[ Contents | Administrivia | The Shadow | Non-Dark | Sources | Prophecy | Publishing | Keywords | Sitemap ]


Chapter Icon

1.4.8: Who killed Adeleas and Ispan?

[John S. Hamby, Craig Moe, Andrea Leistra]


This is an attempt at looking at all the facts concerning the murders of Ispan and Adeleas. Here, we present what is known and what can or cannot be concluded from these facts.

General Considerations

From [TPOD, 28, Crimsonthorn, 545-547], we know that Adeleas had taken Ispan to the small hut the night before. In the morning, Kirstian comes to find Elayne. Lan has found the bodies. So, we have the time frame. It's curious that Lan is the one who found the two. Certainly Vandene as sister and fellow interrogator would have made more sense. Presumably, when Adeleas is dealing with Garenia/Zarya and then Kirstian, Vandene is taking care of Ispan.

Description of the crime scene: "Adeleas lay on her side beside an overturned stool, a cup on the rough wooden floor not far from her outstretched hand. Her eyes stared, and a pool of congealed blood spread out from the deep slash across her throat. Ispan lay on a small cot, staring at the ceiling. Lips drawn back in a rictus bared her teeth, and her bulging eyes seemed full of horror. As well they might have, since a wrist-thick wooden stake stood out from between her breasts. The hammer that had plainly been used to drive it in lay beside the cot, on the edge of a dark stain that ran back under the cot."

Then we get the description of the interior of the hut. "A second three-legged stool, a rough table holding a flickering lamp, a green teapot and a second cup, a rude stone fireplace with cold ash on the hearthstone."

From all this, it certainly seems that the tea was delivered the previous evening. The fire is out; the flickering lamp suggests the oil is running low. That a lamp is burning at all suggests that it was dark outside when the murderer arrived. Though the fact that the two windows are described as tiny might negate this, as a lamp might be needed anytime of the day. However, it seems that the scene is viewed in the light of day and not by the single lamp.

Vandene assumes or directs the line of thought to Ispan being the primary victim. This assumption is presumed because more time was taken to kill Ispan.

Nynaeve makes the assumption that whoever decided to use crimsonthorn did so because they either wanted to make sure that no one came with an antidote or that they wanted one or the other to know who was killing them.

The use of crimsonthorn does indicate two things. First, Adeleas was meant to die. Whether the murder was a hit on Ispan or whether Adeleas' death was the primary goal, a drug is used, in lethal amounts, that Adeleas with her penchant for sweet tea is particularly prone to. This implies that the murderer knew before hand who was guarding Ispan. In fact it might be that the murderer was waiting when Adeleas was by herself with Ispan. This means that the murder was not spontaneous. There was a bit of planning involved.

The second thing that crimsonthorn indicates is that time was not really of the essence. The murderer took her time. It seems possible she knew no one would disturb her that night. (This is also indicated by the method used in killing Ispan: pounding a stake through the heart is not really the quickest way to kill a person.)

Speaking of the stake, the manner of Ispan's death (being staked through the chest) raises some questions. Even if one or both women were immobilized first, pounding a stake through someone is difficult--there's bones and things in the way, not to mention how messy it would be. If the killer did the job up close and personal, she would have been covered in Ispan's blood. There are three possibilities: 1. The killer could not channel, and used physical means (herbs and physical violence) to kill the victims because that was the only way. 2. The killer could channel, and used channeling to make it look like someone who could not did the deed. 3. (Related to #2) The killer could channel and needed to do so because he/she was physically too weak to carry out the deed in the mundane manner. So, there is at least an even chance that the killer was a channeller, and used the OP in Ispan's murder, at least. Unfortunately, this doesn't help much, since most of the suspects (all the Kin, AS, and Windfinders in the party) can channel. [Genevieve Williams, Dave Rothgery]

Who drank the tea?

Adeleas has a cup near her hand. Her body position and the fact she has her throat cut is a definite sign that she fell victim to the tea. But is there anything that really points to Ispan having drank any of it?

We have two cups, yes. But one fell from Adeleas' hand as she presumably fell to the floor. The second cup is on the table still. The reason this sticks out is that the hammer used on Ispan is left by the cot. Yet the cup is on the table by another stool. (Note that this can be explained by positing that the the killer moved Ispan to the cot in order to stake her more easily.)

