Robert Sheaffer,
Box 10441,
San Jose, CA 95157 USA
March 4, 1993
Australian newspaperman Jeff Wells was a member of the National Enquirer team that "packaged" the Travis Walton abduction story for publication. Walton's story is now the subject of a major motion picture from Paramount, "Fire in the Sky." Wells is one of seven authors of the National Enquirer story "Arizona Man Captured by UFO" published Dec. 16, 1975. Upon his return to Australia, Wells wrote up this insiders' view of the sordid goings-on for his newspaper column, the identities of the participants only thinly disguised. "The kid" is obviously Travis Walton. "The cowboy" is his brother, Duane Walton. "The professor" is Dr. James Harder of Berkeley, at that time a leading figure in APRO, the now-defunct Aerial Phenomena Research Organization, and still a prominent "abductionist." The polygraph examiner is John J. McCarthy, the senior polygraph operator in the state of Arizona. This story was reprinted in the Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 5 Nr. 4 (Summer, 1981), pp. 47-52.
The characters in this UFO story are real even if they
appear more like the inventions of a Hollywood hack.
A haunted young man, a ruthless cowboy, a strange professor,
a hard-drinking psychiatrist, a bunch of reporters and a
beautiful girl.
All were thrown together in the desert heat by a close
encounter of the third kind and maybe they did contribute to some
Hollywood thinking.
I was there and I can vouch for the motley human cast - but
you will have to make up your own mind about the
extra-terrestrials with fishbowl heads.
Some of the characters are still growing fat repeating their
version of the story in the seemingly limitless American market
for the bizarre.
The so-called facts, the carefully-woven tapestry that has
become the "official story" can now be counted as UFO lore,
pablum for those who turn their heads to the sky in search of
meaning for their lives.
I will never get rich on my version and I only tell it
because of the UFO madness the papers tell me is sweeping this
part of the world.
The UFO phenomenon is really rolling here, as it has rolled
for many years, and snowballed into juggernaut proportions in
other countries where it is very big business.
The stronger it gets here the closer the attention that will
be paid to so-called classic cases of UFO encounters.
You may recognize elements of this story among them. If so,
you will realise that my story is a warning that in such cases,
even the most celebrated and supposedly well-documented, there is
nothing so pragmatic as proof.
This incident happened a few years ago and made world
headlines.
I was working in San Francisco as a bureau man for a
national weekly which has grown rich and powerful in catering to
the middle-class craving for cancer-cures, Jackie Onassis,
Hollywood gossip, psychic predictions, and like ingredients of
the crumbling cake that is the American mind.
It was naturally a matter of interest that a 22-year-old
forestry worker was missing and that six witnesses had passed lie
detector tests in saying that he had last been seen running
towards a huge UFO.
My paper had offered tens of thousands of dollars to anybody
who could positively prove that aliens had visited our planet -
in the knowledge that exclusive rights could be worth millions.
When, five days later, the young man we came to call "the
kid" stumbled into a small western town, phoned his brother and
claimed he had been kidnapped by the crew of an alien spacecraft
we were ready.
Within an hour I was on a plane to rendezvous in a desert
city with a team of reporters and photographers flying in from
Los Angelesand the East Coast.
At the desert airport I bumped into one of them, a dapper
young Englishman from the L.A. bureau, who briefed me. One
reporter was at the cowboy's home talking money; the kid was
inside in a state of shock.
The office was wiring $1000 to help east the kid's
discomfort and a celebrated UFOlogist, a California professor,
was being flown in, all expenses paid, to lend a hand.
Our immediate task was to bribe the brother with the
thousand to shack up with us in a luxury motel on the outskirts
of town, no names registered, where the rest of Press who were
about to descend and the sheriff, who was calling the whole thing
a hoax and demanding that the kid take a lie-detector test, would
not bother them.
"It isn't going to be easy," said the Englishman as we
pocketed our credit cards and headed for our rented Pontiacs.
"The brother has taken charge and the brother is some kind
of psychopath. The kid is scared to death of him and so is our
reporter."
