as is Home Depot and Service Merchandize. > And Sears, JC Pennys, etc. > The reason everybody is bitching is because we always see clueless people getting sold the wrong thing at Radio Shack. These "clueless" people expect to get good service when they go. Why do they expect good service? Because they see things such as: "You've got questions, we've got answers" and "...our electronics experts who provide outstanding product knowledge and customer care in our stores." When you see something like this you EXPECT to get (right) answers when you have questions. I know enough about the products that I don't get stuck with the wrong crap. What I do have a problem with is when I take a defective product back and it takes them 45 minutes to figure out how it works before exchanging it. When I go to Sears, I know the emphasis is on Quality and low price, they don't have the big "experts" slogan, and even then I find them more knowledgeable in their electronics department than Radio Shack. At Radio Shack you have a reasonable expectation of good service. Most of the time you get none -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:25 1996 From: jay vise Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: 20 Feb 1996 08:11:51 GMT Message-ID: <4gbvo7$bnh@hunter.premier.net> References: <4ejek7$m8s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eo4o4$3i7@nitrogen.mankato.msus.edu> <4fnp6i$p5p@i-2000.com> <4frl7u$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <3122300D.734A@sdrc.com> <4fu55o$5s6@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> >The reason everybody is bitching is because we always see clueless people >getting sold the wrong thing at Radio Shack. These "clueless" people >expect to get good service when they go. Why do they expect good service? >Because they see things such as: > > "You've got questions, we've got answers" and...our electronics experts who provide outstanding product knowledge and customer care in our stores." > >When you see something like this you EXPECT to get (right) answers when you >have questions. I know enough about the products that I don't get stuck >with the wrong crap. What I do have a problem with is when I take a >defective product back and it takes them 45 minutes to figure out how it >works before exchanging it. When I go to Sears, I know the emphasis is on >Quality and low price, they don't have the big "experts" slogan, and even >then I find them more knowledgeable in their electronics department than >Radio Shack. At Radio Shack you have a reasonable expectation of good >service. Most of the time you get none > Having worked for a few months at Radio Shack after college, I have mixed emotions about the thread here. True, many salespeople (management calls them "Salesmakers"...heh) don't know much about the technical ^^^^^^ brass tacks of, say, building a power supply. However, what you must understand is that Radio Shack is like most other American retail corporations: Marketing ("you've got questions....) does not always communicate with Sales ("what's the question again?) or, much less, people on the sales floor ("Uh, let me get the manager.") Next time you're in RS, grab one of the neat little reply cards Marketing has printed up for all the stores. Pissed about being asked for your name for the 13th time in a month? Put it on there! Tired of explaining the difference between slow-blow and fast-blow fuses to the salespeople? Write it down! Depressed when you realize that your reason for bitching is that the only people left in the food chain below you are radio shack clerks? Well....better see your therapist on that one. Jay Vise jvise@premier.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:26 1996 From: dahauss@cyberenet.net (Dave Hauss) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISIFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 00:41:17 GMT Message-ID: <4g5sr8$515@news.cyberenet.net> References: <4etthu$8al@dfw.dfw.net> I used to work for radio shack (about 6 years ago).. and let me tell you.. 1/2 of the people who work for the company know NOTHING.. I watched they make up answers which I knew were either incorrect or were only partially correct.. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:27 1996 From: ncschult@cliff.acs.oakland.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Oakland Co. MI. jail freq. Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:23:20 GMT Message-ID: <4g6638$dcq@news2.acs.oakland.edu> Does anyone have the frequencies for the Oakland County Jail (radios inside facility) in MI? I looked in my copy of Police Call but couldn't find the jail. Thanks, Neil ============================================================== N. Schultheiss Detroit,Michigan,USA ncschult@oakland.edu Great Lakes shipping web page: Photos, passage,and much more http://www.acs.oakland.edu/~ncschult/boatnerd.html ============================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:28 1996 From: batwing@digital.net (Doug) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Ok NASCAR scanners, READ THIS! Date: 21 Feb 1996 03:19:19 GMT Message-ID: <4ge2vn$7h@ddi2.digital.net> Ok, the freqs are nice to have...does anyone have the PL tones? Doug From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:29 1996 From: navigat0r4@aol.com (NAVIGAT0R4) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Old regency mods wanted!!!!! Date: 19 Feb 1996 09:44:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4ga2cl$o3m@newsbf02.news.aol.com> I have an old regency scanner model: R 4010 I was wondering if it was possible to add a few bands to this model like 200-375 Mhz. If any one knows any mods for this radio please let me know by E-mail. The 0 in Navigat0r4 is a zero not an o. Thanx! Navigat0r4@AOL.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:29 1996 From: "George M. (MAC) Hickman" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Opening 2500XLT ? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 09:19:05 -0300 Message-ID: <31271939.A52@super-highway.net> References: To: Jason Baer From MONITORING TIMES, SEPT'93 - It works - I've done it.... "Remove the antenna and battery pack. Lay it on its face on a soft cloth or towel, bottom of radio facing you. Remove the two upper (black) screws and two lower (chrome) screws. Carefully pry the back loose from the radio and lift it off." I recall this requiring more prying than I thought it would. I had to use a bit of pull to get the cover off of my BC2500XLT. Hope this helps. - MAC From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:30 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: jmbaer@netcom.com (Jason Baer) Subject: Opening 2500XLT ? Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 23:23:36 GMT Does anybody know how to open a Uniden BC2500XLT. I have the two black screws and two silver screws out. The case just doesn't seem to want to budge. Please e-mail to jmbaer@netcom.com. Thanks ! -- "The Consultant At Large" jmbaer@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:32 1996 From: tirya@wwa.com (Tirya) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Portland Radio System Press Release (long) Date: 17 Feb 1996 01:09:20 GMT Message-ID: <4g39s0$kgq@kirin.wwa.com> Saw this on the wires... in light of the publicity this system has gotten recently, thought some folks might be interested... PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 16, 1996 CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON BUREAU OF GENERAL SERVICES For Further Information Contact: David Kish (503) 823-6825 Dennis Quail (503) 823-6971 PORTLAND RADIO SYSTEM PERFORMS WELL DURING TEST Portland, OR - The City of Portland's new 800 MHz trunked radio system performed just as it was designed during a public test and demonstration February 7, according to City officials. Representatives from many of the agencies and other governmental entities using the new system attended the demonstration. The City scheduled the demonstration of the Motorola SMARTZONE system following reports the system failed during the severe wind storm here on December 12, 1995. "The City and Motorola have been working aggressively on the system since the December wind storm," says David Kish, Director, Bureau of General Services, for the City of Portland. "This demonstration was designed to simulate the level of calls disasters like the wind storm can generate. The severe rains we had the day of the demonstration gave us an additional challenge we hadn't anticipated. But, the system performed very well." The system did experience some minor technical and weather-related problems during the December storm, says Joel Harrington, a senior communications engineer for the City of Portland. "But, the system did not go down as media reported. City of Portland and Motorola engineers fixed the problems quickly. Some system users never knew there were any system problems at all." Over the last two months, Motorola has upgraded the system's software and some hardware as part of the routine installation process. Those upgrades were completed the day before the public tests. "The same day we completed those upgrades, we really hammered the system to see how far we could push it," says Harrington. "We handled 102,000 calls, 476,000 air time seconds. Normal daily traffic is about 50-70,000 calls. We were very, very happy with how well the system performed." The system also performed well during the hostage incident at the KOIN Tower in early January, and a snow storm in mid-January. Both incidents generated call loads on the system well above those the City experienced during the December wind storm. "The system was purposely designed to accommodate these unexpected surges in call traffic," says Harrington. "In each of these cases, it did just that without any problems at all." One of the issues media reports raised last December concerned system back-up to ensure continuous capability. "Our new system has significantly more redundancy than we've ever had," says Kish. "We actually have seven levels of back-up, all the communications system redundancy necessary to maintain our communications capability and protect personnel doing their jobs in the field." According to Kish and Harrington, the bigger challenge is training personnel on how to use all the new system's many capabilities and features. "This system is easily the most sophisticated we've ever had in the region, and everyone is still learning how to use it effectively," says Kish. "But, the most important point is the system works well. Motorola invested the resources to help us make sure it does. With their support and the hard work of the City's engineering personnel, we have a communications system that can grow with our needs well into the next century." -30- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:33 1996 From: "Sean P. Watts" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Portland, OR Airport Frequencies Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:42:09 -0800 Message-ID: I've looked for a long time for frequencies for airports and airplanes. Since I live in SW Washington State Portland international is the biggest airport in the area. So if anyone has air frequencies for either Portland or frequecies that are used nationwide I would very much appreciate it if someone could send them to me. THANKS!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:34 1996 From: ridgeway@seikotsi.com (Richard Ridgeway) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Portland, OR Airport Frequencies Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 23:54:36 GMT Message-ID: <4g35dp$j7@news1.seikotsi.com> References: "Sean P. Watts" wrote: >I've looked for a long time for frequencies for airports and airplanes. >Since I live in SW Washington State Portland international is the biggest >airport in the area. So if anyone has air frequencies for either >Portland or frequecies that are used nationwide I would very much >appreciate it if someone could send them to me. THANKS!!! Sean, Here is a list captured while searching the aircraft range the day before the Pres. arrived: (not in order) 118.85 128.35 127.475 127.975 122.3 124.2 119.5 118.1 119.65 118.825 133.275 126.0 126.6 133.9 133.7 133.675 128.75 128.725 123.775 122.75 122.7 121.575 120.475 121.625 123.825 127.525 128.025 128.775 133.725 128.3 129.425 125.8 129.725 132.0 135.35 118.7 120.3 126.9 Real Active 129.7 133.0 120.5 135.45 Try these out, I'm sure you will find some activity on most. Also, you can contact the FCC to get thePDX current freqs for all four altitude zones. Monitoring America has a great section too, but it is spendy. //r\\ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:35 1996 From: stevehan@yrkpa.kias.com (Steve Hancock) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2006 Web Page Date: Mon, 19 Feb 96 08:50:44 GMT Message-ID: <4g9ds3$bu8@yrkpa.kias.com> Hello I have designed a web page for the Pro-2006, related hardware, software and publications. Also I have designed a section of the Page for "Probe" which is software for the OptoScan 456. Parts of the page is under constructed but feel free to check it out. Let me know your comments and suggestions. Thanks Steve Steve Hancock (N3FWE) York, Pa The Pro-2006 Web Page at http://yrkpa.kias.com/~stevehan stevehan@yrkpa.kias.com "The Truth is out There" From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:36 1996 From: Charles Lowery Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2026 mod Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 08:00:36 -0800 Message-ID: <3125FBA4.7BE4@halifax.com> I just bought a Realistic Pro-2026 which is rumored to be easy to modify for cellular but when I opened the radio there was no white wire in L201 position nor was there a jumper above or below the board. Help Chuck AB4YR From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:37 1996 From: Danny Banister Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-2026 mod Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:31:11 -0600 Message-ID: <3128CFFF.C6C@msg.ti.com> References: <3125FBA4.7BE4@halifax.com> Charles Lowery wrote: > > I just bought a Realistic Pro-2026 which is rumored to be easy to > modify for cellular but when I opened the radio there was no white wire > in L201 position nor was there a jumper above or below the board. > Help Chuck > AB4YR What you bought is one of the new model Pro-2026's that is not modifiable for full 800 MHz coverage. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Danny Banister |Wk email: banister@ti.com | | Texas Instruments Incorporated |Hm email: banister@flash.net | | 13353 Floyd Road , MS 345 |Wk phone: 214-995-1171 | | Dallas, Texas 75265 | | |"Statements made here are my personal opinions; I do NOT speak for TI"| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:37 1996 From: braymer@SunBelt.Net (Bobby Raymer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-2026 with 800mhz SOLD Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 00:44:36 GMT Message-ID: <4gdtec$vlq@news1.sunbelt.net> Thanks for all the replys i receive the Radio Shack PRO-2026 scanner i listed is SOLD from Bobby Raymer From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:38 1996 From: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-43 SWL Mode Date: 16 Feb 1996 00:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4g164p$eru@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fvm2d$601@bertrand.carleton.ca> Reply-To: jrosariojr@aol.com (JRosariojr) Give me the exact page address and I look and let you know From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:39 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: Steve Giron Subject: PRO-43 Tuneup Message-ID: <3124FC5B.570A@is.arco.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 21:51:23 GMT I have a PRO-43 manufactured prior to the cell-ban. I do have 1 year left on t he R.S. Extended Warranty. I have heard that if I send it in for repair (it recei ves poorly now) I may not receive back a unit with the same cellular capability, a s someone my swap my main board with a post 4/94 unit. Has anyone had a similar experience?? Should I just take it into a respectable radio shop?? I do not ha ve the tech manual nor do I wish to tune it up myself. SGIRON@is.arco.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:40 1996 From: bcheek@cts.com (Bill Cheek) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-43 Tuneup Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 09:24:33 GMT Message-ID: <312a2603.211675107@192.188.72.19> References: <3124FC5B.570A@is.arco.com> Steve Giron wrote: >I have a PRO-43 manufactured prior to the cell-ban. I do have 1 year left on the >R.S. Extended Warranty. I have heard that if I send it in for repair (it rece ives >poorly now) I may not receive back a unit with the same cellular capability, as >someone my swap my main board with a post 4/94 unit. Has anyone had a similar >experience?? Should I just take it into a respectable radio shop?? I do not h ave >the tech manual nor do I wish to tune it up myself. >SGIRON@is.arco.com First of all, I have tried answering your e-mails, but can't get a single one of the many I tried to go through. The following is typical of the Mailer Daemon error returns I get: ========== --------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------| ...transport inet_zone_smtp: connect: No route to host ========== Apparently you can send e-mail, but I bet you have a problem receiving it. Check with your ISP, please. I've had a number of emails returned because there is no route to your host. Now to answer your PRO-43 question: Radio Shack Service centers are not known to undo customer work, notably cellular mods. The techs don't care one way or the other. They just work there. If your mod has something to do with the problem, then there could be a difficulty, but the cell mod alone causes no problem and they are not likely to notice it. Doubtful they will work down to the Logic/CPU board level anyway. Your problem sounds like it's up on one of the higher boards anyway. If "poor reception" is the problem, take a look at the antenna connector where it solders inside the unit. Whoever did the cell mod may have forgotten to resolder that connection. Also, the BNC antenna connector can fail, especially in the poorly designed two-pronged center conductor pins. Examine that area carefully before pushing the panic button. Rgds, Bill +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | | COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | | World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | | PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | | San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | | WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:42 1996 From: bbones@t-online.de (NorthStar Gazer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-43 Tuneup Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:53:13 GMT Message-ID: <4gfiu6$nu8@ram2.ramlink.net> References: <3124FC5B.570A@is.arco.com> <312a2603.211675107@192.188.72.19> >Now to answer your PRO-43 question: Radio Shack Service centers are >not known to undo customer work, notably cellular mods. The techs >don't care one way or the other. They just work there. If your mod >has something to do with the problem, then there could be a >difficulty, but the cell mod alone causes no problem and they are not >likely to notice it. Doubtful they will work down to the Logic/CPU >board level anyway. Your problem sounds like it's up on one of the >higher boards anyway. >If "poor reception" is the problem, take a look at the antenna >connector where it solders inside the unit. Whoever did the cell mod >may have forgotten to resolder that connection. Also, the BNC antenna >connector can fail, especially in the poorly designed two-pronged >center conductor pins. Examine that area carefully before pushing the >panic button. >Rgds, >Bill >+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >| Bill Cheek E-mail: bcheek@cts.com FidoNet: 1:202/731 | >| COMMtronics Engineering Compuserve: 74107,1176 | >| World Scanner Report Voice Phone: (619) 578-9247 1:30pm-5:30pm | >| PO Box 262478 BBS & FAX: after 5:30pm & before 1:30pm | >| San Diego, CA 92196-2478 24-hrs, weekends/holidays | >| WWW home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bcheek | >+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ Bill, I'd seen the same thing happen with a friend's Pro-43. After he'd performed the cell mod. and beep deletion, he was so excitied about turning it on to listen to it, he'd overlooked resoldering the antenna connection to the board. After Fed-xing it to me to fiqure out what he'd done wrong, I told him what it was and he couldn't believe it. I guess it's best to check the easys out first, ehh?? Bill Bones NorthStar Satellite Magazine 810-664-4022 (voice) 810-664-0351 (fax) call today for a complimentary issue. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:43 1996 From: root Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-50 mods Needed Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:21:11 -0800 Message-ID: I'm looking for any info on mods for the PRO-50 Xevious xevious@nether.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:44 1996 From: subbustr@whidbey.net (DAVE M . SCHERTZER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-50 mods Needed Date: 19 Feb 1996 13:45:01 GMT Message-ID: <4g9ust$6md@whidbey.whidbey.com> References: If'n u find any plse email me also. My buddy has been look'in also? subbustr@whidbey.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:46 1996 From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Problem for "experts" in scanning and shortwave! Date: 19 Feb 1996 16:39:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4gaqn2$39i@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) I happened to be on the phone the other night talking long distance (neither person on either side of the line had a cordless or cellular phone) and all of a sudden 2 CB-ers (or what sounded like CB transmissions, maybe HAM) could be heard on the line. I quickly ran to my scanner and CB to turn them on, but couldn't pick up anything on the HAM repeaters, or the CB channels. Can anyone help me with this, or tell me what the heck happened? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:47 1996 From: howard_jim@isa.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: 14 Feb 1996 04:08:49 GMT Message-ID: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> Does anyone know how to do this? Now, before you all jump down my throat for asking a dumb question, let me make my self clear. I have seen ads all over t own for places that will program 2 phones on one cellular number. Why can't I do that myself? I have service with a company, and have a handheld cell phone that wo rks. I also have a mountable car phone that isn't active. Why can't I program the car phone to work on the same service I already pay for? The cell company will do it, but they want to charge me double every month for doing so... Sounds like the old battle I used to have with the TV cable company... Anyway, I'd just like to know if this can be done, and how? Any comments? Jim Howard From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:48 1996 From: "George M. (MAC) Hickman" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: 16 Feb 1996 05:25:07 GMT Message-ID: <4g14fj$gsq@news.super-highway.net> References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> To: Jim,Howard There is a good article on this subject in the February, 1996 Nuts& Volts magazine. The article is titled "Cellular Extensions on Trial". I called them for a trial copy, and they actually sent me three months worth. It seems to be a useful "trader-type" magazine, with a mixture of articles. Nuts & Volts can be reached at 1-800-783-4624. I'll probably subscribe. Bottom Line - Revenue for additional lines is important to the cellular companies. I did not read of any technical reasons against it if only one set is operational at a time. A friend of mine in the cellular industry said that it would drive the system nuts if two like sets were on the system at the same time. Mac From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:49 1996 From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:51:59 GMT Message-ID: <4g67ov$580@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> howard_jim@isa.com wrote: [snip] > Why can't I do that >myself? I have service with a company, and have a handheld cell phone that w orks. >I also have a mountable car phone that isn't active. Why can't I program the car phone to >work on the same service I already pay for? The cell company will do it, but they want to >charge me double every month for doing so... [snip] >Any comments? There are some fundmental reasons why you can't compare adding a second cellular phone (by cloning) to adding a second phone in your house. Cellular is a radio service. Your rates are based on access the network. You don't pay for a "line" to which you can connect as many phones as you wish. You pay for one cellular telephone to access the network. For practical purposes, the wireline bell telephone companies don't care about how many extensions you have on your home phone line - ON YOUR SIDE of the demarcation point (demarc) out side your house. They are only responsible for the service up to that demarc. If you want your line to appear on a phone somewhere across town, you have to have the phone company do it - and they charge you for it. In the case of a cellular telephone, the "demarc" is the transceiver itself. The cellular carrier is the radio system licensee/operator and they have effective control over your cellular phone. If you want that number to work in another location (another cellular telephone - which is a radio) you have to have the cellular phone company do it. And they are within their right to charge you for it. So you would be defrausing the cellular carrier of legitimate revenue by cloning your car phone and making it appear as your hand-held. Especially if the carrier offers "second phone" services that are billable. Cellular is a radiotelephone service - a glorified trunked radio system with interconnect to the public switched telephone network. It is just not the same as wireline telephone service. It has it's own set of laws and rules. I am surprised that we are still seeing ads for shops that appear to be cloning phones. Cloning is expressly prohibited by FCC rules. cwheeler From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:50 1996 From: jc-stapp@ix.netcom.com(Jonathan Stapp ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Q: What is available for price of AR8000? Date: 18 Feb 1996 15:46:00 GMT Message-ID: <4g7hjo$725@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> Planning on buying a portable scanner. Have pretty much decided on the AOR AR8000. Question is, what else is comparable (or better!) for the price? I like what I read about its features (all the bells & whistles), but may not necessarily need LW, MW, or HF coverage, as I already have a portable shortwave. Any advice appreciated. Thanks -Jon From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:50 1996 From: fwhitehurst@ezdial.com (David Whitehurst) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Q: What is available for price of AR8000? Date: 18 Feb 1996 22:25:12 GMT Message-ID: <4g8908$d6u@news.cais.com> References: <4g7hjo$725@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> In article <4g7hjo$725@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>, jc-stapp@ix.netcom.co says... > >Planning on buying a portable scanner. Well, I have the AR8000 & love it! Of course, ALL scanners are limited by the antenna connected to them. The $100.00 DX conversion mod to allow a more n arrow AM filter is something to consider (EEB in Vienna,VA does this). I have , nevertheless, been quite happy with it! Nothing comparable in a handheld exits on the market. The similar Yupteru model has no provision for a computer interface. - David. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:52 1996 From: octo@mi.net (Steve Donovan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 17 Feb 1996 03:28:24 GMT Message-ID: <4g3i0o$3s7@scratchy.mi.net> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Want something better than a radar jammer? I'm not sure of all the details, but apparently an Electronic Tech did something along the following line a couple of years ago. He took a 900 Watt Magnetron from a microwave oven, designed and build the necessary circuitry to hook it up to his radar detector. The effect was that once a radar signal was received the magnetron was switched on sending out a pulse that would blow the front end out of the radar guns. -- .signature under construction From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:54 1996 From: jerry Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 20 Feb 1996 14:57:15 GMT Message-ID: <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> bryant6634@aol.com (BryanT6634) wrote: >In article <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com>, Brad Cuppy writes: > >>; It's my understanding that the operation of a jammer per se is not >>; illegal, however, you can be ticketed for, (get this) >>; >>; "Interfering with an officer of the law in the performance of his >>: duties" >>; >>; Personally, I think I'd rather have the speeding ticket! >>: >>: How 'bout you? >>: >> >>If it's a misdemanor and not a felony, it would be cheaper than >>a speeding ticket after you add in the insurance hikes, points, etc. >>If the FCC comes in the picture, the speeding ticket is definitely >>better. > >If it's a "laser" jammer, since it's not RF, it's my understanding that >the FCC wouldn't become involved with this. > >However, transmitting on any RF frequency for which you are not authorized >can certainly lead to FCC intervention..... and THAT would cost FAR more >than anything the police can cost you.... if you want to jam their radar just am a radar gun at them the gun these days can be bought for about 25-50 dollars in surplus. btw it is true about some of those units causing cancer. yep, the pistol grip type has been blamed for various groin and intestinal cancers. this is the model that the assholes with a badge would hold in their lap waiting for someone to come along. i think its funny From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:55 1996 From: gerald.klein@magnet.at (Ing.Gerald KLEIN) Reply-To: gerald.klein@magnet.at Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Distribution: world Subject: radar warning system Date: 14 Feb 1996 10:11:32 GMT Message-ID: <1939537886.5285721@magnet.at> Hi! I do not know if I am right here. I hope so because it works like a scanner. I am looking for a radar and laser warning system. I heared there is one from U.S. or Can. - Valentine One ( X-Band 10,525 Ghz., K-Band 24,15 Ghz., Ka-Band 33,4 to 36 Ghz. and laserlight 950 nm). Can anyone tell me where I can get it ? Do anyone know something about this system? Or is there a newsgroup on Internet? please to my BOX gerald.klein@magnet.at From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:55 1996 From: fireboss@primenet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Radio News Date: 14 Feb 1996 18:05:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4fu0ru$fvm@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Reply-To: fireboss@primenet.com Attached is an article that provides information of interest to scanner owners. I can post these as they are announced. I am interested in responses so that I know if people find this of value or just more noise. Monday, February 12, 1996 The City of Baltimore Board of Estimates has awarded Motorola a $38 million contract to manufacture and install a new 800 MHz radio communications system for the city's public safety and public service agencies. The ASTRO(TM) digital system initially will serve the City of Baltimore Fire department. Eventually, all City of Baltimore public safety and public service departments will use the system. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:56 1996 From: MITCH_CURLY@msn.com (Mitchell Bogh) Subject: Re: Radio News Date: 19 Feb 96 07:32:05 -0800 References: <4fu0ru$fvm@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+000047cf@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner It always seems to amaze me at how tax dollars are spent. These police depts and fire depts are really being taken for a ride when it comes to these new radio schemes. I think that most of these so called miracle 800mhz systems are junk. I would really hope that the comunity gets involved in trying to stop this foolish waste of money. If these major manufactures want to built these systems they should learn a little more from the cellular industry. Six to ten repeaters for an entire county will not give them (users) the same decent coverage that they already have. this is just my opinion. Mitch From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:58 1996 From: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Radio Shack email address + more Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 20:16:51 -0500 Message-ID: I'm one of many who are getting tired of reading RS complaints on here. Instead of griping here, I told RADIO SHACK! So, if you have a gripe, email them at: rs.customer.relations@tandy.com ...Or snail mail them at: RadioShack Customer Relations 1400 One Tandy Center Ft. Worth, TX 76102 Phone: 817-390-3204 Fax: 817-390-3292 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:16:59 1996 From: "Joseph G. Hill" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Radio Shack Pro 2040 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:14:45 -0500 Message-ID: <31277AA5.1C15@shivasys.com> Radio Shack has the Pro 2040 on sale for $169.99. Is this a good deal??? Is there an alternative for about the same price that is a better choice?? Can this model me modified to hear cellular telephone?? Thanks, Joe Hill From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:00 1996 From: "Joseph G. Hill" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack Pro 2040 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:36:22 -0500 Message-ID: <31286EC6.7348@shivasys.com> References: <31277AA5.1C15@shivasys.com> Joseph G. Hill wrote: > > Radio Shack has the Pro 2040 on sale for $169.99. Is this a good deal??? I s > there an alternative for about the same price that is a better choice?? Can > this model me modified to hear cellular telephone?? Thanks, Joe Hill Someone out there E-mailed me a review of the Pro 2040 and information on other models and somehow I zapped it from my E-mail files...please send it again!!! Thanks, Joe Hill joehill@shivasys.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:01 1996 From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Radio Shack PRO-59 mods?? Date: 18 FEB 96 18:19:28 Message-ID: <4g8cf9$427@mrnews.mro.dec.com> Are there any mods for the Radio Shack PRO-59? thanks, Ken From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:02 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. RG=? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4f5q3f$188@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <4ga7gq$k7l@cloner4.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:41:51 GMT (someone who knows) writes: > Paul Bastian wrote: > > (snip) >> For those who are interested RG stands for Radio Guide, that was >>the term given to the wire before it was called Coax Cable. (snip) > > RG=Radial Ground. > cracker jack box degrees don't count Interesting answers!!! Actually RG= Royal Grade. Originally there were several grades of cable with the Royal Grade being the best. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:03 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We're clueless Date: 15 Feb 1996 16:25:54 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4fvmqi$27vk@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> <4fellj$geo@odo.peak.org> <4fl659$72p@feenix.metronet.com> <4fnl0b$qgo@news-e2a.gnn.com> <4fq4nr$n3i@news-e2a.gnn.com> <4frll5$6ht@alterdial.uu.net> >My HTX-100 also says Uniden, didn't know they were in the 10m business, >but what the hell. Huh?? Where have you been living for the past 8 years? Who do you think manufactures the HR-2510?? -Drew in Charlotte- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:04 1996 From: dringer@access.mountain.net (Dan Ringer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 15 Feb 1996 03:27:01 GMT Message-ID: <4fu965$2fl@news.mountain.net> References: Folks, I've been an amateur radio operator and electronics hobbyist for 33 yea rs, living in towns of less than 50,000 the whole time. For all their faults, it is by far better to have a Radio Shack store availabl e than not. Components. You can get them! No more TV repair shop "Let's look in the back room" hunts. You can buy fair electronic devices with warranties and exchange possibilities . Maybe the prices are a bit higher (maybe), but they're there. Buy it off the shelf! It's a decent first or second job for young people, or a second job for older ones. If they don't know what you're talking about, take a few minutes to talk with the at an off time. If they don't want to talk (and learn), just buy your stuff and leave. If you're buying electronic components you know more than they do. That's pro bably the way it should be. Radio Shack isn't perfect. But try not going into one for a year. You'll appre ciate them. Dan, K8WV From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:06 1996 From: dahauss@cyberenet.net (Dave Hauss) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 00:46:41 GMT Message-ID: <4g5t5c$515@news.cyberenet.net> References: <4eugv0$32s@what.why.net> <3118ccf0.43822270@onyx.indstate.edu> <4fan57$58s@tel.den.mmc.com> <31192BEA.325A@trenton.edu> I used to work at radio shack (about 6 years ago).. I was the tech person for the store I worked at as well as some of the other stores that needed assistance. Taking those tests mean nothing.. when I worked there, we were allowed to take the book and the test home and take it then it would get sent to the district office for scoring.. in fact, the manager of our store highlighted the correct answers (although some of them were wrong)... the reason why I dont work there anymore is simple and its probably why not many tech people work there is because of the $$ they pay and the quotas they set... I remember our store getting yelled at by the DM for out numbers.. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:06 1996 From: doneal@tcac.com (Dave O'Neal) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 18 Feb 1996 01:40:35 GMT Message-ID: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> References: <4f5q3f$188@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> >Not all radio shack staff are cluleless, but no one can argue that the >vast majority of them have no knoweledge of electronics at all. > >Odd for a store that sells capacitors, resistors, etc... YOU EXPECT TOO MUCH! 1) Don't expect that a person trying to sell you something (Radio Shack) will tell you the truth! 2) Don't expect much at all from a minimum wage earner!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:08 1996 From: Paul Bastian Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 13:31:15 -0800 Message-ID: <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> References: <4f5q3f$188@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> Dave O'Neal wrote: > > >Not all radio shack staff are cluleless, but no one can argue that the > >vast majority of them have no knoweledge of electronics at all. > > > >Odd for a store that sells capacitors, resistors, etc... > > YOU EXPECT TOO MUCH! > > 1) Don't expect that a person trying to sell you something > (Radio Shack) will tell you the truth! > > 2) Don't expect much at all from a minimum wage earner!!! > I quess I need to throw my two cents in. I am amazed what some sales person will say to get a sale. Since I have an electronics degree and work with computers, I feel that I know a least a little. Since I travel the Northeast for work, I stop in R/S to kill time and to pick up 5 & Dime Items, such as solder and Caps. To check out how much the sales person knows I ask them a simple question. What does the RG stand for in the Coax, (ie RG-59, RG-6 and so on). You would be amazed the answers I get. But the most popular one is that since Radio Shack sells only the best it stands for Really Good (the best coax around). I have to hold back my laughter. For those who are interested RG stands for Radio Guide, that was the term given to the wire before it was called Coax Cable. I once put in a application at a local R/S for the fun of it. The store manager told me that they did not need anybody that knew anything they wanted people with Sales skills. (?) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:10 1996 From: Mike Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 17:48:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> References: <4f5q3f$188@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> Paul Bastian wrote: > Since I travel the Northeast for work, I stop in R/S to kill time > and to pick up 5 & Dime Items, such as solder and Caps. To check out > how much the sales person knows I ask them a simple question. > What does the RG stand for in the Coax, (ie RG-59, RG-6 and so > on). You would be amazed the answers I get. But the most popular one is > that since Radio Shack sells only the best it stands for Really Good (the > best coax around). I have to hold back my laughter. > For those who are interested RG stands for Radio Guide, that was > the term given to the wire before it was called Coax Cable. I never knew that (I'm a ham, an electronics nut, and a scanner freak). I'd venture to say that MOST hams don't know what RG means. Just like most people don't know what BNC or N stands for, or for that matter, why the batteries are named D, C, AA, AAA, etc. Kind of an unfair question to ask a salesdroid (but fun to watch them squirm out an answer). Here's one for you: Q: What size cells are used in a standard 6-volt lantern battery (the ones with the springy terminals)? A: F-cells, there are four of them (got this from a Radio Shack book, oddly). I would, for example, expect an RS sales person to know the diff between Narrow FM and Wideband FM, but not something as relatively obscure (but great for Trivial Pursuit) as Radio Guide. > I once put in a application at a local R/S for the fun of it. > The store manager told me that they did not need anybody that knew > anything they wanted people with Sales skills. (?) Yep - hence the salesdroid syndrome. -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:11 1996 From: Jack Davis Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RadioShack has the Pro-2026 on sale again! Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 14:50:59 PST Message-ID: References: <4g7h28$gkk_001@nadzam.garlic.com> In Article<4g7h28$gkk_001@nadzam.garlic.com>, writes: > Path: news.deltanet.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.moneng.mei.com!news.ecn.bgu.edu!vixen. c so.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!miwok!news.scruz.n e t!garlic.com!nadzam > From: nadzam@garlic.com (Bill Nadzam) > Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner > Subject: RadioShack has the Pro-2026 on sale again! > Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 15:36:40 GMT > Organization: garlic.com > Lines: 8 > Message-ID: <4g7h28$gkk_001@nadzam.garlic.com> > NNTP-Posting-Host: z.assign.garlic.com > X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 > > I saw the ad today $149.95 for the Pro-2026 > Good value. > > ------------------------------------------------ > Name: Bill.Nadzam > E-mail: "Bill Nadzam" > ------------------------------------------------ > That is a good buy. Don't "assume" they are modable (is that a word) unless you know how to tell the difference. Some can, some can't. Mine did! Jack From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:12 1996 From: nadzam@garlic.com (Bill Nadzam) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RadioShack has the Pro-2026 on sale again! Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 15:36:40 GMT Message-ID: <4g7h28$gkk_001@nadzam.garlic.com> I saw the ad today $149.95 for the Pro-2026 Good value. ------------------------------------------------ Name: Bill.Nadzam E-mail: "Bill Nadzam" ------------------------------------------------ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:13 1996 From: Stephen Waits Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Re2: What exactly is a DTMF decoder? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: References: <199602160721.XAA17443@coyote.rain.org> On Thu, 15 Feb 1996, Tbear wrote: > I was wondering how you input it into your computer? Via a mic on my Soundblaster 2.0.. > If it works so well, why don't you record the tones and theb > then play it back in 5 tone increments for numbers greater than > five tones.................. Because that is shitty. I've almost got my own completed. --Steve (http://pr.erau.edu/~swaits) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:14 1996 From: anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Receiving Television SCA signals Date: 16 Feb 1996 19:08:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> Can anyone explain how SCA signals from television stations work? Does anyone have experience with picking them up on a scanner? How do TV SCA's differ from (or are they the same thing as) the "SAP", or "Second Audio Program". Are there SCA signals which cannot be heard by by a television set's SAP capability? Are SCA or SAP signals done by having an addional FM carrier near the "normal" sound carrier of the TV signal. Or are they done by FM-on-FM modulation on the original sound carrier, which would require some type of modification to the scanner to receive? And what types of things might be found on television station SCA's? Are the stations restricted to using their SCA for their own operation (i.e. cueing remote broadcasts), or can they lease the subcarrier to anyone for purposes similar to the SCA's of broadcast FM stations? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:16 1996 From: Richard Foster Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 12:41:38 -0600 Message-ID: <3128C462.A18@anl.gov> References: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4g7rtk$daq@dfw.dfw.net> Steve Work wrote: > > Brian Oakley (boakley@dfw.net) wrote: > : Has anyone, or does anyone know if SAP signals can be received via cable > : tv allowing that the local broadcaster already brodcasts an SAP signal? > : Seems like this would be possible if the same bandwidth is being used. > : B. > : > > I was messing around with the SAP function on my VCR the other day. > Seems like there were about 4 or 5 TV channels which made the SAP light > come on. Trying to listen to the SAP, I have concluded that SAP merely > stands for "Same Audio Program", because that's what all the stations > were presumably broadcasting on their SAP. Just a duplicate of their > normal TV audio. Perhaps the stations are fearful that ignorant viewers > will punch the SAP button and not know what it's for, and they don't want > to lose audience because of this. > > I was not able to find a SAP which was different from the normal audio > programming. > > Is my experience with SAP typical? During the Superbowl, the SAP channel had the play by play in spanish. At leas t it was in the Chicago area. -- Richard Foster | Electronics and Computing Technologies Div. Network Specialist | Argonne National Laboratory (708) 252-5404 | 9700 S. Cass Ave. e-mail: rgfoster@anl.gov | Argonne, Ill. 60439 From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:17 1996 From: martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals Date: 19 Feb 1996 20:47:42 GMT Message-ID: <4ganle$jde@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> In article <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randal l) writes: >Can anyone explain how SCA signals from television stations work? SCA television signals work exactly the same way that SCA signals work in the FM radio broadcast band. > Does >anyone have experience with picking them up on a scanner? You can't do that very easily on a normal scanner because most scanners don't have a SCA detector built in even if they have a wideband detector for receiving TV sound. In order for SCA to work, the band-width of the signal has to be sufficient to accommodate the SCA transmissions along with the audio. support anything much above >How do TV SCA's differ from (or are they the same thing as) the "SAP", or >"Second Audio Program". Are there SCA signals which cannot be heard by >by a television set's SAP capability? > To answer the second question first, yes. There are SCA transmissions that can't be heard via SAP. This is because the new stereo sound standard adopted in the early eighties allows for two SCA audio channels, one for sAP and another for special studio use such as queuing. All of the subcarrier s are harmonics of the pilot tone which is the same as the horizontal sweep frequency. The stereophonic sound is very much like that used in FM broadcasting except that the frequencies of the pilot tone and stereo subcarier are multiples of the horizontal sweep frequency. >Are SCA or SAP signals done by having an addional FM carrier near the >"normal" sound carrier of the TV signal. Or are they done by FM-on-FM >modulation on the original sound carrier, which would require some type >of modification to the scanner to receive? You've got it right on the nose. The SCA signal might be thought of is very high-pitched FM audio that is way! above a person's ability to hear it. Not only that, but the deimphasis network and other filtering placed in the audio output chain of a television receiver insures that almost none of the SCA energy will ever reach the speaker. You shouldn't hear any difference in the normal programming audio at all when a station is broadcasting SCA. Another use of one of the non-SAP channels is to send remote telemetry from the transmitter site back to the studio so that the engineers can remotely monitor the operation of the transmitter and do not necessarily have to keep a live body at the site if it happens to be across town from the studio. If you have a SCA decoder that tunes such a service, you will hear modem-like sounds which may have a cadence to them as the telemetry system cycles through all the parameters that are being monitored. > >And what types of things might be found on television station SCA's? Are >the stations restricted to using their SCA for their own operation (i.e. >queuing remote broadcasts), or can they lease the subcarrier to anyone for >purposes similar to the SCA's of broadcast FM stations? > Since the SAP channel is included on lots of higher-quality VCR's and many television sets, nobody is going to put anything on there that isn't meant for the general public to receive. AS for the special SCA system, it is more likely not to be used at all or to be used for telemetry than anything that one would find really interesting. The SAP channel is used for foreign language translation of a program such as when KTLA in Las Angeles reads the evening news in Spanish on SAp along with the English which is on the main channel. SAP is also used to provide something called DVS or Descriptive Video Service which consists of a voice-over during quiet parts of a film which describes the scene for blind people. Believe me, blind people enjoy television programs along with the sighted public and they should enjoy them more with DVS. Right now, there is not very much DVS since somebody has to be paid to sit there and do the voice-overs, but it is a good idea. It is sort of like an audio versio n of Closed-Captionning or CC capability. I remember hearing many years ago that KTLA was doing the news in Spanish so if this isn't still being done, I am in error, but this is the exact sort of thing that planners originally had in mind for the SAP system. Martin McCormick 405 744-7572 Stillwater, OK OSU Center for Computing and Information services Data Communications Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:19 1996 From: Bob.Horvath@Microserve.com (Bob Horvath) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals Message-ID: <96021976594@microserve.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 21:16:34 EST Reply-To: Bob.Horvath@Microserve.com (Bob Horvath) Distribution: world >Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner >Path: nuclear.microserve.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci. co >m!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!slwork >From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) >Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals >Message-ID: >Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] >References: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4g7rtk$daq@dfw.dfw.net> >Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:15:28 GMT >Lines: 20 >Sender: slwork@netcom9.netcom.com > >Brian Oakley (boakley@dfw.net) wrote: >: Has anyone, or does anyone know if SAP signals can be received via cable >: tv allowing that the local broadcaster already brodcasts an SAP signal? >: Seems like this would be possible if the same bandwidth is being used. >: B. >: > >I was messing around with the SAP function on my VCR the other day. >Seems like there were about 4 or 5 TV channels which made the SAP light >come on. Trying to listen to the SAP, I have concluded that SAP merely >stands for "Same Audio Program", because that's what all the stations >were presumably broadcasting on their SAP. Just a duplicate of their >normal TV audio. Perhaps the stations are fearful that ignorant viewers >will punch the SAP button and not know what it's for, and they don't want >to lose audience because of this. > >I was not able to find a SAP which was different from the normal audio >programming. > >Is my experience with SAP typical? Here we have 6-7 SAP channels,some change from stereo to mono, and only one is different and that one broadcasts NOAA weather. bob.horvath@microserve.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:19 1996 From: simon@ultratech.net (Simon Tooke) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 03:04:36 GMT Message-ID: <4gbdit$50j@newspeak.ultratech.net> References: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4g7rtk$daq@dfw.dfw.net> <3128C462.A18@anl.gov> Richard Foster wrote: >Steve Work wrote: >> >> Brian Oakley (boakley@dfw.net) wrote: >> I was not able to find a SAP which was different from the normal audio >> programming. >> >> Is my experience with SAP typical? >During the Superbowl, the SAP channel had the play by play in spanish. At lea st >it was in the Chicago area. In Toronto CITY TV used to have instructions on how to get out of SAP mode on their SAP channel. -simon tooke From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:21 1996 From: karolak@city-net.com (Bob Karolak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Receiving Television SCA signals Date: 20 Feb 1996 23:37:08 GMT Message-ID: <4gdlv4$8sh@dns.city-net.com> References: <4g3dab$nc8@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4g7rtk$daq@dfw.dfw.net> In article <4g7rtk$daq@dfw.dfw.net>, boakley@dfw.net says... > >Has anyone, or does anyone know if SAP signals can be received via cable >tv allowing that the local broadcaster already brodcasts an SAP signal? >Seems like this would be possible if the same bandwidth is being used. >B. > I receive SAP from a local station in Pittsburgh, PA (they continually broadcast the local weather report) while connected to cable. The SAP is received with no problem. However, another local channel that shows SAP present (via the indicator light) has the same audio on SAP as well as the normal audio setting. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:21 1996 From: ringo@nyc.pipeline.com (Richard Headley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RS Pro 50 and Mods Date: 16 Feb 1996 14:26:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4g2lq3$fgl@pipe12.nyc.pipeline.com> Is the RS Pro 50 easy to modify. Rich ringo@pipeline.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:22 1996 From: ndavis@spider.lloyd.com (Norman Davis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Sacramento Rail Freqs Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 16:29:32 GMT Message-ID: <4g500t$qos@harry.lloyd.com> * 453.8250 SAC RT Mostly Bus traffic * 161.5500 SP ROAD * 160.8900 SP PBX MT VACA RPTR * 160.3200 SP ROAD 2 (DENVER) * 160.5150 PBX WEAK * 160.6050 UP PBX WEAK * 160.3500 SP CONTAINER TERMINAL * 160.2300 SP ROSEVILLE CARMEN * 161.4300 SP YARD * 160.9800 SP YARD * 146.4900 RAILFAN SIMPLEX * 446.5000 RAILFAN SIMPLEX * 160.6500 ATSF ROAD CH 1 * 160.4250 UP ROAD * 160.2900 UP ROAD * 160.4700 UP ROAD 2 * 160.8600 BART ROAD 2 All these Freqs were active on or about 2-17-96 from my location aprox 30 miles east of Sacramento at 1500 MSL elavation. Rcvr is R-2006 and Antenna is a Discone up 25 Feet. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:24 1996 From: spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu (Steven C Passmore) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Francisco Frequencies Date: 20 Feb 1996 11:25:45 -0800 Message-ID: <4gd77p$73d@cello.gina.calstate.edu> References: This list is pretty old so some of these are probably not correct. If anyone has any additions or corrections please post them. (R)=Repeater (S)=Simplex (B)=Base (M)=Mobile San Francisco City & County Sheriffs Office 488.8125 (R) Ch 1 Primary 488.8125 (S) Ch 2 Primary (Simplex) City Hall & Jail Security 488.6875 (S) Ch 3 County Jail & Court Security 488.8375 (S) Ch 4 City Jail Security Police 45.10 (S) Low Band 1 Richmond, Ingleside, Taravel, Traffic 45.14 (S) Low Band 2 Mission, Potrero 45.58 (S) Low band 3 Central, Southern 45.46 (S) Low Band 4 Northern, Park 460.225 (R) PIC Zone 1 Richmond, Ingleside, Taravel 460.125 (R) PIC Zone 2 Mission, Potrero 460.500 (R) PIC Zone 3 Central, Southern 460.450 (R) Citywide 1 Tow Trucks, Meter Checkers 460.075 (R) Citywide 2 Northern, Park 460.350 (R) Citywide 3 TAC-6 460.525 (S) TAC-7 (low power) 460.550 (S) TAC-8 (low power) 460.025 (R) TAC-3 CLEMARS 45.30 (S) Police Academy Fire 488.3625 (R) Control 1 Downtown, North Beach, South of Market 488.5625 (R) Control 2 Western Addition, Pacific Heights 488.7625 (R) Control 3 Southeast, Mission, Ingleside 489.1625 (S) Control 4 Fireground 489.1875 (S) Control 5 Fireground & Paging 489.1125 (R) Control 6 Mayor, Schools 154.280 (S) Control 7 Mutual Aid - White 46.46 (S) Control 10 Ambulance 462.950 (R) Co-Ord 1 City Ambulance - Dispatch 462.975 (R) Co-Ord 2 City Ambulance - Ambulance to Hospital 155.385 (S) Primary 158.760 (S) Secondary - M.A.P. units 155.160 (S) San Francisco Ambulance (Private) 155.265 (S) King American Ambulance Company 47.66 (S) Mercy Peninsula Ambulance 463.125 (S) Med 6 San Francisco General Hospital - Base 468.125 (S) " San Francisco General Hospital - Mobile 463.175 (S) Med 8 St. Marys Hospital - Base 468.175 (S) " St. Marys Hospital - Mobile Local Government 48.20 (S) Water Dept. - Hetch Hetchy 48.30 (S) Water Dept. - Bay Area 48.40 (S) Water Dept. - Commercial Division 451.250 (R) Water Dept. - Administration & Paging 37.90 (S) Street Dept. 37.92 (S) Street Dept. 489.1125 (R) San Francisco School District 453.225 (R) Housing Authority / Port of SF San Francisco Minicipal Railway - (MUNI) 484.6625 (R) Ch A LRV's & Cable Cars 484.5125 (R) Ch B Coaches 484.5625 (R) Ch C Data 484.6125 (R) Ch D Coaches 484.7125 (R) Ch E Coaches 484.7625 (R) Ch F Data 482.8875 (R) Ch G Coaches San Francisco International Airport 453.375 (R) Police 453.200 (R) Operations 453.775 (S) Fire Bay Area Rapid Transit District - (BART) 160.410 (R) Ch 1 Road 160.455 (S) Yard 160.860 (R) Ch 2 Road 453.150 (R) Police Primary 453.425 (R) Police Secondary 453.975 (S) Yard Golden Gate Transit District 482.3875 (B) / 485.3875 (M) Coaches 482.5375 (B) / 485.5375 (M) Coaches 482.6875 (B) / 485.6875 (M) Coaches 482.7375 (B) / 485.7375 (M) Tow Trucks 482.5875 (B) / 485.5875 (M) Ferry Boats 482.8375 (B) / 485.8375 (M) Administration U.S. Park Service - (Golden Gate National Recreation Area) 163.150 (R) Police 164.525 (S) Police (Tactical) U.S. Army - Presidio of San Francisco 148.600 (R) Ch 1 Police Primary 150.700 (S) Ch 2 Police TAC 148.900 (R) Ch 3 Police TAC 149.700 (S) Fire Primary 149.625 (S) Public Works From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:25 1996 From: tless@iac.net (The Kid) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Scanner Interference Date: 20 Feb 1996 15:28:16 GMT Message-ID: <4gcpag$455@cheyenne.iac.net> I have a BC 760 xlt that has been modified to accept just about every thing an d I run a portable car top antenna to it when I use it in the house. My quest ion is that when its on the desk, and the computer is turned on I get alot of static that interferes with the reception. Is there a better antenna to use p ossible to hook up in the attic? Im in a house with no obvious obstructions o ther than the computer? From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:26 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Scanners and Household Insurance Date: 20 Feb 1996 02:52:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4gbujp$hgm@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <311B7B11.7FB2@primenet.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) ARRL also offers insurance for ham radio equipment and also covers computers and other items as they relate to ham radio operation. While covered by another insurance company years ago, I had a scanner stolen at a hospital I was working at. They covered it! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:27 1996 From: Nicolaia@pi.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SCANNERS FREQ Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 23:29:04 PDT Message-ID: Who knows Freqs. from mobile phones around the house?! Reactions ?! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:28 1996 From: nbussey@calvin.stemnet.nf.ca () Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Schametics Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:20:27 GMT Message-ID: <4gd70f$v5i@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> Hello: Does anyone have the schametics for a Realistic Pro 57 radio scanner? If so I would appreciate hearing from you. Reply by email please to nbussey@calvin.stemnet.nf.ca Thanks Nels From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:29 1996 From: Collier_Chun@ccm.hf.intel.com (Collier Chun) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 16:55:40 PST Message-ID: <4g394p$k4l@ornews.intel.com> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> In article <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com>, mscheetz@pacifier.com says... > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but couldn' t >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or freq s >for this SS activity? I believe he was talking about LERN--the Law Enforcement Radio Net, on 155.37. Oregon State Police et al around here tend to use the Oregon Police Emergency net (OPEN). I have LERN filed under my Washington State Patrol frequencies. This would make sense since he first flew into Washington state, then back down to Oregon. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:29 1996 From: D Stark Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:30:17 -0500 Message-ID: <312610A9.14A6@frontiernet.net> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> > > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN > >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but could n't > >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or fr eqs > >for this SS activity? ILERN = 155.475 MHz From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:30 1996 From: D Stark Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:31:22 -0500 Message-ID: <312610EA.4AF1@frontiernet.net> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> > > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN > >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but could n't > >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or fr eqs > >for this SS activity? ILERN = 155.475 MHz (also known as NLEEF and other acronyms - they keep proposing the same freque ncy and calling it by different names every time) From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:31 1996 From: tim@umcc.umcc.umich.edu (Tim Tyler) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 15 Feb 1996 13:18:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4fvtdg$ia4@umcc.umcc.umich.edu> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4fvb6o$og@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> In article <4fvb6o$og@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us>, John Wilkerson wrote: >Tintin & Snowy (mscheetz@pacifier.com) wrote: > >: Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland and >: Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net (the 155 mhz >: neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background check. >: Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited check >: claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. >: Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >: channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but could n't >: find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or fr eqs >: for this SS activity? > >There are a few other freqs more than likey common to Ohio.... BUT, there >is one... Nationwide Emergency Freq, that all law enforcement agencies >nationwide.. _should_ have.. 155.475 I agree here, but >As far as the Secret Service, they are mosr definitely digitally >encrypted. You woul never in a million years be able to listen to them. Utter B.S. > John L. Wilkerson Jr... jwilkers@freenet.columbus.oh.us > "Political Correctness is for mindless sheep.. Speak up how >_you_ want, not how others say you should" Sounds great, but there's something to be said for accuracy, too! Tim -- Tim Tyler Internet: tim@umcc.umich.edu C$erve: 72571,1005 AOL: Hooligan P.O. Box 443 Amateur Radio: KA8VIR @WB8ZPN.#SEMI.MI.USA.NOAM Ypsilanti, MI 48197-0443 In cyberspace, no one can hear you scream. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:33 1996 From: jwilkers@freenet.columbus.oh.us (John Wilkerson) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 15 Feb 1996 08:07:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4fvb6o$og@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> Tintin & Snowy (mscheetz@pacifier.com) wrote: : Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland and : Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net (the 155m hz : neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background check. : Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited check : claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. : Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN : channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but couldn 't : find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or fre qs : for this SS activity? In Ohio LEERN... Law Enforcement Emergency Radio Network is 154.935. There are a few other freqs more than likey common to Ohio.... BUT, there is one... Nationwide Emergency Freq, that all law enforcement agencies nationwide.. _should_ have.. 155.475 As far as the Secret Service, they are mosr definitely digitally encrypted. You woul never in a million years be able to listen to them. -- John L. Wilkerson Jr... jwilkers@freenet.columbus.oh.us "Political Correctness is for mindless sheep.. Speak up how _you_ want, not how others say you should" From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:36 1996 From: dg715@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David Mark) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 19 Feb 1996 06:54:20 GMT Message-ID: <4g96qs$ka1@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g394p$k4l@ornews.intel.com> Reply-To: dg715@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David Mark) Ohio's LEERN channel is 154.935mhz. -- (DAVID MARK) dg715@cleveland.freenet.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:37 1996 From: dskidmo@halcyon.com (Don Skidmore) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 16 Feb 1996 00:44:03 GMT Message-ID: <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> In article <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com>, mscheetz@pacifier.com says... > > > Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland and >Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net (the 155mh z >neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background check. >Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited check >claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but couldn' t >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or freq s >for this SS activity? Washington State has LERN-Law Enforcement Radio Network, I think. 155.37. SS often uses mutual aid channels to coordinate with locals/county/state. Don -- __ __ _ __ | Just my opinion? You bet! ___/ /__ / /__ (_)__/ /_ _ ___ | dskidmo@halcyon.com / _ (_- References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:37:22 GMT In article <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com>, dskidmo@halcyon.com says... > >In article <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com>, mscheetz@pacifier.com says... >> >> >> Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland and >>Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net (the 155mhz >>neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background check. >>Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited check >>claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. >> Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >>channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but couldn't >>find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or freqs >>for this SS activity? > >Washington State has LERN-Law Enforcement Radio Network, I think. 155.37. SS >often uses mutual aid channels to coordinate with locals/county/state. > >Don ________________________________________________________________________ Howdy, LERN is an acronym which stands for Law Enforcement Radio Network. The Washington statewide LEARN frequency was 155.370 the last that I was aware. LERN has nothing directly to do with the Secret Service operations. Many states have a statewide network set up although the acronym chosen may be different from state to state. All this is is a frequency that is reserved for interagency traffic, usually involving a situation of importance. Cheers :o) cws From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:40 1996 From: strombosis@aol.com (Strombosis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: SF Bay Area 154.6800 Mhz ? Date: 16 Feb 1996 00:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4g14t0$efv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fibak$cej@ccnet3.ccnet.com> Reply-To: strombosis@aol.com (Strombosis) As most of you have figured out, CAL DOJ uses 154.68 as thier primeru calling and ops channels. Agents are equipped with saber III's in the Nor CAl region. THe two common activities you will hear are narcotics (BNE) ops and "VSU" or violence suppression unit programs which are a relatively new style program wherein DOJ augments Local PD's in the investigationa and apprehension of Career or violent criminals. You may here DOJ on any number of freq's and u might listen to reapeater inputs lic to other obscure state agencies also//(hint,hint)........ back to BNE; DOJ supervises many regional Narcotics Task Forces- Westnet = West COCO county Eastnet= East COCO County SACNET= Southern Alameda County Narc Enf Team one of the reprevious replys noted AANET which operates in Santa Clara County and stands for Allied Agency Narc Enf Team These task forces are staffed by officers from local agencies who are committed for a 2-5 year stint. Supervision, Direction & resources are provided by DOJ. wages are paid by the donor agency. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:42 1996 From: "Robert H. Eisner" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: SFO Airline Company Frequencies Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:40:11 -0500 Message-ID: <312A31AB.74A9@internetMCI.COM> References: <4fqtnr$pna@news.vanderbilt.edu> To: singerep@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu kEN Colburn wrote: > > Evan Singer (singerep@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu) wrote: > : I will be at SFO later this month. Am looking for company frequencies > : (airlines ramps, operations, etc.)- VHF (129.0 to 132.0) > > : -Thanks > > SFO/sjose area ports > 108.0500 > 118.0500 .8500 > 119.4750 > 120.3500 > 121.8000 > 126.7000 hayward airport > 127.2000 oakland airport? > 127.8000 airport > 128.5000 airport > 134.1500 Sjose airport > 134.5000 aoklad airprto > > -- > Gimme a bike, a laptop, a gun and a Leathermen's tool and i can > go anywhere and do anything. ezwriter@netcom.com Hi Evan, These list were sent to me a few weeks ago. Bob Jeff Willwerth wrote: Robert, Here are some frequencies I know to be current: SFO SJC Tower 120.50 124.00 269.10 120.70 257.60 Ground 121.80 121.70 124.25 Clearance 118.20 118.00 Approach 135.65 120.10 134.50 135.20 135.40 121.30 127.00 133.95 Departure 120.90 120.10 135.10 121.30 If you have access to the www, check out the web page: www.cc.gatech.edu/db1/fly/airport-info.html Regards, Jeff -- _______________________________________________________________________ / Jeff Willwerth / CONRAD Knowledge Engineer ____ ___ / Hewlett-Packard CSO IT / / / / Cupertino, CA __/ __/ _____/ Email: jwill@hpkel32.cup.hp.com / Phone: (408) 447-1439 ____________ __/ __________________________________________________ Jeff C. Wheeler wrote: Of course, Oakland is a major airport as well... 128.500 ATIS 118.300 Oakland Tower (N Field) 127.200 Oakland Tower (S Field) 124.900 Oakland Tower 121.900 Ground Control N 121.750 Ground Control S 127.000 Bay Approach 135.400 " " 120.100 " " 135.100 " " 120.900 " " 121.100 Clearance Delivery From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:43 1996 From: orlando@accessorl.net (Jimmy K.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Sterling Marlin Freq Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:47:44 -0500 Message-ID: Anyone know Sterling's freq? The ones I have were not in use for the Twin 125's. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:45 1996 From: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Strange practices of my FBI field office Date: 21 Feb 1996 17:19:55 GMT Message-ID: <4gfk7r$pj3@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) Hi, I have a question I hope someone can answer. Here in my hometown, I am able to monitor the local FBI field office on several frequencies. One of the frequencies is more active, by far, than the others. Judging from the traffic I hear, it sounds like a dispatcher's channel. I usually hear a woman, speaking like a dispatcher (providing information, answering questions, checking the "criss cross," relaying messages, etc.) and a man speaking to her on the other end. Now here's where it gets weird . . . I've heard this same frequency identified as F-2, F-3, and F-5. Why? Could there be various input frequencies using the same repeater output frequency, with each input using a different CTCSS tone? What would be the point though? Also, and this is the craziest, the woman "dispatcher" is ALWAYS in the clear, but the "field agent," presumably in his car, is always digitally scrambled. Why?!? Since I can hear half the conversation, I can almost always deduce what they're talking about. From the dispatcher I've heard license plates, addresses, agent's cellular phone numbers, suspect's names, NCIC reports, "28 returns," etc. Shouldn't this be secret too? Why might this be happening, and what would be the point in scrambling only half of a conversation? Any help would be appreciated, thanks Cliff Pearson db477@cleveland.freenet.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:47 1996 From: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Stupid Scanner Tricks wanted Date: 15 Feb 1996 04:17:42 GMT Message-ID: <4fuc56$lf6@news.fullerton.edu> Reply-To: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu > I've got an assignment for school to build a web page. I'm a Graphic > Design major, so the topic is open and I will be graded mostly on the > design of the page. I wanted to do someting about scanners that hasn't > really been done yet. (good luck, right?) So I asked myself wht I would > be interested in seeing on the web and came up with the idea of stupid > scanner tricks. > > What is a Stupid Scanner Trick? It's something that your scanner can do > but you probably didn't think it could if you just listen to the Police, > Fire, and Air bands all the time. This includes things like Fast Food > drive through frequencies, Amusement Parks, Pagers, frequencies for > broadcast TV and CB radios, Ham stuff, weather satelites, tuning into > various electronic gear like computers, searching for other people using > scanners via your scanners, and whatever else that you didn't know you > could do with a scanner till you got on the net. > > All in a fun-yet-graphically-appealing format. > > So I am asking you to pass on whatever interesing things you've been > able to do with your scanner in a How-To format of sorts for all to share > across the net. If you have a good scanner related web site, let me > know too and I may include it. If you do an exceptionally good job or > give me something new and/or unique I'll owe you one big net favor, > plus I'll give you full credit for the info. But remember that this is > due in about two weeks from now (that would be 2-28-96), but updates are > always welcome. > > Send those e-mails to: > xrbarron@fullerton.edu > > No need to clutter UseNet with this stuff. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:48 1996 From: jsturdiv@ico.com (Jim Sturdivant) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TR-4500 USERS Date: 18 Feb 1996 22:57:14 GMT Message-ID: <4g8asa$1ce@kane.ico.net> References: <00001ff6+00004771@msn.com> In article <00001ff6+00004771@msn.com>, aeronca@msn.com says... > >Just recently purchased a tr-4500( ar-2500 clone) and am reasonably >happy with it now that i'm used to its peculiarities. Has an >interesting scanning/spectrum display/logging computer interface. >Semms to be old Klingon technolgy but sure beats the price of the >other >computer controlled radios on the market. Am also currently operating >a Pro-2006, DJ-580(dual band ham HT),a bearcat INF5xl< and a Pro-4. >The Pro-4 is one of the first handheld scanners sold by Radio >Shack,circa 1970,and still performs with the best if you dont mind >buying crystals. Also have a pretty comprehensive freq database for >the Nashville,Tn area. > >73 >Pappy >KD4CVE Hey Greg , I have a AR-2500 , I not sure weather I'm that impressed with the performance , but it does have a high coll factor . As with any scanner at any price , it has it's sweet spots . What software do you drive you 4500 with ? I use some that came with it from ACE. Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:49 1996 From: aeronca@msn.com (greg livingston) Subject: TR-4500 USERS Date: 18 Feb 96 05:40:29 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004771@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Just recently purchased a tr-4500( ar-2500 clone) and am reasonably happy with it now that i'm used to its peculiarities. Has an interesting scanning/spectrum display/logging computer interface. Semms to be old Klingon technolgy but sure beats the price of the other computer controlled radios on the market. Am also currently operating a Pro-2006, DJ-580(dual band ham HT),a bearcat INF5xl< and a Pro-4. The Pro-4 is one of the first handheld scanners sold by Radio Shack,circa 1970,and still performs with the best if you dont mind buying crystals. Also have a pretty comprehensive freq database for the Nashville,Tn area. 73 Pappy KD4CVE From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:50 1996 From: Paul Jones Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UK Frequency Guides???-Help Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:37:11 +0000 Message-ID: <823367089wnr@termcon.demon.co.uk> References: <824765377.8865@steelpw.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: paul@termcon.demon.co.uk In article: <824765377.8865@steelpw.demon.co.uk> peter@steelpw.demon.co.uk wr ites: > > > Is anyone able to help me, I am new to the scanning game and wonder if > anyone is able to either give me details of a frequency guide? or > maybe an outline as to which users broadcast on which bands, e.g.hams, > marine etc. Hi peter, Check out the UK newsgroup, alt.radio.scanner.uk and if you want a UK freq guide, follow the links from my web page. Cheers Paul. -- Paul Jones - Email:paul@termcon.demon.co.uk - paulj@waverider.co.uk WWW:http://www.waverider.co.uk/~paulj/ Compuserve: 101630.3251@compuserve.com UK Scanner Listserver - listserv@termcon.demon.co.uk SUB SCANNER From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:51 1996 From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden 3000xlt hand held scanner for sale! Date: 17 Feb 1996 15:59:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4g5fjc$5f3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Uniden 3000xlt hand held scanner for sale! -brand new condition, perfect, in box, with all manuals etc... -received it as a Christmas gift, but do not need it $365 OBO please e-mail me if interested, thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:52 1996 From: Stephen Waits Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Uniden 350A forgets Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:00:32 -0700 Message-ID: <31249C10.656A@pr.erau.edu> References: <4fq337$ogi@fnnews.fnal.gov> To: Lester Wahl Lester Wahl wrote: > Also, does the 800MHz version of this scanner have the same > problem? Any info is appreciated. Please respond via Email > to the above address. Thanks. Yes, the BC700A has the same problem. I own one myself. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:52 1996 From: Torpor@Fnalv.fnal.gov (Lester Wahl) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden 350A forgets Date: 13 Feb 1996 13:18:31 GMT Message-ID: <4fq337$ogi@fnnews.fnal.gov> I have a Uniden 350A that occasionally forgets stored frequencies in the "private" memory. I understand this is a problem with this model of scanner. Has anyone found any fixes for this unit? Also, does the 800MHz version of this scanner have the same problem? Any info is appreciated. Please respond via Email to the above address. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:53 1996 From: tadunlap@centuryinter.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden BC 210XLT mods??? Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 01:37:15 GMT Message-ID: <4g8j4j$5jp@news.pc.centuryinter.net> Are there any mods for the Uniden Bearcat 210 XLT for channel or frequency expansion? Please post here or e-mail me. Thanks. Todd... tadunlap@centuryinter.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:54 1996 From: scott@comp1.cc.wm.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden BC60XLTB Scanner Date: 19 Feb 1996 18:43:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gagbn$s00@tick.cs.wm.edu> Reply-To: scott@comp1.cc.wm.edu I am looking for information on a Uniden BC60XLTB Scanner. Freq. Range? Is it any good for the money? Anything else that may be helpful. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:55 1996 From: zant0001@gold.tc.umn.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden Bearcat BC3000XLT mod info needed Date: 15 Feb 1996 00:00:17 -0600 Message-ID: Any general information about this scanner, including cellular mods would be much appreciated.. (or even web links or leads..) Thanks Eric -- ........................o O C A U T i O N O o............................ zant0001@gold.tc.umn.edu caution@chess.cs.umn.edu zanto@nh.cc.mn.us General mail delivery: Eric.M.Zanto-1@umn.edu FLP: http://minerva.cis.yale.edu/~ariedels/seal.html WWW: http://www.umn.edu/nlhome/g479/zant0001 IRC: Caution From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:56 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: scanan@biggus-webus.com (Scan Man) Subject: Re: Vancouver BC listeners?-Cantel network modified? Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 06:58:45 GMT References: <297cc$61f22.199@news.express.ca> <4fld73$lk4@Kaos.deepcove.com> > What kind of scanners are you guys using? I'm using a pro-43 and so far I don't seem to notice > any difference If I do, is there any thing I can add-on to clear things up? Also, do you guys have any > interesting freqs? Here's one you might like to try. X-Files production crew 856.2625 Kinda of a cool way > to find out whats going on behind the scences of a really good TV show. Wow! Thanks for the tip on the X-files. by the way, I am using a Pro-43 and I still notice that the Cantel network is not nearly as clear as the Mobility one. (as a side note- the service on the cantel network sucks too). Scan Man From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:57 1996 From: rweber95@ix.netcom.com(Robert Weber) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Virtual downconverter, PRO2035/PRO2042, what is it? Date: 16 Feb 1996 03:55:34 GMT Message-ID: <4g0v7m$gr6@reader2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4g0ot5$8jl@nyx10.cs.du.edu> In <4g0ot5$8jl@nyx10.cs.du.edu> anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) writes: > >I was reading an article in a scanner magazine and there was an ad >offering a "virtual downconverter" for the PRO-2035 for $99. This is >something to presumably allow less restrictions on access to the >800-900Mhz frequencies. > >What do they give you for the $99? Instructions on how to do it? Do you >send your radio in and they fix it for you? >...... I don't know about "virtual converters" but the GRE Super Converter II is about the size of 2 and 1/2 9 Volt transistor batteries and fits between your scanners BNC ant connector and the rubber ducky. A switch on it allows using the downconverter or bypassing it. It converts 800 thru 912 Mhz to 400 thru 510 Mhz. Works like a champ! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:58 1996 From: haruteq@maple.net (Bart) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wanted - Pro-2004 for parts Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:15:18 GMT Message-ID: <4g2e3h$1ss@noc.tor.hookup.net> I'm looking for a junk Pro-2004 for parts. The top pc board is the only thing that needs to be in working order. Please email at: haruteq@maple.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:17:59 1996 From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wanted: Pro-2004 Date: 16 Feb 1996 21:08:43 GMT Message-ID: <4g2ror$dhh@uwm.edu> Wanted: Pro-2004 Hey, that's pretty repetative! Nate, KB9LSX From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:00 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: What freqs am i missing? Message-ID: References: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:29:47 GMT kEN Colburn (ezwriter@netcom.com) wrote: : My Beartracker goes from say, 45.7500 to 45.7550. : My Q is, is there anything on 45.7525 or 45.7521 etc..? : or say at 137.4404? ... : tia The frequency in question possibly might be a "birdie", a frequency which the scanner in not capable of receiving. Most if not all scanners have a number of so-called "birdies". You might check the documentation. It's not out of the question that one of the IF's is at this frequency, and the the scanner is programmed not to tune it. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:01 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ezwriter@netcom.com (kEN Colburn) Subject: What freqs am i missing? Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 18:28:32 GMT My Beartracker goes from say, 45.7500 to 45.7550. My Q is, is there anything on 45.7525 or 45.7521 etc..? or say at 137.4404? ... tia -- Gimme a bike, a laptop, a gun and a Leathermen's tool and i can go anywhere and do anything. ezwriter@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:02 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) Subject: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Message-ID: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 13:58:11 GMT Reply-To: powen@edgewater.com I just don't get it. Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? Is this list compiled for "Lock-Outs" or is someone trying to find out the ingredients of the "Special Sauce"? Phil... \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From the | POwen@Edgewater.com | Accept mind of | - or - | no Phil Owen. | POwen@Lynx.dac.neu.edu | substitutes! \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:03 1996 From: Fred Gerbig <102676.1201@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Windows database for scanner freqs. Date: 16 Feb 1996 17:20:26 GMT Message-ID: <4g2ecr$fct$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> References: <4ftd2o$g77$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> It is also available by FTP. FTP to: ftp://ftp.qrz.com check in the /tmp directory the file name is WSCAN.ZIP It was in /tmp as of Feb 16 but my be moved to another dir in the future. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:04 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: jwest@pgh.nauticom.net (Jim West) Subject: Re: Windows database for scanner freqs. Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 03:33:48 GMT References: <4ftd2o$g77$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> Anywhere I can FTP this from? Fred Gerbig <102676.1201@CompuServe.COM> wrote: >New Windows software for scanner frequencies. WinScan Version 1.1, >has fields like in the Radio Shack Police Call guide. Many >features, search, sort (by any field) print and more! Tested in >Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. Available on Compuserve in the Hamnet >forum. Also on the ARRL bulletin board at (203)665-0090 (no charge >to access files) find it in the General Intrest File area or >search for keyword scanner. File name is WSCAN.ZIP. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:05 1996 From: Richard Mclachlan Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: WiNRADiO - A scanner on a PC card Date: Sun, 18 Feb 96 09:04:44 GMT Message-ID: <824634284snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk WiNRADiO - A SW receiver/scanner on a PC card There is now a demon program of the front panel controls and operation of the new WiNRADiO available for download on the Lowe Electronics web site. The URL is http://www.lowe.co.uk/ Just follow the WiNRADiO link. Richard -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:05 1996 From: D Stark Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WiNRADiO - A scanner on a PC card Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 22:22:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3127ED05.17BB@frontiernet.net> References: <824634284snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> Richard Mclachlan wrote: > > WiNRADiO - A SW receiver/scanner on a PC card > > There is now a demon program of the front panel controls ^^^^^ Everybody's so afraid of a few bad words on the 'net. They should really be worrying about them demons! From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:06 1996 From: edgo@om.com.au (b w edginton) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur Subject: Re: WinRadio - Receiver on a PC card. Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:00:58 GMT Message-ID: <31291c0a.1232297@news.bne.aone.net.au> References: <824131586snz@LOWE.CO.UK> <4g728g$i7c@hawk.ee.port.ac.uk> On 18 Feb 1996 11:24:00 GMT, Dean Ledger wrote: >Any chance of test driving the card? > >Dean > Have been using it for a week. Software is extremely good and a joy to use. Re ceiver is OK but not up to standard of top scanners or HF radios. Of course it does not cost as muc h as one of those, either. As amatter of interest , the tech who installed it for me was very impressed b y standard of the card. In all....I am happy with it. Brian From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:07 1996 From: Tim Glen <76423.540@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WinRadio - Receiver on a PC card. Date: 21 Feb 1996 01:59:34 GMT Message-ID: <4gdua6$hme$2@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> References: <31291c0a.1232297@news.bne.aone.net.au> Where can I get one??? Tim From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:08 1996 From: dayglo@radix.net (Dayglo) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB Broken 2006 Date: 17 Feb 1996 01:30:20 GMT Message-ID: <4g3b3c$44@news1.radix.net> I am looking to purchace a broken PRO-2006 for parts. Depending upon its state of brokenness I will pay up to $100. It will not be very useful to me i f it has been crushed or been damaged by water.. E-mail me with details. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:09 1996 From: duy@emeraldcoast.com (Don Duy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB PRO-2004 400ch Keyboard Template Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:35:09 GMT Message-ID: <4gcmce$v83@ram2.ramlink.net> Hi there... I recently bought a PRO-2004 from a pawn shop & modified it, (thanks to Bill Cheek). Once upon a time, Grove carried the 400 channel adhesive overlay. Problem is, nobody remembers the item - They can't help. Anybody still have one of these around not stuck to anything? If so, let me know. Thanks, Don From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:10 1996 From: robert@eden.com (Robert Barker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WTB PRO-2004 400ch Keyboard Template Date: 20 Feb 1996 19:55:45 GMT Message-ID: <4gd901$9a6@boris.eden.com> References: <4gcmce$v83@ram2.ramlink.net> I called Grove about that about a year ago and he had me call his sect back and she sent me one. From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:10 1996 From: Roland S Geter PhD Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.misc,aus.radio.amateur.wicen,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: WTB:5KW AM Transmitter Date: 17 Feb 1996 07:58:55 GMT Message-ID: <4g41rv$ica@news1.goodnet.com> References: <4fn47d$j76@www.acay.com.au> To: spiroe@acay.com.au What are you going to do with it? Roland S Geter PhD Internet: roland@mycronet.com Packer: WB6LNA@kc7y.az.usa.noam From lwbyppp@epix.net Wed Feb 21 16:18:12 1996 From: Roland S Geter PhD Newsgroups: aus.radio.amateur.misc,aus.radio.amateur.wicen,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: WTB:5KW AM Transmitter Date: 17 Feb 1996 07:57:37 GMT Message-ID: <4g41pi$ica@news1.goodnet.com> References: <4fn47d$j76@www.acay.com.au> To: spiro,evagelakos What are you going to do with it? Roland S Geter PhD Internet: roland@mycronet.com Packer: WB6LNA@kc7y.az.usa.noam From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: clifto@indep1.chi.il.us (Clifton T. Sharp) Subject: "Boring stuff" squelch circuit Message-ID: References: <4ghjau$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 08:09:25 GMT In article <4ghjau$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs writ es: >I have signal squelch, and dead-carrier squelch, but if anybody has a >'boring stuff' squelch circuit, please let me know!!!! I have one. Here's complete construction details. 1. Tune your FM radio to a "beautiful music" or "easy jazz" station. 2. Locate the AC line cord and disconnect it from the power source. 3. Cut the AC line cord off as close to the FM radio as possible. -- Cliff Sharp There are days when no matter which WA9PDM way you spit, it's upwind. clifto@indep1.chi.il.us --The First Law of Reality From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:37 1996 From: rrmoore@iadfw.net (Randall R. Moore) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: "Other" mods for PRO-51 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:23:35 GMT Message-ID: <3131eb9e.2094230@news.iadfw.net> So, Everyone now knows that there are no currently available cell mods for the late model PRO-51s. But I bet someone could come up with a couple of USEFUL mods for that radio. Maybe one to suppress the annoying beep on every keypress. Also how about one to keep the backlight on instead of automatically going off after 15 seconds. I'm sure that a cell mod will be engineered soon enough and until then the Virtual Downconverter mod will work for the impatient ones. best... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:38 1996 From: ferno Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: (no subject) Date: 20 Feb 1996 13:06:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4gd9j9$lm9@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> To: REC.RADIO.SCANNER RADIO SHACK PRO-23 HOW DO I MODIFY THIS SCANNER BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. I PURCHASED IT AFTER RS TOOK THEM OFF THE SHELVES AND DUMPED SOME FREQ. HELP PLEASE From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:40 1996 From: chuckm@zocalo.com (Chuck Meyer) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: *** How to make the AR3000 IF more narrow ? *** Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:35:21 GMT Message-ID: References: <4g428i$qk0@news.simplex.nl> In article <4g428i$qk0@news.simplex.nl>, Marc Gauw wrote : > I know that it should be possible to make the IF > of a AR3000 (normally 12 Kc for NFM and AM) more > narrow (4.3 Kc). This gives improvements in especially > Shortwave and Airband reception. > I know that firms like Bogerfunk (Switzerland) are > advertising with this (Deutch-Mark 150,-). > > Only I like to do it myself, and preferably for free ! > > Therefore, maybe somebody knows the following : > > * Is it possible to modify the IF of the AR3000 just by > a switchable exchange of the current the SSB filter (4.3 Kc) > and the normal IF filter (12 Kc) ? > Or do I have to buy new extra filters ? > > * Could somebody mail (marcgauw@simplex.nl) or fax me > a swithing diagram how to do it myself ? > > Marc Gauw, Holland > > Here's the info on the AR8K mailing list. It's quite specific to this radio & its usage and modification. There is presently discussion on IF filter swapping. Short answer: It's possible & easy. The filters come from Murata in Smyrna, Georgia, USA >>------------------------Administrative-Notes------------------------------- >>To post an ar8000 - relevant message to the list, >>send to: ar8000@ml.rpmdp.com >>To unsubscribe: majordomo@ml.rpmdp.com >>body of message: unsubscribe ar8000 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:41 1996 From: djbond@winternet.com (dj) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: ---tst--tst--- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 21:26:39 GMT Message-ID: <4gin5g$rn1@blackice.winternet.com> Reply-To: djbond@winternet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:42 1996 From: 00496-OEM-0008733-5911@msn.com (FRANK SANS) Subject: RE: 3000xlt - did I get a lemon? Date: 22 Feb 96 07:06:04 -0800 References: <4fva1v$s7a@news4.digex.net> Message-ID: <00001ff6+000048a6@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner No. I would return it for another one. I have the older bc2500xlt. It received better that my pro-2004. the sensitivity on our radios are the same. Good luck Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:43 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RE: 3000xlt - did I get a lemon? Date: 23 Feb 1996 05:14:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4gk42c$g9@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <00001ff6+000048a6@msn.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) The 3000 is BETTER than the 2500! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:43 1996 From: agentmiki@aol.com (AGENT MIKI) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: << Help with group ID'S for 800mhz trunk in your area>> Date: 22 Feb 1996 17:52:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4gis43$gpp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: agentmiki@aol.com (AGENT MIKI) Will trade info on 800 mhz trunking system in your area I'am in Nebraska and am try to put together a data base of group id's . I have programming software and can program radios. This will help all in the search for a real solution to the trunking problem. We have outlets for these radios all we need is group Id's this should be a easy task but i can't aford to fly around to each place a aguire this info so whoever contributes will have acces to the entire data base with upgrades as they arive. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:45 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: _Pro-26 Mods/Specs_ From: ron.roth@canrem.com (Ron Roth) Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.31915.5773.0N20BE58@canrem.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 21:27:00 -0500 For those who sent for 800 MHz and back-light mods, and whose mail I received before the 21st of Feb, I have sent out a second package with an additional mod that extends the battery life another 2-3 hours. For those whose mail I received after the 21st, the package will automatically include all four mods. I found that when using rechargeable batteries with the Pro-26, the warning beep and BATT Lo indicator appear when the voltage drops to about 4.75V, and at 4.55V the scanner cuts out prematurely, even though there is lots of battery power left. By removing R515 on the logic board, one will not get that annoying beep any longer (neither will the BATT Lo indicator appear), and the scanner will continue to operate for an additional 2-3 hours before cutting out. As the Pro-26 approaches about 4V, its sensitivity and voice clarity starts to decline, at which time one can recharge the unit, or continue to listen at lower volume levels until the scanner cuts out. If someone *does* prefer the warning beep and BATT Lo indicator, but likes the extra hours of listening, then replacing R515 with a higher value of around 27k Ohms will still prevent the scanner from cutting out prematurely, while the beep and BATT LO indicator kick in later at a lower voltage level of around 4.3 Volts. Since there are surface-mount components involved, this procedure though requires better than casual soldering skills. How fast the batteries discharge depends of course on the listening volume, whether the back-light is being used, and on the frequencies programmed in. Here is a list of (approximate) squelched current levels at 5V for various (approximate) frequency ranges: 0 MHz ............. 80mA 311-375 MHz ....... 108-110mA 25-29 MHz ............. 85mA 376-399 MHz ....... 113-114mA 29-107 MHz .......... 78-80mA 400-511 MHz ........... 107mA 108-136 MHz .......... 83-84mA 512-805 MHz ......... 80-81mA 137-224 MHz .......... 77-79mA 806-900 MHz ........... 104mA 225-249 MHz ............. 82mA 900-1011 MHz ....... 102-104mA 250-310 MHz ............. 86mA 1012-1300 MHz ....... 104-107mA * Ron Roth --- * RoseReader 2.10b P003228 Entered at [CRS] From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:45 1996 From: robert@eden.com (Robert Barker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Date: 24 Feb 1996 17:57:55 GMT Message-ID: <4gnjj3$20p@boris.eden.com> References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gmsak$1fq@nuntius.u-net.net> Will Message Tracker do ACARS? I tried it but the signal has to be good? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:46 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: Mike Baranowski Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Message-ID: References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 05:28:03 GMT In article <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark 7996, mark7996@aol.com writes: >ACARS, What's the best setup ? Yes, ACARS is new... I heard that some new equipment is currently being developed, so you might want to wait a little bit longer. -Mike Baranowski mhb@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:47 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 22:52:59 Message-ID: References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) wri tes: >From: mark7996@aol.com (Mark 7996) >Subject: ACARS, What's the best setup ? >Date: 20 Feb 1996 07:16:19 -0500 >Any info and ideas that anyone can share ? >ACARS is growing fast, What's the best eqipment ? >mark s. conway I don't know about "best", but I have found the AEA ACARS kit to work well, and the manual is very good, with a lot of good information to help you decipher some of the data. The AEA ACARS kit can be ordered through any AEA dealer (Ham Radio shops, typically) for about $90 if they discount. AEA sells it direct for $149. They have a web site, so you can get some preliminary info there. I was satisfied with my purchase of it. It isn't a "glitzy" product, but it works well. I have it hooked up to a Radio Shack Pro-2026 (dual conversion, inexpensive scanner) and it works great. I am 20 miles away from the airport (PDX), so I usually only get the aircraft-side of the transmissions using an internal whip antenna. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:48 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 08:34:07 -0500 Message-ID: <312F13CF.2A7F@mail.rust.net> References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mike Baranowski wrote: > > In article <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark 7996, mark7996@aol.com > writes: > >ACARS, What's the best setup ? > > Yes, ACARS is new... I heard that some new equipment is currently being > developed, so you might want to wait a little bit longer. > > -Mike Baranowski > mhb@netcom.com Mike: There are device currently available that will decode ACARS. Universal Radio out of Columbus, OH. carries such decoders. I know the M-400 works, possibly the M-1 200, and M-8000 as well. Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:49 1996 From: gorgon@crl.com (Zach Copley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: AR8000 and Telix? Date: 27 Feb 1996 02:55:31 -0800 Message-ID: <4gunv3$61b@crl.crl.com> Summary: Crazy AR8000 Keywords: AR8000 I've been reading the specs on the AR8000. It seems to me that you can actually connect to this scanner and send commands to it with a serial cable and a comm program like Procomm+ or Telix. Is this correct?? Has anyone done this? What's it like? Is it like logging into a computer? If so, that's CRAZY and I love it! The AR8000 seems to be a fantastic hi-tech device. I'm considering buying one from Javiation in the UK. Has anyone had any experience purchasing scanners from this company? Thanks for your comments in advance, Zach -- .^....^. snatcher@arlington.com ! .\/. ! Pigdog: gorgon@crl.com (. oo .) RoR-Alucard `{""}' From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:50 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 audio clipping/narrow I.F. mod Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 14:57:20 GMT Message-ID: <4gshlc$fi@pegasus.odyssee.net> References: <4g8ccc$427@mrnews.mro.dec.com> <4gr953$e8g@gail.ripco.com> Heikki Koivusaari wrote: >>I have designed a switching scheme that allows the user to select >>the stock 12KHz AM filter or the narrow SSB 4.0KHz while still in >>the AM mode. I have found this to make a BIG difference when trying >>to receive a weak shortwave station next to a very strong one. >>The only part required is a switch and some wire. >>My mod has no effect on the use of the DS8000 speech inversion accessory. >> >>Send me email if interested. >> >>Ken >>klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com > > Sure, i'd be intrested to see your design.... Also, what software are >you using with your AR8000? > here's my E-MAIL address. >arcturus@ripco.com >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Here's mine nicolas@odyssee.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:51 1996 From: 00496-OEM-0008733-5911@msn.com (FRANK SANS) Subject: AR8000 cell mod Date: 22 Feb 96 06:59:10 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+000048a5@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Excellent radio, I have one. Cell restoration is possible. Monitoring Times and Popular Communications magazines have advitisers that will do the mod for $40. I haven't had it done because I also own an AR1000 that has cellular. Take care bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:52 1996 From: gary.sellani@solis.sbay.org (Gary Sellani) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AR8000 Narrow I.F. filter Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:54:00 GMT Message-ID: <96022123003818681@solis.sbay.org> Distribution: world MNI>From: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) MNI>Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner MNI>Subject: AR8000 Narrow I.F. filter mod MNI>Date: 7 FEB 96 15:24:08 MNI>Message-ID: <4fb217$d6v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> MNI>Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation MNI>I have designed a switching scheme that allows the user to select MNI>the stock 12KHz AM filter or the narrow SSB 4.0KHz while still in MNI>the AM mode. I have found this to make a BIG difference when trying MNI>to receive a weak shortwave station next to a very strong one. MNI>The only part required is a switch and some wire. MNI>My mod has no effect on the use of the DS8000 speech inversion accessory. MNI>Send me email if interested. MNI>Ken MNI>klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com Bill: FYI this guy solicits $10 for this information. I'm not sure if that is allowed here or not. I was a bit PO'd as I never charged anybody for info. Gary * SLMR 2.1a * 417: NRA member on a Sunday drive From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:53 1996 From: Brett Miller - N7OLQ Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 Narrow I.F. filter Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 12:31:17 -0700 Message-ID: <31320A85.2B7E@ccm.hf.intel.com> References: <96022123003818681@solis.sbay.org> Gary Sellani wrote: > Bill: FYI this guy solicits $10 for this information. > I'm not sure if that is allowed here or not. > I was a bit PO'd as I never charged anybody for info. > Gary There is nothing wrong with him trying to make a buck by selling something that he has taken the time to figure out, but the should be up front about his intentions and offer it as a kit or plans or whatever, rather than leading people to believe the info is free. Brett Miller - N7OLQ brett_miller@ccm.ut.intel.com Intel Corp. CIS: 73370,3030 American Fork, UT From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:54 1996 From: medjbm@emory.edu (John Mills) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Atlanta PD Date: 26 Feb 1996 17:04:16 GMT Message-ID: I'm missing something. What are the new Atlanta PD freqs? jm From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:55 1996 From: onedown@cris.com (Onedown) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: bc 860 xlt radio to close to computer. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:11:34 GMT Message-ID: <4gmroh$g2s@spectator.cris.com> What an idiot I am. After posting about grounding my antenna's shield to earth ground. and still being able to get better reception by touching the shield I turned off the computer that I normally use while scanning and voila, This radio's reception range has tripled!! Now I need to find a way to eliminate the noise it picks up from the computer. "It's not how many fingers you have, It's how you use them!" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:57 1996 From: bnr@universe.digex.net (bnr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: bc3000xlt - mine was a lemon (follow-up) Date: 22 Feb 1996 13:14:58 GMT Message-ID: <4ghq8i$hnk@news4.digex.net> About a week ago I posted an article regarding my new bc3000xlt which didn't function properly. I'm happy to report it was in fact just that particular scanner. I have since rec'd a replacement and it works perfectly. My advice to all would still be to test those new scanners. Line them up with your old scanner (or a friend's) and test them out. It was a strange problem I had and I caught it the first day I had the scanner (therefore it was easy to exchange). One thing I did pick up that I was not aware of before (and is not in the manual) is the light trick (thanks Gary Wilburn). If you hold down the light button when you turn the scanner on - you can then toggle the light on and off (it overrides the 15 second timeout). I have seen vendors and mail order companies offer this mod for around $30!!! NO MOD NEEDED!!! The scanner will stay in this mode until you hold down the light button and turn the scanner on again. Then it returns to the 15 second timeout mode. If anyone knows of any more of these little tricks with the 3000 - please let me know. Many thanks to all who replied via private e-mail with their thoughts and suggestions. Good Scanning! ********************** Brian Raines bnr@universe.digex.net ********************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:58 1996 From: Jonathan Clough Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: bc3000xlt - mine was a lemon (follow-up) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 96 11:21:09 GMT Message-ID: <825333669snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> References: <4ghq8i$hnk@news4.digex.net> Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk In article <4ghq8i$hnk@news4.digex.net> bnr@universe.digex.net "bnr" writes: Hi Brian, > If anyone knows of any more of these little tricks with the 3000 - please > let me know. Following are Undocumented 3000XLT "toggles". Power On/Turn on Holding: ========================= SCAN Toggles Scan direction MANUAL Skips the Welcome message (Only on that turn on) DLY Toggles delay between 2 seconds or 4 seconds LHT Toggles Light Mode. "On Light" - light stays on until LHT pressed again "Off Light" - light goes off after 15 seconds or so. AUTO Toggles Auto Sorting frequencies into numerical order during Scan On or Off. Turning Off will slow scanning down. Enter Toggles Keyboard Beep On/Off# SFT & 1 "Test-1" SFT & 2 "Test-2" SFT & 3 "Test-3" SFT & 4 "Test-4" SFT & 5 Toggles Battery Save On/Off SFT & 6 Toggles user selection of Mode. With this Off you cannot change mode from that selected automatically. Power on/Turn On Holding the keys 2, 9 and.. ============================================ SCAN Loads Test frequencies into Channels 1-14 and 21-30 MANUAL Resets the Scanner and clears all Memory Channels L/O Causes the LCD display to light every segment up. DLY Turns off delay on all channels Keylock Displays ROM/Software revision. USA x.xx on BC-3000XLT Eur x.xx on UBC-3000XLT There maybe others buts thats all I think I have a note of. -- Cheers, /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jonathan Clough | HF/VHF/UHF Receivers & Scanners | | Javiation, | from all the leading manufacturers | | Bradford, UK |Full coverage, "unblocked" scanners Including| | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000 | | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation/ | | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \---------------------------------------------| | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:12:59 1996 From: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC3000xlt cellular question Date: 26 Feb 1996 02:30:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4grnjd$gua@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gq09u$roi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ke4znr@aol.com (KE4ZNR) Tristtom, Hey Buddy! Howzit goin'? The 3000 can recieve the cell Freqs. from the cell tower nearest you. Nope, not all of the band can be received but the Freqs. nearest you can. E-mail me if you need further info. Marshall Sherard KE4ZNR Proud Member: N. Carolina Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave Group From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:02 1996 From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: bc3000xlt hidden features Date: 24 Feb 1996 04:56:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4gmnd5$ped@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4ghq8i$hnk@news4.digex.net> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Someone e-mailed these codes to me and I thought I'd pass them along. By holding down the appropriat button while powering up the unit, you will get the below listed effect on the 3000xlt scanner. Here are the Buttons to press while turning the Scanner on along with my notes: DLY: changes the rescan delay to 4 or 2 Sec. AUTO: disables the sorting of Freqs. within each bank while scanning, but slows scan rate. (MY note-- If you do any 800mhz trunked scanning, press so that "OFF SORT" shows. It makes listening to these systems easier, and the scan rate is not affected much!!) E(nter) key: disables keypad beep. 2, 9, Manual: resets scanner and zeroes all channels. (MY note--don't mess with!!) 2,9,Lockout: tests all display segments. (MY note--good if you want to make sure everything works!!) 2,9, Scan: loads test Freqs. into channels 1-14 and 21-30. (My note--another not to mess with!!) 2,9, DLY: turns off delay for all channels 2, 9, Key Lock: displays "EEECH" then "USA 0.09" (MY note--mine shows 2.0 instead of 0.09, my idea is that this shows the firmware version. What does yours show???) That's it!! Let me know if you have any questions. 73, Marshall Sherard KE4ZNR KE4ZNR@aol.com proud member: Triangle Area Scanner/Shortwave Group Raleigh, NC From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:03 1996 From: cruzer@icanect.net (luis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC760XLT Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 14:30:15 GMT Message-ID: <4gv4sg$cbo@news.icanect.net> I HAVE A BC760XLT. CAN ANY CELL MODS BE DONE TO IT. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:05 1996 From: jmccarty@spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC855XLT Mods Date: 23 Feb 1996 20:21:54 GMT Message-ID: <4gl7l2$5v5@sun001.spd.dsccc.com> References: In article , Jim Whitbeck wrote: ) )Someone was looking for mods for the BC855XLT scanner. Dad performed the )following on mine, and it worked like a charm. There are two: one )restores cellular, the other expands memory to 100 channels (5 banks of 20). ) ) )********************************************************************* ) From : Glenn Cummins 1:392/6 Tue 26 Jan 93 21:03 ) ) UNIDEN BC-855XLT MODIFICATIONS ) Scope of modifications: ) [1] Allow continuous 800 MHz receive. ) [2] Increase channel capacity from 50 to 100 ch. ) ) 1 2 3 4 ) :------------------------------------------: ) | I p p p p o o o o o o | ) :----------| I | | | | | ) | [I] | | X X <-- CUT | ) | [I] D201 | | | | | ) | [I] oooooo | | | | | ) | I d d d d | ) | I------/\/\/\--------|--| | ) | | ) | ADD 4.7K - 22K Ohm (10K works) | ) | 1/4 watt carbon resistor between | ) | diode D201 and lower connection | ) | of Jumpers 3 & 4 | ) | Jumper 3 - 100 ch. Jumper 4 - 800 MHz | ) |-----------------------------------------------------| [Rest cut.] When I first began investigating modding my 855, I tried what you list here (minus the resistor, just jumpered). I found that it caused the stored channels to be dumped when the machine was turned off. The cause is that the holding capacitor is being discharged through the diode. Naturally, the use of a resistor would increase the discharge time, but you are still discharging the holding capacitor. If you remove the jumpers from the top and replace them with alternate jumpers on the bottom, you will not have a problem with losing your program. I have a small document on that, as well as a couple of keyboard hacks. Mike ---- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} I don't speak for DSC. <- They make me say that. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:06 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: BC855XLT Mods Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 02:12:30 GMT Someone was looking for mods for the BC855XLT scanner. Dad performed the following on mine, and it worked like a charm. There are two: one restores cellular, the other expands memory to 100 channels (5 banks of 20). ********************************************************************* From : Glenn Cummins 1:392/6 Tue 26 Jan 93 21:03 UNIDEN BC-855XLT MODIFICATIONS Scope of modifications: [1] Allow continuous 800 MHz receive. [2] Increase channel capacity from 50 to 100 ch. 1 2 3 4 :------------------------------------------: | I p p p p o o o o o o | :----------| I | | | | | | [I] | | X X <-- CUT | | [I] D201 | | | | | | [I] oooooo | | | | | | I d d d d | | I------/\/\/\--------|--| | | | | ADD 4.7K - 22K Ohm (10K works) | | 1/4 watt carbon resistor between | | diode D201 and lower connection | | of Jumpers 3 & 4 | | Jumper 3 - 100 ch. Jumper 4 - 800 MHz | |-----------------------------------------------------| 1. Remove 5 screws from bottom of scanner case. 2. Carefully separate case top and bottom. 3. Unplug connector to the internal speaker. 4. Locate diode D201 and 4 jumpers near edge of circuit board. 5. Cut the 3rd and 4th jumpers near the middle and fold downwulate leads, if necessary. 6. Connect the lower part of jumper 3 & 4 to one end of a 10K Ohm 1/4 watt carbon resistor, insulate all exposed leads. 7. Connect the other resistor lead to the lower connection of diode D201, DO NOT cut any leads on D201. 8. Make sure all exposed leads aren't touching any other connections, insulate as required, tack in place with a dab of RTV silicone, or low temp hot glue. 9. Reassemble scanner, make sure to plug the speaker back in. You should now have a scanner with 100 chs. numbered 01-00 in 5 banks of 20 ch. and continuous 800 MHz coverage. ** This information for educational and lawful use ONLY ** ********************************************************************* Terry --- GEcho 1.00 * Origin: Point of Intercept, San Diego, CA - Mail Only - (1:202/1621) Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:07 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC9000XLT Memory Retention Time Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 16:19:37 -0500 Message-ID: <312797E9.1D30@mail.rust.net> References: <4g7it8$atl@news.hic.net> James G. Edmondson wrote: > > Does anybody know how long the 9000 will retain memory information when > disconnected from a power source? Jim: The BC9000-XLT has non-volitle memory to store your settings and frequencies.. .meaning you can shut it off, and/or unplug it without the fear of loosing those settings...eve r! It really wound be a panic if you had that fully programmed and lost it all!!! :) Now you can sleep. Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:08 1996 From: ggcomm@iinc.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Bearcat 5/800 Info Wanted Date: 22 Feb 1996 05:27:43 GMT Message-ID: <4ggusf$en5@xcalibur.iinc.com> Back in the closing days of the original Bearcat Company, they advertised a Be arcat 5/800 which was actually a Bearcat 5 Hi/Lo/UHF crystal scanner converted to receive 800 Mhz. Does anyone know if this unit was ever produced or does anyone have one. I have an application to continually listen to one fixed 800 Mhz repeater and do not want to use a $400 scanner to do so. Any info appreciated. Gerry - G & G Communications ggcomm@iinc.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:09 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best Base Model $500 +/- Scanner Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:11:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3128A11F.6F44@mail.rust.net> References: <3127da0f.9214986@10.0.2.1> Charles Sprick wrote: > > I'm in the market for a base model scanner in the $500 range. > Obviously, I'd like all the bells and whistles I can get. > > Opinions? > > I'd really like to do some computer interface, but, from the > postings I've seen, I suspect that this will have to be a trade > off for a good model in this price range?? > > Thanks in advance for your response. > > Chuck (csprick@netcom.com) > Chuck Sprick csprick@ix.netcom.com > Redwood Shores, CA OR > csprick@netcom.com Charles: The Uniden BC9000-XLT is a good bet! Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:09 1996 From: SEColegrove@msn.com (Steve Colegrove) Subject: RE: Best Base Model $500 +/- Scanner Date: 23 Feb 96 15:14:47 -0800 References: <3127da0f.9214986@10.0.2.1> Message-ID: <00001ff6+000048ff@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Try the Uniden 9000XLT. I bought one recently, and, except for the computer interface, it has everything you need. The auto-store for searches, and alpha-numberic display are great. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:11 1996 From: Jim Dantin Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best Base Model $500 +/- Scanner Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 18:06:21 -0600 Message-ID: <3129107D.5C9C@uky.campus.mci.net> References: <3127da0f.9214986@10.0.2.1> Charles Sprick wrote: > > I'm in the market for a base model scanner in the $500 range. > Obviously, I'd like all the bells and whistles I can get. > > Opinions? > > I'd really like to do some computer interface, but, from the > postings I've seen, I suspect that this will have to be a trade > off for a good model in this price range?? I use my AR8000 mainly as a base (just pull the batteries and leave it connected to the AC adapter). I have it mounted in a Grove holder. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:11 1996 From: osmosis@icanect.net (Morphine) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best sub $200 handheld scanner? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 06:17:56 GMT Message-ID: <312d5bff.17544154@news.icanect.net> References: <00001ff6+0000477d@msn.com> <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net> On Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:31:49 -0400, michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) wrote: >In article <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net>, Joe Goldsberry wrote: > >> I've found the Radio Shack PRO-46 to be a good scanner for under $200.00, >> and it has 900 mhz. The only problems I've had is the display is hard to >> see, and it's too easy to accidently push a button (and lock out a bank >> of channels) when putting the scanner in your pocket. >> >> Joe, >> Freelance News Photog > >I don't know if Danmark is still selling refurb-ed BC200XLTs but that's a >good choice for under $200 ($179, the last time I checked). > >-- >Michael Alexander >michael@alexander.terranet.com The Pro-51 is also pretty good. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:13 1996 From: khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Better cel reception on AM? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 20:26:11 PST Message-ID: <4gm48f$3f1@blues.axionet.com> On my PRO-43, I sometimes find reception of cel-tels much better when I put the scanner in AM mode. What gives?!?!? Regards, KH From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:13 1996 From: everyknee@aol.com (Everyknee) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT Date: 23 Feb 1996 12:07:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4gks9a$617@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: References: <4gb3ni$58r@news1.erols.com> > Whine, Whine... Your first mistake was buying a PK-232! Sheesh, that's like buying a PK-64 today. Spend a few bucks and get a KAM+... Or better yet, get off of HF and get a good 56k system... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:15 1996 From: gary Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEATTLE Date: 23 Feb 1996 22:00:36 GMT Message-ID: <4glde4$bef@miwok.nbn.com> References: <4gb3ni$58r@news1.erols.com> ssampson@telepath.com (Steve Sampson) wrote: >> Whine, Whine... > >Your first mistake was buying a PK-232! Sheesh, that's like buying a PK-64 >today. Spend a few bucks and get a KAM+... Or better yet, get off of HF and >get a good 56k system... > AHHHH, *ANOTHER* CB'er/ham wannabe heard from! I especially like the resident internet response, "Whine, Whine", it speaks VOLUMES about the mentality of the poster. I, for one, appreciate the reports from sour deals found here, I am here because I am interested in possibly buying or selling stuff myself. If those who have had bad dealings with certain individuals can't pass along their experiences HERE, *WHERE CAN THEY?