The author has produced a useful, informative, interesting, and well-written
work. Furthermore, he has created that rarity of rarities - a book about
UFOs that's a lot of fun to read. Most treatments of the subject,
whether pro or con, are filled with detail, take themselves much
too seriously, and are utterly dull and boring.
Sheaffer is a free-lance writer who has done quite a bit of UFO
investigating on his own. He is a good writer, and to judge by
what is in this book, he knows his astronomy as well. Rather than
bewilder the reader with hundreds of unrelated items, he takes
a small number of the most celebrated UFO flaps and discusses
them thoroughly.
One's interest is seized as early as page 4, where former President
Jimmy Carter's 1969 UFO sighting is taken up. Just about everybody knows
Carter saw a UFO, but few seem to know the sequel to the story. It
took Sheaffer a lot of effort, but he finally tracked down
evidence establishing the correct date of the incident. That done,
it was easy to show that Venus was at the same altitude and in the
same direction as the UFO at the time and date the observation
was made. This incident illustrates an important point: not
everyone who files a UFO report is obscure and unreliable. In
fact, witnesses are usually sober, reliable, and sincere, and
often have some standing in the community...
The UFO "movement" has had a lnog, complex, raucous history, and
the author threads his way neatly through the tangle of acronyms
that litter the organizational UFO scene. Here is probably the
most useful summary in print of a neglected side of a complex
phenomenon....
Sheaffer has coined the interesting term "jealous phenomenon" to
cover the whimsical behavior of UFO's, ESP, and similar oddities.
This "jealousy" is the critical difference between UFO's and
legitimate, albeit poorly understood, scientific phenomena.
Your typical unidentified flying object is very choosy about
when and where it will appear. Apparently, its behavior is
governed by an overriding concern for human thoughts and
emotions - it is determined to thwart all human attempts
to verify its existence......
All in all, Sheaffer sees UFOlogy as a powerful social movement
which, fundamentally, is a reaction against science and reason.
He blends this view with specific cases and general background
in this dandy work, always providing references so the reader
can check up on him. If you're only going to have one book on
UFO's, this is the one....
From _SUCCESS_ Magazine, November, 1988, p. 4:
Resentment Against Achievement -
A Motivational Tour de Force
Those who hate achievement have made their mark throughout
history.
A new work published by Prometheus Books
confronts Christianity with its greatest challenge in many a
year. "The Making of the Messiah" by Robert Sheaffer differs from
conventional works of Freethinkers by suggesting a radically
different picture of the rise of Christianity. The book
describes, to use Nietzsche's phrase, "The Birth of Christianity
from the Spirit of Resentment." It tells why Christianity could
only develop as it did, emerging from the envious anger of the
lower classes. It shows how Christian writers altered historical
facts to make the new religion "sell" better among those seething
with resentment against Roman power and wealth. By looking at
the chronological evolution of Christian writings and doctrine,
exactly as skeptics investigate contemporary accounts of UFO
abductions or psychic wonders, it is possible to infer the kinds
of objections that the infant Church must have been struggling to
meet, and from these long-suppressed objections deduce probable
historical fact. This new perspective radically impacts Biblical
criticism, in a manner that Humanists and Freethinkers will
wholeheartedly applaud.
"The Making of the Messiah" presents a compelling argument that
Jesus was never "crucified" by the Romans, or anyone else. The
familiar Gospel account of Jesus' death is termed the "cruci-
fiction story." Biblical scholars generally acknowledge that the
confusing and contradictory Gospel accounts of Jesus' two trials
make absolutely no sense from the perspective of either Roman or
Jewish law. Resolving this dilemma, the book presents compelling
evidence that Jesus was indeed condemned by the Sanhedrin as
stated in Mark 14:64, stoned to death, and hanged on a tree until
sundown: the inescapable penalty under the Mosaic law for
blasphemers and heretics. All of the ancient Rabbinical texts
mentioning Jesus' death are totally consistent in recalling that
he was "slain and hanged on a tree." There are even a few
passages remaining in the oldest books of the New Testament
proclaiming Jesus to have been slain and "hanged on a tree" - for
example, Acts 5:30 and Galatians 3:13. These passages are NOT
metaphor: they describe the punishment Jesus MUST have suffered
if found guilty of the charges he faced! (See Deuteronomy 13:10;
21:22.) How did the cruci-fiction story arise? Several decades
after Jesus' execution, when the infant Church sought to recruit
converts among the Gentiles, the tale of a Jewish prophet "slain
and hanged on a tree" probably failed to excite or inflame the
listener. But when the story was changed to have Jesus
"crucified" by the Romans, the tale electrified the resentful
throughout the vast Empire.
