From: | Peter Gordon |
Date: | 3 Jun 2001 at 12:04:24 |
Subject: | Re: slightly ot - re: blitz basic |
Hi , on the subject of [amigactive] slightly ot - re: blitz basic, you said:
> theres a pc blitz basic - **sigh**
> if only amiga would hire them to write a tao version for amiga one/
Why? Blitz Basic is horrible. People who like it are people who have struggled
through and got used to its quirks, it is not an instantly usable language.
Perhaps a whole new BASIC implementation would be a better idea... Blitz (on
the amiga at least) is buggy, quirky, inconsistant, generates awful code (so
its best to use as much assembler as possible), ...
Strange Facts #16:
An ostrich's eye is bigger than it's brain.
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/