The effect of the crimsonthorn, as described by Nynaeve, is "A little kills pain. This much... This much kills, but slowly. Even a few sips would be enough. They might have remained conscious for hours. Not able to move, but aware."

This suggests that perhaps Ispan did not drink any tea. How is this possible? Quite simple. Whoever killed the two could channel. The drug was used to take out Adeleas. In fact, it was tailored to take her out. With Adeleas out of the way, the shield around Ispan would disappear, no? Well, not if the murderer was a channeller herself (we can all agree that the murderer is most likely female). Ispan is always kept shielded.

So the only scenario that lets Ispan's murderer be a non-channeller is this: A non-Aes Sedai that Adeleas would take tea from brings tea to the hut, then leaves. Adeleas would not sit and drink tea while guarding Ispan with someone who was not a sister hovering around the hut. The murderer waits outside the hut for the tea to take effect on Adeleas. So in order for Ispan to also be incapacitated a couple of things would have to have happened.

One is that Adeleas gives tea to Ispan and then drinks some herself. Ispan is now drugged and so is Adeleas. Murderer enters and does the deed.

Two, Adeleas can still channel while drugged. She maintains the shield while the murderer enters and forces Ispan to drink the tea while still shielded. Then the killer drives the stake through Ispan's heart and slits Adeleas' throat. A variation on the above is that even if drugged, Adeleas can channel the whole time, but is somehow locked into the shield and Ispan is killed. Not until the stake is completely driven through does the murderer turn to Adeleas.

All these scenarios seem a bit unlikely. Ispan is Black Ajah. I don't see Adeleas sitting down and sharing a cup of tea with her. (Consider the vehemence with which the other Aes Sedai in the series react to the idea of the BA.) So how is Ispan kept helpless if Adeleas loses the ability to channel when the drug takes hold? We're assuming that either the drug incapacitates the ability to channel or Adeleas was so far gone under the influence of the drug that it did not matter by the time the murders took place.

Furthermore the differences in Adeleas and Ispan's bodies might go beyond the way in which each was killed. Adeleas clearly was under the influence of the drug. Yet Ispan's countenance clearly shows the ability to move her face and feel pain. Her eyes bulge and her lips are drawn back. If Adeleas is so far gone into the drug that all she can do is stare while her throat is being cut, how come Ispan is able to show such reaction; not just in terms of horror but to physically show it as well? (Especially since crimsonthorn is a painkiller.)

So it is quite possible that if whoever killed the two could channel, that Adeleas was the only one drugged. Shields can be woven-off and left in place. They can also be passed from one person to another.

One thing we do know is that Vandene is either the killer or she was not a part of the shield when Adeleas was killed. Otherwise she would have felt something was wrong-- she certainly would have noticed when Adeleas died.

So assume for a moment that Vandene is not the murderer. That means that Adeleas was capable of maintaining the shield by herself. So it might also indicate that Adeleas was stronger than Ispan, or even that once in place the shield could be maintained by anyone.

So the use of crimsonthorn does not prove that the killer was a non-channeller and there is indication that maybe the drug was not used on Ispan at all and thus increases the odds of a channeller's involvement.

The Suspects

Non-Channellers

Considering only those from whom Adeleas might accept tea:

One argument says that even if the ability was there despite the crimsonthorn, the common belief shared by most Aes Sedai concerning the connections between channeling and gesturing would mean that once paralyzed Adeleas could not channel to defend herself, since she could not move. But this would mean a foreknowledge of this and I think once again points away from any non-channeller as the killer.

So while possible I think that it is a bit more improbable that any non-channeller could have done the deed.

Channelling Suspects

Non-Aes Sedai:

However, it takes a bit of a leap to assume that any level of trust would exist between Aes Sedai and any of the Kin, especially in the wake of the "we are many and they are few" business. So like the Windfinders I think the Kin are very low on the lists of suspects.

Aes Sedai:

Of the Aes Sedai, then, Careane and Merilille stand out as the most obvious of the non-obvious killers-- Vandene, of course, being the obvious.

