Day 134 - 13 Jun 95 - Page 02


     
     1                                      Tuesday, 13th June, 1995.
     2
     3                         MS. MEAD, recalled.
     4                       Examined by the Court
     5
     6   MS. STEEL:   I do not know whether it might be worth finding out
     7        about what result of any enquires.
     8
     9   MR. RAMPTON:  Yes, my Lord.  Ms. Mead has made all the
    10        aappropriate enquiries.  She can give the answers to your
    11        Lordship's questions raised at the end of yesterday's
    12        hearing.
    13
    14   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It is entirely up to you.  You can pursue it
    15        in cross-examination or, if you like, I will try to help by
    16        just asking about some of the things, but the matter I was,
    17        I will not say most concerned, but which was really raised
    18        on my initiative was firstly G1.  (To the witness):
    19        Do you have that there?  It is behind your statement at
    20        tab 11.
    21        A.  I know it is the one about the New Earnings Survey.
    22        Yes, I have it.
    23
    24   Q.   It is titled New Earnings Survey April 1987.  What did the
    25        "April 1987" refer to?
    26        A.  Right.  It actually referred to a survey which was
    27        conducted at a point in time which was, I think, from
    28        recollection, 8th of April 87, so it was actually for pay
    29        at that point.  That was the date taken in the survey so it
    30        was not, in fact, the publication date which was later.
    31
    32   Q.   I cannot remember whether I asked you to check that, but
    33        were the figures from which it started, the weekly rate,
    34        divided by a number of hours to get the hourly rate?
    35        A.  Yes, they were.  I have not reviewed the table myself
    36        because I only had it this morning, but I spoke to the
    37        person who conducted it and she was certain that what she
    38        did was to take the weekly rate and to divide it, because
    39        we do not think that -- obviously, it is quite a lengthy
    40        document and going back to it, but we are certain that that
    41        is the way we did it, to take the weekly rate and we do not
    42        believe that the hourly rate is provided in the document.
    43
    44   Q.   Whereas I think you told me yesterday that McDonald's was
    45        the hourly rate and then multiplied by 39?
    46        A.  That is right.
    47
    48   Q.   You have no reason to change that, subject to any
    49        cross-examination about it?
    50        A.  No, that is what she did to make the two figures, sets 
    51        of figures, comparable. 
    52 
    53   Q.   Then if you turn to G2 in the last sheet before H begins?
    54        A.  Yes.
    55
    56   Q.   There was the material or relevant date for the figures
    57        which are given for starting rates of pay in other
    58        businesses?
    59        A.  Yes, that is as at around November 1992.
    60

Prev Next Index