RELATED HOMOCIDE IN BRAZIL : THE COMPLETE STORY

Mon, 02 Dec 1996 14:55:12 -0800
Source: Noah's Dove

By G. Cope Schellhorn

If this case is authentically UFO-related - and at this time I have no
reason to believe it is not - then all of us are going to have to reevaluate
to one degree or another our tentative conclusions as to the possible
specific intentions, moral perspectives and general agenda that some of our
extraterrestrial visitors may have.

There have been rumors of homicidal, UFO-related, human mutilation cases for
some time now but hard evidence has been lacking. Until, perhaps, now.
Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion Zapata Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes have
recently presented a series of sensational photographs, obtained from police
files which mimic the wounds of countless UFO-related animal mutilation
cases that have been reported in Europe and North, Central and South America
since the 1960s. On first glance they would seem to be ufology's worst
nightmare.

What is more disturbing is that Brazilian urologists and police have
intimated that there may be at least a dozen or more cases similar to the
recently uncovered Guarapiranga reservoir case. If this is true, it is
somewhat doubtful that any of this potential new material will ever see the
light of day, given the official attitudes now prevailing in Western power
circles. But we can be grateful for fortuitous disclosures, and the
Guarapiranga case and it's accompanying photographs seem to be just that. A
great stroke of luck, albeit a dismaying one. Obviously if the Guarapiranga
data is legitimate, then it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the
position that all visitors are demonstrating a relatively friendly attitude
toward humans, regardless of what their specific agenda(s) may be. The
Guarapiranga situation indicates that there is at least one group of alien
visitors to the planet who have a complete disdain for human sensibilities,
who, in fact, could care less about the value of human life.

When I learned of the Guarapiranga case through Brazilian ufologist A.J.
Gevaerd, who first published the related photos in his magazine UFO, my
interest was stimulated and I quickly made plans for a trip to Brazil. In
Sao Paulo I met Encarnacion Garcia at the home of well known ufologist
Claudeir Covo and talked with her later at length. Then I traveled to Campo
Grande and questioned Gevaerd. He was kind enough to supply me with second
generation photographs (the best available) of the Guarapiranga reservoir
victim having himself become thoroughly convinced that the evidence
supporting the case was authentic and that the case was UFO-related. I came
to the same conclusion because all other alternatives were neither supported
by facts nor good logic, whereas the similarities to numerous cattle
mutilations which I had studied in the United States were startling, exactly
paralleling what I have seen many times before.

The specifics of the case are as follows:

Encarnacion Garcia learned from her friend, Dr. Rubens Goes, that he was in
possession of some rather "odd" photos which had been given to him by his
cousin, police technician, Rubens Sergio. These were official photos of a
body that had been found near Guarapiranga reservoir on the 29th of
September, 1988, of an unnamed male who was, however, later identified. The
name of this man has been withheld from all media investigators, including
UFO investigators, at the request of his relatives.

After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was impressed with how similar
the wounds of the body were to those found on the carcasses of so many
UFO-related mutilated animals, knowledge which the original investigating
police officials and medical doctors involved with the case did not possess.
Surprisingly, Dr. Cuenca, head of the primary investigation, offered his
files on the case. This is the stroke of luck which I previously mentioned
and for which we can all be thankful. These included the all-. important
autopsy description to which I will momentarily refer.

The initial police report, however, was not extraordinary in nature except
for the recognition that the body, although extremely mutilated, had not met
with unusual violence; that is, there were no signs of struggle or the
application of bondage of any kind.

It was the autopsy report itself which was most revealing, especially when
we compare the remarks made there with what we have learned from animal
mutilation cases elsewhere. It is imperative to remember, as I have stated
previously, that the individuals conducting the autopsy had no knowledge of
similar animal mutilation cases. This makes the official remarks of the
report all the more revealing in retrospect.

