The Harbour implementation of codeblocks. Ryszard Glab Compilation of a codeblock. During compile time the codeblock is stored in the following form: - the header - the stream of pcode bytes The header stores information about referenced local variables. +0: the pcode byte for _PUSHBLOCK +1: the number of bytes that defines a codeblock +3: number of codeblock parameters (declared between || in a codeblock) +5: number of used local variables declared in procedure/function where the codeblock is created +7: the list of procedure/function local variables positions on the eval stack of procedure/function. Every local variable used in a codeblock occupies 2 bytes in this list. When nested codeblocks are used then this list is created for the outermost codeblock only. +x: The stream of pcode bytes follows the header. +y: the pcode byte for _ENDBLOCK Creation of a codeblock. When HB_P_PUSHBLOCK opcode is executed then the HB_ITEM structure is created and placed on the eval stack. The type of item is IT_BLOCK. The value of this item is a pointer to HB_CODEBLOCK structure. Additionally this item stores the base of static variables defined for the current function/procedure - this is used during a codeblock evaluation when the evaluation is called from a code from other PRG module. Also the number of expected parameters is stored. The HB_CODEBLOCK structure stores a pointer to the pcodes stream that is executed during a codeblock evaluation. It stores also the pointer to a table with local variables references. Values of all local variables defined in a procedure and used in a codeblock are replaced with a reference to a value stored in a global memory variables pool. This allows the correct access to detached local variables in a codeblock returned from this function (either directly in RETURN statement or indirectly by assigning it to a static or memvar variable. This automatic and unconditional replace is required because there is no safe method to find if a codeblock will be accessed from an outside of a function where it is created. When nested codeblocks are used then only the outermost codeblock creates the table - all inner codeblock uses this table. The first element of this table contains a reference counter for this table. It allows to share the table between nested codeblock - the table is deleted if there is no more references to it. This is caused by the fact that a inner codeblock can be created during evaluation of outer codeblock when local variables don't exist like in this example: PROCEDUE MAIN() PRIVATE foo, bar Test() EVAL( foo ) EVAL( bar ) PROCEDURE Test() LOCAL a:='FOO', b:='BAR' foo ={ || a + ( bar:=EVAL( {|| b} ) ) } RETURN Evaluation of a codeblock. Parameters passed to a codeblock are placed on the eval stack before a codeblock evaluation. They are accessed just like usual function parameters. When a codeblock parameter is referenced then its position on the eval stack is used. When a procedure local variable is referenced then the index into the table of local variables positions (copied from the header) is used. The negative value is used as an index to distinguish it from the reference to a codeblock parameter. Incompatbility with the Clipper. 1) Detached locals passed by reference There is a little difference between the handling of variables passed by the reference in a codeblock. The following code explains it (thanks to David G. Holm) Function Main() Local nTest Local bBlock1 := MakeBlock() Local bBlock2 := {|| DoThing( @nTest ), qout("From Main: ", nTest ) } eval( bBlock1 ) eval( bBlock2 ) Return( NIL ) Function MakeBlock() Local nTest Return( {|| DoThing( @nTest ), qout("From MakeBlock: ", nTest ) } ) Function DoThing( n ) n := 42 Return( NIL ) In Clipper it produces: From MakeBlock: NIL From Main: 42 In Harbour it produces (it is the correct output, IMHO) From MakeBlock: 42 From Main: 42 2) Scope of undeclared variables Consider the following code: PROCEDURE MAIN() LOCAL cb cb :=Detach() ? EVAL( cb, 10 ) RETURN FUNCTION Detach() LOCAL b:={|x| x+a} LOCAL a:=0 RETURN b In Clipper the 'a' variable in a codeblock has the *local* scope however in Harbour the 'a' variable has the *private* scope. As a result, in Clipper this code will print 10 and in Harbour it will raise 'argument error' in '+' operation. This will be true also when the 'a' variable will be declared as PRIVATE PROCEDURE MAIN() LOCAL cb PRIVATE a cb :=Detach() ? EVAL( cb, 10) RETURN The above code also prints 10 in Clipper (even if compiled with -a or -v switches)