*. Chance of misrepresentation? Sure, there always is, but for my own protection, I would prefer to be occassionally misinformed, and maybe miss out on a deal, than for lack of foreknowledge, make another "contribution" to a known rip-off artist. Gary, KJ6Q... *** I AM THE NRA! *** "ONLY IN AMERICA: Veterans in shacks... a draft dodger in the White House!" "I love my country... it's my government that disgusts me." From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:16 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEATTLE Date: 23 Feb 1996 20:48:58 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gl97q$1r0i@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4g7ib1$s3b@whidbey.whidbey.com> >Why does someone not start a Web Page with names and other information >on people who have ripped others off Via The Internet. A nice Database that >posts the names of both people involved and both of thier EMAIL id's. Oh yeah, that's a great idea. What could be better as a breeeding ground for libel and defamation of character lawsuits? -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:17 1996 From: chuckm@zocalo.com (Chuck Meyer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Bill Cheek DSQ Mod Problems Date: 22 Feb 1996 04:00:16 GMT Message-ID: References: <4gf40d$ba0@steel.interlog.com> In article <4gf40d$ba0@steel.interlog.com>, ronkatz@interlog.com (Ron Katz) wrote: > Again I've attempted to make the DSQ Mod in Bill Cheeks book work with > no success. >>>>>>>>> Snip <<<<<<<<<<< > Any comments or suggestions?? COMMtronics is apparently going to issue the DSQ as a kit like the CE232. They've got a Beta test going on now. I don't know if it's too late to get aboard or if the Beta opportunity is closed already. The circuit may be different from the one in the Mod book Contact COMMtronics at the address in the mod book or at bcheek@cts.com -- Chuck From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:18 1996 From: tvine@teleport.com (PjB) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Bill Cheek DSQ Mod Problems Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 15:30:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4gf40d$ba0@steel.interlog.com> In article <4gf40d$ba0@steel.interlog.com>, ronkatz@interlog.com (Ron Katz) wrote: > Again I've attempted to make the DSQ Mod in Bill Cheeks book work with > no success. > > The mod works ok but the hookup information for the 2004 and 2006 > seems to be incorrect. I had problems with the exact same thing. Finally found the correct info from a local; if I can find it I'll email it to you... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:19 1996 From: ronkatz@interlog.com (Ron Katz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Bill Cheek DSQ Mod Problems - some change Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 07:41:30 GMT Message-ID: <4gfto5$ht7@steel.interlog.com> References: <4gf40d$ba0@steel.interlog.com> Oppps Everything still stands the same except the part about the line pulling to a logic low. this is caused by leaving the sound squelch not being isolated. Problem still is the same though. Circuit decodes but scanner will not continue scanning. Force line high and hold it there and it still does not continue. The only mod to the scanner is cutting the navy blue wire and isolating it only to the dsq mod via a diode as per the instructions. Ron Katz News Cameraman Toronto Ontario http://www.interlog.com/~ronkatz/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: gs94ak@sandcastle.cosc.brocku.ca (Geoff Stephenson) Subject: Bills frequency (NFL) Message-ID: <1996Feb24.190751.13120@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 19:07:51 GMT I was thinking about taking my Scanner to some bills games this year, has anyone tried to scan at an NFL game? Does anybody have the Freqs? Think about the advantages a team could have with a good scanner.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:21 1996 From: llpix@aol.com (Ll pix) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Bills frequency (NFL) Date: 26 Feb 1996 04:57:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4gs062$iqe@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <1996Feb24.190751.13120@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA> Reply-To: llpix@aol.com (Ll pix) Sure you could listen to the security, parking control, food servers. Forget about any players or head sets. it's encrypted and they use code. Run red, turn green, cold chills, etc. Might be fun to listen, if you could. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:21 1996 From: cfhulen@usit.net (Charles Hulen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: can Uniden BC3000XLT be modified? ordering Wed.-need quick answer??? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:30:25 GMT Message-ID: <4gsn9f$c79@news.usit.net> I have a chance to get a Uniden BC3000XLT at a reduced price but I must order by Wed. 5 PM CST. Are these capable of being mod. for celluar, etc??? Thanks, Charles Hulen cfhulen@usit.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:22 1996 From: Mike Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CARNIVAL CRUISES FREQUENCIES Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 23:04:59 PDT Message-ID: References: <4gjl4o$peb@newsbf02.news.aol.com> 156.8 Ch.16 Coast Guard Hailing Try 156-158 mhz for ship to shore activity From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:23 1996 From: djblu@aol.com (DJBlu) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: CARNIVAL CRUISES FREQUENCIES Date: 23 Feb 1996 00:59:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4gjl4o$peb@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: djblu@aol.com (DJBlu) Going on a cruise in a few weeks from Los Angeles to Mexico with my European Pro-26. The ship is called Holiday and is operated by Carnival Cruise Lines. Any suggestion for programming frequencies of interest for in port or at sea communications. Perhaps the crew talking to the harbor, crew to crew onboard, etc. Please post to DJBlu@aol.com Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:24 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Carrier operated antenna off switch for scanner? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 23:31:44 -0500 Message-ID: <312E94B0.61C1@mail.rust.net> References: <4girqi$267@blackice.winternet.com> Shaun Kelly wrote: > > I seem to recall sometime back seeing an advertisement for a switch that > could be mounted on a scanner antenna to cut the feed in the case of a > strong signal (say, like my 2 meter rig) nearby. > > Anyone know anything like this out there? My storm-chasing partners will > appreciate it to no end if I can find one. > > -spk > > -- > > This is a test. If this were a real .sig, it'd say: > spk@winternet.com, spk@TennantCo.com, http://www.winternet.com/~spk > ..but it doesn't, does it? Shaun: You can buy filters to help block out unwanted frequencies or interference. G ROVE handles such devices. Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:25 1996 From: kb0qaf@aol.com (KB0QAF) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cell phones on aircraft same as ground cell phones ? how to tune them in. Date: 26 Feb 1996 02:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4grman$gjs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <312ef69d.383161@news.dimensional.com> The ground stations in the Denver metro area operate in the 849.820 to 851.000 MHz range and the aircraft themselves operate in the 894 to 896 MHz range. Both sides use transmit in the AM mode. The problem is, unfortunately, they are primarily using a form of encryption on their voice transmissions out here. Once in a while there's some clear voice but not very often. 454.725 and 454.775 are the only old air phone frequencies still in use in the Denver area. Phil. Author of the Denver Metro SCANlist. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:27 1996 From: asi@escape.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:18:40 Message-ID: References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> In article <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs writ es: In article <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs writ es: >From: Two-Dogs >Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner >Subject: Re: cell tracking program >Date: 19 Feb 1996 11:29:04 GMT >Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd - Australia >Lines: 34 >Message-ID: <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> >References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs $755@news.accessus.net> >NNTP-Posting-Host: slmel4p56.ozemail.com.au >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) >dcocke@accessus.net (David Cocke) wrote: >>On 5 Feb 1996 10:53:59 GMT, Two-Dogs wrote: >> >>>>Greg Ottria wrote: >>>>>I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpose of >>>>>course. >>>> >>>>Look for 'celltracker' that connects to a Motorola car/bag phone. >>>>If someone points me to info on how the 2006 controls the PLL, or >>>>how a Motorola handset 3-wire bus works, I'll modify the code I >>>>have to control either unit. >> >>This sounds interesting, since I have that phone. Can you give me/us a >>clue as to where to get 'celltracker' or at least a filename I could search >>for. >> >>Thanks. >>David >> > Forget the request about the 2006, i know that serial interface on the PLL >chip now. >The tracker program is called 'Celltracker' or 'Spytracker' (UK) look for it >at this site.... >http://www.primenet.com/~mtorola/ >(or the l0pht...nuff said.) >TD. You keep telling people to get this program but it does not work on AMPS systems.??? Is there something I am missing? Peace from Canada. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:28 1996 From: Maj Jeff Snyder Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:34:30 +0000 Message-ID: <312B9DF6.42F@c1-staff.g2dac.army.mil> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs wrote: > > dcocke@accessus.net (David Cocke) wrote: > >On 5 Feb 1996 10:53:59 GMT, Two-Dogs wrote: > > > >>>Greg Ottria wrote: > >>>>I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpos e of > >>>>course. > >>> > >>>Look for 'celltracker' that connects to a Motorola car/bag phone. > >>>If someone points me to info on how the 2006 controls the PLL, or > >>>how a Motorola handset 3-wire bus works, I'll modify the code I > >>>have to control either unit. > > > >This sounds interesting, since I have that phone. Can you give me/us a > >clue as to where to get 'celltracker' or at least a filename I could search > >for. > > > >Thanks. > >David > > > > Forget the request about the 2006, i know that serial interface on the PL L > chip now. > > The tracker program is called 'Celltracker' or 'Spytracker' (UK) look for it > at this site.... > > http://www.primenet.com/~mtorola/ Ok, now that I have the program, how do I get it to work? I'm going to try using a DPC550 and the cable described in the motoBible. Will that do the trick? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:29 1996 From: Maj Jeff Snyder Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: cell tracking program Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:35:24 +0000 Message-ID: <312B9E2C.76A8@c1-staff.g2dac.army.mil> References: <4ev53s$ran@slip.net> <4f4nk7$eo1@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4fircs$755@news.accessus.net> <4g9mu0$r8o@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs wrote: > > dcocke@accessus.net (David Cocke) wrote: > >On 5 Feb 1996 10:53:59 GMT, Two-Dogs wrote: > > > >>>Greg Ottria wrote: > >>>>I'am looking for a cell tracking program strickly for educational purpos e of > >>>>course. > >>> > >>>Look for 'celltracker' that connects to a Motorola car/bag phone. > >>>If someone points me to info on how the 2006 controls the PLL, or > >>>how a Motorola handset 3-wire bus works, I'll modify the code I > >>>have to control either unit. > > > >This sounds interesting, since I have that phone. Can you give me/us a > >clue as to where to get 'celltracker' or at least a filename I could search > >for. > > > >Thanks. > >David > > > > Forget the request about the 2006, i know that serial interface on the PL L > chip now. > > The tracker program is called 'Celltracker' or 'Spytracker' (UK) look for it > at this site.... > > http://www.primenet.com/~mtorola/ Ok, now that I have the program, how do I get it to work? I'm going to try using a DPC550 and the cable described in the motoBible. Will that do the trick? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:31 1996 From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CellTracker For the US(amps) Date: 22 Feb 1996 11:23:33 GMT Message-ID: <4ghjnl$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4fv2rd$47o@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> > >>I got it to half work, but the PC didn't control the phone. > >If you get it to control the phone YOU WILL BE THE MAN. > >What did you do change the software??? Send me new info if so!!! > When the Motorola phones are in test mode, you can enter the channel you want to listen to via a keypad sequence, so the 'celltracker' program hooks onto the data line of the handset and sends the codes to the phone for you, while decoding the data picked off the NRZ data and CLOCK lines from inside the phone, so it knows where and when to change channel to follow a particular call, but I never got it to control the phone, although it would tell me where the call went, I had to punch the code in by hand to change channels.If anyone wants the details, I'll post them. >How are you testing it you DOG?? > >A buddy just got back from your crazy land! Wow some of the story's! > If you know where the bad areas are.... you can have lots of fun! TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:32 1996 From: dbaker@tiger.lsu.edu (David B Baker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: CellTracker For the US(amps) Date: 22 Feb 1996 11:55:39 -0600 Message-ID: <4giamr$2ges@tiger4.ocs.lsu.edu> References: <4fv2rd$47o@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> <4ghjnl$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> Two-Dogs (why@do.you.ask?) wrote: : you want to listen to via a keypad sequence, so the 'celltracker' : program hooks onto the data line of the handset and sends the codes to : the phone for you, while decoding the data picked off the NRZ data : and CLOCK lines from inside the phone, so it knows where and when to : change channel to follow a particular call, but I never got it to : control the phone, although it would tell me where the call went, I had : to punch the code in by hand to change channels.If anyone wants the : details, I'll post them. Yes, please post the details... Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:33 1996 From: djbond@winternet.com (dj) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: celltracking software for pc/radio monitoring? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:57:21 GMT Message-ID: <4gisfi$2l4@blackice.winternet.com> Reply-To: djbond@winternet.com any such program to use with pc and Icom 7000 with the Opto CX12AR interface? educational use only... thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:34 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gegus$34u@hopper.acm.org> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 23:52:17 GMT F. Barry Mulligan (mulligan@ACM.ORG) writes: (snip) > Mobiles transmit 45 MHz below the base (824.040-848.970) and > are usually repeated by the base. Channels are 30 kHz apart. > Channels 800-832 are also identified as Chs 991-1023. > Around here only about half of the cell phones still get repeated by the base. It's really quite annoying. I guess it's a good way to discourage scanner listeners. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:35 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: bvtrader@cy.com (Buddy Trader) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 08:03:46 GMT Reply-To: bvtrader@cy.com References: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> grant@epix.net (anonymous) wrote: >I suspect this is naughty, but since I just purchased a 2006 >w/cellular restored, my inquiring mind wants to know where I can >obtain cellular frequencies so I can try it out. > > Set the lower limit on your 2006 to 868.95 Mhz and the upper limit to 895.98 and search between these freqs. This covers both the wire line and non-wire line services. BT From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:35 1996 From: Marcus_G@mediasoft.net (Gabe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: References: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo> Date: 23 Feb 96 22:59:29 GMT In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: > Buddy Trader (bvtrader@cy.com) writes: > > > > Set the lower limit on your 2006 to 868.95 Mhz and the upper limit to > > 895.98 and search between these freqs. My scanner won't pick up these freqs but I have heard stuff that sounds like phone conversations on freqs >896.1125 Do some cell phones xmit out of the 'accepted' range of cell phones? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:36 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 18:31:00 GMT Buddy Trader (bvtrader@cy.com) writes: > > Set the lower limit on your 2006 to 868.95 Mhz and the upper limit to > 895.98 and search between these freqs. This covers both the wire line > and non-wire line services. BT > You mean regular phone lines use Cell frequencies? Please explain!!! I'm very curious to hear what you have to say. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:37 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cwstan@holli.com (C. W. Stanley) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: References: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 01:52:33 GMT In article <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo>, bvtrader@cy.com¿ says... > >grant@epix.net (anonymous) wrote: > >>I suspect this is naughty, but since I just purchased a 2006 >>w/cellular restored, my inquiring mind wants to know where I can >>obtain cellular frequencies so I can try it out. >> >> > > >Set the lower limit on your 2006 to 868.95 Mhz and the upper limit to >895.98 and search between these freqs. This covers both the wire line >and non-wire line services. BT > > Howdy, And then program the "hot" freqs into a bank [or two, or three] for more consistent action! Cheers :o) cws From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:38 1996 From: Eric Loy Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Champaign CO. IL freqs? Date: 23 Feb 1996 09:12:42 GMT Message-ID: <4gk0ea$j0o@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> Can someone help me with some local and state tac freqs? I also need Parkland College freqs. Thanks Eric Loy -- ________________________________________________________________ Eric Loy, WDWS "A pessimist is what an optimist obvious@firefly.prairienet.org calls a realist." ________________________________________________________________ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:39 1996 From: khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Changing pager cap codes Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 20:24:04 PST Message-ID: <4gm43i$3f1@blues.axionet.com> Is it possible to change the "cap code" of a Motorola type numeric pager? If so, how? Regards, KH From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:40 1996 From: Greg Gilbert Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Changing pager cap codes Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 11:05:14 -0500 Message-ID: <313088BA.4336@ix.netcom.com> References: <4gm43i$3f1@blues.axionet.com> <4gpssa$kja@news-f.iadfw.net> To: Keith Dotson Keith Dotson wrote: > khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) wrote: > >Is it possible to change the "cap code" of a Motorola type numeric pager? Hello: What is a Cap Codes? Thanks for your help. :-) Greg From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:40 1996 From: brando12@ix.netcom.com(anthony lucia) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cordless Freqs Date: 20 Feb 1996 17:04:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gcuvk$fbh@reader2.ix.netcom.com> Can somebody post the cordless phone freqs...i missed them...thnx From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:41 1996 From: Jim McIntyre Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Freqs Date: 25 Feb 1996 01:00:34 GMT Message-ID: <4gocbi$6nr@lehua.ilhawaii.net> References: <4gcuvk$fbh@reader2.ix.netcom.com> To: brando12@ix.netcom.com ch.1 46.61 2 46.63 46.67 46.71 46.73 46.77 46.83 46.87 46.93 46.97 Just remember the antenna is everything: Radio Shack makes a good one, forgot model number but is undef $20, mount it as high as possible. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:42 1996 From: woody@netspace.net.au (Terry Wood) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phone Freqs... Date: 21 Feb 1996 21:38:00 GMT Message-ID: <4gg3bo$372@otis.netspace.net.au> References: Matt Brummer (matthewb@creighton.edu) wrote: : [For informational purposes only. It is unlawful] : [to monitor this form of personal communication. ] : Cordless Telephone : Chan Base Handset Chan Base Handset Here are also the Panasonic Freqs that i have aswell, note the base and handset freqs. The channel number corresponds to the little number that panasonic put ontop of their phones to identify sets. 0 30.1000 39.8000 1 30.0750 39.7750 2 30.1250 39.8250 3 30.1750 39.8750 4 30.2250 39.9250 5 30.2750 39.9750 Scan on. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:44 1996 From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cordless Phone Freqs... Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:16:46 -0600 Message-ID: Here they are as seen about a week ago... Notes: The handset freqs only carry one side of the conversation. The base freqs carry both sides of the conversation. Channels 16-25 are the 'older' freqencies that most phones use. Channels are posted as found in Deja News (North America): [For informational purposes only. It is unlawful] [to monitor this form of personal communication. ] Cordless Telephone Chan Base Handset Chan Base Handset 1 43.72 48.76 16 46.61 49.67 2 43.74 48.84 17 B 46.63 49.845 3 43.82 48.86 18 C 46.67 49.86 4 43.84 48.92 19 46.71 49.77 5 43.92 49.02 20 D 46.73 49.875 6 43.96 49.08 21 A 46.77 49.83 7 44.12 49.10 22 E 46.83 49.89 8 44.16 49.16 23 46.87 49.93 9 44.18 49.20 24 46.93 49.99 10 44.20 49.24 25 46.97 49.97 11 44.32 49.28 12 44.36 49.36 Chs A - E handset frequencies 13 44.40 49.40 are also used for baby room 14 44.46 49.46 monitors and low power 15 44.48 49.50 handie-talkies. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:45 1996 From: copstu1@bomisc902.NMSU.Edu (T.J. Harrell III) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: 19 Feb 1996 23:16:36 GMT Message-ID: <4gb0ck$pca@bubba.NMSU.Edu> References: <4em4jv$2f0@crl6.crl.com> <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> Michael Alexander (michael@alexander.terranet.com) wrote: : In article <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au>, : horsey@shell01.ozemail.com.au (Barry O Grady) wrote: : > Norman E. Abramson (nabramso@yrkpa.kias.com) wrote: : > : > : Thank you! I have been getting many replies to this post from people wh o : > : Yes... You may listen in on cordless phones. 4X.XX mhz : > : > It works better if you listen to 30.XXX Mhz as that is where the base : > transmits. : > : > : nabramso@yrk.kias.com : > : Norman E. Abramson : This is flat out incorrect! Cordless phones, base and handsets, : transmit/receive of freqs between 43.72 to 49.97. I don't have the time or : even the inclination to list the entire 25 channels--base and : handset--that cordless phones use, but perhaps someone else will do it. It's flat out incorrect only if you're talking about US cordless phones. Cordless phones in Australia certainly do use 30.xxx frequencies. (Look at Barry Grady's email address closely.) Once upon a time, US cordless phones used frequencies just above the AM broadcast band (wonder if any of those are still in use?). I'm sure Barry Mulligan's posting from his FAF file is around here somewhere, anyway, if you really want to know the US frequency allocations. T.J. KC5KTO http://www.zianet.com/files/users/kc5kto/scanner.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:46 1996 From: craig todd gafah Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 21:17:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4em4jv$2f0@crl6.crl.com> <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> There are different Cordless Phone Freq for different countries...... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:48 1996 From: diamond@interserf.net (David B. Perrussel) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 13:03:00 GMT Message-ID: <4gpmgq$av4@ns.interserf.net> References: <4em4jv$2f0@crl6.crl.com> <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> <4gb0ck$pca@bubba.NMSU.Edu> Reply-To: diamond@interserf.net copstu1@bomisc902.NMSU.Edu (T.J. Harrell III) wrote: >Michael Alexander (michael@alexander.terranet.com) wrote: >: In article <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au>, >: horsey@shell01.ozemail.com.au (Barry O Grady) wrote: >: > Norman E. Abramson (nabramso@yrkpa.kias.com) wrote: >Once upon a time, US cordless phones used frequencies just above the AM >broadcast band (wonder if any of those are still in use?). Most of them are now in the 'new' extended AM band (1630-1710 KHz), so it would be fairly easy to pick those up. But, its been a LONG time since they made them in that range. Over 10 years ago. Most of them have gone to the demsty dumpster since then :) David Perrussel E-mail: diamond@interserf.net WWW: http://www.nauticom.net/users/diamond/home.htm From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:48 1996 From: MMcanally@gnn.com (Mark McAnally) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: crystals Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 21:14:08 Message-ID: <4ggmsl$sq0@news-e2a.gnn.com> Looking for crystals for an old Bearcat III....email me with what you have..... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:49 1996 From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: crystals Date: 22 Feb 1996 19:03:03 GMT Message-ID: <4giel7$n80@venger.snds.com> References: <4ggmsl$sq0@news-e2a.gnn.com> To: MMcanally@gnn.com MMcanally@gnn.com (Mark McAnally) wrote: >Looking for crystals for an old Bearcat III....email me with what >you have..... > You can get new ones from Jan Crystal at 1-800-JAN-XTAL. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:51 1996 From: n4jvp@ix.netcom.com (n4jvp) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Data Base (was: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEATTLE) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 13:57:53 GMT Message-ID: <312dc68a.3278037@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> References: <4g7ib1$s3b@whidbey.whidbey.com> On Thu, 22 Feb 1996 18:10:02, asi@escape.ca wrote: > >Why does someone not start a Web Page with names and other information on >people who have ripped others off Via The Internet. A nice Database that >posts the names of both people involved and both of thier EMAIL id's. > >Then we could check to see who possibly not to deal with?? > >Peace from Canada. > An interesting idea but legal liabilities probably will prevent such a database. One major problem would be determining the actual events based upon the involved parties statements. The potential for libel suits is scary.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:52 1996 From: onedown@cris.com (Onedown) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: dipole grounding?? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:28:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gfv7h$2h5@spectator.cris.com> I have a uniden 860 xlt which seems to be a decent radio. Question is, Im using a radio shack dipole antenna which I have the shield of the cable connected directly to a ground rod, this greatly increases reception but the reception gets better still when I have my hand on the sheild also. What is the best way to have this antenna connected for optimum reception? Also after opening the case and seeing all the surface mount components, am I right in assuming there are no mods available for this radio. It looks really easy to ruin, and Im an electonics tech, plus journyman electrician. Thanks in advance, Onedown "It's not how many fingers you have, It's how you use them!" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:54 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: morris@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us (Mike Morris) Subject: Re: Dream scanner Message-ID: <1996Feb23.103926.29986@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us> References: <311CE60E.7AB6@ix.netcom.com> <4fqknn$51u@decaxp.harvard.edu> <4gc9be$f97@beyond.escape.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:39:26 GMT marc_k@escape.com (marc_k) writes: >Fu Tham (tham@husc.harvard.edu) wrote: >: In article <311CE60E.7AB6@ix.netcom.com>, "David L. Nelson" says: >: > >: >My list for the perfect handheld would include: >: > >: > - 200 channels in 10 groups >: > - standard RF coverage and specs as today's top of the line models >: > - Alpha/numeric display >: > - similar to Garmin GPS45 (64x100pixels) >: > - display would have: Band #, Band Name (12char), Channel Name (12 char), Channel >: > frequency, status(lockout & delay & number of hits since entered) >: > - full numeric keyboard >: > - up/down/left/right toggle switch for alpha char entry (again sim ilar to Garmin 45 >: > - RS232 like interface (no need to be 12 volt swing) >: > - Optional SW package to allow full range of data manipulation and up/down load >: 1. Someone else mentioned CTCSS programming >: 2. How about at least 1.2AH battery packs. None of these 500mAH stuff. >: 3. Better audio, better audio amp and larger speakers. >: 4. Since it is heavily compterized already, how about extensionl speaker >: (Speaker Mic style) with alpha-numeric LCD display, like the one ICOM got n ow. >: 5. Better case/enclosure like commercial two way radio, none of these >: el-cheapo polyethlene bearcat cases. >: 6. How about better and more flexable rubber duck, perhaps with switchable >: pre-amp built inside. BC200XLT's original rubber duck is so stiff, it keeps breaking the solder >: connection inside. >: 7. How about accessories like, mobile mount plug-in cradle that has antenn a connection, >: power, and external speaker. I think one of the Maxon CB portable got that. This way you get in >: your car, plug the portable scanner in the cradle, and you got instant mobi le scanner. >: 8. Hey! how about Optoelectronics's Scout reaction tune features built ont o the >: handheld scanner. >: Just a few wishful thinking of mine. >WHAT, no DCS decode? >DTMF decode would be nice, and since this is a fantasy, how about a >trunking decoder(to FOLLOW those juicy PD calls, without hearing the >dogcatcher, etc). >BTW 20 banks of 10 channels are better than 10 banks of 20 channels. Memory is CHEAP these days - since it's going to have full upload/download ability to a PC serail port, and alphanumeric ability (so the display says "LA FIRE DISP", etc), lets have 50 banks of 15. This way I can load up all my LA frequencies AND all my San Diego AND all my Portland Oregon stuff so one business trip to all 3 cities means one upload. And a mode where I can essentially say "search from xxx.xxx to yyy.yyy, and whatever breaks the sq store in Banks 1, 2, 3,and 4 but no dupes. And count the hits both as hits and as total unsquelched time". Handy at airshows, etc. for the first couple of hours. -- --- Mike Morris morris@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us #include I have others, but this works the best. This message assembled from 100% recycled electrons (and pixels). From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:55 1996 From: markj@got.net (Mr.News) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Drugged Driving (Was Larsen Antenna) Date: 25 Feb 1996 11:49:04 GMT Message-ID: <4gpibg$lhn@emerald.oz.net> References: <4ea07f$9a7@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4fscj6$dql@emerald.oz.net> <4fummf$37c@kaleka.seanet.com> <4g4bfp$npd@emerald.oz.net> In article , source@netcom.com says... >The remark in question was, > "drugged drivers cause as many accidents if not more than drunk >drivers." Whoops! How the hell did I miss that??? Since that post has expired on my server all I can do is take your word that that's what the original statement was. >The evidence cited to support this claim was partial mention (i.e. no exact >Who What When Where Why) of four (4) incidents, and NO references to any >specific sources of the info. Assuming that this is the best you can do, >you have DISproved your thesis, since there are lots more than four >accidents caused by drunks over the same time span. I was the source...I covered those stories myself...but like I said...if this was the statement posted (I can only take you word for it now) I agree it would be incorrect on my part to say that drugged driving killed *MORE* people then drunk driving. I know that is not so! The original point I was *TRYING* to make was that drugged drivers kill more people then some folks think *AND* there has been a marked increase in arrest and deaths of those types. I stand corrected! Mr.News From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:56 1996 From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DTMF Decoding Date: 22 Feb 1996 09:27:01 -0700 Message-ID: <312C9925.645A@primenet.com> References: <4fu8h1$ftb@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <312BCEB1.562E@webcc.com> Cameron Odam wrote: > > ZARGON1011 wrote: > > > > I'm looking for a windows program that can decode DTMF tones when input > > through my sound card. Anything out there? > > I'm not new to scanning but I am new to all these extras.. Could someone > please tell me what these DTMF tones you are talking about are and what > decoding them would do? > > Thanks... > > Tal.. They are "Dual Tone, Multi Frequency" tones or 'Touch Tones" like on your tele phone. One advantage to haveing a decoder is to check the encoder in a Ham rig or a pocket dialer. Another would be to interce pt (cool word) tones from cordless and cellular phones. Not to give out any ideas (because the bad guys allready know this) bu t they can sometimes intercept* transmissions that are from people calling the bank or a similar institution, that has an automat ed account ballance system. Not only will you get the account/card number, but the pin and everything else. Thats one reason why you DON'T use cellular/cordless technology to do anything that means sending sensitive information without encryption. * Standard disclaimer. Rob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:57 1996 From: Derek Buchler Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Eastern Mass Frequencies List Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:39:07 -0400 (BST) Message-ID: <5507390996523ntc@tecogen.com> Reply-To: derek@tecogen.com A little while back, someone posted an address for a new listserver for Eastern Mass frequencies. If someone has the address handy, could you please post it again. I'd like to subscribe to it. Thanks in advance, Derek derek@tecogen.com '95 Concours DoD #1359 COG #2103 Smart Routes #772 MH#9 Mule #1 PADI NRA LF-FL AAAAA (American Association Against Acronym Abuse) Where there's smoke there's electronics gone bad. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:58 1996 From: Lauren_Casey@msn.com (Lauren_Casey ) Subject: RE: Evangelism (was "Re: Frewquency Ban?" Date: 23 Feb 96 19:23:20 -0800 References: <4g1f5r$46r@osh2.datasync.com> <4g4eik$nfk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004908@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner This is the man's signature, give him a break. Would you prefer Kilroy ASCCI art instead? At least he has something of value to say. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:13:59 1996 From: Allen Tusi Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: F.S. BC200 Scanner Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:58:33 -0800 Message-ID: <312B7969.32B3@sonic.net> Bearcat BC200 scanner with cellular Excellent condx with manual $200.00 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:01 1996 From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: F1 racing team video Date: 22 Feb 1996 11:14:01 GMT Message-ID: <4ghj5p$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4g64p7$71t@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> <4g6cru$qd0@emerald.oz.net> markj@got.net (Mr.News) wrote: >In article <4g64p7$71t@oznet03.ozemail.com.au>, why@do.you.ask? says... >> >>Does anyone know the frequincies used by the on-board >>cameras used by the racing teams? I'm sure this is >>country specific, as the equiptment would be supplied and >>installed by the appropriate TV station responsible for >>the race coverage, but if anyone knows the usual band >>for these, and other portable RF video links (EG at other >>sporting events like golf etc) I would like some hints. > > > Unless you have a reciever *and* are in-line with the signal you will >be pretty much out of luck. > >I don't have the specific freqs handy but look around... > >2ghz Portable ENG,newsvans and helos 7 channels > >6 and 7 ghz fixed links/old newsvans > >13 ghz short hop fixed links/"shoebox" portables > >28 ghz fixed link/short hops > >There are a few more areas,but these are the most common. > > >Mr.News >(News Photographer/Live Truck Operator) > > Thanks for the reply, but do you know about the cameras they use on the cars themselves 'racecam' etc that you see on cars, boats, bikes, canoes, hang-gliders, etc etc, just about anything that races against anything else. Thanks. TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:02 1996 From: Marcus_G@mediasoft.net (Gabe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Favorite Scans Message-ID: References: <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Date: 24 Feb 96 22:15:36 GMT In article <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu>, snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) wrote : > I would like some opinions on what people like to scan. Forget the every > popular cellular and cordless stuff. What else to people scan? Any great > frequencies? I just got my first scanner and would like to learn how and what > you "experts" listen to. Mine is a Pro-43. I would also like opinions on th e > most efficient way to deal with banks? How do YOU have your's arranged? > > Thanks!!! I have a pro-51. I scan the local Fire/Rescue channels,but I don't use the built in FIRE band scan. I have all the freqs programmed in (I know them since i'm a member of Fire/Rescue services). I have all the local stuff programmed into a bank and a half (30 channels). Other county's stuff I have on a different bank. And I have police on a seperate bank. It's nice to have different locales in different banks because sometimes I only want to listen to what's going on locally. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:03 1996 From: petej@rhea.otol.fi (Petteri Junnikkala) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Finland police kode Date: 23 Feb 1996 09:08:58 GMT Message-ID: <4gk07a$ko1@pan.otol.fi> Heips! seuraako kukaan suomalainen t{t{ listaa.. varmaankin joten kieli k{y Eli oliskos kell{{n laitta mailina poliisin toiminta koodeja mulle sill{ ittell{ni on vanhentuneet paprut. -- /I Petteri Junnikkala / I /----I-\ E-mail: petej@rhea.otol.fi, petjun@freenet.hut.fi \____I / WWW: http://www.otol.fi/~petej/ / / Surffer -> \__/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:05 1996 From: "The (Lebanon, Pa.) Daily News" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Freqs: Schuylkill Cty, PA Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 18:38:42 +0000 Message-ID: <31277231.16F8@leba.net> Hi: Looking for some fire, police and other interesting frequencies from the Pine Grove - Tower City area of Schuylkill County in PA. Thanks for your time and attention in advance. Jim Zengerle From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:06 1996 From: bellg@wco.com (greg bell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency counters - which to buy? Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 08:22:36 GMT Message-ID: <4gmt7f$lub@news.wco.com> References: <4eglqe$r7r@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fj5mk$gu3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Javier Montero wrote: >> Get a Radio Shaq Frequency Counter! >> They work just fine... They have two gate speeds, and you set it to look >> for 1-50Mhz or 50-1600Mhz. It has a light and you can easily upgrade the >> antenna. >How much does it costs? >Thanks, > Javi I JUST BOUGHT ONE TODAY IT COST $99.00 + TAX From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:07 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Frequency counters - which to buy? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4eglqe$r7r@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fj5mk$gu3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gmt7f$lub@news.wco.com> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 19:42:25 GMT Jorge Saavedra (ax586@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) writes: >> > I bought one, but I find it lacks sensitivity. It just shows random > values unless you connect it directly to a signal source (like RS's > micro-power "transmitter", for example). To use it to measure the > frequency of a nearby transmitter (police, fd, whatever) I'm sure I'll > need a preamplifier. > > Does yours work better than this? You say it lacks sensitivity, are you comparing this to another frequency counter? I find mine is fine. Of course you need to be RIGHT beside things such as cordless phones, etc. because these are LOW power. WHen you think of the thousands of radio waves that are bombarding your counter, it needs the strongest signal possible. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:09 1996 From: jmckay@interlog.com (NewsRadio) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:01:40 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gck5u$svo@steel.interlog.com> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> <4g0k46$8i1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> bobeisner@aol.com (BOBEISNER) wrote: >I've had success in decoding Frequency Inversion Scrambled cordless phones >with my ICOM R7000 by going to the USB of the frequency and offsetting it >by 1.5 to 2.2 khz. This trick also works with my AOR1500, but using the >BFO. > >I also have a decoder that I purchased in 1982 (which was legal back them) >and it >really didn't perform any better than my trick of using USB on my ICOM This is the easiest way to decode simple frequency inversion. I had a cheap AM wireless mic once that I used to rebroadcast the scanner audio to a short wave Rxcvr (sony 2001). By tuning in the AM mic on ssb and adjusting the bfo, you would get the decoded audio (plus the annoying tone of the carrier). Bit cumbersome but it worked. Probem here is that everyone is now going to rolling code inversion or worse, digital voice privacy -------------------------------------------- Southern Ontario Radio News & Broadcast Engineering homepage: www.interlog.com/~jmckay LeBlanc homepage: www.npsnet.com/leblanc -------------------------------------------- (((x))) | "Waddya mean the tower doesnt meet the | current CODE? Its been standing for 20 years!!??!!" /|\ ------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:10 1996 From: Joseph Cardani Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency Inversion Decrambling Date: 22 Feb 1996 21:59:18 GMT Message-ID: <4giovm$2gi@mail.TJU.EDU> References: <4fu4ln$90@tofu.alt.net> <4g0k46$8i1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <312a63e9.52122067@news2.microserve.net> Ramsey Electronics has a simple and inexpensive voice inversion decoder availa ble. I'm not sure of their address but they usually advertise in Monitoring Times m agazine. Also, another company has advertised in MT for a similar device but I forgot t heir name. I really don't knoe how they work since I don't have one, Maybe someone else t hat has one can fill you in on how well the unit operates. Joe Cardani Voorhees, NJ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:11 1996 From: "William A. Burgess" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: frequency multiplexing Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:59:07 -0600 Message-ID: <312F51EB.41C6@Math.LaTech.edu> I know that during WWII, ham radio operators used to send their signal along the 60 Hz power line. I can do this in the lab with a op-amp summing circuit, but it won't work for high power lines. I was also told you could have your signal sent though multiple series capacitors and connect directly onto the line. Can someone help me or at least point me in the right direction... please email me bill burgess w.burgess@ieee.org -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - William A. Burgess W.Burgess@IEEE.org- - President, IEEE Burgess@Engr.LaTech.edu- - Louisiana Tech University Burgess@Math.LaTech.edu- - http://www.math.latech.edu/~burgess/ IEEEnews@Engr.LaTech.edu- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:12 1996 From: jmatk@tscm.com (James M. Atkinson, Communications Engineer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Re: frequency multiplexing Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 01:28:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <312F51EB.41C6@Math.LaTech.edu> In article <312F51EB.41C6@Math.LaTech.edu>, "William A. Burgess" wrote: > I know that during WWII, ham radio operators used to send their signal > along the 60 Hz power line. I can do this in the lab with a op-amp > summing circuit, but it won't work for high power lines. I was also > told you could have your signal sent though multiple series capacitors > and connect directly onto the line. Can someone help me or at least > point me in the right direction... It works quite well, the military, intelligence community, and other assorted spooks still transmit RF over the AC line, CATV, and Phone wiring. It is possible to maintain a low power signal on the AC mains up to around 50-54 mhz, once the freq gets up to around 200-250mhz the loss to too high to be of any value. BTW: Most AC mains RF systems operate on freqs below 500khz -jma =============================================================== James M. Atkinson "...Shaken, not Stirred..." TSCM.COM 127 Eastern Avenue #291 Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 URL: http://www.tscm.com/ E-Mail: jmatk@tscm.com =============================================================== The First, The Largest, The Most Popular, and the Most Complete TSCM Counterintelligence Site on the Internet =============================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:13 1996 From: grumpy@en.com (Seymour Dupa) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency of air Date: 24 Feb 1996 13:04:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gn2dk$l0m@antares.en.com> References: <4fp6qg$m4j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> XTrenched (xtrenched@aol.com) wrote: : I just got a frequency counter and was wondering why when no near : anything, it is jumping between 48 and 52 mhz Is this normal? Ask the place you got the counter from. : -- : **Remember kiddies: Cover thy tracks when : thou art hacking or thou shalt be banned : from all thy local ISP's and then thou : shalt be doomed to thy AOL** -- *************************************************** You only get one chance on this merry-go-round, ** but if you do it right, once is enough. ** *************************************************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:14 1996 From: rwt2@ix.netcom.com (Roger W. Taylor Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Fresno,CA / Shuttle Frequency Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:34:12 GMT Message-ID: <312c9af7.201195@nntp.ix.netcom.com> Anyone in the Fresno,CA area may like to know that the Shuttle Missions are re-broadcast on 146.755 Mhz. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:15 1996 From: ddecoons@aol.com (DDecoons) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS PRO-2006 with Optoscan 456 Date: 22 Feb 1996 00:00:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4ggt90$riv@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: ddecoons@aol.com (DDecoons) This is a duplicate, my email address has changed. For Sale RS PRO-2006 scanner with Optoscan 456 board installed. Unit is mint and original, except for Opto456 installation. Includes software and RS-232 cable. $625 includes 2nd day air shipping in continental US. Please email me at ddecoons@easyway.net or call 201-896-0549 thanks, Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:16 1996 From: Al Robinson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: FS: BC 855XLT FULL CELL Date: 23 Feb 1996 14:10:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gkhtc$79o@news.rl.af.mil> References: <4gc2v1$35m@rouge.usl.edu> >BC 855XLT for sale......PERFECT CONDITION, has 100 channel mod., FULL CELL >mod for those who want the reciever exactly how the manufacturer intened >to sale it, telescoping anteanea (crappy one that comes with it and good >Rat Shack one). Full time backlit display. For those of you who want aa >FULL 800 MHZ scanner...... > >$200.00 (or best offer, ALWAYS Negotiable--I'm a starving college student) > Wow! What a deal! Last year I bought the same model, brand new at a hamfest for $129.00 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:16 1996 From: dpearson@ctc.ctc.edu (Dennis L. Pearson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: FS: AR3000A Unblocked scanner Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 15:52:02 GMT Message-ID: <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> References: <311BDC28.1B68@interaccess.com> "Herb A. Zite" wrote: >Unblocked AR3000A scanner. In very good condition with all accessories, >box and docs. >$925 or best offer + shipping and COD Excuse my ignorance, but I am new to the technical end of scanning/dxing. What does "unblocked" mean? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:17 1996 From: "Herb A. Zite" Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: FS: AR3000A Unblocked scanner Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 14:37:11 -0600 Message-ID: <313219F7.48E2@interaccess.com> References: <311BDC28.1B68@interaccess.com> <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> Unblocked means that you can receive the cellular frequencies. It would be illegal to listen, but the radio will receive them. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:18 1996 From: jshaffer@pennet.net (Jim Shaffer, Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: FS: AR3000A Unblocked scanner Date: Mon, 26 Feb 96 19:29:53 Message-ID: <19960226.79C2008.11C60@pennet.net> References: <311BDC28.1B68@interaccess.com> <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> In article <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> dpearson@ctc.ctc.edu (Dennis L. Pearson) writes: > What does "unblocked" mean? In the U.S., it's illegal to listen to telephone conversations. In their infinite wisdom, the government has decreed that it is also illegal to sell scanners capable of receiving the cellular band. Don't ask me why the conventional portable phone bands are still legal, but as far as I know they are. An unblocked scanner is one that can receive the cellular band. Most of them are easily modified so that the manufacturer doesn't have to produce a different model for foreign use. If I remember rightly, it's also illegal to sell scanners that can receive the cellular band accidentally by overloading the front-end. Or at least Radio Shack seemed to think so -- I've never read the law. Attempting to change the laws of physics is, of course, a sign that the government doesn't have a clue, but what else is new? -- * From the disk of: | jshaffer@pennet.net | "there's a hell of Jim Shaffer, Jr. | /\v/\ // | a good universe 37 Brook Street | This signature // | next door; let's go" Montgomery, PA 17752 | under construction. \\// | (e.e. cummings) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:19 1996 From: hsattin@nectech.com (Harvey Sattin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: ICOM R7100 Date: 22 Feb 1996 14:26:14 GMT Message-ID: <4ghue6$e9q@cosmos.nectech.com> For Sale: ICOM R7100 receiver, no gaps. Includes speech board. Excellent condition in box with manual. $1400.00 Harvey Sattin, N1PHP Eves: 617-738-6393 Days: 508-635-6246 email: hsattin@nectech.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:20 1996 From: Chris@sublime.com (Chris) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Opto APS-104 Date: 23 Feb 1996 07:04:30 GMT Message-ID: ForSale: OptoElectronics APS-104 Active Pre-Selector -Tunable band pass filter system -10MHz to 1GHz -Continously tunes over more than 5 octaves -Maintains a constant 4MHz bandwidth over entire range -Electronically tunes -Ultimate Security Sweeper -Extend Near Field detection distance 10x -Includes Internal Rechargable battery pack and charger New this is $1000 from Opto, I am asking $750 or best offer The unit is in perfect conditon, and has seen very little use. The perfect use for this is in conjunction with the Scout or Interceptor, it provides a very significant boost in capture range. I was using it with the Scout/AOR-8000 combo and it worked great. I purchased this for a project and no longer need it. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:21 1996 From: David Johanson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,co.ads Subject: FS: PRO-2006 in Excellent Condition w/Original Box & Manual Date: 22 Feb 1996 16:02:35 GMT Message-ID: <4gi42r$17k@cloner3.netcom.com> FS: PRO-2006 in Excellent Condition w/Original Box & Manual This scanner is absolutely immaculate without a single scratch. The cellular and speed mod have been completed. I am purchasing a new ICOM-7100 and will have 1 too many scanner/radios than I really need. This scanner is very clean, none of the bottons or labels show any wear. Price $340 (Firm) (I know what Durham sells it for with or without having to pay Canadian customs> David Johanson Highlands Ranch, Colorado (15 min south of Denver) 303-470-3170 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:22 1996 From: sdmartin@flash.LakeheadU.Ca (Sean D. Martin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Pro-43 Message-ID: <23064@storm.LakeheadU.Ca> Date: 23 Feb 1996 04:49:58 GMT I've got a Pro-43 scanner for sale. Its in good condition and can be modified to receive cellular. If you're interested, email me at this address. The asking price is $200US. Sean. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:23 1996 From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Uniden BC3000xlt $315! Date: 22 Feb 1996 04:36:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4ghdee$3i7@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Uniden 3000xlt hand held scanner for sale! -brand new condition, perfect, in box, with all manuals etc... -receive police, fire, amulance, cell phones (note-this is illegal), + much more! -this is Uniden's top of the line hand held scanner! $315. + shipping please e-mail me if interested or call me at 510.526.1149, thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:24 1996 From: moujesky@why.net (Michael Oujesky) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,phl.scanner,alt.forsale,austin.forsale,houston.forsale,dfw.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,tx.forsale,us.forsale.misc Subject: FT: 205XLT for PRO-60/26 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 00:15:25 GMT Message-ID: <4ggg43$iv8@what.why.net> To: All Anyone interested in trading a PRO-60 (or perhaps a PRO-26) for Uniden Bearcat BC-205XLT? The 205XLT has full 800 mhz coverage enabled. Partial trades considered. Interested parties please reply via e-mail to moujesky@why.net. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:25 1996 From: wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Ham Crap Date: 26 Feb 1996 13:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4gstfl$3c@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> In article <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) writes: >Is it just me, or are the rest of you also sick of seeing all this ham >radio "Code vs No-Code" and "No-Code = No-Brain" garbage crossposted all >over the scanner newsgroups? > > Since I am a technician class ham, I am sick of seeing it PERIOD!! Warren Whitby wwhitby@aol.com - Home wwhitby@.bdm.com - Work Ham radio: KE4ITL "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Romans 10:13 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:26 1996 From: Allen Tusi Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Ham Crap Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 06:15:44 -0800 Message-ID: <31331210.32BF@sonic.net> References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> Dan Morisseau wrote: > > In article VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) writes: > > >Is it just me, or are the rest of you also sick of seeing all this ham > >radio "Code vs No-Code" and "No-Code = No-Brain" garbage crossposted all > >over the scanner newsgroups? > > Yes! As a mlicnesed ahm myself, I find it EXCEPTIONALLY stupid! Just > ignore the cretins who want to fight about this issue. > > Dan Morisseau > N7ZXL > 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W > Elevation: 300'I agree with both of you, this isn't the forum for code-nocode debate. <> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Help need Uniden BC860XLT mods Date: 24 Feb 1996 05:12:24 GMT Message-ID: <4gm6no$d6b@nw002.infi.net> Anyone with any mods for this unit please help... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:28 1996 From: onedown@cris.com (Onedown) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Help need Uniden BC860XLT mods Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 20:03:56 GMT Message-ID: <4gnqul$9pt@spectator.cris.com> References: <4gm6no$d6b@nw002.infi.net> Dan wrote: >Anyone with any mods for this unit please help... Ive been looking for around six months for mods for this radio I dont think they exist. Ive opened the case and due to the surface mount components inside I'd say it would be harmfull to try and modify the unit. "It's not how many fingers you have, It's how you use them!" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:29 1996 From: mnewton@ici.net (Mike) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Help on finding/creating custom? mobile antenna. Date: Mon, 19 Feb 96 15:16:11 GMT Message-ID: <4ga39g$a4m@crusher.ici.net> I'm looking to add a multi-band scanner antenna (30Mhz - 900Mhz) to my car (station wagon with LOTS of ground-plane area!!). The thing I would like to accomplish is to keep it under 24" in length so I don't destroy my new garage doors every time I pull the car in. I know this may be a dumb reason to some of you, but the less painting I have to do, the better :-) I'm willing to try and experiment with making one or if you know of one that already exists, great. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. (e-mail is appreciated too). Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:30 1996 From: DOCTOR_DIALTONE@msn.com (Rick Williams) Subject: RE: Help please Date: 24 Feb 96 18:33:30 -0800 References: <1bb_9602200559@sasbbs.com> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004947@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner saw your message "rec.radio.scanner" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:31 1996 From: Chief Doug Hamer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: HELP WITH TONES ON 800 MHZ TRUNK SYSTEM Date: 24 Feb 1996 03:38:04 GMT Message-ID: <4gm16s$1kjh@darwin.nbnet.nb.ca> References: <4ge70a$ak7@darwin.nbnet.nb.ca> Chief Doug Hamer wrote: > > An area 800 mhz trunk system has recently added a 1250 mhz tone of > about 7 sec duration running every 30 seconds to attempt to thwart > monitoring (or require them to medicate with prozac). > The system is utilized by about 6 - 10 users including some public > safety (pd, fd etc) on a fairly limited number of frequency, The > changing os the data channel every 24 hours was not a big problem... > this is ?? > Any suggestions how to get around it . Monitoring myself on a Radio > Shack 2006. Great Box !! UPDATE On my previous query..... The 800 mhz trunk system in our area that recently added a 1230 Hz tone is a Motorola System. I am not exactly familiar with the model of the system, but it definately is not full digital and most radio traffic is analog. Still wondering how we can get around this aggravation. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:32 1996 From: marty.blaise@cld9.com (MARTY BLAISE) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Houston freqs wanted Message-ID: <8BB3431.089A006347.uuout@cld9.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 17:53:00 -0600 Reply-To: marty.blaise@cld9.com (MARTY BLAISE) MSGID: 1:106/357.0 312ba274 Does anyone have any good frequency listings for the Houston, Texas area? I have logged about 400 different from my home and am always interested in more. Thanks. --- Maximus/2 3.01 * Origin: Return address: conch.cld9.com (1:106/357) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:33 1996 From: larry daniel, larry daniel Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 04:25:32 GMT Message-ID: <312d4075.1913227@news.onramp.net> References: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> >jh14@cornell.edu (Jonathan Ho) wrote: > >>Hi! Forgive my ignorance, but I was concerned about the security on my >>regular cordless phone and was told by someone that a 900mhz cordless >>phone is not scanable. Is this true? Do any of you guys know if you can >>pick-up conversations on a 900mhz cordless? Thanks for all your help! > Jonathan, I have a combination digital answering machine and 900 MHz cordless phone. I turn on the intercom, and put near TV and started scanning, I picked up the TV sound. so it isn't safe from scanners. from what I understand if the 900MHz (Mhz?) phone itself is digital or spread spectrum, it is safe from normall scanners. but there are analog 900 MHz phones out there so be careful in purchasing.. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:34 1996 From: jay vise Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Date: 24 Feb 1996 07:35:38 GMT Message-ID: <4gmf4a$5sd@hunter.premier.net> References: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> <4gfhta$n39@ram2.ramlink.net> >>>Hi! Forgive my ignorance, but I was concerned about the security on my >>>regular cordless phone and was told by someone that a 900mhz cordless >>>phone is not scanable. Is this true? Do any of you guys know if you can >>>pick-up conversations on a 900mhz cordless? Thanks for all your help! > > Try Cincinnati Microwave's Escort series. All their 900Mhz phones >are Spread Spectrum. To my knowledge, there aren't any descrambler >kits out for those phones at all. I've owned my Escort for better than >a year and haven't ever heard the first blip of my conversations on >the 900Mhz + range. > R Shack has a spread-spectrum 900 for about $180... unscannable, for now. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:35 1996 From: pub01201@innet.be (Sven De Troch) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: I SELL A AOR-AR8000 with interface Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:15:45 GMT Message-ID: <312dae98.5006609@news.innet.be> Hallo all, A friend of me (without modem) sells his ar-aor8000 scanner, 1 year old, with manual in dutch and english, interface and soft for pc. New price: 26000 bfr (860 US$) Price now: all together (500 US$) without shipping Bought in the Netherlands, 1 year ago. Comments and info only at e-mail: Sven.DeTroch@innet.be Greetings, SDT From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:35 1996 From: dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:36:35 PST Message-ID: References: <0c2_9602210500@magsystems.com> In article Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland Stiner) writes: > >How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in > >excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. >Whatever the market will bear. Since the radio is unblocked, the sky is >the limit. I wouldn't sell mine for any amount of money. Best be careful there, Roland. You are leaving yourself WIDE open for a very nasty follow-up from Mikey, our resident Net Scanner Price Policeman! Dan Morisseau N7ZXL 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W Elevation: 300' From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:36 1996 From: sfs@gnn.com (Salty) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:28:04 Message-ID: <4gdslv$3n@news-e1a.megaweb.com> References: See the Bob Parness, AJ9S post about "Buying A Used Scanner Radio" and ignore all this hot air. ****************************************************************************** ******** Ignorace of the past, Ignorance of the present, these are forgivable. Ignorance of how ignorant we are is unforgivable. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:38 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 07:13:26 GMT Message-ID: References: <4g4ldp$jph@feenix.metronet.com> In article <4g4ldp$jph@feenix.metronet.com> dave@mandr.com (Dave Rogers) write s: >> Michelle Alexander spews: >> Morriseau's price "advice" is pure opinion and has no basis in reality. I >I'd say you have a little trouble with reality yourself. There is no >such radio as the ICOM R7000-2. There is, however, a R7100-2. As far >as the R7100 being more capable, that is debatable. The R7100 covers >25 MHz that the R7000 does not and it has a few more bells and >whistles. I would rather have an R7000 with it's (mostly) continuous >coverage than a crippled R7100. >BTW, I do own an early model R7100 and would not even consider taking >$1000 for it. Oh sure base your opinion on experience and knowledge. I bet if you had a database of 3 sales you wouldn't feel that way. :-) Seriously Dave, I have heard from a number of people that feel the same way concerning the R7000 comapred to the R7100. A couple of them sold their 7000 to get a R7100 only to sell it and buy a 7000 again. Not a good indicator for the 7100 is it? It also leads one to think that the price of a used 7100 should be lower than a 7000. I too own an early model R7000. It is going to have to be hard times before I let loose of it for under a $1000. Those that own one know and those that pretend to track these things by threes are just guessing. Glenn From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:39 1996 From: Lawrence Artz Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: 21 Feb 1996 20:46:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gg0bs$r1@llnews.ll.mit.edu> References: <0c2_9602210500@magsystems.com> Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland Stiner) wrote: > > >How much is an ICOM R7000 (25MHz-2000MHz), all mode reciever worth, in > >excellent condition? I have an option to buy one. > >Whatever the market will bear. Since the radio is unblocked, the sky is >the limit. I wouldn't sell mine for any amount of money. > >--- > OLX 1.53 --------------> 73, de NK2U <---------------- Me too. As soon as I learned of the then to be outlawed frequencies, I immediately splurged and bought an R7000 within days after hearing of the ban. I would not sell mine at any price. ICOM really did their homework when they designed that rig. Very good receiver design. The R7000 value can only go up since full-coverage receivers post April 1994 are now outlawed to all people except the Government. Larry, KA1CRN From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:41 1996 From: douglas marx Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: 24 Feb 1996 05:29:50 GMT Message-ID: <4gm7oe$i6o@nn.fast.net> References: <4g4ldp$jph@feenix.metronet.com> To: GLENN GLENN I AGREE I BOUGHT A 7100 ONLY TO SELL IY TO BUY A USED 7000 ABOUT A MONTH AFTER I BOUGHT IT PAID $700 WITH TV ADAPTR AND RC. GOOD DEAL I HAVE OCCASIONALLY SEEN THEM FOR ABOUT $800 ON THE HAM NETS. DOUG DOOGIE@FAST.NET SOME PEOPLE ARE ON DRUGS THOSE THAT SPEND 6 GRaND ON A 9000 EX SEVENTY FLEAS From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:42 1996 From: kmorris904@aol.com (KMorris904) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in you Date: 21 Feb 1996 07:02:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4gf1l6$1l3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gb99a$2a22@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> Reply-To: kmorris904@aol.com (KMorris904) Lt. in dept was caught with pror scanner in Priv Vech and was taken to jail and scanner impounded and sold at auction. Welcome to MI kmorris904@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:42 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in you Date: 23 Feb 1996 05:05:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4gk3i5$dc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gf1l6$1l3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) This is not a problem if you have a valid amateur radio license! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:44 1996 From: cphillips@interpath.com (Curt Phillips) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 06:16:42 GMT Message-ID: <4gedca$gtg_001@news.interpath.net> References: <2d7cc$81a12.1@ineter.edgewater.com> <4frkch$sim@netnews.upenn.edu> <4g96fr$d3i@ns.campus.mci.net> In article <4g96fr$d3i@ns.campus.mci.net>, daveanderson@telis.org (Dave Anderson) wrote: >jimsokol@all-phase.com wrote: >>Michigan: Illegal in vehicle unless you are a licensed HAM. >>Indiana: Illegal in vehicle or out walking around unless you >>are a licensed HAM. >What - you connot even walk down the street with a hand held >scanner??? Where is big brother??? When I was writing for MODERN ELECTRONICS magazine, a kid from Kentucky sent me a letter about how he had been "arrested" for having a Radio Shack handheld scanner, and just walking around with it. He was under 16 years old and couldn't drive a car. Fortunately, it was new and he was able to return it to Radio Shack and get a "base" type scanner. Also, fortunately, after taking him to the station and "roughing him up" (a little verbal intimidation), they didn't charge him with anything. UNFORTUNATELY, he was living with an aunt who already had misgivings about his new hobby, and this episode didn't endear it to her. ========= All opinions expressed are solely those of the author ============ Curt Phillips, CEM KD4YU |Here's to the land of the longleaf pine, Engineer/Writer/Raconteur|The summerland where the sun doth shine, cphillips@interpath.com |Where the weak grow strong & the strong grow great, Energy BBS 704-547-3114 |Here's to Downhome, the Old North State. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:45 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Intersystem Frequencies (was: Secret Service LEARN channel?) Date: 23 Feb 1996 01:07:01 GMT Message-ID: <4gj3vm$9o6@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG > I was wondering if anybody knew what the freq. is in Alabama? You might want to check the following freqs. in the "Listing by Frequency" section of Police Call. If you find every county in the state listed under one, you've found a (potential) intersystem channel. Public Safety Intersystem Police [90.19] 39.46 intersystem operations only 45.86 intersystem operations only 155.370 (widely used, but not a Federal allocation) 155.475 statewide emergency nets 173.075 stolen vehicle recovery (LoJack) 154.665 .680 .695 } State Police 154.905 .920 .935 } coordinated 155.445 .460 .490 } operations Fire [90.21] 45.88 intersystem, primarily base-mobile 154.265 .280 .295 mutual aid Emergency Medical [90.27] 155.340 HEAR - Hospital Emerg. Ambul. Radio 460.525 .550 inter/intrasystem w/ Police & Fire (also see FAF-Ambulances for MED channels) Public Safety - all 220.8025-220.8475 Mutual Aid (5 kHz intervals) [90.720] 866.0125 .5125 } 867.0125 .5125 } Mutual Aid [90.617] 868.0125 } (mobile freqs: 220 +1 MHz; 460 +5 MHz; 860 -45 MHz) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:47 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Letter of Appreciation for Radio Dealer "DO buy from this guy..!" Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 23:39:06 Message-ID: References: <4gd8n9$1st4@news.gate.net> <4ge10m$i89@excalibur.edge.net> I have dealt with dozens of people on the Net, sometimes with transactions involving thousands of dollars, and I have yet (knock on wood) to be dealt with unfairly! I feel that if you do your homework, ask lots of questions, and take your time (don't rush into anything), you can get a very good feeling on the potential outcome of a deal. If you feel funny, DON'T DO IT! Get all of the information up front, condition, quantity, price, location, shipping, method of payment, included accessorries, contact phone numbers, mailing/shipping address, Call Sign, etc. If someone balks at providing good contact info (like a phone number), just drop it right there. I get a feeling that SOME (not all) of the bad Net deals I hear about are people rushing into what they thought was a great deal because they were afraid if they didn't jump, it would be gone. Any deal that sounds too good to be true usually (but not always) is. A REAL deal may get by you from time to time, but taking the appropriate steps will usually go a long way to insure that a legitimate transaction that is good for all parties involved is the result. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:47 1996 From: Lauren_Casey@msn.com (Lauren_Casey ) Subject: RE: Letter of Appreciation for Radio Dealer "DO buy from this guy..!" Date: 23 Feb 96 19:27:04 -0800 References: <4gd8n9$1st4@news.gate.net> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004909@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Use COD and certified checks....you can stop payment on them before the check is cashed if the goods fall short of the promises made. Once you have the cash AND the goods in hand, these people suddenly realise what they've done and know they didn't get away with it. Will also not make it worth their while to do it again in the future. Lauren From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:48 1996 From: Jonathan Clough Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: London police Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 10:58:28 GMT Message-ID: <824813908snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> References: <824558682.22564snx@genes.pl.my> Reply-To: Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk In article <824558682.22564snx@genes.pl.my> wired@genes.pl.my "Eugene Kang" writes: Hi, > Yes, I know it's illegal. But does anyone know the freqs for the London > police? I'm sure some of the London "residents" on alt.radio.scanner.uk would be able to help you with some specific frequencies of interest. Main areas to look ar 451-453MHz NFM 25KHz and 147-153MHz, AM & NFM 12.5KHz. -- Cheers, /-------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jonathan Clough | With Best Wishes for a Prosperous | | Javiation, | & Peaceful New Year to all. | | Bradford, UK | VHF/UHF Scanners from all the leading Mfr's | | Tel: +44 (0)1274 732146 | inc PRO-26/43, UBC-3000XLT, AR5000/7030/8000| | Fax: +44 (0)1274 722627 | http://www.demon.co.uk/javiation | | Compu$$erve: 100117,535 \---------------------------------------------| | Internet : Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk (PGP Key available on request) | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:49 1996 From: Matt Brunton Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: London police Date: 22 Feb 1996 10:13:59 GMT Message-ID: <4ghfl7$ck4@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> References: <824558682.22564snx@genes.pl.my> <824813908snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> Jonathan Clough wrote: >In article <824558682.22564snx@genes.pl.my> > wired@genes.pl.my "Eugene Kang" writes: >Hi, >> Yes, I know it's illegal. But does anyone know the freqs for the London >> police? >I'm sure some of the London "residents" on alt.radio.scanner.uk would be >able to help you with some specific frequencies of interest. >Main areas to look ar 451-453MHz NFM 25KHz and 147-153MHz, AM & NFM >12.5KHz. >Cheers, >Jonathan Clough > Also, check out T.Harrel's Scanner page these and other UK freqs (eg Heathrow, Manchester). Matt From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:50 1996 From: tsmith@ici.net (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Looking for Pittsburg/Cleveland/Toledo/Dayton Date: Sun, 25 Feb 96 04:17:43 GMT Message-ID: <4goqfc$rt@crusher.ici.net> On the road starting Sunday evening and driving from Pittsburg to State College, back to Pittsburgh, then Cleveland, Toledo and then down to Dayton. Looking for suggestions for good listening enroute. Anyy state freqs for PA and OH? Turnpike? Thanks, Tim Smith Email: tsmith@ici.net or tsmith@fibusa.com WWW: http://www.ici.net/cust_pages/tsmith/tsmith.html Tel:508-758-2462 Fax: 508-758-9605 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:51 1996 Date: 23 Feb 1996 16:46:56 CST Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: Jonathon.Smirth@nne.com (Jonathon Smirth) Message-ID: <825114393240498@nne.com.nne.com> Subject: MASS POSTING SOFTWARE Introducing the most revolutionary Windows ™ based Newsgroup program ever created....order at http://www.nne.com The Power Poster was designed specifically for those users who want to get their message out to multiple newsgroups without that annoying, "Hey everybody, I just posted to 1000 newsgroups." trail in their header. The Power Poster uses an innovative method to only show the specific newsgroup your message went to, regardless of how many newsgroups to which it was actually posted. The end result: Let potentially millions see your message without it looking like a large cross-posting. * Post one article to as many newsgroups as you choose through a simple point and click operation. * Post one article to unlimited newsgroups without leaving a trail for "cancel-bots", "Flammers", or electronic vandals * Choose any server to maximize newsgroup access * Use the "sort" utility to custom create your own newsgroup lists by subject * Easily attach files to any article or message you post * Automatically post your message to entire subject groups you select on the Usenet * Let newsgroup users see you as you want to be seen through user definable headers * Extensive on-line help feature answers all of your user questions Use INet POWER POSTER v2.1 to quickly and efficiently; *Post opinions *Information *Political Statements *Advertisments Post what ever you like, to all the newsgroups you choose and get the results or response which comes from reaching over 30 million Usenet users. Only $49.95 Through this special pre-release offer (Includes shipping and handling) Order today by sending check, money order, or major credit card info to: Neo Net Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 191118 Little Rock, AR 72209 Or........For more information, to obtain a snail mail order form, or to order on-line, check out our Web page http://www.nne.com ---Visa---Mastercard---Discover---America Express---Checks on-line---- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:52 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: Metal whip antenna from R.S. Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 01:51:33 GMT I just got a Pro-51 from R.S. I've been using a metal whip antenna I had from an old scanner, but I'll probably be selling it soon. I was wondering how R.S.'s whip antenna works? I've heard one good report and one bad report. Anybody else want to weigh in? Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:54 1996 From: tvine@teleport.com (PjB) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Michael Alexander or my dogs Butt?? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 15:26:46 -0800 Message-ID: References: <310ecf24.3023017@news.duke.edu> <4fdku2$m4h@service2.uky.edu> <4fol6n$poc@news.doit.wisc.edu> <00001ff6+000046e3@msn.com> In article , michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) wrote: > > >michael@alexander.terranet.com (Michael Alexander) wrote: (re. Glenn Hansen) > You've already established that you're an simple-minded idiot. Now, you've > demonstrated that you're an uneducated clown. Your response is nothing > more than a cliche or two stolen from a Cheek post, stitched together with > some trash tough talk that you think makes you look like a tough guy. Once again, you're spot on. Look up 'wanna-be' in the dictionary and you get a picture of Glenn Hansen gazing longingly at Bill Geek. He has adopted Geeks manner of speech, no less! Talk about picking questionable role models.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:54 1996 From: spk@subzero.winternet.com (Shaun Kelly) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Minneapolis, MN Date: 23 Feb 1996 16:06:00 GMT Message-ID: <4gkol8$8te@blackice.winternet.com> References: Summary: web list Keywords: frequency list minneapolis Try my list at http://www.winternet.com/~spk/freq.html. However, I've no idea what 481.7 is - I would suspect it's an image of a 460 frequency though. -- This is a test. If this were a real .sig, it'd say: spk@winternet.com, spk@TennantCo.com, http://www.winternet.com/~spk ..but it doesn't, does it? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:55 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Minneapolis, MN Date: 24 Feb 1996 05:09:02 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gm6he$25u8@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: >Does anyone know who 481.7000 is? It sounds like the police, but it's not >in Police Call... My guess would be that you're receiving an image of an active police channel on 460.XXX Mhz. -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:56 1996 From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? Date: 26 Feb 1996 00:00:25 GMT Message-ID: <4gqt6p$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4gemvm$f94@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) wrote: : There are scanner laws in all 50 states. The range is from New York, where : I believe the police can confiscate your scanner, to other states where as : long as you don't get in anyone's way or commit a crime, you're OK. : Even in those states where mobile scanners are completely illegal, if you : have a valid AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE, then its NO PROBLEM! This is wrong. The FCC "preemption statute" only covers amateur transceivers. Now, there are many states that have exempted amateurs from the ban, but not all of them. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:57 1996 From: jann.larsson@swedx.ct.se (Jann Larsson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mod for PRO2032 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 09:22:00 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: jann.larsson@swedx.ct.se I have a PRO2032 and I know it is modifiable for 30-54 Mc (LOW VHF). In Sweden (where I live) the model comes with 68-88 Mc instead of the low VHF. The step in this band i 5kc's wich is useless as 99% of the interesting frequencies are offset. So, is there a way to "restore" this low-VHF? Electronic greetings, Jann From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:58 1996 From: Netscape User Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: mod Yupiteru mvt7100 wanted Date: 23 Feb 1996 14:56:17 GMT Message-ID: <4gkkih$rb@miepmiep.HZeeland.nl> Are there any mods for the Yupiteru MVT7100 scanner? My Yup... my lover! Leon ljooss@mail.HZeeland.nl From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:14:59 1996 From: nickwb4sqi@aol.com (Nickwb4sqi) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Motorola Bible decoding Date: 22 Feb 1996 14:32:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4gigd6$d65@newsbf02.news.aol.com> I have a copy of the Motorola bible and the first line says I need to convert it with Bin Hex 4.0. Can some one upload a copy to me? Tnx, Nick WB4SQI From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:00 1996 From: gary.sellani@solis.sbay.org (Gary Sellani) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 06:29:00 GMT Message-ID: <96022123003618679@solis.sbay.org> Distribution: world WI>From: Will Flor WI>Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner WI>Subject: Re: Muzak music on 900Mhz WI>Date: 11 Feb 1996 22:20:55 GMT WI>Message-ID: <4flq47$34s@news.inc.net> WI>Organization: R R Systems Group, Inc. WI>anon1723@nyx10.cs.du.edu (L. T. Randall) wrote: WI>>I remember a post a few months back about someone claiming to have WI>>received channels carrying Muzak (commerical-free light pop-rock music WI>>and/or elevator music) on 900Mhz. Specifically, the frequencies WI>>mentioned were 928.9125 and 956.3125. All I get on these is data WI>>transmissions. Are the above freqs licensed to Muzak (or whoever) on a WI>>nationwide basis or just in certain locations? Has anyone received music WI>>on these frequencies and if so where are you located? WI>> That may have been me. In the San Francisco Bay Area, you can get Musuck on 956.3875 and 956.4125. They have all sucky music all the time with no IDs. [Actually, I never listened long enough to hear an ID] * SLMR 2.1a * Don't worry, the safety is on... OOPS From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:01 1996 From: peterg4@ibm.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need an expert opinion on scanner/paging question Date: 18 Feb 1996 03:48:19 GMT Message-ID: <4g67i3$1pu4@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> References: <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com> Reply-To: peterg4@ibm.net In <4eus09$mid@spectator.cris.com>, Peter Kamilakis write s: >I tune into an interesting frequency sometimes on my >scanner, and I cannot quite figure out what it is. >It occurs at 152.150, and what happens is I hear two tones >(like rescue tones), followed by what sounds like someone >talking on an answering machine, saying something like >"Bob, call home when you get a chance". That is what paging used to be like... The one you are hearing is called "tone & voice" because the pager both beeped and then you could hear the voice of the caller for a short period. The two tones would activate resonant reeds or active filters in the pager, which would beep then open squelch to the speaker. Of course all the new ones use digital messaging. A big reason for that is channel usage - to get a voice message across took up to 10 seconds (including signalling), while now the digital message takes much less than a second to transmit. This means that many more pagers can be placed on the same RF channel with digital. ..Peter From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:02 1996 From: bwhiston@abwam.com (Bob Whiston) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: need DENVER metro frequencies Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 05:51:15 GMT Message-ID: <4gebj8$ock@hops.entertain.com> References: <4gcfr7$lml@newsbf02.news.aol.com> doctoyguy@aol.com (DOC TOYGUY) wrote: >I am in search of frequencies for the Denver metro area >including police, sheriff,state patrol,fire,rescue and any >other interesting ones, especially for the following: >DENVER >ARAPAHOE CTY >LITTLETON >ENGLEWOOD >C.S.P. >PARAMEDICS >If anyone can help, please E-Mail me at: Hmmmmm... *If* you are in the Denver Metro area I'd suggest that you gi ve the NCC-1701 ENTERPRISE BBS at 659-8294 (Area Code 303 [Or 970-785-0217] for those who aren't in the Denver Metro Area and are still interested in getting those freqs.). It's the `home' of the Denver Scanner Echo *and* the SCANList for Denver and the greater FrontRange area. Just fill out the opening questionaire and you'll have complete access to the system. Doleo ergo sum, -HALFPINT- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:03 1996 From: "joseph c. hawkins" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: need DENVER metro frequencies Date: 20 Feb 1996 19:35:43 GMT Message-ID: <4gd7qf$b09@tel.den.mmc.com> References: <4gcfr7$lml@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Try This http://anansi.panix.com/clay/scanning/Frequencies/States/denver.co From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:04 1996 From: albrite@leonardo.net (Larry Albright) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Need instruction manual for dreaded IC-R1 Date: 19 Feb 1996 04:18:34 GMT Message-ID: I bought a used R-1 and no manual, most is easy, but there are questions....Will pay for Xerox.. I am a bird watcher and use it to listen to "Birdies" O.K? albrite@leonardo.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:05 1996 From: Lauren_Casey@msn.com (Lauren_Casey ) Subject: Need Los Gatos Area Freg's Date: 23 Feb 96 19:05:58 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004907@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Would someone be able to post the available frequencies for the Los Gatos, Saratoga (Santa Clara Sherrif's Office) and major San Jose frequencies? I would sure appreciate having them. I will be able to get an updated book a little later but for the mean time , I will have to ask for the frequencies online. Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:05 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Need tips on buying first scanner.. Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:04:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4gc2r6$ibt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Definitely go with the BC3000XLT. It's easy to use, has a GREAT receiver and GREAT audio output. 400 channels is MORE than enough. I had an AOR1000XLT which also dipped into the shortwave spectrum. You won't hear a DAMNED THING with the rubber duck. You'll have to connect it to an external antenna. It DOES work, but you'll be disappointed if all you use is the ducky. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:07 1996 From: Dan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: NEEDED UNIDEN BC860XLT MODS Date: 24 Feb 1996 15:00:00 GMT Message-ID: <4gn95h$evi@nw002.infi.net> Help I need any mods for a Uniden BC860XLT... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:08 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: bulletindx@nyongwa.montreal.qc.ca Subject: Re: New Pro-51/ Why you are so happy? pl. explain Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:32:13 GMT References: <4g00s8$f82@niven.ksc.nasa.gov> <4g1342$qkp@inx3.inx.net> inx.net (mail.inx.net) wrote: : glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) wrote: : : >I'm also very happy with my Pro-51, and would recommend it very highly. : : >C. Glass : : Would you mind: giving us some concrete reasons! thank u : I'm also a PRO-51 owner. I have owned many RS base and portable scanners, and I must say that the PRO-51 is the best portable I have owned. It is has much less intermod problems than the others I have owned, (I have a PRO-43 also). Frequency coverage is good, and with the IF X 2 trick you can listen to cell phones in the 900-915 MHz range. It also has a fast scanning rate, beeing 50 channels/sec or 100 steps/sec in scanning mode. I like it much more than my PRO-43 which is rather useless in search mode due to intermod problems. If anyone is looking for a RS portable scanner, I strongly suggest this one. good listening!~ Gilles Letourneau From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:09 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Pro-51/ Why you are so happy? pl. explain Message-ID: <4gkrcs$ctr@inet.dp.beckman.com> From: joolson@ccgate.dp.beckman.com (James Olson) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:52:37 GMT References: Distribution: world I tried the PRO60 and PRO51 side-by-side to see which one I should buy. The 51 (avg .5 uv sensitivity) was far more sensitive than the 60 (avg 1uv sensitivity) and the faster scan speed helped me decide on it. The 51 would pick up transmissions that would not even break squelch on the 60. The 51 is small enough to carry in my shirt pocket with an earphone. It also gets acceptable reception in the car using the "duckie" antenna. Also, I can run it 14-15 hrs, using the earphone, on a fully charged set of nicads (AAA size). The nicads charge from the DC adapter while still in the scanner, so you can be listening while the nicads are charging and just unplug it and go whenever. The optional real leather carry case, $20 (too much, but necessary), is thin enough to still keep the unit in my pocket and seems well made. I constructed a home-made Discone antenna and hung it from the rafters in my garage and can now get excellent reception even in the 30-50 mhz area. I listen to PD in a town 35 miles away and pick up County sheriff 90 miles away. The unit I bought 2 months ago (11A3 date code) from Rat Shack still allowed the keyboard cell freq mod, although I don't even use it. I paid $200 on sale for it and it is a very good unit for me. Don't think I would pay normal price of $320 for it though. The only minus, IMHO, is that it is sometimes hard to read the display because of glare. They should install some kind of polarizing lens instead of plain plastic. Jim O. mail.inx.net (inx.net) wrote: >glassc@angelfire.ksc.nasa.gov (C. Glass) wrote: >>I'm also very happy with my Pro-51, and would recommend it very highly. >>C. Glass > Would you mind: giving us some concrete reasons! thank u From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:11 1996 From: xcitor@radix.net (xcitor) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 06:06:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> In article <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net>, dayglo@radix.net (Dayglo) wrote: >On the other side of the coin there is: > >60 ft tower + 1500 Watts + $1200 radio = NO BRAINS > >I am a technician and like building my own kit/antennas. I will be >much more satisfied with a Worked All States from my own equipment then if I >dropped $10,000 for a setup. I was talking with someone just like this on th e >air. The first thing that they said was, technician huh!, well you can >upgrade!! then they proceeded to state that they could not talk because they >were DX'ing Africa. Well how much brains does it take to DX anything with that >setup. How about this one- 100 ft tower + 1500 watts + $3000 radio = who the fuck COULDN'T get a WAS or a DXCC on 40 or 80 meters. Me, a no-code tech, I'll have the bragging rights when I get my VUCC and WAS ALL ON VHF/UHF!!!! It can be done. This will be done probably with less than 500 watts mostly on 6m with my goddam hombrew 6m dipole. Goddam code-knowing egotistical bastards! -- "The problem with the Global Village is all the global idiots." From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:12 1996 From: tonyp@convex.com (Tony J. Podrasky) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 20 Feb 1996 20:25:47 GMT Message-ID: <4gdaob$kii@convex.convex.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> In article <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net>, wrote: > >I use the 2M band on a regular basis and that includes auto patch >and repeater services. I do not have ANY KIND of FCC license although >I might get one if I have the time to waste. > >C. McCane > Please don't "waste" any of your time. Just keep operating without the license . Sooner or later things will take care of themselves. -- Tony J. Podrasky You don't TUG on Superman's cape, You don't SPIT San Diego , Ca in the wind, You don't PULL the mask off the ol' tonyp@convex.com Lone Ranger, and you don't *WEEDWACK* dogsh*t. QSL? QRU? QRZ? QLZ? QFA? - Jim Croce (after doing some yard work) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:14 1996 From: Rod Dinkins Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 22 Feb 1996 15:33:25 GMT Message-ID: <4gi2c5$1vj@reader2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> To: xcitor@radix.net Here in San Diego we have a club with over 800 members -- many many with No-Code Tech Licenses. I and many many others think the No code licenses are a great addition to Amateur Radio. See my articles of accomplishments of same. As for big gun stations -- we have a group of QRPers here, several who have worked DXCC (all CW or SSB) with less than 5 watts and modest antennas such as a Cushcraft R5 mounted 8 foot off the ground. Not easy or for the faint-hearted but DEFINITELY achievable. Don't let a few "bug" you when the majority welcomes you. But: You can get further with a wet noodle and a linear than you can with just a wet noodle -- Big Al from Chicago! -- ***************************************************************** Hark! I Have Hurled My Words To The Far Reaches Of The Earth! What King Of Old Could Do Thus ? --- AC6V ***************************************************************** A Man May Know Of The World Without Leaving The Shelter Of His Own Home! Loa-Tsze ***************************************************************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:16 1996 From: rfm@urth.eng.sun.com (Rich McAllister) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 22 Feb 1996 18:03:05 GMT Message-ID: References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> In article xcitor@radix.ne t (xcitor) writes: >I'll have the bragging rights when I get my VUCC and >WAS ALL ON VHF/UHF!!!! It can be done. Actually, I believe *every* VUCC has been done all on VHF/UHF. -- Rich McAllister (rfm@eng.sun.com) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:17 1996 From: tonyp@convex.com (Tony J. Podrasky) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 20 Feb 1996 20:36:04 GMT Message-ID: <4gdbbk$l59@convex.convex.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> In article <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net>, wrote: > >No Code = No Brain = C.B. > >The following message is a refutation of the above statement. >In fact, the following is much more true: > >Amatuer = Ham = No Brain > yu spelt am-chore rong agin, mistur McCane. It mayks yu luk stoopider then yore argament allreddy iz. 'threes > >C. McCane > -- Tony J. Podrasky | You know those little buttons you press to cross the street San Diego , Ca | at an intersection? Well, regardless of what you have been tonyp@convex.com | told they *do* react to how hard and how many times they WA2EAA/MAZEAAA | have been pressed, and adjust the tfc lights accordingly. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:18 1996 From: vfiscus@mcn.net (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 23:17:21 GMT Message-ID: <4go6b6$3ef@news.mcn.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> Having to learn CW, never hurt anyone. And only IDIOTS complain about it! 73 de KB7ADL From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:19 1996 From: wnewkirk@iu.net (Bill Newkirk) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 25 Feb 1996 05:38:54 GMT Message-ID: <4gosle$a0v@cc.iu.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> Reply-To: wnewkirk@iu.net (Bill Newkirk) In , rfm@urth.eng.sun.com (Rich McAllister ) writes: >In article xcitor@radix.n et (xcitor) writes: >>I'll have the bragging rights when I get my VUCC and >>WAS ALL ON VHF/UHF!!!! It can be done. >Actually, I believe *every* VUCC has been done all on VHF/UHF. >Rich McAllister (rfm@eng.sun.com) oh, now don't be confusing them with the facts, rich... Bill Newkirk WB9IVR The Space Coast Amateur Technical Group Melbourne, FL duty now for the future of amateur radio Lombardi's 1st Law of Business: Companies succeed in spite of their best effort. If they succeed at all. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:20 1996 From: dfinn@nando.net (Dan Finn) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 03:42:12 GMT Message-ID: <4gpvqb$8do@castle.nando.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <312E0831.3D5F@ix.netcom.com> Jim Daneke said: >cmccane@onramp.net@onramp.net wrote: >> >> In <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net>, boblee writes: >> >IF IT WAS NOT FOR THE NO-CODE TECH I WOULD NOT BE A HAM TODAY. >> >ALOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE ARE UPSET ABOUT THIS LICENCE CLASS BUT IT >> >IS ATTRACTING THOUSANDS OF NEW HAMS DAILY. Thousands? Daily? I've said this a trilliion times: usenet is not the proper place for exageration. >> Listen to a new world technologist's attitude that's shared by most: >> >> I'm an electronics engineer, a member of the IEEE, and a computer >> network architect. I like radio and analog electronics as a hobby. >> I use the 2M band on a regular basis and that includes auto patch >> and repeater services. I do not have ANY KIND of FCC license although >> I might get one if I have the time to waste. One thing is for >> sure: >> I WILL NEVER TAKE A TEST ON MORSE CODE!!!!!!!!!!! You will never enjoy legal amateur HF priviledges either. But what the hay... >> >> I've been extremely successful as a designer of TCP/IP networks >> and recently became a Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer to >> boot, so, maybe with all that extra cash I'll pick up an HF radio >> for home and another for the car, hook up some TA's and have >> a roving data terminal, NATIONWIDE!!!!! If this is the type of person an HF codeless license would attract, I may prefer to leave the testing structure as it is, thank you. de KR4AJ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:22 1996 From: Jim Daneke Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 11:32:17 -0700 Message-ID: <312E0831.3D5F@ix.netcom.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> To: cmccane@onramp.net cmccane@onramp.net@onramp.net wrote: > > In <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net>, boblee writes: > >IF IT WAS NOT FOR THE NO-CODE TECH I WOULD NOT BE A HAM TODAY. > >ALOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE ARE UPSET ABOUT THIS LICENCE CLASS BUT IT > >IS ATTRACTING THOUSANDS OF NEW HAMS DAILY. OTHERS THINK WE WON'T > >UPGRADE , I'VE ONLY HAD MY LICENCE FOR A COUPLE MOUNTHS AND I'M ALMOST > >READY FOR GENERAL. MAYBE YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO "NEWS LINE" MORE OFTEN. > > KC7NIY--CHUCK > > 73'S > > Listen to a new world technologist's attitude that's shared by most: > > I'm an electronics engineer, a member of the IEEE, and a computer > network architect. I like radio and analog electronics as a hobby. > I use the 2M band on a regular basis and that includes auto patch > and repeater services. I do not have ANY KIND of FCC license although > I might get one if I have the time to waste. One thing is for > sure: > I WILL NEVER TAKE A TEST ON MORSE CODE!!!!!!!!!!! > > What kind of a BONEHEAD is so obsessed with HISTORY that they seek > to make modern electronics professionals and hobbyists learn the > trade of the old telegraph operators of the 1800's? In terms of > electronics knowledge I have regularly WAXED every "amatuer" > radio operator that I have ever met and all they can do is try to > hold this childs toy morse code thing over my head. Gimme a > break man!!! That CRAP IS DEAD!!!!! It serves NO PURPOSE!!!!! > Don't even try and argue with that - YOU WILL GET WAXED TOO!!!! > Let's face it, in the 1990's it's outdated to even use HF for voice. > This is the age of DATA COMMUNICATIONS. I would like to invite > all really fast morse code guys to come over and try to beat the > speed of my terminal adapter at 9600 baud. And for those who > want to say things like "but what if, in a really bad disaster, > you didn't have your TA?" Do I even need to get involved in > such a pathetic arguement? NO!! > Now, to change the subject a bit, I don't ever want to be called > an "amatuer radio operator" - what a pathetic label. I got my > general class professional ticket while I was in the Navy, so how > am I supposed to be called an "amatuer" - really weak label. And > as for being called a "Ham Operator", I'll never be a HAM. > I've been extremely successful as a designer of TCP/IP networks > and recently became a Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer to > boot, so, maybe with all that extra cash I'll pick up an HF radio > for home and another for the car, hook up some TA's and have > a roving data terminal, NATIONWIDE!!!!! One thing that will never stop > me is MORSE CODE!!!!!!! > > C. McCane Sounds like you're pretty impressed with yourself! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:23 1996 From: myers@West.Sun.COM (Dana Myers) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 25 Feb 1996 07:07:42 GMT Message-ID: <4gp1ru$plg@abyss.West.Sun.COM> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> <4go6b6$3ef@news.mcn.net> In article <4go6b6$3ef@news.mcn.net>, Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote: > >Having to learn CW, never hurt anyone. And only IDIOTS complain about it! > > >73 de KB7ADL Yeah, right. Just like only IDIOTS cross-post to several unrelated groups. Note the followup-to: line, please. -- * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD#: j | Views expressed here are * * (310) 348-6043 | mine and do not necessarily * * Dana.Myers@West.Sun.Com | reflect those of my employer * From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:24 1996 From: 00496-OEM-0008733-5911@msn.com (FRANK SANS) Subject: Opening the 2500XLT Date: 22 Feb 96 07:26:42 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+000048a7@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner You're right it is a little tricky. I too had some problems opening mine when I did a cell mod. Just keep prying the sides and bottom edges where the front connects to the back. It'll come. Good luck Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:26 1996 From: Matt Brummer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Opto changing the CX12AR?? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:18:43 -0600 Message-ID: Called Grove tonight to order a CX12AR and I was told: "We are out of stock right now and Optoelectronics is changing the CX12AR to support a wider range of scanners, so we are not anticipating delivery for 2-3 weeks. We don't know if the price will change, so we are not currently taking orders for the new interface." Anyone heard about these changes? This was news to me & there is no mention of it on the Optoelectronics web page at this time. Just curious if the new model will benefit me or if an older model will do just fine. --> Matt Brummer matthewb@creighton.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:27 1996 From: cruzer@icanect.net (luis) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: P Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 14:33:18 GMT Message-ID: <4gv526$cbo@news.icanect.net> P From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:28 1996 From: sf3362@cnsvax.albany.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: POCSAG,MESSAGE TRACKER Date: 22 Feb 1996 04:49:23 GMT Message-ID: <4ggskk$fvv@rebecca.albany.edu> References: <4eo3vh$39v@mrnews.mro.dec.com> <4f0fra$5uj@boris.eden.com> <311D9434.6603@primenet.com> <4geth5$6l8@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> Once again, I propose the following offer: Evertime the POCSAG info is posted, there are a flurry of postings afterwards from people who cant or do not want to build the interface... I have sucessfully built the reqired interface many times, and tested it with both PD-102 and PD-200. I have the output from my scanner's speaker (A bearcat 100XLT, but my PRO-34 works fine too) wired to the circuit and it has recieved no errors so far... I will build the circuit for you for 50 dollars. Your choice of connectors pre-assembled onto the board for only the cost of the connectors. Interested? Email me at: sf3362@cnsvax.albany.edu Thanx. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:29 1996 From: dafu@rm.sni.de (Dirk Mueller) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,uk.telecom,com.dcom.telecom.tech,com.dcom.telecom,alt.sect.telecom,alt.radio.scanner.uk,alt.radio.scanner,alt.dcom.telecom,alt.cellular.tech,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Re: Police Data equipment ??? Date: 22 Feb 1996 15:37:48 GMT Message-ID: <4gi2kc$3sh@s12.rm.sni.de> References: <4gh0d6$ar4@reader2.ix.netcom.com> >Does anybody know what type of equipment (manufacturer, models, >e.t.c.) police departments of different countries use for transmission >of data and voice. What kind of data transmission equipment is >installed in police cars for connecting to police databeses, for >transmitting different kinds of queris to dispatchers and to control >centers. What type of computers and communicators police use in police >cars ? German Police is thinking about using public data networks as the X.25/Air-Network MODACOM oder MOBITEX! I don't know what they are using know, but is is in fact a private radio network. (and they have problems with it, so they want to change!) Im not that frequently reading this newsgroups so maybe you email me for further detail. I hope that gives you a slight idea... bye Dirk From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:30 1996 From: Juha Veijalainen Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,uk.telecom,com.dcom.telecom.tech,com.dcom.telecom,alt.sect.telecom,alt.radio.scanner.uk,alt.radio.scanner,alt.dcom.telecom,alt.cellular.tech,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Re: Police Data equipment ??? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: <312D94A7.7673@karhu.pp.fi> References: <4gh0d6$ar4@reader2.ix.netcom.com> To: "Oleg V. Melnikov" Oleg V. Melnikov wrote: > We have clients in Russia-police department of one of the biggest > Russian cities. They ask us to develop some test network for mobile > and non-mobile police patrols. Within European Union, police and other officials are supposed to adopt TETRA network - though there is some doubt whether all countries will do that Using Alta Vista search http://www.altavista.digital.com/ (keywords +tetra +radio +network), I found several references to the standard itself and some equipment manufacturers For starters, see http://www.comnets.rwth-aachen.de/~movie/script_engl/node66.html for the standards information -- Juha Veijalainen, http://personal.eunet.fi/pp/karhu/ ** Mielipiteet omiani / Opinions personal, facts suspect ** From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:31 1996 From: kayani1@ix.netcom.com (Oleg V. Melnikov) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,uk.telecom,com.dcom.telecom.tech,com.dcom.telecom,alt.sect.telecom,alt.radio.scanner.uk,alt.radio.scanner,alt.dcom.telecom,alt.cellular.tech,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Police Data equipment ??? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:49:53 GMT Message-ID: <4gh0d6$ar4@reader2.ix.netcom.com> Hi All, Does anybody know what type of equipment (manufacturer, models, e.t.c.) police departments of different countries use for transmission of data and voice. What kind of data transmission equipment is installed in police cars for connecting to police databeses, for transmitting different kinds of queris to dispatchers and to control centers. What type of computers and communicators police use in police cars ? We have clients in Russia-police department of one of the biggest Russian cities. They ask us to develop some test network for mobile and non-mobile police patrols. As I think, the best way for us - to investigate what type of equipment is used in oyher countries. P.S. For non-mobile we are going to use a Multipoint Inc. equipment. Please E-Mail me. Thanks for advance. Best regards. Oleg V. Melnikov From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:32 1996 From: llpix@aol.com (Ll pix) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Portland Radio System Press Release (long) Date: 26 Feb 1996 05:02:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4gs0fu$it1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4g39s0$kgq@kirin.wwa.com> Reply-To: llpix@aol.com (Ll pix) and how much were they paid to write that? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:33 1996 From: tirya@wwa.com (Tirya) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Portland Radio System Press Release (long) Date: 26 Feb 1996 21:48:15 GMT Message-ID: <4gt9qv$58o@kirin.wwa.com> References: <4g39s0$kgq@kirin.wwa.com> <4gs0fu$it1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Ll pix (llpix@aol.com) wrote: : and how much were they paid to write that? ::shrug:: Just thought it was interesting is all... Tir -- /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ / If you can't hear me, it's because I'm in parentheses. \ / \ / tirya@wwa.com http://sashimi.wwa.com/~tirya \ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:34 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: bd703@scn.org (SCN User) Subject: Re: Portland, OR Airport Frequencies Message-ID: Reply-To: bd703@scn.org (SCN User) References: <31250B8B.45BA@internetMCI.COM> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 02:38:43 GMT In a previous article, >Sean P. Watts wrote: >> >> I've looked for a long time for frequencies for airports and airplanes. >> Since I live in SW Washington State Portland international is the biggest >> airport in the area. So if anyone has air frequencies for either >> Portland or frequecies that are used nationwide I would very much >> appreciate it if someone could send them to me. THANKS!!! > There is a good web site for the Portland tower/TRACON. URL = http://www.teleport.com/~rogerb/kpdx/faa1.html Also try the FAA home page at http://www.faa.gov and the Northwest Aviation Online page at... URL = http://www.halcyon.com/wpowers/nwaviat Hope this helps. Kerwin -- ***************************************************************************** * They know who you are... bd703@scn.org * They know where you live... * And there's no doubt about it! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:35 1996 From: chuckm@zocalo.com (Chuck Meyer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO 2006 Speed mod Date: 23 Feb 1996 05:26:46 GMT Message-ID: References: <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net> In article <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net>, karlhoyt@mi.net (Karl Hoyt) wrote: > Ok, so you clip the other diode for faster scanning, fine.. But I'm > curious as to why this is.. I mean why would the manufacturer build it > like that? > > Just wondering Two possibilities 1. The designer wanted to allow for a speed increase for next year's "deluxe" model. Marketroid mentality at work. :-| 2. (more likely) As the radio scans, it must read its static RAM & load data into its PLL's RAM chips used to be slower than they are now and the PLL's also have a maximum load clock rate and a certain settling time. It could well be that the designer saw fit to allow the CPU to be throttled back to allow use of slower (easier to get by the thousands) parts, and by the time of the 2005, the parts would support full speed operation. I have not explored the 2006 with a scope to find which timings are affected by the diode. If anyone has, I'd be curious to know more... -- Chuck From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:36 1996 From: karlhoyt@mi.net (Karl Hoyt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO 2006 Speed mod Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 15:26:53 GMT Message-ID: <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net> Ok, so you clip the other diode for faster scanning, fine.. But I'm curious as to why this is.. I mean why would the manufacturer build it like that? Just wondering From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:37 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: tweek@netcom.com (R R M Tweek) Subject: Re: PRO 2006 Speed mod Message-ID: References: <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:18:03 GMT In article <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net>, Karl Hoyt wrote: >Ok, so you clip the other diode for faster scanning, fine.. But I'm >curious as to why this is.. I mean why would the manufacturer build it >like that? Maybe because they had no idea what type of front end would be used when they burnt the chip... or maybe they planned to use the same chip for different units. There is a drawback to using a faster scan, and that is that you might miss some of the weaker signals which cannot be locked in on within the time the scanner passes the frequency. -- tweek@netcom.com tweek@io.com | "Well, you and I would differ on DoD #MCMLX tweek@ccnet.com | what's ignorance and educated." WWW: http://www.io.com/~tweek/ | - Senator Ernest Hollings From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:38 1996 From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO 2006 Speed mod Date: 23 Feb 1996 04:19:05 GMT Message-ID: <4gjf7p$vj1@uwm.edu> References: <4gi21m$og@scratchy.mi.net> R R M Tweek (tweek@netcom.com) wrote: : There is a drawback to using a faster scan, and that is that you might : miss some of the weaker signals which cannot be locked in on within the : time the scanner passes the frequency. Also, isn't the delay time reduced? Nate, KB9LSX From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:38 1996 From: Ron Ling Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro 2027 (netset) cell mod wanted Date: 22 Feb 1996 02:30:29 GMT Message-ID: <4ggkg5$6eo@News.Dal.Ca> Does anyone know if the radio shack (netset) pro-2027 scanner is modifiable for the cellular freq's. It is a 100 channel desktop scanner. Any replies will be appreciated.... Ron From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:39 1996 From: mike Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO 2032 for sale Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:34:43 -0600 Message-ID: <312B65C3.1584@bayou.uh.edu> I have a Realistic Pro 2032 for sale in mint condition. May even add an amplified antenna if I'm in a good mood. Asking $120. E-mail for specifics and offers!! Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:40 1996 From: Pat Martindale Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO 32A mods. - Help! Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 18:33:17 +0000 Distribution: world Message-ID: <389J6GAttKMxEwYD@crayke.demon.co.uk> Hi, can anyone tell me if it is possible to modify a PRO 32A hand held scanner for AM / FM switchable across the bands? If so, how to do it? Thanks. -- Pat Martindale From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:42 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: pro 51 base ant. reccommendatation Message-ID: <4gi4ba$qbp@inet.dp.beckman.com> From: joolson@ccgate.dp.beckman.com (James Olson) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:07:03 GMT References: <3128b286.1657335@nntp.ix.netcom.com> Distribution: world I constructed a home-made Discone antenna from instructions sent to me by John Mace (thanks John if your still out there) in this news group. It uses 12 ga solid copper wire from the hardware store and a PVC cap as the mount. I am using 25 ft of RG6 from Rat-shack and have it mounted in the rafters of my garage. It is a tremendous improvement over the rubber duckie. I get Police mobiles clearly from a town 35 miles away and county sheriff services 90 miles away. I haven't had the chance to experiment with different lengths and configurations on this antenna. I'm going to try RG8 and compare results as there seems to be differing opinions in this group as to the most efficient cable to use. I will be experimenting with different mobile antennas also, including CB mag mounts. Also, just for info. I had a PRO60 and PRO51 side by side for comparison to decide which one to buy. The 51 definitely had the best sensitivity. It picked up channels that would not even break squelch on the 60. The higher scan speed on the 51 also set my decision to buy the 51. Let me know if you need more info. Jim O. kfoot@ix.netcom.com (Kevin Footlik) wrote: >Does anyone know what a good antenna I could use on a pro-51 hand held >for my home? also what works best for the car? >Thanks for reply, >Kfoot From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:43 1996 From: jwmann@concentric.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: pro 51 base ant. reccommendatation Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 20:50:19 -0800 Message-ID: <312D478B.4585@concentric.net> References: <3128b286.1657335@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <4gi4ba$qbp@inet.dp.beckman.com> James Olson wrote: > > I constructed a home-made Discone antenna from instructions sent to > me by John Mace (thanks John if your still out there) in this news > group. It uses 12 ga solid copper wire from the hardware store and a > PVC cap as the mount. I am using 25 ft of RG6 from Rat-shack and have > > it mounted in the rafters of my garage. It is a tremendous > improvement over the rubber duckie. > > I get Police mobiles clearly from a town 35 miles away and county > sheriff services 90 miles away. I haven't had the chance to > experiment with different lengths and configurations on this antenna. > I'm going to try RG8 and compare results as there seems to be > differing opinions in this group as to the most efficient cable to > use. > > I will be experimenting with different mobile antennas also, including > CB mag mounts. > > Also, just for info. I had a PRO60 and PRO51 side by side for > comparison to decide which one to buy. The 51 definitely had > the best sensitivity. It picked up channels that would not even > break squelch on the 60. The higher scan speed on the 51 also > set my decision to buy the 51. > > Let me know if you need more info. Would you please post the plans you used and a list of materials. Thank you Joseph From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:44 1996 From: stevehan@yrkpa.kias.com (Steve Hancock) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2006 Web Page & Probe Web Page Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 12:59:29 GMT Message-ID: <4ghphm$nrk@yrkpa.kias.com> I have designed a web page for my favorite scanner the Pro-2006 its at http://yrkpa.kias.com/~stevehan It has information on the Pro-2006 in one central location including hardware, software and publication links for the unit. Also I design a page for my favorite software on the OptoScan456, Probe by Datafile. Later the Probe page will include Tips and hints not found in the manuel and probe files you can download and import into your Probe software. The new verison 2.0 makes this a lot easier. The probe link is http://yrkpa.kias.com/~stevehan/probe.html If you have any suggestions or comments about the page let me know. Thanks for listening. Steve Steve Hancock (N3FWE) York, Pa The Pro-2006 Web Page at http://yrkpa.kias.com/~stevehan stevehan@yrkpa.kias.com "The Truth is out There" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:45 1996 From: steve b Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-2035 w/OS535 vs. Pro-2042 w/OS535 - any differences ? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:14:21 -0600 Message-ID: <312E2E2D.10E1@mail.win.org> References: <4gkrkk$dgu@hearst.cac.psu.edu> Brett Saylor wrote: > there any reason to buy the Pro-2042 for $429-$499 Pioneer Data in Woodburn OR is an authorized Radio Shack dealer and sells the PRO 2042 for $379 delivered. The PRO 2035 sells for $339. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:46 1996 From: bigj@opus.freenet.vancouver.bc.ca (Julian Fitzell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2037, MODs? impressions? Date: 25 Feb 1996 18:53:16 GMT Message-ID: <4gqb6s$knk@milo.freenet.vancouver.bc.ca> I have been thinking about buying a scanner for w hile and I just found the Pro-2037 on sale for $249.95 CDN (reg. 399.99CDN) at my local Rat Shack. I would like to know what people here think of this scanner and also if there are any MODs (cellualr, perhaps?). Also, cuold someone please tell me exactly what the difference between a base and a mobile scanner is? Is there some reason a base scanner can't be used in, say, a car or is it just the size factor? I don't suppose the sale will last long so any quick responses would be greatly appreciated. It seems like a great deal. Thanks for your help. bigj Julian Fitzell -- . From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:47 1996 From: Bob Lyle Subject: Re: Pro-2037, MODs? impressions? Message-ID: <260296.21490376965.n@frontier.canrem.com> Date: 26 Feb 1996 21:49:03 GMT Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Julian, The 2037 has *so far* not shown up on any "easily restorable" lists to cover cellular. It's a newer model that's similar to a Bearcat model. Not fancy or particularly wonderful as scanners go. The GRE made PRO-2006 (now discontinued but around in some stores) and the 2035/2042 U.S. models are superior, albiet more expensive. There's no real difference between a base and mobile scanner *except* the base-only models don't usually have a 12VDC input for automobile use. They're generally only powered by 120VAC. A handheld on the other hand, with a suitable external speaker and AC & DC adapters, can suit all purposes very well if you can live with small keys and even smaller displays! Regards, Bob Lyle Editor "Scanning VHF/UHF" in DX Ontario, the monthly publication of the Ontario DX Association. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:49 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Pro-26 is it worth paying $99.00??????????? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <3117F60D.292B@loa.com> <4gc2q2$ibl@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:50:17 GMT Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) writes: > Why on earth would anyone want to listen to cell phone calls? Do you know > how cellular works? The only way you'd be able to listen to one complete > call would be if the person calling remains in one spot during for the > duration of the call. If he moves around, you're gonna lose it. > > Each "cell site" has, say, 100 "channels". How many cell sites are there? > Plenty. Do the math. It's not worth it. Why listen to someone else's phone > calls, anyway? You'll hear more interesting stuff on baby monitors. You'd be surprised at the number of full conversations you'll pick on a cell phone. The most interesting thing I've heard on a baby monitor is a Mother swearing at the baby. In an average apartment building you might find maybe 2 baby monitors with the same baby crying all the time, and the same parents singing the same songs all the time. With cordless phones you will most likely end up with 8 or 9 regular people on the phone around you, although conversation can be quite interesting, you always hear the same people over and over. Now with Cellular you always have someone different. During the day you can always pick up some good financial information. At night, it's better than TV. It's REAL entertainment. There are lots of 900 calls made, fights, etc. So if your're VERY lucky you might find some action on baby monitors. But you'll always get some stuff on cellular. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:50 1996 From: robert@eden.com (Robert Barker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-26 is it worth paying $99.00??????????? Date: 21 Feb 1996 19:46:07 GMT Message-ID: <4gfspv$ssb@boris.eden.com> References: <3117F60D.292B@loa.com> <4gc2q2$ibl@newsbf02.news.aol.com> About the only good time to monitor cellular is when they ARE stationary. Usually in a SWAT standoff.. the negotiators will call the barricated people and be on the phone for hours.. usually it's all done from the swat van and it's all done on cellular. Noone is moving around.. and it never trunks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:52 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-26 is it worth paying $99.00??????????? Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:04:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4gc2q2$ibl@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <3117F60D.292B@loa.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Why on earth would anyone want to listen to cell phone calls? Do you know how cellular works? The only way you'd be able to listen to one complete call would be if the person calling remains in one spot during for the duration of the call. If he moves around, you're gonna lose it. Each "cell site" has, say, 100 "channels". How many cell sites are there? Plenty. Do the math. It's not worth it. Why listen to someone else's phone calls, anyway? You'll hear more interesting stuff on baby monitors. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:53 1996 From: dcoker@panix.com (Dave Coker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-28 Date: 27 Feb 1996 08:53:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4gv2cl$h4i@panix.com> I just received a PRO-28 as a gift. Who knows anything about this model? According to the Rat-Shack catalog, it's one of their newer models....... Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:54 1996 From: gustav@eramp.net (Lynn Gustafson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-43 mods Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 22:12:40 GMT Message-ID: <4gqg3f$o4@news2.nkn.net> References: <4fr3h0$136@news-e2a.gnn.com> >Subject: PRO-43 w/400 CHANNELS HERES HOW! >PRO-43 ENHANCEMENT >MEMORY EXPANSION & "FADE-AWAY" LIGHT >REQUIREMENTS >1 - PRO-43 Service Manual. (Tandy Parts # MS-2000300 - approx. $6.00) >1 - CD4053 - Triple - SPDT analog switch - Surface mount package (DigiKey > #CD4053BCM-ND - approx. $1.50) >2 - 93C67 EEPROMs (Tandy Parts # MX-8050 - approx. $13.00/each) >1 - 100k x 5 resistor network. Common lead type. (DigiKey # Q5104) >1 - UN2111 PNP transistor (Q1 on Logic PCB. Tandy Parts # ) >1 - 1 uF 16v capacitor. >1 - 10 MOhm 1/8-1/16W resistor. >Misc.: >Wire wrap wire-30 gauge. (Radio Shack) >Grounded soldering iron with approx. 