| From: | Gary Peake |
| Date: | 5 Jun 2001 at 19:30:52 |
| Subject: | Re: cost of amigaone ? |
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:21:29 +0100, "phillip.reed"
<phillip.reed@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>i do read the news, but the fact is, the geforce cards are the fastest
>avaible today... even the mx geforce is miles infront of the g450max....
>take a look at this pic and see what you think for yourself...
>i use pcs and i have an amiga, i hate pcs but i just use them for the
>games... simple reason ? they are very quick and very powerfull and
>everything supports them... trouble is i cant play the settlers, banshee,
>all the great classics that i was used too when i first had an amiga. its
>just simple maths, have something that slow, or have something that fast, i
>know which way i would go. im sorry, but have yo seen the new geforce 3 or
>even the gts at work ? im sorry, but its fast as nuts.... dont get me wrong
>guys, i loev the amiga and everything that it represents, but you want a
>fast machine, you have to have fast hardware to begin with.
Have you personally compared the two in the same PC under the same exact
conditions?
We have, the white papers can tell stories.
IF you want a quite fast card that is also more of a professional (WYSIWYG)
look, then Matrox is better. Ask anyone who stares at a computer screen for
long periods of time which card they prefer. They will say the Matrox card.
No wavering lines, no problems with getting too hot and it showing up on
your screen, no hardware acceleration issues, good solid drivers with
Matrox.
Gary Peake
Director - Developer Relations and Support
Amiga Inc.
http://www.amigadev.net
http://www.amiga.com
Never doubt that a group of highly motivated and
dedicated individuals can change the world. In fact,
this is the only thing that ever has.
Team AMIGA - The Amiga Dream Team!
Member of the Amiga Family.
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/