The cowboy was no disappointment. He was one of the meanest
and toughest-looking men I've ever seen - in his late twenties, a
rodeo professional and amateur light-heavyweight fighter, a total
abstainer, broad-shouldered, T-shirt packed with muscle,
chiselled-down hips, bow legged, eyes full of nails, tense,
unpredictable.
He leaned against a pick-up truck with a gun rack in the
cabin and raked us with beams of cunning and hatred as strong as
the flash from the spacecraft that had pole-axed his brother as
the witnesses fled in terror.
"Nobody is going to laugh at my brother," he said.
Nobody wanted to laugh at his brother, we said. We only
wanted give his brother a chance to tell his story to somebody
who would understand.
To prove our bona fides, and to keep away all those other
jackals of the press, who would embarrass the kid with foolish
questions, we would hide them away and pay the kid a grand to
tell his story.
If we liked the story, and it could be properly documented,
and the kid could pass our lie-detector test, we would open up
our cheque books all the way and start talking in five figures.
To our relief the cowboy agreed - but not, he said, because
of the money, because his brother had a true story to tell which
would enlighten the world.
Our first sight of the kid was at dinner in the hotel
diningroom that night. It was a shock.
He sat there mute, pale, twitching like a cornered animal.
He was either a brilliant actor or he was in serious funk about
something.
But the arrival of the professor saved the day.
He was as smooth as butter and he soon had the kid eating
out of his hand.
"You are not alone," he crooned. "There are many people,
more than you would think, who have been chosen to meet them."
Them? I began to wonder about the professor.
The cowboy was so impressed he began to talk about his own
UFO experience when he had been chased by a flying saucer through
the woods as a child.
Within a couple of hours the professor had talked the
brothers out of taking the sheriff's polygraph test and into an
hypnosis session in his room immediately.
It looked as if things were going smoothly enough, with no
hint that we were faced with four days of chaos.
The next day the office announced that the whole story was
to be filmed by a crew from the top-rating CBS muckraker TV show
_60 Minutes_.
We were to be on guard because CBS was out to shaft us, my
editor warned.
We were to present a bold front for good footage of
dedicated reporters sparing no expense to bring the public the
true story of one of the most amazing incidents in recorded
history.
The kid's fantastic story had been coming out under hypnosis
but the brothers had become very conspiratorial with the
professor and would speak only to him. [1]
The professor seemed to have his own future on the lecture
circuit and the paperback bookstands very much in mind and we
didn't trust him.
So we taped everything and had the CBS crew film the kid's
story given under hypnosis.
It was a tale of little men with heads like fishbowls and
skin like mushrooms.
But suddenly the strain began to tell on the kid and he
lapsed into sobbing bouts. He was falling apart and so was his
story.
It necessitated flying in a husband-and-wife team of
psychiatrists from Colorado to tranquilize the kid and keep the
cowboy from exploding.
The kid was a wreck and it was all the psychiatrist could do
to get him ready for the lie-detector expert we had lined up.
The test lasted an hour and I was in the next room fending
off the TV crew when I heard the cowboy scream: "I'll kill the
sonofabitch!"
The kid had failed the test miserably. The polygraph man
said it was the plainest case of lying he'd seen in 20 years but
the office was yelling for another expert and a different result
[2].
To head that off we had the psychiatrist put the cowboy and
the kid through a long session of analysis.
Their methods were unique. The next day the four of them
disappeared into a room and soon a waiter was headed there with
two bottles of cognac.
At the end of it the psychiatrists were rolling drunk but
they had their story and the brothers were crestfallen.
It seemed that the kid's father, who had deserted them as a
child, had been a spaceship fanatic and all his life the kid had
wanted to ride in a spacecraft.
He had seen something out there in the woods, some kind of
an eerie light which had triggered a powerful hallucination which
might recur at any time. There was no question of any kidnap by
any mushroom men.
The kid needed medical help and the cowboy swore he would
shield him from further harassment.
Reports began to filter in that the witnesses' lie detector
tests were not much help either - they supported the story that
they had all seen the strange light but not that the strange
light was identifiable as a spaceship.
