X-15 OPERATIONS FLIGHT REPORT



FLIGHT NO: 2-53-97 DATE OF REPORT: October 9, 1967

PILOT: Maj. W. Knight DATE OF FLIGHT: October 3, 1967

CARRIER AIRCRAFT: B-52 #008 LAUNCH LAKE: Mud Lake #1

ENGINE: S/N 110 APU #1 21 AN APU #2 22AN

PURPOSE OF FLIGHT: (1) Martin Ablative Full Scale Test
 

(2) Ramjet Local Flow

(3) Fluidic Temp Probe Test

(4) Stability & Control with Ramjet (Dummy)


I. Discussion of Previous Operations

A. The ablative coating survived the previous flight (2-52-96) in relatively good condition. The coating required some refurbishment to put it in flight status for this flight.

B. Failure of the Hycon II Camera Mount during the previous flight, resulted in that experiment being deleted until further notice. Redesign is in progress.

II. Configuration Changes A. The Hycon II experiment was removed and replaced with an aft viewing Millikan 16mm camera to photograph the Dummy Ramjet.

B. Drop tanks were installed for this flight.

C. A high temperature measuring probe installation was incorporated at the top leading-edge of the upper vertical. Two sensors were used, a Rosemont probe and a Honeywell fluidic probe.

III. Pre-Flight Events A. Inspection and refurbishment of the ablative coating (following flight 2-52-96) was begun Wednesday, August 23; and was completed Tuesday, September 5.

B. The periodic refurbishment of the pilot seat stabilization booms was accomplished at Talley Corporation between August 28 and September 18. The booms were reinstalled in the seat on Tuesday, September 19.

C. System preflight functional tests were begun on Saturday, September 16, and completed on Wednesday, September 20. The external drop tanks were installed on Monday, September 18.

D. An APU ground run was made on Wednesday, September 20. No engine ground run was made for this flight, but a full load of LOX and NH3 was serviced and chilled leak checks were made. A propellant external to internal flow check was also made to verify proper propellant transfer from the external tanks.

E. The X-15 was closed out for flight on Friday, September 22, ablative coating touch-up repairs were made Saturday, September 23, and the X-15 was mated on the following Monday.

F. Wet weather made Mud Lake unusable for X-15 operations during the week of Monday, September 25, and flight 2-53-97 was scheduled for Tuesday, October 3. The flight was made on that date.

IV. Flight Events A. Flight 2-53-97 was made on Tuesday, October 3. Scheduled take-off of 1200 hours was delayed to 1330 hours due to two annoying problems: 1. A persistent dribble of NH3 from the fuel jettison valve required that the fuel tank be pressurized to reseat that valve. Subsequent venting of the tank allowed the valve to back off again slightly, but the resulting dribble was quite small and acceptable. The valve will be removed prior to the next flight.

2. The other delay was caused by a failure of the communications system within the pilots helmet, which was noted after pilot entry. The helmet was replaced with a spare.

B. Subsystem Operation during the flight was normal, except that during pre-launch tests of the SAS System, the yaw channel failed to trip out on "Working Channel Test." Since no inadvertent yaw trip outs had occurred up to that point and since the yaw channel reset without incident, it was decided to proceed. Following launch all SAS channels performed normally.

Engine operation and propellant feed system operation during boost phase were excellent. The pilot's NH3 helium flow indicator was, as in the past, rather slow in responding, but the "Paddle Switch" flow indicators responded instantly in external flow, and confirmed proper propellant feed sequencing.

C. The ramjet separated prematurely during the turn to downwind leg over Rogers Lake, at approximately 32,000 feet and approximately Mach 1.0. The ramjet impacted in the Edwards Bombing Range and was recovered. Due to the high separation speed the parachute failed and impact damage was great. Certain major pieces of the ramjet are salvageable however. It appears that aerodynamic heating caused the explosive bolts (which attach the ramjet to the pylon) to fire prematurely (see item D below).

D. Post flight inspection shows that local aerodynamic heating of the ramjet pylon, especially the leading-edge area, was too great for the ablative coating installed in that area, and virtually all of the ablative coating dissipated down to bare metal. Skin failure followed, and several holes were burned in the skin and substructure. The excessive heating propagated upward into the lower fuselage area, causing an over-temperature indication in the engine H202 compartment, failure of a control-gas line, and loss of helium control-gas. As a result, residual propellants could not be jettisoned.

It appears that the excessive heating of the unprotected pylon eventually "cooked off" the explosive bolts attaching the Dummy Ramjet, (inspection shows all four to have fired) resulting in premature separation as reported above. The design of the pylon is now under scrutiny and a new leading-edge design, able to withstand the Ramjet shock wave heating, will probably be incorporated prior to the next flight.
 
 
 
 

Approved By: Prepared by:

Perry V. Row William P. Albrecht

X-15 Senior Project Engineer X-15 Project Engineer