One problem with any of the Salidar Aes Sedai being the killer is that they didn't try to prevent the finding and use of the Bowl and didn't steal it and the rest of the goodies afterwards. However, since the AS are a very hierarchical organization (and the BA follows that pattern), and since the Shadow hierarchy was rather disorganised at the time the embassy was sent (all the Forsaken scheming for themselves), some low-level BA in the Salidar embassy to Ebou Dar might not have been informed of the importance of the Bowl, and would have just followed orders to stick with the party and spy/whatever.

The Prime Suspect: Vandene

[Andrea Leistra, Craig Moe]

Arguments in Favor of Vandene Being the Killer

In defense of Vandene

Here are counter-arguments for the points against Vandene, and rebuttals:

Further arguments against Vandene being the killer, and counter-arguments

Other thoughts on Vandene as the killer

Motive: Why kill one or both?

Ispan failed, was captured and that is what happens to BA who fail and are captured.

This was a precedent set down with the killings of Amico and Joiya. But there are some pretty major differences. Amico and Joiya both actually gave out information. Amico told where Liandrin and crew went. And Joiya told about the BA freeing Taim (although that may have been a lie). Ispan has not revealed anything important, as far as we know.

Joiya's and Amico's deaths were also incidental. Someone took advantage of the attack on Rand and the Stone to kill them. Chances are had Rand not been attacked, the two would not have been killed when they were. There really was no risk involved. Killing Ispan and Adeleas, though, reveals that there is a DF/BA among them. The killer tipped their hand. So something must have forced them to do this.

Joiya and Amico also were on their way to the Tower. Certainly the risk of revealing anything of import ran much higher if those two actually made it there. So removing them when the chance presented itself certainly makes sense.

But if Ispan was the main target why now? Why not before if she is a threat? Also consider that if the killer is BA herself, then she would certainly know how much a threat Ispan is and how much a threat she is not. There certainly has been time before this to kill Ispan.

Also look at Katerine and Falion. While Falion's death by wicked keg-bong might be imminent, it is not definite. And Katerine is allowed to escape and presumably live. So death is not the automatic sentence for BA who screw up. Certainly Ispan's escape could have been managed as easily as Katerine's. After all, Katerine's escape pretty much reveals her to be BA, whereas Ispan is already known to be. Her escape certainly poses no risks to the killer that killing her did not.

So was Ispan the prime victim? Perhaps not. Adeleas could have been the one intended to die all along. Whoever did it wants Adeleas dead. Knows she will be alone with Ispan so takes tea laced with a poison specifically chosen for Adeleas' liking for sweet tea. Of course once Adeleas is down Ispan is killed. Regardless of being a fellow BA, the Killer has revealed her identity to another. So Ispan takes a stake through the heart. The killer eliminates a witness, a possible rival and throws off the scent that Adeleas was the intended victim. Note that this line of reasoning could be applied the other way around: Adeleas could have been killed because she was a witness.

So why kill Adeleas? Well, Adeleas discovered two former novices. Garenia, who was in the Tower seventy years ago. She was a novice with Careane. Also seventy years ago both Namelle sisters were present. From Joline's comment about Merilille being an instructor, it is highly likely that she too was in the Tower at the time. Kirstian, on the other hand, left the Tower three hundred years ago. It seems a bit of a stretch that she would possess any knowledge that could reveal one of the sisters to be a liar and/or BA.

One thing that seems to indicate Adeleas as the intended victim is that even if Vandene is not the killer, someone went a bit of trouble to get rid of Adeleas. The poison was designed for her in a sense. It was her watch. And if Ispan was a threat, then surely if Vandene was not the killer she could pose a threat as well. If Ispan was the victim then both Adeleas and Vandene should be removed just in case. This strengthens the case against Vandene.


[ Previous Section | Previous | Section Contents | Next | Next Section ]

[ Contents | Administrivia | The Shadow | Non-Dark | Sources | Prophecy | Publishing | Keywords | Sitemap ]


This page was last modified on (19-Jul-1999, 06:14). Illustrations © 1989-1996 by Tor Books.

The Wheel of Time FAQ. Copyright 1999 by Pamela Korda and Erica Sadun. HTML implementation by Matthew Hunter. This site maintained by Matthew Hunter (mhunter@andrew.cmu.edu). Comments and questions regarding the content itself should be directed to Pam Korda (kor2 @ midway.uchicago.edu).