The CBS crew had left in disgust and I sat down to detail
everything that had happened in a 16-page memorandum designed to
kill the story. It was all over.
I paid the $2000 hotel bill - including a mammoth bar tab to
which the psychiatrists had contributed nobly - for the five days
and we all scattered to the airport.
It had been a lunatic experience from beginning to end, made
more disturbing by the fact that on several occasions, with
coaxings from the professor, I had almost believed that the
story was real.
As I drove to the airport I was never so glad to be leaving
a city and to this day the whole experience there remains in my
memory as some kind of nightmare.
As I neared the airport I switched on the car radio and
heard familiar voices - the kid, the cowboy, and the professor
giving an interview about the kid's shatteing experience on board
a flying saucer.
A few weeks later I picked up the paper I worked for and
found that with the help of the professor it had turned my
memorandum into a sensational front-page story.
The professor was calling me up demanding tapes for his
lectures and the kid was signing contracts for books and TV
documentaries.
And so another UFO hero was made.
"Ground Saucer Watch," a pro-UFO organization, was the very first
UFO organization on the scene of the Walton "abduction".
1. Walton never boarded the UFO. This fact is supported by the
six witnesses and the polygraph test results. [3]
2. The entire Walton family has had a continual UFO history.
The Walton boys have reported observing 10 to 15 separate
UFO sightings (very high).
3. When Duane was questioned about his brother's disappearance,
he stated that "Travis will be found, that UFO's are
friendly." GSW countered, "How do you know Travis will be
found?" Duane said "I have a feeling, a strong feeling." GSW
asked "If the UFO 'captors' are going to return Travis, will
you have a camera to record this great occurrence?" Duane,
"No, if I have a camera 'they' will not return."
4. The Walton's mother showed no outward emotion over the
'loss' of Travis. She said that UFO's will not harm her son,
he will be returned and that UFO's have been seen by her
family many times.
5. The Walton's refused any outside scientific help or anyone
who logically doubted the abduction portion of the story.
6. The media and GSW was fair to the witnesses. However, when
the story started to 'fall apart' the Waltons would only
talk to people who did not doubt the abduction story.
7. APRO became involved and criticized both GSW and Dr. Hynek
for taking a negative position on the encounter.
8. The Waltons 'sold' their story to the National Enquirer and
the story was completely twisted from the truth.
1. In other words, James Harder was using hypnosis to lead
Travis Walton into "remembering" a proper UFO abduction
story. UFOlogists cite the apparent consistencies of these
stories as proof that they are supposedly authentic! But
here we glimpse the real reason behind the apparent
similarities.
2. The very existence of this polygraph session with John J.
McCarthy was kept secret by the National Enquirer and by
APRO, with McCarthy ordered never to speak about it. The
cover-up was revealed by Philip J. Klass in June, 1976. The
details of the Walton hoax, and its associated cover-up, can
be found in chapters 18-23 of Klass' book UFOs The Public
Deceived (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1983).
3. Apparently GSW thought that in order to have a "genuine" UFO
abduction, the UFO would have to land, and pick up its
passenger.
On November 5, 1975, a 22 year old logger by the name of Travis
Walton was allegedly abducted by a UFO near Snowflake, Arizona.
Witnessed by six companions, his experience is possibly the most
unique and controversial alien abduction tale in the short
history of the phenomenon. Now, some seventeen years later,
Paramount Pictures has brought this incredible story to the
silver screen. On March 12, 1993, Fire in the Sky opened in
theaters across the country. Scripted by Tracy Torme', who also
wrote last year's CBS miniseries on alien abductions,
Intruders, the movie is loosely based on Walton's book, aptly
named The Walton Experience. "Loosely" because Torme' has
significantly altered the portrayal of Walton's experience on the
UFO from what Walton himself described, because Torme' has
created a fictional UFO investigating organization to replace the
real group involved, and because Torme' combined several real
individuals into "composites," all for the sake of literary
license. However, after examining the full evidence of the case,
he may be forgiven these fictionalizations -- for how can one be
too critical of fictionalizing a work of fiction? Philip J.
