Day 053 - 22 Nov 94 - Page 02


     
     1                                 Tuesday, 22nd November, 1994.
     2
     3   MS. STEEL:   I was going to do things in a slightly different
     4        order, mainly because, if we talk a bit about what the
     5        meaning is earlier on, then it may actually save time.
     6
     7   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You take your own order.
     8
     9   MS. STEEL:  As you know, they have applied for an order that we
    10        should set out in writing the meaning that we are seeking
    11        to justify, and they have relied on the Lucas-Box case.
    12        From what I can read of the Lucas-Box case, the situation
    13        there was quite different, in that they have not pleaded a
    14        meaning at all -- there was no meaning on the record.  In
    15        our case we have pleaded a meaning.  That has been on the
    16        record since 1991, I think.
    17
    18        At no time, until the skeleton argument of 3rd November
    19        this year, have the Plaintiffs asked for clarification of
    20        that meaning.  We would say that the only reason they are
    21        asking for clarification now is because they want to change
    22        their case, their meaning of the leaflet in their Statement
    23        of Claim.  The reason for that is because we have proved
    24        the meaning they have pleaded, and they now want to change
    25        the meaning, to move the goal posts.
    26
    27   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I do not want to distract you.  One of the
    28        difficulties in my mind is that when I have looked at words
    29        like the "links between" or "linked with", whether in the
    30        Plaintiffs' Statement of Claim or your particulars of
    31        justification, I have thought that that meant "causally
    32        linked with", or the "causal links between", for a variety
    33        of reasons, but in large part, at least, from the witness
    34        statements on both sides -- that is, yours as well as the
    35        statements of the Plaintiffs' witnesses.
    36
    37        I have said on a number of occasions, most recently
    38        yesterday evening, that whatever Mr. Rampton is asking for
    39        by way of further pleading, I would like you to tell me
    40        what the phrases in your pleading the "links between" or
    41        "relationship between" or an "association between" mean,
    42        if one does not put in the word "causal".  Do you
    43        understand?
    44
    45   MS. STEEL:  Yes.  We were -----
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It is so that you can tell me where I am
    48        wrong in thinking it means "causal".  But you carry on.
    49
    50   MS. STEEL:  I was going to say that we are willing to expand on 
    51        what is meant and go into more detail, though your 
    52        interpretation of our pleadings was incorrect, in that 
    53        "cause" is one type of link, but that was not what was
    54        particularly specified in our pleadings.
    55
    56        The leaflet itself states:
    57
    58        "McDonald's try to show in their 'Nutrition Guide' (which
    59        is full of impressive-looking but irrelevant facts &
    60        figures) that mass-produced hamburgers, chips, colas,

Prev Next Index