Encarnacion Garcia received copies of seven photos. I have included the five
most revealing ones here with a description and commentary. The work of the
perpetrators of this atrocity: the kinds of cuts made, the precision of the
cuts, the removal of whole internal organs through small apertures, the lack
of bleeding, the failure of the body to smell or decompose rapidly - all
these are hallmarks of UFO-related animal mutilations. These peculiarities
would seem to rule out Satanists, revenge- seekers or casual mutilators and
go beyond even the capacities of a modern Jack the Ripper.

photo #I: Face and upper torso photo. The body was in perfect condition.
Rigor mortis had not set in and it was estimated that the victim had been
killed approximately 48 to 72 hours previously. There were no signs of
animal predation or putrefaction which might be expected. Strangely, there
was no odor to the cadaver. Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal. The
black coloration found in the face area and in other places within the photo
is partly due to low light exposure when this photo and others were taken.
It is also partly due to coagulated blood in the wound areas.

As can clearly be seen, flesh and lips have been excised around the
mandibles, as is common in cattle and other animal mutilations, the autopsy
report noted that "the eyes and ears were also removed and the mouth cavity
was emptied." Removal of these body parts, including the tongue as here, is
common enough in animal mutilation cases.

As Encarnacion Garcia rightly recognized, if a comparison of the victim with
animal mutilation cases is made, "You can see they are the same - and that
is also the conclusion of experienced doctors." The doctors drew their
conclusion only after they had been shown photographs of similar animal
mutilation cases, cases with which they were not previously familiar.

The autopsy report states: "There has been a removal of extensive tissue
along many parts of the face, head and neck of the victim... There has also
been extraction of ocular tissue, eyes, auditive internal and external
organs (ears) and entire parts of the head. The tongue and several muscles
were also extracted."

The kinds of cuts on the cadaver are what we have come to expect in
UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Of primary interest is their precision.
The "surgery" (or butchery, if you will) was done with agility and care and
probably with speed. The lack of profuse bleeding suggests the use of a
laser-like instrument producing acute heat, thus cauterizing almost
immediately the edge of the wounds. This is a speculation on my part,
however, :although there are numerous precedents. Many of the cases studied
by Dr. John Altshuler in the United States exhibit this kind of high heat,
rapid surgery. Whether it would still be possible to test fragments of the
flesh from the victim's wound areas is doubtful. Suffice it to say the
wounds appear to be exact replicas of cases studied by Dr. Altshuler, Tom
Adams, Bob Pratt, Ted Oliphant, Linda Howe, Colman VonKeviczky and myself.

Photo #2: (Above) Face and upper torso with arms outstretched. Perhaps it is
best to begin here with several quotes from the autopsy report. "The
axillary regions on both sides showed soft spots where organs had been
removed. Incisions were made on the face, internal thorax, abdomen, legs,
arms, and chest." As Garcia observed, the doctors stated that these wounds
were quite uncommon. The report also observes, "Shoulders and arms have
perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter where tissue and muscles were
extracted. The edges of the perforations were uniform and so was their size.
The chest had shrunk due to the removal of internal organs."

In other words, internal organs were removed or sucked somehow through these
small circular incisions. Why such a technique? Some doctors today are using
a similar method to remove diseased tissue and organs from their human
subjects - but this kind of procedure injures those organs in the process.
Did the "surgeons" who worked on this victim care whether the organs were
injured or not? What kind of specimens were they looking for? What kind of
research is this? Wouldn't it be easier and more medically expedient to
abduct a human specimen and study it live, including its anatomy and
physiology, in a properly equipped laboratory? It would appear that the
perpetrators of this act did not care if the man's life was lost nor did
they care if the body were found. Here we have strong indication of a total
disregard for the specimen and, by extension, for human life in general. The
body was left as trash. What does this say about the perpetrators and their
attitudes?

The photo clearly shows the symmetrical holes in the man's arms. One arm
clearly shows the sunken area near the perforation clearly, demonstrating
where muscle has been extracted. The shrunken chest area also indicates a
similar process of internal extractions. It is significant that the police
and medical examiners were convinced the holes found in the head, arms,
stomach, anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds.