Another subject covered in great detail is Jesus' supposed
"Virgin Birth." In recent years even many liberal Christians have
been willing to question this highly-dubious claim. They quietly
assume that Jesus must have been the natural son of Joseph. What
they do not seem to realize is that it is absolutely clear (see
Matthew 1:19) that Joseph knew the child was not his, and that he
believed Mary to be guilty of adultery. This is abundantly
confirmed by a number of other ancient texts, both Christian and
Jewish. Therefore, unless Mary's pregnancy is of supernatural
origin, she is an adulteress. Tracing the development of
Christianity's various accounts of Jesus' origin, it becomes
obvious that the "Virgin Birth" fable, which was not taught until
nearly a century after Jesus was born, was invented as a "cover
story" to mask the shameful reality of Jesus' illegitimate birth.
The gospels of Mark and John say nothing whatever about Jesus'
birth; the authors of those gospels must have assumed that the
reader already knew of Jesus' illegitimacy, which intrudes upon
the text in several places. The genealogies of Jesus given in
Matthew and Luke differ because the former was obviously compiled
by someone hostile to the new religion. It lists among Jesus'
ancestors some of the most notorious disinherited kings and
fallen women of the Davidic line. The problem was fixed in Luke,
whose genealogy contains only respectable names. Because bastard
children were treated extremely harshly under the Mosaic law, it
is not surprising that Jesus chafed at the restrictions The Law
placed upon him, claiming the inspiration of a "higher law" from
above. Jesus' experience of being "despised and rejected" owing
to an accident of birth shaped the very fabric of early
Christianity, and drew together under that religion's banner all
who chafed at living under The Law.
What set Jesus apart from other Messianic pretenders was the
claim that he arose from the dead. The evidence offered in
support of this claim is scrutinized in detail. When these
accounts are examined in chronological order of composition, in
light of long-suppressed Roman-era criticisms, a clear pattern
emerges. The earliest accounts make the least-convincing claims
of an actual, physical resurrection. Paul sees a vision of a
risen Jesus, which is worthless as "evidence" for anything. As
time progresses, Christianity's claims that people had sighted an
actual, physical risen Jesus become more definite. Many ancient
manuscripts of the earliest gospel, Mark, contain absolutely no
sightings of a risen Jesus, whose resurrection is merely inferred
because his body was not where it had been left. Mark 16:9-20,
which describes such sightings, was written years later, to
answer objections that nobody actually SAW Jesus after his
supposed resurrection. The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn
is that the supposed resurrection never occurred.
Robert Sheaffer is the author of "Resentment Against Achievement"
(Prometheus, 1988). Laissez Faire Books hails it as "a modern
classic," comparing it to the works of H. L. Mencken, Friedrich
Nietzsche, and Ayn Rand. Success Magazine writes that "the book
crackles with ideas that others have failed to perceive, or have
been too timid to express." Sheaffer's first book was "The UFO
Verdict" (Prometheus, 1981), a highly-skeptical analysis of UFO
mania, about which Sky and Telescope magazine said, "if you're
only going to have one book on UFOs, this is the one." He is a
regular columnist for The Skeptical Inquirer.
I contributed the articles The Philadelphia Experiment and
Unidentified Flying Objects.
In fact, I wrote everything that begins with the letter "U".
I contributed the article
Unidentified Flying Objects, in
Vol. 27, on p. 159.
I contributed the paper An Examination of Claims that Extraterrestrial
Visitors to Earth Are Being Observed.
Other contributors to the volume, taken from papers presented to a
Conference at the University of Maryland, include Freeman Dyson
(Jim Oberg and I had lunch with him), Sebastian von Hoerner, Ronald
Bracewell, Jill Tarter, and the late Cyril Ponnamperuma.
This was the now-famous conference organized by John Mack,
Budd Hopkins, David E. Pritchard, and David Jacobs.
I contributed the paper A Skeptical Perspective on
UFO Abductions, on p. 382.