Klass, chairman of CSICOP's UFO Subcommittee (which also includes
such noted skeptics as Robert Sheaffer and James Oberg),
investigated the Walton case immediately after it occurred. As
detailed in his book UFOs: The Public Deceived (Prometheus,
1983), in the months following Walton's disappearance, Klass
found significant evidence of "gross deception."
According to Walton, he and six other loggers were driving from
their work site at Turkey Springs in Sitgreaves National Forest
to their homes in Snowflake about forty-five miles away.
Sometime after 6:00 P.M., both Walton and one of his companions,
Allen Dalis, saw a saucer-shaped object hovering over a slash
pile of cut timber in a clearing. Walton jumped out of the truck
(luckily, he was sitting next to the door) and ran towards the
object, which was emitting a yellowish light. Suddenly, the
object let loose a flash of brilliant blue-green light which
reportedly "blew him [Walton] back ten feet" according to
Walton's friend and employer Mike Rogers, who was driving the
truck at the time. In a panic, Rogers sped off leaving Walton at
the mercy of whatever controlled the UFO.
Upon reaching Heber (a small town between the work site and
Snowflake), Rogers contacted Undersheriff L.C. Ellison, who met
them in the village. Rogers and the rest of his crew told
Ellison their story; Ellison then called Navajo County Sheriff
Marlin Gillespie. Gillespie, his deputy Kenneth Coplan, Ellison,
Rogers, and two other crew members (the other three refused to go
along) returned to the site and searched for several hours for
Walton.
Approximately 1:30 A.M. on the morning of the sixth (and after
abandoning the search for the night), Coplan and Rogers went to
notify Walton's mother, Mary Kellett, of her son's disappearance.
Mrs. Kellett's calm response upon being awakened and told her
youngest son had been kidnapped by a UFO was "Well, that's the
way these things happen" and then she proceeded to described two
instances when she and/or her oldest son, Duane, had also seen
UFOs. Later that morning (approximately 3:00 A.M.) when Mrs.
Kellett told Walton's sister, Mrs. Grant Neff, that "a flying
saucer got him [Travis]," Mrs. Neff surprised Coplan with how
calmly she too took the news.
The rest of the that day, November 6, was taken up by an
extensive search of the area where Walton allegedly disappeared.
Curiously absent from the site was any physical evidence of
anything happening, in spite of the "explosive" force of the
blue-green beam. No blood, no shreds of clothing, no evidence of
the blast effects was found by any of the nearly fifty searchers
involved.
By November 7, law enforcement officials were concentrating on
the possibility that Walton might have been the victim of foul
play at the hands of his coworkers. Walton's other brother
Donald also felt that the UFO story was a cover for something
else. To this end, Rogers and his crew volunteered to take
polygraph examinations the following Monday, November 10. During
the exams, C.E. Gilson of the Arizona Department of Public Safety
asked four "relevant" questions; three of which dealt with
whether Walton had been seriously injured or killed by the one or
more members of the crew. The fourth question, added at the last
minute, was: "Did you tell the truth about actually seeing a UFO
last Wednesday when Travis Walton disappeared?" Not
surprisingly, the six crew members were unanimous in their
responses: "No" to the first three questions and "Yes" to the
last. Five were judged to be truthful, results on the sixth
(Allen Dalis) were "inconclusive." In his formal written report,
Gilson said, "The polygraph examinations prove that these five
men did see some object that they believe to be a UFO and that
Travis Walton was not injured or murdered by any of these men, on
that Wednesday (5 November 1975). If an actual UFO did not exist
and the UFO is a manmade hoax, five of these men had no prior
knowledge of a hoax. No such determination can be made of the
sixth man whose test results were inconclusive."
On November 8, Phoenix UFOlogist Fred Sylvanus interviewed both
Rogers and Duane Walton. The tape of this conversation reveals
several striking details. Not once during the entire sixty-five
minute interview did Duane or Rogers express any concern over
Walton's well-being. Rogers described the UFO as "beautiful."
