AmigaActive (191/1728)

From:David McMinn
Date:5 Jun 2001 at 00:00:54
Subject:Re: amiga survivor (vaporware? maybe it SHOULD be!)

--- In amigactive@y..., Samuel Byford <sam@b...> wrote:
> A bit thin maybe but then its a new venture.

Hardly! Amiga Survivor has been around for a while. It may seem like
a new venture because a new lot have taken it over, but if they've changed
it that drastically, maybe it would be better calling it somthing else :/

And isn't issue 10 about 4 months overdue? From what I've seen on various
mailing lists they've had abit of trouble recently.

> WebWatch - why on earth is a Corrs website in an Amiga Mag?

Everyone likes to wan^Htch the Corrs in action ;)

> All in all an interesting read but it'll need improving! And for
> something that I paid to receive over 1 � years ago when the original

Ah, had I read this far down before replying I wouldn't have needed
to write the first couple of paragraphs. And I can't be arsed changing
them now :)

Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/