When C. D. B. Bryan wrote up his account of this conference,
Close Encounters of the Fourthg Kind, so beloved
of UFOlogists, he somehow forgot to mention my paper, as well
as several others he apparently didn't like.
Go to
Robert's Home Page
Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, 1981; Paperback, 1986, $19.95. ISBN 0-87975-146-0.
From Sky and Telescope Magazine, Nov., 1981
by Ronald A. Schorn
Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, 1988, Cloth, $27.95. ISBN 0-87975-447-8.
Editor's Note by Scott DaGarmo
Angry mobs inflamed by envy destroyed the magnificent works
of ancient civilization. In their insane riots, these madmen even
dismembered the statues we still treasure for their beauty,
despite their missing limbs.
Today we see the hatred of achievement in slashed tires,
vandalized classrooms, and sabotaged office machines.
We see it in a hostile suspicion toward "greedy
capitalists," who are depicted as exploiters rather than what
they really are - the creators of jobs and wealth.
We see it in a surly animosity toward managers and owners,
who are reviled as enemies despite the fact that they would like
nothing better than to inspire the resentful with a desire to
achieve. Instead of seeing employers as powerful economic allies,
the resentful scorn their values, then blame "the system" on
their not being able to find work.
We see it among intellectuals, who seethe with jealousy at
the sight of individuals less educated than they making
bigger incomes.
We see it in lower-class toughs, whose poverty is "an
inevitable consequence of the achievement-hating values they
preserve and (forcibly) transmit."
All this and more makes up the thesis of a new book by
Robert Sheaffer entitled "Resentment Against Achievement".
Subtitled "Understanding the Assault Upon Ability," the book
crackles with ideas that others have failed to perceive, or have
been too timid to express.
The rhetoric of resentment is highly polished, and achievers
are often left speechless in its onslaught. Within this book is a
reply to virtually every defense made for the resentful. For
example, says the author, people do not steal because they are
poor. (A fatuous notion when you note that what is stolen today
are not loaves of bread and beans but luxury items like jewelry
and stereos that are fenced for drugs.) Rather, they are poor
because they steal. Sheaffer makes a rational - rather than
moralistic - case that the "upper-class" values of honesty,
reliability, self-discipline, and respect for property are
integral to success for anyone.
Similarly, Sheaffer asserts that what is needed in education
is nothing less than an assault on lower-class culture. Sheaffer
is not talking about genocide, but about a "benign cultural
imperialism" allied at recruiting lower-class members into the
upper classes by teaching them how to succeed.
Don't mistake Sheaffer for a bigoted arch-conservative. He
is a libertarian, with a powerful belief in individual liberties,
free trade, and open opportunity. He has articulated a philosophy
for a complex, urban, high-tech, competitive, entrepreneurial
society - a philosophy that affirms a new-age morality based on
accomplishment.
This book will offend those with rigidly conventional
religious views, and I suggest they do not read it. On the other
hand, those who thrive on the elixir of fresh insights will be
delighted as the author excoriates religion for romanticizing,
and hence perpetuating, economic incompetence. Sheaffer urges the
impoverished to break away from a slave morality that encourages
passivity, and embrace a new morality based on the pride of
achievement.
Today, you don't need to be born wealthy to be perceived as
a member of the higher classes, says Sheaffer. "Those who adopt
higher-class values and ethics will find themselves gradually
accumulating so much money that no one will doubt their status
any longer."
He urges everyone to experience the joy of being achievers,
those fortunate people who "create because of an inner fire
urging them onward."
For all its harsh denunciation of the resentful, this book
is a positive call to action not to harm people but to help them
succeed. Some will see this work as mainly political. But the
author has also written a valuable tour de force of motivation
with a message for us all:
Harboring resentment is self-destructive. It keeps you from
succeeding.
Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, 1991, Cloth, $24.95. ISBN 0-87975-691-8
Book Confronts Christianity with
New Challenge
Or, you can FAX your order to Prometheus at 716-691-0137
Edited by Gordon Stein. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, 1996
Norma H. Dickey, Editor-in-chief.
Funk & Wagnalls, Inc., 1984.
Edited by Ben Zuckerman and Michael H. Hart. Cambridge University Press,
1995 (second edition)
Edited by Andrea Pritchard et. al. Cambridge, Ma:
North Cambridge Press,
1994
Free Inquiry, Spring, 1995.
Book review, Scientific American, November, 1995.