Day 249 - 14 May 96 - Page 06


     
     1        important point in respect of paragraph 11, is that I am
     2        not objecting to paragraph 12 where Mr. Nicholson says that
     3        in the light of my cross-examination of Mr. Carroll he now
     4        sets out in more detail what he saw that day, although, you
     5        know, obviously that will be tested.  However, paragraph 11
     6        is purely and simply comment.  Despite what Mr. Rampton
     7        said about me changing my case, he tried to raise this on
     8        day 110 of the trial, and I did actually say that I was not
     9        changing my case, I have said it all along, and that I do
    10        have a good reason for a firm belief that I was not handing
    11        out the leaflets, and then I went on to say 'I do not want
    12        to go further than that at this stage because I am not
    13        giving evidence at the moment', and you told Mr. Rampton
    14        that in the light of what I had just said he ought to
    15        reconsider calling the publication witnesses sooner.  It is
    16        clear there that if he was not aware of it before then,
    17        which he should have been because it was pretty obvious
    18        from my witness statement that it would be contested...
    19        Sorry, that was on page 21 of day 110.  I do not know what
    20        the date is, but it is not something that is new.
    21
    22   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Thank you.
    23
    24            (Ruling 1 follows -- see separate transcript)
    25
    26   MS. STEEL:   There is just one other thing I wanted to raise,
    27        which is because of Mr. Nicholson coming at quite short
    28        notice.  I actually wrote to -- you remember, ages ago, the
    29        Plaintiffs asked us about the person who took the video of
    30        16th October 1989 picket, the ----
    31
    32   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I have some vague uncertain recollection
    33        about it.
    34
    35   MS. STEEL:   I actually wrote back saying I had already tried to
    36        contact him and that as far I was aware he had emigrated to
    37        Australia.  We have not actually made contact with him, and
    38        I wrote to him a couple of...  I do not know, about a month
    39        ago maybe, I am not sure.  Anyway, we spoke to him on the
    40        phone last night and he is going to look for the video.
    41        Hopefully, he will then be able to send it to us and I want
    42        to ask that if that happens will it be possible for Mr.
    43        Nicholson to be recalled so that we can ask him anything
    44        arising from the video?
    45
    46   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What it will be possible for you to do is
    47        apply to me to have him recalled and I will make a decision
    48        on that in the light of all the information which I then
    49        have.  You will remember I said the same with regard to you
    50        coming across any documents subsequently.  What I am not 
    51        prepared to do is to say categorically yes or no now, 
    52        because I want to consider the matter in the light of all 
    53        the up-to-date information I have when you have made your
    54        application.
    55
    56   MS. STEEL:   OK.  The person is in Australia, so it is not very
    57        easy to contact him but hopefully we will try and get hold
    58        of that as soon as possible and get it in.
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What I said the other day, I want you to

Prev Next Index