1/32" tip or smaller. >Desoldering Equipment. >Digital Volt Meter. (Used to double check your VCC and Ground connections, > pre-check switching assembly) >Utility knife with fresh sharp small blade. (Needed to cut traces.) >Strong hand held magnifying lens. (Needed to check solder joints.) >+5-10 Volt bench power supply. (Used to check switching assembly.) >Anti-Static work place and grounding wrist band. >Very fine needle nose pliers, wire cutters. where is the rest of this mod?????????? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:55 1996 From: john@computek.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro2006 30 KHz Step Question Date: 26 Feb 1996 16:55:49 GMT Message-ID: <4gsoml$tv2@news.computek.net> I recently bought a used Pro 2006 and preformed the cellular mod to it. I can now get the frequencies that were blocked out before but I can not get a 30 Khz step when I am in search mode. I had understood that as soon as the mod was finished I could select this step rate. Is there something that I am missing? Thanks! _John --------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Haynes 73s de KC5PWL 147.180 MHz John@CompuTek.Net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:56 1996 From: "Mark S. Conway" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro2006 30 KHz Step Question Date: 26 Feb 1996 23:53:48 GMT Message-ID: <4gth6c$3ui@moby.nantucket.net> References: <4gsoml$tv2@news.computek.net> To: john@computek.net Just hit the reset button while in search. It will revert to 30khz....... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:57 1996 From: mattera@nautilus.cig.mot.com (Michael Mattera) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Problem for "experts" in scanning and shortwave! Date: 21 Feb 96 19:37:10 GMT Message-ID: References: <4gaqn2$39i@newsbf02.news.aol.com> ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) writes: >I happened to be on the phone the other night talking long distance >(neither person on either side of the line had a cordless or cellular >phone) and all of a sudden 2 CB-ers (or what sounded like CB >transmissions, maybe HAM) could be heard on the line. I quickly ran to my >scanner and CB to turn them on, but couldn't pick up anything on the HAM >repeaters, or the CB channels. It sounds like the interference was on the other end of the call. The transmit ters leaked (or a high power amplifier injected) the signal into the other end of t he phone line. It is unlikely that the long distance "wire" picked this up, since that traffic is digital. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:58 1996 From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Problem for "experts" in scanning and shortwave! Date: 23 Feb 1996 21:15:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4glsbf$g9u@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) I'm not sure about what you're saying, but I beleive that I've found the problem, and have even raised more questions! Earlier in the month, I'd been getting strange RF-like interference with the 2 line phone. This is ok, because it was weak, and sounded like radio frequencies or something. At first, I thought it went along with problems in the line. However, the other night I was listening to my scanner in the 46.mhz range (46.745, or .845 I beleive) and was able to hear someone in my family talking on the phone to someone just up the street. The person up the street wasn't on a cordless, and if he had been, I would have picked up the call on a slightly different channel, and a LOT stronger than the vague signal I was getting. I checked into this later by picking up on the phone, and listening to the same channel on my scanner. I could hear dialtone, and every button pushed! My theory is that these phones use slight transmission on their lines, to allow conferencing on the 2 different lines. This also makes them suceptible to radio interference. Still working though! Let me know if you can help! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:15:59 1996 Distribution: world Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHON From: gary.saffer@channel1.com (Gary Saffer) Message-ID: <40.33406.2433@channel1.com> References: <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 19:17:00 -0640 BP>So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing BP>to go through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges.I'll BP>tell you why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network BP>they are able to charge you. Also cloning a phone if you use the BP>trunking system analogy means that you can have many means of BP>accessing the service that you paid for! Good luck on your crusade. And exactly how would you access another phone 30-40 miles from yours? Magic? * CMPQwk 1.42 129 *Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:00 1996 Distribution: world Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHON From: gary.saffer@channel1.com (Gary Saffer) Message-ID: <40.33408.2433@channel1.com> References: <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 20:01:00 -0640 BP>So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing BP>to go through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges.I'll BP>tell you why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network BP>they are able to charge you. Also cloning a phone if you use the BP>trunking system analogy means that you can have many means of BP>accessing the service that you paid for! Good luck on your crusade. And exactly how would you access another phone 30-40 miles from yours? Magic? * CMPQwk 1.42 129 *Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:01 1996 From: Bernie Pineda Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 21:33:54 -0600 Message-ID: <312D35A2.7409@why.net> References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> <4g67ov$580@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing to go through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges.I'll tell you why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network they are able to charge you. Also cloning a phone if you use the trunking system analogy means that you can have many means of accessing the service that you paid for! Good luck on your crusade. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:02 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 19:46:27 GMT Message-ID: References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> <4g67ov$580@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> <312D35A2.7409@why.net> In article <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Bernie Pineda writes: >So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing to go >through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges. They do, it is called a radio transciever. I suppose you piss and moan that the city won't let you string up your own phone lines too! >I'll tell you why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network they >are able to charge you. Get real, nobody is forced to buy and unless you are blind and stupid you would have realized the limits of the service. grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:03 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: clifto@indep1.chi.il.us (Clifton T. Sharp) Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Message-ID: References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> <4g67ov$580@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 06:56:52 GMT In article <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Bernie Pineda writes: >So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing to go >through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges.I'll tell you >why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network they are able to >charge you. Also cloning a phone if you use the trunking system analogy >means that you can have many means of accessing the service that you >paid for! Good luck on your crusade. *sigh* Another Giant Conspiracy To Charge Toll Charges. If one phone called another directly, the call would have to go through every repeater everywhere in the calling area, or cell sites would have to have highly sophisticated and extremely expensive tracking and routing circuitry to locate both vehicles and route the call through only the repeaters in their path. You could then have about 300 phone calls going at once in the entire area served by cellular telephone. If the phone call goes from phone through one cell site to network, the system can handle about 300 calls per CELL, the cell doesn't need to know where you are or where you're going (it can just say "I can't hear him, all y'all other cells, someone else get his call"), and the whole thing is more foolproof, less noisy and MUCH cheaper for all concerned. -- Cliff Sharp There are days when no matter which WA9PDM way you spit, it's upwind. clifto@indep1.chi.il.us --The First Law of Reality From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:04 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <4gnnlq$aus@klein.iguide.com> From: DOUG GAVILANES Subject: Programming Info For Regency XL2000 VHF 250B Mobile Date: 24 Feb 1996 19:07:38 GMT From: DOUG GAVILANES Subject: Programming Info For Regency XL2000 VHF 250B Mobile Date: 24 Feb 1996 19:07:38 GMT Organization: MCI/News Corp. Message-Id: <4gnnlq$aus@klein.iguide.com> Help needed here. I just picked up a Regency 250B (XL2000, XLH250B, and I don't remember how to program it. This will be a bigger problem for me soon, as a UHF version I had lent out a long time ago to a user will be coming back to me, and I'll need to reprogram it, also. Any help is appreciated. I used to know how; I just don't remember the steps or how to get a channel into program mode (a few steps beyond the jumper...). Please EMail replies to Doug Gavilanes, 75310.434@compuserve.com. My account on MCI is about to close, so Compuserve is good. Thanks, Doug Gavilanes From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:05 1996 From: joe@cris.com (joe simmons) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Question about 220xlt.. Date: 26 Feb 1996 02:45:45 GMT Message-ID: <4gr6sp$7ks@spectator.cris.com> I've been out of the scanner scene for a while and I've fallen behind the times. I was wondering if the 220xlt is cellular modifiable. If not, what scanner on the market that's comparable to the 220xlt is. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:06 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Message-ID: References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 03:06:05 GMT jerry (jerry@vuse.vanderbilt.edu) wrote: : if you want to jam their radar just am a radar gun at them : the gun these days can be bought for about 25-50 dollars : in surplus. : btw it is true about some of those units causing cancer. yep, the : this is the model that the assholes with a badge would hold in : their lap waiting for someone to come along. : i think its funny Even easier is to speed, but only if the cars in front of you for about 1/2 mile or so are also speeding. That way, if the cops aim a radar or laser gun at someone, they will get the cars in front of you, not you. And besides, the cars in front of you will see the cops if there are any out there and slow down, you will see their brake lights and slow down too. If there is no one in front of you, just set your cruise control about 7mph above the limit and relax. Besides, radar guns don't cause cancer, they operate on microwaves. Gamma rays are the ones which cause cancer. Unfortunately, the bulk of the population is so scientifically illiterate they think microwaves and gamma rays are almost the same thing. After all, they are both invisible forms of radiation, aren't they? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:07 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:08:35 GMT Steve Work (slwork@netcom.com) writes: > > Besides, radar guns don't cause cancer, they operate on microwaves. > Gamma rays are the ones which cause cancer. Unfortunately, the bulk of > the population is so scientifically illiterate they think microwaves and > gamma rays are almost the same thing. After all, they are both invisible > forms of radiation, aren't they? > Any elecromagnetic radiation in high enough dose is dangerous. A microwave oven can be dangerous. Most consumer RF devices have sufficiently low power to be fairly safe. There have been several cases of cops who develop cancer after 15 years or so of using radar guns. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:08 1996 From: jay vise Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 24 Feb 1996 07:25:42 GMT Message-ID: <4gmehm$5jg@hunter.premier.net> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> > >Any elecromagnetic radiation in high enough dose is dangerous. A microwave >oven can be dangerous. Most consumer RF devices have sufficiently low >power to be fairly safe. There have been several cases of cops who develop >cancer after 15 years or so of using radar guns. > Cccoorrect...those officers suffered a much-higher-than normal incidence of testicular cancer....the area where they would rest the radar gun between drivers. (So as not to alert any oncoming detectors.) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:09 1996 From: heathbar@servtech.com (Brian Heath) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 96 16:19:27 GMT Message-ID: <4gq26r$lsg@murphy2.servtech.com> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> <4gmehm$5jg@hunter.premier.net> jay vise writes: * Cccoorrect...those officers suffered a much-higher-than normal incidence * of testicular cancer....the area where they would rest the radar gun * between drivers. (So as not to alert any oncoming detectors.) I heard about a case where a police officer got testicular cancer and had to have one of them removed. The officer reportedly would rest the radar gun in his lap between speeders -- and the radiation caused the cancer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ ^ Brian Heath -- Photojournalist -- Rochester NY @ @ http://www.servtech.com/public/heathbar == v == heathbar@servtech.com / heathbar@cis.compuserve.com ^ "O.J. Simpson is going to appear on the Golf Channel. He is going to give tips on how to play your way out of a terrible lie." --- Bill Maher +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:10 1996 From: diamond@interserf.net (David B. Perrussel) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 13:08:39 GMT Message-ID: <4gpmre$av4@ns.interserf.net> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> Reply-To: diamond@interserf.net cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: >Steve Work (slwork@netcom.com) writes: >> >> Besides, radar guns don't cause cancer, they operate on microwaves. >> Gamma rays are the ones which cause cancer. Unfortunately, the bulk of >> the population is so scientifically illiterate they think microwaves and >> gamma rays are almost the same thing. After all, they are both invisible >> forms of radiation, aren't they? >> >Any elecromagnetic radiation in high enough dose is dangerous. A microwave >oven can be dangerous. Most consumer RF devices have sufficiently low >power to be fairly safe. There have been several cases of cops who develop >cancer after 15 years or so of using radar guns. ANYTHING of that frequency range with very short wavelengths (i.e. high frequency) can cause cancer if strong enough and close enough to the body. this includes cellular phones (the hand held ones) only if you use them a lot (though I doubt it for the occasional user) David Perrussel E-mail: diamond@interserf.net WWW: http://www.nauticom.net/users/diamond/home.htm From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:11 1996 From: Per Stangeland Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.space,rec.radio.noncomm,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: Radio Database Program LW, MW, SW coverage for YOU..... Date: 22 Feb 1996 19:50:43 GMT Message-ID: <4gihej$3q6@nms.telepost.no> References: <4gduns$sio@news.flinet.com> To: chuck@mail.flinet.com Charles Bolland wrote: >FRIENDS, > >If you would like a free copy of a radio database program that covers >longwave, mediumwave, and shortwave with at least 4,000 of records, send >your NAME, POSTAL ADDRESS, and EMAIL address to chuck@flinet, and I will >return the program to you via EMAIL. > >The program is not up to date! It is a program used during 1994 and >hasn't be updated since. However, many of the records are still current >for stations that do not change every quarter. > >The program is good until June 6, 1996. After that it will not function. > >Hope to hear from you and don't forget your Postal Address for >registration and future information via mail.. > >All addresses will be kept confidential! > >Chuck > >chuck@flinet.com > > My address is: Per Stangeland Luftfartsverket Luftveien 16 N-3440 Royken Norway. Best Regards Per From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:12 1996 From: fireboss@primenet.com Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Radio News 02/22/96 Date: 22 Feb 1996 21:02:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4gje7q$p0g@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Reply-To: fireboss@primenet.com Thursday, February 22, 1996 MIMS -- The Advanced Messaging Systems Division (AMSD) announced that it will supply a minimum of 13 Motorola Wireless Message Gateway(tm) (WMG(tm)) terminals for use in the IRIDIUM(r) system. The WMG will manage paging services, store and forward faxes, and provide voice mail services for telephony and paging subscribers. /BUSINESS WIRE/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:14 1996 From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack Pro 2040 Date: 19 Feb 1996 00:12:46 GMT Message-ID: <4g8f9u$9lg@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <31277AA5.1C15@shivasys.com> Reply-To: parnass@att.com In article <31277AA5.1C15@shivasys.com>, Joseph G. Hill wrote: >Radio Shack has the Pro 2040 on sale for $169.99. > Is this a good deal??? That's fair. From the "Buying a Used Scanner" FAQ: PRO-2040: late 1995 vintage 100 channel base made by Uniden. Fair performance, but minimal image rejection. Local oscillator harmonics account for spurious responses, e.g., reception of cellular telephone calls in the 460 MHz UHF-high band. Scans over 40 channels/sec. Can lock out up to 50 channels from search. "Soft" on/off power switching via keypad. See "The Radio Shack PRO-2040," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, December 1995. >Is there an alternative for about the same price that is a >better choice??... The Uniden/Bearcat BC860XLT has comparable features at about the same price: BC860XLT (Uniden): 1995 vintage. 100 channel table top unit. Can lock out 10 channels during search. Good performer except for images. See "The Uniden Bearcat BC860XLT," by Bob Parnass, AJ9S, in Monitoring Times, May 1995. The BC860XLT sells for about $179 at the Best Buy discount stores around here, and perhaps less via mail order. I tested both a PRO-2040 and BC860XLT and the PRO-2040 had more spurious responses, but you can lock out more channels from a Search. Both models will serve very well as first scanners for newcomers or as backup radios for "old timers." Reprints of articles from Monitoring Times are available for $2.00 each from: Grove Enterprises, 300 S. Highway 64 West, Brasstown, NC 28902. For a free catalog, call (704)837-9200. Telephone (orders only): (800)438-8155. Note: I don't get any part of the $2.00. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:15 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: tweek@netcom.com (R R M Tweek) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Message-ID: References: <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <4ga7gq$k7l@cloner4.netcom.com> <4ge5u2$g5r@krel.iea.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:14:28 GMT Thadius T. Pigman wrote: > >You will make more money at any Burger joint. >[...] > >My >complaints are with the compensation given to their so called and self >proclaimed "experts with the answers". You can get better answers from the g uy >at the burger joint from my experience... Ironicaly, this all makes sense. ;-) So why do you feel a RS employee should make the same amount of money as a fast food worker, when the fast food worker gives better answers? -- tweek@netcom.com tweek@io.com | "Well, you and I would differ on DoD #MCMLX tweek@ccnet.com | what's ignorance and educated." WWW: http://www.io.com/~tweek/ | - Senator Ernest Hollings From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:16 1996 From: vbreault@rinhp750.gmr.com (Val Breault) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 22 Feb 1996 21:04:31 GMT Message-ID: References: <4f5q3f$188@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> Paul Bastian wrote: > I once put in a application at a local R/S for the fun of it. > The store manager told me that they did not need anybody that knew > anything they wanted people with Sales skills. (?) I've been involved with electronics for several decades. I've done bench service, field service, I am an active amateur radio operator and professionally a senior technician. I may not know as much as some folks and certainly not as much as I wish I did but I know a few things about electronics. I also worked part-time for Radio Shack for three years ('93-'95). At the start I'd do what I could to answer ANY technical question. I'd help people select resistors and transistors. I'd review their plans and offer alternative ways to build their little projects. It took me quite a few months to understand that Radio Shack really doesn't want or need super techs standing around chatting with the customers. They need salespersons who have the technical background necessary to close a sale. Prior to learning that I was nearly always earning the hourly rate. My co-workers were getting the good sales while I talked shop. After learning that fact of life I was nearly always in commission. The system is set up to reward good salespersons. I swallowed my professional pride and worked toward being a better salesman. In 15 minutes time I could chat with an electronics hobbiest and sell him $8 worth of parts for minimum wage or I could chat with someone else and sell him $250 worth of scanner and accessories at 6.6% commission. Can I help who's next? You need a fuse? They're in the back. Can I help you sir? No, I don't what PNP means. Will that be all? Can I help you? Yes, we have the new DSS. Did you know that it..... -- Val Breault vbreault@gmr.com \ /| ars N8OEF General Motors R&D Center, Warren, MI \ / | pres GM ARC My opinions are not necessarily those \ /__| HF mobile on of GM R&D or of the GM Corporation. \/ |___ 14.200 +/- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:18 1996 From: pigman@itron.com (Thadius T. Pigman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 24 Feb 1996 03:35:43 GMT Message-ID: <4gm12f$314@krel.iea.com> References: <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <4ga7gq$k7l@cloner4.netcom.com> <4ge5u2$g5r@krel.iea.com> >>proclaimed "experts with the answers". You can get better answers from the guy > >>at the burger joint from my experience... > >Ironicaly, this all makes sense. ;-) > >So why do you feel a RS employee should make the same amount of >money as a fast food worker, when the fast food worker gives >better answers? Guess your right. It does have some sort of logic. I hope no one takes my digs at the shack in any personal way. It's still the best place to grab those hard to find electro-bits and pieces.. Great entry-level employmen t as well. Still think though, if you wanted answers *AND* a burger, you have only one choice!! Since I am so far off topic so far, let me ask a question about my new Bearcat BC3000XLT. Could some one drop a note about where I could get a spare battery and case fo r it? (I am not going to any burger joints tonight)! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:19 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: RadioShack has the Pro-2026 on sale again! Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:21:02 Message-ID: References: <4g7h28$gkk_001@nadzam.garlic.com> <4gb2cl$1b9@asia.lm.com> In article <4gb2cl$1b9@asia.lm.com> tunaman@telerama.lm.com (tunaman) writes: >From: tunaman@telerama.lm.com (tunaman) >Subject: Re: RadioShack has the Pro-2026 on sale again! >Date: 19 Feb 1996 18:50:45 -0500 >In article , >Jack Davis wrote: >>> >>That is a good buy. Don't "assume" they are modable (is that a word) >>unless you know how to tell the difference. Some can, some can't. >>Mine did! >> >>Jack >> >> >Jack-- > So tell me, how do you tell the difference? > tunaman > tunaman@telerama.lm.com I don't know Jack, but I'll tell you anyway! Disregard the color sticker on the outside of the box, AND the "B" on the Radio Shack part number, these are virtually meaningless in my experience. Look at the date code on the rear-panel of the scanner itself. The first numeric digits are the month, the alpha character is a separator, and the last numeric character is the year. My unit had a date code of 11A3, which is November 1993, and is modifiable. Any scanner manufactured after April 1994 will not be modifiable. I saw this in a Pro-2026 with a date code of 7A4. There are several different mods floating about, your mileage may vary. If the Pro-2026 you are looking at has a captive 12Vdc cable (not disconnectable) and has the "Patrolman" label on the front panel instead of "Radio Shack", pass it by. This is the older model that will forget all programming IMMEDIATELY after disconnecting it from DC power (which is why the cable is built-in). The newer models can be disconnected from DC power for up to 2 weeks without losing the programming. Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:20 1996 From: ssanford@mail2.sas.upenn.edu (Stephen Sanford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Real Audio clips? Date: 21 Feb 1996 22:33:28 GMT Message-ID: <4gg6jo$37u@netnews.upenn.edu> Anyone know of any WWW sites with Real Audio clips off scanners, etc? Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:20 1996 From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Real Audio clips? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:46:26 -0500 Message-ID: <312BCAF2.6B56@frontiernet.net> References: <4gg6jo$37u@netnews.upenn.edu> Stephen Sanford wrote: > > Anyone know of any WWW sites with Real Audio clips off scanners, etc? > > Thanks. Ron Katz up in Toronto is serving up RealAudio, but his ISP doesn't support i t correctly, so the files download completely before they start playing. His URL is: www.interlog.com/~ronkatz/ My page has .wav files available for download. The address: www.frontiernet.net/~dstark/ I would also be interested in finding other sites that have scanner audio! 73 de Dave, NF2G dstark@frontiernet.net http://www.frontiernet.net/~dstark/ Editor/Author "Scanner Master Upstate New York Guide" Co-Editor "Monitor America" From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:21 1996 From: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org (R. Ford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: RS PRO 2035-2042 have mods Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:14:16 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4gij5n$o9u@tsunami.traveller.com> Reply-To: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org Can a RS Pro 2035 2026 2037 or 2039 be moded. If so where can I find the info. Also are these good systems to buy. I am going to buy a new base scanner. I have a RS pro-43 (with mods) and would like a base unit. Please email or post. rford@hsvchamber.org Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:22 1996 From: bud.jamison@thekat.esnet.com (Bud Jamison) Date: 22 Feb 96 07:16:50 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Diego/Mercy Air/Airlife Message-ID: <41d_9602221947@thekat.esnet.com> ML> San Diego also has LIFEFLIGHT, I believe, which operate on 155.400. Police The OLD Lifeflight (it's gone now, replaced by Mercy Air and AirLife) used 154.515, which is U.C.S.D. Hospital security. The LifeFlight base station was at the hospital. ... Now and then an innocent man becomes a senator. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:23 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Diego/Mercy Air/Airlife Date: 23 Feb 1996 05:10:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4gk3rg$et@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <41d_9602221947@thekat.esnet.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Wow, I guess it's been a long time since I listened to them. No wonder they've been "absent" from the airwaves! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: bi307@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Adam Blechman) Subject: SC150 SportCat Message-ID: Reply-To: bi307@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Adam Blechman) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:18:00 GMT I would appreciate hearing any opinions on this scanner. One question: does this scanner receive the freqs that cell phones operate on? Any assistance is appreciated. Adam Blechman From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:25 1996 From: OAK HALL RESCUE Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: scanner amps Date: 24 Feb 1996 18:38:57 GMT Message-ID: <4gnm01$7f9@shore4.intercom.net> I am interested in buying a new of used scannner amp for under 75 dollars. Must ne in good clean and in good working order From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:25 1996 From: you@somehost.somedomain (Aaron Everson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Scanner Wanted w/ aircraft band Date: 24 Feb 1996 19:41:59 GMT Message-ID: <4gnpm7$20jg@news.doit.wisc.edu> I am a poor pilot and I cannot afford a new scanner, does anyone have a good used scanner, tabletop or hand held, that they want to sell, Cheap? Please Email me at: aweverso@students.wisc.edu Thank you Aaron Everson From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:26 1996 From: chiamkh@news-server.engin.umich.edu (Keng Hwee Chiam) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Scanning in another country Date: 22 Feb 1996 21:28:08 GMT Message-ID: <4gin58$arq@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> Hi, If anyone has any experience scanning in a foreign country (say, in Asia or Europe), please e-mail me at chiamkh@engin.umich.edu. In particular, I would like to know if the frequencies used are the same as those used in the United States, and if a U.S.-manufactured scanner, such as the ICOM R100 or the BC9000XLT are recommendable (in terms of frequency coverage, power supply, etc.). Thanks in advance, Keng-Hwee chiamkh@engin.umich.edu 2/22/96 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:27 1996 From: jmeeks@wwnet.com (Jon Meeks) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 21 Feb 1996 22:42:51 GMT Message-ID: <4gg75b$oq3@trellis.wwnet.com> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> In article , cwstan@holli.com says... > >Howdy, > >LERN is an acronym which stands for Law Enforcement Radio Network. The >Washington statewide LEARN frequency was 155.370 the last that I was >aware. LERN has nothing directly to do with the Secret Service >operations. > >Many states have a statewide network set up although the acronym chosen >may be different from state to state. All this is is a frequency that is >reserved for interagency traffic, usually involving a situation of >importance. > >Cheers :o) cws > Here in Michigan the frequency is called "inter city point to point" no fancy acronyms, and it too is state wide everyone has it . it too is 155.370mhz -- *************Reply by mail to jmeeks@wwnet.com************** *****Then visit my homepage at http:/www.wwnet/~jmeeks****** From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:28 1996 From: edag@aub.mindspring.com (Eric D'Agostino) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 04:54:32 GMT Message-ID: <4ggt65$179i@stealth.mindspring.com> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> <4gg75b$oq3@trellis.wwnet.com> Reply-To: edag@aub.mindspring.com >Here in Michigan the frequency is called >"inter city point to point" no fancy acronyms, and it too is state wide >everyone has it . >it too is 155.370mhz >-- >*************Reply by mail to jmeeks@wwnet.com************** >*****Then visit my homepage at http:/www.wwnet/~jmeeks****** I was wondering if anybody knew what the freq. is in Alabama? Thanks Eric D'Agostino From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:29 1996 From: Tom Humphrey Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: 22 Feb 1996 03:23:37 GMT Message-ID: <4ggnjp$a7@grandcanyon.binc.net> References: <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> cwstan@holli.com (C. W. Stanley) wrote: > > In article <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com>, dskidmo@halcyon.com says... > > > >In article <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com>, mscheetz@pacifier.com > says... > >> > >> > >> Today, when good ol' boy Billy Clinton visited the Portland > and > >>Woodland area, I picked up traffic on the Clark County Sheriff net > (the 155mhz > >>neighborhood) about an altercation involving a needed background > check. > >>Standard stuff so far, but then the sheriff asked for an expedited > check > >>claiming Secret Service involvement. My ears perked up at that. > >> Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN > >>channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but > couldn't > >>find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas > or freqs > >>for this SS activity? > > > >Washington State has LERN-Law Enforcement Radio Network, I think. > 155.37. SS > >often uses mutual aid channels to coordinate with locals/county/state. > > > >Don > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Howdy, > > LERN is an acronym which stands for Law Enforcement Radio Network. The > Washington statewide LEARN frequency was 155.370 the last that I was > aware. LERN has nothing directly to do with the Secret Service > operations. > > Many states have a statewide network set up although the acronym chosen > may be different from state to state. All this is is a frequency that is > reserved for interagency traffic, usually involving a situation of > importance. > > Cheers :o) cws > you might want to check 155.475 national net channel From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:30 1996 From: hpeach@pop.uky.edu (Harold G. Peach, Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:48:07 GMT Message-ID: <4gkn96$af5@service2.uky.edu> References: <312610EA.4AF1@frontiernet.net> <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> Reply-To: hpeach@pop.uky.edu bd703@scn.org (SCN User) wrote: >In a previous article, dstark@frontiernet.net (D Stark) says: >>> > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >>> >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but cou ldn't >>> >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or freqs >>> >for this SS activity? >> >> ILERN = 155.475 MHz >> (also known as NLEEF and other acronyms - they keep proposing the same freq uency and calling >>it by different names every time) >> >Washington State Patrol calls 155.475 NLEEC ( National Law Enforcement >Emergency Channel). PDs in Kentucky call it "Inter City." Only dispatchers typically have radios for this frequency and the statewide law enforcement computer network (LINK) has all but made it obsolete, except for the state police. --- Harold hpeach@pop.uky.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:31 1996 From: D Stark Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:51:39 -0500 Message-ID: <312E36EB.4CCB@frontiernet.net> References: <312610EA.4AF1@frontiernet.net> <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> <4gkn96$af5@service2.uky.edu> Harold G. Peach, Jr. wrote: > >Washington State Patrol calls 155.475 NLEEC ( National Law Enforcement > >Emergency Channel). > > PDs in Kentucky call it "Inter City." Only dispatchers typically have > radios for this frequency and the statewide law enforcement computer > network (LINK) has all but made it obsolete, except for the state > police. How would a nationwide mutual aid frequency on which any police officer could call any other officer or agency for emergency assistance be made "obsolete" by any computer network? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:32 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: bd703@scn.org (SCN User) Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Message-ID: Reply-To: bd703@scn.org (SCN User) References: <312610EA.4AF1@frontiernet.net> <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 02:51:51 GMT In a previous article, dstark@frontiernet.net (D Stark) says: >> > Then the sheriff advised further contact on LEARN or the LEARN >> >channel. I kept scanning the 155mhz area and the trunked systems but coul dn't >> >find any other reference to it. Does anyone out there have any ideas or f reqs >> >for this SS activity? > > ILERN = 155.475 MHz > (also known as NLEEF and other acronyms - they keep proposing the same frequ ency and calling >it by different names every time) > Washington State Patrol calls 155.475 NLEEC ( National Law Enforcement Emergency Channel). Kerwin -- ***************************************************************************** * They know who you are... bd703@scn.org * They know where you live... * And there's no doubt about it! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:33 1996 From: Richard Mclachlan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Seeking U.K. Scanner enthusiasts Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 20:30:09 GMT Message-ID: <825193809snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> References: Reply-To: Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk In article phil@pearcott.demon.co.uk writes: > > I'm in the U.K. Midlands have scanner and HF etc. Seeking info on some > 'utilitie' freqs etc and contact with other enthusiasts. Listen to air traff ic, > and 'other' things - the location of some of which defeat me still!! > > Phil > > try looking at alt.radio.scanner.uk lots of info there -- Richard Mclachlan From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:34 1996 From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: smallest hand held scanners?????? please help Date: 22 Feb 1996 07:37:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4gho1m$qif@panix3.panix.com> References: <4fuo3r$86u@news.rain.org> <723.6624T1309T2545@metropolis.nl> <4ge1qs$rlg@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> In article <4ge1qs$rlg@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, JC Woodard wrote: > > > can anyone tell me just how small hand held/portable scanners have >gotten? I'm looking for a new one, as samll as possible - thanks - The smallest are the ICOM IC-R1 and Alinco DJ-X1. -- Mike Schuster | schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM ------------------- | schuster@shell.portal.com | schuster@mem.po.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:35 1996 From: jberszoner@aol.com (JBerszoner) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: smallest hand held scanners?????? please help Date: 21 Feb 1996 18:20:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4gg9bf$hlp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4ge1qs$rlg@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: jberszoner@aol.com (JBerszoner) I have a UNIDEN BC3000XLT. It fits into my shirt pocket and has a freq. range of 25mhz - 1300 mhz minus cell phone bands. I purchased it here in the Chicago area for $335.00. Damn good radio. Haven't had any troubles with it at all. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:36 1996 From: HAL Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: smallest hand held scanners?????? please help Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:23:57 -0500 Message-ID: <312E225D.23E6@ccgate.hac.com> References: <4ge1qs$rlg@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4gg9bf$hlp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Can the BC3000XLT be modified to receive the cells?? Can I get some more info on it? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:37 1996 From: calanan@fstrf.org (Michael C. Calanan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Sterling Marlin Freq Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:46:28 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gi6sm$rdg@niktow.canisius.edu> References: Reply-To: calanan@fstrf.org orlando@accessorl.net (Jimmy K.) wrote: |:>Anyone know Sterling's freq? The ones I have were not in use for the Twin |:>125's. |:>Thanks. Per the NASCAR Winston Cup Scanner Frequencies page at: http://student-www.eng.hawaii.edu/carina/nascar/misc/nascar.freqs.html =================================================================== NO. DRIVER FREQUENCY(Mhz) =================================================================== ...edit... 4 Sterling Marlin 464.3000 464.3875 467.9250 Good luck! - mike Turkish Proverb: "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." '96 Impala SS: "It goes fast, FAST!" --- +-------------------------------------------------------+ | Michael C. Calanan calanan@fstrf.org | | Programmer / Analyst | | Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation | | 4033 Maple Road Amherst NY 14226 | | http://stewart.fstrf.org/~calanan | +-------------------------------------------------------+ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:39 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Strange practices of my FBI field office Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 23:29:33 -0500 Message-ID: <312E942D.573D@mail.rust.net> References: <4gfk7r$pj3@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Cliff Pearson wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question I hope someone can answer. Here in my hometown, I > am able to monitor the local FBI field office on several frequencies. > One of the frequencies is more active, by far, than the others. Judging > from the traffic I hear, it sounds like a dispatcher's channel. I > usually hear a woman, speaking like a dispatcher (providing information, > answering questions, checking the "criss cross," relaying messages, etc.) > and a man speaking to her on the other end. > > Now here's where it gets weird . . . > > I've heard this same frequency identified as F-2, F-3, and F-5. Why? > Could there be various input frequencies using the same repeater output > frequency, with each input using a different CTCSS tone? What would be > the point though? > > Also, and this is the craziest, the woman "dispatcher" is ALWAYS in > the clear, but the "field agent," presumably in his car, is always > digitally scrambled. Why?!? Since I can hear half the conversation, > I can almost always deduce what they're talking about. From the > dispatcher I've heard license plates, addresses, agent's cellular > phone numbers, suspect's names, NCIC reports, "28 returns," etc. > Shouldn't this be secret too? Why might this be happening, and > what would be the point in scrambling only half of a conversation? > > Any help would be appreciated, thanks > > Cliff Pearson > db477@cleveland.freenet.edu Cliff: Regarding the F-1, F-2, F-3, etc., this is a common practice to refere to what channels to use, rather than saying something like; "Change to frequency 163.0 55" Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:40 1996 From: Brett Miller - N7OLQ Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Strange practices of my FBI field office Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 09:08:12 -0700 Message-ID: <312DE66C.5BD4@ccm.hf.intel.com> References: <4gfk7r$pj3@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Cliff Pearson wrote: > I've heard this same frequency identified as F-2, F-3, and F-5. Why? > Could there be various input frequencies using the same repeater output > frequency, with each input using a different CTCSS tone? What would be > the point though? There are several reasons I can think of. 1. More than one field office or group uses this frequency, so for one field office it is the F-2 position on their radio dial, and for another it is F-5 etc. 2. A more likely reason is that one channel on their radio uses a particular PL tone and another channel (same frequency) uses a different PL tone. In addition, one may be simplex and another uses the repeater. Also one may be designated to use scrambling and another in the clear. COmbine all these and you get alot of designations for the same frequency. I don't know why there seems to be conversations 1/2 scrambled. Maybe the dispatcher talks in the clear because some agents don't have DVP and this way they can keep track of what is going on. -- Brett Miller - N7OLQ brett_miller@ccm.ut.intel.com Intel Corp. CIS: 73370,3030 American Fork, UT From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:40 1996 From: Mark Rogers Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: SWISS FREQS Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 17:03:33 -0800 Message-ID: <312E63E5.2F82@glide.org> My partner Christian Eipper recently moved from San Francisco to Dornach, Switzerland near Basel. He is having a difficult time finding active frequencies on his 400 channel AR scanner. I would appreciate any info or actual frequencies (police, fire, aircraft, etcetera). He has no e-mail access but I can snail him info. Thanks in advance dshark@glide.org From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:42 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TRAIN FREQUENCIES...HELP Date: 20 Feb 1996 22:45:13 GMT Message-ID: <4gditp$1s3@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG The standard reference is "The Compendium of American Railroad Radio Frequencies" (200 pp) by Sturm and Landgraf. It's available from hobby shops (model trains) or Kalmbach Publishing (800 533-6644) for $16.95. It lists virtually all frequencies, ordered by railroad and location. From the FAF - Frequently Asked Frequencies on ftp://oak.oakland.edu as /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/scanner.faf Railroads [90.91 ] Ch Freq 2 159.810 3 159.930 4 160.050 5 160.185 6 160.200 7 160.215 8 160.230 .. ....... 96 161.550 97 161.565 The channel designation is that assigned by the Association of American Railroads. Chs 2 thru 6 are used only in Canada. Above channel 6, spacing is 15 kz. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:43 1996 From: ronkatz@interlog.com (Ron Katz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TRAIN FREQUENCIES...HELP Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 07:43:58 GMT Message-ID: <4gftsq$ht7@steel.interlog.com> References: <4gb41k$6rs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> br679@aol.com (BR679) wrote: >I am working on a project and am in need of train frequencies. That is I >want to monitor the conversations between trains and between trains and >there dispatch..etc. >I would GREATLY APPRECIATE ANY and ALL help in finding these frequencies. >THANK YOU >PAT For what country??? I have some at my web page below and some handy scanning tips for the canadian stuff also under the railroad section. Ron Katz News Cameraman Toronto Ontario http://www.interlog.com/~ronkatz/ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:44 1996 From: hpeach@pop.uky.edu (Harold G. Peach, Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TRAIN FREQUENCIES...HELP Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:34:26 GMT Message-ID: <4gd0ch$1us@service2.uky.edu> References: <4gb41k$6rs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: hpeach@pop.uky.edu br679@aol.com (BR679) wrote: >I am working on a project and am in need of train frequencies. That is I >want to monitor the conversations between trains and between trains and >there dispatch..etc. >I would GREATLY APPRECIATE ANY and ALL help in finding these frequencies. >THANK YOU >PAT An extensive list of railroad frequencies is at the following web site: http://ux1.cso.uiuc.edu/~roma/rr-freqs.html Harold hpeach@pop.uky.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:45 1996 From: Mike Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TRAIN FREQUENCIES...HELP Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:22:43 -0500 Message-ID: <312E1403.5290@boulder.vni.com> References: <4gb41k$6rs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gftsq$ht7@steel.interlog.com> The allocation for railroads by the FCC is: 160.215 - 161.565MHz, 15kHz step. I have programmed this search range into my scanner rather than programming every frequency in this range. Hope this helps. Mike -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:46 1996 From: "B. K." Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Trunked Sys. - Where is control channel? Date: 22 Feb 1996 07:23:14 GMT Message-ID: <4gh5l2$r0q@hgea01.hgea.org> References: To: norelco@shadow.net If you are referring to a MOTOROLA system, the control channel changes daily and is the BUZZ that is heard. 73's From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:47 1996 From: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Trunked Sys. - Where is control channel? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 23:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: How does someone identify a control channel in a trunked system? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:47 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power probl From: ron.roth@canrem.com (Ron Roth) Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.31719.5773.0N20B9D6@canrem.com> References: <603.6624T1303T80@metropolis.nl> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:30:00 -0500 L > (ron.roth@ghbbs.com) wrote: L > > I hooked up a power supply to my 200XLT and found that it "powers on" L > > at about 5V, and reducing the voltage, it cuts out at about 4.5V L > L > Do you happen to know the voltage of the battery pack if it's L > connected to the loader. Mine's about 9 Volts, which seems a bit L > on the high side. Mine is 9.7 Volts open-ended. If I connect the scanner and switch it on, it goes down to about 9.3 Volts. I guess the condition/age and charge status of the NiCads would have some effect on the output voltage of the power pack (I had just charged mine up a couple of days ago, before measuring the voltage for you). * Ron Roth --- * RoseReader 2.10b P003228 Entered at [CRS] From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:48 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power probl Message-ID: <327.6626T1093T473@metropolis.nl> References: <603.6624T1303T80@metropolis.nl> <60.31719.5773.0N20B9D6@canrem.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:13:09 GMT Ron Roth (ron.roth@canrem.com) wrote: > Mine is 9.7 Volts open-ended. If I connect the scanner and switch > it on, it goes down to about 9.3 Volts. I guess the condition/age Thanks. I guess the ~9 Volts of my pack is nothing to worry about, then. -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:49 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problem Message-ID: <603.6624T1303T80@metropolis.nl> References: <8BAF4C4.0AA300161C.uuout@ghbbs.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:43:01 GMT RON ROTH (ron.roth@ghbbs.com) wrote: > I hooked up a power supply to my 200XLT and found that it "powers on" > at about 5V, and reducing the voltage, it cuts out at about 4.5V Do you happen to know the voltage of the battery pack if it's connected to the loader. Mine's about 9 Volts, which seems a bit on the high side. > Other than comparing regulated and unregulated voltage path values > with those given in the service manual, you may want to temporarily Oh boy. I don't have the service manual. I'll try to find one. -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:50 1996 From: jpk@dfw.dfw.net (Jason Kazarian) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problems Date: 21 Feb 1996 04:42:51 GMT Message-ID: <4ge7sb$676@fnord.dfw.net> References: <3123AE04.112D@west.net> <698.6620T129T640@metropolis.nl> Things to think about the BC200XLT: 1) If the unit works when plugged in to the AC adapter, the probability that the charging circuit works is high. 2) Yes, some bands use more current then the others, 800 MHz on up especially. 3) If you have had your pack for about five or more years, the nicad cells probably need replacing. There is an outfit in NY called BatteryTech that sells this for about $20-30. They advertise in photo and video magazines. Note you have to disassemble the pack, unsolder the old nicads, and solder in the new ones. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:52 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: ldp@metropolis.nl (Lennard voor den Dag) Subject: Re: UBC200XLT power problems Message-ID: <1077.6626T1086T2680@metropolis.nl> References: <4ge7sb$676@fnord.dfw.net> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:06:53 GMT Jason Kazarian (jpk@dfw.dfw.net) wrote: >1) If the unit works when plugged in to the AC adapter, the probability >that the charging circuit works is high. Yes, it works. But when the AC adapter is connected, the battery pack delivers 9V to the scanner. Can this harm the unit in the long run? >2) Yes, some bands use more current then the others, 800 MHz on up >especially. Everytime I program/band search freqs in the 400 and 800 MHz ranges, my scanners turns itself off. 80 and 160 MHz bands are ok. >3) If you have had your pack for about five or more years, the nicad >cells probably need replacing. There is an outfit in NY called I've had the pack for about 4 years. My scanner works >10 hours on it, if fully loaded. I don't think the cells need replacing, yet. :-) BTW: I can't find the service manual for the 200xlt anywhere. Can you get this only from Uniden directly, and if so, how? Do they have a customer/tech service email address? I'd rather avoid calling international. -- ST:CCG Card of the Day * http://www.metropolis.nl/~ldp/COTD.html -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:52 1996 From: ccartee@cisco.com (Claude Alan Cartee) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden 900Mhz Phones... Date: 21 Feb 1996 03:56:57 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: I remember reading a post a while back where someone had 'discovered' that the Uniden 900MHz Spread Spectrum phones had a ~400MHz leak that was scannable. Before I set up an experiment, does someone have that mail? Or know what I am talking about? Thanks... From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:54 1996 From: mnewton@ici.net (Mike) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Uniden 900Mhz Phones... Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 01:05:29 GMT Message-ID: <4glnbk$c28@crusher.ici.net> References: In article , ccartee@cisco.com (Claude Alan Cartee) wrote: >I remember reading a post a while back where someone had 'discovered' >that the Uniden 900MHz Spread Spectrum phones had a ~400MHz leak that >was scannable. Before I set up an experiment, does someone have that >mail? Or know what I am talking about? Thanks... Hmmmm....this sounds discouraging. I have a Uniden EXP9200 2-line phone. I bought it because of the 'spread-spectrum' and digital features. I don't like the idea of people like me listening to me! :) I have put a frequency counter up to the base and handset with unstable results. It reports anywhere from 500Mhz - 800Mhz with about a 50% of normal signal strength. I am assuming that this is because it is transmitting on multiple frequencies at the same time and it just 'confuses' the frequency counter. I have also scanned the ~902Mhz - ? as indicated in the manual with no audible results. I will be checking out the 400+Mhz range over the weekend and let you know how I make out......I would be interested to see what results you come up with as well. Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:54 1996 From: slick@primenet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 23 Feb 1996 16:59:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> I have a TV antenna that I don't use anyoore but it is still on top of my house. Can I hook up my scanner to the antenna for better reception espcially 29-54 mhz? I have the coax cable and adapter but the guy at Radio Shack told me it wouldn't work. Any ideas? THANKS! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:55 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:35:51 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gq6ln$146k@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> >the guy at Radio Shack told me it wouldn't work. Any ideas? The first rule is "never believe anything that Sammy Salesdroid from Radio Shack tells you." Usually, just the opposite is true. >First a TV antenna is horizontal, most scanners uses use vertical >polariation. Drill two new holes in the boom and mount it vertically! Since TV antennas are designed for a wide variety of frequencies from 50-900Mhz, it will work very well as a scanner antenna. Remember, though, that the antenna is directional and will have to be aimed accordingly. Also remember to feed it with RG-6 (satellite) coax. NOT RG58 or RG59. -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:57 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: darreng@actrix.gen.nz Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Message-ID: <31316a29.8900137@news.actrix.gen.nz> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 08:09:33 GMT References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> On 23 Feb 1996 16:59:02 -0700, slick@primenet.com wrote: >I have a TV antenna that I don't use anyoore but it is still on top of >my house. Can I hook up my scanner to the antenna for better reception >espcially 29-54 mhz? I have the coax cable and adapter but the guy at >Radio Shack told me it wouldn't work. Any ideas? >THANKS! > > It works fine for me on all bands here in NZ as the antenna is a multiband TV antenna. I would estimate my reception has improved 200 % by hooking my scanner up to the TV antenna and I have an aerial amplifier inline as well. I have about 40 feet of cable as well so I can move my scanner around the house and have no problems with it. Darren From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:58 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ezwriter@netcom.com (kEN Colburn) Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Message-ID: References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gp3ip$f39@news.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 21:41:50 GMT i got like 400% more freqs when i tried my old TV ant. compared to telescoping ant. RS sells a home ant tho for about $17. -- Gimme a bike, a laptop, a gun and a Leathermen's tool and i can go anywhere and do anything. ezwriter@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:16:59 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: Jim Whitbeck Subject: Used BC855XLT Worth...? Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 01:49:27 GMT I have a used BC855XLT that I'm looking to sell and I'd love for somebody to give me an idea of what it's worth. It's had the cell mod and the extra channels mod, so it now has 100 channels in 5 banks. We bought it in December 1991 for $240. I have original packaging, manual, and antenna. It hasn't been damaged (ie dropped) in any way. The only glitch has been that the search mode suddenly started going from the upper limit down instead of from the lower up. A comparable one (faster, of course, but without cell) at Lowe's new is about $200. What's a fair price? I was thinking around $75. Am I ripping myself off or her? Thanks. Please e-mail me directly if you can at whitbje@mail.auburn.edu. Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:00 1996 From: pwguth@erinet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 01:17:55 GMT Message-ID: <4giq6v$ead@eri2.erinet.com> References: <96022123003718680@solis.sbay.org> gary.sellani@solis.sbay.org (Gary Sellani) wrote: >NRG>From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) >NRG>Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner >NRG>Subject: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 >NRG>Date: 12 Feb 1996 15:50:56 GMT >NRG>Message-ID: <4fnnl0$j35@uwm.edu> >NRG>Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee >NRG>I was wondering if i am the only one who likes the R-1. Everytime i post >NRG>anything about it, i get some DICKHEAD flaiming it saying how much the >NRG>radio sucks.Though I owned one, and with either the supplied duckie, or >NRG>a scout-type antenna It was fine. There was intermod, but what do you >NRG>expect from something so small? (ever try a kenwood TH78a?) >I never owned one, but what stopped me was the following: >1) Wideband with no sideband >2) No banks, i.e. all the freqs are in one bank >3) Fancy battery pack (give me AAs any day) By the way, there is an auxilliary battery pack available for the R1 that takes six AA batteries. I think I paid about $12 for it-too much for two pieces of molded plastic with a few metal connectors, but it is a good investment for those of us who use our R1 constantly. Yes, it has all of the problems that the flamers report, but it also has A LOT OF ADVANTAGES! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:03 1996 From: jwayda@cogent.net (Jim Wayda) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 Date: 23 Feb 1996 04:49:43 GMT Message-ID: References: <96022123003718680@solis.sbay.org> <4giq6v$ead@eri2.erinet.com> The only advantage that the R1 has is it's small size. Jim Wayda Captain, Scanner Price Police In article <4giq6v$ead@eri2.erinet.com>, pwguth@erinet.com wrote: : gary.sellani@solis.sbay.org (Gary Sellani) wrote: : : >NRG>From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) : >NRG>Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner : >NRG>Subject: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 : >NRG>Date: 12 Feb 1996 15:50:56 GMT : >NRG>Message-ID: <4fnnl0$j35@uwm.edu> : >NRG>Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee : : >NRG>I was wondering if i am the only one who likes the R-1. Everytime i pos t : >NRG>anything about it, i get some DICKHEAD flaiming it saying how much the : >NRG>radio sucks.Though I owned one, and with either the supplied duckie, or : >NRG>a scout-type antenna It was fine. There was intermod, but what do you : >NRG>expect from something so small? (ever try a kenwood TH78a?) : : : >I never owned one, but what stopped me was the following: : >1) Wideband with no sideband : >2) No banks, i.e. all the freqs are in one bank : >3) Fancy battery pack (give me AAs any day) : : : By the way, there is an auxilliary battery pack available for the R1 : that takes six AA batteries. I think I paid about $12 for it-too much : for two pieces of molded plastic with a few metal connectors, but it : is a good investment for those of us who use our R1 constantly. Yes, : it has all of the problems that the flamers report, but it also has A : LOT OF ADVANTAGES! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:04 1996 From: gary.sellani@solis.sbay.org (Gary Sellani) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 06:41:00 GMT Message-ID: <96022123003718680@solis.sbay.org> Distribution: world NRG>From: herb@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Nathan Ryan Gingras) NRG>Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner NRG>Subject: Vote in favor of Icom R-1 NRG>Date: 12 Feb 1996 15:50:56 GMT NRG>Message-ID: <4fnnl0$j35@uwm.edu> NRG>Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee NRG>I was wondering if i am the only one who likes the R-1. Everytime i post NRG>anything about it, i get some DICKHEAD flaiming it saying how much the NRG>radio sucks.Though I owned one, and with either the supplied duckie, or NRG>a scout-type antenna It was fine. There was intermod, but what do you NRG>expect from something so small? (ever try a kenwood TH78a?) NRG>Don't post here if you intend to bitch about how much you hate the R-1. NRG>(Get your own damn thread!) I never owned one, but what stopped me was the following: 1) Wideband with no sideband 2) No banks, i.e. all the freqs are in one bank 3) Fancy battery pack (give me AAs any day) I do own a TH78A and no what you mean about intermod. However, it only has real trouble when you do odd stuff such as put a high gain antenna on it or hike in the hills near powerful transmitters. * SLMR 2.1a * MAO: Justice comes from the barrel of a gun From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:05 1996 From: defender@vixa.voyager.net (Steve) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: wanted !!!:) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 18:35:34 GMT Message-ID: <312f59e9.4282612@news.voyager.net> i am looking for any mods for a BC560xlt scanner if you can help me out mail me at defender@vixa.voyager.net thanxs :) From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:06 1996 From: defender@vixa.voyager.net (Steve) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wanted BC560xlt modifications Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 02:13:16 GMT Message-ID: <312bcff3.1675596@news.voyager.net> if anyone out here knows about how to do any mods for this scanner to enhance it's performance please let me know i am interested in all things about it like adding more channeles above and below what it normally gets i would like to see if it can go all the way down to 26.0000 if at all posiable i dunno much about it but ii am sure someone out here might .. anyhow any mod's are apreciated thank you :) wt From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:06 1996 From: Lauren_Casey@msn.com (Lauren_Casey ) Subject: Wanted: Patrolman-9 Date: 23 Feb 96 19:02:58 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004906@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner I am trying to locate an old Radio Shack radio called the Patrolman-9, which dated back to about 1971. If anyone has one they would concider selling please contact me by private e-mail. Thanks! Lauren From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:07 1996 From: sba3020@InfoNET.st-johns.nf.ca (Carl Hodder) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: What 8500XLTs can have mods done? Date: 23 Feb 1996 19:10:00 GMT Message-ID: <4gl3e8$jtr@coranto.ucs.mun.ca> What 8500XLT Bearcat scanners can have mods (cellular) done. Do you tell but the serial # or have to look inside on a chip? I have seen ADs in Popular Communications about 8500XLT cellular mods for this scanner. Anyone else have this scanner? E-mail sba3020@infonet.st-johns.nf.