HACKERS DESTROY EVIDENCE OF GULF WAR CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
Sun, 3 Nov 1996 16:00:40 -0500
Source: "Geoffrey Stewart Nimmo"
==========================================
WESNET NEWS
==========================================
EXCLUSIVE Saturday, Nov. 2, 5:00 p.m.
HACKERS DESTROY EVIDENCE OF GULF WAR CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
WASHINGTON DC -- Hackers broke into a Web site (http://insigniausa.com)
containing suppressed evidence of Gulf War chemical and biological weapons
Friday, erasing all files.
"Someone hacked in Friday around 4 p.m. and completely trashed our
machine," said Kenneth Weaver, webmaster of W3 Concepts, Inc.
(http://ns.w3concepts.com) of Poolesville, Maryland (a suburb of Washington
D.C.), which houses the site.
The Web site contained recently-released supressed Department of Defense
documents exposing biological and chemical warfare materials that U.S.
companies allegedly provided to Iraq before the war.
Bruce Klett, publisher, Insignia Publishing said they are now restoring the
files. "We plan to be operational again Saturday evening or Sunday," he
said. "We encourage anyone to copy these files and distribute them." There
are over 300 files, requiring 50 MB of disk space.
The Department of Defense has its own version of these files on its
Gulflink Web site (http://www.dtic.dla.mil/gulflink/).
Insignia plans to publish Gassed In the Gulf, a book on the government's
coverup by former CIA analyst Patrick Eddington, in six to eight weeks,
Klett added.
Hackers also brought down SNETNEWS and IUFO, Internet mailing lists
covering conspiracies and UFOs, on Oct. 25, according to list administrator
Steve Wingate. He plans to move the lists to another Internet service
provider to be back in operation soon.
"We've seen this happen regularly when we get too close to sensitive
subjects," Wingate said. "The election is Tuesday. This is a factor."
He also said a "quiet" helicopter buzzed and illuminated his Marin County
house and car Thursday night for several minutes.
# # #
-----------------------------------------------------------
(c) 1996 Wesnet News Service
Wes Thomas, editor/publisher
west@sonic.net (707) 887-2228 fax: (707) 887-0698
You are encouraged to forward this message in its entirety for
non-commercial purposes only.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mailing Lists Have Been Censored
From: "Steve Wingate"
To: iufo@alterzone.com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 21:31:31 -0700
Subject: Mailing Lists Have Been Censored
Reply-to: steve@linex.com
Cc: snetnews@alterzone.com, skywatch@wic.net, Wes Thomas
Priority: normal
IUFO and SNETNEWS have been shut down, perhaps permanently. Those
that did this will not suceed. Plans are underway to restart these
lists on a more robust server. I guess we don't get anything for
free. The alterzone server seems to be easy for hackers to shut
down. We have seen this happen regularly, when we get too close to
sensitive subjects. The election is Tuesday. This is a factor. The
'company' that controls the assignment of domains, and which
determines which domains are valid, does not like IUFO or SNETNEWS.
They do not like the site:
http://www.insigniausa.com
which recently released supressed documents from the Department of
Defence exposing the biological and chemical warfare that the USA
gave to Sadam Hussain.
Their site has been replaced by a thinly disguised CIA clone. In
fact, this happened while I was online a few minutes ago. The CIA is
currently DESPERATE. Do not kid yourself. These lists have been very
important in exposing many facts that the CIA and others want
supressed.
Fortunately, their time is short. We will not let them win. And we
have very powerful help. I will leave it at that for now. But I can
assure you that we will NEVER give up. No matter what happens.
N:EVER!!!
Steve Wingate
Anomalous Images and UFO Files
http://www.linex.com/ufo
Steve and all,
Does this article fit?
Best regards,
Bob Drake
************
http://www.copi.com/articles/CIAPsyOps.htm
CIA Psy-Ops on the Internet CIA Opposed Freedom, and Freedom of
Discussion by Michael Kelly
A description of the evolution of alt.politics.org.cia and the
changing tactics used by the US government to suppress discussion of
the real issues.
About a year ago, almost all the posters on this group were "retired"
spooks. What they would do is sit like spiders in their webs waiting
for innocents to come along and ask a question, such as "what are some
good books to read" on such and such an intelligence-related topic. Of
course, the newbie was then steered to some CIA-approved or
CIA-written propaganda. A favorite being The Night Watch, by David
Atlee Phillips, who was propaganda meister for the Western Hemisphere
Division of CIA. If the poster criticized CIA, that poster was flamed.
If the flaming didn't have any effect, then all the spooks would
killfile the poster in lockstep.
This strategy only works well when the "retired" spooks make up a vast
majority of the posters here. Now that more "real people" have gotten
involved in this group, it doesn't work so well because a critic is
likely to be able to interact with others who want to discuss the
issues.
The last thing The Company wants is a genuine discussion of the issues
here. What they want is a propaganda outlet. That's why anyone who
raises the real issues of CIA and Clandestine Services(as the "old
boys" like to call the covert ops department) will be set upon by
provocateurs.
See, if the "retired" spooks flame in too nasty a fashion and too
constantly, it makes them look bad. The technique used is to bring
people in from outside with no other purpose than to start flame wars
with, and otherwise harass the critic. An analogy would be the hockey
player who can't skate but is on the team to take out the talented
players on the opposing team by starting brawls.