Photo #3: Close up of the left side of the victim's head. Here we see that
the ear is cleanly excised. As the report states, "auditive internal and
external" matter was removed The photo does not show the small holes
discovered in the cranium. These were detected, however, by the medical
examiners. How much, if any, of the brain tissue was removed is not stated.

Photo #4: Close up of lower torso including thighs. The stretcher, pants and
cord that are visible belonged to the rescue team. The autopsy report
continues, "You also find the removal of the belly button leaving a 1.5 inch
hole in the abdomen and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the removal of
the intestines." Brazilian doctors who later viewed the evidence were left
nonplused by the hole in the umbilical area where, it appeared, "a great
amount of internal organs were extracted. The edge of the hole was perfect
and shows a precision cut. Also, the abdominal area of the body was very
shrunken because of organ removal." The original autopsy report notes that
"the scrotum was also removed by a 3 x 1.5 cm. elliptical incision."
Strangely, the penis itself was left intact although it appeared to have
been stretched to about twice its normal length. Why excise the scrotum
without taking the penis? Human logic is defied by such actions. We are
aware, however, of the great similarity here with other animal mutilation
cases, particularly female cattle where it is not unusual to see anus,
teats, vagina and uterus extracted. But why exactly this is done is as big a
mystery as who the exact perpetrators are, although there is enough strong
circumstantial evidence to implicate UFO involvement.

The hole in the left leg duplicates in size the umbilical hole and the arm
hole previously discussed. In the words of the autopsy report, "It was an...
elliptical incision of about 3 x 1. 5 cm...The penis was stretched and had
no signs of being cut. The testicles were extracted with a precision cut."
Rather startling is the lack of pubic hair, as if the victim had been
readied for surgery.

Early on in the investigation, Brazilian official investigators considered
the possibility that the castration of the victim was an act of revenge.
They soon rejected this theory, however, because it could not account for
the remaining wounds and the other peculiarities related to the body. What
is more, revenge seekers who castrate usually excise the penis, not just the
scrotum.

Photo #5: Victim lying on his stomach. The autopsy report specifies:
-"Removal of the anus and a hole between the second and third toes...The
anal orifice of the victim was extracted with a large incision about 3 by 6
inches in diameter. The rectum and other internal parts of the human
discharge system were also removed. It is probable that even some of the
internal organs of the man could have been removed through this incision."

What is most compelling about the anal incision and the extraction of anal
and digestive tract tissue is that it is a carbon copy of the surgery we
have seen in so many UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Are we supposed to
believe a revengeful human or a group of Satanists are capable of such
precise, difficult, surgical techniques/procedures which leave even medical
professionals perplexed as to how they could have been done? I think not.
Has the Brazilian and/or American government staged a little demonstration
at the Guarapiranga reservoir to frighten UFO investigators and the general
public into fearing all extraterrestrial contact? In other words, are we
faced with a gruesome, carefully orchestrated display of misinformation?
Possibly, but probably not, and my reasons for believing this are several.

First, it would seem a fortuitous turn of events that ufologist Encarnacion
Zapata Garcia had the right friend(s) in the right places at the right time.
If our government, and presumably the Brazilian government, has kept a lid
on similarly sensational material in the past - and I have no doubt there is
more than ample evidence supporting such a contention - here we have an
accidental bubble that has, against all odds, escaped the pot. It is our
good fortune, you might say.

The photos are definitely causing a stir; causing many people, including
some UFO investigators, to do some new thinking. But the powers that control
lids will be carefully double-checking in the near future to make sure the
pot is as secure as possible. Thus I would not get my hopes up that
additional homicidal, UFO-related human mutilation cases and graphic
photographs accompanying them will surface in the near future.