Duane stated he had been seeing UFOs for the past "ten or twelve
years. I've been seeing them all the time." He also stated that
he and Walton had made an agreement to "immediately get as
directly under the object as physically possible" if one of them
ever saw a UFO. Duane went on the state that he felt Walton was
"having the experience of a lifetime."
Later on the 10th, Travis Walton reappeared at a gas station in
Heber.
Calling his sister collect after midnight, Walton begged for help
when her husband answered the phone. Grant Neff picked up
Walton's brother Duane and the two drove to Heber to pick up
Walton after informing Mrs. Kellett of his call. The telephone
operator who handled the collect call called Sheriff Gillespie to
let him know of Walton's reappearance; Gillespie then called
Deputy Glen Flake and asked him to keep a look out for the men
returning to Snowflake.
Flake missed Neff, Duane, and Walton on the way in, so he went to
Mrs. Kellett's house. It was after 2:00 A.M., but the lights
were on and Duane was outside siphoning gas from one car to
another. He made no mention to the officer that Walton had been
found and Flake did not reveal the information the telephone
operator had provided.
Duane did not inform the deputy that Walton was inside Mrs.
Kellett's house, nor did he tell him of the physical examination
Duane had performed on Walton. During the exam, Duane found no
bruises, burns, or evidence of any physical injury except for a
red mark on the inside of Walton's right elbow. Walton's
physical condition was curious given his reported violent
encounter with the blue-green beam.
In any case, Duane decided to drive Walton to a doctor in Phoenix
after the deputy left. They made an abortive attempt to see a
hypnotherapist, but Duane backed out saying that Walton was not
ready for regressive hypnosis. It was not until the afternoon of
November 11 that a cursory exam by two doctors was performed.
Like Duane, they found no evidence of physical injury, except for
the mark on Walton's arm. One of the doctors, Howard Kandell,
stated it "was compatible with a puncture wound such as when
somebody takes blood from you." He went on to note that Walton
claimed he had not noticed it before, in spite of the fact that
both Duane and the hypnotherapist had seen the mark earlier.
More telling, though, were the results of the urine analysis
performed on a sample from Walton. It showed no trace of drugs,
but also no trace of acetone. After going without food for more
than a couple of days, the body begins to break down its own fat.
The waste product of this is acetone, and it is excreted in the
urine. If Walton had been without food for several days, his
urine should have shown some traces of acetone. Also, Walton
later claimed to have lost ten pounds during his missing five
days.
The doctors who examined Walton were members of APRO, the Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization, and it was at this time that
APRO became intimately involved in the case. It is also at this
time that the National Enquirer became involved. Coral Lorenzen,
who had made the arrangements for the doctor's examination,
received a call from the National Enquirer about the case. She
convinced the paper to pay Duane and Walton's expenses while
being "sequestered" in a local hotel in exchange for exclusive
rights to the story.
When Duane finally called Sheriff Gillespie to inform him of
Walton's reappearance, he told the sheriff they were in Tucson
where Walton was receiving a check-up. He changed the story in a
later phone call, saying they were at a private home in Phoenix.
At Gillespie's insistence, Duane reluctantly agreed to let him
interview Walton. The Walton brothers refused to allow Gillespie
to record the interview, but Travis did agree to take a polygraph
exam later in the week.
Seven days after Walton had disappeared and two days after his
sudden reappearance, his story was hitting the local newspapers.
The Tucson Arizona Daily Star quoted Duane as saying, in part:
"I'm not a UFO buff and neither is my brother" -- this flatly
contradicts Duane's earlier statements to UFOlogist Fred
Sylvanus.
Gillespie had scheduled Walton's polygraph examination for
Friday, November 14, but Walton did not show up. The excuse was
that the press had "laid siege" and Duane did not feel Walton was
ready to face the press. This is curious, since a team of
reporters from the National Enquirer had been interviewing Walton
already. Also, Duane could have had the polygrapher come to the
hotel where Walton was staying if he was concerned about exposing
Walton to the media.