A trademark of these types is that they never contribute anything of
substance. Their refrain is "so and so is a... blah blah." By this
technique the attempt is made to portray the critic as someone who
argues with everyone. By attacking from many sides they attempt to
portray the target as the common denominator in all the flame wars. Of
course the hope is that the provocations will substitute the flame
wars themselves as the issue, instead of the discussion of illegal and
immoral practices of The Company.
It's just a diversionary tactic. Keep focused on what The Company
avoids discussing. Those are the real topics of importance here. All
that's needed for them to have total control of your lives is for you
to do nothing. They never stop seeking more power. Henry Kissinger
called power "the ultimate aphrodisiac" and he should know since he
stopped at nothing to increase his share of it. When Congress asked
him if it was really a nice thing to encourage the Kurds to rise up,
then abandon them when it was convenient, his response was roughly
"one should not confuse covert operations with missionary work." What
a guy! Yeah, give him another peace prize!
Provocation is an old technique The Company has used for decades. They
have experience subverting labor unions, student organizations, and
governments, remember? So it's old hat for them to divide and conquer.
The purpose is to divert you all from discussing the substantive
issues. As soon as the standard Company "dirty tricks" are brought up,
then all kinds of nitwits come out of the woodwork to start flame wars
and commence e-mail and other harassments of the critic in order to
obfuscate the issues.
The following are issues The Company would rather not confirm or deny:
1.CIA training of assassins and Latin American death squads. Read
anything you can on the School of the Americas (known fondly as The
School of Assassins.) You will find alumni such as the illustrious
Manuel Noriega.
2.CIA rigging of elections, especially now in conjunction with the
"National Endowment for Democracy" or NED.
3.The "standard practices" of CIA, including propaganda via
"friendly"
reporters in the American press, and the publishing of books via CIA
proprietary companies that pass themselves off as private commercial
enterprises. (Beware especially of former KGB officials who author
these pieces of trash as "vigorish" for being allowed to live in the
US.)
4.The subversion of labor, educational, cultural, student,
political, and military organizations at home and abroad.
5.The illegal opening and interception of U.S. citizen's mail and
electronic correspondence. In case you're tempted to tell me they are
prohibited from doing this domestically, they get around these
proscriptions by multi-lateral agreements with the intelligence
agencies of other countries. It amounts to "we'll spy on your people
and give you the take if you return the favor." So, Britain's GCHQ may
intercept your phone call instead of NSA, and everything will be
"legal," but your privacy is still violated nonetheless.
6.CIA dealing in drugs, weapons, money-laundering, and currency
speculation on the black markets. This is a handy means of raising
operating expenses for projects the Congress is not willing to fund, a
la Iran/Contra, or multiplying the funds Congress appropriates. One
example of this technique is described in the book Portrait of A Cold
Warrior by Joseph B. Smith. He worked for the Company rigging
elections in the Philippines. He was instrumental in bringing
Ferdinand Marcos to power. He dealt the operating funds sent to him by
CIA on the black market until they were multiplied by a factor of 10,
then used the take to finance CIA-backed candidates. Imelda needs a
new pair of shoes!
7.The funding of "media magnates" and "stock market wizards."
Intelligence agencies provide insider info (their game is espionage,
remember?) to their puppets who parlay it into windfalls on the stock
market. A percentage of the take is used to promote propaganda, back
arms deals, pay bribes, etc.. An example of this is the backing of
Robert Maxwell by Mossad. In the US, Howard Hughes was deeply
involved with The Company. It's also the reason Robert Vesco will
never be extradited to the United States.
That should do for starters. Although it may be fun to discuss the
high resolution photography of spy satellites, and all the nifty toys
that government research has produced, the spy business is an old one.
Secret power doesn't require technology so much as a willingness to
betray your fellow citizens in order to curry favor with those in
control. The techniques I discuss above are some of the means they use
to do this. I think discussing these issues is more central to
preserving what freedom we have left than marveling at the latest
"sneaky" the boys in the lab have contrived.
Mike
"The institution of any reform is proof positive that its
circumvention is already in place."
Skywatch International, Inc.
skywatch@wic.net
"Strange is sometimes stranger when it's true"
For latest UFO and Paranormal information
Site: http://www.wic.net/colonel/ufopage.htm
The vicious tyranny of the NWO is starting to descend like a curtain
over the minds of men who once thought we were free. The worst is yet to
come--after the election, when Clinton and his wrecking crew win. It is
so tragic that so many voters are so stupid and corrupt that a known
criminal sociopath can win reelection in this country, which once was a
proud and free nation! We can probably expect UN troops and street gangs
to make house to house raids upon known dissidents, and to seize our
weapons, if any. Are we going to sit still for this?? FORBID IT,
ALMIGHTY GOD! As for me, I shall die on my feet before I will choose to
live on my knees!!
Byron Weeks
We are The Holy Inquisition. It is for your good. We protect you. We think
for you. We are your security. We give you toys, TV, newspapers.
We teach you. We are the Truth. Believe. We save you.
Oh, do not think. Thinking is bad. To be intelligent is bad. To be
you is bad. We save you from you.
Well, IMO to think is good, and they give us the proof that we are on
the right way.
All rights reserved to WUFOC and NÄRKONTAKT. If you reprint or quote any part of the content,
you must give credit to: WUFOC, the free UFO-alternative on the Internet, http://www.wufoc.com