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:08 1996 From: schner@c-zone.net (Jim Schneringer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: What are the BC2500 Tricks??? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 08:26:39 GMT Message-ID: <4gp6cr$s5n@tweety.sna.com> What are the keypress tricks for the Bearcat BC2500 and what do they do? Are any of them very usefull like the light toggle trick on the BC3000? Anyone have a spare service manual they want to give away? I can't see spending $25 + shipping for something I think they should have included. Please e-mail Thanks in Advance, Jim Schneringer Shasta Lake, CA. schner@c-zone.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:09 1996 From: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org (R. Ford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: What do you think of the RS PRO 2026 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:39:40 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4gi32r$jme@tsunami.traveller.com> Reply-To: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org The local RS has the pro-2026 on sale for $145.00. I have found one that was dated "11A3" and am thinking of buying the unit. I would like some input from someone who has owned the unit or have a unit. Please feel free to email me at rford@hsvchamber.org or to post to the news groups. Thanks for all the help. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:10 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:04:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4gc2qv$ibs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4ft3jj$55d@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) AOR scanners are SUPERIOR to almost ANYTHING. I gave up my AOR1000 only because it was so darned hard to use. A great MONITOR, but 1000 channels was a bit MUCH. Got myself a BC3000 now and am VERY happy with it. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:10 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :-( Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4gc2q9$ibq@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fb2d2$l8g@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) The Uniden BC3000XLT is a FAR SUPERIOR receive and has higher audio output than ANY of the Radio Shack models. Plus, 400 channels is better than 200. The RS scanners are OK, but why have OK when you can have GREAT? Also, look at AOR. WHY is everyone so interested in CELLULAR? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:11 1996 From: Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland Stiner) Date: 20 Feb 96 21:01:00 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Message-ID: <0c3_9602210500@magsystems.com> To: markl9@aol.com Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :N M>WHY is everyone so interested in CELLULAR? Forbidden fruit. Make it illegal and everyone wants to listen to it. Same with drugs and other stuff. --- OLX 1.53 --------------> 73, de NK2U <---------------- -- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:12 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 20 Feb 1996 04:05:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able to scan them! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:13 1996 From: prografx@teleport.com (Steve Kennedy) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:03:54 Message-ID: References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> In article <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) writes : >From: froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) >Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? >Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 08:24:48 GMT >jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com (John Wierzbicki) wrote: >>In article <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) writ es: >>|> What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to >>|> hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! >>|> You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible >>|> cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able t o >>|> scan them! >>Sure enough, AOL. >Damn Scanners!!! Hey.. I got an idea. How about if they had a feature >which let you search through a specified range of frequencies!!!! Better yet, how about a newsgroup filter that scans for AOL postings. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:15 1996 From: Two-Dogs Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 22 Feb 1996 11:16:46 GMT Message-ID: <4ghjau$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) wrote: >jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com (John Wierzbicki) wrote: > >>In article <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) writ es: >>|> What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to >>|> hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! >>|> You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible >>|> cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able t o >>|> scan them! > >>Sure enough, AOL. > >Damn Scanners!!! Hey.. I got an idea. How about if they had a feature >which let you search through a specified range of frequencies!!!! > CAN YOU BELIVE-->> 'it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway!' I have signal squelch, and dead-carrier squelch, but if anybody has a 'boring stuff' squelch circuit, please let me know!!!! TD. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:16 1996 From: From someone who enjoys it Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:33:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gj55n$u4@dfw.nkn.net> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) wrote: >jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com (John Wierzbicki) wrote: >>In article <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) writ es: >>|> What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to >>|> hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! >>|> You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible >>|> cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able t o >>|> scan them! >>Sure enough, AOL. >Damn Scanners!!! Hey.. I got an idea. How about if they had a feature >which let you search through a specified range of frequencies!!!! You can scan the freqs that Cellular fall into. Just scan the bank of freqs from 865 to 893 MHz. You will hit them just fine. You May or may not hear both sides of the conversation. Friday and Saturday nights are the best time to listen. Its amazing what some people will say over the phone. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:17 1996 From: aedwards@tdc.dircon.co.uk (Alan Edwards) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 22 Feb 1996 10:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4ghhfc$pof@tdc.dircon.co.uk> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) writes: >Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) wrote: >: What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to >: hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! >: You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible >: cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able to >: scan them! >I thought that there were 666 cellular frequencies. Radios like the >PRO-2035, PRO-2042 have 1000 frequencies which they can scan. However, >someone would have to be very devoted to manually punch all of those in, >because scanners generally do not support 30Khz spacing. My old Pro-35 can be given a lower and upper limit and told to look between them. If you programmed the boundaries for cellular, it could search between them and find any cellular calls, except the Pro-35 tops out at 512Mhz :-(. I take your point, though - it would still only get one side. By the time a second scanner had found the other frequency, the conversation would be over. Alan. -- ************************************************************************* Push to test ... ... Release to detonate ************************************************************************* Alan Edwards aedwards@tdc.dircon.co.uk 100256.1113@compuserve.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:18 1996 From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 23 Feb 1996 17:06:14 -0600 Message-ID: <4glh96$m6n@eugene.convex.com> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> <4gj55n$u4@dfw.nkn.net> >>>In article <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) wri tes: >>>|> You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible >>>|> cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able to >>>|> scan them! One of the things I haven't seen mentioned is to find the 17 cell channels on the cell site nearest you and scan those. Scan all 34 channels if you want both wire/non-wireline. The inputs are good to scan if you only want signals in the *immediate* vacinity. Depending on the site configuration, you can usually find channels spaced 630 KHz apart. Freqs are between 869-894 (site) and 824-849 (mobile). David From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:19 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:03:50 GMT Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) writes: > What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to > hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! > You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible > cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able to > scan them! I usually listen to cellular after midnight, so there aren't a ton of people on. If I happen to lose a conversation I just scan through the 833 possible frequencies and usually find it again within a few seconds. I like to get the phone number, then go to a pay phone and tell the person what I just heard. The reactions you get can be quite amusing. By the way when listening to cellular you don't program the frequencies in your memory, you SEARCH between the frequency limits. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:20 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <312B5A8E.72DA@boulder.vni.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:49:17 GMT >> because scanners generally do not support 30Khz spacing. > > Yes, quite devoted (and off their nut). Although scanners like the AR8000 c an > easily be set to 30KHz spacing, as can others. > Most scanners that can be modified for cellular will default to 30kHz steps for the cellular band. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:21 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 23 Feb 1996 05:01:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4gk3a6$bs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4ghjau$gjp@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) >>CAN YOU BELIVE-->> 'it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway!' Kan yoo spel? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:22 1996 From: Ray Matthews Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 22 Feb 1996 19:01:54 GMT Message-ID: <4giej2$n80@venger.snds.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> To: powen@edgewater.com powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) wrote: >I just don't get it. > >Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? These fast food headset radios are not only used for taking the customer orders. They are also used by the employees for just talking between each other. And sometimes they make 'interesting' comments about the customers, or on really slow nights I have heard some very risque discussions about the party someone was at the night before, etc. It's just one more facet of radio voyeurism that some people can't seem to ignore. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:23 1996 From: pwguth@erinet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 01:19:21 GMT Message-ID: <4giq9k$ead@eri2.erinet.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> powen@edgewater.com (Phil Owen) wrote: >I just don't get it. >Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? Is this >list compiled for "Lock-Outs" or is someone trying to find out the >ingredients of the "Special Sauce"? >Phil... For those of use who are really into the hobby, I guess it's just the knowledge that "I did it". From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <312B6588.186F@clark.net> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:54:01 GMT steves (steves@clark.net) writes: > Phil Owen wrote: >> >> I just don't get it. >> >> Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? Is this >> list compiled for "Lock-Outs" or is someone trying to find out the >> ingredients of the "Special Sauce"? >> >> Phil... >> > > I gotta agree with you on this one. The only idea I could come up with is t hat they are fast food abusers. Maybe someone > needs to start a Fast Food Anonymous. Counselors could be located at the or dering kiosk. Which means they would also have > to add an emergency exit lane from the drive-thru. There's half an hour wait at the drive through booth. You listen in for an order you like, then slip up to the window before the REAL customer get's there. You still have to pay, but you know the price and it's a lot faster than waiting in line. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:25 1996 From: jberszoner@aol.com (JBerszoner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 23 Feb 1996 02:01:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4gjonn$qhp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: jberszoner@aol.com (JBerszoner) Why not. It's just a matter of curiousity. It's out there, so it's fair game. Just like everything else and the bands. Like Sir Edmund Hilary said, "It was there." From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:27 1996 From: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 22 Feb 1996 07:38:09 GMT Message-ID: <4gh6h1$4e0@news.fullerton.edu> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com>, Reply-To: xrbarron@ccvax.fullerton.edu In article , tweek@netcom.com (R R M Tweek) writes :> > >The reason for the Fast Food listings, is because there is an elaborate >Gypsy Spy Network which has tapped into the kiosk system at many fast >food locations... they have gone as far as using the francise's own >nationwide computer networks to distribute their own communications to >the locations. > >These communications are AM encoded on top of the standard FM transmissions >which you would expect to hear... you know... the standard "You want >fries with that?" stuff... > >I have yet to actually crack the code used, but given enough time, I >will be able to decode the seemingly unsuspicious rise and fall of >the carrier amplitude, and have the communications decoded to my >computer screen. > >So far, I have analyzed the front porch sweep of the signal, as well >as the intermediate ramping following the start bit and the 10 data >bits. There is a secondary ramping just prior (1/46 ms) to the >back porch following the stop bit. The coding in this secondary >ramping has me still clueless as to the extraction of the byte >checksum. Any help would be appreciated. > >I hope we can get the final decoding formula completed and written >into the software before the gypsies proceed to phase three. I >already get the feeling that they are closely observing me at >times. I hope it's not too late. Sadly, that was the last anyone ever heard from tweek@netcom.com. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:28 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 23 Feb 1996 16:32:34 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gkq72$11ae@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <4giej2$n80@venger.snds.com> <312d791f.2568@primenet.com> >I showed her the radio and told her that I can hear them for at least 2 miles No, no, no...never TELL them that you can hear them. That just spoils it for the rest of us! If the word actually got out to these people that their micro-power transmitters could actually be heard by others, there wouldn't be anything left for us to listen to. -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:29 1996 From: hickman@super-highway.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:51:11 -0300 Message-ID: <312DFE8F.33D3@super-highway.net> References: <4gjonn$qhp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gkin1$r2i@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> Frank Allen wrote: > > > >said, "It was there." > Gotta programmable xcvr? What fun you could have with the person > wearing the headset-"You want fries with those 75 mikshakes?" > Not that I would do it! I don't do it often, but have heard some great side comments, especially about the people in line - mostly boaring. From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:30 1996 From: genealle@ix.netcom.com(Frank Allen ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 23 Feb 1996 14:24:33 GMT Message-ID: <4gkin1$r2i@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> References: <4gjonn$qhp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In <4gjonn$qhp@newsbf02.news.aol.com> jberszoner@aol.com (JBerszoner) writes: > >Why not. It's just a matter of curiousity. It's out there, so it's fair >game. Just like everything else and the bands. Like Sir Edmund Hilary >said, "It was there." Gotta programmable xcvr? What fun you could have with the person wearing the headset-"You want fries with those 75 mikshakes?" Not that I would do it! From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:31 1996 From: Rob Neff Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 22 Feb 1996 13:21:01 -0700 Message-ID: <312D791F.2568@primenet.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <4giej2$n80@venger.snds.com> Ray Matthews wrote: > These fast food headset radios are not only used for taking the > customer orders. They are also used by the employees for just talking > between each other. And sometimes they make 'interesting' comments about > the customers, or on really slow nights I have heard some very risque > discussions about the party someone was at the night before, etc. > It's just one more facet of radio voyeurism that some people can't > seem to ignore. I was in the drive thru of a Micky-D's quite a while back, and overheard one o f the gals make a rude comment about the guy in front of me. When I got to the w indow, I leaned over and told her, "You're right". She said, "Im sorry, right about w hat?" "You're right about that guy being an a$$hole, how rude!" I replied. She turned as red as a rose, and just gasped. I showed her the radio and told her that I can hear them for at least 2 miles, whether it's to the drive thru or b etween headsets. She didn't believe me at first, so I turned up the radio and had her say somet hing. SCREECH! She heard her voice along with the feedback and nearly fainted. I never did hear those kinds of comments again. Was it something I said? The Mobile Interceptor.. (GRIN) Rob From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:32 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:31:24 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gq6dc$1ehu@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <4gn38v$l0m@antares.en.com> <3130821d.1401@adnc.com> >Anyone else have funny stories of monitoring fast food? Mount a PA speaker behind the front grille of your car. Then, wire the PA speker to the external speaker jack on the scanner. Punch up the drive-thru's frequency and get in line. People in front of you will freak out as they hear themselves...and the restaurant employee's voice coming from BEHIND them! When you get to the window, turn it up as you speak and there will be massive feedback! Turn it down as they talk and then back up again when you talk...they think there's something wrong with their headset and usually go get the manager! Good, cheap entertainment! -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:33 1996 From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wierd Noise on 160.785 Date: 22 Feb 1996 17:21:28 -0500 Message-ID: <4giq98$g6c@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gfkmu$o91@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Its probably just a trunked frequency. Anyone interested in selling a decoder? From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:35 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) Subject: Re: WiNRADiO - A scanner on a PC card Message-ID: References: <824634284snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 21:46:30 GMT Richard Mclachlan (Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk) wrote: : WiNRADiO - A SW receiver/scanner on a PC card : There is now a demon program of the front panel controls : and operation of the new WiNRADiO available for download : on the Lowe Electronics web site. : The URL is http://www.lowe.co.uk/ : Just follow the WiNRADiO link. Following that link takes me to an info page on Demon. : Richard : -- -- feustel@netcom.com Dave Feustel N9MYI For PGP Public Key, finger feustel@netcom.com Fort Wayne, IN Or else access http://www.mixi.net/~feustel/ 219-483-1857 From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:37 1996 From: jmatk@tscm.com (James M. Atkinson, Communications Engineer) Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave,misc.legal.computing,comp.security.unix Subject: Wiretapping and Telephone Bugging Web Page tscm.com Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 15:33:31 -0500 Message-ID: Reply-To: jmatk@tscm.com Keywords: Counterintelligence Debugging Surveillance Counter-Terrorism Finally the tools and test equipment page is finished, and we have updated our frequency tables/lists. Check out our updated tool and TSCM test equipment list. http://www.tscm.com/ http://www.tscm.com/tmde.html <--- TSCM Test Equipment http://www.tscm.com/tools.html <--- TSCM Hand Tools http://www.tscm.com/stu.html <--- Secure Telephones and Scramblers Upcoming Topics to watch for in March... Any interest?? Wired Microphones and Pinhole devices... tons of pictures The Computer Audio/Video Threat... tons of pictures Join us for a real world TSCM sweep... Feel free to suggest topics... =============================================================== James M. Atkinson "...Shaken, not Stirred..." TSCM.COM 127 Eastern Avenue #291 Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 URL: http://www.tscm.com/ E-Mail: jmatk@tscm.com =============================================================== The First, The Largest, The Most Popular, and the Most Complete TSCM Counterintelligence Site on the Internet =============================================================== From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:38 1996 From: rbarnett@traveller.com (Robert Barnett) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wiring Diagram Vertex FTH-7008 Date: 25 Feb 1996 20:11:24 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4gqfpc$gbe@tsunami.traveller.com> I have a Yaesu/Vertex FTH-7008 UHF handheld. I am in need of the wiring diagram to connect the radio to the Serial port for programming. Please forward a pinout or diagram to me... Thanks, Rob rbarnett@traveller.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:39 1996 From: QRP%mimi@magic.itg.ti.com (D W Hemphill KC5NG) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: Two scanners with 800 MHz, cellular coverage not needed Date: 22 Feb 1996 13:54:23 GMT Message-ID: <4ghsif$dpa@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> My local police and fire departments are getting ready to switch from high VHF and UHF to 800 MHz, and I don't have a scanner that will receive 800 MHz. Serious bummer! I don't need anything fancy, and I don't want to spend lots of money. I couldn't care less if the cellular bands are un-blocked, as I have no desire to eaves-drop on peoples' private conversations. I'd like to find one handheld and one desk top scanners which cover the following bands: 29 - 54, 108 - 136, 136 - 174, 406 - 512, 800 - 900 The handheld must accept NiCd batteries. The desk top must run on 115 VAC and 13.8 VDC. Anything I buy will be in nice condition, with no modifications, and with manual (and preferably with the original boxes, packing, etc). Whatcha got that I can use? Please e-mail or phone me. Thanks! Dean Hemphill, KC5NG Lake Dallas, Texas (817) 497-5365 QRP%mimi@magic.itg.ti.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:40 1996 From: Danny Banister Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: AR8000 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:37:22 -0600 Message-ID: <312DED42.6440@msg.ti.com> Anyone have suggestions on the best place to purchase an AR8000? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Danny Banister |WK email: banister@ti.com | | Texas Instruments Incorporated |HM email: banister@flash.net | | 13353 Floyd Road , MS 345 |WK phone: 214-995-1171 | | Dallas, Texas 75265 | |"Statements made here are my personal opinions; I do NOT speak for TI"| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:41 1996 From: shawn Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WTB: AR8000 Date: 25 Feb 1996 18:30:47 GMT Message-ID: <4gq9sn$5iq@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> References: <312DED42.6440@msg.ti.com> To: ddb1@msg.ti.com I just purchased an AR8000 from Javiation. I could not be more pleased. They performed the crystal replacement mod for me before they shipped the radio ($15 and money well spent.) Also, the UK version is not blocked in the cellular range. If you live in the US, just ask for the US bandplan and everything is great! -- Sincerely Shawn Raper shawn@intellex.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:42 1996 From: Holger Stetefeld Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: Serial Interface for Kenwood Transceiver TS-790 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:46:47 -0800 Message-ID: <312B76A7.2321@eleceng.uct.ac.za> Hello, I am looking for a Serial Interface to connect the Kenwood Transceiver TS-790 to the RS-232 Interface of a PC. Kennwood itself offers the IF-232C Interface for about 170 US$, but that is too much for my budget. That's why I am looking for a kit to built it by myself or a used one. If you know a company which is able to deliver such a kit please mail me the Fax.-Nr. or E-mail address. Thanks, Holger From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:42 1996 From: srcemag@gate.net (Richard Green) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB:Desktop scanner Date: 23 Feb 1996 13:56:53 GMT Message-ID: <4gkh35$qqm@news.gate.net> I need a model like an ICOM R100 with a a full scann from KHZ range through 400 range From lwbyppp@epix.net Tue Feb 27 20:17:43 1996 From: Mike Fink Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB:UHF milair antenna for handheld Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:11:54 -0800 Message-ID: <312BDEFA.51A7@shadow.net> Can anyone recommend a good antenna 225-400Mhz to use on a handheld to listen to Milair? Thanks Mike From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:18 1996 From: Brian.Petersen@604.sasbbs.com (Brian Petersen) Date: 22 Feb 96 14:23:02 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: L.a. county flood control Message-ID: <238_9602231409@sasbbs.com> With all of the recent heavy rain in the Los Angeles area, I was wondering if anyone out there has the frequencies for the L.A. County flood control? I'm also interested (mainly) in the freqs that local dams, reservoirs, and spillways might use, if any ... Any info would be appreciated. brian.petersen@604.sasbbs.com ... 640k is 4480k in dog bytes. -- |Fidonet: Brian Petersen 1:103/604 |Internet: Brian.Petersen@604.sasbbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:19 1996 From: static@winternet.com (Bradley) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Minneapolis, MN Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 04:32:26 -0600 Message-ID: Anybody know of any scanner related BBSs in Minneapolis? Anyone have some neat frequencies? Does anyone know who 481.7000 is? It sounds like the police, but it's not in Police Call... E-Mail me. (or post) Bradley From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:20 1996 From: DaveS Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Poor reception on Pro-34 in 30-50 range Date: 23 Feb 1996 04:57:17 GMT Message-ID: <4gjhfd$m7j@over.mhv.net> My Pro 34 has poor reception in the low freq ranges. It did this when new and they repaired the solder connection on the antenna. However, the solder connection looks fine. Does anybody have any ideas? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:21 1996 From: foxtow@aol.com (FOX TOW) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: New Pro-51/ Why you are so happy? pl. explain Date: 23 Feb 1996 14:19:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4gl40a$8cc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Hey what is mod for the Pro-51. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:21 1996 From: foxtow@aol.com (FOX TOW) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: HELP Date: 23 Feb 1996 14:22:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4gl46g$8ds@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Any mods for the Pro-2038 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:22 1996 From: Mike Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Trunked Sys. - Where is control channel? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:37:05 -0500 Message-ID: <312E2571.88A@boulder.vni.com> References: Arnie B. wrote: > > How does someone identify a control channel in a trunked system? At least for cellphone systems they do not stay in one place, but switch between several frequencies every so often to distribute the wear and tear on the transmitter (that is what I have heard). You can always tell the control channel by the digital roaring sound you hear. Most annoying. It sounds like a loud diesel engine. Mike -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:23 1996 From: bds2@psu.edu (Brett Saylor) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-2035 w/OS535 vs. Pro-2042 w/OS535 - any differences ? Date: 23 Feb 1996 16:56:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gkrkk$dgu@hearst.cac.psu.edu> I'd like to put together a computer-controlled scanning system. My local RatShack has the Pro-2035 on clearance for $389 (vs. list $449 in last year's catalog). If my ultimate goal is to have an Optoscan 535 in the radio anyway, is there any reason to buy the Pro-2042 for $429-$499 (depending on source) rather than a 2035 for $389? I know about the differences in firmware between the two (better channel mgmt. and freq. duplication checking on the 2042), but my impression is that the computer control software will far exceed the capabilities of the 2042 anyway. Any impressions or suggestions would be most appreciated! Brett Saylor bsaylor@psu.edu PS: While the local store has 1 or 2 2035's in stock, none of the area stores have *any* 2042's. Are they that hard-to-get?? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: PROGRAMMING CELL PHONES Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4frn8h$ktp@tin.monsanto.com> <4g67ov$580@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> <312D35A2.7409@why.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 18:27:25 GMT Bernie Pineda (bpineda@why.net) writes: > So...why don't they design the phone to call another without needing to go > through the network. Therefore bypassing any toll charges.I'll tell you > why because it is a scam. By forcing you into the network they are able to > charge you. Also cloning a phone if you use the trunking system analogy > means that you can have many means of accessing the service that you > paid for! Good luck on your crusade. Calling another cell phone without the network would be a little hard. You'd have to be only a couple of miles apart otherwise you won't get a thing. So you'd be better off buying a CB to talk to your friend. How about stringing up wire between you neighbors house and you so you can call on regular phones without the network. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:25 1996 From: sfs@gnn.com (Salty) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in you Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 18:52:25 Message-ID: <4glnn5$jg9@news-e2c.gnn.com> References: <4gf1l6$1l3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gk3i5$dc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article <4gk3i5$dc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark L9 wrote: >This is not a problem if you have a valid amateur radio license! Is this true in all the States? Does it have to be an amateur radio or does it matter if its only a scanner and you have a valid amateur license in your possesion? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:26 1996 From: jmccarty@spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: antenna length @ 161MHz ? Date: 23 Feb 1996 20:08:04 GMT Message-ID: <4gl6r4$5ka@sun001.spd.dsccc.com> References: <4fpoef$loq@cello.gina.calstate.edu> <4gb7mj$4bk@cello.gina.calstate.edu> In article <4gb7mj$4bk@cello.gina.calstate.edu>, Steven C Passmore wrote: )Thanks to all who replied to my post on antenna length. For now I hace )cut it at 17.44" and if i find the need to cut it to 16.5 I can. ) )Anyone have formulas for 1/2 and full wave? ) ) )Thanks Again, ) Steve Passmore ) spassmo@cello.gina.calstate.edu The speed of electromagnetic wave propagation in free space is almost exactly 3x10^8 meters/second. Since frequency x wavelength = propagation speed, all you need to do is divide. (161 x 10^6)/second x (wavelength) = (3 x 10^8) meters/second so wavelength = 1.86 meters = 6.11 feet = 6'1.4" wavelength/2 = 0.932 meters = 3.06 feet = 3'0.7" wavelength/4 = 0.466 meters = 1.53 feet = 1'6.3" or 18.3" The speed of propagation in the -wire- is somewhat lower, so you might want to cut about 10%-20% longer, and then trim. Mike ---- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} I don't speak for DSC. <- They make me say that. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:27 1996 From: khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: VHF Marine RDF/ADF Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 20:30:24 PST Message-ID: <4gm4gc$3f1@blues.axionet.com> I am looking for a Marine VHF radio direction finder. Regency (now Uniden) and Apelco (a marine electronics outfit) used to make them, but no longer. Can anyone suggest/recommend a manufacturer/make/model? Alternatively, does anyone have one they wish to sell? Regards, KH From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:28 1996 From: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 23 Feb 1996 21:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4glsat$g99@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> Reply-To: ukfan1a@aol.com (Ukfan1a) What do you mean, you couldn't listen to the entire call? I do it all the time. Its just a matter of keeping track of what frequencies are used by towers, and at what time. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:29 1996 From: vmmcgarr@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu (Vince) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-2026--Can it be modified? Date: 23 Feb 1996 22:08:08 GMT Message-ID: <4glds8$5rt@norm.uoknor.edu> Hi, I am thinking about buying a new one of these at Radio Shack for $149.99. Can it be modified for the cellular band? Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:29 1996 From: hals@blarg.net (Hal Sullivan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Seattle North Tac Freq? Date: 23 Feb 1996 22:36:15 GMT Message-ID: <4glfgv$43e@guysmiley.blarg.net> Does anyone know what the frequency is of the Seattle Police Dept North Tac channel? Thanks, Hal From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:30 1996 From: Marcus_G@mediasoft.net (Gabe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Message-ID: References: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> <312d4075.1913227@news.onramp.net> Date: 23 Feb 96 22:57:01 GMT In article <312d4075.1913227@news.onramp.net>, larry daniel, larry daniel wrot e: I turn on the intercom, and put near TV and > started scanning, I picked up the TV sound. so it isn't safe from > scanners. But do you know you didn't pick up the TV sound from the TV itself? I was trying to scan all of my portable phones (not at once) and I picked up the sound from the TV. I turned off the phone and changed the TV channel and the sound I picked up changed as well. It appeared that I was getting the sound from the TV somehow. I thought it was interesting. I have an AT&T 900 mhz phone and I couldn't pick it up and I scanned through the entire band twice. Oh well. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:31 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Beware of AP in Canada Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gkoiv$m8h@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 23:13:46 GMT Frank Allen (genealle@ix.netcom.com) writes: > Guy named AP in Labrador City, Newfoundland Canada advertises in back > of PopComm, says scanner mods for $7 each. Sent him $7 for BC-890 and > got a photocopy of freqs that receive images of cell freqs. SOME MOD!!! > BE WARNED > NEVER, EVER send money to anyone just for a mod. Mods can very easily be found on all kinds of web pages and such. It's like the cable descrambler scam. Sure you can build a descrambler for $10, but it's of no use now, maybe back in the 70's or something. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:32 1996 From: srcemag@gate.net (Richard Green) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Looking for USED ICOM R100 *see note Date: 23 Feb 1996 23:39:55 GMT Message-ID: <4glj8b$qig@news.gate.net> Looking for a USED ICOM R100 ( cellular IS NOT REQUIRED ) What should I expect to pay? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:33 1996 From: Bob@vntg-mustang.com (Bob Moore) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How do I build an RS-232 to CI-V level converter? Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 00:26:42 -0800 Message-ID: References: <31238D82.2497@gtri.gatech.edu> I think you want to get a hold of chris smolinski- if you have www access, just search on his name! if not, get back to me and I can send you the path, or maybe even the schematic- haven't tried, as I have a ct-17 . . . -bob In article <31238D82.2497@gtri.gatech.edu>, Glenn Champion wrote: > Subject says it all - anyone seen schematics? I checked OAK and a few > other archives with no success. > > thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:34 1996 From: Bob@vntg-mustang.com (Bob Moore) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: WTB: "Guide to the AOR 1000" by Howard Bornstein Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 00:39:27 -0800 Message-ID: Does anyone know where I can get a copy (even a photocopy maybe ;-)? of this book? If Howard is around here- I'd preffer to buy it from him- I'm not trying to avoid the copyright laws! Tucker's used to carry this book that covers both the AR-1000 and the AR-2800 and I guess I made a mistake in not ordering it when it was available from them. (Selling price _was_ 14.95). Thanks, Bob From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:34 1996 From: brer_fox@ix.netcom.com (Brer Fox) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Disneyland and WDW Frequency Lists - disney.exe (0/1) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 01:56:34 GMT Message-ID: <312e6ff0.126756@199.35.181.8> Reply-To: brer_fox@ix.netcom.com I've put together a more organized listing of frequencies for Walt Disney World & Disneyland. If anyone has any information to add, if some parts are outdated, or your having problems downloading the file please email me at "brer_fox@ix.netcom.com". The following file is a self extracting archive. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:35 1996 From: snyders2@pilot.msu.edu (SS) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Favorite Scans Date: Sat, 24 Feb 96 02:24:48 GMT Message-ID: <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu> I would like some opinions on what people like to scan. Forget the every popular cellular and cordless stuff. What else to people scan? Any great frequencies? I just got my first scanner and would like to learn how and what you "experts" listen to. Mine is a Pro-43. I would also like opinions on the most efficient way to deal with banks? How do YOU have your's arranged? Thanks!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:36 1996 From: MIKEKC5GJN@AOL.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: NOT SATISFIED with RADIO SHACK SPEAK OUT! Date: 24 Feb 1996 03:26:23 GMT Message-ID: <4gm0gv$lip@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: <4ejek7$m8s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4eo4o4$3i7@nitrogen.mankato.msus.edu> <4fnp6i$p5p@i-2000.com> <4frl7u$6ht@alterdial.UU.NET> <3122300D.734A@sdrc.com> <4fu55o$5s6@mozo.cc.purdue.edu> <4g4vub$f9d@news-e1a.megaweb.com> JD I apologize I hit the wrong button when I sent that piece of flame about Radio Shack. I meant to post it to the news group. It was not meant to go to you personally. I try not to send anyone out of the store with anything they dont need. When it comes to people that come in the store needing electronic parts, I let them get what they need. If they ask me where a part is I try to know enough to be able to go get it for them and save them time. But when someone comes in and ask me if they can use this part with this value and that part with that value and make it do this? I say, I'm not the technician, I'm A salesman. I can sell you the parts you need to build somthing but that doesnt mean I can can tell you how to build it. Anyway if you would care to forward that piece to the newsgroup I would appriciate it. As far as your computer goes Radio Shack doesnt take trade ins 73 JD Mike KC5GJN From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:37 1996 From: Rick McGaver Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: crystals Date: 24 Feb 1996 05:48:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gm8qj$epv@daily-planet.execpc.com> References: <4ggmsl$sq0@news-e2a.gnn.com> <4giel7$n80@venger.snds.com> Try ICM out of Shawnee Mission KS. JAN XTALS are Guaranteed for X amount of months.. I have used ICM's and they have gone bad and they have replaced them free of charge. I believe they advertise a lifetime warranty. Xtals do go bad! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:38 1996 From: cheidorn@iac.net (Cliff Heidorn) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 200XLT Modification Date: 24 Feb 1996 06:11:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gma5n$e4e@cheyenne.iac.net> I have the mod for the 200xlt where the resistor is removed, but it will not have any effect. A friend did his and his mods told him to power it up after with a series of keypad entries to reset it? Any ideas?? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:39 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gdtjk$78q@guava.epix.net> <2177cc$22d27.3cd@vertigo> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 06:36:11 GMT Gabe (Marcus_G@mediasoft.net) writes: > In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA > (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: > >> Buddy Trader (bvtrader@cy.com) writes: >> > >> > Set the lower limit on your 2006 to 868.95 Mhz and the upper limit to >> > 895.98 and search between these freqs. > > My scanner won't pick up these freqs but I have heard stuff that sounds > like phone conversations on freqs >896.1125 Do some cell phones xmit out > of the 'accepted' range of cell phones? No. Your scanner is picking up the Image frequencies. -- ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º cv282@freeNET.carleton.CA º º purdon@ott.ve2sux.ampr.org º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:40 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: greg@core.rose.hp.com (Greg Dolkas) Subject: Icom R-7000 repair help! Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 07:49:59 GMT Subject: Icom R-7000 repair help! Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc Summary: Keywords: I have an Icom R-7000 receiver which has freaked out. Turn it on, and the display goes nuts. It has a mind of its own, blinking and switching bands and modes. Quite a sight to see, but not very functional. My first thougth was that my recent replacement of the memory backup battery broke something, but I seem to recall that the DC-DC board had some sort of design problem with an underrated capacitor. I can't find a reference to the exact fix in my files; does anyone have a copy of the relevant info? Thanks! Greg KO6TH From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:41 1996 From: iain@morfis.u-net.com (Iain L. Taylor) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:20:57 GMT Message-ID: <4gmsak$1fq@nuntius.u-net.net> References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mike Baranowski wrote: >In article <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark 7996, mark7996@aol.com >writes: >>ACARS, What's the best setup ? >Yes, ACARS is new... I heard that some new equipment is currently being >developed, so you might want to wait a little bit longer. Not really that new, Mike, soon celebrates it's 20th. birthday. See my web site for some ACARS info http://www.u-net.com/~morfis/preacars.htm is an index to the site. >-Mike Baranowski > mhb@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:42 1996 From: trekker1@usa.pipeline.com(Chris Halladay) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ:SF Bay Area Freqs Date: 24 Feb 1996 12:10:45 GMT Message-ID: <4gmv85$gkg@news1.usa.pipeline.com> I have a request. I would like to receive the frequencies for the following agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area: 1)Oakland Police 2)Oakland Fire 3)San Jose Police 4)San Jose Fire 5)Milpitas Police 6)Milpitas Fire I would also like to receive the 9,10, & 11 codes used by each agency. I would prefer to have this information emailed to me. With thanks, Chris Halladay (trekker1@usa.pipeline.com) Castro Valley,CA From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:43 1996 From: MIKEKC5GJN@AOL.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 24 Feb 1996 12:41:47 GMT Message-ID: <4gn12b$b5m@news.cis.okstate.edu> Did you try checking to see if Radio Shack can order it? They also have a list of mfgs. 800 #s to put you in touch with the mfg. 73 Mike KC5GJN From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:44 1996 From: grumpy@en.com (Seymour Dupa) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 24 Feb 1996 13:19:27 GMT Message-ID: <4gn38v$l0m@antares.en.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> Phil Owen (powen@edgewater.com) wrote: : Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? Is this For the same reason mountain climbers climb mountains - because they are there. -- *************************************************** You only get one chance on this merry-go-round, ** but if you do it right, once is enough. ** *************************************************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:45 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com (John Wierzbicki) Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 14:01:24 GMT Message-ID: In article <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com>, froggie@intac.com (Frank Geluso) write s: |> jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com (John Wierzbicki) wrote: |> |> >In article <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) wr ites: |> >|> What is the big deal about listening to cellular? You won't be able to |> >|> hear complete calls and it's totally by chance what you'll hear anyway! |> >|> You can't possible get a scanner that you can program all the possible |> >|> cellular frequencies in, anyway, and the damn thing would never be able to |> >|> scan them! |> |> >Sure enough, AOL. |> |> Damn Scanners!!! Hey.. I got an idea. How about if they had a feature |> which let you search through a specified range of frequencies!!!! |> Isn't a model like that coming out sometime around May? *********************************************************** * If you stare at a can of frozen orange juice because * * the label says "concentrate", you might be a redneck. * * --Jeff Foxworthy-- * * * * John L. Wierzbicki Senior Engineer * * jwierzbicki@melpar.esys.com Centerville, Va. * *********************************************************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:46 1996 From: mtiernan@bbn.com (Michael C. Tiernan) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WiNRADiO - A scanner on a PC card Date: 24 Feb 1996 14:48:10 GMT Message-ID: <4gn8fa$3nl@info-server.bbn.com> References: <824634284snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> David Feustel wrote: > Richard Mclachlan (Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk) wrote: > : WiNRADiO - A SW receiver/scanner on a PC card > : There is now a [demo] program of the front panel controls > [...] > Following that link takes me to an info page on Demon. Yea, I told them this and they can't reproduce it. They've got a space in the URL and they say that they can't find it. :) I just did it again too. :) -- << MCT >> HARK-Support@bbn.com Michael C Tiernan BBN HARK Systems Corporation Customer Support Engineering 70 Fawcett Street MS: 14/1A Phone: +1 (617) 873-4242 Cambridge MA 02138 USA From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:47 1996 From: rwt2@ix.netcom.com (Roger W. Taylor Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Best sub $200 handheld scanner? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 02:00:41 GMT Message-ID: <312fc257.3521131@nntp.ix.netcom.com> References: <00001ff6+0000477d@msn.com> <3127F9CB.4C30@tiac.net> <312d5bff.17544154@news.icanect.net> I purchased my Pro-51 yesterday on sale for $199. I also own a Pro-49 and and AC2500 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:48 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ron.roth@ghbbs.com (RON ROTH) Subject: _Pro-26 Mods/Specs_ Message-ID: <8BB6503.0AA30016CE.uuout@ghbbs.com> Reply-To: ron.roth@ghbbs.com (RON ROTH) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 02:23:00 GMT For those who sent for 800 MHz and back-light mods, and whose mail I received before the 21st of Feb, I have sent out a second package with an additional mod that extends the battery life another 2-3 hours. For those whose mail I received after the 21st, the package will automatically include all four mods. I found that when using rechargeable batteries with the Pro-26, the warning beep and BATT Lo indicator appear when the voltage drops to about 4.75V, and at 4.55V the scanner cuts out prematurely, even though there is lots of battery power left. By removing R515 on the logic board, one will not get that annoying beep any longer (neither will the BATT Lo indicator appear), and the scanner will continue to operate for an additional 2-3 hours before cutting out. As the Pro-26 approaches about 4V, its sensitivity and voice clarity starts to decline, at which time one can recharge the unit, or continue to listen at lower volume levels until the scanner cuts out. If someone *does* prefer the warning beep and BATT Lo indicator, but likes the extra hours of listening, then replacing R515 with a higher value of around 27k Ohms will still prevent the scanner from cutting out prematurely, while the beep and BATT LO indicator kick in later at a lower voltage level of around 4.3 Volts. Since there are surface-mount components involved, this procedure though requires better than casual soldering skills. How fast the batteries discharge depends of course on the listening volume, whether the back-light is being used, and on the frequencies programmed in. Here is a list of (approximate) squelched current levels at 5V for various (approximate) frequency ranges: 0 MHz ............. 80mA 311-375 MHz ....... 108-110mA 25-29 MHz ............. 85mA 376-399 MHz ....... 113-114mA 29-107 MHz .......... 78-80mA 400-511 MHz ........... 107mA 108-136 MHz .......... 83-84mA 512-805 MHz ......... 80-81mA 137-224 MHz .......... 77-79mA 806-900 MHz ........... 104mA 225-249 MHz ............. 82mA 900-1011 MHz ....... 102-104mA 250-310 MHz ............. 86mA 1012-1300 MHz ....... 104-107mA * Ron Roth --- þ RoseReader 2.10á P003228 Entered at [GHBBS] From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:49 1996 From: jimack@execpc.com (James Acker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: $200-300 base Date: 25 Feb 1996 02:56:54 GMT Message-ID: <4goj5m$au9@daily-planet.execpc.com> Pro 2036 are now clearing out at $198.00,are they worth it? Thanks,Jim From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:50 1996 From: Ed Walsh Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:37:01 -0800 Message-ID: <3130821D.1401@adnc.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <4gn38v$l0m@antares.en.com> > Why would anyone want to monitor fast food joint frequencies? I enjoy monitoirng the freq's mainly because of the conversations between the employees. They will often talk about their dates, what customers look like and such. About a year ago I went to a McD's that had a double drive-thru window. I paid at the first window and then heard the girl say "Jenny, watch out, the guy in the Taurus is in a really bad mood". So, when I got to the pick-up window I really turned on the charm and was in a GREAT mood. I drove off and heard Jenny tell the other that I was great to her and that she must have caused my bad mood towards her. Anyone else have funny stories of monitoring fast food? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:52 1996 From: "Sean P. Watts" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Favorite Scans Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 10:18:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu> On Sat, 24 Feb 1996, SS wrote: > I would like some opinions on what people like to scan. Forget the every > popular cellular and cordless stuff. What else to people scan? Any great > frequencies? I just got my first scanner and would like to learn how and wh at > you "experts" listen to. Mine is a Pro-43. I would also like opinions on th e > most efficient way to deal with banks? How do YOU have your's arranged? > > Thanks!!! > > I myself always tune in to the airport, police, fire, and medical. I sometimes tune in the local traffic reports and tv stations. My scanner has 100 channels split into 10 channel blocks, so I usually keep the police in one block, fire in another, and so on. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:52 1996 From: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC3000xlt cellular question Date: 25 Feb 1996 10:47:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4gq09u$roi@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: tristtom@aol.com (TristTom) I understand the BC3000xlt can receive cellular fine via the image frequencies. My question is-can it receive the entire cell band? or just part of it? thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:54 1996 From: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: CB is CB (was: No Code = No Brain = CB) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 13:14:04 -0500 Message-ID: While there are countless obnoxious idiots playing with CB, it may be here to stay. It has it's purpose, as well as many limitations. I have one and use it "on the road" on long trips. It can be entertaining and helpful. It can also be frustrating when lots of "wanna-be's" are all trying to do what they think is fun, important, or just act like a--holes. Truckers can provide helpful info, and there are a few jerks among them too. It's like walking down a street - you meet all types. There are a few CB'rs who do have a life, and don't devote it to the CB, like me. I probably turn mine on 2-3 times a year on the open highway. When I was 12, I wanted to play with it all the time. In comparison, there are some "scanner nuts" who might sit for 4-5 hours at a time listening to the scanner. They might know how many traffic citations were issued in an afternoon, but fail to realize that things are happening in the real world, country, state, etc. (Or even in their own home.) Licensed radio operators also come in different types. Some have elite attitudes: they think that because they "got their ticket", they are better than CB'ers. Some realize that there are a few real humans who might be on a CB for road informaton, and some of them are Ham operators - some are not. I think more time ought to be spent on positive things and helping others and sharing information than knocking the underdog. I'm just tired of seeing a topic knocking CB day after day after day. Maybe now, after I spewed all this garbage (forgive me), the topic that ought to be dead will die. That's just my 2 cents worth... And I will not end this with "73's"..... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:56 1996 From: Paul Bastian Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ACARS, What's the best setup ? Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 17:13:27 -0800 Message-ID: <31310937.11C1@sprynet.com> References: <4gce2j$ksk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gmsak$1fq@nuntius.u-net.net> <4gnjj3$20p@boris.eden.com> Robert Barker wrote: > > Will Message Tracker do ACARS? I tried it but the signal has to > be good? CQ Magazine has an ad for a Stand Alone unit that will pick up ACARS. AEA is the company and they have the AEA ACARS which comes with Demodulator & Software. Not price listed but should be much cheaper than the Universal M-400 unit. Paul From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:57 1996 From: Nick Edwards Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: 900MHZ Cordless Phones Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:22:28 GMT Message-ID: <4gq5sk$7es@news.htp.com> References: <312AE09E.DE9@mail.revealed.net> To: jm1986@mail.revealed.net Many cordless phones operate n the 902-928 MHz range whick is shared w/many lo w power devices & the 33 centimeter amateur radio band. A few of these phones, s uch as the Escort 9000, use advanced spread spectrum technology which makes monitorin g with a scanner impossible. Article from ScanFan Magazine 6th Edition p. 335 Hope this helps :) Scan on, Nick From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:58 1996 From: tuomi@kraiti.cc.lut.fi (Pasi Tuomi) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Comments needed: IC-R100 Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4gpvog$ofn@kraiti.cc.lut.fi> How does the IC-R100 perform ? How about aviation band and AM, is the sensitivity good enough ? How fast is the scanner ? Any other comments ? Thanks, Pasi, OH3NPS, OH5NPS From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:13:59 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Ham Crap Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:38:31 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> Is it just me, or are the rest of you also sick of seeing all this ham radio "Code vs No-Code" and "No-Code = No-Brain" garbage crossposted all over the scanner newsgroups? -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:00 1996 From: "Marie H. McDonough" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in your car illegal? Date: 25 Feb 1996 18:27:11 GMT Message-ID: <4gq9lv$138a@cedar.evansville.edu> References: <4gb99a$2a22@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> <4gdu3o$hme$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com> To my knowledge, it is illegal to have a portable scanner in Indiana unless you have a licence, i.e. ham licence. I don't see what one has to do with the other, but that is what I hear. Paul McDonough evansville, In From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:00 1996 From: KRVT94A@prodigy.com (Tony Raymond) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PL TONES/BEARCAT 760 Date: 25 Feb 1996 18:53:02 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gqb6e$1f0i@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> I would like to find a little information concerning different PL Tones for the same frequency. On my Bearcat 760 do I need to buy a PL board or will I hear transmissions on bith tones such as a frequency used by the Washington State Patrol in different parts of the State. HELP! - TONY RAYMOND KRVT94A@prodigy.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:01 1996 From: gustav@eramp.net (Lynn Gustafson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-43 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 20:45:31 GMT Message-ID: <4gqb01$ruq@news2.nkn.net> References: <9601212301261065@trinity.org> <4ebf0t$f02@news2.cts.com> <4edrut$nae@news2.cts.com> gdallal@world.std.com (Jerry Dallal) wrote: >Hey, I'm not looking for an argument. You wrote >"Then the PRO-43 was among >the first to appear with "RadioShack" instead of "Realistic". Those >carried an "A" in the serial number." I am not sure where you found that information but it is not true. I have a PRO-43 that has radio shack on it and it does not have an a in the serial number. You might have the serial number mixed up with the FCC ID number. the pro-43 that are modifiable are the ones with AA020-300 in the FCC ID the ones with AA020-300A are not modifable From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:03 1996 From: MIKEKC5GJN@AOL.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Ham Crap Date: 25 Feb 1996 21:27:55 GMT Message-ID: <4gqk8r$3bf@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> In article <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>, VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) wrote: >Path: news.cis.okstate.edu!news.ksu.ksu.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!math.ohio-state.e du!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com! in1.uu.net!prodigy.com!usenet >From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) >Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner >Subject: Ham Crap >Date: 25 Feb 1996 17:38:31 GMT >Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY >Lines: 6 >Distribution: world >Message-ID: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> >NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap2.news.prodigy.com >X-Newsreader: Version 1.2 >Status: N > >Is it just me, or are the rest of you also sick of seeing all this ham >radio "Code vs No-Code" and "No-Code = No-Brain" garbage crossposted all >over the scanner newsgroups? > >-Drew in Sunny Central Florida- > No I agree with you but these are the same kind of people you hear on 14.313. You get it everywhere you go. 73 Mike KC5GJN From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:04 1996 From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Favorite Scans Date: 25 Feb 1996 21:45:32 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gql9s$16q0@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu> As wierd as people may think, I like listening to the T.V "cue" broadcast, where you can hear the studio talking to the remotes and such. Also, the FBI and Secret Service is fun. If you do not live in a huge metropolitan area such as LA/Orange county, It most likely would be reeeaallly slow! As far as "channel management", I sort like items by banks. CHP in the first two banks, Orange County Sheriff/Police in another, Fire in one and so on. I leave bank #10 open for temporary stuff, like the police in a city I do not visit often. Or the repeater that carries the Space Shuttle while it is up and about. If your Pro-43 is able to be modified for cellular you should go for it! Lots of wild trash that is entertaining when all else fails!! ( Of course being illegal, I have not actually participated in that activity. Just heresay!!!) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:05 1996 From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Ham Crap Date: 25 Feb 1996 21:47:30 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gqldi$145s@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> All this talk about Ham has made me hungry! Think I'll grab a sandwich! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:05 1996 From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Problem for "experts" in scanning and shortwave! Date: 25 Feb 1996 21:53:46 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gqlpa$2d64@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4glsbf$g9u@newsbf02.news.aol.com> I did not read the previous notes, but do you have a cordless phone? Those are the base freq's that are commonly used. The handset uses another set of freq's. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:06 1996 From: BQFY79B@prodigy.com (Michael Risney) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: 25 Feb 1996 21:59:38 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gqm4a$2a04@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4geaba$2ta@uucp.intac.com> <4gj55n$u4@dfw.nkn.net> <4glh96$m6n@eugene.convex.com> SUBJECT: Re: WHY CELLULAR? I have said the same thing about people who watch "soap's" on TV!! At least the trash I hear on cellular (or should I say "have heard about ") is real life! Nothing like that late night phone call from a overdue husband trying to explain where he is!! Or as is done in The LA/Orange county areas [and many others]] the police often use cellular to talk about stuff they want to keep "private"!! I often hear both sides and if you scan up or down you can often follow callers from cell to cell. And last, when you pick up someone calling a 1-900 slut line, that saves 5 bucks a minute!!! Anyway why does anyone listen to anything?? It is just human nature to be curious!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:07 1996 From: wnewkirk@iu.net (Bill Newkirk) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 25 Feb 1996 22:21:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gqne0$p16@cc.iu.net> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <312E0831.3D5F@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: wnewkirk@iu.net (Bill Newkirk) In <312E0831.3D5F@ix.netcom.com>, Jim Daneke writes: >cmccane@onramp.net@onramp.net wrote: >> What kind of a BONEHEAD is so obsessed with HISTORY that they seek >> to make modern electronics professionals and hobbyists learn the >> trade of the old telegraph operators of the 1800's? In terms of ... >> C. McCane a bonehead who will be spending his time defending his designs and application s against previous patents and defending his patents against prior art claims. >Sounds like you're pretty impressed with yourself! Bill Newkirk WB9IVR The Space Coast Amateur Technical Group Melbourne, FL duty now for the future of amateur radio Lombardi's 1st Law of Business: Companies succeed in spite of their best effort. If they succeed at all. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:08 1996 From: rhymepayz@aol.com (Rhymepayz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Metal whip antenna from R.S. Date: 25 Feb 1996 22:39:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4gra0v$c08@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Hey ALL - For anyone searching for mods on thier scanners etc. look no further than the Oakland FTP site... oak.oakland.edu/pub/ham_radio/mods/ This place has several directories from which you can find mods for most any scanner/radio...remember that any scanner 'manufactured' after April 1994 is designed to not be easily modifiable if at all. Johnny From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:10 1996 From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radar Jammers Work? Date: 25 Feb 1996 22:50:11 GMT Message-ID: <4gqp33$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <4f5puj$1hd@dns1.mci.com> <4g2g44$so2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gcngb$3ug@news.vanderbilt.edu> Brian varine (varine@ece.orst.edu) wrote: : > > : > >However, transmitting on any RF frequency for which you are not authorize d : > >can certainly lead to FCC intervention..... and THAT would cost FAR mor e : > >than anything the police can cost you.... : Hmmm, you know I wonder how a device can be illegal if it meets FCC Regs? : It could be that most people (ie Cops) just assume they are illegal. I : haven't seen anything that would make a jammer illegal if it complied : with FCC power levels. Read the paragraph you quoted, that is one reason why it is illegal. Another is the statute regarding "intentional interference". Both are FCC regulations mandated by congress. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:11 1996 From: billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cheeky 4 Announcing a Big Cheek Date: 25 Feb 1996 23:00:44 GMT Message-ID: <4gqpms$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> References: <041302Z17021996@anon.penet.fi> an519923@anon.penet.fi wrote: : Here ye here ye. Watch this space for the really big big new and improved : Cheek. Including such items as: What's wrong - not enough guts to take responsibility for your own comments? Please people, let's not get another flame-fest going. I suspect that this person has lost (or will soon lose) his anonymous posting privileges. Bill Nelson From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:12 1996 From: necros@pacificnet.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: I need Bearcat200 mods Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 23:08:55 GMT Message-ID: <4gqtmm$d2k@zippy.cais.net> I need some modification info for my Bearcat 200. I already have cell phones and increased the scan rate. I've heard there is a mod to decrease battery consumption and to take out some of the other blocks. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you Gary Parks (KE6RTY) necros@pacificnet.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:13 1996 From: Greg Gilbert Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Timer Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 23:21:43 -0500 Message-ID: <31313557.26F7@ix.netcom.com> Hello All: I know this is a little out of the the subject area but; I am looking for a 7 day a week; 14 ON/OFF times; digital AC plug in timer. RS (Micronta CAT #63-889) was made a few years back. It is no longer made. I used it to time SWl/Scanner programs. Any ideas for an update would be appreciated. Thanks for your interest. BTU Greg From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:14 1996 From: vbook@vbook.com (Ed Mitchell) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave Subject: Free classified Ads at Ham Radio Online Date: 26 Feb 1996 04:33:49 GMT Message-ID: <4grd7d$htp@news.accessone.com> We've added free "classified" ads to our freeware Ham Radio Online international "magazine" web site. We also have original feature stories, international ham radio newsletters, broadcast/SWL info, REAL-TIME world-wide propagation resources including MUFs, aurora, geomagnetic field conditions and tons more stuff. The March stories will begin by the end of the coming weekend. Stop on by and check out the new Ham Radio Online Interactive section - where you can add your own messages and your own ads, DX announcements, VHF band openings or whatever. Please enjoy, 73, Ed, KF7VY ------------------------ personal email to vbook@vbook.com Visit Ham Radio Online, it's free, at http://www.accessone.com/~vbook/hronline.htm From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:16 1996 From: () Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 audio clipping/narrow I.F. mod Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 15:02:40 GMT Message-ID: <4gshvc$tk@pegasus.odyssee.net> References: <4g8ccc$427@mrnews.mro.dec.com> <4gr953$e8g@gail.ripco.com> Heikki Koivusaari wrote: >>I have designed a switching scheme that allows the user to select >>the stock 12KHz AM filter or the narrow SSB 4.0KHz while still in >>the AM mode. I have found this to make a BIG difference when trying >>to receive a weak shortwave station next to a very strong one. >>The only part required is a switch and some wire. >>My mod has no effect on the use of the DS8000 speech inversion accessory. >> >>Send me email if interested. >> >>Ken >>klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com > > Sure, i'd be intrested to see your design.... Also, what software are >you using with your AR8000? > here's my E-MAIL address. >arcturus@ripco.com >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX How is the <30Mhz monitoring? Do you use an external antenna? Thanks again NG nicolas@odyssee.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:17 1996 From: Tom@Tass.Com (Tom Allebrandi) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Frequencies on TV band wireless mics? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:04:21 GMT Message-ID: <3131d94f.1695369@news.niia.net> Hi! A number of wireless mics operate on frequencies in the TV audio range. Does anyone have a list of the frequencies that are actually used? In particular, I'm looking for 8-2 8-20 8-23 12-2 12-20 Thanks! --- Tom Tom Allebrandi Frontline Test Equipment | TA Software Systems | Valparaiso, IN USA tallebrandi@fte.com | tom@tass.com | +1-219-465-0108 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:18 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Which is better? Pro From: ron.roth@canrem.com (Ron Roth) Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.32088.5773.0N20C099@canrem.com> References: <4grgja$634@sulla.cyberstore.ca> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 96 20:17:00 -0500 G > writes: G > Since I originated this post, I feel the need to fill you all in. G > I actually went out and purchased a Pro26. It was AWFUL! G > Very sensitive to pager broadcasts. Very difficult to hear when G > driving in the car--even at maximum volume. I returned it. G > Then a kind soul put me onto Durham Radio in Ontario. A week G > later I had my replacement Pro43 and I am very happy with it... -- Maybe that particular Pro-26 was a lemon. When I got my first '26, it had some problems as well (new out of the box). Then I tried out the display model in the store and it was perfect, so I kept that one instead. Yes, the audio could be better, and although it personally doesn't bother me that much, I'm looking into improving it. Despite that, I like the Pro-26 _a lot_ for all its other great features, including its small size and weight, and especially with the mods done. Of all the BC and RS handheld scanners I've tried, I haven't found one yet that does exceptionally well with pagers or image rejection. The trade-off would invariably be either size, weight, cost, and/or reduced frequency coverage. * Ron Roth --- * RoseReader 2.10b P003228 Entered at [CRS] From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:19 1996 From: estabrooks@aol.com (Estabrooks) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro-43 Question Date: 26 Feb 1996 20:46:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4gtnqc$b8c@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: estabrooks@aol.com (Estabrooks) I have a Pro-43 with the # of FCC ID: AA020-300 and Serial # 067596. The manufacture date inside is 7A3. Is this unit modifiable? Also, I read a rumor in this conference that if I were to send my unit in for repair (under warranty), will RS replace my "board" with one that is NOT modifiable? Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:21 1996 From: raiar@inlink.com (Gary V. Deutschmann, Sr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Help on finding/creating custom? mobile antenna. Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 22:19:29 GMT Message-ID: <4gtb4g$lgi@news1.inlink.com> References: <4ga39g$a4m@crusher.ici.net> mnewton@ici.net (Mike) wrote: >I'm looking to add a multi-band scanner antenna (30Mhz - 900Mhz) to my car >(station wagon with LOTS of ground-plane area!!). >The thing I would like to accomplish is to keep it under 24" in length so I >don't destroy my new garage doors every time I pull the car in. I know this >may be a dumb reason to some of you, but the less painting I have to do, the >better :-) >I'm willing to try and experiment with making one or if you know of one that >already exists, great. >Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. (e-mail is appreciated too). >Mike Hi Mike I used to have an old UPS truck with the fiberglass top and built an antenna that tuned from about 20 MHz all the way up to about 1500 MHz, just guessing at the numbers, more likely a little less, let's say 30 MHz up to 1200 MHz to be on the safe side. The antenna was very very simple and included it's own ground plane, out of necessity to the fiberglass top of the truck, but assume it would work on a metal vehicle as well since the ground plane was to shield. The antenna consists primarily of two metal disks, the bottom disk is 32 inches in diameter and the top disk is 22-3/4 inches in diameter. The space between the bottom disk and top disk is exactly 5/8 inch. The coax is connected to the very center of each disk, center conductor to the top disk and shield to the bottom disk. I used 1/4 inch welded wire fabric for construction, however, solid aluminum or even wire to a loop frame would work as well. The two plates do not connect electrically, they are separated by insulators, either one in the center on rigid material or around the perimiter on flimsy material. I used nylon bolts with pieces of 3/8 diameter PVC tube for the insulators between the plates. This antenna cannot be used for transmission purposes as constructed, however a similar version using a 32 inch diameter by 32 inch high cone measured on the hypontenous as the bottom plate (now cone) will work fine on both 2 meters and 440 with an SWR under 1.8 - 1 Again, the cone can be constructed of welded wire fabric, solid aluminum or even wire to a formed ring. TTUL Gary From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:22 1996 From: DTBW93A@prodigy.com (Sherri Sharpe) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC170XLT MOD Date: 26 Feb 1996 23:39:03 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4gtgan$80u@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> I need information on modifying a BC170XLT to receive 800MHZ , particularly mobile phone ranges. - SLS DTBW93A@prodigy.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:23 1996 From: john@inquiziter.thegap.com (inquiziter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cordless Phones? Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:41:06 GMT Message-ID: <4gtjrq$t5s@errigle.gpl.net> References: <4em4jv$2f0@crl6.crl.com> <4fkv8c$fa@yrkpa.kias.com> <4g6vpc$vi@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> Reply-To: john@inquiziter.thegap.com craig todd gafah wrote: >There are different Cordless Phone Freq for different countries...... YES Craig your are 100% correct for instants here in the UK the base unit is on 1.2 - 1.8 mhz and the hand sets transmit on 49mhz ( legal versions ) Tandy ( UK's radio shack division ) had to modifi and is not allowed to sell certain cordless phone that would be ok under FCC rules because of the freq and/ or output power . before they got approvel the just re-badged some UK cordless phone But in the Republic of Ireland anything goes :-) if it works use it thats their rules ( GREAT) 1.2 mhz / 30mhz / 46mhz-50 mhz 70mhz (yes 70 not patching but phones) and 900 and scrambled panasonic and Sanyo make scrambled cordless god knows how many more freq's How, Who, Where, Why, What, When, but mostly Why NOT ? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: bn141@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michel Vasquez) Subject: Re: PRO-2026--Can it be modified? Message-ID: Reply-To: bn141@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michel Vasquez) References: <4glds8$5rt@norm.uoknor.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 05:42:33 GMT Vince (vmmcgarr@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu) writes: > Hi, > > I am thinking about buying a new one of these at Radio Shack for $149.99. C an > it be modified for the cellular band? > > Thanks! > Open unit, locate jumper wire L201, clip it, and voila, full 800MHz in 30k steps, but it also affects the 'pre-set' scan bands such as police and fire. Mike [former owner of PRO-2026 mobile] -- | EMail | technics@freenet.hut.fi s660334@aix2.uottawa.ca | WWW | http://www.marche.com/irc/x-zotic.htm [french] | Other | VoiceMailBox: (613) 245-0246, upon welcome, just dial 16433940# | Pager | (613) 751-1267 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:25 1996 From: frisbie@flying-disk.com (Alan Frisbie) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: LAFD WEBSITE...NEW URL & UPDATE Message-ID: <1996Feb27.085225.819@flying-disk.com> Date: 27 Feb 96 08:52:25 PST On 18-Feb-1996, Brian Humphry wrote: > LOS ANGELES CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT: > > http://www.ci.la.ca.us/dept/LAFD/index.html ^^^^ Please note that "LAFD" is CASE SENSITIVE. It simply will not work in lower case. It took me quite a while to figure this out. Brian, perhaps you could suggest to your webmaster that he/she either reconfigure your site to not be case sensitive, or to have two versions of the data. Also, there seems to be a problem when displaying the list of fire stations, at least when using Netcom's Netcruiser. Perhaps you could ask your webmaster to take a look at this. Thanks for being so open with information about the LAFD. I wish that your counterparts in the LAPD were like this. -- Alan E. Frisbie Frisbie@Flying-Disk.Com -- Flying Disk Systems, Inc. -- 4759 Round Top Drive (213) 256-2575 (voice) -- Los Angeles, CA 90065 (213) 258-3585 (FAX) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:26 1996 From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 27 Feb 1996 11:39:27 -0600 Message-ID: <4gvfkf$lii@eugene.convex.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> In keithr@primenet.com (Keith Rowland) writes : >First a TV antenna is horizontal, most scanners uses use vertical >polariation. Second, a TV feedline is 75 ohm, your scanner is 50 ohm. >Third, the lowest frequency your TV antenna is designed for is Channel 2, or >56 Mhz. Scanners themselves don't "use" any type of polarization. It is true that most of the transmissions in the VHF/UHF spectrum are vertically polarized but after you consider bounce/reflection of signals, the horizontal/vertical issue is not real important. Also, the 75/50 ohm issue is not important. Even for transmitting, the 75/50 ohm mismatch is acceptable at low power levels. >However, even with these differences, it still may work better than the >rubber duck antennna at ground level. It can't hurt to try. You'll probably >find different perfromance comparisons depending upon frequency. Agreed. David From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:27 1996 From: Bill Crocker Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap Subject: Re: FS: AR3000A Unblocked scanner Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 14:06:53 -0300 Message-ID: <31333A2D.48D9@mail.rust.net> References: <311BDC28.1B68@interaccess.com> <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> <19960226.79C2008.11C60@pennet.net> Jim Shaffer, Jr. wrote: > > In article <4gskmk$8k2@news.ctc.edu> dpearson@ctc.ctc.edu (Dennis L. Pearson ) writes: > > What does "unblocked" mean? > > In the U.S., it's illegal to listen to telephone conversations. In their > infinite wisdom, the government has decreed that it is also illegal to > sell scanners capable of receiving the cellular band. Don't ask me why > the conventional portable phone bands are still legal, but as far as I > know they are. Jim: Last time I read the law, it was still legal to own a Cellular capable scanner . You could also sell it. I belive the law only applied to importing additional Cellular capab le radios into the U.S. after the law was passed. When you think about it, maybe it's illegal to own a Cellular phone! :) Bill Crocker From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:28 1996 From: Joseph Cardani Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Icom R-7000 repair help! Date: 27 Feb 1996 14:20:03 GMT Message-ID: <4gv3uj$ija@mail.TJU.EDU> References: Greg, I would return the R-7000 to ICOm for expert repair. The 7000 is too nice to p lay around with! And as you probably know, the radio is difficult to replace. I own one along with a R-7100. The bad news is that ICOM repair takes abou t 1 month turn around time from the time they receive the unit in Washington State. Good Luck, Joe Cardani From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:29 1996 From: genealle@ix.netcom.com(?) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: crystals Date: 27 Feb 1996 14:29:43 GMT Message-ID: <4gv4gn$6jf@cloner4.netcom.com> References: <4ggmsl$sq0@news-e2a.gnn.com> <4giel7$n80@venger.snds.com> <4gm8qj$epv@daily-planet.execpc.com> In <4gm8qj$epv@daily-planet.execpc.com> Rick McGaver writes: > >Try ICM out of Shawnee Mission KS. JAN XTALS are Guaranteed for X amount >of months.. I have used ICM's and they have gone bad and they have >replaced them free of charge. I believe they advertise a lifetime >warranty. Xtals do go bad! > What's a crystal? :) From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:30 1996 From: tvine@teleport.com (PjB) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cheeky 4 Announcing a Big Cheek Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:42:08 -0800 Message-ID: References: <041302Z17021996@anon.penet.fi> <4gqpms$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> In article <4gqpms$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG>, billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) wrote: > an519923@anon.penet.fi wrote: > > : Here ye here ye. Watch this space for the really big big new and improved > : Cheek. Including such items as: > > What's wrong - not enough guts to take responsibility for your own comments? > > Please people, let's not get another flame-fest going. I suspect that this > person has lost (or will soon lose) his anonymous posting privileges. > > Bill Nelson Amen. Been nice and quiet lately.....lets hope it stays that way. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:31 1996 From: rickhz@primenet.com (Rick) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 27 Feb 1996 16:47:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4h055l$ble@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> Internationl Communications treaties still require the Morse code for any one wanting to operate in the HF bands 160-10 meters. There are plenty of U.S hams that have petitioned the FCC to drop the code requirement but the FCC has rejected all such proposals. Things have changed though at least there is no code requirement for the VHF and higher bands. I started as a No Code Tech but quickly upgraded so I could operate on the HF bands. Rick Horwitz, AB7FH From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:32 1996 From: salavi@nando.net (salavi) Newsgroups: misc.forsale.non-computer,alt.forsale,comp.forsale,misc.forsale,va.forsale,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,triangle.radio,rec.radio.cb,rec.autos.marketplace,rec.autos.misc,alt.autos,milw.forsale.autos,nj.market.autos,nc.charlotte.forsale,dc.forsale.misc,dc.forsale,atl.forsale Subject: Re: +++ Bearcat BCT-2 Scanner/Detector for sale +++ Date: 27 Feb 1996 16:47:04 -0500 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4gvu4o$ehp@parsifal.nando.net> I have a Bearcat BCT-2 Multi band Scanner (that I have hardly used) for sale. It's a pretty neat device in that not only you can just punch in the state that you are in (and it picks up Police, Highway Patrol, DOT, weather, etc.) It also alerts you to the presence of radio waves in the vicinity (has a large red light and beeps). That way it offers protection from Vascar, airplanes, etc). It retails for $250+ and mine looks brand new. Includes cigarett lighter plug, mounting brakets, car radio antenna splitter/and wire antenna (that attaches to your windshield with small suction cups). $$ Best Offer. >>> Please include this message for reference <<< ====== S. Alavi [salavi@nando.net] (919)467-7909 (H) ======== From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:33 1996 From: Fred Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 18:00:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <312E0831.3D5F@ix.netcom.com> > cmccane@onramp.net@onramp.net wrote: > > > > Listen to a new world technologist's attitude that's shared by most: > > > > I'm an electronics engineer, a member of the IEEE, and a computer > > network architect. I like radio and analog electronics as a hobby. > > I use the 2M band on a regular basis and that includes auto patch > > and repeater services. I do not have ANY KIND of FCC license although ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Make note of this statement!!!!!!!!!! > > I might get one if I have the time to waste. One thing is for > > sure: > > I WILL NEVER TAKE A TEST ON MORSE CODE!!!!!!!!!!! Much selfserving BS has been snipped out here to shorten things. > > > > Now, to change the subject a bit, I don't ever want to be called > > an "amatuer radio operator" - what a pathetic label. I got my > > general class professional ticket while I was in the Navy, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Now, what did that statement say a bit earlier in this tirade???? Then how the hell could he have a General Class Radio/Telephone Oerators ticket from his US Navy days if he has no kind of FCC license. This is starting to sound like a wimp that cannot even grasp the concept of any kind of personal effort. BTW--when I was in the Navy you got a Radio/Telegraph Operators license as was required by Maritime law for shipboad radio OPs. You hadda know morse to get that!!!!!!!!!!! Good thing I got a pair of hip boots to wear. It's getting pretty deep. > > C. McCane Fred Fred Peerenboom internet: peerenbf@dmapub.dma.org Amateur Radio: ke8tq@n8acv.#day.oh.usa.noam BTW-- We run a 19.2 Kb packet backbone network here linking a big chunk of the state of Ohio. What do you do for the hobby of personal, amateur, ham or what ever you wish to call it, radio?????????? Besides spout off about how great you are and how you enjoy breaking the FCC regs as to transmitter operations by unlicensed operators. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:34 1996 From: hornett@sentex.net (Dave Hornett) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro 43 reset? Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 19:41:31 GMT Message-ID: <4gvnd4$h2n@granite.sentex.net> My pro 43 is acting strange......ie....enter 142.410 at keypad and press enter and another freq is displayed (102.395 etc...) the freq entered is sometimes correct and sometimes comes up as garbage... is there any reset...memory clear function ?????? Help Dave From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:35 1996 From: Joseph Cardani Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Diego/Mercy Air/Airlife Date: 27 Feb 1996 22:13:52 GMT Message-ID: <4gvvn0$6bg@mail.TJU.EDU> References: <41d_9602221947@thekat.esnet.com> <4gojop$7fp@taurus.adnc.com> Why not call the Mercy Air business number, and ask the communications superv isor what frequency they use. I don't mean to be smart, but I got alot of my information by just a sking. Normally, the communications personnel know the frequencies that are used. Mos t times thay are glad to assist! Fire and Medical information is much easier to obtain than law enforcement. Joe Cardani From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:36 1996 From: sutr2way@ns.net (Steve Borzelleri) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS-Uniden scanner accessories Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:22:15 GMT Message-ID: <4h044d$pbv@falcon.ns.net> I have large quantities of new Uniden mobile power cords,brackets,cig. lighter plugs, rf adapters, & AC adapters. MAKE OFFER Steve Borzelleri Sutter Buttes 2-Way P.O. Box 3419. Yuba City, CA 95992 916.674.7532 Fax 916.674.1941 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:37 1996 From: "David J. Sampson" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:24:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3133D912.6D23@ix.netcom.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gq6ln$146k@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> If I split the feed for my TV system in my house between the TV antenna and the scanner antenna, will this work effectively? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:38 1996 From: Danny Banister Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WTB: AR8000 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:56:27 -0600 Message-ID: <3133FC9B.7C16@flash.net> References: <312DED42.6440@msg.ti.com> <4gq9sn$5iq@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <31310263.3108@connect.net> SWW wrote: > > > I just purchased an AR8000 from Javiation. I could not be more pleased. > > They performed the crystal replacement mod for me before they shipped > > the radio ($15 and money well spent.) Also, the UK version is not > > blocked in the cellular range. > >What was your total cost? > > Thanks What is the crystal replacement mod for the AR8000? Anyone know the details? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:38 1996 From: Danny Banister Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WTB: AR8000 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:58:56 -0600 Message-ID: <3133FD30.70CB@flash.net> References: <312DED42.6440@msg.ti.com> Danny Banister wrote: > > Anyone have suggestions on the best place to purchase an AR8000? > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Danny Banister |WK email: banister@ti.com | > | Texas Instruments Incorporated |HM email: banister@flash.net | > | 13353 Floyd Road , MS 345 |WK phone: 214-995-1171 | > | Dallas, Texas 75265 | > |"Statements made here are my personal opinions; I do NOT speak for TI"| > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Many people suggested Javiation. Can anyone give me the price you paid for radio plus shipping, customs duty, ...etc from Javiation to U.S.? Thanks, Danny From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:39 1996 From: macone@atc.ameritel.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:07:25 GMT Message-ID: <4h09om$a7@news1.radix.net> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> slick@primenet.com wrote: >I have a TV antenna that I don't use anyoore but it is still on top of >my house. Can I hook up my scanner to the antenna for better reception >espcially 29-54 mhz? Works fine.....I don't worry about the horizontal polarization (did you ever see a horizontally polarized TV transmitter tower?), secondly i used the existing cable, the 75 ohm mismatch doesn't hurt that much especially on recieve only applications...and oh yeah, I cheat with the TV pre-amp. ....Dan From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:40 1996 From: dwentz@basenet.net (Dale Wentz) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: help with pro 2037 Date: 28 Feb 1996 01:38:49 GMT Message-ID: <4h0bn9$1kp@news.accessus.net> I just purchased a Radio Shack Pro 2036 scanner. I believe this is is the same radio as a Bearcat BC 890XLT. I purchased the radio to monitor some of the local HAM repeaters in the area, but am having problems with some of the 220 Mhz frequencies. Once I get the radio in the 220 Mhz band it will only allow me to make steps of 12.5 or 25 Mhz. The 5 Mhz step is no longer available. Even if I Manually enter the frequency it will round it up to the closest 12.5 Mhz. Does anyone know of a MOD for this? I would also be interested in any other MODs for this scanner., or Information on where to connect a S Meter. Thanks for your help in advanced. dwentz@basenet.net KB9JJA From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:42 1996 From: MIKEKC5GJN@AOL.COM Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 28 Feb 1996 01:49:09 GMT Message-ID: <4h0cal$61f@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> In article <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu>, db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) wrote: >Path: news.cis.okstate.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!pirates!c ssun.mathcs.emory.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnu s.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!db477 >From: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) >Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner >Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers >Date: 27 Feb 1996 04:40:27 GMT >Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) >Lines: 25 >Message-ID: <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> >References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> >Reply-To: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) >NNTP-Posting-Host: eeyore.ins.cwru.edu >Status: N > > >I went to a Radio Shack the other day and noticed a new radio >I'd never seen or heard of before. I asked the clerk if it was >a scanner or a shortwave receiver, or what, and she SWORE it was >a scanner. I started asking questions about it, like, what's >the frequency range? How many channels? Etc. She didn't know >as usual. It turned out the radio was a shortwave general >coverage receiver. > >Radio Shack employees are stupid. I've never been in a Radio >Shack where anyone could help me with ANYTHING. They know what >TV's, VCR's and cellular phones are, but thet couldn't answer >anything about them. One guy tried to tell me that a cellular >phone could be used in your house as a portable cordless phone. > >"Hi welcome to Radio Shack, may I help you?" >"Yes, do you sell radios?" >"Uhhh, let me check, I'm not sure." >"Well, do you have anything electronic in this store?" >"I think so, ummmm, do you have a catalog number?" >"Do you know your butt from a brickwall?" >"Ummmm, I'm gonna let you talk to my manager, he could >probably help you with that." > >Cliff Cliff, Not everyone that works at radio shack knows about radio's or even give's a shit for that matter. It's not uncommon for a new product to come in the store and we dont know it's there till someone comes in and see's it and ask's about it. I personally like radio and related items so the HF reciever cought my before it ever hit the store. I know there are plenty of guys that work there that dont know much and thats probably because they havent been there very long. If they stay very long they usually learn something. If they knew enough to satisfy everyone on these news groups though they wouldnt be working for Radio Shack. Mike KC5GJN Lite'n up From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:43 1996 From: Tom Aldrich Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Ham Crap Date: 28 Feb 1996 03:49:55 GMT Message-ID: <4h0jd3$suu@insosf1.netins.net> References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) wrote: > > In article VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) writes: > > >Is it just me, or are the rest of you also sick of seeing all this ham > >radio "Code vs No-Code" and "No-Code = No-Brain" garbage crossposted all > >over the scanner newsgroups? > > Yes! As a mlicnesed ahm myself, I find it EXCEPTIONALLY stupid! Just > ignore the cretins who want to fight about this issue. > > Dan Morisseau > N7ZXL > 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W > Elevation: 300' Yeah! There are more important things....like spelling!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:44 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: crystals Date: 28 Feb 1996 04:10:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4h1670$kd2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gv4gn$6jf@cloner4.netcom.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) <> You MUST be kidding! Seriously? In the OLD days of scanning/monitoring, way before there were direct-entry programmable scanners, before you had 1000 channels or even 100, there were handheld and base/mobile scanners of 2,3,4, 10, 20 channels that needed a "crystal" for each frequency. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:45 1996 From: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 28 Feb 1996 05:43:26 GMT Message-ID: <4h0q1u$6f8@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) I need to make a very public apology. It is not at all comon for me to use the word "stupid" to describe people, and rarely do I attack organizations. Yet, in my diatribe against Radio Shack in an earlier post, I did both. This attack against these people was ill-thought out, ÿimpulsive, and unprovoked. For this I am truly sorry. I urge everyone to please disregard my previous posting. My assault was the result of impulsiveness combined with a bad experience with a Radio Shack employee and a bad experience with my employer earlier that day. I accept full responsibility though for my statements. I also apologiize for having cross-posted the original posting. I simply wasn't paying attention to the automatic heading maker of my newsgroup reader when I made the follow-up post. This apology is being made solely do to my conscious, no one has coerced me or enticed me in any way to make it. In other words, Radio Shack hasn't e-mailed me. :) Thanks for allowing me to apologize, Cliff Pearson From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:46 1996 From: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Favorite Scans Date: 28 Feb 1996 05:54:16 GMT Message-ID: <4h0qm8$8nh@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <4gls9c$1dj8@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Reply-To: db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Cliff Pearson) I have 400 channels in 10 banks of 40. I've broken them down as: 1 Police 2 Fire/Emergency 3 Federal agencies (frequent traffic) 4 Aviation 5 Aviation #2 6 Railroad 7 Media (and the ham emergency weather freqs) 8 Extras (things I discover searching) 9 Federal government (non-law enforcement) 0 Federal agencies (law enforcement but infrequent use) My favorites are the federal law enforcement agencies. Bank 3 has ATF, Customs, DEA, FBI, and Secret Service. Bank 7 is news remotes and traffic reporters. Bank 9 has things like HUD, the U.S. Attorney's Office, the Federal Reserve Bank, etc. Bank 0 has the FAA, the FCC, the EPA, and the INS. And some others. My typical scanning session involves scanning banks 3, 7, and 0. Cliff From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:47 1996 From: SGCR@msg.ti.com (Steve Carter) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:22:19 GMT Message-ID: <4h1l03$oqd@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> References: <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> <4gfhta$n39@ram2.ramlink.net> Reply-To: SGCR@msg.ti.com (Steve Carter) > > Re: How safe is a 900mhz cordless phone? > > bbones@t-online.de (NorthStar Gazer) > Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:35:41 GMT > RAMLink Internet Access Service > > Newsgroups: > rec.radio.scanner > References: > <4g63if$1l5@nova.dimensional.com> > > hackman@dimensional.com (Hack Man) wrote: > >jh14@cornell.edu (Jonathan Ho) wrote: > >>Hi! Forgive my ignorance, but I was concerned about the security on my > >>regular cordless phone and was told by someone that a 900mhz cordless > >>phone is not scanable. Is this true? Do any of you guys know if you can > >>pick-up conversations on a 900mhz cordless? Thanks for all your help! > Try Cincinnati Microwave's Escort series. All their 900Mhz phones > are Spread Spectrum. To my knowledge, there aren't any descrambler > kits out for those phones at all. I've owned my Escort for better than > a year and haven't ever heard the first blip of my conversations on > the 900Mhz + range. Do watch the phone you get. There are a few 900 MHz analog phones that can be scanned, then there is the digital and then the spread spectrum. Neither is scannable by a scanner, although there surely will be someone somewhere who will work until they can d -> A the signal. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:48 1996 From: Burt Wilson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PRO-2026--Can it be modified? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: <31340006.7C00@pukfsk.puk.ac.za> References: <4glds8$5rt@norm.uoknor.edu> > > I am thinking about buying a new one of these at Radio Shack for $149.99. Can > > it be modified for the cellular band? > Open unit, locate jumper wire L201, clip it, and voila, full 800MHz in 30k > steps, but it also affects the 'pre-set' scan bands such as police and fire. I don't agree. It was possible with the old models but not with the new ones. Take a look at the serial number. If it ends with a B it is not possible. The circuit ry exists but it is not programmed in the CPU. Burt From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:49 1996 From: NewsRadio Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: crystals Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:23:45 -0800 Message-ID: <31348FA1.2DBA@interlog.com> References: <4gv4gn$6jf@cloner4.netcom.com> <4h1670$kd2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mark L9 wrote: > > <> You MUST be kidding! > > Seriously? In the OLD days of scanning/monitoring, way before there were > direct-entry programmable scanners, before you had 1000 channels or even > 100, there were handheld and base/mobile scanners of 2,3,4, 10, 20 > channels that needed a "crystal" for each frequency. I still have an old radio shack portable 4ch crystal scanner. Its not as good as my Pro43 but it still works! Covers air/vhf bands so its good for things that done change frequency often like local airport towers, weather, etc. There are still lots of these kicking around but with rsh and uniden selling simple synthsized scanners for a low as 100$, its hard to _give_ these crystal scanners away. I know 'cause I tried to sell mine a few months back and got NO responses at all :) -- -------------------------------------------- Southern Ontario Radio News & Broadcast Engineering homepage: www.interlog.com/~jmckay LeBlanc homepage: www.npsnet.com/leblanc -------------------------------------------- (((x))) | "Waddya mean the tower doesnt meet the | current CODE? Its been standing for 20 years!!??!!" /|\ ------- CSA S37-1994 is in effect...does YOUR tower meet the new code? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:50 1996 From: d-cripps@dircon.co.uk (David Cripps) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Canadian Ski Resorts Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 15:07:11 GMT Message-ID: <4h1r3o$83t@newsgate.dircon.co.uk> I'm off to Lake Louise, near Calgary in a few weeks. Is it worth taking a scanner? If so what freqs do the Ski guides/rescue people use. I know that in Europe the various resorts tend to use amateur equipment in the 144MHz area. Thanks in advance. Dave Cripps From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:51 1996 From: sfritts@usit.net (Steven Fritts) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: HELP! Need info on Pro 2032 scanner Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 15:39:54 GMT Message-ID: <4h1t2b$1d4@news.usit.net> Reply-To: sfritts@usit.net I found a Pro 2032 scanner in a local shop. Is it triple conver? Is it modifiable? Any help/info would be appreciated!! Thanks, Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:52 1996 From: genealle@ix.netcom.com(?) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: BC-890 cell mods? Date: 28 Feb 1996 15:40:20 GMT Message-ID: <4h1t14$35p@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> Still looking for the cell mod for this Uniden. Not listed in oakland.edu/ham(they have evrything but!). One kind person sent me the mod in a zipped format but after a million tries I gave up unzipping. A few sentences on how to do it might help, don't know how complex it is, but I did a couple of BC-205's with no prob. If you have a fax I'll give you my # and you can call collect. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:53 1996 From: scott@comp1.cc.wm.edu Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Uniden BC55 & BC60 Date: 28 Feb 1996 16:05:58 GMT Message-ID: <4h1uh6$479@tick.cs.wm.edu> Reply-To: scott@comp1.cc.wm.edu I need to know the specs on each of these handheld scanner units. BC55 BC60 Are they synthesized? Freq. Range? Can they be modified? Anything else that may be helpful. Scott Scott Fenstermacher scott@comp1.cc.wm.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:54 1996 From: hpeach@pop.uky.edu (Harold G. Peach, Jr.) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Secret Service LEARN channel? National? Local? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:44:52 GMT Message-ID: <4h20pl$bnn@service2.uky.edu> References: <312610EA.4AF1@frontiernet.net> <4ftk3s$93c_001@van2.pacifier.com> <4g0k0j$8ck@news.halcyon.com> <4gkn96$af5@service2.uky.edu> <312E36EB.4CCB@frontiernet.net> Reply-To: hpeach@pop.uky.edu D Stark wrote: >Harold G. Peach, Jr. wrote: >> >Washington State Patrol calls 155.475 NLEEC ( National Law Enforcement >> >Emergency Channel). >> >> PDs in Kentucky call it "Inter City." Only dispatchers typically have >> radios for this frequency and the statewide law enforcement computer >> network (LINK) has all but made it obsolete, except for the state >> police. > How would a nationwide mutual aid frequency on which any police officer coul d call >any other officer or agency for emergency assistance be made "obsolete" by an y computer network? The system is not used that way in Kentucky. Individual officers do not even have the frequency in their radios. Instead, the radios are in the dispatch offices. In the past the system was used to call other PDs in the same region without having to use the telephone. Now that all dispatch centers in the state are linked by computer the radio system is obsolete. In states where it is used by individual officers I would presume the system is still quite useful. There are 7+ law enforcement agencies in the county where I live. I can see how having a common channel would be useful, but probably not feasable considering their systems are spread across several bands. --- Harold hpeach@pop.uky.edu From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:55 1996 From: crscasio@pixi.com (Lawrence Koga) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FS:PRO-43 $ 175.00 Date: 28 Feb 1996 17:52:04 GMT Message-ID: <4h24o4$3im@rigel.pixi.com> I have a PRO-43 for sale. The unit can be modified for full 800Mhz. It has Ni-Cad batteries. The instruction book is modified. The DOWNSIDE: The unit was purchased new for a "child". The "child" decided to put a new paint job on the case. I took exception to the paint scheme, so the unit is being sold. There are white and blue stripes on the side, the antenna has a white stripe. The push button numbers are clear and untouched, but the silkscreen below them are beginning to fade. $ 175.00+shipping(I live in Hawaii). Thanks, Lawrence From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:56 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:41:02 GMT Message-ID: References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gvfkf$lii@eugene.convex.com> In article <4gvfkf$lii@eugene.convex.com> horak@convex.com (David Horak) write s: >Scanners themselves don't "use" any type of polarization. It is true >that most of the transmissions in the VHF/UHF spectrum are vertically >polarized but after you consider bounce/reflection of signals, the >horizontal/vertical issue is not real important. Ummm, yea if we were talking HF spectrum, but we are not. Poloarization is a big deal. Using a TV antenna for VHF/UHF try it and see for yourself. Signal strength will be way down for most signals received using the horizontal plane. VHF/UHF signals are not intended to be bounced and reflected as a way of life before reception. > Also, the 75/50 ohm issue is not important. For receiving this seems to hold true. > Even for transmitting, the >75/50 ohm mismatch is acceptable at low power levels. I suppose, especially if you don't want to get any signal out. The lower the power level the less you have left over after losses. Antenna matching when transmitting is important and keeping the power low just decreases the damage. grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:57 1996 From: hickman@super-highway.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro-43 Question Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:00:14 -0300 Message-ID: <3134D06E.284A@super-highway.net> References: <4gtnqc$b8c@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Estabrooks wrote: > Also, I read a rumor in this conference that if I were to send my unit in > for repair > (under warranty), will RS replace my "board" with one that is NOT > modifiable? I sent mine in for repair Aug. '95 (bad antenna connection). They did not change the board. It came back with full coverage. Mac From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:58 1996 From: Randall Buxton <#rbuxton@popd.ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Diego/Mercy Air/Airlife Date: 28 Feb 1996 19:49:01 GMT Message-ID: <4h2bjd$d1g@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> References: <41d_9602221947@thekat.esnet.com> <4gojop$7fp@taurus.adnc.com> The old LifeFlight service used 462.975, which was a repeater. AirLife uses 462.975 for dispatch, 467.975 for 'copters-to-dispatch. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:14:59 1996 From: sarge@interaccess.com (Jim Shoes) Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave:,rec.radio.scanner Subject: PC Shortwave Monitor and ScanBase Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:00:54 GMT Message-ID: <4h2c95$ppb@nntp.interaccess.com> Would someone post or E-Mail the site(s) where I may download the two subject programs. A recent fire destroyed many of my possessions, among them most of my computer disks. I need to replace these two programs, as I was testing them and had not really had a chance to work with them. Or, if someone could provide the same info for a good shortwave logging program and/or a scanner frequency database program, I would be most appreciative. Thanks in advance for any info. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:00 1996 From: run2me4310@msn.com (chuck ) Subject: RE: Poor reception on Pro-34 in 30-50 range Date: 28 Feb 96 20:10:24 -0800 References: <4gjhfd$m7j@over.mhv.net> Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004a1c@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner check the solder connection very carefully.i have had my pro 34 for about 8 yrs. and i have resolderd mine about 20 time thus far. good scanner but bad antenna mounting. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:00 1996 From: joe2tpd Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: 28 Feb 1996 22:01:54 GMT Message-ID: <4h2jci$cnh@ns2.ptd.net> markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) writes: > << TNC connectors>> TNC = Terminal Node Controller. i thought You need one year of Electronics From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:01 1996 From: jocky@ibm.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: List of frequence ??? Date: 28 Feb 1996 22:29:13 GMT Message-ID: <4h2kvp$g4o@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: jocky@ibm.net Hi all ! I've just bought a smart scanner but I'm desesperatly looking for a list of wh at is available in Switzerland between 0 and 1300 Mhz (airplanes, police, broadca st, mobil phones, aso). It would be very usefull for me if you could give me any information. Thanks ! NICK From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:02 1996 From: jocky@ibm.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: List of freq. ? Date: 28 Feb 1996 22:39:54 GMT Message-ID: <4h2ljq$g4o@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: jocky@ibm.net Hi all, I've just received a smart scanner Uniden but I'm desesperately looking for a list of what is available in Switzerland between 0 and 1300 Mhz. If would be very usefull for me and my scanner if you could give me any information. Thanks, Nick From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:03 1996 From: fkelco@iconn.net (Frank Kelco) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: How do I build an RS-232 to CI-V level converter? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 23:16:53 GMT Message-ID: <4h2n5q$ffn@news.iconn.net> References: <31238D82.2497@gtri.gatech.edu> See QST Magazine July 1992 page 37 for construction article including schematics. FJK >In article <31238D82.2497@gtri.gatech.edu>, Glenn Champion > wrote: >> Subject says it all - anyone seen schematics? I checked OAK and a few >> other archives with no success. >> >> thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:04 1996 From: marcc88@aol.com (MarCc88) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Programming cell phones Date: 28 Feb 1996 23:22:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4h39m5$cu3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: marcc88@aol.com (MarCc88) If you would like to recieve information and software to programing cellular phones...Please contact Me>>> at MarCc88@aol.com The kit includes software and Detailed info on programming all Cellular phones...$ 150.00 From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:04 1996 From: marcc88@aol.com (MarCc88) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Kit for programming cell phones Date: 28 Feb 1996 23:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4h3avm$dfh@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: marcc88@aol.com (MarCc88) For detailed info and software on programing cellular phones>> contact Me at MarCc88@aol.com price $150.00 we have complete kits to fit all your programming needs... From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:05 1996 From: alanoue@shrsys.hslc.org Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BC760XLT Date: 29 FEB 96 00:09:48 GMT Message-ID: <29FEB96.00094889@shrsys.hslc.org> References: <4gv4sg$cbo@news.icanect.net> In a previous article, cruzer@icanect.net (luis) wrote: ->I HAVE A BC760XLT. ->CAN ANY CELL MODS BE DONE TO IT. -> Luis, My 760 picks up cellular imaging great at 21.7 above the actuall cell freq. Try it on your's, maybe you won't need to do a mod. Phil From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:06 1996 From: khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: What is the Opto Scout? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 00:10:48 PST Message-ID: <4h3mtm$fvi@blues.axionet.com> References: <4guogf$63s@crl.crl.com> In article <4guogf$63s@crl.crl.com>, gorgon@crl.com says... > >....What do you use the Opti Scout for?.... The Scout is a frequency counter. That is, it will display the frequency of a nearby transmitter, simply by picking up the airborne transmission. The Scout, however, also has the ability to immediately and automatically program the frequency into compatible scanners. Thus, if you see someone trasmitting on a portable radio, for example, you can immediately listen in. Regards, KH From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:07 1996 Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner From: Business Resource Group Subject: undocumented features Message-ID: <3134F6BB.240E@holli.com> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 00:43:39 GMT I am searching for a web site or other source for "undocumented features" for various scanners (i.e. memory reset, battery voltage, etc...). I'm in need of these features for a number of different units. If anyone knows of a source for this, please e-mail me and let me know. Thanks in advance, DOUG From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:08 1996 From: srcemag@gate.net (Richard Green) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: SCANNER HELP Date: 29 Feb 1996 01:02:14 GMT Message-ID: <4h2tum$29qc@news.gate.net> Does any1 here know of any models in the mid price range that recieve 950 - 1.5 GHz? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:09 1996 From: Stud Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 01:03:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> There are a lot of Good employees at Radio Shack, but I know that there are those who are not product educated. They earn a commission on the sales, so they really hurt themselves, as well as that of the image of the company. I really don't understand their logic either. I have a very substantial background in Electronics and they didn't even want to consider my application. I see flunkies there all the time. I help myself. I've seen a few good sales people, but by and by, I do agree. However, lots of other stores "Electronics" departments suffer the same fate. So, it's not limited to JUST Radio Shack. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:10 1996 From: riten@aol.com (Riten) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: FT-530 mods needed Date: 29 Feb 1996 02:38:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4h3l6j$hdu@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: riten@aol.com (Riten) I am looking for all the available FT-530 mods. Can you email them to me, or tell me where to get them John From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:11 1996 From: g.l.g.1@ix.netcom.com(Greg Gilbert) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Cell tracking Date: 29 Feb 1996 03:45:24 GMT Message-ID: <4h37gk$2q7@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> Hello All: I am loking for a cell phone tracker *for educational uses only*. I would like to use the audio from my scanner to run the software/hardware. Any ideas? I don't want to use a real cell phone. Thanks. :-) Greg From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:11 1996 From: doneal@tcac.com (Dave O'Neal) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Trunked Sys. - Where is control channel? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 03:58:58 GMT Message-ID: <4h3822$ai2@jupiter.tcac.com> References: <4gtcbb$avv@ccnet2.ccnet.com> "C. Wheeler" wrote: >norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) wrote: >>How does someone identify a control channel in a trunked system? >You'll hear data on it. Buzzing sounds. On older Moto systems it changes o nce in a >while. It should be one of four system channels. Either the highest or the lowest >four - I can't remember right now. (ex motorola trunking tech) Not neccesarily the lowest four channels, but usually. Each time the system goes through a RESET, the control channel will change to the next sequential channel. The system automatically resets every night at midnight. A reset can also occur after a power outage or the system operator can reset by modem or locally. Some simulcast and other special systems may have less than 4 control channels. Usually 1 or 2. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:13 1996 From: edellers@shivasys.com (Ed Ellers) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: 29 Feb 1996 04:26:42 GMT Message-ID: <4h39u2$5al@news.paonline.com> References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <4ga2mr$lhu@anomaly.ideamation.com> In article <4ga2mr$lhu@anomaly.ideamation.com>, kd1hz@anomaly.ideamation.com says... >You run 9600 baud over HF? Wow. I'm impressed. You must be the EE of all >EEs. It doesn't take an EE to run 9600 bps on HF -- just somebody with a wideband transmitter and a willingness to break the rules. :-) (Actually, things might get interesting if hams are able to start using advanced digital modulation modes in the next few years. Zenith's 8-VSB system can transmit 19.3 Mbps in a 6 MHz TV channel with room to spare, and there's a project going on to transmit compressed digital audio -- using 96-128 kbps of data -- in the AM broadcast band *under* regular AM broadcasts, so a station can run AM and digital stereo on the same frequency through the same rig!) -- Ed Ellers, KD4AWQ From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:13 1996 From: subbustr@whidbey.net (DAVE M . SCHERTZER) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: SCANNER HELP Date: 29 Feb 1996 04:30:06 GMT Message-ID: <4h3a4e$mdq@whidbey.whidbey.com> References: <4h2tum$29qc@news.gate.net> Bearcat/Uniden 8500xlt $300 or so !!! subbustr@whidbey.net From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:14 1996 From: NCZN58A@prodigy.com (Amy Rives mccollum) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PC Scanner Interference Date: 29 Feb 1996 04:52:49 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4h3bf1$18qa@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gq6ln$146k@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <3133d912.6d23@ix.netcom.com> <4h2rpv$ebo@blackice.winternet.com> I've had my base scanner hooked up to a 43 element v/u tv antenna mounted sideways with a Channel Master TV amp for about two years now, ever since I broke down and hooked up to cable, and it works great! If you can't find a Channel Master amp, just about any broadband RF tv amp like the ones at Radio Shack will boost the desired signals. Just make sure you turn the fm trap OFF!! Also, this setup is directional, so a rotor really makes it hum, and can avoid intermod if you happen to live under a big hill with a lot of towers like I do. Jim Dean JamesDthDJ@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:15 1996 From: NCZN58A@prodigy.com (Amy Rives mccollum) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 29 Feb 1996 05:02:01 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4h3c09$1058@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> References: <4h2jvc$cnh@ns2.ptd.net> I use a 43 element tv antenna w/ my scanner, hooked through a Channel Master 0064 pre-amp and it works great!! I did turn the antenna on it's side, and mounted it back to the mast this way to acheive vertical polarization, but found not a lot of difference. If you want to try to see how much difference the polarization makes, just try listening to your scanner on it's side. In most urban areas you will notice little difference. If you do use a TV preamp, and live in a strong signal area, intermod could be a problem if a non directional antenna is used, also, don't forget to turn the FM trap off. Jim Dean JamesDthDJ@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:16 1996 From: VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Why monitor Fast Food joints? Date: 29 Feb 1996 05:13:43 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4h3cm7$1bie@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <2157cc$932c.382@ineter.edgewater.com> <4gn38v$l0m@antares.en.com> <3130821d.1401@adnc.com> <4gq6dc$1ehu@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <29feb96.00065474@shrsys.hslc.org> >Drew, you did'nt *really* do this, did you? Once upon a time, in a previous life...yes!! -Drew in Sunny Central Florida- From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:17 1996 From: dangrant@mulberry.com (dangrant) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: 2005 Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 05:24:21 GMT Message-ID: <4h3dgp$466@news.mulberry.com> Reply-To: dangrant@mulberry.com were to get service manual? From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:18 1996 From: jwayda@cogent.net (Jim Wayda) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: ICOM R1 Warning Date: 29 Feb 1996 06:44:36 GMT Message-ID: This message is provided as a public service announcement: Do not be suckered by the Icom R1! Several years ago, I purchased an R1 new for $500.00. At first I thought that my unit was defective, so I exchanged it for another R1. When I found that a $100.00 Radio Shack Scanner provided better performance, I returned the scanner for a full refund. Before returning the scanner to Icom, I discussed the problems with the Icom repair technicians in the Irvine, Ca repair facility. They confirmed all of my findings regarding the radio and told me that it was a result of poor design and attempting to fit "everything but the kitchen sink" into a receiver as small as the R1. My negative posts regarding the R1 are targeted at "newbies" to the scanning hobby. For the money, they will be much happier with a Bearcat 3000XLT or any other good RS or Uniden Scanner. As for the R1...., I would like to own one simply for the portability. and will pay up to $150.00 . Best regards, Jim Wayda Captain, Scanner Price Police From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:18 1996 From: "Mr. Manatee" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: [Q:] Does anyone know how to modify to receive CELLULAR? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:13:37 -0800 Message-ID: <3135C2A1.699C@a.crl.com> Does anyone know how I can find out what the best scanner to buy is that I can modify to listen to cellular telephone calls with? Please let me know where I can find out how to modify radios, and which one to get. Thanks for e-mailing me. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:19 1996 From: "William D. Staab" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-32 Mods Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:15:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3135A6DA.A2E@imcnet.net> Somebody gave me a PRO-32 handheld just a few days ago. Was in pretty bad shape corroded terminals, broken antenna etc. Got it up and working but now I'm interested in doing some mods to it. I know it can't be modified for 800 mhz but I don't really care about that anyway. I've got a PRO-2004 for that. I want to use this radio for another purpose. What I'm interested in is the following: A) Speeding up the scan rate B) Making it more sensitive C) Opening up the frequencies between 174-330 D) Adding more channels E) Any other cool mods Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:22 1996 From: Brett Miller - N7OLQ Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:01:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3135CDC8.12EE@ccm.hf.intel.com> References: <4g4ldp$jph@feenix.metronet.com> <4gm7oe$i6o@nn.fast.net> Glenn Hansen wrote: > $700 with the TV adapter is a good deal to say the least. Have you seen what > Icom wants for that little TV box? > -- I bought my R7000 about 6 years ago (used) with TV module, remote control, and voice synthisizer for about $850. Because of the cellular ban and considering Icom qulailty, I' m sure it is worth more now. Brett Miller - N7OLQ brett_miller@ccm.ut.intel.com Intel Corp. CIS: 73370,3030 American Fork, UT From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:23 1996 From: jamoran@indirect.com (John Moran) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AM on UHF???(KFI L.A.) Date: 29 Feb 1996 09:03:03 GMT Message-ID: <4h3q47$qcr@globe.indirect.com> References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> <4fmtj1$f44@emerald.oz.net> <4g2mkt$1f3o@saba.info.ucla.edu> <1996Feb19.192401.24649@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency counters - which to buy? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:03:28 -0700 Message-ID: <3135CE50.2133@ccm.hf.intel.com> References: <4eglqe$r7r@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fj5mk$gu3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gmt7f$lub@news.wco.com> <4grehl$688@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> bbull wrote: > I also just bought one the ant. sucks. can't pick-up anything that puts out > under 1/2 watt.-- Check out the Opto Cub. It is a more intelligent counter that can better distinguish between noise and actual signals. It is the same as the scout without the memories and computer interface. Brett Miller - N7OLQ brett_miller@ccm.ut.intel.com Intel Corp. CIS: 73370,3030 American Fork, UT From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:25 1996 From: "Mr. Manatee" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: [Q:] How do you modify a Bearcat 200 XLT Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:48:15 -0800 Message-ID: <3135E6DF.5D5F@a.crl.com> References: <21c7cc$b3a13.2f4@tcnntp.trader.com> I would like any information on how to modify a Bearcat BC 200 XLT to receive Cellular Freqs. I appreciate the e-mail. Thank you From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:26 1996 From: rkm@scanproj.raster.kodak.com (Rich Mulvey) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT Date: 29 Feb 1996 13:20:26 GMT Message-ID: <4h496q$9cg@elmgate.raster.Kodak.Com> References: <4gon7k$itc@bubba.NMSU.Edu> Reply-To: rkm@scanproj.raster.kodak.com On 25 Feb 1996 04:06:12 GMT, jd wrote: >Ship it C.O.D. with a stipulation of "cash only" on the receipt. That >way the buyer doesn't pay until he gets the goods, and the seller knows >his property will not be delivered in exchange for a rubber check. Of course, there is still a problem - typically, you can't open the package until you've paid. So the seller could easily just ship you a piece of rock. It can be, and has been, done... - Rich From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:27 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: tweek@netcom.com (Reverend Tweek) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Message-ID: References: <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> <4h0b67$61f@news.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:05:38 GMT In article <4h0b67$61f@news.cis.okstate.edu>, wrote: >> >>[You really could have clipped most of that... including the headers] > >WOW, your smart!!!! Damn! Another brilliant post from AOL... OK State. amazing. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:28 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: BEWARE OF DEALING WITH DERRICK HALL, SEAT Message-ID: References: <4gon7k$itc@bubba.NMSU.Edu> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:14:56 GMT jd (jd@acca.nmsu.edu) wrote: : Ship it C.O.D. with a stipulation of "cash only" on the receipt. That : way the buyer doesn't pay until he gets the goods, and the seller knows : his property will not be delivered in exchange for a rubber check. Unless the "goods" are a brick and some bubble wrap inside a box. I was wondering something. Can the person receiving a COD package open and inspect the package at the UPS (or whoever) facility before accepting and paying for it? Then decide whether he wants to pay for and accept it? It seems this would be the ideal way to handle transactions with unknown parties. Of course, I'm not sure shipping companies policies allow for doing this. Also, if you could do this, you probably wouldn't be able to know you received a *working* scanner, but at least you'd know you got a scanner for your money. Just wondering. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:29 1996 From: dcoker@panix.com (Dave Coker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: UK Scanning? Date: 29 Feb 1996 19:07:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4h5f3p$nc5@panix.com> My employer is sending me over to London for roughly a week sometime next month. Does anyone know about the legaility of scanning in the UK? TIA! From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:30 1996 From: Tom Pennington Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Wow! DO NOT BOTHER, SCAM!!!! Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:21:31 -0800 Message-ID: <31366D3B.864@ix.netcom.com> References: <4goj80$dlo@newsbf02.news.aol.com> From Mike wrote: > > Description: Make Money! For Real! > > [Section: 1/1 File: $$$ UULite v2.0] > [Original File Size: 5539]For those who have not already seen this, it is a uuencoded file containing the same old chain letter scam that has been going around for months. It is not legal despite the claims to the contrary, and is for suckers only. -- Tom Pennington _---_---_---______--__--___+-----+||] tpenning@ix.netcom.com [||####### B & O #####|______||_____ || __| [][] |__ || When all else is said ||_______________________/ _| B&O |___\_|| and done, take the | ||| | | | | | | / | 4212 | # ||| | train. []|=|==================o=====o==================|=|[] /|-||(0)|=|(0)|=|(O) |_________| (0)|=|(0)|=|(O)||-|\ ============================================================================= From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:31 1996 From: Tom Pennington Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Son of 2006 Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:32:52 -0800 Message-ID: <31366FE4.6D01@ix.netcom.com> I have a Pro 2006 and am quite happy with it. However, I now would like another scanner of comparable quality and performance (and could not care if it is restorable). What scanner (Pro 20xx) is the closest decendant of the 2006, and is the performance as good, better, or worse. Thanks, any info is appreciated. -- Tom Pennington _---_---_---______--__--___+-----+||] tpenning@ix.netcom.com [||####### B & O #####|______||_____ || __| [][] |__ || When all else is said ||_______________________/ _| B&O |___\_|| and done, take the | ||| | | | | | | / | 4212 | # ||| | train. []|=|==================o=====o==================|=|[] /|-||(0)|=|(0)|=|(O) |_________| (0)|=|(0)|=|(O)||-|\ ============================================================================= From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:32 1996 From: Richard Mclachlan Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner Subject: WiNRADiO user review Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 19:37:15 GMT Message-ID: <825622635snz@foxfield.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk There is now a user review of the WiNRADiO on the Lowe Electronics web site at http://www.lowe.co.uk/ Just follow the WiNRADiO links -- Richard From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:33 1996 From: alanoue@shrsys.hslc.org Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Freqs. used by crews at movie locations wanted Date: 29 FEB 96 20:01:54 GMT Message-ID: <29FEB96.20015478@shrsys.hslc.org> There is a crew in my town this week filming an outdoor location scene for a movie starring Brad Pitt & Harrison Ford. I'm trying to figure out which frequencies they use. I was over there today briefly with some regular business & itinerant freqs. plugged into my Pro 43, but no luck. I also tried searching through these frequency areas, but still no luck. I know that the motion picture industry is alloted certain special frequencies, but what are they? I do not currently own a counter, which would have been helpful. Incidently, I was'nt on the scene five min. before some smartass spots my radio and marches up to me demanding to know what I'm listening to. Of course he KNEW what I was listening to (or at least trying to listen to). Plus, tons of cell phones all over... Anyway, help would be greatly appreciated with this. Thanks, Phil From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:33 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: greg@core.rose.hp.com (Greg Dolkas) Subject: Re: Icom R-7000 repair help! Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 21:08:59 GMT References: <4goa16$ao8@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Dino AL7LZ (dinoal7lz@aol.com) wrote: : Just for grins did you reset the CPU after you replaced the battery??? : With Kenwood radios you gotta do that to bring 'em back to life but it : works just fine. : : Dino -- AL7LZ Well, I didn't need to do anything special last time (or the time before). It also fails without any battery in place, which was the case before it was replaced. Thanks for the thought, Greg. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:34 1996 From: anthonyr@microsoft.com (Anthony A. Robinson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 and Telix? Date: 29 Feb 1996 21:55:07 GMT Message-ID: <4h57br$6l@news.microsoft.com> References: <4gunv3$61b@crl.crl.com> <4h0mkk$t46@lal.interserv.net> I'm curious... Why is using a Windows-based terminal program versus a DOS-based terminal program considered "self-abuse"? In article <4h0mkk$t46@lal.interserv.net>, abates@m1.interserv.com says... > >Well, I have an AR2700 which is similar to the AR8000 with only 500 >channels (and other differences) and have used ProComm to "talk" to >it.[...] >You can also use the Windows Terminal program (if you are into self >abuse) to talk to it. -- The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:35 1996 From: warnergt@postoffice.ptd.net (George Warner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 22:15:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fmimn$kgv@is05.micron.net> <4g6kv7$jmq@news.onramp.net> <4ga2mr$lhu@anomaly.ideamation.com> <4h39u2$5al@news.paonline.com> In article <4h39u2$5al@news.paonline.com>, edellers@shivasys.com (Ed Ellers) wrote: > In article <4ga2mr$lhu@anomaly.ideamation.com>, kd1hz@anomaly.ideamation.com > says... > >You run 9600 baud over HF? Wow. I'm impressed. You must be the EE of all > >EEs. > > It doesn't take an EE to run 9600 bps on HF -- just somebody with a wideband > transmitter and a willingness to break the rules. :-) 9600 bps does not require a wideband transmitter. It will fit within the bandwidth of a standard audio channel. Despite this, I still don't think the rules allow it. George Warner warnergt@postoffice.ptd.net http://home.ptd.net/~warnergt From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:36 1996 From: run2me4310@msn.com (chuck ) Subject: computer scan help Date: 29 Feb 96 22:22:07 -0800 Message-ID: <00001ff6+00004a41@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner i am looking for some type of product to run my pro 2006 on my computer. i know there are some products out there but i don't know much about them. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:37 1996 From: moujesky@why.net (Michael Oujesky) Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,phl.scanner,alt.forsale,austin.forsale,houston.forsale,dfw.forsale,misc.forsale.non-computer,tx.forsale,us.forsale.misc Subject: Re: FT: 200/205XLT for PRO-60/26 Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 23:28:38 GMT Message-ID: <4h5gdc$6sj@what.why.net> References: <4ggg43$iv8@what.why.net> To: aLL Anyone interested in trading a PRO-60 (or perhaps a PRO-26) for Uniden Bearcat BC-200/205XLT plus some cash? The 200/205XLT has full 800 mhz coverage enabled. Interested parties please reply via e-mail to moujesky@why.net. Thanks. From lwbyppp@epix.net Fri Mar 01 21:15:38 1996 From: steves@oo.com (Steve Stiglich) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: TRAIN FREQUENCIES...HELP Date: 29 Feb 1996 23:39:34 GMT Message-ID: <4h5dfn$l19@comet.magicnet.net> References: <4gb41k$6rs@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gftsq$ht7@steel.interlog.com> In article <4gftsq$ht7@steel.interlog.com>, ronkatz@interlog.com says... > >br679@aol.com (BR679) wrote: > >>I am working on a project and am in need of train frequencies. That is I >>want to monitor the conversations between trains and between trains and >>there dispatch..etc. > >>I would GREATLY APPRECIATE ANY and ALL help in finding these frequencies. > >>THANK YOU > >>PAT > > Try these two places; most complete list I've found. http://uxl.cso.uiuc.edu/~roma/rr-freqs.html http://www.k2nesoft.com/~pirmann/subway/news/other/freq.html From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:45 1996 From: SWW Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WTB: AR8000 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 22:52:20 -0600 Message-ID: <31313C84.25D5@connect.net> References: <312DED42.6440@msg.ti.com> <4gq9sn$5iq@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw> <31310263.3108@connect.net> What was your total cost? Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:45 1996 From: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: San Diego/Mercy Air/Airlife Date: 25 Feb 1996 23:20:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4grces$crl@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gojop$7fp@taurus.adnc.com> Reply-To: markl9@aol.com (Mark L9) The Mercy Air nurse would probably know what they're using. Re: Orange County, 462.975 is listed as "Hospital-Paramedic Coordination". What goes on there is the ambulance will call in to "OCC" (Orange County Communications) and be given the channel to contact the hospital on. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:46 1996 From: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF FTP SITE Date: 25 Feb 1996 23:33:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4grd78$d8l@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) Special thanks to everyone that asked for a copy of my DTMF program. I have made the DTMF program available at my ftp site. You can still request it by e-mailing me at PDRUNEN@AOL.COM. To get there ftp to users.aol.com login as "ftp" Password as "your e-mail address" then cd /pdrunen then cd /dtmf get dtmf_v11.exe. You will also find a really nice windows based GIF viewer, VUGRAF13.ZIP for the taking. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:47 1996 From: Heikki Koivusaari Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: DTMF Program/Schematics Date: 26 Feb 1996 03:15:45 GMT Message-ID: <4gr8l1$e8g@gail.ripco.com> References: <4g6jv9$jfd@newsbf02.news.aol.com> To: pdrunen@aol.com pdrunen@aol.com (PDRUNEN) wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I have a DTMF program and the associated schematic free to anyone >interested. The hardware is a simple two chip circuit which >connects into your existing Parallel port, the port where the printer >is connected. > >The schematics are in a GIF format so you need a GIF viewer. > >If you want it, e-mail me at PDRUNEN@AOL.COM and I will send it >via the Internet! > >Paul Sure, send it up, i'd love to take a look at it.. My E-MAIL arcturus@ripco.com XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:48 1996 From: Heikki Koivusaari Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: AR8000 audio clipping/narrow I.F. mod Date: 26 Feb 1996 03:24:19 GMT Message-ID: <4gr953$e8g@gail.ripco.com> References: <4g8ccc$427@mrnews.mro.dec.com> To: klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com >I have designed a switching scheme that allows the user to select >the stock 12KHz AM filter or the narrow SSB 4.0KHz while still in >the AM mode. I have found this to make a BIG difference when trying >to receive a weak shortwave station next to a very strong one. >The only part required is a switch and some wire. >My mod has no effect on the use of the DS8000 speech inversion accessory. > >Send me email if interested. > >Ken >klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com Sure, i'd be intrested to see your design.... Also, what software are you using with your AR8000? here's my E-MAIL address. arcturus@ripco.com XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:49 1996 From: ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: ICOM R7000 worth??? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 04:47:47 GMT Message-ID: References: <4g4ldp$jph@feenix.metronet.com> <4gm7oe$i6o@nn.fast.net> In article <4gm7oe$i6o@nn.fast.net> douglas marx writes: >GLENN I AGREE I BOUGHT A 7100 ONLY TO SELL IY TO BUY A USED 7000 ABOUT >A MONTH AFTER I BOUGHT IT PAID $700 WITH TV ADAPTR AND RC. GOOD DEAL >I HAVE OCCASIONALLY SEEN THEM FOR ABOUT $800 ON THE HAM NETS. $700 with the TV adapter is a good deal to say the least. Have you seen what Icom wants for that little TV box? grh From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:50 1996 From: bbull@uidaho.edu (bbull) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Frequency counters - which to buy? Date: 26 Feb 1996 04:56:21 GMT Distribution: world Message-ID: <4grehl$688@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> References: <4eglqe$r7r@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fj5mk$gu3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gmt7f$lub@news.wco.com> In article <4gmt7f$lub@news.wco.com>, bellg@wco.com (greg bell) wrote: >Javier Montero wrote: > > > >>> Get a Radio Shaq Frequency Counter! >>> They work just fine... They have two gate speeds, and you set it to look >>> for 1-50Mhz or 50-1600Mhz. It has a light and you can easily upgrade the >>> antenna. > >>How much does it costs? > >>Thanks, >> Javi >I JUST BOUGHT ONE TODAY IT COST $99.00 + TAX > I also just bought one the ant. sucks. can't pick-up anything that puts out under 1/2 watt. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:51 1996 From: gjacek@Cyberstore.ca Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Which is better? Pro60 or Pro26? -Replacing my Pro43 :N Date: 26 Feb 1996 05:31:22 GMT Message-ID: <4grgja$634@sulla.cyberstore.ca> References: <0c3_9602210500@magsystems.com> Reply-To: gjacek@Cyberstore.ca In <0c3_9602210500@magsystems.com>, Roland.Stiner@151.magsystems.com (Roland S tiner) writes: > >M>WHY is everyone so interested in CELLULAR? >Forbidden fruit. Make it illegal and everyone wants to listen to it. >Same with drugs and other stuff. Since I originated this post, I feel the need to fill you all in. I actually went out and purchased a Pro26. It was AWFUL! Very sensitive to pager broadcasts. Very difficult to hear when driving in the car--even at maximum volume. I returned it. Then a kind soul put me onto Durham Radio in Ontario. A week later I had my replacement Pro43 and I am very happy with it. Yes, they resto red the Cellular and the 54-88MHz bands. Despite the fancy new features of the Pro26, I think the Pro43 is outstanding where it counts. RECEPTION! One final note. I live in Canada where the cellular providers have not manage d to buy a listening law. YET. ..Gary gjacek@freenet.vancouver.bc.ca gjacek@cyberstore.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:53 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: zdanowsk@bc.cybernex.net (william zdanowski) Subject: Re: Changing pager cap codes Message-ID: References: <4gm43i$3f1@blues.axionet.com> <4gpssa$kja@news-f.iadfw.net> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 05:52:09 GMT In article <4gpssa$kja@news-f.iadfw.net> kadotson@iadfw.net (Keith Dotson) wri tes: >From: kadotson@iadfw.net (Keith Dotson) >Subject: Re: Changing pager cap codes >Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 08:49:42 -0600 (CST) >khamer@axionet.com (Ken Hamer) wrote: >>Is it possible to change the "cap code" of a Motorola type numeric pager? >>If so, how? >>Regards, >>KH >Yes, it is possible. The paging company we use at work loaned us the >equipment and software to remove the capcodes for the news updates on >the pagers we issue to drivers. It is a very simple and painless >procedure if you have access to the equipment. I was surprised at all >of the programmable choices available on the alpha numeric pagers. >You just drop the pager into the holder, scan its memory into the PC >and then make the changes you need to. The software then writes these >changes into the pager. I was able to change/delete capcodes, change >the message that appears on turning on from the leasing companies name >to our company name and phone number, change if messages are deleted >or kept when unit is turned off and several other things. This took >just a copule of minutes per pager and I had no previous exposure to >any of this and no instruction in using the equipment. It had been >hooked up to the PC while I was out making a delivery. >Very simple process if you have the equipment/software. >Keith Dotson >kadotson@iadfw.net Thats if you have the password for the pager, default for advisor is "ADVISOR". But most companies change them and after 9 times the pager disables itself, which I know from experience. I think there is a way to jump it out but not sure. Bill From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:54 1996 From: dschmidt@rain.org (David G. Schmidt) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: DTMF decoders FS Date: 26 Feb 1996 06:37:41 GMT Message-ID: <4grkfl$52n@news.rain.org> With and Without Displays. Pictures available on web page. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ( DSchmidt Technologies, Ventura CA http://www.rain.org/~dschmidt ) ( Freq selectors for FME/FM25, DTMF decoders, Email dschmidt@rain.org ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:55 1996 From: lancecr@msn.com (Lance Craig) Subject: RE: AR8000 Control via PC? Date: 26 Feb 96 07:04:31 -0800 References: <287618798wnr@kfvr.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <00001ff6+0000499c@msn.com> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner There is some good information on: http://www.cpl.uiuc.edu/~tpeckish/appendix.html But this page also references the docs that come with the AOR computer interface. I went back to the place I bought my radio and asked for a copy of the documentation for the AOR interface and they had just sold the last one. If someone has this info and it wouldn't be a violation of some law or other, it would be very cool to post it here. Lance From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:56 1996 From: mulligan@ACM.ORG (F. Barry Mulligan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Cell phones on aircraft same as ground cell phones? Date: 26 Feb 1996 07:28:55 GMT Message-ID: <4grnfn$m6v@hopper.acm.org> Reply-To: mulligan@ACM.ORG From the FAF - Frequently Asked Frequencies on ftp://oak.oakland.edu as /pub/hamradio/docs/misc/scanner.faf 800 MHz Air to Ground Telephone [22.1107] - - Airborne - - Blk Ch 1 - Ch 29 10 894.0055 - 894.1735 9 894.2055 - 894.3735 8 894.4055 - 894.5735 Guard Band - 7 894.6055 - 894.7735 .x765-.x797 6 894.8055 - 894.9735 5 895.0055 - 895.1735 Control Channels - 4 895.2055 - 895.3735 .x813-.x973 3 895.4055 - 895.5735 2 895.6055 - 895.7735 1 895.8055 - 895.9735 Transmissions are AM. Channels are spaced 6 kHz apart. A specific block of 29 channels is assigned to each geographical area. Ground frequencies are 45 MHz lower and do not echo the airborne half of the conversation. Service is used on passenger airlines. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:57 1996 From: Mike Mayer Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Better cel reception on AM? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 13:12:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3131F812.28FF@boulder.vni.com> References: <4gm48f$3f1@blues.axionet.com> Ken Hamer wrote: > > On my PRO-43, I sometimes find reception of cel-tels much better when I > put the scanner in AM mode. What gives?!?!? > > Regards, > > KH Perhaps your scanner has a wider IF filter in the AM mode as opposed to the NFM mode normally used. Cell transmissions have a wider bandwidth than normal NFM but not as wide as WFM. I would agree that what you have discovered is indeed strange. What your AM mode is probably picking up is any amplitude variance of the signal that shows up as an artifact of the FM deviation produced by the cell transmitter not being perfectly linear with respect to amplitude. I would accept that I am blowing smoke here, but it sounds plausible anyway. Mikr -- ^v^v^v^v^v^v PV-WAVE: Where it's @! http://www.vni.com ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^ Michael Mayer, Senior Technical Support Engineer Amateur Radio KB8RJO Visual Numerics, Inc. 32915 Aurora Rd. Suite 160, Solon OH 44139 USA Email: mayer@boulder.vni.com Human: 216-248-4900 Fax: 216-248-2733 v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Good * Cheap * Quick (pick any two) ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:58 1996 From: james diaz Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: whats the best way to monitor trunked systems????? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:00:27 -0500 Message-ID: <31322D7B.6160@neptune.com> I would like to know how everybody deals with scanning trunked systems I really enjoyed listening to my scanner in the old days before this trunking stuff began I would like to know if theyre is a way to monitor this so that i can keep up whats going on like in the old days when each police,fire,ems had they're own channels I really miss following some of the pursuit calls that my local police dept and especially the stake outs I live in broward county fla if that makes a difference and im not a crimnal:) thanks please help From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:23:59 1996 From: hillibilly@aol.com (Hillibilly) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Mods for bearcat bc120xlt Date: 26 Feb 1996 18:06:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4gtedd$6np@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Reply-To: hillibilly@aol.com (Hillibilly) Does anyone have any mods for a Bearcat BC120XLT??? It seems that when I look for a mod for that particular scanner no one can help me. Is the scanner that I own an "unmodifiable" scanner? Hillibilly@aol.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:00 1996 From: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org (R. Ford) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Does anyone have info., mods for a PRO 2036 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 18:11:32 GMT Distribution: inet Message-ID: <4gsmev$o4k@tsunami.traveller.com> Reply-To: rford@mail.hsvchamber.org I just bought a PRO 2036 and was looking for some information or mods for a pro 2036. I paid 139 + tax (150.12 total) was that a good price for the unit. Please email me at rford@hsvchamber.org or post. Thanks From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:01 1996 From: Piran Mohazzabi Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Wanted new Phone # for RADIO HOBBIES BBS Date: Mon, 26 Feb 96 18:34:23 -0500 Message-ID: <5dGJLUP.pmohazzabi@delphi.com> Wanted new phone number for RADIO HOBBIES BBS. OLD ph was 708-238-1901, but no longer for that bbs. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:02 1996 From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 26 Feb 1996 19:08:21 GMT Message-ID: <4gt0f5$h1o@gaudi.lahabra.chevron.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gq6ln$146k@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> VUBS79A@prodigy.com (Drew Durigan) wrote: >>the guy at Radio Shack told me it wouldn't work. Any ideas? > >The first rule is "never believe anything that Sammy Salesdroid from >Radio Shack tells you." Usually, just the opposite is true. > > >>First a TV antenna is horizontal, most scanners uses use vertical >>polariation. > >Drill two new holes in the boom and mount it vertically! Since TV >antennas are designed for a wide variety of frequencies from 50-900Mhz, >it will work very well as a scanner antenna. Remember, though, that the >antenna is directional and will have to be aimed accordingly. Also >remember to feed it with RG-6 (satellite) coax. NOT RG58 or RG59. If you decide to change the mounting scheme to make it vertical, use caution. Most directional, broadband TV antennas are log periodic dipole arrays (LPDAs). They have two booms. The booms feed the antnenna. Don't short them together with your new hardware. Curtis From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:03 1996 From: wwhitby@aol.com (Wwhitby) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? Date: 26 Feb 1996 19:15:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4gtif1$8iq@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gqt6p$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> In article <4gqt6p$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG>, billn@PEAK.ORG (Bill Nelson) writes: >This is wrong. The FCC "preemption statute" only covers amateur transceivers. >Now, there are many states that have exempted amateurs from the ban, but not >all of them. > > I think the best solution is to get a copy of the state statute and read it. You may also be able to go to your local PD or SO and find out about your state scanner law. Warren Whitby wwhitby@aol.com - Home wwhitby@.bdm.com - Work Ham radio: KE4ITL "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Romans 10:13 From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:05 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Baltimore County Poli From: chonma@mbbs.com (David Sabo) Distribution: world Message-ID: <291.9939.956.0N349910@mbbs.com> References: Date: Mon, 26 Feb 96 19:24:00 -0820 Cb> @SUBJECT:Baltimore County Police Freq. (800 mhz) pleeeze Cb> Does anyone have a list?? The Baltimore County public safety trunked system is: 856.2125 857.2125 858.2125 859.2125 860.2125 856.4625 857.4625 858.4625 859.4625 860.4625 856.7125 857.7125 858.7125 859.7125 860.7125 856.9625 857.9625 858.9625 859.9625 860.9625 +------------------------------------------------------+ | David Sabo * Glen Burnie, Maryland * chonma@mbbs.com | +------------------------------------------------------+ ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:07 1996 From: Kevin Leffler Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: _Pro-26 Mods/Specs_ Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 21:07:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3132676A.26F0@qnet.com> References: <8BB6503.0AA30016CE.uuout@ghbbs.com> RON ROTH wrote: > > For those who sent for 800 MHz and back-light mods, and whose mail > I received before the 21st of Feb, I have sent out a second package > with an additional mod that extends the battery life another 2-3 > hours. For those whose mail I received after the 21st, the package > will automatically include all four mods. > > I found that when using rechargeable batteries with the Pro-26, the > warning beep and BATT Lo indicator appear when the voltage drops to > about 4.75V, and at 4.55V the scanner cuts out prematurely, even > though there is lots of battery power left. > By removing R515 on the logic board, one will not get that annoying > beep any longer (neither will the BATT Lo indicator appear), and the > scanner will continue to operate for an additional 2-3 hours before > cutting out. As the Pro-26 approaches about 4V, its sensitivity and > voice clarity starts to decline, at which time one can recharge the > unit, or continue to listen at lower volume levels until the scanner > cuts out. > If someone *does* prefer the warning beep and BATT Lo indicator, but > likes the extra hours of listening, then replacing R515 with a higher > value of around 27k Ohms will still prevent the scanner from cutting > out prematurely, while the beep and BATT LO indicator kick in later > at a lower voltage level of around 4.3 Volts. > Since there are surface-mount components involved, this procedure > though requires better than casual soldering skills. > > How fast the batteries discharge depends of course on the listening > volume, whether the back-light is being used, and on the frequencies > programmed in. Here is a list of (approximate) squelched current > levels at 5V for various (approximate) frequency ranges: > > 0 MHz ............. 80mA 311-375 MHz ....... 108-110mA > 25-29 MHz ............. 85mA 376-399 MHz ....... 113-114mA > 29-107 MHz .......... 78-80mA 400-511 MHz ........... 107mA > 108-136 MHz .......... 83-84mA 512-805 MHz ......... 80-81mA > 137-224 MHz .......... 77-79mA 806-900 MHz ........... 104mA > 225-249 MHz ............. 82mA 900-1011 MHz ....... 102-104mA > 250-310 MHz ............. 86mA 1012-1300 MHz ....... 104-107mA > > * Ron Roth > --- > þ RoseReader 2.10á P003228 Entered at [GHBBS] Ron, how can I get these mods? I would be greatful for them. kleffler@qnet.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:07 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: ezwriter@netcom.com (kEN Colburn) Subject: Re: AM on UHF???(KFI L.A.) Message-ID: References: <1996feb5.203748.10318@lafn.org> <4f6tkn$mkg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4fcooj$ok2@kwuz.nerc-keyworth.ac.uk> <4fmtj1$f44@emerald.oz.net> <4g2mkt$1f3o@saba.info.ucla.edu> <1996Feb19.192401.24649@llyene.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 21:29:12 GMT 450.8500 is KFWB doing the same thing. Its funny to hear their outtakes and practices. and the traffic copters - 450.7500,450.4875... KISS 450.9500 -- Gimme a bike, a laptop, a gun and a Leathermen's tool and i can go anywhere and do anything. ezwriter@netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:08 1996 From: Bob Lyle Subject: Re: Icom R-7000 repair help! Message-ID: <260296.21550776965.n@frontier.canrem.com> Date: 26 Feb 1996 21:55:07 GMT Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Greg, Change all the electrolitic capacitors on the DC-DC convertor PCB, and while you're at it do the same on the display board. I have 2 R-7000's under my "control" between work and home and they've both needed the caps changed. Regards, Bob Lyle From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:09 1996 From: Dan Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: *HELP* UNIDEN BC860XLT MODS NEEDED Date: 26 Feb 1996 22:02:15 GMT Message-ID: <4gtal7$an4@nw002.infi.net> I NEED MODS FOR UBC 860XLT ANYONE HAVE ANY? From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:11 1996 From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Trunked Sys. - Where is control channel? Date: 26 Feb 1996 22:31:07 GMT Message-ID: <4gtcbb$avv@ccnet2.ccnet.com> References: norelco@shadow.net (Arnie B.) wrote: >How does someone identify a control channel in a trunked system? You'll hear data on it. Buzzing sounds. On older Moto systems it changes on ce in a while. It should be one of four system channels. Either the highest or the l owest four - I can't remember right now. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:11 1996 From: sfritts@usit.net (Steven Fritts) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Pro 2032 questions Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 23:27:18 GMT Message-ID: <4gtfml$f6b@news.usit.net> Reply-To: sfritts@usit.net I found a Pro 2032 in a local pawn shop. What are the freq ranges of this unit? Is it modifiable? What is a fair price for it? Thanks for your help, Steve From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:12 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: tweek@netcom.com (Reverend Tweek) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Message-ID: References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:27:03 GMT Mike Mayer wrote: > >I never knew that (I'm a ham, an electronics nut, and a scanner freak). >I'd venture to say that MOST hams don't know what RG means. Just like most >people don't know what BNC or N stands for, or for that matter, why the I'm studying for a job at Radio Shack... mind if I try this one? BNC = Big Nubby Connector Then there are the TNC connectors used on cellphones: Tiny Nubby Connector Oh, and the original... the plain old N connector... Yep... plain Nubby. >I would, for example, expect an RS sales person to know the diff between >Narrow FM and Wideband FM, but not something as relatively obscure >(but great for Trivial Pursuit) as Radio Guide. Hey... just go in there and watch them try to explain to an elder-folk, how to interface their cable television in some form other than the loopthrough in the VCR. "Hi, welcome to Radio Shack. May I help you?" "I'm looking for 7805 voltage regulator." "Do you have the catalog number?" "Nope, catalogs cost too much... don't need it anyway." "I can't tell you where it is if you can't point to it in the catalog." "That's fine, just ring it up." "Oh, I could have told you where _that_ was." *PLONK* From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:13 1996 From: obetron@ix.netcom.com(David M. Oberholtzer ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: PRO-39 cellular mods? needed Date: 27 Feb 1996 01:50:37 GMT Message-ID: <4gto1d$au@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> Does anyone out there know if the RS PRO-39 handheld is modifiable to restore the cellular? I believe it is, but not positive. Can anyone help me with the cellular restoration or where to find them? Thank you, scanner buddies! David M. Oberholtzer obetron@ix.netcom.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:14 1996 From: tmartin@igs.net (Terry Martin) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: WHY CELLULAR? Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 02:02:35 GMT Message-ID: <4gtoln$qgr@nntp.igs.net> References: <4gc2s6$icc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> In article , cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) wrote: > >Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) writes: >> What is the big deal about listening to cellular? > >I usually listen to cellular after midnight, so there aren't a ton of >people on. If I happen to lose a conversation I just scan through the 833 >possible frequencies and usually find it again within a few seconds. I >like to get the phone number, then go to a pay phone and tell the person >what I just heard. The reactions you get can be quite amusing. > Reminds me of the time I had a really annoying salesman at the door that had been trying to sign me up on a service contract, that I had a hard time getting rid of. Finally he went back to his car and turned on his cellphone. My roomate walked up to the scanner, which was on anyway, and hit the search button for a cell BASE search just in time to hear the guy say "I don't know about that guy on the 400 block, he's just a goof." The look on his face was priceless when I stuck my head out the door and said, "HEY! Who you callin' a goof?" For a salesman, he sure got speechless in a hurry. Never saw him again, either. Terry From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:15 1996 From: lmilrad@passport.ca (Radioman) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: FS: Yupiteru MVT 8000 (price reduced) Date: 27 Feb 1996 04:53:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4gukba$mk@diplomatic.passport.ca> Price is now $450.00 US plus shipping. The MVT 8000 is 200 channel ac/dc scanner with a mounting bracket for mobile use and comes with a cigarette lighter adapter although it can be hard wired. It covers 8 Mhz to 1300 Mhz (continuous without blockage) and receives in WFM, NFM and AM. Frequency steps are 5,10,12.5,50 and 100 Khz. It's got a 10 band search function, pass memory function, and other goodies found in high-end scanners. Lou Milrad VE3TRY lmilrad@passport.ca From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:16 1996 From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Uniden 900Mhz Phones... Date: 27 Feb 1996 11:43:40 -0600 Message-ID: <4gvfsc$ln2@eugene.convex.com> References: <4glnbk$c28@crusher.ici.net> In <4glnbk$c28@crusher.ici.net> mnewton@ici.net (Mike) writes: >In article , > ccartee@cisco.com (Claude Alan Cartee) wrote: >>I remember reading a post a while back where someone had 'discovered' >>that the Uniden 900MHz Spread Spectrum phones had a ~400MHz leak that >>was scannable. Before I set up an experiment, does someone have that >>mail? Or know what I am talking about? Thanks... The Tropez models have a leak around 400 MHz. I don't remember hearing about Uniden having this problem. >I have put a frequency counter up to the base and handset with unstable >results. It reports anywhere from 500Mhz - 800Mhz with about a 50% of normal >signal strength. I am assuming that this is because it is transmitting on >multiple frequencies at the same time and it just 'confuses' the frequency >counter. Counters normally do this when they aren't locking onto anything. >I have also scanned the ~902Mhz - ? as indicated in the manual with no audibl e >results. Try 902 to 906 and listen for some raspy digital garbage on at least three nearby freqs. David From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:17 1996 From: dcoker@panix.com (Dave Coker) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Keypad tricks - test mode? Date: 27 Feb 1996 12:52:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4gvgcn$k40@panix.com> Could someone please post the "keyboard tricks" - the sequences that drop a RatShack portable scanner into test mode? Thanks! From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:18 1996 From: parnass@radioman.ih.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner Subject: Re: "Other" mods for PRO-51 Date: 27 Feb 1996 15:25:11 GMT Message-ID: <4gv7on$vg@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <3131eb9e.2094230@news.iadfw.net> Reply-To: parnass@att.com Summary: read up and tinker on In article <3131eb9e.2094230@news.iadfw.net>, Randall R. Moore wrote: >So, Everyone now knows that there are no currently >available cell mods >for the late model PRO-51s.... The PRO-51 and BC220XLT are similar, so why can't the PRO-51 be modified for expanded frequency reception like the BC220XLT, as described by Steve Donnell, WA1YKL? The technique, applied to the BC220XLT, was described in Steve's Mod House column in Nat Scan or in the RCMA Scanner Journal (I've forgotten which), and more generally in Feb 1995 Monitoring Times. Only a subset of modifications are available on the Internet. I subscribe to several radio and electronics magazines and see modification tips for radios which people claim are "unmodifiable" merely because they haven't found a mod file on a BBS or web site. Read up and tinker on. -- ============================================================================== Copyright 1996, Bob Parnass, AJ9S parnass@att.com Find and identify transmitter sites with RadioMap(tm) From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:19 1996 From: TyBryner@sisna.com (Tyson Bryner) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: AM signal amplifier? Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:09:57 GMT Reply-To: TyBryner@sisna.com Message-ID: <31333a67.768139@news.sisna.com> Does anyone have, or know of a place where I can get a schematic for an AM broadcast signal amplifier? Or where such a device can be purchased? If so, could you please email me? Thanks, 73 Tyson Bryner KC7DPA From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:20 1996 From: gary@abccom.com (Gary Barnes) Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Letter of Appreciation for Radio Dealer "DO buy from this guy..!" Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:25:23 GMT Message-ID: <31333dd9.3725507@news.amug.org> References: <4gd8n9$1st4@news.gate.net> <4ge10m$i89@excalibur.edge.net> <313020CA.275@the.door> On Sun, 25 Feb 1996 00:41:46 -0800, Who Dat wrote: >jim wrote: > >> I have bought and sold several items over the internet (all HAM gear) >> and have never had a problem with anyone...I may have just been lucky >> but I don't think there are many HAMs looking to cheat other HAMs.(snip) > >There is always someone looking to cheat someone else. I have purchased quite a few radios over the net and really have had good luck ....1 water damaged radio and a couple of misrepresented radios but that is really pretty good considering I have purchased about 150 radios on the net. Gary ABC Communications Systems Inc. 441 S. Robson Bldg # 108 Mesa,Az 85210 Voice # 800-729-6473 Fax #602-964-3909 From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:21 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner From: gregl@iglou.com (Gregory A. Law) Subject: Re: No Code = No Brain = C.B. Message-ID: <31334209.88091006@news.iglou.com> Reply-To: gregl@iglou.com References: <4csf3v$bgo@news.mcn.net> <4d4g0r$7eb@netport.com> <4d6u7n$qik@news.mcn.net> <4da7b5$3k4@jupiter.planet.net> <4dhtig$5pl@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <4dokh9$7gj@pegasus.starlink.com> <4e0088$t1g@brutus.bright.net> <4e2j9r$m65@netport.com> <4e6osq$l11@news.mcn.net> <4ed2jo$s1j@netport.com> <4f3q9o$f5e@news.ecn.bgu.edu> <4fa64n$qpe@netport.com> <4fi74f$rjb@over.mhv.net> <4gb4pa$182@news.onramp.net> <4gdj1c$hm5@news1.radix.net> <4gi2c5$1vj@reade Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:41:10 GMT On 22 Feb 1996 15:33:25 GMT, Rod Dinkins wrote: >Here in San Diego we have a club with over 800 members -- many many with >No-Code Tech Licenses. I and many many others think the No code licenses >are a great addition to Amateur Radio. See my articles of accomplishments >of same. > >As for big gun stations -- we have a group of QRPers here, several who >have worked DXCC (all CW or SSB) with less than 5 watts and modest >antennas such as a Cushcraft R5 mounted 8 foot off the ground. Not easy or >for the faint-hearted but DEFINITELY achievable. I find it quite refreshing each time I learn of others that enjoy working QRP. I have a fairly modest station consisting of an Icom IC-701 with a 40-meter dipole in the attic of my apartment. I may not be able to work Australia at the flip of a switch, but I always get a contact when I call CQ. >Don't let a few "bug" you when the majority welcomes you. Agreed. I don't read the rec.radio.* news groups often because I'd much rather enjoy a curteous conversation on HF than read the bickering that goes on here. --- Greg KE4DPX Morse Code: The universal language spoken around the world. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:22 1996 From: sreider@holmes.umd.edu (Susan) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Asking Help Date: 28 Feb 1996 11:48:44 -0500 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <4h211c$dt5@holmes.umd.edu> I'm trying to find information about police car computers. I would like the name of any systems (acroynms and such) I would like info on police car tracking systems. The services a police car computer provides. Data rates of transmissions ? Is it via digital cellular packets ? Any help would be appreciated. TIA Richard Reider From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:23 1996 From: Al Robinson Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: In what states are mobile scanners in you Date: 28 Feb 1996 15:42:47 GMT Message-ID: <4h1t5n$nrf@news.rl.af.mil> References: <4gf1l6$1l3@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4gk3i5$dc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4glnn5$jg9@news-e2c.gnn.com> To: sfs@gnn.com >Does it have to be an amateur radio or does it matter if its only a >scanner and you have a valid amateur license in your possesion? > I believe it must be an amateur radio and you must have a valid amateur license in your possession to be legal. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:24 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: "David A. Lovell" Subject: WTB: Bearcat Service Manuals Message-ID: <21c7cc$b3a13.2f4@tcnntp.trader.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:58:19 GMT Wanted to Buy: Old ELECTRA model Bearcat Service (not Owner's) Manuals. Particularly interested in BC210XL and BC250 Service Manuals, but might buy others as well. Contact: David Lovell - RF Eng. Owner, ELECTRA Corporation (317) 326-4419 71722,40 Compuserve, and of course Electra@trader.com I'd try Uniden, but why waste my time? From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: slwork@netcom.com (Steve Work) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Message-ID: References: <4g602j$lig@jupiter.tcac.com> <31279AA3.3C89@sprynet.com> <3128FE52.2B20@boulder.vni.com> <4gu1vr$roi@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:18:32 GMT Cliff Pearson (db477@cleveland.Freenet.Edu) wrote: : Radio Shack employees are stupid. I've never been in a Radio : Shack where anyone could help me with ANYTHING. They know what : TV's, VCR's and cellular phones are, but thet couldn't answer : anything about them. One guy tried to tell me that a cellular : phone could be used in your house as a portable cordless phone. : Well it can, can't it? Assuming the guy is being paid by commission, he might not be quite as dumb as first would appear. Of course, the buyer would have to be well-endowed with stupidity.... From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:26 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Radio Shack: You've got Questions. We've got answers Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4h15tr$kb2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:22:59 GMT Mark L9 (markl9@aol.com) writes: > << TNC connectors>> TNC = Terminal Node Controller. TNC connectors have absolutely nothing to do with Packet Radio. They aren't even the type of connector you would attach to a "Terminal Node Controller" From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:28 1996 Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner From: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies??? Message-ID: Reply-To: cv282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mistie Mullarkey) References: <4gegus$34u@hopper.acm.org> <4h1c0u$9cu@oznet07.ozemail.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:31:16 GMT Two-Dogs (why@do.you.ask?) writes: > > What you hear is the same thing as the person with the mobile hears, and if > the person they are talking to is using a phone which reflects some of the > earpiece noise to the mic, then you can hear the mobile station as well, as > it has just made a round-trip, however at a much reduced volume. If you get > the land-phone that has a headset/earpiece like a switch opperator uses, the n > you wont get this feedback, and wont hear the mobile. It's just luck as to h ow > bad the land-phone is designed. > Actually it depends on how new the users cell phone is. As I said before about half the phones get repeated by the base. I don't like straining to hear the other half of the conversation, so I usually skip to the next full conversation. (you know where both people are speaking with the same volume). Anyway it's a good way to discourage scanner listeners. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:28 1996 From: Dan <102507.3041@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: REQ: C-SPAN freqs Date: 28 Feb 1996 17:52:00 GMT Message-ID: <4h24o0$dlu$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> Please post freqs for C-SPAN network Thanks -- Dan From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:29 1996 From: Henry Wysmulek Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Problem for "experts" in scanning and shortwave! Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:01:54 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4glsbf$g9u@newsbf02.news.aol.com> the problem is not with your 2 line phone. the problem lies with your low cost cordless phone. your phone line is a series circuit, add a fault into it anywhere and your whole circuit is affected. the only other way rf usually gets onto your line, is if you are feed by overhead wires and not by buried cable. the overhead lines act like an antenna and pick up signals. proper grounding of the overhead lines by your telco will eliminate these unwanted signals on your line. H. WYSMULEK xhp195@freenet.mb.ca BLUE SKY FREENET From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:30 1996 From: ctrice@ssnet.com Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:09:38 GMT Message-ID: <4h1r7v$1mt@news.ssnet.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> slick@primenet.com wrote: >I have a TV antenna that I don't use anyoore but it is still on top of >my house. Can I hook up my scanner to the antenna for better reception >espcially 29-54 mhz? I have the coax cable and adapter but the guy at >Radio Shack told me it wouldn't work. Any ideas? >THANKS! According to Cheeks that if you set it vertical that it makes a rather good ant. But by the time you do that it's just as cheap to buy and scan master ant. Gary ctrice@ssnet.com They can run but they can't hide!!!! From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:32 1996 From: dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Tommy the Dipstick (was Re: Ham Crap) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:17:21 PST Message-ID: References: <4gq6qn$24pg@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4h0jd3$suu@insosf1.netins.net> In article <4h0jd3$suu@insosf1.netins.net> Tom Aldrich wr ites: :>dpm3@dpm3.seanet.com (Dan Morisseau) wrote: :>> Yes! As a mlicnesed ahm myself, I find it EXCEPTIONALLY stupid! Just :>> ignore the cretins who want to fight about this issue. :> Yeah! There are more important things....like spelling!! You are right and I am wrong, Tommy! I let my fingers try and get ahead of my eyes and my (rather slow) brain when typing and look at the keyboard instead of the screen and then don't proofread what I've typed. Typos are the inevitable result! So, Tommy-boy, you proved yourself a REAL insightful observer of issues and commentary on this one! I've often wondered about the habit of spotting people's typo's -as opposed to REAL misspellings -is it something akin to Shortwave DX-ing? Do you keep a log of really "great" catches? Do you keep totals and trade by e-mail with other hobbyists the nifty things you find and the impressive way you skewer the unlucky victim in public? Is there a club that you guys belong to? Tell us more, Tommy. Dan Morisseau N7ZXL 47 17' 16"N / 122 11' 40"W Elevation: 300' From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:33 1996 From: bnr@universe.digex.net (bnr) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: bc3000xlt - battery charging question Date: 28 Feb 1996 21:05:27 GMT Message-ID: <4h2g2n$72i@news4.digex.net> I was just curious as to what the proper amount of time would be to charge the battery pack in the 3000. I've wasted video camera ni-cads before and don't want to make the same mistake now. Anybody care to share their experiences? Along the same lines (once I determine the proper time for charging) I am thinking about getting one of those electrical outlet timers and setting it to charge fully drained batteries. I have ordered a second battery so I will always have a spare. No over or under charging with a consistent charge time. Anybody tried this or something along the same lines? BTW, thanks to Bob Parnass for his suggestion on using a Smiley Thin Stick 18" telescoping metal antenna on my 3000. It hasn't increased coverage *drastically* but it has most certainly made a difference and I would recommend the same to anyone else looking to replace the rubber duck. And the flexible bottom has come in handy (I would probably have broken a metal antenna already and I have only had it several days). Reply here or via private e-mail, no difference (except here someone else may pick something up). Thanks, ********************** Brian Raines bnr@universe.digex.net ********************** From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:34 1996 From: randylee@ix.netcom.com(Larry Solinger) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Riverside area Date: 29 Feb 1996 00:31:56 GMT Message-ID: <4h2s5s$dqo@cloner4.netcom.com> I would like the frequency for police,aircraft,medical. Thanks randylee@ix.netcom From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:34 1996 From: wa6sul@ix.netcom.com(gg ) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Icom R-7000 repair help! Date: 29 Feb 1996 06:24:25 GMT Message-ID: <4h3gqp$77p@cloner4.netcom.com> References: <4gv3uj$ija@mail.TJU.EDU> Keep in mind there is a ICOM repair shop in Irvine Calif. near the I405 freeway and MacArthur. I did not catch where you live, but their turn around time is, I think better, than Washington's. My R7000 re-calibration took about 1 week, and that was waiting inline behind all the other work they had. THey did an excellent job too. You might want to make a telephone inquiry first, since business conditions seem to change so fast. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:36 1996 From: horak@convex.com (David Horak) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Use TV Antenna for Scanner? Date: 29 Feb 1996 11:34:59 -0600 Message-ID: <4h4o43$gto@eugene.convex.com> References: <4glkc6$r7f@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4gvfkf$lii@eugene.convex.com> In ghansen@accessone.com (Glenn Hansen) w rites: >In article <4gvfkf$lii@eugene.convex.com> horak@convex.com (David Horak) writ es: >Ummm, yea if we were talking HF spectrum, but we are not. Poloarization is a >big deal. Using a TV antenna for VHF/UHF try it and see for yourself. Signa l >strength will be way down for most signals received using the horizontal >plane. VHF/UHF signals are not intended to be bounced and >reflected as a way of life before reception. Huh? VHF/UHF bounces around big time. That's one of the fun things about fox hunts and bouncing signals off water towers, buildings, etc. Sometimes polarization is a big deal, especially in theory but in practical terms, I haven't found it to be *that* big a deal, especially if it would take considerable effort to re-mount the TV antenna. >> Even for transmitting, the >>75/50 ohm mismatch is acceptable at low power levels. >I suppose, especially if you don't want to get any signal out. The lower the >power level the less you have left over after losses. Antenna matching when >transmitting is important and keeping the power low just decreases the damage . Again, I speak from experience. I used to run 5 watts out of a R/S discone with RG6 cable. Had real good luck with it and the mismatch only slightly increased the SWR. Besides, radios these days are designed to take considerable mismatches. What do you think those "rubber ducks" look like to a transceiver? David From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:36 1996 From: unclebob@ripco.com (Uncle Bob) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Pro 43 problem Date: 29 Feb 1996 18:30:11 GMT Message-ID: <4h4rbj$pi@gail.ripco.com> References: <4gvpo7$m7n@granite.sentex.net> Two choices: 1. Toss scanner against wall and see if it works afterwards. ;-) 2. Visit the repair shop. -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Uncle Bob..............unclebob@ripco.com From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:37 1996 From: Donnie Hagan Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,alt.radio.scanner Subject: ORION TELECOM? Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:08:24 -0800 Message-ID: <31366A28.DCC@occ-uky.campus.mci.net> References: <4gon7k$itc@bubba.NMSU.Edu> Anybody had any dealings with these guys-good or bad? E-mail me please. From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:38 1996 From: Joseph Cardani Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: PL decode Date: 29 Feb 1996 20:34:19 GMT Message-ID: <4h52kb$7vq@mail.TJU.EDU> References: <2fb_9602271200@magsystems.com> Roland, The Uniden Bearcat BC-9000 has this option. You would need to buy an optional CTCSS decoder chip and install it. I have a BC-8500 (former model) and have the CTCSS chip i nstalled. The unit works fine with the chip. Installation is fairly easy, but you have t o wbe careful with the IC's pins. The 9000 should be better, since it is an improvement over the 8500. You can get a 9000 for around $380.00 via mail order. I use Grove in N.C. The CTCSS tone board is additional. Not sure of the price but Grove's url is www.grove.net Joe Cardani Voorhees NJ From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:39 1996 From: "C. Wheeler" Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Re: Mobile Scanner legal in WA, OR, or CA?? Date: 29 Feb 1996 20:40:33 GMT Message-ID: <4h5302$k77@ccnet2.ccnet.com> References: <4gqt6p$huq@odo.PEAK.ORG> <4h14vh$k4b@newsbf02.news.aol.com> It is perfectly legal in California to use a scanner in a vehicle for general monitoring. It is of course, illegal to use a scanner (mobile or otherwise) t o avoid detection by the police or otherwise assist you in commiting a crime. In other words...technically...it is illegal to use a scanner to keep track of police units so you can get with intentionally breaking traffic laws etc. That's probably true in all, or least most, states. Curtis From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:40 1996 From: dd37666@goodnet.com (Brett Duane) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Could PRO-2002/3/4 mods be done on PRO-2030? Date: 29 Feb 1996 21:13:13 GMT Message-ID: <4h54ta$jlk@news1.goodnet.com> Reply-To: dd37666@goodnet.com I see many mods for the PRO-200? group of scanners and would like to install a computer interface to my PRO-2030. I suspect that there are many simularities, but I haven't heard of many. I took a chance one evening by cutting a wire loop to enable the cellular band, and it worked. This after I read similar mods for PRO-2002/3/4, but before seeing anything for the PRO-2030. Are the PRO-2002/3/4 scanners similar enough to the 2030 to make it practical? Or weren't there enough 2030's sold to stimulate much interest? From lwbyppp@epix.net Thu Mar 07 10:24:41 1996 From: bumski@ix.netcom.com (Gregory K. Dawson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.scanner Subject: Looking for Broadband Linear Amplifier Operating in 20 to 1000megahertz Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 21:45:38 GMT Message-ID: <4h56tu$f4r@cloner4.netcom.com> I'm looking for a broadband linear operating from 20 to 1000 megahertz range. The minimum final output must be 50 watts. Please, e-mail me at bumski@ix.netcom.com if you have one. Please send asking price, phone number, and address. Thanks, Greg