If we discard the possibility of the Guarapiranga case as a piece of
misinformation, we are left with several intriguing alternatives. Is this
the infrequent act of a rogue extraterrestrial group which from time to time
enjoys indulging themselves in a pathological blood sport at the expense of
humans? Perhaps. More likely, I think, we are indirect witnesses to an
intentionally contemptuous act by a group or species of extraterrestrial
origin who would like to give other visiting species a bad name and, as a
bonus, harness mankind into a greater fear-mentality than already binds it.
But these are only speculations and we will have to wait until a future time
for a greater truth when more thorough revelations, and evidence that
supports them, become available.

Do we have any precedents to the Guarapiranga case? Yes, we do. At least one
good example and the rumors of possibly another. The case of Sgt. Jonathan P
Louette, who was stationed at White Sands Missile Test Range in 1956 and
whose mutilated body was found on the Range three days after an Air Force
major had witnessed his abduction by a "disk shaped" object, bares a
striking resemblance to the Guarapiranga situation. Louette's genitals had
been removed, his rectum cored out with surgical precision and his eyes
excised in a manner quite similar to the incisions made upon our
Guarapiranga victim. And then there is the rumor of the Texas mutilation
case which occurred - and was quickly hushed up - in the mid '60s. I have
had verification of the legitimacy of this by two intelligence agency
personnel, one active and one retired, but have not had time to investigate
further.

At present, the rumors of human body parts found on at least one crashed UFO
in the 1940s, body parts found in a barn in the state of Oregon several
years ago or the rumor of a mutilated Vietnam War B-52 crew will have to
remain just that - rumors, until the lid accidentally, albeit infrequently,
comes ajar again and we have some solid evidence. But there is no denying
that the Guarapiranga reservoir case has taken us far beyond rumor. The
evidence is unmistakable and it is sobering. On the one hand, it points
stunningly in a UFO-related direction. On the other hand, I believe it would
be wise of us to draw a tentative conclusion if other less violent cases
have not already led us to do so. We should not, in most cases, generalize
about our extraterrestrial visitors; neither about their motives , morals
nor research agendas. And one addendum also seems advisable: In an age when
almost anything has come to seem possible, if not probable, either
cosmically or here on earth, the wisest course might be to let our
extraterrestrial visitors demonstrate their friendliness before jumping to
conclusions about their philanthropy and opening the door too wide. After
all, Little Red Riding Hood, nine times out of ten, is no match for the wolf
at the door.

We have seen in the past, especially in Brazil, many cases where Human
beings have been attacked by UFOs and their occupants. This is an undeniable
reality that many researchers do not want to face. The Fenomeno Chupa-Chupa
or "Suck-Suck" phenomenon which occurred in the Amazon and northeastern part
of the country in the '70s and '80s produced hundreds of injured people and
ultimately some fatalities. These mostly impoverished people were usually
attacked by small probes (3-6 inches in diameter), probably unmanned, little
UFOs which emitted strong, burning beams of light. Many of the victims
suffered not only burns but a significant loss of blood (thus the
"suck-suck" appellation) during their encounters. Some, such as Luiz
Fernandes Barroso, suffered appreciable mental as well as physical
incapacitation. Barroso's mind was reduced to that of a two-year-old long
before his death.

In North America, reports of brutal manhandling by UFO occupants are much
rarer. If homicidal, UFO-related human mutilations have taken place they
have either gone unrecognized for what they really are or have been adeptly
covered up by official intervention. Whatever the truth may be, the
Guarapiranga reservoir case and the startling photos which accompany it
should give us pause for thought. I, like ufologist editor A.J. Gevaerd,
came to the conclusion after reviewing the evidence that UFO-related
mutilators were most probably the perpetrators of the abominations revealed
by the photographs of the Guarapiranga reservoir victim. And I believe
Gevaerd is probably right when he says most extraterrestrial visitors seem
neutral in their attitudes towards Earth and earth humans, some are friendly
and some could care less. We had better learn, I think, to discern the
differences. It might in the long run save our world culture and our very
lives.

11
---- End Forwarded Message


All rights reserved to WUFOC and NÄRKONTAKT. If you reprint or quote any part of the content, you must give credit to: WUFOC, the free UFO-alternative on the Internet, http://www.wufoc.com