Some of the most damning evidence that the entire case was a hoax
surrounds the various polygraph examinations and the behavior of
the principles involved, Duane and Travis Walton, and Mike
Rogers. APRO announced on February 7, 1976, that both Travis and
Duane had passed an exam given by George Pfeiffer, who worked for
Tom Ezell and Associates. But that test was flawed in a number
of respects: Pfeiffer allowed Walton to dictate a number of the
questions he asked. While it is not uncommon for polygraphers to
allow the test subjects and/or sponsors to outline the general
area to be probed, allowing the subject to dictate specific
questions violates the basic principles of polygraphy and should
invalidate the test results. Also, Pfeiffer was relatively
inexperienced, having been practicing only two years. This
inexperience expressed itself when he judged Walton's "No" answer
to the question "Before November 5, 1975, were you a UFO buff?"
to be truthful. Walton's answer directly contradicted
information provided by both his mother and brother Duane and by
Walton himself during an earlier psychological examination.
Later in March of 1976, when Pfeiffer's employer Tom Ezell had
reviewed the charts, he concluded that it was impossible to
determine if Walton and Duane were answering the test questions
truthfully. Ezell stated in a letter to Phil Klass: "Upon
review of this examination, I find that to me it is not
acceptable. In the first place I would not be a party to an
examination in which the subject dictated the questions to be
asked ... Because of the dictation of the questions to be asked,
this test should be invalidated. Also, upon examining the
resultant charts, I find that I cannot give an opinion one way or
another" whether the subjects had been truthful or not. Yet this
is the examination to which Walton refers when he states he has
passed a lie detector test.
But the real "bombshell," as Klass describes it in his book, was
the fact that Walton had failed an earlier polygraph examination
miserably and this information had been suppressed by APRO, which
had been proclaiming the Walton case "one of the most important
and intriguing in the history of the UFO phenomena." This test
was administered by John McCarthy, who with twenty years of
experience was one of the most respected examiners in the state
of Arizona. His conclusion: "Gross deception." Proponents of
the Walton case never mention this examination.
If the case is a hoax, what possible motivation could Walton and
the others have? Two possibilities have been identified: every
year, the National Enquirer offered a multi-thousand dollar award
for the "Best Case" of the year (up to $100,000 for "positive
proof" of ET). Walton and the other crew members divided a $5000
award from the National Enquirer. The second, and more
compelling, motive involved a contract Rogers had with the U.S.
Forest Service. Rogers had contracted with the Service to thin
out the Turkey Springs area over a year before Walton's
experience. He won the contract when he submitted the low bid of
$24.70/acre in June of 1974. The contract term was 200 working
days ("working days" to allow for bad weather and the long
mountain winter) to thin 1277 acres, later reduced to 1205 acres.
Rogers was seriously behind schedule and in fact had received an
eighty-four day extension (accompanied with a $1.00 per acre
penalty for missing the completion date). Only five days of this
extension remained at the time of Walton's alleged abduction. At
the time of Walton's disappearance, Rogers was in serious
trouble: he had over a hundred acres left to finish in five days
or he would default on the contract and lose some $2500 -- money
sorely needed to get through the winter months -- or he request a
second extension and accept another penalty for failing to finish
on schedule a second time.
Just two weeks prior to Walton's disappearance, NBC-TV aired a
two hour movie featuring the abduction tale of Betty and Barney
Hill. Rogers has acknowledged watching the first portion of the
movie, the portion that detailed the Hills' "abduction." Klass
speculates in his book that "to a man facing two unattractive
alternatives on his Turkey Springs contract, the account of the
Hills' 'UFO-abduction' could easily suggest a third." By making
Turkey Springs the site of an alien abduction, Rogers could claim
his men were too afraid to return and continue working --
providing an "act of God" that could result in contract
termination with no penalty and full payment to Rogers.
During the months after Klass revealed the results of his
investigation, Rogers and Walton entered into a lengthy
negotiation with him to have the flawed polygraph exams re-
administered -- this time with a mutually acceptable, independent
polygrapher. Rogers issued a "challenge" to Klass: Duane and
Travis Walton and Rogers would agree to be retested by "a
mutually acceptable examiner of high standing and proper
credentials" and that, if all parties passed the tests, Klass
would pay all costs involved; if any of them failed, Klass would
be "reimbursed." Klass agreed in principle with most of the
conditions, however as time progressed and negotiations continued
it became clear that Rogers was engaging in delaying tactics and
was, in fact, doing everything possible to not be retested.
