| From: | Jan-Erik Karlsson |
| Date: | 26 Jun 2001 at 21:43:35 |
| Subject: | Re: setenv |
Hello, Robert
On 26-Jun-01, you wrote:
RC > Hi Jan-Erik,
RC >
RC > On 23-Jun-01, you wrote:
RC >
RC >> 1) you really should disable the resident setenv (the built-in one) it
RC >> doesn't hurt to have it enabled but then you have to call the new
RC >> setenv with c:setenv instead of just purely setenv (and you could also
RC >> make it resident of course :-)
RC >
RC > So could you not then remove the resident one and put the new version
RC > resident at the beginning of the startup-sequence? Surely that would
RC > make the update transparent, you could use setenv just like before,
RC > without the C: path.
yes, but since the setenv command is very small the gain of having it
resident is minimal
remember that c: is already in the your search path automatically so you
only really need to disable the default setenv (meaning the built-in one)
With kind regards,
Jan-Erik Karlsson
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
To unsubscribe mailto:amigactive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Anyone sending unsubscribe messages to the list will be SHOT!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/