Ultimately, none of the principles in the Walton case was given
new polygraph examinations.
And there the case laid for seventeen years, with proponents
still proclaiming it one of the best documented abductions in
history and skeptics decrying the multiple instances of
intentional deception which imply "hoax." Then comes Fire in the
Sky and a media blitz to promote the "true story." Travis Walton
has made appearances on national talk shows (from CNBC's Tom
Snyder show to Larry King Live on the night of the movie's
premier), tabloid television shows (such as Hard Copy and Fox's
Sightings), radio call-in shows, and has even appeared via
satellite on local news programs (the week of the premier, Walton
was interviewed on WAGA Channel 5's Good Day Atlanta morning
show).
In the February, 1993, issue of the Mutual UFO Network's MUFON
UFO Journal, Travis Walton "takes time to address his critics."
Describing himself as a "naive country boy" (Walton hardly seemed
naive when he accused Phil Klass of being a government
disinformation agent on Larry King Live - a charge for which he
has absolutely no proof) Walton tells of his shock at the
"attacks" he received from skeptics such as Klass and repeats
throughout his article that Klass' claims had been refuted time
and time again. Unfortunately, Walton provides little
information in the article which actually refutes Klass'
evidence; instead he offers tantalizing tidbits which seem
intended more to enduce the reader to buy a copy of his newly
revised book (whose title he has changed to, oddly enough, Fire
in the Sky) than to actually "set the record straight." Walton
claims that the various charges against him "starkly contradict
each other" [emphasis in original], but provides no specific
examples of these contradictions. He says, "So the irony is that
when one's foremost detractor [Klass] makes an internally
inconsistent scattergun assault, he is actually making a perverse
sort of endorsement because it says loud and clear that the
detractor himself doesn't believe that any of his attacks has
sufficient merit to stand alone." It is a perverse sort of logic
which will go through such convolutions in an effort to justify a
failing position.
In a recent issue of his Skeptics' UFO Newsletter, Klass
wonders if Walton will refute the fact that his first polygraph
exam indicated "gross deception," or that his mother was
abnormally calm upon hearing word of his disappearance, or that
he - along with his mother and brother - had a long history of
seeing UFOs prior to November 5, 1975, or that the lie detector
test he did pass was seriously flawed. The list can go on and
on.
So what can we make of this long and twisted tale? At the time,
the Walton experience seemed little more than yet another in a
long line of elaborate hoaxes. It continued to have its
supporters among the UFO community, but enough questions
surrounded it that few considered it "proof positive." Now, a
multi-million dollar movie billed as a "true story" is in
theaters across the country. Prior to its release, UFO fans were
predicting how this would "raise the public's awareness" of UFOs
in general and the alien abduction phenomenon in particular. Of
course, they said they same thing about last year's _Intruders_,
which seems to have had little impact on the public's perception
of these things. We expect that _Fire in the Sky_ will sway the
public just as much. Unfortunately, we also expect that
Hollywood will make more of such "fiction as truth" productions.
The bottom line for the public is to always view these
productions with a critical eye.
Anson Kennedy Internet: anson@netcom.com
"Ground Saucer Watch" Memo on the Walton Incident
Conclusions (undated: probably December, 1975)
In cooperation with Dr. J. Allen
Hynek of CUFOS, Dr. Lester Stewart of GSW began to interview the
Walton family while Travis was still "missing."
They immediately
smelled a hoax. These are their conclusions, without any changes
- RS.
The following appeared in the March/April, 1993 issue of The Georgia
Skeptic, the newsletter of the Georgia Skeptics
"Fire in the Sky" -- The Walton Travesty
by Anson Kennedy
VP, Georgia Skeptics Compu$erve: 71167,2435
(speaking only for myself, however) Prodigy(sm): DVCW08A